1: \section{ECL performance}
2: \label{sec:ecl}
3: For the electromagnetic calorimeter, ECL, overlapping beam-background
4: events will degrade the performance. The mean shift of energy distribution due to this
5: background source can be calibrated in principle, but the energy
6: resolution will be worse and cannot be recovered unless we resolve the
7: contribution from the background. Therefore, we will upgrade the
8: readout electronics so that we can sample and fit the signal
9: waveform. With waveform fitting two overlapping waveforms can be
10: resolved if they are separated by more than about one
11: peaking time. From a toy MC study, in which we assume a flat background
12: distribution in time, the background reduction factor is estimated to
13: be seven in the energy range above 20\,MeV where the background hits
14: create fake clusters.
15:
16: On the other hand, in the energy range below
17: 20\,MeV, the effect of the beam-background is similar to electric
18: noise; we call this low energy background ``pileup noise''. The
19: waveform fitting does not have great suppression power for the pileup
20: noise, compared to its suppression of fake clusters; the
21: suppression factor is two for the pileup noise.
22: The magnitude of the pileup noise, $\sigma_p$, is proportional to the
23: fluctuation of the background, which is,
24: \[
25: \sigma_p\propto\sqrt{\nu\tau (\overline{\epsilon^2}-\overline{\epsilon}^2)},
26: \]
27: where $\nu$ is the rate of the photons, $\tau$ is effective duration
28: of the signal, $\overline{\epsilon}$ and $\overline{\epsilon^{2}}$ are
29: the mean and the square mean of the photon energies.
30: Therefore, the background suppression factor for the pileup noise by
31: waveform fitting is four ($\sqrt{N}/2 = \sqrt{N/4}$).
32: A concern is only in the
33: low energy photon reconstruction, which should be examined in the
34: analysis of $B\to D^\ast K, D^\ast\to D\gamma$ or $D\pi^0$.
35:
36: For higher background levels when the suppression by waveform fitting
37: is not sufficient, CsI(Tl) has to be replaced
38: with pure CsI crystals. This is planned for both endcaps.
39: Because of the shorter time constant for pure CsI ($\sim 30$\,ns)
40: compared to CsI(Tl) ($\sim 1\,\mu$s), a background reduction of about 30 is expected.
41: Since the light output will be lower and the wavelength of the
42: scintillation light will be in the UV region, photomultiplier tubes
43: have to be used instead of PIN photodiodes.
44: The biggest issue for pure CsI crystals is the cost. The
45: number of crystals that we can replace will depend on the available budget.
46: In the following subsections, effects of a partial upgrade with pure
47: CsI are discussed.
48:
49: \subsection{Partition of endcaps}
50: If only a part of the endcaps is upgraded with pure CsI crystals, a
51: choice on the location of the pure CsI part has to be made.
52: There are several possible partitions of the two regions. Two ways of
53: partitioning are under consideration,
54: \begin{itemize}
55: \item {\bf (A)}:
56: Forward innermost 4 rings (224), middle 5 rings (448) and
57: outermost 4 rings (480)\\
58: Barrel (6624)\\
59: Backward innermost 6 rings (480), and outermost 4 rings (480),
60: \item {\bf (B)}:
61: Forward innermost 5 rings (288), next 2 rings (192), next 2
62: rings (192) and outermost 4 rings (480)\\
63: Barrel (6624)\\
64: Backward innermost 3 rings (192), next 1 ring (96), next 2 rings
65: (192) and outermost 4 rings (480),
66: \end{itemize}
67: where the numbers in parentheses are the numbers of crystals in each partition.
68: The difference between the two turn out to be minor,
69: and are not crucial for the conclusion of the studies in this
70: section.
71: %Just to record which study is based on what, those
72: % are as follows, :
73:
74: \subsection{Study of $B\to\PKzS\Pgpz\gamma$ decays}
75: Assuming that the readout electronics will be upgraded and that
76: waveform fitting will give us a background suppression by a factor of 7 as
77: expected, 20 times more background corresponds to 3 times more
78: background for the case with CsI(Tl), while we will be essentially free from
79: background for the case with pure CsI.
80: The effect of a partial upgrade with pure CsI on $B\to\PKzS\Pgpz\gamma$ is studied
81: with partitioning scheme A.
82: Using exp 55 MC, we overlaid 3 times more background to the part with
83: CsI(Tl), while no background is overlaid on the part with pure CsI.
84: For detectors other than ECL, 3 times more background is overlaid in
85: all cases for technical reasons.
86:
87: Several combinations of partitions are tested. Each configuration is
88: identified with a 6 digit identifier like 033000, where each digit
89: represents the background multiplication factor; the leftmost
90: digit refers to the most backward (largest in theta) partition,
91: and the rightmost digit to the most forward (smallest in theta)
92: partition. Hence in the example given above, 033000, corresponds to
93: no background in the backward innermost 6 rings,
94: 3 times more background in the backgward outermost 4 rings, 3 times
95: more background in the barrel, and no background in the forward endcap.
96: Note that the present conditions correspond to 111111.
97:
98: As shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:de_kspi0gam}, in the case of 333333 (green,
99: with filled circles),
100: the mean of the $\Delta E$ distribution is shifted towards the positive
101: side, the width becomes larger, and the signal yield is lower compared
102: to 111111 (black solid histogram); these are consequences of the
103: background superposition. We observe a similar deterioration also in
104: the case of 003000 (red, with open circles), namely
105: the case with both forward and backward endcaps fully upgraded to pure
106: CsI. Other configurations (003300, 003333, 033000, 033300, 033330,
107: 033333, 333000, 333300 and 333330) are also tested; it is found that the
108: corresponding performance is between the performances for 003000 and 333333.
109: This deterioration corresponds to a 10 to 15 percent loss of
110: luminosity, depending on the number of pure CsI crystals.
111:
112: \begin{figure}
113: \resizebox{0.46\columnwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{epsfiles/ecl_bkg_kspi0gam/de3_kspi0gam.eps}}
114: \caption{ $\Delta E$ distributions for $B\to\PKzS\Pgpz\gamma$ decays for several
115: background conditions.
116: }
117: \label{fig:de_kspi0gam}
118: \end{figure}
119:
120: Note that in this decay photons with relatively high energy
121: are produced as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:energies_kspi0gam}.
122: The analysis can be performed using the barrel ECL.
123: Therefore, the impact of having pure CsI in the endcaps on this mode
124: is not very large, although it is preferable to have a larger number of
125: pure CsI crystals.
126:
127: \begin{figure}
128: \resizebox{0.46\columnwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{epsfiles/ecl_bkg_kspi0gam/energies_bw.eps}}
129: \caption{ Laboratory energy distribution of three photons in the
130: $B\to\PKzS\Pgpz\gamma$ decay sequence: the primary photon from the $B$
131: decay (top) and the two photons from the $\Pgpz$ decay ordered by energy (middle and bottom).}
132: \label{fig:energies_kspi0gam}
133: \end{figure}
134:
135: % I. Nakamura-san
136: \input{ecl_frec}
137:
138: % \subsection{$B\to D^\ast K, D^\ast\to D\gamma, D\Pgpz$}
139: % is an important decay mode, and contains low energy photons, however,
140: % no study has been done yet.
141: