1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
30: %% use the longabstract style option.
31:
32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
33:
34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
36: %% the \begin{document} command.
37: %%
38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
41: %% for information.
42:
43: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
44: \newcommand{\myemail}{}
45:
46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
47:
48: \slugcomment{}
49:
50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
56:
57: \shorttitle{Deep galaxy LF}
58: \shortauthors{Harsono \& De Propris}
59:
60: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
62:
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
66: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
67: %% you desire.
68:
69: \title{The luminosity function of galaxies to $M_{BgVriz} \sim -14$ in
70: $z \sim 0.3$ clusters}
71:
72: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
73: %% author and affiliation information.
74: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
75: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
76: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
77: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
78:
79: \author{Daniel Harsono\altaffilmark{1}}
80: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, UCLA, 430 Portola Plaza, Box 951547, Los Angeles,
81: CA 90095-1547, USA}
82: \email{dharsono@ucla.edu}
83:
84: \and
85:
86: \author{Roberto De Propris}
87: \affil{Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, Casilla 603, La Serena, Chile}
88: \email{rdepropris@ctio.noao.edu}
89:
90: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
91: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
92: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
93: %% affiliation.
94:
95: \altaffiltext{1}{Current address: Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, Postbus 9513,
96: NL-2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.}
97:
98:
99: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
100: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
101: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
102: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
103: %% editorial office after submission.
104:
105: \begin{abstract}
106:
107: We present deep composite luminosity functions in $B$, $g$, $V$, $r$, $i$
108: and $z$ for six clusters at $0.14 < z < 0.40$ observed with the Hubble Space
109: Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys. The luminosity functions reach to
110: absolute magnitude of $\sim -14 + 5\log h$ mag. and are well fitted by a single
111: Schechter function with $M^*_{BgVriz}=-19.8,\,-20.9\,-21.9,\,-22.0,\,-21.7,\,
112: -22.3$ mag. and $\alpha \sim -1.3$ (in all bands). The observations suggest that
113: the galaxy luminosity function is dominated by objects on the red sequence
114: to at least 6 mags. below the $L^*$ point. Comparison with local data shows that
115: the red sequence is well established at least at $z \sim 0.3$ down to $\sim 1/600^{th}$
116: of the luminosity of the Milky Way and that galaxies down to the regime of dwarf
117: spheroidals have been completely assembled in clusters at this redshift.
118: We do not detect a steepening of the luminosity function at $M > -16$ as
119: is observed locally. If the faint end upturn is real, the steepening of
120: the luminosity function must be due to a newly infalling population of
121: faint dwarf galaxies.
122:
123: \end{abstract}
124:
125: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
126: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
127: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
128: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
129:
130: \keywords{galaxies: luminosity function, mass function --- galaxies: dwarfs
131: --- galaxies: formation and evolution --- galaxies: clusters}
132:
133: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
134: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
135: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
136: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
137: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
138: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
139: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
140: %% each reference.
141:
142:
143: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
144: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
145: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
146: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
147: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
148: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
149: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
150: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
151: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
152: %%
153: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
154: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
155: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
156: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
157:
158: \section{Introduction}
159:
160: The galaxy luminosity function (hereafter LF) provides a $0^{th}$ order
161: description of the gross properties of galaxy populations. Although it
162: may be regarded as somewhat simplistic, in reducing galaxy properties
163: to the two numbers ($M^*$ and $\alpha$) that describe the LF in the
164: \cite{schechter76} form, reproducing the observed LF is a fundamental
165: test for any viable theory of galaxy formation, and one that has
166: proven surprisingly complex to achieve until relatively recently (e.g.,
167: \citealt{croton06}).
168:
169: Clusters of galaxies are, in several ways, ideal laboratories to study
170: the LF and its evolution. Cluster galaxies may be considered as a volume
171: limited sample of objects observed at the same cosmic epoch and occupy
172: a relatively `constant' environment corresponding to the highest density
173: peaks at the redshift of observation. Operationally, cluster members have
174: a much higher surface density on the sky than the surrounding field and
175: often exhibit distinctive morphologies and colors (see Fig.~1 below). It
176: is therefore possible to establish membership in a cluster (at least in a
177: statistical sense) without resorting to observationally expensive redshift
178: surveys.
179:
180: On the other hand, clusters are obviously special places, containing only a
181: small percentage ($5$--$10\%$) of all galaxies in the Universe. Their galaxy
182: populations clearly implicate the cluster environment in a variety of processes
183: that affect the morphological evolution of galaxies (e.g., \citealt{dressler80})
184: and suppress or modify their star formation history \citep{lewis02,gomez03}.
185: In order to use clusters as probes of galaxy evolution it is therefore
186: important to understand the effects of environment and carry out careful
187: comparisons with field samples. For local samples, this is now possible
188: thanks to large redshift surveys such as 2dF \citep{colless01} and SDSS
189: \citep{york00}.
190:
191: Although bright galaxies appear to have formed the majority of their stellar
192: populations and assembled their mass at least by $z=1.5$ (e.g., \citealt{andreon06a,
193: depropris07,muzzin08} and references therein), there is considerable evidence
194: that fainter galaxies undergo significant evolution since $z=1$. The red sequence
195: in clusters in the EDisCS sample appears to be truncated at faint magnitudes
196: \citep{delucia07}, while \cite{stott07} show that the luminosity function of
197: red cluster galaxies flattens at higher redshifts, as do \cite{krick08} for
198: clusters in a deep {\it Spitzer} field. On the other hand, there are clusters
199: with well-formed red sequences at redshifts approaching $1$ as well \citep{andreon06b,
200: crawford08}. It may not be surprising that the faint end of the LF shows considerable
201: variations from cluster to cluster, as one expects that dwarfs are more sensitive
202: to environmental effects. Although the bright end of the LF ($M < -16$) is broadly
203: universal, the faint end varies between clusters and may even change radially within
204: clusters \citep{popesso06,barkhouse07}.
205:
206: The evolution of the faint end slope of the total LF provides an interesting test
207: of galaxy formation models. Even if the red sequence is truncated at faint luminosities
208: at earlier epochs, one expects a steepening faint end as established by the initial
209: power spectrum of fluctuations, which is very steep \citep{khochfar07}. In higher
210: redshift clusters, there should be a steeper LF and a larger fraction of bluer
211: dwarfs.
212:
213: The purpose of this paper is to explore the evolution of the LF to very faint
214: magnitudes in a sample of $z \sim 0.3$ clusters observed with the Hubble Space
215: Telescope (HST), reaching well below the $L^*$ point and into the domain of
216: dwarf spheroidal galaxies, using a multicolor imaging sample. This will allow
217: to test scenarios for the evolution of dwarf galaxy populations in $\Lambda$CDM
218: hierarchical models. The structure of this paper is as follows: we describe
219: the data and photometry in the next section. We derive the composite LFs and
220: then discuss the results in the context of galaxy formation models. We adopt
221: the `consensus' cosmology with $\Omega_M=0.27$, $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.73$ and
222: use H$_0$=100 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$. All data are photometrically calibrated
223: to the AB system, using the latest ACS zeropoints published on the HST Instrument
224: Web page.
225:
226: \section{Observations and Data Analysis}
227:
228: Observations for this paper consist of deep HST imaging of six clusters at
229: $0.14 < z < 0.40$ taken with the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) in the
230: $B$ (F435W), $g$ (F475W), $V$ (F555W), $r$ (F625W), $i$ (F775W) and $z$
231: (F850LP) bands with exposure times of 5,000--10,000 seconds in each band.
232: Each cluster was observed in a single ACS exposure, covering about $200''$
233: on the sky. The data were originally taken for studies of gravitational lenses
234: in these clusters. Table 1 shows the clusters observed, their redshifts, exposure
235: times in each band, and HST proposal IDs. Table 2 summarizes some essential
236: physical characteristics for the observed clusters. Most data are from the
237: compilation of \cite{wu99}, from which $r_{200}$ can be estimated via the
238: formula of \cite{carlberg97}, except for A1413 where $r_{200}$ was derived by
239: \cite{pointecouteau05} from the X-ray profile. We were unable to find data in
240: the literature for A1703.
241:
242: The data were retrieved from the HST archive as fully reduced and flatfielded
243: files (*.flt) and then processed through the {\tt Multidrizzle} algorithm
244: \citep{koekemoer02} to produce fully registered and co-added images for each
245: band. Fig.~1 shows color composites for our data. Full resolution JPEGs will
246: be made available on the $AJ$ web site.
247:
248: Detection of objects and photometry were carried out using Sextractor \citep{
249: bertin96}. We experimented with Sextractor parameters to maximize our detections
250: and minimize the number of spurious objects. All detections were visually
251: examined to eliminate noise spikes, bleed trails from bright stars and
252: other contaminants, especially the numerous arclets present in the images.
253: The Sextractor parameters eventually employed are shown in Table 3. We used
254: the same parameters for all images.
255:
256: For each object we compute a total (Kron-like) magnitude and an aperture
257: magnitude of area equivalent to the minimum number of connected pixels needed
258: for detection. This provides an estimate of the central surface brightness
259: for each object. The motivation behind this procedure is as follows. Detections
260: of objects in deep images depends on their total magnitude but also on their
261: central surface brightness. An object could be brighter than the magnitude
262: threshold but be lost in the night sky because of low surface brightness (see
263: discussion in \citealt{cross02}). For this reason we need to determine both a
264: limiting total magnitude for completeness and a surface brightness threshold
265: for detection.
266:
267: We do this by plotting central surface brightness vs. total magnitude for
268: all bands in Fig.~2. To save space we only show the data for Abell 1703, but
269: equivalent figures for all other clusters are available on the $AJ$ web site.
270: In these figures the sequence at high surface brightness that provides an upper
271: limit to the scatter plot is caused by stars. We can therefore discriminate
272: against stellar contamination in this way (cf. \citealt{garilli99}). The surface
273: brightness threshold is chosen empirically. The limit is selected
274: to include as many objects as possible, but avoiding regions of the parameter
275: space where the sample is obviously very incomplete. Selection lines in surface
276: brightness, apparent magnitude and the star-galaxy separation line are shown in
277: Fig.~2.
278:
279: In order to determine a limiting magnitude, we plot the raw number counts for
280: galaxies in the Abell 1703 field in Fig.~3. As for Fig.~2, figures for all the
281: other clusters are made available electronically. The completeness magnitude is
282: chosen to lie about 0.5 mag.~brighter than the luminosity at which counts start
283: to decrease, in order to select a highly complete sample of objects.
284:
285: The only way to establish cluster membership for faint galaxies is by statistical
286: background subtraction. In order to do so, we need to analyze `blank' (cluster-less)
287: comparison fields of similar or greater photometric depth. We choose to use the
288: two GOODS fields \citep{giavalisco04} as these are the deepest and widest fields
289: where HST multicolor photometry is available.
290:
291: We used the same Sextractor parameters as we used for the cluster fields and
292: impose the same selection limits on the GOODS fields as we did for the target
293: fields. Fig.~4 shows the detection and selection plots for the GOODS fields
294: (similar to Fig.~2 above). The fields are much deeper than the cluster fields
295: we use. It must be noted that we plot only $10\%$ of the detections in the GOODS
296: fields in Fig.~4 to avoid saturating the figure.
297:
298: Fig.~5 plots galaxy number counts for the GOODS fields and comparison galaxy
299: number counts from the literature. The HST data were corrected to the SDSS
300: and Johnson-Cousins systems using the transformations tabulated in \cite{holberg06}.
301: GOODS number counts were fitted with a quadratic of the form $a_0+a_1 x+a_2x^2$.
302: The fit was carried out over galaxies brighter than the completeness limit shown
303: in Fig.~4 and fainter than m$\sim 21$ mag. as GOODS counts for brighter galaxies
304: are affected by small scale clustering. Table 4 shows the values of the coefficients
305: for the quadratic fits.
306:
307: \section{Luminosity Functions}
308:
309: We now subtract the scaled contribution from fore/background counts from
310: galaxy counts. Errors in galaxy counts for clusters and the GOODS fields
311: are assumed to be Poissonian. We used our smoothed quadratic for the background
312: counts, extrapolating for galaxies brighter than $m \sim 21$ mag. Field counts
313: at these bright limits and over the small ($\sim 9$ arcmin$^2$) covered by
314: ACS are very small in any case. Clustering errors over the cluster and GOODS
315: fields are estimated following the counts-in-cells approach and the fitting
316: formula described by \cite{huang97}.
317:
318: It may be possible to further refine the selection of cluster members using
319: photometric redshifts or color cuts. Contamination of the LF by background
320: galaxies has been suggested as a possible cause of the faint end upturn (see
321: below) by \cite{valotto01}. However, this would lead to loss of generality.
322: The argument by \cite{valotto01} may be correct for nearby clusters (although
323: \citealt{andreon05} point out that the simulations used by \citealt{valotto01}
324: are unrealistic and that the background subtraction approach used here works
325: as long as proper care is taken of statistical uncertainties, see their \S 3.3.6),
326: but it is not appropriate for these distant objects where the redshift is much
327: larger than the typical scale of structure in the Universe (so that the counts
328: should be smooth).
329:
330: There are some mismatches between the GOODS data (used for background subtraction)
331: and the cluster data. For the $g$ (F435W) and $r$ (F625W) bands, we can use the
332: GOODS F475W and F606W counts (respectively), which are close matches to the bands
333: used, however, for F555W ($V$) we used the average of the F475W and F606W counts.
334: The LF in this bands is more uncertain, because we do not have an appropriate
335: background field.
336:
337: We $k$ and $e$ correct the LFs to $z=0$ for ease of comparison with local
338: data. In order to do so we use a \cite{bruzual03} model for a solar metallicity
339: elliptical formed at $z=3$ with an e-folding time of 1 Gyr. This is appropriate
340: to the red ellipticals that dominate the bright end of cluster LFs. In
341: effect this approach allows us to consider the differential evolution,
342: if any, between the dwarfs and the giants, who appear to consist mainly
343: of old galaxies with little or no recent star formation.
344:
345: The LF of each individual cluster is relatively uncertain. We therefore
346: build composite LFs in each band following the method by \cite{colless89}
347: in order to average out errors. The method assumes that the LF is broadly
348: universal, but this appears to be borne out by observations at low redshift,
349: at least for relatively bright galaxies \citep{popesso06,barkhouse07}.
350:
351: Composite LFs are built as follows: the number of cluster galaxies in the
352: $j^{th}$ magnitude bin of the composite LF is given by:
353:
354: \begin{equation}
355: N_{cj}={N_{c0} \over m_j} {\sum_i {N_{ij} \over N_{i0}}}
356: \end{equation}
357:
358: where $N_{ij}$ is the (background corrected) number of galaxies in the $j^{th}$
359: magnitude bin of the LF of the $i^{th}$ cluster LF, $N_{i0}$ is the normalization
360: of the cluster LF (to take care of the different richnesses of the clusters) and
361: is taken to be the background corrected number of cluster galaxies brighter than
362: $M_B=-19$ (or its equivalent in the other bands, assuming the color of an old
363: elliptical), $m_j$ is the number of $i$ clusters contributing to the $j^{th}$
364: magnitude bin of the composite LF and $N_{c0}$ is the sum of all the $i$ normalizations.
365:
366: \begin{equation}
367: N_{c0}=\sum_i N_{i0}
368: \end{equation}
369:
370: Essentially, this carried out a weighted average of the individual cluster LFs, scaled
371: by the number of galaxies (in each cluster) brighter than approximately the $L^*$ point.
372: The formal errors on $N_{cj}$ are computed as:
373:
374: \begin{equation}
375: \delta N_{cj} = {N_{c0} \over m_j} \left[\sum_i \left({\delta N_{ij} \over N_{i0}} \right)^2
376: \right]^{1/2}
377: \end{equation}
378:
379: where $\delta N_{ij}$ are the errors on the number counts (including Poissonian and clustering
380: contributions) for the $j^{th}$ magnitude bin of the $i^{th}$ cluster LF.
381:
382: For each cluster we build the composite LF by summing up the individual LFs in absolute
383: magnitude bins, after correcting for the distance modulus, extinction and $k+e$ correction
384: to the common redshift of $z=0$.
385:
386: The resulting LFs are presented in Fig.~6, together with the 1, 2 and 3$\sigma$ error countours.
387: We fit the data to a single Schechter function (see discussion below, regarding the existence
388: of a faint end upturn). In some cases we exclude the fainter and/or brighter magnitude bin from
389: the fit, because these points are dominated by either the poorly sampled very massive galaxies or
390: the fainter objects that suffer from complex incompleteness due to magnitude and surface brightness
391: selection. The fit parameters are tabulated in Table 5, together with the $1\sigma$
392: errors for each parameter, marginalized over the remaining parameters.
393:
394: \section{Discussion}
395:
396: There are only a few deep cluster LFs having comparable depth to our own.
397: In general, we are in good agreement with previous work, based on smaller
398: and shallower samples \citep{driver94,trentham98a,boyce01,mercurio03,
399: pracy04,andreon05,harsono07}. The $M^*$ point we measure gets steadily
400: brighter with increasing wavelength, tracking the color of old, passively
401: evolving stellar populations that are the main component of bright
402: elliptical galaxies \citep{cool06}. The value we find is also consistent
403: with the local SDSS value by \cite{popesso06}: this is not surprising, as
404: it is well known that massive galaxies evolve passively since high redshift.
405:
406: The main interest of this investigation is in the evolution of the LF slope.
407: The LF is well fitted by a single Schechter function, with a slope $\alpha
408: \sim -1.3$ which is essentially the same in all bands. This suggests that
409: the cluster LF is dominated by galaxies on the red sequence to a luminosity
410: of $M \sim -14$ in all bands, and that therefore the red sequence continues
411: at least to 6 magnitudes below the $L^*$ point even at $z \sim 0.3$. This
412: can be clearly seen in Fig.~7 where we show the $g-r$ vs. $z$ color-magnitude
413: relation for Abell 1703. The relation can be clearly followed at least to
414: $z=25$ with little scatter. A more detailed analysis of the color-magnitude
415: relation is deferred to a future paper (Harsono \& De Propris 2008, in preparation).
416: The red sequence appears to be well established and contain the majority
417: of cluster populations even at a lookback time of $\sim 3.5$ Gyrs (cf. \citealt{
418: andreon06c,eisenhardt07} for a similarly deep relation in local clusters).
419:
420: The slope is very similar to the local value for $M < -16$ derived by
421: \cite{popesso06} and \cite{barkhouse07}. This argues that even galaxies
422: to $M \sim -14$ have formed their stellar populations and assembled the
423: majority of their mass at least at $z \sim 0.3$. We can therefore place
424: a significant lower limit to the assembly epoch of galaxies down to 1/600$^{th}$
425: of the mass of the Milky Way. Given the evidence for truncation of the red
426: sequence at $z \sim 0.8$ \citep{delucia07,stott07,krick08}, our data point
427: to the $0.3 < z < 0.8$ interval as a crucial epoch to investigate the formation of
428: the fainter galaxy populations.
429:
430: The other issue we wish to address is the faint end upturn. This has been a
431: controversial subject, ever since its original discovery by \cite{driver94}
432: and \cite{depropris95}. There have been a series of claims and counterclaims
433: regarding the faint end slope and the existence of an upward inflection,
434: sometimes even in the same cluster. For instance, \cite{depropris98,
435: trentham98b,adami07,jenkins07} and \cite{milne07} observe a steep LF
436: at the faint end for the Coma cluster, while \cite{bernstein95,adami98}
437: and \cite{beijersbergen02} quote much flatter slopes. In Virgo, \cite{sabatini05}
438: claim a slope as steep as $\sim -1.6$, while \cite{rines08} derive $\alpha=-1.3$.
439: \cite{baldry08} review the existence of the upturn and the shape of the faint
440: end of the LF and conclude that there is a steep mass function. The observation
441: of the upturn in two composite LFs, derived by two different groups \citep{popesso06,
442: barkhouse07}, suggests that the upward inflection of the LF is real (however,
443: cf., \citealt{hilker03,penny08}).
444:
445: Unlike \cite{popesso06} and \cite{barkhouse07} we do not find a steepening
446: of the LF at $M > -16$. However, we must consider that the LF upturn is more
447: pronounced at large clustercentric radii, while our fields generally cover
448: only the central region of each cluster. The size of the ACS fields used
449: in this study covers between 350 and 750 $h^{-1}$ kpc on the side. In terms
450: of $R_{200}$ (the radius at which \citealt{popesso06} and \cite{barkhouse07}
451: normalize their LFs), the areas imaged by ACS cover between 20\% and 40\% of
452: the area of the cluster out to $r_{200}$. We therefore only derive LFs for
453: the cluster cores. This should not affect our comparisons with the bright
454: end of the LF ($M < -16$), as this does not seem to vary significantly
455: with radius. However, the steep upturn claimed by \cite{popesso06} and
456: \cite{barkhouse07} is much more pronounced at large clustercentric
457: radii, i.e., in the cluster outskirts. On the other hand it is possible
458: to see the upturn even in the more central regions of the sample studied
459: by \cite{popesso06}, inside $\sim 0.3r_{200}$ (see Fig.~10 of \citealt{
460: popesso06}), so our data should exhibit an upturn at faint magnitudes,
461: although of course more clusters would be welcome to bolster the argument.
462:
463: As we do not detect a steepening in the LF, we suggest that, if the
464: steepening is real, the faint galaxies contributing to the upturn
465: consist of a population of recently infalling objects (e.g., \citealt{
466: smith08}) whose star formation is curtailed by the cluster environment.
467: This would be consistent with the observation that about 1/2 of the fainter
468: cluster dwarfs in Virgo and elsewhere have been forming stars until
469: relatively recently \citep{conselice01,conselice03}, until their star
470: formation stopped and their colors moved to the red sequence. The newly
471: infalling population may be the one now contributing to the steep upturn.
472: In a `downsizing' model, it may be expected that objects undergoing
473: star formation suppression and cluster infall at the present epoch
474: would indeed tend to be among the fainter and less massive galaxies
475: and to have the steep LF characteristic of `pristine' CDM power spectra.
476:
477: Our observations imply that the passive evolution of bright galaxies can
478: be extended to faint dwarfs, at least to $z \sim 0.3$ and suggest that
479: the majority of galaxy evolution may have taken place at surprisingly early
480: epochs even for the least massive objects.
481:
482: %% In a manner similar to \objectname authors can provide links to dataset
483: %% hosted at participating data centers via the \dataset{} command. The
484: %% second curly bracket argument is printed in the text while the first
485: %% parentheses argument serves as the valid data set identifier. Large
486: %% lists of data set are best provided in a table (see Table 3 for an example).
487: %% Valid data set identifiers should be obtained from the data center that
488: %% is currently hosting the data.
489: %%
490: %% Note that AASTeX interprets everything between the curly braces in the
491: %% macro as regular text, so any special characters, e.g. "#" or "_," must be
492: %% preceded by a backslash. Otherwise, you will get a LaTeX error when you
493: %% compile your manuscript. Special characters do not
494: %% need to be escaped in the optional, square-bracket argument.
495:
496:
497: %% In this section, we use the \subsection command to set off
498: %% a subsection. \footnote is used to insert a footnote to the text.
499:
500: %% Observe the use of the LaTeX \label
501: %% command after the \subsection to give a symbolic KEY to the
502: %% subsection for cross-referencing in a \ref command.
503: %% You can use LaTeX's \ref and \label commands to keep track of
504: %% cross-references to sections, equations, tables, and figures.
505: %% That way, if you change the order of any elements, LaTeX will
506: %% automatically renumber them.
507:
508: %% This section also includes several of the displayed math environments
509: %% mentioned in the Author Guide.
510:
511:
512: \acknowledgments
513:
514: We would like to thank the referee for a very helpful report, that has considerably improved the
515: paper. We would also like to thank Stefano Andreon for having commented on a version of this paper.
516:
517: All of the data presented in this paper were obtained from the Multimission Archive at the Space Telescope Science Institute (MAST). STScI is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555. Support for MAST for non-HST data is provided by the NASA Office of Space Science via grant NAG5-7584 and by other grants and contracts.
518:
519: We acknowledge use of the Cosmology Calculator \citep{wright06}.
520:
521: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
522: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
523: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
524: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
525: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
526: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
527: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
528: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
529:
530: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
531: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
532: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
533: %% copy editing. Individual instruments or configurations can be provided
534: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
535:
536: {\it Facilities:} \facility{HST (ACS)}.
537:
538: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
539: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
540: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
541:
542: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
543: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
544: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
545:
546:
547: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
548: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
549: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
550: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
551: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
552: %%
553: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
554: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
555: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
556: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
557: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
558: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
559: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
560: %% place of the \cite commands.
561:
562: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
563: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
564: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
565:
566: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
567: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
568: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
569: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
570: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
571:
572: \begin{thebibliography}{}
573: \bibitem[Adami et al.(1998)]{adami98}
574: Adami, C., Nichol, R. C., Mazure, A., Durret, F., Holden, B. \& Lobo, C.
575: 1998, \aap, 334, 765
576: \bibitem[Adami et al.(2007)]{adami07}
577: Adami, C., Picat, J. P., Durret, F., Mazure, A., Pell{\'o}, R. \& West, M.
578: 2007, \aap, 472, 749
579: \bibitem[Andreon et al.(2005)]{andreon05}
580: Andreon, S., Punzi, G., Grado, A. 2005, \mnras, 360, 727
581: \bibitem[Andreon(2006a)]{andreon06a}
582: Andreon, S. 2006a, \aap, 448, 447
583: \bibitem[Andreon(2006b)]{andreon06b}
584: Andreon, S. 2006b, \mnras, 369, 969
585: \bibitem[Andreon et al.(2006)]{andreon06c} Andreon, S., Cuillandre, J.-C., Puddu, E.
586: \& Mellier, Y. 2006, \mnras, 372, 60
587: \bibitem[Baldry et al.(2008)]{baldry08} Baldry, I. K., Glazebrook, K. \& Driver, S. P.
588: 2008, \mnras, 388, 945
589: \bibitem[Barkhouse et al.(2007)]{barkhouse07}
590: Barkhouse, W. A., Yee, H. K. C. \& Lopez-Cruz O. 2007, \apj, 671, 1471
591: \bibitem[Beijersbergen et al.(2002)]{beijersbergen02}
592: Beijersbergen, M., Hoekstra, H., van Dokkum, P. G.\& van der Hulst, T. 2002, \mnras, 329, 385
593: \bibitem[Bernstein et al.(1995)]{bernstein95}
594: Bernstein, G. M., Nichol, R. C., Tyson, J. A., Ulmer, M. P. \& Wittman, D.
595: 1995, \aj, 110, 1507
596: \bibitem[Bertin \& Arnouts(1996)]{bertin96}
597: Bertin E., Arnouts S. 1996, \aaps, 117, 393
598: \bibitem[Boyce et al.(2001)]{boyce01}
599: Boyce, P. J., Phillipps, S., Jones, J. B., Driver, S. P., Smith, R. M., \& Couch, W. J.
600: 2001, \mnras, 328, 277
601: \bibitem[Bruzual \& Charlot(2003)]{bruzual03}
602: Bruzual, G. \& Charlot, S. 2003, \mnras, 344, 1000
603: \bibitem[Capak et al.(2007)]{capak07}
604: Capak, P. et al. 2007, \apjs, 172, 99
605: \bibitem[Carlberg et al.(1997)]{carlberg97}
606: Carlberg, R. G., Yee, H. K. C. \& Ellingson, E. 1997, \apj, 478, 462
607: \bibitem[Crawford et al.(2008)]{crawford08}
608: Crawford, S. M., Bershady, J. A. \& Hoessel, J. G.
609: 2008, astro.ph 0809.1661
610: \bibitem[Colless(1989)]{colless89}
611: Colless, M. M. 1989, \mnras, 237, 799
612: \bibitem[Colless et al.(2001)]{colless01}
613: Colless, M. M. et al. 2001, \mnras, 328, 1039
614: \bibitem[Conselice et al.(2001)]{conselice01} Conselice, C. J., Gallagher, J. S. \& Wyse, R. F. G.
615: 2001, \apj, 559. 791
616: \bibitem[Conselice et al.(2003)]{conselice03} Conselice, C. J., Gallagher, J. S. \& Wyse, R. F. G.
617: 2003, \aj, 125, 66
618: \bibitem[Cool et al.(2006)]{cool06}
619: Cool, R. J., Eisenstein, D. J., Scranton, R., Brinkmann, J., Schneider, D. P. \& Zehavi, I.
620: 2006, \aj, 131, 736
621: \bibitem[Cross \& Driver(2002)]{cross02}
622: Cross, N. J. G. \& Driver, S. P. 2002, \mnras, 329, 579
623: \bibitem[Croton et al.(2006)]{croton06}
624: Croton, D. et al. 2006, \mnras, 365, 11
625: \bibitem[De Lucia et al.(2007)]{delucia07}
626: De Lucia, G. et al. 2007, \mnras, 374, 809
627: \bibitem[De Propris et al.(1995)]{depropris95}
628: De Propris, R., Pritchet, C. J., Hartwick, F. D. A. \& McClure, R. D.
629: 1995, \apj, 450, 534
630: \bibitem[De Propris et al.(1998)]{depropris98} De Propris, R., Eisenhardt, P. R., Stanford, S. A.
631: \& Dickinson, M. 1998, \apj, 503, L45
632: \bibitem[De Propris et al.(2007)]{depropris07}
633: De Propris, R., Stanford, S. A., Eisenhardt, P. R., Holden, B. P. \& Rosati, P.
634: 2007, \aj, 133, 2207
635: \bibitem[Dressler(1980)]{dressler80}
636: Dressler, A. 1980, \apj, 236, 351
637: \bibitem[Driver et al.(1994)]{driver94}
638: Driver, S. P., Phillipps, S., Davies, J. I., Morgan, I., Disney, M. J.
639: 1994, \mnras, 268, 393
640: \bibitem[Eisenhardt et al.(2007)]{eisenhardt07}
641: Eisenhardt, P. R., De Propris, R., Gonzalez, A. H., Stanford, S. A., Wang, M. \& Dickinson, M.
642: 2007, \apjs, 169, 225
643: \bibitem[Garilli et al.(1999)]{garilli99}
644: Garilli, B., Maccagni, D. \& Andreon, S. 1999, \aap, 353, 479
645: \bibitem[Giavalisco et al.(2004)]{giavalisco04}
646: Giavalisco, M. et al. 2004, \apj, 600, L93
647: \bibitem[Gomez et al.(2003)]{gomez03}
648: Gomez, P. L. et al. 2003, \apj, 584, 210
649: \bibitem[Harsono \& De Propris(2007)]{harsono07}
650: Harsono D. \& De Propris R. 2007, \mnras, 380, 1036
651: \bibitem[Hilker et al.(2003)]{hilker03}
652: Hilker, M., Mieske, S. \& Infante, L. 2003, \aap, 397, L9
653: \bibitem[Holberg \& Bergeron(2006)]{holberg06}
654: Holberg, J. B. \& Bergeron P. 2006, \aj, 132, 1221
655: \bibitem[Huang et al.(1997)]{huang97}
656: Huang J.-S., Cowie L. L., Gardner J. P., Hu E. M., Songaila A., Wainscoat R. J.
657: 1997, \apj, 476, 12
658: \bibitem[Jenkins et al.(2007)]{jenkins07}
659: Jenkins, L. P., Hornschemeier, A. E., Mobasher, B., Alexander, D. M. \& Bauer, F. E.
660: 2007, \apj, 666, 846
661: \bibitem[Koekemoer et al.(2002)]{koekemoer02}
662: Koekemoer, A., Fruchter, A. S., Hook, R. N. \& Hack, W.
663: 2002, in {\sl The 2002 HST Calibration Workshop: Hubble after the installation of ACS and the
664: NICMOS cooling system} ed. by S. Arribas, A. Koekemoer, B. Whitmore (Baltimore: Space Telescope
665: Science Institute), p. 337
666: \bibitem[Khochfar et al.(2007)]{khochfar07}
667: Khochfar, S., Silk, J., Windhorst, R. A. \& Ryan, R. E. 2007, \apj, 668, L115
668: \bibitem[Krick et al.(2008)]{krick08}
669: Krick, J. E., Surace, J. A., Thompson, D., Ashby, M. L. N., Hora, J. L.,
670: Gorjian, V. \& Yan, L. 2008, astro-ph 0807.1565
671: \bibitem[Lewis et al.(2002)]{lewis02}
672: Lewis, I. J. et al. 2002, \mnras, 334, 673
673: \bibitem[MacDonald et al.(2004)]{macdonald04}
674: MacDonald, E. C. et al. 2004, \mnras, 352, 1255
675: \bibitem[Mercurio et al.(2003)]{mercurio03}
676: Mercurio, A., Massarotti, M., Merluzzi, P., Girardi, M., La Barbera, F. \& Busarello, G.
677: 2003, \mnras, 408, 57
678: \bibitem[Milne et al.(2007)]{milne07}
679: Milne, M. L., Pritchet, C. J., Poole, G. B., Gwyn, S. D. J., Kavelaars, J. J.,
680: Harris, W. E. \& Hanes, D. A. 2007, \aj, 133, 177
681: \bibitem[Muzzin et al.(2008)]{muzzin08}
682: Muzzin, A., Wilson, G., Lacy, M., Yee, H. K. C. \& Stanford, S. A.
683: 2008, astro-ph 0807.0227
684: \bibitem[Penny \& Conselice(2008)]{penny08}
685: Penny, S. J. \& Conselice, C. J. 2008, \mnras, 383, 247
686: \bibitem[Pointecouteau et al.(2005)]{pointecouteau05}
687: Pointecouteau, E., Arnaud, M. \& Pratt, G. W. 2005, \aap, 435, 1
688: \bibitem[Popesso et al.(2006)]{popesso06}
689: Popesso, P., Biviano, A., B{\"o}hringer, H. \& Romaniello, M.
690: 2006, \aap, 445, 29
691: \bibitem[Pracy et al.(2004)]{pracy04}
692: Pracy, M., De Propris, R., Driver, S. P., Couch, W. J. \& Nulsen, P. E. J.
693: 2004, \mnras, 352, 1135
694: \bibitem[Rines \& Geller(2008)]{rines08}
695: Rines, K. \& Geller, M. J. 2008, \aj, 135, 1837
696: \bibitem[Sabatini et al.(2005)]{sabatini05}
697: Sabatini, S., Davies, J. I., Scaramella, R., Smith, R., Baes, M., Linder, S. M.,
698: Roberts, S. \& Testa, M. 2005, \mnras, 357, 819
699: \bibitem[Schechter(1976)]{schechter76}
700: Schechter, P. 1976, \apj, 203, 297
701: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2008)]{smith08}
702: Smith, R. J. et al. 2008, \mnras, 386, L96
703: \bibitem[Stott et al.(2007)]{stott07}
704: Stott, J. P., Smail, I., Edge, A. C., Ebeling, H., Smith, G. P., Kneib, J.-P.
705: \& Pimbblet, K. A. 2007, \apj, 661, 95
706: \bibitem[Trentham(1998a)]{trentham98a}
707: Trentham, N. 1998a, \mnras, 295, 360
708: \bibitem[Trentham(1998b)]{trentham98b}
709: Trentham, N. 1998b, \mnras, 293, 71
710: \bibitem[Valotto et al.(2001)]{valotto01}
711: Valotto, C., Moore, B. \& Lambas, D. G. 2001, \apj, 546, 157
712: \bibitem[Wright(2006)]{wright06} Wright, E. L. 2006, \pasp, 118, 1711
713: \bibitem[Wu et al.(1999)]{wu99} Wu, X.-P., Xue, Y.-J. \& Fang, L.-Z. 1999, \apj, 524, 22
714: \bibitem[Yasuda et al.(2001)]{yasuda01}
715: Yasuda, N. et al. 2001, \aj, 122, 1104
716: \bibitem[York et al.(2000)]{york00}
717: York, D. G. et al. 2000, \aj, 120, 1579
718: \end{thebibliography}
719:
720: \clearpage
721:
722: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
723: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
724: %% To embed the sample graphics in
725: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
726: %% \includegraphics commands
727: %%
728: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
729: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
730: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
731: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
732: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
733: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
734: %%
735: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
736: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
737: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
738: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
739: %% journal to journal.
740:
741: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
742: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
743: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
744: %% available in the electronic journal.
745:
746: %% Here we use \plottwo to present two versions of the same figure,
747: %% one in black and white for print the other in RGB color
748: %% for online presentation. Note that the caption indicates
749: %% that a color version of the figure will be available online.
750: %%
751: %% This figure uses \includegraphics to scale and rotate the still frame
752: %% for an mpeg animation.
753:
754: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may
755: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the
756: %% User Guide for details.
757: %%
758: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
759: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
760: %% after every seventh one.
761:
762: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before
763: %% each one.
764:
765: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables: the
766: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX
767: %% table environment. Use of deluxetable is preferred.
768: %%
769:
770: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,
771: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.
772:
773: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}
774: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.
775: %% We also use the \rotate command to rotate the table to
776: %% landscape orientation since it is very wide even at the
777: %% reduced font size.
778: %%
779: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed
780: %% inside the \tablecaption.
781:
782: %% This table also includes a table comment indicating that the full
783: %% version will be available in machine-readable format in the electronic
784: %% edition.
785:
786: \begin{figure*}
787: \begin{tabular}{cc}
788: %\includegraphics[width=7.5cm]{f1a.eps} & \includegraphics[width=7.5cm]{f1b.eps} \\
789: %\includegraphics[width=7.5cm]{f1c.eps} & \includegraphics[width=7.5cm]{f1d.eps} \\
790: %\includegraphics[width=7.5cm]{f1e.eps} & \includegraphics[width=7.5cm]{f1f.eps} \\
791: \end{tabular}
792: \caption{Colour images of target clusters. From left to right: A1413, A1689,
793: A2218, A1703, MS1358 and Cl0024. {\sc These figures exceed arXiv size limits
794: and cannot be compressed further. They will appear as JPEG in AJ. Please email
795: {\tt rdepropris@ctio.noao.edu} for the figures to be sent to you via FTP (provide
796: site) or email}}
797: \end{figure*}
798:
799: \clearpage
800:
801: \begin{figure*}
802: \begin{tabular}{cc}
803: %\plotone{f1.eps}
804: \includegraphics[width=6cm,angle=270]{f2a.ps} & \includegraphics[width=6cm,angle=270]{f2b.ps} \\
805: \includegraphics[width=6cm,angle=270]{f2c.ps} & \includegraphics[width=6cm,angle=270]{f2d.ps} \\
806: \includegraphics[width=6cm,angle=270]{f2e.ps} & \includegraphics[width=6cm,angle=270]{f2f.ps} \\
807: \end{tabular}
808: \caption{ Mean central surface brightness vs. total magnitudes for objects in the
809: Abell 1703 field. Selection lines show the star-galaxy separation, the surface
810: brightness threshold and the magnitude completeness limit. Similar figures for all
811: the other objects in our sample can be found in the electronic version of this
812: paper.}
813: \end{figure*}
814:
815: \clearpage
816:
817: \begin{figure*}
818: \begin{tabular}{cc}
819: %\plotone{f1.eps}
820: \includegraphics[width=6cm,angle=270]{f3a.ps} & \includegraphics[width=6cm,angle=270]{f3b.ps} \\
821: \includegraphics[width=6cm,angle=270]{f3c.ps} & \includegraphics[width=6cm,angle=270]{f3d.ps} \\
822: \includegraphics[width=6cm,angle=270]{f3e.ps} & \includegraphics[width=6cm,angle=270]{f3f.ps} \\
823: \end{tabular}
824: \caption{Raw galaxy number counts in the Abell 1703 field. See the electronic
825: version of this paper for the relative figures for all other targets.}
826: \end{figure*}
827: \clearpage
828:
829: \begin{figure*}
830: \begin{tabular}{cc}
831: %\plotone{f1.eps}
832: \includegraphics[width=5cm,angle=270]{f4a.ps} & \includegraphics[width=5cm,angle=270]{f4b.ps} \\
833: \includegraphics[width=5cm,angle=270]{f4c.ps} & \includegraphics[width=5cm,angle=270]{f4d.ps} \\
834: \end{tabular}
835: \caption{Same as Fig.~2, but for the combined GOODS fields. We only plot a random
836: selection of 10\% of the objects in the GOODS fields, for clarity.}
837: \end{figure*}
838: \clearpage
839:
840: \begin{figure*}
841: \begin{tabular}{cc}
842: %\plotone{f1.eps}
843: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{f5a.eps} & \includegraphics[width=8cm]{f5b.eps} \\
844: & \\
845: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{f5c.eps} & \includegraphics[width=8cm]{f5d.eps} \\
846: \end{tabular}
847: \caption{Number counts for the GOODS fields and quadratic fits. Literature
848: counts (see text) are also shown.}
849: \end{figure*}
850: \clearpage
851:
852: \begin{figure*}
853: %\plotone{f1.eps}
854: \plottwo{f6a.ps}{f6b.ps} \\
855: \caption{Composite luminosity functions, best fits and error ellipses for the $B$ and $g$ bands}
856: \end{figure*}
857: \clearpage
858:
859: \begin{figure*}
860: %\plotone{f1.eps}
861: \setcounter{figure}{5}
862: \plottwo{f6c.ps}{f6d.ps} \\
863: \caption{(Continued): for the $V$ and $r$ bands}
864: \end{figure*}
865: \clearpage
866:
867: \begin{figure*}
868: %\plotone{f1.eps}
869: \setcounter{figure}{5}
870: \plottwo{f6e.ps}{f6f.ps} \\
871: \caption{(Continued): for the $i$ and $z$ bands}
872: \end{figure*}
873: \clearpage
874:
875: \begin{figure}
876: \includegraphics[width=10cm,angle=270]{f7.ps}
877: \caption{The color magnitude diagram for galaxies in A1703}
878: \end{figure}
879: %% Tables may also be prepared as separate files. See the accompanying
880: %% sample file table.tex for an example of an external table file.
881: %% To include an external file in your main document, use the \input
882: %% command. Uncomment the line below to include table.tex in this
883: %% sample file. (Note that you will need to comment out the \documentclass,
884: %% \begin{document}, and \end{document} commands from table.tex if you want
885: %% to include it in this document.)
886:
887: %% \input{table}
888: \clearpage
889:
890: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccl}
891: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
892: \rotate
893: \tablecaption{Archival HST cluster observations}
894: \tablewidth{0pt}
895: \tablehead{
896: \colhead{Cluster} & \colhead{redshift} & \colhead{$B$ Exposure} & \colhead{$g$} & \colhead{$V$} &
897: \colhead{$r$} & \colhead{$i$} & \colhead{$z$} & \colhead{Proposal ID}
898: }
899: \startdata
900: Abell 1413 & 0.143 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 2440 & 2560 & 9292 \\
901: Abell 2218 & 0.171 & 7048 & 5640 & 7048 & 8386 & 10732 & 5640 & 9452, 9717, 10325 \\
902: Abell 1689 & 0.183 & \nodata & 9500 & \nodata & 9500 & 11800 & 16600 & 9289 \\
903: Abell 1703 & 0.258 & 7050 & 5564 & 5564 & 9834 & 11128 & 17800 & 10325 \\
904: MS 1358.4+6245 & 0.328 & 7928 & 5470 & 5482 & 9196 & 10952 & 15017 & 9292, 9717, 10325 \\
905: Cl 0024.0+1652 & 0.395 & 6435 & 5072 & 5072 & 8971 & 10144 & 16328 & 10325 \\
906: \enddata
907:
908: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
909: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
910: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
911: \end{deluxetable}
912:
913: %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using
914: %% \tableline, not \hline.
915: %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.
916: %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.
917:
918: \clearpage
919:
920: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}
921: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
922: \rotate
923: \tablecaption{Cluster properties}
924: \tablewidth{0pt}
925: \tablehead{
926: \colhead{Cluster} & \colhead{redshift} & \colhead{$\sigma$ [km s$^{-1}$]} & \colhead{$T$ (KeV)}
927: & \colhead{$L_X$ ($10^{44}$ [ergs s$^{-1}$]} & \colhead{$r_{200}$ (Mpc $h^{-1}$)} & \colhead{Coverage (\% $r_{200}$)}
928: }
929: \startdata
930: Abell 1413 & 0.143 & \nodata & $8.85 \pm 0.50$ & $36.01 \pm 4.54$ & 1.71 & 21 \\
931: Abell 2218 & 0.171 & $1800 \pm 207$ & $9.02^{+0.40}_{-0.30}$ & $55.73 \pm 8.92$ & 2.94 & 14 \\
932: Abell 1689 & 0.183 & $1370^{+180}_{-220}$ & $7.10 \pm 0.20$ & $21.96 \pm 2.01$ & 2.24 & 19 \\
933: Abell 1703 & 0.258 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
934: MS 1358.4+6245 & 0.328 & $937 \pm 54$ & $7.50 \pm 4.30$ & $21.81 \pm 3.81$ & 2.40 & 28 \\
935: Cl 0024.0+1652 & 0.395 & $1339 \pm 233$ & \nodata & $4.26 \pm 0.01$ & 1.95 & 39 \\
936: \enddata
937:
938: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
939: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
940: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
941: \end{deluxetable}
942:
943: %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using
944: %% \tableline, not \hline.
945: %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.
946: %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.
947:
948: \clearpage
949: %% If the table is more than one page long, the width of the table can vary
950: %% from page to page when the default \tablewidth is used, as below. The
951: %% individual table widths for each page will be written to the log file; a
952: %% maximum tablewidth for the table can be computed from these values.
953: %% The \tablewidth argument can then be reset and the file reprocessed, so
954: %% that the table is of uniform width throughout. Try getting the widths
955: %% from the log file and changing the \tablewidth parameter to see how
956: %% adjusting this value affects table formatting.
957:
958: %% The \dataset{} macro has also been applied to a few of the objects to
959: %% show how many observations can be tagged in a table.
960:
961: \clearpage
962:
963: \begin{deluxetable}{rr}
964: \tablewidth{0pt}
965: \tablecaption{Sextractor parameters}
966: \tablehead{
967: \colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{Value}}
968: \startdata
969: DETECT MINAREA & 7.0 pixels \\
970: DETECT THRESH & 2.0 \\
971: ANALYSIS THRESH & 2.0 \\
972: DEBLEND NTHRESH & 32 \\
973: PHOT APERTURES & 1.5 \\
974: PHOT AUTOPARAMS & 2.5, 3.5 \\
975: \enddata
976:
977: \end{deluxetable}
978:
979: \clearpage
980:
981: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}
982: \tablewidth{0pt}
983: \tablecaption{Quadratic fits to GOODS counts}
984: \tablehead{
985: \colhead{Band} & \colhead{a0} & \colhead{a1} & \colhead{a2}}
986: \startdata
987: $g$ (F475W) & $-44.46$ & 3.544 & $-0.06346$ \\
988: $r$ (F606W) & $-23.58$ & 1.928 & $-0.03196$ \\
989: $i$ (F775W) & $-18.51$ & 1.590 & $-0.02643$ \\
990: $z$ (F850LP) & $-10.50$ & 0.9377 & $-0.01417$ \\
991: \enddata
992:
993: \end{deluxetable}
994:
995: \clearpage
996:
997: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}
998: \tablewidth{0pt}
999: \tablecaption{Best fit parameters for composite LFs}
1000: \tablehead{
1001: \colhead{Band} & \colhead{$M^*$} & \colhead{$\alpha$} & \colhead{$\chi^2_\nu$}}
1002: \startdata
1003: $B$ (F435W) & $-19.80 \pm 0.27$ & $-1.29 \pm 0.06$ & $ 0.59 $ \\
1004: $g$ (F475W) & $-20.94 \pm 0.17$ & $-1.31 \pm 0.04$ & $ 0.95 $ \\
1005: $V$ (F555W) & $-21.86 \pm 0.27$ & $-1.27 \pm 0.05$ & $ 1.08 $ \\
1006: $r$ (F625W) & $-21.95 \pm 0.29$ & $-1.33 \pm 0.03$ & $ 0.43 $ \\
1007: $i$ (F775W) & $-21.66 \pm 0.27$ & $-1.27 \pm 0.04$ & $ 0.37 $ \\
1008: $z$ (F850LP) & $-22.26 \pm 0.30$ & $-1.45 \pm 0.02$ & $ 0.94$ \\
1009: \enddata
1010:
1011: \end{deluxetable}
1012:
1013:
1014: \end{document}
1015:
1016: %%
1017: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
1018: