1: \documentclass[useAMS,usenatbib]{mn2e}

2: %\documentclass[useAMS,usenatbib,referee]{mn2e}

3: 

4: \usepackage{natbib}

5: \usepackage{psfig}

6: \usepackage{graphicx}

7: \usepackage{amsmath}

8: \usepackage{amssymb}

9: \usepackage{color}

10: 

11: \newcommand{\kmsmpc}{{\rm\ km\ s^{-1}\ Mpc^{-1}}}

12: \newcommand{\kms}{\rm\ km\ s^{-1}}

13: \newcommand{\LCDM}{$\Lambda$CDM}

14: \newcommand{\msun}{\mbox{${\rm M}_{\odot}$}}

15: \newcommand{\mvir}{\mbox{$M_{\rm vir}$}}

16: \newcommand{\rvir}{\mbox{$r_{\rm vir}$}}

17: \newcommand{\rcool}{\mbox{$r_{\rm cool}$}}

18: \newcommand{\tcool}{\mbox{$t_{\rm cool}$}}

19: \newcommand{\vvir}{\mbox{$V_{\rm vir}$}}

20: \newcommand{\cnfw}{\mbox{$c_{\rm NFW}$}}

21: \newcommand{\mbh}{\mbox{$M_{\rm BH}$}}

22: \newcommand{\fred}{\mbox{$f_{\rm red}$}}

23: \newcommand{\fpass}{\mbox{$f_{\rm passive}$}}

24: \newcommand{\fearly}{\mbox{$f_{\rm early}$}}

25: \newcommand{\mgal}{\mbox{$M_{\rm gal}$}}

26: \newcommand{\mhalo}{\mbox{$M_{\rm halo}$}}

27: 

28: %plotting commands

29: \newcommand{\plotone}[1]

30:            {\centering \leavevmode \psfig{file=#1,width=\columnwidth,clip=}}

31: \newcommand{\plotside}[1]

32:            {\centering \leavevmode \psfig{file=#1,width=\textwidth,clip=}}

33: \newcommand{\plottwo}[2]

34:            {\centering \leavevmode \psfig{file=#1,width=\columnwidth,clip=}

35:                             \hfill \psfig{file=#2,width=\columnwidth,clip=}}

36: \newcommand{\plotfull}[1]

37:            {\centering \leavevmode \psfig{file=#1,width=\textwidth,clip=}}

38: \newcommand{\plotwhole}[1]

39:            {\centering \leavevmode

40:              \psfig{file=#1,width=\textwidth,height=8.2in,clip=}}

41: 

42: 

43: \def\lesssim{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}}

44: \def\gtrsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}}

45: 

46: \title[Quenching: internal properties and environment]

47: {The Correlation of Star Formation Quenching with Internal Galaxy Properties and Environment}

48: 

49: \author[Taysun Kimm et al.]{

50: \parbox[t]{\textwidth}{

51: Taysun Kimm$^{1}$,

52: Rachel S. Somerville$^{2,3}$, 

53: Sukyoung K. Yi$^{1}$\thanks{e-mail: yi@yonsei.ac.kr},

54: Frank C. van den Bosch$^{3}$, 

55: Samir Salim$^{4}$, 

56: Fabio Fontanot$^{3}$, 

57: Pierluigi Monaco$^{5,6}$, 

58: Houjun Mo$^{7}$,

59: Anna Pasquali$^{3}$,

60: R. M. Rich$^{8}$,

61: Xiaohu Yang$^{9}$

62: }

63: \vspace*{6pt} \\

64: $^1$ Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, Korea\\

65: $^2$ Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Dr., Baltimore, MD 21218, USA\\

66: $^3$ Max-Planck-Institut f\"{u}r Astronomie, K\"{o}nigstuhl 17, Heidelberg 

67: D-69117, Germany\\

68: $^4$ National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 950 North Cherry Ave., Tucson AZ 85719, USA\\

69: $^5$ Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit\`a di Trieste, via Tiepolo 11, I-34143 Trieste, Italy \\

70: $^6$ INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico, Via Tiepolo 11, I-34143 Trieste, Italy \\

71: $^7$ Department of Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA01003-9305, USA \\

72: $^8$ Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA\\

73: $^9$ Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, the Partner Group of MPA, Nandan Road 80, Shanghai 200030, China\\

74: \\

75: }

76: 

77: \begin{document}

78: \date{\today}

79: %\pubyear{2008}

80: \maketitle

81: \label{firstpage}

82: 

83: \begin{abstract}

84: We investigate the correlation of star formation quenching with

85: internal galaxy properties and large scale environment (halo mass) in

86: empirical data and theoretical models.  We make use of the halo-based

87: Group Catalog of Yang and collaborators, which is based on the Sloan

88: Digital Sky Survey. Data from the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX)

89: are also used to extract the recent star formation rate.  In order to

90: investigate the environmental effects, we examine the properties of

91: ``central'' and ``satellite'' galaxies separately.  For central

92: galaxies, we are unable to conclude whether star formation quenching is

93: primarily connected with halo mass or stellar mass, because these two

94: quantities are themselves strongly correlated. For satellite

95: galaxies, a nearly equally strong dependence on halo mass and stellar

96: mass is seen.  We make the same comparison for five different

97: semi-analytic models based on three independently developed codes. We

98: find that the models with AGN feedback reproduce reasonably well the

99: dependence of the fraction of central red and passive galaxies on halo

100: mass and stellar mass.  However, for satellite galaxies, the same

101: models badly overproduce the fraction of red/passive galaxies and do

102: not reproduce the empirical trends with stellar mass or halo mass.

103: This {\em satellite overquenching problem} is caused by

104: the too-rapid stripping of the satellites' hot gas halos, which leads

105: to rapid strangulation of star formation.

106: \end{abstract}

107: 

108: \section{Introduction}

109: \label{sec:intro}

110: 

111: Galaxies may be broadly divided into two categories: those that are

112: forming stars fairly rapidly relative to their past averaged star

113: formation rate (SFR), and those that show little recent star formation

114: relative to their past average. It is well known that, at least at low

115: redshift ($z\lesssim 1$), the former type tend to have blue colours

116: and to be morphologically disk dominated, while the latter tend to

117: have red colours and to be morphologically early type or spheroid

118: dominated. Galaxies exhibit colour bimodalities throughout a wide

119: range of cosmic history

120: \citep{strateva01,bell04,baldry04,balogh04,blanton05b}.  One of the

121: fundamental questions in galaxy formation is: what are the main

122: physical forces that regulate and in some cases quench star formation?

123: Are these processes more closely correlated with {\em internal galaxy

124: properties} such as mass or luminosity, or {\em large scale

125: environment} (sometimes referred to as ``Nature or Nurture'')?

126: 

127: There have been many studies on the impact of environment on galaxy

128: properties. For example, \citet{davis76} and many

129: others found that early-type galaxies are more strongly clustered

130: than the late-types, and \citet{dressler80} systematically

131: demonstrated that the fraction of elliptical and S0 galaxies is

132: higher in denser environments. Similarly, it is well known that

133: galaxies in dense environments tend to be red and to have depressed

134: star formation rates \citep{hashimoto98,lewis02,gomez03,tanaka04,balogh04,

135: kauffmann04,christ05,poggianti06}.  There are several physical

136: processes associated with environment that may play a role in galaxy

137: transformation. Major (near equal-mass) mergers can transform spiral

138: galaxies into ellipticals (\citealt{toomre72}; cf.

139: \citealt{barnes02}), and may also quench future star formation by

140: ejecting the ISM from the galaxy via starburst, AGN, or shock-driven

141: winds \citep{cox04,springel05,murray05}. In rich clusters, where the

142: probability of merging is suppressed because of the large relative

143: velocities of galaxies, galaxy ``harrassment'' (rapid encounters or

144: fly-bys) may cause a less dramatic form of transformation by heating

145: disks, perhaps causing the formation of a bar and growth of a

146: spheroidal component \citep{moore98}.  Also, cold gas can be stripped

147: out of the galaxy both by tidal forces due to the background dark

148: matter dominated potential of the cluster, and due to ram pressure

149: stripping by the intracluster medium \citep{gunn72,abadi99,

150:   quilis00,chung07}. Similarly, the hot halo that provides future fuel

151: for cooling and star formation may be efficiently stripped in dense

152: environments, thus quenching further star formation by ``starvation''

153: or ``strangulation'' \citep{larson80,balogh00,bekki02}. 

154: 

155: However, studies by \citet{vdb08a} and \citet{tanaka04} 

156: suggest that processes specific to clusters

157: (e.g. ram-pressure stripping) are not the main mechanisms for

158: quenching star-formation activity. Similar results were also found

159: at higher redshift \citep[e.g.,][]{cooper06}.  Moreover, both the

160: morphological and spectrophotometric characteristics of galaxies are

161: also known to be strongly correlated with their internal properties,

162: such as luminosity, mass, and internal velocity

163: \citep{roberts94,kauffmann03}.  More massive or luminous galaxies are

164: more likely to be spheroid dominated, to be red, and to have old

165: stellar populations and little recent star formation. Indeed,

166: \citet{kauffmann03} showed that galaxies appear to make a transition

167: in all of these properties above a critical stellar mass of $\sim 3

168: \times 10^{10} M_{\odot}$.

169: 

170: Again, there are various physical processes that one might expect to

171: imprint this kind of dependence on internal properties. Supernova

172: feedback has long been invoked as a mechanism that could heat and

173: drive gas out of galaxies \citep{larson74,dekel86}, and is

174: expected to be more effective in low-mass galaxies. There is also

175: mounting observational evidence that AGN are associated with the

176: quenching of star formation \citep{schawinski06,schawinski07,salim07}. 

177: AGN feedback is expected to have more impact on massive galaxies,

178: which host larger mass black holes \citep[e.g.][]{silk98}.

179: 

180: The emerging picture is that AGN seem to have two modes of fueling and

181: also to couple to their surroundings in different ways. ``Bright

182: mode'' AGN are associated with high (near Eddington) fueling rates,

183: and observationally with classical X-ray or optically bright

184: quasars. The radiation emitted by these objects can couple with the

185: cold gas in the galaxy, perhaps driving powerful winds that can drive

186: the gas out of the galaxy and quench star formation

187: \citep{murray05,dimatteo05,monaco05}.

188: 

189: In contrast, many massive galaxies seem to contain AGN which are

190: accreting at a small fraction of their Eddington rate, and which

191: typically do not show classical quasar-like signatures such as bright

192: X-ray radiation or broad emission lines. However, these objects are

193: associated with the efficient production of radio jets, which may be

194: able to couple to and heat the hot gas in the galaxy's halo

195: \citep[e.g.][]{mcnamara07}. These objects are often referred to as

196: ``radio mode'' AGN \citep{croton06}. 

197: This process is expected to be a function both of

198: internal properties and environment: the bigger the black hole, the

199: more energy can be tapped (and black hole mass is of course correlated with

200: galaxy mass), and empirically it is known that the fraction of

201: radio-detected galaxies increases strongly with stellar mass \citep{best05} 

202: and halo mass \citep{pasquali08}. 

203: But as well, the radio jets must have a ``working surface''

204: and therefore can only be effective in environments that can support a

205: quasi-hydrostatic hot gas halo, such as groups and clusters. Galaxies

206: in smaller mass halos ($\mhalo \lesssim 10^{12} \msun$) likely accrete

207: most of their gas in a ``cold flow'', and never form a hot halo

208: \citep{birnboim03,dekel06,keres05}.

209: 

210: A great deal of recent progress has been made towards developing a

211: comprehensive theory of galaxy formation.

212: The semi-analytic approach, although it has its limitations, is a

213: powerful and flexible tool for exploring detailed predictions based on

214: this theor

215: \citep[e.g.,][]{wf91,kauffmann93,kauffmann99,sp99,cole00,spf01,

216:   springel01,benson03,hatton03,khochfar03,khochfar05,kang05}.

217: Several groups have now implemented one or both modes of black hole

218: growth and AGN feedback into their semi-analytic models 

219: \citep[e.g.,][]{croton06,bower06,monaco07,s08}.

220: There seems to be consensus that including

221: these new processes leads to greatly improved agreement with key

222: observations such as galaxy luminosity or mass functions, and the

223: galaxy colour-magnitude distribution or stellar mass vs. specific star

224: formation distribution. However, this necessitates including several

225: new recipes and parameters associated with the poorly understood

226: physics of black hole growth and AGN feedback. Each model contains somewhat

227: different parameterizations and treatments of these processes, yet

228: they all produce similar results for global quantities such as the

229: galaxy luminosity function and colour-magnitude distribution, no doubt

230: in part because these observations were ``targets'' that the modellers

231: were trying to reproduce. One goal of our work here is to determine

232: whether breaking down the fraction of quenched galaxies in the dual

233: space of internal galaxy properties and environment can discriminate

234: between these different treatments of AGN feedback.

235: 

236: The large and homegeneous databases provided by modern surveys, such

237: as SDSS and GALEX, finally allow a statistically significant

238: investigation of different sub-populations of galaxies. However, an

239: obvious question that arises in any study of galaxy environment is

240: exactly how to measure and characterize environment in observational

241: samples. Clearly, it is desirable to span as broad a range of

242: environments as possible, from isolated field galaxies to groups to

243: rich clusters. The majority of the studies in the literature have

244: parameterised environment in terms of the number of

245: galaxies, either within a fixed metric aperture, or by the distance of

246: the $n$th-nearest galaxy, where $n$ is typically in the range 3--10. 

247: Although these indicators are straightforward to measure, they

248: are not straightforward to interpret in physical terms or to compare

249: with theoretical models (see discussions in \citealt{kauffmann04} and

250: \citealt{weinmann06a}). An alternate approach is to use a galaxy group

251: catalogue, in which galaxies in an observational catalog are not only

252: grouped together into putatively gravitationally bound structures, but

253: also the total mass of their associated dark matter halo is estimated

254: (Yang et al. 2007). Thus, the relationship between galaxy properties and dark

255: matter halo properties can be studied directly. Another advantage of

256: this method is that galaxies can be separated into ``central'' and

257: ``satellite'' populations. Most of the environment-related

258: tranformation mechanisms described above (such as stripping) are

259: expected to work only on satellite galaxies, so this offers a way to

260: separate out the effects of different physical processes.

261: 

262: Here we make use of a large galaxy group catalogue constructed from 

263: the SDSS using the halo-based galaxy group finder developed by 

264: \citet{yang05}. These catalogues have already been used for 

265: several studies regarding the environment dependence of galaxy properties. 

266: \citet{weinmann06a}, using the version based on the SDSS DR2, studied 

267: the correlations between colours, specific star formation rate and halo mass. 

268: Splitting the galaxy population into early and late types, based on their 

269: colours and specific star formation rates, they found that, at a fixed 

270: luminosity, the late (early) type fraction of  galaxies increases 

271: (decreases) with decreasing halo mass. Using the much larger galaxy 

272: group  catalogue of Yang et al. (2007; hereafter Y07), based on the 

273: SDSS DR4, \citet{vdb08a} showed that, on average, satellite 

274: galaxies are redder and more concentrated than central galaxies of 

275: the same stellar mass. They also found that the colour and concentration 

276: differences of central-satellite pairs matched in stellar mass are 

277: completely independent of the mass of the host halo of the satellite 

278: galaxy. This indicates that satellite-specific transformation mechanisms 

279: are equally efficient in host haloes of all masses and rules against

280: satellite transformation mechanisms that are thought to operate only in 

281: very massive haloes. Further support for this was provided by \citet{vdb08b} 

282: and \citet{pasquali08}, who showed that, at fixed 

283: stellar mass, the average colours and concentrations, as well as the 

284: occurrence of star formation and AGN activity, reveal only a very weak 

285: dependence on halo mass (but see \citealt{weinmann08}).

286: 

287: \citet{weinmann06b} compared the fractions of red and blue

288: galaxies in the SDSS group catalogue of \citet{weinmann06a} with

289: the semi-analytic model of galaxy formation of \citet{croton06}.

290: Although this model accurately fits the global statistics of the

291: galaxy population, the model predicts a red fraction of satellites

292: that is much higher than observed 

293: \citep[see also][]{baldry06,coil08}.

294: 

295: In this paper we extend the study of \citet{weinmann06b} using the

296: much larger galaxy group catalogue of Y07 and a larger suite of

297: semi-analytic models.  Another new aspect of our work here is that we

298: augment the SDSS-based galaxy properties in the group catalogue with

299: information derived from the GALEX-SDSS matched sample of Salim et

300: al. (2007; hereafter S07). The S07 analysis provides complementary

301: quantities such as stellar masses and star formation rates based on

302: the two GALEX UV bands plus five-band SDSS photometry. The UV provides

303: a much more sensitive probe of the recent star formation history of a

304: galaxy than optical colours alone, which reflect the highly degenerate

305: effects of stellar populations, metallicity, and dust extinction

306: \citep{yi05,kaviraj07}.  In addition, the UV can provide reliable

307: measures of SFR for galaxies with weak or undetected emission lines.

308: 

309: The goal of this paper is to investigate the dependence of the

310: fraction of quenched galaxies on galaxy properties and DM halo mass in

311: both the observational group catalogue and in several different

312: semi-analytic galaxy formation models. Another new aspect of our study

313: with respect to previous comparisons \citep[e.g.][]{weinmann06b} is

314: that we compare with the results from three independently developed

315: semi-analytic codes, and for one of the codes, we examine three

316: different variants with different physical ingredients.  In this way,

317: we investigate how these empirical results can constrain the input

318: physics in these kinds of models. An outline of the rest of our paper

319: is as follows: in \S 2, we describe the empirical data sets and

320: the group catalogues used in our study; in \S 3 we describe the

321: theoretical models; in \S 4 we present the results of our comparisons

322: between the empirical data and the models; we discuss our results

323: and conclude in \S 5.

324: 

325: \section{The Data Sample}

326: \label{sec:data}

327: 

328: \subsection{The SDSS Group Catalog}

329: \label{sec:data:group}

330: 

331: We make use of the Galaxy Group Catalog of Yang et al. (2007; Y07).

332: The catalogue was constructed by applying the halo-based group finder

333: of \citet{yang05} to the New York University Value-Added Galaxy

334: Catalog (NYU-VAGC, \citealt{blanton05a}), which is based on the Sloan

335: Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Data Release 4 (DR4; \citealt{adelman06}). 

336: From the Main Galaxy Sample, Y07 selected galaxies with

337: extinction-corrected $r$-band apparent magnitude brighter than $r=17.77$,

338: within a redshift range $0.01 < z < 0.2$, and with a redshift

339: completeness $\mathcal{C}>0.7$. They augmented this sample with 7091

340: galaxies with $0.01 <z< 0.2$ with redshifts from alternate

341: sources. The resulting sample (Sample II of Y07) has a mean redshift

342: of $z\sim0.1$ and a total sky coverage of 4,514 deg$^2$, and contains

343: 369,447 galaxies. In this paper, we refer to this as ``the SDSS

344: sample''.

345: 

346: All absolute magnitudes are k and evolution (e) corrected to the

347: $z=0.1$ rest-frame, as described by \citet{blanton03}. Stellar masses

348: are computed using the relation between rest-frame optical colour and

349: mass-to-light ratio of \citet{bell03}, as specified in Y07, assuming a

350: Kroupa IMF.  Our sample is not volume limited, and we therefore

351: attempt to correct for the resulting Malmquist bias by weighting each

352: galaxy by a standard $V_{\rm max}$ correction \citep{schmidt68}.

353: 

354: The group finder first identifies a potential group centre by the

355: friends-of-friends algorithm \citep{davis85}, and then computes the

356: characteristic luminosity of each tentative group. The characteristic

357: group luminosity is defined as the (incompleteness corrected; see Y07)

358: combined luminosity of all group members with $^{0.1}M_r \leq -19.5 +

359: 5\log h$. The characteristic group stellar mass is similarly the

360: incompleteness-corrected total stellar mass contributed by galaxies

361: with $^{0.1}M_r \leq -19.5 + 5\log h$. Then, the velocity dispersion

362: and the virial radius of the dark matter halo (DMH) associated with

363: each tentative group are estimated iteratively, assuming a constant

364: mass-to-light ratio as an initial guess. These two estimates can be

365: used for determining the spherical \citet{navarro97} (NFW)-type dark

366: matter profile.  Assuming a Gaussian probability distribution along

367: the redshift direction and a projected spherical NFW dark matter

368: profile for the perpendicular plane, group members are updated until

369: there is no change in their memberships.

370: 

371: Lastly, a DMH mass is assigned to each group, assuming a one-to-one

372: correlation between the characteristic stellar mass for each group and

373: the halo mass derived from a theoretical mass function 

374: \citep[e.g.][]{warren05}. We use the halo mass estimated from stellar mass,

375: as luminosity-based halo mass estimates may be biased differently for

376: groups with blue vs. red galaxies (Y07).  Y07 find that they can

377: assign group masses down to a lower limit of $M_{\rm halo} < 10^{11.6}

378: M_{\odot}/h$, although the completeness of the group catalogue begins

379: to drop below unity for halo masses less than $M_{\rm halo} \lesssim

380: 10^{13} h^{-1} \msun$. The central galaxy in each group is identified

381: as the galaxy with the largest stellar mass.

382: 

383: There are 204,813 groups in the resulting group catalogue.

384: Note that we call all clusters ``groups'' regardless of their richness

385: or density, including groups that contain only a single member.  

386: For a more detailed description of the group finder, and the results

387: of extensive tests of its completeness, contamination, and purity, we

388: refer interested readers to \citet{yang07}.

389: 

390: \begin{table*}

391: \begin{center}

392:  \caption{Model descriptions}

393: \begin{tabular}{ c c c c c}\hline \hline

394:   Model & box size (Mpc/h) & Characteristics\\

395:   \hline

396:   S08 AGN-FB (fiducial) & 120 & Bright mode AGN-driven winds + Radio mode AGN heating\\

397:   S08 no AGN-FB & 120 & Control model without AGN feedback\\

398:   S08 HQ & 120 & cooling quenched according to the halo mass\\

399:   dL06 & 120 & Radio mode AGN heating \\

400:   {\sc morgana} & 144 & Bright mode AGN-driven winds + Radio mode AGN heating\\

401: \hline

402:  \end{tabular}

403:  \end{center}

404: \end{table*}

405: 

406: 

407: \subsection{GALEX}

408: \label{sec:data:galex}

409: 

410: The GALEX data provide near-UV (NUV, effective wavelength $\sim$

411: 2271\AA) and far-UV (FUV, $\sim$ 1528\AA) band information \citep{martin05}.

412: Of 741 sq. deg. of GALEX unique imaging, 645

413: sq. deg. overlaps with the SDSS DR4 spectroscopic area. We make use of

414: the GALEX-SDSS matched sample constructed by Salim et al. (2007;

415: S07). S07 first define a SDSS parent sample in the GALEX overlap

416: region of objects spectroscopically classified as galaxies, and having

417: optical magnitude $14.5<r_{petro}<17.77$ and redshift

418: $0.005<z<0.22$. This sample contains 49,346 galaxies. For each of the

419: galaxies in the SDSS parent sample, S07 searched within a 4 arcsec

420: radius (corresponding to $\sim$ 7 kpc at $z\sim$0.1) for a match in

421: the GALEX source catalog.

422: 

423: Using a large library of model SEDs based on the \citet{bc03} 

424: population synthesis code, S07 then performed Bayesian SED fitting to

425: the 7-band photometry ($FUV, NUV, u, g, r, i, z$) to obtain estimates

426: of dust extinction, stellar mass, and star formation rate (SFR).  

427: These parameters were built from probability distribution functions, thus 

428: taking into account parameter degeneracies. 

429: The typical error in the specific SFR (obtained from the width of the SED

430: fitting probability distribution) is 0.2 dex (star-forming galaxies)

431: to 0.7 dex (passive galaxies).

432: 

433: Of the full S07 sample, we use 32,787 galaxies that are associated 

434: with SDSS galaxies in our group catalog, and exclude a small number of 

435: objects with very poor fits (see discussion in \S 4.3 in S07).

436: The redshift range for this final sample is $0.01\leq z \leq 0.2$ with

437: mean redshift $\sim$ 0.104, and the redshift distribution is very

438: similar to that of the parent SDSS sample.

439: 

440: 

441: 

442: 

443: \section{Theoretical Models}

444: \label{sec:models}

445: 

446: We adopt a semi-analytic approach to model galaxy formation within the

447: \LCDM\ picture. We make use of a total of 5 sets of models based on

448: different prescriptions for our comparison with the empirical

449: data.  Three of the models are constructed using the latest version of

450: the Somerville code (\citealt{sp99,spf01,s08}, hereafter S08).

451: The others are the Millennium models \citep{croton06,delucia06} and 

452: the MORGANA models \citep{monaco07,fontanot06,fontanot07}.

453: 

454: We describe the basic scheme in the Somerville code.  We use an N-body

455: simulation box to obtain the masses and positions of the ``root'' dark

456: matter halos, and compute the merger history for each halo using the

457: method of \citet{sk99}. Within each dark matter halo, gas cools via

458: atomic cooling \citep{wf91,sp99} and forms a rotationally supported

459: disk. The radial sizes of disks are computed using the model described

460: in \citet{somerville08a}, which accounts for the initial

461: Navarro-Frenk-White profiles of the DM halos and the ``adiabatic

462: contraction'' due to the self-gravity of the infalling baryons.  Cold

463: gas is turned into stars in the galactic disk following the

464: Schmidt-Kennicutt law \citep{kennicutt89,kennicutt98}, and gas with

465: surface density lower than a critical threshold density 

466: \citep[e.g.][]{martin01} does not form stars. Massive stars explode as

467: supernovae and reheat the cold gas. We trace chemical evolution using

468: a simple ``effective yield'' parameter. Each generation of stars

469: produces a fixed ``yield'' of metals, which are deposited in the cold

470: gas. This gas may then be ejected and mixed with the hot component by

471: supernova or AGN driven winds.

472: 

473: When a satellite is subsumed into a larger dark matter halo, it is

474: assumed that it immediately loses its hot gas halo, and thus does not

475: receive any new supply of cold gas.   The orbital decay and eventual

476: merging, due to dynamical friction, of satellite galaxies within dark

477: matter halos is tracked using a modified version of the

478: \citet{chandra43} formula \citep{boylan08}.  Mass loss and tidal

479: destruction are also accounted for, using a simplified version of the

480: approach presented in \citet{taylor04} and \citet{zentner03}. Galaxy

481: mergers trigger bursts of star formation, the efficiency and

482: timescales of which are modelled using results from hydrodynamic

483: simulations of galaxy-galaxy mergers.

484: 

485: The code also tracks the growth of black holes and the energy they

486: produce. Every top level DM halo is seeded with a black hole of $\sim

487: 100 \msun$. Mergers trigger the ``bright mode'' black hole growth that

488: is associated with luminous quasars. Following every merger with mass

489: ratio greater than 1:10, the black hole grows at its Eddington rate

490: until it reaches a critical mass. The critical mass is that at which

491: the energy radiated by the black hole is sufficient to halt further

492: accretion, i.e., the black hole growth is self-regulated

493: \citep{hopkins07}.  Soon after reaching the critical mass, the black

494: hole enters a ``blowout'' phase, resulting in a decline in the

495: accretion rate. The associated radiation can also drive winds that

496: remove cold gas from the galaxy (see S08 for details).

497: 

498: The S08 models also incorporate ``radio mode'' feedback associated

499: with low-efficiency accretion. The accretion rate is computed using

500: the isothermal Bondi flow model of \citet{nulsen00}. In the presence

501: of a quasi-hydrostatic shock-heated gas halo, the energy from this

502: accretion is assumed to drive radio jets that can heat the gas and

503: partially or completely offset the cooling flow.

504: 

505: The resulting star formation and enrichment histories are convolved

506: with the stellar population models of \citet{bc03} to compute

507: magnitudes and colours. We have adopted a Chabrier IMF. The impact of

508: dust extinction is modelled using an analytic model, 

509: as in \citet{delucia07}.

510: 

511: The S08 {\em fiducial model} includes all of these mechanisms. We also

512: consider a ``no AGN feedback model'', which does not include either the

513: bright mode or radio mode AGN feedback mechanisms, and the ``Halo

514: Quenching'' model, in which cooling is shut off when a halo grows more

515: massive than $\sim 10^{12} M{\odot}/h^{-1}$ (see Table 1 for a summary

516: of all models). The halo quenching model is included as an

517: illustration of a quenching mechanism that has a simple dependence on

518: halo mass only. A similar model has been considered by

519: \citet{cattaneo06}. It is based on the ideas proposed by

520: \citet{birnboim03} and \citet{dekel06}, who suggest that whenever a

521: halo grows above this critical quenching mass, the gas is shock-heated

522: to near the virial temperature, and can be easily kept hot either by

523: an AGN or by other processes such as heating by gas clumps or orbiting

524: satellites \citep{dekel08,khochfar08}.

525: 

526: \begin{figure*}

527: \begin{center}

528: \includegraphics[width=16cm]{fig1.ps}

529: \caption{The distribution of $^{0.1}r$-band absolute magnitude

530:   vs. $^{0.1}(g-r)$ colour.  Gray shading and green contours show the

531:   conditional probability P($^{0.1}M_r|^{0.1}(g-r)$). The orange line

532:   shows the demarcation line for the ``red'' and ``blue'' galaxy

533:   populations used in this study.  }

534: \label{fig:colourmag}

535: \end{center}

536: \end{figure*}

537: 

538: \begin{figure*}

539: \begin{center}

540: \includegraphics[width=16cm]{fig2.ps}

541: \caption{Galaxy stellar mass vs. specific star formation rate.  Gray

542:   shading and pink contours show the conditional probability

543:   P($\mgal|SSFR$). The purple line shows the demarcation line between

544:   ``passive'' and ``active'' galaxies used in this study.

545: } \label{fig:ssfr}

546: \end{center}

547: \end{figure*}

548: 

549: 

550: We also consider two additional models from other groups in this

551: study.  The de Lucia et al. (2006, hereafter dL06) models contain

552: similar ingredients to the S08 models, with the following differences.

553: They are based on merger trees extracted from the Millennium N-body

554: simulations \citep{springel05nature}. 

555: Unlike in the models of S08, they do not include

556: the effects of adiabatic contraction and an NFW halo profile in their

557: estimates of galaxy sizes, which leads to a different evolution in the

558: star formation rates and gas fractions in their models. They use

559: somewhat different (though similar in spirit) recipes for star

560: formation and supernova feedback, and they use a different approach

561: for modelling black hole growth (though, like S08, they assume that

562: ``bright mode'' black hole growth is triggered by mergers). They do not

563: include ``bright mode'' AGN feedback (AGN-driven winds), and their

564: treatment of the radio mode feedback is again similar in spirit but

565: different in detail from S08. Magnitudes and colours (including dust

566: extinction) are computed in a similar manner to S08, and use a

567: Chabrier IMF. We obtained the dL06 catalogs from the public Millennium

568: database (http://www.g-vo.org/Millennium).

569: 

570: We also consider the predictions of the semi-analytic model {\sc

571:   morgana} \citep{monaco07,fontanot06,fontanot07}.  {\sc morgana}

572: follows a scheme similar to S08 and dL06, but it includes a different

573: treatment for the thermal processes acting on baryonic gas. More

574: details on the updated version we use in this paper are presented in

575: Lo Faro et al. (2008, in prep).  The model is based on merger trees

576: obtained using the {\sc pinocchio} method \citep{monaco02}, similar to

577: those predicted by N-body simulations.  Gas cooling and infall follow

578: the prescription described and tested in \citet{viola08}, while star

579: formation and stellar feedback are then modeled as in

580: \citet{monaco04}.  When two DM halos merge, dynamical friction, tidal

581: stripping and tidal shocks on the satellite galaxies are followed

582: using the \citet{taffoni03} formulation. Similarly to S08, when a

583: satellite DM halo merges into a larger one, all of its hot gas is

584: shock heated according to the new halo potential and gets removed from

585: the satellite (thus implying that the corresponding satellite galaxy

586: does not receive any further cold gas supply).  Disc sizes are

587: computed using the model of \cite{mo98}, and bulge sizes are computed

588: assuming that kinetic energy is conserved in mergers.

589: 

590: A key ingredient in {\sc morgana} is the inclusion of a

591: self-consistent model for the accretion of gas onto supermassive black holes 

592: and the resulting AGN feedback modes (following \citealt{umemura01} and

593: \citealt{granato04}, see \citealt{fontanot06} for more details).  

594: This modeling assumes that the loss of angular momentum is the main

595: regulator of black hole accretion. This is triggered by the presence of gas 

596: in the bulge component, and the almost complete loss of angular momentum

597: of accreted gas is related to star formation activity.  Following

598: \citet{granato04}, star formation creates a reservoir of low angular

599: momentum gas which is then accreted at a rate regulated by the viscous

600: accretion time scale or by the Eddington limit. The nature of feedback

601: from the AGN depends on the accretion rate in Eddington units:

602: whenever this is higher than 0.01 (``bright mode''), the AGN can

603: trigger a massive galactic-scale wind \citep[see][]{monaco05} which

604: leads to the complete removal of the ISM from the galaxy, while at lower

605: accretion rates (``radio mode'')

606: the energy is ejected through jets that feed back on the hot halo gas

607: with an efficiency that scales with $V_c^2$, where $V_c$ is the halo

608: circular velocity. As a consequence, BH accretion requires some star

609: formation to be triggered, and feedback follows the onset of cooling

610: only after some time. The ejected energy heats the hot halo gas

611: component and quenches the cooling flow.

612: Galaxy SEDs, magnitudes and colours are obtained using the GRASIL

613: spectro-photometric code with radiative transfer for computing the 

614: effect of dust \citep{silva98}.

615: 

616: In Table 1, we present a brief description of each model.

617: 

618: \section{Results}

619: \label{sec:results}

620: 

621: In this section, we investigate the joint dependence of star formation

622: quenching on {\em stellar mass} and {\em halo mass}, in order to

623: try to contrain the physical mechanisms that are responsible for

624: quenching. We make use of two indicators of quenched star formation:

625: red optical colours, and low specific star formation rates ($SSFR

626: \equiv SFR/M_{\rm gal}$). Red optical colours are frequently used to isolate

627: ``quenched'' galaxies; however, a red optical colour can arise from a

628: degenerate combination of an old stellar population, a high

629: metallicity, or strong dust extinction. SSFR based on UV-optical data

630: are a more sensitive probe of recent star formation.

631: 

632: In order to mimic the selection effects of the flux-limited

633: observational sample, we first assign redshifts to all the model

634: galaxies by placing an ``observer'' in a corner of the simulation

635: box.  We apply the same flux limit used in the observational catalogs

636: to the models by selecting only galaxies with apparent $r$-band

637: magnitude $r<17.77$. We then apply the $\rm{V_{max}}$ weighting

638: factor, just as we do with the galaxies in the observational

639: sample. Then, we exclude all halos that do not contain any galaxy

640: brighter than $^{0.1}M_r \ge -19.5 + 5\log h$, as these halos would

641: not be included in the group catalog.

642: 

643: We apply these selection criteria for all of the

644: model-data comparisons shown in the main text, unless otherwise noted.

645: We also present our main results for the models without these

646: selection criteria in the Appendix.

647: 

648: \subsection{Global Distribution Functions: colour and SSFR}

649: \label{sec:global}

650: 

651: In Fig.~\ref{fig:colourmag}, we present the global colour-magnitude

652: relations (CMRs) at $z=0.1$ for the observations and theoretical

653: models, along with the dividing line between the observed red sequence

654: and the blue cloud (sometimes called the ``green valley''). In this

655: figure, we show the results for the whole SDSS sample, regardless of

656: inclusion in the group catalog, and similarly we have not applied the

657: observational selection criteria to the theoretical models.

658: The magnitudes and colours are shown in the rest-frame $z=0.1$ system

659: defined by \citet{blanton03}. For the dL06 models, we used the

660: observed frame magnitudes at $z=0.1$, converted to absolute

661: magnitudes.  For the {\sc morgana} galaxies, we compute the absolute

662: $z=0.1$ magnitudes from the corresponding synthetic spectra.  For the

663: S08 models, when we computed standard $z=0.0$ frame colours and

664: magnitudes, we produced a good match to the observed colour-magnitude

665: relation expressed in the $z=0$ frame. However, when we computed the

666: $z=0.1$ system colours as described in \citet{blanton07}, we found it

667: necessary to apply a shift of 0.05 magnitudes to the $^{0.1}(g-r)$

668: colour to match the location of the observed $z=0.1$ system red

669: sequence. This is indicative of small differences in the shape of the

670: SED's in the semi-analytic models from the synthetic SED's used by

671: \citet{blanton03} for computing the k-corrections.  It should also be

672: noted that details in the population synthesis prescriptions, such as

673: chemical enrichment and dust extinction, may also cause noticeable

674: differences in colours (see Appendix for the effect of

675: dust). Therefore, reproducing the CMR quantitatively in semi-analytic

676: models is quite challenging.

677: 

678: The observations clearly show the familiar red sequence and blue

679: cloud, and these features are reproduced reasonably well in all of the

680: theoretical models, except the S08 no-AGN-feedback model. As has been

681: pointed out before \citep[e.g.,][]{croton06,cattaneo06}, semi-analytic

682: models without some kind of suppression of cooling in massive halos,

683: e.g. by AGN feedback, predict that massive galaxies are still

684: accreting plenty of cold gas at the present day, and therefore are

685: star-forming and blue, in conflict with observations. We do see subtle

686: differences in the structure of the CM distribution for the different

687: models, for example, the S08-halo-quenching model produces very few

688: low-luminosity red galaxies, and the dL06 model produces a very strong

689: bimodality. Also, we notice that the red sequence in the

690: halo-quenching model is slightly bluer compared with the S08 fiducial

691: model.  This is because the central galaxies in the halo-quenching

692: model stop forming stars once their halo becomes more massive as

693: $10^{12} h^{-1}M_\odot$. In general, this happens at an earlier epoch

694: than the ``radio mode'' feedback is able to quench star

695: formation. Because chemical evolution is also halted when star

696: formation is quenched, the massive galaxies in the halo-quenching

697: model do not become as enriched as do the galaxies in the fiducial

698: model (see S08). We could have adjusted for this by increasing the

699: chemical yield, but we chose to leave all the free parameters fixed in

700: both models to allow a direct comparison.

701: 

702: The behavior of {\sc morgana} is somewhat different from that of the

703: other models. A clear red sequence is present at intermediate and

704: faint magnitudes, but it fades away at bright magnitudes, in contrast

705: to the observations. Luminous galaxies tend to be blue. We interpret

706: this result as an inefficient quenching of star formation through

707: ``radio-mode'' feedback in {\sc morgana}. In fact, as explained in

708: \S.~\ref{sec:models}, in this model the AGN heating switches on only

709: after some cooled gas has already started forming stars in the host

710: galaxy. Obviously the residual activity is stronger for longer time

711: delays between the onset of cooling flows and the accretion onto the

712: central black hole.  On the other hand, the blue cloud seems depleted. As

713: shown in Fontanot et al. (2008, in prep), the depletion of the blue

714: cloud is connected in part to the ``satellite overquenching problem'',

715: discussed further in \S5, caused by the too-efficient strangulation of

716: satellite galaxies. However, we shall see later that {\sc morgana}

717: also produces too few low mass blue central galaxies. This is likely

718: due to strong supernova feedback.

719: 

720: 

721: \begin{figure*}

722: \begin{center}

723: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig3_1.ps}

724: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig3_2.ps}

725: \caption{The fraction of red galaxies ($\rm{f_{red}}$; left) and

726:   passive galaxies ($\rm{f_{passive}}$; right) as a function of galaxy

727:   stellar mass.  The empirical data are shown by a black solid

728:   line, and coloured lines show the results of the theoretical models,

729:   as indicated on the plot.  We show the dependence for all galaxies

730:   (top), and for central (middle), and satellite (bottom) galaxies

731:   seperately. Each point contains at least 10 galaxies.  Most of the

732:   SAMs reproduce the trend for central galaxies reasonably well, but

733:   predict a much larger fraction of small-mass red/passive satellite

734:   galaxies than are observed. The error bars indicate Poisson errors.

735: }

736: \label{fig:fred_mgal}

737: \end{center}

738: \end{figure*}

739: 

740: \begin{figure*}

741: \begin{center}

742: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig4_1.ps}

743: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig4_2.ps}

744: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig4_3.ps}

745: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig4_4.ps}

746: \caption{The red fraction $\rm{f_{\rm red}}$ (left) and passive

747:   fraction $\rm{f_{passive}}$ (right) as a function of halo mass, for

748:   different stellar mass bins, as indicated by different colours and

749:   symbol sizes (see plot legend). In each plot, results are shown for

750:   the observed SDSS or GALEX+SDSS group catalog (top left) and the

751:   five models as indicated on the plot. We present the results for

752:   central ({\it top set of panels}) and satellite ({\it bottom set of

753:     panels}) galaxies seperately.  Each point contains at least 5

754:   galaxies. The SAMs reproduce the main trends reasonably well for

755:   central galaxies, but satellite galaxies do not show the correct

756:   trend of $f_{\rm red}$ with stellar mass. }

757: \label{fig:fredmgalmhalo1}

758: \end{center}

759: \end{figure*}

760: 

761: 

762: \begin{figure*}

763: \begin{center}

764: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig5_1.ps}

765: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig5_2.ps}

766: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig5_3.ps}

767: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig5_4.ps}

768: \caption{The red fraction $\rm{f_{\rm red}}$ (left) and passive

769:   fraction $\rm{f_{passive}}$ (right) as a function of stellar mass,

770:   for different halo mass bins, as indicated by different colours and

771:   symbol sizes (see plot legend). The rest of the plot details are as

772:   in Fig.~\protect\ref{fig:fredmgalmhalo1}.  }

773: \label{fig:fredmgalmhalo2}

774: \end{center}

775: \end{figure*}

776: 

777: Given the strongly bimodal colour distribution exhibited by both the

778: empirical data and most of the models, it is natural to define a

779: dividing line between the two populations, and to investigate the

780: fraction of galaxies in the red population, \fred, as

781: representing quenched objects. We adopt the same demarcation line

782: between red and blue galaxies as Weinmann et al.  (2006a, hereafter

783: W06a):

784: \begin{equation}

785: ^{0.1}(g-r) = 0.7 - 0.032 ( ^{0.1} M_r - 5 \log_{10} h + 16.5)

786: \label{def_colour}

787: \end{equation} 

788: as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:colourmag}.

789: 

790: We can also define the specific star formation rate (SSFR), as the

791: present star formation rate divided by the stellar mass of the galaxy

792: ($=SFR/M_{\rm gal}$), and plot a similar diagram in terms of SSFR and

793: mass. In Fig. \ref{fig:ssfr}, we show the conditional probability

794: distribution for SSFR as a function of stellar mass, as derived from

795: the GALEX+SDSS observations, and for the models. The star formation 

796: rate is averaged

797: over the past 100 Myr. Note that the number of galaxies in the sample

798: is roughly 8 times smaller than the sample shown in the

799: colour-magnitude distribution plot, because the field coverage of GALEX

800: survey used in the Salim et al.  study is not as wide as that of the

801: SDSS. In a similar manner, we define a cut in SSFR to separate

802: ``active'' star forming galaxies from ``passive'' ones. We define a

803: galaxy as ``passive'' if the following condition is met:

804: \begin{equation}

805: \log_{10} SSFR \le  -9 - 0.2 \log [\mgal/h^{-2}M_\odot]

806: \label{def_ssfr}

807: \end{equation}

808: 

809: Note here that our criterion is based on galaxy stellar mass in order

810: to make a more direct comparison with the theoretical models. It is

811: also worth noting that our criterion roughly corresponds to $SFR \sim

812: 1 M_\odot \rm yr^{-1}$ at \mgal$\sim10^{11}h^{-2}\msun$ and $SFR

813: \sim0.1 M_\odot \rm yr^{-1}$ at \mgal$\sim10^{9.5}h^{-2}\msun$.  Below

814: 0.1$M_\odot \rm yr^{-1}$, SFR obtained from multiband photometry may

815: not be robust due to the degeneracy of burst time and the mass

816: fraction of a young population \citep[e.g.][]{kaviraj07}.

817: 

818: Our demarcation is comparable to that of W06a when their criterion,

819: which is based on the $^{0.1}r$-band magnitude, is lowered by 0.6 dex.

820: However, SFR estimates from emission lines, which were used by W06a,

821: trace only very recent star formation, whereas the UV used here traces

822: star formation over a longer timescale ($\sim$ 1 Gyr). Therefore our ``passive''

823: sample is not directly comparable to that of W06a, though the results

824: are qualitatively similar.

825: The amount of UV flux in the passive galaxies is very small and can

826: still be consistent with the amount of UV flux that can be

827: produced by old stars such as low-mass horizontal-branch stars (see 

828: \citealt{yi05} for details).  In this regard it is justifiable to call

829: them ``passive''.  

830: 

831: In Fig.~\ref{fig:ssfr}, we see a well-defined ``star-forming sequence''

832: that produces the blue sequence in the traditional CM diagram, but the

833: ``quenched'' population that produces the tight red sequence is quite

834: spread out in SSFR. This is simply a reflection of the relative

835: insensitivity of optical colours to small amounts of recent star

836: formation. The precise values of SSFR at low levels of star formation cannot be

837: estimated very accurately from the data, and therefore one should not

838: take too seriously the position of the quenched galaxies in the SSFR

839: vs. \mgal\ plot. Again, the models with AGN feedback (or halo

840: quenching) qualitatively reproduce the empirical distribution

841: reasonably well, but show some interesting differences. The dL06 model

842: has a strongly-bimodal distribution of SSFR, with most galaxies living

843: either on the star-forming sequence or being completely quenched. In

844: contrast, the S08 model has a larger population of ``semi-quenched''

845: galaxies at intermediate values of SSFR. The {\sc morgana} model

846: produces an even broader distribution of SSFR, with many quenched

847: low-mass galaxies.

848: 

849: \subsection{Dependence of Star Formation Quenching on Stellar Mass}

850: 

851: Fig.~\ref{fig:fred_mgal} shows the dependence of \fred\ and \fpass\ on

852: galaxy stellar mass.  We show \fred\ and \fpass\ vs. stellar mass

853: for all galaxies (upper panels), and for central and satellite

854: galaxies separately (middle and lower panels, respectively). Although

855: we do not specifically use the information from the group catalog in

856: the uppermost panel, in all panels we use only the SDSS galaxies that

857: are included in the group catalog, and apply the group catalog-like

858: selection criteria to the theoretical models, as described at the

859: beginning of this section.

860: 

861: In the empirical data, \fred\ shows a strong dependence on galaxy mass

862: for both centrals and satellites, in the well-known sense that

863: low-mass galaxies are largely blue, whereas massive galaxies are more

864: likely to be red. It appears that \fred\ is a steeper function of

865: stellar mass for central galaxies than for satellites.

866: In general, the red galaxy fraction is higher for satellites for a

867: fixed galaxy mass. Similarly, \citet{vdb08a,vdb08b} found

868: that satellite galaxies have redder mean colours than centrals at a

869: fixed stellar mass. The trends appear qualitatively very similar when

870: we consider \fpass\ as a function of stellar mass.

871: 

872: The S08 fiducial model, S08 halo-quenching model, and dL06 model all

873: reproduce the trends in \fred\ and \fpass\ with stellar mass quite

874: well for {\em central} galaxies. Note the similarity of the

875: predictions of the S08 fiducial and halo-quenching model. The S08 no

876: AGN feedback model, as we have already seen, predicts the presence of too

877: many massive blue central galaxies.  

878: {\sc morgana} reproduces the sense of the trend of the red fraction

879: with stellar mass, but slightly overproduces red galaxies at low

880: stellar masses, and significantly overproduces blue galaxies at high

881: stellar masses.

882: 

883: All of the models badly overproduce the number of low mass red

884: satellites, and predict too weak a trend of \fred\ with stellar mass

885: for these objects. The dL06 models predict a nearly flat run of

886: \fred\ with stellar mass for satellites, with values that are much too

887: high (close to unity) compared with the empirical values.  At the

888: highest satellite masses, there is {\em too high} a fraction of blue

889: galaxies in the {\sc morgana} model and the S08 no-AGN-feedback model.

890: We can see by comparing the S08 no-AGN-feedback model with the

891: fiducial model that AGN feedback does not affect galaxy colours below

892: stellar masses of $\sim 10^{10} h^{-2}\msun$; therefore {\em the

893: excess of low-mass red satellites is not connected with AGN

894: feedback.}

895: 

896: The conclusions we would draw from the comparison with \fpass\ are

897: qualitatively similar, though quantitatively somewhat different. For

898: example, the dL06 model shows a better quantitative match to the

899: \fpass\ data than to \fred\ for central galaxies. The S08 fiducial and

900: halo-quenching models produced almost indistinguishable results for

901: \fred(\mgal), but significantly different results for

902: \fpass(\mgal). This is due to the age-metallicity degeneracy --- as we

903: discussed in \S\ref{sec:global}, massive galaxies in the halo-quenching

904: model are more metal poor than in the fiducial model. Therefore,

905: although they are older (as seen in the \fpass\ diagram), their

906: optical colours are similar. Similarly, the large difference between

907: \fred\ and \fpass\ for the S08 no AGN-feedback model is due to dust

908: extinction: in this model, massive galaxies are actively star forming,

909: and therefore extremely dusty (see Appendix for more discussion of the

910: effects of dust extinction). 

911: 

912: The somewhat lower fraction of red/passive satellite galaxies in the

913: S08 models is due to the inclusion of tidal destruction, which is not

914: included in the dL06 or {\sc morgana} models. In the S08 model,

915: satellites that orbit within their host halo for a long time can

916: eventually become tidally destroyed, and their stars are added to a

917: ``Diffuse Stellar Halo'' (see S08). Naturally, in the absence of tidal

918: destruction, these satellites exhaust all of their gas and become very

919: red. However, we see here that although the inclusion of tidal

920: destruction helps reduce the excess of low-mass red satellites in the

921: models, a significant discrepancy still remains.

922: 

923: One might then wonder whether increasing the efficiency of tidal

924: destruction could completely solve the satellite 'over-quenching'

925: problem that we see here. We do not believe that this is a viable

926: solution, for several reasons. First, the tidal disruption model

927: used by S08 was tuned to match the sub-structure mass function for

928: very high-resolution N-body simulations. S08 also showed that their

929: models correctly reproduce the total number of low-mass galaxies

930: (i.e. the faint end slope of the stellar mass function), although

931: the model overproduces low-mass bulge-dominated (red/passive)

932: galaxies and underproduces low-mass disc-dominated (blue/active)

933: galaxies. Significantly increasing the efficiency of tidal

934: destruction would be in conflict with the N-body results and would

935: also produce an overall deficit of low-mass galaxies. Put another

936: way, tidal destruction can remove low-mass red satellites but cannot

937: increase the number of low-mass blue satellites.  

938: 

939: 

940: 

941: \subsection{Dependence on Stellar Mass and Halo Mass}

942: 

943: In this section we explore the dependence of \fred\ and \fpass\ on DM

944: halo mass and stellar mass.  In Fig.~\ref{fig:fredmgalmhalo1} we show

945: \fred\ and \fpass\ as a function of halo mass, for different bins in

946: stellar mass. We show the results for \fred\ and \fpass\ for central

947: galaxies (top row), and for satellite galaxies (bottom row). In

948: Fig.~\ref{fig:fredmgalmhalo2}, we show a similar plot, but this time

949: with the galaxy stellar mass plotted on the x-axis, and different bins

950: in halo mass shown by the different colors.

951: 

952: In the empirical data, we see that for massive $\mgal > 10^{11}

953: h^{-2}\msun$ {\em central} galaxies, there is no significant

954: dependence of \fred\ on halo mass (environment) for fixed stellar

955: mass. For intermediate mass galaxies ($10^{10} h^{-2} < \mgal <10^{11}

956: h^{-2}\msun$), the dependence on halo mass appears to be stronger, but

957: there is a limited region of overlap in galaxies with different

958: stellar masses that occupy halos of the same mass. This is because

959: there is a fairly tight correlation between halo mass and stellar

960: mass. Similar results are again obtained for \fpass.

961: 

962: The S08 fiducial and dL06 models, both of which include AGN feedback,

963: do reasonably well at reproducing the overall trends for central

964: galaxies, as does the S08 halo-quenching model. We see a hint of a

965: dependence on stellar mass in intermediate mass halos

966: ($10^{11.5}h^{-1}\msun \lesssim \mhalo \lesssim 10^{12.5}

967: h^{-1}\msun$) in the S08 models, while in the dL06 model, the

968: dependence seems to be almost solely on halo mass. However,

969: interestingly, we see almost the same stellar mass dependence in the

970: S08 fiducial and halo-quenching models, while we know that the

971: quenching mechanism is a pure function of halo mass in the

972: halo-quenching model.  The S08 no-AGN feedback model shows the correct

973: trend with stellar mass at fixed halo mass (more massive galaxies have

974: higher \fred), but the opposite trend with halo mass (more massive

975: halos have lower \fred).  Interestingly, {\sc morgana} shows similar

976: trends to the S08 no-AGN-feedback model: this implies that the current

977: implementation of AGN feedback in this model is insufficient to fully

978: cure the ``star formation quenching'' problem.

979: 

980: Considering \fpass, we see somewhat different behavior.  The S08 no

981: AGN-feedback model produces no quenched galaxies at all in terms of

982: \fpass. The S08 and dL06 models appear surprisingly similar, both

983: showing almost a pure halo mass dependence (no significant dependence

984: on stellar mass).  On the other hand, {\sc morgana} predicts

985: a significant dependence of \fpass\ on stellar mass, while showing

986: overall low values of \fpass.

987: 

988: Observed satellite galaxies show an \fred\ dependence that is very

989: similar to that of centrals for massive galaxies ($\mgal \gtrsim

990: 10^{10.5} h^{-2}\msun$). For intermediate and low mass satellites,

991: \fred\ shows some dependence on both galaxy stellar mass and halo

992: mass, but does not show the very sharp drop over intermediate halo

993: masses ($11.5 \lesssim \mhalo \lesssim 12.5 h^{-1} \msun$) seen in the

994: central population. In the semi-analytic models, we see that

995: \fred\ for the satellites does not have a strong enough dependence on

996: \mgal\ at fixed halo mass. 

997: 

998: The stellar mass dependence of \fpass\ for satellites in the empirical

999: sample is not as clear as it was in terms of \fred. This may be in

1000: part due to the smaller size of the GALEX-SDSS matched sample used to

1001: obtain \fpass. The S08 models now all show a clear {\em inverted}

1002: trend: \fpass\ is higher for lower mass galaxies (the opposite of the

1003: empirical trend). For the dL06 model, nearly all satellites are

1004: passive regardless of their stellar mass or halo mass.  In {\sc

1005:   morgana}, satellite properties are a weak function of stellar mass,

1006: and the values of \fpass\ are overall too high.

1007: 

1008: Based on Fig.~\ref{fig:fredmgalmhalo1} alone, we might be tempted to

1009: conclude that quenching is primarily a function of halo mass. However,

1010: Fig.~\ref{fig:fredmgalmhalo2} shows that quenching could equally well

1011: be considered to be primarily a function of stellar mass. We conclude

1012: that, especially for central galaxies, the degeneracy between stellar

1013: mass and halo mass is too strong to reach a firm conclusion on this

1014: point.

1015: 

1016: 

1017: \begin{figure*}

1018: \begin{center}

1019: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig6_1.ps}

1020: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig6_2.ps}

1021: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig6_3.ps}

1022: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig6_4.ps}

1023: \caption{The fraction of ``red'' galaxies (\fred; left) and passive

1024:   galaxies (\fpass; right) for central ({\it top set of plots}) and

1025:   satellite ({\it bottom set of plots}) galaxies in the (\mhalo,

1026:   \mgal) plane. The fraction of red/passive galaxies in a given pixel

1027:   in (\mhalo, \mgal) is indicated by the colour, where red colours

1028:   indicate a higher red/passive fraction, as shown in the scale. To

1029:   guide the eye, we draw a solid (dotted) line showing the approximate

1030:   upper envelope of the central (satellite) galaxy mass distribution

1031:   for the observational group catalog, and repeat this same line on

1032:   every panel. Central and satellite galaxies in the observational

1033:   group catalogs show noticably different joint dependencies on

1034:   stellar mass and halo mass. The models with AGN feedback

1035:   qualitatively reproduce the trends for central galaxies, but do not

1036:   reproduce the empirical trends for satellites. }

1037: \label{fig:fred2d}

1038: \end{center}

1039: \end{figure*}

1040: 

1041: In Fig.~\ref{fig:fred2d}, we present the \fred\ and

1042: \fpass\ distributions in the $(\mhalo,\mgal)$ plane.  We pixelise the

1043: $(\mhalo,\mgal)$ plane, compute \fred\ and \fpass\ in each pixel, and

1044: indicate its value by the colour of the pixel.  For example, a red

1045: colour indicates that galaxies are mostly red or passive within the

1046: pixel, while a blue colour indicates that most of the galaxies are

1047: blue/active. These diagrams reveal a number of interesting

1048: features. Considering the diagram for central galaxies in the empirical

1049: sample, we see that above a critical halo mass ($\mhalo \gtrsim 

1050: 10^{13}h^{-1}\msun$), nearly all galaxies are red and passive. For

1051: intermediate halo masses $10^{11} \lesssim \mhalo \lesssim 10^{13}

1052: h^{-1}\msun$, the structures show a complex dependence on both 

1053: halo mass and stellar mass. In particular we note that above a ``critical''

1054: stellar mass of $2-3~10^{10} h^{-2}\msun$, the majority of

1055: galaxies are red and passive, regardless of their halo mass (though

1056: such massive galaxies are not found in halos less massive than

1057: $10^{12} h^{-1}\msun$).

1058: Comparing with the models that showed good

1059: qualitative behavior in terms of the binned quantities (S08 fiducial,

1060: S08 halo-quenching, and dL06), we can see that the distribution of the

1061: patterns in $(\mhalo,\mgal)$ space are quite different from the

1062: observations --- in general, the structures show stronger vertical

1063: divisions, indicating a stronger dependence on halo mass than on

1064: galaxy mass. It is interesting to note that these three models look

1065: much more similar to one another than any of the models does to the

1066: empirical data. It is also interesting that in terms of \fred, the S08

1067: fiducial and S08 halo-quenching models look very similar to one

1068: another, but they look extremely different in the

1069: \fpass\ diagram. This again illustrates that optical colours are not

1070: an ideal probe of star formation quenching.

1071: 

1072: The observed satellites show an interesting striation, which is nearly

1073: horizontal at the highest and lowest stellar masses, but somewhat

1074: diagonal for intermediate masses. It appears that the majority of

1075: satellite galaxies are red/passive if they are more massive than a few

1076: times $10^{10} h^{-2}\msun$ (just as for the central population), and

1077: are predominantly blue/active if they are less massive than $10^{10}

1078: h^{-2}\msun$, regardless of their halo mass. For intermediate halo

1079: masses, it seems that unlike for central galaxies, the critical mass

1080: that marks the transition between mostly blue and mostly red galaxies

1081: {\em is a function of halo mass}, and is lower for higher halo

1082: masses. 

1083: This suggests that the star formation activity in the most massive satellites is

1084: regulated by the same processes that shape centrals, while lower mass

1085: satellites are influenced by environmental processes such as tidal

1086: forces or ram pressure stripping.

1087: 

1088: All the models fail quite miserably to reproduce the satellite

1089: properties. In addition to simply predicting too high a fraction of

1090: red satellites, none of the models shows the diagonal pattern of

1091: contours in the \fred\ or \fpass\ diagrams. The few pixels with high

1092: blue fractions in the models lie at high stellar mass for their halo

1093: mass, which is the opposite from what is seen in the

1094: empirical data. These are simply galaxies that were forming stars as

1095: centrals and have become satellites very recently. 

1096: 

1097: Readers are referred to the Appendix for a discussion of the impact on our 

1098: results of the modelling of dust extinction, our imposed selection criteria,

1099: and possible biases in the procedure for assigning halo masses in the

1100: SDSS group catalog.

1101: 

1102: \subsection{Connection with Morphology, Black Hole Formation and AGN Feedback}

1103: \label{sec:conclusions}

1104: 

1105: \begin{figure}

1106: \begin{center}

1107: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{fig7.ps}

1108: \caption{ The fraction of early-type galaxies ($\rm{f_{early}}$) for

1109:   centrals ({\it left}) and satellites ({\it right}) in the SDSS group

1110:   catalog. Early type galaxies are defined as having a concentration

1111:   index ($C$) greater than 2.6.  }

1112: \label{fig:fearly}

1113: \end{center}

1114: \end{figure}

1115: 

1116: These results naturally beg the question: which physical process(es)

1117: are responsible for imprinting this dependence of star formation

1118: quenching on galaxy and halo mass? Although this is a complex question

1119: that we will not be able to fully address in this paper, we attempt to

1120: at least identify some promising hypotheses that can be pursued futher

1121: in the future.

1122: 

1123: As already discussed by many authors \citep[e.g.][]{kauffmann03}, we

1124: are suspicous that the correlation of star formation quenching with stellar 

1125: mass may in fact be linked to the tendency of the {\em increasing bulge 

1126: fraction} also with stellar mass and perhaps halo mass. Although we

1127: have only rough morphological information for SDSS, we make use of a

1128: standard cut in concentration index ($C\equiv r_{90}/r_{50}$) to

1129: coarsely divide our sample into early and late type galaxies (early

1130: types have $C>2.6$; \citealt{strateva01,shimasaku01}). Such

1131: classification using the concentration index is subject to

1132: contamination at roughly the 20\% level \citep{strateva01}. We then

1133: plot $f_{\rm early}$ in the (\mhalo,\mgal) plane as

1134: before\footnote{Because of the difficulty of mapping the morphological

1135:   information available in the models to the observable concentration

1136:   index, we do not show the model predictions. The qualitative trends

1137:   in the models are similar.}, and show the results in

1138: Fig.~\ref{fig:fearly}. We see a strikingly similar pattern to the one

1139: seen when we plotted \fred\ and \fpass\ in this way in

1140: Fig.~\ref{fig:fred2d}, indicating a very strong correlation between

1141: red, passive, and early type galaxies. 

1142: 

1143: We test the connection of black hole mass with star formation quenching by plotting the

1144: ratio of black hole mass to the total stellar mass of the galaxy

1145: ($\left<M_{BH}/M_{\rm gal}\right>$) in the same (\mhalo,\mgal) plane,

1146: which we do in Fig.~\ref{fig:mbhmgal} (for central galaxies

1147: only). Note that all three semi-analytic model codes reproduce the

1148: empirical relation between bulge mass and black hole mass reasonably well

1149: within the observational errors. In the S08, dL06, and {\sc morgana}

1150: models, we see that the galaxies that have the {\em highest} stellar

1151: mass to halo mass ratios have the {\em lowest} black hole mass to stellar mass

1152: ratios. This is a reflection of the spread in halo merger histories at

1153: fixed halo mass. In halos in which a massive black hole is formed relatively

1154: early, the cooling flow is also shut off at an earlier time, halting

1155: further galaxy growth except by mergers. Conversely, halos with

1156: relatively small black holes for their mass will be able to continue to cool,

1157: and the central galaxies will continue to form stars and remain

1158: blue. This is seen to be the case in the ``blue ridge'' in

1159: Fig.~\ref{fig:fred2d} (see panels h, k, and l). 

1160: Note that neither the strong trend in

1161: $\left<M_{BH}/M_{\rm gal}\right>$ nor the ``blue ridge'' is seen in the

1162: S08 ``halo quenching'' model, in which quenching is regulated purely

1163: by the halo mass.

1164: 

1165: In all three models with AGN feedback, there is also a trend with halo

1166: mass in the sense that larger mass halos have larger black

1167: hole-to-stellar mass ratios.  This is due to the dual modes of black

1168: hole growth in the models. In the ``bright mode'', the growth of the

1169: stellar bulge and the black hole are linked. Most of the black hole

1170: growth in the models occurs via this bright mode of black hole

1171: feeding. However, at late times, large mass halos can develop a hot

1172: hydrostatic halo which is assumed to fuel the ``radio mode'' of black

1173: hole growth. In these halos, the black hole can grow without any

1174: associated star formation, leading to an increase in

1175: $\left<M_{BH}/M_{\rm gal}\right>$. This is supported by the fact that

1176: we do not see such a trend in the halo quenching model, which only

1177: contains black hole growth via the bright mode.

1178: 

1179: We attempt to investigate whether this trend exists in the

1180: empirical data, using the SDSS velocity dispersion $\sigma$ as a proxy

1181: for black hole mass. We compute $M_{\sigma}$ from the $M_{BH}-\sigma_e$

1182: relation using the empirical relation of \citet{gebhardt00}. We assign

1183: a scatter to the black hole mass at a given $\sigma$ by choosing a uniform

1184: random deviate over the 1$\sigma$ range quoted by \citet{gebhardt00}

1185: (we obtain indistinguishable results when a Gaussian random deviate is

1186: used). Interestingly, we see no evidence of a trend in

1187: $\left<M_{BH}/M_{\rm gal}\right>$ with halo mass.

1188: 

1189: However, this result is not strongly conclusive, because it is not

1190: known whether the relationship between $M_{BH}$ and $\sigma_e$ depends

1191: on halo mass. However, these results are suggestive that there may be

1192: too much black hole growth via the ``radio mode'' in the models,

1193: perhaps indicating that other heating processes {\em not associated

1194:   with black hole growth} may also be important in quenching cooling

1195: flows.

1196: 

1197: We caution, as well, that although it is tempting to try to interpret

1198: the ``fine features'' in these diagrams, the assignment of halo masses

1199: in the current SDSS group catalogs is not very precise (see the

1200: Appendix), and therefore only broad statistical trends should be taken

1201: seriously. It is possible that in the future, if more precise

1202: estimates of individual halo masses become available for large

1203: samples, for example from gravitational lensing or X-rays, we may be

1204: able to investigate these predicted trends in more detail.

1205: 

1206: 

1207: \begin{figure}

1208: \begin{center}

1209: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig8.ps}

1210: \caption{Average black hole mass to galaxy stellar mass ratio

1211:   $\left<M_{BH}/M_{gal}\right>$ for central galaxies, shown by the

1212:   colour coding, as a function of \mhalo\ and \mgal, for four of the

1213:   theoretical models.  For the S08 and dL06 models, note the

1214:   similarity of the structures seen here to those seen in the plot of

1215:   \fpass\ in Fig.~\protect\ref{fig:fred2d}. This suggests that for

1216:   intermediate halo masses, \fpass\ is closely related to

1217:   $\left<M_{BH}/M_{gal}\right>$ in the models.  We also show

1218:   $\left<M_{\sigma}/M_{gal}\right>$ for the SDSS group catalogs, where

1219:   $M_{\sigma}$, based on the SDSS measured velocity dispersion and the

1220:   observed $M_{\rm BH}-\sigma$ relation, is used as a proxy for the

1221:   average black hole mass.  Interestingly, the strong dependence of

1222:   $\left<M_{\sigma}/M_{gal}\right>$ on halo mass is not visible.  }

1223: \label{fig:mbhmgal}

1224: \end{center}

1225: \end{figure}

1226: 

1227: 

1228: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}

1229: 

1230: In this paper, we set out to investigate the significance of internal

1231: galaxy properties vs. environment in shaping the star formation

1232: history of galaxies, and to attempt to understand some of the physical

1233: processes that might be at work. We made use of the observational

1234: Group Catalog constructed from SDSS DR4 and the NYU-VAGC

1235: \citep{yang07}.  The Group Catalog provides an estimate of the halo

1236: mass for each group, which can be directly compared with semi-analytic

1237: models. These halo mass estimates should provide a more unbiased probe

1238: of global environment than measures based on local galaxy density

1239: (e.g. distance to the $n$-th nearest neighbor)

1240: \footnote{But note that some groups have started measuring

1241:   galaxy number densities using search ellipsoids large

1242:   enough to be representative of massive cluster halos 

1243:   \citep[e.g.,][]{schawinski07a,yoon08}}.  

1244: 

1245: We have also used a sub-sample of SDSS with GALEX coverage to

1246: estimate star formation rates \citep{salim07}, which should be a more

1247: direct probe of the physics of star formation quenching than optical

1248: colours. Besides, we make use of semi-analytic models from several

1249: independent groups (S08, dL06, {\sc morgana}), and containing

1250: different sets of recipes representing physical processes.

1251: 

1252: We first investigated the global distribution of colour vs. magnitude

1253: and SSFR vs. stellar mass in the five models we considered, compared

1254: with the empirical data. Although the different models showed some

1255: differences in the details of their predictions for these quantities,

1256: the models with some kind of quenching (either due to AGN feedback or

1257: according to a critical halo mass) have similar qualitative features

1258: and on the whole are a reasonable match to the empirical data --- not

1259: surprisingly, as these observational quantities have been a target for

1260: theoretical models for some time. We therefore found that it was

1261: sensible to identify active or quenched galaxies according either to a

1262: colour-magnitude criterion (the usual ``green valley''), or a similar

1263: SSFR-\mgal\ criterion.

1264: 

1265: Next we investigated the stellar mass dependence of the quenched

1266: fraction, based on optical colours (\fred), or on SSFR determined from

1267: SDSS+GALEX photometry (\fpass). Here we largely confirmed and

1268: reproduced results shown previously by other authors (though our

1269: results in terms of SSFR from GALEX are new), namely that the fraction

1270: of red/passive galaxies increases with stellar mass for both central

1271: and satellite galaxies, and that the models with AGN feedback or halo

1272: mass-based quenching reproduce this trend reasonably well for central

1273: galaxies, but fail badly for satellites. All of the models produce too

1274: high a fraction of red satellites and too flat a dependence of

1275: quenching on stellar mass, which we term the {\em satellite

1276:   over-quenching problem}.

1277: 

1278: We then investigated the joint dependence of quenched fraction

1279: (\fred\ and \fpass) on galaxy mass and halo mass. First we

1280: investigated \fred\ and \fpass\ as a function of halo mass, in

1281: different stellar mass bins. A difficulty with this approach was that,

1282: especially for central galaxies, there is quite a limited range of

1283: stellar masses in halos of a given mass. 

1284: Our analysis showed that, for central galaxies in

1285: the observational group catalogs, the fraction of quenched galaxies

1286: shows a strong dependence on halo mass at fixed stellar mass, but

1287: also shows a strong dependence on stellar mass at fixed halo

1288: mass. We were not able to determine which quantity is the primary

1289: driver of quenching.

1290: The S08 fiducial and dL06 models reproduced these trends fairly well. 

1291: For observed satellite galaxies, there was a much stronger dependence on 

1292: stellar mass visible in the \fred\ diagram (based on optical colours), 

1293: and a weaker trend in the \fpass\ diagram (based on UV-derived SSFR). 

1294: Once again, all models failed to reproduce the satellite properties, 

1295: and even showed an inverted trend in \fpass\ with respect to the 

1296: empirical data.

1297: 

1298: We also found it interesting to look at the pattern of \fred\ and

1299: \fpass\ in terms of the two dimensional (\mhalo-\mgal) plane. 

1300: This analysis revealed that the contours of

1301: \fred\ and \fpass\ for central galaxies can be interpreted either as

1302: a horizontal run or as a vertical run, again due to the halo mass --

1303: central galaxy mass degeneracy.  The models showed quite a

1304: different pattern in this space, and tended to show stronger vertical

1305: boundaries, indicating a stronger dependence on halo mass.  For both

1306: the empirical data and the models, these diagrams demonstrate the

1307: complexity of the interplay between halo mass and stellar mass, and

1308: are a promising tool for posing stringent tests on physical recipes in

1309: galaxy formation models.  However, we caution that the estimates of

1310: halo mass in the SDSS group catalogs are statistical in nature, and

1311: this may introduce distortions into these distributions (see

1312: Appendix).

1313: 

1314: We attempted to probe the physical origin of these results by

1315: exploring additional correlations, such as the fraction of

1316: morphologically early type (spheroid dominated) galaxies in the

1317: observed sample, \fearly. We found a strikingly similar pattern for

1318: \fearly\ in the (\mhalo,\mgal) plane as we did for \fred\ and \fpass,

1319: suggesting that these quantities are tightly linked in some way. One

1320: natural possibility is that the bulge mass is correlated with the mass

1321: of a supermassive black hole, and that the black hole mass in turn

1322: controls the quenching of star formation.  Intriguingly, we found that

1323: in the models with black hole-regulated AGN heating (S08 fiducial and

1324: dL06), the galaxies that were most likely to be blue, actively star

1325: forming, and disk dominated, were expected to be those with the

1326: smallest black hole for their mass. In addition, we saw a trend with

1327: halo mass, in the sense that central galaxies in larger mass halos are

1328: able to grow black holes more efficiently (the ratio of black hole mass

1329: to stellar mass is larger). These trends were much weaker or absent in

1330: models in which the black hole is not involved in regulating cooling

1331: (such as the ``halo quenching'' model). We do not have direct

1332: estimates of black hole masses for large samples of galaxies, but we

1333: used the measured SDSS velocity dispersion $\sigma_e$ and the observed

1334: $M_{BH}-\sigma_e$ relation to obtain estimates of a black hole mass

1335: proxy, $M_{\sigma}$. We do not see a strong trend in

1336: $M_{\sigma}/\mgal$ for the SDSS group catalog, indicating either that

1337: this method for estimating the empirical black hole masses is too

1338: crude, or that the dependence of black hole mass on halo mass in the

1339: models is too strong.

1340: 

1341: Although the model predictions for the distribution of \fred\ and

1342: \fpass\ in the (\mhalo, \mgal) plane do not match the observational

1343: results in detail, we conclude that the observational data

1344: are consistent with the basic qualitative picture

1345: presented by the models in which cooling is regulated by AGN feedback

1346: at least for central galaxies. In these models, the suppression of

1347: cooling and the quenching of star formation depend on two factors: the

1348: presence of a quasi-hydrostatic hot halo (strongly correlated with

1349: halo mass), and the mass of the supermassive black hole (strongly

1350: correlated with galaxy mass). This picture is also strongly supported

1351: by the recent work of \citet{pasquali08}, which directly explored the

1352: dependence of ``radio mode'' and ``bright mode'' AGN activity on halo

1353: mass and stellar mass in these same SDSS group catalogs.  The

1354: empirical data do not seem to support models in which the process that

1355: suppresses cooling is solely a function of halo mass

1356: \citep[e.g.,][]{dekel08,khochfar08}, although it will be important to

1357: explore the explicit predictions of alternate heating mechanisms (such

1358: as heating by clumps or infalling satellites) in detail.

1359: 

1360: The {\sc morgana} model suffers from the largest disagreement with the

1361: observations. The treatment of the triggering of ``radio mode''

1362: accretion in {\sc morgana} is significantly different than in the

1363: other two models, requiring that star formation is inevitably

1364: associated with the triggering of radio mode accretion. Although the

1365: radio mode feedback mechanism adopted in {\sc morgana} is largely able

1366: to solve the ``overcooling problem'' in terms of reproducing the

1367: galaxy stellar mass or luminosity function, this star formation makes

1368: many massive galaxies too blue. Our analysis places tight constraints

1369: on the links between star formation and AGN activity at late times,

1370: and highlights our current lack of understanding of the details of the

1371: processes that regulate both kinds of activity.

1372: 

1373: For satellite galaxies, the empirical diagrams suggested that

1374: quenching depends on {\em both} stellar mass and halo mass, such that the

1375: ``critical stellar mass'' that divides active from passive (blue from

1376: red) galaxies decreases with increasing halo mass.  None of the models

1377: was successful in predicting this trend.  

1378: Including tidal destruction of satellites, as was

1379: done in the S08 models, improves the agreement with the data because

1380: satellites that have been orbiting for a long time within the host

1381: halo (which tend to be red and passive) are destroyed. However, it

1382: seems that tidal destruction cannot provide a full solution to the

1383: problem.

1384: 

1385: The problems with

1386: over-quenching of satellites in semi-analytic models have been

1387: demonstrated before \citep[e.g.][]{weinmann06b} and are likely due to

1388: the assumption applied in nearly all SAMs that the hot gas halo, which

1389: is the source of new cooling gas, is stripped off instantly when a

1390: galaxy becomes a satellite in a larger halo (sometimes called

1391: ``strangulation''). Therefore satellites fairly quickly consume their

1392: remaining cold gas reservoirs and become red and passive

1393: \citep[e.g.][]{crowl06}. However, recent hydrodynamic simulations have

1394: found that the hot gas halos of satellites are not stripped instantly

1395: \citep{kawata08,mccarthy08}.  Recently, several authors

1396: \citep{kang08,font08} have proposed improved recipes for the treatment

1397: of cooling onto satellites, which produce better results for the

1398: predictions of satellite colours. Clearly, our analysis should be

1399: repeated with one of these improved treatments implemented in our

1400: models. However, it is probably also important to properly treat the

1401: effects of ram pressure stripping on both the satellites' hot halo and

1402: the cold gas in the galaxy \citep{lanzoni05,quilis00,okamoto03}.  This

1403: will clearly be an important area for improvements to the modelling

1404: and further investigations.

1405: 

1406: \section*{Acknowledgments}

1407: \begin{small}

1408: The empirical data derived from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the

1409: Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) observations played a critical role

1410: in this project.  We warmly thank G. de Lucia and G. Lemson for help

1411: with the Millennium Catalogs and database server, and Sadegh Khochfar

1412: and Marc Sarzi for numerous insightful discussions.  We are also grateful

1413: to the referee for several important clarifications. SKY acknowledges

1414: support from the Basic Research Program of the Korea Science and

1415: Engineering Foundation (R01-2006-000-10716-0).  TK is grateful for the

1416: hospitality of the Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Astronomie in Heidelberg

1417: during his visit.  FF and PM thank Laura Silva for help in the use of

1418: GRASIL.  Some of the calculations were carried out at the PIA cluster

1419: of the Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Astronomie at the Rechenzentrum

1420: Garching.

1421: 

1422: \end{small}

1423: 

1424: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

1425: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Abadi, Moore, \& Bower}{1999}]{abadi99} 

1426: Abadi M. G., Moore B., Bower R. G., 1999, MNRAS, 308, 947

1427: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Adelman-McCarthy et al.}{2006}]{adelman06} 

1428: Adelman-McCarthy J. K. et al., 2006, ApJS, 162, 38

1429: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Baldry et al.}{2004}]{baldry04}

1430: Baldry I. K. et al., 2004, ApJ, 600, 681

1431: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Baldry et al.}{2006}]{baldry06}

1432: Baldry I. K., Balogh M. L., Bower R. G., Glazebrook K., Nichol R. C., 

1433: Bamford S. P., Budavari T., 2006, MNRAS, 373, 469 

1434: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Balogh \& Morris}{2000}]{balogh00}

1435: Balogh M. L., Morris S. M., 2000, MNRAS, 318, 703

1436: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Balogh et al.}{2004}]{balogh04}

1437: Balogh M. L. et al., 2004, ApJ, 615L, 101

1438: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Barnes}{2002}]{barnes02}

1439: Barnes J. E., 2002, MNRAS, 333, 481

1440: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bell et al.}{2003}]{bell03}

1441: Bell F. E., McIntosh D. H., Katz N., Weinberg M. D., 2003, ApJ, 149, 289

1442: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bell et al.}{2004}]{bell04}

1443: Bell F. E. et al., 2004, ApJ, 608, 752

1444: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bekki, Couch, \& Shioya}{2002}]{bekki02}

1445: Bekki K., Couch W. J., Shioya Y., 2002, ApJ, 577, 651

1446: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Benson et al.}{2003}]{benson03}

1447: Benson A. J., Bower R. G., Frenk C. S., Baugh C. M., Cole S., 2003, ApJ, 599, 38

1448: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Best et al.}{2005}]{best05}

1449: Best P. N. et al., 2005, MNRAS, 362, 25

1450: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Birnboim \& Dekel}{2003}]{birnboim03}

1451: Birnboim Y., Dekel A., 2003, MNRAS, 345, 349 

1452: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Blanton et al.}{2003}]{blanton03}

1453: Blanton M. R. et al., 2003, AJ, 125, 2348

1454: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Blanton et al.}{2005a}]{blanton05a} 

1455: Blanton M. R. et al., 2005a, AJ, 129, 2562

1456: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Blanton et al.}{2005b}]{blanton05b} 

1457: Blanton M. R. et al., 2005b, ApJ, 629, 143

1458: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Blanton \& Roweis}{2007}]{blanton07}

1459: Blanton M. R., Roweis S., 2007, AJ, 133, 734

1460: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bower et al.}{2006}]{bower06}

1461: Bower R. G. et al., 2006, MNRAS, 370, 645

1462: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Boylan-Kolchin, Ma, \& Quataert}{2008}]{boylan08}

1463: Boylan-Kolchin M., Ma C. -P., Quataert E., 2008, MNRAS, 383, 93

1464: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bruzual \& Charlot}{2003}]{bc03}

1465: Bruzual G., Charlot S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000 

1466: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Cattaneo et al.}{2006}]{cattaneo06}

1467: Cattaneo A., Dekel A., Devriendt J., Guiderdoni B., Blaizot J., 2006, MNRAS, 370, 1651 

1468: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Chandrasekhar}{1943}]{chandra43}

1469: Chandrasekhar S., 1943, ApJ, 97, 255

1470: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Christlein \& Zabludoff}{2005}]{christ05}

1471: Christlein D., Zabludoff A., 2005, ApJ, 621, 201

1472: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Chung et al.}{2007}]{chung07}

1473: Chung A., van Gorkom J. H., Kenney J. D. P., Vollmer B., 2007, ApJ, 659, L115

1474: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Coil et al.}{2008}]{coil08} 

1475: Coil A. L., et al., 2008, ApJ, 672, 153 

1476: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Cooper et al.}{2006}]{cooper06} 

1477: Cooper M. C., et al., 2006, MNRAS, 370, 198 

1478: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Cole et al.}{2000}]{cole00} 

1479: Cole S., Lacey C. G., Baugh C. M., Frenk C. S., 2000, MNRAS, 319, 168 

1480: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Cox et al.}{2004}]{cox04} 

1481: Cox T. J., Primack J., Jonsson P., Somerville R. S., 2004, ApJ, 607L, 87

1482: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Croton et al.}{2006}]{croton06}

1483: Croton D. et al., 2006, MNRAS, 365, 11

1484: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Crowl \& Kenney}{2006}]{crowl06} 

1485: Crowl H. H., Kenney J.~D.~P., 2006, ApJ, 649, L75 

1486: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Davis \& Geller}{1976}]{davis76}

1487: Davis M., Geller M. J. 1976, ApJ, 208, 13 

1488: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Davis et al.}{1985}]{davis85} 

1489: Davis M., Efstathiou G., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., 1985, ApJ, 292, 371  

1490: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{De Lucia et al.}{2006}]{delucia06}

1491: De Lucia G., Springel V., White S. D. M., Croton D., Kauffmann G., 2006, MNRAS, 366, 499

1492: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{De Lucia \& Blaizot}{2007}]{delucia07}

1493: De Lucia G., Blaizot J., 2007, MNRAS, 375, 2

1494: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dekel \& Silk}{1986}]{dekel86}

1495: Dekel A., Silk J., 1986, ApJ, 303, 39

1496: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dekel \& Birnboim}{2006}]{dekel06} 

1497: Dekel A., Birnboim Y., 2006, MNRAS, 368, 2 

1498: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dekel \& Birnboim}{2008}]{dekel08} 

1499: Dekel A., Birnboim Y., 2008, MNRAS, 383, 119 

1500: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Di Matteo, Springel, \& Hernquist}{2005}]{dimatteo05} 

1501: Di Matteo T., Springel V., Hernquist L., 2005, Nature, 433,604

1502: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dressler}{1980}]{dressler80} 

1503: Dressler A., 1980, ApJ, 236, 351

1504: %\bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dressler et al.}{1997}]{dressler97} 

1505: %Dressler A. et al., 1997, ApJ, 490, 577

1506: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Font et al.}{2008}]{font08} 

1507: Font A. S. et al., 2008, MNRAS, 389, 1619 

1508: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Fontanot et al.}{2006}]{fontanot06} 

1509: Fontanot F., Monaco P., Cristiani S., Tozzi P., 2006, MNRAS, 373, 1173  

1510: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Fontanot et al.}{2007}]{fontanot07} 

1511: Fontanot F., Monaco P., Silva L., Grazian A., 2007, MNRAS, 382, 903 

1512: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Gebhardt et al.}{2000}]{gebhardt00} 

1513: Gebhardt K., et al., 2000, ApJ, 539, L13

1514: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Granato et al.}{2004}]{granato04} 

1515: Granato G.~L., De Zotti G., Silva L., Bressan A., \& Danese L., 2004, ApJ, 600, 580 

1516: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Gomez et al.}{2003}]{gomez03} 

1517: Gomez P. L. et al., 2003, ApJ, 584, 210

1518: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Gunn \& Gott}{1972}]{gunn72} 

1519: Gunn J. E., Gott, J. R., 1972, ApJ, 176, 1

1520: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hashimoto et al.}{1998}]{hashimoto98} 

1521: Hashimoto Y., Oemler A., Lin H., Tucker D. L., 1998, ApJ, 499, 589

1522: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hatton et al.}{2003}]{hatton03} 

1523: Hatton S., Devriendt J. E. G., Ninin S., Bouchet F. R., Guiderdoni B., Vibert D., 2003, MNRAS, 343, 75

1524: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hopkins et al.}{2007}]{hopkins07} 

1525: Hopkins P. F., Hernquist L., Cox T. J., Robertson B., Krause E. 2007, ApJ, 669, 45 

1526: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kang et al.}{2005}]{kang05} 

1527: Kang X., Jing Y. P., Mo H, J., Borner G, 2005, ApJ, 631, 21

1528: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kang \& van den Bosch}{2008}]{kang08} 

1529: Kang X., van den Bosch F. C., 2008, ApJ, 676L, 101

1530: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kauffmann, White, \& Guiderdoni}{1993}]{kauffmann93} 

1531: Kauffmann G., White S. D. M, Guiderdoni B., 1993, MNRAS, 264, 201

1532: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kauffmann et al.}{1999}]{kauffmann99} 

1533: Kauffmann G., Colberg, J. M., Diaferio, A., White, S. D. M. 1999, MNRAS, 303, 188

1534: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kauffmann et al.}{2003}]{kauffmann03} 

1535: Kauffmann G. et al., 2003, MNRAS, 341, 54

1536: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kauffmann et al.}{2004}]{kauffmann04} 

1537: Kauffmann G., White S. D. M., Heckman T. M., M{\'e}nard B., Brinchmann J., Charlot S., 

1538: Tremonti C., Brinkmann J., 2004, MNRAS, 353, 713 

1539: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kaviraj et al.}{2007}]{kaviraj07} 

1540: Kaviraj S. et al., 2007, ApJS, 173, 619

1541: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kawata \& Mulchaey}{2008}]{kawata08} 

1542: Kawata D., Mulchaey J. S., 2008, ApJ, 672L, 103

1543: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kennicutt}{1989}]{kennicutt89} 

1544: Kennicutt R. C., 1989, ApJ, 344, 685

1545: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kennicutt}{1998}]{kennicutt98} 

1546: Kennicutt R. C., 1998, ApJ, 498, 181 

1547: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kere{\v s} et al.}{2005}]{keres05} 

1548: Kere{\v s} D., Katz N., Weinberg D. H., Dav{\'e} R., 2005, MNRAS, 363, 2

1549: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Khochfar \& Burkert}{2003}]{khochfar03} 

1550: Khochfar S., Burkert A., 2003, ApJ, 597L, 117

1551: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Khochfar \& Burkert}{2005}]{khochfar05} 

1552: Khochfar S., Burkert A., 2005, MNRAS, 359, 1379

1553: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Khochfar \& Ostriker}{2008}]{khochfar08} 

1554: Khochfar S., Ostriker J., 2008, MNRAS, 680, 54

1555: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Lanzoni et al.}{2005}]{lanzoni05} 

1556: Lanzoni B., Guiderdoni B., Mamon G. A., Devriendt J., Hatton S., 2005, MNRAS, 361, 369 

1557: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Larson}{1974}]{larson74} 

1558: Larson R. B., 1974, MNRAS, 169, 229

1559: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Larson, Tinsley, \& Caldwell}{1980}]{larson80} 

1560: Larson R. B., Tinsely B. M., Caldwell C. N., 1980, ApJ, 237, 692

1561: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Lewis et al.}{2002}]{lewis02} 

1562: Lewis I. et al., 2002, MNRAS, 334, 673

1563: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Martin et al.}{2005}]{martin05} 

1564: Martin D. C. et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, 1

1565: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Martin \& Kennicutt}{2001}]{martin01} 

1566: Martin C. L., Kennicutt R. C., 2001, ApJ, 555, 301

1567: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{McCarthy et al.}{2008}]{mccarthy08} 

1568: McCarthy I. G., Frenk C. S., Font A. S., Lacey C. G., Bower R. G., Mitchell N. L., Balogh M. L., Theuns T., 2008, MNRAS, 383, 593

1569: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{McNamara \& Nulsen}{2007}]{mcnamara07} 

1570: McNamara B. R., Nulsen P. E. J., 2007, ARA\&A, 45, 117

1571: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Mo, Mao \& White}{1998}]{mo98}

1572: Mo H. J., Mao S., White S. D. M., 1998, MNRAS, 295, 319

1573: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Monaco}{2004}]{monaco04} 

1574: Monaco P., 2004, MNRAS, 352, 181 

1575: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Monaco \& Fontanot}{2005}]{monaco05} 

1576: Monaco P., Fontanot F., 2005, MNRAS, 359, 283 

1577: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Monaco, Fontanot, \& Taffoni}{2007}]{monaco07} 

1578: Monaco P., Fontanot F., Taffoni G., 2007, MNRAS, 375, 1189

1579: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Monaco, Theuns, \& Taffoni}{2002}]{monaco02}

1580: Monaco  P., Theuns  T., Taffoni  G., 2002, MNRAS, 331, 587 

1581: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Moore, Lake, \& Katz}{1998}]{moore98} 

1582: Moore B., Lake G., Katz N. 1998, ApJ, 495, 139

1583: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Murray, Quataert, \& Thompson}{2005}]{murray05} 

1584: Murray N., Quataert E., Thompson T. A., 2005, ApJ, 618, 569

1585: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Navarro, Frenk, \& White}{1997}]{navarro97} 

1586: Navarro J. F., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., 1997, ApJ, 490, 493

1587: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Nulsen \& Fabian}{2000}]{nulsen00} 

1588: Nulsen P. E. J., Fabian A. C., 2000, MNRAS, 311, 346 

1589: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Okamoto \& Nagashima}{2003}]{okamoto03} 

1590: Okamoto T., Nagashima M., 2003, ApJ, 587, 500

1591: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Quilis, Moore, \& Bower}{2000}]{quilis00} 

1592: Quilis V., Moore B., Bower R., 2000, Science, 288, 1617

1593: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Pasquali et al.}{2008}]{pasquali08} 

1594: Pasquali A., van den Bosch F.C., Mo H. J., Yang X., Somerville R. S., 2008, preprint (arXiv:0807.4178)

1595: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Press \& Schechter}{1974}]{press74} 

1596: Press W., Schechter P, 1974, ApJ, 187, 425

1597: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Poggianti et al.}{2006}]{poggianti06} 

1598: Poggianti B. M., et al., 2006, ApJ, 642, 188 

1599: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Roberts \& Haynes}{1994}]{roberts94} 

1600: Roberts M. S., Haynes M. P., 1994, ARA\&A, 32, 115

1601: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Salim et al.}{2007}]{salim07} 

1602: Salim S. et al., 2007, ApJS, 173, 267

1603: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Schawinski et al.}{2006}]{schawinski06} 

1604: Schawinski K. et al., 2006, Nature, 442, 888

1605: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Schawinski et al.}{2007a}]{schawinski07a} 

1606: Schawinski K. et al., 2007a, ApJS, 173, 512

1607: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Schawinski et al.}{2007b}]{schawinski07} 

1608: Schawinski K. et al., 2007b, MNRAS, 382, 1415

1609: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Schmidt}{1968}]{schmidt68} 

1610: Schmidt M., 1968, ApJ, 151, 393

1611: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Shimasaku et al.}{2001}]{shimasaku01} 

1612: Shimasaku K. et al., 2001, AJ, 122, 1238

1613: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Silk \& Rees}{1998}]{silk98} 

1614: Silk J., Rees M. J., 1998, A\&A, 331L, 1

1615: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Silva et al.}{1998}]{silva98}

1616: Silva L., Granato G. L., Bressan A., Danese L., 1998, ApJ, 509, 103

1617: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Somerville \& Primack}{1999}]{sp99} 

1618: Somerville R. S., Primack J. R., 1999, MNRAS, 310, 1087

1619: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Somerville \& Kolatt}{1999}]{sk99} 

1620: Somerville R. S., Kolatt T. S., 1999, MNRAS, 305, 1

1621: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Somerville, Primack, \& Faber}{2001}]{spf01} 

1622: Somerville R. S., Primack J. R., Faber S. M., 2001, MNRAS, 320, 504

1623: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Somerville et al.}{2008a}]{somerville08a}

1624: Somerville et al., 2008a, ApJ, 672, 776

1625: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Somerville et al.}{2008b}]{s08} 

1626: Somerville R. S., Hopkins P. F., Cox T. J., Robertson B. E., Hernquist L., 2008b, MNRAS, in press

1627: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Strateva et al.}{2001}]{strateva01} 

1628: Strateva I. et al., 2001, AJ, 122, 1861

1629: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Springel et al.}{2001}]{springel01} 

1630: Springel V., White S. D. M., Tormen G., Kauffmann G., 2001, MNRAS, 328, 726

1631: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Springel et al.}{2005}]{springel05nature}

1632: Springel V. et al., 2005, Nature, 435, 629

1633: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Springel, Di Matteo, \& Hernquist}{2005}]{springel05} 

1634: Springel V., Di Matteo T., Hernquist L., 2005, MNRAS, 361, 776

1635: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Taffoni et al.}{2003}]{taffoni03} 

1636: Taffoni G., Mayer L., Colpi M., \& Governato F., 2003, MNRAS, 341, 434 

1637: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Tanaka et al.}{2004}]{tanaka04} 

1638: Tanaka M., Goto T., Okamura S., Shimasaku K., Brinkmann J., 2004, ApJ, 128, 2677

1639: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Taylor \& Babul}{2004}]{taylor04} 

1640: Taylor J. E., Babul A., 2004, MNRAS, 348, 811

1641: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Toomre \& Toomre}{1972}]{toomre72} 

1642: Toomre A., Toomre J., 1972, ApJ, 178, 623

1643: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Umemura}{2001}]{umemura01} 

1644: Umemura M. 2001, ApJ, 560, L29 

1645: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{van den Bosch et al.}{2008a}]{vdb08a} 

1646: van den Bosch F. C., Aquino D., Yang X., Mo H. J., Pasquali A., McIntosh D. H., Weinmann S. M., Kang X., 2008, MNRAS, 387, 79 

1647: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{van den Bosch et al.}{2008b}]{vdb08b} 

1648: van den Bosch F. C., Pasquali A., Yang X., Mo H. J., Weinmann S., McIntosh D. H., Aquino D., 2008, preprint (arXiv:0805.0002)

1649: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Viola et al.}{2008}]{viola08} 

1650: Viola M., Monaco P., Borgani S., Murante G., Tornatore, L., 2008, MNRAS, 383, 777

1651: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Warren et al.}{2005}]{warren05} 

1652: Warren M. S., Abazajian K., Holz D. E., Teodoro L. 2006, ApJ, 646, 881

1653: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Weinmann et al.}{2006a}]{weinmann06a} 

1654: Weinmann S. M, van den Bosch F. C., Yang X., Mo H. J., 2006a, MNRAS, 366, 2

1655: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Weinmann et al.}{2006b}]{weinmann06b} 

1656: Weinmann S. M. et al., 2006b, MNRAS, 372, 1161

1657: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Weinmann et al.}{2008}]{weinmann08} 

1658: Weinmann S. M., Kauffmann G., van den Bosch F. C., Pasquali A., McIntosh D. H., Mo H. J., Yang X., Guo Y., 2008, preprint (arXiv:0809.2283)

1659: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{White \& Frenk}{1991}]{wf91} 

1660: White S. D. M., Frenk C. S., 1991, ApJ, 379, 52

1661: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Yang et al.}{2005}]{yang05} 

1662: Yang X., Mo H. J., van den Bosch F. C., Jing Y. P., 2005, MNRAS, 356, 1293 

1663: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Yang et al.}{2007}]{yang07} 

1664: Yang X., Mo H. J., van den Bosch F. C., Pasquali A., Li C., Barden M., 2007, ApJ, 671, 153

1665: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Yi et al.}{2005}]{yi05} 

1666: Yi S.~K. et al., 2005, ApJ, 619, L111 

1667: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Yoon et al.}{2008}]{yoon08} 

1668: Yoon J.~H., Schawinski K., Sheen Y.-K., Ree C.~H., Yi S.~K., 2008, ApJS, 176, 414 

1669: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Zentner \& Bullock}{2003}]{zentner03} 

1670: Zentner A. R., Bullock J. S., 2003, ApJ, 598, 49

1671: \end{thebibliography}

1672: 

1673: \newpage

1674: 

1675: \begin{figure*}

1676: \begin{center}

1677: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig9_1.ps}

1678: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig9_2.ps}

1679: \caption{The fraction of "red" (\fred) (left panels) and "passive"

1680:   galaxies ($f_{\rm passive}$) (right panels) in models without dust

1681:   corrections. The colour scale is as in Fig.~\ref{fig:fred2d}. We

1682:   present the results for central galaxies (left) and satellite

1683:   (right) galaxies seperately.  We see that the details of the

1684:   \fred\ distribution are quite sensitive to the dust correction,

1685:   whereas $f_{\rm passive}$ is not noticably affected by the dust

1686:   correction. We also note that the dust-free \fred\ results appear

1687:   more similar to the \fpass\ results, which presumably probe the

1688:   physical properties of galaxies more directly. }

1689: \label{fig:fred2d_nodust}

1690: \end{center}

1691: \end{figure*}

1692: 

1693: \begin{figure*}

1694: \begin{center}

1695: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig10_1.ps}

1696: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig10_2.ps}

1697: \caption{ The fraction of ``red'' galaxies (\fred) (left panels) and of

1698:   ``passive'' galaxies ($f_{\rm passive}$) (right panels) without

1699:   selection criteria. The colour scale is as in

1700:   Fig.~\ref{fig:fred2d}. We present the results for central

1701:   galaxies (left) and satellite (right) galaxies seperately.  It can

1702:   be inferred that our main results do not depend on our selection

1703:   criteria.  }

1704: \label{fig:fred2d_noselec}

1705: \end{center}

1706: \end{figure*}

1707: 

1708: \section*{Appendix : The effect of dust, selection criteria, and group catalog halo mass estimates}

1709: 

1710: All of our models include a treatment of dust extinction, which

1711: affects both the colours and magnitudes of the model galaxies. In

1712: addition, as mentioned in \S 4, for our main analysis we have applied

1713: selection criteria to the models to mimic those that we believe to be

1714: present in the SDSS group catalog. We include only galaxies with

1715: apparent $r$-band magnitude brighter than 17.77 mags, and we also

1716: excluded halos which do not contain any galaxy member brighter than

1717: $^{0.1}M_r \leq -19.5 + 5\log h$. In this Appendix we provide the

1718: results for the 2-d distributions of \fred\ and \fpass\ for the

1719: theoretical models without dust extinction and without selection

1720: criteria applied. In addition, we test for possible biases that may

1721: arise from the approach used to assign halo masses to the groups in

1722: the SDSS group catalogs by applying this method to the model mock

1723: catalogs.

1724: 

1725: 

1726: 

1727: In Fig.~\ref{fig:fred2d_nodust} we show \fred\ and \fpass\ without any

1728: `dust corrections applied to the models. Since we do not have magnitude

1729: information without dust corrections for the dL06 models, only the S08

1730: fiducial and {\sc morgana} models are shown. Interestingly, the

1731: results now look much more similar to the results seen before for

1732: \fpass. In particular, the blue ridge which was visible in the

1733: \fpass\ diagrams corresponded to a {\em red} ridge in the

1734: \fred\ diagram (Fig.~\ref{fig:fred2d}). The blue ridge is now visible

1735: in \fred\ as well, indicating that these galaxies are actually

1736: actively star forming, and were predicted to be red only because of

1737: dust extinction. In the case of \fpass, the dust correction only

1738: affects the galaxy selection and causes a negligible change in the

1739: diagrams. The treatment of dust extinction is one of the most

1740: uncertain aspects of the modelling, and this highlights the advantage

1741: of using intrinsic physical quantities extracted from the

1742: observations.

1743: 

1744: 

1745: Fig.~\ref{fig:fred2d_noselec} shows the model predictions with no

1746: selection effects applied. Comparing this with Fig.~\ref{fig:fred2d}, we

1747: see that the results appear unchanged above a halo mass $\log

1748: \mhalo/h^{-1}\msun \ge 11.6$ and a stellar mass $\mgal \ge 10^{9}

1749: \msun$. This is reassuring in the context of our present

1750: analysis. However, we can also see that there is interesting predicted

1751: behavior at lower halo and galaxy masses than we can currently probe,

1752: and also interesting differences between the models at these

1753: masses. This suggests that it would be extremely useful to obtain

1754: similar data that are complete to fainter levels, so that we could

1755: probe lower mass galaxies and lower mass halos.

1756: 

1757: \begin{figure}

1758: \begin{center}

1759: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig11.ps}

1760: \caption{The true halo mass in the fiducial semi-analytic model of

1761:   S08, compared with the halo mass estimate based on the total stellar

1762:   mass in the halo, using a procedure similar to that of Y07 for the

1763:   SDSS-based group catalog. The colour-scale indicates the stellar mass

1764:   of the central galaxy in each halo, as shown by the key on the

1765:   figure. Although the mean halo mass is reproduced fairly well, there

1766:   is quite a large scatter in the true halo mass at a given estimated

1767:   halo mass.}

1768: \label{fig:mhalocomp}

1769: \end{center}

1770: \end{figure}

1771: 

1772: 

1773: Finally, we investigate the procedure used to assign halo masses to

1774: the groups that are identified in the SDSS group catalog. For the

1775: results presented here, stellar masses for several models are obtained 

1776: from \citet{bell03} like Y07, and halo masses are assigned based on the

1777: ``characteristic'' stellar mass of the group, where the characteristic

1778: stellar mass is defined as the total stellar

1779: mass contributed by galaxies with $^{0.1}M_r \leq -19.5 + 5\log h$. 

1780: Halo masses are then assigned by matching the rank-ordered list of

1781: group characteristic stellar masses with a rank-ordered list of dark

1782: matter halo masses from a theoretical estimate of the DM halo mass

1783: function, assuming a monotonic mapping between the characteristic

1784: stellar mass and DM halo mass (see \S\ref{sec:data:group} and Y07). We

1785: apply this procedure to the halos in the mock catalog produced with

1786: the S08 fiducial semi-analytic model, and show the comparison between

1787: the true and estimated halo mass in Fig.~\ref{fig:mhalocomp}. We see

1788: that although the mean halo mass is estimated fairly accurately, there

1789: is a large scatter in true halo mass at a given value of the estimated

1790: halo mass.

1791: 

1792: \begin{figure}

1793: \begin{center}

1794: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig12.ps}

1795: \caption{The fraction of ``red'' galaxies (\fred) as a function of halo

1796:   mass and stellar mass, where halo masses have been assigned in the

1797:   semi-analytic models using an approach similar to that used in the

1798:   SDSS group catalogs. The colour scale is as in

1799:   Fig.~\ref{fig:fred2d}. We present the results for central

1800:   galaxies (left) and satellite (right) galaxies seperately. We see

1801:   that the procedure used to assign halo masses in the SDSS group

1802:   catalogs reduces the scatter in \mgal\ at fixed halo mass, and

1803:   washes out many of the detailed features of the 2d distribution that

1804:   are visible in the raw model predictions. }

1805: \label{fig:fred2d_yang}

1806: \end{center}

1807: \end{figure}

1808: 

1809: In Fig.~\ref{fig:fred2d_yang}, we show again the distribution of

1810: \fred\ with halo mass and stellar mass, now using the Y07-like halo

1811: mass estimates for the semi-analytic models instead of the true halo

1812: masses. We see that the procedure artificially reduces the scatter in

1813: \mgal\ at fixed halo mass. 

1814: This can be attributed to two effects.  First, the halo mass estimates

1815: in the Y07 group catalogue are based on the total stellar mass in the

1816: halo, which strongly correlates with the stellar mass of the central

1817: galaxy.  In addition, the Y07 group catalogue includes corrections for

1818: various incompleteness effects in the SDSS (the factor {\cal C} in

1819: Eqs. 3--4 in Y07), which creates scatter that is not visible in the

1820: mock catalogues.  It should also be noted that the halo-mass

1821: estimating algorithm of Y07 washes out many of the detailed features

1822: that are visible in the model predictions.  Hence we should not make

1823: too much of the detailed features in the empirical

1824: \mgal-\mhalo\ diagrams but should focus on the mean trends instead.

1825: 

1826: 

1827: 

1828: 

1829: 

1830: \end{document}

1831: