1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
29:
30:
31: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
32: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
33: %% use the longabstract style option.
34:
35: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
36:
37: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
38: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
39: %% the \begin{document} command.
40: %%
41: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
42: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
43: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
44: %% for information.
45:
46: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
47: \newcommand{\myemail}{petri@saao.ac.za}
48:
49: \DeclareRobustCommand{\ion}[2]{%
50: \relax\ifmmode
51: \ifx\testbx\f
52: {\mathrm{#1\,\textsc{#2}}}\else
53: {\mathrm{#1\,\mathsc{#2}}}\fi
54: \else\textup{#1\,{\mdseries\textsc{#2}}}%
55: \fi}
56:
57:
58: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
59:
60: \slugcomment{accepted to ApJ Letters October 16 2008}
61:
62: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
63: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
64: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
65: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
66: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
67: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
68:
69: \shorttitle{Leading spiral arms in a LIRG}
70: \shortauthors{V\"ais\"anen et al.}
71:
72: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
73: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
74:
75: \begin{document}
76:
77: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
78: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
79: %% you desire.
80:
81: \title{A pair of leading spiral arms in a luminous infrared galaxy?
82: \altaffilmark{1}}
83: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations made with the ESO telescopes
84: at the
85: Paranal Observatory under programme 073.D-0406B and
86: observations made at the Anglo-Australian Telescope.}
87:
88: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
89: %% author and affiliation information.
90: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
91: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
92: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
93: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
94:
95: \author{Petri V\"ais\"anen \altaffilmark{2}}
96: \altaffiltext{2}{South African Astronomical Observatory, P.O.Box 9,
97: Observatory 7935, Cape Town, South Africa; petri@saao.ac.za}
98:
99: \author{Stuart Ryder \altaffilmark{3}}
100: \altaffiltext{3}{Anglo-Australian Observatory, P.O.Box 296,
101: Epping, NSW 1710, Australia; sdr@aao.gov.au}
102:
103: \author{Seppo Mattila \altaffilmark{4}}
104: \author {Jari Kotilainen \altaffilmark{4}}
105:
106: \altaffiltext{4}{Tuorla Observatory, Department of Physics and Astronomy,
107: University of Turku, V\"ais\"al\"antie 20, FI-21500 Piikki\"o, Finland;
108: seppo.mattila@utu.fi; jarkot@utu.fi}
109:
110: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
111: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
112: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
113: %% affiliation.
114:
115: %\altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory.
116: %CTIO is operated by AURA, Inc.\ under contract to the National Science
117: %Foundation.}
118: %\altaffiltext{2}{Society of Fellows, Harvard University.}
119: %\altaffiltext{3}{present address: Center for Astrophysics,
120: % 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
121:
122: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
123: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
124: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
125: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
126: %% editorial office after submission.
127:
128: \begin{abstract}
129: Leading spiral arms are a rare phenomenon. We present here one of the
130: very few convincing candidates of spiral arms opening counter-intuitively
131: in the same direction as the galaxy disk is rotating. This
132: detection in a luminous IR galaxy (LIRG) IRAS~18293-3134 is based on
133: near infrared (NIR) adaptive optics imaging with the Very Large Telescope
134: and long-slit NIR spectroscopy with the Anglo-Australian Telescope.
135: We discuss the orientation of the galaxy based on imaging and derive rotation
136: curves from both emission and absorption features in the spectrum. The galaxy
137: is strongly star-forming and has a minor companion in a high-velocity
138: encounter.
139: The fact that the arms of IRAS~18293-3134
140: are not easily traceable from optical images
141: suggests that larger samples of high-quality NIR imaging of interacting
142: systems and LIRGs might uncover further cases of leading arms, placing
143: constraints on spiral arm theories and retrograde encounters, and especially
144: on the relationship between disk masses and dark matter halo masses.
145: \end{abstract}
146:
147: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
148: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
149: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
150: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
151:
152: \keywords{galaxies:individual(IRAS 18293-3413) -- infrared: galaxies
153: -- galaxies: kinematics and dynamics
154: -- galaxies: spiral -- galaxies: interactions
155: -- galaxies: structure}
156:
157: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
158: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
159: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
160: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
161: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
162: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
163: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
164: %% each reference.
165:
166: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
167: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
168: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
169: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
170: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
171: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
172: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
173: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
174: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
175: %%
176: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
177: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
178: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
179: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
180:
181: \section{Introduction}
182:
183: Though once a subject of active discussion, the sense of rotation
184: of spiral arms in galaxies has generally been considered as
185: resolved for half a century. In a thorough discussion
186: \citet{devauc} showed that all galaxies in
187: his sample had {\em trailing} arms, in agreement with the early position
188: of Slipher and Hubble, and in contrast to the {\em leading} arm camp
189: of Lindblad.
190:
191: Afterwards the only systematic
192: study of the subject with large samples of spirals is work done
193: in the early 1980's
194: by \citet[][]{pasha82} and \citet[][]{pasha85}.
195: The crucial question for them was not whether spirals are
196: trailing or leading, but rather whether {\em all} spirals are trailing, or
197: whether some leading arm cases could be found.
198: In the end, they came up with a sample
199: of 4 leading arm galaxy candidates from a sample of close to 200. However, one
200: of them (NGC~5395) was later shown not to be leading \citep{sharpkeel},
201: another (NGC~4490) is a highly dubious case regarding its orientation and
202: existence of arms, and even the remaining two (NGC~3786 and NGC~5426) are
203: not clear-cut cases regarding their tilt, which determines the
204: sense of rotation.
205: More recently, NGC~4622 has attracted attention
206: \citep[][]{buta92,buta03,byrd08}.
207: The authors conclude that regardless of its orientation, it has to
208: have leading arms since two pairs of detected arms have the opposite sense
209: with each other, in addition to single arms. Another example of a similar
210: ``counter-winding'' spiral structure in ESO~297-27 was recently published by
211: \citet{grouchy}.
212:
213: If leading arms are convincingly detected, it naturally places
214: constraints on any theory of the origin and structure of spirals in galaxies.
215: In the favoured density wave models
216: \citep[see e.g.][]{binney} leading arms are allowed in principle:
217: the density waves themselves can be trailing or leading, though trailing
218: waves are expected to be more robust \citep{toomre81}.
219: However, many theoretical studies suggest that retrograde encounters with
220: companion galaxies should generate a robust single leading arm
221: \citep{athanas, thomasson89, byrd93}. It is very interesting that indeed
222: every case of a suspected leading arm galaxy has a companion
223: or a suspected companion.
224: This then raises an interesting problem:
225: since encounter directions are random,
226: it is not easy to understand why there are so very few observed candidates
227: of leading arms (single or otherwise) in the multitude of observed
228: interacting galaxies. \citet{thomasson89} find that if the disk mass is
229: similar to, or larger than the surrounding halo mass, the formation of a
230: leading arm is suppressed in the interaction.
231: The question to answer thus becomes whether
232: i) the spiral galaxy dark matter (DM) halos really are so small;
233: ii) whether leading arms are extremely short-lived (the modelling cited
234: argues against this);
235: or iii) are leading arms perhaps hidden from typical searches thus far?
236:
237: With the link to interactions and tidal disturbances and a way to probe the
238: DM halo, leading arms are cousins of other intriguing and rare
239: effects in disk galaxies, such as counter-rotating disks and (polar) rings
240: \citep[][]{tremaine,vergani,brosch}. To understand spiral galaxy evolution,
241: and to answer the questions above, more modelling and more and new kinds of
242: observations are needed.
243: In this Letter we present a strong candidate for the most clear-cut
244: leading arm case to date, detected using a mode of observation
245: not attempted before in the case of leading arms: a galaxy with an obvious
246: classical 2-arm spiral pattern as seen in adaptive optics (AO) imaging in
247: the near-infrared (NIR).
248:
249:
250: \section{Observations and data reduction}
251:
252:
253: \object{IRAS 18293-3413}, a gas-rich spiral with an IR luminosity
254: of $L_{IR} = 10^{11.7}{\rm L}_{\odot}$ \citep{sanders},
255: was observed with the NAOS-CONICA (NACO) AO instrument
256: on the VLT UT4 as part of our program to find dust obscured
257: core-collapse supernovae in
258: the inner regions of LIRGs and to study star-formation and its triggering
259: in LIRGs \citep[][]{seppo07,petri}.
260: The $K$-band data set
261: used here was taken on 14 Sep 2004 with the S27 camera, giving
262: a pixel size of 0.027 arcsec, and using the visual wave-front sensor.
263: These observations and data reduction are described in more detail in
264: \citet[][]{seppo07}, where we presented the discovery of the highly obscured
265: core-collapse \citep[see][]{miguel07} supernova 2004ip detected within
266: the nuclear regions of this galaxy.
267: The final combined $K$-band image (Fig.~\ref{bigima}, left)
268: has an on-source integration time of 1230 seconds. Two spiral arms are
269: seen to open clock-wise around a single nucleus.
270: We also extracted HST/ACS images from the archive (PI: Evans) which show
271: the chaotic optical appearance of IRAS 18293-3413, though the arms can
272: be traced in the $I$-band image aided by the NIR view.
273:
274:
275:
276:
277: Spectroscopic observations were obtained with the IRIS2 instrument at
278: the Anglo-Australian Telescope on the nights
279: of 27 and 28 Sep 2007, using a 1 arcsec wide slit, at a resolution
280: R$\sim2400$.
281: The position angle (PA = 128 deg) is close to the major axis of the galaxy
282: and was such that the suspected companion galaxy to the NW also fell on the
283: slit.
284: Three sets of data were taken of the target, in the $J$, $H$, and $K$-bands,
285: in 300 sec nodded exposures.
286: Total integration time was 2700 sec in the $K$-band, and 3600 sec in the
287: $J$ and $H$ bands. An A0V-type standard star was observed in each band,
288: as well as arc and flat lamps.
289:
290: The AAT data were reduced with
291: IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy
292: Observatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities for
293: Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National
294: Science Foundation.} and IDL.
295: All science frames were flatfielded by a normalized smoothed ON-OFF flat,
296: cosmic-ray corrected, and then subtracted pairwise from each other. Xe-arcs
297: were used to fit the wavelength solution and also correct for the 2D shape
298: distortion of the frames. A final background subtraction along columns was
299: done to remove some sky-line residuals remaining after the pairwise
300: subtraction. Frames were then shifted, co-added, and traced to produce
301: a clean, integrated, straightened 2D spectrum in each band.
302: The standard star data
303: were reduced in exactly the same way, except that the prominent hydrogen
304: absorption features were fitted and removed. The 1D extracted
305: standard star spectrum was then divided into the target, and the result
306: multiplied by a smooth blackbody model of the star, thereby removing
307: telluric features from the target spectrum while also performing a
308: relative flux calibration.
309:
310:
311: \section{Analysis}
312:
313: \subsection{Rotation curve}
314:
315: To determine the sense of rotation of the galaxy we first analyzed the spectra
316: and derived rotation curves using five of the brightest emission lines
317: in the whole $JHK$ region.
318: As an example Fig.~\ref{kspectrum} shows the extracted spectrum in
319: $K$-band over a central 4 arcsec wide aperture.
320: Single component Gaussians were fitted line by line
321: in the 2D spectra
322: around the regions of interest, providing the wavelengths of the peaks.
323: The resulting heliocentric radial velocities as a function of
324: spatial position over the slit are plotted in
325: Fig.~\ref{rot-emission}. The radial velocities calculated
326: from all the lines are very consistent.
327: The rotation of IRAS~18293-3413 on the sky is
328: such that the NW side facing the companion is approaching us.
329:
330:
331:
332:
333:
334: We also examined the $^{12}$CO J=$2\rightarrow 0$ absorption feature
335: at 2.2935 $\mu$m in order to measure the velocity of the stellar
336: population in addition to the warm emitting gas producing the
337: emission lines. For this purpose
338: we fitted stellar templates of giant and supergiant stars
339: (Winge, Riffel \& Storchi-Bergmann, in prep.\
340: \footnote{http://www.gemini.edu/sciops/instruments/nir/spectemp/})
341: to the relevant $K$-band region (per 5 binned pixel rows)
342: by redshifting the templates and convolving
343: them with a range of internal velocity dispersions. The exact choice of the
344: stellar template had no relevance for the resulting radial velocity, and
345: only a small effect on the fitted velocity dispersion.
346: The red overlay in Fig.~\ref{kspectrum} shows the
347: best-fit K7 III type template (HD63425B).
348: The resulting velocity curve is overplotted with
349: black circles over the emission line derived curves in
350: Fig.~\ref{rot-emission}. It is seen that the stellar rotation
351: follows closely that of the warm gas.
352:
353: The spectra also yield a redshift, for the first time, of the
354: smaller elliptical galaxy to the NW,
355: based on the
356: $K$-band CO-feature and Fe II emission in $J$-band: we derived
357: $5960 \pm 80$ km~s$^{-1}$, while the main galaxy systemic velocity
358: is $5450 \pm 20$ km~s$^{-1}$.
359:
360:
361:
362:
363: \subsection{Orientation of the galaxy}
364: \label{orientation}
365:
366: As thoroughly discussed in the literature
367: \citep[e.g.][]{devauc,pasha85,sharpkeel},
368: a key issue in determining the sense of rotation
369: of a moderately inclined spiral galaxy
370: is the difficulty in deciding its orientation in space
371: (i.e.\ which side is nearer).
372: Two methods discussed in the literature are appropriate here:
373: detection of dust lanes obscuring some of the brighter and smoother
374: central regions of a galaxy often reveal the side of the disk nearer
375: to the observer;
376: and essentially for the same reason the surface brightness profile along
377: the minor axis of the nearer side of the disk falls more abruptly than
378: the profile along the far side.
379:
380: First, looking at the images in Fig.~\ref{bigima}, the significantly more
381: drastic dust obscuration in the ACS $B$ and $I$ band images on the SW
382: side of the system, and extending to S and SE,
383: as well as the more pronounced dust filaments against the
384: brighter regions on the same SW side, give a visual impression of that
385: being the near side of the galaxy. More quantitatively, Fig.~\ref{profile}
386: shows the surface brightness profiles along the minor axis
387: of the galaxy in all three images. Since the exact PA depends somewhat on the
388: isophote used, the plotted curves are averages from cuts ranging from 20 to
389: 30 degrees.
390: While the chaotic appearance and numerous star-forming regions make the
391: profiles ragged
392: it nevertheless is clear that the brightness on average falls more rapidly
393: on the SW side in all bands, suggesting this is the side nearer to us.
394:
395:
396:
397:
398:
399:
400: \section{Discussion and conclusions}
401:
402: Figure~\ref{rot-emission} illustrates
403: that the side of the galaxy closest to the companion
404: galaxy is the approaching side. If we now accept, based on imaging and surface
405: brightness profiles, that the SW side of IRAS~18293-3413 is
406: the one nearer to us, we have to conclude that the galaxy is turning
407: clockwise in the image, i.e.\ in the same direction that the spiral
408: arms open. It is a leading arm spiral.
409:
410: Is there any ambiguity in the result leading to the classification of
411: a leading arm spiral? Since spectroscopy can
412: be interpreted in only one way, the tilt of the galaxy opens the
413: only possibility of misinterpretation.
414: It could be that while the SW side of the disk with the obscuring dust
415: is the near one, the {\em stellar}
416: disk and arm structure as seen in the NIR has
417: the opposite tilt. Though possible in principle, this is extremely
418: unlikely: it would require that the rotational velocities and angles of the
419: de-coupled stellar and gas disks are
420: {\em exactly} fine-tuned to produce the identical line-of-sight rotation
421: curves measured (Fig.~\ref{rot-emission}). De-coupling in itself is not
422: far-fetched at all as evidenced by counter-rotating disks.
423: On the other hand, and more seriously, perhaps the significant amount of
424: extinction on the SW side of the galaxy (Fig.~\ref{profile}) is not related
425: to the main galaxy and its orientation at all, but is rather foreground
426: material e.g.\ stripped off of a companion galaxy.
427: Given the chaotic nature of LIRGs and the assumed interaction here,
428: this is quite plausible -- indeed it may not be trivial to apply `normal'
429: tilt-determining criteria to LIRGs.
430: If this were the case, the tilt of the galaxy would be
431: more difficult to judge, and would have to be based essentially only on
432: NIR imaging.
433: However, since our slit in the spectral observations does overlap the dust
434: structure on the SE and NW sides of the galaxy we would expect some signal
435: of de-coupled and/or complex velocity fields
436: \citep[compare e.g.][]{petri}. We see no such structures. Moreover, the visual
437: impression of the $I$-band image does suggest the intertwining of the dust
438: structures and the stellar light clearly associated with the spiral arms
439: especially on the E and SE sides of the
440: galaxy. Nevertheless, with the present data we cannot resolve this ambiguity,
441: and rather stress that we have detected {\em a very
442: strong candidate} for a leading arm spiral. Future integral field unit
443: spectroscopy, or long-slit observations at other orientations could put the
444: issue to rest.
445:
446: Based on our knowledge of peculiarities in spiral galaxies, the origin
447: of the leading arms is likely
448: due to an encounter with another galaxy.
449: The smaller elliptical (it is well fit by a de Vaucouleur profile)
450: companion is the obvious candidate, which makes
451: IRAS~18293-3413 a 'mixed' interacting/merging pair \cite[e.g.][]{phjoh08},
452: rather than a typical LIRG case of a pair of gas-rich spirals
453: (unless the companion is the remaining bulge of a long-gone larger
454: spiral). The radial
455: velocity offset of $~500$ km s$^{-1}$ is surprisingly large,
456: and typical only right at first
457: {\em close} passages of merging galaxies
458: \citep{murphy,petri}. However, given the disturbed morphology of the main
459: galaxy, an on-going LIRG-scale star formation burst,
460: and that there are no other
461: 2MASS galaxies seen within $7^{\prime}$
462: ($\sim160$ kpc distance at $z=0.0185$), it is
463: very unlikely that the companion would be unrelated.
464: Of course we do not know
465: the transverse motion of the companion,
466: but with the measured rotation of the main galaxy, the
467: positive radial velocity offset of the companion is retrograde with
468: respect to the rotation of the spiral disk. This
469: fits well the general picture that it is retrograde encounters that might
470: trigger leading arms \citep[e.g.][]{thomasson89}.
471:
472: The leading arm simulations of \citet{byrd93}
473: %specifically
474: concerning NGC~4622 favour
475: a small companion of 1:100 mass-ratio
476: passing close to a disk galaxy centre, while
477: \citet{thomasson89} show how a more distant and massive
478: retrograde companion produces a leading arm.
479: Our system clearly resembles more the small perturber case.
480: We can estimate the galaxy masses
481: from their NIR light and velocity dispersion.
482: We measure $M_{K} \approx -21.4$ for the companion, while the main galaxy
483: has $M_{K} \approx -25.0$. Assuming both have the same
484: mass-to-light ratio, their mass-ratio would thus be close to 1:30.
485: The companion does however have a fairly significant mass of
486: $\sim7\times10^{9} \ {\rm M}_{\odot}$ based on the
487: $K$-band mass-to-light ratio of \citet{thron}.
488: The CO-bands are detected in the companion, though
489: with low signal-to-noise ratio (Fig.~\ref{kspectrum}).
490: By directly fitting a Gaussian to the feature, and correcting for instrumental
491: effects, we arrive at $\sigma \approx 90$ km/s.
492: Using an effective radius of $r_e = 0.62$ kpc determined by surface
493: brightness profile fitting with GALFIT \citep{peng},
494: we calculate a dynamical mass estimate \citep[e.g.][]{petri} of
495: $\sim7\times10^{9} \ {\rm M}_{\odot}$,
496: while an equivalent mass estimate for the main galaxy results
497: in $\sim1.1\times10^{11}\ {\rm M}_{\odot}$ (adopting 50 deg inclination,
498: observed $v_{rot}=140$ km/s, $r_e=1.0$kpc, $\sigma=260$). The ratio is
499: 1:16, though given the uncertainties of the $\sigma$
500: determination of the companion the result is consistent with the 1:30 ratio
501: from NIR light.
502:
503: Perhaps the most far-reaching aspect of leading arms is their connection to
504: cosmology via DM halos -- these halos are
505: generally thought to dominate the dynamics of galaxies, but their nature and
506: structure are still largely unknown \citep[e.g.][]{ostriker,olling,sofue}.
507: \citet[][]{thomasson89} found that leading arms form only
508: when the surrounding DM halos dominate the disk mass. The non-existence of
509: leading arms could thus be seen as support for maximum-disk and small
510: DM halo models, while more evidence, such as our result, for leading arms
511: would support massive DM halos.
512:
513: There are not many candidate
514: leading arm spirals in the literature. Of the handful, the case of
515: IRAS~18293-3413 is unique: the interpretation is significantly less
516: ambiguous than any of the \citet{pasha85} candidates, and ours is less
517: complex compared to the better known case of NGC~4622 and the recent
518: ESO~297-27. The latter two are ``counter-winding spirals'' with sets
519: of arms opening in opposing directions, while our case appears to be a
520: classical 2-arm spiral (in the NIR).
521: Notably, this is the type of a leading spiral that has not been
522: theoretically studied in the literature
523: to the degree that single leading arms have.
524: In particular, whether a 1:30 mass-ratio companion in a high-velocity
525: encounter described above actually can produce a pair of leading arms,
526: and what the arms would imply about the DM halo properties,
527: obviously needs to be followed up by modelling.
528:
529: Typical to many LIRGs, but in contrast to the previous leading-arm candidates,
530: IRAS~18293-3413 has a large dust and gas mass and is very strongly
531: star-forming, and its appearance in the optical is chaotic.
532: We argue that this last aspect may in fact prove significant:
533: there appear to be no published systematic studies of spiral arm
534: characterisation {\em and} rotation determinations {\em in the infrared}.
535: Once larger interacting IR-galaxy samples are followed-up
536: with high spatial resolution imaging in the NIR together with
537: high-quality spectroscopy, we speculate that more leading arms
538: may well be found. These cases must be searched for,
539: and if more are identified, they should be studied and modelled
540: dynamically. This will be crucial to fully understand the dynamics and
541: evolution of disk galaxies.
542:
543:
544: \acknowledgments
545:
546: We gratefully acknowledge useful discussions with Noah Brosch,
547: Karl-Johann Donner, Peter Johansson and Mauri Valtonen. SM and JK acknowledge
548: financial support from the Academy of Finland (projects: 8120503 and 8121122).
549:
550: {\it facilities:} \facility{VLT:Yepun}, \facility{AAT}
551:
552:
553: \begin{thebibliography}{100}
554:
555: \bibitem[Athanassoula(1978)]{athanas} Athanassoula, E., 1978, A\&A, 69, 395
556: \bibitem[Binney \& Tremaine(1987)]{binney} Binney, J. \& Tremaine, S., 1987
557: {\em Galactic Dynamics}, Princeton University Press,
558: Princeton NJ
559: \bibitem[Brosch et al.(2007)]{brosch} Brosch, N., et al., 2007,
560: \mnras, 382, 1809
561: \bibitem[Buta, Crocker \& Byrd(1992)]{buta92} Buta, R., Crocker, D. \&
562: Byrd, G.G., 1992, \aj, 103, 1526
563: \bibitem[Buta, Byrd \& Freeman (2003)]{buta03} Buta, R.J., Byrd, G.G. \&
564: Freeman, T., 2003, \aj, 125, 634
565: \bibitem[Byrd, Freeman \& Howard(1993)]{byrd93} Byrd, G.G., Freeman, T. \&
566: Howard, S., 1993, AJ, 105, 447
567: \bibitem[Byrd et al.(2008)]{byrd08} Byrd, G.G., Freeman, T., Howard, S. \&
568: Buta, R.J., 2008, \aj, 135, 408
569: \bibitem[de~Vaucouleurs(1958)]{devauc} de Vaucouleurs, G., 1958,
570: \apj, 127, 487
571: \bibitem[Grouchy et al.(2008)]{grouchy} Grouchy, R.D., Buta, R., Salo, H.,
572: Laurikainen, E., \& Speltincx, T., 2008, AJ, 136, 980
573: \bibitem[Johansson et al.(2008)]{phjoh08} Johansson, P.H., Naab, T. \&
574: Burkert, A., 2008, ApJ submitted, arXiv:0802.0210
575: \bibitem[Mattila et al.(2007)]{seppo07}
576: Mattila, S., et al. 2007, \apj, 659, L9
577: \bibitem[Murphy et al.(2001)]{murphy} Murphy, Jr., T.W., Soifer, B.T.,
578: Matthews, K., Armus, L. \& Kiger, J.R., 2001, \aj, 121, 97
579: \bibitem[Olling \& Merrifield(2000)]{olling} Olling, R.P. \& Merrifield, M.R.,
580: 2000, MNRAS, 311, 361
581: \bibitem[Ostriker et al.(1974)]{ostriker} Ostriker, J.P., Peebles, P.J.E. \&
582: Yahil, A., 1974, ApJ, 193, L1
583: \bibitem[Pasha \& Smirnov(1982)]{pasha82} Pasha, I.I. \& Smirnov, M.A.,
584: 1982, Astrophys. and Space Sci., 86, 215
585: \bibitem[Pasha(1985)]{pasha85} Pasha, I.I., 1985, Sov.Astron.Lett., 11, 1
586: \bibitem[Peng et al.(2002)]{peng} Peng, C.Y., Ho L.C., Impey C.D., \&
587: Rix H.-W., 2002, AJ, 124, 266
588: \bibitem[P\'erez-Torres et al.(2007)]{miguel07} P\'erez-Torres, M.A., et al.
589: 2007, \apj, 671, L12
590: \bibitem[Sanders et al.(2003)]{sanders} Sanders, D.B., Mazzarella, J.M.,
591: Kim, D.-C., Surace, J.A., \& Soifer, B.T. 2003, \aj, 126, 1607
592: \bibitem[Sharp \& Keel(1985)]{sharpkeel} Sharp, N.A. \& Keel, W.C., 1985,
593: \aj, 90, 469
594: \bibitem[Sofue \& Rubin(2001)]{sofue} Sofue, Y. \& Rubin, V., 2001, ARAA,
595: 39, 137
596: \bibitem[Thomasson et al.(1989)]{thomasson89} Thomasson, M., Donner, K.J.,
597: Sundelius, B., Byrd, G.G., Huang, T.-Y., \& Valtonen, M., 1989,
598: A\&A, 211, 25
599: \bibitem[Thronson \& Greenhouse(1988)]{thron} Thronson Jr, H.A. \&
600: Greenhouse M.A., 1988, \apj, 327, 671
601: \bibitem[Toomre(1981)]{toomre81} Toomre, A., 1981, in Structure and
602: Evolution of Normal Galaxies, ed. S.M.Fall \& D.Lynden-Bell, Cambridge
603: University Press, Cambridge, p. 111
604: \bibitem[Tremaine \& Yu(2000)]{tremaine} Tremaine, S. \& Yu, Q. 2000, \mnras,
605: 319, 1
606: \bibitem[Vergani et al.(2007)]{vergani} Vergani, D., Pizzella, A.,
607: Corsini, E.M., van Driel, W., Buson, L.M., Dettmar, R.-J., Bertola, F.,
608: 2007, A\&A, 463, 883
609: \bibitem[V\"ais\"anen et al.(2008)]{petri} V\"ais\"anen, P., et al. 2008,
610: \mnras, 384, 886
611:
612: \end{thebibliography}
613:
614: \clearpage
615:
616: \begin{figure*}
617: \plotone{f1.col.eps}
618: \caption{The NACO image of IRAS 18293-3413
619: is at left, with the inset showing an un-sharp masked
620: image to highlight the arms in better contrast. The
621: slit position observed with AAT/IRIS2 is indicated.
622: The HST/ACS $I$ and $B$-band images are at the centre
623: and right, respectively.
624: The Virgo infall-corrected distance to IRAS 18293-3413 is
625: 79 Mpc making the angular scale 380 pc arcsec$^{-1}$.
626: Tick marks in the main panels are in one arcsec intervals,
627: and all the brightness scales are logarithmic. \label{bigima}}
628: \end{figure*}
629:
630: \begin{figure}
631: \plotone{f2.col.eps}
632: \caption{The de-redshifted
633: $K$-band spectrum of IRAS 18293-3413 is shown at
634: the top on a relative flux scale.
635: The main emission lines are labelled,
636: and a spectral template of a K7 III star is overplotted (thick red curve)
637: in the region containing the CO band-heads. The bottom spectrum shows the
638: companion galaxy, arbitrarily scaled and de-redshifted by 5960 km/s.
639: The LIRG spectrum is unsmoothed, while the companion spectrum is
640: smoothed with a 4-pixel box-car.
641: \label{kspectrum}}
642: \end{figure}
643:
644: \begin{figure}
645: \plotone{f3.col.eps}
646: \caption{The line-of-sight velocity curve determined from
647: CO 2.2935$\mu$m band-head (solid circles), and various emission
648: lines: $[$FeII$]$ 1.2567$\mu$m (black diamonds), Pa$\alpha$ (red triangles),
649: HeI (magenta plus-signs), H$_{2}$(1-0)S(1) (blue squares),
650: and Br$\gamma$ (green crosses).
651: Error bars are not shown for the latter as they are on the order of
652: the scatter between the individual curves.
653: \label{rot-emission}}
654: \end{figure}
655:
656: \begin{figure}
657: \plotone{f4.col.eps}
658: \caption{Surface brightness profiles along the minor axis of IRAS 18293-3413
659: are shown in all three bands. The y-scales are normalized to maximum
660: brightness in each band, while the x-axis is tied to the location
661: of the $K$-band nucleus. The brightness falls more rapidly in the
662: SW-side of the galaxy. \label{profile}}
663: \end{figure}
664:
665: \end{document}
666:
667: