1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: % STYLE : revtex4
3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4: %
5: \documentclass%
6: [twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb,floatfix]{revtex4}
7: %
8: \usepackage{txfonts}
9: \usepackage{graphicx}
10: \usepackage{dcolumn}
11: \usepackage{bm}
12: %
13: \sloppy
14: %\hyphenation{mono-pole}
15: %
16: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
17: % DOCUMENT
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: %
20: \begin{document}
21: %
22: \sloppy
23: %
24: %%%% TITLE & ABSTRACT %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
25: %
26: \preprint{}
27:
28: \title{\boldmath%
29: The $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling effect
30: in the neutron-rich $\Lambda$-hypernucleus ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$
31: by microscopic shell model%
32: }
33: \author{A. Umeya}
34: \email{u-atusi@isc.osakac.ac.jp}
35: \author{T. Harada}
36: \affiliation{Research Center for Physics and Mathematics,
37: Osaka Electro-Communication University, Neyagawa, Osaka, 572-8530, Japan
38: }%
39: \date{\today}
40: %
41: \begin{abstract}
42: We investigate the structure of the neutron-rich $\Lambda$-hypernucleus
43: ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$
44: by using microscopic shell-model calculations
45: considering a $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling effect.
46: The calculated $\Sigma$-mixing probability
47: in the ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$ ground state
48: is found to be about $0.34$ $\%$
49: which is coherently enhanced
50: by the $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling configurations,
51: leading to the energy shift $0.28$ $\mathrm{MeV}$
52: which is about 3 times larger than that in ${}_{\Lambda}^{7}\mathrm{Li}$.
53: The importance of the $\Sigma$ configuration
54: obtained by the $\Sigma N$ interaction
55: and the potentiality of the neutron-rich environment
56: are discussed.
57: \end{abstract}
58: %
59: \pacs{21.60.Cs, 21.80.+a, 27.20.+n}
60: %
61: \maketitle
62: %
63: %%%% MAIN %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
64: %
65: \section{Introduction}
66: %
67: One of the most important subjects in strangeness nuclear physics
68: is a study of neutron-rich $\Lambda$-hypernuclei~\cite{maj95}.
69: It is expected that
70: a $\Lambda$ hyperon
71: plays a glue-like role in nuclei beyond the neutron-drip line,
72: together with a strong $\Lambda N$-$\Sigma N$ coupling~\cite{swe00,aka00},
73: which might induce a $\Sigma$-mixing in nuclei.
74: The knowledge of behavior of hyperons in a neutron-excess environment
75: significantly affects our understanding of neutron stars,
76: because it makes the Equation of State soften~\cite{bal00}.
77: The purpose of our study
78: is to theoretically clarify
79: the structure of the neutron-rich $\Lambda$-hypernuclei
80: by a nuclear shell model,
81: which has successfully been applied for description of the neutron-excess
82: nuclei~\cite{por08:0,ume04a,ume06a,ume08b}.
83: %
84: \par
85: %
86: Shell-model studies for $p$-shell $\Lambda$-hypernuclei
87: have been performed by several
88: authors~\cite{gal71:3,dal78,mil85,aue83,ito90,mil07:2,fuj02,hal08}.
89: A series of pioneering shell-model calculations
90: was carried out by Gal, Soper and Dalitz \cite{gal71:3} in the 1970s,
91: using $\Lambda N$ effective interactions
92: parametrized from the available data.
93: The $\gamma$-ray transitions for $p$-shell
94: $\Lambda$-hypernuclei~\cite{dal78,mil85}
95: and $\Lambda$ production cross sections
96: of $(K_{}^{-}, \pi_{}^{-})$ and $(\pi_{}^{+}, K_{}^{+})$
97: reactions~\cite{aue83,ito90}
98: were successfully explained by shell-model descriptions.
99: Recently,
100: energy spacings of $p$-shell $\Lambda$-hypernuclei
101: have been studied by Millener's shell-model calculations
102: including the $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling~\cite{mil07:2},
103: so as to interpret the precise data
104: of $p$-shell \mbox{$N \approx Z$} $\Lambda$-hypernuclei
105: from $\gamma$-ray measurements by $\mathrm{Ge}$ detector~\cite{tam08:0}.
106: Moreover,
107: properties of the $\Lambda N$ effective interactions
108: derived form the recent Nijmegen potentials~\cite{mae89,rij99,rij06}
109: in shell-model calculations have been discussed~\cite{fuj02,hal08}.
110: %
111: \par
112: %
113: Recently,
114: Saha \textit{et~al.}\
115: have performed the first successful measurement
116: of a neutron-rich $\Lambda$-hypernucleus ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$
117: by the double-charge exchange reaction $(\pi_{}^{-}, K_{}^{+})$
118: on a ${}_{}^{10}\mathrm{B}$ target~\cite{sah05}.
119: However,
120: the magnitude and incident-momentum dependence
121: of the experimental production cross sections
122: cannot be reproduced in a theoretical calculation
123: by Tretyakova and Lanskoy~\cite{tre03}.
124: They predicted that the cross section for ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$
125: is mainly explained by a two-step process,
126: $\pi_{}^{-} p$ $\to$ $K_{}^{0} \Lambda$
127: followed by
128: $K_{}^{0} p$ $\to$ $K_{}^{+} n$,
129: or
130: $\pi_{}^{-} p$ $\to$ $\pi_{}^{0} n$
131: followed by
132: $\pi_{}^{0} p$ $\to$ $K_{}^{+} \Lambda$
133: with the distorted-wave impulse approximation,
134: rather than by a one-step process,
135: $\pi_{}^{-} p$ $\to$ $K_{}^{+} \Sigma_{}^{-}$
136: via $\Sigma_{}^{-} p$ doorways due to the
137: $\Sigma_{}^{-} p$ $\leftrightarrow$ $\Lambda n$
138: coupling.
139: This problem might suggest the importance of a $\Sigma$-mixing
140: in the $\Lambda$-hypernucleus.
141: The analysis of the ${}_{}^{10}\mathrm{B}$ $(\pi_{}^{-}, K_{}^{+})$ reaction
142: provides a reason to carefully examine wave functions
143: involving $\Sigma$ admixtures in ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$,
144: as well as a mechanism of this reaction~\cite{har09}.
145: %
146: \par
147: %
148: In this paper,
149: we investigate the structure
150: of the neutron-rich hypernucleus ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$,
151: in microscopic shell-model calculations
152: considering the $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling effect.
153: We focus on the $\Sigma$-mixing probabilities and the energy shifts
154: of the neutron-rich hypernucleus.
155: Also,
156: we investigate the effect of the $\Sigma N$ interaction
157: to the core-nuclear state by the perturbation method.
158: We discuss that
159: the coupling strengths
160: are enhanced in the neutron-rich $\Lambda$-hypernucleus
161: and
162: are related to the $\beta$-transition properties of the nuclear core state.
163: %
164: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
165: \section{Formalism}
166: \label{form}
167: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
168: %
169: \subsection{\boldmath Multi-configuration shell model for $\Lambda$-hypernuclei}
170: \label{1-form}
171: %
172: We consider a $\Lambda$-nuclear state
173: involving a $\Sigma$-mixing in a $\Lambda$-hypernucleus ${}_{\Lambda}^{A}Z$
174: with the mass number $A$ and the atomic number $Z$
175: in a multi-configuration nuclear shell model.
176: The state of the $\Lambda$-hypernucleus
177: is represented by $| ({}_{\Lambda}^{A} Z) \nu T T_{z}^{} J M \rangle$,
178: where $T$ and $T_{z}^{}$ are the isospin and its $z$-component,
179: respectively,
180: and $J$ and $M$ for the angular momentum.
181: The index $\nu$ is introduced to distinguish states with the same $T$ and $J$.
182: %
183: \par
184: %
185: In the configuration space for the $\Lambda$-hypernucleus
186: involving a $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling,
187: the Hamiltonian is given as
188: %
189: \begin{gather}
190: \begin{aligned}[b]
191: H
192: &=
193: H_{\Lambda}^{}
194: +
195: H_{\Sigma}^{}
196: +
197: V_{\Lambda\Sigma}^{}
198: +
199: V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{}
200: ,
201: \end{aligned}
202: \label{e01-form}
203: \end{gather}
204: %
205: where
206: $H_{\Lambda}^{}$ is the Hamiltonian in the $\Lambda$ configuration space
207: and
208: $H_{\Sigma}^{}$ is that in the $\Sigma$ configuration space.
209: $V_{\Lambda\Sigma}^{}$ and its Hermitian conjugate $V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{}$
210: denote the two-body $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling interaction,
211: $\Lambda N$ $\leftrightarrow$ $\Sigma N$.
212: Then,
213: we can write the $\Lambda$-nuclear state with $T$, $J$ as
214: %
215: \begin{gather}
216: \begin{aligned}[b]
217: | ({}_{\Lambda}^{A} Z) \nu T J \rangle
218: &=
219: \sum_{\mu}^{}
220: C_{\nu,\mu}^{}
221: | \psi_{\mu}^{\Lambda}; T J \rangle
222: +
223: \sum_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{}
224: D_{\nu,\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{}
225: | \psi_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\Sigma}; T J \rangle
226: ,
227: \end{aligned}
228: \label{e02-form}
229: \end{gather}
230: %
231: where
232: $| \psi_{\mu}^{\Lambda}; T J \rangle$ and
233: $| \psi_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\Sigma}; T J \rangle$
234: are eigenstates
235: for the $\Lambda$ and $\Sigma$ configurations,
236: respectively,
237: which are given by
238: %
239: \begin{gather}
240: \begin{aligned}[b]
241: H_{\Lambda}^{}
242: | \psi_{\mu}^{\Lambda}; T J \rangle
243: &=
244: E_{\mu}^{\Lambda}
245: | \psi_{\mu}^{\Lambda}; T J \rangle
246: ,
247: \end{aligned}
248: \label{e03-form}
249: \\
250: \begin{aligned}[b]
251: H_{\Sigma}^{}
252: | \psi_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\Sigma}; T J \rangle
253: &=
254: E_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\Sigma}
255: | \psi_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\Sigma}; T J \rangle
256: .
257: \end{aligned}
258: \label{e04-form}
259: \end{gather}
260: %
261: Although the coefficients $C_{\nu,\mu}^{}$ and $D_{\nu,\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{}$
262: are determined by diagonalization of the full Hamiltonian $H$,
263: we treat $V_{\Lambda\Sigma}^{}$ and $V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{}$ as perturbation
264: because a $\Sigma$ hyperon has a larger mass
265: than a $\Lambda$ hyperon by about $80$ $\mathrm{MeV}$\@.
266: When taking into account up to the first-order terms,
267: the coefficients can be written as
268: %
269: \begin{gather}
270: \begin{aligned}[b]
271: C_{\nu,\mu}^{}
272: &=
273: \delta_{\nu \mu}^{}
274: ,
275: \end{aligned}
276: \label{e05-form}
277: \\
278: \begin{aligned}[b]
279: D_{\nu,\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{}
280: &=
281: -
282: \frac{ \langle \psi_{\nu}^{\Lambda}; T J |
283: V_{\Lambda\Sigma}^{}
284: | \psi_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\Sigma}; T J \rangle }
285: { E_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\Sigma} - E_{\nu}^{\Lambda} }
286: .
287: \end{aligned}
288: \label{e06-form}
289: \end{gather}
290: %
291: Since a $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling strength
292: for each $\Sigma$ eigenstate
293: $| \psi_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\Sigma}; T J \rangle$
294: is obtained as $| D_{\nu,\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{} |_{}^{2}$,
295: the $\Sigma$-mixing probability
296: in the $\Lambda$-nuclear state $| ({}_{\Lambda}^{A} Z) \nu T J \rangle$
297: is given as
298: %
299: \begin{gather}
300: \begin{aligned}[b]
301: P_{\Sigma}^{}
302: &=
303: \sum_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{}
304: | D_{\nu,\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{} |_{}^{2}
305: \end{aligned}
306: \label{e07-form}
307: \end{gather}
308: %
309: or
310: %
311: \begin{gather}
312: \begin{aligned}[b]
313: P_{\Sigma}^{(R)}
314: &=
315: \mathinner{\biggl(
316: \sum_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{}
317: | D_{\nu,\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{} |_{}^{2}
318: \biggr)}
319: \biggm/
320: \mathinner{\biggl(
321: 1
322: +
323: \sum_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{}
324: | D_{\nu,\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{} |_{}^{2}
325: \biggr)}
326: ,
327: \end{aligned}
328: \label{e08-form}
329: \end{gather}
330: %
331: where the latter probability is a renormalized value.
332: The binding energy $E_{\nu}^{\Lambda} - \Delta E$
333: is calculated by the energy shift
334: which is given as
335: %
336: \begin{gather}
337: \begin{aligned}[b]
338: \Delta E
339: &=
340: \sum_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{}
341: \left( E_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\Sigma} - E_{\nu}^{\Lambda} \right)
342: | D_{\nu,\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{} |_{}^{2}
343: \end{aligned}
344: \label{e09-form}
345: \end{gather}
346: %
347: in the perturbation theory.
348: %
349: \par
350: %
351: It is well known that
352: a $\Lambda$ hyperon in a $\Lambda$-hypernucleus
353: is described by the single-particle picture very well
354: because the $\Lambda N$ interaction is weak.
355: On the other hand,
356: in terms of a $\Sigma$ hyperon,
357: the nuclear configuration
358: would change due to the strong spin-isospin dependence
359: in the $\Sigma N$ interaction~\cite{dov89}.
360: In order to evaluate the single-particle picture for a hyperon,
361: we consider a spectroscopic factor for a hyperon-pickup from
362: $| \psi_{\mu}^{Y}; T J \rangle$,
363: %
364: \begin{gather}
365: \begin{aligned}[b]
366: S_{\mu}^{}( \nu_{N}^{} T_{N}^{} J_{N}^{}, j_{Y}^{} )
367: &=
368: \frac{ \left|
369: \langle \psi_{\mu}^{Y}; T J \|
370: \bm{a}_{ j_{Y}^{} }^{\dagger}
371: \| ({}_{}^{A-1} Z) \nu_{N}^{} T_{N}^{} J_{N}^{} \rangle
372: \right|_{}^{2} }
373: { \mathinner{(2T+1)} \mathinner{(2J+1)} }
374: ,
375: \end{aligned}
376: \label{e10-form}
377: \end{gather}
378: %
379: where
380: $| ({}_{}^{A-1} Z) \nu_{N}^{} T_{N}^{} J_{N}^{} \rangle$
381: is an eigenstate of the core nucleus,
382: which is obtained by diagonalizing in the nucleon configurations,
383: and
384: $\bm{a}_{ j_{Y}^{} }^{\dagger}$
385: is a creation operator of a single-particle state of the hyperon
386: in an orbit $j_{Y}^{}$.
387: The matrix element
388: $\langle \cdot \| \cdot \| \cdot \rangle$
389: with the Edmonds' convention~\cite{edm60}
390: is reduced with respect to both the isospin and the angular momentum.
391: The spectroscopic factor satisfies the sum rule
392: %
393: \begin{gather}
394: \begin{aligned}[b]
395: \sum_{ \nu_{N}^{} T_{N}^{} J_{N}^{} }^{}
396: S_{\mu}^{}( \nu_{N}^{} T_{N}^{} J_{N}^{}, j_{Y}^{} )
397: &=
398: n_{ j_{Y}^{} }^{}
399: ,
400: \end{aligned}
401: \label{e11-form}
402: \end{gather}
403: %
404: where $n_{ j_{Y}^{} }^{}$ is the number of hyperons in the orbit $j_{Y}^{}$.
405: If a hyperon in the hypernucleus provides the single-particle nature,
406: the state $| \psi_{\mu}^{Y}; T J \rangle$
407: is represented as a tensor product of
408: a core-nuclear state
409: $| ({}_{}^{A-1}Z) \nu_{\mathrm{core}}^{} T_{N}^{} J_{N}^{} \rangle$
410: and a hyperon state $| j_{Y}^{} \rangle$;
411: we obtain
412: \mbox{$S_{\mu}^{}( \nu_{N}^{} T_{N}^{} J_{N}^{}, j_{Y}^{} )
413: = \delta_{\nu_{N}^{} \nu_{\mathrm{core}}^{}}^{}$},
414: where \mbox{$\nu_{N}^{} = \nu_{\mathrm{core}}^{}$} means
415: the core state
416: is equivalent to the ${}_{}^{A-1}Z$ state in the weak-coupling limit.
417: %
418: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
419: %
420: \subsection{Shell-model setup and effective interactions}
421: \label{2-form}
422: %
423: In the present shell-model calculations,
424: we construct wave functions of ${}_{\Lambda}^{A}Z$ as follows:
425: Four nucleons are inert in the ${}_{}^{4}\mathrm{He}$ core
426: and
427: \mbox{$(A-5)$} valence nucleons move in the $p$-shell orbits.
428: The $\Lambda$ or $\Sigma$ hyperon
429: is assumed to be in the lowest $0s_{1/2}^{}$ orbit.
430: For the $NN$ effective interaction,
431: we adopt the Cohen-Kurath (8--16) 2BME~\cite{coh65},
432: which is a traditional and empirical interaction for ordinary $p$-shell nuclei,
433: and
434: is one of the reliable effective interactions
435: for stable and semi-stable nuclei.
436: The $YN$ effective interaction
437: is written~\cite{gal71:3,dal78,mil85} as
438: %
439: \begin{gather}
440: \begin{aligned}[b]
441: V_{Y}^{}
442: &=
443: V_{0}^{}(r)
444: +
445: V_{\sigma}^{}(r)
446: \bm{s}_{N}^{} \cdot \bm{s}_{Y}^{}
447: +
448: V_{\mathrm{LS}}^{}(r)
449: \bm{\ell} \cdot \mathinner{( \bm{s}_{N}^{} + \bm{s}_{Y}^{} )}
450: \\
451: & \hspace{1em}
452: {}
453: +
454: V_{\mathrm{ALS}}^{}(r)
455: \bm{\ell} \cdot \mathinner{( - \bm{s}_{N}^{} + \bm{s}_{Y}^{} )}
456: +
457: V_{T}^{}(r)
458: S_{12}^{}
459: ,
460: \end{aligned}
461: \label{e12-form}
462: \end{gather}
463: %
464: where
465: $V(r)$'s are radial functions of the relative coordinate
466: \mbox{$r = | \bm{r}_{N}^{} - \bm{r}_{Y}^{} |$}
467: between the nucleon and the hyperon.
468: $\bm{s}_{N}^{}$ and $\bm{s}_{Y}^{}$
469: are spin operators for the nucleon and the hyperon,
470: respectively,
471: and
472: $\bm{\ell}$ is the angular momentum operator of the relative motion.
473: The tensor operator $S_{12}^{}$ is defined by
474: %
475: \begin{gather}
476: \begin{aligned}[b]
477: S_{12}^{}
478: &=
479: 3
480: \mathinner{( \hat{\bm{r}} \cdot \bm{\sigma}_{N}^{} )}
481: \mathinner{( \hat{\bm{r}} \cdot \bm{\sigma}_{Y}^{} )}
482: -
483: \mathinner{( \bm{\sigma}_{N}^{} \cdot \bm{\sigma}_{Y}^{} )}
484: \end{aligned}
485: \label{e13-form}
486: \end{gather}
487: %
488: with \mbox{$\bm{\sigma} = 2 \bm{s}$}
489: and \mbox{$\hat{\bm{r}} = (\bm{r}_{N}^{} - \bm{r}_{Y}^{}) / r$}.
490: In Table~\ref{t01},
491: we list the parameters of radial integrals
492: $\bar{V}$, $\Delta$, $S_{+}^{}$, $S_{-}^{}$ and $T$,
493: which correspond to
494: $V_{0}^{}$, $V_{\sigma}^{}$, $V_{\mathrm{LS}}^{}$,
495: $V_{\mathrm{ALS}}^{}$ and $V_{T}^{}$,
496: respectively.
497: The parameters $S_{+}^{}$ and $S_{-}^{}$
498: are defined as the coefficients of
499: $\bm{\ell}_{N}^{} \cdot \mathinner{( \bm{s}_{N}^{} + \bm{s}_{Y}^{} )}$
500: and
501: $\bm{\ell}_{N}^{} \cdot \mathinner{( - \bm{s}_{N}^{} + \bm{s}_{Y}^{} )}$,
502: respectively,
503: where
504: $\bm{\ell}_{N}^{}$ is the angular momentum operator of the nucleon
505: and is proportional to the relative $\bm{\ell}$
506: for the hyperon in the $0s_{1/2}^{}$ orbit.
507: We adopt the values of $V_{\Lambda}^{}$
508: which is given in Ref.~\cite{mil07:2}.
509: For $V_{\Lambda\Sigma}^{}$ and $V_{\Sigma}^{}$,
510: we used the $\Lambda N$-$\Sigma N$ and $\Sigma N$ effective
511: interactions~\cite{mil07:2,mil:p}
512: based on the NSC97e,f potentials~\cite{rij99}.
513: %
514: \begin{table}[t]
515: \caption[$YN$ interactions]{%
516: Radial integrals for $YN$ effective interactions
517: in unit of $\mathrm{MeV}$\@.
518: The values are listed in Ref.~\cite{mil07:2}
519: for the $\Lambda N$ interaction $V_{\Lambda}^{}$
520: and the $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling interaction $V_{\Lambda\Sigma}^{}$,
521: and Ref.~\cite{mil:p} for the $\Sigma N$ interaction $V_{\Sigma}^{}$.%
522: }%
523: \label{t01}
524: \begin{ruledtabular}
525: \begin{tabular}{lcrrrrr}
526: & Isospin
527: & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\bar{V}$}
528: & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\Delta$}
529: & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$S_{+}^{}$}
530: & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$S_{-}^{}$}
531: & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$T$}
532: \\ \hline
533: $V_{\Lambda}^{}$
534: & $T=\frac{1}{2}$
535: & $-1.2200$ & $ 0.4300$ & $-0.2025$ & $ 0.1875$ & $ 0.0300$ \\[0.5ex]
536: $V_{\Sigma}^{}$
537: & $T=\frac{1}{2}$
538: & $ 1.0100$ & $-7.2150$ & $-0.0010$ & $ 0.0000$ & $-0.3640$ \\[0.5ex]
539: $V_{\Sigma}^{}$
540: & $T=\frac{3}{2}$
541: & $-1.1070$ & $ 2.2750$ & $-0.2680$ & $ 0.0000$ & $ 0.1870$ \\[0.5ex]
542: $V_{\Lambda\Sigma}^{}, V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{}$
543: & $T=\frac{1}{2}$
544: & $ 1.4500$ & $ 3.0400$ & $-0.0850$ & $ 0.0000$ & $ 0.1570$
545: \end{tabular}
546: \end{ruledtabular}
547: \end{table}
548: %
549: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
550: \section{Numerical results}
551: \label{rd}
552: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
553: %
554: \subsection{\boldmath $\Sigma$-mixing probabilities and energy shifts}
555: \label{1-rd}
556: %
557: We perform numerical calculations
558: of the neutron-rich $\Lambda$-hypernucleus ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$
559: in order to evaluate the $\Sigma$-mixing probabilities and the energy shifts
560: which are obtained by Eqs.~(\ref{e07-form})--(\ref{e09-form}).
561: In order to check our shell-model calculation,
562: we compare our numerical results
563: for the \mbox{$Z \approx N$} $\Lambda$-hypernuclei
564: to other work~\cite{mil07:2}.
565: We obtain the energy shifts,
566: e.g.,
567: \mbox{$\Delta E = 0.085$} and $0.073$ $\mathrm{MeV}$
568: for the ground states of
569: ${}_{\Lambda}^{7}\mathrm{Li}$ and ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{11}\mathrm{B}$,
570: which are comparable to the Millener's results
571: of $0.078$ and $0.066$ $\mathrm{MeV}$,
572: respectively.
573: Therefore,
574: we confirm that our calculations fully reproduce the Millener's results.
575: %
576: \par
577: %
578: In Fig.~\ref{f01},
579: we show the schematic energy levels
580: for the $\Lambda$ and $\Sigma$ ground states of ${}_{\;Y}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$.
581: Here,
582: we assume that
583: the difference between $\Lambda$ and $\Sigma$ threshold energies
584: is
585: $E( {}_{}^{9}\mathrm{Li}_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{} {+} \Sigma )
586: -
587: E( {}_{}^{9}\mathrm{Li}_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{} {+} \Lambda ) = 80$
588: $\mathrm{MeV}$.
589: Thus the energy of the $\Sigma$ ground state
590: $| \psi_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{\Sigma} \rangle$
591: is calculated to be
592: $E_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{\Sigma} - E_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{\Lambda}
593: =
594: \Delta M + B_{\Lambda}^{} - B_{\Sigma}^{}
595: =
596: 69.3$
597: $\mathrm{MeV}$,
598: measured from that of the $\Lambda$ ground state
599: $| \psi_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{\Lambda} \rangle$.
600: %
601: \begin{figure}[t]
602: \includegraphics*[width=0.9\linewidth]{./f01.eps}
603: \caption%
604: [Schematic energy levels]%
605: {Schematic energy levels
606: for $\Lambda$ and $\Sigma$ ground states of ${}_{\;Y}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$.}
607: \label{f01}
608: \end{figure}
609: %
610: \par
611: %
612: \begin{figure}[t]
613: \includegraphics*[width=0.9\linewidth]{./f02.eps}
614: \caption%
615: [The energy spectra of ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$]%
616: {The energy spectra of ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$
617: by the shell-model calculation with the $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling.
618: The experimental ${}_{}^{9}\mathrm{Li}$ binding energies
619: are taken from Ref.~\cite{til04}.
620: All states in the figure have the isospin \mbox{$T=\frac{3}{2}$}.}
621: \label{f02}
622: \end{figure}
623: %
624: The calculated energy levels for the ground and low-lying excited states
625: in ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$
626: are shown in Fig.~\ref{f02}.
627: Here,
628: the experimental ${}_{}^{9}\mathrm{Li}$ binding energies~\cite{til04}
629: are used for the core-nucleus energies,
630: instead of the calculated ones.
631: The energy shift $\Delta E$ for ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$
632: is obtained to be $0.280$ $\mathrm{MeV}$
633: which is about 3 times larger than
634: that for ${}_{\Lambda}^{7}\mathrm{Li}$ or ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{11}\mathrm{B}$.
635: As shown in Fig.~\ref{f02},
636: the values of energy shifts for the low-lying excited states
637: also account for about a few hundreds of $\mathrm{keV}$.
638: In particular,
639: the second $2_{}^{-}$ state with the $4.604$ $\mathrm{MeV}$ excitation energy
640: has the large energy shift of $0.282$ $\mathrm{MeV}$.
641: The calculated $\Sigma$-mixing probabilities
642: are shown in Table~\ref{t02}.
643: It is found that
644: the $\Sigma$-mixing probability is
645: \mbox{$P_{\Sigma}^{} = 0.345$} $\%$
646: in the $1_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{-}$ ground state
647: of ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$,
648: where the effect of renormalization is very small,
649: \mbox{$P_{\Sigma}^{(R)} = 0.344$} $\%$.
650: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
651: The $\Sigma_{}^{-}$ and $\Sigma_{}^{0}$ admixtures
652: for the ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$ ground state
653: are
654: $P_{\Sigma_{}^{-}}^{} = 0.183$ $\%$ and $P_{\Sigma_{}^{0}}^{} = 0.159$ $\%$,
655: respectively.
656: The $\Sigma_{}^{+}$ admixture is negligible.
657: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
658: This is the first result that
659: the $\Sigma$-mixing probabilities and the energy shifts
660: in the neutron-rich hypernucleus
661: are coherently enhanced by the configuration mixing
662: in the nuclear shell model.
663: %
664: \begin{table}[t]
665: \caption[$\Sigma$-mixing probabilities]{%
666: The calculated $\Sigma$-mixing probabilities of
667: ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$.
668: All states in the table have the isospin $T=3/2$.
669: }%
670: \label{t02}
671: \begin{ruledtabular}
672: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
673: $J_{}^{\pi}$
674: & $P_{\Sigma}^{}$ $[\%]$
675: & $P_{\Sigma_{}^{-}}^{}$ $[\%]$
676: & $P_{\Sigma_{}^{0}}^{}$ $[\%]$
677: & $P_{\Sigma_{}^{+}}^{}$ $[\%]$
678: \\ \hline
679: $1_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{-}$ & $0.345$ & $0.183$ & $0.159$ & $0.002$ \\
680: $2_{}^{-}$ & $0.166$ & $0.096$ & $0.070$ & $0.000$ \\
681: $0_{}^{-}$ & $0.185$ & $0.098$ & $0.086$ & $0.001$ \\
682: $1_{2}^{-}$ & $0.227$ & $0.128$ & $0.098$ & $0.001$ \\
683: $2_{2}^{-}$ & $0.350$ & $0.187$ & $0.162$ & $0.001$ \\
684: $3_{}^{-}$ & $0.175$ & $0.104$ & $0.071$ & ---
685: \end{tabular}
686: \end{ruledtabular}
687: \end{table}
688: %
689: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
690: %
691: \subsection{\boldmath$\Lambda$ and $\Sigma$ eigenstates}
692: \label{2-rd}
693: %
694: We examine an enhancement of $\Sigma$-mixing probabilities and energy shifts
695: of ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$ eigenstates
696: by the configuration mixing in the $\Sigma$ states,
697: which couple to the $\Lambda$ states
698: by the $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling.
699: In order to investigate a change of the core-nuclear configuration
700: due to the $YN$ interaction,
701: we estimate the energy spectra and the hyperon-pickup spectroscopic factors
702: in the $\Lambda$ and $\Sigma$ eigenstates
703: with \mbox{$T=\frac{3}{2}$}, \mbox{$J_{}^{\pi}=1_{}^{-}$}
704: including the ground and excited states.
705: %
706: \par
707: %
708: The calculated energy spectra of $\Lambda$ eigenstates
709: $| \psi_{\mu}^{\Lambda}; T J \rangle$
710: are shown in the left panel of Fig.~\ref{f03},
711: measured from the ground state.
712: We find that
713: the energy spacings between the levels of ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$
714: are very similar to those of ${}_{}^{9}\mathrm{Li}$
715: with \mbox{$T = \frac{3}{2}$},
716: \mbox{$J_{}^{\pi} = \frac{1}{2}_{}^{-}, \frac{3}{2}_{}^{-}$},
717: as seen in Fig.~\ref{f03}.
718: We confirm that
719: the ${}_{}^{9}\mathrm{Li}$ core state
720: is slightly changed by the addition of the $\Lambda$ hyperon,
721: and that the $\Lambda$ hyperon
722: behaves as a single-particle motion in the nucleus~\cite{dov89}
723: because the $\Lambda N$ interaction is rather weak.
724: The results
725: are supported by the calculated $\Lambda$-pickup spectroscopic factors
726: of Eq.~(\ref{e10-form})\@.
727: In Fig.~\ref{f03},
728: we also show the calculated spectroscopic factors $S_{\Lambda}^{}$
729: for the $\Lambda$ ground and two excited states;
730: (a) \mbox{$(T, J_{}^{\pi}) = (\frac{3}{2}, 1_{}^{-})_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{}$}
731: at $0.0$ $\mathrm{MeV}$,
732: (b) $(\frac{3}{2}, 1_{}^{-})_{5}^{}$ at $9.5$ $\mathrm{MeV}$,
733: and
734: (c) $(\frac{3}{2}, 1_{}^{-})_{10}^{}$ at $16.0$ $\mathrm{MeV}$.
735: In the case of (a),
736: we obtain
737: \mbox{$S_{\Lambda}^{} \approx 1$} for the ${}_{}^{9}\mathrm{Li}$ ground state
738: and \mbox{$S_{\Lambda}^{} \approx 0$} for other eigenstates.
739: Similarly,
740: in the case of (b),
741: \mbox{$S_{\Lambda}^{} \approx 1$} for the ${}_{}^{9}\mathrm{Li}$ eigenstate.
742: In the case of (c),
743: \mbox{$S_{\Lambda}^{}$} has a large value for the two eigenstates,
744: because these states are almost degenerate.
745: %
746: \begin{figure}[t]
747: \includegraphics*[width=\linewidth]{./f03.eps}
748: \caption%
749: [Calculated energy spectra and spectroscopic factors]%
750: {Calculated energy spectra
751: for $\Lambda$ eigenstates of ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$
752: and eigenstates of ${}_{}^{9}\mathrm{Li}$.
753: $\Lambda$-pickup spectroscopic factors for three eigenstates,
754: labeled by (a), (b), and (c),
755: are shown in each panel.}
756: \label{f03}
757: \end{figure}
758: %
759: \par
760: %
761: In Fig.~\ref{f04},
762: we display the calculated energy spectra
763: of $\Sigma$ eigenstates in ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$
764: and of ${}_{}^{9}\mathrm{Be}$ eigenstates
765: with \mbox{$T_{}^{} = \frac{1}{2}, \frac{3}{2}, \frac{5}{2}$}
766: and \mbox{$J_{}^{\pi} = \frac{1}{2}_{}^{-}, \frac{3}{2}_{}^{-}$},
767: together with the $\Sigma$-pickup spectroscopic factors $S_{\Sigma_{}^{-}}^{}$
768: for three states;
769: (a) $(\frac{3}{2}, 1_{}^{-})_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{}$
770: at $0.0$ $\mathrm{MeV}$,
771: (b) $(\frac{3}{2}, 1_{}^{-})_{4}^{}$ at $9.4$ $\mathrm{MeV}$,
772: and
773: (c) $(\frac{3}{2}, 1_{}^{-})_{13}^{}$ at $19.7$ $\mathrm{MeV}$.
774: The excited states of (b) and (c)
775: are strongly coupled to the $\Lambda$ ground state
776: in the energy regions of
777: \mbox{$E_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{\Sigma} - E_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{\Lambda} \approx 80$}
778: and $90$ $\mathrm{MeV}$,
779: respectively,
780: as we will mention in Fig.~\ref{f05}.
781: The distributions of $S_{\Sigma_{}^{-}}^{}$ for (b) and (c)
782: widely spread with the multi-configuration of ${}_{}^{9}\mathrm{Be}_{}^{\ast}$,
783: as seen in Fig.~\ref{f04}.
784: This implies that
785: the $\Sigma$ hyperon
786: has the ability of largely changing the core-nuclear configuration.
787: %
788: \begin{figure}[t]
789: \includegraphics*[width=\linewidth]{./f04.eps}
790: \caption%
791: [Calculated energy spectra and spectroscopic factors]%
792: {Calculated energy spectra
793: for $\Sigma$ eigenstates of ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$
794: and eigenstates of ${}_{}^{9}\mathrm{Be}$.
795: $\Sigma_{}^{-}$-pickup spectroscopic factors for three eigenstates,
796: labeled by (a), (b), and (c),
797: are shown in each panel.}
798: \label{f04}
799: \end{figure}
800: %
801: \par
802: %
803: The calculated $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling strengths
804: $|D_{\mu_{}^{\prime} }^{}|_{}^{2}$
805: between the $\Sigma$ eigenstates $| \psi_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\Sigma} \rangle$
806: and the $\Lambda$ ground state $| \psi_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{\Lambda} \rangle$
807: are shown in Fig.~\ref{f05}.
808: It should be noticed that
809: a contribution of the $\Sigma$ ground state
810: $| \psi_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{\Sigma} \rangle$
811: to the $\Sigma$-mixing of the ground state of ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$
812: is reduced to \mbox{$|D_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{}|_{}^{2} = 0.002$} $\%$,
813: whereas the several $\Sigma$ excited states in the
814: \mbox{$E_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\Sigma} - E_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{\Lambda} \approx 80$}
815: $\mathrm{MeV}$ region considerably contribute to the $\Sigma$-mixing.
816: These contributions are coherently enhanced
817: by the configuration mixing
818: which is caused by the $\Sigma N$ interaction.
819: It is shown that
820: the nature of the $\Sigma$-nuclear states
821: plays an important role in the $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling.
822: %
823: \begin{figure}[t]
824: \includegraphics*[width=\linewidth]{./f05.eps}
825: \caption%
826: [$\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling strengths]%
827: {$\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling strengths $|D_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{}|_{}^{2}$
828: of the $\Sigma$ eigenstates
829: in the ground state of ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$.}
830: \label{f05}
831: \end{figure}
832: %
833: \par
834: %
835: However,
836: it should be noticed that
837: the $\Sigma N$ interaction has still ambiguities.
838: The values of radial integrals
839: in the $\Sigma N$ \mbox{$T=\frac{3}{2}$} effective interaction,
840: $\bar{V} = -1.107$ and $\Delta = 2.275$ $\mathrm{MeV}$
841: in NSC97e,f,
842: lead to the attractive ${}_{}^{3}S_{1}^{}$ interaction of
843: ${}_{}^{33}V = \bar{V} + \frac{1}{4} \Delta = -0.538$ $\mathrm{MeV}$,
844: as pointed out in Ref.~\cite{dab99},
845: whereas the \mbox{$T=\frac{3}{2}$}, ${}_{}^{3}S_{1}^{}$ interaction
846: may be repulsive~\cite{fuj07y,rij08}
847: because of recent suggestions of repulsive $\Sigma$-nuclear
848: potentials~\cite{dab99,har91,nou02,fri07}.
849: Further theoretical investigation are needed.
850: %
851: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
852: \section{Discussion}
853: \label{dis}
854: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
855: %
856: \begin{figure}[t]
857: \includegraphics*[width=\linewidth]{./f06.eps}
858: \caption%
859: [Fermi and Gamow-Teller type coupling strengths]%
860: {(a)
861: Fermi-type coupling strengths $|D_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\mathrm{F}}|_{}^{2}$
862: and
863: (b)
864: Gamow-Teller-type coupling strengths
865: $|D_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\mathrm{GT}}|_{}^{2}$
866: of the $\Sigma$ eigenstates
867: in the ground state of ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$.}
868: \label{f06}
869: \end{figure}
870: %
871: \par
872: %
873: It is important to understand a mechanism of the $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling
874: in neutron-rich nuclei microscopically.
875: When a $\Lambda$ state in ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$
876: converts to a $\Sigma_{}^{-}$ state
877: by the $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling interaction,
878: the ${}_{}^{9}\mathrm{Li}$ core state
879: changes into the ${}_{}^{9}\mathrm{Be}$ core state.
880: In other words,
881: the $\beta_{}^{-}$-transition,
882: \mbox{${}_{}^{9}\mathrm{Li} \to {}_{}^{9}\mathrm{Be}$},
883: occurs in the core-nuclear state.
884: Thus it is interesting
885: to consider the $\beta$-transitions between the core-nuclear components
886: of $\Lambda$ and $\Sigma$ eigenstates
887: in order to investigate the strength distribution
888: of the $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling.
889: The two-body $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling interaction $V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{}$
890: is approximately rewritten as
891: %
892: \begin{gather}
893: \begin{aligned}[b]
894: V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{}
895: &\simeq
896: V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{\mathrm{F}}
897: +
898: V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{\mathrm{GT}}
899: \end{aligned}
900: \label{e01-dis}
901: \end{gather}
902: %
903: with
904: %
905: \begin{gather}
906: \begin{aligned}[b]
907: V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{\mathrm{F}}
908: &=
909: V_{\mathrm{F}}^{}(r)
910: \bm{t}_{N}^{} \cdot \bm{\phi}_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{}
911: ,
912: \end{aligned}
913: \label{e02-dis}
914: \\
915: \begin{aligned}[b]
916: V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{\mathrm{GT}}
917: &=
918: V_{\mathrm{GT}}^{}(r)
919: \mathinner{( \bm{\sigma}_{N}^{} \cdot \bm{\sigma}_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{} )}
920: \bm{t}_{N}^{} \cdot \bm{\phi}_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{}
921: ,
922: \end{aligned}
923: \label{e03-dis}
924: \end{gather}
925: %
926: where
927: $\bm{t}_{N}^{}$ and $\bm{\sigma}_{N}^{} \bm{t}_{N}^{}$
928: denote the Fermi and Gamow-Teller $\beta$-transition operators for nucleons,
929: respectively,
930: and the operator
931: $\bm{\phi}_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{}$
932: changes the $\Lambda$ hyperon into the $\Sigma$ hyperon,
933: %
934: \begin{gather}
935: \begin{aligned}[b]
936: | j_{\Sigma}^{} \rangle
937: &=
938: \bm{\phi}_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{}
939: | j_{\Lambda}^{} \rangle
940: ,
941: \end{aligned}
942: \label{e04-dis}
943: \end{gather}
944: %
945: and
946: has tensorial rank-$0$ in the spin space and rank-$1$ in the isospin space;
947: $\bm{\sigma}_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{}$ is the spin operator for a hyperon.
948: Therefore,
949: $V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{\mathrm{F}}$ and $V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{\mathrm{GT}}$
950: are regarded as the Fermi-type and Gamow-Teller-type coupling interactions,
951: respectively.
952: We stress that
953: the $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling strengths $|D_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{}|_{}^{2}$
954: are extremely affected by strengths of these $\beta$-transitions
955: between the core-nuclear states.
956: We discuss
957: which type interaction in $V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{}$
958: contributes to the coupling strengths in the regions of
959: \mbox{$E_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\Sigma} - E_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{\Lambda} \approx 80$}
960: $\mathrm{MeV}$,
961: as shown in Fig.~\ref{f05}.
962: We can evaluate the strengths,
963: %
964: \begin{gather}
965: \begin{aligned}[b]
966: |D_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\mathrm{F}}|_{}^{2}
967: &=
968: \left|
969: \frac{ \langle \psi_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{\Lambda}; T J |
970: V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{\mathrm{F}}
971: | \psi_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\Sigma}; T J \rangle }
972: { E_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\Sigma} - E_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{\Lambda} }
973: \right|_{}^{2}
974: ,
975: \end{aligned}
976: \label{e05-dis}
977: \\
978: \begin{aligned}[b]
979: |D_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\mathrm{GT}}|_{}^{2}
980: &=
981: \left|
982: \frac{ \langle \psi_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{\Lambda}; T J |
983: V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{\mathrm{GT}}
984: | \psi_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\Sigma}; T J \rangle }
985: { E_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\Sigma} - E_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{\Lambda} }
986: \right|_{}^{2}
987: ,
988: \end{aligned}
989: \label{e06-dis}
990: \end{gather}
991: %
992: using
993: \mbox{$\bar{V}_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{} = 1.45$ $\mathrm{MeV}$}
994: and
995: \mbox{$\Delta_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{} = 3.04$ $\mathrm{MeV}$}
996: in Table~\ref{t01}.
997: The calculated strength distributions
998: of the Fermi- and Gamow-Teller-type couplings
999: are shown in Figs.~\ref{f06} (a) and (b),
1000: respectively.
1001: Comparing Fig.~\ref{f06} with Fig.~\ref{f05},
1002: we recognize
1003: the Fermi and Gamow-Teller components
1004: coherently contribute to the $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling strengths
1005: in the energy region of
1006: \mbox{$E_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\Sigma} - E_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{\Lambda} \approx 80$}
1007: $\mathrm{MeV}$.
1008: The calculated $\Sigma$-mixing probability involving both couplings is
1009: %
1010: \begin{gather}
1011: \begin{aligned}[b]
1012: \sum_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{}
1013: \left|
1014: \frac{ \langle \psi_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{\Lambda}; T J |
1015: \mathinner{(
1016: V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{\mathrm{F}}
1017: +
1018: V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{\mathrm{GT}}
1019: )}
1020: | \psi_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\Sigma}; T J \rangle }
1021: { E_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\Sigma} - E_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{\Lambda} }
1022: \right|_{}^{2}
1023: =
1024: 0.350 \; \%
1025: ,
1026: \end{aligned}
1027: \label{e07-dis}
1028: \end{gather}
1029: %
1030: which is close to the full calculated probability
1031: \mbox{$P_{\Sigma}^{} = 0.345$} $\%$,
1032: while
1033: \mbox{$\sum_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{} |D_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\mathrm{F}}|_{}^{2}
1034: = 0.144$} $\%$
1035: is obtained for the Fermi type
1036: and
1037: \mbox{$\sum_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{} |D_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\mathrm{GT}}|_{}^{2}
1038: = 0.098$} $\%$
1039: for the Gamow-Teller type.
1040: %
1041: \par
1042: %
1043: The Fermi-type operator
1044: \mbox{$\bm{t}_{N}^{} \cdot \bm{\phi}_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{}$}
1045: does not change the core-nuclear states in
1046: $| \psi_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{\Lambda} \rangle$,
1047: which is equivalent to the Fermi $\beta$-transition,
1048: $| ({}_{}^{A}Z) \nu T T_{z}^{} J M \rangle$
1049: $\to$
1050: $| ({}_{}^{A}Z{\pm}1) \nu T \, T_{z}^{}{\pm}1 \, J M \rangle$.
1051: Note that this transition can change only $T_{z}^{}$.
1052: By the Fermi $\beta$-transition
1053: from the ${}_{}^{9}\mathrm{Li}$ \mbox{$T = \frac{3}{2}$} ground state,
1054: the ${}_{}^{9}\mathrm{Be}_{}^{\ast}$ \mbox{$T = \frac{3}{2}$} excited state
1055: is populated around
1056: \mbox{$E_{x}^{}({}_{}^{9}\mathrm{Be}_{}^{*}) \simeq 14$} $\mathrm{MeV}$,
1057: measured from
1058: the ${}_{}^{9}\mathrm{Be}$ \mbox{$T = \frac{1}{2}$} ground state.
1059: If the weak-coupling limit in the $\Sigma N$ interaction
1060: works well like the $\Lambda N$ interaction,
1061: the coupling is concentrated on the only one state.
1062: As a result,
1063: one peak arises at
1064: \mbox{$E_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\Sigma} - E_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{\Lambda} \approx 80$}
1065: $\mathrm{MeV}$
1066: in the coupling strength.
1067: However,
1068: the calculated strength distribution of
1069: $|D_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\mathrm{F}}|_{}^{2}$
1070: widely spreads to the energy regions of
1071: \mbox{$E_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\Sigma} - E_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{\Lambda} = 75$}--$80$
1072: and about $90$ $\mathrm{MeV}$,
1073: as shown in Fig.~\ref{f06} (a).
1074: This means that
1075: the $\Sigma$ hyperon changes a nuclear configuration mixing
1076: due to the strong spin-isospin dependence in the $\Sigma N$ interaction,
1077: leading to the coherence of the $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling.
1078: %
1079: \par
1080: %
1081: In order to see the potentiality of the neutron-rich nuclei clearly,
1082: we discuss
1083: why the energy shift for ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$
1084: is about 3 times larger than that for ${}_{\Lambda}^{7}\mathrm{Li}$.
1085: The enhancement of the $\Sigma$-mixing probabilities
1086: in neutron-rich $\Lambda$-hypernuclei
1087: is mainly due to the Fermi-type coupling interaction
1088: $V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{\mathrm{F}}$,
1089: which might correspond to the coherent $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling
1090: suggested in Refs.~\cite{swe00,aka00}.
1091: When we use the weak-coupling limit for simplicity,
1092: we consider a matrix element of $V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{\mathrm{F}}$
1093: between $\Lambda$ and $\Sigma$ states,
1094: %
1095: \begin{gather}
1096: \begin{aligned}[b]
1097: \langle V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{\mathrm{\mathrm{F}}} \rangle
1098: &=
1099: \langle T_{N}^{}{=}T J_{N}^{}, j_{\Sigma}^{}; T J |
1100: V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{\mathrm{\mathrm{F}}}
1101: | T_{N}^{}{=}T J_{N}^{}, j_{\Lambda}^{}; T J \rangle
1102: ,
1103: \end{aligned}
1104: \label{e08-dis}
1105: \end{gather}
1106: %
1107: where
1108: the $\Lambda$ and $\Sigma$ states
1109: must have the same core-nuclear state
1110: $| T_{N}^{} J_{N}^{} \rangle$.
1111: If we assume that
1112: \mbox{$V_{\mathrm{F}}^{}(r) = \bar{V}_{\mathrm{F}}^{}$},
1113: we obtain
1114: %
1115: \begin{gather}
1116: \begin{aligned}[b]
1117: \langle V_{\Sigma\Lambda}^{\mathrm{\mathrm{F}}} \rangle
1118: &=
1119: \bar{V}
1120: \sqrt{ \frac{ 4 T \mathinner{(T+1)} }{ 3 } }
1121: \end{aligned}
1122: \label{e09-dis}
1123: \end{gather}
1124: %
1125: and find that
1126: the Fermi-type coupling strength $|D_{\mu_{}^{\prime}}^{\mathrm{F}}|_{}^{2}$
1127: is proportional to $T \mathinner{(T+1)}$.
1128: Therefore,
1129: the Fermi-type coupling strengths
1130: play the important role in the $\Sigma$-mixing probability
1131: of neutron-rich ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$ eigenstates
1132: because of \mbox{$T = \frac{3}{2}$}.
1133: On the other hand,
1134: in ${}_{\Lambda}^{7}\mathrm{Li}$ \mbox{$T = 0$} states,
1135: the Fermi-type coupling strengths vanish
1136: whereas
1137: the $\Sigma$-mixing probability
1138: is mainly caused by the Gamow-Teller-type coupling strengths.
1139: %
1140: \par
1141: %
1142: In the Gamow-Teller transitions for ordinary nuclei,
1143: the sum rule~\cite{ike63}
1144: %
1145: \begin{gather}
1146: \begin{aligned}[b]
1147: \sum B(\mathrm{GT-}) - \sum B(\mathrm{GT+})
1148: &=
1149: 3 \mathinner{( N - Z )}
1150: \end{aligned}
1151: \label{}
1152: \end{gather}
1153: %
1154: is well known as a model independent formula,
1155: where
1156: $B(\mathrm{GT\mp})$
1157: is a strength of the Gamow-Teller $\beta_{}^{\mp}$-transition,
1158: $| {}_{}^{A}Z \rangle \to | {}_{}^{A}Z{\pm}1 \rangle$.
1159: In general,
1160: $\sum B(\mathrm{GT+})$ becomes smaller as neutron-excess grows larger,
1161: leading to
1162: $\sum B(\mathrm{GT-}) \approx 3 \mathinner{( N - Z )}$.
1163: Therefore,
1164: the Gamow-Teller-type coupling
1165: is very important
1166: in $\Lambda$-hypernuclei with large neutron excess.
1167: %
1168: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1169: \section{Summary and conclusion}
1170: \label{conc}
1171: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1172: %
1173: We have investigated the structure
1174: of the neutron-rich ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$ hypernucleus,
1175: in shell-model calculations considering the $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling
1176: in the perturbation theory.
1177: We have found that
1178: the $\Sigma$-mixing probabilities and the energy shifts
1179: of ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$ eigenstates
1180: are coherently enhanced
1181: by the $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling configurations
1182: in the neutron-rich nucleus.
1183: We have argued the effects of the $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ coupling interaction
1184: in terms of the $\beta$-transitions for the core-nuclear states.
1185: The reasons why the $\Sigma$-mixing probabilities are enhanced
1186: are summarized as follows:
1187: (i)
1188: The multi-configuration $\Sigma$ excited states
1189: can be strongly coupled with the $\Lambda$ ground state
1190: with the help of the $\Sigma N$ interaction.
1191: (ii)
1192: These strong $\Lambda$-$\Sigma$ couplings
1193: are coherently enhanced
1194: by the Fermi- and Gamow-Teller-type coupling components.
1195: (iii)
1196: The Fermi-type coupling
1197: becomes more effective in the neutron-rich environment
1198: increasing as $T \mathinner{(T+1)}$.
1199: %
1200: \par
1201: %
1202: In conclusion,
1203: we have found that
1204: the $\Sigma$-mixing probability is about $0.34$ $\%$
1205: and the energy shift is about $0.28$ $\mathrm{MeV}$
1206: for the neutron-rich ${}_{\;\Lambda}^{10}\mathrm{Li}$
1207: $1_{\mathrm{g.s.}}^{-}$ ground state,
1208: which is about 3 times larger than
1209: that for ${}_{\Lambda}^{7}\mathrm{Li}$.
1210: This is the first estimation of the $\Sigma$-mixing
1211: in the neutron-rich hypernuclei
1212: by microscopic shell-model calculations.
1213: %
1214: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1215: %
1216: \begin{acknowledgments}
1217: The authors are obliged to K. Muto for valuable discussion and useful comments.
1218: They are pleased to acknowledge D.~J. Millener
1219: for providing the $\Sigma N$ effective interaction in $p$ shell
1220: based on NSC97e,f
1221: and
1222: for valuable discussion and comments.
1223: This work is supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research
1224: on Priority Areas (Nos.~17070002 and 20028010).
1225: \end{acknowledgments}
1226: %
1227: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1228: %
1229: %%% REFERENCES %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1230: %
1231: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
1232:
1233: \bibitem{maj95}
1234: L. Majling, Nucl. Phys. \textbf{A585}, 211c (1995).
1235:
1236: \bibitem{swe00}
1237: Khin~Swe Myint, T. Harada, S. Shinmura, and Y. Akaishi, Few-Body Syst. Suppl.
1238: \textbf{12}, 383 (2000).
1239:
1240: \bibitem{aka00}
1241: Y. Akaishi, T. Harada, S. Shinmura, and Khin~Swe Myint, Phys. Rev. Lett.
1242: \textbf{84}, 3539 (2000).
1243:
1244: \bibitem{bal00}
1245: M. Baldo, G.~F. Burgio, and H.-J. Schulze, Phys. Rev. C \textbf{61}, 055801
1246: (2000).
1247:
1248: \bibitem{por08:0}
1249: O. Sorlin and M.-G. Porquet, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. \textbf{61}, 602 (2008),
1250: and references therein.
1251:
1252: \bibitem{ume04a}
1253: A. Umeya and K. Muto, Phys. Rev. C \textbf{69}, 024306 (2004).
1254:
1255: \bibitem{ume06a}
1256: A. Umeya and K. Muto, Phys. Rev. C \textbf{74}, 034330 (2006).
1257:
1258: \bibitem{ume08b}
1259: A. Umeya, G. Kaneko, T. Haneda, and K. Muto, Phys. Rev. C \textbf{77}, 044301
1260: (2008).
1261:
1262: \bibitem{gal71:3}
1263: A. Gal, J.~M. Soper, and R.~H. Dalitz, \relax Ann. Phys. (NY) \textbf{63}, 53
1264: (1971); A. Gal, J. M. Soper, R. H. Dalitz, Ann. Phys. (NY) \textbf{72}, 445
1265: (1972); A. Gal, J. M. Soper, R. H. Dalitz, Ann. Phys. (NY) \textbf{113}, 79
1266: (1978).
1267:
1268: \bibitem{dal78}
1269: R.~H. Dalitz and A. Gal, Ann. Phys. (NY) \textbf{116}, 167 (1978).
1270:
1271: \bibitem{mil85}
1272: D.~J. Millener, A. Gal, C.~B. Dover, and R.~H. Dalitz, Phys. Rev. C
1273: \textbf{31}, 499 (1985).
1274:
1275: \bibitem{aue83}
1276: E.~H. Auerbach, A.~J. Baltz, C.~B. Dover, A. Gal, S.~H. Kahana, L. Ludeking,
1277: and D.~J. Millener, Ann. Phys. (NY) \textbf{148}, 381 (1983).
1278:
1279: \bibitem{ito90}
1280: K. Itonaga, T. Motoba, and H. Band{\=o}, Prog. Theor. Phys. \textbf{84}, 291
1281: (1990).
1282:
1283: \bibitem{mil07:2}
1284: D.~J. Millener, \relax Springer Lecture Notes in Physics \textbf{724}, 31
1285: (2007); D. J. Millener, Nucl. Phys. \textbf{A804}, 84 (2008).
1286:
1287: \bibitem{fuj02}
1288: S. Fujii, R. Okamoto, and K. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. C \textbf{66}, 054301 (2002).
1289:
1290: \bibitem{hal08}
1291: D. Halderson, Phys. Rev. C \textbf{77}, 034304 (2008).
1292:
1293: \bibitem{tam08:0}
1294: H. Tamura, K. Hosomi, T. Koike, Y. Ma, M. Mimori, K. Miwa, K. Shirotori, and M.
1295: Ukai, Nucl. Phys. \textbf{A804}, 73 (2008), and references therein.
1296:
1297: \bibitem{mae89}
1298: P.~M.~M. Maessen, Th.~A. Rijken, and J.~J. de~Swart, Phys. Rev. C \textbf{40},
1299: 2226 (1989).
1300:
1301: \bibitem{rij99}
1302: Th.~A. Rijken, V.~G.~J. Stoks, and Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. C \textbf{59}, 21
1303: (1999).
1304:
1305: \bibitem{rij06}
1306: Th.~A. Rijken and Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. C \textbf{73}, 044008 (2006).
1307:
1308: \bibitem{sah05}
1309: P.~K. Saha, T. Fukuda, W. Imoto, J.~K. Ahn, S. Ajimura, K. Aoki, H.~C. Bhang,
1310: H. Fujioka, H. Hotchi, J.~I. Hwang, T. Itabashi, B.~H. Kang, H.~D. Kim, M.~J.
1311: Kim, T. Kishimoto, A. Krutenkova, T. Maruta, Y. Miura, K. Miwa, T. Nagae, H.
1312: Noumi, H. Outa, T. Ohtaki, A. Sakaguchi, Y. Sato, M. Sekimoto, Y. Shimizu, H.
1313: Tamura, K. Tanida, A. Toyoda, M. Ukai, and H.~J. Yim, Phys. Rev. Lett.
1314: \textbf{94}, 052502 (2005).
1315:
1316: \bibitem{tre03}
1317: T.~Yu. Tretyakova and D.~E. Lanskoy, Phys. At. Nucl. \textbf{66}, 1651
1318: (2003).
1319:
1320: \bibitem{har09}
1321: T. Harada, A. Umeya, and Y. Hirabayashi, Phys. Rev. C \textbf{79}, 014603
1322: (2009).
1323:
1324: \bibitem{dov89}
1325: C.~B. Dover, D.~J. Millener, and A. Gal, Phys. Rep. \textbf{184}, 1 (1989).
1326:
1327: \bibitem{edm60}
1328: A.~R. Edmonds, {\em Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics}, 2nd ed. (Princeton
1329: University Press, New Jersey, 1960).
1330:
1331: \bibitem{coh65}
1332: S. Cohen and D. Kurath, Nucl. Phys. \textbf{73}, 1 (1965).
1333:
1334: \bibitem{mil:p}
1335: D.~J. Millener, private communication.
1336:
1337: \bibitem{til04}
1338: D.~R. Tilley, J.~H. Kelley, J.~L. Godwin, D.~J. Millener, J.~E. Purcell, C.~G.
1339: Sheu, and H.~R. Weller, Nucl. Phys. \textbf{A745}, 155 (2004).
1340:
1341: \bibitem{dab99}
1342: J. Da{\c{}}browski, Phys. Rev. C \textbf{60}, 025205 (1999).
1343:
1344: \bibitem{fuj07y}
1345: Y. Fujiwara, Y. Suzuki, and C. Nakamoto, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. \textbf{58},
1346: 439 (2007).
1347:
1348: \bibitem{rij08}
1349: Th.~A. Rijken and Y. Yamamoto, Nucl. Phys. \textbf{A804}, 51 (2008).
1350:
1351: \bibitem{har91}
1352: T. Harada and Y. Akaishi, Phys. Lett. \textbf{B262}, 205 (1991).
1353:
1354: \bibitem{nou02}
1355: H. Noumi, P.~K. Saha, D. Abe, S. Ajimura, K. Aoki, H.~C. Bhang, T. Endo, Y.
1356: Fujii, T. Fukuda, H.~C. Guo, K. Imai, O. Hashimoto, H. Hotchi, E.~H. Kim,
1357: J.~H. Kim, T. Kishimoto, A. Krutenkova, K. Maeda, T. Nagae, M. Nakamura, H.
1358: Outa, M. Sekimoto, T. Saito, A. Sakaguchi, Y. Sato, R. Sawafta, Y. Shimizu,
1359: T. Takahashi, L. Tang, H. Tamura, K. Tanida, T. Watanabe, H.~H. Xia, S.~H.
1360: Zhou, L.~H. Zhu, and X.~F. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{89}, 072301
1361: (2002).
1362:
1363: \bibitem{fri07}
1364: E. Friedman and A. Gal, Phys. Rep. \textbf{452}, 89 (2007).
1365:
1366: \bibitem{ike63}
1367: K. Ikeda, S. Fujii, and J.~I. Fujita, Phys. Lett. \textbf{3}, 271 (1963).
1368:
1369: \end{thebibliography}
1370: %
1371: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1372: %
1373: \end{document}
1374: %
1375: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1376: