1: %\documentclass[12pt,aasms4,aastexug]{aastex}
2: %\documentstyle[11pt,aaspp4]{article} %\documentstyle[aas2pp4]{article}
3: %\documentclass[10pt,preprint]{aastex}
4:
5: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
6: \documentclass[10pt,preprint]{emulateapj}
7: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
8: %\usepackage{rotating}
9: \def\msun{\rm M_{\sun}}
10: \def\rsun{\rm R_{\sun}}
11: \def\lsun{\rm L_{\sun}}
12: \def\micron{$\mu$m}
13: \def\microns{$\mu$m}
14: \def\mdot{\rm \dot{M}}
15:
16: \begin{document}
17:
18: \shortauthors{Espaillat et al.}
19: \shorttitle{CVSO 224}
20:
21: \title{A slowly accreting $\sim$10 Myr old transitional disk in Orion
22: OB1a}
23:
24:
25: \author{C. Espaillat\altaffilmark{1}, J. Muzerolle\altaffilmark{2}, J.
26: Hern\'{a}ndez\altaffilmark{1,3}, C. Brice{\~n}o\altaffilmark{3}, N.
27: Calvet\altaffilmark{1}, P. D'Alessio\altaffilmark{4}, M.
28: McClure\altaffilmark{5}, D. M. Watson\altaffilmark{5}, L. Hartmann\altaffilmark{1},
29: \& B. Sargent\altaffilmark{5}}
30:
31: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 830
32: Dennison Building, 500 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
33: ccespa@umich.edu, ncalvet@umich.edu, hernandj@umich.edu,
34: lhartm@umich.edu}
35: \altaffiltext{2}{Steward Observatory, University of
36: Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85712, USA; jamesm@as.arizona.edu}
37: \altaffiltext{3}{Centro de Investigaciones de Astronom\'{i}a(CIDA),
38: Merida, 5101-A, Venezuela; briceno@cida.ve}
39: \altaffiltext{4}{Centro de
40: Radioastronom\'{i}a y Astrof\'{i}sica, Universidad Nacional Aut\'{o}noma
41: de M\'{e}xico, 58089 Morelia, Michoac\'{a}n, M\'{e}xico;
42: p.dalessio@astrosmo.unam.mx}
43: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Physics and
44: Astronomy, University of Rochester, NY 14627-0171, USA;
45: melisma@astro.pas.rochester.edu, dmw@astro.pas.rochester.edu}
46:
47:
48: \begin{abstract}
49:
50: Here we present the {\it Spitzer} IRS spectrum of CVSO 224, the sole
51: transitional disk located within the $\sim$10 Myr old 25 Orionis
52: group in Orion OB1a. A model fit to the spectral energy distribution of
53: this object indicates a $\sim$7 AU inner disk hole that contains a small
54: amount of optically thin dust. In previous studies, CVSO 224 had been
55: classified as a weak-line T Tauri star based on its H${\alpha}$ equivalent
56: width, but here we find an accretion rate of 7$\times$10$^{-11}$
57: ${\msun}$ yr$^{-1}$ based on high-resolution Hectochelle data.
58: CVSO 224's low $\mdot$ is in line with photoevaporative clearing
59: theories. However, the {\it Spitzer} IRS spectrum of CVSO 224 has
60: a substantial mid-infrared excess beyond 20{\micron} which indicates
61: that it is surrounded by a massive outer disk. Millimeter measurements
62: are necessary to constrain the mass of the outer disk around CVSO 224 in
63: order to confirm that photoevaporation is not the mechanism behind
64: creating its inner disk hole.
65:
66:
67:
68:
69: \end{abstract}
70:
71: \keywords{accretion disks, stars: circumstellar matter, stars:
72: formation, stars: pre-main sequence}
73:
74: \section{Introduction}
75:
76: Stars surrounded by transitional disks have characteristics that fall
77: between objects that have clear evidence for disks and stars with no
78: disk material. They have deficits of infrared flux at $\lambda$ $<$ 8 {\micron} but
79: show strong excesses at longer wavelengths, indicating that the
80: innermost regions have undergone significant clearing of small dust grains
81: \citep{strom89, skrutskie90}.
82:
83: The {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} has greatly improved our resolution in
84: the infrared and has recently provoked extensive modeling studies of
85: several transitional disks around T Tauri stars e.g TW Hya
86: \citep{uchida04}, GM Aur, DM Tau
87: \citep{calvet05}, CS Cha \citep{espaillat07a}, HD 98800B
88: \citep{furlan07}, and Hen 3-600 \citep{uchida04}. These objects have
89: been explained as inwardly truncated disks which are optically thick to
90: the stellar radiation, with most of the mid-infrared emission
91: originating in the inner edge or ``wall" of the outer disk. Spectral
92: energy distributions (SEDs) point to holes in these disks of less than
93: $\sim$40 AU. The inner holes of the transitional disks around DM Tau and
94: CoKu Tau$/$4 are cleared of small dust grains \citep{dalessio05, calvet05}
95: while the transitional disks GM Aur, TW Hya, CS Cha, HD 98800B,
96: and Hen 3-600 have
97: a small yet detectable near-infrared excess produced by some
98: submicron and micron sized optically thin dust remaining in the inner
99: disk hole \citep{calvet05, calvet02, espaillat07a,furlan07,uchida04}. In addition
100: to these disks with holes (i.e. large reductions of small dust grains from the
101: star out to an outer optically thick wall), the ``pre-transitional disk"
102: class has recently been identified \citep{espaillat07b}. These objects,
103: exemplified by UX Tau A and LkCa 15, have an inner optically thick disk
104: separated from an outer optically thick disk by an optically thin gap
105: \citep{espaillat07b, espaillat08}.
106:
107: One possible cause for these dust clearings in transitional and
108: pre-transitional disks is planet formation.
109: Hydrodynamical simulations have shown that a newly formed planet could
110: accrete and sweep out the material around it through tidal disturbances
111: \citep{quillen04, rice03, paardekooper04, varniere06}. Stellar
112: companions could also dynamically clear the inner disk
113: \citep{artymowicz94}. Additional dust clearing theories include
114: inside-out evacuation induced by the MRI \citep{chiang07} and
115: photoevaporation \citep{clarke01}.
116:
117: The holes of GM Aur, TW
118: Hya, and DM Tau can potentially be explained by the MRI.
119: It has been proposed that the MRI can operate on the ionized inner wall
120: of the disk which leads material to accrete from the wall onto the star,
121: creating a hole in the disk that grows from the inside-out
122: \citep{chiang07}.
123: In order for photoevaporation to be effective, the disk mass must be below
124: $\sim$0.005 M$_{\sun}$ and the disk accretion rate must fall below
125: the wind rate ($\sim$10$^{-10}$ M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$; Alexander \& Armitage
126: 2007; AA07).
127: Photoevaporation cannot explain the holes of these
128: three objects since their outer disks are massive (M$_{disk}$ $>$ 0.05 M$_{\sun}$; Calvet et al. 2002, 2005)
129: and their accretion rates are higher than the
130: photoevaporative wind rate.
131: Neither the MRI nor photoevaporation
132: can explain the gaps seen in UX Tau A and LkCa 15 given that these
133: inside-out clearing mechanisms cannot account for a remnant optically
134: thick inner disk. Photoevaporation could in principle explain CoKu Tau$/$4's hole
135: since this object has a weak outer disk (M$_{disk}$ $\sim$ 0.0005 M$_{\sun}$; Andrews \& Williams 2005) and a non-detectable accretion rate, however, its disk clearing is
136: most likely caused by its recently discovered stellar companion
137: \citep{ireland08}. HD 98800B and Hen 3-600 are additional examples of a
138: transitional disk where a stellar companion is apparently responsible for the
139: disk's hole \citep{furlan07,uchida04}. \citet{guenther07} also found a companion
140: in the inner hole of CS Cha although the separation of the stellar pair
141: is less than 5 AU (Eike Guenther, private communication) which is too
142: small to explain the truncation of the outer disk at $\sim$ 43 AU
143: \citep{espaillat07a} with existing models \citep{artymowicz94}. To
144: date, a radial velocity detection of a planetary companion in a transitional disk has
145: only been claimed in TW Hya \citep{setiawan08}.
146:
147: While most transitional disk studies have focused on objects located in
148: 1--2 Myr old star-forming regions with relatively isolated star
149: formation, here we present detailed modeling of CVSO 224, the only
150: transitional disk located in the $\sim$10 Myr old 25 Orionis group
151: \citep{briceno07} in the Orion OB1a subassociation \citep{briceno05}.
152: %This makes CVSO 224 an analog of TW Hya, a transitional disk in the
153: %$\sim$10 Myr old TW Hydrae association \citep{jayawardhana99, webb99}.
154: %Here we use CVSO 224 to explore disk evolution theories and
155: %revisit accretion diagnostics.
156:
157:
158:
159: \section{Observations \& Data Reduction} \label{sec:obs}
160: We present the
161: SED of CVSO 224, which is also known as 1a$\_$1200 (Hern\'{a}ndez et al. 2007) and
162: 05254675+0143303 (2MASS), in Figure 1. B- and R-band photometry were
163: taken from the USNO database. V- and I-band photometry \citep{briceno07}
164: as well as J-, H-, and K-band (2MASS) are shown. IRAC and MIPS data were
165: taken from \citet{hernandez07}.
166:
167: An A$_{V}$ of 0.21 for CVSO 224 is derived from fitting an M3
168: photosphere (KH95) to the observations, and the data are dereddened
169: with the \citet{mathis90} reddening law. The derived A$_{V}$ is
170: consistent with a mean extinction of 0.5 mag found toward Orion OB1a by
171: \citet{calvet05orion}. Stellar parameters (M$_{*}$, R$_{*}$; Table 1)
172: are derived from the HR diagram and the Baraffe evolutionary tracks
173: \citep{baraffe02} using a T$_*$ of 3470 K (KH95) for an M3 star
174: \citep{briceno07}. The distance to 25 Orionis is 330pc
175: \citep{briceno07}.
176:
177: CVSO 224 was observed by the $Spitzer$ IRS instrument on March 8, 2006
178: (AOR ID: 16264960) with the short-wavelength, low-resolution (SL) module
179: of IRS and the long-wavelength, low-resolution (LL) module, covering
180: $\sim$5 to 40 {\micron}, at a resolving power of
181: $\lambda$/$\delta$$\lambda$ = 60-100. The observation was carried out
182: in IRS Staring Mode. We used the Spectral Modeling, Analysis, and
183: Reduction Tool (SMART) software package developed by the IRS instrument
184: team \citep{higdon04} to extract and calibrate the spectrum. \citet{furlan06}
185: can be consulted for further data-reduction details.
186:
187: In Figure 2 we show the high-resolution (R$\sim$34,000) spectrum of
188: CVSO 224 centered on the H$\alpha$ 6563{\AA} line. It was obtained with the
189: Hectochelle multifiber instrument (Szentgyorgyi et al. 1998) mounted on
190: the 6.5m MMT at Mt. Hopkins, Arizona for the dataset presented in
191: \citet{briceno07}. We refer the reader to that article for details on
192: the observations and data reduction.
193:
194:
195: \begin{deluxetable}{l c | l c}
196: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} \tablewidth{0pt}
197: \tablecaption{Stellar and Model Properties\label{tab:prop}}
198: \startdata
199: \hline
200: \hline
201: \multicolumn{2}{c}{Stellar Properties} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Optically Thick Outer Wall} \\
202:
203: \hline
204: M$_{*}$(M$_{\sun}$) & 0.3 & a$_{min}$ ({\micron}) & 0.005 \\
205: R$_{*}$ (R$_{\sun}$) & 0.9 & a$_{max}$({\micron}) & 0.25 \\
206: T$_{*}$ (K) & 3470 & T$_{wall}$ (K) & 120\\
207: L$_{*}$ ($\lsun$) & 0.1 & z$_{wall}$ (AU) & 1\\
208: Distance (pc) & 330 & R$_{wall}$ (AU) & 7 \\
209: $\mdot$ (M$_{\sun}$yr$^{-1}$) & 7$\times$10$^{-11}$ & &\\
210: Inclination (deg) & 30 & &\\
211: A$_{V}$ & 0.21 & &\\
212: Spectral Type & M3 & &\\
213: \hline
214: \multicolumn{4}{c}{Optically Thin Inner Region}\\
215: \hline
216: a$_{min, thin}$ ({\micron}) & 0.005 & R$_{in, thin}$ (AU) & 0.04 \\
217: a$_{max, thin}$ ({\micron}) & 4 & R$_{out, thin}$ (AU) & 1\\
218: M$_{dust,thin}$ (M$_{\sun}$) & 4$\times$10$^{-12}$ & &
219: \enddata
220: \end{deluxetable}
221:
222:
223:
224: \begin{figure}
225: \figurenum{1}
226: \label{sedfig}
227: \epsscale{0.7}
228: \plotone{f1.ps}
229: \caption{SED of CVSO 224. We show dereddened
230: ground-based optical (open circles), J,H,K (filled circles), $Spitzer$
231: IRAC and MIPS (closed squares), and $Spitzer$ IRS (solid line) data. We
232: also show the median SED of Taurus \citep[short-dashed line]{dalessio99,
233: furlan06}, which represents a full disk, and an M3 photosphere
234: \citep[dotted line]{KH95}. [See the electronic edition of the Journal
235: for a color version of this figure.]
236: }
237: \label{figsed} \end{figure}
238:
239: \begin{figure}
240: \figurenum{2}
241: \label{mdotfig}
242: \epsscale{0.7}
243: \plotone{f2.eps}
244: \caption{Hectochelle spectrum of CVSO 224 (solid
245: line) with the best-fit accretion model (dashed line). We measure an
246: accretion rate of 7$\times$10$^{-11}$ M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$.}
247: \label{figsed}
248: \end{figure}
249:
250: \begin{figure}
251: \figurenum{3}
252: \label{figmodel}
253: \epsscale{0.7}
254: \plotone{f3.ps}
255: \caption{SED and transitional disk model of CVSO
256: 224. Symbols are the same as in Figure 1. The best-fit model (heavy solid line)
257: corresponds to an inner disk hole of 7 AU that has
258: $\sim$4$\times$10$^{-12}$ M$_{\sun}$ of optically thin dust located
259: between the dust destruction radius and 1 AU; the disk is relatively
260: devoid of small dust grains between 1 and 7 AU. Model components are as
261: follows: stellar photosphere (dotted line),
262: optically thin dust region (long-dash), outer wall
263: (dot-short-dash). [See the electronic edition of the Journal for a
264: color version of this figure.]
265: }
266: \label{figsed} \end{figure}
267:
268:
269: \section{Analysis}
270:
271:
272: \subsection{Accretion Properties}
273:
274: According to theories of magnetospheric accretion,
275: the inner disk is truncated by the stellar magnetic field and material
276: is channeled onto the star via accretion columns. This leads to strong,
277: broad H${\alpha}$ emission profiles due to the high temperatures and
278: velocities of the accreting material \citep{muzerolle01}.
279: \citet{whitebasri03} showed that a star is accreting if EW(H${\alpha}$)
280: $\geq$ 20 {\AA} for M3 stars. According to this criteria, CVSO 224, a
281: M3 star \citep{briceno07} with EW(H${\alpha}$) of $\leq$ 20 {\AA}, can
282: be classified as a weakly accreting T Tauri star (WTTS)
283: \citep{briceno07}. However, some stars which
284: lie just below this EW(H${\alpha}$) limit could be
285: slow accretors \citep{barrado03}.
286: When analyzing the high-resolution spectrum of CVSO 224 taken with
287: Hectochelle (Fig. 2) we find that the width of the H${\alpha}$ profile
288: at 10$\%$ is larger than 200 km/s indicating that this star is accreting
289: \citep{whitebasri03}.
290:
291: We estimated the accretion rate using the
292: magnetospheric accretion models of Muzerolle et al. (2001). See that
293: paper for the details of the fitting procedure. In short, we calculated
294: models using the mass, radius, and effective temperature of the star as
295: fixed inputs. The gas temperature, density (calculated from $\mdot$),
296: and inclination were then varied to find the best fit to the observed
297: line profile. The profile of CVSO 224 has a central self-reversal as
298: seen in WTTS (e.g. Figure 1 of Muzerolle et al.\ 2000), but also has broad
299: wings and redshifted absorption. This suggests that we are seeing signatures
300: of both the stellar chromosphere and the accreting
301: material traveling in the magnetospheric field lines. Since the line
302: core is dominated by chromospheric emission, which is not included in
303: the models, only the line wings were considered in the fit. %Thus, the
304: %observed peak flux is taken to be an upper limit for quantifying the
305: %mass accretion rate.
306: The resultant best-fit model parameters are
307: $i$=30$^{\circ}$, T$_{max}$=12,000 K, $\mdot$=7$\times$10$^{-11}$
308: M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$. The inclination angle derived here is constrained
309: to about 50$\%$ of the nominal value of 30$^{\circ}$ since the actual
310: geometry is likely much more complicated \citep{muzerolle01}. We adopt
311: this value for CVSO 224 since there is no other estimate for the
312: inclination angle.
313:
314:
315: \subsection{Disk Properties}
316:
317: When we compare CVSO 224 to the median SED of Taurus (Fig. 1; D'Alessio et al. 1999, Furlan
318: et al. 2006) which has been shown to be representative of a
319: full disk \citep{dalessio99, dalessio06}, it is apparent that
320: there is a strong infrared deficit, indicating that CVSO 224 is
321: surrounded by a transitional disk. We follow D'Alessio et al. (2005) to
322: calculate the structure and emission of the optically thick disk's inner
323: edge or ``wall," assumed to be vertical and axisymmetric. The radiative transfer in the wall atmosphere is
324: calculated with M$_*$, R$_*$, T$_*$, distance,
325: inclination, and $\mdot$ as well as minimum and maximum grain sizes
326: (Table 1). We use a grain-size distribution that follows a power-law of
327: $a$$^{-3.5}$, where $a$ is the grain radius. We assume ISM sized grains
328: and adopt a$_{min}$=0.005 {\micron} and a$_{max}$=0.25 {\micron}
329: \citep{drainelee84}. The wall has a radial gradient of temperature and
330: we use its outermost temperature, T$_{wall}$, as a free parameter in
331: fitting the SED. This temperature, combined with the dust composition,
332: determines the wall radius \citep{dalessio05}. The best fit to the SED
333: is shown in Figure 3 and corresponds to T$_{wall}$=120 K and
334: R$_{wall}$=7 AU. The wall height, z$_{wall}$ (1 AU), is also a
335: free parameter which is dependent on the best-fit to the SED. Varying
336: the inclination angle within 50$\%$ of 30$^{\circ}$ %(see previous section)
337: does not change the size of the inner hole.
338:
339: CVSO 224 has a near-infrared excess; the ratio of its observed to photospheric
340: emission %at 4.5 {\micron} is 1.2 and
341: at 5.8 {\micron} is 1.6.
342: The low value of T$_{wall}$ implies that the wall can account for
343: neither the 10 {\micron} silicate-feature emission nor the small near-IR excess. While a wall
344: with a higher T$_{wall}$ produces more 10 {\micron} emission, it cannot
345: account for the excess beyond 20 {\micron}. As is seen in previous
346: studies \citep{calvet05, espaillat07a}, a small amount of optically thin
347: dust can account for the 10 {\micron} emission and the near-IR excess.
348: Following \citet{calvet02}, the spectrum for the optically thin region
349: is calculated as the sum of the emergent flux from optically thin annuli
350: where the dust in each annulus is heated by stellar radiation. We hold
351: the inner radius fixed at the dust destruction radius (0.04 AU) and the
352: outer radius is determined by the best fit (1 AU). The silicate feature
353: is well fit with a$_{max}$=4 {\micron} and probes temperatures of $\sim$190--1110 K.
354: About 4$\times$10$^{-12}$
355: ${\msun}$ of dust exists in the optically thin region which in the models is composed
356: of $\sim$80$\%$ amorphous silicates, $\sim$14$\%$ organics, $\sim$3$\%$
357: amorphous carbon, $\sim$2.6$\%$ troilite, and less than 1$\%$ enstatite
358: and forsterite. The total emission of this optically thin region is
359: scaled to the vertical optical depth at 10 {\micron}, $\tau_{0}$ $\sim$
360: 0.025.
361:
362: Since there are no far-infrared or millimeter measurements for CVSO 224,
363: we cannot constrain the contribution to the SED from the outer disk.
364: However, previous papers have shown that the wall and optically thin
365: dust region dominate the mid-infrared flux \citep{calvet05,
366: espaillat07a, espaillat07b} and so in this first approximation we
367: neglect the outer disk. %Since this SED resembles previously studied
368: %transitional disks, we assume that future studies will detect an outer
369: %disk; if the outer disk is substantial, this model will need to be revisited.
370:
371:
372:
373: \section{Discussion \& Conclusions}
374:
375: CVSO 224 is $\sim$10 Myr old, making it one of the oldest transitional
376: disks around a classical T Tauri star. TW Hya is another
377: $\sim$10 Myr old transitional disk that has been studied in detail. In both objects, there is an
378: inner hole of $\leq$10 AU that contains optically thin dust that is
379: larger than ISM-sized grains \citep{calvet02}. The $\sim$2 Myr old CS
380: Cha also has larger grains in its optically thin region
381: \citep{espaillat07a}. In contrast, LkCa 15 and GM Aur in Taurus
382: ($\sim$1 Myr old) have small ISM-sized grains in their optically thin
383: regions
384: \citep{espaillat07b, calvet05}. These optically thin disks are
385: possibly the result of the inward drift of small dust grains from the outer disk
386: \citep{rice06}.
387: Larger dust grains in the optically thin
388: regions of older transitional disks may imply that there is
389: some correlation between the process that creates the optically thin
390: dust and dust evolution over time.
391: Like GM Aur and LkCa 15, CVSO 224 and TW Hya
392: have no obvious signs of crystalline silicates in their disks.
393: This is hard to explain given that
394: one would expect 10 Myr of processing to result in crystalline
395: silicates. This lack of cystallization is in contrast to
396: several young full disks in Taurus which show high degrees
397: of dust processing (Watson et al. 2008). %One cannot yet exclude the possibility
398: %that the reason behind crystallinity is different in transitional disks than
399: %full disks.
400:
401: %While it shares many similarities with previously studied transitional
402: %disks, CVSO 224 has the slowest mass accretion rate of any accreting
403: %transitional disk.
404: %Our derived mass accretion rate for CVSO 224 is
405: %consistent with the mean value of 5$\times$10$^{-10}$ M$_{\sun}$
406: %yr$^{-1}$ found in OB1a (Calvet et al. 2005b) which supports the observed
407: %trend that $\mdot$ decreases with age \citep{calvet05orion}.
408: %On the other hand, perhaps accretion variability is common in
409: %transitional disks. TW Hya's mass accretion rate ranges from
410: %5$\times$10$^{-10}$ M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$ \citep{muzerolle00} up to
411: %10$^{-8}$ M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$ \citep{alencar02}. If we assume that
412: %CVSO 224 is likewise variable, we could be
413: %observing it in a low state.
414:
415: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
416:
417: CVSO 224 is an ideal target to test the role of photoevaporation in
418: transitional disks. Photoevaporation will create an inner hole in disks
419: with masses $<$0.005 M$_{\sun}$ and mass accretion rates below the
420: photoevaporative wind rate of $\sim$10$^{-10}$ M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$
421: (AA07). CVSO 224's $\mdot$ is below the photoevaporative wind rate,
422: however, we are detecting a robust mid-infrared excess beyond
423: 20{\micron} from the disk's wall. This excess agrees with the median
424: SED of Taurus' T Tauri disks (Figure 1) and is similar to what is observed in
425: other massive (M$_{disk}$ $>$ 0.05 M$_{\sun}$) transitional disks
426: (e.g. DM Tau, GM Aur; Calvet et al. 2005), indicating that CVSO 224 still
427: has a substantial outer disk. This indication of a massive outer disk
428: is evidence against photoevaporation being the main cause of
429: clearing behind the hole we observe in CVSO 224. Additionally, AA07 show that the size of
430: the inner hole should reach tens of AU within 0.1 Myr of the onset of
431: photoevaporation. Excluding the unlikely possibility that we are
432: catching CVSO 224 immediately after photoevaporation has switched on,
433: one would expect the inner hole to be larger and the outer disk to be
434: mostly gone. Millimeter observations of CVSO 224 are necessary to
435: confirm that it has a massive disk in order to eliminate the possibility
436: that photoevaporation is creating the disk hole around CVSO 224.
437:
438: If CVSO 224 does have a massive disk
439: and is not being photoevaporated, one can speculate that the
440: $\mdot$ of the outer disk, $\mdot_{disk}$, is actually higher than the
441: observed accretion rate onto the star, $\mdot_{star}$. One way to create
442: a situation where $\mdot_{star}$ is less than $\mdot_{disk}$ is with
443: planet formation. If a planet is forming in the disk, the mass coming
444: from the outer disk is shared by the planet and the inner disk (Lubow
445: \& D'Angelo 2006; Najita et al. 2007; AA07). \citet{lubow06} show that
446: the mass accretion rate past a planet and into the inner disk is 10-25
447: $\%$ of the mass accretion rate outside the planet's orbit.
448: Alternatively, the low mass accretion rate of CVSO 224 could also
449: be due to a stellar companion. Hen 3-600
450: is another weakly accreting $\sim$10 Myr old transitional disk
451: (7$\times$10$^{-11}$ M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$; Muzerolle et al. 2000) whose
452: hole is most likely due to dynamical clearing by its companion
453: \citep{uchida04}. Its low $\mdot$ also indicates that photoevaporation
454: should be clearing this disk, however, Hen 3-600 has a small hole
455: ($\sim$1 AU; Uchida et al. 2004) and its infrared excess \citep{low05}
456: indicates a substantial outer disk. Hen 3-600's $\mdot_{star}$ could be
457: limited by binary tidal forces \citep{artymowicz96} and not be
458: reflective of $\mdot_{disk}$.
459:
460: CVSO 224 presents an opportune test of photoevaporation and planet
461: formation in older disks and further observations of this object will
462: help clarify the role of photoevaporation in disk clearing. Millimeter
463: studies of CVSO 224 are necessary to derive the mass of its outer disk.
464: If a massive disk is present, its low $\mdot$ could be due to a
465: planetary or stellar companion and more study will be needed to
466: distinguish between these two scenarios.
467:
468: %\vskip 0.5in
469: \acknowledgments{We thank the referee for comments which helped improve the manuscript.
470: We also thank W. K. M. Rice for discussions.
471: This work is based on Spitzer Space Telescope data. N.C. and
472: and L.H. acknowledge support
473: from NASA Origins Grants NNG05GI26G and NNG06GJ32G. N.C. acknowledges JPL grant AR50406.
474: P.D. acknowledges
475: grants from CONACyT, M\`exico. D.M.W. acknowledges support from the
476: Spitzer Infrared Spectrograph Instrument Project.}
477:
478: \begin{thebibliography}
479:
480: %\bibitem[Alencar \& Batalha(2002)]{alencar02} Alencar, S.H.P. \&
481: %Batalha, C. 2002, \apj, 571, 378
482:
483: \bibitem[Alexander \& Armitage (2007)]{alexanderarmitage} Alexander,
484: R.D, \& Armitage, P.J. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 500; AA07
485:
486: \bibitem[Andrews \& Williams(2005)]{aw05} Andrews, S.~M., \& Williams, J.~P.\ 2005, \apj, 631, 1134
487:
488: \bibitem[Artymowicz \& Lubow(1994)]{artymowicz94}Artymowicz, P. and
489: Lubow, S.H. 1994, \apj, 421, 651
490:
491: \bibitem[Artymowicz
492: \& Lubow(1996)]{artymowicz96} Artymowicz, P., \& Lubow, S.~H.\ 1996, \apjl, 467, L77
493:
494: \bibitem[Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s \& Mart{\'{\i}}n(2003)]{barrado03} Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s, D.,
495: \& Mart{\'{\i}}n, E.~L.\ 2003, \aj, 126, 2997
496:
497: \bibitem[Baraffe et al.(2002)]{baraffe02} Baraffe, I., et al. 2002,
498: A\&A, 382, 563
499:
500: \bibitem[Brice{\~n}o et al.(2005)]{briceno05} Brice{\~n}o, C., et al.
501: 2005, \aj, 2005, 129, 907
502:
503: \bibitem[Brice{\~n}o et al.(2007)]{briceno07} Brice{\~n}o, C., et al.
504: 2007, \apj, 661, 1119
505:
506: \bibitem[Calvet et al.(2002)]{calvet02} Calvet, N., et al. 2002, ApJ,
507: 568, 1008
508:
509: \bibitem[Calvet et al.(2005a)]{calvet05} Calvet, N., et al., 2005a,
510: ApJL, 630, L185
511:
512: \bibitem[Calvet et al.(2005b)]{calvet05orion} Calvet, N., et al. 2005b,
513: \aj, 129, 935
514:
515: \bibitem[Chiang \& Murray-Clay (2007)]{chiang07} Chiang, E. I. \&
516: Murray-Clay, R. A., 2007, Nature Physics, 3, 604
517:
518: \bibitem[Clarke, Gendrin, \& Sotomayor(2001)]{clarke01} Clarke, C.J.,
519: Gendrin, A., \& Sotomayor, M. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 485
520:
521: \bibitem[D'Alessio et al.(1999)]{dalessio99}D'Alessio, P., et
522: al.,1999,ApJ,527,893
523:
524: \bibitem[D'Alessio et al.(2005)]{dalessio05} D'Alessio, P., et al.,
525: 2005, ApJ, 621, 461
526:
527: \bibitem[D'Alessio et al.(2006)]{dalessio06} D'Alessio, P., et al.,
528: 2006, ApJ, 638, 314
529:
530: \bibitem[Draine \& Lee(1984)]{drainelee84} Draine, B.~T., \& Lee, H.~M.\
531: 1984, \apj, 285, 89
532:
533: \bibitem[Espaillat et al.(2007a)]{espaillat07a} Espaillat, C., et al.,
534: 2007a, ApJ, 664, L111
535:
536: \bibitem[Espaillat et al.(2007b)]{espaillat07b} Espaillat, C., et al.
537: 2007b, \apjl, 670, L135
538:
539: \bibitem[Espaillat et al.(2008)]{espaillat08} Espaillat, C., et al.,
540: 2008, ApJ, 682, L125
541:
542: \bibitem[Furlan et al.(2006)]{furlan06} Furlan, E. et al., 2006, ApJS,
543: 165, 568
544:
545: \bibitem[Furlan et al.(2007)]{furlan07} Furlan, E., et al.\ 2007, \apj,
546: 664, 1176
547:
548: \bibitem[Guenther et al.(2007)]{guenther07} Guenther, E.~W., et al.
549: 2007, \aap, 467, 1147
550:
551: \bibitem[Hartmann et al.(1998)]{hartmann98} Hartmann, L., Calvet,
552: N., Gullbring, E., \& D'Alessio, P.\ 1998, \apj, 495, 385
553:
554: \bibitem[Hern\'{a}ndez et al.(2007)]{hernandez07} Hern\'{a}ndez, J. et
555: al., 2007, ApJ, 671, 1784
556:
557: \bibitem[Higdon et al.(2004)]{higdon04} Higdon, S.J.U, et al. 2004,
558: PASP, 116, 975
559:
560: \bibitem[Ireland \& Kraus(2008)]{ireland08}Ireland, M.J., \& Kraus, A.L.
561: 2008, \apj, 678, 59
562:
563: %\bibitem[Jayawardhana et al.(1999)]{jayawardhana99} Jayawardhana, R., et
564: %al., 1999, ApJ, 521, L129
565:
566: \bibitem[Kenyon \& Bromley(2004)]{kenyonbromley04} Kenyon, S.~J., \&
567: Bromley, B.~C.\ 2004, \apjl, 602, L133
568:
569: \bibitem[Kenyon \& Hartmann(1995)]{KH95}Kenyon, S.~J.~\& Hartmann, L.\
570: 1995, \apjs, 101, 117; KH95
571:
572: \bibitem[Low et al.(2005)]{low05} Low, F.~J., Smith, P.~S.,
573: Werner, M., Chen, C., Krause, V., Jura, M.,
574: \& Hines, D.~C.\ 2005, \apj, 631, 1170
575:
576: \bibitem[Lubow \& D'Angelo(2006)]{lubow06} Lubow, S.H. \& D'Angelo G. 2006,
577: \apj, 641, 526
578:
579: \bibitem[Mathis(1990)]{mathis90}Mathis, J.S. 1990, ARA\&A, 28, 37
580:
581: %\bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(2000)]{muzerolle00} Muzerolle, J., et al.
582: %2000, \apjl, 535, L47
583:
584: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(2001)]{muzerolle01} Muzerolle, J., Calvet, N.,
585: \& Hartmann, L.\ 2001, \apj, 550, 944
586:
587: \bibitem[Najita et al.(2007)]{najita07} Najita, J.~R., Strom,
588: S.~E., \& Muzerolle, J.\ 2007, \mnras, 378, 369
589:
590: \bibitem[Paardekooper \& Mellema(2004)]{paardekooper04}Paardekooper,
591: S.J. and Mellema, G. 2004, A\&A, 425, 9
592:
593: \bibitem[Papaloizou et al.(2007)]{papaloizou07} Papaloizou, J.~C.~B., et
594: al. 2007, Protostars and Planets V, 655
595:
596: \bibitem[Pollack et al.(1996)]{pollack96} Pollack, J.~B., et al. 1996,
597: Icarus, 124, 62
598:
599: \bibitem[Quillen et al.(2004)]{quillen04} Quillen, A.C., et al.
600: 2004,ApJ,612,L137
601:
602: \bibitem[Rice et al.(2003)]{rice03} Rice et al., 2003, MNRAS, 342, 79
603:
604: \bibitem[Rice et al. (2006)]{rice06} Rice, W.K.M., Armitage, P.J., Wood,
605: K. \& Lodato, G. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 1619
606:
607: \bibitem[Setiawan et al.(2008)]{setiawan08}Setiawan, J., et al. 2008,
608: Nature, 451, 38
609:
610: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(1990)]{skrutskie90} Skrutskie, M.~F., et al.
611: 1990, \aj, 99, 1187
612:
613: \bibitem[Szentgyorgyi et al.(1998)]{1998SPIE.3355..242S} Szentgyorgyi,
614: A.~H., et al. 1998, \procspie, 3355, 242
615:
616: \bibitem[Strom et al.(1989)]{strom89} Strom, K.~M., et al. 1989, \aj,
617: 97, 1451
618:
619: \bibitem[Uchida et al.(2004)]{uchida04} Uchida, K.I., et al., 2004,
620: ApJS, 154, 439
621:
622: \bibitem[Varni{\`e}re et al.(2006)]{varniere06} Varni{\`e}re, P.,
623: Blackman, E.~G., Frank, A., \& Quillen, A.~C.\ 2006, \apj, 640, 1110
624:
625: \bibitem[Watson et al. (2008)]{watson08} Watson et al., ApJS, submitted, (arXiv:0704.1518)
626:
627: %\bibitem[Webb et al.(1999)]{webb99} Webb, R.~A., et al. 1999, \apjl,
628: %512, L63
629:
630: \bibitem[Weidenschilling(1997)]{weiden97} Weidenschilling, S.~J.\ 1997,
631: Icarus, 127, 290
632:
633: \bibitem[White \& Basri(2003)]{whitebasri03} White, R.~J., \& Basri, G.\
634: 2003, \apj, 582, 1109
635:
636: \end{thebibliography}
637:
638:
639:
640:
641: \end{document}
642:
643: