1:
2: %%
3: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
4: %%
5: %% Modified 2005 December 5
6: %%
7: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
8: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
9:
10: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
11: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
12: %% any data that comes before this command.
13:
14: %% The command below calls the preprint style
15: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
16: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
17: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
18: %%
19: \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
20:
21: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
22:
23: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
24:
25: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
26:
27: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
28:
29: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
30: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
31: %% use the longabstract style option.
32:
33: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
34:
35: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
36: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
37: %% the \begin{document} command.
38: %%
39: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
40: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
41: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
42: %% for information.
43:
44: \newcommand{\hi}{H~{\sc i}}
45: \newcommand{\neii}{Ne~{\sc ii}}
46: \newcommand{\ctht}{C$_2$H$_2$}
47:
48: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
49:
50: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
51:
52: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
53: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
54: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
55: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
56: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
57: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
58:
59: \shorttitle{Gas and Dust in Protoplanetary Disks}
60: \shortauthors{Pascucci et al.}
61:
62: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
63: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
64:
65: \begin{document}
66:
67: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
68: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
69: %% you desire.
70:
71: \title{The Different Evolution of Gas and Dust in Disks around Sun-like and Cool Stars}
72:
73: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
74: %% author and affiliation information.
75: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
76: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
77: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
78: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
79:
80: \author{I. Pascucci\altaffilmark{1}, D. Apai\altaffilmark{2}, K. Luhman\altaffilmark{3}
81: Th. Henning\altaffilmark{4}, J. Bouwman\altaffilmark{4}, M. R. Meyer\altaffilmark{5},
82: F. Lahuis\altaffilmark{6}, A. Natta\altaffilmark{7}}
83: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218}
84: \altaffiltext{2}{Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD 21218}
85: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802}
86: \altaffiltext{4}{Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Heidelberg, Germany}
87: \altaffiltext{5}{Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721}
88: \altaffiltext{6}{SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Groningen, The Netherlands}
89: \altaffiltext{7}{INAF-Osservatorio di Arcetri, 50125 Firenze, Italy}
90:
91:
92: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
93: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
94: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
95: %% affiliation.
96:
97: %\altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory.
98: %CTIO is operated by AURA, Inc.\ under contract to the National Science
99: %Foundation.}
100: %\altaffiltext{2}{Society of Fellows, Harvard University.}
101: %\altaffiltext{3}{present address: Center for Astrophysics,
102: % 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
103: %\altaffiltext{4}{Visiting Programmer, Space Telescope Science Institute}
104: %\altaffiltext{5}{Patron, Alonso's Bar and Grill}
105:
106: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
107: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
108: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
109: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
110: %% editorial office after submission.
111:
112: \begin{abstract}
113:
114: Planet formation is profoundly impacted by the properties
115: of protoplanetary disks and their central star. However, how
116: disk properties vary with stellar parameters remain poorly known.
117: Here we present the first comprehensive, comparative Spitzer/IRS
118: study of the dust and gas properties of disks around young sun-like stars (K1--M5) and cool
119: stars/brown dwarfs (M5--M9). The comparison of these two large samples of over 60 sources reveal
120: major differences in the evolution of both the dust and gas components.
121:
122: We report the first detection of organic molecules in disks around brown dwarfs.
123: The detection rate statistics and the line flux ratios of HCN and C$_2$H$_2$ show a
124: striking difference between the two samples, demonstrating a significant under-abundance of HCN relative
125: to C$_2$H$_2$ in the disk surface of cool stars. We propose this to originate from the
126: large difference in the UV-irradiation around the two types of sources.
127: The statistical comparison of the 10\,\micron{} silicate emission features also reveals a
128: difference between the two samples. Cool stars and brown dwarfs show weaker features arising
129: from more processed silicate grains in the disk atmosphere.
130:
131: These findings complement previous indications of flatter disk structures and longer disk lifetimes
132: around cool stars. Our results highlight important differences in the chemical and physical
133: evolution of protoplanetary disks as function of stellar mass, temperature, and radiation field
134: which should be taken into account in planet formation models. We note that the
135: different chemistry of pre-planetary materials in the disk may also influence the bulk composition and
136: volatile content of the forming planets. In particular, if exogenous HCN has played a key role
137: in the synthesis of prebiotic molecules on Earth as proposed, then prebiotic chemistry may
138: unfold differently on planets around cool stars.
139:
140:
141: %We present the first comparative study of the dust and gas properties of disks
142: %around young sun-like stars and cooler/lower-mass objects, several of which
143: %are in the substellar mass regime. We use the Spitzer low-resolution
144: %spectra between 7.4 and 14.5\,\micron{} to probe the prominent 10\,\micron{}
145: %silicate emission feature and molecular emission bands from HCN and \ctht.
146: %We show that silicate emission features from disks around very low-mass stars
147: %appear statistically weaker than those from disks around higher mass stars.
148: %This is indicative of more processed dust, micron-sized grains, around
149: %very low-mass stars in the region traced
150: %by the 10\,\micron{} emission feature.
151: %We also report the first detections of organic molecules in disks around brown dwarfs.
152: %We find a striking difference in the detection rate statistics and line flux ratios
153: %of HCN and \ctht{} between the samples of sun-like and cool star disks.
154: %The HCN emission is brighter than the \ctht{} emission in at least 80\% of the sun-like stars,
155: %while it is absent in the spectra of 93\% of the cool star disks.
156: %This difference originates from the under-abundance of HCN in the disk surface of cool stars,
157: %and may reflect an overall under-abundance in the case of efficient turbulent mixing.
158: %If exogenous HCN has played a key role in the synthesis of prebiotic molecules on Earth as proposed,
159: %then prebiotic chemistry may unfold differently on planets around cool stars.
160:
161:
162: \end{abstract}
163:
164: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
165: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
166: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
167: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
168:
169: \keywords{}
170:
171: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
172: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
173: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
174: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
175: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
176: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
177: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
178: %% each reference.
179:
180:
181: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
182: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
183: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
184: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
185: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
186: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
187: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
188: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
189: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
190: %%
191: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
192: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
193: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
194: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
195:
196: \section{Introduction}
197:
198: Circumstellar disks are a natural outcome of the star formation process and the birthplace of planetary systems. Their evolution and their lifetime determine what type of planets can form.
199: Most studies so far have focused on characterizing protoplanetary disks around young sun-like stars (e.g. \citealt{meyer07} for a review).
200: It is now well established that most sun-like stars clear out their primordial dust disk in 5\,Myr and only a few percent of them still retain it by an age of 10\,Myr (e.g. \citealt{hernandez07}). The dispersal of the gas component is less well characterized but appears to proceed equally fast \citep{pas06,aguilar06}. This rapid clearing of dust and gas around sun-like stars matches the fast growth of planetesimals and gas dispersal in the protosolar nebula as inferred from meteorites, asteroids, and planets \citep{pascuccitachibana}.
201: But do disks around stars of different masses evolve similarly? Recent studies hint that disks around cool/late-type M stars, the most typical protoplanetary disks, evolve differently (e.g. \citealt{apai08}). There are at least three major differences.
202:
203: First, the dispersal of primordial dust disks seems to operate less efficiently for cool stars.
204: \citet{carpenter06} find that the disk frequency of low-mass stars ($\sim 0.1-1.2$\,M$_\sun$) is statistically higher than that of higher-mass stars in the 5 Myr-old Upper Sco OB association. Infrared excess studies by
205: \citet{sterzik04}, \citet{scholz07}, and \citet{riaz08} all suggest that this trend extends to the brown dwarf regime. Second, there is evidence that disks around cool stars have, on average, flatter disk structures than the more flared disks around sun-like stars (\citealt{pas03,apai04,allers06} but see also the flared disks from \citealt{mohanty04,bouy08}). Third, the dust probed through the 10\,\micron{} silicate emission feature appears to be more processed around cool stars than around sun-like stars of similar age, suggesting more rapid grain growth in cool star disks \citep{apai05,ks06}.
206:
207:
208: However, there has not been a detailed comparison of the dust properties of disks around sun-like and cool stars and no investigation of their gas content. Here we present the first such comparative study. We will show that there are statistically significant differences between cool and sun-like stars in their gas and dust disk properties. First, we will demonstrate that cool stars/brown dwarfs have much weaker continuum-subtracted 10\,\micron{} features than higher-mass stars (Sect.~\ref{res:silicates}) implying different dust populations at the observed disk radii (Sect.~\ref{sect:discuss_dust}). Second, we will show that HCN emission is often present in sun-like star spectra, but absent from the cool star spectra. Similarly, the median sun-like star spectrum has an HCN/\ctht{} flux ratio that is an order of magnitude higher than the median cool star spectrum (Sect.~\ref{res:gas}). We will see that this arises from an under-abundance of HCN in the disk atmosphere of cool stars (Sect.~\ref{discuss:gaslines}).
209: These findings highlight how stellar mass, and radiation field affect the physical and chemical evolution of protoplanetary disks including the organic compounds available during planet formation.
210:
211: \section{Targets, Observations, and Data Reduction}\label{obs}
212: \subsection{Target Selection}
213: We compare two large samples of disks around sun-like and cool stars (including brown dwarfs) that have
214: Spitzer spectra obtained with the same resolution and very similar signal-to-noise.
215: The Taurus and the Cha~I star-forming regions provide the best samples of protoplanetary disks to carry out our comparative study. These low-mass star forming regions are at about the same distance and do not contain
216: early B or O type stars. In addition, their median age ($\sim$1 and 2\,Myr) is the same within our ability to discern (see, e.g. \citealt{kenyon08book} and \citealt{luhman08book} for a review on Taurus and Cha~I).
217:
218:
219: The sun-like star sample is the same as in \citet{pas08}: it contains 23 single and 21 binary stars
220: from the Taurus-Auriga star-forming region with spectral types between K1--M5,
221: temperatures between 3,000--5,000\,K, and stellar masses between 0.4--2\,M$_\sun$ (see also \citealt{kh95} for other stellar properties).
222: Two-thirds of the binary systems have stellar companions between 0.1\arcsec-1\arcsec , with a mean projected
223: separation of 0.4\arcsec , or 56\,AU at the distance of the Taurus star-forming region.
224: The low-resolution IRS spectra for the sun-like star sample were acquired as part of the IRS/GTO program \citep{furlan06} and have been reduced as described in \citet{pas08} and \citet{bouwman08}. \citet{pas08} showed that there is no statistically significant difference between the strength of the 10\,\micron{} emission
225: features from the single and binary systems in these two samples. Similarly, they showed that the ensemble of spectral energy distributions is indistinguishable between the single and binary system samples.
226: %Therefore, we will not distinguish here between single and binary stars,
227: %but rather compare the disk properties of the sun-like star sample to those of the cool star sample.
228:
229: Our cool star sample includes objects with spectral types between M5--M9, stellar temperatures between $\sim$2,500-3,000\,K and masses between $\sim$0.04-0.15\,M$_\sun$ (see Table~\ref{T:photometry} and also \citealt{apai05,luhman07}). These objects were selected from the Cha~I star-forming region following two main criteria: i) reliable spectral classification, and ii) mid--infrared excess emission. We used the optical/infrared surveys by
230: \citet{comeron00}, \citet{lopez04}, \citet{luhman04}, and
231: \citet{luhman05} to identify sources close to or below the substellar boundary.
232: We then correlated these sources with the ISO/ISOCAM detections at 6.7 and 14.3\,\micron{} from
233: \citet{persi00} and the Spitzer/IRAC 8\,\micron{} fluxes from \citet{luhman08}.
234: The ISOCAM--selected sample consists of eight sources: Hn~2, CHXR~15, Cha~H$\alpha$~1,
235: Cha~H$\alpha$~9, Cha~H$\alpha$~2, ISO~138, Cha~H$\alpha$~6, and ISO~217.
236: These sources were observed in March 2005 as part of our Cycle--1 Spitzer proposal and
237: were selected to have fluxes larger than 10\,mJy in at least one of the two wavelengths to ensure a
238: reliable detection of excess emission. Another eleven sources were selected later based
239: on excess emission in the IRAC 5.8 and/or 8\,\micron{} bandpasses \citep{luhman08}, and were observed as part of our Cycle--3 Spitzer proposal in August
240: 2006 and March 2007. The IRAC--selected sources are: ESO~H$\alpha$~559, ISO~79, CHSM~9484, Cha~23943,
241: ISO~147, Cha~9086, T37, ISO~165, ISO~252, Hn~13, and Cha~21330.
242:
243: \subsection{Cool Star Sample: Observations}\label{sect:selection}
244: We used the infrared spectrograph (IRS, \citealt{houck04}) on--board the Spitzer
245: Space Telescope to perform low--resolution ($R\sim$64--128) spectroscopy of the
246: 10\,\micron{} silicate emission feature of the selected cool stars.
247: We employed for all sources the SL1 module covering the
248: wavelength range between 7.4--14.5\,\micron. For several sources of the Cycle--1 proposal we also
249: adopted the LL1 module (19.5 -- 38.0\,\micron) aiming to probe solid--state features at long
250: wavelengths. However, because most of the selected brown dwarfs turned out to have flat disk
251: structures \citep{apai05}, the signal--to--noise ratio of the LL1 observations is only
252: modest. This means that we can use the LL1 data only to trace the infrared continuum. In view of
253: this finding, we preferred to drop the LL1 module for the Cycle--3 observations. We chose instead
254: the SL2 module (5.2--7.7\,\micron) to better establish the continuum slope around the 10\,\micron{}
255: silicate emission feature. The parameters of the observations are summarized in
256: Table~\ref{T:Observations}. Most of the sources were centered in the spectrograph slit using the
257: high-accuracy PCRS mode (1 $\sigma$ positional uncertainty of 0.4\arcsec). The exceptions are Cha~9086,
258: ISO~217, and Hn~13 where no suitable optical reference star was available. For these sources, we used
259: the medium accuracy infrared peak-up array integrated onto the IRS focal
260: plate providing a 1 $\sigma$ positional uncertainty of 1\arcsec.
261: All peak-up operations were successful and no significant flux loss is expected
262: from any of our sources. Each source was checked individually to confirm that only one
263: point source was covered by the slit. We used fixed cluster offset-mode observations and
264: grouped nearby targets to reduce the telescope overhead. By using the staring mode observation template, we acquired each target in two nod positions along
265: the spatial direction of the slit, at 1/3 and
266: 2/3 of the slit length.
267:
268: \subsection{Data Reduction}\label{S:DataRedu}
269: The sun-like and cool star samples have been reduced in an identical way, with only very minor differences.
270: We have already published the spectra of the sun-like star sample in \citet{pas08}.
271: Here we adopted the already reduced spectra from our previous paper and will now only
272: discuss the reduction of the cool star sample.
273:
274: The cool star data have been processed through the SSC pipeline version S15.3.0 and S16.1.0.
275: Our goals required a data quality higher than that produced by the SSC pipeline.
276: We start our data reduction from the so-called {\it droopres} products and use the SMART reduction package \citep{higdon04}, in combination with IDL routines developed for the FEPS Spitzer Science Legacy program \citep{meyer06}.
277: The data reduction steps are outlined in detail in \citet{bouwman08} and have been successfully
278: used in a series of publications \citep[see, e.g.][]{meyer04,apai05,bouwman06,pas08}.
279: In brief, we first subtracted the pairs of imaged spectra acquired along the spatial direction of the slit to
280: correct for background emission, stray light, and pixels with anomalous dark current.
281: We replaced pixels flagged as bad by the SSC pipeline (and additional 3-4 pixels per frame identified by eye)
282: by interpolating over neighboring good pixels.
283: Spectra were extracted from the background-subtracted pixel-corrected images using a 6-pixel
284: fixed-width aperture in the spatial direction.
285:
286: Because all targets have been acquired with a high or moderate peak-up option (pointing accuracy within 0.4-1\arcsec) and the majority are too faint to perform source profile fitting, we opted to fix the position of the aperture for each spectral order to that derived by the FEPS legacy program.
287: After extracting the spectra for each order, nod, and cycle, we computed a mean spectrum for each order and as uncertainty we quoted the 1–$\sigma$ standard deviation of the distribution of the flux densities measured at the given wavelength. We converted our output spectra to flux by applying the spectral response function derived by the FEPS Legacy team \citep{bouwman08}, and propagate the calibration error into the quoted uncertainties.
288:
289: \section{Results}\label{S:results}
290: The SL1 observations detected all cool stars and achieved a sub--mJy accuracy. We confirm the ISOCAM
291: excess emission detections in all but two sources: Our Spitzer/IRS observations of Hn~2 and CHXR~15 show flux densities fully consistent with photospheric emission and we identify no
292: hints of the ISOCAM excess emission reported by \citet{lopez04}.
293: It seems likely that these two sources have been missclassified: photospheric emission from sources earlier than our spectral type limit of M6 can fully explain the ISOCAM observations (\citealt{luhman08}, see also Table~\ref{T:photometry}). We excluded these two sources from the following analysis and discussion. In
294: addition, we find that ISO~138 has IRS excess emission inconsistent with the ISOCAM photometry
295: \citep{persi00,lopez04}, but fully consistent with the IRAC 8\,\micron{} by \citet{luhman08}, see also Fig.~\ref{fig:spec2}. The IRS and the IRAC fluxes at
296: 8\,\micron{} are about eight times lower than the ISOCAM flux at 6.7\,\micron . We suspect that the
297: source 2MASS~11082238-7730277 at $\sim$18\arcsec{} from ISO~138 has contaminated the ISOCAM estimates
298: by \citet{lopez04}.
299:
300: The LL1 observations detected all disks in our sample.
301: The low LL1 fluxes confirm the previous suspicion that most very low mass objects have flatter disk structures \citep{apai05}. However, given the low S/N these observations do not further our understanding of the dust composition and will not be discussed in the rest of the paper.
302:
303: We find that 14 out of 17 cool star disks have 10\,\micron{} silicate emission features. These, combined with the sun-like stars and the Herbig Ae/Be stars as described in Sect.~\ref{res:silicates}, make a sample of 72 disks where the dust properties can be studied as a function of stellar mass/luminosity. To compute the strength of the 10\micron{} features we followed the procedure described in \citet{pas08}. The continuum below the feature is estimated as follows. For the sources that have IRS spectra covering the wavelength region between 5.3-14.2\,\micron{} we fit a third-order polynomial between 6 and 8\,\micron{} and between 12 and 14\,\micron.
304: These sources comprise all the sun-like stars and the following cool stars: ESO-H$\alpha$559, ISO~79, CHSM~9484, ISO~147, T37, ISO~165, ISO~252, and Hn~13. For sources that have a smaller wavelength coverage we fit a first order polynomial between the minimum wavelength and 8.2\,\micron{} and between 12\,\micron{} and the maximum wavelength. The sources belonging to the last sample are all the Herbig Ae/Be disks and the following cool stars: Cha~H$\alpha$1, Cha~H$\alpha$9, Cha~H$\alpha$2, ISO~138, Cha~H$\alpha$6, and ISO~217.
305:
306: We report the detection of the $\nu_5$ vibration-rotation band of acetylene (\ctht) around 13.7\,\micron{} and of the $\nu_2$ band of hydrogen cyanide (HCN) around 14.0\,\micron{} toward at least 20 disks in the combined sample of sun-like and cool stars (Sect.~\ref{res:gas}).
307: We identify the $\nu_5$ and $\nu_2$ bands of \ctht{} and HCN using the following procedure. First, we fit a linear continuum in a wavelength region outside the expected emission bands (between 13.4--13.60\micron{} and 14.15--14.3\micron{}). Then, we integrate the flux of the continuum-subtracted spectra within the wavelength region of the low-resolution spectrum where the emission bands are expected to be (13.6--13.81\micron{} for \ctht{} and 13.81--14.15\micron{} for HCN). The uncertainty on the measured band flux is dominated by two errors: a) the error on the continuum subtraction, which we compute as the standard deviation of the pixels outside the emission feature in the continuum-subtracted spectrum; and, b) the propagation of the measurement errors at each pixel. We classify emission bands as ``firm'' detections or ``possible'' detections, based on the S/N values derived above. We successfully confirmed this classification by individually inspecting every spectra by eye. In the case of the cool star sample ‘possible’ detections have S/N between 2 and 5 while all ‘firm’ detections have a S/N $> 7$. In the case of the
308: sun-like sample the S/N estimate is more uncertain for two reasons: i) the fit of the continuum is less certain because the continuum is less flat than that from cool star spectra; ii) the errors at each wavelength are more uncertain because the
309: sun-like stars have only 4 exposures per nod position (for comparison cool stars have
310: more than 10 exposures per nod). Most firm identifications have S/N greater than 3 in the
311: sun-like star
312: sample (possible identifications have S/N slightly lower than 3). Five out of 17 cool star disks have
313: ``firm'' detections of \ctht, other 4 sources have possible detections. Only 1 cool star shows a ``possible'' detection of the HCN rovibrational emission band. Among the 44
314: sun-like stars, there are 4 ``firm'' and 3 more ``possible'' detections of \ctht, while there are 13 ``firm'' detections and 7 more ``possible'' detections of HCN (see also Table~\ref{T:det_stat}).
315:
316: \subsection{Weak Silicate Emission Features in Cool Star Disks}\label{res:silicates}
317: Grains from the interstellar medium (ISM) provide the initial solids that comprise forming circumstellar disks.
318: These grains are likely a mixture of silicates and carbon with a range in size from a few tens of
319: \AA{} up to $\sim$0.2\,\micron{} (see, e.g. \citealt{draine03,gail09}). The 10\,\micron{} absorption features
320: toward several lines of sight show that most of the silcates are amorphous and crystalline material
321: constitutes less than 2\% by mass \citep{kemper05}. These primordial grains undergo major chemical and physical changes during and after the formation of circumstellar disks, some of which are reflected
322: in the 10\,\micron{} silicate emission feature. Silicate emission features from our targets
323: show a considerable diversity ranging from the strong, sharp feature of Cha~H$\alpha\,1$ to the
324: almost featureless spectra of J11082570, J11084952, and J11112249.
325:
326: The qualitative spectral comparison in Fig.~\ref{fig:featcomp} shows that
327: dust in the disks of cool stars is more processed than it is in the ISM (see also \citealt{apai05}).
328: In fact, these disks have a broad,
329: flat-topped 10\,\micron{} emission band, indicative of grains larger
330: than the 0.1\,\micron{} grains that dominate the ISM.
331: In addition, most spectra show peaks at 9.4 and 11.3\,\micron{} from
332: crystalline silicates similar to those identified in spectra of
333: comets \citep[e.g.,][]{wooden07}.
334:
335: Van~Boekel et al.~(2003) first identified a correlation between the shape
336: and the strength of the 10\,\micron{} silicate emission features from disks around intermediate-mass stars (Herbig Ae/Be stars). This
337: correlation was interpreted in terms of dust evolution and is often used to
338: characterize the amount of ``primitive'' versus ``processed'' dust in disk
339: atmospheres. We have re--analyzed the Herbig Ae/Be sample from
340: \citet{vanboekel05} and expanded the analysis to disks around young
341: sun-like stars (from the sample studied in \citealt{pas08}) and cool stars (from this work). In Fig.~\ref{fig:ss},
342: we show the flux ratio of the continuum-subtracted spectra at 11.3 and
343: 9.8\,\micron{} versus the peak-over-continuum
344: flux density within the 10\,\micron{} emission feature. Features dominated by ``primitive'' dust
345: (sub-micron amorphous grains like those in the ISM) have low 11.3/9.8 ratios and high peak-over-continuum fluxes. In contrast,
346: features dominated by ``processed'' dust (micron-sized grains and crystals)
347: are characterized by high 11.3/9.8 ratios and low peak-over-continuum fluxes. This
348: figure confirms the trend we reported in \citet{apai05}: disks of cool stars have silicate emission features dominated by ``processed'' dust, the
349: extent of processing is typically higher than in disks around
350: sun-like and Herbig Ae/Be stars. Recently, \citet{ks06}
351: compared the strength of the silicate emission feature from disks around 13 Herbig Ae/Be stars to that
352: from disks around 15 M stars and found a probability as large as $\sim$15\% that these two
353: groups are drawn from the same parent population.
354: %This probability translates to barely more than a 1-sigma detection and should thus not be considered as evidence for differences in the two samples.
355: We applied the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test to our much larger sample of Herbig Ae/Be, sun-like and cool stars.
356: We find that the feature strengths from the Herbig Ae/Be and sun-like star disks and
357: from the sun-like star and cool star disks are also consistent with being drawn
358: from the same parent population (K-S probabilities of 6 and 7\% respectively).
359: On the other hand, the samples of cool star and Herbig Ae/Be disks statistically
360: differ in the {\it strength} of their 10\,\micron{} emission features (K-S probability of 0.6\%), with cool star disks having weaker features than Herbig Ae/Be disks. The {\it shape} of the 10\,\micron{} emission feature is not statistically different among the three samples of disks (P(cool:sun-like)=7\%, P(cool:Herbig)=16\%, P(sun-like:Herbig)=6\%). Note that the mean value of the peak-over-continuum becomes larger going from the disks of cool stars, through the sun-like stars, to the Herbig Ae/Be stars (see Fig.~\ref{fig:ss}).
361: In Sect.~\ref{sect:discuss_dust} we will discuss a scenario that can explain the observed trend between the strength of the silicate features and the stellar mass/luminosity.
362:
363:
364: \subsection{Low HCN/\ctht Flux Ratios in Cool Star Disks}\label{res:gas}
365: The most exciting result of our survey has been the discovery of the vibration-rotation bands of \ctht{} and HCN in at least 5 out of 17 cool stars with disks (Figs.~\ref{fig:spec1}, \ref{fig:spec2}, \ref{fig:spec3}, \ref{fig:spec4}).
366: No organic molecules have been previously detected toward such very low-mass stars. Motivated by the high detection rate, we have searched for the presence of the \ctht{} and HCN bands in the sun-like star sample. We find that at least 15 out of 44
367: sun-like spectra exhibit emission from \ctht{} and/or HCN (Figs.~\ref{fig:spec5}, \ref{fig:spec6}, \ref{fig:spec7}, \ref{fig:spec8}). The sample of sun-like stars consists of about an equal number of single and binary stars \citep{pas08}. The detection rate of \ctht{} and HCN among single stars is similar to that among binary stars. Therefore, in the following we will not distinguish between single and binary stars, but rather contrast the
368: sun-like star sample to the cool star sample.
369:
370: First, we note that the overall detection rate of \ctht{} and HCN is very similar in the
371: sun-like star and cool star samples, with $\sim$30\% of the disks showing emission bands in the Spitzer low-resolution spectra. We searched for any correlation between the presence of gas lines and the dust disk properties, such as the strength of the 10\,\micron{} emission feature and the infrared slope of the source spectral energy distribution\footnote{for this we used the IRS fluxes at 7 and 13\,\micron{}, and the MIPS 24\,\micron{} data from \citet{pas08} and \citet{luhman08}}. Since the 44 sun-like stars were selected to have silicate emission features from optically thin disk atmospheres, we excluded the 3 featureless cool stars from this comparison (J11082570-7716396, J11084952-7638443, J11112249-7745427). Fig.~\ref{fig:histo_det} shows the histograms of the peak--over--continuum ratios of the 10\micron{} silicate emission features for the detections and for the non-detections of the \ctht{} and HCN rovibrational bands. Detections are only present in disks with weak silicate emission features (peak-over-continuum ratios $< 2$). In addition, detections are confined to those disks with evidence for flatter geometries (Fig.~\ref{fig:infrared}). In summary, the disks with gas detections show clear signs of grain growth and dust settling both among the sun-like and the cool star samples. This correlation may be an observational bias. Disks with larger grains and flatter disk geometries have weaker mid-infrared continuum levels making it easier to detect gas emission lines (see, e.g. \citealt{pascucci07}).
372:
373:
374: When inspecting the detection rates of \ctht{} and HCN separately, we find a striking difference between the samples of sun-like and cool stars. \ctht{} is detected in at least 5 out of 14 cool star spectra with silicate emission features, but at most in 7 out of 44 sun-like stars (only 4 are considered 'firm' detections). In contrast, only the single cool star spectrum of Cha~H$\alpha$2 presents a possible HCN emission band, but at least 13
375: sun-like stars have HCN detected (see Table~\ref{T:det_stat}). In addition, the band strengths of \ctht{} and HCN are different in the two samples. Emission from HCN is brighter than that from \ctht{} in most disks around sun-like stars (a notable exception is CY~Tau). In contrast, all disks around cool stars have brighter \ctht{} emission compared to HCN.
376: This trend is well illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:plcomb_scaled}, where we plot the median (at each wavelength) of the continuum-subtracted and normalized spectra for the
377: sun-like and the cool stars with \ctht{} and/or HCN emission band detections. The flux ratio of HCN over \ctht{} is $\sim$2.9 for the median sun-like star spectrum, while it is only 0.26 for the median cool star spectrum. The only two sources where both \ctht{} and HCN are firmly detected are the sun-like stars DF~Tau and CoKu~Tau~3 with HCN over \ctht{} flux ratios of $\sim$1.3 and 0.7, respectively (see Fig.~\ref{fig:plcomb_scaled}). These two objects alone point to a diversity in the line flux ratios of HCN and \ctht{} in sun-like stars. This diversity should be further investigated with sensitive high-resolution Spitzer spectra. We stress, that the differences in detection frequency and band strength between the sun-like and cool stars are not explained by possible differences in the infrared continuum, its shape, and signal--to--noise ratio among the two samples because the \ctht{} and HCN bands are at adjacent wavelengths. Sect.~\ref{discuss:gaslines} suggests a possible scenario to explain these findings.
378:
379: \section{Discussion}\label{sect:discussion}
380:
381: \subsection{Dust Processing, Stellar Luminosity and Disk Turbulence}\label{sect:discuss_dust}
382: The main result of Sect.~\ref{res:silicates} is the trend between the
383: stellar mass/luminosity and the strength of the 10\,\micron{} silicate emission
384: feature with disks around Herbig Ae/Be stars having statistically stronger features
385: than disks around cooler/lower-mass stars. In other words, the 10\,\micron{} emission features
386: from disks around low-mass/luminosity stars are dominated by more ``processed'' dust
387: than the same features from disks around higher mass/luminosity stars. How can we explain this observational trend?
388:
389: The 10\,\micron{} silicate emission feature arises from different regions in disks around stars of different luminosities. \citet{ks07} calculated that it probes radii $\ge$ 0.5--50\,AU in disks around Herbig Ae/Be stars, but only radii $\le$0.001--0.1\,AU in brown dwarf disks.
390: This fact may provide an explanation to our observations. The closer the grains are
391: to the central star the faster they are depleted due to the higher density and rotational frequency which
392: enhance the collision rate of dust grains and the velocity at which particles settle to the disk midplane.
393: In this picture, the grain sizes inferred from the 10\,\micron{} silicate features are not representative for the bulk silicate dust in the disk but rather reflect the different location of the 10\,\micron{} emission zone around stars of different luminosities (see also \citealt{apai05,ks07}).
394: However, grain growth and dust settling are not the only mechanisms determining the grain size distribution in the disk atmosphere.
395:
396: Turbulence may also affect the strength of the 10\,\micron{} emission feature, for instance by stirring up large grains from the disk midplane. In the frame of the magnetorotational instability model \citep{balbus91}, stellar accretion rates are a good proxy for the disk turbulence \citep{gammie96}. In Fig.~\ref{fig:Mdotvs10um} we plot the strength of the 10\,\micron{} emission features versus the stellar accretion rates for the sample of sun-like stars. The upper envelope of this plot suggests a trend with high accretion rate systems having large grains and moderate/low-accretion rate systems having small grains. However, the large uncertainty in the stellar accretion rates precludes any firm conclusion. This, in addition to the fact that large grains are seen commonly at all accretion rates, suggests that accretion/turbulence can only play a minor role in determining the strength of the 10\,\micron{} silicate emission feature.
397:
398:
399: %there is a moderate anti-correlation between the strength of the 10\,\micron{} emission feature and the stellar accretion rate of sun-like stars. Could this be an observational bias?
400: %Stars accreting at higher rates produce more continuum flux shortward of the 10\,\micron{} emission feature which could decrease the peak-over-continuum of solid state features, as illustrated in Fig.~9 from \citet{dalessio99}. However, the continuum of the sun-like stars in our sample with the higher accretion rates (CI~Tau, DL~Tau, DO~Tau, RW~Aur, and UY~Aur) does not appear to be dominated by accretion heating. This suggests that the possible anti-correlation between accretion rate and 10\,\micron{} feature strength could result from high accretion rate stars having predominantly micron-sized grains in their disk atmosphere (see also \citet{sicilia07}). If this relation
401: %is confirmed, then turbulence contributes to replenish the disk atmosphere with large grains.
402:
403: Finally, it should be also noted that disk models including only dust coagulation and settling/vertical mixing produce a too rapid (only 10$^4$\,years) depletion of grains up to 100\,\micron{} in size essentially at all disk radii \citep{dd05}, which is inconsistent with the frequent detection of 10\,\micron{} emission features in Myr-old disks.
404: Fragmentation of aggregate grains could be the major mechanism replenishing the population of small grains.
405: \citet{brauer08} implemented aggregate fragmentation in their disk model and show that grain growth and fragmentation can reach an equilibrium for a period of $\sim10^6$ which results in a quasi-stationary grain size distribution. If the average grain size of quasi-stationary grain size distributions decreases with radial distance from the central star then such disk models could explain our observations.
406:
407: \subsection{HCN under-abundance in Disk Atmospheres of Cool Stars}\label{discuss:gaslines}
408: We have shown in Sect.~\ref{res:gas} that there is a striking difference in the detection rates
409: of HCN and \ctht{} between the sun-like and the cool star samples. HCN is often present in
410: sun-like star spectra,
411: but absent from the spectra of cool stars. Similarly, Fig.~\ref{fig:plcomb_scaled} demonstrates that the HCN/\ctht{} flux ratio is much higher toward sun-like stars than toward cool stars.
412: As explained below, these differences arise from different abundances in the two samples.
413:
414: % Previous observations toward 12 young massive stars find
415: %highly correlated excitation temperatures for HCN and \ctht{} demonstrating that the two
416: %molecules probe warm gas at similar temperatures \citep{lahuis00}. Supporting this, the rovibrational
417: %bands of HCN and \ctht{} are found to trace gas at $\sim$600\,K located in the upper disk
418: %atmosphere of the sun-like star AA Tau \citep{carr08}. It does appear that the $\nu_5$ band of \ctht{} and the
419: %$\nu_2$ band of HCN probe the same volume of warm gas. In what follows, we want to determine whether the large
420: %difference in their relative strengths implies different abundances of the two molecules in the disk
421: %atmosphere of sun-like and cool stars.
422:
423: To model the emission from the $\nu_5$ band of \ctht{} and the $\nu_2$ band of
424: HCN we followed the procedure described in \citet{lahuis00}, which assumes
425: rotational and vibrational levels in local thermal equilibrium.
426: Using the populations in each level, the optical depths are
427: calculated assuming a Voigt profile function. The spectrum is also
428: multiplied at each frequency by the black body emission of gas at the temperature T$_{\rm gas}$ and
429: reduced to the resolution of the IRS/SL module using a Gaussian profile.
430: First, we explored whether our low-resolution spectra can provide any interesting constraints on
431: T$_{\rm gas}$. To do that, we have simulated spectra with gas temperatures from 100 to 900\,K
432: and measured the shift in the band head peak emission.
433: The peak emission of the $\nu_2$ band of HCN shifts from 14.02\,\micron{} for T$_{\rm gas}$=100\,K to 13.96\,\micron{} for T$_{\rm gas}$=900\,K.
434: This shift is about half the spectral resolution of the IRS/SL1 module at 14\,\micron{} and cannot be reliably detected in our spectra. A similar result is reached for the $\nu_5$ band of \ctht . We find that the wavelengths at which the emission of HCN and \ctht{} peak in the observed spectra are in between the predicted peaks for gas at 100\,K and 900\,K. In summary, the resolution of our spectra is not sufficient to measure the temperature of the emitting gas, but it is fully consistent with the emitting gas having temperature between 100\,K and 900\,K.
435:
436: More excitingly, the HCN/\ctht{} flux ratio informs us on the relative column densities of the two
437: molecules. We computed synthetic spectra with varying column density ratios of HCN over \ctht{},
438: calculated the line flux ratios and compared them to the observed line flux ratios in the sun-like
439: and cool star samples (see Fig.~\ref{fig:abun_fig}).
440: Absorption spectra of HCN and \ctht{} toward
441: young embedded massive stars find highly correlated excitation temperatures for these molecules
442: demonstrating that they probe warm gas at similar temperatures \citep{lahuis00}. We consider here
443: three temperatures for the HCN and \ctht{} emitting gas: 650\,K, which \citet{carr08} find to fit
444: best the HCN and \ctht{} band profiles from AA~Tau, 450 and 850\,K as comparison temperatures.
445: Other important model parameters are the gas column densities and Doppler broaden line widths.
446: In our calculations we keep the \ctht{} column density fixed to 10$^{16}$\,cm$^{-2}$ while we vary the HCN column density between 0.5-11$\time10^{16}$\,cm$^{-2}$, thus covering the column densities derived by \citet{carr08} for AA~Tau. We also assume a Doppler line broadening of 5\,km/s, greater than the thermal broadening for the considered temperature range. The strongest \ctht{} and HCN emission lines start to become optically thick around 10$^{16}$\,cm$^{-2}$ and 7$\times10^{16}$\,cm$^{-2}$, respectively, for gas temperatures $\ge$400\,K (see Fig.~3 from \citealt{lahuis00}).
447: Fig.~\ref{fig:abun_fig} shows that, regardless of the gas temperature, HCN/\ctht{} line flux ratios
448: as high as 3 can be obtained only for large HCN/\ctht{} column density ratios.
449: The line ratio is almost independent from the gas temperature because both the \ctht{} and the HCN lines start to become only marginally thick for the parameters we considered. If we assumed higher column densities for the two molecules or smaller Doppler line broadening, the HCN over \ctht{} line flux ratio would start to saturate faster and even higher HCN/\ctht{} column density ratios would be required to obtain the typical HCN/\ctht{} line ratio of 3 of sun-like stars. In contrast, the low HCN/\ctht{} flux ratio measured in cool stars must originate from a lower column density of HCN in respect to \ctht.
450: For comparison, \citet{lahuis00} and \citet{boonman03} find that HCN is a
451: factor of a few more abundant than \ctht{} in hot molecular cores. How can we explain the HCN
452: under-abundance in the disk atmospheres of cool stars?
453:
454: Here we propose a possible explanation. If HCN is formed in the warm disk atmosphere then its abundance may be limited by the availability of gas--phase atomic N (e.g. \citealt{agundez08}). Atomic N is primarily produced via the photo--dissociation of N$_2$, thought to be the most abundant nitrogen-bearing molecule in the interstellar medium \citep{bergin95}. Thus, the HCN abundance may be limited by $\Phi_{\rm uv}$, the flux of UV--photons with $\lambda < 110$ nm, required to dissociate N$_2$\footnote{While the dissociation of NH$_3$ could also provide free N, \citet{vandishoeck08} show that photodissociation rates for this molecule are insensitive to the radiation field for temperatures between 10,000 and 4,000\,K}. For young stars $\Phi_{\rm uv}$ is dominated by emission of hot ($\sim$10,000\,K) gas accreting onto the stars \citep{matsuyama03, herczeg04}. A simple estimate for the accretion luminosities of the two samples suggests that their $\Phi_{\rm uv}$ differ by more than 3 orders of magnitude, although the stellar temperatures differ by only 30\% (Table~\ref{T:det_stat}). If the HCN production from N is indeed driven by the UV-–photochemistry, the large difference in the UV flux of
455: sun-like and cool stars may naturally explain our observations. An important consequence of this scenario is the general under--abundance of molecular species produced through UV chemistry and an over--abundance of molecules with large binding energies in cool star disks. With efficient vertical and radial mixing (e.g., \citealt{ciesla07}), the composition of the disk atmosphere may be representative of the overall disk composition. Indeed, turbulent mixing seems to be necessary to explain the high abundances of warm HCN and \ctht{} in the only single disk atmosphere where they were detected previously \citep{carr08}.
456: Detailed dust and gas disk modeling is required to understand whether the UV-photochemistry in the disk atmosphere can radically affect the organics in the disk midplane.
457:
458: An alternative, though perhaps less likely explanation is that our observations are tracing cometary or interstellar ice evaporation, in which case the organics in the disk midplane may not be different. \citet{disanti08} have shown that Oort cloud comets have an HCN/\ctht{} ratio near unity, but Jupiter family comets have less \ctht. Because the HCN abundance relative to water is high by interstellar standards in Oort cloud comets, HCN seem to form efficiently in the outer disk, perhaps via surface chemical reactions on icy dust grains \citep{charnley92}. Nonetheless, the evaporation of cometary ices alone cannot reproduce our results, unless \ctht{} is preferentially destroyed in
459: the disk atmospheres of sun-like stars. \ctht{} has a dissociation cross-section that is at least an order of magnitude higher than HCN for photons with $\lambda$ between 1300--2000\,\AA{} (\citealt{lee84}). Because
460: sun-like stars have more flux than cool stars at these wavelengths, \ctht{} could be more easily destroyed in the disk atmosphere of sun-like stars. However, it is interesting to consider how photodissociation rates depend on the stellar radiation field (Table~2 from \citealt{vandishoeck08}). Going from a stellar radiation field produced by a star of 10,000\,K to that of a 4,000\,K star the \ctht{} photodissociation rate decreases only by a factor of 9, that of HCN by a factor of 68, while that of N$_2$ by more than 4 orders of magnitudes. Based on this dependence on the temperature of the radiation field, it seems more likely that the large difference in HCN/\ctht{} abundance is caused by more efficient dissociation of N$_2$ in disk atmospheres of accreting sun-like stars.
461:
462: \subsection{On the Organics Available During Planet Formation}
463: HCN is the key building block of many complex organic compounds. Under reducing conditions the polimerization of five HCN molecules can form adenine \citep{oro60}, one of the two purine nucleobases at the core of the replication system of all terrestrial organisms. But even if the early Earth atmosphere was reducing, the synthesis of adenine through HCN polymerization under terrestrial conditions remains controversial
464: \citep{shapiro95} and its delivery through cometary or meteoritic impacts has been proposed as a likely alternative \citep{chyba92}. Adenine synthesis likely occurs in extraterrestrial environments \citep{stoks81,kissel87}, consistent with the observations of abundant HCN in the interstellar space \citep{hirota98}, in comets \citep{magee02} and recently in disks (this work, \citealt{lahuis06,gibb07,najita07}). In addition, the availability of simple organic molecules such as HCN has a fundamental impact on the chemical networks in protoplanetry disks \citep{semenov04} and thus on the compounds available during planet formation.
465:
466: Our observations show that HCN is under-abundant in the disk atmosphere of cool stars. With efficient mixing in the disk, this finding may reflect an overall deficiency of HCN in disks around cool stars. In this case, it is possible that the organics in the planet forming regions of cool stars, as well as the organics possibly delivered post-formation, will differ from those around sun-like stars. If exogenous HCN has played a key role in the synthesis of prebiotic molecules on Earth as proposed, then prebiotic chemistry may unfold differently on planets around cool stars.
467:
468:
469: \section{Summary}
470: Using Spitzer/IRS we compared the gas and dust properties of 17 disks around cool stars/brown dwarfs
471: to 58 disks around sun-like and intermediate-mass stars. The cool stars have spectral types later than M5, the sun-like stars between K1 and M5, and the intermediate-mass stars have spectral types earlier than A0.
472: As the first large comparison,
473: we found important and surprising differences between these samples.
474: %We have carried out the first comparative study of the dust and gas properties of disks around stars of different masses/luminosities. We used the strength of the 10\,\micron{} silicate emission feature derived from IRS/Spitzer spectra to probe micron-sized grains in the disk atmosphere and molecular emission bands from HCN and \ctht{} to trace the gas content. We mainly focused on differences between two large samples of disks around young sun-like and cool stars. When comparing the strength of 10\,\micron{} silicate emission features, we also included a sample of disks around intermediate-mass stars, Herbig Ae/Be stars, that have spectra from ground-based facilities.
475: Our results can be summarized as follows:
476: \begin{enumerate}
477: \item We identify 14 cool star disks with 10\,\micron{} silicate emission features. Features are broad and weak suggesting that grains at least a few-microns in size are present in the disk atmospheres.
478: Most of the cool star spectra also show prominent crystalline silicate features.
479:
480: \item The sample of disks around cool and intermediate-mass stars statistically differ in the strength of their 10\,\micron{} emission features, with cool stars having much weaker continuum-subtracted features than intermediate-mass stars. The observed difference demonstrates that the dust populations at the observed disk radii are different in the two samples.
481:
482: %\item There is a tentative anti-correlation between the strength of the 10\,\micron{} feature and the
483: %stellar accretion rate of sun-like stars. If this finding is reinforced by larger samples, it may
484: %indicate that disk turbulence contributes to replenish the disk atmosphere with large grains.
485:
486: \item We report the first detections of organic molecules from disks around brown dwarfs.
487:
488: \item We find a striking difference in the detection rates of HCN and \ctht{} between the sun-like and the cool star samples, with HCN often present in sun-like stars, but absent from the cool star spectra. Similarly, the HCN/\ctht{} flux ratio of the median sun-like star spectrum is an order of magnitude higher than that of the median cool star spectrum.
489: We interpret these as evidence for different abundances of the two molecules in the disk atmosphere of sun-like and cool stars. Efficient photo–dissociation of N$_2$ in the disk atmosphere of sun-like stars may drive the higher production of HCN.
490: \end{enumerate}
491:
492:
493:
494: \acknowledgments
495: We would like to thank S. Strom, J. Najita, and J. Carr for interesting discussions.
496: I. P. thanks T. Heran who contributed to the realization of Fig.~\ref{fig:Mdotvs10um} in the frame of the NASA Space Grant Program. K. L. was supported by grant AST-0544588 from the National Science Foundation.
497: This work is based on observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. We are pleased to acknowledge support through the NASA/RSA contract number 1351891. M. R. M. acknowledges the support of the NASA Astrobiology Institute through LAPLACE.
498:
499:
500:
501: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
502: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
503: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
504: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
505: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
506: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
507: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
508: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
509:
510: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
511: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
512: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
513: %% copy editing. Individual instruments or configurations can be provided
514: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
515:
516: {\it Facilities:} \facility{Spitzer Space Telescope}
517:
518: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
519: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
520: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
521:
522: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
523: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
524: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
525:
526: %\appendix
527:
528: %\section{Appendix material}
529:
530:
531:
532: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
533: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
534: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
535: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
536: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
537: %%
538: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
539: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
540: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
541: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
542: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
543: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
544: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
545: %% place of the \cite commands.
546:
547: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
548: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
549: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
550:
551: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
552: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
553: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
554: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
555: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
556:
557: \begin{thebibliography}{}
558: \bibitem[Allers et al.(2006)]{allers06} Allers, K. N., Kessler-Silacci, J. E., Cieza, L. A., Jaffe, D. T. 2006, \apj, 644, 364
559: \bibitem[Apai et al.(2004)]{apai04} Apai, D., Pascucci, I., Sterzik, M. F., van der Bliek, N., Bouwman, J., Dullemond, C. P., Henning, Th. 2004, A\&A, L426, 53
560: \bibitem[Apai et al.(2005)]{apai05} Apai, D., Pascucci, I., Bouwman, J.,
561: Natta, A., Henning, Th., Dullemond, C. P. 2005, Science, 310, 834
562: \bibitem[Apai et al.(2008)]{apai08} Apai, D., Luhman, K., Liu, M. C. 2008, 14th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun ASP Conference Series, Vol. 384,
563: \bibitem[Agundez et al.(2008)]{agundez08} Agundez, M., Cernicharo, J., Goicoechea, J. R. 2008, A\&A in press
564: \bibitem[Balbus \& Hawley(1991)]{balbus91} Balbus, S. A. \& Hawley, J. F. 1991, \apj, 376, 214
565: \bibitem[Bergin et al.(1995)]{bergin95} Bergin, E. A., Langer, W. D., Goldsmith, P. F. 1995, \apj, 441, 222
566: \bibitem[Boonman et al.(2003)]{boonman03} Boonman, A. M. S., van Dishoeck, E. F., Lahuis, F., Doty, S. D., Wright, C. M., Rosenthal, D. 2003, A\&A, 399, 1047
567: \bibitem[Bouy et al.(2008)]{bouy08} Bouy, H., Hu{\'e}lamo, N., Pinte, C. et al. 2008, A\&A, 486, 877
568: \bibitem[Bouwman et al.(2006)]{bouwman06} Bouwman, J. et al. 2006, \apj, L653, 57
569: \bibitem[Bouwman et al.(2008)]{bouwman08} Bouwman, J. et al. 2008, \apj, 683, 479
570: \bibitem[Brauer et al.(2008)]{brauer08} Brauer, F., Dullemond, C. P., Henning, Th. 2008, A\&A, 480, 859
571: \bibitem[Carpenter et al.(2006)]{carpenter06} Carpenter J. M., Mamajek, Eric E., Hillenbrand, L. A., Meyer, M. R. 2006, \apj, L651, 49
572: \bibitem[Carr \& Najita(2008)]{carr08} Carr, J. S. \& Najita, J. R. 2008, Science, 319, 1504
573: \bibitem[Charnley et al.(1992)]{charnley92} Charnley, S. B., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Millar, T. J. 1992, \apj 399, L71
574: \bibitem[Chyba \& Sagan(1992)]{chyba92} Chyba, C. F. \& Sagan, C., Nature 1992, 355, 125
575: \bibitem[Ciesla(2007)]{ciesla07} Ciesla, F. J. 2007, Science 318, 613
576: \bibitem[Comer{\'o}n et al.(2000)]{comeron00} Comer{\'o}n, F., Neuh\"{a}user, R.,
577: Kaas, A. A 2000, \aap, 359, 269
578: \bibitem[Crovisier et al.(1997)]{crovisier97} Crovisier, J., Leech, K., Bockelee-Morvan, D., Brooke, T. Y., Hanner, M. S., Altieri, B., Keller, H. U., Lellouch, E. 1997, Science, 275, 1904
579: \bibitem[Cutri et al.(2003)]{cutri03} Cutri, R. M. et al. 2003, 2MASS All Sky Catalog of point sources
580: \bibitem[D'Alessio et al.(1999)]{dalessio99} D'Alessio, P., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., Lizano, S., Cantó, J. 1999, \apj, 527, 893
581: \bibitem[DiSanti \& Mumma(2008)]{disanti08} Disanti, M. A. \& Mumma, M. J. 2008, Space Science Reviews, 70
582: \bibitem[Draine(2003)]{draine03} Draine, B. T. 2003, ARA\&A, 41, 241
583: \bibitem[Dullemond \& Dominik(2005)]{dd05} Dullemond \& Dominik 2005, A\&A, 434, 971
584: \bibitem[Furlan et al.(2006)]{furlan06} Furlan, E., Hartmann, L., Calvet, N. et al. 2006, ApJS, 165, 568
585: \bibitem[Gail \& Hoppe(2009)]{gail09} Gail, H. \& Hoppe, P. 2009, to appear in the book Protoplanetary Dust, eds. D. Apai \& D. Lauretta (Cambridge University Press)
586: \bibitem[Gammie(1996)]{gammie96} Gammie, C. F. 1996, \apj, 462, 725
587: \bibitem[Gibb et al.(2007)]{gibb07} Gibb, E. L., Van Brunt, K. A., Brittain, S. D., Rettig, T. W. 2007, \apj, 660, 1572
588: \bibitem[Gullbring et al.(1998)]{gullbring98} Gullbring, E., Hartmann, L., Briceno, C., Calvet, N. 1998, \apj, 492, 323
589: \bibitem[Hartigan et al.(1995)]{hartigan95} Hartigan, P., Edwards, S., Ghandour, L. 1995, \apj, 452, 736
590: \bibitem[Hartmann et al.(1998)]{hartmann98} Hartmann, L., Calvet, N., Gullbring, E., D'Alessio, P. 1998, \apj, 495, 385
591: \bibitem[Hartmann(2001)]{hartmann01} Hartmann, L. 2001, AJ, 121, 1030
592: \bibitem[Herczeg et al.(2004)]{herczeg04} Herczeg, G. J., Wood, B. E., Linsky, J. L., Valenti, J. A., Johns-Krull, C. M., Astrophys. J. 2004, 607, 369
593: \bibitem[Hern{\'a}ndez et al.(2007)]{hernandez07} Hern{\'a}ndez, J., Hartmann, L., Megeath, T. et al. 2007, \apj, 662, 1067
594: \bibitem[Higdon et al.(2004)]{higdon04} Higdon, S. J. U., Devost, D.,
595: Higdon, J. L. et al. 2004, PASP, 116, 975
596: \bibitem[Hirota et al.(1998)]{hirota98} Hirota, T., Yamamoto, S., Mikami, H., Ohishi, M. 1998, \apj, 503, 717
597: \bibitem[Houck et al.(2004)]{houck04} Houck, J. R., Charmandaris, V.,
598: Brandl, B. R. et al. 2004, \apj S, 154, 211
599: \bibitem[Kemper et al.(2005)]{kemper05} Kemper, F., Vriend, W. J.,
600: Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2005, \apj, 633, 534
601: \bibitem[Kenyon \& Hartmann(1995)]{kh95} Kenyon, S. J. \& Hartmann, L. 1995, \apjs, 101, 117
602: \bibitem[Kenyon et al.(2008)]{kenyon08book} Kenyon, S. J., Gomez, M., Whitney, B. 2008, to appear in the Handbook of Star Forming Regions, ASP Monograph Series
603: \bibitem[Kessler-Silacci et al.(2006)]{ks06} Kessler-Silacci, J., Augereau,
604: J., Dullemond, C. P. et al. 2006, \apj, 639, 275
605: \bibitem[Kessler-Silacci et al.(2007)]{ks07} Kessler-Silacci, J., E., Dullemond, C. P., Augereau, J.-C.
606: et al. 2007, \apj, 659, 680
607: \bibitem[Kissel \& Krueger(1987)]{kissel87} Kissel, J. \& Krueger, F. R. 1987, Nature 326, 755
608: \bibitem[Lahuis \& van Dishoeck(2000)]{lahuis00} Lahuis, F.\& van Dishoeck, E. F. 2000, A\&A, 355, 699
609: \bibitem[Lahuis et al.(2006)]{lahuis06} Lahuis, F., van Dishoeck, E. F., Boogert, A. C. A. et al. 2006, \apj, L636, 145
610: \bibitem[Lahuis et al.(2007)]{lahuis07} Lahuis, F., van Dishoeck, E. F., Blake, G. A. et al. 2007, \apj, 665, 492
611: \bibitem[Lee(1984)]{lee84} Lee, L. C. 1984, \apj, 282, 172
612: \bibitem[L{\'o}pez-Mart{\'i} et al.(2004)]{lopez04} L{\'o}pez Mart{\'i}, B.; Eisl\"{o}ffel,
613: J., Scholz, A., Mundt, R. 2004, \aap, 416, 555
614: \bibitem[Luhman(2004)]{luhman04} Luhman, K. L. 2004, \apj, 602, 816
615: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2005)]{luhman05} Luhman, K. L., Lada, C. J.,
616: Hartmann, L. et al. 2005, \apj, L631, 69
617: \bibitem[Luhman (2007)]{luhman07} Luhman, K. L. 2007, \apjs, 173, 104
618: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2008a)]{luhman08} Luhman, K. L. et al. 2008, \apj, 675, 1375
619: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2008b)]{luhman08book} Luhman, K. L. 2008, to appear in the Handbook of Star Forming Regions, ASP Monograph Series
620: \bibitem[Magee-Sauer et al.(2002)]{magee02} Magee-Sauer, K., Mumma, M. J., DiSanti, M. A., Dello Russo, N. 2002, Journal of Geophysical Research, 107, 6
621: \bibitem[Mathis(1990)]{mathis90} Mathis, J. S. 1990, \araa, 28, 37
622: \bibitem[Matsuyama et al.(2003)]{matsuyama03} Matsuyama, I., Johnstone, D., Hartmann, L. 2003, \apj, 582, 893
623: \bibitem[Meyer et al.(2004)]{meyer04} Meyer, M. R. et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 422
624: \bibitem[Meyer et al.(2006)]{meyer06} Meyer, M. R. et al. 2006, \pasp, 118, 1690
625: \bibitem[Meyer et al.(2007)]{meyer07} Meyer, M. R., Backman, D. E., Weinberger, A. J., Wyatt, M. C. in Protostars and Planets V, 573
626: \bibitem[Mohanty et al.(2004)]{mohanty04} Mohanty S., Jayawardhana, R., Natta, A., Fujiyoshi, T., Tamura, M., Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s, D. 2004, \apj, L609, 33
627: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(2005)]{muzerolle05} Muzerolle, J., Luhman, K. L., Briceno, C., Hartmann, L., Calvet, N. 2005, \apj, 625, 906
628: \bibitem[Najita et al.(2007)]{najita07} Najita, J. R., Strom, S. E., Muzerolle, J. 2007, \mnras, 378, 369
629: \bibitem[Natta et al.(2004)]{natta04} Natta A., Testi, L., Muzerolle, J., Randich, S., Comer\'{o}n, F., Persi, P. 2004, \aap, 424, 603
630: \bibitem[Oro(1960)]{oro60} Oro, J. 1960, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 2, 407
631: \bibitem[Pascucci et al.(2003)]{pas03} Pascucci, I., Apai, D., Henning, Th., Dullemond, C. P. 2003, \apj, L590, 111
632: \bibitem[Pascucci et al.(2006)]{pas06} Pascucci, I., Gorti, U., Hollenbach, D. et al. 2006, \apj, 651, 1177
633: \bibitem[Pascucci et al.(2007)]{pascucci07} Pascucci, I., Hollenbach, D., Najita, J. et al. 2007, \apj, 663, 383
634: \bibitem[Pascucci et al.(2008)]{pas08} Pascucci, I., Apai, D., Hardegree-Ullman, E. E.,
635: Kim, J. S., Meyer, M. R., Bouwman, J. 2008, \apj, 673, 477
636: \bibitem[Pascucci \& Tachibana(2009)]{pascuccitachibana} Pascucci, I. \& Tachibana, S. 2009, to appear in the book Protoplanetary Dust, eds. D. Apai \& D. Lauretta (Cambridge University Press)
637: \bibitem[Persi et al.(2000)]{persi00} Persi, P., Marenzi, A. R., Olofsson, G.
638: et al. 2000, \aap, 357, 219
639: \bibitem[Riaz \& Gizis(2008)]{riaz08} Riaz \& Gizis 2008, \apj, 681, 1584
640: \bibitem[Scholz et al.(2007)]{scholz07} Scholz, A., Jayawardhana, R., Wood, K., Meeus, G., Stelzer, B., Walker, C., O'Sullivan, M. 2007, \apj, 660, 1517
641: \bibitem[Shapiro(1995)]{shapiro95} Shapiro, R. 1995, Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere 25, Issue 1–3, 83
642: \bibitem[Semenov et al.(2004)]{semenov04} Semenov, D., Wiebe, D., Henning, Th. 2004, A\&A, 417, 93
643: \bibitem[Sicilia-Aguilar et al.(2006)]{aguilar06} Sicilia-Aguilar, A., Hartmann, L. W., Fur{\'e}sz, G., Henning, Th., Dullemond, C., Brandner, W. 2006, AJ, 132, 2135
644: \bibitem[Sicilia-Aguilar et al.(2007)]{sicilia07} Sicilia-Aguilar, A., Hartmann, L. W., Watson, D., Bohac, C.,
645: Henning, Th., Bouwman, J. 2007, \apj, 659, 1637
646: \bibitem[Sterzik et al.(2004)]{sterzik04} Sterzik, M. F., Pascucci, I., Apai, D., van der Bliek, N., Dullemond, C. P. 2004, A\&A, 427, 245
647: \bibitem[Stoks \& Schwartz(1981)]{stoks81} Stoks, P. G. \& Schwartz, A. W., 1981, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 45, 563
648: \bibitem[van Boekel et al.(2003)]{vanboekel03} van Boekel, R., Waters, L. B.
649: F. M., Dominik, C., Bouwman, J., de Koter, A., Dullemond, C. P., Paresce, F.
650: 2003, \aap, 400L, 21
651: \bibitem[van Boekel et al.(2005)]{vanboekel05} van Boekel, R., Min, M.,
652: Waters, L. B. F. M., de Koter, A., Dominik, C., van den Ancker, M. E.,
653: Bouwman, J. 2005, \aap, 437, 189
654: \bibitem[van Dishoeck et al.(2008)]{vandishoeck08} van Dishoeck, E. F., Jonkheid, B., van Hemert, M. C. eprint arXiv:0806.0088
655: \bibitem[White \& Basri(2003)]{wb03} White, R. J. \& Basri, G. 2003, \apj, 582, 1109
656: \bibitem[Wooden et al.(2007)]{wooden07} Wooden, D., Desch, S., Harker, D., Gail, H.-P., Keller, L. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, 815
657: \end{thebibliography}
658:
659: \clearpage
660:
661: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
662: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
663: %% To embed the sample graphics in
664: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
665: %% \includegraphics commands
666: %%
667: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
668: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
669: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
670: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
671: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
672: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
673: %%
674: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
675: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
676: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
677: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
678: %% journal to journal.
679:
680: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
681: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
682: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
683: %% available in the electronic journal.
684:
685: %\begin{figure}
686: %\epsscale{.80}
687: %\plotone{f1.eps}
688: %\caption{Derived spectra for 3C138 \citep[see][]{heiles03}. Plots for all sources are available
689: %in the electronic edition of {\it The Astrophysical Journal}.\label{fig1}}
690: %\end{figure}
691:
692: %\clearpage
693:
694: %% Here we use \plottwo to present two versions of the same figure,
695: %% one in black and white for print the other in RGB color
696: %% for online presentation. Note that the caption indicates
697: %% that a color version of the figure will be available online.
698: %%
699:
700: %\begin{figure}
701: %\plottwo{f2.eps}{f2_color.eps}
702: %\caption{A panel taken from Figure 2 of \citet{rudnick03}.
703: %See the electronic edition of the Journal for a color version
704: %of this figure.\label{fig2}}
705: %\end{figure}
706:
707: %% This figure uses \includegraphics to scale and rotate the still frame
708: %% for an mpeg animation.
709:
710: %============== Figs. showing the full spectra
711: \begin{figure}
712: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=1.0]{spec1.ps}
713: \caption{Left Panels:
714: IRS low-resolution spectra for the cool star sample.
715: The IRAC 5.8 and 8\,\micron{} fluxes from \citet{luhman08} are over-plotted as filled black circles (when multiple observations are available we plot the mean flux values).
716: Right Panels:
717: Expanded view of the brown dwarf spectra around the C$_2$H$_2$ and HCN emission bands. A star indicates a ``firm'' detection while a question mark indicates a ``possible'' detection.
718: \label{fig:spec1}}
719: \end{figure}
720: \clearpage
721: \begin{figure}
722: %\centering
723: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=1.0]{spec2.ps}
724: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:spec1}.\label{fig:spec2}}
725: \end{figure}
726: \clearpage
727: \begin{figure}
728: %\centering
729: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=1.0]{spec3.ps}
730: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:spec1}.\label{fig:spec3}}
731: \end{figure}
732: \clearpage
733: \begin{figure}
734: %\centering
735: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=1.0]{spec4.ps}
736: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:spec1}.\label{fig:spec4}}
737: \end{figure}
738: \clearpage
739: %==============
740:
741:
742: %============== comparison of continuum subtracted/normalzed features
743: \begin{figure}
744: %\centering
745: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{featcomp.ps}
746: \caption{Qualitative comparison of the 10\,\micron{} silicate emission features from cool star disks.
747: Spectra have been continuum-subtracted and normalized to the peak emission.
748: For comparison the spectra of the amorphous silicate-dominated ISM \citep{kemper05} and the
749: crystalline-rich comet Hale-Bopp \citep{crovisier97} are also shown.
750: \label{fig:featcomp}}
751: \end{figure}
752: \clearpage
753:
754: %============== Shape and strength of the 10um emission features
755: \begin{figure}
756: %\centering
757: \includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=90]{sili_strength.ps}
758: \caption{Shapes and strengths of the 10\,\micron{} emission features for the samples of Herbig
759: Ae/Be stars (green stars), sun-like/T~Tauri stars (blue squares), and cool stars/brown dwarfs (red circles). On the y--axis we plot the ratios of the normalized flux at 11.3\,\micron{} over 9.8\,\micron{}, which are proxies for the degree of crystallinity. The x--axis gives the peak over continuum in the 10\,\micron{} region of normalized spectra, which indicates the amount of grain growth. The filled symbols with errorbars show the mean values and the 1$\sigma$ standard deviations of the peak-over-continuum and of the F11.3/F9.8 for the three groups of disks. Cool star disks have statistically weaker 10\,\micron{} features than Herbig Ae/Be disks.\label{fig:ss}}
760: \end{figure}
761: \clearpage
762:
763:
764:
765: %============== Detections/non-detections of gas lines in the TT sample
766: \begin{figure}
767: %\centering
768: \includegraphics[scale=1.]{spec5.ps}
769: \caption{Expanded view of the sun-like spectra around the C$_2$H$_2$ and HCN emission bands. A star indicates a ``firm'' detection while a question mark indicates a ``possible'' detection. The full spectra are presented in \citet{pas08}.
770: \label{fig:spec5}}
771: \end{figure}
772: \clearpage
773:
774: %============== Detections/non-detections of gas lines in the TT sample
775: \begin{figure}
776: %\centering
777: \includegraphics[scale=1.]{spec6.ps}
778: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:spec5}. \label{fig:spec6}}
779: \end{figure}
780: \clearpage
781:
782: %============== Detections/non-detections of gas lines in the TT sample
783: \begin{figure}
784: \centering
785: \includegraphics[scale=1.]{spec7.ps}
786: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:spec5}. \label{fig:spec7}}
787: \end{figure}
788: \clearpage
789:
790: %============== Detections/non-detections of gas lines in the TT sample
791: \begin{figure}
792: \includegraphics[scale=1.0]{spec8.ps}
793: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:spec5}. \label{fig:spec8}}
794: \end{figure}
795: \clearpage
796:
797:
798: %============== Detection/non-detection statistics 10um feature strength
799: \begin{figure}
800: \centering
801: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{histo_det.ps}
802: \caption{Upper Panel: Histogram of the 10\micron{} silicate feature strengths for the detections (solid line)
803: and non--detections (dashed line) of the \ctht{} emission band in the combined
804: sample of disks around sun-like and cool stars.
805: Lower Panel: Histogram of the 10\micron{} feature strengths for the detections (solid line) and non--detections (dashed line) of the HCN emission band in the sample of disks around
806: sun-like stars (no cool star spectrum presents a firm HCN detection).
807: Both panels show that detections are confined to weak features (peak--over--continuum ratios $< 2$).
808: The K-S probabilities that \ctht{} and HCN detections and non--detections are
809: drawn from the same parent population are only 0.3 and 2.8\% respectively.
810: \label{fig:histo_det}}
811: \end{figure}
812: \clearpage
813:
814:
815: %============== SED slope vs S/N
816: \begin{figure}
817: \centering
818: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{infrared.ps}
819: \caption{Upper Panel : Flux ratios at 24 over 7\,\micron{} versus the signal--to--noise in the continuum close to the rovibrational emission bands of \ctht{} and HCN. Fluxes at 24\,\micron{} are from \citet{pas08} and \citet{luhman08}. Flatter disk structures are indicated by lower flux ratios in the figure. Detections of the \ctht{} band are filled symbols, non--detections are empty symbols (``possible'' detections are omitted). Squares are for sun-like stars, circles for cool stars.
820: Lower Panel : Same as upper panel but for the HCN emission band. No cool star spectrum presents a ``firm'' HCN detection.
821: \ctht{} as well as HCN detections are confined to low flux ratios, indicative of flatter disk structures. The figure demonstrates that the pattern of the gas line detections are not primarily set by the signal--to--noise of the observations, thus differences between the two groups of objects compared are not due to different sensitivities.\label{fig:infrared}}
822: \end{figure}
823: \clearpage
824:
825: %============== strength 10micron emission feature vs Mdot
826: \begin{figure}
827: \centering
828: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{Mdot10um.ps}
829: \caption{Stellar accretion rate (M$_{\rm accr}$) versus 10\,\micron{} feature strength for the sample of sun-like stars.
830: Accretion rates are from the literature \citep{hartigan95,hartmann98,gullbring98,wb03,najita07} and have been placed on a consistent scale using the factors calculated in \citet{najita07}.
831: FM~Tau, CoKu~Tau~3, IT~Tau, and V710~Tau do not have measured accretion rates.
832: The errorbar on the peak-over-continuum is from \citet{pas08} while the
833: uncertainty in the mass accretion rate is from \citet{najita07}.
834: There is a 4\% probability that the data are randomly distributed, the negative Kendall rank correlation coefficient (-0.22) indicates a moderate anti-correlation. Yet, given the large uncertainty in the mass accretion rate we are cautious of concluding this. \label{fig:Mdotvs10um}}
835: \end{figure}
836: \clearpage
837:
838: %============== Scaled HCN and C2H2 fluxes
839: \begin{figure}
840: \centering
841: \includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=90]{plcomb.ps}
842: \caption{Median of continuum-subtracted and normalized spectra for the sun-like star (blue) and the
843: cool star (black) samples presenting \ctht{} and/or HCN emission bands (5 cool stars and 15 sun-like stars).
844: The spectra are normalized to
845: the peak of emission and scaled to match the \ctht{} emission in the two samples. The errorbars are
846: the standard deviations of the normalized spectra. If cool stars had the same flux ratio of HCN
847: versus \ctht{} as the sun-like stars do, HCN emission would have been easily detected toward
848: them.\label{fig:plcomb_scaled}}
849: \end{figure}
850: \clearpage
851:
852: %============== Line flux ratio versus column density atio
853: \begin{figure}
854: \centering
855: \includegraphics[scale=0.5, angle=90]{abun_fig.ps}
856: \caption{Line flux ratio of HCN over \ctht{} versus column density ratio of the two molecules.
857: Circles are values predicted from sythetic spectra calculated following \citet{lahuis00}. The \ctht{} column density is kept fixed at 10$^{16}$\,cm$^{-2}$ while the HCN column density varies from 0.5-11$\times$10$^{16}$\,cm$^{-2}$, thus covering the \ctht{} and HCN column densities reported by \citet{carr08} for AA~Tau.
858: Filled circles are for a gas temperature of 650\,K while empty circles are for gas at 450 and 850\,K.
859: Arrows indicate the line flux ratios measured from the median cool star and sun-like star spectra in Fig.~14. The dashed lines report the HCN over \ctht{} flux ratios for the only two sources in our sample where both molecular lines are firmly detected. The figure illustrates that the large difference in the HCN/\ctht{} flux ratio between the cool star and the sun-like star samples translates into very different column density ratios of the two molecules. We note that in the case of AA~Tau \citet{carr08} find an HCN/\ctht{} column density ratio of
860: 8, similar to what we require for the median spectrum of the sun-like stars.\label{fig:abun_fig}}
861: \end{figure}
862: \clearpage
863:
864:
865:
866: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may
867: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the
868: %% User Guide for details.
869: %%
870: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
871: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
872: %% after every seventh one.
873:
874: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before
875: %% each one.
876:
877: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables: the
878: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX
879: %% table environment. Use of deluxetable is preferred.
880: %%
881:
882: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,
883: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.
884:
885: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}
886: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.
887: %% We also use the \rotate command to rotate the table to
888: %% landscape orientation since it is very wide even at the
889: %% reduced font size.
890: %%
891: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed
892: %% inside the \tablecaption.
893:
894: %% This table also includes a table comment indicating that the full
895: %% version will be available in machine-readable format in the electronic
896: %% edition.
897:
898: %\clearpage
899:
900: %\begin{deluxetable}{ccrrrrrrrrcrl}
901: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
902: %\rotate
903: %\tablecaption{Sample table taken from \citet{treu03}\label{tbl-1}}
904: %\tablewidth{0pt}
905: %\tablehead{
906: %\colhead{POS} & \colhead{chip} & \colhead{ID} & \colhead{X} & \colhead{Y} &
907: %\colhead{RA} & \colhead{DEC} & \colhead{IAU$\pm$ $\delta$ IAU} &
908: %\colhead{IAP1$\pm$ $\delta$ IAP1} & \colhead{IAP2 $\pm$ $\delta$ IAP2} &
909: %\colhead{star} & \colhead{E} & \colhead{Comment}
910: %}
911: %\startdata
912: %0 & 2 & 1 & 1370.99 & 57.35 & 6.651120 & 17.131149 & 21.344$\pm$0.006 & 2
913: %4.385$\pm$0.016 & 23.528$\pm$0.013 & 0.0 & 9 & - \\
914: %\enddata
915: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
916: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
917: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
918: %\tablecomments{Table \ref{tbl-1} is published in its entirety in the
919: %electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}. A portion is
920: %shown here for guidance regarding its form and content.}
921: %\tablenotetext{a}{Sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-1} that was generated
922: %with the deluxetable environment}
923: %\tablenotetext{b}{Another sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-1}}
924: %\end{deluxetable}
925:
926: %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using
927: %% \tableline, not \hline.
928: %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.
929: %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.
930:
931:
932: %% If the table is more than one page long, the width of the table can vary
933: %% from page to page when the default \tablewidth is used, as below. The
934: %% individual table widths for each page will be written to the log file; a
935: %% maximum tablewidth for the table can be computed from these values.
936: %% The \tablewidth argument can then be reset and the file reprocessed, so
937: %% that the table is of uniform width throughout. Try getting the widths
938: %% from the log file and changing the \tablewidth parameter to see how
939: %% adjusting this value affects table formatting.
940:
941: %% The \dataset{} macro has also been applied to a few of the objects to
942: %% show how many observations can be tagged in a table.
943:
944: \clearpage
945: \begin{deluxetable}{l cc ccc c}
946: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
947: \tablecaption{Sample of cool stars in the Cha~I star-forming region identified via infrared photometry.
948: \label{T:photometry}}
949: \tablewidth{0pt}
950: \tablehead{
951: \colhead{Source} &\colhead{2MASS~J\tablenotemark{a}} &\colhead{Sp. Type} &
952: \colhead{$F_{6.7\mu m}$} & \colhead{$F_{14.3\mu m}$} & \colhead{$F_{8\mu m}$} &
953: \colhead{Other name} \\
954: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} &
955: \colhead{(mJy)} & \colhead{(mJy)} & \colhead{(mJy)} &
956: \colhead{}
957: }
958: \startdata
959: Hn~2$^\ast$ &11034764-7719563 & M5 &11.4$\pm$0.8& 3.7$\pm$1.0 & 9.1 & ChaI~425,ISO~32 \\
960: CHXR~15$^\ast$ &11054300-7726517 & M5.25 &13.2$\pm$1.1& -- & 8.5 & ChaI~449,ISO~65 \\
961: ESO-H$\alpha$559&11062554-7633418 & M5.25 & -- & -- & 11.4 & \\
962: ISO~79 &11063945-7736052 & M5.25 &8.0$\pm$2.0 & 9.9$\pm$1.5& 8.2 & \\
963: CHSM~9484 &11071181-7625501 & M5.25 & -- & -- & 2.4 &ChaI~711 \\
964: Cha~H$\alpha$~1 &11071668-7735532 & M7.75 &6.7$\pm$1.8 &11.8$\pm$1.5& 8.1 &ISO~95 \\
965: Cha~H$\alpha$~9 &11071860-7732516 & M5.5 &11.4$\pm$0.9&9.2$\pm$1.3 & 9.4 & ISO~98 \\
966: Cha~H$\alpha$~2 &11074245-7733593 & M5.25 &24.5$\pm$1.4&23.4$\pm$1.2& 23.3 & ISO~111 \\
967: ISO~138 &11081850-7730408 & M6.5 &15.3$\pm$0.8&17.6$\pm$1.3& 1.8 & ChaI~410 \\
968: J11082570-7716396 &11082570-7716396 & M8 & -- & -- & 1.0 & \\
969: ISO~147 &11082650-7715550 & M5.75 &4.3$\pm$1.1 & -- & 4.7 & \\
970: Cha~H$\alpha$~6 &11083952-7734166 & M5.75 &12.7$\pm$1.5& -- & 11.8 & ISO~152 \\
971: J11084952-7638443 &11084952-7638443 & M8.75 & -- & -- & 0.8 & \\
972: T37 &11085090-7625135 & M5.25 &7.5$\pm$1.5& -- & 11.1 & ISO~157 \\
973: ISO~165 &11085497-7632410 & M5.5 &12$\pm$1.8 & -- & 10.1 & \\
974: ISO~217 &11095215-7639128 & M6.25 &10.3$\pm$2.5& --& 20.7 & ChaI~726 \\
975: ISO~252 &11104141-7720480 & M6 &5.5$\pm$0.8 &6.8$\pm$1.2& 8.1 \\
976: Hn~13 &11105597-7645325 & M5.75 &31.4$\pm$1.8&27.5$\pm$1.9 & 44.4& ISO~259 \\
977: J11112249-7745427$^b$ &11112249-7745427 & M8.25 & -- & -- & -- & \\
978: % Notes:
979: % - J11082570-7716396 is Cha~23943
980: % - J11084952-7638443 is Cha~9086
981: % - J11112249-7745427 is Cha~21330
982: \enddata
983: \tablecomments{All spectral types are from \citet{luhman04,luhman08} and \citet{luhman05}. They are determined from optical spectra and have typical precisions of 0.25. Fluxes at 6.7 and 14.3\,\micron{} are from \citet{persi00}, while fluxes at 8\,\micron{} are from \citet{luhman08}. The 8\,\micron{} IRAC fluxes are mean values of fluxes from multiple campaigns.}
984: \tablenotetext{a}{The 2MASS source name includes the J2000 sexagesimal, equatorial position in the form: hhmmssss+ddmmsss \citep{cutri03}.}
985: \tablenotetext{\ast}{The IRS spectra are consistent with photospheric emission, see text.}
986: \tablenotetext{b}{This source has no 8\,\micron{} IRAC data but has excess emission at 5.8\,\micron}
987: \end{deluxetable}
988:
989: \begin{deluxetable}{l cc ccc}
990: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
991: \tablecaption{Log of the observations.\label{T:Observations}}
992: \tablewidth{0pt}
993: \tablehead{
994: \colhead{Source}&\colhead{Date}&\colhead{Peak--up}& & \colhead{Exposure Times}& \\
995: &\colhead{mm/dd/year} &\colhead{Mode} &\colhead{SL1} &\colhead{SL2} &\colhead{LL1}
996: }
997: \startdata
998: Hn~2 & 03/12/2005 & PCRS & 60s$\times$20 & -- &30s$\times$36 \\
999: CHXR~15 & 03/12/2005 & PCRS & 60s$\times$20 & -- &30s$\times$36 \\
1000: ESO-H$\alpha$559 & 08/02/2006 & PCRS & 60s$\times$40 & 60s$\times$12 & -- \\
1001: ISO~79 & 03/13/2007 & PCRS & 60s$\times$40 & 60s$\times$10 & -- \\
1002: CHSM~9484 & 08/02/2006 & PCRS & 60s$\times$40 & 60s$\times$12 & -- \\
1003: Cha~H$\alpha$~1 & 03/12/2005 & PCRS & 60s$\times$20& -- & -- \\
1004: Cha~H$\alpha$~9 & 03/12/2005 & PCRS & 60s$\times$20& -- &30s$\times$36 \\
1005: Cha~H$\alpha$~2 & 03/12/2005 & PCRS & 60s$\times$14 & -- & -- \\
1006: ISO~138 & 03/12/2005 & PCRS & 60s$\times$14 & -- &-- \\
1007: J11082570-7716396 & 03/11/2007 & PCRS & 60s$\times$40 & 60s$\times$12 & -- \\
1008: ISO~147 & 03/11/2007 & PCRS & 60s$\times$40 & 60s$\times$12 & -- \\
1009: Cha~H$\alpha$~6 & 03/12/2005 & PCRS & 60s$\times$20 & -- &30s$\times$36 \\
1010: J11084952-7638443 & 03/11/2007 & IRS & 60s$\times$40 & 60s$\times$12 & -- \\
1011: T37 & 07/25/2006 & PCRS & 60s$\times$40 & 60s$\times$10 & -- \\
1012: ISO~165 & 08/02/2006 & PCRS & 60s$\times$40 & 60s$\times$12 & -- \\
1013: ISO~217 & 03/12/2005 & IRS & 60s$\times$20 & --&30s$\times$36 \\
1014: ISO~252 & 03/11/2007 & PCRS & 60s$\times$40 & 60s$\times$12 & -- \\
1015: Hn~13 & 03/11/2007 & IRS & 60s$\times$40 & 60s$\times$12 & -- \\
1016: J11112249-7745427 & 08/02/2006 & PCRS & 60s$\times$40 & 60s$\times$10 & -- \\
1017: %ISO\#023 & 03/20/2005 & IRS & 60s$\times$12 & 30s$\times$36\\
1018: %ISO\#030 & 03/20/2005 & IRS & 60s$\times$12 & 30s$\times$36\\
1019: %ISO\#032 & 03/18/2005 & PCRS & 60s$\times$8 & 30s$\times$36 \\
1020: %ISO\#033 & ?? was observed?? & & & \\
1021: %ISO\#102 & 03/18/2005 & PCRS & 60s$\times$8 & -- \\
1022: %ISO\#160 & 03/20/2005 & PCRS & 60s$\times$12 & 30s$\times$36 \\
1023: %ISO\#164 & 03/18/2005 & PCRS & 60s$\times$8 & -- \\
1024: %ISO\#176 & 03/18/2005 & PCRS & 60s$\times$8 & --\\
1025: %ISO\#193 & 03/20/2005 & PCRS & 60s$\times$12 & 30s$\times$36
1026: \enddata
1027: \end{deluxetable}
1028:
1029:
1030: \begin{deluxetable}{l cccccc}
1031: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1032: \tablecaption{Statistics on the firm detections of HCN and \ctht{} from the sun-like and cool stars with disks. Because the sun-like stars were selected to have silicate emission features, we have excluded from the cool star sample the 3 featureless cool stars (J11082570,
1033: J11084952, and J11112249). Also shown in the Table are the mean stellar temperatures, masses, radii, and accretion rates, used to compute the accretion luminosities. Values for individual stars are from \citet{apai05,luhman07,pas08,kh95,najita07,wb03,natta04,muzerolle05}.\label{T:det_stat}}
1034: \tablewidth{0pt}
1035: \tablehead{
1036: \colhead{Sample}&\colhead{\ctht}&\colhead{HCN}&
1037: \colhead{$<T_\star>$} &\colhead{$<M_\star>$} &\colhead{$<R_\star>$} &\colhead{$<\dot{M}>$} \\
1038: \colhead{} & \colhead{detections} & \colhead{detections} &
1039: \colhead{[K]} &\colhead{[M$_\sun$]} &\colhead{[R$_\sun$]} &\colhead{M$_\sun$/yr}
1040: }
1041: \startdata
1042: Sun-like stars & 4/44 & 13/44 & 3,900 & 0.8 & 2.1 & 1.3$\times 10^{-8}$ \\
1043: Cool stars & 5/14 & 0/14 & 3,000 & 0.1 & 0.7 & $<$3$\times 10^{-11}$ \\
1044: \enddata
1045: \end{deluxetable}
1046: %====== Accretion Luminosity : Lacc = G*Mstar*Mdot/Rstar
1047:
1048: %\begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
1049: %\tablewidth{0pt}
1050: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1051: %\tablecaption{Line fluxes and 1$\sigma$ errors for the BD sample}
1052: %\tablehead{
1053: %\colhead{Source} & \colhead{Flux[H$_2$~S(3)]} &
1054: %\colhead{Flux[H$_2$~S(2)]} & \colhead{Flux[\ctht]}& \colhead{Flux[HCN]} \\
1055: %\colhead{ } & \colhead{$\times 10^{-15}$}&
1056: %\colhead{$\times 10^{-15}$}& \colhead{$\times 10^{-15}$}&\colhead{$\times 10^{-15}$} \\
1057: %\colhead{ } & \colhead{[erg\,s\,cm$^{-2}$]}&
1058: %\colhead{[erg\,s\,cm$^{-2}$]}& \colhead{[erg\,s\,cm$^{-2}$]}&\colhead{[erg\,s\,cm$^{-2}$]}
1059: %}
1060: %\startdata
1061: % Hn~2 & 3.5$\pm$0.7 & 2.2$\pm$0.7 & & \\
1062: % CHXR~15 & 2.1$\pm$0.8 & 1.3$\pm$0.6 & & \\
1063: % Cha~H$\alpha$~1 & & & 4.7$\pm$0.7 & \\
1064: % Cha~H$\alpha$~9 & & & 2.9$\pm$0.7 & \\
1065: % Cha~H$\alpha$~2 & & & 7.3$\pm$0.9 & 4.6$\pm$1.1 \\
1066: % ISO~138 & & & 2.5$\pm$0.7 & \\
1067: % ISO~147 & & & 3.4$\pm$0. 5& \\
1068: % T37 & & & 3.2$\pm$0.7 & \\
1069: % ISO~165 & & & 1.9$\pm$0.6 & \\
1070: % ISO~252 & & & 1.1$\pm$0.5 & \\
1071: %\enddata
1072: %\tablecomments{The wavelengths for the H$_2$~S(3), H$_2$~S(2), \ctht{}, and HCN lines are
1073: %9.67, 12.28, 13.71, and 14.04\,\micron{} respectively. The 1$\sigma$ errors on the detections are
1074: %calculated from the RMS of the observations minus model fit and the uncertainties at the wavelengths close to the peak of the emission (see Sect.~\ref{S:results} for more details). Empty fields indicate non--detections.}
1075: %\tablenotetext{a}{}
1076: %% You can append references to a table using the \tablerefs command.
1077: %\tablerefs{}
1078: %\end{deluxetable}
1079:
1080:
1081: %\begin{deluxetable}{l ccc}
1082: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1083: %\tablecaption{\ctht{} and HCN detections}
1084: %\tablewidth{0pt}
1085: %\tablehead{
1086: %\colhead{Source}&\colhead{\ctht}&\colhead{HCN}&\colhead{Comments}& \\
1087: % &\colhead{13.72\micron}&\colhead{14.04\micron}&\colhead{}
1088: %}
1089: %\startdata
1090: %Hn~2 &? & & 13.9? \\
1091: %CHXR~15 & & & \\
1092: %ESO-H$\alpha$559 & & & \\
1093: %ISO~79 &\checkmark& ?& \\
1094: %CHSM~9484 & & & \\
1095: %Cha~H$\alpha$~1 &\checkmark&\checkmark& \\
1096: %Cha~H$\alpha$~9 &\checkmark& & \\
1097: %Cha~H$\alpha$~2 &\checkmark&\checkmark& \\
1098: %ISO~138 &\checkmark& & \\
1099: %Cha~23943 & & & \\
1100: %ISO~147 &\checkmark& & \\
1101: %Cha~H$\alpha$~6 & & & \\
1102: %Cha~9086 & & & \\
1103: %T37 &\checkmark& & 13.9 \\
1104: %ISO~165 &\checkmark& & \\
1105: %ISO~217 & & & \\
1106: %ISO~252 &\checkmark& & \\
1107: %Hn~13 &\checkmark& ?& \\
1108: %Cha~21330 & & & \\
1109: %\enddata
1110: %\end{deluxetable}
1111:
1112:
1113: %\begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}
1114: %\tablewidth{0pt}
1115: %\tabletypesize{\tiny}
1116: %\tablecaption{Literature Data for Program Stars}
1117: %\tablehead{
1118: %\colhead{Source} & \colhead{?} &
1119: %\colhead{\hi(6-5)} & \colhead{\hi(7-6)}& \colhead{[\neii]}&
1120: %\colhead{\ctht} & \colhead{HCN} & \colhead{bumpHI-NeII} \\
1121: %\colhead{ } & \colhead{6.5\micron}&
1122: %\colhead{7.46\micron}& \colhead{12.37\micron}&\colhead{12.81\micron}&
1123: %\colhead{13.72\micron}& \colhead{14.0\micron} \colhead{12um}
1124: %}
1125: %\startdata
1126: % AA~Tau & & & & & & \checkmark &\\
1127: % BP~Tau & & & & & & \checkmark &\checkmark \\
1128: % CI~Tau &\checkmark & & & & & &\\
1129: % CW~Tau &\checkmark & & & & & &\checkmark \\
1130: % CX~Tau & & & & &\checkmark & &\\
1131: % CY~Tau &\checkmark &\checkmark & & &\checkmark & & \\
1132: % DE~Tau & & & & & & &\\
1133: % DH~Tau & & & & & & &double peak at 6.5um \\
1134: % DL~Tau & & & & &\checkmark &\checkmark& \\
1135: % DM~Tau & & & & & & &\\
1136: % DN~Tau & & & & &\checkmark &\checkmark &\\
1137: % DO~Tau &\checkmark & & & & & &\\
1138: % DP~Tau & & & & & & & \\
1139: % DS~Tau & & & & & &\checkmark& \\
1140: % FM~Tau & & & & & & &\\
1141: % FN~Tau & & & & & & &\\
1142: % FZ~Tau & & & & & & &?\\
1143: % GI~Tau &\checkmark & & & & & &\\
1144: % GK~Tau & & & & & & \\
1145: % GM~Aur & & & &\checkmark & & &\\
1146: % IP~Tau & & & & & & &\\
1147: % IQ~Tau &\checkmark & & & & &\checkmark& \\
1148: % LkCa~15& & & & & & &\\
1149: %\hline
1150: % CoKu~Tau3 & & &\checkmark & &\checkmark &\checkmark &\\
1151: % CZ~Tau & & & & & & & \\
1152: % DD~Tau &\checkmark & & & & & &\checkmark\\
1153: % DF~Tau &\checkmark & & & &\checkmark &\checkmark &\checkmark\\
1154: % DK~Tau & & & & & & &\checkmark \\
1155: % FO~Tau & & & & & & &\\
1156: % FS~Tau & & & &\checkmark & &\checkmark? & \\
1157: % FV~Tau & & & & & & &\\
1158: % FX~Tau & & & & & & &\\
1159: % GG~Tau & & & & & & &\\
1160: % GH~Tau & & & & & & &\checkmark \\
1161: % GN~Tau &\checkmark & & & & & &\checkmark \\
1162: % HK~Tau & & & & & & &something\\
1163: % HN~Tau &\checkmark & & & & & \\
1164: % IS~Tau & & & & &\checkmark &\checkmark &\checkmark\\
1165: % IT~Tau &\checkmark & & & & & &\\
1166: % RW~Aur &\checkmark & & & & & \\
1167: % UY~Aur & & & & & & &\\
1168: % V710~Tau & & & & &\checkmark &\checkmark& \\
1169: % V807~Tau & & & & & & &\\
1170: % V955~Tau & & & & & & &\checkmark\\
1171: %\enddata
1172: %\tablenotetext{a}{}
1173: %% You can append references to a table using the \tablerefs command.
1174: %\tablerefs{}
1175: %\end{deluxetable}
1176:
1177:
1178: %\begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
1179: %\tablewidth{0pt}
1180: %\tabletypesize{\tiny}
1181: %\tablecaption{\ctht{} and HCN detections}
1182: %\tablehead{
1183: %\colhead{Source} & \colhead{\ctht} & \colhead{HCN} & \colhead{Comments} \\
1184: %\colhead{ } & \colhead{13.72\micron}& \colhead{14.0\micron} \colhead{ }
1185: %}
1186: %\startdata
1187: % AA~Tau & &\checkmark & \\
1188: % BP~Tau & &\checkmark & \\
1189: % CI~Tau & & & \\
1190: % CW~Tau & & ? & \\
1191: % CX~Tau & & ? & \\
1192: % CY~Tau &\checkmark& & \\
1193: % DE~Tau & & & \\
1194: % DH~Tau & & & \\
1195: % DL~Tau &\checkmark &\checkmark & \\
1196: % DM~Tau & & & \\
1197: % DN~Tau &\checkmark &\checkmark & \\
1198: % DO~Tau & & & \\
1199: % DP~Tau & & & \\
1200: % DS~Tau & &\checkmark & \\
1201: % FM~Tau & & & \\
1202: % FN~Tau & & & \\
1203: % FZ~Tau & &\checkmark & 13.45? \\
1204: % GI~Tau & ? &\checkmark & huge errorbars\\
1205: % GK~Tau & & & \\
1206: % GM~Aur & & & \\
1207: % IP~Tau & & & 13.8?\\
1208: % IQ~Tau & &\checkmark & \\
1209: % LkCa~15& & & \\
1210: %\hline
1211: % CoKu~Tau3 &\checkmark &\checkmark & \\
1212: % CZ~Tau & & & \\
1213: % DD~Tau & &\checkmark & \\
1214: % DF~Tau &\checkmark &\checkmark & \\
1215: % DK~Tau & & & \\
1216: % FO~Tau & & & 13.8?\\
1217: % FS~Tau & &\checkmark & \\
1218: % FV~Tau &\checkmark &\checkmark & \\
1219: % FX~Tau & ? & & \\
1220: % GG~Tau & & & 13.8?\\
1221: % GH~Tau & &\checkmark & 13.8?\\
1222: % GN~Tau & & ? & 13.5 \\
1223: % HK~Tau & & & \\
1224: % HN~Tau & & & \\
1225: % IS~Tau &\checkmark &\checkmark & \\
1226: % IT~Tau &\checkmark &\checkmark & \\
1227: % RW~Aur & &\checkmark & \\
1228: % UY~Aur & &\checkmark & \\
1229: % V710~Tau &\checkmark &\checkmark & \\
1230: % V807~Tau & & & \\
1231: % V955~Tau & ? & \checkmark & \\
1232: %\enddata
1233: %\tablenotetext{a}{}
1234: %% You can append references to a table using the \tablerefs command.
1235: %\tablerefs{}
1236: %\end{deluxetable}
1237:
1238: %% Tables may also be prepared as separate files. See the accompanying
1239: %% sample file table.tex for an example of an external table file.
1240: %% To include an external file in your main document, use the \input
1241: %% command. Uncomment the line below to include table.tex in this
1242: %% sample file. (Note that you will need to comment out the \documentclass,
1243: %% \begin{document}, and \end{document} commands from table.tex if you want
1244: %% to include it in this document.)
1245:
1246: %% \input{table}
1247:
1248: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
1249: %% that appears after it.
1250:
1251: \end{document}
1252:
1253: %%
1254: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
1255: