1: %\documentclass[10pt]{article}

2: \documentclass[12pt, /preprint]{aastex}

3: \textwidth 6.5in

4: \textheight 8.8in

5: \oddsidemargin 0.0in

6: \evensidemargin 0.0in

7: \topmargin -0.3truein

8: \raggedbottom

9: \parskip 8pt

10: %\doublespacing

11: 

12: \input{macros}

13: 

14: \usepackage{epsfig}

15: 

16: %\def\plotfiddle#1#2#3#4#5#6#7{{\centering \leavevmode \vbox to#2{\rule{0pt}{#2}}\special{psfile=#1 voffset=#7 hoffset=#6 vscale=#5 hscale=#4 angle=#3}}}

17: %\def\@tightleading{0.95}

18: %\def\baselinestretch{\@tightleading}\normalsize

19: % temp id is:    

20: 

21: \begin{document}

22: 

23: %\pagestyle{plain}

24: %\parindent 0pt

25: %\parskip 8pt

26: %\baselineskip 12pt

27: %\null

28: %\vskip -2.cm

29: 

30: %\hskip 5.5in 29Sep2004 

31: 

32: \title{The Arecibo Legacy Fast ALFA Survey VII:  A Neutral Hydrogen Cloud Complex in the Virgo Cluster}

33: \author {Brian R. Kent\altaffilmark{1,2}, Kristine Spekkens\altaffilmark{3}, Riccardo Giovanelli\altaffilmark{4,5}, Martha P. Haynes\altaffilmark{4,5}, 

34: Emmanuel Momjian\altaffilmark{6}, Juan R. Cort{\'e}s\altaffilmark{7,8}, Eduardo Hardy\altaffilmark{9,7}, and Andrew A. West\altaffilmark{10}

35: }

36: 

37: \altaffiltext{1}{Jansky Fellow of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory.}

38: 

39: \altaffiltext{2}{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, 520 Edgemont Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903.

40: The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the  

41: National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by  

42: Associated Universities, Inc.

43: {\it e--mail:} bkent@nrao.edu}

44: 

45: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics, Royal Military College of Canada, P.O. Box 17000, Station Forces,

46: Kingston, Ontario, K7K 7B4. {\it e--mail:} Kristine.Spekkens@rmc.ca}

47: 

48: \altaffiltext{4}{Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Space Sciences Building,

49: Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853. {\it e--mail:} riccardo@astro.cornell.edu,

50: haynes@astro.cornell.edu}

51: 

52: \altaffiltext{5}{National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center, Cornell University,

53: Space Sciences Building,

54: Ithaca, NY 14853. The National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center is operated

55: by Cornell University under a cooperative agreement with the National Science

56: Foundation.}

57: 

58: \altaffiltext{6}{National Radio Astronomy Observatory,

59: 1003 Lopezville Rd.,

60: P. O. Box O,

61: Socorro, NM 87801.

62: {\it e--mail:} emomjian@nrao.edu

63: }

64: 

65: \altaffiltext{7}{Departamento de Astronom{\'i}a, 

66: Universidad de Chile, 

67: Casilla 36-D, 

68: Santiago, Chile

69: {\it e--mail:}  jcortes@das.uchile.cl

70: }

71: 

72: \altaffiltext{8}{National Astronomical Observatory of Japan,

73: 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8588

74: }

75: 

76: \altaffiltext{9}{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, 

77: Casilla El Golf 16-10, 

78: Las Condes, Santiago, Chile

79: {\it e--mail:} ehardy@nrao.edu

80: }

81: 

82: \altaffiltext{10}{Astronomy Department,

83: 601 Campbell Hall,

84: University of California,

85: Berkeley, CA 94720-3411

86: {\it e--mail:} awest@astro.berkeley.edu

87: }

88: 

89: 

90: \begin{abstract}

91: We present observations of an HI cloud complex most likely located in the Virgo galaxy 

92: cluster, first reported by Kent \etal (2007). The complex consists of five clouds, 

93: detected in the data set of the ALFALFA extragalactic HI survey at Arecibo. The clouds 

94: have radial velocities between $cz_{\odot}~\sim$480 and 610 \kms. At the Virgo cluster

95: distance, they are spread over a projected span of 170 kpc and have HI masses ranging  

96: from 0.48 to 1.7 $\times 10^8$ \msun. The overall HI mass of the complex is 

97: $5.1\times 10^8$ \msun. The clouds' velocity 

98: widths vary between 50 and 250 \kms. New results of follow-up aperture synthesis 

99: observations conducted with the Very Large Array are also presented, which yield

100: a higher resolution view of two of the clouds in the complex. These two resolved

101: clouds show no evidence of symmetry in the gas distribution or of any ordered

102: motions. The possibility that the complex is a group of primordial objects, embedded

103: in their own dark matter halo is thought to be unlikely. Scenarios in which the

104: clouds have been removed from the disk of a galaxy traveling at high speed through

105: the intracluster medium are considered. The most likely among those is thought to be

106: one where the clouds were separated from NGC~4445 at a time $>0.5$ Gyr ago. The 

107: orbital velocity of the clouds and the putative parent galaxy would now be seen at 

108: a relatively large angle with respect to the line of sight.

109: \end{abstract}

110: 

111: \keywords{galaxies: intergalactic medium ---

112: galaxies: halos ---

113: radio lines: galaxies --- 

114: galaxies:clusters --- 

115: galaxies: interactions

116: galaxies: individual (NGC 4445, NGC 4424)

117: }

118: 

119: \section{Introduction}

120: \label{intro}

121: 

122: The study of the cold gas content in extragalactic systems plays an important role in 

123: understanding their formation and evolution.  

124: Not only does the gas content reveal information

125: on the star formation potential of a galaxy, it can also help trace

126: the dynamic history and response to the surrounding

127: environment, whether it inhabits a dense cluster or an unpopulated field.

128: For example, the fingerprint of galactic collisions and ram pressure stripping effects can 

129: be seen in the form of detached gaseous fragments 

130: and clumps. The 21 cm spectral line of neutral hydrogen 

131: serves as an important tool for

132: measuring the cool, neutral gas component

133: of galaxies, as well as a redshift indicator and 

134: kinematical probe.  The HI line can also be detected

135: in low mass systems with

136: little or no stellar emission. Blind HI

137: surveys thus yield samples which include a

138: population ``underappreciated'' in optical surveys.

139: 

140: %Give examples here

141: %Now segue into the different HI phenomena, tails, etc.

142: %Then into Virgo and the cluster

143: 

144: A number of intergalactic HI clouds have been reported in the literature,

145: some in pairs and groups or in the vicinity of large disk galaxies 

146: (e.g. Schneider \etal 1983; Sancisi \etal 1987;  

147: Kilborn \etal 2000; Ryder \etal 2001),

148: others the result of disturbances

149: from interactions within a cluster

150: (Minchin \etal 2005, 2007; Oosterloo \& van Gorkom 2005; Haynes \etal 2007).

151: The serendipitous detection of HI1225+01 (Giovanelli \& Haynes 1989; 

152: Chengalur \etal 1995) revealed a binary structure, with the NE component

153: found to be associated with a dwarf galaxy, while the SW component

154: has failed to yield any 

155: optical light down to a surface magnitude 

156: limit of 27 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ (Salzer \etal 1991). 

157: A recently reported HI feature, VirgoHI21, 

158: was detected north of the spiral galaxy NGC 4254 (Minchin \etal 2005) and

159: interpreted as a fairly massive "dark galaxy". ALFALFA survey data, 

160: which provides full coverage of the region, indicate that VirgoHI21 is not 

161: an isolated dark galaxy, but rather a tidal tail of NGC 4254 resulting from

162: the high speed encounter of that galaxy with a now distant interloper 

163: (Haynes \etal 2007; Duc \& Bournaud 2008).

164: 

165: A galaxy traveling through a cluster can be affected by a 

166: variety of mechanisms, the most commonly invoked being ram pressure stripping. 

167: The study of HI deficiency in Virgo spirals was pioneered by Davies \& Lewis (1973),

168: with the first reliably measured deficiencies reported

169: by Chamaraux, Balkowski \& Gerard (1980). Giovanelli \& Haynes (1983) showed

170: that HI deficient galaxies in Virgo had truncated HI disks. These results

171: were extended to other clusters (Giovanelli \& Haynes 1985; Haynes \& Giovanelli

172: 1986; Haynes, Giovanelli \& Chincarini 1984) and mapped with  higher resolution

173: (Cayatte \etal ~1990; Chung \etal ~2007).

174: Oosterloo \& van Gorkhom (2005) recently reported the discovery

175: of a HI cloud in the vicinity of the Virgo spiral 

176: NGC 4388 with a HI mass of $3.4~\times~10^8$\msun, resolved

177: into distinct clumps. They show a clear connection to NGC 4388.  

178: It has also been shown that galaxies  

179: can be ``harassed'' by the collective effect of the cluster potential and

180: multiple high speed encounters with other cluster members (e.g. Moore \etal 1996;

181: Mihos \etal 2005).

182: The hot intracluster gas is a hostile environment for the cold material

183: removed from cluster galaxies through these processes. The interaction

184: remnants represented by the latter are thus transient features. A full census

185: of their number and estimates of longevity can provide insights on the metal

186: enrichment of the intracluster gas.

187: 

188: 

189: %It remains an exciting open question as to 

190: %whether isolated, graviationally bound objects can exist

191: %in a cluster potential.

192: 

193: %We observe these objects

194: %in many different environments and dynamic scenarios. 

195: %Extended tidal tails - long gas streams

196: %of close encounters between large disk galaxies (Toomre, Hibbard) are seen in HI and CO.

197: 

198: %The fingerprint of galactic collisions can 

199: %also been seen with the detection of gaseous fragments and clumps in the vicinity of groups(reference).

200: %It remains an exciting open question as to whether isolated, graviationally bound objects can exist.  Would

201: %such ``dark galaxies'' be primordial in nature?  Do they exist isolated in the field and in cluster environments?

202: %Can gravitationally bound gas exist in a dark matter halo and in a cluster environment since the formation

203: %epoch?  If there really are primordial dark galaxies, why do some 

204: %extragalactic systems not exhibit a stellar component?

205: 

206: %  An even larger gravitation potential source, that of 

207: %a cluster of galaxies can also lead to tidal interactions on a larger scale.  These interactions, known

208: %as galaxy harrassment scenarios (Moore \etal 1996, 1998) can yield tidal streams several hundred kiloparsecs in

209: %length.

210: 

211: %While quasars without host galaxies could provide a link to dark galaxies in the early universe (Verde 2002

212: %reference for HE0450-2958), true dark matter halos with no baryons could be difficult to detect.

213: %However,  surveys, especially in the high density regions of 

214: %clusters. 

215: 

216: Virgo is the nearest rich cluster of galaxies, thus providing the best

217: target for the detailed study of many environment driven effects on the 

218: evolution of galaxies. With over 1300 cataloged detections (Binggeli \etal 1985), 

219: the overdensity associated with the Virgo cluster extends over more than 300 

220: square degrees in the sky, distributed in

221: several subclumps.  The largest two clumps are centered around large elliptical galaxies, 

222: M87 for the main clump, and M49 for the southern subclump.  

223: The morphology--density relation is well established in the cluster, with late type 

224: objects thought to be still falling into the cluster, as it dynamically evolves.

225: The dynamically vulnerable, extended HI disks of late type galaxies can be easy

226: victims of the processes discussed above.

227: Optical data bases, such as the Digital Sky Survey (Lasker \etal 1990) and the Sloan Digital

228: Sky Survey (York \etal 2000), provide photometry and targeted spectroscopy of cluster 

229: objects, as does the compendium of Virgo galaxies data of GOLDMINE website 

230: (http://goldmine.mib.infn.it/ ; Gavazzi \etal 2003). Individual galaxy distances are growing

231: in number thanks to the ACS Virgo Cluster survey, which focuses on early-type galaxies 

232: via the surface-brightness fluctuation method (Mei \etal 2007).

233: Targeted HI surveys also have played an important role in the overall characterization

234: of the cluster (see, e.g. GOLDMINE for references).

235: 

236: The HI Parkes All-Sky Survey

237: (HIPASS; Barnes \etal 2001) has mapped 30000 deg$^{2}$, part of which covers

238: Virgo in the region 12$^{h}<$ R.A. $<13^{h}$ and +2$^{\circ} < $ Dec. $ < +20^{\circ}$.  HIPASS catalogs available

239: from NED list 125 galaxies in this region.

240: The Arecibo Legacy Fast ALFA Survey (ALFALFA; Giovanelli \etal 2005) is more  

241: sensitive and has significantly higher angular and spectral resolution than HIPASS.

242: It is thus providing a much more incisive look into the HI properties of the cluster.

243: While the HI content of many individual spiral galaxies has been mapped in detail 

244: with interferometry (Cayatte \etal 1990, 1994; Chung \etal 2007), no survey has 

245: covered the Virgo cluster region with the sensitivity and completeness of ALFALFA. 

246: It is a primary goal of the ALFALFA survey to study and characterize the local HI 

247: Universe, including the Virgo cluster.  

248: ALFALFA will provide a fair, well-sampled and homogeneous spectral dataset, covering 

249: 7000 deg$^{2}$ of the

250: high galactic latitude sky out to a redshift of $cz_{\odot} \sim 18000 $~\kms.  

251: Approximately 250 deg$^{2}$

252: of the Virgo cluster in the range $11^h44^m <$ R.A.(J2000) $< 14^h00^m$ and 

253: $+8^\circ <$ Dec.(J2000) $<+16^\circ$ have been completely surveyed as of late 2007,  

254: with catalogs of extracted source parameters already released

255: for publication (Giovanelli \etal 2007; Kent \etal 2008).

256: A key feature of the survey is its sensitivity to low HI mass objects --

257: ALFALFA will provide a complete HI census down to $2 \times 10^7$\msun~ at the Virgo distance. 

258: Sampling the low-mass population will be key in determining the HI mass 

259: function in the cluster environment, as well as in the field.

260: The ALFALFA dataset in Virgo has already yielded many new interesting results 

261: (Kent \etal ~2007; Haynes \etal ~2007; Koopmann \etal ~2008). 

262: 

263: In this paper we give a detailed description

264: of a multi-component HI cloud complex in the Virgo

265: cluster region initially reported by Kent \etal (2007).  

266: In section 2 we describe the observations and data reduction method

267: within the context of ALFALFA and the cloud detections made with that dataset.  

268: In section 3 we detail

269: follow-up observations conducted with the Very Large Array.  In section 4

270: we discuss CO observations of the cloud.  Section 5 discusses the environment of the cloud complex.

271: Section 6 discusses possible formation mechanisms for the cloud complex.  Section 7

272: summarizes the results of the paper.

273: Throughout the paper we assume a distance to the Virgo Cluster of \dv=16.7 Mpc, and 

274: refer to the heliocentric reference frame for all velocities. 

275: 

276: \section{Discovery of a HI Cloud Complex}

277: \label{AO}

278: 

279: The ALFALFA observing strategy is described in detail by Giovanelli \etal (2005).  

280: The data are obtained

281: in a meridian transit drift mode with the Arecibo $L$-band Feed Array (ALFA).

282: Raw scans consist of 14 spectra (7 beams $\times$ 2 linear polarizations/beam), 

283: sampled at a rate of 1 Hz.

284: The spectra span a 100 MHz bandwidth with 4096 channels per polarization, centered at 1385 MHz.

285: The resulting spectral resolution is 24.4 kHz before smoothing, corresponding to $\delta V = 5.1$~\kms ~at the rest frequency of the 21cm HI line.

286: Scans are calibrated, baselined, and flagged for radio frequency interference, and then

287: combined into regularly sampled data cubes. 

288: 

289: Details of the ALFALFA data processing can be found in Kent (2008, PhD thesis).

290: Briefly, frequency channels in each grid have been baselined

291: with linear fits and then ``flatfielded'', where a median subtraction

292: has been performed in both the right ascension and declination directions.

293: A matched-filter algorithm was used for signal detection,

294: with manual follow-up (Saintonge 2007). The careful attention to signal 

295: extraction, analysis, and data quality has

296: proven to be invaluable in detecting faint objects 

297: and optimizing the output of the signal extraction process.

298: 

299: The cloud complex was discovered in the ALFALFA data obtained in the Spring 2005 campaign, 

300: which sampled the Virgo core region 

301: ($12^{\rm{h}} < \alpha < 13^{\rm{h}}, 8^{\circ} < \delta < 16^{\circ}$). 

302: The data presented here are taken from a $2^\circ.4\times 2^\circ.4$ data cube centered 

303: at $\alpha= 12^{\rm{h}}20^{\rm{m}},\delta= 9^{\circ}00^{\prime}$ (J2000). The system 

304: temperatures of the ALFA receivers during the observations were in the range 

305: $26~\rm{K} < \rm{T}_{sys} < 30~\rm{K}$, yielding a root mean square (rms) noise of 

306: $\sigma_m=2.5\,$mJy/beam in channels with $\delta V=5.1$~\kms. The characteristics of the 

307: ALFALFA data cube from which the data are taken are summarized in Table~\ref{AOobs}. 

308: 

309: %The Arecibo detection presented in this paper are part of a larger catalog to be published in the future (Kent \etal 2007

310: %in preparation).

311: 

312: 

313: \subsection{ALFALFA Observations}

314: \label{AOdetect}

315: 

316:  The cloud complex is located near 

317: $\alpha\sim12^{\rm{h}}30^{\rm{m}}, \delta\sim9^{\circ}30^{\prime}$ -- this places it 

318: 2.9$^{\circ}$~(845 kpc in projection) South of M87 and 1.5$^{\circ}$~(432 kpc in 

319: projection) north of M49. We discuss the optical environment of the cloud complex in 

320: Section 5.

321:  

322: The complex consists of five distinct emission features or ``clouds", which we denote C1--C5.

323: Together, they span approximately 35\arcmin~(170~kpc in projection at the cluster distance)

324: on the sky and 130 \kms~ in velocity. Channel maps of the ALFALFA dataset in the vicinity of

325: these detections are shown in Figure~\ref{AOcontours}, and total intensity (zeroth moment)

326: and intensity-weighted velocity maps of the region is in Figure~\ref{AOmainimage}. An

327: integrated spectral profile for each cloud is presented in Figure~\ref{AOspectra}. 

328: %LOCATION OF M49: 12 29 46.7, 8 0 02.

329: 

330: The individual properties of the clouds derived from the ALFALFA data are given in 

331: Table~\ref{AOparams}; all parameters are computed in the manner described by Giovanelli 

332: \etal (2007).  The spatial centroid of each cloud is in col.~(2). Its accuracy depends 

333: on the source strength, and varies from an average of $\sim15\arcsec$~for the brightest 

334: features to $\sim30\arcsec$~for the faintest ones. The heliocentric velocity $cz_\odot$, 

335: width at 50\% of the peak W50 and total flux $F_c$ of the integrated spectral profiles in 

336: Figure~\ref{AOspectra} are in cols.~(3)--(5). The signal-to-noise ratio $S/N$ of the 

337: detections is in col.~(6), and is given by

338: \be

339:         S/N=\Bigl({1000 \, F_c \over W_{50}}\Bigr){w^{1/2}_{smo}\over \sigma_{rms}} \;\;,

340:         \label{snr}

341: \ee

342: where $F_c$ is in Jy \kms, $W50$ is in \kms, $w_{smo}$ is a smoothing width equal to the number of $10\,$ \kms~bins bridging half the signal, and $\sigma_{rms}$ is the rms noise (in mJy) across the integrated spectrum at 10~\kms\ resolution. The HI mass \mhi~ for each cloud is in col.~(7), and is computed assuming that the clouds are optically thin and at the Virgo distance \dv=16.7 Mpc:

343: \be

344: M_{HI}/M_\odot = 2.356 \times 10^5 \, D_V^{2} \, F_c \;\;,

345: \label{HImass}

346: \ee        

347: where \dv\ is in Mpc and \fc\ is in Jy~\kms. The uncertainties on \mhi\ in Table~\ref{AOparams} and elsewhere do not include that in the distance adopted, which is poorly constrained due to the large peculiar velocities of objects near or within the cluster.

348: 

349: %\subsection{Distances Problems and Mass Estimates}

350: %The Virgo cluster population of galaxies

351: %exhibits a large velocity dispersion along the line of sight, maxing out at $\sigma_{v}=890$ \kms

352: % for late type galaxies (Binggeli \etal 1987).  As Virgo is a young cluster and has not yet virialized,

353: %many late type spirals on the periphery are moving at high velocities with respect to the cluster.  

354: %As a result, large deviations from the bulk Hubble flow make it difficult to obtain accurate distance determinations

355: %in the direction of the Virgo Cluster.  Distance corrections can be approximated by way of various parametric

356: %flow models of the local velocity field, such as the multi-attractor model by Tonry \etal (2000).

357: 

358:       

359:         %the ratio $1000 F_c/W50$ is the mean flux across the feature in mJy,

360: %        , and \sigrms\

361: %        is the rms noise figure across the spectrum measured in mJy at 10

362: %        \kms ~resolution.

363: 

364: 

365: \subsection{Cloud Morphologies and Kinematics from ALFALFA data}

366: \label{AOclouds}

367: 

368: \textbf{Cloud C1:}  C1 is the main cloud in the complex and the highest $S/N$ detection 

369: in this region. It is marginally resolved by the ALFA beams (Figure~\ref{AOmainimage}). 

370: Its integrated profile is symmetric and narrow with a peak flux density of $38\,$mJy 

371: (Figure~\ref{AOspectra}). C1 has one of the largest HI masses in the complex at 

372: $M_{HI} = (1.62 \pm 0.04) \times 10^8$ \msun. There is a faint, uncataloged optical 

373: feature visible in SDSS images in the vicinity of C1; its relationship to the HI cloud 

374: is discussed in Section 5.

375: 

376: \textbf{Cloud C2:}  This isolated cloud is the faintest ALFALFA detection in the region 

377: at $\sn=6.5$, and it has the lowest \hi\ mass.  C2 is close to the ImV dwarf galaxy 

378: VCC~1357 (Binggeli \etal 1985), but the ALFALFA centroid is offset from the optical 

379: position of the latter by 2\arcmin\ to the West. No optical redshift is available for 

380: VCC~1357. An Arecibo single-beam observation centered on VCC~1357 with similar 

381: sensitivity to the ALFALFA data is presented by Hoffman \etal (1987). The properties 

382: of their detection are identical to those of C2 within the measurement uncertainties; 

383: these and the ALFALFA observations have likely uncovered the same object. However, 

384: the previous association of VCC~1357 with this \hi\ source is now in doubt by the 

385: evidence for an offset in position between the two, and by the detection of the other 

386: \hi\ complex clouds presented here. The positional offset between VCC~1357 and C2 is 

387: confirmed by the VLA data discussed in the next section. The possible relationship 

388: between C2 and VCC~1357 is discussed in Section 5.

389: %NOTE THIS IS NOT A NEW DETECTION! ORIGINAL REF IS Hoffman et al. 1987, ApJSS 63, 247: "BST 1357".

390: %They get rms=2.4mJy at 15km/s resolution --> obs slightly less sensitive than integrated global profiles.

391: %Profile looks the same as ours.

392: %Their numbers: Vsun = 603 \pm 10, W50=55 \pm 20, F_c=0.637 \pm 20% = 0.64 \pm 0.13: agree with our estimates.

393: 

394: \textbf{Cloud C3:}  This northernmost component of the complex is unresolved by the 

395: ALFA beam. Its integrated profile appears asymmetric with more emission on the 

396: high velocity side of the peak (Figure~\ref{AOspectra}), but this may be an artifact 

397: of the poor \sn. C3 is not connected to the main clouds C1 and C4 at the sensitivity

398: obtained. There is no discernible optical counterpart to C3 in the SDSS or DSS survey 

399: images of the region.

400: %situated 19$^{\prime}$ northwest

401: %of C1.  It has a HI mass of $M_{HI}=7.4 \times 10^7 $ \msun and is not connected to the main clouds C1 and C4.

402: 

403: \textbf{Cloud C4:}  This cloud appears to be connected to the main cloud C1,

404: with its centroid located just 6$^{\prime}$.6 to the North of the latter (Figures~\ref{AOcontours}~and~\ref{AOmainimage}). Its \hi\ mass, $M_{HI}= (1.66 \pm 0.08) \times 10^8$  \msun, is comparable with that of C1 but its integrated profile is significantly 

405: broader.  The spectrum is asymmetric with more emission on the high-velocity side of 

406: the peak (Figure~\ref{AOspectra}), and the cloud is (poorly) resolved into a collection 

407: of smaller clumps by the ALFA beam (Figure~\ref{AOcontours}). Line broadening is thus

408: likely to arise from this superposition, rather than from coherent rotation. There is 

409: no discernible optical counterpart to C4 in the SDSS or DSS survey images of the region.

410: 

411: \textbf{Cloud C5:}  This cloud is located 17\arcmin.4\ Southeast of the main cloud C1. 

412: Its integrated profile appears to be symmetric, and implies an \hi\ mass that is a third 

413: that of C1 at $M_{HI} = (5.9 \pm 0.4) \times 10^7$ \msun. At the ALFALFA sensitivity, C5 

414: is not connected with any other complex clouds. There is no discernible optical 

415: counterpart to C5 in the SDSS or DSS survey images of the region.

416:  

417: 

418: %Integrated spectral profiles are presented for each member of the complex in Figure \ref{AOspectra}. The average RMS of

419: %the five profiles after averaging the two polarizations and smoothing is 2.13 mJy/channel.

420: %Zeroth moment maps of the cloud complex are shown in Figure \ref{AOcontours}.  Each of the eight maps is 

421: %integrated over a velocity range of 50 \kms, centered on the velocity value indicated in each box.  

422: 

423: 

424: 

425: %NOTE TO SELF - describe NGC 4424.

426: 

427: %Start KS section

428: 

429: \section{Aperture Synthesis Follow-up Observations}

430: \label{VLA}

431: 

432: %new KS update

433: Aperture synthesis observations of the central region of the cloud complex detected 

434: by ALFALFA were obtained with the Very Large Array\footnote{The VLA is a 

435: facility of National Radio Astronomy Observatory, which is operated by Associated Universities, Inc., under a cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.} (VLA) in two campaigns. On 2005 July 11, 5 hours on-source 

436: were obtained via rapid response observations 

437: in C configuration. On 2006 Jan 18 -- 23, dynamically scheduled observations during 

438: the D -- A configuration 

439: change yielded  $\sim1.5$ hours on-source 

440: with antennas that hadn't yet been moved. %The synthesized beam of these observations

441: %is 20" (1.7 kpc at the Virgo distance). 

442: %[BK: THIS BEAMSIZE CORRECT?]

443: All observations had common pointing and spectral centers of

444: $\alpha=12^{\rm{h}}\,30^{\rm{m}}\,45^{\rm{s}},\, \delta= +9^\circ\,26'\, 0''$ (J2000) 

445: and $\nu=1417\,$MHz, 

446: and online Hanning smoothing was applied to yield 48.8 kHz channels over a total 

447: bandpass of 3.125 MHz. The 

448: observing setup was chosen to maximize the number of ALFALFA cloud detections 

449: accessible to the VLA in a single pointing: all of the clouds in Table~\ref{AOparams} 

450: except C3 fall within the resulting field-of-view and bandpass.

451: 

452: The data from the runs was reduced using the Astronomical Image Processing System 

453: ({AIPS}; Greisen 2003). 

454: Standard flux, phase and 

455: bandpass calibration routines were applied. Continuum emission was removed from the 

456: data via linear fits to 

457: the average visibilities 

458: in line-free channels spanning 245 kHz at either end of the calibrated bandpass, 

459: yielding a net bandwidth of 

460: 2.2 MHz sensitive to HI 

461: emission. 

462: 

463:  After calibration, the data from each run were combined into a single UV data cube and imaged using a variety of spatial 

464: and spectral weighting schemes. The dirty beam pattern was deconvolved from the data using 

465: the Multi-Scale Clean algorithm implemented in AIPS (Cornwell 2008; Greisen \etal, in prep.), in which components are extracted from a series of tapered images of the visibilities. We find that the resulting maps are not sensitive to the details of the deconvolution process, and therefore analyze the highest sensitivity, naturally-weighted cube with a synthesized beam width of 22\arcsec~(1.8 kpc at the Virgo distance).  

466: All maps and derived parameters are corrected for the attenuation of the 

467: primary beam, and averaged over 2 or 3 spectral channels to yield resolutions of $\delta V' =20.7$ \kms~

468: or $\delta V' = 31.0$~\kms, respectively. A summary of the aperture synthesis observing and map parameters is given in Table~\ref{VLAobs}. For clarity, all variables denoting parameters derived from the VLA observations are primed.

469: % We searched for circular Gaussian source models with FWHM of 45\arcsec\ and 150\arcsec. 

470: %%% SEE MOMJIAN et al. 587:160-170, 2003 for good description of deconvolution.

471: 

472: 

473: 

474: 

475: \subsection{\hi\ Aperture Synthesis Detections}

476: \label{VLAdetect}

477: 

478:  We make two detections in the VLA data, which correspond to the clouds C1 and C2 

479: identified in the ALFALFA survey data. Channel maps of these detections are shown 

480: in Figs.~\ref{C1chans} and~\ref{C2chans}. 

481: Contours are at multiples of the median rms map noise $\sigma_m'$ in the 

482: primary beam--corrected maps at that location, and negative contours are indicated by 

483: dashed lines. We find that the emission associated with C1 and C2 spans multiple 

484: synthesized beams over contiguous (but largely independent\footnote{The noise in 

485: each channel is weakly correlated by the continuum subtraction. We have verified 

486: that the details of this subtraction do not impact the detected cloud morphologies.})

487:  channels irrespective of the visibility weighting or image deconvolution scheme 

488: adopted: they are credible detections in the VLA data.

489: 

490:  Total intensity and intensity-weighted velocity maps for the clouds are shown in 

491: Figs.~\ref{C1moments} and \ref{C2moments}. The data cubes are blanked before these 

492: moments are computed: a mask is generated for each frequency channel by smoothing 

493: the data to half the angular resolution in Table~\ref{VLAobs} and blanking regions 

494: with fluxes less than 2\smp\ of that image. In addition, the intensity-weighted 

495: velocity maps in Figs.~\ref{C1moments}b and \ref{C2moments}b are computed only at 

496: locations with column density %$\nhp \geq 10^{20}\,\cm$

497: \nhp$\geq 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$.  Integrated spectral profiles for C1 and C2 from the 

498: VLA observations are in Figure~\ref{VLAspectra}. The $1\sigma$ error bars on each 

499: point in Fig.~\ref{VLAspectra} reflect \smp\ integrated over the emission region in that channel and a $5\%$

500:  calibration uncertainty. 

501: 

502:  The properties of C1 and C2 derived from the VLA data are given in 

503: Table~\ref{VLAparams}. Unless otherwise indicated, the parameters are computed 

504: in the same manner as their ALFALFA counterparts (see Section~\ref{AOdetect}). The 

505: location of the peak \nhp\ in the total intensity maps of Figs.~\ref{C1moments}a 

506: and \ref{C2moments}a is given in col.~(2). The centroid $cz_\odot'$ of the 

507: integrated profiles of Figure~\ref{VLAspectra} is in col.~(3), and $W50'$ of 

508: the profiles is in col.~(4). The values of $W50'$ are corrected for instrumental 

509: effects by assuming that the unbroadened profile is gaussian. The integrated flux 

510: density $F_c'$ and \hi\ mass $M_{HI}'$ are in cols.~(5)~and~(8), respectively.  

511: The maximum angular extent $a_{HI}'$ of each cloud is in col.~(6). We adopt the 

512: outermost locations where \nhp $= 10^{20}$ 

513: cm$^{-2}$ in Figs.~\ref{C1moments}a~and~\ref{C2moments}a as the cloud edges, and 

514: correct the measured values for beam smearing. The position angle \pahip\ at which \ahip\ is measured is in col.~(7). An estimate of the dynamical mass 

515: $M_{dyn}'$ of each cloud is in col.~(9), and is computed via:

516:  \be

517:  M_{dyn}' = (3.39 \times 10^4)\,a_{HI}' D_V \left( \frac{W50'}{2} \right)^2 \;\;,

518:  \label{Dynmass}

519:  \ee 

520:  where $a_{HI}'$ is the object diameter in arcminutes, $W50'$ is in \kms\ and the 

521: Virgo distance \dv\ is in Mpc. We note that $M_{dyn}'$ has physical meaning only 

522: if the clouds are self-gravitating and in dynamical equilibrium; these two assumptions 

523: may not be valid for C1 and C2 (see Section~\ref{discussion}).

524:  

525:  Position-velocity slices through the C1 and C2 datacubes are shown in Figs.~\ref{C1slice} and \ref{C2slice}, respectively. For C1 in Fig.\ref{C1slice}, one 3\arcsec-wide slice is oriented along \pahip, and the other is perpendicular to this axis. We note that the emission is unresolved both spatially and spectrally along the axis perpendicular to \pahip\ for C2, and we therefore show only the slice oriented along \pahip\ in Fig.~\ref{C2slice}. 

526: 

527: 

528: \subsection{HI Morphologies and Kinematics of C1 and C2}

529: \label{VLAclouds}

530: 

531:  The VLA follow-up data provide important insight into the \hi\ morphologies and kinematics of C1 and C2.

532:  

533: \textbf{Cloud C1:}  Figs.~\ref{C1chans} and \ref{C1moments}a show that C1 has a 

534: disordered morphology at the resolution of the VLA observations, with the bulk 

535: of the emission stemming from an arc-like structure at $cz_{\odot}^{\prime}=486$~\kms. 

536: The apparent ``clumpiness" of the detected emission down to the synthesized beam 

537: width of $\sim22$\arcsec~(1.8~kpc) is not a deconvolution artifact, and suggests 

538: that the cloud exhibits structure on even smaller scales. The box in Fig.~\ref{C1moments}

539: a encloses a faint, uncatalogued optical feature that is coincident with a high $N_{HI}^{\prime}$ 

540: peak in C1; we discuss the implications of an association between these optical and HI 

541: sources in \S\ref{discussion}. Figs.~\ref{C1moments}b and \ref{C1slice} show that the cloud has no coherent

542: velocity structure. 

543: 

544: Figs~\ref{C1chans} and~\ref{C1moments} illustrate that there is very good agreement between the centroid 

545: of the C1 emission detected by ALFALFA and that detected by the VLA. The

546: global properties of C1 measured from the VLA data also correspond well with 

547: those obtained from the ALFALFA data, although less HI flux is detected in the

548: former ($F^{\prime}_{c}/F_{c} = 86 \pm$ 4\%, Tables 2 and 4). 

549: If this ``missing" flux is uniformly distributed over a circular region at least 1.5\arcmin~across, it would escape

550: detection at the 3$\sigma^{\prime}_m$ level in an optimally smoothed frequency channel of the VLA data. 

551: If it is contained in a coherent structure, we expect it to be

552: kinematically coincident with the arc in Fig. 6 since $cz_{\odot}-cz_{\odot}^{\prime}\sim$ 0.

553: 

554: %the main feature detected in the VLA observations. There are hints of faint emission 

555: %in this region in the VLA data, including a $\sim4\smp$ linear feature at 

556: %$ \alpha^{\prime} = 12^{\rm{h}}\,31^{\rm{m}}\,18.0^{\rm{s}},\, \delta^{\prime}= 

557: %+9^{\circ}\,29'\, 30''$, $cz^{\prime}_{\odot}=486~\kms$. This suggests that C1 consists of 

558: %an $\nh^{\prime} \gtrsim 10^{20}~\cm$ main arc (detected by both ALFALFA and the VLA follow-up) 

559: %and a fainter Southern extension (detected by ALFALFA only), a conclusion that is

560: % corroborated by the lower \hi\ integrated flux density of the emission detected 

561: %in the VLA observations ($\fcp/\fc = [86 \pm 4]\%$, Tables~\ref{AOparams}~and~

562: %\ref{VLAparams}). If the \hi\ detected only by ALFALFA were contained in this 

563: %Southern extension, it needs to be (uniformly) distributed over a circular region 

564: %at least 1.5\arcmin\ across in an optimally-smoothed frequency channel to escape 

565: %detection at the 3\smp-level by the VLA. The excellent agreement between the 

566: %heliocentric velocities and velocity widths of the integrated spectral profiles 

567: %from the ALFALFA and VLA data (Tables~\ref{AOparams}~and~\ref{VLAparams}) implies 

568: %that this Southern extension must be kinematically coincident with the arc in 

569: %Fig.~\ref{C1moments}.

570: 

571: \textbf{Cloud C2:} Figs.~\ref{C2chans} and \ref{C2moments} illustrate that C2 

572: has a markedly different \hi\ morphology from C1. The emission 

573: in each channel of the VLA observations is barely resolved both spatially and 

574: spectrally, with the bulk of the emission in an unresolved feature  

575: at $ \alpha^{\prime} = 12^{\rm{h}}\,31^{\rm{m}}\,18.0^{\rm{s}},\, \delta^{\prime}= +9^{\circ}\,29'\, 30''$ (J2000) in the $cz^{\prime}_{\odot}=585~\kms$ channel. The total intensity 

576: map of C2 in Fig.~\ref{C2moments}a consists of two clumps: that to the Northwest 

577: results from the brightest \hi\ feature at $cz^{\prime}_{\odot}=585~\kms$, and 

578: that to the Southeast results from emission distributed over 

579: $585~$\kms $< cz_{\odot} <$ 625~\kms. Figs.~\ref{C2moments}b and \ref{C1slice} indicate that there 

580: is a $\sim15~\kms$ gradient in the velocity field  of C2. Given the poor 

581: sensitivity and resolution of the VLA data across the detection, it remains 

582: unclear whether or not this gradient stems from coherent internal motions.  

583: 

584:  A comparison between the integrated properties of C2 derived from the ALFALFA 

585: and VLA observations suggests that a small but statistically significant amount 

586: of \hi\ in this source has not been detected by the VLA 

587: ($\mhi - \mhip = [1.0 \pm 0.5] \times 10^7 \msun$; Tables~\ref{AOparams}~and~

588: \ref{VLAparams}). There are few direct constraints on the morphology of the 

589: missing gas. However, given the gradient in the C2 velocity field (Fig.~

590: \ref{C2moments}b), the quantities $\czsun - \czsunp = (10 \pm 5)~\kms$ and 

591: $\wf - \wfp = (18 \pm 9)~\kms$ are consistent with a kinematically coherent 

592: extension to the Southeast beyond that detected at $\czsunp = 626~\kms$ in 

593: Fig~\ref{C2chans}. 

594:  

595:  The star in Figs.~\ref{C2chans}~and~\ref{C2moments}a denotes the optical 

596: location of VCC~1357 (Binggeli \etal 1985). The VLA observations therefore 

597: confirm the offset between this source and C2 suggested by the ALFALFA data 

598: (\S\ref{AOclouds}). It is thus clear that if C2 is associated with VCC~1357, 

599: then the gas in this system is displaced by $\sim2'$ (10~kpc in projection, 

600: or $\sim 10$ optical diameters; Binggeli \etal 1993) from the stars. We discuss 

601: the implications of an association between these \hi\ and optical features in 

602: Section 5.

603: 

604: \subsection{Non-Detections in the VLA Follow-up Data}

605: \label{VLAnondetect}

606: 

607:  While the complex clouds C4 and C5 fall within the field-of-view and bandpass 

608: of our VLA observations, they are not detected in the resulting dataset. This 

609: is not surprising given their projected distances of 11.2\arcmin\ and 12.5\arcmin\ 

610: from the pointing center in Table~\ref{VLAparams}. Given the integrated spectral  

611: profile shapes and centroids of these clouds in the ALFALFA survey data (Table~

612: \ref{AOparams}), we expect their emission to fall below the $3\smp$ detection 

613: limit in the VLA data cube if they are smoothly distributed over a circular 

614: region with a diameter $\gtrsim 1\arcmin$. The VLA non-detections therefore 

615: provide little insight into the morphologies and kinematics of C4 and C5.

616: 

617: 

618:   

619: \section {CO(3--2) Observations}

620: 

621: An exploratory observation of the CO(3--2) emission line consisting of a single pointing (R.A.(J2000) = 12$^{h}$30$^{m}$

622: 27$^{s}$, Dec.(J2000) = +9$^{\circ}$28$^{\prime}$34.5$^{\prime \prime}$)

623: was carried out with

624: the APEX Telescope (G{\"u}sten \etal~2006) located in the Chajnantor Plateau

625: in northern Chile. This pointing was chosen because corresponds to the

626: peak of the HI emission in the VLA map. The observations took place during the night of January 1st, 2008, using the

627: the 345 GHz DSB heterodyne receiver APEX-2A. The beamsize (FWHM)

628: of the APEX 12-m telescope is 18$^{\prime \prime}$ at 345 GHz. The receiver

629: was tuned to CO(3--2) at $V_{\rm helio} =$ 490 km s$^{-1}$, with a total

630: bandwidth of 1550 km s$^{-1}$ and spectral resolution of 0.8 km s$^{-1}$.

631: Observations were performed with an atmospheric opacity at 220 GHz of 0.34,

632: with a mean PWV $\sim$ 2.1 mm yielding to a T$_{\rm sys}$(DSB) = 370 K.

633: Pointing using Saturn as reference was regularly performed and was better than 2$^{\prime \prime}.$ 

634: The total on-source integration time was 36 min, reaching a rms of

635: 48 mK with a spectral resolution of 0.9  km s$^{-1}$. The antenna efficiency 

636: was estimated at 70\%.

637: 

638: Data reduction and analysis were performed using the CLASS package from

639: the GILDAS software (Pety 2005). Reduction consisted of baseline subtraction

640: and the integration of the individual scans. The adjacent channels were re-binned

641: to a velocity resolution of 22.9 km s$^{-1}$, leading to a rms of 12.9 mK in

642: $T_{mb}$. No clear detection was found.

643: 

644: These exploratory CO(3--2) observations allow us to place an upper limit

645: to the mass in molecular form in C1. In order 

646: to estimate a 3-$\sigma$ upper limit, we assume an expected line width

647: of 50 km s$^{-1}$, yielding to a $I_{\rm CO(3-2)} =$ 1.93 K km s$^{-1}$.

648:  We assume a conversion ``X'' factor between the CO(1--0) line and

649: the molecular hydrogen column density $N_{\rm H_{2}}$

650: of 2.8$\times$10$^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ (km s$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$ (Bloemen \etal~1986).

651: We also

652: adopted a CO(3--2)/CO(1--0) integrated line intensity ratio of 0.4

653: which is the typical value of the Galactic disk (Sanders \etal~1993). These

654: values yield a H$_{2}$ column density limit for the observation of

655: $N_{\rm H_{2}} <$ 1.3$\times$10$^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$, averaged over a beam of 18$^{\prime \prime}$.

656: At a distance of 16.7 Mpc, this column density over a 1\arcmin~diameter is equivalent

657: to a molecular hydrogen upper mass limit of $M_{\rm H_{2}} <$ 4.0 $\times$10$^{8}$ M$_{\odot}$,

658: which is comparable to the HI mass (see Table 2.). Allowing for uncertainties

659: in the value of the X factor, the metallicity of the cloud gas, and the

660: CO(3--2)/CO(1--0) integrated line ratio, we can conclude that the gas mass

661: in the cloud C1 is unlikely to be dominated by the molecular component.

662: 

663: %An exploratory observation was carried out with the APEX telescope located in the

664: %Chajnantor Plateau of northern Chile.

665: %

666: %[ASK JUAN AND EDUARDO FOR A BRIEF WRITEUP of obsns********************]

667: %

668: %These exploratory CO observations allow us to place

669: %an upper limit to the mass in molecular form in cloud C1. We assume a conversion ``X''

670: %factor of $2.3\times 10^{20}$ between the $^{12}CO$ line intensity $I_{CO}$, expressed

671: %in K \kms, and the molecular hydrogen column density $N_{H_2}$ in cm$^{-2}$. That 

672: %conversion factor value is roughly appropriate for solar metal abundance gas. A 5--sigma

673: %limit averaged over an expected line width of 50 \kms ~then yields an H$_2$ column density 

674: %limit for the observation of $N_{H_2}<6\times 10^{20}$, averaged over the beam of 1'.

675: %At a distance of 16.7 Mpc, that column density over a 1' diameter is equivalent to

676: %a molecular hydrogen upper mass limit of $M_{H_2}<2.3\times 10^{8}$ \msun, which is 

677: %comparable to the HI mass. Allowing for uncertainties in the value of the X factor

678: %and the metallicity of the cloud gas, we can conclude that the gas mass in the cloud

679: %C1 is unlikely to be dominated by the molecular component.

680: 

681: 

682: \section {The Environment of the Cloud Complex}\label{optenv}

683: 

684: The optical feature of unknown redshift appearing in the field of C1 and

685: discussed in Section 3.2 appears to be just above the SDSS $g$--band detection limit.

686: %Its computed luminosity and resulting M$_{HI}/$L ratios are shown as a function

687: %of optical size in Figure~\ref{surfbright}, for M$_{HI}=1.62 \times 10^{8}$~\msun.

688: If the feature is approximately $\sim 10^{\prime\prime}$ across, then its $g$--band 

689: luminosity at the Virgo distance would be $L_{g}\sim 10^{6}~L_{\odot}$.

690: The stellar M/L ratios models of Bell \etal (2003) give $M^*/L^*\sim$1.6. 

691: If this feature is the optical counterpart of C1, then the

692: stellar to HI mass ratio is less than 0.01 and $M_{HI}/L_g> 170$.

693: An analogous exercise for C2 and the putative counterpart VCC 1357 yields 

694: a stellar to HI mass ratio of less than 0.05.

695: 

696: As for the possible optical counterparts of clouds C1 and C2, attempts to 

697: obtain optical redshifts were made in two occasions with the Palomar 5m 

698: Hale telescope. The first time was unsuccessful due to limited sky transparency,

699: the second due to lack of any discernible H$_\alpha$ emission or of any other 

700: measurable spectral signature. The possibility of an association between HI and 

701: optical features remains open.

702: 

703: Figure \ref{virgoenviron} shows the Virgo Cluster X-ray emission in the vicinity 

704: of the HI cloud complex (Snowden \etal 1995). The large X--ray emission regions are 

705: centered on M49 and M87, with the HI cloud complex indicated with the crossed circles.

706: Near the projected location of the cloud complex, Vollmer \etal (2001) estimate that the

707: hot intracluster gas (ICM) density is $n_{icm} \sim 10^{-4}$ cm$^{-3}$, while 

708: Shibata \etal~(2001) have measured an ICM temperature

709: of $T_8=0.235$ in units of $10^8$ K.

710: 

711: Several galaxies are projected in the vicinity of the cloud complex. Figure~\ref{skyarea}

712: shows all cataloged objects within $1^{\circ}$ of C1 and with heliocentric velocities

713: between 100 and 900 \kms: 

714: galaxies detected in the 21cm line are plotted with a circle of area proportional to the

715: HI mass;  galaxies not detected in ALFALFA with redshift information from

716: other sources are plotted with crosses, most of which are early type systems.  

717: It is assumed that all galaxies are located at the distance of the Virgo cluster. 

718: Note that the velocities of the HI clouds range between 480 and 607 \kms, i.e. if they

719: are part of the Virgo cluster their line of sight velocity with respect to the cluster

720: reference frame is directed toward us, as the heliocentric velocity of the cluster is 

721: 1150 \kms ~(Huchra 1988). Under the assumption that the clouds originated in the disk 

722: of a galaxy moving at high speed through the cluster, the velocity of the parent galaxy 

723: should also be incoming in the cluster reference frame, and most likely doing so at a 

724: larger velocity than the clouds themselves, as the latter would be decelerated by ram 

725: pressure after stripping. In the heliocentric reference frame, the parent galaxy should 

726: then have a {\it lower} velocity than those in the cloud complex. Two objects satisfy 

727: that condition: NGC 4424 and NGC 4445. Their locations are indicated by a plus sign 

728: (NGC 4424) and X symbol (NGC 4445) in Figure~\ref{virgoenviron}. In addition, as  we

729: discuss below, they are also extremely gas deficient for their size, which is evidence 

730: that they have been stripped within the last passage through the cluster. 

731: 

732: The SBa galaxy NGC 4424 (also known as UGC 7561 and VCC 9079) is located at 

733: $\alpha=12^{\rm{h}}27^{\rm{m}}11.6^{\rm{s}}, \delta=+09^{\circ}25^{\prime}14^{\prime\prime}$~(J2000).  

734: This places NGC 4424 at a projected distance of 236 kpc from the cloud center, 

735: and 900 kpc from M87. This peculiar galaxy is at a velocity ($cz_{\odot}$=437 \kms), 

736: near that of the main cloud. The angular size of the stellar component, 

737: $3^\prime.6 \times 1^\prime.8$, translates to a linear size of $17\times 9$ kpc 

738: at the Virgo distance. A detailed study by Cortes \etal (2006) characterizes it 

739: as having disturbed morphology; they also suggest that CO observations are 

740: indicative of non--circular gas motions and discuss convincingly the vulnerability 

741: of the galaxy to ram pressure stripping (see also  Kenney \etal~1996). NGC 4424 has 

742: a HI mass of 2.5$\times 10^8$ \msun~and estimations of HI deficiency values have 

743: been reported between of 0.75 (Chung \etal ~2007) and 1.09 (Helou \etal~1984). 

744: Those figures indicate that NGC~4424 has lost between 80\% and 90\% of its HI gas.

745: Chung \etal (2007) noted that NGC 4424 exhibits a one--sided tail extending to 

746: the southeast, %[CONSIDER PLACING A MAP OF THE TAIL FROM ALFALFA, HERE]

747: which is also detected by ALFALFA, and that the HI disk is truncated at a radius 

748: smaller than that of the stellar component of the galaxy.  The direction

749: of the tail shows the southeast to northwest direction of motion

750: for NGC 4424; this motion is not compatible with the position of the cloud complex.  

751: %Figure~\ref{ngc4424map}~shows the ALFALFA map of NGC 4424: the "ears" in the image

752: %to the West and East of the feature are due to telescope feed sidelobes; the tail

753: %to the SSE extends reliably at least 6\arcmin--7\arcmin.

754: 

755: NGC 4445 (also known as UGC 7587 and VCC 1086) is an edge on spiral, possibly of type

756: Sab, located at $\alpha=12^{\rm{h}}28^{\rm{m}}15.9^{\rm{s}}, \delta=+09^{\circ}26^{\prime}11^{\prime\prime}$~(J2000).

757: Its heliocentric radial velocity is $cz_{\odot}$=354 \kms~and the HI mass 

758: $5.5\times 10^7$ \msun ~(Kent \etal ~2008). Solanes \etal ~(2002) estimate its

759: HI deficiency between 0.98 and 1.11, i.e. NGC 4445 has lost about between 90\% 

760: and 93\% of its HI gas. With a major axis angular diameter of $2^\prime .6$, its

761: linear size is about 13 kpc. We are not aware of HI synthesis data of this

762: object; none are found in the VLA data archive.

763: 

764: 

765: 

766: \section{Discussion}

767: \label{discussion}

768: 

769: %Figure 4 shows the cloud complex in the greater context of the Virgo Cluster.  The upward

770: %and downward triangles indicate large cluster members M87 and M49 respectively, with the HI cloud

771: %complex indicated with the large star.  The density of galaxies in this environment is (Schindler paper) ENTER HERE.

772: %The nearest large spiral is SBa galaxy NGC 4424,

773: %located at $\alpha=2^{\rm{h}}27^{\rm{m}}11.6^{\rm{s}}, \delta=+09^{\circ}25^{\prime}14^{\prime\prime}$, 48.6$^{prime}$ west

774: %of the cloud complex.  This galaxy is at a similar velocity measurement ($cz$=439 \kms) to the main cloud.

775: %Chung \etal (2007) noted that NGC 4424 exhibited a long, one sided tail, and that the HI disk is truncated

776: %to within the emission seen from the stellar component of the galaxy.

777: 

778: One possibility that deems consideration is that the clouds are gravitationally

779: bound structures, embedded in their own dark matter halos. 

780: If an HI cloud is gravitationally bound, its total dynamical mass within the

781: HI radius can be computed from Equation 3, assuming spherical symmetry.  

782: Such mass is 2.3$\times 10^9$ \msun~for C1 and 0.3$\times 10^9$ \msun~for C2 as 

783: calculated from the aperture synthesis measurements.  

784: The density of such objects would be $1.4\times 10^{-25}~\rm{g~cm^{-3}}$~for C1 

785: and $1.0\times 10^{-25}~\rm{g~cm^{-3}}$~for C2. These densities can be 

786: compared to the critical density, $\rho_{crit}=\left(1.9 \times 10^{-29} ~\rm{g~cm^{-3}}\right)h^2$,

787: where $h=0.7$. Were dark matter to provide the gravitational binding and to extend

788: well beyond the visible, baryonic component, the total halo mass of, e.g., C1 would exceed

789: $10^{10}$ \msun. In that case, it would be surprising that the VLA data

790: do not exhibit any trace of ordered motions in the gas, nor does the visible

791: matter show any degree of central concentration, thus violating the mass--concentration

792: relation for halos. A similar issue can be raised for the whole cloud complex.

793: If bound by self--gravity, its total dynamical mass would be of order of $10^{11}$~ 

794: \msun~and its mean density $2.1\times 10^{-27}~\rm{g~cm^{-3}}$. Again, the cloud complex 

795: shows no ordered motions. The possibility that the clouds in the complex are a group of 

796: optically dark galaxies embedded in their own dark matter halo appears relatively

797: implausible.

798: 

799: For a purely gravitational event, we may expect stream-like topology in the removed gas, 

800: which is not observed. 

801: %The lack of a visible optical counterpart to the gas clouds could 

802: %be attributed to the shallowness of the available optical survey

803: %data. 

804: High speed galaxy-galaxy encounters tend to produce relatively small damage in terms of gas mass loss 

805: by the victim, albeit spectacular in spatial extent as in the case of NGC 4254/VirgoHI21. For 

806: NGC~4424 and NGC~4445, the damage would have been quite substantial (more HI is seen in the

807: cloud complex than in either of the galaxies themselves) and the topology of the remnant 

808: is not particularly stream-like. These are not however very strong arguments and the

809: possible origin through a high speed close encounter cannot be excluded.

810: 

811: Ram pressure stripping is very likely if the galaxy's orbit takes it deep in the 

812: cluster potential well, and can result in severe gas depletion

813: from its outer disk (Cortes \etal 2006). %This possibility is discussed

814: %by Cortes \etal ~(2006) in light of a careful multi-wavelength study for NGC~4424. 

815: %They conclude that the galaxy has undergone a recent merger with mass ratio of the  

816: %progenitors between 1:10 and 1:4, combined with severe gas depletion from its outer 

817: %disk by ram pressure. 

818: With a radial velocity differing from the systemic velocity 

819: of the cluster by 700 \kms~and a projected location half way between M87 and M49, 

820: the likelihood that ram pressure is currently very effective is marginal; it could

821: however have been far more effective a few 10$^8$ years ago, if the orbit dipped closer

822: to the cluster center, independently on whether or not an encounter or merger took place.

823: As we will see, that likelihood is even higher for NGC 4445. 

824: 

825: \subsection{Orbital Motion Through the ICM: a Simple Simulation}

826: 

827: We consider the motion

828: of a galaxy as it dips into the ICM on a parabolic orbit of pericluster distance

829: $r_p$. Parametrized by the azimuthal angle $\phi$, as illustrated in Figure \ref{orbit},

830: the distance of the galaxy from the focal point (M87) is 

831: \be

832: r=\frac{2r_p}{1+\cos{\phi}}

833: \ee

834: while the orbital escape velocity is

835: \be

836: v_g=\sqrt{\frac{2GM_{clu}}{r}}

837: \ee

838: where $M_{clu}$ is the cluster mass. For simplicity, we assume the cluster mass is

839: concentrated in M87 and equal to $10^{14}$ \msun, rather than integrating the

840: motion for a changing cluster mass within the variable $r$, which is sufficient 

841: for our purposes. For the ICM density $n_{icm}$ we assume the

842: $\beta$--model (Schindler, Binggeli \& Boehringer 1999; Vollmer \etal

843: ~2001), given by

844: \be

845: n_{icm}=n_{0} (1+ r^2/r^2_{clu})^{-3\beta/2} \label{beta}

846: \ee

847: with a central density of $n_{0}=0.04$ cm$^{-3}$ and a core radius of $r_{clu}=21$ kpc,

848: appropriate for the SW sector of the cluster and $r_{clu}=13.4$ kpc for the cluster as a

849: whole.

850: 

851: As the galaxy travels through the ICM, we assume the galactic

852: gas is stripped at pericluster; from there on, we estimate the ram acceleration

853: and integrate the growing separation  $\Delta r$ and $\Delta v$ between the galaxy

854: and clouds. Figure~\ref{kinematics} shows the orbital parameters for pericluster distances

855: of $r_{p}$ = 400, 500, and 600 kpc.  The best orbit in this simple exercise is

856: fit with $r_{p} \sim $ 500 kpc.  In that scenario, a galaxy reaches

857: a distance $r$ = 1100 kpc, 1.0 Gyr after pericluster passage.  The velocity

858: of the galaxy at $r$ = 1100 kpc is 1100~\kms.  Velocity ($\Delta v$) and

859: spatial ($\Delta r$) separation values of 200 kpc and 300~\kms~respectively are obtained

860: from Figure~\ref{kinematics}.  Corrections for the inclination along

861: the line-of-sight for $\theta \sim $ 45$^{\circ}$ give values

862: of $\Delta r \sim$ 140 kpc and $\Delta v \sim$ 200~\kms.  These numbers are in general

863: agreement with the observed values.

864: 

865: %

866: 

867: \subsection{Possible Formation Mechanisms}

868: 

869: %We next consider the prospect that the cloud complex arose from

870: %interactions between a gas-rich galaxy and the cluster environment. 

871: We can now consider two possible scenarios of cloud formation as the galaxy moves through

872: the cluster:

873: (a) removal by ram pressure and (b) a high speed tidal interaction, of the type

874: responsible for VirgoHI21 (Duc \& Bournaud 2008; Haynes \etal 2007). 

875: 

876: Ram pressure stripping will occur

877: when the ram pressure arising from the motion of the galaxy at velocity

878: $v_{gal,3d}$ with respect to the intracluster medium of number density $n_{icm}$,

879: $n_{icm} m_p v_{gal,3d}^{2}$ (where $m_p$ is the proton mass), exceeds the 

880: restoring gravitational force that binds the

881: gas to the galaxy: $2\pi G \Sigma_{ism} \Sigma_d$, where $\Sigma_{ism}$ is the

882: gas surface density of the galactic disk and $\Sigma_{d}$ is the total 

883: surface mass density of the disk. This condition can be rewritten as

884: \be

885: \Bigl({n_{icm}\over 10^{-3}\, \rm{cm}^{-3}}\Bigr) 

886: \Bigl({v_{gal,3d}\over 10^3\, \rm{km~ s}^{-1}}\Bigr)^{2} \geq

887: 11 \Bigl({M_d\over 10^{11} M_\odot}\Bigr)^2

888:    \Bigl({R_{gal}\over 10\, \rm{kpc}}\Bigr)^{-4}

889:    \Bigr({M_{ism}\over 0.1M_d}\Bigr) \label{ramp}

890: \ee

891: where $M_d$ and $M_{ism}$ are now the total disk and gas masses within the

892: radius $R_{gal}$. 

893: 

894: At the location of the cloud complex, some 845 kpc from M87, the density of the

895: intracluster gas (ICM) is significantly lower than near the center of the cluster.

896: For a $\beta$--model (Eqn.~\ref{beta}) at the present projected distance of the clouds from M87, $n_{icm} \sim 10^{-4}$

897: cm$^{-3}$.

898: In the case of NGC 4424, $v_{gal,3d}\simeq 700/ \cos{\theta}$ 

899: \kms, where $\theta$ is the angle between the line of sight and the galaxy 

900: velocity vector. We estimate a disk mass enclosed within $R_{gal}\simeq 10$ kpc 

901: of about $10^{10}$ \msun (a generous estimate, since the total velocity width of 

902: the HI emission of the galaxy is 61 \kms ~(Kent \etal ~2008) and the inclination 

903: of the disk, albeit unknown, is unlikely to be smaller than 45$^\circ$) and 

904: assume $M_{ism}/0.1M_d\sim 1$.

905: With those numbers, the ram pressure term roughly matches the restoring 

906: force at the larger galactocentric radii. Chung \etal (2007) also compute ram pressure 

907: effects in the range between 125 $< n_{icm} v_{gal}^{2} <$ 175 cm$^{-3}$ (\kms)$^2$  

908: and a restoring force range between 40 $< \Sigma_{ism}V_{rot}^2/R_{gal} <$ 475 

909: cm$^{-3}$ (\kms)$^2$ for NGC 4424.

910: %ADD HERE A NOTE ABOUT NGC4522

911: 

912: In the case of NGC 4445, $v_{gal,3d}\simeq 800/ \cos{\theta}$ \kms. 

913: The radial extent of the HI disk is currently unknown, but we can estimate

914: the ram pressure and the restoring force at $R_{gal}\simeq 6$ kpc, as

915: well as its disk mass from a rotational velocity of 107 \kms, from the measured velocity 

916: full width of the HI line of 213 \kms.  Again, the ram pressure term is comparable

917: with the restoring force at the galactocentric radii at which most of 

918: the HI would be expected to be found in an unperturbed disk.

919: 

920: It is interesting to point out that NGC 4522, a very clear case of ram pressure 

921: stripping carefully studied by Kenney \etal ~(2004),

922: is projected on the same region of the cluster (RA=12$^h$ 33$^m$ 39.7$^s$, 

923: Dec=09$^\circ$ 10\arcmin 30\arcsec) albeit in a different velocity regime ($cz=2307$ \kms).

924: At the present location, Kenney \etal ~argue that the ICM density as described

925: by the smooth $\beta$--model of eqn. \ref{beta} is likely to be inadequate to

926: explain the stripping. They invoke the possibility that the ICM may be locally

927: denser than implied by the model.

928: 

929: 

930: \subsection {Timing Considerations}

931: 

932: Estimates of the tidal effects can be made by considering 

933: two nearby clouds in the vicinity of a cluster

934: (Figure~\ref{clusterinteraction}). 

935: The two clouds will disperse at a rate 

936: $\Delta v=g\Delta t$ under the gravitational tidal acceleration $g$ 

937: from the cluster potential, where $g$ is

938: \begin{equation}

939: g=\frac{2GM_{cluster}x}{R_{cluster}^{3}}

940: \end{equation}

941: where $M_{cluster}$ is the mass of the cluster within radius R$_{cluster}$, 

942: and $x$ is the initial separation of the two clouds.  The timescale of the encounter can be taken as 

943: $\Delta t\sim R_{cluster}/v_{c,3d}$, where $v_{c,3d}=v_c/\cos \theta$ is the 

944: velocity of the cloud complex with respect to the cluster.  Taking 

945: $\Delta v=g\Delta t$, we can write a simple relation for the separation rate 

946: of the two clouds

947: \begin{equation}

948: \Delta v \approx\frac{2GM_{cluster}x}{R_{cluster}^2 v_{c,3d}}

949: \end{equation}

950: Two clouds initially separated by 10 kpc, located 845 kpc from the center of the 

951: cluster of mass $10^{14}$~\msun~and moving at a velocity of $600/\cos {\theta}$ 

952: \kms ~with respect to the cluster would roughly double their separation in a time

953: comparable with the cluster crossing time. Tidal forces related to the cluster

954: potential alone are unlikely to account for the spatial dispersion of the clouds 

955: in the complex, if they were stripped from a single galaxy.

956: 

957: The cloud complex is separated by $\Delta r\sim 235/\sin \theta$ kpc and by 

958: $\Delta v\sim 100/\cos \theta$ \kms ~in velocity from NGC 4424; the corresponding

959: numbers for NGC~4445 are respectively $\Delta r\sim 150/\sin \theta$ kpc 

960: $\Delta v\sim 200/\cos \theta$ \kms. This separation would increase from zero 

961: to the observed value over a time of order

962: \be 

963: \Delta t_{sep,4424}\sim 2.3(\tan{\theta})^{-1} \,\,\,\rm{Gyr}\label{cgsep4424}

964: \ee

965: for NGC~4424 and

966: \be 

967: \Delta t_{sep,4445}\sim 0.7(\tan{\theta})^{-1} \,\,\,\rm{Gyr}\label{cgsep4445}.

968: \ee

969: for NGC~4445. For relatively large values of $\theta$, they can be comparable 

970: with the time it takes for the galaxy to cross the inner regions of the cluster

971: $R_{cluster}/v_{gal,3d}$. Under constant acceleration, the time necessary to 

972: reach the observed values of $\Delta v$ and $\Delta r$ would be about twice 

973: $\Delta t_{sep}$ as computed above. Either of those assumptions are unrealistic 

974: if ram pressure acts upon the clouds, as they travel through an ICM of variable

975: density. However, two preliminary conclusions can be made already: (i) if the

976: clouds originated from NGC 4445 or NGC~4424, the stripping took place at least

977: a few $10^8$ yrs ago; (ii) simple kinematic timescales make NGC~4445 as a more

978: palatable candidate as a parent galaxy than NGC~4424. In the following, we 

979: concentrate our discussion on the assumption that the clouds were stripped from

980: NGC~4445, although we maintain the inferred relations parametrized form for easy application

981: to NGC~4424. Next, we derive the acceleration due to ram pressure.

982: 

983: As a spherical cloud of radius $r_c$ travels through the ICM at speed 

984: $v_{c,3d}=v_c/\cos \theta$, the force 

985: acting on its surface can be written as the ram pressure times the area, given by 

986: \be

987: F = n_{icm} m_{p} v_{c,3d}^{2} \pi r_{c}^{2}.

988: \ee

989: 

990: The resulting acceleration due to ram pressure is

991: \be

992: a_{rp} = \Delta v / \Delta t = \frac{\rho_{icm}v_{c,3d}^2 \pi r_{c}^2 \eta}{ M_{HI}}

993: \ee

994: where the factor $\eta$ accounts for the fraction of gas in form other than HI

995: and $M_{HI}$ is the HI mass of the cloud.

996: The acceleration can then be written as

997: \be

998: \label{eq:accel}

999: a_{rp} = 2.5 \times 10^{-9}\eta \left(\frac{n_{icm}}{10^{-3}~\rm{cm^{-3}}}\right) 

1000: \left(\frac{r_{c}}{\rm{kpc}}\right)^{2} \left(\frac{v_{c,3d}}{10^3 ~\rm{\kms}}\right)^2

1001: \left(\frac{M_{HI}}{10^8 ~M_{\odot}}\right)^{-1}~~\rm{[cm~s^{-2}]} 

1002: \ee

1003: Once the gas is stripped, while the motion of the galaxy is relatively unimpeded by the 

1004: ram pressure, the clouds fall behind, affected by the acceleration $a$. In order to accumulate 

1005: a velocity difference from the galaxy $\Delta v$, at constant acceleration

1006: a time on order of $\Delta t_v = \Delta v/a$

1007: will be required, while in order to accumulate a separation $\Delta r$, a

1008: time on order of $\Delta t_r = (2 \Delta r/a)^{1/2}$ will be required:

1009: \be

1010: \Delta t_v = 1.3\times 10^8 ~\rm{yr}\,\left(\frac{\Delta v}{10^2 ~\rm{\kms}}\right)

1011: A \cos \theta 

1012: \label{dtv}

1013: \ee

1014: \be

1015: \Delta t_r = 5.0\times 10^8 ~\rm{yr}~ \left(\frac{\Delta r}{10^2 ~\rm{kpc}}\right)^{1/2} 

1016: A^{1/2}\cos \theta \sin^{-1/2} \theta

1017: \label{dtr}

1018: \ee

1019: where

1020: \be

1021: A=\eta^{-1} 

1022: \left(\frac{n_{icm}}{10^{-3}~\rm{cm^{-3}}}\right)^{-1}

1023: \left(\frac{v_{c}}{10^3 ~\rm{\kms}}\right)^{-2}

1024: \left(\frac{r_{c}}{\rm{kpc}}\right)^{-2} 

1025: \left(\frac{M_{HI}}{10^8~M_{\odot}}\right)

1026: \ee

1027: For cloud C1, $M_{HI}=1.6\times 10^8$ \msun. The maximum radius out to which 

1028: the VLA detects HI emission in C1 is about $1'.3$, which translates to 6.5 kpc at 

1029: the Virgo cluster distance. However, the {\it effective}

1030: radius of the cloud is very likely smaller than 6.5 kpc. A cursory inspection of 

1031: Figure~\ref{C1moments}~shows that only about 1/3 of the area subtended by the emission out to a 1\arcmin~

1032: radius exceeds a column density of gas at half the peak level, which would yield

1033: an effective radius of order of 3 kpc. In addition, from 

1034: the topology of the HI gas in our own ISM, it is found that while the majority

1035: of the HI emission arises in denser regions, those clouds' volume filling factor

1036: is quite small. Such structure would be unresolved by the 22\arcsec~(1.8 kpc) beam of

1037: the VLA observations. Values of order $r_c=2$--4 kpc appear appropriate. The 

1038: parameter $\eta$, which accounts for the mass fraction of He and other than HI gas, 

1039: should be in the range 0.4--0.7. Near the current location of the clouds,

1040: the ICM density is unlikely to exceed $n_{icm}\simeq 10^{-4}$ cm$^{-3}$, unless the 

1041: ICM is very clumpy, as suggested by Kenney \etal ~(2004). As for the parameters

1042: specific for the galaxies, for NGC 4424 $v_c=700$ \kms, $\Delta r=235$ kpc and

1043: $\Delta v=100$ \kms, while for NGC~4445 $v_c=800$ \kms, $\Delta r=150$ kpc and

1044: $\Delta v=200$ \kms. Note that by imposing 

1045: $\Delta t_v \simeq \Delta t_r \simeq 2\Delta t_{sep}$ we can obtain a constraint 

1046: on the combination of physical parameters 

1047: \be

1048: 0.26 ~A^{1/2} \left(\frac{\Delta v}{10^2 ~\rm{\kms}}\right)

1049: \left(\frac{\Delta r}{10^2 ~\rm{kpc}}\right)^{1/2} 

1050: \sin^{1/2}\theta =1

1051: \label{eq:equality}

1052: \ee

1053: As we discussed earlier, accumulation of distance and velocity offsets between clouds

1054: and parent galaxy, $\Delta r$ and $\Delta v$, at either constant rate or constant 

1055: acceleration are used under outlined above, and do not take

1056: into account projection effects, which would account for the

1057: orientation of NGC 4445 and the clouds with respect to M87 at the

1058: cluster center.  It is important to note that a connection between NGC

1059: 4445

1060: and the cloud complex

1061: is somewhat ambiguous, especially when compared to other disrupted gas

1062: features like NGC 4388 which show a clear connection in the form of a tail.

1063: 

1064: %In the following, we use the parametric analysis 

1065: %obtained above and consider a simple simulation

1066: %of a nearly parabolic orbit for the galaxy, which would  take it through a

1067: %wide range of ICM densities.

1068: 

1069: \subsection{Evaporation Timescale}

1070: 

1071: According to our findings, if the clouds were stripped from a parent 

1072: galaxy, most of the stripping took place a fair fraction of a Gyr ago. In that

1073: case, it is reasonable to investigate the survival of the clouds in the ICM.

1074: Differential ram pressure forces will lead to ablation and dilution of the gas

1075: clouds. In addition, upon removal from the galaxy, the cold gas can be heated 

1076: by conduction by the intracluster gas and the gas mass of the cloud would thus

1077: be progressively reduced by evaporation, if (presumably absent) stellar 

1078: mass loss does not replenish the gas. The evaporation rate in \msun ~yr$^{-1}$ 

1079: can be written as (Cowie \& Songaila 1977)

1080: \be

1081: \dot{M_{ev}}\simeq 16\pi \mu m_p \,\kappa \,r_{kpc}/25 k\simeq 35\, T_8^{5/2}\, r_{kpc} 

1082: \,(40/\ln \Lambda)\,\,\, M_\odot\,\,\rm{ yr}^{-1}

1083: \label{eq:mev}

1084: \ee

1085: where $\mu$ is the mean molecular weight, $m_p$ the proton mass, $\kappa$ the

1086: thermal conductivity, $T_8$ the intracluster gas temperature in units of $10^8$ K,

1087: $r_{kpc}$ the effective cloud radius in kpc (proportional to the square root of 

1088: the area of the cloud exposed to the ICM), $k$ the Boltzmann constant and ln~$\Lambda$ the 

1089: Coulomb logarithm. For $T_8 = 0.235$ (Shibata \etal ~2001) and $40/\ln \Lambda\sim 1$,

1090: the evaporation timescale is

1091: \be

1092: \label{eq:tev}

1093: t_{ev} = M_{gas}/\dot{M_{ev}} \geq 1.7\times 10^8 r_{kpc}^{-1} \eta^{-1}\psi^{-1}~~\rm{yr,}

1094: \ee

1095: where $\psi\leq 1$ is a correction factor roughly proportional to the fraction of 

1096: the time the cloud's orbit -- between the time the gas is removed from the disk

1097: and the time of observations --- places it in a part of the ICM within which the 

1098: conductivity coefficient yields the evaporation rate in Eqn. \ref{eq:mev}.  

1099: This estimate is very uncertain due to the largely unknown geometry of 

1100: the cloud, an exact knowledge of its orbit through the ICM, the unknown fraction 

1101: of the gas in ionized form and the possible 

1102: presence of magnetic fields, which would inhibit conduction across field lines.

1103: It is clear from Eqn. \ref{eq:tev} that if the HI gas is stripped from the galaxy

1104: in a region deep enough in the cluster ICM, conduction can obliterate evidence

1105: of the cold gas on timescales of $<10^8$ yr. However, the rate in Eqn. \ref{eq:tev} is 

1106: approximately valid only in vicinity of the cluster core. Away from the central 

1107: and denser parts of the cluster conduction becomes decreasingly effective, 

1108: due to the rapid increase of the mean free path of electrons and conduction becoming 

1109: saturated: this is thought to take place a couple of cluster ICM core radii 

1110: ($\sim 50$ kpc) out from the center of the ICM distribution (Sarazin 1986).

1111: This is why in the simulation described in the preceding section, we have 

1112: maintained the closest approach of the galaxy to M87, $r_p$, at values greater 

1113: than a few hundred kpc; the evaporation timescale remains higher than the

1114: kinematical ones and the clouds can be preserved. 

1115: 

1116: %I'D LEAVE THIS SECTION OUT... INTERESTING BUT DESERVING OF MORE DEVELOPMENT

1117: %The expected density of optically inert objects with HI masses $M_{HI} > 3 \times 10^7 $ 

1118: %\msun, resulting from stripping episodes in a cluster such as Virgo, was estimated by 

1119: %Hoffman \etal (1989) as $\rho < 0.1~$Mpc$^{-3}$.  The ALFALFA survey has the ability to 

1120: %detect objects down to $M_{HI} \sim 2.0 \times 10^7 $\msun~at the Virgo distance; with its 

1121: %full coverage of the cluster, it will provide a full census of such objects. To date,

1122: %the survey has detected on order of half dozen objects (Kent \etal ~2007,

1123: %Haynes \etal ~2008; Koopmann \etal ~2008), counting cloud complexes and

1124: %streams as single objects, over a sampled volume of order of 10 Mpc$^3$. Unless the 

1125: %origin of the observed features is not related to stripping processes, this suggests

1126: %that the effectiveness of stripping mechanisms extends further out in the cluster region

1127: %than assumed by Hoffman \etal. [BRIAN: CHECK THE NUMBER AGAIN IN HOFFMAN etal]

1128: 

1129: 

1130: \section{Summary}

1131: \label{summary}

1132: 

1133: We have utilized datasets from the ALFALFA survey and follow-up observations with 

1134: the Very Large Array to obtain both single dish and aperture 

1135: synthesis observations of a new HI cloud complex in the Virgo Cluster. 

1136: The results of these observations are summarized as follows:

1137: 

1138: \begin{enumerate}

1139: \item Five separate HI clouds in the ALFALFA survey have been discovered with

1140: radial velocities between $cz_{\odot}~\sim$500 and 600 \kms. The complex subtends 

1141: an angle of 35' (170 kpc), the individual cloud HI masses 

1142: range  from 0.48 to 1.7 $\times 10^8$ \msun ~and the overall HI mass of the complex 

1143: is $5.1\times 10^8$ \msun, at the distance of the Virgo cluster. The clouds'

1144: velocity widths vary between 50 and 250 \kms. In the latter case, the wide

1145: spectrum is likely to be due to a blend of several poorly resolved clumps.

1146: 

1147: \item Several cluster galaxies are found in the vicinity of the cloud complex;

1148: the most likely candidates for association with the clouds are NGC~4424, a

1149: disturbed SBa with $cz_{\odot} = 437$~\kms~at a projected distance of 235 kpc 

1150: from the center of the cloud complex, and NGC~4445, an edge on spiral at a

1151: projected distance of 150 kpc, with $cz_{\odot} = 354$~\kms. Both galaxies are

1152: extremely HI deficient, apparently having lost between 80\% and 93\% of their

1153: HI gas. The total HI mass of the cloud complex is equivalent to between 1/2

1154: and 1/3 of the HI lost by NGC~4424 and about 4/5 of the HI lost by NGC~4445.

1155: 

1156: \item Two of the clouds in the complex (C1 ad C2) have been detected with the VLA. They

1157: have angular sizes of 2.7\arcmin~and 1.5\arcmin~respectively. The synthesis maps

1158: do not exhibit any degree of symmetry in the gas distribution or in the

1159: velocity field. Faint optical features are found in the vicinity of the two

1160: clouds. Lack of optical redshifts prevent us from establishing a physical

1161: association. If the optical features were associated with the two clouds,

1162: their HI mass to $g$--band luminosity ratios would be respectively $M_{HI}/L_g\sim 170$

1163: for C1 and $M_{HI}/L_g\sim 30$ for C2, in solar units.

1164: A handle on the HI size allows estimates of the dynamical masses of the clouds,

1165: contained within the HI radius and under the hypothesis that they are self--gravitating.

1166: Those values are $2.3\times 10^9$ \msun ~for C1 and $0.3\times 10^9$ \msun ~for C2.

1167: 

1168: \item The possibility that the clouds constitute a group of primordial structures,

1169: embedded in their own dark matter halos, appears unlikely. A more plausible 

1170: scenario is that the complex is material removed from a galaxy traveling through

1171: the cluster at high speed, such as NGC~4424 or NGC~4445. A ram pressure stripping

1172: event is preferred to a purely gravitational one.

1173:     

1174: \item A simulation of plausible orbital parameters for the putative parent galaxy

1175: was carried out showing that a nearly radial orbit that would take it to within

1176: 400 kpc from M87 would produce effects comparable with those

1177: observed. Nearest approach to M87 would have resulted  $\sim$ 1 Gyr ago, at which

1178: stripping of most of the gas is assumed to have taken place. The nearest approach to the cluster center

1179: would be approximately 500 kpc.  At that distance from 

1180: M87, thermal conduction would be ineffective at 

1181: evaporating the clouds after removal from the parent galaxy. At pericluster passage, 

1182: the velocity (not corrected for l.o.s. inclination) of the galaxy would be 1100~

1183: \kms. The inclination of the orbital plane to the line of sight of the best fit

1184: simulation would be approximately 45$^{\circ}$. 

1185: 

1186: \item Dynamical timescales, based on relative velocities and spatial 

1187: displacements of the clouds from the putative parent galaxy, suggest that

1188: the most likely such parent is NGC~4445. 

1189: 

1190: \end{enumerate}

1191: %Further detections and catalogs will follow this paper in later publications.

1192: 

1193: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is 

1194: operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 

1195: under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.   $Skyview$ was developed 

1196: and maintained under NASA ADP Grant NAS5-32068

1197: under the auspices of the High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center at the 

1198: Goddard Space Flight Center Laboratory of NASA.  

1199: KS acknowledges support from a Jansky Fellowship during the completion of this work.

1200: This work has been supported by NSF 

1201: grants AST--0307661, AST--0435697, AST--0607007 and the Brinson Foundation.

1202: 

1203: This research has made use of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data. Funding for the SDSS 

1204: has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National Aeronautics 

1205: and Space Administration, the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the Japanese Monbukagakusho, 

1206: and the Max Planck Society. The SDSS Web site is http://www.sdss.org/.  The SDSS is managed by the Astrophysical Research 

1207: Consortium (ARC) for the Participating Institutions. The Participating Institutions are The University of Chicago, Fermilab, 

1208: the Institute for Advanced Study, the Japan Participation Group, The Johns Hopkins University, the Korean Scientist Group, Los

1209: Alamos National Laboratory, the Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), the Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA), 

1210: New Mexico State University, University of Pittsburgh, University of Portsmouth, Princeton University, the United States 

1211: Naval Observatory, and the University of Washington.

1212: 

1213: 

1214: 

1215: \newpage

1216: 

1217: \clearpage

1218: 

1219: \input bib.tex

1220: 

1221: 

1222: %{\large{\bf Further References}}

1223: 

1224: %Paper on scenario with Nbody and missing satellites.

1225: 

1226: %Solanes 2001?

1227: 

1228: %Cayatte 1990 VLA of the cluster

1229: 

1230: %Virgo papers with HI maps?

1231: 

1232: \newpage

1233: 

1234: 

1235: \begin{deluxetable}{lc}

1236: \tablecaption{ALFALFA Observing and Data Cube Parameters \label{AOobs}}

1237: \tablewidth{0pt}

1238: \tablehead{

1239: 	 \colhead{Parameter} & 

1240: 	 \colhead{Value}

1241: }

1242: \startdata

1243: Sky center (J2000)                                &      $12\,20\,00$, $+09\,00\,00$\\

1244: Spectral range	                          &      25 MHz (-2000 -- 3200 \kms) \\

1245: Effective integration time                         &      48 seconds (beam solid angle)$^{-1}$\\

1246: Spectral resolution \chan\                 &      24.4 kHz (5.1 \kms)\\

1247: Half-power beam size                               &      $3\arcmin.3\ \times 3\arcmin.8$ \\

1248: RMS noise $\sm$ for $\chan = 5.1\,$\kms           &      2.5 mJy/beam\\

1249: %Map size                                           &      59\arcmin\ \\

1250: \enddata

1251: \end{deluxetable} 

1252: 

1253: 

1254: %NEW TABLE VALUES

1255: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccc}

1256: \tablecaption{Single-Dish Cloud Properties from ALFALFA Survey\label{AOparams}}

1257: \tablewidth{0pt}

1258: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}

1259: \tablehead{

1260:             \colhead{Cloud} & 

1261: 	    \colhead{$\alpha,\delta$} & 

1262: 	    \colhead{\czsun} & 

1263: 	    \colhead{\wf} & 

1264: 	    \colhead{\fc} &

1265: 	    \colhead{\sn} &

1266: 	    \colhead{$\log(\mhi/\msun)$}

1267: 	    \\ 	    

1268: 	    \colhead{ } & 

1269: 	    \colhead{(J2000)} & 

1270: 	    \colhead{(\kms)} & 

1271: 	    \colhead{(\kms)} & 

1272: 	    \colhead{(Jy \kms)}  & 

1273: 	    \colhead{ } & 

1274: 	    \colhead{ } 

1275: 	    \\	    

1276: 	    \colhead{(1)} & 

1277: 	    \colhead{(2)} & 

1278: 	    \colhead{(3)} & 

1279: 	    \colhead{(4)} & 

1280: 	    \colhead{(5)} & 

1281: 	    \colhead{(6)} &

1282: 	    \colhead{(7)} 

1283: }

1284: \startdata

1285: C1  & $12\,30\,25.8$, $+09\,28\,01$ &  $488 \pm 5$ & $62 \pm 11$ & $2.48 \pm 0.07$ & $21.2$ & $8.21$ \\

1286: C2  & $12\,31\,19.0$, $+09\,27\,49$ &  $607 \pm 4$ & $56 \pm 7$  & $0.72 \pm 0.06$ & $6.5$  & $7.67$ \\

1287: C3  & $12\,29\,42.8$, $+09\,41\,54$ &  $524 \pm 7$ & $116 \pm 15$& $1.16 \pm 0.07$ & $8.6$  & $7.87$ \\

1288: C4  & $12\,30\,19.4$, $+09\,35\,18$ &  $603 \pm 4$ & $252 \pm 7$ & $2.56 \pm 0.09$ & $13.1$ & $8.22$ \\

1289: C5  & $12\,31\,26.7$, $+09\,18\,52$ &  $480 \pm 10$& $53 \pm 21$ & $0.91 \pm 0.06$ & $7.6$  & $7.77$ \\ 

1290: \enddata

1291: \tablecomments{Col.~(1): cloud name. Col.~(2): right ascension and declination of cloud centroid (J2000). Col.~(3): average heliocentric velocity of integrated spectral profile from Figure~\ref{AOspectra}. Col.~(4): profile width, measured at 50\% of the integrated spectra profile peak and corrected for instrumental broadening as described in Giovanelli \etal (2007). Col.~(5): total flux of integrated spectral profile. Col.~(6): signal-to-noise ratio of the detection, computed using \wf\ and \fc\ via eq.~\ref{snr}. Col.~(7): base 10 logarithm of total HI mass, computed using \fc\ via eq.~\ref{HImass}.

1292: }

1293: \end{deluxetable}

1294: 

1295: 

1296: %TABLE FROM BRIAN SEPT 2007

1297: %\begin{deluxetable}{cccccccc}

1298: %\tablecaption{HI Cloud Complex: Arecibo Detections\label{AOparams}}

1299: %\tablewidth{0pt}

1300: %\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}

1301: %\tablehead{

1302: %            \colhead{Feature} & 

1303: %	    \colhead{$(\alpha,\delta)_{AO}$} & 

1304: %	    \colhead{$cz_{AO}$} & 

1305: %	    \colhead{$W_{FWHM, AO}$} & 

1306: %	    \colhead{\ints$_{AO}^a$} &

1307: %	    \colhead{log$_{10}$ M$_{HI}$} & 

1308: %	    \colhead{S/N} & \colhead{Comments}  \\

1309: 	    

1310: %	    \colhead{ } & 

1311: %	    \colhead{(J2000)} & 

1312: %	    \colhead{(\kms)} & 

1313: %	    \colhead{(\kms)} & 

1314: %	    \colhead{(Jy \kms)}  & 

1315: %	    \colhead{\msun} & 

1316: %	    \colhead{ } & 

1317: %	    \colhead{ } \\

1318: 	    

1319: %	    \tableline

1320:  

1321: %	    \colhead{(1)} & 

1322: %	    \colhead{(2)} & 

1323: %	    \colhead{(3)} & 

1324: %	    \colhead{(4)} & 

1325: %	    \colhead{(5)} & 

1326: %	    \colhead{(6)} &

1327: %	    \colhead{(7)} & 

1328: %	    \colhead{(8)} 

1329: %}

1330: %\startdata

1331: %C1  & $12\,30\,25.8$ $+09\,25\,01$ &  $488 \pm 5$ & $62 \pm 11$ & $2.48 \pm 0.07$ & 8.21 & 21.2 & main cloud center  \\

1332: %C2  & $12\,31\,19.0$ $+09\,27\,49$ &  $607 \pm 4$ & $56 \pm 7$  & $0.72 \pm 0.06$ & 7.67 & 6.5 & near VCC~1357\\

1333: %C3  & $12\,29\,42.8$ $+09\,41\,54$ &  $524 \pm 7$ & $116 \pm 15$& $1.16 \pm 0.07$ & 7.87 & 8.6 & outside VLA primary beam\\

1334: %C4  & $12\,30\,19.4$ $+09\,35\,18$ &  $603 \pm 4$ & $252 \pm 7$ & $2.56 \pm 0.09$ & 8.22 & 13.1 & 10.5$'$ from VLA center\\

1335: %C5  & $12\,31\,26.7$ $+09\,18\,52$ &  $480 \pm 10$& $53 \pm 21$ & $0.91 \pm 0.06$ & 7.77 & 7.6 & 12.8$'$ from VLA center\\ 

1336: 

1337: %U7561/N4424& $12\,27\,11.6$ $+09\,25\,14$ &  441 & 58 & $2.9 \pm 0.4$ & 21 & outside VLA primary beam\\

1338: %U7587/N4445& $12\, 28\, 13.0$ $+09\, 25\, 33$ & 362 & 213 & $0.75 \pm 0.11$ & 5 & outside VLA primary beam\\

1339: %AO6 (old) & 122711 +092330 & 448 &  100 & &  9 & outside VLA primary beam\\

1340: %\enddata

1341: %\tablecomments{$a)$ Uncertainty on these fluxes $\sim 10\%$?}

1342: %\end{deluxetable}

1343: 

1344: 

1345: 

1346: \begin{deluxetable}{lc}

1347: \tablecaption{Aperture Synthesis Observing and Data Cube Parameters \label{VLAobs}}

1348: \tablewidth{0pt}

1349: \tablehead{ 

1350: 	\colhead{Parameter} & 

1351: 	\colhead{Value}

1352: }

1353: \startdata

1354:     Pointing center (J2000)                 & $12\,30\,45$, $+09\,26\,00$    \\

1355:     Total time on-source                    &         265 min               \\

1356:     Net bandpass                            &  2.2~MHz (378 -- 822~\kms)    \\

1357:     Maximum spectral resolution \chanp      &    48.8 kHz (10.3~\kms)       \\

1358:     Natural Weighting:                      & \\

1359:        \hspace{8pt} Synthesized beam        & $22.2'' \times 20.7''$ @ \,-20\dg\\

1360:        \hspace {8pt} $\smp$ at pointing center, $\chanp =20.7\,$\kms\      &      0.33 mJy/beam\\

1361:        \hspace {8pt} $\smp$ at pointing center, $\chanp =31.0\,$\kms\      &      0.29 mJy/beam\\

1362: %Band center &  $1417\,$MHz$=600\,$\kms\\

1363: %Net bandwidth & $2.2\,$MHz$=445\,$\kms  \\

1364: \enddata

1365: %\tablenotetext{a}{Measured at the pointing center in the central channel of the data cube.}

1366: \end{deluxetable}

1367: 

1368: \newpage

1369: 

1370: %KS NOTE TO SELF: I got W50 values by using convol.pro and finding input gaussian consistent with raw

1371: %W50 convolved by tophat of right width. For C1: 82 raw --> 78

1372: %corrected, for C2: 43 raw --> 38 corrected. 

1373: 

1374: 

1375: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccccc}

1376: \tablecaption{Aperture Synthesis Cloud Properties from the VLA Observations \label{VLAparams}}

1377: \tablewidth{0pt}

1378: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}

1379: \rotate

1380: \tablehead{ 

1381: 	\colhead{Feature} & 

1382: 	\colhead{$(\alpha,\delta)^\prime$} & 

1383: 	\colhead{\czsunp } & 

1384: 	\colhead{\wfp } & 

1385: 	\colhead{\fcp } & 

1386: 	\colhead{\ahip} &

1387: 	\colhead{\pahip} &

1388: 	\colhead{$\log(\mhip/\msun)$} & 

1389: 	\colhead{$\log(\mdynp/\msun)$}  

1390: 	\\

1391: 	\colhead{} &

1392:    \colhead{(J2000)} & 

1393:    \colhead{(\kms)} & 

1394:     \colhead{(\kms)} &  

1395:     \colhead{(\jykms)} & 

1396:     \colhead{(\arcmin)} &

1397:     \colhead{(\arcdeg)} &

1398:     \colhead{} & 

1399:     \colhead{}

1400:     \\

1401:     \colhead{(1)} & 

1402:     \colhead{(2)} &  

1403:     \colhead{(3)} & 

1404:     \colhead{(4)} &  

1405:     \colhead{(5)} & 

1406:     \colhead{(6)} & 

1407:     \colhead{(7)} &

1408:     \colhead{(8)} &

1409:     \colhead{(9)}

1410: }

1411: \startdata

1412:  C1 &  $12\,30\,24$ $+09\,28\,20$ & $488 \pm 6$ & $78 \pm 11$ & $2.14 \pm 0.07$ & $2.7 \pm 0.3$  & 36 & $8.15$ & $9.36$ \\

1413:  C2 &  $12\,31\,18$ $+09\,29\,25$ & $597 \pm 3$ & $38 \pm 5$ & $0.57 \pm 0.06$  & $1.5 \pm 0.3$  & 146 & $7.57$ & $8.48$ \\

1414: \enddata

1415: \tablecomments{Col.~(1): cloud name. Col.~(2): right ascension and declination of the peak \nhp\ (J2000). Col.~(3): average heliocentric velocity of integrated spectral profile from Figure~\ref{VLAspectra}. Col.~(4): profile width, measured at 50\% of the integrated spectral profile peak and corrected for instrumental effects assuming that unbroadened profile is gaussian. Col.~(5): total flux of integrated spectral profile. Col.~(6): maximum linear extent of region with $\nhp \geq 10^{20}~\cm$ in the total intensity maps (Figs~\ref{C1moments}a~and~\ref{C2moments}a). Col.~(7): position angle at which \ahip\ was measured. Col.~(8): base 10 logarithm of total \hi\ mass, computed using \fcp\ via eq.~\ref{HImass}. Col.~(9): base 10 logarithm of the dynamical mass, computed using \wfp\ and \ahip\ via eq.~\ref{Dynmass}.

1416: }

1417: \end{deluxetable}

1418: 

1419: 

1420: %\clearpage

1421: %\begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccc}

1422: %\tablecaption{Aperture Synthesis Cloud Properties from the VLA Observations \label{VLAparams}}

1423: %\tablewidth{0pt}

1424: %\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}

1425: %\rotate

1426: %\tablehead{ \colhead{Feature} & \colhead{$(\alpha,\delta)_{max}$} & \colhead{$N_{HI,max}$} &\colhead{$cz_{VLA}$} & \colhead{$W_{1/2, VLA}$} & \colhead{\fc$_{VLA}$} & \colhead{$M_{HI,VLA}$} & \colhead{$M_{dyn}$} \\

1427: % & \colhead{(J2000)} & \colhead{($\times 10^{20}\,\cm$)} &\colhead{(\kms)} & \colhead{(\kms)} &  \colhead{(Jy $km s^{-1}$)} & \colhead{$10^8(D/D_{V})M_{\odot}$} & \colhead{$10^8(D/D_{V})M_{\odot}$}\\

1428: % \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} &  \colhead{(3)} & \colhead{(4)} &  \colhead{(5)} & \colhead{(6)} & \colhead{(7)} & \colhead{(8)}

1429: %}

1430: %\startdata

1431: % C1 &  $12\,30\,24$ $+09\,28\,20$ & 3.3 & $496$ & $71 \pm 13$ & $2.8 \pm 0.2$ & $1.7 \pm 0.1$ & $\sim20$\\

1432: % C2 &  $12\,31\,18$ $+09\,29\,25$ & 2.3 & $597$ & $33 \pm 7$ & $0.57 \pm 0.09$ & $0.34 \pm 0.06$ &  $\sim5$\\

1433: %\enddata

1434: %\tablecomments{$a)$ Peak S/N at $20.7\,$\kms\ resolution.}

1435: %\end{deluxetable}

1436: 

1437: 

1438: 

1439: 

1440: \clearpage

1441: 

1442: \parskip 8pt

1443: 

1444: 

1445: 

1446: 

1447: \begin{figure}

1448: \begin{center}

1449: \includegraphics[width=6.0in]{f1.eps}

1450: \caption{Channel maps of the cloud complex from $760$~\kms~to~$400$~\kms in the ALFALFA survey data.  

1451:           Contours are at (2, 3, 4, 5) and 6--26 mJy/beam in 2 mJy/beam intervals.  The velocities indicated 

1452:          in the upper right corner

1453:          represent the central channel velocity of the map.  The maps are boxcar smoothed at the indicated velocities

1454:          +/- 5 channels (at $\sim5$~\kms~resolution).  The five HI cloud detections are indicated as C1 through C5.

1455:           The ellipse in the lower left indicates the ALFALFA beam size ($3^{\prime}.3 \times 3^{\prime}.8$).

1456: \label{AOcontours}}

1457: \end{center} 

1458: \end{figure} 

1459: 

1460: \begin{figure} 

1461: \begin{center} 

1462: \includegraphics[width=7.0in]{f2.eps} 

1463: %\includegraphics[width=7.0in]{f2color.eps} 

1464: \caption{Global HI distribution and kinematics of the cloud complex.  $a)$

1465: One square degree total intensity (zeroth moment) map of the cloud

1466: complex field.  The cloud identifiers from Table~\ref{AOparams} are indicated.

1467: The \hi~contours are 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600~mJy \kms~beam$^{-1}$.

1468: The background image is taken from the 2nd generation Digital Sky Survey B-band plates (Lasker \etal 1990). 

1469: The ellipse in the lower left indicates the ALFALFA beam size ($3^{\prime}.3 \times 3^{\prime}.8$).

1470: $b)$ Intensity-weighted velocity (first moment) map.  The linear scale bar ranges from 416-745 \kms.

1471: Contours indicate 450, 500, 550, 600, 650, 700 \kms.  A color version of this figure is available

1472: in the electronic edition of the Journal.

1473: \label{AOmainimage}} 

1474: \end{center} 

1475: \end{figure} 

1476: 

1477: 

1478: %\begin{figure}

1479: %\begin{center}

1480: %\includegraphics[width=7.0in]{virgospectra.ps}

1481: %\caption{Integrated spectral profiles for C1-C5 at a resolution of $\chan = 5.1~\kms$.  

1482: %Corresponding weight functions are shown below each spectrum.  The average RMS across the five spectra is 2.13 mJy/channel.

1483: %\label{AOspectra}}

1484: %\end{center}

1485: %\end{figure}

1486: 

1487: \begin{figure}

1488: \begin{center}

1489: \includegraphics[width=2.75in]{f3.eps}

1490: \caption{Integrated spectral profiles for C1-C5 at a resolution of $\chan = 5.1~\kms$.  

1491: The average RMS across the five spectra is 2.13 mJy/channel.

1492: \label{AOspectra}}

1493: \end{center}

1494: \end{figure}

1495: 

1496: 

1497: 

1498: \begin{figure}

1499: \epsscale{1.0}

1500: %\plotone{f4color.eps}

1501: \plotone{f4.eps}

1502: \caption{Naturally-weighted channel maps for C1 from the VLA observations. The plotted channels are independent ($\chanp = 31~\kms$). Contours are at 0.35 $\times$ (-3, -2, 2 ($2\sigma_m^{\prime}$), 3, 4, 5, 6) mJy/beam; 

1503: negative contours are represented with dashed lines. The cross denotes the C1 centroid in the ALFALFA data (Table~\ref{AOparams}). 

1504: The heliocentric radial velocity is in the upper right corner of each panel, and the synthesized beam is in the lower left corner 

1505: of the first panel.  A color version of this figure is available in the electronic edition of the Journal.

1506: \label{C1chans}}

1507: \end{figure}

1508: 

1509: \clearpage

1510: 

1511: \begin{figure}

1512: \epsscale{1.0}

1513: %\plotone{f5color.eps}

1514: \plotone{f5.eps}

1515: \caption{Naturally-weighted channel maps for C2 from the VLA observations.  The plotted channels are independent ($\chanp = 20.7~\kms$). Contours are at 0.46 $\times$ (-3, -2, 2 ($2\sigma_m^{\prime}$), 3, 4, 5, 6) mJy/beam; 

1516: negative contours are represented with dashed lines.  The cross denotes the C2 centroid in the ALFALFA data (Table~\ref{AOparams}), 

1517: and the star denotes the optical position of VCC~1357 (Binggeli \etal 1985). The heliocentric radial velocity is in the upper right 

1518: corner of each panel, and the  synthesized beam is in the lower left corner of the first panel. A color version of this figure is 

1519: available in the electronic edition of the Journal.

1520: \label{C2chans}}

1521: \end{figure}

1522: 

1523: \clearpage

1524: 

1525: \begin{figure}

1526: \epsscale{1.0}

1527: \plotone{f6.eps}

1528: %\plotone{f6color.eps}

1529: \caption{\hi\ distribution and kinematics of C1 in the VLA data. $a)$ Total intensity map of C1 (contours) superimposed on an SDSS $g$ image (grayscale). Contours 

1530: are at $\nhp=10^{20} \times\,$(1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3)~\cm, and the grayscale is plotted logarithmically. A very faint, uncatalogued source in the optical image is enclosed by the box. The cross indicates the centroid of the Arecibo detection for C1.  The synthesized beam is in the lower left corner of the panel. $b)$ Intensity-weighted velocity map of C1 in regions where $\nhp \geq 10^{20}~\cm$. The grayscale spans 470--505~\kms\ on a linear scale, as indicated by the wedge at the top of the plot. Contours are at (480, 490, 500, 510)~\kms.   A color version of this figure is available in the electronic edition of the Journal.

1531: \label{C1moments}}

1532: \end{figure}

1533: 

1534: \begin{figure}

1535: \epsscale{1.0}

1536: \plotone{f7.eps}

1537: %\plotone{f7color.eps}

1538: \caption{\hi\ distribution and kinematics of C2 in the VLA data. $a)$ Total intensity map of C2 (contours) superimposed on an SDSS $g$ image (grayscale). Contours 

1539: are at $\nhp = 10^{20} \times\,$(0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.25)~\cm, and the grayscale is plotted logarithmically. The star indicates the 

1540: location of VCC~1357 (Binggeli \etal 1985); it is just visible in the optical image.  The synthesized beam is in the lower right corner of the panel. $b)$ Intensity-weighted velocity map of C2 in regions where $\nhp \geq 10^{20}~\cm$. The grayscale spans 585--600~\kms\ on a linear scale, as indicated by the wedge at the top of the plot. Contours are at (583, 586, 592, 595, 598)~\kms.   A color version of this figure is available in the electronic edition of the Journal.

1541: \label{C2moments}}

1542: \end{figure}

1543: 

1544: \begin{figure}

1545: \epsscale{0.7}

1546: %\plotone{f8color.eps}

1547: \plotone{f8.eps}

1548: \caption{Integrated spectral profiles of C1 ($\chanp = 31.0~\kms$; solid lines and circles) and C2 ($\chanp = 20.7~\kms$; dashed lines and triangles) from the VLA observations.  A color version of this figure is available in the electronic edition of the Journal. 

1549: \label{VLAspectra}}

1550: \end{figure}

1551: 

1552: \begin{figure}

1553: \epsscale{0.8}

1554: \plotone{f9.eps}

1555: \caption{Position-velocity plot of the \hi\ distribution in C1 along $a)$ $\pahip = 36$\arcdeg, the position angle at which the maximum linear extent \ahip\ was measured (see Table~\ref{VLAparams}), $b)$ the axis perpendicular to \pahip. In both panels, the position axis increases with increasing RA, and its origin corresponds to $ \alpha^{\prime} = 12^{\rm{h}}\,30^{\rm{m}}\,24.3^{\rm{s}},\, \delta^{\prime}= +9^{\circ}\,27'\, 41''$ (J2000). Contours are at 0.35 $\times$ (-3, -2, 2 ($2\sigma_m^{\prime}$), 3, 4, 5, 6) mJy/beam; negative contours are represented with dashed lines.

1556: \label{C1slice}}

1557: \end{figure}

1558: 

1559: \begin{figure}

1560: \epsscale{0.8}

1561: \plotone{f10.eps}

1562: \caption{Position-velocity plot of the \hi\ distribution in C2 along $\pahip = 146$\arcdeg, the position angle at which the maximum linear extent \ahip\ was measured (see Table~\ref{VLAparams}). The position axis increases with increasing RA, and its origin corresponds to $ \alpha^{\prime} = 12^{\rm{h}}\,31^{\rm{m}}\,19.2^{\rm{s}},\, \delta^{\prime}= +9^{\circ}\,29'\, 01''$ (J2000).  Contours are at 0.46 $\times$ (-3, -2, 2 ($2\sigma_m^{\prime}$), 3, 4, 5, 6) mJy/beam; negative contours are represented with dashed lines. 

1563: \label{C2slice}}

1564: \end{figure}

1565: 

1566: 

1567: \begin{figure}

1568: \begin{center}

1569: \includegraphics[width=2.0in]{f11.eps}

1570: \caption{The environment of the \hi\ cloud complex within the greater cluster area. The crossed circles indicate the five components

1571:           of the complex discussed in this paper.  The large plus(+) indicates the 

1572:           position of SBa galaxy NGC 4424 ($cz_{\odot}$ = 476~\kms).  The large X indicates the position 

1573:           of Sab galaxy NGC 4445 ($cz_{\odot}$ = 354~\kms.  The X-ray peaks are labeled

1574:           indicating Virgo cluster galaxies M49 and M87 (Snowden \etal~1995).  The symbols are not indicative of source sizes and 

1575:           are shown only for positional indication.

1576: \label{virgoenviron}}

1577: \end{center}

1578: \end{figure}

1579: 

1580: \begin{figure}

1581: \begin{center}

1582: \includegraphics[width=6.0in]{f12.eps}

1583: \caption{Galaxies in the vicinity of the cloud complex.

1584:          The plot shows all objects with 100 $<~cz_{\odot}~<$ 900~\kms~

1585:          and within 1$^{\circ}$ of C1

1586:          listed in the Arecibo General Catalog.  The cloud identifiers

1587:          from Table~\ref{AOparams} are indicated by the shaded circles.

1588:          The crosses indicate objects without HI measurements 

1589:          from the ALFALFA survey.  Objects with HI masses as measured from ALFALFA

1590:          are shown as circles, with the circle radius indicative of the HI mass. The smallest circle indicates

1591:          log$_{10}$(M$_{HI}/$\msun)=7.30 and the largest circle indicates log$_{10}$(M$_{HI}/$\msun)=8.28.

1592:          Galaxies pertaining to the possible origin of the HI cloud complex are labeled for reference.\label{skyarea}}

1593: \end{center}

1594: \end{figure}

1595: 

1596: %\begin{figure}

1597: %\begin{center}

1598: %\includegraphics[width=6.0in]{ngc4424map.ps}

1599: %\caption{ALFALFA map of NGC 4424 ($cz_{\odot}$ = 476~\kms), showing

1600: %           the HI tail extending to the southeast.  The total intensity

1601: %           map shows emission integrated over the velocity range 367 $\leq cz_{\odot} \leq $ 517~\kms.

1602: %           The contour levels indicate 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400, and 1600 mJy~\kms~beam$^{-1}$.

1603: %           The ellipse in the lower left shows the size of the ALFALFA beam.\label{ngc4424map}}

1604: %\end{center}

1605: %\end{figure}

1606: 

1607: %\begin{figure}

1608: %\begin{center}

1609: %\includegraphics[width=6.5in]{f11.eps}

1610: %\caption{Surface brightness limits on the main cloud detection C1 for all five 

1611: %SDSS bands.  The limits are computed for a range of sizes assuming M$_{HI}=1.7 \times 10^{8}$~\msun.\label{surfbright}}

1612: %\end{center}

1613: %\end{figure}

1614: 

1615: \begin{figure}

1616: \begin{center}

1617: \includegraphics[width=3.1in]{f13.eps}

1618: \caption{

1619: Simple schematic showing parabolic trajectories around the cluster.  The axes

1620: are centered on the position of M87.  The top plot shows parabolic trajectories in the orbital plane

1621: with $r_{p}$=400 (solid), 500 (dotted), and 600 (dashed) kpc.  The position

1622: of M49 is shown as an inverted triangle.  The dot-dashed concentric circles

1623: show radial distances of 100, 500 and 1000 kpc.  The bottom plot

1624: shows the parabolic trajectory for $r_{p}$=500 kpc, corrected for an inclination 

1625: of $\theta$ = 45$^{\circ}$ to the line of sight.  The positions of NGC 4445 (square) and HI cloud C1 (star) are also shown.

1626: \label{orbit}}

1627: \end{center}

1628: \end{figure}

1629: 

1630: \begin{figure}

1631: \begin{center}

1632: \includegraphics[width=2.5in]{f14.eps}

1633: \caption{\footnotesize{Results of a simple simulation of a galaxy moving in a

1634: parabolic orbit through the ICM.  A cloud is detached

1635: from the galaxy at the pericluster distance, and experiences

1636: the dynamic effects due to ram pressure.  The plotted parameters

1637: are not corrected for the inclination of the orbit to the line of sight.  Three

1638: cases are shown for a pericluster distance

1639: of $r_{p}$=400 (solid), 500 (dotted), and 600 (dashed) kpc.  Each plot

1640: is depicted as a function of time in gigayears since pericluster passage.  The plots show (from

1641: top to bottom), $r$, the distance from the center

1642: of the cluster, $v_{3d}$, the velocity of the galaxy,

1643: log$_{10}~n_{icm}$, the base 10 logarithm of the ICM density as the galaxy

1644:  moves through the cluster, $a_{rp}$, the acceleration

1645: on the detached HI cloud due to ram pressure, $\Delta v$, the

1646: velocity accumulated by the cloud due to acceleration by ram pressure, 

1647: and $\Delta r$, the separation between the galaxy

1648: and cloud as they move in the parabolic orbit.}\label{kinematics}

1649: }

1650: \end{center}

1651: \end{figure}

1652: 

1653: 

1654: \begin{figure}

1655: \begin{center}

1656: \includegraphics[width=3.0in]{f15.eps}

1657: \caption{Schematic of an encounter of two clouds in a cluster.  The clouds are

1658: separated by a distance $x$.  The cloud complex model is located a distance $R$ from

1659: the cluster core of mass $M$, moving at a velocity $v$ relative to the cluster.\label{clusterinteraction}}

1660: \end{center}

1661: \end{figure}

1662: 

1663: 

1664: 

1665: \end{document}

1666: