1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \documentclass{emulateapj}
3: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
4: %\usepackage{psfig}
5:
6: \shorttitle{A Bipolar Molecular Outflow from a Young Brown Dwarf}
7: \shortauthors{Phan-Bao et al.}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10:
11: \title{First Confirmed Detection of a Bipolar Molecular Outflow from a Young Brown Dwarf}
12:
13: \author{Ngoc Phan-Bao,\altaffilmark{1}
14: Basmah Riaz,\altaffilmark{2}
15: Chin-Fei Lee,\altaffilmark{1}
16: Ya-Wen Tang,\altaffilmark{1}
17: Paul T.P. Ho,\altaffilmark{1,3}
18: Eduardo L. Mart\'{\i}n,\altaffilmark{2,4}
19: Jeremy Lim,\altaffilmark{1}
20: Nagayoshi Ohashi,\altaffilmark{1}
21: Hsien Shang\altaffilmark{1}}
22: \altaffiltext{1}{Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, P.O. Box 23-141,
23: Taipei 106, Taiwan, ROC; pbngoc@asiaa.sinica.edu.tw}
24: \altaffiltext{2}{Instituto de Astrof\'{\i}sica de Canarias,
25: C/ V\'{\i}a L\'actea s/n, E-38200 La Laguna (Tenerife), Spain.}
26: \altaffiltext{3}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA}
27: \altaffiltext{4}{University of Central Florida, Dept. of Physics,
28: PO Box 162385, Orlando, FL 32816-2385}
29:
30: \begin{abstract}
31: Studying the earliest stages in the birth of stars is crucial
32: for understanding how they form.
33: Brown dwarfs with masses between that of stars and planets
34: are not massive
35: enough to maintain stable hydrogen-burning fusion reactions during most
36: of their lifetime.
37: Their origins are subject to much debate in recent literature because their
38: masses are far below the typical mass where core collapse is expected to occur.
39: We present the first confirmed evidence that brown dwarfs undergo a phase of molecular
40: outflow that is typical of young stars. Using the Submillimeter Array,
41: we have obtained a map of a bipolar molecular outflow from
42: a young brown dwarf.
43: We estimate an outflow mass of $1.6 \times 10^{-4} M_{\odot}$ and a mass-loss rate of
44: $1.4 \times 10^{-9} M_{\odot}$. These values are over two orders of magnitude
45: smaller than the typical ones for T Tauri stars.
46: From our millimiter continuum data and our own analysis of Spitzer infrared
47: photometry, we estimate that the brown dwarf has a disk with a mass
48: of $8 \times 10^{-3} M_{\odot}$ and an outer disk radius of 80 AU.
49: Our results demonstrate that the bipolar
50: molecular outflow operates down to planetary masses, occurring in
51: brown dwarfs as a scaled-down version of the universal process seen in young stars.
52: \end{abstract}
53:
54: \keywords{ISM: jets and outflows --- ISM: individual (ISO-Oph 102, [GY92] 204) ---
55: stars: formation --- stars: low mass, brown dwarfs --- technique: interferometric}
56:
57: \section{Introduction}
58: %
59: Star formation starts with collapse, accretion and launching of material
60: as a bipolar outflow \citep{lada}.
61: It is thought that brown dwarfs could
62: undergo the same stages of formation as stars and that they have a common
63: origin \citep{luhman07}.
64: However the typical masses of brown dwarfs, 15--75~$M_{\rm J}$,
65: are far below
66: the typical Jeans mass in molecular clouds, and hence it is difficult to make a large
67: number of them by direct gravitational collapse. Several brown dwarf formation
68: mechanisms have been proposed (see \citealt{whitworth}
69: and references therein), and more observations are needed to
70: improve our understanding of the role of each of them.
71:
72: Recent observational evidences for accretion, and optical jets
73: have been found in
74: young brown dwarfs \citep{martin01,fer01,jay,whelan07}.
75: However there is no firm evidence up to now to demonstrate that the brown dwarf formation
76: involves the bipolar molecular outflow process
77: as seen in young stars.
78: In the case of low-mass stars,
79: the molecular outflow plays a vital role
80: \citep{ba92,ba96,rei01,mckee}
81: to testing the low-mass star formation theory \citep{shu91,masson,raga,pudritz}.
82: Therefore, the detection of molecular outflows provides a key piece of
83: information on the earliest phase of the brown dwarf formation and allows us
84: to constrain the low-mass star formation theory in the sub-stellar domain.
85:
In this Letter, we present millimeter observations
86: of the young brown dwarf ISO-Oph~102 in the $\rho$ Ophiuchi dark cloud.
87: We detect a
88: bipolar molecular outflow from the brown dwarf, demonstrating that this outflow mechanism
89: as seen in young stars continues to operate down to the masses of brown dwarfs.
90: We show that the outflow mass is much smaller than typical values found
91: in low-mass stars by two to three orders of magnitude.
92: We also combine our radio data with infrared data to estimate disk parameters.
93: The infrared spectrum of ISO-Oph~102
94: shows strong crystalline silicate features. This demonstrates
95: dust processing in the protoplanetary disk \citep{apai} of the brown dwarf.
96: The coexistence of the molecular outflow with the crystallization of dust grains
97: could be of importance for models of planet formation.
98:
99: Sec.~2 presents the millimeter observations and the data reduction,
100: Sec.~3. discusses the physical properties of the bipolar molecular outflow,
101: the disk parameters, and the crystalline silicate features in
102: ISO-Oph~102, Sec.~4 summarizes our results.
103: %
104: \section{Observations and data reduction}
105: %
106: ISO-Oph~102 (or [GY92]~204), a young M6 dwarf
107: initially identified by \citet{greene}, is
108: located in the $\rho$ Ophiuchi dark cloud at a distance of
109: 125~parsecs \citep{degeus89}.
110: Its estimated mass is 60~$M_{\rm J}$ \citep{natta02}.
111: This value is below the Hydrogen-burning limit and in good agreement
112: with the dynamically measured mass one of an M6.5 dwarf of 55~$M_{\rm J}$ at the same age
113: (see \citealt{stassun}). ISO-Oph~102 is therefore a young
114: bona-fide brown dwarf.
115: The presence of the Lithium absorption in its optical spectrum \citep{natta04}
116: supports its brown dwarf nature \citep{martin94}.
117: Strong evidences for the presence of an accretion disk
118: have been reported \citep{natta04}. The blue-shifted optical jet
119: component was discovered by \citet{whelan05}.
120: The optical visibility of $\rho$~Oph~102 suggests that the source
121: corresponds to a class II object \citep{lada} in the star formation phase,
122: a class with an accreting circumstellar
123: disk and the protostar at this stage is the so-called
124: classical T Tauri star.
125:
126: We have observed ISO-Oph~102 with the receiver band at 230~GHz of the SMA\footnote{
127: The Submillimeter Array is a joint project between the
128: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and
129: the Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics
130: and is funded by the Smithsonian Institution and the Academia Sinica.} \citep{ho}.
131: Both 2 GHz-wide sidebands which are separated
132: by 10 GHz were used. The SMA correlator was configured with high spectral
133: resolution bands of 512 channels per chunk of 104~MHz for $^{12}$CO, $^{13}$CO,
134: and C$^{18}$O $J=2 \rightarrow 1$ lines, giving a channel spacing of 0.27~km~s$^{-1}$.
135: A lower resolution of 3.25~MHz per channel was set up for the remainder of
136: each sideband. The quasars 1625$-$254 and 3C~279 have been observed for gain
137: and passband calibration, respectively. Mars were used for
138: flux calibration. The data were calibrated using the MIR software package
139: and further analysis was carried out with the MIRIAD package adapted
140: for the SMA.
141: The compact configuration was used, resulting a synthesized beam of
142: 3$''$.60~$\times$~2$''$.43 with a position angle of 8.5$^{\circ}$.
143: The rms (root mean square) sensitivity was about 3~mJy for the continuum,
144: using both sidebands and $\sim$0.2~Jy~beam$^{-1}$ per channel for
145: the line data. The primary FWHM (full width at half maximum)
146: beam is about 55$''$~at the observed frequencies.
147: The integrated flux density from the dust continuum emission was 7$\pm$3~mJy
148: measured at the brown dwarf position.
149: %
150: \section{Discussion}
151: %
152: An overlay of a near-infrared image and
153: the integrated intensity in the carbon monoxide (CO $J=2-1$) line
154: emission is shown in Figure 1.
155: Two spatially resolved blue- and red-shifted
156: CO components are symmetrically displaced
157: on opposite sides of the brown dwarf position, with
158: the size of each lobe of about 8$''$ corresponding
159: to 1000~AU in length.
160: This is similar to the typical pattern of bipolar molecular outflows
161: as seen in young stars \citep{lada}.
162: The two outflow components with a wide range of velocity (Figure 2)
163: suggests a bow shock structure, an effect of the interaction
164: between the jet propagation and the ambient material, which appears very similar
165: to the bow shock phenomena as seen in young stars \citep{lee}.
166: Such a CO outflow morphology suggests that
167: the jet-driven bow shock model (e.g., \citealt{masson}) may be at work in $\rho$~Oph~102.
168:
169: Following the standard manner \citep{cabrit,andre}, we calculate the
170: outflow properties. We use a value of 35~K \citep{loren}
171: for the excitation temperature, and we derive a lower limit to
172: the outflow mass of $3.2 \times 10^{-5} M_{\odot}$. If we correct for optical depth
173: with a typical value of 5 \citep{l88a}, we obtain an upper limit
174: to the outflow mass of $1.6 \times 10^{-4} M_{\odot}$. This
175: value is smaller than the ones observed in young stars \citep{l88b}
176: by three orders of magnitude.
177:
178: To estimate the outflow inclination, we combine our SMA data with archival
179: infrared data of the Spitzer Space Telescope.
180: For the infrared photometry, we use the archival basic calibrated data (PIDs: 58, 177)
181: that were reduced with IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the
182: National Optical Astronomy Observatories,
183: which are operated by the Association of Universities for Research
184: in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National
185: Science Foundation.}
186: to measure flux densities.
187: Disk modeling is performed
188: as the previous works (see \citealt{riaz} and references therein).
189: The circumstellar geometry consists of a rotationally flattened infalling envelope,
190: bipolar cavities,
191: and a flared accretion disk in hydrostatic equilibrium.
192: The disk density is proportional to $\varpi^{-\alpha}$,
193: where $\varpi$ is the radial coordinate in the disk midplane,
194: and $\alpha$ is the radial density exponent.
195: The disk scale height increases with radius, $h=h_{0}(\varpi / R_{*})^{\beta}$,
196: where $h_{0}$ is the scale height at $R_{*}$ (the brown dwarf radius)
197: and $\beta$ is the flaring power.
198: Stellar parameters are obtained from \citet{natta04},
199: and an accretion rate of $10^{-9} M_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$ is used.
200: The NextGen \citep{haus} atmosphere file for an effective temperature
201: $T_{eff}$ of 2700~K,
202: and log {\it g} = 3.5, where $g$ is the surface gravity,
203: is used to fit the atmosphere spectrum of the central sub-stellar source.
204: The disk shows some flaring longward of $\sim$10 $\mu$m,
205: and the best model-fit was obtained using a disk mass of $8 \times 10^{-3} M_{\odot}$,
206: an inclination angle between 63$^{\circ}$ and 66$^{\circ}$,
207: an outer disk radius of 80 AU, and an inner disk radius equal to $R_{\rm sub}$, where $R_{\rm sub}$
208: is the dust sublimation radius: 1~$R_{\rm sub}$$\sim 6.8~R_{\odot}$.
209: There is thus no inner hole in the disk as it would have to be larger than $R_{\rm sub}$.
210: The outer disk radius and the disk mass are well-constrained by the millimeter observations.
211: A more face-on inclination can be ruled out as it results in larger-than-observed mid- and
212: far-infrared fluxes.
213: Figure 3 presents the best fit
214: from the disk modeling obtained using a disk mass of $8 \times 10^{-3} M_{\odot}$,
215: an inclination angle between 63$^{\circ}$ and 66$^{\circ}$,
216: an outer disk radius of 80 AU, resulting in a projected disk radius
217: of 32-36 AU.
218: This immediately explains the non-detection of the red-shifted optical jet component,
219: estimated to be about 15~AU in length as reported
220: in the previous observation \citep{whelan05}. Since the projected disk radius is larger
221: than the jet length, the disk therefore hides the red-shifted jet component
222: from our view.
223:
224: We use the observed maximum flow velocity of 2.2 km~s$^{-1}$ and apply
225: a correction for the outflow inclination to compute upper limit
226: values for the kinematic and
227: dynamic parameters.
228: We find that the momentum is $P=1.4 \times 10^{-4}$$M_{\odot}$~km~s$^{-1}$,
229: the energy is $E=3.1 \times 10^{-4}$$M_{\odot}$~km$^{2}$~s$^{-2}$,
230: the force is $F=5.9 \times 10^{-8}$$M_{\odot}$~km~s$^{-1}$~yr$^{-1}$,
231: and the mechanical luminosity is $L=2.1 \times 10^{-5}$~L$_{\odot}$, where L$_{\odot}$
232: is the solar luminosity. A correction for the optical depth factor of 5 and
233: a missing flux factor of 3 for SMA \citep{bourke} will increase these upper limit values
234: by a factor of 15.
235: Using the lower value of the outflow mass and
236: a correction factor of 10 applied for the outflow duration time \citep{parker},
237: we derive the outflow mass-loss rate of
238: $1.4 \times 10^{-9}$$M_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$, which is smaller
239: than a typical value for T Tauri stars \citep{lada} by two orders of magnitude.
240: One should note that
241: these values are roughly estimated, depending on the correction factor values
242: used in the calculation.
243: One should also note that the outflow mass and the mass loss rate values from ISO-Oph 102 appear
244: similar to that from L1014-IRS \citep{bourke}, suggesting that they share
245: the same origin. However as clearly stated in \citet{huard} L1014-IRS could be an embedded
246: protostar or a proto-brown dwarf, corresponding to the earliest stages of star
247: or brown dwarf formation processes, respectively.
248: More observations are needed to confirm the L1014-IRS nature and
249: study the connection between ISO-Oph 102 and L1014-IRS
250: in the whole formation phase.
251:
252: We also examine the possibility that the emission might be due to bound motions
253: and not outflow emission. This would require
254: an interior mass \citep{lada} of 2.7$M_{\odot}$ for an outflow size of
255: 1000~AU with a velocity of 2.2~km~s$^{-1}$, which is significant larger
256: than the core mass of $< 0.4$~$M_{\odot}$ within the same radius \citep{motte,young}.
257: We therefore conclude that the detected emission is from the outflow.
258:
259: The IRS infrared (7.5-14.3 $\mu$m) \citep{houck}
260: spectra of ISO-Oph~102
261: whose the basic-calibrated data were downloaded from the Spitzer archive (PID: 3499)
262: and reduced using the SMART software package \citep{higdon}
263: are also analyzed. It is worthy to note here that
264: the mid-infrared spectrum of ISO-Oph~102 shows crystalline
265: silicate features: enstatite (MgSiO$_{3}$) at 9.3~$\mu$m and very strong
266: forsterite (Mg$_{2}$SiO$_{4}$) at 11.3~$\mu$m (see Figure 4). The brown dwarf is indeed
267: an analog of SST-Lup3-1, which is an M5.5 brown dwarf in the Lupus III dark cloud \citep{merin}.
268: The crystalline contribution to the silicate feature (flux at 11.3 $\mu$m
269: over flux at 9.8 $\mu$m) in ISO-Oph~102 is 1.1, even greater than
270: the value of 0.9 in SST-Lup3-1 \citep{merin}.
271: This provides a direct evidence of grain growth and dust settling,
272: indicating the object is in the transition phase between
273: the class II and III (a class with an optically thin disk) and the brown
274: dwarf is reaching the final mass.
275:
276: %
277: \section{Summary}
278: %
279: Here, we report the first confirmed detection of the bipolar molecular outflow
280: in young brown dwarfs. We characterize the fundamental properties
281: of the outflow with the first insight on its morphology.
282: The results indicate that the bipolar molecular outflow in brown dwarfs is very similar
283: to outflows as seen in young stars but scaled down by three and two
284: orders of magnitude for the outflow mass and the mass-loss rate, respectively.
285: We demonstrate for the first time that brown dwarfs,
286: even young planetary mass
287: objects \citep{martin01} can launch a
288: bipolar molecular outflow, and hence we confirm that they are likely to have
289: a common origin with the low-mass stars.
290: This suggests that the terminal stellar/brown dwarf mass
291: is not due to different formation mechanisms,
292: but more likely due to the initial mass of the cloud core.
293: We also show that there is evidence
294: for dust crystallization in the disk around the brown dwarf.
295: In brown dwarfs the molecular outflows may be longer lived than in low-mass
296: stars and they coexist with grain growth and crystallization.
297: Outflows from brown dwarfs may play a crucial role in sweeping out gas from
298: the disk and favouring the formation of rocky planets.
299:
300: \acknowledgments
301: NP-B has been aided in this work by a Henri Chr\'etien International Research Grant administered
302: by the American Astronomical Society.
303: This work is based in part on observations made with the Spitzer
304: Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
305: California Institute of Technology, under a contract with NASA.
306: This work has made use of the Centre de Donn\'ees astronomiques de Strasbourg (CDS)
307: database.
308:
309: \begin{thebibliography}{}
310:
311: \bibitem[Andr\'e et al.(1990)]{andre}
312: Andr\'e, P., Mart\'{\i}n-Pintado, J., Despois, D., Montmerle, T. 1990, A\&A, 236, 180
313:
314: \bibitem[Apai et al.(2005)]{apai}
315: Apai, D., Pascucci, I., Bouwman, J., Natta, A.,
316: Henning, T., Dullemond, C. P. 2005, Science, 310, 834
317:
318: \bibitem[Bachiller \& G\'omez-Gonz\'alez(1992)]{ba92}
319: Bachiller, R., \& G\'omez-Gonz\'alez, J. 1992, ARA\&A, 3, 257
320:
321: \bibitem[Bachiller(1996)]{ba96}
322: Bachiller, R. 1996, ARA\&A, 34, 111
323:
324: \bibitem[Bourke et al.(2005)]{bourke}
325: Bourke, T. L., Crapsi, A., Myers, P. C., Evans, Neal J., II,
326: Wilner, D. J., Huard, T. L., J{\o}rgensen, J. K., \& Young, C. H. 2005, \apj, 633, L129
327:
328: \bibitem[Cabrit \& Bertout(1990)]{cabrit}
329: Cabrit, S., \& Bertout, C. 1990, 348, 530
330:
331: \bibitem[de Geus et al.(1989)]{degeus89}
332: de Geus, E. J., de Zeeuw, P. T., \& Lub, J. 1989, A\&A, 216, 44
333:
334: \bibitem[Fern\'andez \& Comer\'on(2001)]{fer01}
335: Fern\'andez, M., \& Comer\'on, F. 2001, A\&A, 380, 264
336:
337: \bibitem[Fern\'andez \& Comer\'on(2005)]{fer05}
338: Fern\'andez, M., \& Comer\'on, F. 2005, A\&A, 440, 1119
339:
340: \bibitem[Greene \& Young(1992)]{greene}
341: Greene, T.P., \& Young, E. T. 1992, \apj, 395, 516
342:
343: \bibitem[Hauschildt et al.(1999)]{haus}
344: Hauschildt, P. H., Allard, F., Barron, E. 1999, \apj, 512, 377
345:
346: \bibitem[Higdon et al.(2004)]{higdon}
347: Higdon, S. J. U., et al. 2004, PASP, 116, 975
348:
349: \bibitem[Ho et al.(2004)]{ho}
350: Ho, P. T. P., Moran, J. M., \& Lo, K. Y. 2004, \apj, 616, L1
351:
352: \bibitem[Houck et al.(2004)]{houck}
353: Houck, J. R., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 18
354:
355: \bibitem[Huard et al.(2006)]{huard}
356: Huard, T. L., et al. 2006, \apj, 640, 391
357:
358: \bibitem[Jayawardhana et al.(2003)]{jay}
359: Jayawardhana, R., Mohanty, S., \& Basri, G. 2003, \apj, 592, 282
360:
361: \bibitem[Lada(1985)]{lada}
362: Lada, C. J. 1985, ARA\&A, 23, 267
363:
364: \bibitem[Lee et al.(2000)]{lee}
365: Lee, C.-F., Mundy, L. G., Reipurth, B., Ostriker, E. C., \& Stone, J. M. 2000, ApJ, 542, 925
366:
367: \bibitem[Levreault(1988a)]{l88a}
368: Levreault, R. M. 1988a, ApJS, 67, 283
369:
370: \bibitem[Levreault(1988b)]{l88b}
371: Levreault, R. M. 1988b, ApJ, 330, 897
372:
373: \bibitem[Loren et al.(1983)]{loren}
374: Loren, R. B., Sandqvist, A., \& Wootten, A. 1983, A\&A, 270, 620
375:
376: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2007)]{luhman07}
377: Luhman, K. L., Joergens, V., Lada, C., Muzerolle, J., Pascucci, I., \& White, R. 2007,
378: in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, \& K. Keil
379: (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 443
380:
381: \bibitem[Mart\'{\i}n et al.(2001)]{martin01}
382: Mart\'{\i}n, E.L., Dougados, C., Magnier, E., M\'enard, F., Magazz\`u, A.,
383: Cuillandre, J.-C., Delfosse, X. 2001, \apj, 561, L195
384:
385: \bibitem[Mart\'{\i}n et al.(1994)]{martin94}
386: Mart\'{\i}n, E. L., Rebolo, R., \& Magazz\`u, A. 1994, \apj, 436, 262
387:
388: \bibitem[Masson \& Chernin(1993)]{masson}
389: Masson, C. R., Chernin, L. M. 1993, \apj, 414, 230
390:
391: \bibitem[McKee \& Ostriker(2007)]{mckee}
392: McKee, C. F., \& Ostriker, E. C. 2007, ARA\&A, 45, 565
393:
394: \bibitem[Mer\'{\i}n et al.(2007)]{merin}
395: Mer\'{\i}n, B., et al. 2007, \apj, 661, 361
396:
397: \bibitem[Motte et al.(1998)]{motte}
398: Motte, F., Andr\'e, P., \& Neri, R. 1998, A\&A, 336, 150
399:
400: \bibitem[Natta et al.(2002)]{natta02}
401: Natta, A., Testi, L., Comer\'on, F.,
402: Oliva, E., D'Antona, F., Baffa, C., Comoretto, G., Gennari, S. 2002, A\&A, 393, 597
403:
404: \bibitem[Natta et al.(2004)]{natta04}
405: Natta, A., Testi, L., Muzerolle, J., Randich, S., Comer\'on, F., Persi, P. 2004, A\&A, 424, 603
406:
407: \bibitem[Parker et al.(1991)]{parker}
408: Parker, N. D., Padman, R., Scott, P. F. 1991, MNRAS, 252, 442
409:
410: \bibitem[Pudritz et al.(2007)]{pudritz}
411: Pudritz, R. E., Ouyed, R., Fendt, Ch., Brandenburg, A. 2007,
412: in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, \& K. Keil
413: (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 277
414:
415: \bibitem[Raga \& Cabrit(1993)]{raga}
416: Raga, A. C., \& Cabrit, S. 1993, A\&A, 278, 267
417:
418: \bibitem[Reipurth \& Bally(2001)]{rei01}
419: Reipurth, B., \& Bally, J. 2001, ARA\&A, 39, 403
420:
421: \bibitem[Riaz \& Gizis(2008)]{riaz}
422: Riaz, B., Gizis, J. E. 2008, \apj, 681, 1584
423:
424: \bibitem[Shu et al.(1991)]{shu91}
425: Shu, F. H., Ruden, S. P., Lada, C. J., \& Lizano, S. 1991, \apj, 370, L31
426:
427: \bibitem[Stassun et al.(2005)]{stassun}
428: Stassun, K. G., Mathieu, R. D., \& Valenti, J. A. 2005, \nat, 440, 311
429:
430: \bibitem[van Boekel et al.(2003)]{van03}
431: van Boekel, R., Waters, L. B. F. M., Dominik, C., Bouwman, J.,
432: de Koter, A., Dullemond, C. P., Paresce, F. 2003, A\&A, 400, L21
433:
434: \bibitem[Whelan et al.(2005)]{whelan05}
435: Whelan, E. T., Ray, T. P., Bacciotti, F., Natta, A., Testi, L., Randich, S. 2005, \nat, 435, 652
436:
437: \bibitem[Whelan et al.(2007)]{whelan07}
438: Whelan, E. T., Ray, T. P., Randich, S., Bacciotti, F., Jayawardhana, R., Testi, L., Natta, A.,
439: Mohanty, S. 2007, \apj, 659, L45
440:
441: \bibitem[Whitworth et al.(2007)]{whitworth}
442: Whitworth, A., Bate, M. R., Nordlund, \AA., Reipurth, B., \& Zinnecker, H. 2007,
443: in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, \& K. Keil
444: (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 459
445:
446: \bibitem[Young et al.(2006)]{young}
447: Young, K. E., et al. 2006, \apj, 644, 326
448:
449: \end{thebibliography}
450:
451: \clearpage
452:
453: \begin{figure}
454: \vskip 1in
455: \hskip -0.25in
456: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=6in,angle=0]{f1.eps}}
457: \caption{\normalsize An overlay of the J-band (1.25 $\mu$m) near-infrared
458: Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) image and
459: the integrated intensity in the carbon monoxide (CO $J=2-1$) line
460: emission from 3.8 to 7.7~km~s$^{-1}$ line-of-sight velocities.
461: The blue and red contours represent the blue-shifted
462: (integrated over 3.8 and 5.9~km~s$^{-1}$) and red-shifted (integrated over 5.9 and 7.7~km~s$^{-1}$)
463: emissions, respectively.
464: The contours are 3,6,9,...times the
465: rms of 0.15~Jy~beam$^{-1}$~km~s$^{-1}$. The brown dwarf is visible in the
466: J-band image. The position angle of the outflow is about 3$^{\circ}$.
467: The peaks of the blue- and red-shifted components are symmetric to the center
468: of the brown dwarf with an offset of 10$''$. The synthesized beam is shown in the bottom
469: left corner.
470: \label{of}}
471: \end{figure}
472:
473: \clearpage
474:
475: \begin{figure}
476: \vskip 1in
477: \hskip -0.25in
478: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=5in,angle=-90]{f2.eps}}
479: \caption{\normalsize Position-Velocity (PV) cut diagram for CO~$J=2 \rightarrow 1$ emission
480: at a position angle of 3$^{\circ}$.
481: The contours are $-$12, $-$9, $-$6, $-$3, 3, 6, 9, 12,...times the
482: rms of 0.2 Jy beam$^{-1}$. The systemic velocity of the brown dwarf,
483: which is estimated by an average of the velocities
484: of red- and blue-shifted components, is indicated
485: by the dashed line. Our value of 5.9$\pm$0.27~km~s$^{-1}$ is consistent with
486: the previously measured value \citep{whelan05} of 7$\pm$8~km~s$^{-1}$
487: within the error bar.
488: Both blue- and red-shifted components shows a wide range of
489: the velocity in their structure, which appears
490: to be the bow-shock surfaces as observed in young stars \citep{lee}. These
491: surfaces are formed at the head of the jet and accelerate the material
492: in the bow-shock sideways (e.g., \citealt{masson}).
493: \label{pv}}
494: \end{figure}
495:
496: \clearpage
497:
498: \begin{figure}
499: \vskip 1in
500: \hskip -0.25in
501: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=6in,angle=0]{f3.eps}}
502: \caption{\normalsize Best fit model for ISO-Oph~102. Contributions
503: from the stellar photosphere, the disk and the scattered flux are indicated.
504: Optical and near-infrared data collected from the Vizier archive, infrared fluxes
505: from \citet{natta02} and
506: measured based on data from
507: the Spitzer archive (IRAC, MIPS, IRS),
508: millimeter data from our observations.
509: \label{sed}}
510: \end{figure}
511:
512: \clearpage
513:
514: \begin{figure}
515: \vskip 1in
516: \hskip -0.25in
517: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=5in,angle=-90]{f4.eps}}
518: \caption{\normalsize Infrared spectral comparison between ISO-Oph 102 and
519: SST-Lup3-1 \citep{merin} whose spectrum obtained from the Spitzer archival data (PID: 179).
520: Continuum subtraction was done following the literature \citep{van03,apai}.
521: The crystalline silicate features at 9.3 $\mu$m (mainly enstatite) and 11.3 $\mu$m
522: (forsterite) are indicated.
523: \label{cs}}
524: \end{figure}
525:
526: \end{document}
527:
528:
529: