1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %%% PASJ LaTeX template for draft(body)<2001/02/08>
3: %%%
4: %%% IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR AUTHORS
5: %%% 1. ``\draft'' creates single column and double spaces format.
6: %%% 2. If you comment out ``\draft'', the output will be double column
7: %%% and single space.
8: %%% 3. For cross-references, the use of \label/\ref/\cite and the
9: %%% thebibliography environment is strongly recommended
10: %%% 4. Do NOT use \def/\renewcommand.
11: %%% 5. Do NOT redifine commands provided by PASJ00.cls.
12: %%%
13: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
14: \documentclass{pasj00}
15: \draft
16:
17:
18: \begin{document}
19: \SetRunningHead{Awaki et al.}{Detection of NGC 2273 with Suzaku}
20: \Received{**/**/**}%{yyyy/mm/dd}
21: \Accepted{**/**/**}%{yyyy/mm/dd}
22:
23: \title{Detection of Hard X-Rays from the Compton-Thick Seyfert 2 Galaxy NGC 2273 with Suzaku}
24:
25: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
26: %% author and affiliation information.
27: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
28: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
29: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
30: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
31:
32: %%% begin:list of authors
33: \author{Hisamitsu \textsc{Awaki},\altaffilmark{1},
34: Yuichi \textsc{Terashima}, \altaffilmark{1},
35: Yuusuke \textsc{Higaki}, \altaffilmark{1},
36: Yasushi \textsc{Fukazawa},\altaffilmark{2}
37: }
38: %% \thanks{Example: Present Address is xxxxxxxxxx}}
39: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics, Ehime University, Matsuyama, 790-8577, Japan}
40: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physical Science, Hiroshima University, \\
41: 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526}
42: \email{awaki@astro.phys.sci.ehime-u.ac.jp}
43: %%% end:list of authors
44:
45: %%% Please use the following style in case that sorting by
46: %%% affilation is impossible.
47: %
48: % \author{%
49: % D-Firstname \textsc{D-Familyname}\altaffilmark{1}
50: % E-Firstname \textsc{E-Familyname}\altaffilmark{1,2}
51: % and
52: % F-Firstname \textsc{F-Familyname}\altaffilmark{2}}
53: % \altaffiltext{1}{Address of Institute}
54: % \email{ddddd@xxx.xxx.xx.xx}
55: % \email{eeeee@xxx.xxx.xx.xx}
56: % \altaffiltext{2}{Address of Institute}
57:
58: %% `\KeyWords{}' always has to be placed before `\maketitle'.
59: \KeyWords{galaxies:active---galaxies: Seyfert ---galaxies: individual (NGC 2273)} %Do NOT move this preamble from here!
60:
61: \maketitle
62:
63: \begin{abstract}
64: We have obtained a broad-band spectrum of the Compton-thick Seyfert 2
65: galaxy NGC 2273 with Suzaku. The spectrum reveals the first detection
66: of hard X-rays above $\sim$10 keV from NGC 2273. The broad-band
67: spectrum is well represented by a three-component model, accompanied
68: by both a strong iron K$\alpha$ line with an equivalent width of
69: $\sim$1.8 keV and several weak lines. The three-component model
70: consists of a soft component, a reflection component from cold matter,
71: and an absorbed power-law component. The soft component can be
72: represented by thin thermal emission with $kT\sim$0.56 keV or by a
73: scattered component with a scattering fraction of 0.4\%. Fixing the
74: photon indices of the power law and reflection components at 1.9, we
75: found that the power law component, heavily absorbed by gas with a
76: column density of $\sim$ 1.5$\times$10$^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$, has an
77: intrinsic 2--10 keV luminosity of $\sim$1.7$\times$10$^{42}$ erg
78: s$^{-1}$. We also apply a reflection model based on a Monte Carlo
79: simulation, assuming a simple torus geometry. We found that the model
80: fits the broad band spectrum well, and we place some tentative
81: constraints on the geometry of the putative torus in NGC2273.
82: \end{abstract}
83:
84:
85: \section{Introduction}
86:
87: Compton-thick active galactic nuclei (AGN) are predicted to constitute
88: about a half of AGN (e.g., \cite{risaliti99}). This type of AGN has
89: a characteristic strong iron line with an equivalent width of $>$ 1
90: keV (e.g., \cite{bassani99}), and a low ratio of $L_{\rm X}$/$L_{\rm
91: [OIII]}$ (e.g., \cite{maiolino98}), where $L_{\rm X}$ and $L_{\rm
92: [OIII]}$ are the luminosity in the 2--10 keV band and the luminosity
93: of the [OIII]$\lambda$5007 line, respectively. However, the detailed
94: nature of this type of AGN remains unclear due to the heavy
95: obscuration below 10 keV and the complex X-ray spectrum. To reveal the
96: nature of the hidden nucleus and to understand the complex X-ray
97: spectra, we need to obtain broad-band spectra covering energies above
98: 10 keV. BeppoSAX detected hard X-rays above 10 keV from several
99: Compton-thick Seyfert 2 galaxies: e.g., NGC 1068 (Matt et al. 1997),
100: NGC 4945 (Guainazzi et al. 2000), Mrk 3 (Cappi et al. 1999), Circinus
101: galaxy (Matt et al. 1999), NGC 3393, and NGC 4939 (Maiolino et
102: al. 1998). Thanks to observations above 10 keV with INTEGRAL,
103: Swift/BAT, and Suzaku, the number of detected Compton-thick
104: sources has increased to 18 (Della Ceca 2008, and references
105: therein). However, the number of Compton-thick sources whose
106: wide-band spectra were analyzed in detail is small: e.g., NGC 1068
107: (Matt et al. 1997), Circinus galaxy (Matt et al. 1999; Yang et
108: al. 2008), Mrk 3 (Cappi et al. 1999; Awaki et al. 2008), NGC 4945
109: (Guainazzi et al. 2000; Itoh et al. 2008), and ESO 005-G004 (Ueda et
110: al. 2007).
111:
112: NGC 2273 is a nearby SB(r)a galaxy with a Seyfert 2 nucleus
113: (z=0.006138), and it is listed in a bright [OIII] sample of
114: \citet{risaliti99}. This galaxy is considered to be a Compton-thick
115: Seyfert 2 galaxy due to the detection of a strong iron line with an
116: equivalent width of greater than 1 keV and a low ratio of $L_{\rm
117: X}$/$L_{\rm [OIII]}$ (e.g., \cite{guainazzi05}). The
118: existence of a hidden nucleus is also suggested by the detection of
119: polarized broad lines \citep{moran00}, establishing the presence of a
120: Seyfert 1 nucleus obscured by thick matter. To measure the absorbing
121: column, NGC 2273 was observed with ASCA, BeppoSAX, and
122: XMM-Newton, but the column density could not be determined from these
123: data. \citet{terashima02} found that NGC 2273 had a large column
124: density of 1.1$\times$10$^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$, by fitting the 0.8--10 keV
125: ASCA spectra with a partially-covered power-law model. On the other
126: hand, \citet{maiolino98} and \citet{guainazzi05} suggested a large
127: absorbing column $>$10$^{25}$ cm$^{-2}$, due to lack of the absorbed
128: power-law component in the spectra below 10 keV observed with BeppoSAX
129: and XMM-Newton. In order to measure the column density and to reveal
130: its nuclear activity, a wide-band spectrum of NGC 2273 is crucial.
131:
132: Using the Japanese X-ray satellite Suzaku, it is possible to obtain a
133: wide-band spectrum from 0.2 to 700 keV \citep{mitsuda07}. The
134: satellite is suitable for achieving the aims of detecting the high
135: energy X-rays above 10 keV and of revealing the properties of the NGC
136: 2273 nucleus. In this paper, we present the analysis of the
137: broad-band spectrum of NGC 2273 obtained with Suzaku, and present the
138: results by fitting the spectrum with a baseline model consisting of a
139: soft component, an absorbed power-law component, and a reflection
140: component. In addition, we apply a reflection model based on a
141: Monte Carlo simulation assuming a simple torus geometry
142: \citep{ikeda08}. Quoted errors correspond to the 90 \% confidence
143: level for one interesting parameter, unless explicitly stated.
144:
145:
146: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
147:
148: NGC 2273 was observed with the Suzaku satellite on 2007 April 21--22
149: during the AO-2 phase. Suzaku has four X-ray telescopes (XRTs:
150: \cite{serlemitsos07}) with X-ray CCD cameras (XIS) in their
151: focal-planes. The XISs are sensitive to 0.2--12 keV X-rays on a
152: 18$^{\prime}\times18^{\prime}$ field of view. Three of the four XISs
153: (XIS-0, 2, and 3) are front-illuminated CCDs (FI) and the other XIS
154: (XIS-1) is a back-illuminated CCD (BI) \citep{koyama07}. Due to
155: damage to XIS2 on 2006 November 9, no astronomical data were obtained
156: with XIS2. Suzaku also has a non-imaging hard X-ray detector (HXD:
157: \cite{takahashi07}). The HXD has two types of detectors, the PIN and
158: the GSO, which are sensitive between $\sim$10 and $\sim$700 keV.
159:
160: NGC 2273 was placed at the HXD-nominal position, and then both XIS
161: and HXD data were obtained simultaneously. The XISs were operated in
162: the normal clocking mode with spaced-raw-charge injection (SCI) in
163: order to recover the cumulative effect of in-orbit radiation damage
164: \citep{nakajima08}. The observed data were processed through pipeline
165: processing. We analyzed the v2.0 data by using the analysis software
166: package HEASOFT 6.4 and the calibration database CALDB released on
167: 2008 February 1.
168:
169: \subsection{XIS Reduction}
170: The XIS team recommends a recalculation of the PI values to account
171: for the update of the CALDB files. Thus, we performed the
172: recalculation of unfiltered event files, and then reprocessed the
173: cleaned event files from the XIS-0, 1, and 3 with the {\it xselect}
174: script provided by NASA/GSFC GOF \footnote{The Suzaku Data Reduction
175: Guide January 2008, which can be obtained from the GOF web page at
176: {\it
177: http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.goc/docs/suzaku/aehp\_data\_analysis.html}}.
178: We imposed an additional data screening with a criterion "COR $>$ 6",
179: where COR is geomagnetic cut-off rigidity in units of GV. The net
180: exposure of the cleaned event data was about 76 ks. We made a 0.4--2
181: keV band image and a 2--10 keV band image using the cleaned XIS data
182: (Figure 1), and clearly detected NGC 2273 and two nearby bright X-ray
183: sources, 2XMM J065012.9+604842 and 2XMM J065003.7+604639. The XIS0
184: count rates of these detected sources are listed in Table 1. The
185: former bright XMM-source is also known as a radio source NVSS
186: J065012+604842 \citep{condon98}. Since one of the serendipitous X-ray
187: sources, 2XMM J065012.9+604842 is within $\sim$2$^{\prime}$ .1
188: of NGC 2273, we selected X-ray events within a 2$^{\prime}$.0
189: radius centered on NGC 2273 and removed X-ray events close to the
190: serendipitous source for the spectral analysis in order to reduce the
191: contamination from the serendipitous X-ray source.
192:
193: Response matrices (RMFs) and ancillary response files (ARFs) were
194: generated for each XIS independently by using {\it xisrmfgen} and {\it
195: xissimarfgen} \citep{ishisaki07}. To examine the accuracy of the
196: energy scale of our data, we extracted spectra of the $^{55}$Fe
197: calibration sources which illuminate the CCD corners, and
198: then fitted the spectra with a two-Gaussian model. The difference
199: between the best-fit center energies of the calibration sources and
200: the weighted value of the theoretical energies for the transitions of
201: K$\alpha_1$ and K$\alpha_2$ was 0--10 eV, which was within the
202: accuracy ($\sim$0.2\% at Mn-K$\alpha$) of the energy calibration of
203: XIS. The line widths of the calibration sources were found to be $<$
204: 25 eV. Since the energy scales of the front-illuminated CCDs, XIS-0
205: and 3 were quite similar to within 5 eV, we added the XIS-0 and XIS-3
206: spectra of NGC 2273 using {\it mathpha}.
207:
208: To estimate the contamination from the nearby source, we made a
209: spectrum of 2XMM J065012.9+604842 by extracting X-ray events within a
210: 2$^{\prime}$ radius centered on this source. Note that the X-ray events
211: close to NGC 2273 were removed in this spectral analysis. The X-ray
212: spectrum is shown in Figure 2. The spectrum was fitted by a single
213: power law model with a photon index of 1.72$^{+0.15}_{-0.14}$ absorbed
214: by $N_{\rm H}$=7$^{+7}_{-6}\times$10$^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$. The absorbing
215: column is consistent with the Galactic column density toward NGC 2273,
216: 6.7$\times$ 10$^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ \citep{kalberla05}. The X-ray fluxes
217: in the 0.5--2 keV and the 2--10 keV bands were measured to be
218: 7.6$\times$10$^{-14}$ and 1.7$\times$ 10$^{-13}$ ergs s$^{-1}$
219: cm$^{-2}$, respectively. We found, analyzing the XMM-Newton archival
220: data, that the flux had increased by a factor two in both bands.
221: The contamination of 2XMM J065012.9+604842 in the NGC 2273 source
222: region was inferred to be $\sim$1.8$\times$10$^{-14}$ erg s$^{-1}$
223: cm$^{-2}$ in the 2--10 keV band, and this contamination was taken into
224: account in our fitting procedure.
225:
226:
227: \subsection{HXD Reduction}
228: The internal (non-X-ray) background (NXB) of the HXD-PIN is variable,
229: and depends strongly on the Suzaku satellite orbit \citep{kokubun07}.
230: Thus we extracted both the source and the NXB spectra with identical
231: good time intervals. After the instrument dead-time correction of the
232: source spectrum, an exposure time of 64.6 ks was obtained. A NXB
233: spectrum for the NGC 2273 observation was produced by the tuned NXB
234: event file for v2.0 data. Since the HXD-PIN is not an imaging
235: detector, we also had to subtract any contribution from the Cosmic
236: X-ray Background (CXB). We simulated a CXB spectrum observed by the
237: HXD-PIN, and then added the simulated CXB spectrum to the NXB
238: spectrum. The HXD-PIN count rate of NGC 2273 was found to be about
239: 0.020$\pm$0.002 cts s$^{-1}$ in the 15--40 keV band, which was about
240: 7\% of the NXB of the HXD-PIN. Note that the errors presented in this
241: subsection are at 1$\sigma$ level. The accuracy of the present PIN
242: NXB model in a 40 ks observation is about 1\% of the NXB at the
243: 1$\sigma$ level (Mizuno et
244: al. 2008\footnote{http://www.astro.isas.jaxa.jp/suzaku/doc/suzakumemo/suzakumemo-2008-03.pdf}).
245: NGC 2273 was detected in the 15--40 keV band with $>$ 5 $\sigma$
246: level. We confirmed the detection of the hard X-rays of NGC 2273 from
247: the comparison of the PIN count rates in the 15--40 keV band with
248: those obtained during earth occultation. Although there were no
249: earth occultation data taken during this observation, we were able to
250: use the earth occultation data from both the previous and the
251: subsequent observations; these are included in the Suzaku trend
252: archive provided by the Suzaku team. The upper panel
253: of Figure 3 shows a light curve of the PIN count rates in the 15--40
254: keV band during earth occultation and the data reproduced by the NXB
255: model. We also plotted the light curve of NGC 2273 in this panel. The
256: bottom panel shows the light curve in which the NXB model has been
257: subtracted. A clear excess was found during the NGC 2273 observation
258: with a mean count rate of 0.035$\pm$0.003 c s$^{-1}$. Subtracting the
259: CXB count rate of 0.016 c s$^{-1}$ from the mean count rate yields an
260: estimated net count rate of 0.019$\pm$0.003 c s$^{-1}$. Since the PIN
261: FOV is 34$^{\prime}\times$34$\prime$ (Kokubun et al. 2007), there are bright
262: X-ray sources detected with XIS in the PIN FOV. We estimated the
263: contamination of the brightest XMM source, 2XMM J065012.9+604842 by
264: extrapolation of its 2-10 keV band spectrum. The contamination was
265: estimated to be about 0.0005 c s$^{-1}$ in the 15--40 keV band, which
266: corresponds to about 3 \% of the net count rate. Since the 2--10 keV
267: count rate of the other XMM source is about 1/3 of the brightest XMM
268: source, we concluded that NGC 2273 was detected in the 15--40 keV
269: band.
270:
271: The response matrix for a point source at the HXD nominal position
272: (ae\_hxd\_pinhxnome3\_20070914.rsp) was used for our spectral
273: analysis. The cross-normalization of the HXD-PIN relative to the XIS0
274: have been derived using Suzaku observations of the Crab nebula. We
275: used the cross-normalization of 1.137$\pm$0.015 at the HXD nominal
276: position (Ishida et
277: al. 2007\footnote{http://www.astro.isas.jaxa.jp/suzaku/doc/suzakumemo/suzakumemo-2007-11.pdf}).
278:
279: The spectra of XIS and HXD PIN were binned to a minimum of 50 and 1500
280: counts per bin, respectively.
281:
282: \section{Analysis \& Results}
283: \subsection{Spectral Analysis with the Baseline Model}
284:
285: \citet{guainazzi05} found that the XMM-Newton spectrum was well
286: fitted with a thin-thermal model ( {\it mekal} in
287: {\it XSPEC}), plus Compton reflection model ({\it pexrav} ). Thus we
288: fitted the XIS and HXD spectra with this model using {\it XSPEC}
289: v12.4.0. The abundances of \citet{ag89} were used. The cosine of the
290: inclination and the iron abundance in {\it pexrav} were fixed at 0.45
291: and one solar abundance, respectively. The best-fit spectrum and
292: residuals are shown in Figure 4. The overall spectrum was represented
293: by this model with a $\chi^{2}$ of 199.2 with 130 degrees of freedom
294: (d.o.f.); however, there were several features apparent in the
295: residuals. Therefore, we added gaussian components at $\sim$0.7,
296: $\sim$1.8, $\sim$3.2, $\sim$7.0, and $\sim$7.2 keV to the model. The
297: $\chi^{2}$ was reduced to 120 with 120 d.o.f. The best-fit
298: parameters are listed as Model 1 in Table 2. The $\sim$3.2 keV line
299: like feature was also detected in the BeppoSAX observation
300: \citep{maiolino98}, although the significance of this feature was low.
301: The best-fit photon index was well determined to be
302: 1.49$^{+0.13}_{-0.08}$, which was consistent with that found in the
303: XMM-Newton spectrum (1.5$\pm$0.4; \cite{guainazzi05}). The
304: thin-thermal component was represented by a temperature of
305: $kT\sim$0.59 keV and a metal abundance of 0.04 solar. We note that
306: a portion of the line fluxes of the additional lines at $\sim$0.7
307: and $\sim$1.8 keV could be explained by increasing metal abundances of
308: O and Si to 0.1$^{+0.4}_{-0.1}$ and 0.45$^{+0.30}_{-0.20}$ solar,
309: respectively. However, line-like features still remained near these
310: line energies. This may indicate that the lines are composed of
311: different origins. The thermal component is absorbed by a thick
312: matter with $N_{\rm H}$=(2.9$^{+2.6}_{-1.4}$)$\times$10$^{21}$
313: cm$^{-2}$, which is significantly larger than the Galactic column
314: density. The observed fluxes in the 0.5--2 keV, 2--10 keV, and 15--40
315: keV bands were estimated to be 6$\times$10$^{-14}$,
316: 9.5$\times$10$^{-13}$, and 1.0$\times$10$^{-11}$ erg s$^{-1}$
317: cm$^{-2}$, respectively. The 2--10 keV flux is nearly equal to the
318: BeppoSAX result \citep{maiolino98}, although the flux is 1.3 times
319: larger than that of XMM-Newton. The 0.5--2 keV flux is consistent with
320: the XMM-Newton result considering the uncertainties
321: \citep{guainazzi05}. The iron line intensity of
322: (2.5$\pm$0.2)$\times$10$^{-5}$ ph s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ is consistent
323: with that found using XMM-Newton
324: ((2.3$^{+0.4}_{-0.3}$)$\times$10$^{-5}$ ph s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$) and
325: using BeppoSAX ((2.36$^{+1.35}_{-0.70}$) $\times$10$^{-5}$ ph s$^{-1}$
326: cm$^{-2}$)).
327:
328: The best-fit photon index in the above model was clearly smaller than
329: the canonical value of $\sim$1.9 for AGNs (e.g., Nandra et
330: al. 1997). Therefore, we added a heavily absorbed component to the
331: model. We assumed that the photon index of the absorbed
332: power-law component is the same as that of the reflection component,
333: and fixed the photon index at 1.9. The model gives a $\chi^{2}$ value
334: of 119 with 120 d.o.f. The best-fit parameters are listed in Tables 2 and
335: 3, and residuals are plotted in Figure 4 (Model 2 in Table 2). Since
336: the best-fit absorption column ($N_{\rm H}$) was deduced to be
337: (1.46$\pm$0.42)$\times$10$^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$, we considered
338: attenuation of the X-ray light due to Thomson scattering by the thick
339: matter along our line of sight. The reflection ratio $R$ of the cold
340: reflection to the absorbed power law component was found to be
341: 0.5$^{+0.7}_{-0.3}$. The 2--10 keV intrinsic luminosity, $L_{\rm
342: 2-10}$, was estimated to be 1.7$^{+2.5}_{-0.4} \times$10$^{42}$ erg
343: s$^{-1}$ assuming $H_{\rm 0}$=70 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$. The error of
344: the luminosity was calculated from the error on the normalization of
345: the absorbed power-law component. The equivalent width (hereafter EW)
346: of the iron K$\alpha$ line with respect to the continuum emission was
347: deduced to be 1.8$\pm0.1$ keV. The column density and the reflection
348: ratio are affected by the systematic uncertainties of the
349: reproducibility of the PIN NXB. For the +1\% NXB and $-$1\% NXB, the
350: best-fit values became 1.0 and 0.3 for $R$, and 1.15$\times$10$^{24}$
351: cm $^{-2}$ and 1.72$\times$10$^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$ for $N_{\rm H}$,
352: respectively. The change in these parameters is smaller than the
353: statistical errors on $R$ and $N_{\rm H}$.
354:
355: $N_{\rm H}$ and $L_{\rm 2-10}$ are expected to depend on the
356: intrinsic power-law photon index. We examined this parameter coupling
357: by fitting the spectrum with model 2 assuming a photon index of 1.7
358: or 2.1 instead of 1.9. The models using these photon indices also fit
359: well with $\chi^2$=116 and 124 (120 d.o.f), respectively. For a
360: photon index of 1.7, $N_{\rm H}$ and $L_{\rm 2-10}$ were found to be
361: 1.10$^{+0.55}_{-0.40}\times$10$^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$ and
362: 0.5$^{+1.0}_{-0.2}\times$10$^{42}$ erg s$^{-1}$, respectively. On
363: the other hand, for a photon index of 2.1, $N_{\rm H}$ and $L_{\rm
364: 2-10}$ were found to be 1.6$\pm$0.4$\times$10$^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$ and
365: 3.0$^{+1.7}_{-1.5}\times$10$^{42}$ erg s$^{-1}$, respectively. These
366: best-fit values of $N_{\rm H}$ are close to those obtained with the
367: photon index was fixed at 1.9; in contrast, the $L_{\rm 2-10}$ values
368: are different from that using a photon index of 1.9. Levenson et
369: al. (2006) found a relationship between Fe line luminosity $L_{\rm
370: Fe}$ and intrinsic luminosity based on Monte Carlo simulations.
371: Although the ratio $L_{\rm Fe}$/$L_{\rm 2-10}$ depends on the
372: geometry of a torus, they found a typical ratio of 2$\times$10$^{-3}$.
373: NGC 2273 has a intense iron line with $L_{\rm Fe}$$\sim$
374: 2$\times$10$^{40}$ erg s$^{-1}$, and the intense iron line requires
375: $L_{\rm 2-10}$$\sim$10$^{43}$ erg s$^{-1}$. Based on the Levenson et
376: al.\ (2006) relationship, the $L_{\rm 2-10}$ found using a photon
377: index of 1.7 may be too low to explain the observed $L_{\rm Fe}$.
378:
379: It is possible to search for a Compton shoulder (hereafter CS) on an
380: iron K$\alpha$ line with large equivalent width. We added a pulse
381: function with a pulse width of 156 eV in order to represent the
382: first-order CS of iron K$\alpha$ line \citep{awaki08}. We found
383: that the fraction of the CS intensity with respect to that of the
384: primary Gaussian component is less than 15\%. \citet{matt02}
385: calculated the fractions of CS for a spherical distribution
386: of matter, and for a plane-parallel slab. The low fraction of $<$
387: 15\% indicates a low column density below 10$^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$ and/or
388: small inclination angle to the slab.
389:
390: An iron K$_{\beta}$ line was also detected with an intensity of
391: (3.2$\pm$1.0)$\times$10$^{-6}$ ph s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$. Fe K$_{\alpha}$
392: and K$_{\beta}$ lines are useful for estimating the ionization state
393: of the line-emitting gas (e.g., \cite{bianchi05}; \cite{yaqoob07}). We
394: derived a line intensity ratio, $I_{K\beta}$/$I_{K\alpha}$, of
395: 0.13$\pm$0.04, which is consistent with emission by low ionization
396: states of iron \citep{palmeri03}. The measured center energies of the
397: iron K$\alpha$ and K$\beta$ lines also indicate a low ionization state
398: ($\leqq$ Fe IX) of the reflecting matter. The low ionization state
399: corresponds to an ionization parameter ($\xi$=$\frac{L^{\rm
400: ion}}{n~r^{2}}$) of $\xi$ $<$ 1 erg cm s$^{-1}$, assuming low density
401: gas, where $L^{\rm ion}$, $n$ and $r$ are the luminosity in the 1 --
402: 1000 ryd band, the hydrogen density of material, and the distance from
403: the X-ray source. Assuming a simple power law model with a photon
404: index of 1.9, $L^{\rm ion}$ is inferred to be 3.5-times the 2--10 keV
405: luminosity.
406:
407: The soft component of NGC 2273 was fitted with a thermal plasma
408: model with $kT\sim$0.56 keV. Next, we examined whether the soft component
409: instead could be represented by a scattered component as seen in Mrk
410: 3. Since the soft component of Mrk 3 is a good template for the scattered
411: light of AGN (e.g., \cite{sako00}), we rescaled the soft component of
412: Mrk 3 to produce the soft component of NGC 2273. In this fit, we
413: fixed the photon index at 1.8, which is the best-fit photon index for
414: Mrk 3 \citep{awaki08}. We found that the overall spectrum of NGC 2273
415: could be represented with a scaling factor of $\sim$0.092. The best-fit
416: parameters are listed as model 3 in Table 2, and the best-fit spectrum
417: is shown in Figure 5. The scaling factor corresponds to a scattered
418: fraction of 0.4$\pm$0.1\%. Note that we also included additional
419: lines that are present in the thin thermal model. The best-fit
420: line intensities for the 0.7 keV and 1.8 keV lines are changed to
421: 7$^{+7}_{-4}\times 10^{-6}$ and 1.2$\pm$10$^{-6}$ ph s$^{-1}$
422: cm$^{-2}$, respectively.
423:
424: \subsection{Spectral Analysis with a Reflection Model based on a Monte
425: Carlo Simulations}
426:
427: The baseline model is useful to reproduce X-ray spectra of Seyfert 2
428: galaxies empirically. However, it is difficult to obtain information
429: about the structure of surrounding material from the spectral fitting
430: with the baseline model, since $pexrav$ was developed for an accretion
431: disc geometry (Magdziarz \& Zdziarski 1995). Thus, we tried to
432: reproduce the X-ray spectrum of NGC 2273 with a reflection model based
433: on a Monte Carlo simulation in which a simple torus geometry of the
434: surrounding material with arbitrary half opening angle, viewing
435: angle, and column density along the equatorial plane was assumed (see
436: Figure 2 in \cite{ikeda08}). \citet{ikeda08} divided the simulation
437: spectra into three components: the direct component, a reflection
438: component absorbed by the torus itself (reflection 1), and an
439: unabsorbed reflection component (reflection 2), and created table
440: models of these reflection components for XSPEC. We fitted the
441: observed spectrum with these table models in the energy range from 1
442: to 40 keV (model 4 in Table 4). These models also worked well with a
443: $\chi^{2}$ of 108 (dof=106) (see Table 4 and Figure 6). Due to
444: Compton scattering by thick matter along our line of sight, the
445: absorbed component in Figure 6 was reduced by a factor of
446: $\exp(-\sigma_{\rm c}N_{\rm H})$, where $\sigma_{\rm c}$ is the Compton
447: scattering cross-section. \citet{ikeda08} pointed out that the
448: $\chi^{2}$ value was affected by the statistical deviation of the
449: table models. In the case of Mrk 3, the scatter in $\chi^{2}$ due
450: to that deviation was estimated to be about 5. Since NGC 2273 is
451: fainter than Mrk 3, the scatter of the $\chi^{2}$ was estimated to be
452: less than 1. The best-fit opening angle of the torus was found to
453: be 40$^{+25}_{-30}$$^{\circ}$. We found that the viewing angle was
454: strongly coupled to the opening angle, and the best-fit viewing
455: angle was 2--3$^{\circ}$ larger than the opening angle. In Table 4, we
456: give the difference between these angles when we fixed the opening
457: angle at the best-fit value. This result means that we observe the
458: nucleus along a line of sight intercepting the torus near its edge. As
459: a result, we observed strong unabsorbed reflection. The best-fit
460: photon index of the power-law component is 2.42$^{+0.08}_{-0.57}$. The
461: positive bound on the photon index is a consequence of the hard limit
462: of the table models of $\Gamma=2.5$. The column density along the
463: equatorial plane of the torus is 5.4$^{+3.7}_{-3.1}\times$ 10$^{24}$
464: cm$^{-2}$. The X-ray luminosity in the 2--10 keV band was estimated
465: to be 3.9$\times$10$^{42}$ erg s$^{-1}$. When we fixed the photon
466: index at 1.9, the $\chi^{2}$ becomes 111.6 (dof=107), the column
467: density along the equatorial plane becomes
468: (4.8$^{+5.2}_{-3.0}$)$\times$10$^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$ and the intrinsic
469: X-ray luminosity in the 2--10 keV band is estimated to be
470: 1.9$\times$10$^{42}$ erg s$^{-1}$.
471:
472:
473: \section{Discussion}
474: \subsection{Hard X-ray Emission and AGN Activity}
475: Thanks to the high sensitivity of Suzaku, we detected X-ray photons
476: above 10 keV at the $>$ 5 $\sigma$ significance level. The hard X-ray
477: flux in the 15--40 keV band was estimated to be 1$\times$10$^{-11}$
478: erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$. The wide-band X-ray spectrum in the 0.3--40
479: keV band was roughly fitted with the model applied by
480: \citet{guainazzi05}. However, we found that the best-fit photon index
481: of $\sim$1.5 is clearly smaller than the canonical value for Seyfert
482: galaxies. Therefore, we added an absorbed power-law emission to the
483: model, and obtained the best-fit absorption column of
484: $\sim$1.5$\times$10$^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$, and the intrinsic luminosity of
485: $L_{\rm 2-10}$=1.7$\times$10$^{42}$ erg s$^{-1}$. Our observation has
486: revealed a luminous nucleus obscured by optically thick matter.
487:
488: We compared the intrinsic X-ray luminosity of NGC 2273 with the
489: [OIII]$\lambda$5007 luminosity in order to determine the nature of the
490: Compton-thick nucleus. \citet{heckman05} shows that ratios of hard
491: X-ray (2--10 keV) to [OIII] luminosities for Seyfert 1 galaxies are
492: distributed around 1.59 dex with a standard deviation of only 0.48
493: dex. The [OIII] luminosity of NGC 2273 was found to be
494: 4.2$\times$10$^{40}$ erg s$^{-1}$ by \citet{whittle92} assuming
495: $H_{\rm 0}$ = 70 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$. Based on the mean ratio
496: given by \citet{heckman05}, this [OIII] luminosity suggests that the
497: intrinsic X-ray luminosity from the AGN should be 1.6$\times$10$^{42}$
498: erg s$^{-1}$ in the 2--10 keV band. This estimate is consistent with
499: our result. Thus, the ionized region emitting the [OIII] line is most
500: likely powered by the intense emission from the nucleus.
501: \citet{maiolino98} pointed out that the Seyfert 2 galaxy NGC
502: 2273 was consistent with being Compton thick because of its low
503: luminosity ratio, $L_{\rm 2-10}$/$L_{\rm [OIII]}$, of $<$ 0 dex. Our
504: Suzaku observation allows us to measure the 2 - 10 keV intrinsic
505: luminosity of NGC 2273, and suggests that NGC 2273 has a similar
506: intrinsic ratio as those of Seyfert 1 galaxies.
507:
508: We note that NGC 2273 was undetected in a 12 ks observation by the PDS
509: on-board BeppoSAX\citep{maiolino98}. They obtained a 1$\sigma$-upper
510: limit of 0.096 c s$^{-1}$ in the 15-100 keV band, which corresponds to
511: a 15-40 keV flux of $\sim$5$\times$10$^{-12}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$,
512: assuming the same spectral shape as that of Mrk 3. This upper limit is
513: about half of our detected flux. This discrepancy can be explained by
514: time variability of the absorbed power-law emission on a time scale of
515: years. If NGC 2273 lacked the absorbed power-law emission, the
516: observed flux would be reduced to $\sim$5$\times$10$^{-12}$ erg
517: s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$. The absence of the absorbed emission may be
518: caused by a decrease of the intrinsic luminosity and/or an increase of
519: the absorption column up to $>$ 3.5$\times$10$^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$.
520:
521: \subsection{Soft X-ray Emission }
522: \citet{fwm00} found [NII] +H$\alpha$ emission associated with a
523: nuclear ring, and this emission was inferred to be produced by
524: star-formation activity in the ring. The soft X-rays represented by a
525: thin-thermal model with $kT$$\sim$0.6 keV may be associated with the
526: star-formation activity. The X-ray luminosity, $L_{\rm 0.5-2.0}$, of
527: the thin-thermal component was estimated to be 6$\times$10$^{39}$ erg
528: s$^{-1}$ in the 0.5 -- 2.0 keV band. This galaxy has luminous
529: far-infrared emission with $L_{\rm FIR}$ = 2.9$\times$10$^{43}$ erg
530: s$^{-1}$ (Londsdale et al. 1992). The observed 0.5--2 keV luminosity
531: is nearly equal to expectations given the ratio of $L_{\rm
532: 0.5-2.0}$/$L_{\rm FIR}$ for starburst galaxies \citep{rcs02}. In the
533: thin-thermal model, the absorption by $N_{\rm H}$=
534: (2.9$^{+2.6}_{-1.4}$)$\times$10$^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$ is required. The
535: absorption can be explained by an obscuration of HII regions in the
536: galaxy ring (Ferruit et al. 2000). On the other hand, the soft X-rays
537: may come from a photoionized region as often seen in other Seyfert 2
538: galaxies. The scattering fraction is found to be $\sim$0.4\%, which
539: is about half that found in Mrk 3 \citep{awaki08}. In this model, the
540: additional lines at $\sim$0.7 keV and $\sim$1.8 keV were explained by
541: the emission from photo-ionized plasma. The line at $\sim$1.8 keV
542: suggests a lower-ionization form of Si in the photoionized region of
543: NGC 2273 compared with that of Mrk 3.
544:
545: Since the observed soft emission is consistent both with thin thermal
546: emission from the star-forming region, and with a scattered component
547: often seen in Seyfert 2 galaxies, we cannot conclusively determine
548: its origin. A deep Chandra observation could possibly
549: separate the thin thermal emission from the nuclear emission, since
550: the H$\alpha$ region is often coincident with the thin-thermal
551: emission region, and the diameter of the circumnuclear region is about
552: 4$^{\prime\prime}$.
553:
554: \subsection{Implications for reflecting matter in NGC 2273}
555: Using the iron lines, we found the reflecting matter is in a low
556: ionization state with $\xi$ $<$ 1 erg cm s$^{-1}$, suggesting that the
557: reflecting matter is located at some distance from the X-ray source:
558: $\sim 0.75 (\frac{L^{\rm ion}}{\rm 5\times10^{42}~erg~s^{-1}})^{1/2}~
559: (\frac{\xi}{\rm 1~erg~cm~s^{-1}})^{-1/2}~(\frac{n}{\rm
560: 10^{6}~cm^{-3}})^{-1/2}$ (pc). A characteristic broad-line region
561: size ($R_{\rm BLR}$) has been shown to be related to the X-ray, UV,
562: and optical continuum luminosities \citep{kaspi05}. Using their
563: relationship, the characteristic $R_{\rm BLR}$ was estimated to be
564: $\sim 0.003 (\frac{L_{\rm 2-10}} {2\times10^{42}
565: {\rm~erg~s^{-1}}})^{0.7}$ (pc). The distance of the reflecting
566: matter is larger than the characteristic size of broad line region of
567: NGC 2273. It is natural to consider the reflection matter to be the
568: dusty torus which also obscures the broad line region in this Seyfert
569: 2 galaxy.
570:
571:
572: We tried to determine the properties of the dusty torus of NGC 2273 by
573: fitting the reflection component seen in the observed spectrum with
574: the reflection model based on simulations. Although the
575: opening angle of the torus was poorly constrained, we found that we
576: observe the nucleus along a line of sight intercepting the torus near
577: its edge. If the photon index was fixed at 1.9, the intrinsic
578: luminosity in the 2--10 keV band and the column density of the torus
579: along the equatorial plane were estimated to be 1.9$\times$10$^{42}$
580: erg s$^{-1}$ and 4.8$^{+5.2}_{-3.0}\times$10$^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$,
581: respectively. The large column of the torus naturally explains the
582: observed large iron line EW of 1.8 keV (e.g., \cite{ikeda08}).
583: However, the large column predicts a large fraction of CS up to 0.2
584: (e.g., \cite{matt02}). In the torus geometry, the column density
585: should be small, and/or the opening angle should be large to obtain
586: such a small CS. We performed Monte Carlo simulations using the torus
587: geometry to explain the small CS. Figure 7 shows the fraction of the
588: CS as a function of column density and opening angle. The large
589: opening angle seems to be inconsistent with the small fraction of the
590: scattering X-rays. To resolve the puzzle about the small CS, an
591: accurate measurement of the CS using an instrument with high energy
592: resolution, such as the X-ray micro-calorimeter onboad {\it Astro-H},
593: is crucial.
594:
595: \section{Conclusion}
596: We observed the weak Compton-thick Seyfert 2 galaxy NGC 2273 with the
597: Japanese X-ray satellite Suzaku, and detected hard X-rays above 10
598: keV. The flux in the 15-40 keV is about 1$\times$10$^{-11}$ erg
599: s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$. First, the broad-band spectrum from 0.3 to 40 keV
600: was fitted with thin-thermal plus reflection components. The best-fit
601: photon index was found to be 1.5, smaller than the
602: canonical value of Seyfert galaxies. We then added an absorbed
603: power-law component to the model. When we fixed the photon index at
604: 1.9, the absorbed column and intrinsic luminosity in the 2--10 keV
605: band were found to be 1.5$\times$10$^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$ and
606: 2$\times$10$^{42}$ erg s$^{-1}$, respectively. Our observation
607: reveals the obscured nucleus of NGC 2273. The luminosity ratio,
608: $L_{\rm X}/L_{\rm [OIII]}$, for NGC 2273 is similar to those for
609: Seyfert 1 galaxies. This indicates that the photoionized region that
610: is emitting the [OIII] lines is consistent with being powered by the
611: nuclear activity. For the soft X-ray emission below 2 keV, it could
612: be represented equally well by thin-thermal emission or by a scattered
613: emission model as seen in Mrk 3, and thus we could not obtain a
614: conclusive result on the origin of the soft component.
615:
616: A strong iron K$\alpha$ line with an EW of 1.8 keV was detected. To
617: achieve such a large EW, the direct light must be blocked by thick
618: matter with $N_{\rm H}$ $>$ 2$\times$10$^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$. This column
619: density is consistent with the spectral fitting using a model based
620: on a Monte Carlo simulation. However, the large column density is
621: inconsistent with the observed small fraction of CS of the iron
622: K$\alpha$ line. We also detected a weak iron K$\beta$ line with a
623: center energy of $\sim$7.0 keV. From the properties of K$\alpha$ and
624: K$\beta$ lines, we conclude that the iron emitting matter is in a low
625: ionization states of $<$ Fe VIII, which indicate that the iron
626: emitting matter is located far from the X-ray source.
627:
628: We fitted the hard X-ray emission with a reflection model based on a
629: Monte Carlo simulation, assuming a simple torus geometry. Although the
630: opening angle of the torus was not constrained well, it was found that
631: we observe the nucleus along a line of sight intercepting the torus
632: near its edge. The column density of the torus along the equatorial
633: plane is 4.8$^{+6.2}_{-3.0}\times$10$^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$ if the photon
634: index is fixed at 1.9.
635:
636:
637: %
638: \vspace{1cm}
639:
640: The authors wish to thank the members of the Suzaku team for their
641: operation of the satellite, and the members of the Suzaku HXD team for
642: their effort on the NXB study of the HXD. We are very grateful to an
643: anonymous referee for valuable comments and to Dr. K. Leighly for her careful reading of our draft.
644: This study is carried out in
645: part by the Grant support for Scientific Research of Ehime university
646: (H.A.) and the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (20740109 Y.T.)
647: of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.
648:
649:
650:
651: \begin{thebibliography}{}
652:
653: \bibitem[Anders \& Grevesse (1989)]{ag89} Anders, E., \& Grevesse, N. 1989, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 53, 197
654: %%\bibitem{Antonucci, Miller 1985} Antonucci, R. R. J. \& Miller, J. S. 1985, \apj, 297, 621
655: %%\bibitem{Awaki et al. 1990} Awaki, H., Koyama, K., Kunieda, H., \& Tawara, Y. 1990, \nat, 346, 544
656: %%\bibitem{Awaki et al. 1991} Awaki, H., Koyama, K., Inoue, H., \& Halpern, J. P. 1991, \pasj, 43, 195
657: %%\bibitem{Awaki et al. 2006} Awaki, H., Murakami, H., Ogawa, Y., \& Leighly, K. 2006, ApJ, 645, 928
658: \bibitem[Awaki et al. (2008)]{awaki08} Awaki, H. et al. 2008, \pasj, 60, S293
659: \bibitem[Bassani et al. (1999)]{bassani99} Bassani, L., Dadina, M., Naiolino, R., Salvati, M., Risaliti, G., Della Ceca, R., Matt, G., \& Zamorani, G. 1999, \apjs, 121, 473
660: \bibitem[Bianchi et al. (2005)]{bianchi05} Bianchi, S., Miniutti, G., Fabian, A. C., \& Iwasawa, K. 2005, \mnras, 360, 380
661: %%\bibitem{Boldt 196} Bolt, E. 1987, IAU Symp., 124, 611
662: %%\bibitem{Capetti et al. 1995} Capetti, A., Macchetto, F., Axon, D. J., Sparks, W. B., \& Boksenberg, A. 1995, \apj, 448, 600
663: \bibitem[Cappi et al. (1999)]{cappi99} Cappi, M. et al. 1999, \aap, 344, 857
664: \bibitem[Condon et al. (1998)]{condon98} Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., Greisen, E. W., Yin, Q. F., Perley, R. A., Taylor, G. B., \& Broderick, J. J. 1998, \aj, 115, 1693
665: %%\bibitem{Corbert, Ptak 2002} Corbert, E. J. M., \& Ptak, A. F. 2002, \apjs, 143, 25
666: %%\bibitem[David et al. (1992)]{david92} David, L. P., Jones, C., \& Forman, W. 1992, \apj, 388, 82
667: \bibitem[Della Ceca (2008)]{dc08} Della Ceca, R., Severgnini, P., Caccianiga, A., Comastri, A., Gilli, R., Fiore, F., Piconcelli, E., Malaguti, P., \& Vignali, C. 2008, {\it Mem. S.A.It}, 79, 65
668: \bibitem[Ferruit, Wilson, \& Mulchaey (2000)]{fwm00} Ferruit, P., Wilson, A. S., \& Mulchaey, J. 2000, \apjs, 128, 139
669: %%\bibitem{Ghisellini et al. 1994} Ghisellini, G., Haardt, F., \& Matt, G. 1994, \mnras, 267, 743
670: %%\bibitem{George, Fabian 1991} George, I.M., Fabian, A.C. 1991, MNRAS, 249, 352
671: %%\bibitem{Griffiths et al. 1998} Griffiths, R. G., Warwick, R. S., Georgantopolos, I., Done, C., \& Smith, D. A. 1998, \mnras, 298, 1159
672: %%\bibitem{Gruber et al. 1999} Gruber, D.E., Matteson, J.L., Peterson, L.E., \& Jung, G.V. 1999, ApJ, 520, 124
673: \bibitem[Guainazzi et al. (2000)]{guainazzi00} Guainazzi, M., Matt, G., Brandt, W. N., Antonelli, L. A., Barr, P., \& Bassani, L. 2000, \aap, 356, 463
674: \bibitem[Guainazzi et al. (2005)]{guainazzi05} Guainazzi, M., Fabian, A. C., Iwasawa, K., Matt, G., \& Fiore, F. 2005, \mnras, 356, 295
675: %%\bibitem{Ishida XRT 2006} Ishida, M., et al. 2006, JX-ISAS-SUZAKU-MEMO-2006-40, "Relative normalizations of XIS and HXD-PIN for V1.2.2.3 data"
676: %%\bibitem[Hameed \& Devereux (2005)]{hd05} Hameed, S., \& Devereux, N. 2005, \aj, 129, 2597
677: \bibitem[Heckman et al. (2005)]{heckman05}Heckman, T. M., Ptak, A., Hornschemeier, A., \& Kauffmann, G. 2005, \apj, 634, 161
678: \bibitem[Ikeda et al. (2008)]{ikeda08} Ikeda, S., Awaki, H., \& Terashima, Y. 2008, accepted to \apj (arXiv0810.3950)
679: \bibitem[Ishisaki et al. (2007)]{ishisaki07} Ishisaki, Y., et al. 2007, \pasj, 59, S113
680: \bibitem[Itoh et al. 2008]{itoh08} Itoh, T. et al., 2008, \pasj, 60, S251
681: %%\bibitem[Iwasawa et al. 1994]{iwasawa94} Iwasawa, K., Yaqoob, T., Awaki, H., \& Ogasaka, Y. 1994, \pasj, 46, L167
682: \bibitem[Kalberla et al. (2005)]{kalberla05} Kalberla, P. M. W., Burton, W. B., Hartmann, D., Arnal, E. M., Bajaja, E., Morras, R., \& P\"{o}ppel, W. G. L. 2005, \aap, 440, 775
683: %%\bibitem{Kallman and Bautista 2001} Kallman, T., \& Bautista, M. 2001, \apjs, 133, 221
684: \bibitem[Kaspi et al. (2005)]{kaspi05} Kaspi, S., Maoz, D., Netzer, H., Peterson, B. M., Vestergarrd, M., \& Jannuzi, B. T. 2005, \apj, 629, 61
685: \bibitem[Kokubun et al. (2007)]{kokubun07} Kokubun, M., et al. 2007, \pasj, 59, S53
686: \bibitem[Koyama et al. (2007)]{koyama07} Koyama, K., et al. 2007, \pasj, 59, S23
687: %%\bibitem[Levenson et al. (2002)]{levenson02}Levenson, N. A., Krolik, J. H., Zycki, P. T., Heckman, T. M., Weaver, K. A., Awaki, H., \& Terashima, Y. 2002, \apj, 573, L81
688: \bibitem[Levenson et al. (2006)]{levenson06} Levenson, N. A., Heckman, T. M., Krolik, J. H., Weaver, K. A., \& \.{Z}ycki, P. T. 2006, \apj, 648, 111
689: %%\bibitem{Lodders 2003} Lodders, K. 2003, \apj, 591, 1220
690: \bibitem[Londsdale \& Londsdale (1992)]{ll92}Londsdale, C. J., \& Londsdale, C. J. 1992, \apj, 391, 629
691: %%\bibitem{Markowitz et al.} Markowitz, A., et al. 2003, \apj, 593, 96
692: %%\bibitem{Markowitz et al.} Markowitz, A., et al. 2007, \apj, 665, 209
693: %%\bibitem{Matt et al. 1997} Matt, G., Fabian, A. C., \& Reynolds, C. S. 1997, \mnras, 289, 175
694: \bibitem[Maiolino et al. (1998)]{maiolino98} Maiolino, R., Salvati, M., Dadina, M., Della Ceca, R., Matt, G., Risaliti, G., \& Zamorani, G. 1998, \aap, 338, 781
695: \bibitem[Matt et al. (1996)]{matt96} Matt, G., Fiore, F., Perola, G.C., Piro, L., Fink, H.H., Grandi, P., Matsuoka, M., Oliva, E., \& Salvati, M. 1996, \mnras, 281, L69
696: \bibitem[Matt et al. (1997)]{matt97} Matt, G., et al. 1997, \aap, 325, L13
697: \bibitem[Matt et al. (1999)]{matt99} Matt, G., et al. 1999, \aap, 341, L39
698: \bibitem[Matt (2002)]{matt02} Matt, G. 2002, \mnras, 337, 147
699: %%\bibitem{Miller and Goodrich 1990} Miller, J. S., \& Goodrich, R. W. 1990, \apj, 355, 456
700: \bibitem[Mitsuda et al. (2007)]{mitsuda07} Mitsuda, K., et al. 2007, \pasj, 59, S1
701: %%\bibitem{Mizuno et al. 2006} Mizuno, T., et al. 2006, JX-ISAS-SUZAKU-MEMO-2006-42, "Reproducibility of the HXD PIN Non X-ray background" http://www.astro.isas.jaxa.jp/suzaku/doc/suzakumemo/suzakumemo-2006-42.pdf
702: \bibitem[Moran et al. (2000)]{moran00} Moran, E. D., Barth, A. J., Kay, L. E., \& Fillippenko, A. V. 2000, \apj, 540, L73
703: \bibitem[Nakajima et al. (2008)]{nakajima08}Nakajima, H. et al., 2008, \pasj, 60, S1
704: \bibitem[Nandra et al. (1997)]{nandra97}Nandra, K., George, I. M., Mushotzky, R. F., Turner, T.J., \& Yaqoob, T. 1997, \apj, 477, 602
705: %%\bibitem{Netzer et al. 1998} Netzer, H., Turner, T. J., \& George, I. M. 1998, \apj, 504, 680
706: \bibitem[Palmeri et al. (2003)]{palmeri03} Palmeri, P., Mendoza, C., Kallman, T. R., \& Bautista, M. A. 2003, \aap, 410, 359
707: \bibitem[Petitpas \& Wilson (2002)]{pw02} Petitpas, G. R., \& Wilson. C. D. 2002, \apj, 575, 814
708: %%\bibitem{Pounds and Page 2005} Pounds, K. A., \& Page, K. L. 2005, \mnras, 360, 1123
709: %%\bibitem{Reeves et al. 2007} Reeves, J. N., et al. 2007, \pasj, 59, S301
710: \bibitem[Ranalli et al. (2002)]{rcs02} Ranalli, P., Comastri, A., \& Setti, G. 2002, \aap, 399, 39
711: \bibitem[Risaliti et al. (1999)]{risaliti99} Risaliti, G., Miolino, R., \& Salvati, M. 1999, \apj, 522, 157
712: %%\bibitem{Ruiz et al. 2001} Ruiz, J. R., Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S. B., Bower, G. A., Gull, T. R., Hutchings, J. B., Kaiser, M. E., \& Weistrop, D. 2001, \aj, 122, 2961
713: \bibitem[Sako et al. (2000)]{sako00} Sako, M., Kahn, S. M., Paerels, F., \& Liedahl, D. A. 2000, \apj, 543, L115
714: \bibitem[Serlemitsos et al. (2007)]{serlemitsos07} Serlemitsos, P.J., et al. 2007, \pasj, 59, S9
715: %%\bibitem{Stark et al. 1992} Stark, A. A., Gammie, C. F., Wilson, R. W., Bally, J., Linke, R. A., Heiles, C., \& Hurwitz, M. 1992, \apjs, 79, 77
716: \bibitem[Takahashi et al. (2007)]{takahashi07} Takahashi, T., et al. 2007, \pasj, 59, S35
717: \bibitem[Terashima et al. (2002)]{terashima02} Terashima, Y., Iyomoto, N., Ho, L. C., \& Ptak, A. F. 2002, \apjs, 139, 1
718: %%\bibitem[Treu et al.(2003)]{treu03} Treu, T. et al., 2003, \apj, 591, 53
719: %%\bibitem{Tifft and Cocke 1988} Tifft, W. G., \& Cocke, W. J. 1988, \apjs, 67, 1
720: %%\bibitem{Tsuru et al. 2007} Tsuru, T.G., et al. 2007, \pasj, 59, S269
721: %%\bibitem{Turner et al. 1997} Turner, T. J., George, I. M., Nandra, K., \& Mushotzky, R. F. 1997, \apjs, 113, 23
722: \bibitem[Ueda et al. (2007)]{ueda07} Ueda, Y. et al., 2007, \apj, 664, L79
723: %%\bibitem[Ueno et al. (1994)]{ueno94} Ueno, S., Mushotzky, R.F., Koyama, K., Iwasawa, K., Awaki, H., \& Hayashi, I. et al., 1994, \pasj, 46, L71
724: %%\bibitem{Watanabe et al. 2003} Watanabe, S., et al. 2003, \apj, 597, L37
725: %%\bibitem{Wilms et al. 2000} Wilms, J., Allen, A., \& McCray, R. 2000, \apj, 542, 914
726: \bibitem[Whittle (1992)]{whittle92} Whittle, M. 1992, \apjs, 79, 49
727: %%\bibitem{Woo and Urry 2002} Woo, J., \& Urry, C. M. 2002, \apj, 579, 530
728: %%\bibitem{Yaqoob 1997} Yaqoob, T. 1997, \apj, 479, 184
729: \bibitem[Yang et al. (2008)]{yang08} Yang, Y., Wilson, A. S., Matt, G., Terashima, Y., \& Greenhill, L. J. 2008, \apj, in press (arXiv0809.4656)
730: \bibitem[Yaqoob et al. (2007)]{yaqoob07} Yaqoob, T., et al. 2007, \pasj, 59, S283
731: \end{thebibliography}
732:
733:
734: \clearpage
735: \begin{table}
736: \begin{center}
737: \begin{scriptsize}
738: \caption{XIS0 count rates of the detected sources \label{tbl-1}}
739: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
740: \hline \hline
741: NAME & $N_{\rm 0.4-2 keV}^{*}$ & $N_{\rm 2-10keV}^{*}$ \\
742: & ($\times$10$^{-3}$ c s$^{-1}$) & ($\times$10$^{-3}$ c s$^{-1}$) \\
743: \hline
744: NGC 2273 & 2.5$\pm$0.2 & 8.7$\pm$0.4 \\
745: 2XMM J065012.9+604842 & 3.7$\pm$0.2 & 3.1$\pm$0.2 \\
746: 2XMM J065003.7+604639 & 2.9$\pm$0.2 & 1.1$\pm$0.2 \\
747: \hline
748: \end{tabular}
749:
750: \end{scriptsize}
751: \end{center}
752: $*$ count rates within a 1$^{\prime}$ radius centered on each source \\
753: \end{table}
754:
755:
756:
757: \begin{table}
758: \begin{center}
759: \begin{scriptsize}
760: \caption{Best-fit parameters of the three models to the wide-band spectrum of NGC 2273\label{tbl-1}}
761: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccc}
762: \hline \hline
763: ID & model$^{*}$ & $N_{\rm H1}$$^{\dagger}$ & soft component & & & hard component & & $\chi^{2}$ (d.o.f.) \\
764: & & & kT/scattering fraction & abundance & photon index & $N_{\rm H}$$^{\ddag}$ & $R^{\S}$ & \\
765: & & ($\times$10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$) & (keV/ --- ) & & & ($\times$10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$) & & \\
766: \hline
767: 1 & T+R+lines & 0.29$^{+0.25}_{-0.15}$ & 0.59$^{+0.20}_{-0.14}$ & 0.04$^{+0.12}_{-0.03}$ &
768: 1.49$^{+0.13}_{-0.08}$ & & & 120 (120) \\
769: 2 & T+R+abs-PL+lines & 0.30$^{+0.28}_{-0.18}$ & 0.56$^{+0.14}_{-0.16}$ & 0.05$^{+0.17}_{-0.04}$ &
770: 1.9 (fixed) & 146$\pm42$ & 0.5$^{+0.7}_{-0.3}$ & 119 (120) \\
771: 3 & S+R+abs-PL+lines & 0.14$\pm$0.07 & 0.092$^{+0.021}_{-0.018}$ & - & 1.8 (fixed) & 115$\pm40$ & 0.8$^{+1.2}_{-0.4}$ & 121 (122) \\
772: \hline
773: \end{tabular}
774:
775: \end{scriptsize}
776: \end{center}
777: $*$ T: thin thermal plasma model ({\it mekal}). R: cold reflection model ({\it pexrav}). abs-PL: absorbed power-law emission. S: scattered emission. \\
778: $\dagger$ the absorption column for each model, i.e. exp(-$\sigma$ $N_{\rm H1}$) (model). \\
779: $\ddag$ the absorption column for the absorbed power-law emission. \\
780: $\S$ the reflection ratio of the cold reflection to the absorbed power-law emission. \\
781: \end{table}
782:
783: %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using
784: %% \tableline, not \hline.
785: %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.
786: %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.
787:
788: \begin{table}
789: \begin{center}
790: \begin{scriptsize}
791: \caption{The best-fit center energy and intensity of each line in model 2\label{tbl-2}}
792: \begin{tabular}{cccccccc}
793: \hline\hline
794: Center energy$^{*}$ & line width & intensity & EW & line identifications \\
795: (keV) & (eV) & ($\times$10$^{-6}$ph s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$) & (eV) & \\
796: \hline
797: 0.745$^{+0.045}_{-0.025}$ & 5 (fixed) & 17$^{+100}_{-14}$ & 75$^{+440}_{-60}$ & OVII RRC ($>$ 0.739 keV)\\
798: 1.806$^{+0.027}_{-0.025}$ & 10(fixed) & 1.7$\pm$0.7 & 160$\pm$70 & Si K$_{\alpha}$ (1.740 keV) and \\
799: & & & & Si XIII (1.854(f)/1.865(r+i) keV) \\
800: 3.26$^{+0.06}_{-0.14}$ & 10(fixed) & 0.9$^{+0.7}_{-0.6}$ & 140 $^{+110}_{-100}$ & Ar XVII (3.124(f)/3.140(r+i) keV) and \\
801: & & & & Ar XVIII (3.32 keV) \\
802: 6.400$\pm$0.005 & 4 ($<$26) & 24.7$\pm$1.7 & 1810$\pm$120 & Fe K$_{\alpha}$ (6.4038 keV)\\
803: 7.06$\pm0.03$ & 4$^{\dagger}$ & 3.2$\pm$1.0 & 270$\pm$85 & Fe K$_{\beta}$ (7.058 keV) \\
804: 7.50$^{+0.09}_{-0.19}$ & 4$^{\dagger}$ & 1.4$^{+1.0}_{-1.1}$ & 130$^{+90}_{-100}$ & Ni K$_{\alpha}$ (7.4782 keV)) \\
805: \hline
806: \end{tabular}
807: %% Any table notes must follow the \end{tabular} command.
808:
809: \end{scriptsize}
810: \end{center}
811: $*$ corrected for cosmological redshift ($z$=0.006138).\\
812: $\dagger$ these line widths were linked to that of the 6.4 keV line.
813: \end{table}
814:
815:
816: \begin{table}
817: \begin{center}
818: \begin{scriptsize}
819: \caption{Best-fit parameters of the cold reflection model based on a Monte Carlo simulation \label{tbl-3}}
820: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccccc}
821: \hline \hline
822: ID & model$^{*}$ & $N_{\rm H1}$ & soft component & & & hard component & & & $\chi^{2}$ (d.o.f.) \\
823: & & & kT & abundance & photon index & $N_{\rm H}$$^{\dagger}$ & $\theta_{\rm oa}$$^{\dagger}$ & $\theta_{\rm i}$$^{\dagger}$-$\theta_{\rm oa}$ & \\
824: & & ($\times$10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$) & (keV) & & & ($\times$10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$) & ($^{\circ}$) & ($^{\circ}$) &\\
825: \hline
826: %%1 & thermal + reflection + Fe lines & 19$\pm$7 & 0.66$\pm$0.11 & 0.02$\pm$0.01 & & 1.57$\pm$0.08 & 1 (fixed)
827: %%& \nodata & \nodata & 198 (130) \\
828: 4 & T+RS+abs-PL+lines & 0.39 ($<$0.9) & 0.75$^{+0.25}_{-0.40}$ & 0.2 ($<$5) & 2.42$^{+0.08}_{-0.57}$ & 540$^{+370}_{-310}$ & 40$^{+25}_{-30}$ & 3$\pm$2$^{\ddag}$ & 108 (106) \\
829: \hline
830: \end{tabular}
831:
832: \end{scriptsize}
833: \end{center}
834: $*$ RS: cold reflection model based on a Monte Carlo simulation. \\
835: $\dagger$ $N_{\rm H}$: the column density along the equatorial plane of the torus. $\theta_{\rm oa}$: the opening angle of the torus. $\theta_{\rm i}$: the inclination angle of the torus. \\
836: $\ddag$ the best-fit value and error are listed, when $\theta_{\rm oa}$ is fixed at the best fit value.
837: \end{table}
838:
839: \clearpage
840:
841: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
842: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
843: %% To embed the sample graphics in
844: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
845: %% \includegraphics commands
846: %%
847: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
848: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
849: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
850: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
851: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
852: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
853: %%
854: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
855: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
856: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
857: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
858: %% journal to journal.
859:
860: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
861: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
862: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
863: %% available in the electronic journal.
864:
865: \begin{figure}
866: \FigureFile(80mm,50mm){f1a.eps}
867: \FigureFile(80mm,50mm){f1b.eps}
868: \caption{The 0.4--2 keV (left) and 2--10 keV (right) images for NGC
869: 2273 obtained by Suzaku. The images were smoothed by a gaussian
870: function with $\sigma$=0$^{\prime}$.2. The color scale is linear in
871: the range of 0.013--0.413 c pix$^{-1}$ for the 0.4--2 keV image and in
872: the range of 0.03--0.63 c pix$^{-1}$ for the 2--10 keV image. The
873: minimum value for each image corresponds to the background emission.
874: \label{fig1}}
875: \end{figure}
876:
877:
878: %% Here we use \plottwo to present two versions of the same figure,
879: %% one in black and white for print the other in RGB color
880: %% for online presentation. Note that the caption indicates
881: %% that a color version of the figure will be available online.
882: %%
883: \begin{figure}
884: %%\FigureFile(100mm,50mm){2XMM_spec/2XMM.ps}
885: \includegraphics[scale=0.5, angle=-90, clip] {f2.eps}
886: \caption{The spectrum of 2XMM J065012.9+604842 observed with the
887: Suzaku XIS. The spectrum is fitted with a single power-law model.
888: \label{fig2}}
889: \end{figure}
890:
891: \begin{figure}
892: %%\plottwo{f2.eps}{f2_color.eps}
893: %%\FigureFile(100mm,50mm){f2.eps}
894: \includegraphics[scale=0.5, angle=-90, clip] {f3.eps}
895: \caption{The HXD PIN light curve in the 15--40 keV band.
896: The upper panel shows observed count rates (open circles) and NXB
897: count rates reproduced from the tuned NXB events (filled circles).
898: The PIN light curve consists of data from earth occultation periods
899: and the data from NGC 2273. The lower panel shows a light curve after
900: NXB subtraction. The "NXB" in the lower panel shows the mean count
901: rate of the earth occultation data after NXB subtraction. The CXB is the
902: count rate of the cosmic diffuse X-ray background radiation in the 15
903: -- 40 keV band, estimated to be 0.016 c s$^{-1}$. \label{fig2}}
904: \end{figure}
905:
906: %% This figure uses \includegraphics to scale and rotate the still frame
907: %% for an mpeg animation.
908: %% figure 4 Suzaku wide band spectrum
909: \begin{figure}
910: %%\FigureFile(100mm,50mm){f3.eps}
911: \includegraphics[scale=0.5, angle=-90, clip] {f4.eps}
912: \caption{A broad-band spectrum of NGC 2273 observed with Suzaku and
913: residuals for our fitting models. The upper panel shows the
914: wide-band spectrum obtained by XIS0+3 (black), XIS1 (red), and PIN
915: (green). The "model g05" corresponds to the model by
916: \citet{guainazzi05}. Models 1 and 2 are described in Table 2. }
917: \end{figure}
918:
919: %%\begin{figure}
920: %%\FigureFile(100mm,50mm){f4.eps}
921: %%\caption{A comparison of NGDC 2273 with the spectrum of Mrk 3. The
922: %%scaling factor is 1/8.}
923: %%\end{figure}
924:
925: \begin{figure}
926: %%\FigureFile(100mm,50mm){scat.eps}
927: \includegraphics[scale=0.4, angle=-90, clip] {f5.eps}
928: \caption{The best-fit spectrum obtained by XIS0 and PIN for the model
929: 3 in Table 2. In this model, the soft component was fitted with a
930: scattered light. We also display the contamination (dashed line) from
931: the nearby bright source (see text). The green lines indicate emission
932: lines included in our fitting model. Escape lines for the emission
933: lines are also displayed in this figure.
934: }
935: \end{figure}
936:
937: \begin{figure}
938: %%\FigureFile(100mm,50mm){ikeda.eps}
939: \includegraphics[scale=0.4, angle=-90, clip] {f6.eps}
940: \caption{The best-fit spectrum obtained by XIS0 and PIN for model
941: 4 in Table 4. In this model, the reflection component was fitted
942: with the reflection model based on a Monte Carlo simulation (Ikeda et
943: al. 2008). A brief explanation of reflections 1 and 2 is presented
944: in text. The green lines indicate emission lines included in our
945: fitting model. Escape lines for the emission lines are also displayed
946: in this figure. The photon index of the power-law emission from the
947: central X-ray source is fixed at 1.9.
948: }
949: \end{figure}
950:
951: \begin{figure}
952: %%\includegraphics[scale=0.5, angle=-90, clip] { }
953: \FigureFile(100mm,50mm){f7.eps}
954: \caption{Fractions of the Compton shoulder with respect to the primary
955: gaussian component as a function of the column density along the
956: equatorial plane of a dusty torus. The fractions for the opening
957: angles of 30$^{\circ}$ (filled circles), 45$^{\circ}$ (open circles),
958: and 60$^{\circ}$ (open diamond) were estimated from the Monte Carlo
959: simulation developed by \citet{ikeda08}. The photon index of the
960: power-law emission from a central X-ray source is fixed at 1.9.
961: }
962: \end{figure}
963:
964:
965: \end{document}
966:
967: %%
968: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
969: