1: %%
2: %% This is file `template-6s.tex',
3: %% generated with the docstrip utility.
4: %%
5: %% The original source files were:
6: %%
7: %% template.raw (with options: `6s')
8: %%
9: %% Template for the LaTeX class aipproc.
10: %%
11: %% (C) 1998,2000,2001 American Institute of Physics and Frank Mittelbach
12: %% All rights reserved
13: %%
14: %%
15: %% $Id: template.raw,v 1.12 2005/07/06 19:22:14 frank Exp $
16: %%
17:
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: %% Please remove the next line of code if you
20: %% are satisfied that your installation is
21: %% complete and working.
22: %%
23: %% It is only there to help you in detecting
24: %% potential problems.
25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
26:
27: % \input{aipcheck}
28:
29: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
30: %% SELECT THE LAYOUT
31: %%
32: %% The class supports further options.
33: %% See aipguide.pdf for details.
34: %%
35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
36:
37: \newcommand{\astt}{AST}
38: \newcommand{\wire}{\emph{WIRE}}
39: \newcommand{\smei}{{SMEI}}
40: \newcommand{\coriolis}{\emph{Coriolis}}
41: \newcommand{\apj}{ApJ}
42: \newcommand{\jrasc}{JRASC} % Royal astr. soc. of Canada
43: \newcommand{\pasp}{PASP}
44: \newcommand{\aj}{AJ}
45: \newcommand{\mnras}{MNRAS}
46:
47: \newcommand{\hb}{{\bf CHECK}}
48:
49: \documentclass[
50: ,final % use final for the camera ready runs
51: %% ,draft % use draft while you are working on the paper
52: %% ,numberedheadings % uncomment this option for numbered sections
53: %% , % add further options here if necessary
54: ]
55: {aipproc}
56:
57: \layoutstyle{6x9}
58:
59: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
60: %% FRONTMATTER
61: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
62:
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: \title{Welcome back, Polaris the Cepheid\thanks{Presented as a
66: poster by A.\ J.\ Penny at the Cool Stars 15 meeting
67: at St Andrews.}}
68:
69: \classification{95.75.Wx, 97.10.Cv, 97.10.Sj, 97.20.Pm, 97.30.Gj}
70:
71: % <Replace this text with PACS numbers; choose from this list:
72: % \texttt{http://www.aip..org/pacs/index.html}>}
73:
74: \keywords {Stars: individual: Polaris ($\alpha$~UMi),
75: Stars: variable: Cepheids, Stellar evolution}
76:
77: \author{H.\ Bruntt}{
78: address={Institute of Astronomy, School of Physics A29,
79: University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia}
80: }
81:
82: \author{A.\ J.\ Penny}{
83: address={School of Physics \& Astronomy,
84: University of St Andrews, North Haugh, KY16, 9SS, UK}
85: }
86:
87: \author{D.\ Stello}{
88: address={Institute of Astronomy, School of Physics A29,
89: University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia}
90: }
91:
92: \author{N.\ R.\ Evans}{
93: address={Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, 60 Garden St.,
94: Cambridge, MA 02138, USA}
95: % ,altaddress={<author1 address>} % additional visiting address
96: }
97:
98: \author{J.\ A.\ Eaton}{
99: address={Center for Excellence in Information Systems, Tennessee
100: State Univ., Nashville, TN 37209, USA}
101: }
102:
103:
104:
105: \begin{abstract}
106:
107: For about 100 years the amplitude of the 4\,d pulsation in Polaris has decreased.
108: We present new results showing a significant increase in the amplitude
109: based on $4.5$ years of continuous monitoring from the ground and with two satellite missions.
110:
111: \end{abstract}
112:
113: \maketitle
114:
115: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
116: %% MAINMATTER
117: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
118:
119: \section{Introduction}
120:
121: Polaris is the brightest Cepheid in the sky with a single known
122: pulsation mode with a period close to 4 days.
123: The star was found to be variable
124: around 150 years ago \cite{schmidt1857} and the period was first
125: identified about 100 years ago \citep{hertz1911}.
126: For the past century the pulsation amplitude has
127: decreased from $\sim100$ to 20 mmag in $V$ (peak-to-peak)
128: and the period has increased by 4.5\,s yr$^{-1}$ \citep{turner05, ferro83}.
129:
130: If the decrease in amplitude had continued,
131: a possible explanation offered for the decrease in amplitude
132: is that Polaris has completed its evolution through the
133: instability strip and is therefore becoming stable \cite{dinshaw89, kamper98}.
134: The high rate of period change is typical of overtone
135: pulsators \cite{evans02} like Polaris, though other explanations
136: have been suggested \cite{turner06, spreckley08}.
137:
138: % A possible explanation offered for the decrease in amplitude is that
139: % Polaris has completed its evolution through the
140: % instability strip and is therefore becoming stable \cite{dinshaw89, kamper98}.
141: % The rate of change is consistent with some theoretical models \citep{turner06=7},
142: % indicating that Polaris is crossing the instability strip
143: % for the first time (for further discussion see \cite{evans02=8, spreckley08=9}).
144:
145: About fifteen years ago a paper with the title
146: \emph{Goodbye Polaris the Cepheid} \cite{fernie93}
147: predicted that the 4\,d mode would disappear around 1994.
148: However, a fundamental error was found in that paper \citep{kamper98},
149: and new measurements at the end of millennium indicated that the decrease
150: in amplitude had ceased \citep{kamper98, hatzes00}.
151: Coincidentally, in 2008 three independent groups
152: have reported unambiguous evidence for
153: a significant increase in the amplitude
154: \citep{spreckley08, bruntt08, lee08},
155: and we can now say, \emph{Welcome back, Polaris!}
156:
157: Details of our work are given in \cite{bruntt08};
158: here we shall summarize our most important conclusions
159: and make comparisons with the results from the two other groups.
160: In addition we shall discuss a possible explanation for the surprising
161: increase in the amplitude of Polaris,
162: based on new results for Cepheids in the Large Magellanic Cloud \cite{moska08}.
163:
164: \begin{figure}
165: \includegraphics[height=.38\textheight]{f1x.eps}
166: \caption{Light curves of Polaris from \wire\ and \smei\ and
167: radial velocities from \astt. The top panel is the
168: entire data set with a baseline of 4.5 years;
169: the bottom panel shows the pulsation over 40 days.}
170: \label{fig:lc}
171: \end{figure}
172:
173:
174:
175: \section{Observations from ground and space}
176:
177: We have collected extensive data for Polaris from
178: both ground and space. We used the 2-m Tennessee
179: State University Automatic Spectroscopic Telescope
180: (\astt\ \cite{eaton07}) to collect over 500 spectra over
181: a period of 3.8 years from 2003--7. %% (2 or 3 spectra per week).
182: We used the 52\,mm star tracker on the \wire\ satellite \citep{bruntt07wire}
183: to collect 62 days of
184: high-precision photometry during three runs,
185: each lasting from 2 to 4 weeks, in 2004--5. Finally, we obtained
186: photometry from the \smei\ instrument on the \coriolis\
187: satellite spanning 3.7 years from 2003--6.
188:
189: % The time sampling in the
190: % \wire\ data is 10 images per second yielding sub-mmag precision
191: % in the light curve. On the other hand, \smei\ surveys almost
192: % the complete sky in one orbit and we only get a few images of
193: % Polaris per orbit: the time baseline is much longer than
194: % for \wire, but the point-to-point precision is about 6\,mmag.
195:
196:
197: \section{A significant increase in the amplitude}
198:
199: In Fig.~\ref{fig:lc} we show the light curves from \smei\
200: and \wire\ and the radial velocity curve from \astt.
201: The baseline of the combined data set is 4.5 years.
202: To analyse the data we compute the Fourier amplitude
203: spectrum of each data set as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:amp}.
204: The left panel shows the dominant peak due to the 4\,d pulsation mode.
205: The right panel shows the details at lower frequencies
206: after having subtracted the primary mode.
207: The insets show details around the main features in the amplitude spectra.
208: Notice that in the right panel there is a significant residual
209: signal around the main peak at $\simeq0.25$ c/day.
210: This is due to an increase in amplitude during
211: the time span of the observations \cite{bruntt08}.
212:
213: To quantify the increase in amplitude,
214: we split the data sets in groups of 30 pulsation cycles (4 months)
215: and measured the amplitude in each.
216: The result is given in the left panel in Fig.~\ref{fig:ampinc}
217: showing a $\simeq30$\% increase in both photometric and radial-velocity amplitude.
218: In the right panel we show the change in radial-velocity amplitude over
219: a century and note that the precision of the data collected since the
220: 1990s have improved greatly with the advent of very stable spectrographs.
221: We can see that the amplitude of the 4\,d mode in Polaris
222: stopped its decrease around 1995 and has increased since then.
223:
224: Our measurement of the increase in amplitude
225: is in very good agreement with the results from \cite{spreckley08}
226: and \cite{lee08} which are also shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:ampinc}
227: (marked as SS08 and L08, respectively).
228: SS08 used an independent reduction pipeline
229: to reduce the \smei\ data and obtained
230: a significantly better point-to-point precision.
231: L08 used 264 spectra collected over 2.6 years and
232: partly overlapping with our dataset.
233:
234:
235: \section{Long-period variation in Polaris}
236:
237: In addition to the dominant 4\,d mode,
238: long-period variation has been reported in some of
239: the extensive campaigns done on Polaris since the 1980s.
240: These include variation at
241: $P=9.75$\,d ($A_{\rm rv}\simeq 1$\,km/s) \cite{kamper84}, %% semi-amplitude from their Fig. 2 around 1 km/s
242: %% Lee referes to this peak, but I cannot find it in the paper: 34.3\,d \cite{kamper98},
243: $45.3$\,d ($505\pm45$\,m/s) \cite{dinshaw89}, %% amplitude: 505 +- 45 m/s (semi)
244: $17.2$\,d and $40.2$\,d ($\simeq200$ m/s) \cite{hatzes00}, %% Hatzes, abstract+Fig.7: semi-ampl. ~200 m/s
245: and most recently at 119.1\,d ($138\pm8$\,m/s) \cite{lee08}, %%% Paper: 138 m/s
246: with semi-amplitudes given in the parentheses.
247: Based on simulations \cite{bruntt08} we
248: argue that these modes are probably not intrinsic to Polaris,
249: but due to a combination of
250: instrumental drift,
251: too sparse sampling of the pulsation,
252: and difficulties imposed by the period being so close to an integer number of days.
253: Our spectroscopic data from \astt\
254: has the lowest noise at low frequencies among the published data sets.
255: In the range 3--50\,d days we set an upper limit for the
256: variation at 100\,m\,s$^{-1}$, which is four times the average
257: noise level in the amplitude spectrum. %% for this range in period.
258:
259: %%% The most recent report of variation with a period of 119.1\,d \cite{lee08}
260: %%% from spectroscopy has an amplitude of 138\,m\,s$^{-1}$.
261: %%% Since these data were collected at about the same time as our \astt\ data,
262: %%% we claim that this is likely a case of digging too
263: %%% far into the $1/f$ instrumental noise of the residual amplitude spectrum.
264:
265: \begin{figure}
266: \includegraphics[height=.35\textwidth]{f2a.eps}
267: \hskip 0.5cm
268: \includegraphics[height=.35\textwidth]{f2b.eps}
269: \caption{Left panel: amplitude spectrum of the three data sets. Right panel:
270: details of the amplitude at low frequencies after having subtracted the main 4\,d mode.}
271: \label{fig:amp}
272: \end{figure}
273:
274:
275: %% \section{Independent analyses of the \smei\ data set}
276: %%
277: %% % \hb\ More detailed comparison here. Read the Spreckley $+$ Lee papers again.
278: %%
279: %% \cite{spreckley08} recently reported on the increase in amplitude of Polaris.
280: %% This group also used the \smei\ data but made a completely independent
281: %% data reduction and subsequent analysis.
282: %% The quality of their reduction is superior to ours:
283: %% their point-to-point noise before high-pass filtering
284: %% is $\sigma \simeq 4$ (S.\ Spreckley, private communication)
285: %% while we have $\sigma = 6$\,mmag.
286: %% However, the overall conclusion of these two independent studies
287: %% are in very good agreement.
288: %%
289: %% \cite{spreckley08} included
290: %% some preliminary modelling of Polaris in an effort to understand
291: %% the reversal of the decrease in amplitude (cite from their conclusions).
292:
293: %A compelling explanation for the steady decrease in the amplitude
294: %% of the 4\,d mode over the past 100 years is that it is due to stellar evolution, i.e.\
295: %that Polaris is about the leave the instability strip \cite{dinshaw89, turner05}.
296:
297:
298: \section{Why has the amplitude increased?}
299:
300: The increase in the amplitude of Polaris makes it unlikely that it is
301: evolving out of the instability strip and ceasing to pulsate.
302: Rather, the amplitude change seems to be a cyclic phenomenon, related to pulsation.
303: Based on comparison with pulsation models \cite{spreckley08}
304: suggested that Polaris is on the red edge of the instability
305: strip for overtone pulsators, and that it could be evolving
306: (depending on its mass) from a first-overtone pulsator to become
307: a fundamental or double-mode Cepheid (also suggested by \cite{kamper98}).
308:
309: Another potential explanation is beating of the primary mode
310: with an additional unresolved pulsation mode,
311: as suggested by \cite{bruntt08} and \cite{spreckley08}.
312: If this be the case, the two modes would have nearly the same frequency,
313: since the beat-period is at least 200 years. %% The mode must be non-radial!
314: Recently, non-radial pulsation was detected in 42 out of 462 first-overtone Cepheids
315: in the Large Magellanic Cloud \cite{moska08}.
316: %% Another 23 stars have unresolved excess power around the main pulsation peak.
317: Interestingly, the non-radial frequencies are most often
318: located close to the primary radial overtone mode.
319: These secondary peaks were not found in any of the 718 fundamental mode Cepheids \cite{moska08}.
320: Since Polaris is a first overtone pulsator \cite{feast97},
321: beating of the first overtone with a non-radial mode could explain the observed increase in amplitude.
322: However, this requires that the amplitudes of the two modes be comparable
323: due to the low amplitude of the variation around the millennium.
324: This is not the case for any of the LMC overtone Cepheids;
325: the non-radial modes typically have amplitudes around 5\% of the main mode,
326: with one Cepheid having a secondary peak with 20\% of the amplitude of the main mode.
327:
328: %%% To make the plots:
329: %%% .r wire_polaris_ampvar
330:
331: \begin{figure}
332: \includegraphics[height=.37\textwidth]{f3a.eps}
333: \hskip 0.6cm
334: \includegraphics[height=.37\textwidth]{f3b.eps}
335: \caption{The left panel shows the measured increase in amplitude from out \astt\ and \smei\ data sets.
336: The results from L08 \cite{lee08} and SS08 \cite{spreckley08} is also shown.
337: The right panel shows the change in radial velocity amplitude in Polaris over a century.}
338: %% The new data from \astt\ (filled circles) show an increase of about 30\% from 2004--7.}
339: \label{fig:ampinc}
340: \end{figure}
341:
342: \section{Outlook}
343:
344: Fernie, Kamper \& Seager were apparently too pessimistic when
345: they said \emph{goodbye} to Polaris 10 years ago \cite{fernie93}.
346: Polaris has now evidently come back and is presenting
347: us with a new puzzle: why is the amplitude increasing?
348: In the coming years we will continue to monitor
349: Polaris with \astt, and we will collect additional
350: spectra at different longitudes to improve the spectral
351: window of the observations.
352:
353:
354: % An evolutionary effect now seems less plausible, while
355: % new observational evidence of non-radial modes in
356: % Cepheids in the LMC could perhaps explain the increase
357: % in amplitude in Polaris. If it is a beating phenomenon
358: % it is not expected that the amplitudes of the non-radial
359: % mode in comparable to the amplitude of the first overtone
360: % (reference, anyone?!).
361:
362:
363:
364: % \subsection{<A subsection>}
365: % \subsubsection{<A subsubsection>}
366: % \paragraph{<A subsubsubsection>}
367:
368: % \footnote{Here we test footnotes.}
369: % Some url test \url{http://www.world.universe}.
370:
371: % \begin{equation}
372: % J_{ion}=A\frac{exp\left[-\frac{E_a}{kT}\right]}{kT}\alpha \label{ionflux}
373: % \end{equation}
374: % See \eqref{ionflux}.
375:
376:
377:
378:
379:
380: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
381: %% SAMPLE TABLE
382: %%
383: %% Shows the use of \tablehead and \tablenote
384: %% macros
385: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
386:
387: % \begin{table}
388: % \begin{tabular}{lrrrr}
389: % \hline
390: % & \tablehead{1}{r}{b}{Single\\outlet}
391: % & \tablehead{1}{r}{b}{Small\tablenote{2-9 retail outlets}\\multiple}
392: % & \tablehead{1}{r}{b}{Large\\multiple}
393: % & \tablehead{1}{r}{b}{Total} \\
394: %\hline
395: %1982 & 98 & 129 & 620 & 847\\
396: %1987 & 138 & 176 & 1000 & 1314\\
397: %1991 & 173 & 248 & 1230 & 1651\\
398: %1998\tablenote{predicted} & 200 & 300 & 1500 & 2000\\
399: %\hline
400: %\end{tabular}
401: %\caption{Average turnover per shop: by type
402: % of retail organisation}
403: %\label{tab:a}
404: %\end{table}
405:
406: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
407: %% BACKMATTER
408: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
409:
410: % \begin{theacknowledgments}
411: %\end{theacknowledgments}
412:
413: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
414: %% The bibliography can be prepared using the BibTeX program or
415: %% manually.
416: %%
417: %% The code below assumes that BibTeX is used. If the bibliography is
418: %% produced without BibTeX comment out the following lines and see the
419: %% aipguide.pdf for further information.
420: %%
421: %% For your convenience a manually coded example is appended
422: %% after the \end{document}
423: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
424:
425: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
426: %% You may have to change the BibTeX style below, depending on your
427: %% setup or preferences.
428: %%
429: %%
430: %% For The AIP proceedings layouts use either
431: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
432:
433: \newpage
434:
435: \bibliographystyle{aipproc} % if natbib is available
436: %\bibliographystyle{aipprocl} % if natbib is missing
437:
438: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
439: %% You probably want to use your own bibtex database here
440: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
441: \bibliography{ms.bib}
442:
443: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
444: %% Just a reminder that you may have to run bibtex
445: %% All of it up to \end{document} can be removed
446: %% if you don't like the warning.
447: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
448: %\IfFileExists{\jobname.bbl}{}
449: % {\typeout{}
450: % \typeout{******************************************}
451: % \typeout{** Please run "bibtex \jobname" to optain}
452: % \typeout{** the bibliography and then re-run LaTeX}
453: % \typeout{** twice to fix the references!}
454: % \typeout{******************************************}
455: % \typeout{}
456: % }
457:
458: \end{document}
459:
460: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
461: %% The following lines show an example how to produce a bibliography
462: %% without the help of the BibTeX program. This could be used instead
463: %% of the above.
464: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
465:
466: %% \begin{thebibliography}{9}
467: %%
468: %% \bibitem{Brown2000}
469: %% M.~P. Brown, and K.~Austin, \emph{The New Physique}, Publisher Name,
470: %% Publisher City, 2000, pp. 212--213.
471: %%
472: %% \bibitem{BrownAustin:2000}
473: %% M.~P. Brown, and K.~Austin, \emph{Appl. Phys. Letters} \textbf{85},
474: %% 2503--2504 (2000).
475: %%
476: %% \bibitem{Wang}
477: %% R.~Wang, ``Title of Chapter,'' in \emph{Classic Physiques}, edited by
478: %% R.~B. Hamil, Publisher Name, Publisher City, 2000, pp. 212--213.
479: %%
480: %% \bibitem{SJ:1999}
481: %% C.~D.~Smith and E.~F.~Jones, ``Load-Cycling in Cubic Press,'' in
482: %%\emph{Shock Compression of Condensed Matter-1999}, edited by M.~D.~F. et~al.,
483: %% AIP Conference Proceedings 505, American Institute of Physics, New York,
484: %% 1999, pp. 651--654.
485: %%
486: %% \end{thebibliography}
487: %%
488: %% \endinput
489: %%
490: %% End of file `template-6s.tex'.
491: