1: \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3: \usepackage{txfonts}
4: \usepackage{natbib}
5: \newcommand{\EWmin}{EW$_{\rm min}$}
6: %
7: \shorttitle{ESO VLT optical spectroscopy of BL Lac objects.}
8: \shortauthors{Sbarufatti et al.}
9: \begin{document}
10: \title{ESO VLT optical spectroscopy of BL Lacertae objects. III. An extension of the sample.}
11: \author{B. Sbarufatti}
12: \affil{INAF, Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica di Palermo}
13: \affil{Via Ugo La Malfa 153, I-90146 Palermo, Italy}
14: \email{sbarufatti@ifc.inaf.it}
15: \author{S. Ciprini}
16: \affil{
17: 1. Physics Department University of Perugia, and I.N.F.N.
18: Perugia Section,\\
19: Via A. Pascoli, I-06123 Perugia, Italy\\
20: 2. Tuorla Observatory, University of Turku,\\
21: V\"ais\"al\"antie 20, FIN-21500 Piikki\"o, Finland}
22: \author{J. Kotilainen}
23: \affil{Tuorla Observatory, University of Turku}
24: \affil{V\"ais\"al\"antie 20, FIN-21500 Piikki\"o, Finland}
25: \author{R. Decarli, A. Treves, A. Veronesi}
26: \affil{Universit\`a dell'Insubria}
27: \affil{Via Valleggio 11, I-22100 Como, Italy}
28: \and
29: \author{R. Falomo}
30: \affil{INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova}
31: \affil{Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 5, I-35122 Padova, Italy}
32: \begin{abstract}
33: We present results of an ongoing program at the ESO VLT for spectroscopy
34: of BL Lac objects lacking a firm redshift estimate
35: %, performed in non optimal seeing conditions,
36: and here we report on 15 objects. For 11 sources we confirm
37: the BL Lac classification, and we determine new redshifts for 3 objects, 1
38: with weak emission lines (PKS 1057$-$79, $z=0.569$) and 2 with absorptions
39: from the host galaxy (RBS 1752, $z=0.449$; RBS 1915, $z=0.243$); moreover
40: a sub Damped Lyman Alpha (sub-DLA) system
41: is detected in the direction of the BL Lac PKS 0823$-$223 ($z\geq0.911$). For
42: the remaining 8 BL Lacs, from the very absence of absorption lines of the host
43: galaxy, lower limits to the redshift are deduced with $z_{\rm min}$ in the
44: interval $0.20-0.80$.
45: The remaining three sources are reclassified as a FSRQ (PKS 1145$-$676,
46: $z=0.210$; TXS 2346+052, $z=0.419$) and a misclassified galactic star
47: (PMNJ 1323$-$3652).
48: \end{abstract}
49:
50: \keywords{BL Lacertae objects: general}
51:
52: \section{Introduction}
53: Blazars dominate the scene of extragalactic gamma ray astronomy as space borne
54: missions and \v{C}erenkov atmospheric telescopes have shown.
55: BL Lac objects ( BL Lacs or BLLs)
56: are a main sub-class of \textit{blazars} that by definition exhibit featureless
57: spectra or very weak lines, most probably because of the relativistic
58: enhancement of the continuum.
59: Surely, the recent launch of AGILE and GLAST gamma-ray observatories
60: and the upgrading of the existing ground-based \v{C}erenkov telescopes will
61: significantly increase the interest in the BL Lac objects.
62: The determination of the redshift is mandatory in order to characterize these
63: sources (e.g. \ to determine nuclear and host galaxy luminosity of the
64: sources), but it is arduous, in most of the objects, to detect the weak
65: spectral features over the continuum. Indeed, a redshift determination exists
66: for only about half of the known BLLs. The detection of the weak spectral
67: lines necessarily requires the use of $8-10$ meters telescopes.
68: In addition to the issue of redshift, high S/N and spectral resolution
69: are also of importance for detecting the host galaxy independently of
70: imaging, since its emission may appear superposed to the non-thermal
71: continuum of the nucleus.
72: Absorption lines may be related to the host galaxy itself, to the
73: intergalactic medium and to the interstellar medium of our galaxy and its
74: halo. The emission lines are the most direct probe to the physical conditions
75: around the nucleus.
76:
77: We have an ongoing program for BL Lac's spectroscopy at the European Southern
78: Observatory (ESO) $8-$ meter Very Large Telescope (VLT),
79: which utilizes the telescope in service mode under non-optimal seeing
80: conditions.
81: The results of the first three runs (2003 and 2004) referred to 35 BLLs.
82: We measured new redshifts for 17 sources, while for the rest of the
83: objects we have given upper limits using a technique specifically designed
84: for this project. Details are given in \citet[][ S05 and S06 in the
85: following]{sbarufatti05_vlt1, sbarufatti06_vlt2}, together with the criteria
86: on the sample selection.
87:
88: In this paper we present the spectra of 15 objects observed in 2006
89: (Guest Observer run: ESO 077.B-0045).
90: Data reduction and analysis procedures are described in section 2. Results are
91: reported in section 3 along with specific comments about each source. Summary
92: and conclusion are given in section 4. Throughout this paper we assume the
93: following cosmological parameters: H$_0$=70 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$,
94: $\Omega_\Lambda$=0.7, $\Omega_{\rm m}$=0.3.
95:
96: \section{Observations and data analysis}
97:
98: The observations (Table \ref{tab:journal})
99: were performed between 2006 March through August in Service Mode at
100: the ESO VLT UT2 (Kueyen) telescope, equipped with the FOcal Reducer and low
101: dispersion Spectrograph (FORS1), using the 300V+I grism combined with a
102: 2\arcsec{ } slit, yielding a dispersion of 112 \AA~mm$^{-1}$ (corresponding to
103: 2.64 \AA~pixel$^{-1}$) and a spectral resolution of 15 \AA~covering the
104: 3800--8000 \AA~range.
105: The seeing during observations was in the range 0.5-2.5\arcsec, with an
106: average of 1\arcsec.
107:
108: We performed data reduction using IRAF\footnote{IRAF (Image Reduction and
109: Analysis Facility) is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy
110: Observatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities for
111: Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National
112: Science Foundation.} \citep{tody86,tody93}, following the standard procedures
113: for spectral analysis. This includes bias subtraction, flat fielding, and
114: removal of bad pixels. For each target, we obtained three spectra for an
115: optimal correction of the cosmic rays and to check for the reality of
116: weak spectral features. The individual frames were then combined into
117: a single average image. Wavelength calibration was performed using the spectra
118: of a He/Ne/Ar lamp,
119: resulting in an accuracy of $\sim$3 \AA \ (rms). From these calibrated final
120: images, we extracted the one-dimensional spectra inside a
121: 2\arcsec$\times$6\arcsec aperture, adopting an optimal extraction algorithm
122: \citep{horne86} to improve the Signal to Noise ratio (S/N).
123:
124: As a part of a fill-in program, our observations did not require optimal
125: photometric conditions. However, the sky was clear for most of the
126: observations. This enabled us to perform a spectrophotometric calibration of
127: the data using standard stars \citep{oke90}. We estimate an uncertainty
128: of the order of 10\% in the flux calibration because of the not optimal sky
129: condition. Flux losses due to the slit not being oriented along the parallactic
130: angle are negligible with respect to the flux calibration uncertainties.
131: All the spectra were dereddened following the extinction law by
132: \citet{cardelli89} and assuming the E$_{\textrm{B-V}}$ values computed by
133: \citet{schlegel98}.
134:
135: \section{Results}\label{sec:results}
136:
137: In Figure \ref{fig:spectra} we give the optical spectrum for each source. In
138: order to make apparent the shape of the continuum and the faint spectral
139: features, we report both the flux calibrated and the normalized spectra.
140: Intrinsic and intervening spectral features are identified
141: with atomic species. Absorptions caused by the Galactic
142: interstellar medium are indicated with ISM for simple atomic species, and with
143: DIB (Diffuse Interstellar Band) for complex molecules. The Earth symbol is used
144: to mark telluric absorptions. All spectra can be retrieved in electronic form
145: at \texttt{http://www.oapd.inaf.it/zbllac/}, where all the results of our program are
146: archived.
147:
148: \subsection{Continuum emission and host galaxy contribution}\label{sec:cont}
149:
150: The optical spectrum of a BL Lac can be
151: described, in a first approximation, as the superposition of two components.
152: The first one is a non-thermal continuum emitted by the active nucleus.
153: The second is the contribution from the stars and the ISM of the
154: BLL host galaxy. Extensive studies in the past \citep[e.g.][]{urry00}
155: have shown that these galaxies are usually giant ellipticals
156: the optical magnitudes of which follow a narrow Gaussian distribution centered
157: around M$_{\rm R}^{\rm host}=-22.9\pm0.5$ \citep{sbarufatti05_hst}. In most
158: cases the host galaxy signature was not detected in our spectrum because it
159: was too faint with respect to the nuclear component. For these objects, we
160: performed a fit of the optical continuum with a simple power-law model
161: ($F_\lambda \propto \lambda^{-\alpha}$). In two cases however (RBS 1752 and RBS
162: 1915) the host galaxy spectral features were detected, and we performed a fit
163: to the spectrum using a two component model (see Fig. \ref{fig:specdec}): a
164: power-law plus an elliptical galaxy spectrum as in the template given in
165: \citet[][see also S06 for details on the fitting procedure]{kinney96}.
166: The results from our fits are reported in Table \ref{tab:fits}, where for each
167: object we give the power-law index, the object class \citep[High
168: Energy Peaked BLL, HBL; Low Energy Peaked BLL, LBL, see][for a definition]
169: {padovani95b} the apparent magnitude, and the extinction
170: coefficient. For RBS 1752 and RBS 1915 we report also the absolute magnitudes
171: of the host galaxies corrected for the aperture effect which were
172: M$_{\rm R}= -23.3$ and M$_{\rm R}$= -22.4 respectively, in agreement with the
173: expected distribution.
174:
175: \subsection{Line detection and redshift determination}
176:
177: Since emission and absorption lines in a BLL spectrum can be very faint, their
178: detection can be a difficult task. Using the same technique presented in S06,
179: we estimated the minimum detectable equivalent width \EWmin~ for each spectrum,
180: and considered all features with equivalent width (EW) above this threshold as
181: line candidates which were then carefully inspected for identification or
182: rejection.
183: \EWmin ~ values for each spectrum are given in table 1, while line
184: identifications, Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM) and EW are reported in table
185: \ref{tab:lines}. The continuum and line properties confirmed the BL Lac
186: classification for 12 objects. In section \ref{sec:notes} we report notes on
187: the individual sources.
188:
189: \subsubsection{Redshift lower limits}
190: Most of the confirmed BLL in our sample show featureless spectra, despite the
191: high S/N reached using VLT. As extensively discussed in S06
192: (4.2.4), it is possible to estimate a lower limit to the redshift of such
193: sources, knowing the \EWmin ~ and the nucleus apparent magnitude and exploiting
194: the assumption that BL Lac hosts can be considered as candles
195: \citep{sbarufatti05_hst}.
196: We remark here that Equation 1 in S06 contains a typographical error, which was
197: noted also by \citet{finke08}. The correct expression is:
198: \begin{equation}\label{eq:1}
199: \mathrm{EW}_{\rm obs}=\frac{(1+z) \times \mathrm{EW}_0}{1+\rho / A(z)}
200: \end{equation}
201: where EW$_{\rm obs}$ is the observed equivalent width, EW$_{0}$ is the
202: equivalent width of the feature in the host galaxy template \citep{kinney96},
203: $\rho$ is the nucleus-to-host flux ratio, $z$ is the redshift and $A(z)$ is
204: the aperture correction.
205:
206: We applied this procedure to all featureless spectra in the sample, obtaining
207: the lower limits reported in section \ref{sec:notes}.
208:
209: \subsection{Notes on individual objects.}\label{sec:notes}
210:
211: \paragraph{PKS 0019+058}
212: This radio selected source \citep{condon74} was first classified as a BLL
213: by \citet{fricke83}, based on a featureless optical spectrum. We observed this
214: object in two epochs separated by about a month, noticing an optical
215: variability of 0.7 mag ($R$ band) and an evolution of the spectral index from
216: 0.65 to 0.76. The reality of the optical variability is fully confirmed by
217: the $R$-band images exposed prior to the spectra which enable direct
218: photometry. The optical variability was known, both in magnitude
219: \citep[$V= 19.2$ and $V>21$ in][ respectively]{fricke83, abraham91}
220: and in spectral index \citep[$\alpha_{\nu}$=0.8 and 0.94 in ][]{fricke83,
221: chen05}. We find no intrinsic feature with EW $>$ \EWmin~ in any of the two
222: spectra. The NaI$\lambda$5891 absorption from the Galaxy ISM is detected in
223: both spectra with EW $=0.43$ \AA~ (July 12) and 0.66 \AA~ (August 8).
224: A marginally significant excess around 5600 \AA~ is present in both
225: observations, but it is most probably spurious because of a residuals left
226: after the subtraction of a nearby atmospheric emission line.
227: The most stringent redshift lower limits, obtained from the August 2006
228: spectrum is $z>$0.64.
229:
230: \paragraph{GC 0109+224}
231:
232: This source was discovered in radio observations by \citet{davis71}, and
233: subsequently classified as a BL Lac by \citet{owen77}. Strong flux and
234: polarization variability was reported both in the radio and optical band
235: \citep[e.g.][]{katajainen00, ciprini03, ciprini04}. Optical imaging by
236: \citet{falomo96} and \citet{nilsson03} failed to detect the host
237: galaxy, while the detection reported by \citet{wright98} is dubious,
238: since it has not been confirmed by any subsequent observation.
239: The lower limit on the redshift proposed by \citet{falomo96} is $z>$ 0.4.
240: Previous optical spectroscopy by \citet{wills79,falomo94,sbarufatti06_eso36}
241: performed with 2--4 m class telescopes showed featureless spectra,
242: while \citet{healey08} report z=0.265 for this object based on an
243: unpublished optical spectrum.
244: The lower limit to the redshift as deduced by \citet{sbarufatti06_eso36}
245: was based on an \EWmin$= 0.43$ \AA~ that yielded $z > 0.18$. The considerably
246: higher S/N spectrum we obtained with VLT has \EWmin$=0.09$ \AA, which in turn
247: implies $z>$ 0.25, which improves the previous spectroscopical limit, but
248: it is still less stringent than the imaging limit.
249:
250: \paragraph{RBS 0231}
251:
252: This X-ray-selected object \citep{voges99} was classified as a BLL by
253: \citet{schwope00}, and as a HBL by \citet{brinkmann00}. No previous
254: optical spectroscopy was published. The VLT spectrum is featureless,
255: with \EWmin$=1.27$ \AA, which implies $z>0.41$.
256:
257: \paragraph{PKS 0823$-$223}
258:
259: This radio selected BL Lac \citep{allen82} is characterized by a number of
260: absorption lines in the UV and optical band \citep[e.g.][]{rao06,
261: meiring07, falomo90, veron90, falomo94}. These features are consistent with
262: the presence of a sub-Damped Lyman $\alpha$ Absorber at $z = 0.91$. In our VLT
263: spectrum we detect the absorption features of
264: FeII $\lambda\lambda$2373.7, 2383.2, 2585.9, 2599.4, MgII
265: $\lambda$2798 and MgI $\lambda$2852 at the same redshift.
266:
267: \paragraph{PKS 1057$-$79}
268:
269: This radio selected object \citep{shimmins81} was proposed as a
270: counterpart for the $\gamma$-ray source 2EGS 1050$-$7650 by
271: \citet{tornikoski02}. No previous optical spectroscopy was published.
272: Our VLT spectrum shows several emission lines ([OIII]
273: $\lambda\lambda$4959,5007, [NeIII] $\lambda$3868, MgII $\lambda$2798), at
274: $z=0.581$. Since the FWHM of the MgII line (see table \ref{tab:lines})
275: is in excess of $1000~km~s^{-1}$ we propose to classify this object as a
276: broad line AGN.
277:
278: \paragraph{PKS 1145$-$676}
279:
280: This radio source was classified as a quasar due to its point-like appearance
281: by \citet{white87}. The flat radio spectrum and optical variability
282: \citep{beasley97, costa02} prompted a \textit{blazar} classification. We
283: detect several emission lines ([OII] $\lambda$3727, H$\beta~ \lambda$4861,
284: [OIII] $\lambda\lambda$4959,5007, H$\alpha~ \lambda$6563, [NII] $\lambda$6585)
285: at $z= 0.210$. The observed EW are in the range 4--25 \AA, pointing towards a
286: FSRQ classification. The FWHM of the H$\beta~$ line could indicate
287: that this source is a narrow lines object, but the fact that we are unable
288: to measure the H$\alpha~$ FWHM due to the blending with the [NII] lines
289: permits only a type $\sim1.9$ classification.
290:
291: \paragraph{OM 280}
292:
293: This radio selected source \citep{colla72} was classified as a BLL due
294: to its featureless spectrum by \citet{strittmatter74}. Subsequent optical
295: spectroscopy by \citet{rector01} also failed to discover any intrinsic
296: spectral feature. The host galaxy was not detected in deep HST imaging
297: \citep{urry00}, implying $z>0.63$ \citep{sbarufatti05_hst}. The VLT
298: spectrum is featureless, with \EWmin$=0.35$ \AA, which implies a redshift
299: lower limit of 0.20, less stringent than the one from imaging.
300:
301: \paragraph{PMN J1323$-$3652}
302:
303: This radio selected source was classified as a candidate BL Lac by the WGA
304: catalog \citep{wga2000} and the Deep X-ray Radio Blazar survey
305: \citep[DXRBS,][]{landt01}, that also provided a featureless
306: optical spectrum. However, our VLT optical spectrum clearly shows the
307: absorption lines and the characteristic shape of a Galactic F-type star. This
308: indicates a mis-identification of the optical counterpart of this source.
309:
310: \paragraph{OQ 012}
311:
312: This radio selected BLL \citep{weiler80} showed a featureless optical spectrum
313: in observations by \citet{falomo94}. \citet{richards04} gave a photometric
314: redshift estimate $z=0.475$ based on data from the Sloan
315: Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). Our VLT spectrum shows an absorption line by
316: Galactic ISM (NaI $\lambda$5891), but no intrinsic features. The \EWmin~ is
317: 0.31 \AA, which implies $z>0.65$, inconsistent with the photometric estimate.
318:
319:
320: \paragraph{PMNJ 1539$-$0658}
321:
322: This radio source \citep{griffith95} was classified as a BL Lac in the DXRBS
323: \citep{landt01}, which also provided a featureless optical spectrum. In the
324: VLT spectrum we detect the NaI $\lambda$5891 absorption line from the Galaxy,
325: but no intrinsic features. The minimum detectable EW is 0.61 \AA, which
326: implies $z>0.80$.
327:
328: \paragraph{PKS 1830-589}
329:
330: This radio-selected BL Lac \citep{griffith95, landt01} showed a featureless
331: optical spectrum when observed in the DXRBS. Our VLT spectrum is also
332: featureless (NaI$\lambda$5891 is marginally detected with EW = 0.4 \AA). The
333: minimum detectable equivalent width is \EWmin$=0.46$ \AA, which gives
334: a lower limit $z>0.45$.
335:
336: \paragraph{RBS 1752}
337:
338: This X-ray-selected BLL \citep{voges99} had a tentative redshift $z=0.449$
339: proposed in the Sedentary Survey \citep{giommi05, piranomonte07}, based on
340: the possible detection of the host galaxy spectral features in an ESO 3.6 m
341: optical spectrum. The high S/N obtained using VLT allowed us to detect
342: some weak host galaxy lines (CaII $\lambda\lambda$3934,3968, G band
343: $\lambda$4305, and MgI $\lambda$5175) at $z=0.449$. However, the G band is
344: possibly contaminated by the [OI] atmospheric line at 6300 \AA, and the
345: MgI line is very close to the telluric O$_2$ A band. therefore, while the
346: absorption features reported by \citet{piranomonte07} are confirmed, the
347: redshift remains tentative because of the lack of other firm absorption
348: features.
349: The fit to the spectrum with a power-law plus elliptical galaxy model gives
350: M$_{\rm R}^{\rm host}=-23.3$, in good agreement with the expected distribution
351: M$_{\rm R}^{\rm host}=-22.9\pm0.5$.
352:
353: \paragraph{RBS 1915}
354:
355: This X-ray selected object \citep{voges99} was classified as a BLL by
356: \citet{schwope00}. The optical spectrum reported by \citet{chavushyan00} was
357: featureless. Our VLT spectrum shows faint absorption lines from the BLL host
358: galaxy (CaII $\lambda\lambda$3934,3968, G band $\lambda$4305, and MgI
359: $\lambda$5175) at $z=0.243$. We performed a fit to the spectrum using a
360: power-law plus elliptical galaxy model, obtaining M$_R^{host}$=-22.4, consistent
361: with the expected distribution (M$_R^{host}$=-22.9$\pm$0.5).
362:
363: \paragraph{TXS 2346+052}
364:
365: This radio selected source \citep{large81} was classified as a BL Lac because
366: of its flat radio spectrum \citep{gorshkov00} and the featureless optical
367: spectrum \citep{chavushyan00}. Our VLT spectrum shows several emission lines
368: (MgII $\lambda$2798, [OII] $\lambda$3727, [NeIII] $\lambda$3868, [OIII]
369: $\lambda\lambda$4959,5007) at $z=0.419$. The observed EW of the MgII
370: and [OIII] lines (exceeding 5 \AA), rules out a BL Lac classification and
371: suggests a FSRQ nature for this source. The EW ratio between the [OII] and
372: [OIII] lines are untypical for an AGN, possibly indicating an ongoing star
373: formation \citep[as seen in PKS 2005-489 by ][]{bressan06}.
374: A measurement of the equivalent width of the H$\alpha$+[NII] line system
375: (which is out of the observed spectral range) could help to clarify this issue.
376:
377:
378: \paragraph{1RXS J235730.1$-$171801}
379:
380: This X-ray selected object \citep{voges99} was classified as a BLL by
381: \citet{schwope00}. Our previous VLT observations (S06)
382: gave a limit $z>$ 0.85. The spectrum presented here has a slightly lower S/N
383: (110, to be compared with 150 of the earlier observation, because
384: of the different seeing conditions between the observations), that gives
385: \EWmin$=0.22$ \AA~ and $z>0.60$. CaII$\lambda$3934 and NaI$\lambda$5891
386: absorptions from the Galaxy ISM are marginally detected (they were also
387: detected in the S06 spectrum, along with several DIBs).
388: No significant flux variations were detected between two different observation
389: periods.
390: \section{Summary and conclusions}
391:
392: Of 15 observed objects, we confirm the BL Lac classification for 11
393: sources, and the detection of a sub-DLA system in PKS 0823$-223$
394: ($z\geq0.911$). PKS 1145$-$676 and TXS2346+052 are reclassified as
395: FSRQ ($z=0.210$~ and $z=0.419$ respectively), while PMN J1323$-$3652 is a
396: F-type star. For 4 BLLs we are able to give a new determination of the redshift
397: (PKS 1057$-$79 $z=0.569$; RBS 1752 $z=0.448$; RBS 1915, $z=0.243$).
398: For the remaining 8 BLLs, we give redshift lower limits based on the
399: minimum detectable equivalent width of their featureless spectra.
400: On the whole, our BL Lac spectroscopy database now contains 45 confirmed BL
401: Lacs observed with VLT, with 20 redshifts determinated by detection of faint
402: lines, and 25 redshift lower limits.
403:
404:
405: In those cases where even VLT+FORS observations are inconclusive,
406: a further increase in the S/N ratio is required, for example through the use of
407: adaptive optics, Very Large Telescope Interferometry, the Large Binocular
408: Telescope, observations in the near infrared region, where the nucleus-to-host
409: ratio is smaller than in the optical range, or, in the future, even the use of
410: Extremely Large Telescopes. Alternatively, it would be possible to
411: observe these sources when the active nucleus goes into a low state, since the
412: decrease in the N/H ratio would make easier to detect the features of the host
413: galaxy.
414:
415: \acknowledgments
416: Based on observations collected at the European Organisation for Astronomical
417: Research in the Southern Hemisphere, Chile. Observing proposal:
418: ESO 077.B-0045 (PI: S. Ciprini).
419: SC acknowledges the funding by the European Community's Human Potential
420: Programme under contract HPRN-CT-2002-00321.
421:
422:
423: \begin{thebibliography}{67}
424:
425:
426: \bibitem[{{Abraham} {et~al.}(1991){Abraham}, {Crawford}, \&
427: {McHardy}}]{abraham91}
428: {Abraham}, R.~G., {Crawford}, C.~S., \& {McHardy}, I.~M. 1991, \mnras, 252, 482
429:
430: \bibitem[{{Allen} {et~al.}(1982){Allen}, {Ward}, \& {Hyland}}]{allen82}
431: {Allen}, D.~A., {Ward}, M.~J., \& {Hyland}, A.~R. 1982, \mnras, 199, 969
432:
433: \bibitem[{{Bauer} {et~al.}(2000){Bauer}, {Condon}, {Thuan}, \&
434: {Broderick}}]{bauer00}
435: {Bauer}, F.~E., {Condon}, J.~J., {Thuan}, T.~X., \& {Broderick}, J.~J. 2000,
436: VizieR Online Data Catalog, 212, 90547
437:
438: \bibitem[{{Beasley} {et~al.}(1997){Beasley}, {Conway}, {Booth}, {Nyman}, \&
439: {Holdaway}}]{beasley97}
440: {Beasley}, A.~J., {Conway}, J.~E., {Booth}, R.~S., {Nyman}, L.-A., \&
441: {Holdaway}, M. 1997, \aaps, 124, 469
442:
443: \bibitem[{{Bressan} {et~al.}(2006){Bressan}, {Falomo}, {Vald{\'e}s}, \&
444: {Rampazzo}}]{bressan06}
445: {Bressan}, A., {Falomo}, R., {Vald{\'e}s}, J.~R., \& {Rampazzo}, R. 2006,
446: \apjl, 645, L101
447:
448: \bibitem[{{Brinkmann} {et~al.}(2000){Brinkmann}, {Laurent-Muehleisen}, {Voges},
449: {Siebert}, {Becker}, {Brotherton}, {White}, \& {Gregg}}]{brinkmann00}
450: {Brinkmann}, W., {Laurent-Muehleisen}, S.~A., {Voges}, W., {et~al.} 2000, \aap,
451: 356, 445
452:
453: \bibitem[{{Cardelli} {et~al.}(1989){Cardelli}, {Clayton}, \&
454: {Mathis}}]{cardelli89}
455: {Cardelli}, J.~A., {Clayton}, G.~C., \& {Mathis}, J.~S. 1989, \apj, 345, 245
456:
457: \bibitem[{{Chavushyan} {et~al.}(2000){Chavushyan}, {Mujica}, {Gorshkov},
458: {Konnikova}, \& {Mingaliev}}]{chavushyan00}
459: {Chavushyan}, V., {Mujica}, R., {Gorshkov}, A.~G., {Konnikova}, V.~K., \&
460: {Mingaliev}, M.~G. 2000, Astronomy Letters, 26, 339
461:
462: \bibitem[{{Chen} {et~al.}(2005){Chen}, {Fu}, \& {Gao}}]{chen05}
463: {Chen}, P.~S., {Fu}, H.~W., \& {Gao}, Y.~F. 2005, New Astronomy, 11, 27
464:
465: \bibitem[{{Ciprini} {et~al.}(2003){Ciprini}, {Tosti}, {Raiteri}, {Villata},
466: {Ibrahimov}, {Nucciarelli}, \& {Lanteri}}]{ciprini03}
467: {Ciprini}, S., {Tosti}, G., {Raiteri}, C.~M., {et~al.} 2003, \aap, 400, 487
468:
469: \bibitem[{{Ciprini} {et~al.}(2004){Ciprini}, {Tosti}, {Ter{\"a}sranta}, \&
470: {Aller}}]{ciprini04}
471: {Ciprini}, S., {Tosti}, G., {Ter{\"a}sranta}, H., \& {Aller}, H.~D. 2004,
472: \mnras, 348, 1379
473:
474: \bibitem[{{Colla} {et~al.}(1972){Colla}, {Fanti}, {Fanti}, {Ficarra},
475: {Formiggini}, {Gandolfi}, {Lari}, {Marano}, {Padrielli}, \&
476: {Tomasi}}]{colla72}
477: {Colla}, G., {Fanti}, C., {Fanti}, R., {et~al.} 1972, \aaps, 7, 1
478:
479: \bibitem[{{Condon} \& {Jauncey}(1974)}]{condon74}
480: {Condon}, J.~J. \& {Jauncey}, D.~L. 1974, \aj, 79, 1220
481:
482: \bibitem[{{Costa}(2002)}]{costa02}
483: {Costa}, E. 2002, \aap, 381, 13
484:
485: \bibitem[{{Davis}(1971)}]{davis71}
486: {Davis}, M.~M. 1971, \aj, 76, 980
487:
488: \bibitem[{{della Ceca} {et~al.}(1990){della Ceca}, {Palumbo}, {Persic},
489: {Boldt}, {Marshall}, \& {de Zotti}}]{dellaceca90}
490: {della Ceca}, R., {Palumbo}, G.~G.~C., {Persic}, M., {et~al.} 1990, \apjs, 72,
491: 471
492:
493: \bibitem[{{Donato} {et~al.}(2001){Donato}, {Ghisellini}, {Tagliaferri}, \&
494: {Fossati}}]{donato01}
495: {Donato}, D., {Ghisellini}, G., {Tagliaferri}, G., \& {Fossati}, G. 2001, \aap,
496: 375, 739
497:
498: \bibitem[{{Edwards} \& {Tingay}(2004)}]{edwards04}
499: {Edwards}, P.~G. \& {Tingay}, S.~J. 2004, \aap, 424, 91
500:
501: \bibitem[{{Falomo}(1990)}]{falomo90}
502: {Falomo}, R. 1990, \apj, 353, 114
503:
504: \bibitem[{{Falomo}(1996)}]{falomo96}
505: {Falomo}, R. 1996, \mnras, 283, 241
506:
507: \bibitem[{{Falomo} {et~al.}(1994){Falomo}, {Scarpa}, \&
508: {Bersanelli}}]{falomo94}
509: {Falomo}, R., {Scarpa}, R., \& {Bersanelli}, M. 1994, \apjs, 93, 125
510:
511: \bibitem[{{Finke} {et~al.}(2008){Finke}, {Shields}, {B{\"o}ttcher}, \&
512: {Basu}}]{finke08}
513: {Finke}, J.~D., {Shields}, J.~C., {B{\"o}ttcher}, M., \& {Basu}, S. 2008, \aap,
514: 477, 513
515:
516: \bibitem[{{Flesch} \& {Hardcastle}(2004)}]{flesch04}
517: {Flesch}, E. \& {Hardcastle}, M.~J. 2004, \aap, 427, 387
518:
519: \bibitem[{{Fricke} {et~al.}(1983){Fricke}, {Kollatschny}, \&
520: {Witzel}}]{fricke83}
521: {Fricke}, K.~J., {Kollatschny}, W., \& {Witzel}, A. 1983, \aap, 117, 60
522:
523: \bibitem[{{Ghosh} \& {Soundararajaperumal}(1995)}]{ghosh95}
524: {Ghosh}, K.~K. \& {Soundararajaperumal}, S. 1995, \apjs, 100, 37
525:
526: \bibitem[{{Giommi} {et~al.}(2005{\natexlab{a}}){Giommi}, {Piranomonte},
527: {Perri}, \& {Padovani}}]{giommi05}
528: {Giommi}, P., {Piranomonte}, S., {Perri}, M., \& {Padovani}, P.
529: 2005{\natexlab{a}}, \aap, 434, 385
530:
531: \bibitem[{{Giommi} {et~al.}(2005{\natexlab{b}}){Giommi}, {Piranomonte},
532: {Perri}, \& {Padovani}}]{giommi05cat}
533: {Giommi}, P., {Piranomonte}, S., {Perri}, M., \& {Padovani}, P.
534: 2005{\natexlab{b}}, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 343, 40385
535:
536: \bibitem[{{Gorshkov} {et~al.}(2000){Gorshkov}, {Konnikova}, \&
537: {Mingaliev}}]{gorshkov00}
538: {Gorshkov}, A.~G., {Konnikova}, V.~K., \& {Mingaliev}, M.~G. 2000, Astronomy
539: Reports, 44, 353
540:
541: \bibitem[{{Griffith} {et~al.}(1995){Griffith}, {Wright}, {Burke}, \&
542: {Ekers}}]{griffith95}
543: {Griffith}, M.~R., {Wright}, A.~E., {Burke}, B.~F., \& {Ekers}, R.~D. 1995,
544: \apjs, 97, 347
545:
546: \bibitem[{{Healey} {et~al.}(2008){Healey}, {Romani}, {Cotter}, {Michelson},
547: {Schlafly}, {Readhead}, {Giommi}, {Chaty}, {Grenier}, \&
548: {Weintraub}}]{healey08}
549: {Healey}, S.~E., {Romani}, R.~W., {Cotter}, G., {et~al.} 2008, \apjs, 175, 97
550:
551: \bibitem[{{Horne}(1986)}]{horne86}
552: {Horne}, K. 1986, \pasp, 98, 609
553:
554: \bibitem[{{Katajainen} {et~al.}(2000){Katajainen}, {Takalo},
555: {Sillanp{\"a}{\"a}}, {Nilsson}, {Pursimo}, {Hanski}, {Hein{\"a}m{\"a}ki},
556: {Kotoneva}, {Lainela}, {Nurmi}, {Pietil{\"a}}, {Rekola}, {Riehokainen},
557: {Teerikorpi}, {Valtaoja}, \& {L{\"a}hteenm{\"a}ki}}]{katajainen00}
558: {Katajainen}, S., {Takalo}, L.~O., {Sillanp{\"a}{\"a}}, A., {et~al.} 2000,
559: \aaps, 143, 357
560:
561: \bibitem[{{Kinney} {et~al.}(1996){Kinney}, {Calzetti}, {Bohlin}, {McQuade},
562: {Storchi-Bergmann}, \& {Schmitt}}]{kinney96}
563: {Kinney}, A.~L., {Calzetti}, D., {Bohlin}, R.~C., {et~al.} 1996, \apj, 467, 38
564:
565: \bibitem[{{Landt} {et~al.}(2001){Landt}, {Padovani}, {Perlman}, {Giommi},
566: {Bignall}, \& {Tzioumis}}]{landt01}
567: {Landt}, H., {Padovani}, P., {Perlman}, E.~S., {et~al.} 2001, \mnras, 323, 757
568:
569: \bibitem[{{Large} {et~al.}(1981){Large}, {Mills}, {Little}, {Crawford}, \&
570: {Sutton}}]{large81}
571: {Large}, M.~I., {Mills}, B.~Y., {Little}, A.~G., {Crawford}, D.~F., \&
572: {Sutton}, J.~M. 1981, \mnras, 194, 693
573:
574: \bibitem[{{Meiring} {et~al.}(2007){Meiring}, {Lauroesch}, {Kulkarni},
575: {P{\'e}roux}, {Khare}, {York}, \& {Crotts}}]{meiring07}
576: {Meiring}, J.~D., {Lauroesch}, J.~T., {Kulkarni}, V.~P., {et~al.} 2007, \mnras,
577: 376, 557
578:
579: \bibitem[{{Nass} {et~al.}(1996){Nass}, {Bade}, {Kollgaard},
580: {Laurent-Muehleisen}, {Reimers}, \& {Voges}}]{nass96}
581: {Nass}, P., {Bade}, N., {Kollgaard}, R.~I., {et~al.} 1996, \aap, 309, 419
582:
583: \bibitem[{{Nieppola} {et~al.}(2006){Nieppola}, {Tornikoski}, \&
584: {Valtaoja}}]{nieppola06}
585: {Nieppola}, E., {Tornikoski}, M., \& {Valtaoja}, E. 2006, \aap, 445, 441
586:
587: \bibitem[{{Nilsson} {et~al.}(2003){Nilsson}, {Pursimo}, {Heidt}, {Takalo},
588: {Sillanp{\"a}{\"a}}, \& {Brinkmann}}]{nilsson03}
589: {Nilsson}, K., {Pursimo}, T., {Heidt}, J., {et~al.} 2003, \aap, 400, 95
590:
591: \bibitem[{{Oke}(1990)}]{oke90}
592: {Oke}, J.~B. 1990, \aj, 99, 1621
593:
594: \bibitem[{{Owen} \& {Muffson}(1977)}]{owen77}
595: {Owen}, F.~N. \& {Muffson}, S.~L. 1977, \aj, 82, 776
596:
597: \bibitem[{{Padovani} \& {Giommi}(1995)}]{padovani95b}
598: {Padovani}, P. \& {Giommi}, P. 1995, \apj, 444, 567
599:
600: \bibitem[{{Piranomonte} {et~al.}(2007){Piranomonte}, {Perri}, {Giommi},
601: {Landt}, \& {Padovani}}]{piranomonte07}
602: {Piranomonte}, S., {Perri}, M., {Giommi}, P., {Landt}, H., \& {Padovani}, P.
603: 2007, \aap, 470, 787
604:
605: \bibitem[{{Rao} \& {Turnshek}(2000)}]{rao06}
606: {Rao}, S.~M. \& {Turnshek}, D.~A. 2000, \apjs, 130, 1
607:
608: \bibitem[{{Rector} \& {Stocke}(2001)}]{rector01}
609: {Rector}, T.~A. \& {Stocke}, J.~T. 2001, \aj, 122, 565
610:
611: \bibitem[{{Richards} {et~al.}(2004){Richards}, {Nichol}, {Gray}, {Brunner},
612: {Lupton}, {Vanden Berk}, {Chong}, {Weinstein}, {Schneider}, {Anderson},
613: {Munn}, {Harris}, {Strauss}, {Fan}, {Gunn}, {Ivezi{\'c}}, {York},
614: {Brinkmann}, \& {Moore}}]{richards04}
615: {Richards}, G.~T., {Nichol}, R.~C., {Gray}, A.~G., {et~al.} 2004, \apjs, 155,
616: 257
617:
618: \bibitem[{{Sbarufatti} {et~al.}(2006{\natexlab{a}}){Sbarufatti}, {Falomo},
619: {Treves}, \& {Kotilainen}}]{sbarufatti06_eso36}
620: {Sbarufatti}, B., {Falomo}, R., {Treves}, A., \& {Kotilainen}, J.
621: 2006{\natexlab{a}}, \aap, 457, 35
622:
623: \bibitem[{{Sbarufatti} {et~al.}(2005{\natexlab{a}}){Sbarufatti}, {Treves}, \&
624: {Falomo}}]{sbarufatti05_hst}
625: {Sbarufatti}, B., {Treves}, A., \& {Falomo}, R. 2005{\natexlab{a}}, \apj, 635,
626: 173
627:
628: \bibitem[{{Sbarufatti} {et~al.}(2005{\natexlab{b}}){Sbarufatti}, {Treves},
629: {Falomo}, {Heidt}, {Kotilainen}, \& {Scarpa}}]{sbarufatti05_vlt1}
630: {Sbarufatti}, B., {Treves}, A., {Falomo}, R., {et~al.} 2005{\natexlab{b}}, \aj,
631: 129, 559
632:
633: \bibitem[{{Sbarufatti} {et~al.}(2006{\natexlab{b}}){Sbarufatti}, {Treves},
634: {Falomo}, {Heidt}, {Kotilainen}, \& {Scarpa}}]{sbarufatti06_vlt2}
635: {Sbarufatti}, B., {Treves}, A., {Falomo}, R., {et~al.} 2006{\natexlab{b}}, \aj,
636: 132, 1
637:
638: \bibitem[{{Schlegel} {et~al.}(1998){Schlegel}, {Finkbeiner}, \&
639: {Davis}}]{schlegel98}
640: {Schlegel}, D.~J., {Finkbeiner}, D.~P., \& {Davis}, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
641:
642: \bibitem[{{Schwope} {et~al.}(2000){Schwope}, {Hasinger}, {Lehmann}, {Schwarz},
643: {Brunner}, {Neizvestny}, {Ugryumov}, {Balega}, {Tr{\"u}mper}, \&
644: {Voges}}]{schwope00}
645: {Schwope}, A., {Hasinger}, G., {Lehmann}, I., {et~al.} 2000, Astronomische
646: Nachrichten, 321, 1
647:
648: \bibitem[{{Shimmins} \& {Bolton}(1981)}]{shimmins81}
649: {Shimmins}, A.~J. \& {Bolton}, J.~G. 1981, Australian Journal of Physics, 34,
650: 471
651:
652: \bibitem[{{Strittmatter} {et~al.}(1974){Strittmatter}, {Carswell}, {Gilbert},
653: \& {Burbidge}}]{strittmatter74}
654: {Strittmatter}, P.~A., {Carswell}, R.~F., {Gilbert}, G., \& {Burbidge}, E.~M.
655: 1974, \apj, 190, 509
656:
657: \bibitem[{{Tody}(1986)}]{tody86}
658: {Tody}, D. 1986, in Presented at the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation
659: Engineers (SPIE) Conference, Vol. 627, Instrumentation in astronomy VI;
660: Proceedings of the Meeting, Tucson, AZ, Mar. 4-8, 1986. Part 2 (A87-36376
661: 15-35). Bellingham, WA, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers,
662: 1986, p. 733., ed. D.~L. {Crawford}, 733--+
663:
664: \bibitem[{{Tody}(1993)}]{tody93}
665: {Tody}, D. 1993, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series,
666: Vol.~52, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems II, ed. R.~J.
667: {Hanisch}, R.~J.~V. {Brissenden}, \& J.~{Barnes}, 173--+
668:
669: \bibitem[{{Tornikoski} {et~al.}(2002){Tornikoski}, {L{\"a}hteenm{\"a}ki},
670: {Lainela}, \& {Valtaoja}}]{tornikoski02}
671: {Tornikoski}, M., {L{\"a}hteenm{\"a}ki}, A., {Lainela}, M., \& {Valtaoja}, E.
672: 2002, \apj, 579, 136
673:
674: \bibitem[{{Urry} {et~al.}(2000){Urry}, {Scarpa}, {O'Dowd}, {Falomo}, {Pesce},
675: \& {Treves}}]{urry00}
676: {Urry}, C.~M., {Scarpa}, R., {O'Dowd}, M., {et~al.} 2000, \apj, 532, 816
677:
678: \bibitem[{{Veron} {et~al.}(1990){Veron}, {Veron-Cetty}, {Djorgovski}, {Magain},
679: {Meylan}, \& {Surdej}}]{veron90}
680: {Veron}, P., {Veron-Cetty}, M.-P., {Djorgovski}, S., {et~al.} 1990, \aaps, 86,
681: 543
682:
683: \bibitem[{{Voges} {et~al.}(1999){Voges}, {Aschenbach}, {Boller},
684: {Br{\"a}uninger}, {Briel}, {Burkert}, {Dennerl}, {Englhauser}, {Gruber},
685: {Haberl}, {Hartner}, {Hasinger}, {K{\"u}rster}, {Pfeffermann}, {Pietsch},
686: {Predehl}, {Rosso}, {Schmitt}, {Tr{\"u}mper}, \& {Zimmermann}}]{voges99}
687: {Voges}, W., {Aschenbach}, B., {Boller}, T., {et~al.} 1999, \aap, 349, 389
688:
689: \bibitem[{{Vollmer} {et~al.}(2005){Vollmer}, {Davoust}, {Dubois}, {Genova},
690: {Ochsenbein}, \& {van Driel}}]{vollmer05}
691: {Vollmer}, B., {Davoust}, E., {Dubois}, P., {et~al.} 2005, \aap, 431, 1177
692:
693: \bibitem[{{Weiler} \& {Johnston}(1980)}]{weiler80}
694: {Weiler}, K.~W. \& {Johnston}, K.~J. 1980, \mnras, 190, 269
695:
696: \bibitem[{{White}(1992)}]{white92}
697: {White}, G.~L. 1992, Proceedings of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 10,
698: 140
699:
700: \bibitem[{{White} {et~al.}(1987){White}, {Batty}, {Bunton}, {Brown}, \&
701: {Corben}}]{white87}
702: {White}, G.~L., {Batty}, M.~J., {Bunton}, J.~D., {Brown}, D.~R., \& {Corben},
703: J.~B. 1987, \mnras, 227, 705
704:
705: \bibitem[{{White} {et~al.}(2000){White}, {Giommi}, \& {Angelini}}]{wga2000}
706: {White}, N.~E., {Giommi}, P., \& {Angelini}, L. 2000, VizieR Online Data
707: Catalog, 9031, 0
708:
709: \bibitem[{{Wills} \& {Wills}(1979)}]{wills79}
710: {Wills}, B.~J. \& {Wills}, D. 1979, \apjs, 41, 689
711:
712: \bibitem[{{Wright} {et~al.}(1998){Wright}, {McHardy}, {Abraham}, \&
713: {Crawford}}]{wright98}
714: {Wright}, S.~C., {McHardy}, I.~M., {Abraham}, R.~G., \& {Crawford}, C.~S. 1998,
715: \mnras, 296, 961
716:
717: \bibitem[{{Wu} {et~al.}(2007){Wu}, {Jiang}, {Gu}, \& {Liu}}]{wu07}
718: {Wu}, Z., {Jiang}, D.~R., {Gu}, M., \& {Liu}, Y. 2007, \aap, 466, 63
719:
720: \end{thebibliography}
721:
722:
723: \newpage
724: \onecolumn
725: \begin{figure}[htbp]
726: \centering
727: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{fig1_a}}
728: \caption{Spectra of the observed objects. Top panels: flux calibrated
729: dereddened spectra.
730: Bottom panels: normalized spectra.
731: Telluric bands are indicated by $\oplus$, spectral lines are marked by the
732: line identification, absorption features from atomic species in the
733: interstellar medium of our galaxy are labeled by ISM, diffuse interstellar
734: bands by DIB. The flux \textbf{density} is given in units of $10^{-16}$ erg~ cm$^{-2}$
735: s$^{-1}$ \AA$^{-1}$}\label{fig:spectra}
736: \label{fig:spec}
737: \end{figure}
738: \addtocounter{figure}{-1}
739:
740: \begin{figure}[htbp]
741: \centering
742: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{fig1_b}}
743: \caption{continued}
744:
745: \end{figure}
746: \addtocounter{figure}{-1}
747:
748: \begin{figure}[htbp]
749: \centering
750: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{fig1_c}}
751: \caption{continued}
752:
753: \end{figure}
754: \addtocounter{figure}{-1}
755:
756: \begin{figure}[htbp]
757: \centering
758: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{fig1_d}}
759: \caption{continued}
760:
761: \end{figure}
762:
763:
764: \begin{figure}[htbp]
765: \centering
766: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{fig2}}
767: \caption{Spectral decomposition for objects RBS 1752 and RBS 1915.
768: Solid line shows the fitted spectrum, dotted line the observed
769: one.}\label{fig:specdec}
770:
771: \end{figure}
772:
773:
774: \newpage
775:
776:
777: \begin{deluxetable}{lllllllll}
778: \centering
779: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
780: \tablecaption{Journal of observations\label{tab:journal}}
781: \tablehead{
782: \colhead{Object name} & \colhead{IAU name} &\colhead{RA (J2000)} & \colhead{Dec (J2000)} & \colhead{Date of obs.} & \colhead{Exposure} & \colhead{S/N} & \colhead{\EWmin} & \colhead{$z$} \\
783: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{s} & \colhead{} & \colhead{\AA} & \colhead{} \\
784: \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} & \colhead{(3)} & \colhead{(4)} & \colhead{(5)} & \colhead{(6)} & \colhead{(7)} & \colhead{(8)} & \colhead{(9)} \\}
785: \startdata
786: PKS 0019+058 & 0019+058 & 00 22 32 & +06 08 04 & Jul 12 & 2400 & 120 &0.38 &$>$0.49\\
787: \nodata & ... & \nodata & \nodata & Aug 08 & 2400 & 70 &0.40 &$>$0.64\\
788: GC 0109+224 & 0109+224 & 01 12 06 & +22 44 39 & Sep 01 & 4065 & 380 &0.09 &$>$0.25\\
789: RBS 0231 & none & 01 40 41 & $-$07 58 49 & Jul 13 & 2400 & 20 &1.27 &$>$0.41\\
790: PKS 0823$-$223 & 0823-223 & 08 26 02 & $-$22 30 27 & Apr 14 & 2400 & 220 &0.41 &$\geqq$0.911\\
791: PKS 1057$-$79 & 1057-797 & 10 58 43 & $-$80 03 54 & Mar 31 & 2400 & 90 &0.39 &0.581\\
792: PKS 1145$-$676 & 1145-676 & 11 47 33 & $-$67 53 42 & Apr 14 & 2400 & 80 &1.84 &0.210\\
793: OM 280 & 1147+245 & 11 50 19 & +24 17 54 & Apr 16 & 2400 & 100 &0.35 &$>$0.20\\
794: PMN J1323$-$3652 & none & 13 23 46 & $-$36 53 39 & May 07 & 2400 & 20 &1.57 &0\\
795: OQ 012 & 1407+022 & 14 10 04 & +02 03 07 & May 07 & 2400 & 120 &0.31 &$>$0.63\\
796: PMNJ 1539$-$0658 & none & 15 39 10 & $-$06 58 43 & Mar 28, Apr 20 & 4800 & 50 &0.61 &$>$0.80\\
797: PKS 1830$-$589 & 1830-589 & 18 34 28 & $-$58 56 36 & Apr 15 & 2400 & 100 &0.46 &$>$0.45\\
798: RBS 1752 & none & 21 31 35 & $-$09 15 23 & May 10 & 2400 & 90 &0.49 &0.448\\
799: RBS 1915 & none & 22 56 13 & $-$33 03 38 & May 05 & 2400 & 160 &0.35 &0.243\\
800: TXS 2346+052 & 2346+052 & 23 49 21 & +05 34 40 & Jul 01 & 2400 & 80 &0.63 &0.419\\
801: 1RXS J235730.1$-$171801& none & 23 57 30 & $-$17 18 05 & Jul 01 & 2400 & 110 &0.22 &$>$0.63\\
802: \enddata
803: \tablecomments{Description of columns:
804: (1) Object name;
805: (2) IAU J1950 code-name;
806: (3) Right Ascension (J2000);
807: (4) Declination (J2000);
808: (5) Date of observations, year 2006;
809: (6) Exposure time;
810: (7) Signal to Noise;
811: (8) Minimum detectable EW, calculated following \citet{sbarufatti06_vlt2};
812: (9) Redshifts measured from spectral features and redshift lower limits.
813: }
814: \end{deluxetable}
815:
816: \begin{deluxetable}{lllllll}
817: \centering
818: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
819: \tablecaption{Spectral fits\label{tab:fits}}
820: \tablehead{
821: \colhead{Object name}&\colhead{$\alpha$} &\colhead{M$_{\rm R}^{\rm host}$} &\colhead{Class} &\colhead{$R$} &\colhead{E(B-V)}&\\
822: \colhead{(1)} &\colhead{(2)} &\colhead{(3)} &\colhead{(4)} &\colhead{(5)} &\colhead{(6)} &\colhead{(7)} \\}
823: \startdata
824: PKS 0019+058 & -0.65 & & L & 17.7 & 0.023 &N96,G00\\
825: PKS 0019+058 & -0.76 & & L & 18.4 & 0.023 &N96,G00\\
826: GC 0109+224 & -0.82 & & L & 14.6 & 0.049 &N96,W07\\
827: RBS 0231 & -1.00 & & L & 18.6 & 0.109 &G05\\
828: PKS 0823$-$223 & -0.47 & & H & 15.4 & 0.472 &D90,W92\\
829: PKS 1057$-$79 & -0.73 & & L & 15.9 & 0.306 &F04,E04\\
830: OM 280 & -0.79 & & L & 15.7 & 0.027 &D01,G95\\
831: OQ 012 & -0.29 & & L & 18.1 & 0.108 &N06\\
832: PMNJ 1539$-$0658 & -0.50 & & L & 19.5 & 0.156 &L01\\
833: PKS 1830$-$589 & -0.65 & & L & 17.7 & 0.095 &L01\\
834: RBS 1752 & -1.45 & -23.3 & L & 17.5 & 0.037 &G05\\
835: RBS 1915 & -1.09 & -22.4 & L & 16.8 & 0.018 &B00\\
836: TXS 2346+052 & -0.06 & & L\tablenotemark{1} & 18.3 & 0.187 &V05\\
837: 1RXS J235730.1$-$171801& -1.40 & & H & 17.7 & 0.070 &G05\\
838: \enddata
839: \tablecomments{
840: (1) Object name;
841: (2) Spectral index of the continuum, $\alpha$, defined by
842: F$_{\lambda}\propto\lambda^{-\alpha}$;
843: (3) absolute $R$ magnitude of the host galaxy;
844: (4) Class of the object (H: High energy peaked BL Lac, L: Low energy peaked BL Lac);
845: (5) apparent $R$ magnitude of the object, extracted within a 6''x2'' aperture;
846: (6) Galactic extinction in the direction of the object, from \citet{schlegel98}.
847: (7) References for HBL/LBL classification: D90: \citet{dellaceca90}, W92: \citet{white92}, G95: \citet{ghosh95}, N96: \citet{nass96}, B00: \citet{bauer00}, G00: \citet{gorshkov00}, D01: \citet{donato01}, L01: \citet{landt01}, E04: \citet{edwards04}, F04:\citet{flesch04}, G05: \citet{giommi05cat}, V05: \citet{vollmer05}, N06: \citet{nieppola06}, W07: \citet{wu07}.
848: }
849: \tablenotetext{1}{Source lacking an X-ray detection in literature. The LBL classification is tentative.}
850: \end{deluxetable}
851:
852: \begin{deluxetable}{lllclllll}
853: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
854: \tablecaption{Spectral lines.\label{tab:lines}}
855: \tablehead{
856: \colhead{Object name} & \colhead{Object Class}& \colhead{$z$} & \colhead{Line ID} & \colhead{Wavelength} & \colhead{$z_{\rm line}$} & \colhead{Type} &\colhead{FWHM} & \colhead{EW} \\
857: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{\AA} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} &\colhead{km s$^{-1}$} & \colhead{\AA} \\
858: \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} & \colhead{(3)} & \colhead{(4)} & \colhead{(5)} & \colhead{(6)} & \colhead{(7)} &\colhead{(8)} & \colhead{(9)}\\
859: }
860: \startdata
861: PKS 0823$-$223 & sub-DLA/BLL &$\geqq$0.911 & & & & & & \\
862: & & & Galactic CaII K & 3935 & 0 & i & 1700 & 1.85 \\
863: & & & Galactic CaII H & 3970 & 0 & i & 1500 & 1.00 \\
864: & & & FeII & 4481 & 0.911 & a & 800 & 0.47 \\
865: & & & FeII & 4553 & 0.911 & a & 1300 & 1.33 \\
866: & & & FeII & 4948 & 0.914 & a & 600 & 0.30 \\
867: & & & FeII & 4970 & 0.912 & a & 800 & 0.85 \\
868: & & & MgII & 5349 & 0.911 & a & 1300 & 4.12 \\
869: & & & MgI & 5452 & 0.911 & a & 600 & 0.44 \\
870: & & & Galactic NaI & 5893 & 0 & i & 900 & 1.08 \\
871: PKS 1057$-$79 & BLL & 0.581 & & & & & & \\
872: & & & MgII & 4423 & 0.581 & e & 3400 & -4.24 \\
873: & & & NeIII & 6119 & 0.582 & e & 300 & -0.25 \\
874: & & & [OIII] & 7842 & 0.581 & e & 500 & -1.25 \\
875: & & & [OIII] & 7917 & 0.581 & e & 500 & -3.58 \\
876: PKS 1145$-$676 & QSO & 0.210 & & & & & & \\
877: & & & [OII] & 4512 & 0.210 & e & 1000 & 9.25 \\
878: & & & [NeIII] & 4680 & 0.210 & e & 1200 & 3.99 \\
879: & & & H$\beta$ & 5880 & 0.210 & e & 900 & 5.52 \\
880: & & & [OIII] & 6001 & 0.210 & e & 1000 & 9.14 \\
881: & & & [OIII] & 6059 & 0.210 & e & 800 & 24.66 \\
882: & & & H$\alpha$ & 7944 & 0.210 & e & \nodata & \nodata \\
883: & & & NII & 7970 & 0.210 & e & \nodata & \nodata \\
884: RBS 1752 & BLL & 0.448 & & & & & & \\
885: & & & CaII & 5693 & 0.447 & g & 1000 & 0.5 \\
886: & & & CaII & 5749 & 0.449 & g & 1900 & 0.9 \\
887: & & & G band & 6237 & 0.449 & g & 1200 & 1.0 \\
888: & & & MgI & 7493 & 0.448 & g & 600 & 0.4 \\
889: RBS 1915 & BLL & 0.243 & & & & & & \\
890: & & & CaII & 4890 & 0.243 & g & 1700 & 0.75 \\
891: & & & CaII & 4932 & 0.243 & g & 1100 & 0.46 \\
892: & & & G band & 5351 & 0.243 & g & 2600 & 0.88 \\
893: & & & MgI & 6429 & 0.243 & g & 1900 & 1.96 \\
894: TXS 2346+052 & FSRQ & 0.419 & & & & & & \\
895: & & & MgII & 3973 & 0.420 & e & 3600 & -7.0 \\
896: & & & [OII] & 5290 & 0.419 & e & 1000 & -5.0 \\
897: & & & [NeV] & 5488 & 0.419 & e & 800 & -1.2 \\
898: & & & [OIII] & 7033 & 0.418 & e & 700 & -2.1 \\
899: & & & [OIII] & 7103 & 0.419 & e & 700 & -5.3 \\
900: \enddata
901:
902: \tablecomments{Description of columns:
903: (1) Object name;
904: (2) Object class;
905: (3) average redshift;
906: (4) line identification;
907: (5) observed wavelength of line center;
908: (6) redshift of the line;
909: (7) type of the line (\textbf{e}: emission line,
910: \textbf{g}: absorption line from the host galaxy,
911: \textbf{a}: absorption line from intervening systems),
912: \textbf{i}: absorption line from our Galaxy ISM);
913: (8) FWHM of the line;
914: (9) EW of the line;
915: }
916: \end{deluxetable}
917: \end{document}
918: