1: % aa.dem
2: % AA vers. 6, LaTeX class for Astronomy & Astrophysics
3: % demonstration file
4: % (c) Springer-Verlag HD
5: % revised by EDP Sciences
6: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
7: %
8: %\documentclass[referee,oldversion]{aa} % for a referee version
9: %\documentclass[onecolumn]{aa} % for a paper on 1 column
10: %\documentclass[longauth]{aa} % for the long lists of affiliations
11: %\documentclass[rnote]{aa} % for the research notes
12:
13: %\documentclass[referee,10pt,oldversion]{aa}
14: \documentclass[oldversion]{aa}
15: %
16: \usepackage{graphicx}
17: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
18: \usepackage{savesymbol}
19: \usepackage{amsmath}
20: \savesymbol{iint}
21: \usepackage{txfonts}
22: \restoresymbol{TXF}{iint}
23: \usepackage{txfonts}
24: \usepackage{float}
25: \usepackage{placeins}
26: \usepackage{lscape}
27: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
28: \usepackage{natbib}
29: %
30:
31: \bibpunct{(}{)}{;}{a}{}{,}
32: \DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.eps}
33: \graphicspath{{./pub_graphics/}}
34:
35: %\setcounter{topnumber}{4} % Floats allowed at the top of a page
36: %\setcounter{bottomnumber}{2} % Floats allowed at the bottom of a page
37: %\setcounter{totalnumber}{6} % Maximum floats allowed on a page
38: %\def\topfraction{1.00} % Float fraction that can be occupied at top
39: %\def\bottomfraction{1.00} % Float fraction that can be occupied at bottom
40: %\def\textfraction{0.01} % Min. fraction of text. Others for floats.
41: %\def\floatpagefraction{0.0} % Min. fraction of floats. Others for texts.
42:
43: \renewcommand{\deg}{\hbox{$^\circ$}}
44: \newcommand{\hmsm}[4]{{#1}^{\rm h}{#2}^{\rm m}{#3}^{\rm s}\!\!.\:\!{#4}}
45: \newcommand{\dmsm}[4]{\, {#1}^{\circ}{#2}^{\prime}{#3}^{\prime\prime}\!\!\!.\;\!{#4}}
46: \def\fmag{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\rm m}$}}
47: \newcommand{\tth}{\cdot 10^{19}\,{\rm atoms}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}}
48: \newcommand{\mJyb}{\,{\rm mJy}/{\rm beam}}
49: \def\fd{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\rm d}$}}
50: \def\fdeg{.\!\!^{\circ}}
51: \def\fh{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\rm h}$}}
52: \def\fm{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\rm m}$}}
53: \def\fs{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\rm s}$}}
54: \def\fdg{\hbox{$.\!\!^\circ$}}
55: \def\farcm{\hbox{$.\mkern-4mu^\prime$}}
56: \def\farcs{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\prime\prime}$}}
57: \newcommand{\cng}[1]{{ #1}}
58: \newcommand{\cngs}[1]{{\bf #1}}
59: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
60: %
61: \begin{document}
62: %
63: \title{Kinematic modeling of disk galaxies}
64:
65: \subtitle{III. The warped ``Spindle'' NGC~2685}
66:
67: \author{G. I. G. J\'ozsa\thanks{\email{gjozsa@astro.uni-bonn.de}}
68: \inst{1}
69: \and
70: T. A. Oosterloo\thanks{\email{oosterloo@astron.nl}}
71: \inst{1,3}
72: \and
73: R. Morganti\thanks{\email{morganti@astron.nl}}
74: \inst{1,3}
75: \and
76: U. Klein\thanks{\email{uklein@astro.uni-bonn.de}}
77: \inst{2}
78: \and
79: T. Erben\thanks{\email{terben@astro.uni-bonn.de}}
80: \inst{2}
81: }
82: \offprints{G. J\'ozsa}
83:
84: \institute{Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy, Postbus 2,
85: 7990 AA Dwingeloo, The Netherlands\\
86: \and
87: Argelander Institute for Astronomy (AIfA), Univ. Bonn,
88: Auf dem H\"ugel 71, D-53121 Bonn\\
89: \and
90: Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, Univ. Groningen, Postbus 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands}
91:
92: \date{Received 9 January 2008 / Accepted 10 October 2008}
93:
94: \abstract {
95: This is the third of a series of papers in which the structure and
96: kinematics of disk galaxies is studied. Employing direct tilted-ring
97: fits to the data cube as introduced in Paper I, we perform an analysis
98: of the ``Spindle'' galaxy NGC~2685, previously
99: regarded as two-ringed polar ring galaxy.
100:
101: Deep \ion{H}{i} and optical (i$^{\prime}$-band) observations are
102: presented. The \ion{H}{i} observations strongly suggest that the
103: gaseous structure of NGC~2685 does not consist of two separate
104: mutually inclined regions, but forms a coherent, extremely warped
105: disk, the appearance of two rings being due to projection effects. By
106: comparing the \ion{H}{i} total-intensity maps with the optical image
107: we demonstrate that at large radii a faint stellar disk is well
108: aligned with the outer \ion{H}{i} disk. The shape of the dust-lanes
109: obscuring the NE part of the inner stellar body indicates that also at
110: smaller radii NGC~2685 possesses a disk containing gas, dust, and
111: stars in which the various constituents are aligned.
112:
113: At smaller radii, this disk is kinematically decoupled from the
114: central stellar body. Hence, in the region of the bright, central
115: stellar body, NGC~2685 appears to consist of two disks that share a
116: common centre, but have different orientation: a bright stellar
117: lenticular body apparently devoid of dust and gas, and a heavily
118: warped low-surface brightness disk containing stars, gas and dust. The
119: low-surface-brightness disk changes its orientation gradually and at
120: large radii assumes the orientation of the central stellar S0
121: disk. Since, according to our analysis, the intrinsic orientation of
122: the low-surface-brightness disk changes through $70\deg$, the gaseous
123: disk is coherent, and is at no radius orientated perpendicularly with
124: respect to the central stellar body, NGC~2685 is likely not a
125: classical polar-ring galaxy.
126: }
127:
128: \keywords{Galaxies: kinematics and dynamics -- Galaxies: structure -- Galaxies: ISM -- Galaxies: peculiar Galaxies: individual: NGC~2685}
129: \maketitle
130: %
131: %________________________________________________________________
132: \section{Introduction}
133: \label{Sect_3.1}
134: NGC~2685 obtained the name ``Spindle Galaxy'' from
135: \citet[][]{Sandage61} who referred to this object as ``perhaps the
136: most unusual galaxy in the Shapely-Ames catalogue''. The image
137: consists of a bright central object elongated from NE to SW. The whole
138: of the NE side of the central object is obscured by dust-lanes with
139: associated star-forming regions. Dust-lanes and {H\,{\small II}}
140: regions are missing on the SW side. In projection the dust-lanes
141: resemble a helical structure, hence NGC~2685 is also often referred to
142: as the ``Helix''. At larger radii an outer stellar ring is visible on
143: optical images that appears to have the same orientation as the
144: central object. Basic properties of NGC~2685 are
145: listed in Table~\ref{Tab_1} where distance dependent quantities
146: taken from the literature were corrected for differences in the
147: assumed distances (see Sect.~\ref{Sect_5}).
148:
149: An inner ionised gas component, rotating rapidly on orbits
150: perpendicular to the major axis of the central stellar object, was
151: detected by \citet[][]{Ulrich75}. She showed that inside radii of
152: $4\arcsec$ to $10\arcsec$ this component is rotating differentially
153: with a projected amplitude of about $125\,{\rm km}\,{\rm
154: s}^{-1}$. This was confirmed by \citet[][]{Schechter78}, who analysed
155: stellar absorption- and emission spectra employing long-slit
156: observations along the projected major- and minor axes of the central
157: body. For the stellar component they found a velocity gradient along
158: the major axis. They observed that the central galaxy shows
159: non-solid-body rotation with a projected amplitude of $115\,{\rm
160: km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$ and concluded that it is a lenticular galaxy
161: \citep[see also][]{Whitmore90,Emsellem04}. \citet[][]{Whitmore90}
162: showed that the inner ring structure has an excess luminosity with
163: respect to the central body, indicating the existence of a stellar
164: component in the inner ring and the helical structure.
165: %
166: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
167: %
168: \begin{table*}
169: \caption{
170: Basic properties of NGC~2685.}
171: \label{Tab_1}
172: \begin{center}
173: \begin{tabular}{llrr}
174: \hline
175: \hline
176: Description & Parameter name & & Reference \\
177: \hline
178: Classification of galaxy & Type & SB0+ & \citealt{Vaucouleurs91} \\
179: Right Ascension (J2000) (NED) & RA & $ \hmsm{08}{55}{34}{75} $ & NED \\
180: Declination (J2000) (NED) & Dec & $ \dmsm{+58}{44}{03}{9} $ & NED \\
181: Optical heliocentric systemic velocity ($\rm km\,{\rm s}^{-1}$) & $V_{\rm sys}$ & $ 875.2 \,\pm\, 2.0 $ & this work \\
182: Distance of object ($\rm Mpc$) & $\rm D$ & $ 15.2 \,\pm\, 3.8 $ & this work \\
183: Scale between distance on sky and true distance (${\rm pc}/\,^{\prime\prime}$). & $sc$ & $ 74 \,\pm\, 19 $ & this work \\
184: Apparent B-band magnitude ($\rm mag$). & $m_{\rm B}$ & $ 12.05 \,\pm\, 0.15 $ & LEDA \citep[][]{LEDA} \\
185: Apparent I-band magnitude ($\rm mag$). & $m_{\rm I}$ & $ 9.90 \,\pm\, 0.10 $ & LEDA \citep[][]{LEDA} \\
186: Extinction-corrected apparent B-band magnitude ($\rm mag$). & $m_{\rm B}^{\rm c}$ & $ 11.77 \,\pm\, 0.15 $ & NED \\
187: Extinction-corrected apparent I-band magnitude ($\rm mag$). & $m_{\rm I}^{\rm c}$ & $ 9.54 \,\pm\, 0.12 $ & this work \\
188: Absolute B-band magnitude ($\rm mag$). & $M_{\rm B}$ & $ -19.1 \,\pm\, 0.7 $ & this work \\
189: Absolute I-band magnitude ($\rm mag$). & $M_{\rm I}$ & $ -21.4 \,\pm\, 0.6 $ & this work \\
190: B-band luminosity ($ 10^9\, {L}_\odot $). & $L_{\rm B}$ & $ 7.0 \,\pm\, 3.7 $ & this work \\
191: I-band luminosity ($ 10^9\, {L}_\odot $). & $L_{\rm I}$ & $ 15.2 \,\pm\, 7.7 $ & this work \\
192: Total {\ion{H}{i}} flux (${\rm Jy}\,{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$). & $F_{\rm {\ion{H}{i}}}$ & $ 31.4 \,\pm\, 3.1 $ & this work \\
193: {\ion{H}{i}} mass ($10^9\,{M}_\odot$). & $M_{\rm {\ion{H}{i}}}$ & $ 1.7 \,\pm\, 0.9 $ & this work \\
194: B-band optical radius ($\,^{\prime\prime}$). & $r_{25}$ & $ 147 \,\pm\, 30 $ & LEDA \citep[][]{LEDA} \\
195: {\ion{H}{i}} radius ($\,^{\prime\prime}$). & $r_{\rm {\ion{H}{i}}}$ & $ 200 \,\pm\, 40 $ & this work \\
196: Terminal radius ($\,^{\prime\prime}$). & $r_{\rm t}$ & $ 420 \,\pm\, 30 $ & this work \\
197: B-band optical radius ($\rm kpc$). & $R_{25}$ & $ 10.8 \,\pm\, 2.7 $ & this work \\
198: {\ion{H}{i}} radius ($\rm kpc$). & $R_{\rm {\ion{H}{i}}}$ & $ 14.8 \,\pm\, 3.7 $ & this work \\
199: Terminal radius ($\rm kpc$). & $R_{\rm t}$ & $ 31.0 \,\pm\, 7.7 $ & this work \\
200: Rotation velocity at terminal radius (${\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$). & $V_{\rm t}$ & $ 147 \,\pm\, 15 $ & this work \\
201: Rotation period at terminal radius (${\rm Gyr}$). & $t_{\rm t}$ & $ 1.297 \,\pm\, 0.030 $ & this work \\
202: Dynamical mass ($10^9\,{M}_\odot$). & $M_{\rm dyn}$ & $ >\, 155 \,\pm\, 50 $ & this work \\
203: Ratio of {\ion{H}{i}} mass and B-band luminosity (${M}_\odot\,{L}_\odot^{-1}$). & $\frac{M_{\rm {\ion{H}{i}}}}{L_{\rm B}}$ & $ 0.2 \,\pm\, 0.03 $ & this work \\
204: Ratio of {\ion{H}{i}} mass and I-band luminosity (${M}_\odot\,{L}_\odot^{-1}$). & $\frac{M_{\rm {\ion{H}{i}}}}{L_{\rm I}}$ & $ 0.1 \,\pm\, 0.01 $ & this work \\
205: Ratio of dynamical mass and {\ion{H}{i}} mass. & $\frac{M_{\rm dyn}}{M_{\rm {\ion{H}{i}}}}$ & $ >\, 91 \,\pm\, 25 $ & this work \\
206: Ratio of dynamical mass and B-band luminosity (${M}_\odot\,{L}_\odot^{-1}$). & $\frac{M_{\rm dyn}}{L_{\rm B}}$ & $ >\, 22 \,\pm\, 7.3 $ & this work \\
207: Ratio of dynamical mass and I-band luminosity (${M}_\odot\,{L}_\odot^{-1}$). & $\frac{M_{\rm dyn}}{L_{\rm I}}$ & $ >\, 10.2 \,\pm\, 3.4 $ & this work \\
208: \hline
209: \end{tabular}
210: \end{center}
211: \end{table*}
212:
213: %
214: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
215: %
216: Hence, NGC~2685 is claimed to be a polar-ring galaxy with a gaseous-
217: and stellar component that rotates at rather small radii on a polar
218: orbit about a central lenticular galaxy.
219:
220: Today's picture of NGC~2685 as containing two kinematically
221: independent, clearly separated kinematic systems in the neutral gas
222: was drawn by Shane \citeyearpar{Shane77,Shane80} and sustained in
223: other studies by \citet[][]{Mahon92} and
224: \citet[][]{Schinnerer02}. Examining \ion{H}{i} synthesis observations
225: of the galaxy, they concluded that the neutral gas resides in two
226: separate rings. One is supposedly connected with the dust-lane
227: structure seen in the galaxy. The other one at large radii is assumed
228: to be orientated perpendicularly with respect to the first ring. It
229: seems to be aligned with the central stellar body and to rotate at a
230: speed of about $150\,{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$.
231:
232: The purpose of this paper is to present new observations conducted
233: with the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT, Westerbork, The
234: Netherlands) and the 2.5m Isaac Newton Telescope (INT, Roque de los
235: Muchachos, Spain). Using our \ion{H}{i} observations to perform a
236: simple tilted-ring analysis, we argue that the picture of NGC 2685
237: containing two seperate \ion{H}{i} rings is probably not tenable: we
238: reproduce the \ion{H}{i} observations by assuming a coherent, warped
239: disk structure of the \ion{H}{i} component, in which the orbits are
240: circular. Comparing our model to the observations, there is no
241: evidence for significant deviations from circular orbits, except
242: possibly at the edges of the projected central body. Based on these
243: findings we suggest a different scenario: in addition to the central
244: stellar body NGC~2685 contains an extremely warped disk of low surface
245: brightness, consisting of gas, dust, and stars. Only in projection
246: the galaxy appears to have two rings and a central ``helix''. At large
247: radii the gaseous disk shares its orientation with the central
248: lenticular galaxy. Since the single low-surface brightness disk is
249: coherent and changing its orientation gradually, NGC~2685 does not
250: contain two clearly separated systems with nearly orthogonal spin
251: vectors. Hence, NGC~2685 is probably not a classic polar ring galaxy
252: as defined by \citet[][ a polar ring galaxy contains two rotating
253: sub-systems, a disk and a ring or an additional disk, of comparable
254: sizes with orthogonal angular momentum vectors of similar amplitude;
255: both systems share the centre and the systemic velocity and the ring
256: is nearly planar.]{Whitmore90}: The rotation curve derived from the
257: \ion{H}{i} data resembles a rotation curve of a spiral galaxy, staying
258: relatively flat out to the last measured data point. The shape of
259: rotation curve, in conjunction with the extreme warp geometry,
260: indicates that the overall potential is not extremely flattened but
261: close to spherical.
262: %
263: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
264: %
265: \begin{table*}[htbp]
266: \caption{Summary of observations and data reduction.}
267: \label{Tab_2}
268: \begin{center}
269: \begin{tabular}{l r r r}
270: \hline
271: \hline
272: Name of telescope & & \multicolumn{2}{c}{WSRT} \\
273: Total on-source integration time ($\rm h$) & $t_{\rm obs}$ & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$4\times 12$} \\
274: Observation dates & \multicolumn{3}{c}{19-20/12/02, 21-22/12/02, 7-8/01/03, 8-9/01/03} \\
275: \hline
276: Resolution of data cube & & high & low \\
277: \hline
278: Weighting scheme & & uniform & robust 0.4 \\
279: Pixel size ($\,\arcsec$) & $dx$ & $ 4 $ & $ 7 $ \\
280: Channel width (${\rm km}\,{{\rm s}^{-1}}$) & $dv$ & $ 2.06 $ & $ 4.12 $ \\
281: Velocity resolution (${\rm km}\,{{\rm s}^{-1}}$) & $FWHM_{\rm V}$ & $ 4.12 $ & $ 8.24 $ \\
282: Half-power-beam-width along the beam major axis ($\,\arcsec$) & ${\rm HPBW}_{\rm maj}$ & $ 13.7 $ & $ 28.4 $ \\
283: Half-power-beam-width along the beam minor axis ($\,\arcsec$) & ${\rm HPBW}_{\rm min}$ & $ 12.0 $ & $ 25.6 $ \\
284: Beam position angle ($\,\deg$) & ${\rm PA}_{\rm beam}$ & $ -0.6 $ & $ 10.6 $ \\
285: rms noise (${\rm mJy}/{\rm beam}$) in the data cubes & $\sigma_{\rm rms}$ & $ 0.42 $ & $ 0.24 $ \\
286: rms noise per velocity resolution element ($10^{19}\,{\rm atoms}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}$) & $\sigma_{\rm rms}^{N}$ & $ 1.16 $ & $ 0.30 $ \\
287: %rms noise per velocity resolution element (${\rm M}_\odot\,{\rm pc}^{-2}$) & $\sigma_{\rm rms}^{\sigma}$ & $ 0.092 $ & $ 0.024 $ \\
288: %Maximal rms noise in the total-intensity map (${\rm Jy}/{\rm beam}\,{\rm km}\,{{\rm s}^{-1}}$) & $\sigma_{\rm rms,tot}$ & $ 0.012 $ & $ 0.012 $ \\
289: %Maximal rms noise in the total-intensity map ($10^{19}\,{\rm atoms}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}$) & $\sigma_{\rm rms,tot}^{N}$ & $ 8.04 $ & $ 1.78 $ \\
290: %Maximal rms noise in the total-intensity map (${\rm M}_\odot\,{\rm pc}^{-2}$) & $ \sigma_{\rm rms,tot}^{\sigma}$ & $ 0.64 $ & $ 0.143 $ \\
291: \hline
292: Name of telescope/instrument & & \multicolumn{2}{c}{INT WFC} \\
293: Total on-source integration time ($\rm s$) & $t_{\rm obs}$ & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$13350$} \\
294: Observing dates & & \multicolumn{2}{c}{26/02-04/03/04} \\
295: rms noise in the optical image (${\rm mag}\,{\rm arcsec}^{-2}$) & $\sigma_{{\rm i}^\prime} $ & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$ 25.8 $} \\
296: rms noise in the optical image, $5\,\sigma_{\rm rms}$-level for a $2\arcsec$ aperture ($\rm mag$) & $\sigma_{{\rm i}^\prime,2^{\prime\prime}} $ & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$ 21.3 $} \\
297: \hline
298: \end{tabular}
299: \end{center}
300: \end{table*}
301: %
302: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
303: %
304:
305: The paper is laid out as follows: In Sect.~\ref{Sect_2} our
306: observations and the data reduction are described. In
307: Sect.~\ref{Sect_3} we compare the appearance of NGC~2685 in the optical
308: and in the \ion{H}{i}. In Sect.~\ref{Sect_4} we present basic
309: arguments in favour of NGC~2685 possessing one coherent, warped disk,
310: rather than two separate disks. In Sect.~\ref{Sect_5} the data
311: analysis via a direct tilted-ring modelling is described, the results
312: of which are discussed in Sect.~\ref{Sect_6}. In
313: Sect.~\ref{Sect_7} the possible presence and location of
314: non-circular motions is discussed. In Sect.~\ref{Sect_8} we briefly
315: discuss dynamical implications of our kinematical
316: model. Section~\ref{Sect_9} discusses the detection of possible
317: companions to NGC~2685. Section~\ref{Sect_10} summarises our results
318: and a discusses possible formation scenarios for the peculiar
319: structure of NGC~2685. Supplementary figures and tables are placed in
320: the appendix.
321: \section{Observations and data reduction}
322: \label{Sect_2}
323: \subsection{Optical observations}
324: \label{Sect_2.1}
325: NGC~2685 was observed with the INT in the i$^\prime$-band from
326: February 26th until March 4th 2004 under non-photometric weather
327: conditions. Each night, sky flats and bias frames were obtained.
328: Using a series of exposures with a maximum of 400s single exposure
329: time while using a wide dithering scheme the total on-source observing
330: time amounts to $13350\,\rm s$. To obtain a coadded image from the
331: data we made use of the GaBoDS Wide Field Imager reduction pipeline
332: \citep[][]{Schirmer03,Erben05}. After the overscan- and bias
333: correction, the images of each chip were flat-fielded,
334: super-flat-fielded and defringed on a per-night basis. Non-Gaussian
335: noise-features (cosmic rays, hot and cold pixels) were detected and
336: masked, and the single frames visually inspected to apply a
337: manual masking or, in some cases, to reject single frames. The images
338: were photometrically (relatively) calibrated,
339: background-subtracted and co-added, taking into account the sky
340: background variation in the single chips and solving for astrometric
341: distortion and for the relative sensitivity of the chips by making use
342: of the USNO-A2 standard catalog \citep[][]{Monet98}. Using average
343: zero-points for the WFC, as published in the Internet by the CASU INT
344: Wide Field Survey team \citep[][]{McMahon01} the resulting unbinned
345: coadded map can roughly be estimated to have a noise level of
346: $25.8\,{\rm mag}\,{\rm arcsec}^{-2}$ (see Table~\ref{Tab_2}. The
347: obtained image is shown in Fig.~\ref{Fig_01} (upper left panel).
348: %
349: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
350: %
351: \subsection{\ion{H}{i} observations}
352: \label{Sect_2.2}
353: NGC~2685 was observed with the WSRT in December 2002 (2$\times$12h)
354: and January 2004 (2$\times$12h, see Table~\ref{Tab_2}). To ensure a
355: good central uv-coverage all observations were done in maxi-short
356: configuration. We used a total bandwidth of $10\,\rm MHz$, two
357: parallel polarisations, and 1024 channels in total. The data
358: underwent a standard data reduction with the Miriad
359: \citep[][]{Sault95} software package (for a detailed description see
360: \citealt{Jozsa06}). The continuum data resulting from a second-order
361: continuum subtraction with the Miriad-task uvlin were used to correct
362: the frequency independent gains by means of self-calibration. To
363: enhance the signal-to-noise ratio, we performed a second continuum
364: subtraction on the self-calibrated data. We used the clean table of
365: our continuum image to subtract a continuum model from the
366: visibilities (Miriad task uvmodel). Then, we performed a first-order
367: continuum subtraction using 550 line-free channels (Miriad task
368: uvlin). Before inverting the visibilities we applied a Hanning
369: smoothing using the miriad task uvfil. Two data cubes, a
370: high-resolution (uniform weighting using all baselines) and a
371: low-resolution one (Robust weighting of 0.4, using baselines of length
372: $<6.4\,{\rm k\lambda}$) were produced. The data cubes were deconvolved
373: using an iterative CLEAN with appropriate masks. The derived total
374: flux for NGC~2685 is in good agreement with single-dish measurements
375: \citep[][]{Richter94}, showing that no substantial fraction of the
376: flux is resolved out in the \ion{H}{i} observations. Representative
377: examples of resulting channel maps are shown in Figs.~\ref{Fig_A1} and
378: \ref{Fig_A2}. Total intensity maps and first-moment maps were
379: generated by first masking the cubes with the finally applied clean
380: masks. The resulting high-resolution total-intensity map, the
381: low-resolution total-intensity map, and a low-resolution moment-1 map
382: are shown in Fig.~\ref{Fig_01}. A second plot of the high-resolution
383: total intensity map and the corresponding velocity field are shown in
384: \ref{Fig_A3}.
385: %
386: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
387: %
388: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
389: \begin{center}
390: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.49\textwidth]{xx_01a.eps}
391: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.49\textwidth]{xx_01b.eps}
392: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.49\textwidth]{xx_01c.eps}
393: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.49\textwidth]{xx_01d.eps}
394: \caption{Top, left panel: logarithmic grey-scale plot of the i'-band image
395: obtained with the INT. Top, right panel: Grey-scale plot of the
396: high-resolution \ion{H}{i} total-intensity map. Bottom, left panel:
397: Low-resolution total-intensity \ion{H}{i} map (contours and grey
398: scale). Contours represent the $5, 40, 80, 160 \tth$ levels (see
399: Table~\ref{Tab_2}). The boxes indicate the region where spectra were
400: taken to support the hypothesis that NGC~2685 contains a warped disk
401: (see Sect.~\ref{Sect_4}). Bottom, right panel: first-moment velocity
402: field (contours $V_{\rm sys} \pm 0, 40, 80, 120, 140\,{\rm km}\,{\rm
403: s}^{-1}$) derived from the low-resolution data cube, overlaid on
404: low-resolution total-intensity map (grey scale). The approaching side
405: is orientated towards NE. Ellipses in the lower left corner of the
406: \ion{H}{i} maps represent the clean beam HPBW. All images are on the same spatial scale.}
407: \label{Fig_01}
408: \end{center}
409: \end{figure*}
410: %
411: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
412: %
413: Table~\ref{Tab_2} gives an overview of the observations and related
414: parameters. The quality of our \ion{H}{i} observations is
415: significantly better than that of former ones by \citet[][]{Shane80}
416: and \citet[][]{Mahon92}. \citet[][]{Shane80} obtains a sensitivity of
417: $4.5\cdot10^{19}\,{\rm atoms\,{\rm cm}^{-2}}$ per velocity resolution
418: element with a velocity resolution of $27\,{\rm km}{\rm s}^{-1}$
419: (FWHM) and a beam of $49\,\arcsec\times57\,\arcsec$ (HPBW). The high
420: sensitivity is reached at the expense of spatial resolution. The
421: observations of \citet[][]{Mahon92} yielded data cubes
422: \citep[cf.][]{Schinnerer02} with a velocity resolution of $41.4\,{\rm
423: km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$ (FWHM) and a sensitivity of $1.2\cdot10^{19}\,{\rm
424: atoms\,{\rm cm}^{-2}}$ ($1.7\cdot10^{20}\,{\rm atoms\,{\rm cm}^{-2}}$)
425: per velocity resolution element, depending on the spatial resolution
426: (HPBW: $35\,\arcsec\times34\,\arcsec$, and
427: $13\,\arcsec\times11\,\arcsec$ respectively). While the spatial
428: resolution of our observations is comparable to that of the
429: observations of Mahon, the noise level of our data cubes is better by
430: a factor of 4 and the velocity resolution increased by a factor of 5
431: (10 for the high-resolution data cube, see Table~\ref{Tab_2}).
432: %
433: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
434: %
435: \section{The relation between stars and ISM in NGC~2685}
436: \label{Sect_3}
437: %
438: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
439: %
440: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
441: \includegraphics[width=0.32\textwidth]{xx_02a.eps}
442: \includegraphics[width=0.32\textwidth]{xx_02c.eps}
443: \includegraphics[width=0.32\textwidth]{xx_02e.eps}\\
444: \includegraphics[width=0.32\textwidth]{xx_02b.eps}
445: \includegraphics[width=0.32\textwidth]{xx_02d.eps}
446: \includegraphics[width=0.32\textwidth]{xx_02f.eps}
447: \caption{
448: Parametrisations of toy model data cubes and toy model total-intensity
449: maps. Top panels: ``Flip model''. The orientation of the disk flips
450: at a certain radius, the minimum requirement in order to speak of a
451: two-ring or two-disk system in NGC~2685. Bottom panels: ``Warp
452: model''. Here a coherent but heavily warped disk is assumed. Left:
453: surface brightness profile, rotation curve and disk orientation. SD:
454: \ion{H}{i} face-on column density/surface mass density. VROT: rotation
455: velocity. INCL: inclination. PA: position angle. R: radius. Middle:
456: three-dimensional visualisations of the disks. Right: Toy model
457: total-intensity maps. The lines trace the track along which the
458: spectra in the position-velocity diagrams (PV-diagrams) shown in
459: Fig.~\ref{Fig_03} are traced.}
460: \label{Fig_02}
461: \end{figure*}
462: %
463: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
464: %
465: The upper left panel in Fig.~\ref{Fig_01} shows the optical image of
466: the Spindle obtained with the INT WFC, while in the top right panel a
467: grey-scale plot of the \ion{H}{i} high-resolution total-intensity map
468: is shown, using the same spatial scale. A comparison by eye is
469: sufficient to identify several structures to be present in all maps.
470:
471: Firstly, apart from showing the central lenticular body, the optical
472: image resembles the integrated \ion{H}{i} map in such great detail
473: that there is little doubt that both stars and gas belong to the same
474: structure that exists in addition to the central stellar body.
475: Especially the small deviations from axisymmetry, such as a hook-like
476: structure to the NE side of the galaxy and a more diffuse structure
477: towards the SW side are visible in all images \citep[see
478: also][]{Shane77,Shane80}.
479:
480: Secondly, there is no region completely devoid of stars or gas within
481: the projected outer ring. Thanks to the high sensitivity of our
482: observations, this is also evident in the high-resolution \ion{H}{i}
483: map (Fig.~\ref{Fig_01}, top right panel), where beam-smearing effects
484: can be excluded to cause the appearance of a filled inner region.
485: This means that the galaxy possesses an extended disk or, being a
486: rather implausible option, a stellar and gaseous halo that does not
487: belong to its inner bright lenticular stellar body.
488:
489: Thirdly, looking at the high-resolution \ion{H}{i} map
490: (Fig.~\ref{Fig_01}, top right panel), it seems that the helical
491: structure is also present in the \ion{H}{i} component. Apparently, the
492: \ion{H}{i} follows the dust-lane structure like \ion{H}{i} follows
493: spiral arms in spiral galaxies. As the \ion{H}{i} component is
494: optically thin, the spiral-arm structures can be seen on both sides of
495: the galaxy. Using integral-field emission line spectra from the SAURON
496: survey \citep[][]{Emsellem04} and the \ion{H}{i} data presented here,
497: \citet[][]{Morganti06} show that the neutral gas
498: has an ionised counterpart towards the centre \citep[see
499: also][]{Ulrich75} of the galaxy and that in the overlap region the
500: ionised gas shares the kinematical structure of the \ion{H}{i}.
501:
502: It can be concluded that the \ion{H}{i} component in the galaxy
503: belongs to one or two structures, distinct from the central stellar
504: body, which contain molecular, neutral, and ionised gas, dust, and
505: stars. The distribution of all components follows the \ion{H}{i}
506: distribution. At the largest radii beyond the outer projected ring,
507: the \ion{H}{i} maps show a disk-like extension that cannot be seen in
508: the optical image, possibly due to insufficient sensitivity in the
509: optical observations. The outer disk is not detected in the observations
510: of \citet[][]{Shane80} but is evident in the work of
511: \citet[][]{Mahon92} and \citet[][]{Schinnerer02}.
512: %
513: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
514: %
515: \section{The warped structure of the gas disk of NGC~2685}
516: \label{Sect_4}
517: It has been argued that the \ion{H}{i} component of NGC~2685 consists
518: of two rings \citep[][]{Shane77,Shane80,Mahon92,Schinnerer02}. For a
519: number of reasons, we believe that this is probably not the case.
520: %
521: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
522: %
523: \paragraph{The spectral and integrated appearance of the {H\,{\small I}}
524: component\\}
525: Our main point is that the total \ion{H}{i} appearance
526: and the kinematics as observed in the \ion{H}{i} component of NGC~2685
527: are not well matched with two disjunct rings or disks.
528:
529: To demonstrate this, we constructed two tilted-ring models using our
530: software TiRiFiC \citep[][ hereafter Paper I]{Jozsa07a}. These
531: represent a galaxy as a set of thin, mutually inclined rings projected
532: on a data cube. The model parametrisations and 3-d realisations of the
533: toy models are shown in Fig.~\ref{Fig_02}. For the first toy model
534: (``flip model'') it is assumed that the \ion{H}{i} disk of NGC~2685
535: flips at a certain radius. The other model (``warp model''), has a
536: smooth transition from one disk orientation to the
537: other. Figure~\ref{Fig_02} displays the total-intensity maps of the
538: two models. Both models were kept as simple as possible, while by
539: changing the model parameters by hand a rough match with the
540: observations was achieved. Both models require an
541: \ion{H}{i} deficiency towards the centre to reproduce the central
542: \ion{H}{i} ``hole''. Comparing to the original total-intensity map
543: (Fig.~\ref{Fig_01}), the shape of the outer ring and the intensity
544: distribution along the ring is clearly better represented by the warp
545: model. While in the flip model an elliptical ring is produced, the
546: shape of the outer ring is properly reproduced and deviates from a
547: perfect ellipse in the warp model. This is due to projection effects
548: only. The intensity maxima on the minor axis of the ring are highly
549: concentrated at the position where the two disks adjoin in the flip
550: model, while in the warp model they are smoothed out along the outer
551: ring as is the case in the observed total-intensity map. The diffuse
552: appearance of the projected surface brightness at the major axis
553: positions is also seen in the warp model, while it is not in the flip
554: model.
555:
556: The strongest argument against a sudden flip in the \ion{H}{i} disk of
557: NGC~2685 concerns the kinematics. Figure~\ref{Fig_03} shows
558: position-velocity diagrams (PV-diagrams) along the lines shown in
559: Fig.~\ref{Fig_02} calculated from the original low-resolution data
560: cube and the two toy model data cubes. Every discontinuity in the disk
561: orientation causes a gap between the spectral features that belong to
562: the single constituents, as is the case for the flip
563: %
564: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
565: %
566: \begin{figure}[htbp]
567: \resizebox{0.87\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[angle=270]{xx_03a.eps}}\\
568: \resizebox{0.87\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[angle=270]{xx_03b.eps}}\\
569: \resizebox{0.87\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[angle=270]{xx_03c.eps}}
570: \caption{
571: PV-diagrams along the lines across the minor axis of the inner ring
572: shown in Fig.~\ref{Fig_02}. Top panel: taken from the flip-model data
573: cube. Middle panel: taken from the original data cube. Bottom panel:
574: taken from the warp-model data cube. The ellipses in the lower left
575: corners denote the clean beam major axis (HPBW) and the velocity
576: resolution (FWHM). The warp model is able to reproduce the connecting
577: feature indicated by the ellipses, while the flip model is not.
578: }
579: \label{Fig_03}
580: \end{figure}
581: %
582: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
583: %
584: %
585: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
586: %
587: \begin{figure}[htbp]
588: \begin{center}
589: \resizebox{0.9\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{xx_04a.eps}}
590: \resizebox{0.9\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{xx_04b.eps}}
591: \caption{
592: Spectra taken from the low-resolution data cube at the positions
593: indicated by the boxes in Fig.~\ref{Fig_01}. Black: the original
594: spectrum. Light grey (green in online version): fitted Gaussians. Dark
595: grey (red in online version): residual after subtracting the fitted
596: Gaussians from the original profile. The velocity differences $\Delta
597: V_{\rm i,sys}$, $\Delta V_{\rm i,max}$, $\Delta V_{\rm i,bulk}$,
598: $\Delta V_{\rm o,max}$, $\Delta V_{\rm o, bulk}$ are used to quantify
599: the amplitude of hypothetical streaming motions (see text). Top:
600: spectrum derived at RA $ \hmsm{08}{55}{28}{304} $, Dec $
601: \dmsm{58}{44}{30}{98} $ (J2000). Bottom: spectrum derived at RA $
602: \hmsm{08}{55}{40}{893} $, Dec $ \dmsm{58}{43}{34}{99}$ (J2000).
603: }
604: \label{Fig_04}
605: \end{center}
606: \end{figure}
607: %
608: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
609: %
610: model. There is no connecting feature to be seen between the intensity
611: maxima belonging to the ``outer ring'' (intensity peaks closer to the
612: systemic velocity) and the intensity maxima belonging to the ``inner
613: ring''. The PV-diagrams taken from the original data cube and from the
614: warp model show this connection. The superior quality of our
615: observations, in this case the high spectral resolution, enables us to
616: ensure that the connection of the intensity peaks in the PV-diagram of
617: the original data is a real feature and not due to resolution effects.
618:
619: Under the assumption of the presence of two kinematically disjunct
620: rings, strong streaming motions have to be invoked to give rise to the
621: connecting feature (Fig.~\ref{Fig_03}). We analysed 18 spectra at
622: equidistant positions on either side of the centre of the galaxy. They
623: were chosen to show the connecting feature in the PV-diagram of
624: Fig.~\ref{Fig_03}. The spectra were taken from our low-resolution data
625: cube, at the positions of $2\times 9$ adjacent pixels indicated by
626: boxes in Fig.~\ref{Fig_01}. The co-ordinates of the corresponding
627: positions are listed in Table~\ref{Tab_3a} in the
628: appendix. Fig.~\ref{Fig_04} shows two example spectra, extracted at
629: the centre of the boxes. Like the example spectra, all spectra show
630: the same features, two intensity peaks are visible, connected at a
631: lower intensity level. Under the assumption that two separate rings
632: are observed in NGC~2685, the positions of the peak closer to the
633: systemic velocity mark the line-of-sight velocity of the outer ring
634: and the other peak positions the line-of-sight velocity of the inner
635: ring. If all emission would stem from gas on regular orbits, one
636: expects the shape of both emission features to resemble a
637: Gaussian. The rotation velocity of NGC~2685 at a distance of
638: $10\arcsec$ from the centre is already comparable to the overall
639: rotational amplitude of the galaxy
640: \citep[][]{Ulrich75,Shane80}. Inside that radius NGC~2685 is devoid of
641: \ion{H}{i}. Thus, the assumption is well justified. In the two-ringed
642: picture, gas at intermediate velocities belongs to one of the rings,
643: but does not follow the regular orbits of the inner or the outer
644: ring. To separate the anomalous gas component from the regular gas
645: component we fitted two Gaussians to the peaks, and subtracted them
646: from the spectra (Fig.~\ref{Fig_04}). From the peak positions of the
647: fitted Gaussians and the velocities at 20 percent of the peak
648: intensity level of the residuum we calculated the projected bulk- and
649: maximal excess velocities of the anomalous component with respect to
650: the assumed regular components (see Fig.~\ref{Fig_04}). We also
651: calculated the total flux contained in the residuum and in the fitted
652: components (see Table~\ref{Tab_3a} in the appendix). On average, if
653: the excess component would belong to the outer ring, our analysis
654: would indicate a bulk excess velocity of the anomalous component of
655: $\overline{\Delta V_{\rm o,bulk}} = 56\pm 6{\,\rm km\,s^{-1}} $,
656: reaching on average $\overline{\Delta V_{\rm o,max}} = 88\pm 12{\,\rm
657: km\,s^{-1}}$. If it would belong to the inner ring, the average bulk
658: excess velocity would amount to $\overline{\Delta V_{\rm i,bulk}} =
659: 48\pm 6{\,\rm km\,s^{-1}}$, reaching on average $\overline{\Delta
660: V_{\rm i,max}} = 80\pm 13{\,\rm km\,s^{-1}}$. The mass of the
661: anomalous component compared to the mass contained in the outer ring
662: averages to $\overline{F_{\rm
663: \ion{H}{i},e}/F_{\rm \ion{H}{i},o}} = 0.6\pm 0.4$. Compared to the
664: mass contained in the inner ring it is on average $\overline{F_{\rm
665: \ion{H}{i},e}/F_{\rm \ion{H}{i},i}} = 1.1\pm 0.6$. The
666: \textit{projected} velocities of the assumed excess component reach
667: more than two thirds of the assumed projected rotation velocity of
668: either ring and are on average at a level of nearly half the assumed
669: rotation velocity (for the inner ring we assumed $130\,\rm km\,s^{-1}$
670: as the projected rotation velocity, for the inner ring we directly
671: determined $\Delta V_{\rm i,sys}$ from the spectra, see
672: Fig.~\ref{Fig_04}). We thus conclude that the hypothesis that the
673: \ion{H}{i} in NGC~2685 has the structure of two disconnected rings or
674: disks would require the presence of massive streaming motions to
675: explain the spectral appearance of the \ion{H}{i}. This would,
676: however, contradict the lack of enhanced star formation in the galaxy
677: \citep[][]{Schinnerer02}. Hence, an analysis of our spectral data cube
678: renders this hypothesis improbable. We also remark that it would
679: state a strong coincidence to detect gas with such strong deviations
680: from the regular component at the junction of the projected
681: rings. This would not contradict the two-ring hypothesis but weakens
682: it even further. The assumption of a strongly warped \ion{H}{i} disk
683: qualitatively fits the observations. We thus conclude that the
684: (spectral) appearance of NGC~2685 is best compatible with the
685: assumption that it is caused by geometrical effects. In the following
686: section (Sect.~\ref{Sect_5}) we show that we can reproduce the data
687: cube in great detail under that assumption.
688:
689: For the ionised gas disk of NGC~2685, the warped structure of the
690: helix has already been documented by
691: \citet[][]{Nicholson87}.
692:
693: Further support for the warp hypothesis comes from optical
694: measurements, mainly showing that the \ion{H}{i} structure is also
695: found to be present in stars and dust (see also Sect.~\ref{Sect_3}).
696: %
697: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
698: %
699: \paragraph{The dust lanes\\}
700: The appearance of the dust-lanes obscuring the whole NE part of the
701: central body is inconsistent with a single central ring. The simplest
702: way to explain the shape of the dust-lanes would be to assume a strong
703: warp in the associated component. This was already realised by other
704: authors \citep[e.g.][]{Simonson83,Nicholson87,Taniguchi90} and agrees
705: well with our suggestion that the inner low-surface brightness
706: component of NGC~2685 is a heavily warped disk.
707: %
708: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
709: %
710: \paragraph{The outer disk and the filled inner ring\\}
711: Beyond the outer apparent \ion{H}{i}-ring NGC~2685 possesses a diffuse,
712: extended structure, most likely a disk (since it shows a rotational
713: signature in the velocity field, Fig.~\ref{Fig_01}). The outer disk
714: has already been detected by \citet[][]{Mahon92}. As mentioned above,
715: another feature directly evident in the {H\,{\small I}} maps is that
716: inside the outer apparent \ion{H}{i}-ring no empty regions are found
717: (Sect.~\ref{Sect_3}). This is especially true for the optical image
718: and the high-resolution {H\,{\small I}} total-intensity map
719: (Fig.~\ref{Fig_01}, upper right panel), which have a sufficient
720: resolution and sensitivity to detect such holes. If the central
721: \ion{H}{i} structure was a polar ring, we have to assume in our flip
722: model a filled inner region of low-surface brightness, orientated like
723: the outer ring, leading to a quite implausible surface-brightness
724: profile in the flip-model (Fig.~\ref{Fig_02}, top left). While it has
725: been suggested that the outer projected ring could be a resonance
726: feature reacting to the central stellar body, which would then be a
727: bar-like structure \citep[][]{Schinnerer02}, the stellar velocity
728: field published by \citet[][]{Emsellem04} leaves not much doubt that
729: the central stellar body is a differentially rotating disk as has
730: already been found by \citet[][]{Schechter78}. Under the assumption of
731: a polar ring, the same very peculiar surface brightness profile in the
732: gas and in the stars would be required to fill in projection the area
733: inside the projected outer ring. Assuming a warp, this is not the
734: case, the required schematic surface brightness profile (as shown in
735: Fig.~\ref{Fig_02}, bottom left panel) resembles that of a normal disk
736: galaxy.
737:
738: The arguments given above make it plausible to draw the following
739: picture: NGC~2685 contains a stellar- and gaseous disk that shares
740: typical characteristics with the disks of spiral galaxies. However,
741: the disk is extremely warped and NGC~2685 owes its two-ringed
742: appearance to projection effects. Apparently, the helical structure
743: consists of dust-features made up by spiral arms that are wrapped
744: around the central body in a warped structure.
745:
746: %
747: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
748: %
749: \begin{figure}[htbp]
750: \begin{center}
751: \resizebox{0.9\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{xx_05.eps}}
752: \caption{
753: ``Inclinogram'' of the NGC~2685 overlaid on the original total
754: intensity maps: the ellipses mark the projection of the rings at radii
755: of $12\arcsec,36\arcsec,60\arcsec,84\arcsec,108\arcsec,140\arcsec,
756: 180\arcsec,240\arcsec,320\arcsec,$ and $400\arcsec$ on the celestial
757: plane, grey lines mark the kinematical major and minor axes. In light
758: grey (red in the online version) the kinematical major axis in the
759: receding part of the galaxy is plotted, in dark grey (blue in online
760: version) the kinematical major axis of the approaching part.
761: }
762: \label{Fig_05}
763: \end{center}
764: \end{figure}
765: %
766: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
767: %
768: Cases of extreme warps are not unknown. \citet[][]{Schwarz85}
769: quantified the structure of the warp in the large spiral galaxy
770: NGC~3718. It shows an extreme warp in its stellar and gaseous disk
771: that changes its orientation by nearly $90\deg$. In this galaxy, that
772: has a different orientation and does not appear ring-like in
773: projection, the warp is already evident through the appearance of
774: dust-lanes in optical photographs. In a similar approach as presented
775: above, \citet[][]{Arnaboldi93} showed that the galaxy NGC~660 probably
776: has a very simple disk structure with a warp of a large amplitude.
777: %
778: %
779: Several cases of extremely warped \ion{H}{i} disks in gas-rich early
780: type galaxies are known
781: \citep[][]{Morganti97,Oosterloo02,Serra06,Oosterloo07,Sparke08},
782: suggesting that warps of large amplitude could be a common feature
783: among this type of galaxy. Also, the kinematical decoupling of the
784: inner stellar- and gaseous components is not an uncommon feature for
785: early-type galaxies \citep[][]{Sarzi06}.
786: %
787: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
788: %
789: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
790: \begin{center}
791: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=\textwidth]{xx_06.eps}
792: \caption{
793: Tilted-ring parametrisation of the Spindle galaxy. SBR: surface
794: brightness (upper limits only for the first two data points). VROT:
795: rotation velocity. INCL: inclination (unconstrained at origin). PA:
796: position angle (unconstrained at origin). R: radius. The vertical line
797: denotes the optical radius $r_{25}$.}
798: \label{Fig_06}
799: \end{center}
800: \end{figure*}
801: %
802: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
803: %
804: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
805: %
806: \section{Tilted-ring modelling}
807: \label{Sect_5}
808: %
809: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
810: %
811:
812: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
813: \begin{center}
814: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.48\textwidth]{xx_07a.eps}
815: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.48\textwidth]{xx_07b.eps}\\
816: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.48\textwidth]{xx_07c.eps}
817: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.48\textwidth]{xx_07d.eps}
818: \caption{
819: Top panels: total-intensity contour plots (left panel) and
820: first-moment velocity fields (right panel) derived from the
821: low-resolution data cubes (dark-grey, blue in online version:
822: original, light grey, pink in online version: model) overlaid on a
823: total-intensity grey-scale map derived from the observed data
824: cube. The ellipse in the lower left corner represents the clean beam.
825: The contours represent the $5, 20, 80, 160 \tth$ levels and the
826: $V_{\rm sys} \pm 0,40,80,120,140\,{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$ levels
827: respectively (see Tab.~\ref{Tab_2}). Bottom panels: PV-diagrams
828: comparing the final best-fit models (light grey contours, pink in
829: online version) with the original low-resolution data (dark grey
830: contours, blue in online version, and grey scale image). The vertical
831: line marks the systemic velocity. The ellipses in the lower right
832: corners denote the clean beam major axis (HPBW) and the velocity
833: resolution (FWHM). Bottom left: PV-diagram along the kinematical major
834: axis (see Fig.~\ref{Fig_05}), the boxes connected with the lines
835: denote the rotation curve corrected for the inclination. Bottom right:
836: PV-diagram along the kinematical minor axis (see
837: Fig.~\ref{Fig_05}). Contour levels are $0.5, 4, 10\,\mJyb$.
838: }
839: \label{Fig_07}
840: \end{center}
841: \end{figure*}
842: %
843: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
844: %
845: \begin{table*}[htbp]
846: \begin{center}
847: \caption{
848: Global best-fit tilted-ring parameters of NGC~2685. Error in systemic
849: velocity and dispersion: $2.0\,{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$. Error in
850: position and scale height: $6.0^{\prime\prime}\,\hat{=}\,450\,\rm
851: pc$.}
852: \label{Tab_3}
853: \begin{tabular}{l l c c}
854: \hline
855: \hline
856: Descr. & Par.\\
857: \hline
858: Right Ascension (J2000), fitting results & RA$_{\rm fit}$ & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$ \hmsm{08}{55}{34}{92} $} \\
859: Declination (J2000), fitting results & Dec$_{\rm fit}$ & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$ \dmsm{+58}{44}{04}{4} $} \\
860: Right Ascension (J2000) from NED & RA$_{\rm NED}$ & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$ \hmsm{08}{55}{34}{75} $} \\
861: Declination (J2000) from NED & Dec$_{\rm NED}$ & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$ \dmsm{+58}{44}{03}{9} $} \\
862: Heliocentric optical systemic velocity (${\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$) & $V_{\rm sys}$ & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$ 875.2 $} \\
863: Type of data cube used for analysis, high-resolution or low-resolution & & high & low \\
864: Dispersion (${\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$) & $V_{\rm disp,tot}$ & $ 9.8 $ & $ 10.2 $ \\
865: Internal dispersion, instrumental dispersion subtracted (${\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$)& $V_{\rm disp,int}$ & $ 9.6 $ & $ 9.6 $ \\
866: Global scaleheight ($\arcsec$) & $z_0$ & $ 5.4 $ & $ 3.0 $ \\
867: Global scaleheight ($\rm pc$) & $z_0^{\rm pc}$ & $ 400 $ & $ 220 $ \\
868: \hline
869: \end{tabular}
870: \end{center}
871: \end{table*}
872: %
873: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
874: %
875: After having argued that there are reasons to believe that the
876: \ion{H}{i} (-and optical) disk of NGC~2685 is heavily warped, we
877: present our attempts to fit a full tilted-ring model to the data
878: cube. Due to the assumed warp, the projections of the orbits are very
879: crowded at some positions. It is impossible to disentangle this orbit
880: crowding employing any tilted-ring analysis of a velocity field (see
881: discussion in Paper I). Instead, we perform a direct, automated fit to
882: the data cube with our software TiRiFiC. Since the software is
883: described in great detail in Papers I and II
884: \citep[][]{Jozsa07a,Jozsa07b}, we refer to these papers and to
885: \citet[][]{Jozsa06} for details of the analysis procedure. The
886: low-resolution data cube was analysed first using a spacing of ring
887: radii of $20\,\arcsec$. The centre of the galaxy, the systemic
888: velocity, the velocity dispersion, and the scale height were kept as
889: free parameters, but were not allowed to vary independently from ring
890: to ring. For each ring, the surface-brightness, the orientational
891: parameters, and the rotation velocity were varied independently. To
892: estimate errors, independent fits to the receding and approaching side
893: were performed. The errors were calculated as the maximum deviation
894: of the parameters from the fits to the approaching and the receding
895: side from the earlier fit to the entire galaxy. The errors of the
896: central position, scale height, the systemic velocity and the global
897: dispersion of the galaxy can be very roughly estimated to be less than
898: $6\,\arcsec$ and $2\,\,{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$ respectively, roughly
899: corresponding to half the (minor-axis) FWHM of the resolution for the
900: high-resolution data cube (concerning the accuracy of the applied
901: method see Paper I). In a few cases, where the errors calculated were
902: obviously too large or too small, the data were visually inspected and
903: errors were estimated by varying the parameter in question and
904: comparing resulting model data cubes with the original data cube. This
905: was only necessary for some data points at the largest and the
906: smallest radii. To refine the spatial resolution in the inner regions
907: of the galaxy, the high-resolution data cube was used. Up to a radius
908: of $108\arcsec$, where all parameters vary rapidly with radius, the
909: spacing of the ring radii was refined to $12\arcsec$. The finally
910: resulting fit is shown in Fig.~\ref{Fig_06}. Figure \ref{Fig_05}
911: illustrates the geometry of the fitted disk by means of an
912: ``inclinogram'', projecting the rings onto the celestial plane.
913: Analysing the high-resolution data cube, it was found that the
914: \ion{H}{i} surface brightness inside a radius of
915: $10\,\arcsec-15\,\arcsec$ was negligibly small. Therefore, the
916: orientational parameters are not constrained at the origin. We
917: consider our model and the formal errors reliable beyond the third
918: data point (at a radius of $36^{\prime\prime}$). Figure~\ref{Fig_A1}
919: in the appendix shows contour-plots overlaying the low-resolution data
920: cube with the corresponding synthetic data cube. Figure~\ref{Fig_07}
921: shows overlays of corresponding moment maps of the original data and
922: the synthetic ones and PV-diagrams along the kinematical major and
923: minor axes as traced in Fig.~\ref{Fig_05}. All comparisons show a very
924: good agreement of measurement and model out to largest radii until the
925: {H\,{\small I}} distribution in the galaxy becomes asymmetric. The
926: tilted-ring model is able to reproduce both the kinematics and the
927: surface-brightness profile of the {H\,{\small I}} component in
928: NGC~2685 in great detail, despite the peculiar structure of NGC~2685.
929: Table~\ref{Tab_3} lists the finally adopted global parameters of the
930: model. Internal velocity dispersion (the velocity dispersion of the
931: \ion{H}{i} disk itself after subtracting instrumental effects) and
932: scale height are in good agreement for both fits. Table~\ref{Tab_5}
933: contains the radially dependent best-fit parameters; in addition, for
934: a simplified further use, it lists the normal vectors of the rings as
935: derived quantities.
936:
937: To estimate some of the global physical parameters shown in
938: Tab.~\ref{Tab_1}, the Tully-Fisher relation was applied to derive the
939: distance of NGC~2685 following \citet[][Sak00]{Sakai00} , treating the
940: galaxy like a spiral galaxy.
941: %
942: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
943: %
944: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
945: \begin{center}
946: \includegraphics[width=0.34\textwidth]{xx_08a.eps}
947: \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{xx_08b.eps}
948: \includegraphics[width=0.34\textwidth]{xx_08c.eps}
949: \caption{
950: Tip-LON plots for the \ion{H}{i} disk of NGC~2685. Left and right
951: panel: tip-LON plots (see \citealt{Briggs90} and Paper II), the filled
952: circles are the projection of the tip of the normal vectors of the
953: rings at different radii onto a reference plane; the centre of the
954: galaxy is denoted by a larger circle. The circles are drawn at
955: intervals of $10\deg$. Left panel: The reference plane is the ring at
956: a radius of $36\arcsec$, the arrow indicating the direction of
957: rotation. As NGC~2685 does not contain an inner flat disk, this ring
958: was chosen to be representative to check for the third rule of
959: \citet[][]{Briggs90}. Middle panel: linear representation of the
960: tip-LON plot shown in the left panel. Right panel: the reference plane
961: is chosen such that two straight LONs are roughly visible, resembling
962: the fourth rule of \citet[][]{Briggs90}. At larger radii the dots are
963: clustered around the same position, indicating an outer planar disk.
964: }
965: \label{Fig_08}
966: \end{center}
967: \end{figure*}
968: %
969: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
970: %
971: We used equation 11 in Sak00 to estimate the total
972: extinction-corrected I-band magnitude of the galaxy. To correct for
973: inclination, the \ion{H}{i} 50\% line width was derived by changing
974: all modelled inclinations to $90\deg$ and determining a line width of
975: $320\pm23\,{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$ by artificially observing NGC~2685
976: as if observing an edge-on disk. The apparent I-band magnitude of
977: $9\fm 9\pm 0\fm 1$ (see Table~\ref{Tab_1}) was taken from
978: \citet[][]{Prugniel98} as listed in \citet[][]{LEDA}. A (marginal)
979: k-correction was applied and the magnitude was corrected for Galactic
980: (0\fm 121, NED, following \citealt{Schlegel98}) and internal
981: extinction. For the latter, we use a 20\%-linewidth of $306\pm17\,{\rm
982: km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$ (not corrected for inclination), derived from our
983: model data cube, which compares well to $298\,{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$
984: published by \citeauthor[][]{Driel00} (Table 2, from
985: \citealt{Richter94}, Table 1), and the logarithmic axis ratio
986: $\log(a/b) = 0.27\pm 0.06$ \citep[LEDA, ][]{LEDA} to apply formula 2
987: \citep[][]{Tully98} in Sak00. This yields a Tully-Fisher distance of
988: $15.2\pm3.8\,{\rm Mpc}$. The large error mainly arises from the
989: conservative errors in the 50\%-line width and the axis ratio
990: $\log(a/b)$ that is used to estimate dust extinction. We find this
991: result to be well in agreement with a distance estimate using a Hubble
992: constant of $72\,{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}\,{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$ yielding
993: distances of $13.9\,{\rm Mpc}$ (corrected the solar motion relative to
994: the CMB) and $13.4\,{\rm Mpc}$ (corrected for the solar motion
995: relative to the Local Group) with the inherent uncertainty of the
996: peculiar motion of the galaxy. Therefore, we consider the usage of
997: the Tully-Fisher relation a valid method to estimate the distance to
998: NGC 2685.
999: %
1000: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1001: %
1002: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1003: \begin{center}
1004: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.48\textwidth]{xx_09a.eps}
1005: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.3\textwidth]{xx_09b.eps}
1006: \caption{
1007: Top panel: ``tiltogram'' of NGC~2685. This is a pixel map showing the
1008: mutual inclination of rings at different radii (see Paper II). Bottom
1009: panel: three-dimensional model of the \ion{H}{i} disk of NGC~2685
1010: according to the best-fit tilted-ring model. The model is rotated and
1011: artificially made opaque to show again the presence of an outer planar
1012: disk.
1013: }
1014: \label{Fig_09}
1015: \end{center}
1016: \end{figure}
1017: %
1018: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1019: %
1020: %
1021: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1022: %
1023: \section{The structure of the warp}
1024: \label{Sect_6}
1025: The tilted-ring model shown in Fig.~\ref{Fig_06} is visualised in
1026: various forms in Figs.~\ref{Fig_05}, \ref{Fig_08}, and
1027: Fig.~\ref{Fig_09}. Our findings again support our picture drawn in
1028: Sect.~{\ref{Sect_4}}; a sudden change in orientation, as would be
1029: expected in case of the presence a distinct polar structure, should be
1030: reflected in our parametrisation resulting from a free fit. In
1031: contrast, we find that the best-fit model is similar to the warp toy
1032: model shown in Sect.~\ref{Sect_4}. As is the case for the spiral
1033: galaxy NGC~3718 \citep{Schwarz85}, the gaseous disk of NGC~2685
1034: changes its orientation continuously from the innermost radii onward,
1035: and then becomes remarkably flat towards large radii. For the
1036: innermost $12\arcsec -36\arcsec$, however, no reliable information can
1037: be derived from the data, as obviously the gas becomes ionised towards
1038: the centre of the galaxy.
1039:
1040: Towards the centre the \ion{H}{i} disk changes its orientation
1041: continuously. Therefore, it has a different quality compared to warps
1042: in common disks of spiral galaxies, which show an inner flat part, the
1043: bending occurring at larger radii \citep[][]{Briggs90}. It is,
1044: however, remarkable that nevertheless some typical warp features seem
1045: to be reproduced (for a brief review on the properties of \ion{H}{i}
1046: warps see Paper II). Figure~\ref{Fig_08} shows tip-LON plots
1047: \citep[][]{Briggs90}, a projection of the spin normal vectors of the
1048: disk onto a reference plane. In the left-hand panel this plane is
1049: chosen to be the orbital plane at a radius of $36^{\prime\prime}$, the
1050: first radius at which we consider the parametrisation being
1051: reliable. Our analysis indicates that -- in this reference frame --
1052: quite some portion of the inner disk shares a common line-of-nodes:
1053: with increasing radius, in the chosen projection, the LON-angle is
1054: constant within the errors (see Fig.~\ref{Fig_08}, middle panel). For
1055: spiral galaxies the same feature is observed when choosing the flat
1056: inner disk as a reference plane and is indicative of co-precession in
1057: the inner warped disk \citep[][]{Briggs90}. We emphasise that this
1058: feature depends on the choice of the reference plane: the same feature
1059: would not be observed choosing the orbital plane of the outer flat
1060: disk as reference. A rapid change of the direction of the LON occurs
1061: at a radius of $100\,\arcsec$. At larger radii ($> 120\,\arcsec$), the
1062: data points fall into the same region, such that in the outer region
1063: they share the same LON angle again. Consistent with observations of
1064: normal warps, the LON advances in the direction of galactic rotation
1065: (\citealt{Briggs90}, Paper II), indicating an outwards decreasing
1066: torque \citep[][]{Shen06}. The right panel in Fig.~\ref{Fig_08}
1067: illustrates that also for NGC~2685 a reference plane can be found that
1068: divides the \ion{H}{i} disk into two parts, connected by a small
1069: transition region, with a comparably constant LON angle
1070: (\citealt{Briggs90}, Paper II). The implication made for warped disk
1071: galaxies is that the disk is divided in two connected regions, each of
1072: which is in a state of co-precession \citep[][]{Revaz01}. The top
1073: panel of Fig.~\ref{Fig_09} shows the mutual inclination of the spin
1074: vectors of the disk. Beyond a radius of $100\arcsec$, the values in
1075: this diagram are consistent with being zero, meaning that NGC~2685
1076: possesses a flat outer disk, as illustrated in an opaque 3d-model
1077: based on our best-fit parametrisation shown in the bottom panel
1078: Fig.~\ref{Fig_09}. This is also evident from the clustering of the
1079: data points at larger radii in the tip-LON plots of Fig.~\ref{Fig_08}
1080: and the fact that the orientational parameters of the tilted-ring
1081: parametrisation (Fig.~\ref{Fig_06}) do not change within the error
1082: bars. The occurrence of the flat outer disk is a feature that has been
1083: previously found to be present in some warped disk galaxies (Paper II
1084: and references therein).
1085:
1086: Since the warped structure of the gas disk indicates that the galaxy
1087: is not a typical polar-ring galaxy as defined by
1088: \citet[][]{Whitmore90}, the question arises to which degree a polar
1089: orbit is reached at all in this system, either with respect to the
1090: outer disk or with respect to the central stellar
1091: body. Figure~\ref{Fig_08} shows that at least for radii $\geq
1092: 36\arcsec$, a polar orientation of outer and inner \ion{H}{i} disk is
1093: not compatible with our model. The outer disk, assumed to be flat, is
1094: inclined by $\approx 75\deg$ with respect to the disk at a radius of
1095: $36\arcsec$. This is remarkably consistent with the same value found
1096: by \citet[][]{Sarzi06} for the mutual inclination of the central
1097: stellar body and ionised gas disk of NGC~2685 \citep[see
1098: also][]{Nicholson87}. Our analysis disfavours the hypothesis of a true
1099: polar structure at radii $\geq 36\arcsec$, at smaller radii our model
1100: becoming unreliable. However, the results of \citet[][]{Sarzi06} can
1101: be interpreted as evidence against a polar orientation in the central,
1102: ionised part of the gaseous disk.
1103: %
1104: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1105: %
1106: \section{Non-circular motions}
1107: \label{Sect_7}
1108: The previous sections showed that the kinematics of NGC~2685, as they
1109: appear in projection, can be well represented by the tilted-ring
1110: model. However, beacause of the peculiar structure of NGC~2685, the
1111: kinematics of the gas disk of the galaxy is expected to show
1112: deviations from the assumed symmetry. The orbits of any tracer
1113: material are expected to deviate from circularity. Given the lack of
1114: appropriate analysis software to deal with non-circular motions in
1115: extremely warped cases like NGC~2685, we have to restrict ourselves to
1116: a brief discussion at a phenomenological level.
1117:
1118: Figure~\ref{Fig_10} shows the residual obtained when subtracting the
1119: first-moment velocity maps derived from the low-resolution original-
1120: and the model data cube for NGC~2685. In such a map, systematic
1121: patterns indicate a mismatch of the model and measurement. Such a
1122: mismatch can be due to i) a wrong fit, ii) an incompatibility of
1123: morphology and/or kinematics of the observed structure with the
1124: assumed tilted-ring symmetry, or iii) an erroneous calculation of the
1125: weighted mean recession velocity in the noisy observed data cube. We
1126: cannot provide any independent tests for the accuracy of our fit
1127: method. Hence we cannot exclude that residuals in velocity arise from
1128: a wrong fit (if they are of first-order harmonic nature). However,
1129: extensive tests (see Paper I) suggest that for the given geometry of
1130: the \ion{H}{i} disk, such errors are unlikely (for radii $>\,1.5-2$
1131: synthetic beams) to show up in the residual velocity field.
1132: %
1133: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1134: %
1135: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1136: \begin{center}
1137: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{xx_10.eps}}
1138: \caption{
1139: Difference- or residual velocity map derived by subtracting the model
1140: first-moment map from the original first-moment map. Overlaid are the
1141: projected rings of the best-fit model at radii
1142: $12\arcsec,36\arcsec,60\arcsec,84\arcsec,108\arcsec,140\arcsec,
1143: 180\arcsec,240\arcsec,320\arcsec,$ and $400\arcsec$. Apart from the
1144: antisymmetric feature between a radius of $30\arcsec$ and $70\arcsec$,
1145: no significant deviations of modelled and measured velocity field are
1146: seen.
1147: }
1148: \label{Fig_10}
1149: \end{center}
1150: \end{figure}
1151: %
1152: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1153: %
1154: The single obvious feature in the residual map is located at the tip
1155: of the inner stellar body, roughly within a radial range between
1156: $48\arcsec$ and $60\arcsec$, and is of antisymmetric nature. An
1157: interpretation can, however, only be of a speculative nature: we use a
1158: primitive approach as NGC~2685 is
1159: probably
1160: a dynamically complex
1161: case. Using epicyclic theory, \citet[][]{Franx94} connect an
1162: antisymmetric deviation from circular symmetry in the radial
1163: velocities to a symmetric distortion in the potential, hence a bar or
1164: an elliptic potential. However, the basic assumption made therein is
1165: that the disk is flat, which is obviously not the case for
1166: NGC~2685. Another, straightforward, suggestion would be that we
1167: witness (vertical) precession, which would cause a first-order
1168: harmonic distortion in radial velocity along a ring. With the
1169: (symmetrically) warped nature of the disk, precession does not seem
1170: unlikely. We emphasise, however, that the observed deviation of
1171: observed and synthetic velocity field can also be caused by a purely
1172: morphological asymmetry in the tracer material. Given the line-widths
1173: at the radii concerned (see Fig.~\ref{Fig_07}), over which the
1174: velocities are calculated as an intensity-weighted mean, this is also
1175: a possible option. Since the feature seen is very localised, we prefer
1176: this interpretation.
1177:
1178: Except for the very localised axisymmetric feature in the vicinity of
1179: the central stellar constituent, the residuals are low compared to the
1180: rotation velocity. Also the direct comparison of our model with the
1181: data (Figs.~\ref{Fig_07},~\ref{Fig_A1}) shows that we reproduce the
1182: data in great detail, without obvious systematic deviations. In the
1183: presence of large deviations from the circularity of orbits, those
1184: would usually be expected to show up
1185: \citep[][]{Franx94,Schoenmakers97}. Hence, in the scope of our model,
1186: we find no obvious evidence for a global deviation from the
1187: tilted-ring symmetry and, with that, for a significant global
1188: non-circularity of orbits.
1189:
1190: Especially the suggestion that the outer projected ring could be a
1191: real accumulation of gas and stars at an outer Lindblad resonance of a
1192: bar \citep[][]{Schinnerer02} does not fit our results. While a change
1193: of position angle and inclination in a tilted-ring model can be
1194: indicative for a bar
1195: \citep[][]{Schinnerer02}, streaming motions would leave a distinct
1196: large-scale imprint on the residual velocity field shown in
1197: Fig.~\ref{Fig_10}, which is not seen \citep[see also][]{Erwin03}.
1198:
1199: Our fitting results would certainly be improved including an
1200: appropriate treatment of noncircular motions, like allowing for
1201: azimuthal variations of velocities along the sight
1202: \citep[][]{Franx94,Schoenmakers97}.
1203: On the other hand, our simplified
1204: treatment indicates that there is probably not much room for a large
1205: amplitude of harmonic terms indicative for non-circular motions,
1206: provided there is no significantly different parametrisation that
1207: reproduces the data equally well. In Sect.~\ref{Sect_4}, we discuss
1208: that at least a two-ringed solution seems improbable, but we are not
1209: able, technically and principally, to search the complete parameter
1210: space to exclude the existence of such a solution.
1211: %
1212: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1213: %
1214: \section{Dynamical considerations}
1215: \label{Sect_8}
1216: While polar-ring galaxies are not frequent (\citealt{Whitmore90}
1217: calculate a detection rate of roughly 0.5\% among all nearby,
1218: lenticular galaxies, and estimate a fraction of 4.5\% of all nearby,
1219: lenticulars to have a polar ring), they are subject to quite some
1220: interest. Their kinematics contains information about the
1221: three-dimensional shape of the overall potential, since the orbits of
1222: the observed tracers (stars and gas) do not share a common plane of
1223: motion. The same accounts in principle for a galaxy with an extreme
1224: warp in a low-surface-brightness disk in co-existence with a rotating,
1225: central stellar body. The main purpose of the paper is to present our
1226: observations and the consequent kinematical description of NGC~2685,
1227: while a detailed dynamical treatment under consideration of further
1228: data will follow in a different paper.
1229:
1230: Here, we briefly discuss some implications of our tilted-ring model
1231: concerning the dynamics of the object.
1232: %
1233: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1234: %
1235: \subsection{The age of the low-surface brightness disk}
1236: \label{Sect_8.1}
1237: Our analysis indicates the presence of a relaxed \ion{H}{i} disk at
1238: large radii, rotating regularly with a rotational period of $1.3\,\rm
1239: Gyr$ (see Table~\ref{Tab_1}). The coherence in the \ion{H}{i} disk of
1240: NGC~2685 suggests that its major portion has been acquired in a single
1241: event in the evolution of NGC~2685. Due to the fact that a settling
1242: onto regular orbits requires a few orbital periods, this implies an
1243: age of several Gyr of the warped \ion{H}{i} disk of NGC~2685. In line
1244: with this is the observation that the orientation of the outer
1245: \ion{H}{i} (- and stellar) disk of NGC~2685 has the same orientation
1246: as the inner lenticular stellar body, suggesting a connection of the
1247: outer gaseous and stellar disk \citep[][]{Morganti06}. Following that
1248: notion, \citet[][]{Morganti06} proposed that the warp of the inner
1249: low-luminosity disk formed in a later event.
1250:
1251: Optical observations, however, suggest that the warp is a long-lived
1252: configuration. \citet[][]{Peletier93} estimated the age of the stellar
1253: population in the helical structure to lie between 2 and 5~Gyr,
1254: depending on metallicity. Following \citet[][]{Eskridge97}, who found
1255: a solar abundance, the age of the stars in the helical structure is
1256: about 2~Gyr. The most recent estimates by \citet[][]{Karataeva04}
1257: point to a low metallicity typical for a dIrr or an LSB galaxy, which
1258: corresponds to a larger age of the helix, possibly reaching the age of
1259: the outer disk inferred from the rotation period. A further argument
1260: for the longevity of the warped structure comes from the analysis of
1261: our model parameters, that suggest a co-precession within the helical
1262: structure, as indicated by the straight LON angle in the region of the
1263: inner warp (Sect.~\ref{Sect_6}, Fig.~\ref{Fig_08}); the signature of a
1264: transient warp would be a gradient in the LON angle due to a rapid
1265: wind-up through differential precession.
1266: %
1267: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1268: %
1269: \subsection{The kinematical model and the shape of the potential}
1270: \label{Sect_8.2}
1271: The low-surface-brightness component in NGC~2685 tends towards a polar
1272: orientation at small radii, while at large radii the disk is aligned
1273: with the central stellar body. The age estimates for the helical
1274: structure point towards the fact that this feature is long-lived (see
1275: previous section). Without being conclusive, we discuss possibilities
1276: to explain the warped low-surface-brightness component as a long-lived
1277: feature.
1278:
1279: It had already been pointed out by \citet[][]{Simonson83} that NGC~2685
1280: could contain an extremely warped component stabilised under the
1281: influence of a prolate, tumbling potential. This was motivated by
1282: \citet[][]{Tohline82} and \citet[][]{Albada82}, who found that under
1283: the influence of such a potential the gas would settle into a stable
1284: extremely warped plane. The tumbling of the potential would be
1285: necessary to prevent the definition of two separate planes in which
1286: orbits stable against differential precession are possible \citep[see
1287: e.g.][]{Whitmore90,Reshetnikov94}, ultimately leading to a break-up of
1288: the warp. Since the central stellar object at that time was not
1289: clearly identified as a ``pancake'', the alternative, an elliptical
1290: galaxy tumbling with a rotation axis orientated towards the pole of
1291: the outer disk could explain the shape of the warp \citep[see
1292: also][]{Varnas90,Peletier93,Bekki02}. While the nature of the central
1293: object as a lenticular galaxy has been clarified, the possibility
1294: remains that nevertheless the overall potential is triaxial and
1295: tumbling, which would lead to the observed structure. Consequently,
1296: the central lenticular galaxy would be subject to the same deviation
1297: from axisymmetry in the potential. Therefore, its kinematics should
1298: show accordingly oval distortions. We remark that such deviation is
1299: not reported in the literature despite the existence of
1300: high-resolution stellar absorption line kinematics
1301: \citep[][]{Emsellem04}. The absorption-line velocity-field
1302: published by \citet[][]{Emsellem04} does not show obvious signatures
1303: of deviations from axial symmetry indicative for an oval distortion of
1304: the potential out to a radius of $\approx 40\arcsec$ or about one third of
1305: the region where we model the \ion{H}{i} disk to be severely
1306: warped. Since therefore the potential is traced in the optical on a smaller scale than the extent of the warped region,
1307: the lack of such obvious signatures is indicative, but it does not
1308: exclude the possibility of a tumbling, triaxial potential at larger
1309: radii.
1310:
1311: A second possibility is that the inner warped structure is stabilised
1312: via self-gravity under the influence of an oblate potential, aligned
1313: with the central stellar body. In a simplified analysis (consisting of
1314: two heavy rings, or ``wires'' under the influence of an oblate, scale
1315: free logarithmic potential), \citet[][]{Sparke86} showed that
1316: neutrally stable configurations exist, where the inner portion of a
1317: self-gravitating disk lies close to polar, while the outer disk spin
1318: axis aligns with the symmetry axis of the potential \citep[comparable
1319: to Type II warps as defined by][]{Sparke88}. However, the assumption
1320: of the presence of such a modified-tilt mode \citep[][]{Sparke88}, in
1321: which the disk would be in a state of co-precession throughout is in
1322: conflict with our observations (Sect.~\ref{Sect_6},
1323: Fig.~\ref{Fig_08}).
1324:
1325: The time-development of heavy disks under the influence of aspherical
1326: potentials was investigated by \citet[][]{Sparke86} (oblate) and
1327: \citet[][]{Arnaboldi94} (prolate, figure-rotating potentials). Within
1328: the parameter range investigated, they observed that in case of a
1329: large change in disk orientation (not only a slight warp), a break-up
1330: of the disk into multiple regions occurs, which themselves show
1331: co-precession. A global mode of co-precession is not reached. While
1332: this is reminiscent of the rapid change in the LON angle at a radius
1333: $r\approx 100\arcsec$ (Fig.~\ref{Fig_08}), it is questionable if the
1334: coherency of the disk orientation in NGC~2685 is reproducible in a
1335: model setup of a heavy disk in a distinctly aspherical potential. We
1336: emphasise, however, that in the studies discussed here
1337: \citep[][]{Sparke86,Sparke88,Arnaboldi94}, the parameter space was not
1338: searched to fit an extremely warped disk, since the goal was to
1339: resemble true polar ring galaxies with slight warps in their disks or
1340: stable modes.
1341:
1342: If we assume that the low-surface brightness disk of NGC~2685 has a
1343: negligible mass compared to the common potential of the bright S0
1344: stellar body and the dark-matter halo, we can estimate the flattening
1345: q of the potential under the assumption of free precession in a scale
1346: free logarithmic potential aligned with the main stellar body and
1347: hence roughly with the outer \ion{H}{i} disk \citep[][]{Morganti06},
1348: giving an upper limit. In the approximation of a nearly spherical,
1349: logarithmic, scale free potential, the disk precesses about the pole
1350: at a precession rate given by \citep[][]{Sparke86,Cox06}
1351: %
1352: \begin{equation}
1353: \dot{\phi_i} = -\frac{3V_i}{4r_i}\eta \cos \theta_i\qquad {\rm ,}
1354: \end{equation}
1355: %
1356: where $\theta_i$ is the inclination of the spin vector of the disk at
1357: radius $r_i$ with respect to the symmetry axis of the potential, $V_i$
1358: is the rotation velocity at $r_i$, and $\eta=1-b/a$ is the ellipticity
1359: of the potential with axis ratio $b/a$, $a$ being the long axis. If we
1360: assume the potential to be aligned with the outer disk, we can
1361: calculate from our tilted-ring model the inclination of the disk spin
1362: vectors with respect to the symmetry axis of the potential. With
1363: $\phi_i$ being the angle enclosed by an arbitrary zero-point and the
1364: projection of the spin normal vector at radius $r_i$ onto the symmetry
1365: plane of the potential (the LON angle in a Briggs-plot with the outer
1366: disk as reference plane; in this reference plane, the LON is not
1367: straight), we can calculate the ellipticity employing above estimates
1368: $t_{\rm warp}=3.5\pm1.5,\ \rm Gyr$ for the age of the warp feature:
1369: \begin{equation}
1370: \eta = \frac{4}{3}(\phi_i-\phi_j)(t_{\rm warp}(V_i/r_i \cos \theta_i -V_j/r_j \cos \theta_j))^{-1}
1371: \end{equation}
1372: We define the symmetry plane as the orbital plane given by the mean of
1373: the orientational parameters between radii of $160\arcsec$ and
1374: $360\arcsec$. Building a weighted mean of the potential ellipticities
1375: calculated for every pair of radii between $36\arcsec$ and $96\arcsec$
1376: yields $\eta = 0.011 \pm 0.009$: under the assumption of free
1377: precession under the influence of a flattened potential aligned with
1378: the central S0 stellar body, the potential of NGC~2685 in the reach of
1379: the warp is close to spherical. Given the high orbital frequencies
1380: within the radial range considered, the coherency of the disk, and the
1381: high assumed life time of the warp, this result is expected.
1382:
1383: The assumption of the presence of at most slight deviations from
1384: sphericity of the overall potential is supported by the absence of
1385: obvious global features in the residual velocity map
1386: (Sect.~\ref{Sect_7}). Furthermore, we find that the measured rotation
1387: curve does not show any peculiarities compared to a rotation curve
1388: measured for a non-warped early-type galaxy. In the case of a halo
1389: flattening towards the polar orientation as suggested for polar ring
1390: galaxies by \citet[][]{Iodice03}, one would expect a distinct drop in
1391: the measured rotation velocity within the warped region. The slight
1392: decrease in rotation velocity towards larger radii and the shallow
1393: maximum in a radial range of $60\arcsec$ to $100\arcsec$ is a common
1394: feature observed for (non-warped) early type galaxies
1395: \citep[e.g.][]{Noordermeer07}. The shape of the rotation curve is
1396: therefore not indicative of a flattening of the potential.
1397:
1398: In the same notion, comparing our distance estimate from the
1399: Tully-Fisher relation to the Hubble Distance, we do not find a
1400: significant offset from the Tully-Fisher relation as reported by
1401: \citet[][NGC~2685 being a galaxy in their sample]{Iodice03}: NGC~2685
1402: does not appear significantly dimmer than suggested by the \ion{H}{i}
1403: line width (see Sect.~\ref{Sect_5}). In a statistical treatment of
1404: several polar ring galaxies, \citet[][]{Iodice03} interprete such an
1405: offset from the Tully-Fisher relation as indication for a deformation
1406: of the potential. Thus, we conclude that also the peak amplitude of
1407: the rotation curve of NGC~2685 (determining the \ion{H}{i} line width)
1408: is not indicative of a flattening of the potential.
1409: %
1410: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1411: %
1412: \section{The environment of the Spindle}
1413: \label{Sect_9}
1414: %
1415: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1416: %
1417: \begin{table*}[htbp]
1418: \caption{
1419: Basic properties of the detected dwarf galaxies in the vicinity of
1420: NGC~2685. For all objects the same distance of NGC~2685
1421: (Table~\ref{Tab_1}) was assumed. The data show that these galaxies
1422: probably cannot account for the ring in NGC~2685 and are dynamically
1423: unimportant.}
1424: \label{Tab_4}
1425: \begin{center}
1426: \begin{tabular}{llrrr}
1427: \hline
1428: \hline
1429: Descr. & Par. & PGC 25002 & UGC 4683 & unknown \\
1430: \hline
1431: Classification of galaxy (\citealt[][]{Vaucouleurs91}) & Type & IB(rs)m & dI & unknown \\
1432: Right Ascension (J2000) (NED) & RA (J2000) & $ \hmsm{8}{54}{22}{50.0} $ & $ \hmsm{8}{57}{54}{37.0} $ & $ \hmsm{8}{57}{42}{51.0} $ \\
1433: Declination (J2000) (NED) & Dec (J2000) & $ \dmsm{58}{58}{4}{0.00} $ & $ \dmsm{59}{4}{57}{7.00} $ & $ \dmsm{59}{2}{28}{85.00} $ \\
1434: Optical heliocentric systemic velocity (${\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$) & $ V_{\rm sys} $ & $ 1017.2 \,\pm\, 8.2 $ & $ 927.0 \,\pm\, 8.2 $ & $ 1187.0 \,\pm\, 8.2 $ \\
1435: Apparent B-band magnitude ($\rm mag$, \citealt[][]{Paturel89}) & $ m_{\rm B} $ & $ 16.4 $ & $ 14.8 $ & very low \\
1436: Total \ion{H}{i} flux (${\rm Jy}\,{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$) & $ F_{\rm \ion{H}{i}} $ & $ 3.3 \,\pm\, 0.3 $ & $ 2.2 \,\pm\, 0.2 $ & $ 2.1 \,\pm\, 0.2 $ \\
1437: \ion{H}{i} mass ($10^7\,{\rm M}_\odot$) & $ M_{\rm \ion{H}{i}} $ & $ 17.8 \,\pm\, 1.9 $ & $ 12.2 \,\pm\, 1.3 $ & $ 11.3 \,\pm\, 1.2 $ \\
1438: Projected distance of object from NGC~2685 ($\,\arcsec$) & $ \rm d_{2685} $ & $ 1016 \,\pm\, 28 $ & $ 1651 \,\pm\, 28 $ & $ 1484 \,\pm\, 28 $ \\
1439: Distance of object from NGC~2685 ($\rm kpc$) & $ \rm D_{2685} $ & $ 75 \,\pm\, 20 $ & $ 122 \,\pm\, 31 $ & $ 109 \,\pm\, 28 $ \\
1440: Profile width at 20 percent of the peak flux density (${\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$) & $ w_{20} $ & $ 95.0 \,\pm\, 9.6 $ & $ 64.0 \,\pm\, 6.5 $ & $ 72.5 \,\pm\, 7.2 $ \\
1441: Inclination ($\,\deg$) & $ i $ & $ 29.2 $ & $ 31.6 $ & $ 90.0 $ \\
1442: Dynamical mass ($10^8{\rm M}_\odot$) & $ M_{\rm dyn} $ & $ > 137 \,\pm\, 53 $ & $ > 32 \,\pm\, 18 $ & $ > 8.7 \,\pm\, 6.0 $ \\
1443: \hline
1444: \end{tabular}
1445: \end{center}
1446: \end{table*}
1447: %
1448: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1449: %
1450: In \ion{H}{i}, NGC~2685 and four additional, small objects were
1451: detected (Fig.~\ref{Fig_11}). This means that NGC~2685 is probably the
1452: dominating member of a small loose group of galaxies; hence, the
1453: question arises whether the peculiar structure of NGC~2685 might be
1454: connected to a past interaction with (one of) its companions. Two
1455: \ion{H}{i} detections can be associated with the known dwarf galaxies
1456: UGC~4683 and PGC~25002, while two objects were detected that are
1457: barely, if at all, visible in the DSS. Their projected separation is
1458: very small ($\approx65\arcsec\,\hat{=}\,4.8\,{\rm kpc}$) and a faint
1459: \ion{H}{i} bridge between the two gas clouds is present. However,
1460: their kinematical axes are misaligned, indicating that these are two
1461: individual, possibly interacting dwarf galaxies with an extremely low
1462: surface brightness. Figure~\ref{Fig_11} shows an overlay of the total
1463: \ion{H}{i} map on a DSS image containing all objects detected in
1464: \ion{H}{i}.
1465: %
1466: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1467: %
1468: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1469: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[angle=270]{xx_11.eps}}
1470: \caption{
1471: \ion{H}{i} total-intensity maps of the observed field overlaid on a
1472: DSS (red) image. From top to bottom: UGC~4683, two unknown possibly
1473: merging objects, PGC~25002, NGC~2685. The contours represent the $1.5,
1474: 40, 85, 145 \tth$ levels. Note that the \ion{H}{i} map is primary-beam
1475: corrected.
1476: }
1477: \label{Fig_11}
1478: \end{figure}
1479: %
1480: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1481: %
1482: Table~\ref{Tab_4} lists the properties of the \ion{H}{i} detections
1483: and associated galaxies. The \ion{H}{i} masses are derived under the
1484: assumption that each object is at the same distance as NGC~2685
1485: ($15.2\,\rm kpc$, see Table~\ref{Tab_1}). The diameters needed to
1486: calculate their dynamical masses are estimated from the moment
1487: maps. The integrated \ion{H}{i} spectra of the galaxies are used to
1488: calculate the $20\%$ peak line width and the systemic velocities of
1489: the objects. Then, the (lower limit to the) dynamical mass is derived
1490: from these line widths and the diameters of the targets. In case of
1491: the two unknown objects, only rough estimates can be made. They are
1492: approximately of the same size and have probably the same rotation
1493: amplitude. The \ion{H}{i} flux, systemic velocity and linewidth are
1494: calculated from the spectrum of both objects, while the dynamical mass
1495: was derived taking into account the extent of only one of the objects.
1496: Table~\ref{Tab_4} shows that none of the possible companion galaxies
1497: is large enough to be important for the dynamics of NGC~2685. The most
1498: massive companion is PGC~25002 with about one tenth of the (dynamical)
1499: mass of NGC~2685; its projected distance to NGC~2685 is $75\,\rm
1500: kpc$. The mass-ratio of PGC~25002 and NGC~2685 is roughly the same as
1501: that of the Milky Way and the Large Magellanic Cloud, which is
1502: currently at its pericentric passage and depositing quite some gas on
1503: a polar orbit about the Milky Way albeit at a large distance from the
1504: Galactic centre. The position of PGC~25002 lies roughly in the
1505: direction of the projected minor axis of the central stellar body of
1506: NGC~2685, such that it might be speculated that this object deposited
1507: some amount of gas into a polar orbit about NGC~2685. However, the
1508: rather high ratio of gas mass to B-band luminosity of $1.8\pm 0.2
1509: \,{M_{\rm {\ion{H}{i}}}}/{L_{\rm B}}$ for PGC~25002 (estimated from
1510: Table~\ref{Tab_4}) indicates that this galaxy has not lost any major
1511: fraction of its gas. Consequently a comparison of the total gas masses
1512: of NGC~2685 and PGC~25002 (10:1) makes it questionable as a donor for
1513: the complete amount of neutral gas in NGC~2685. This conclusion
1514: remains if we consider only the gas mass contained in the inner warped
1515: structure, assuming that only the gas in the warped structure has been
1516: acquired in an accretion event: from our model we estimate a gas mass
1517: of $5.2\cdot 10^8 {M}_\odot$ inside radii $\leq 96^{\prime\prime}$,
1518: which is a third of the total \ion{H}{i} mass of NGC~2685.
1519:
1520: UGC~4683 has a ratio of gas mass to B-band luminosity of $0.28\pm 0.03
1521: \,{M_{\rm {\ion{H}{i}}}}/{L_{\rm B}}$. Under the assumption that the
1522: \ion{H}{i} in NGC~2685 comes from this galaxy, an initial ratio of gas
1523: mass to B-band luminosity of about $4\,{M_{\rm {\ion{H}{i}}}}/{L_{\rm
1524: B}}$ before the encounter with NGC~2685 would be required. In this
1525: case, because of the position of the galaxy with respect to NGC~2685,
1526: UGC~4683 must have donated its gas on an orbit well aligned with the
1527: outer gas disk and hence to the inner lenticular stellar body. Also
1528: here it is unlikely that the complete gas content of NGC~2685 was
1529: deposited by UGC~4683.
1530:
1531: The optical observations show a very faint elliptical stellar system
1532: located at the SW side of NGC~2685 (see Fig.~\ref{Fig_01}, upper left
1533: panel). It is, however, unclear at which distance this object is with
1534: respect to NGC~2685, since it is not detected in \ion{H}{i}. There is
1535: no evidence for any interaction as no \ion{H}{i} feature in the gas
1536: belonging to NGC~2685 seems to be connected with the object.
1537:
1538: We therefore conclude that the peculiar structure of NGC~2685 is
1539: probably not caused by an interaction with its direct neighbours. It
1540: is, however, clear that with a lifetime of the helix of more than 2
1541: Gyr a possible donor galaxy that had an encounter with NGC~2685 can
1542: now be located at a distance of Megaparsecs. Hence, the lack of
1543: possible donors in the field-of-view of our \ion{H}{i} observations
1544: does not exclude the possibility of a gas accretion from a bypassing
1545: galaxy as a possible origin for the peculiar structure of NGC~2685.
1546: %
1547: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1548: %
1549: \section{Summary and discussion}
1550: \label{Sect_10}
1551: We analyse deep WSRT HI synthesis observations and deep INT WFC
1552: observations in the i$^\prime$ band of the Spindle Galaxy
1553: NGC~2685. Our analysis includes a tilted-ring parametrisation of the
1554: \ion{H}{i} disk. Our analysis
1555: supports the following
1556: hypotheses:
1557: \begin{itemize}
1558: \item{
1559: NGC~2685 possesses two separate components, one being the central S0
1560: stellar body. The other is a coherent large-scale warped disk
1561: consisting of gas, stars and dust. The appearance of a two-ringed
1562: structure \citep[][]{Shane77,Shane80,Mahon92,Schinnerer02}
1563: is due to
1564: projection effects. This makes scenarios in which the rings,
1565: respectively the disk, of NGC~2685 have been acquired in two separate
1566: accretion events unlikely.
1567: }
1568: \item{
1569: the large-scale disk shares many properties of a small spiral-galaxy
1570: disk of low surface brightness, containing molecular-, neutral-, and
1571: ionised gas and stars. The helical dust-lane structure appearing in
1572: optical images can be identified with spiral arms that are matched by
1573: density peaks in the neutral gas component. The spiral arms also occur
1574: on the far side of the galaxy in high resolution \ion{H}{i} maps. The
1575: \ion{H}{i} surface density profile resembles that of any spiral
1576: galaxy.
1577: }
1578: \item{
1579: our analysis indicates the presence of a relaxed \ion{H}{i} disk at
1580: large radii, rotating regularly with a rotational period of 1.3 Gyr
1581: (see Table~\ref{Tab_1}). The age of the stellar population in the
1582: helical structure is between 2 and 5 Gyrs
1583: \citep[][]{Peletier93,Eskridge97,Karataeva04}. Since after an
1584: accretion event several rotational periods are necessary for the gas
1585: to settle on regular orbits, we conclude that the age of the gas disk
1586: is probably significantly larger than 2 Gyr. This is consistent with
1587: the findings of \citet[][]{Karataeva04}. In contrast to
1588: \citet[][]{Eskridge97}, they found a metallicity typical for a dIrr or
1589: LSB galaxy with the consequence of a higher stellar age
1590: \citep[][]{Peletier93}. This suggests that the large-scale disk of
1591: NGC~2685, part of which is the helical structure, has not been
1592: acquired recently, but is of intermediate age.
1593: }
1594: \item{
1595: The warp in the large-scale disk shares important properties with
1596: warps of lower amplitude in spiral galaxies. The disk is divided into
1597: two regimes each of which shares a common line-of-nodes
1598: \citep[][]{Briggs90}. Hence, the disk is co-precessing (or not
1599: precessing) in both regimes. The disk is coherent, hence both regimes
1600: are connected by a small transition region. In the transition region
1601: the nodal line progresses in the direction of rotation, as was
1602: previously found by \citet[][]{Briggs90} for other galaxies. The outer
1603: disk of NGC~2685 is flat out to a radius of about $420\arcsec\,
1604: \hat{=} \, 31\, \rm kpc$.
1605: }
1606: \item{
1607: For radii $\geq 36\arcsec$, where we consider our model reliable, the
1608: maximal mutual inclination of two spin vectors is $\approx75\deg$ and
1609: no polar orientation w.r.t. to the central bright stellar body is
1610: reached. Optical analyses indicate that this also holds for the
1611: ionised gas disk at radii $\leq 36\arcsec$ \citep[][]{Sarzi06}.
1612: }
1613: \item
1614: {
1615: Within the scope of our measurements and our analysis,
1616: we do not find obvious indications for a large deviation of the
1617: potential from sphericity. The absence of global residuals when
1618: subtracting the modelled velocity field from the observed ones and the
1619: fact that the rotation curve does not show any peculiarities compared
1620: to rotation curves of other early-type galaxies rather indicates that
1621: the potential is close to spherical. This is consistent with an
1622: estimate of the ellipticity of the potential in the limit of free
1623: precession ($\eta = 0.011 \pm 0.009 $), providing an upper limit for
1624: the ellipticity.
1625: }
1626: \item
1627: {
1628: Because of their low \ion{H}{i} mass compared to that of NGC~2685,
1629: and the lack of an \ion{H}{i}-deficiency, companions of NGC~2685
1630: detected in \ion{H}{i} can be excluded as donors to create the entire
1631: coherent \ion{H}{i} disk. If an interaction with a present companion
1632: galaxy created the warped structure of the large-scale disk, the
1633: interaction was mainly of tidal nature.
1634: }
1635: \end{itemize}
1636: As stated in Sect.~\ref{Sect_4}, cases similar to NGC~2685 are known
1637: and the question arises how such a structure can form. The fact that
1638: the colours of the inner stellar body and the helical structure differ
1639: \citep[][]{Peletier93} leaves little doubt that the inner warp and
1640: segregation of two rotating systems is the result of a more recent
1641: interaction rather than it has formed at early times.
1642:
1643: As it is the case for polar ring galaxies
1644: \citep[e.g.][]{Bekki97,Bournaud03}, two scenarios come into
1645: question. The first is that NGC~2685 is the result of a merger
1646: event. Simulations of wet, dissipative mergers of spiral galaxies have
1647: shown that indeed extremely warped structures of resulting gas disks
1648: as reported here can show up as a result of a merger \citep[][Fig.~2
1649: therein showing a case with a gas structure very similar to that of
1650: NGC~2685]{Barnes02,Naab06}. \citet[][]{Barnes02} shows that extended,
1651: regular gas disks (containing up to about half of the gas of the
1652: progenitor galaxies) can build up after a major merger that would
1653: resemble the outer \ion{H}{i} disk of NGC~2685, while towards the
1654: centre a highly inclined disk turns up, in some cases connected to the
1655: outer disk. In contrast to \citet[][]{Naab06}, \citet[][]{Barnes02}
1656: finds extremely warped gas remnants of a merger to turn up also in the
1657: case of unequal (3:1) mass mergers. This is of relevance insofar as
1658: simulations
1659: \citep[][]{Naab99,Naab03} show that generally equal-mass mergers tend
1660: to result in slowly rotating, boxy stellar remnants, while the central
1661: stellar body of NGC~2685, despite showing a de Vaucouleurs profile in
1662: surface-brightness \citep[][]{Peletier93}, is clearly a fast rotating,
1663: flattened system \citep[][]{Emsellem04}, as is produced in simulations
1664: with preference in unequal-mass mergers.
1665:
1666: A second scenario could be that the central warp in NGC 2685 is the
1667: result of gas accretion, the gas being acquired either in the course
1668: of a tidal interaction with a (now distant, Sect.~\ref{Sect_9}) donor
1669: galaxy \citep[][]{Schweizer83,Reshetnikov97,Bournaud03}, or through
1670: direct infall of cold, primordial gas \citep[][]{Maccio06}. In the
1671: latter scenario, the (cold) accreted gas falls onto an inner part of a
1672: pre-existing spiral galaxy, is stopped in the gas disk and mixes its
1673: angular momentum with the original gas disk only in the region of the
1674: resulting warp. Depending on the ratio of angular momentum carried by
1675: the infalling material and the disk at differing radii, in this way a
1676: warped gas structure might build up. A similar scenario has been
1677: successfully simulated by \citet[][]{Bournaud03} to explain the
1678: co-existence of an inner polar and an outer equatorial ring. The
1679: important difference of their model predictions and our simple model
1680: for the gas structure in NGC~2685 is that in their simulations a
1681: coherent disk and a warp of large amplitude never turns up. This is
1682: due to the fact that within their setup the gas on an inclined orbit
1683: with respect to the progenitor disk is subject to a torque strong
1684: enough to prevent the formation of warped structure with partly low
1685: inclination with respect to the equatorial plane. Only gas on highly
1686: inclined orbits is stable against differential precession. This
1687: situation might change if the torque imposed on the mixture of
1688: infalling- and disk material is attenuated by choosing a different
1689: setup, e.g. a more dominating spherical DM halo potential. In favour
1690: of the accretion scenario could be the excess of \ion{H}{i} surface
1691: brightness (Fig.~\ref{Fig_06}) in the region of the inner warp. The
1692: shape of the \ion{H}{i} surface-brightness profile is not unusual
1693: compared to a spiral galaxy. A concern against the accretion scenario
1694: is the light profile of the central stellar
1695: body. \citet[][]{Peletier93} showed that it follows a de
1696: Vaucouleurs-law, while an exponential profile would be expected if the
1697: central stellar body would form from a spiral galaxy stripped from the
1698: gas in the inner regions. Furthermore, the accretion scenario would
1699: require fine-tuning, since the structure of the gas disk of NGC~2685
1700: is highly symmetric. An accretion event would likely also impose
1701: linear momentum on the progenitor disk, which would then probably
1702: result in a more asymmetric warp and a lopsided kinematics and gas
1703: distribution. The task would be to find a scenario where the transfer
1704: of linear momentum is small or where the resulting displacement of
1705: inner, warped disk and outer disk vanishes quickly
1706: \citep[see e.g. ][on the topic of warp formation through gas
1707: infall]{Sanchez-Salcedo05}.
1708:
1709: A possibility to distinguish between the two tentative scenarios might
1710: be to consider photometric observations. Obviously, a stellar
1711: component has formed within the gaseous, warped disk of NGC~2685. In
1712: the merging scenario, the gas disk grows from inside out
1713: \citep[][]{Barnes02}, after a rapid initial transport of gas to the
1714: centre. Therefore, it is to be expected that the age of the
1715: subsequently formed stars becomes younger towards larger radii. Hence,
1716: if at all, a colour gradient towards a bluer population with
1717: increasing radius is expected in the merging scenario. In the
1718: accretion scenario, since the bulk of the new star forming material
1719: should be placed in the centre of the galaxy, a transition in colour
1720: from the inner, warped, region, to the outer remnant of the progenitor
1721: disk is expected to occur from bluer to redder colours. Considering
1722: the colour maps published by \citet[][]{Erwin02}, it is immediatily
1723: evident that this distinction cannot be made easily. In fact, the
1724: inner helical structure appears reddened with respect to the outer
1725: projected ring, but this may well be due to reddening by dust and a
1726: mixing of the light from the low-surface-brightness disk and the
1727: central stellar body on the line-of-sight. According to our
1728: tilted-ring model (Fig.~\ref{Fig_05}), the material along the
1729: projected outer ring is a mixture of material at smaller and larger
1730: radii, while on the apparent minor axis it is dominated by material at
1731: smaller radii and on the apparent major axis it is dominated by
1732: material at larger radii. Thus, one can inspect the projected ring to
1733: search for a change in colour along the projected ring. While the
1734: colour changes indeed along the projected outer ring, no clear trend
1735: can be made out in the colour maps published by \citet[][]{Erwin02}.
1736:
1737: We cannot be conclusive about the origin of the structure of
1738: NGC~2685. However, due to the facts that the inner stellar body does
1739: not follow an exponential light profile, and that warped gas
1740: structures do turn up in simulations of wet mergers, we give our
1741: preference to the hypothesis that NGC~2685 is the result of a merger
1742: of two disk galaxies.
1743:
1744: NGC~2685 remains an interesting object, mainly because of the
1745: co-existence of two rotating disks of extreme symmetry at differing
1746: orientation. Exploiting the kinematics of both the stars of the
1747: central lenticular stellar body and the gas disk should lead to
1748: further insight in the 3D structure of the galaxy.
1749:
1750: \begin{acknowledgements}
1751: %
1752:
1753: We thank the first, anonymous referee for initiating the discussion
1754: about the origin of the intrinsic structure of NGC~2685 in
1755: Sect.~\ref{Sect_10}, and for animating us to compare our results
1756: concerning the Tully Fisher relation to the work by Enrichetta Iodice
1757: and collaborators.
1758:
1759: We like to thank the editor, Fran\c{c}oise Combes, for finishing the refereeing process and for giving good advise.
1760:
1761: The underlying PhD thesis project was partly financed by the Deutsche
1762: Forschungsgemeinschaft in the framework of the Graduiertenkolleg 787
1763: ``Galaxy Groups as Laboratories for Baryonic and Dark Matter''.
1764:
1765: The underlying PhD thesis project was also partly financed by the
1766: University of Bonn in the framework of the ``Research Group Bonn: Dark
1767: Matter and Dark Energy''.
1768:
1769: GJ likes to emphasise that the NGC~2685-project originates from a
1770: summer studentship at ASTRON (Dwingeloo, The Netherlands).
1771:
1772: The Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope is operated by the ASTRON
1773: (Netherlands Foundation for Research in Astronomy) with support from
1774: the Netherlands Foundation for Scientific Research (NWO).
1775:
1776: The Isaac Newton Telescope is operated on the island of La Palma by
1777: the Isaac Newton Group in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los
1778: Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrof\'isica de Canarias.
1779:
1780: This work makes use of a digitised image of the Second Palomar
1781: Observatory Sky Survey (POSS-II) obtained through the Digitized Sky
1782: Survey (DSS) websites. The Digitized Sky Surveys were produced at the
1783: Space Telescope Science Institute under U.S. Government grant NAG
1784: W-2166.
1785:
1786: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database
1787: (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California
1788: Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics
1789: and Space Administration\footnote{The NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database
1790: (NED) is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California
1791: Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics
1792: and Space Administration.}.
1793:
1794: We acknowledge the usage of the HyperLeda database (http://leda.univ-lyon1.fr).
1795: \end{acknowledgements}
1796:
1797: \bibliographystyle{aa}
1798: \bibliography{n2685_aa}
1799: \appendix
1800: \newpage
1801: \section{Data cubes and moment maps}
1802: \label{Sect_4.8}
1803: %
1804: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1805: %
1806: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1807: \begin{center}
1808: \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{xx_A1.eps}
1809: \caption{
1810: Selected images from the low-resolution data cube (channel width of
1811: $4.12\,{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$, Robust weighting 0.4, baselines of
1812: length $<6.4\,{\rm k\lambda}$ used) overlaid with contours of the
1813: original dataset (black) and the final model data cube (grey, blue in
1814: online-version). The numbers on the upper left give the heliocentric
1815: radio velocity in ${\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$. The dot in the lower left
1816: corner represents the clean beam. The contours represent the $0.5, 2,
1817: 8 \mJyb$ levels. }
1818: \label{Fig_A1}
1819: \end{center}
1820: \end{figure*}
1821: %
1822: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1823: %
1824: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
1825: \begin{center}
1826: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.9\textwidth]{xx_A2.eps}
1827: \caption{
1828: Selected images from the high-resolution data cube (channel width
1829: of $2.06\,{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$, uniform weighting, all visibilities
1830: regarded). The numbers on the upper left give the heliocentric radio
1831: velocity in ${\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$ . The dot in the lower left
1832: corner represents the clean beam. The contours represent the $0.75, 3,
1833: 4.5 \mJyb$ levels.
1834: }
1835: \label{Fig_A2}
1836: \end{center}
1837: \end{figure*}
1838: %
1839: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1840: %
1841: \begin{figure*}[hbp]
1842: \begin{center}
1843: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=8.5cm]{xx_A3a.eps}
1844: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=8.5cm]{xx_A3b.eps}
1845: \caption{
1846: Total-intensity map (left) and first-moment velocity field (right)
1847: derived from the high-resolution data cube overlaid on a total
1848: intensity grey-scale map. The ellipse in the lower left corner
1849: represents the clean beam. The contours represent the $5,20,50,140
1850: \tth$ levels and the $V_{\rm sys} \pm 0,40,80,120,140\,{\rm km}\,{\rm
1851: s}^{-1}$ levels respectively (see Table~\ref{Tab_2}).
1852: }
1853: \label{Fig_A3}
1854: \end{center}
1855: \end{figure*}
1856: %
1857: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1858: %
1859: \clearpage
1860: \section{Results from spectral fits}
1861: \begin{table*}[htbp]
1862: \begin{center}
1863: \caption{
1864: Velocities and masses of gas detected at ``anomalous'' velocities as
1865: derived from fitting a double-Gaussian to several profiles of the data
1866: cube.
1867: {\bf (1)} Position, right ascension (J2000) of profile.
1868: {\bf (2)} Position, declination (J2000) of profile.
1869: {\bf (3)} Difference between peak position belonging to inner
1870: component and systemic velocity: assumed projected rotation velocity
1871: (${\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$).
1872: {\bf (4)} Difference between peak position belonging to inner
1873: component and far side 20 percent peak position of residual: maximal
1874: excess motion with respect to inner component (${\rm km}\,{\rm
1875: s}^{-1}$).
1876: {\bf (5)} Difference between peak position belonging to inner
1877: component and bulk velocity of residual: bulk excess motion with
1878: respect to inner component (${\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$).
1879: {\bf (6)} Difference between peak position belonging to outer
1880: component and far side 20 percent peak position of residual: maximal
1881: excess motion with respect to inner component (${\rm km}\,{\rm
1882: s}^{-1}$).
1883: {\bf (7)} Difference between peak position belonging to outer
1884: component and bulk velocity of residual: bulk excess motion with
1885: respect to inner component (${\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$).
1886: {\bf (8)} Total flux of residual within the boundaries set by 20
1887: percent of the peak intensity (${\rm Jy}\,{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$).
1888: {\bf (9)} Total flux derived from Gaussian fit to the inner component
1889: (${\rm Jy}\,{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$).
1890: {\bf (10)} Total flux derived from Gaussian fit to the outer component
1891: (${\rm Jy}\,{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$).
1892: }
1893: \label{Tab_3a}
1894: \begin{tabular}{r r r r r r r r r r}
1895: \hline
1896: \hline
1897:
1898: $ \rm RA $ & $ \rm Dec $ & $\Delta V_{\rm i,sys} $ & $\Delta V_{\rm i,max} $ & $\Delta V_{\rm i,bulk} $ & $\Delta V_{\rm o,max} $ & $\Delta V_{\rm o,bulk} $ & $F_{\rm {\ion{H}{i}},e}$ & $F_{\rm {\ion{H}{i}},i}$ & $F_{\rm {\ion{H}{i}},o}$ \\
1899: (1) & (2) & (3) & (4) & (5) & (6) & (7) & (8) & (9) & (10) \\
1900: \hline
1901: $ \hmsm{08}{55}{29}{204} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{44}{23}{98} $ & $ 110.0 $ & $ 71.5 $ & $ 44.7 $ & $ 82.8 $ & $ 56.0 $ & $ 0.21 $ & $ 0.60 $ & $ 0.34 $ \\
1902: $ \hmsm{08}{55}{39}{994} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{43}{41}{99} $ & $ 112.3 $ & $ 97.2 $ & $ 58.1 $ & $ 94.4 $ & $ 55.2 $ & $ 0.23 $ & $ 0.47 $ & $ 0.18 $ \\
1903: $ \hmsm{08}{55}{29}{204} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{44}{30}{98} $ & $ 109.6 $ & $ 75.2 $ & $ 48.4 $ & $ 82.1 $ & $ 55.3 $ & $ 0.21 $ & $ 0.42 $ & $ 0.47 $ \\
1904: $ \hmsm{08}{55}{39}{993} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{43}{34}{99} $ & $ 114.0 $ & $ 98.9 $ & $ 57.7 $ & $ 102.2 $ & $ 61.0 $ & $ 0.29 $ & $ 0.26 $ & $ 0.26 $ \\
1905: $ \hmsm{08}{55}{29}{204} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{44}{37}{99} $ & $ 109.9 $ & $ 79.6 $ & $ 48.7 $ & $ 90.5 $ & $ 59.6 $ & $ 0.18 $ & $ 0.22 $ & $ 0.56 $ \\
1906: $ \hmsm{08}{55}{39}{993} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{43}{27}{98} $ & $ 113.8 $ & $ 98.7 $ & $ 55.4 $ & $ 109.9 $ & $ 66.6 $ & $ 0.25 $ & $ 0.12 $ & $ 0.36 $ \\
1907: $ \hmsm{08}{55}{28}{306} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{44}{23}{98} $ & $ 107.8 $ & $ 69.3 $ & $ 44.6 $ & $ 74.6 $ & $ 49.9 $ & $ 0.21 $ & $ 0.46 $ & $ 0.42 $ \\
1908: $ \hmsm{08}{55}{40}{893} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{43}{41}{99} $ & $ 113.1 $ & $ 98.0 $ & $ 56.8 $ & $ 96.4 $ & $ 55.2 $ & $ 0.35 $ & $ 0.32 $ & $ 0.26 $ \\
1909: $ \hmsm{08}{55}{28}{304} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{44}{30}{98} $ & $ 108.6 $ & $ 70.1 $ & $ 45.3 $ & $ 78.6 $ & $ 53.8 $ & $ 0.21 $ & $ 0.29 $ & $ 0.50 $ \\
1910: $ \hmsm{08}{55}{40}{893} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{43}{34}{99} $ & $ 111.8 $ & $ 96.7 $ & $ 55.5 $ & $ 99.3 $ & $ 58.1 $ & $ 0.31 $ & $ 0.21 $ & $ 0.34 $ \\
1911: $ \hmsm{08}{55}{28}{304} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{44}{37}{99} $ & $ 109.8 $ & $ 75.5 $ & $ 46.6 $ & $ 87.0 $ & $ 58.2 $ & $ 0.17 $ & $ 0.15 $ & $ 0.54 $ \\
1912: $ \hmsm{08}{55}{40}{893} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{43}{27}{98} $ & $ 109.1 $ & $ 89.9 $ & $ 50.8 $ & $ 102.8 $ & $ 63.6 $ & $ 0.22 $ & $ 0.11 $ & $ 0.40 $ \\
1913: $ \hmsm{08}{55}{27}{405} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{44}{23}{98} $ & $ 103.8 $ & $ 65.3 $ & $ 40.5 $ & $ 71.0 $ & $ 46.2 $ & $ 0.21 $ & $ 0.31 $ & $ 0.45 $ \\
1914: $ \hmsm{08}{55}{41}{792} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{43}{41}{99} $ & $ 108.3 $ & $ 76.8 $ & $ 43.8 $ & $ 86.0 $ & $ 53.1 $ & $ 0.25 $ & $ 0.25 $ & $ 0.45 $ \\
1915: $ \hmsm{08}{55}{27}{405} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{44}{30}{98} $ & $ 105.4 $ & $ 66.8 $ & $ 42.1 $ & $ 74.9 $ & $ 50.2 $ & $ 0.19 $ & $ 0.18 $ & $ 0.48 $ \\
1916: $ \hmsm{08}{55}{41}{792} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{43}{34}{99} $ & $ 91.5 $ & $ 68.2 $ & $ 43.4 $ & $ 69.0 $ & $ 44.2 $ & $ 0.12 $ & $ 0.30 $ & $ 0.41 $ \\
1917: $ \hmsm{08}{55}{27}{405} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{44}{37}{99} $ & $ 107.8 $ & $ 69.3 $ & $ 42.5 $ & $ 83.6 $ & $ 56.8 $ & $ 0.13 $ & $ 0.08 $ & $ 0.46 $ \\
1918: $ \hmsm{08}{55}{41}{792} $ & $ \dmsm{58}{43}{27}{98} $ & $ 102.1 $ & $ 78.8 $ & $ 43.8 $ & $ 94.5 $ & $ 59.5 $ & $ 0.17 $ & $ 0.09 $ & $ 0.39 $ \\
1919: \hline
1920: \multicolumn{2}{c}{mean} &$ 108.3 $ & $ 80.3 $ & $ 48.3 $ & $ 87.8 $ & $ 55.7 $ & $ 0.22 $ & $ 0.27 $ & $ 0.40 $ \\
1921: \multicolumn{2}{c}{standard deviation} &$ 5.3 $ & $ 12.6 $ & $ 5.9 $ & $ 11.8 $ & $ 5.7 $ & $ 0.06 $ & $ 0.14 $ & $ 0.10 $ \\
1922: \hline
1923: \end{tabular}
1924: \end{center}
1925: \end{table*}
1926: %
1927: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
1928: %
1929: \clearpage
1930: \begin{landscape}
1931: \section{Tilted-ring parameters}
1932: \label{Sect_4.9}
1933: \begin{table}[hbp]
1934: \begin{center}
1935: \caption{
1936: Radially dependent best-fit parameters.
1937: {\bf (1)} Radius ($\,\arcsec$).
1938: {\bf (2)} Radius ($\rm kpc$, according to Table~\ref{Tab_1}).
1939: {\bf (3)} Error of $ r_{\rm t} $ ($\rm kpc$)
1940: {\bf (4)} Face-on surface brightness (${\rm Jy}\,{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$).
1941: {\bf (5)} Error of $I_{\rm tot,f}$ (${\rm Jy}\,{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$).
1942: {\bf (6)} Face-on {H\,{\small I}} column-density ($10^{19}\,{\rm atoms}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}$).
1943: {\bf (7)} Error of $N_{\rm {H\,{\small I}}}$ ($10^{19}\,{\rm atoms}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}$).
1944: {\bf (8)} Face-on surface density (${\rm M}_{\odot}\,{\rm pc}^{-2}$).
1945: {\bf (9)} Error of $\sigma$(${\rm M}_{\odot}\,{\rm pc}^{-2}$).
1946: {\bf (10)} Rotation velocity (${\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$).
1947: {\bf (11)} Error of $V_{\rm rot}$ (${\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}$).
1948: {\bf (12)} Inclination ($\,\deg$).
1949: {\bf (13)} Error of $i$ ($\,\deg$).
1950: {\bf (14)} Position angle ($\,\deg$).
1951: {\bf (15)} Error of $pa$ ($\,\deg$).
1952: {\bf (16)} Inclination ($\,\deg$).
1953: {\bf (17)}-{\bf (23)} are Cartesian components of the spin normal
1954: vector ${\bf n}$ of the ring and their errors.
1955: {\bf (17)} Spin normal vector component towards W (natural units).
1956: {\bf (18)} Error of $n_{\rm W}$ (natural units).
1957: {\bf (19)} Spin normal vector component towards N (natural units).
1958: {\bf (20)} Error of $n_{\rm N}$ (natural units).
1959: {\bf (21)} Spin normal vector component towards observer (natural units).
1960: {\bf (22)} Error of $n_{\rm LOS}$ (natural units).
1961: }
1962: \label{Tab_5}
1963: \begin{tabular}{r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r}
1964: \hline
1965: \hline
1966: $ r_{\rm p} $ & $ r_{\rm t} $ & $\Delta\,r_{\rm t}$ & $ I_{\rm tot,f} $ & $\Delta\,I_{\rm tot,f}$ & $ N_{\rm {H\,{\small I}}} $ & $ \Delta\,N_{\rm {H\,{\small I}}} $ & $\sigma$ & $\Delta\,\sigma$ & $V_{\rm rot}$ & $\Delta\,V_{\rm rot}$ & $i$ & $\Delta\,i$ & $pa$ & $\Delta\,pa$ & $n_{\rm W}$ & $\Delta\,n_{\rm W}$ & $n_{\rm N}$ & $\Delta\,n_{\rm N}$ & $n_{\rm LOS}$ & $\Delta\,n_{\rm LOS}$ \\
1967: (1) & (2) & (3) & (4) & (5) & (6) & (7) & (8) & (9) & (10) & (11) & (12) & (13) & (14) & (15) & (16) & (17) & (18) & (19) & (20) & (21)\\
1968: \hline
1969: $ 0 $ & $ 0.00 $ & $ 0.00 $ & $ 0.0 $ & $ 2.0 $ & $ 0.0 $ & $ 2.5 $ & $ 0.0 $ & $ 0.2 $ & $ 0.0 $ & $ 0.0 $ & & & & & & & & & & \\
1970: $ 12 $ & $ 0.88 $ & $ 0.22 $ & $ 0.0 $ & $ 2.0 $ & $ 0.0 $ & $ 2.5 $ & $ 0.0 $ & $ 0.2 $ & $ 154.2 $ & $ 79.0 $ & $ 35.3 $ & $ 18.7 $ & $ 245.0 $ & $ 68.7 $ & $ -0.524 $ & $ 0.379 $ & $ 0.244 $ & $ 0.639 $ & $ 0.816 $ & $ 0.189 $\\
1971: $ 24 $ & $ 1.77 $ & $ 0.44 $ & $ 8.8 $ & $ 20.8 $ & $ 10.9 $ & $ 25.9 $ & $ 0.9 $ & $ 2.1 $ & $ 134.9 $ & $ 13.1 $ & $ 65.4 $ & $ 11.7 $ & $ 217.7 $ & $ 10.5 $ & $ -0.556 $ & $ 0.142 $ & $ 0.720 $ & $ 0.122 $ & $ 0.416 $ & $ 0.186 $\\
1972: $ 36 $ & $ 2.65 $ & $ 0.66 $ & $ 72.4 $ & $ 7.3 $ & $ 90.4 $ & $ 9.1 $ & $ 7.2 $ & $ 0.7 $ & $ 131.2 $ & $ 5.6 $ & $ 69.7 $ & $ 4.0 $ & $ 204.7 $ & $ 4.0 $ & $ -0.392 $ & $ 0.060 $ & $ 0.852 $ & $ 0.035 $ & $ 0.348 $ & $ 0.065 $\\
1973: $ 48 $ & $ 3.54 $ & $ 0.87 $ & $ 57.2 $ & $ 12.1 $ & $ 71.5 $ & $ 15.1 $ & $ 5.7 $ & $ 1.2 $ & $ 144.6 $ & $ 10.0 $ & $ 54.4 $ & $ 4.9 $ & $ 197.9 $ & $ 5.9 $ & $ -0.249 $ & $ 0.081 $ & $ 0.774 $ & $ 0.054 $ & $ 0.582 $ & $ 0.070 $\\
1974: $ 60 $ & $ 4.42 $ & $ 1.09 $ & $ 33.5 $ & $ 11.8 $ & $ 41.9 $ & $ 14.7 $ & $ 3.4 $ & $ 1.2 $ & $ 163.9 $ & $ 30.5 $ & $ 47.8 $ & $ 7.6 $ & $ 160.0 $ & $ 8.9 $ & $ 0.253 $ & $ 0.112 $ & $ 0.696 $ & $ 0.093 $ & $ 0.672 $ & $ 0.099 $\\
1975: $ 72 $ & $ 5.31 $ & $ 1.31 $ & $ 39.0 $ & $ 11.5 $ & $ 48.7 $ & $ 14.3 $ & $ 3.9 $ & $ 1.1 $ & $ 146.1 $ & $ 18.2 $ & $ 41.5 $ & $ 8.3 $ & $ 161.1 $ & $ 10.9 $ & $ 0.215 $ & $ 0.125 $ & $ 0.627 $ & $ 0.111 $ & $ 0.749 $ & $ 0.096 $\\
1976: $ 84 $ & $ 6.19 $ & $ 1.53 $ & $ 15.9 $ & $ 11.2 $ & $ 19.8 $ & $ 14.0 $ & $ 1.6 $ & $ 1.1 $ & $ 183.1 $ & $ 41.9 $ & $ 31.0 $ & $ 11.3 $ & $ 147.4 $ & $ 4.1 $ & $ 0.277 $ & $ 0.096 $ & $ 0.434 $ & $ 0.144 $ & $ 0.857 $ & $ 0.101 $\\
1977: $ 96 $ & $ 7.08 $ & $ 1.75 $ & $ 22.0 $ & $ 9.9 $ & $ 27.4 $ & $ 12.4 $ & $ 2.2 $ & $ 1.0 $ & $ 184.0 $ & $ 20.7 $ & $ 33.6 $ & $ 13.6 $ & $ 120.0 $ & $ 12.5 $ & $ 0.479 $ & $ 0.182 $ & $ 0.276 $ & $ 0.144 $ & $ 0.833 $ & $ 0.132 $\\
1978: $ 108 $ & $ 7.96 $ & $ 1.97 $ & $ 14.0 $ & $ 8.6 $ & $ 17.5 $ & $ 10.8 $ & $ 1.4 $ & $ 0.9 $ & $ 141.5 $ & $ 6.4 $ & $ 60.6 $ & $ 4.0 $ & $ 132.9 $ & $ 6.4 $ & $ 0.638 $ & $ 0.071 $ & $ 0.593 $ & $ 0.075 $ & $ 0.490 $ & $ 0.061 $\\
1979: $ 120 $ & $ 8.85 $ & $ 2.19 $ & $ 21.9 $ & $ 3.9 $ & $ 27.4 $ & $ 4.9 $ & $ 2.2 $ & $ 0.4 $ & $ 160.0 $ & $ 8.2 $ & $ 59.5 $ & $ 4.0 $ & $ 126.1 $ & $ 4.0 $ & $ 0.696 $ & $ 0.046 $ & $ 0.508 $ & $ 0.053 $ & $ 0.507 $ & $ 0.060 $\\
1980: $ 140 $ & $ 10.32 $ & $ 2.55 $ & $ 16.8 $ & $ 2.0 $ & $ 21.0 $ & $ 2.5 $ & $ 1.7 $ & $ 0.2 $ & $ 152.2 $ & $ 11.6 $ & $ 67.3 $ & $ 4.0 $ & $ 122.6 $ & $ 4.0 $ & $ 0.777 $ & $ 0.041 $ & $ 0.497 $ & $ 0.056 $ & $ 0.385 $ & $ 0.064 $\\
1981: $ 160 $ & $ 11.80 $ & $ 2.91 $ & $ 17.5 $ & $ 2.0 $ & $ 21.8 $ & $ 2.5 $ & $ 1.7 $ & $ 0.2 $ & $ 151.0 $ & $ 8.2 $ & $ 70.0 $ & $ 4.0 $ & $ 125.5 $ & $ 4.0 $ & $ 0.765 $ & $ 0.043 $ & $ 0.545 $ & $ 0.055 $ & $ 0.342 $ & $ 0.066 $\\
1982: $ 180 $ & $ 13.27 $ & $ 3.28 $ & $ 15.2 $ & $ 2.0 $ & $ 18.9 $ & $ 2.5 $ & $ 1.5 $ & $ 0.2 $ & $ 156.4 $ & $ 8.2 $ & $ 69.1 $ & $ 4.2 $ & $ 126.7 $ & $ 4.0 $ & $ 0.749 $ & $ 0.044 $ & $ 0.558 $ & $ 0.055 $ & $ 0.358 $ & $ 0.068 $\\
1983: $ 200 $ & $ 14.75 $ & $ 3.64 $ & $ 5.0 $ & $ 2.0 $ & $ 6.2 $ & $ 2.5 $ & $ 0.5 $ & $ 0.2 $ & $ 152.1 $ & $ 8.2 $ & $ 64.5 $ & $ 7.0 $ & $ 125.8 $ & $ 4.0 $ & $ 0.732 $ & $ 0.057 $ & $ 0.527 $ & $ 0.060 $ & $ 0.431 $ & $ 0.111 $\\
1984: $ 240 $ & $ 17.69 $ & $ 4.37 $ & $ 2.4 $ & $ 2.0 $ & $ 3.0 $ & $ 2.5 $ & $ 0.2 $ & $ 0.2 $ & $ 147.5 $ & $ 8.2 $ & $ 63.6 $ & $ 4.0 $ & $ 124.5 $ & $ 4.0 $ & $ 0.738 $ & $ 0.044 $ & $ 0.507 $ & $ 0.054 $ & $ 0.445 $ & $ 0.063 $\\
1985: $ 280 $ & $ 20.64 $ & $ 5.10 $ & $ 2.0 $ & $ 2.0 $ & $ 2.5 $ & $ 2.5 $ & $ 0.2 $ & $ 0.2 $ & $ 137.5 $ & $ 8.2 $ & $ 62.5 $ & $ 4.0 $ & $ 121.3 $ & $ 4.2 $ & $ 0.758 $ & $ 0.044 $ & $ 0.460 $ & $ 0.059 $ & $ 0.462 $ & $ 0.062 $\\
1986: $ 320 $ & $ 23.59 $ & $ 5.83 $ & $ 0.5 $ & $ 2.0 $ & $ 0.6 $ & $ 2.5 $ & $ 0.0 $ & $ 0.2 $ & $ 143.9 $ & $ 15.0 $ & $ 64.8 $ & $ 4.3 $ & $ 123.2 $ & $ 13.7 $ & $ 0.757 $ & $ 0.122 $ & $ 0.496 $ & $ 0.182 $ & $ 0.425 $ & $ 0.068 $\\
1987: $ 360 $ & $ 26.54 $ & $ 6.56 $ & $ 0.8 $ & $ 2.0 $ & $ 1.0 $ & $ 2.5 $ & $ 0.1 $ & $ 0.2 $ & $ 139.6 $ & $ 15.0 $ & $ 66.7 $ & $ 4.0 $ & $ 121.9 $ & $ 7.1 $ & $ 0.780 $ & $ 0.065 $ & $ 0.485 $ & $ 0.098 $ & $ 0.396 $ & $ 0.064 $\\
1988: $ 400 $ & $ 29.49 $ & $ 7.29 $ & $ 0.2 $ & $ 2.0 $ & $ 0.2 $ & $ 2.5 $ & $ 0.0 $ & $ 0.2 $ & $ 146.7 $ & $ 15.0 $ & $ 66.9 $ & $ 8.4 $ & $ 119.5 $ & $ 10.0 $ & $ 0.801 $ & $ 0.093 $ & $ 0.454 $ & $ 0.143 $ & $ 0.392 $ & $ 0.134 $\\
1989: $ 420 $ & $ 30.96 $ & $ 7.65 $ & $ 0.9 $ & $ 2.0 $ & $ 1.2 $ & $ 2.5 $ & $ 0.1 $ & $ 0.2 $ & $ 168.8 $ & $ 15.0 $ & $ 67.4 $ & $ 10.6 $ & $ 119.0 $ & $ 10.0 $ & $ 0.807 $ & $ 0.100 $ & $ 0.448 $ & $ 0.145 $ & $ 0.384 $ & $ 0.171 $\\
1990: \hline
1991: \end{tabular}
1992: \end{center}
1993: \end{table}
1994: \end{landscape}
1995: \end{document}
1996: