1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3:
4: \textwidth 165 truemm
5: \textheight 235 truemm
6: \tolerance 500
7: \voffset = -1.0truecm %% ñäâèíóò âíèç
8: \hoffset = -1.0truecm %% ðåçóëüòàò ñäâèíóò â ïðàâî
9:
10: \def\leaderfill{\leaders\hbox to 1em{\hss.\hss}\hfill} %% òî÷êà-ïðîâîäíèê
11: \def\bull{\vrule height .9ex width .8ex depth -.1ex} %% êâàäðàò
12: \def\bul{\vrule height .4ex width .4ex depth -.1ex} %% êâàäðàò
13:
14: \sloppy
15:
16: \begin{document}
17:
18:
19: \noindent{\small\it ISSN 1063-7729, Astronomy Reports, Vol. 52,
20: No. 1, 2008, pp. 951--962. \copyright Pleiades Publishing, Ltd.,
21: 2008. \noindent Original Russian Text \copyright A.T. Bajkova,
22: 2008, published in Astronomicheski$\check{\imath}$ Zhurnal, 2008,
23: Vol. 85, No. 12, pp. 1059--1071. }
24:
25: \vskip -4mm
26:
27: \begin{tabular}{lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll}
28: & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & \\
29: \hline \hline
30: \end{tabular}
31:
32: \vskip 1.5cm
33:
34:
35: \bigskip
36:
37: \centerline{\bf\large Multi-Frequency Synthesis of VLBI Images
38: Using a Generalized} \centerline{\bf\large Maximum Entropy Method
39: }
40:
41: \bigskip
42:
43: \centerline{\bf A. T. Bajkova}
44:
45: \bigskip
46:
47: \centerline{\it Main Astronomical Observatory, Russian Academy of
48: Sciences} \centerline{\it Pulkovo, St.Petersburg, 196140 Russia}
49: \centerline{\small Received February 26, 2008; in final form, July
50: 2, 2008}
51:
52: \bigskip
53:
54: {\bf Abstract} -- A new multi-frequency synthesis algorithm for
55: reconstructing images from multi-frequency VLBI data is proposed.
56: The algorithm is based on a generalized maximum-entropy method,
57: and makes it possible to derive an effective spectral correction
58: for images over a broad frequency bandwidth, while simultaneously
59: reconstructing the spectral-index distribution over the source.
60: The results of numerical simulations demonstrating the
61: capabilities of the algorithm are presented.
62:
63: \medskip
64:
65: PACS numbers: 95.55.Jz, 95.75.Kk, 95.75.Mn
66:
67: \medskip
68:
69: {\bf DOI}: 10.1134/S1063772908120019
70:
71: \vskip 1 cm
72:
73: \centerline{1.~INTRODUCTION}
74:
75: \medskip
76:
77: Coverage of the $UV$ spatial-frequency plane in VLBI observations
78: [1] is mainly achieved using(1) several antennas, (2) the diurnal
79: rotation of the Earth, (3) relocation of the antennas. However,
80: the interferometer aperture is never filled completely due to the
81: limited observation time and number of antennas, interruptions
82: during the observations, and limitations on the smallest and
83: longest baselines. Since the baseline coordinates $U$ and $V$ in
84: the visibility function are measured in wavelengths, an
85: alternative method of filling the $UV$ plane is to observe a
86: source at several frequencies simultaneously.
87:
88: This method for fast filling of the aperture is called
89: multi-frequency synthesis (MFS), and its effect is greatest in the
90: case of interferometers with relatively few baselines. Figure 1a
91: shows an example of a poor filling of the $UV$ plane obtained by a
92: four-element interferometer during12 h of observations of a radio
93: source with a declination of 34. at 8.2 GHz. The coordinates of
94: the four telescopes were taken to be those of the three stations
95: in the Russian QUASAR VLBI complex Svetloe, Zelenchukskaya, and
96: Badary [2], together with the Matera station. Figures 1b, 1c, and
97: 1d present the filling of the $UV$ plane for MFS observations of
98: this same source with this interferometer using various frequency
99: ranges. Since the coordinates of the interferometer baseline are
100: proportional to the frequency, different frequencies within the
101: total band refer to different, radially arranged $(U, V)$ points.
102: As we can see, MFS can provide a much denser filling of the $UV$
103: plane, as well as increase the diameter of the synthesized
104: aperture compared to the single frequency observations.
105:
106: However, the application of MFS is complicated by the fact that
107: the source brightness is a function of frequency; to avoid imaging
108: artifacts due to this frequency dependence, we must derive and
109: apply a spectral correction for the maps as they are deconvolved
110: (reconstructed).
111:
112: This problem has been considered by many authors. The most
113: fundamental results on spectral effects in images and methods for
114: correcting them are presented in [3–7]. These show that, when
115: sufficiently narrow frequency bands are used, with widths within
116: $\pm 12.5\%$ of the reference frequency, we can essentially
117: disregard the spectral dependence of the source brightness, since
118: these effects are small and can be corrected for during
119: calibration or self-calibration. However, for broader bands, e.g.,
120: $\pm 30\%$, correction for spectral effects is necessary.
121:
122: The most studied linear spectral-correction algorithm is based on
123: the CLEAN method [8], and is called "double deconvolution" [3].
124: This algorithm involves the successive deconvolution of a "dirty"
125: image using a "dirty" beam and using the beam corresponding to the
126: spectral term. The development of this method enabling the
127: simultaneous reconstruction of the desired image and the
128: corresponding spectral map was proposed in [5]. The
129: vector-relaxation algorithm [9] represents a generalized CLEAN
130: deconvolution that can take into account spectral terms of any
131: order.
132:
133: An alternative deconvolution method that is also actively used in
134: radio astronomy is the maximum entropy method (MEM). MEM was first
135: proposed in [10] and [11] for the reconstruction of images in the
136: optical and radio, respectively. Since then the method has been
137: developed in many studies [12– 18] and implemented in a number of
138: software packages designed for image reconstruction (MEMSYS, AIPS,
139: VLBImager, etc.). A comparative analysis of CLEAN and MEM in VLBI
140: is given in [16]; essentially, these methods complement each
141: other. In particular, CLEAN is preferential for reconstructing
142: images of compact sources from relatively poor data, while MEM is
143: more suitable for imaging extended sources from better-quality
144: data. A severe drawback of MEM compared to CLEAN, the bias of the
145: solution [16], can easily be removed by generalizing the method to
146: enable the reconstruction of sign-variable functions [17, 18].
147: This generalized MEM also enables difference imaging making it
148: possible to substantially broaden the dynamic range of maps of
149: sources including both compact and extended, faint components
150: [19]. An important technical advantage of MEM over CLEAN is the
151: absence of the need to discretize (grid) [1] the visibility
152: function: MEM does not involve calculation of the inverse Fourier
153: transform of the visibility data.
154:
155: The purpose of the current study was to realize in an effective
156: MFS aperture-synthesis method all the advantages of MEM, in order
157: to enable high precision correction for spectral effects in a
158: broad frequency band, as well as to study the developed algorithm
159: for broad ranges of the various parameters involved.
160:
161: \bigskip
162:
163: \centerline{2.~SPECTRAL DEPENDENCE}
164:
165: \bigskip
166:
167: The dependence of the source intensity on the frequency í for
168: synchrotron emission is usually described using the relation [3–7]
169:
170: \begin{equation}
171: I(\nu)=I(\nu_0)\left(\frac{\nu}{\nu_0}\right)^\alpha,
172: \end{equation}
173: where $I(\nu_0)$ is the intensity at the reference frequency í0
174: and á is the spectral index. For simplicity, we will use the
175: notation $I_0=I(\nu_0)$.
176:
177: Restricting our consideration to the first $Q$ terms of the Taylor
178: expansion (1) at the point $\nu_0$, we can write the approximate
179: equality
180:
181: \begin{equation}
182: I(\nu)\approx I_0+\sum_{q=1}^{Q-1}I_q
183: \left(\frac{\nu-\nu_0}{\nu_0}\right)^q,
184: \end{equation}
185: where
186: $$I_q=I_0\frac{\alpha(\alpha-1)\cdots[\alpha-(q-1)]}{q!}.$$
187:
188: In accordance with (2), we have for each point $(l,m)$ in the
189: two-dimensional ($N\times N$) brightness distribution (image, map)
190: of the source
191:
192: \begin{equation}
193: I(l,m)\approx I_0(l,m)+\sum_{q=1}^{Q-1}I_q(l,m)
194: \left(\frac{\nu-\nu_0}{\nu_0}\right)^q,
195: \end{equation}
196: where $l,m=1,...,N$.
197:
198: Thus, the obtained brightness distribution of the source (3)
199: represents the sum of the brightness distribution at the reference
200: frequency $\nu_0$ and various spectral terms. The $q$th-order
201: spectral map depends on the spectral-index distribution in the
202: source as
203:
204: \begin{equation}
205: I_q(l,m)=I_0(l,m)\frac{\alpha(l,m)[\alpha(l,m)-1]\cdots[\alpha(l,m)-(q-1)]}{q!}.
206: \end{equation}
207:
208: The first-order spectral map,
209:
210: \begin{equation}
211: I_1(l,m)=I_0(l,m)\alpha(l,m)
212: \end{equation}
213: is of primary interest.
214:
215: We can obtain from (5) the estimate of the spectral index
216: distribution in the source
217: \begin{equation}
218: \alpha(l,m)=I_1(l,m)/I_0(l,m).
219: \end{equation}
220:
221: \bigskip
222:
223: \centerline{3.~RESTRICTIONS ON THE VISIBILITY FUNCTION}
224:
225: \bigskip
226:
227: The complex visibility function represents the Fourier transform
228: of the source intensity distribution, which satisfies the spectral
229: dependence (1) at each point $(l,m)$ of the map. In view of the
230: finite order of the Taylor series expansion (3), we can write the
231: restrictions on the visibility function as
232: \begin{equation}
233: V_{u_\nu,v_\nu}= {\bf F}\{I(l,m)\}\times {\bf
234: D}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}\approx \sum_{q=0}^{Q-1} {\bf F}\left\{I_q(l,m)
235: \left(\frac{\nu-\nu_0}{\nu_0}\right)^q\right\}\times {\bf
236: D}_{u_\nu,v_\nu},
237: \end{equation}
238: where {\bf F} denotes the Fourier transform and D is the transfer
239: function, which is a $\delta$ function of $u$ and $v$ for each
240: visibility measurement; each used frequency í corresponds to its
241: own set of $\delta$ functions, indicated by the subscripts of $u$
242: and $v$.
243:
244: Let us rewrite (7) for the real and imaginary parts of the
245: visibility function
246: $V_{u_\nu,v_\nu}=A_{u_\nu,v_\nu}+jB_{u_\nu,v_\nu}$ taking into
247: account the measurement errors:
248:
249: \begin{equation}
250: \sum_{q=0}^{Q-1}\sum_{l,m} I_q(l,m)
251: a^{lm}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}\left(\frac{\nu-\nu_0}{\nu_0}\right)^q+\eta^{re}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}=A_{u_\nu,v_\nu},
252: \end{equation}
253:
254: \begin{equation}
255: \sum_{q=0}^{Q-1}\sum_{l,m} I_q(l,m)
256: b^{lm}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}\left(\frac{\nu-\nu_0}{\nu_0}\right)^q+\eta^{im}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}=B_{u_\nu,v_\nu},
257: \end{equation}
258: where $a^{lm}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}$ and $b^{lm}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}$ are
259: constant factors (cosines and sines) that correspond to the
260: Fourier transform; $\eta^{re}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}$ and
261: $b^{lm}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}$ are the real and imaginary parts of the
262: additive instrumental noise, which has a normal distribution with
263: zero mean and a known dispersion $\sigma_{u_\nu,v_\nu}$.
264:
265:
266: \bigskip
267:
268: \centerline{4.~RECONSTRUCTION METHOD}
269:
270: \bigskip
271:
272: In our case, the unknowns are the distributions $I_q(l,m)$
273: ($q=0,...,Q-1;~~ l,m=1,...,N$) and the errors of the visibility
274: function $\eta^{re}_{u_\nu,v_\nu},~\eta^{im}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}$. Note
275: that, in spite of the fact that the source brightness distribution
276: is described by a nonnegative function, in general, spectral maps
277: of arbitrary order (4) can take on both positive and negative
278: values, due to the sign-variable spectral-index distribution in
279: the source. Since the logarithm of a negative value is not defined
280: on the set of real numbers, we will compose for the purpose of
281: finding a solution for $I_q(l,m),~q=0,...,Q-1$ a functional in
282: which the values of the spectral maps are represented by their
283: absolute values:
284: \begin{equation}
285: {\bf E}=\{\sum_{l,m} I_0(l,m)\ln [I_0(l,m)]+\sum_{q=1}^{Q-1}
286: \sum_{l,m} |I_q(l,m)|\ln [|I_q(l,m)|]\}
287: +\rho\sum_{u_\nu,v_\nu}\frac{(\eta^{re}_{u_\nu,v_\nu})^2+(\eta^{im}_{u_\nu,v_\nu})^2}{\sigma^2_{u_\nu,v_\nu}},
288: \end{equation}
289: \begin{equation}
290: I_0(l,m)\ge 0,
291: \end{equation}
292: where $\rho$ is a positive weighting coefficient.
293:
294: The minimization of the functional (10) with the restrictions (8),
295: (9), and (11) is the essence of MEM.
296:
297: We can see from (10) that the minimized functional has two parts:
298: the entropy functional in the Shannon form and a term representing
299: an estimate of the ÷2 residual for the difference between the
300: reconstructed spectrum and the data. This term can be considered
301: an additional regularizing or stabilizing term that facilitates
302: further regularization of the solution beyond that possible with
303: the entropy functional alone [18]. We will bear in mind the effect
304: of this term on the resolving power of the reconstruction
305: algorithm.
306:
307: For carrying out the reconstruction in practice, we now proceed to
308: the generalized maximum-entropy method described in detail in
309: [17–19]. This consists in the substitution
310: \begin{equation}
311: I_q(l,m)=I_q^+(l,m)-I_q^-(l,m),
312: \end{equation}
313: where the superscripts $+$ and $-$ denote the positive and
314: negative parts of the function, and, in the following modification
315: of functional (10),
316: \begin{eqnarray}
317: {\bf E}=\sum_{l,m} I_0(l,m)\ln [a I_0(l,m)]+\sum_{q=1}^{Q-1}
318: \sum_{l,m} \{I_q^+(l,m)\ln [a I_q^+(l,m)]+ \nonumber
319: \\+I_q^-(l,m)\ln [a I_q^-(l,m)] \}
320: +\rho\sum_{u_\nu,v_\nu}\frac{(\eta^{re}_{u_\nu,v_\nu})^2+(\eta^{im}_{u_\nu,v_\nu})^2}{\sigma^2_{u_\nu,v_\nu}},
321: \end{eqnarray}
322:
323: \begin{equation}
324: I_0(l,m)\ge 0,~~~~~I_q^+(l,m)\ge 0,~~~~~I_q^-(l,m)\ge 0,
325: \end{equation}
326: where $a\gg 1$ is a parameter responsible [as will be shown below,
327: see (24)] for the accuracy with which the positive $I_q^+(l,m)$
328: and negative $I_q^-(l,m)$ parts of the solution for $I_q(l,m)$ can
329: be separated [see (12)].
330:
331: The linear restrictions (8) and (9) on the visibility data are
332: accordingly rewritten
333: \begin{equation}
334: {\bf R_A}=\sum_{l,m} I_0(l,m)
335: a^{lm}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}+\sum_{q=1}^{Q-1}\sum_{l,m}
336: [I_q^+(l,m)-I_q^-(l,m)]
337: a^{lm}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}\left(\frac{\nu-\nu_0}{\nu_0}\right)^q+\eta^{re}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}=A_{u_\nu,v_\nu},
338: \end{equation}
339: \begin{equation}
340: {\bf R_B}=\sum_{l,m} I_0(l,m)
341: b^{lm}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}+\sum_{q=1}^{Q-1}\sum_{l,m}
342: [I_q^+(l,m)-I_q^-(l,m)]
343: b^{lm}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}\left(\frac{\nu-\nu_0}{\nu_0}\right)^q+\eta^{im}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}=B_{u_\nu,v_\nu},
344: \end{equation}
345: where ${\bf R_A}$ and ${\bf R_B}$ denote the left-hand sides of
346: the equations.
347:
348: Thus, the reconstruction of the image I0(l,m) requires the
349: optimization of the functional (13); i.e., we must find
350: \begin{equation}
351: \min {\bf E}
352: \end{equation}
353: with the constraints (14)–(16) with respect to all the unknowns
354: $I_0(l,m),~I_q^{+(-)}(l,m),~q=1,...,Q-1,~l,m=1,...,N $, and
355: $\eta^{re}_{u_\nu,v_\nu},~\eta^{im}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}$. Note that the
356: requirements (14) can be omitted since the entropy solution can
357: only be positive; there then remain only the linear constraints
358: (15) and (16) on the measurements of the complex visibility
359: function.
360:
361: \bigskip
362:
363: \centerline{6.~THE OPTIMIZATION}
364:
365: \bigskip
366:
367: The numerical solution for the optimization of (17) with the
368: constraints (15) and (16) is based on the method of Lagrange
369: multipliers; in this method, the conditional optimization is
370: reduced to an unconditional optimization by composing the
371: following dual functional, which is called the Lagrange
372: functional:
373:
374: \begin{equation}
375: {\bf L}={\bf E}+\sum_{u_\nu,v_\nu}\{\beta_{u_\nu,v_\nu}({\bf
376: R_A}-A_{u_\nu,v_\nu}) +\gamma_{u_\nu,v_\nu}({\bf
377: R_B}-B_{u_\nu,v_\nu})\},
378: \end{equation}
379: where $\beta_{u_\nu,v_\nu}$ and $\gamma_{u_\nu,v_\nu}$ are
380: Lagrange multipliers, or the dual variables with which the
381: constraints (15) and (16) enter the considered functional.
382:
383: Thus, the reconstruction is reduced to minimizing the Lag rang e
384: functional:
385:
386: \begin{equation}
387: \min {\bf L}.
388: \end{equation}
389:
390: We optimize (19) using the necessary condition for the existence
391: of an extremum:
392:
393: $$
394: \frac{d{\bf L}}{dI_0(l,m)}=0;~~\frac{d{\bf L}}{dI_q^+(l,m)}=0;
395: ~~\frac{d{\bf L}}{dI_q^-(l,m)}=0
396: $$
397: for $q=1,...,Q-1$ and $l,m=1,...,N$, and also
398:
399: $$
400: \frac{d{\bf L}}{dI\eta^{re}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}}=0;~~\frac{d{\bf
401: L}}{dI\eta^{im}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}}=0
402: $$
403: for all values of the visibility function.
404:
405: Note that a sufficient condition for the existence of a minimum of
406: {\bf L} is the positive definiteness of the Hessian matrix.
407:
408: As a result we obtain the following solution s for the required
409: unknowns expressed in terms of the dual variables:
410: \begin{equation}
411: I_0(l,m)=\exp(-\sum_{u_\nu,v_\nu}[\beta_{u_\nu,v_\nu}
412: a^{lm}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}+ \gamma_{u_\nu,v_\nu}
413: b^{lm}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}]-1-\ln a),
414: \end{equation}
415: \begin{equation}
416: I_q^+(l,m)=\exp(-\sum_{u_\nu,v_\nu}[\beta_{u_\nu,v_\nu}
417: a^{lm}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}+ \gamma_{u_\nu,v_\nu}
418: b^{lm}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}]\left(\frac{\nu-\nu_0}{\nu_0}\right)^q-1-\ln
419: a),
420: \end{equation}
421: \begin{equation}
422: I_q^-(l,m)=\exp(\sum_{u_\nu,v_\nu}[\beta_{u_\nu,v_\nu}
423: a^{lm}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}+ \gamma_{u_\nu,v_\nu}
424: b^{lm}_{u_\nu,v_\nu}]\left(\frac{\nu-\nu_0}{\nu_0}\right)^q-1-\ln
425: a),
426: \end{equation}
427: \begin{equation}
428: \eta_{u_\nu,v_\nu}^{re} = -\frac{\sigma_{u_\nu,v_\nu}^2
429: \beta_{u_\nu,v_\nu}}{\rho}, ~~~~\eta_{u_\nu,v_\nu}^{im} =
430: -\frac{\sigma_{u_\nu,v_\nu}^2 \gamma_{u_\nu,v_\nu}}{\rho}.
431: \end{equation}
432:
433: The solutions (20)–(22) are exclusively positive. To obtain
434: spectral maps, we must use (12).
435:
436: It follows from (21) and (22) that the positive and negative parts
437: of the spectral maps are related as
438:
439: \begin{equation}
440: I_q^+(l,m)I_q^-(l,m)=\exp(-2-2\ln a)=K(a),
441: \end{equation}
442: with, as was said above, the parameter $a$ playing the role of a
443: separator between the positive and negative parts of the
444: $I_q(l,m)$ solution. The higher the value of $a$, the more exact
445: the separation. The upper limit of $a$ is determined by
446: computational effects.
447:
448: It can be readily shown that the Hessian matrix is positively
449: defined everywhere; therefore, the functional ${\bf L}$ is convex
450: and the solution is global, i.e., unique.
451:
452: Substituting the solutions (20)–(23) in to the right-hand side of
453: (18), we obtain the expression for the dual functional
454: \begin{equation}
455: {\bf L}
456: =\sum_{l,m}I_0(l,m)+\sum_{q=1}^{Q-1}\sum_{l,m}[I_q^+(l,m)+I_q^-(l,m)]+\sum_{u_\nu,v_\nu}[\beta_{u_\nu,v_\nu}A_{u_\nu,v_\nu}+\gamma_{u_\nu,v_\nu}B_{u_\nu,v_\nu}],
457: \end{equation}
458: Minimizing this expression [with regard to (20)–(22)] enables us
459: to find the dual variables $\beta_{u_\nu,v_\nu}$ and
460: $\gamma_{u_\nu,v_\nu}$.
461:
462: We can find the extremum of (25) using various gradient methods.We
463: utilized the coordinate-descent method, considering it to be the
464: most reliable, though not the fastest. In this method, the
465: increment of $z_x$ for each unknown
466: ($\beta_{u_\nu,v_\nu},\gamma_{u_\nu,v_\nu}$), which we will
467: conditionally denote $x$, is searched for based on the condition
468: for an extremum of ${\bf L}(z_x)$:
469:
470: \begin{equation}
471: \frac{d{\bf
472: L}(z_x)}{dz_x}=0.
473: \end{equation}
474: ${\bf L}(z_x)$ is obtained by replacing the variable $x$ in the
475: functional ${\bf L}$ (26) with $x+z_x$.
476:
477: In our case, (25) is nonlinear in $z_x$. Obtaining a numerical
478: solution using the Newton method is an iterative process. At the
479: $i$th iteration, the value of $z_x$ is
480: $$
481: z_x^i=z_x^{i-1}
482: -\Big({d{\bf
483: L}(z_x)}/{dz_x}\Big)
484: /\Big({d^2 {\bf
485: L}(z_x)}/{dz_x^2}\Big)\Big|_{z_x=z_x^{i-1}}.
486: $$
487: The solution for $z_x$ usually converges after one to three
488: iterations. As a result of one descent, the required variable
489: acquires a new value, $x+z_x$. Simulation have shown that a
490: high-quality reconstruction of the radio image and spectral maps
491: requires from 100 to 500 descents in all dual coordinates
492: $\beta_{u_\nu,v_\nu},\gamma_{u_\nu,v_\nu}$.
493:
494: \bigskip
495:
496: \centerline{5.~SIMULATION RESULTS}
497:
498: \bigskip
499:
500: In this section, we present the results of our numerical modeling
501: of MFS using the above reconstruction based on the generalized
502: MEM.
503:
504: As a model radio source at frequency $\nu_0$, we consider the
505: intensity distribution $I_0(x,y)$ for two Gaussian components with
506: amplitudes of 1 and 0.4 Jy/beam (Fig. 2a). The source size is
507: about 3– 4 mas in both right ascension and declination. Thus, the
508: source has a size appropriate for VLBI mapping. The model
509: spectral-index distribution of the source $\alpha(x,y)$ is shown
510: in Fig. 2c.
511:
512: The model spectral indices have values from 0 to 0.84. The
513: distribution of the first-order spectral map,
514: $I_1(x,y)=I_0(x,y)\alpha(x,y)$, is shown in Fig. 2b. According to
515: (4), odd-order spectral maps are positive and even-order spectral
516: maps are negative. The sign of the model spectral-index
517: distribution is not of primary importance from the viewpoint of
518: testing the algorithm, since the solutions for the spectral maps
519: of any order are searched for in the form of sign-variable
520: functions [see (13) and (25)], and obtaining either positive or
521: negative solutions is equally valid.
522:
523: The contour levels in all images in Figs. 2–6 are 0.0625, 0.125,
524: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 99\% of the peak value;
525: this allows us to adequately display maps with dynamic ranges of
526: up to 3200.
527:
528: The visibility data are formed from the Fourier transform of the
529: source intensity distribution calculated at each point (x, y) in
530: accordance with the spectral dependence (1), with measurement
531: errors added in accordance with (8) and (9).
532:
533: We adopted $\nu_0=8.2$ GHz as the central, or reference, frequency
534: of the observations.
535:
536: To study the quality of the synthesized images as a function of
537: the range of frequencies used, we carried out simulations for
538: three cases, with bandwidths of $\pm30\%$, $\pm60\%$, and
539: $\pm90\%$ of the central frequency. In each case, we used nine
540: equidistant frequencies. The corresponding UV plane coverages are
541: shown in Fig. 1.
542:
543: The primary goal of our simulations is to analyze the quality of
544: the image reconstruction using various degrees of spectral
545: corrections, and to establish the minimum necessary number of
546: spectral terms that must be included in the Taylor series (3) as a
547: function of the frequency band used. We carried out this analysis
548: first for fairly accurately measured visibility data (with a
549: signal-to-noise ratio of about 100) and then for data containing
550: appreciable measurement errors having a normal distribution with
551: zero mean and a dispersion yielding a signal-to-noise ratio of
552: about 10. We chose fairly broad frequency ranges (up to $\pm90\%$
553: of the central frequency) in order to more fully study the
554: properties and capabilities of the developed frequency-correction
555: algorithm, which is of considerable theoretical interest.
556:
557: As was said in the Introduction, the idea of MFS arises in
558: connection with the need for fast aperture image synthesis, and is
559: most urgent for VLBI arrays with relatively few baselines (Fig.
560: 1a). Figure 3a shows an image reconstructed from visibility data
561: corresponding to the single-frequency coverage of the UV plane
562: shown in Fig. 1a. Comparing the result of the reconstruction with
563: the original image, we note severe distortions of the source
564: shape, as well as some spurious features, leading to a low dynamic
565: range for the derived map.
566:
567: The MFS in a $\pm30\%$ band (Fig. 1b) provides a much fuller
568: coverage of the UV plane. The image reconstructed from the data
569: corresponding to this coverage (provided the source brightness
570: does not depend on the frequency) has a substantially higher
571: quality, with a signal-to-noise ratio of more than 50 (Fig. 3b).
572:
573: As said above, the MFS is strongly complicated by the spectral
574: dependence of the source brightness. If the spectral-index
575: distribution corresponds to the model distribution shown in Fig.
576: 2c, but we have ignored this in the reconstruction, we obtain the
577: image in Fig. 3c, which has an even poorer quality than the
578: single-frequency image. Indeed, the resulting image has a
579: signal-to-noise ratio a factor of three lower than the image in
580: Fig. 3a. Thus, this simple experiment demonstrates that applying
581: MFS without taking into account the spectral dependence of the
582: source emission can result in a deterioration of the
583: reconstruction.
584:
585: Our next simulations were directly related to establishing the
586: relationship between the MFS bandwidth and the minimum necessary
587: number of terms in the Taylor series expansion (3) of the spectral
588: component of the image when frequency corrections are applied. It
589: is clear that, the wider the frequency band, the stronger the
590: effect of the spectral component and the greater number of terms
591: in the series required for a satisfactory correction of the
592: images. However, it is not reasonable to include a very large
593: number of terms in the expansion, since this results in an
594: unjustifiably large number of unknowns in the optimization
595: problem, which can, in turn, lead to a deterioration of the
596: reconstruction.
597:
598: Figure 4 shows the results of reconstructing the source emission
599: distribution, first-order spectral map, and spectral-index
600: distribution with a frequency band of $\pm30\%$ of the central
601: frequency (UV coverage of Fig. 1b). According to (6), the
602: spectral-index distribution is defined by the pixel-by-pixel
603: division [9] of the reconstructed first-order spectral term
604: $I_1(x,y)$ by the reconstructed brightness $I_0(x,y)$, for all
605: pixel values exceeding some empirically chosen threshold, to avoid
606: division by zero or very small values. The spectral-index maps
607: were all obtained with the same threshold value of 0.004 of the
608: peak of $I_0(x,y)$. The upper row of maps were obtained using the
609: first two terms in the Taylor series expansion (2), and the lower
610: row of maps using three terms in the expansion; these two sets of
611: results virtually coincide. A fairly high quality of the
612: reconstruction has been achieved. Thus, the first-order spectral
613: term is sufficient when using a fairly narrow frequency band ($\pm
614: 30\%$), consistent with the results of other studies [3--6].
615:
616: Figure 5 presents the reconstruction results for a $\pm60\%$
617: frequency band ($UV$ coverage in Fig. 1c). The upper, middle, and
618: lower rows of the maps were obtained using the first two, three,
619: and four terms in expansion (3). Using the first-order spectral
620: term alone does not yield a satisfactory quality of the
621: reconstruction, while using the third-order spectral term is
622: unnecessary, since the results using the second term along and
623: both the second and third terms virtually coincide. Thus, using a
624: frequency band of up to $60\%$ requires including higher-order
625: terms together with the first-order spectral term. Addition of the
626: second-order spectral term approximately doubles the resulting
627: signal-to-noise ratio.
628:
629: Figure 6 shows the reconstruction results for a much broader
630: frequency band reaching $\pm90\%$ of the central frequency ($UV$
631: coverage in Fig. 1d). The rows of maps from top to bottom were
632: obtained using the first two, three, four, and five terms in
633: expansion (3). Including only the first-order spectral term in the
634: spectral correction is clearly not sufficient. Including the
635: second-order spectral term appreciably improves the quality of the
636: reconstruction, increasing the signal-to-noise ratio by almost a
637: factor of two. Including the third-order spectral term provides a
638: further substantial improvement in the quality of the
639: reconstruction, increasing the signal-to-noise ratio by another
640: factor of 1.5. Including the fourth-order spectral term results in
641: a further, though not so significant, improvement in the quality
642: of the reconstruction. Thus, using a frequency band of up to 90\%
643: requires taking into account spectral terms at least up to third
644: order.
645:
646: The results of our simulations demonstrate that the highest
647: accuracy of the reconstruction can be achieved for the $I_0(x,y)$
648: source images, while the maps of the first-order spectral term
649: $I_1(x,y)$ have a lower accuracy, and the spectral-index maps
650: $\alpha(x,y)$ have the lowest accuracy. In particular, the maximum
651: signal-to-noise ratios achieved for the $I_0(x,y)$, $I_1(x,y)$,
652: and $\alpha(x,y)$ maps are 40, 15, and 4, respectively
653:
654: An intercomparison of the best reconstruction results obtained
655: using each frequency band demonstrates that, for the same number
656: of frequencies within the band, the quality of the reconstruction
657: degrades slightly with increasing bandwidth. This is true because,
658: with increasing frequency bandwidth, we must increase the number
659: of spectral terms taken into account. In turn, for the same number
660: of visibility measurements, the number of unknowns in the
661: optimization of (25) is increased. To improve the reconstruction
662: quality of images with increasing frequency bandwidths, we must
663: proportionally increase the number of frequencies in the band. The
664: simulations demonstrate (Fig. 7) that using 27 (instead of 9)
665: frequencies in a $\pm90\%$ band increases the signal-to- noise
666: ratio to 54 and the image dynamic range to 3200.
667:
668: Figure 8 shows the reconstruction results obtained from data
669: containing appreciable errors. The dynamic range of the maps
670: obtained is reduced by approximately a factor of four due to the
671: effect of the errors. The contour levels on these images are 0.25,
672: 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 99\% of the peak value. Figure 8a
673: presents the radio map reconstructed from single-frequency data
674: (Fig. 1a), which displays a higher level of distortion than the
675: analogous map in Fig. 3a. Figure 8b shows the MFS map obtained
676: using a $\pm90\%$ band with nine frequencies (Fig. 1d), neglecting
677: the spectral dependence of the source emission. This map is
678: likewise characterized by strong distortions, and its
679: signal-to-noise ratio is only 1.4, a factor of six lower than the
680: previous map. Figures 8c, 8d, 8e, and 8f present MFS maps
681: reconstructed from the same data including two, three, four, and
682: five terms in the expansion (2), respectively. Adding subsequent
683: terms to the expansion substantially improves the quality of the
684: reconstruction. The inclusion of spectral terms up to fourth order
685: improves the signal-to-noise ratio to 20, twice the
686: signal-to-noise ratio in the data. Figures 8g and 8h show the maps
687: of the first-order spectral term and the spectral index
688: reconstructed using five terms in expansion (2). The
689: spectral-index map was obtained using(7) with a threshold value of
690: 0.01 of the peak in the $I_0(x,y)$ map. The signal-to-noise ratios
691: of the spectral-term and spectral-index maps are six and two,
692: respectively. A comparison of these images with the model maps
693: indicates a satisfactory reconstruction of the source intensity
694: (the dynamic range is about 400) and spectral-index distributions,
695: even in the presence of a considerable noise in the data. The
696: quality of the reconstruction is substantially improved by
697: increasing the number of frequencies within the frequency band. In
698: particular, if the number of frequencies is tripled, the dynamic
699: range of the maps is approximately doubled.
700:
701: \bigskip
702:
703: \centerline{6.~CONCLUSION}
704:
705: \bigskip
706:
707: Multifrequency synthesis is an effective means of synthesizing the
708: aperture of a radio interferometer, which can enable
709: high-dynamic-range imaging of radio sources. The main problem that
710: must be solved in MFS is the need to apply a frequency correction
711: to the images, due to the frequency dependence of the source
712: brightness. Deconvolution algorithms incorporating such a
713: frequency correction based on the CLEAN method are well known. The
714: best studied of these is a double-deconvolution algorithm intended
715: for linear spectral correction. This algorithm is effective when
716: applied to frequency bandwidths no broader than $\pm30\%$.
717:
718: We have proposed, developed, and studied a more fundamental
719: deconvolution method for MFS images based on a generalized maximum
720: entropy method. This new method makes it possible to apply
721: frequency corrections in a much broader frequency band, due to the
722: ability to include non-linear terms of arbitrary order, together
723: with the linear term of the spectral component of the image. The
724: main advantage of MEM over CLEAN -- the ability to more accurately
725: restore extended sources -- is also realized. In addition, the
726: developed algorithm enables acceptably accurate estimation of the
727: spectral-index distribution.
728:
729: Our numerical simulations have enabled us to establish
730: regularities in the quality of the image reconstruction associated
731: with changes in the frequency bandwidth, number of frequencies
732: within the frequency band, number of spectral terms included, and
733: the noise level in the input data. We conclude that our developed
734: deconvolution method with frequency correction is most effective
735: for mapping extended sources in a broad frequency band using
736: high-precision visibility data. The proposed spectral correction
737: method can be further developed using the principle of difference
738: mapping [19], intended to improve the quality of image
739: reconstruction for sources whose structure includes both compact
740: and extended components. Another subject of further studies is a
741: combination of MFS with phaseless mapping [20], including also
742: data from a high-orbit space radio interferometer [21].
743:
744: \bigskip
745:
746: \centerline{ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}
747:
748: \bigskip
749:
750: This work was supported by the Basic-Research Program of the
751: Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences on “The Origin and
752: Evolution of Stars and Galaxies” and the Program of State Support
753: for Leading Scientific Schools of the Russian Federation (grant
754: NSH-6110.2008.2, "Multi-wavelength Astrophysical Research"). The
755: author thanks the referee for valuable comments, which helped to
756: improve the paper.
757:
758:
759: \bigskip
760:
761: \centerline{REFERENCES}
762:
763: \bigskip
764:
765: 1. A. R. Thompson, J. M. Moran, and G. W. Swenson, Interferometry
766: and Synthesis in Radio Astronomy, (Wiley, New York, 1986;
767: Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2003).
768:
769: 2. A. T. Bajkova and A. M. Finkelstein, Astron. Astrophys. Trans.
770: {\bf 1}, 159 (1992).
771:
772: 3. J. E. Conway, T. J. Cornwell, and P. N. Wilkinson, Mon. Not. R.
773: Astron. Soc. {\bf 246}, 490 (1990).
774:
775: 4. J. E. Conway, ASP Conf. Ser. {\bf 19}, 171 (1991).
776:
777: 5. R. J. Sault and M. H. Wieringa, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser.
778: {\bf 108}, 585 (1994).
779:
780: 6. R. J. Sault and J. E. Conway, in: Synthesis imaging in Radio
781: Astronomy II, eds G. B. Taylor,C. L. Carilli, R. A. Perley, ASP
782: Conf. Ser. {\bf 180}, 419 (1999).
783:
784: 7. R. J. Sault and T. A. Oosterloo, e-Print arXiv:astroph/
785: 0701171v1 (2007).
786:
787: 8. J. A. H\"{o}gbom, Astron. Astroph. Suppl. Ser. {\bf 15}, 417
788: (1974).
789:
790: 9. S. F. Likhachev, V. A. Ladynin, and I. A. Girin, Izv.
791: Vyssh.Uchebn. Zaved., Ser.Radiofiz. {\bf 49}, 553 (2006).
792:
793: 10. B. R. Frieden, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. {\bf 62}, 511 (1972).
794:
795: 11. J. G. Ables, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. {\bf 15}, 383
796: (1974).
797:
798: 12. J. Skilling and R.K.Bryan, Mon.Not. R. Astron. Soc. {\bf 211},
799: 111 (1984).
800:
801: 13. S. J. Wernecke and L. R. D’Addario, IEEE Trans. Comp. {\bf
802: C-26}, 351 (1977).
803:
804: 14. T. J. Cornwell and K. F. Evans, Astron. Astrophys. {\bf 143},
805: 77 (1985).
806:
807: 15. R. Narayan and R. Nityananda, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.
808: {\bf 24}, 127 (1986).
809:
810: 16. T. J. Cornwell, R. Braun, and D. S. Briggs, in: Synthesis
811: imaging in Radio Astronomy II, eds G. B. Taylor, C. L. Carilli, R.
812: A. Perley, ASP Conf. Ser. {\bf 180}, 151 (1999).
813:
814: 17. A. T. Bajkova, Rep. Institute Appl.Astron.No. 58 (Inst. Appl.
815: Astron. Ross. Akad. Nauk, S.-Petersburg, 1993).
816:
817: 18. B. R. Frieden and A. T. Bajkova, Appl. Opt. {\bf 33}, 219
818: (1994).
819:
820: 19. A. T. Bajkova, Astron. Zh. {\bf 84}, 984 (2007) [Astron. Rep.
821: 51, 891 (2007)].
822:
823: 20. A. T. Bajkova, Pis’ma Astron. Zh. 30, 253 (2004) [Astron.
824: Lett. {\bf 30}, 218 (2004)].
825:
826: 21. A. T. Bajkova, Astron. Zh. {\bf 82}, 1087 (2005) [Astron. Rep.
827: 49, 947 (2005)].
828:
829: \newpage
830:
831:
832:
833: \newpage
834: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.1:
835: \begin{figure}[t]
836: {\begin{center}
837: \includegraphics[width= 100mm]{IMAGE1.EPS}
838: \end{center}
839: Fig. 1. $UV$ coverages for a four-element radio interferometer
840: comprised of the Svetloe, Zelenchukskaya, Badary, and Matera
841: stations for a 12-hour observation of a radio source with a
842: declination of $34^o$, for (a) single-frequency observations
843: ($\nu_0=8.2$ GHz) and multi-frequency synthesis in a band
844: encompassing(b) $\pm30\%, \pm60\% $, and (d) $\pm90\%$ of the
845: reference frequency (nine frequency channels are used in each
846: band). The horizontal and vertical axes show the $U$ and $V$
847: spatial frequencies in millions of wavelengths. }
848: \end{figure}
849:
850:
851: \newpage
852: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.1:
853: \begin{figure}[t]
854: {\begin{center}
855: \includegraphics[width= 160mm]{IMAGE2.EPS}
856: \end{center}
857: Fig. 2. Model (preset) (a) radio intensity map $I_0(x,y)$, (b)
858: first-order spectral map $I_1(x,y)$, and (c) spectral-index map
859: $\alpha(x,y)$. The horizontal and vertical axes plot right
860: ascension $x$ and declination $y$ in milliarcseconds.
861:
862: }
863:
864: \end{figure}
865:
866:
867: \newpage
868: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.3:
869: \begin{figure}[t]
870: {\begin{center}
871: \includegraphics[width= 160mm]{IMAGE3.EPS}
872: \end{center}
873: Fig. 3. Restored maps of the radio source using( a)
874: single-frequency data, (b) MFS data in a $\pm30\%$ band assuming
875: frequency independence of the image ($\alpha(x,y)=0$), and (c)
876: from MFS data in the same band without assuming frequency
877: dependence of the image ($\alpha(x,y)\ne 0$). }
878: \end{figure}
879:
880:
881:
882: \newpage
883: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.4:
884: \begin{figure}[t]
885: {\begin{center}
886: \includegraphics[width= 160mm]{IMAGE4.EPS}
887: \end{center}
888: Fig. 4. Results of the reconstruction using MFS data in a
889: $\pm30\%$ band. The horizontal ordering of the maps is as in Fig.
890: 2. Maps of the upper row (a), (b), (c) were obtained using the
891: first two terms, and maps of the lower row (d), (e), (f) the first
892: three terms of the Taylor series expansion. }
893: \end{figure}
894:
895:
896: \newpage
897: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.5:
898: \begin{figure}[t]
899: {\begin{center}
900: \includegraphics[width= 160mm]{IMAGE5.EPS}
901: \end{center}
902: Fig. 5. Results of the reconstruction using MFS data in a
903: $\pm60\%$ band. The horizontal ordering of the maps is as in Fig.
904: 2. Maps of the upper row (a), (b), (c) were obtained using the
905: first two terms, maps of the middle row (d), (e), (f) the first
906: three terms, and maps of the lower row (g), (h), (i) the first
907: four terms of the Taylor series expansion. }
908: \end{figure}
909:
910:
911:
912: \newpage
913: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.6:
914: \begin{figure}[t]
915: {\begin{center}
916: \includegraphics[width= 160mm]{IMAGE6.EPS}
917: \end{center}
918: Fig. 6. Results of the reconstruction using MFS data in a
919: $\pm90\%$ band. The horizontal ordering of the maps is as in Fig.
920: 2. Maps of the first row (a), (b), (c) were obtained using the
921: first two terms, maps of the second row (d), (e), (f) the first
922: three terms, maps of the third row (g), (h), (i) the first four
923: terms, and maps of the fourth row (j), (k), (l) the first five
924: terms of the Taylor series expansion. }
925: \end{figure}
926:
927:
928:
929: \newpage
930: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.7:
931: \begin{figure}[t]
932: {\begin{center}
933: \includegraphics[width= 160mm]{IMAGE7.EPS}
934: \end{center}
935: Fig. 7. Results of the reconstruction using MFS data in a
936: $\pm90\%$ band with 27 frequency channels using five terms in the
937: Taylor series expansion. The horizontal ordering of the maps is as
938: in Fig. 2. }
939: \end{figure}
940:
941:
942:
943:
944: \newpage
945: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.8:
946: \begin{figure}[t]
947: {\begin{center}
948: \includegraphics[width= 100mm]{IMAGE8.EPS}
949: \end{center}
950: Fig. 8. Results of the reconstruction with appreciable data errors
951: (a) for single-frequency data (UV coverage of Fig. 1a); (b) for
952: MFS with a $\pm90\%$ band without assuming frequency dependence of
953: the map. Panels (c), (d), (e) and (f) show the radio images
954: obtained using two, three, four, and five terms of the Taylor
955: series expansion of the spectral term, respectively, and panels
956: (g) and (h) the first-order spectral map and spectral-index map
957: corresponding to map (f). }
958: \end{figure}
959:
960:
961: \end{document}
962: