1: \documentclass{pasj00}
2: %\draft
3:
4: \SetRunningHead{M. Tsujimoto et al.}{Suzaku Observation of V458 Vul}
5:
6: \Received{\today}
7: \Accepted{\today}
8: %\Received{//}
9: %\Accepted{//}
10:
11: \begin{document}
12: \title{X-Ray Spectroscopy of the Classical Nova V458 Vulpeculae with Suzaku}
13: %
14: \author{
15: Masahiro~\textsc{Tsujimoto},\altaffilmark{1,2}\thanks{Chandra Fellow}
16: Dai~\textsc{Takei},\altaffilmark{3}
17: Jeremy~J.~\textsc{Drake},\altaffilmark{4}
18: Jan-Uwe~\textsc{Ness},\altaffilmark{5}\thanks{Chandra Fellow}
19: and Shunji~\textsc{Kitamoto}\altaffilmark{3}
20: }
21: %
22: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy \& Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University,\\
23: 525 Davey Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802, USA}
24: \altaffiltext{2}{Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, Institute of Space and
25: Astronautical Science,\\
26: 3-1-1 Yoshino-dai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510}
27: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics, Rikkyo University, 3-34-1 Nishi-Ikebukuro, Toshima, Tokyo 171-8501}
28: \altaffiltext{4}{Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, MS-3, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA}
29: \altaffiltext{5}{School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA}
30: %
31: \email{tsujimot@astro.isas.jaxa.jp}
32: %
33: \KeyWords{stars: individual (Nova Vulpeculae 2007 number 1, V458 Vulpeculae) --- stars: novae --- X-rays: stars}
34: \maketitle
35:
36: \begin{abstract}
37: We conducted a target of opportunity X-ray observation of the classical nova V458
38: Vulpeculae 88 days after the explosion using the Suzaku satellite. With a $\sim$20~ks
39: exposure, the X-ray Imaging Spectrometer detected X-ray emission significantly harder
40: than typical super-soft source emission. The X-ray spectrum shows K$\alpha$ lines from
41: N, Ne, Mg, Si, and S, and L-series emission from Fe in highly ionized states. The
42: spectrum can be described by a single temperature ($\sim$0.64~keV) thin thermal plasma model
43: in collisional equilibrium with a hydrogen-equivalent extinction column density of
44: $\sim 3 \times 10^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$, a flux of $\sim 10^{-12}$~erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$,
45: and a luminosity of $\sim$6$\times$10$^{34}$~erg~s$^{-1}$ in the 0.3--3.0~keV band at
46: an assumed distance of 13~kpc. We found a hint of an enhancement of N and deficiencies
47: of O and Fe relative to other metals. The observed X-ray properties can be interpreted
48: as the emission arising from shocks of ejecta from an ONe-type nova.
49: \end{abstract}
50:
51:
52: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
53: \section{Introduction}\label{s1}
54: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
55: Classical novae occur in accreting binaries with a white dwarf (WD) as the
56: primary. Hydrogen-rich accreted material is accumulated on the WD surface until a
57: critical mass is reached that ignites a thermonuclear runaway. A wind driven by
58: radiation pressure leads to ejection of accreted and partially nuclear-processed
59: material, forming an optically thick shell around the binary system. The nova terminates
60: once the remaining hydrogen is consumed on the WD surface. Reviews of classical novae
61: can be found in e.g., \citet{gehrz98,starrfield08}.
62:
63: Classical novae are copious X-ray emitters (e.g., \cite{krautter02}). Several processes
64: are involved in producing the X-rays. One is photospheric emission from a hot layer of
65: the WD surface fueled by residual nuclear burning after the explosion. The layer is
66: rendered visible after the ejecta shell expands and becomes less opaque to soft
67: X-rays. Its X-ray spectrum is characterized by a very soft blackbody-like emission with
68: a temperature of $\stackrel{<}{_\sim}$50~eV and is easily identified in
69: medium-resolution CCD spectra. Higher-resolution grating spectroscopy can further
70: identify absorption features by the WD atmosphere over the blackbody continuum
71: \citep{ness03}. These types of X-ray emitters are known as super-soft sources (SSS).
72:
73: Another type of X-ray emission originates from circumstellar material that is
74: photoionized by the SSS emission. This reprocessed emission is usually dwarfed by the
75: ionizing source. However, when the surface nuclear fuel is consumed and the SSS emission
76: fades out, residual emission from the heated surrounding medium can emerge. This was
77: found in the nova V382 Vel, in which the residual emission was interpreted as the
78: radiatively cooling ejecta that are optically thin and have reached a collisional
79: equilibrium \citep{ness05}. Similar line-dominated emission was found in V4743 Sgr, when
80: the SSS emission turned off for a brief period for unknown reasons \citep{ness03}.
81:
82: Yet another type is weak and hard X-rays, which a substantial fraction of X-ray-emitting
83: novae exhibit within a year of the outburst before the SSS emission becomes visible. In
84: systematic studies by ROSAT \citep{orio01} and Swift \citep{ness07}, more than half and
85: six out of eight are among such novae, respectively. While their spectra are similar to
86: that found in V382 Vel \citep{ness05}, their origin is probably different; the ejected
87: material has not expanded enough to be optically thin, and no ionizing source is present
88: to heat up the surrounding material. Several possible origins have been proposed for the
89: hard X-rays including shock heating of expanding ejecta \citep{lloyd92,obrien94} and
90: reestablished accretion. The latter explains the X-rays seen in a nova by a magnetic WD
91: (V2487 Oph; \cite{hernanz02}).
92:
93: Detailed and timely spectroscopy is requisite to understanding the origin of the early
94: hard X-ray emission, but it is complicated by the faint and more transient nature of
95: this phenomenon. While grating spectroscopy yields a wealth of information, it is
96: limited to extremely bright sources. Only two novae have been studied with grating
97: spectroscopy for their hard emission, but they are atypical samples; RS Oph
98: \citep{nelson08,drake08a,ness08a} is a symbiotic nova, where shocks are expected between
99: the expanding ejecta and the stellar wind of the giant companion. Hard emission from
100: V382 Vel \citep{ness05} was also observed with grating, but the emission has a different
101: origin as described earlier. Hard emission in most classical novae with a main sequence
102: companion has generally been studied based on scant low-resolution spectra and data of
103: poor statistical quality. The utility of such data is limited to determination of the
104: plasma temperature and X-ray extinction from broad-band spectral shapes. Few studies to
105: date attempted to go beyond this \citep{mukai01,orio01,hernanz07}.
106:
107: Suzaku fills the gap well. Its medium-resolution CCD spectrometer yields a high
108: signal-to-noise ratio spectrum for moderately bright X-ray sources in a reasonable
109: telescope time. It has sufficient spectral resolution to resolve emission lines from
110: abundant elements. While we can only rely on global spectral models, the relative flux
111: and energy of these lines enable us to conduct a temperature diagnosis, to study the
112: plasma evolution using non-equilibrium features in emission lines, and to reveal
113: abundance patterns in the X-ray-emitting plasma.
114:
115: Here, we present a Suzaku spectroscopic study of the nova V458 Vulpeculae (V458 Vul) 88
116: days after the explosion. A high signal-to-noise ratio spectrum of the hard X-ray
117: emission was obtained using the X-ray Imaging Spectrometer (XIS). Emission lines from
118: highly-ionized N, Ne, Mg, Si, S, and Fe are resolved, enabling us to conduct the types
119: of diagnosis described above. We present the finding of the study and discuss their
120: implications.
121:
122:
123: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
124: \section{V458 Vulpeculae}\label{s2}
125: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
126: \subsection{Ground-based monitoring}
127: \begin{figure}
128: \begin{center}
129: \FigureFile(85mm,85mm){f1.eps}
130: \end{center}
131: \caption{Evolution of V458 Vul in brightness and color (upper and lower panels,
132: respectively). The origin of the abscissa is day 54320.54 in modified Julian date when
133: the nova was first spotted \citep{nakano07}. The epoch of the Suzaku observation is
134: indicated with ``S'' on the abscissa. In the upper panel, the \textit{y}-,
135: \textit{R\rm{c}}-, \textit{V}-, and \textit{B}-band magnitudes (private communication
136: with K. Nakajima) are respectively shown in magenta, red, green, and blue, while the
137: Swift X-ray count rate (0.3--10.0~keV) is shown in black with 1 $\sigma$ errors
138: \citep{ness08b}. The 95.5\% upper-limit for non-detected X-rays on day 1 is indicated
139: by an open circle. In the lower panel, the \textit{B}--\textit{V} color is shown in
140: orange, while the Swift hardness ratio is in black with 1 $\sigma$ errors. Hardness
141: ratio is defined by (H$-$S)/(H$+$S), where S and H are the Swift count rates in the
142: 0.25--1.5~keV and 1.5--10~keV band, respectively.}\label{f1}
143: \end{figure}
144:
145: On 2007 August 8.54 UT, an optical nova reaching a visual magnitude of $\sim$9.5~mag was
146: spotted in the constellation Vulpecula at (RA, Dec) $=$ (\timeform{19h54m24.66s},
147: \timeform{+20D52'51.7''}) in the equinox J2000.0 \citep{nakano07}. The variable star was
148: fainter by $\sim$8~mag before the explosion if a cataloged source (USNO-A2.0
149: 1050-15545600; \cite{monet98}) is its precursor. Optical spectroscopic observations on
150: the following day revealed hydrogen and helium emission lines with P-Cygni profiles with
151: a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 1750--1900~km~s$^{-1}$ \citep{buil07},
152: establishing the classical nova nature of this source. The nova was named V458 Vul
153: \citep{samus07}.
154:
155: Subsequent ground-based observations were made both photometrically and
156: spectroscopically. The light curve of the nova
157: \citep{bianciardi07a,bianciardi07b,broens07,casas07,labordena07,nakamura07,scarmato07}
158: declined from the maximum \textit{V}-band magnitude of 7.65~mag on day 1.42 to
159: $\sim$14~mag in five months with time scales of $t_{2}\sim$~7~day \citep{poggiani08},
160: where $t_{2}$ is the time of decline from the optical maximum by 2 mag. The declining
161: trend is globally monotonic, but with several exceptions of local brightening at around
162: 68 and 95 days after the explosion (figure~\ref{f1}). The earliest spectra
163: \citep{kiss07,lynch07,munari07,prater07,skoda07,tarasova07} are characterized by P Cygni
164: profiles in H Balmer series, He\emissiontype{I}, and Fe\emissiontype{II} lines. From all
165: these data, the nova was initially classified as a very fast \citep{payne57} and a
166: Fe\emissiontype{II}-type \citep{williams92} nova. However, subsequent observations
167: obtained approximately one month after the outburst show that the Fe lines have faded
168: and the N\emissiontype{II} and N\emissiontype{III} lines have gained prominence,
169: indicating an evolution toward a He/N class nova \citep{poggiani08}. \cite{wesson08}
170: found that this nova occurred inside a planetary nebula with H$\alpha$ imaging, a second
171: such case after GK Per.
172:
173: We adopt the distance to V458 Vul to be 13~kpc \citep{wesson08}. In a series of
174: H$\alpha$ images taken in May 2008, a bright circumstellar knot was discovered at
175: 3\farcs5\ away from the central source. By assuming that the knot is illuminated by the
176: flash of the nova, the distance of $\sim$13~kpc was derived. This is consistent with two
177: other distance estimates. The one is derived from a maximum-magnitude versus
178: rate-of-decline relation \citep{downes07}, an empirical relation that intrinsically
179: bright novae fade our fast. The other is derived from the assumption that the measured
180: radial velocity stems only from the Galactic rotation \citep{wesson08}.
181:
182: The interstellar extinction ($A_{V,\rm{ISM}}$) was estimated to be 1.76~$\pm$~0.32~mag
183: \citep{poggiani08}. This converts to an interstellar hydrogen-equivalent extinction
184: column density ($N_{\rm H,ISM}$) of $3.15 \pm 0.57 \times 10^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$ using the
185: relation $N_{\rm{H,ISM}}$/$A_{V,\rm{ISM}}= 1.79 \times 10^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$~mag$^{-1}$
186: \citep{predehl95}. The line-of-sight extinction integrated through our Galaxy toward
187: V458 Vul is estimated from H\emissiontype{I} maps to be 3.7$\times$10$^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$
188: \citep{kalberla05} or 4.0$\times$10$^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$ \citep{dickey90}, which is
189: consistent that the nova is within in our Galaxy.
190:
191:
192: \subsection{Space-based monitoring}
193: Monitoring observations were also conducted with space-based facilities. The X-Ray
194: Telescope (XRT; \cite{burrows05}) aboard Swift was employed to take an immediate
195: follow-up image on day 1 and repeated snapshots from day 71 to 140
196: (figure~\ref{f1}). The X-ray emission was not detected on day 1, but it started to
197: emerge on day 70 during the first optical rebrightening. A total of 192 X-ray counts
198: were accumulated in a short observation of $\sim$6.7~ks, which is at least 10 times
199: brighter than the upper limit to the X-ray counts on day 1 \citep{drake07}. The X-ray
200: flux continued to increase until the peak on day $\sim$100, showed a stable flux for
201: $\sim$30 days, then decreased in flux quite sharply on the last Swift visit on day 140.
202:
203: The XRT spectrum on day 70 has significant signal above 1~keV, indicating that hard
204: X-ray emission component was present in addition to any soft emission typical of the SSS
205: phase \citep{drake07}. No detailed spectroscopy was possible due to the paucity of
206: counts. We therefore requested a director's discretionary time on the Suzaku telescope
207: to obtain an X-ray spectrum of better statistics and resolution. A $\sim$20~ks
208: observation was conducted on day 88. We present the detailed analysis of the Suzaku
209: observation in this paper. Swift resumed its observing campaign on day 315. In this
210: later phase, the hard X-ray flux is highly variable and is anti-correlated with the UV
211: flux. The Swift results, including the later observations, are presented in
212: \citet{drake08b,ness08b}.
213:
214:
215: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
216: \section{Observation}\label{s3}
217: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
218: Suzaku observed V458 Vul on 2007 November 4 from 7:51 UT to 21:00 UT. The observatory
219: \citep{mitsuda07} carries two instruments: the X-ray Imaging Spectrometer (XIS:
220: \cite{koyama07}) sensitive at 0.2--12~keV and the Hard X-ray Detector (HXD:
221: \cite{kokubun07,takahashi07}) at 10--600~keV. We concentrate on the XIS data in this
222: paper, which has sensitivity for the energy range of interest.
223:
224: The XIS is equipped with four X-ray CCDs. Three of them (XIS0, 2, and 3) are
225: front-illuminated (FI) devices, while the remaining one (XIS1) is back-illuminated (BI).
226: FI and BI CCDs are superior to each other in the hard and soft band responses,
227: respectively. XIS2 has not been functioning since 2006 November, and we use data from
228: the remaining three devices. The CCDs are mounted at the focus of four independent X-ray
229: telescopes \citep{serlemitsos07}, which are aligned to observe a $\sim$18\arcmin
230: $\times$18\arcmin\ field with a half-power diameter of $\sim$2\arcmin.
231:
232: The three imaging-spectrometers have a combined effective area of $\sim$1030~cm$^{2}$ at
233: 1.5~keV. We used the spaced-row charge injection technique, which rejuvenates the
234: degraded spectral resolution by filling the charge traps with artificially injected
235: electrons during CCD readouts. This yields an FWHM resolution of 145--174~eV at 5.9~keV.
236:
237: The observation was conducted using the normal clocking mode with a frame time of
238: 8~s. Data were cleaned using processing version 2.1 to remove non--X-ray events and
239: those taken during the South Atlantic Anomaly passages, at elevation angles below
240: 5$^\circ$ from the Earth rim, and at elevation angles below 20$^\circ$ from sunlit Earth
241: rim. After filtering, the net integration time is $\sim$19.6~ks. We used HEASoft version
242: 6.4.1\footnote{See http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/software/lheasoft/ for detail.} for
243: the data reduction and Xspec version 11.3.2\footnote{See
244: http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/xanadu/xspec/index.html for detail.} for the X-ray
245: spectral analysis.
246:
247:
248: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
249: \section{Analysis}\label{s4}
250: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
251: \subsection{Image and Timing}
252: Figure~\ref{f2} shows the XIS image in the 0.2--5.0~keV band obtained by merging the
253: events recorded by all the three CCDs. Four sources were detected by visual
254: inspection. The brightest one at the center is V458 Vul based on astrometric consistency
255: with the Swift data. We fine-tuned the coordinate of the XIS image using this source as
256: a reference. The resulting positions, X-ray count rates (CR), and hardness ratio (HR) of
257: the four sources are summarized in table~\ref{t1}. None of the sources except for V458
258: Vul has records in the SIMBAD or the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database, leaving their
259: natures unclear.
260:
261: \begin{figure}
262: \begin{center}
263: \FigureFile(85mm,85mm){f2.eps}
264: \end{center}
265: \caption{Smoothed XIS image in the 0.2--5.0~keV band. Three CCD images were merged and
266: a Gaussian smoothing was applied. V458 Vul (source 1) and three faint sources (sources
267: 2--4) were detected. The source regions are shown with solid circles around each
268: source, while the background region for V458 Vul is shown with broken annulus with
269: masks.}\label{f2}
270: \end{figure}
271:
272: \begin{table}
273: \begin{center}
274: \caption{Source list.}\label{t1}
275: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
276: \hline
277: Source & RA & Dec & CR\footnotemark[$*$] & HR\footnotemark[$\dagger$] \\
278: & (J2000.0) & (J2000.0) & (s$^{-1}$) & \\
279: \hline
280: 1\footnotemark[$\ddagger$] & \timeform{19h54m25s} & \timeform{+20D52'52''} & 9.8$\times$10$^{-2}$ & $-$0.55 \\
281: 2 & \timeform{19h54m13s} & \timeform{+20D54'53''} & 7.9$\times$10$^{-3}$ & $+$0.43 \\
282: 3 & \timeform{19h54m47s} & \timeform{+20D50'13''} & 2.7$\times$10$^{-3}$ & $+$0.40 \\
283: 4 & \timeform{19h54m55s} & \timeform{+20D55'48''} & 5.2$\times$10$^{-3}$ & $-$0.34 \\
284: \hline
285: \multicolumn{4}{@{}l@{}}{\hbox to 0pt{\parbox{85mm}{\footnotesize
286: \par\noindent
287: \footnotemark[$*$] The background-subtracted count rate in the 0.2--5.0~keV
288: averaged over the three CCDs. The values are normalized to the circular aperture of
289: a 3\arcmin\ radius.
290: \par\noindent
291: \footnotemark[$\dagger$] The hardness ratio defined as (H$-$S)/(H$+$S), where H and
292: S are background-subtracted count rates in the hard (1.5--5.0~keV) and soft
293: (0.2--1.5~keV) band, respectively.
294: \par\noindent
295: \footnotemark[$\ddagger$] V458 Vul. The contamination by source 2 is not corrected in the
296: CR and HR values.
297: }\hss}}
298: \end{tabular}
299: \end{center}
300: \end{table}
301:
302: The background was subtracted to compute CR and HR. Source counts were integrated in
303: circles with adaptively-chosen radii to maximize the ratio against background for all
304: sources (solid circles in figure~\ref{f2}). Background counts were accumulated in a
305: different method for V458 Vul and the others. For V458 Vul, background was from an
306: annular region with inner and outer radii of 5\arcmin\ and 7\arcmin, respectively. For
307: the other sources, it was from annuli around V458 Vul with the inner circle
308: circumscribed to and the outer circle inscribed to the source extraction circle of each
309: source. The 3\arcmin\ circles around all sources were masked in these annuli. In this
310: way, we canceled the contamination to the faint three sources by the dominantly bright
311: source 1. The background was corrected for the vignetting before subtracting from the
312: source. The contamination of source 1 by source 2 is considered later.
313:
314: We constructed a light curve of V458 Vul and found no significant changes. The curve was
315: fitted with a constant flux model with a null hypothesis probability of 53\%.
316:
317:
318: \subsection{Spectrum}\label{s4-2}
319: \begin{figure}
320: \begin{center}
321: \FigureFile(85mm,85mm){f3.eps}
322: \end{center}
323: \caption{X-ray spectra of V458 Vul (background subtracted) in a linear scale observed
324: with the XIS0 and XIS3 (both FI devices; dark and light gray shadings, respectively)
325: and with the XIS1 (BI device; solid line). The energies of plausible emission lines are
326: labeled.}\label{f3}
327: \end{figure}
328:
329: Figure~\ref{f3} shows the background-subtracted XIS spectra of V458 Vul in a linear
330: scale at the 0.4--3.5~keV band. We see conspicuous K$\alpha$
331: line emission from N\emissiontype{VII}, Ne\emissiontype{IX}, Ne\emissiontype{X},
332: Mg\emissiontype{XI}, Mg\emissiontype{XII}, Si\emissiontype{XIII}, and
333: S\emissiontype{XV}. We also see some emission from Fe\emissiontype{XVII} L-series lines.
334:
335: \begin{figure}[ht!]
336: \begin{center}
337: \FigureFile(85mm,85mm){f4.eps}
338: \end{center}
339: \caption{Best-fit models to the background-subtracted spectra in a logarithmic
340: scale. Different colors are used for each CCD. The top panel shows the data with
341: crosses and the best-fit model with solid lines. The contamination by the nearby source
342: 2 is included as dotted lines. The bottom panel shows the residuals to the
343: fit.}\label{f4}
344: \end{figure}
345:
346: In order to model the spectrum, we generated the redistribution matrix functions and the
347: auxiliary response functions using \texttt{xisrmfgen} and \texttt{xissimarfgen}
348: \citep{ishisaki07}, respectively. The difference in effective area arising from
349: different off-axis angles between the source and the background regions were compensated
350: following the procedure described in \citet{hyodo08}.
351:
352: The contamination by the nearby source 2 was considered by including an additional
353: absorbed power-law model (7.8$\times$10$^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$ for the absorption column and
354: 2.1 for the photon index) that best describes its spectrum. From a ray-tracing
355: simulation, we found that $\sim$1.5\% of the emission from source 2 is in the source
356: extraction region of source 1. Fortunately, sources 1 and 2 have different spectral
357: hardness (table~\ref{t1}) and the contamination by source 2 is almost negligible.
358:
359: We fitted the 0.3--3.0~keV spectrum of source 1 using an optically-thin thermal plasma
360: model in collisional equilibrium (the APEC model; \cite{smith01}) convolved with an
361: interstellar absorption assuming the cross sections and the chemical abundance in
362: \citet{wilms00}. The plasma temperature ($k_{\rm{B}}T$) and its emission measure as well
363: as the hydrogen column density ($N_{\rm H}$) were allowed to vary.
364:
365: For the chemical composition of the plasma, we tried four models with different constraints
366: on the abundance of elements (Model 1--4). The base-line model is the ``Model 1'', in
367: which the abundance of elements with noticeable K$\alpha$ emission (N, Ne, Mg, Si, and
368: S) were allowed to vary individually. Also, the abundance of Fe was also varied, as the
369: Fe L series emission is necessary to explain the spectrum between the
370: O\emissiontype{VIII} K$\alpha$ (0.65~keV) and Ne\emissiontype{IX} K$\alpha$ (0.92~keV)
371: features. The abundance of Ni, which also contributes through its L series emission, was
372: tied to that of Fe at the solar ratio. Other elements were fixed to the solar
373: abundance. Here, we assumed the solar values by \citet{anders89}. The spectrum and the
374: best-fit model is shown in figure~\ref{f4}, and the best-fit parameters are summarized
375: in table~\ref{t2}. Additional components are not statistically required to explain the
376: spectra.
377:
378: For the other models, we put additional constraints on the ``Model 1'' for the purpose
379: of reducing the statistical uncertainties. In the ``Model 2'', we tied the abundance of
380: intermediate-mass elements (Ne, Mg, Si, S) after confirming that the abundance of these
381: elements is consistent with each other in the ``Model 1`'. In the ``Model 3'', we fixed
382: the N abundance to be 1 solar. In the ``Model 4'', we fixed the abundance of less
383: constrained elements (N, O, and S) than the others to be 1 solar. The best-fit
384: parameters for these models are also tabulated in table~\ref{t2}. The results are
385: consistent among all these models except for the ''Model 4``, in which the estimate of
386: $N_{\rm{H}}$ and the abundance values are higher and the $\chi^{2}$-fitting is worse
387: than the others with significant residuals in the N--O K$\alpha$ energy range. We
388: therefore consider that this is not an appropriate model, and interpret the spectrum
389: based on the result of the other three models.
390:
391: \begin{table*}[th!]
392: \begin{center}
393: \caption{Best-fits spectral parameters.}\label{t2}
394: \begin{tabular}{llcccc}
395: \hline
396: Param. & Unit & Model 1\footnotemark[$*\dagger$] & Model 2\footnotemark[$*\dagger$] & Model 3\footnotemark[$*\dagger$] & Model 4\footnotemark[$*\dagger$] \\
397: \hline
398: $N_{\rm{H}}$ & 10$^{21}$ (cm$^{-2}$) \dotfill
399: & 2.8 (1.8--4.6) & 2.8 (1.8--4.4) & 2.8 (1.9--4.1) & 3.8 (2.9--4.8) \\
400: $k_{\rm{B}}T$ & (keV) \dotfill
401: & 0.64 (0.57--0.71) & 0.65 (0.60--0.71) & 0.64 (0.60--0.70) & 0.64 (0.59--0.69) \\
402: $Z_{\rm{N}}$ & (solar) \dotfill
403: & 1.0 (0.0-45) & 1.3 (0.0--35) & 1 (fixed) & 1 (fixed) \\
404: $Z_{\rm{O}}$ & (solar) \dotfill
405: & 0.0 (0.0--1.6) & 0.0 (0.0--1.1) & 0.0 (0.0--0.8) & 1 (fixed) \\
406: $Z_{\rm{Ne}}$ & (solar) \dotfill
407: & 0.6 (0.3--1.8) & 0.5 (0.3--1.1) & 0.6 (0.3--1.2) & 1.2 (0.6--1.9) \\
408: $Z_{\rm{Mg}}$ & (solar) \dotfill
409: & 0.4 (0.2--1.3) & 0.5 (0.3--1.1) & 0.4 (0.2--0.9) & 0.9 (0.5--1.4) \\
410: $Z_{\rm{Si}}$ & (solar) \dotfill
411: & 0.5 (0.3--1.3) & 0.5 (0.3--1.1) & 0.5 (0.3--0.9) & 0.9 (0.5--1.5) \\
412: $Z_{\rm{S}}$ & (solar) \dotfill
413: & 0.6 (0.0--1.5) & 0.5 (0.3--1.1) & 0.6 (0.0--1.3) & 1 (fixed) \\
414: $Z_{\rm{Fe}}$ & (solar) \dotfill
415: & 0.2 (0.1--0.8) & 0.2 (0.1--0.6) & 0.2 (0.1--0.4) & 0.5 (0.3--0.7) \\
416: $Z_{\rm{Ni}}$ & (solar) \dotfill
417: & 0.2 (0.1--0.8) & 0.2 (0.1--0.6) & 0.2 (0.1--0.4) & 0.5 (0.3--0.7) \\
418: $F_{\rm{X}}$\footnotemark[$\ddagger$] & 10$^{-12}$ (erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$) \dotfill
419: & 1.1 (0.5--1.7) & 1.1 (0.7--1.5) & 1.1 (0.7--1.6) & 1.1 (0.8--1.5) \\
420: $L_{\rm{X}}$\footnotemark[$\ddagger\S$] & 10$^{34}$ (erg~s$^{-1}$) \dotfill
421: & 5.9 & 5.7 & 5.9 & 7.2 \\
422: $\chi^{2}$/d.o.f. & \dotfill
423: & 385.2/456 & 391.0/449 & 385.3/447 & 403.3/449 \\
424: \hline
425: %
426: \multicolumn{3}{@{}l@{}}{\hbox to 0pt{\parbox{170mm}{\footnotesize
427: \par\noindent
428: \footnotemark[$*$] The statistical uncertainties are indicated by the 90\% confidence
429: range.
430: \par\noindent
431: \footnotemark[$\dagger$] Fitting with constraints with $Z_{\rm{Fe}}=Z_{\rm{Ni}}$ (Model 1),
432: $Z_{\rm{Fe}}=Z_{\rm{Ni}}$ and $Z_{\rm{Ne}}=Z_{\rm{Mg}}=Z_{\rm{Si}}=Z_{\rm{S}}$ (Model
433: 2), $Z_{\rm{Fe}}=Z_{\rm{Ni}}$ and $Z_{\rm{N}}=1$ (Model 3), and $Z_{\rm{Fe}}=Z_{\rm{Ni}}$ and $Z_{\rm{N}}=Z_{\rm{O}}=Z_{\rm{S}}=1$ (Model 4).
434: \par\noindent
435: \footnotemark[$\ddagger$] The X-ray flux in the 0.3--3.0~keV band.
436: \par\noindent
437: \footnotemark[$\S$] A distance of 13~kpc is assumed.
438: }\hss}}
439: \end{tabular}
440: \end{center}
441: \end{table*}
442:
443: \medskip
444:
445: In a transient plasma like that characterizing our V458 Vul spectra, electrons and ions
446: may not have reached a collisional ionization equilibrium. For non-equilibrium
447: ionization (NEI) plasmas, low levels of ionization of ions can be seen for the
448: temperature determined from the electron bremsstrahlung emission (e.g.,
449: \cite{mewe98}). As a result, the energies of dominant emission features appear shifted
450: toward lower energies in X-ray CCD spectra by $\gtrsim$10~eV, which is detectable by XIS
451: \citep{miyata07,bamba08}. The degree of the shifts is parameterized by the ionization
452: parameter $\int_{0}^{t} dt^{\prime} n_{\rm{e}}(t^{\prime})$, where $n_{\rm{e}}(t)$ is
453: the electron density as a function of time $t$. We fitted the XIS spectra using an NEI
454: model \citep{hamilton83,borkowski94,liedahl95,borkowski01} and found a 90\% lower limit
455: to the ionization parameter of 1.4$\times$10$^{12}$~s~cm$^{-3}$. Finding a value higher
456: than $\approx 10^{11}$--$10^{12}$~s~cm$^{-3}$ implies that the XIS spectrum is
457: consistent with being at a collisional equilibrium \citep{mewe98}.
458:
459:
460:
461: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
462: \section{Discussion}\label{s5}
463: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
464: \subsection{Interstellar and Circumstellar Extinction}
465: From our spectral fitting, we derived a neutral hydrogen column density of $N_{\rm
466: H}=$~(1.8--4.6)~$\times 10^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$ along the line of sight to V458 Vul
467: (table~\ref{t2}). The value is consistent with the interstellar extinction estimated by
468: \citet{poggiani08}. By the time of the Suzaku observation, the color index
469: (\textit{B}--\textit{V}) of the nova has plateaued from the initial redder
470: values. Therefore, most of the observed extinction stems from the interstellar medium,
471: not from the material local to the nova.
472:
473: The average interstellar hydrogen density ($n_{\rm{H,ISM}}$) in the line of sight is
474: then estimated as $\sim$0.1~cm$^{-3}$, which is smaller by an order of magnitude than
475: the canonical value of $n_{\rm{H,ISM}}=$~1~cm$^{-3}$. We suspect that this is due to the
476: off-plane location of the nova at --3.6~degree in the Galactic latitude
477: \citep{schlegel98}.
478:
479:
480: \subsection{Chemical Abundance}
481: \subsubsection{Previous Abundance Studies}
482: WDs causing novae can have two different chemical compositions depending on their mass;
483: CO-type for sources less than $\sim$1.2~$M_{\odot}$ and ONe-type for those more than
484: 1.1--1.2~$M_{\odot}$ \citep{iben89}. With a less mass, the gravitational potential on
485: the WD surface is smaller and the peak temperature in the thermo-nuclear runaway is
486: lower. Together with a different core composition, the two types of novae yield
487: different species of elements in runaways. The major nuclear reaction in CO novae does
488: not go beyond elements heavier than O, while that in ONe novae reaches up to Si and
489: S. Theoretical calculations show that intermediate-mass species are enhanced in the
490: ejecta from ONe novae \citep{starrfield08,jose98,jose07}. Also, the ratio of C and N
491: against O increases as the WD mass increases \citep{jose98,jose07}. The chemical pattern
492: of nova ejecta thus provides important clues to guess the type of the WD that hosts the
493: nova.
494:
495: Three novae have been studied to discuss the chemical abundance in their hard X-ray
496: plasma. V382 Vel was observed by medium-resolution gas scintillation proportional
497: counters aboard BeppoSAX on day 15 \citep{orio01} and by a high-resolution grating
498: spectrometer aboard Chandra on day 268, after the nova had turned off
499: \citep{ness05}. V4633 Sgr was observed by medium-resolution CCD spectrometers aboard
500: XMM-Newton 2.6 and 3.5 years after the explosion \citep{hernanz07}. RS Oph was observed
501: by high-resolution grating on Chandra and XMM-Newton \citep{nelson08,drake08a,ness08a}
502: ten times from day~14 to day~239.
503:
504: In the high-resolution grating spectra of the early hard X-rays in RS Oph
505: \citep{ness08a}, bremsstrahlung continuum emission and line emission are resolved. N is
506: found overabundant as a fingerprint of the CNO cycle for the H fusion. High N abundances
507: thus point to the ejected material from the WD as the source for the X-ray
508: emission. However, in the specific case of RS Oph, the abundances must be compared to
509: those of the accreted material from its giant companion (thus the composition of the
510: companion) in order to confirm that the observed X-rays originate from the WD ejecta. In
511: a grating spectrum of V382 Vel, a high N abundance was also found
512: \citep{ness05}. However, the observation was conducted well after the nova had turned
513: off, thus reflecting the late nebular emission rather than the early hard emission.
514:
515: In the medium-resolution studies, the chemical pattern is murkier for being unable to
516: derive the abundances element by element. Nevertheless, \citet{orio01} found a hint of
517: significant iron depletion in V382 Vel. \citet{hernanz07} tried two thermal models with
518: different chemical patterns to fit the V4633 Sgr spectra, one with all elements fixed to
519: the solar values and the other fixed to those of a CO nova shell. Both models can
520: explain the data.
521:
522:
523: \subsubsection{Abundance of V458 Vul}
524: We observed V458 Vul with the medium-resolution spectrometer aboard Suzaku. A high
525: signal-to-noise ratio spectrum allows us to constrain the abundance of metals
526: individually for seven elements (table~\ref{t2}). The abundance values are subject to
527: change due to the unconstrained He abundance. He, along with H, contributes to the
528: continuum emission in the observed band. We fixed the He abundance to the solar value in
529: our fitting procedures, but an increased abundance of He leads to an increased estimate
530: of metal abundances. Therefore, the best-fit abundance values of metals should be
531: considered only in a sense relative to each other.
532:
533: Using the result of the ``Model 2'', we define the metal abundance,
534: $Z_{\rm{m}}=$~0.5~$Z_{\odot}$, which we derived by collectively thawing Ne, Mg, Si, and
535: S abundances. With respect to this value, the best-fit parameters of the spectrum shows
536: an enhanced N abundance with $Z_{\rm{N}}$/$Z_{\rm{m}} \sim$~2.6 and deficient O and Fe
537: abundances with $Z_{\rm{O}}$/$Z_{\rm{m}} \sim$~0 and $Z_{\rm{Fe}}$/$Z_{\rm{m}}
538: \sim$~0.4.
539:
540: We note here that systematic uncertainties can arise from possible inaccurate
541: modeling. First, the uncertainty in the $N_{\rm{H}}$ estimate amplifies the uncertainty
542: of the N and O abundances, although we consider it unlikely that the both elements have
543: the solar abundance from the result of the ``Model 4''. Second, a single temperature
544: model may be an oversimplification. This leads to particularly high uncertainties in
545: elements formed far away from the isothermal temperature. For example, in a 0.65~keV
546: plasma, the lines of S and Si (the peak formation temperature $\sim$1.4~keV) have to be
547: formed in the wings of their line emissivity functions. Small changes in temperature
548: require large changes in abundance, because the slope of the line emissivity functions
549: is steeper in their wings than near the peak. This explains the increasing uncertainties
550: of Mg, Si, to S in the ``Model 1''. The same arguments apply for the low-temperature
551: lines of N and O (the peak formation temperature $\sim 0.3$~keV). If the plasma is not
552: isothermal and additional components with temperatures of 0.3 and 1.4 keV are present,
553: significantly lower abundances for N, O, Si, and S will be obtained. Without a knowledge
554: of the true emission measure distribution such as that determined by \citet{ness05}, it
555: is impossible to determine the accurate abundances. We speculate, however, that
556: contributions from plasma with temperatures below 0.3~keV and above 1.4~keV are minor,
557: judging from a high ratio of N\emissiontype{VII} to N\emissiontype{VI} and a low ratio
558: of Si\emissiontype{XIV} and Si\emissiontype{XIII} (figure~\ref{f3}).
559:
560: With these uncertainties in mind, it is interesting to note that an N enhancement and a
561: Fe deficiency in hard X-ray emission are seen in all novae with a $Z_{\rm{N}}$ and a
562: $Z_{\rm{Fe}}$ measurement, respectively, including the present work
563: \citep{mukai01,orio01,ness05,ness08a}. We speculate that this typical pattern in the
564: X-ray spectra is a consequence of these novae belonging to the ONe-type. The deficiency
565: of the Fe abundance with respect to the intermediate-mass elements is consistent with
566: the theoretical understanding that ONe-type novae produce elements up to Si and S. The N
567: enhancement can be interpreted as an outcome of the H fusion on the WD surface, where
568: the CNO cycle produces abundant N by the N to O conversion as the rate-determining
569: process The abundance of N with respect to O increases for more massive ONe-type
570: novae. A quantitative comparison with theoretical work
571: \citep{starrfield08,jose98,jose07} is hampered by a relatively large uncertainty in our
572: fitting results, but the overall abundance pattern in V458 Vul indicates that this is an
573: ONe-type nova.
574:
575:
576: \subsection{Plasma Origin and Parameter Constraints}
577: We first argue that the X-ray emission observed from V458 Vul is most likely to be the
578: internal shock of the nova ejecta, and not due to other processes. The hard spectrum
579: exceeding 1~keV shows that it is neither the SSS emission nor the reprocessed emission
580: of it. The possible N enhancement is consistent with the plasma mostly composed of the
581: ejecta. Shocks might occur externally between the ejecta and swept-up interstellar
582: matter, but the total mass of the swept-up matter by the time of the Suzaku observation
583: is too small compared to the ejected mass. The ejecta mass is estimated to be in the
584: range of $\sim$10$^{-3}$--10$^{-6}$ $M_{\odot}$ \citep{gehrz98}, whereas the swept-up
585: mass is $\sim 4\pi/3 (v_{0}t_{\rm{S}})^3 m_{\rm{p}} n_{\rm{H,ISM}} \sim 10^{-11}
586: M_{\odot}$ where $m_{\rm{p}}$ is the proton mass, $n_{\rm{H,ISM}} = 1$~cm$^{-3}$ is the
587: ISM density, $v_{0} = 1.8 \times 10^{3}$~km~s$^{-1}$ is the initial speed of expanding
588: shell \citep{buil07}, and $t_{\rm{S}}$ is the time of the Suzaku observation elapsed
589: from the explosion. If we adopt $n_{\rm{H,ISM}} = 155$~cm$^{-3}$, the densest value in
590: the surrounding planetary nebula \citep{wesson08}, the swept-up mass is far smaller than
591: the typical ejecta mass.
592:
593: In the case of symbiotic novae like RS Oph, early hard emission can be produced by
594: external shocks between the expanding ejecta and the stellar wind of the giant companion
595: \citep{bode06}. This does not work for classical novae, in which the secondary is a main
596: sequence star and the stellar wind is not dense enough \citep{obrien94}. While no
597: observational evidence exists that V458 Vul is not a symbiotic nova, shock emission by
598: collisions between the expanding ejecta and the stellar wind of the companion is not
599: likely. In RS Oph, the shock itself occurred over a relatively short time scales, and
600: the hard X-ray emission quickly faded afterwards \citep{bode06}, while the X-ray count
601: rate in V458 Vul rises with no indication of a decline. It is most likely that the
602: X-rays from V458 Vul originate in shocks internal to the expanding system, presumably
603: between slower and earlier pre-maximum ejecta and faster and later nova winds
604: \citep{friedjung87,mukai01}. However, in the later Swift observations one year after the
605: nova, this hard X-ray emission still remains and exhibits highly variable flux in
606: anti-correlation with the UV flux \citep{ness08b}. Elaborated theoretical work is
607: necessary to explain all these properties to see if the internal shock interpretation is
608: valid.
609:
610: From the spectral fits, the absorption-corrected X-ray luminosity at the Suzaku
611: observation is $L_{\rm{X}} (t_{\rm{S}})= 6 \times 10^{34}$~erg~s$^{-1}$ in the
612: 0.3--3.0~keV band at an assumed distance of 13~kpc. The luminosity is in a typical
613: range for classical novae \citep{mukai08}. The X-ray volume emission measure at the same
614: time is $EM(t_{\rm S}) = n_{\rm{e}}^{2}(t_{\rm{S}}) V_{\rm{X}}(t_{\rm{S}}) \sim 7
615: \times 10^{57}$~cm$^{-3}$, where $V_{\rm{X}}(t)$ and $n_{\rm{e}}(t)$ represent the
616: X-ray-emitting volume and the plasma density as a function of time $t$.
617:
618: With these measurements and several simplifying assumptions, a crude estimate can be
619: obtained for the lower and upper bounds of the plasma density at $t_{\rm{S}}$. Assuming
620: that the plasma density is uniform and that the expansion velocity $v_{0}$ has not
621: changed since the outburst, the X-ray emitting volume cannot exceed the volume of the
622: expanding shell; i.e., $V_{X}(t_{\rm{S}}) < 4\pi/3 (v_0 t_{\rm{S}})^{3}$. The observed
623: $EM(t_{\rm{S}})$ thus implies that the density must be $n_{\rm{e}}(t_{\rm{S}}) > 8
624: \times 10^{5}$~cm$^{-3}$. If we further assume that the plasma was created at one epoch
625: and not heated repeatedly, the plasma density cannot be too high to cool radiatively too
626: soon. The cooling time $t_{\rm rc}$ at $t_{\rm{S}}$ is approximated as
627: $3n_{\rm{e}}(t_{\rm{S}})k_{\rm{B}}T(t_{\rm{S}})V_{X}(t_{\rm{S}})/L_{\rm{X}}(t_{\rm{S}})$.
628: With $t_{\rm rc} >$ 100~day, which is an approximate duration of the detected X-ray
629: coverage by Swift, the upper bound is estimated as $n_{\rm{e}}(t_{\rm{S}}) < 4 \times
630: 10^{7}$~cm$^{-3}$. The lower and upper bounds put $n_{e}(t_{\rm{S}})$ within a range of
631: two orders around $\approx$10$^{6}$~cm$^{-3}$. \citet{orio96} derived a similar density
632: of $n_{\rm{e}} \sim 2 \times 10^{6}$~cm$^{-3}$ assuming $V_{\rm{X}}(t) = 4\pi/3 (v_0
633: t)^{3}$ for V351 Pup observed 16 month after its explosion.
634:
635:
636: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
637: \section{Summary}\label{s6}
638: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
639: The classical nova V458 Vul was discovered on 2007 August 8. In response to the Swift
640: detection of X-ray emission on day 70, we conducted a target of opportunity observation
641: on day 88 with Suzaku.
642:
643: The X-ray spectrum obtained by the XIS is attributable to a single-temperature
644: ($\sim$0.64~keV) optically-thin thermal plasma emission at a collisional equilibrium
645: with an interstellar extinction of $\sim$3$\times$10$^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$. In addition to
646: the plasma temperature and the amount of extinction, the chemical abundances of
647: conspicuous elements were derived. The abundance pattern is characterized by a possible
648: enhancement of N and deficiencies of O and Fe abundances with respect to other
649: metals. From the X-ray luminosity of $6 \times 10^{34}$~erg~s$^{-1}$, the plasma
650: temperature of 0.64~keV, and the volume emission measure of $7 \times 10^{57}$~cm$^{-3}$
651: at the time of the Suzaku observation, we constrained the average plasma density to be
652: $8 \times 10^{5}$--$4 \times 10^{7}$~cm$^{-3}$ assuming a constant expansion velocity of
653: $1.8\times 10^{3}$~km~s$^{-1}$. All the observed X-ray properties obtained by Suzaku can
654: be interpreted as the emission arising from shocks of ejecta in a nova at a $\sim$13~kpc
655: distance.
656:
657: We demonstrated the capability of the XIS to yield a high signal-to-noise ratio spectrum
658: for a moderately bright X-ray nova in a reasonable telescope time. This put constraints
659: on physical values and chemical compositions of the X-ray emission. In conjunction with
660: monitoring observations routinely done by Swift, we anticipate that similar Suzaku
661: observations can be executed for several novae every year.
662:
663:
664: % Acknowledgment
665: \bigskip
666:
667: The authors appreciate an excellent review by Gloria Sala. We also thank Kazuhiro
668: Nakajima and Hitoshi Yamaoka in the Variable Star Observers League in Japan for
669: providing optical data of V458 Vul, and the Suzaku telescope managers for allocating a
670: part of the director's discretionary time for this observation. Support for this work
671: was provided by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration through Chandra
672: Postdoctoral Fellowship Awards Number PF6-70044 (M.\,T.) and PF5-60039 (J.-U.\,N.)
673: issued by the Chandra X-ray Observatory Center, which is operated by the Smithsonian
674: Astrophysical Observatory for and on behalf of the National Aeronautics Space
675: Administration under contract NAS8-03060. J.\,J.\,D. was supported by NASA contract
676: NAS8-39073 to the CXC during the course of this research. D.\,T. is financially
677: supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. This research has made use
678: of the SIMBAD database operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France and the NASA/IPAC
679: Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
680: California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and
681: Space Administration.
682:
683:
684: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
685: % Bibliography
686: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
687: \begin{thebibliography}{}
688: \bibitem[Anders \& Grevesse(1989)]{anders89}
689: Anders, E. \& Grevesse, N.\ 1989, \gca, 53, 197
690: \bibitem[Bamba et al.(2008)]{bamba08}
691: Bamba, A., et al.\ 2008, \pasj, 60, 153
692: \bibitem[Bianciardi et al.(2007a)]{bianciardi07a}
693: Bianciardi, G., Villegas, J.~M., \& Sanchez, A.\ 2007a, Central Bureau
694: Electronic Telegrams, 1035, 2
695: \bibitem[Bianciardi et al.(2007b)]{bianciardi07b}
696: Bianciardi, G., Puig, X., \& Forne, E.\ 2007b, Central Bureau Electronic
697: Telegrams, 1038, 2
698: \bibitem[Bode et al.(2006)]{bode06}
699: Bode, M.~F., et al.\ 2006, \apj, 652, 629
700: \bibitem[Borkowski et al.(1994)]{borkowski94}
701: Borkowski, K.~J., Sarazin, C.~L., \& Blondin, J.~M.\ 1994, \apj, 429, 710
702: \bibitem[Borkowski et al.(2001)]{borkowski01}
703: Borkowski, K.~J., Lyerly, W.~J., \& Reynolds, S.~P.\ 2001, \apj, 548, 820
704: \bibitem[Broens et al.(2007)]{broens07}
705: Broens, E., Hornoch, K., Cloesen, P., van Loo, F., Diepvens, A.,
706: Hautecler, H., Lehky, M., \& Muyllaert, E.\ 2007, \iaucirc, 8878, 2
707: \bibitem[Buil \& Fujii(2007)]{buil07}
708: Buil, C. \& Fujii, M.\ 2007, \iaucirc, 8862, 2
709: \bibitem[Burrows et al.(2005)]{burrows05}
710: Burrows, D.~N., et al.\ 2005, Space Science Reviews, 120, 165
711: \bibitem[Casas et al.(2007)]{casas07}
712: Casas, R., Fernandez-Ocana, M.~A., Diepvens, A., Scarmato, T., \&
713: Lehky, M.\ 2007, Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams, 1035, 3
714: \bibitem[Dickey \& Lockman(1990)]{dickey90} Dickey, J.~M., \& Lockman, F.~J.\ 1990,
715: \araa, 28, 215
716: \bibitem[Downes \& Duerbeck(2000)]{downes07}
717: Downes, R.~A., \& Duerbeck, H.~W.\ 2000, \aj, 120, 2007
718: \bibitem[Drake et al.(2007)]{drake07}
719: Drake, J.~J., et al.\ 2007, The Astronomer's Telegram, 1246, 1
720: \bibitem[Drake et al.(2008a)]{drake08a}
721: Drake, J.~J., Laming, M., Ness, J.-U., \& Starrfield, S.\ 2008a, \apj,
722: submitted
723: \bibitem[Drake et al.(2008b)]{drake08b}
724: Drake, J.~J., et al.\ 2008b, The Astronomer's Telegram, 1631, 1
725: \bibitem[Friedjung(1987)]{friedjung87}
726: Friedjung, M.\ 1987, \aap, 180, 155
727: \bibitem[Gehrz et al.(1998)]{gehrz98}
728: Gehrz, R.~D., Truran, J.~W., Williams, R.~E., \& Starrfield, S.\ 1998,
729: \pasp, 110, 3
730: \bibitem[Hamilton et al.(1983)]{hamilton83}
731: Hamilton, A.~J.~S., Chevalier, R.~A., \& Sarazin, C.~L.\ 1983, \apjs, 51, 115
732: \bibitem[Hernanz \& Sala(2002)]{hernanz02}
733: Hernanz, M., \& Sala, G.\ 2002, Science, 298, 393
734: \bibitem[Hernanz \& Sala(2007)]{hernanz07}
735: Hernanz, M. \& Sala, G.\ 2007, \apj, 664, 467
736: \bibitem[Hyodo et al.(2008)]{hyodo08}
737: Hyodo, Y., Tsujimoto, M., Hamaguchi, K., Koyama, K., Kitamoto, S.,
738: Maeda, Y., Tsuboi, Y., \& Ezoe, Y.\ 2008, \pasj, 60, 85
739: \bibitem[Iben \& Tutukov(1989)]{iben89}
740: Iben, I.~J., \& Tutukov, A.~V.\ 1989, \apj, 342, 430
741: \bibitem[Ishisaki et al.(2007)]{ishisaki07}
742: Ishisaki, Y., et al.\ 2007, \pasj, 59, S113
743: \bibitem[Jose \& Hernanz(1998)]{jose98}
744: Jose, J., \& Hernanz, M.\ 1998, \apj, 494, 680
745: \bibitem[Jos\'{e} \& Hernanz(2007)]{jose07}
746: Jos\'{e}, J \& Hernanz, M.\ 2007, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys., 34,
747: R431
748: \bibitem[Kalberla et al.(2005)]{kalberla05} Kalberla, P.~M.~W., Burton, W.~B.,
749: Hartmann, D., Arnal, E.~M., Bajaja, E., Morras, R., P\"{o}ppel,
750: W.~G.~L.\ 2005, \aap, 440, 775
751: \bibitem[Kiss \& Sarneczky(2007)]{kiss07}
752: Kiss, L. \& Sarneczky, K.\ 2007, Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams,
753: 1038, 1
754: \bibitem[Kokubun et al.(2007)]{kokubun07}
755: Kokubun, M., et al.\ 2007, \pasj, 59, S53
756: \bibitem[Koyama et al.(2007)]{koyama07}
757: Koyama, K., et al.\ 2007, \pasj, 59, S23
758: \bibitem[Krautter(2002)]{krautter02} Krautter, J.\ 2002, Classical Nova Explosions,
759: 637, 345
760: \bibitem[Labordena et al.(2007)]{labordena07}
761: Labordena, C., Forne, E., \& Ardanuy, A.\ 2007, \iaucirc, 8863, 3
762: \bibitem[Liedahl et al.(1995)]{liedahl95}
763: Liedahl, D.~A., Osterheld, A.~L., \& Goldstein, W.~H.\ 1995, \apjl, 438, L115
764: \bibitem[Lloyd et al.(1992)]{lloyd92}
765: Lloyd, H.~M., O'Brien, T.~J., Bode, M.~F., Predehl, P., Schmitt,
766: J.~H.~M.~M., Truemper, J., Watson, M.~G., \& Pounds, K.~A.\ 1992, \nat,
767: 356, 222
768: \bibitem[Lynch et al.(2007)]{lynch07}
769: Lynch, D.~K., Russell, R.~W., Rudy, R.~J., \& Woodward, C.~E.\ 2007,
770: \iaucirc, 8883, 1
771: \bibitem[Mitsuda et al.(2007)]{mitsuda07}
772: Mitsuda, K., et al.\ 2007, \pasj, 59, S1
773: \bibitem[Mewe(1998)]{mewe98}
774: Mewe,~R.\ 1998, in Lecture Notes in Physics vol. 520,
775: ed. J.~van~Paradijs, \& J.~A.~M.~Bleeker (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 109
776: \bibitem[Miyata et al.(2007)]{miyata07}
777: Miyata, E., Katsuda, S., Tsunemi, H., Hughes, J.~P., Kokubun, M., \&
778: Porter, F.~S.\ 2007, \pasj, 59, 163
779: \bibitem[Monet et al.(1998)]{monet98}
780: Monet, D., et al.\ 1998, The PMM USNO-A2.0 Catalog.~(1998)
781: \bibitem[Mukai \& Ishida(2001)]{mukai01}
782: Mukai, K. \& Ishida, M.\ 2001, \apj, 551, 1024
783: \bibitem[Mukai et al.(2008)]{mukai08} Mukai, K., Orio, M., \& Della Valle, M.\ 2008,
784: \apj, 677, 1248
785: \bibitem[Munari et al.(2007)]{munari07}
786: Munari, U., Moretti, S., \& Tomaselli, S.\ 2007, Central Bureau
787: Electronic Telegrams, 1029, 1
788: \bibitem[Nakamura et al.(2007)]{nakamura07}
789: Nakamura, Y., Yamaoka, H., Dillon, W.~G., Guido, E., Sostero, G., Abe,
790: H., Nakano, S., \& Labordena, C.\ 2007, Central Bureau Electronic
791: Telegrams, 1029, 2
792: \bibitem[Nakano et al.(2007)]{nakano07}
793: Nakano, S., Kadota, K., Waagen, E., Swierczynski, S., Komorous, M.,
794: King, R., \& Bortle, J.\ 2007, \iaucirc, 8861, 2
795: \bibitem[Nelson et al.(2008)]{nelson08}
796: Nelson, T., Orio, M., Cassinelli, J.~P., Still, M., Leibowitz, E., \&
797: Mucciarelli, P.\ 2008, \apj, 673, 1067
798: \bibitem[Ness et al.(2003)]{ness03}
799: Ness, J.-U., et al.\ 2003, \apjl, 594, L127
800: \bibitem[Ness et al.(2005)]{ness05}
801: Ness, J.-U., Starrfield, S., Jordan, C., Krautter, J., \& Schmitt,
802: J.~H.~M.~M.\ 2005, \mnras, 364, 1015
803: \bibitem[Ness et al.(2007)]{ness07}
804: Ness, J.-U., Schwarz, G.~J., Retter, A., Starrfield, S., Schmitt,
805: J.~H.~M.~M., Gehrels, N., Burrows, D., \& Osborne, J.~P.\ 2007, \apj,
806: 663, 505
807: \bibitem[Ness et al.(2008a)]{ness08a}
808: Ness, J.-U., et al.\ 2008a, submitted to \aj
809: \bibitem[Ness et al.(2008b)]{ness08b}
810: Ness, J.-U., et al.\ 2008b, submited to \apj
811: \bibitem[O'Brien et al.(1994)]{obrien94}
812: O'Brien, T.~J., Lloyd, H.~M., \& Bode, M.~F.\ 1994, \mnras, 271, 155
813: \bibitem[Orio et al.(1996)]{orio96}
814: Orio, M., Balman, S., della Valle, M., Gallagher, J., \& Oegelman, H.\
815: 1996, \apj, 466, 410
816: \bibitem[Orio et al.(2001)]{orio01}
817: Orio, M., Covington, J., \"{O}gelman, H.\ 2001, \aap, 373, 542
818: \bibitem[Payne-Gaposchkin(1957)]{payne57}
819: Payne-Gaposchkin, C.\ 1957, The Galactic Novae, (Amsterdam, North Holland)
820: \bibitem[Poggiani(2008)]{poggiani08}
821: Poggiani, R.\ 2008, \apss, 77
822: \bibitem[Prater et al.(2007)]{prater07}
823: Prater, T.~R., Rudy, R.~J., Lynch, D.~K., Mazuk, S., Perry, R.~B., \&
824: Puetter, R.~C.\ 2007, \iaucirc, 8904, 2
825: \bibitem[Predehl \& Schmitt(1995)]{predehl95}
826: Predehl, P. \& Schmitt, J.~H.~M.~M.\ 1995, \aap, 293, 889
827: \bibitem[Samus(2007)]{samus07}
828: Samus, N.~N.\ 2007, \iaucirc, 8863, 2
829: \bibitem[Scarmato(2007)]{scarmato07}
830: Scarmato, T.\ 2007, Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams, 1038, 3
831: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)]{schlegel98}
832: Schlegel, D.~J., Finkbeiner, D.~P., \& Davis, M.\ 1998, \apj, 500, 525
833: \bibitem[Serlemitsos et al.(2007)]{serlemitsos07}
834: Serlemitsos, P.~J., et al.\ 2007, \pasj, 59, S9
835: \bibitem[Skoda et al.(2007)]{skoda07}
836: Skoda, P., Kubat, J., Votruba, V., Slechta, M., Podskalsky, Z., \&
837: Kartak, M.\ 2007, Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams, 1035, 1
838: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2001)]{smith01}
839: Smith, R.~K., Brickhouse, N.~S., Liedahl, D.~A., \& Raymond, J.~C.\
840: 2001, \apj, 556, L91
841: \bibitem[Starrfield et al.(1998)]{starrfield98}
842: Starrfield, S., Truran, J.~W., Wiescher, M.~C., \& Sparks, W.~M.\ 1998,
843: \mnras, 296, 502
844: \bibitem[Starrfield et al.(2008)]{starrfield08}
845: Starrfield, S., Illiadis, C., Hix, W.~R.\ 2008, in Classical Novae,
846: ed. M. Bode and A. Evans (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 77
847: \bibitem[Takahashi et al.(2007)]{takahashi07}
848: Takahashi, T., et al.\ 2007, \pasj, 59, S35
849: \bibitem[Tarasova(2007)]{tarasova07}
850: Tarasova, T.~N.\ 2007, Informational Bulletin on Variable Stars, 5807, 1
851: \bibitem[Wesson et al.(2008)]{wesson08}
852: Wesson, R. et al.\ 2008, \apjl, in press
853: \bibitem[Williams(1992)]{williams92}
854: Williams, R.~E.\ 1992, \aj, 104, 725
855: \bibitem[Wilms et al.(2000)]{wilms00} Wilms, J., Allen, A., \& McCray, R.\ 2000, \apj,
856: 542, 914
857: \end{thebibliography}
858: \end{document}
859: