1: % aa.dem
2: % AA vers. 6.1, LaTeX class for Astronomy & Astrophysics
3: % demonstration file
4: % (c) Springer-Verlag HD
5: % revised by EDP Sciences
6: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
7: %
8: %\documentclass[referee]{aa} % for a referee version
9: %\documentclass[onecolumn]{aa} % for a paper on 1 column
10: %\documentclass[longauth]{aa} % for the long lists of affiliations
11: %\documentclass[rnote]{aa} % for the research notes
12: %\documentclass[letter]{aa} % for the letters
13: %
14: \documentclass[structabstract]{aa}
15: %\documentclass[tradiabstract]{aa} % for the abstract without structuration
16: % (traditional abstract)
17: %
18: \usepackage{graphicx}
19: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
20: %\usepackage{txfonts}
21: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
22: %
23: \def\cs{{c_{\rm s}}}
24: \newcommand{\dfrac}[2]{\frac{\displaystyle{#1}}{\displaystyle{#2}}}
25: \newcommand{\stck}[1]{\stackrel{#1}{\longrightarrow}}
26:
27: \begin{document}
28: %
29: \title{Effects of accretion flow on the chemical structure in the
30: inner regions of protoplanetary disks}
31:
32: % \subtitle{I. Overviewing the $\kappa$-mechanism}
33:
34: \author{H. Nomura\inst{1}
35: \thanks{Now at Department of Astronomy, Graduate School of Science,
36: Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan},
37: Y. Aikawa\inst{2}, Y. Nakagawa\inst{2}
38: \and
39: T.J. Millar\inst{1}
40: % C. Ptolemy\inst{2}\fnmsep\thanks{Just to show the usage
41: % of the elements in the author field}
42: }
43:
44: \institute{Astrophysics Research Centre, School of Mathematics \&
45: Physics, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK\\
46: \email{h.nomura@qub.ac.uk}
47: \and
48: Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences,
49: Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai-cho, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan
50: % University of Alexandria, Department of Geography, ...\\
51: % \email{c.ptolemy@hipparch.uheaven.space}
52: % \thanks{The university of heaven temporarily does not
53: % accept e-mails}
54: }
55:
56: % \date{Received September 15, 1996; accepted March 16, 1997}
57:
58: \abstract
59: {}
60: {We have studied the dependence of the profiles of molecular abundances
61: and line emission on the accretion flow in the hot ($\ga 100$K)
62: inner region of protoplanetary disks.}
63: {The gas-phase reactions initiated by evaporation of the ice mantle on
64: dust grains are calculated along the accretion flow.
65: We focus on methanol, a molecule that is formed predominantly through
66: the evaporation of warm ice mantles, to show how the abundance profile
67: and line emission depend on the accretion flow.}
68: %and the line emission of methanol is simulated using the obtained
69: %abundance profile.
70: {Our results show that some evaporated molecules keep high
71: abundances only when the accretion
72: velocity is large enough, and that methanol could be useful as
73: a diagnostic of the accretion flow by means
74: of ALMA observations at the disk radius of $\la 10$AU.}
75: {}
76: % 5 {} token are mandatory
77:
78: % \abstract
79: % context heading (optional)
80: % {} leave it empty if necessary
81: % {To investigate the physical nature of the `nuc\-leated instability' of
82: % proto giant planets, the stability of layers
83: % in static, radiative gas spheres is analysed on the basis of Baker's
84: % standard one-zone model.}
85: % aims heading (mandatory)
86: % {It is shown that stability
87: % depends only upon the equations of state, the opacities and the local
88: % thermodynamic state in the layer. Stability and instability can
89: % therefore be expressed in the form of stability equations of state
90: % which are universal for a given composition.}
91: % methods heading (mandatory)
92: % {The stability equations of state are
93: % calculated for solar composition and are displayed in the domain
94: % $-14 \leq \lg \rho / \mathrm{[g\, cm^{-3}]} \leq 0 $,
95: % $ 8.8 \leq \lg e / \mathrm{[erg\, g^{-1}]} \leq 17.7$. These displays
96: % may be
97: % used to determine the one-zone stability of layers in stellar
98: % or planetary structure models by directly reading off the value of
99: % the stability equations for the thermodynamic state of these layers,
100: % specified
101: % by state quantities as density $\rho$, temperature $T$ or
102: % specific internal energy $e$.
103: % Regions of instability in the $(\rho,e)$-plane are described
104: % and related to the underlying microphysical processes.}
105: % results heading (mandatory)
106: % {Vibrational instability is found to be a common phenomenon
107: % at temperatures lower than the second He ionisation
108: % zone. The $\kappa$-mechanism is widespread under `cool'
109: % conditions.}
110: % conclusions heading (optional), leave it empty if necessary
111: % {}
112:
113: \keywords{accretion disks -- line: formation -- molecular processes --
114: planetary systems: protoplanetary disks
115: % \keywords{giant planet formation --
116: % $\kappa$-mechanism --
117: % stability of gas spheres
118: }
119:
120: \authorrunning{H.Nomura et al.}
121: \titlerunning{Effects of accretion flow on inner disk chemistry}
122: \maketitle
123: %
124: %________________________________________________________________
125:
126: \section{Introduction}
127:
128: Recent observations have detected a variety of
129: molecular lines towards disks around T Tauri stars
130: %(e.g., \cite{dut97}; \cite{thi04}; \cite{qi08})
131: %\citep[e.g.,][]{dut97}
132: %\citep[e.g.,][]{dut97,thi04,qi08}.
133: (e.g., Dutrey et al. 1997; Thi et al. 2004; Qi et al. 2008).
134: Existing millimetre/sub-millimetre
135: observations, which have relatively low spatial resolution, can trace
136: only the outer
137: region ($\ga 50$AU) of the disk, while near-infrared observations with high
138: sensitivity or high spectral resolution probe molecular lines from
139: the planet-forming region in the disks (Lahuis et
140: al. 2006; Gibb et al. 2007; Carr \& Najita 2008).
141: The forthcoming Atacama Large Millimeter/sub-millimeter Array (ALMA),
142: with both high sensitivity and high spatial resolution, will make
143: it possible to observe various molecular lines from the inner
144: regions of the disks.
145: %(e.g., Semenov et al. 2008).
146:
147: Although many models on the chemical structure of young circumstellar
148: disks focus on the outer disk (e.g., Aikawa et al. 2002; Willacy 2007),
149: %Vasyunin et al. 2008
150: the chemistry in the inner disks has also been studied (e.g., Markwick
151: et al. 2002).
152: In cold pre-stellar cores, observations suggest that many gas-phase molecules,
153: including CO, are frozen onto dust grains (e.g.,
154: Caselli et al. 1999). Young stars and circumstellar disks are thought to
155: be formed as a result of the collapse of such molecular cloud cores.
156: In addition, observations of molecular lines towards disks suggest that the
157: gas-phase molecules are frozen onto grains near the midplane of cold
158: outer disks (e.g., Dutrey et al. 1997). However,
159: in the inner region of the disk the dust temperature is high due to the
160: irradiation from the central star, and the ice mantles
161: %molecules
162: are expected to evaporate into the gas
163: by analogy with the molecules observed towards star-forming cores,
164: so-called hot molecular cores and hot corinos
165: (e.g., Millar 1993; Ceccarelli et al. 2007),
166: %hot cores and hot corinos (high and low mass sfarforming cores),
167: %which are thought to be formed as a result of the icy mantle
168: %evaporation and the subsequent gas-phase reactions
169: so that the chemistry in the inner
170: disk will be characterized by this ice mantle evaporation.
171:
172: %It is likely that the gas and dust in young
173: %circumstellar disks are accreting towards a central star and supplying
174: %an additional mass to the star.
175: Accretion flow towards a central star is
176: important for planet formation in the disk because it is one
177: of the possible mechanisms for the dispersal of the gas,
178: (e.g., Hollenbach et al. 2000),
179: while the amount
180: of the gas in the disk influences the coagulation and settling of dust
181: grains, which lead to planetesimal formation, and
182: also controls gaseous planet formation as well as the orbital motion
183: of the planets
184: (e.g., Nakagawa et al. 1986;
185: %Hayashi et al. 1985;
186: Kominami \& Ida 2002; Papaloizou et al. 2007).
187: %
188: Meanwhile theory has suggested that the planet forming region
189: in the disks could be magnetorotationally stable, that is, there could be
190: no driving source of the accretion flow (e.g., Sano et al. 2000).
191: Therefore, it will be useful if we can identify observational
192: evidence for the accretion flow in the inner disk in order to
193: understand the planet formation processes.
194:
195: If the gas and dust in the disks are accreting towards the central star,
196: the ice mantle molecules, which are frozen onto dust grains in the cold
197: outer disk, will evaporate when they are transported into the hot inner
198: disk.
199: %
200: The evaporated molecules will be destroyed by chemical reactions
201: while they are migrating inwards along the accretion flow.
202: Thus, the distributions of the molecules will trace the accretion
203: velocity, depending on whether the timescale of the chemical
204: reactions is shorter or longer than the accretion time. Hence, it
205: will be possible to check the existence of accretion flow
206: %the existence of accretion flow
207: from observations of the molecular distributions in the inner disk.
208: %comparing the timescale of the chemical reactions and the accretion time,
209:
210: In this work we study the effect of the accretion flow on the chemical
211: structure
212: %and the observational properties
213: of the inner region of
214: young disks by modelling the chemistry, initiated by the ice evaporation, along
215: the accretion flow.
216: %
217: And we examine the effect on the observational properties,
218: especially focusing on
219: a transition line of methanol, which is an abundant ice molecule in many
220: high and low mass star forming cores (e.g., Gibb et al. 2004; Boogert et
221: al. 2008). Methanol, which is difficult to form efficiently in the gas
222: phase, is also known to be more abundant in the gas-phase around high
223: and low mass young stars as well as comets (e.g., Macdonald et
224: al. 1996; Sch\"oier et al. 2002; Bockelee-Morvan et al. 1991)
225: by more than orders of magnitude compared with cold dark clouds
226: (e.g., Ohishi et al. 1992).
227: In addition, laboratory experiments have shown that methanol can
228: be formed in ice mantle with reasonably short timescale
229: as a result of hydrogenation of carbon monoxide
230: %and the observed abundances of icy methanol can be
231: %reproduced by the reaction with a reasonable timescale
232: (e.g., Watanabe et al. 2006).
233: Therefore, methanol is thought one of the most probable components of
234: grain mantle molecules.
235:
236: In the following section we introduce the physical and
237: chemical models of the disk. We present the resulting molecular
238: abundance profiles of the inner disk
239: %and a brief comparison between our results and the recent infrared observations
240: in Sect.~3 and the line
241: emission of methanol in Sect.~4, using the models with different
242: accretion velocities. Influence of some assumptions on the results are
243: discussed in Sect.~5, and
244: %Finally,
245: the results are summarized in Sect.~6.
246:
247: %__________________________________________________________________
248:
249: \section{Models}
250:
251: We model an axisymmetric disk surrounding a central star with a mass of
252: $M_*=1.5M_{\odot}$, a radius of $R_*=2R_{\odot}$,
253: and a temperature of $T_*=6000$K, whose luminosity ($\sim 5L_\odot$)
254: is relatively higher than the averaged luminosity of typical T Tauri
255: stars ($\sim 1L_\odot$) (e.g., D'Alessio et al. 2005).
256: It is observationally known that many T Tauri stars emit strong X-ray
257: and UV radiation.
258: We adopt a model with black body ($T_*=6000$K) plus thermal
259: bremsstrahlung ($T_{\rm br}=2.5\times 10^4$K) emission for UV radiation
260: ($L_{\rm FUV}= 7\times 10^{31}$ergs s$^{-1}$; see Nomura \& Millar 2005,
261: hereafter NM05) and a simple thermal bremsstrahlung
262: emission model with $T_{\rm X}=1$keV and $L_{\rm X}=10^{30}$ ergs
263: s$^{-1}$ for X-rays (Glassgold et al. 2004; Garmire et al. 2000).
264:
265: \begin{figure}
266: \centering
267: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{f0.eps}
268: \caption{Contour plots of the gas temperature ({\it solid lines}) and
269: density ({\it dotted lines}) distributions in the $z/x$ vs. $x$ plane
270: for the fiducial model with $\dot{M}=1.0\times 10^{-8} M_{\odot}$
271: yr$^{-1}$.}
272: \label{f0}
273: \end{figure}
274:
275: The temperature and density distributions
276: of gas and dust
277: in the disk are obtained
278: self-consistently as described in previous papers; see
279: %Nomura \& Millar 2005, hereafter
280: NM05 and Nomura et al. (2007) for details.
281: Dust temperature is obtained by the iterative radiative transfer
282: calculation (see Nomura 2002),
283: where an initial dust temperature profile is calculated using
284: the variable Eddington factor method (Dullemond et al. 2002)
285: in this work.
286: %We adopt a model with black body ($T_*=6000$K) plus thermal
287: %bremsstrahlung ($T_{\rm br}=2.5\times 10^4$K) emission for UV radiation
288: %($L_{\rm FUV}= 7\times 10^{31}$ergs
289: %s$^{-1}$; see NM05) and a simple thermal bremsstrahlung
290: %emission model with $T_{\rm X}=1$keV and $L_{\rm X}=10^{30}$ ergs
291: %s$^{-1}$ for X-rays (Glassgold et al. 2004; Garmire et al. 2000).
292: %The dust temperature is obtained by assuming local radiative equilibrium
293: %with the axisymmetric two-dimensional radiative transfer calculations
294: %(Nomura 2002). The variable Eddington factor method (Dullemond et
295: %al. 2002) is adopted for obtaining an initial dust temperature profile
296: %for the iterative radiative transfer calculations in this work.
297: The disk is assumed to accrete towards the central star with a constant
298: mass accretion rate, and the $\alpha$-viscous model with $\alpha=0.01$ is
299: adopted. The dust model which reproduces the observational extinction
300: curve of dense clouds (see NM05) is adopted here.
301: %
302: The resulting gas temperature and density profiles for a fiducial model
303: with the mass accretion rate of $\dot{M}=1.0\times 10^{-8}M_{\odot}$
304: yr$^{-1}$ are plotted in Figure~\ref{f0}.
305: %The line around $x=1$AU and
306: %$z/x=0.4-0.5$ in the figure shows the disk surface in this model.
307:
308: %__________________________________________________ Table 1
309: \begin{table}
310: \caption[]{Initial fractional abundances with respect to total
311: hydrogen nuclei.}\label{T1}
312: $$ \begin{array}{p{0.11\linewidth}c|p{0.12\linewidth}c} \hline
313: Species & {\rm Abundance} & Species & {\rm Abundance} \\ \hline
314: H$^+$ & 1.0\times 10^{-11} & CO & 1.3\times 10^{-4} \\
315: He$^+$ & 2.5\times 10^{-12} & CO$_2$ & 3.0\times 10^{-6} \\
316: H$_3^+$ & 1.0\times 10^{-9} & H$_2$CO & 2.0\times 10^{-6} \\
317: Fe$^+$ & 2.4\times 10^{-8} & CH$_3$OH & 2.0\times 10^{-7} \\
318: He & 1.0\times 10^{-1} & C$_2$H$_5$OH & 5.0\times 10^{-9} \\
319: S & 5.0\times 10^{-9} & O$_2$ & 1.0\times 10^{-6} \\
320: Si & 3.6\times 10^{-8} & H$_2$O & 2.8\times 10^{-4} \\
321: C$_2$H$_2$ & 5.0\times 10^{-7} & N$_2$ & 3.7\times 10^{-5} \\
322: CH$_4$ & 2.0\times 10^{-7} & NH$_3$ & 6.0\times 10^{-7} \\
323: C$_2$H$_4$ & 5.0\times 10^{-9} & H$_2$S & 1.0\times 10^{-7} \\
324: C$_2$H$_6$ & 5.0\times 10^{-9} & OCS & 5.0\times 10^{-8} \\ \hline
325: \end{array}
326: $$
327: \end{table}
328: %
329:
330: For the chemical model we calculate the time-dependent gas-phase
331: reactions along stream lines of steady accretion flow as
332: \begin{equation}
333: \dfrac{\partial (n_iv_{\rm acc})}{\partial l}=\sum_{j}k_{ij}n_{j}+\sum_{j,k}k_{ijk}n_{j}n_{k},
334: \end{equation}
335: where $n_{i}$ is the number density of the species, $i$, and
336: the right hand side of the equation describes the formation and
337: destruction of the species, $i$, due to cosmic-ray/photo-chemistry (the
338: first term) and two-body reactions (the second term). Three-body
339: reactions are not included, since
340: they will not affect the result very much in the gas temperature range
341: we treat in this work (e.g., Willacy et al. 1998).
342: We assume that the stream lines, $l$, are simply described as
343: $z=sH$, where $H=\cs_0/\Omega_{\rm K}$ is the disk scale height, and
344: $\cs_0$ the sound speed at the disk midplane, $\Omega_{\rm K}$ the
345: Keplerian frequency. We set 60 grids for $0\leq s\leq 3$.
346: %in the calculations in Sect.~4.
347: %The total mass conservation is applied in order to solve the
348: %equations,
349: The equations are solved together with the continuity
350: equation along the stream lines.
351: The accretion velocity, $v_{\rm acc}$, is simply given by
352: $v_{\rm acc}=\dot{M}/(2\pi\Sigma x)$, where $\dot{M}$ is the mass
353: accretion rate, $\Sigma$ the surface
354: density of the disk, and $x$ the distance from the central star.
355: %
356: Turbulent mixing is not taken into account in this paper (see
357: discussions in Sect.~5).
358:
359: The chemical network consists of 208 species and is connected by 2830
360: reactions, in which the reaction rate coefficients are taken from the
361: UMIST RATE06 database (http://www.udfa.net/)
362: (Woodall et al. 2007). The X-ray ionisation is
363: simply modelled by analogy with the cosmic-ray ionisation (see e.g., Aikawa
364: et al. 1999 for a more detailed model).
365: %
366: X-rays will ionise the gas and induce photoreactions, similar to
367: cosmic-rays;
368: we adopt the rates enhanced by $\zeta_X/\zeta_{\rm CR}$ for the
369: reactions, where the X-ray ionisation rate, $\zeta_X$, is calculated
370: using the X-ray flux at each position in the disk (see Nomura et al.
371: 2007). The H$_2$ cosmic-ray ionisation rate
372: is set to be $\zeta_{\rm CR}=1.3\times 10^{-17}$ s$^{-1}$, and the
373: attenuation is neglected since it is not significant except very
374: close to the disk midplane at the disk radii of $x\sim 1$AU in this model.
375: %a H$_2$ cosmic ray ionisation rate of $1.3\times 10^{-17}$ s$^{-1}$ is
376: %adopted.
377: %
378: %The chemical reactions in the gas-phase are assumed to be initiated by
379: %the evaporation of ice mantle molecules on dust grains which are
380: %transported from the cold outer disk into the hot inner disk.
381: As the initial condition of the calculations,
382: the fractional abundances of the species are taken from
383: %Table 1 of
384: Nomura \& Millar (2004; hereafter NM04), in which
385: the initial ice mantle composition is fixed so as to be
386: consistent with the infrared absorption features of ices
387: observed towards young stellar objects as
388: well as the line emission of gas-phase molecules observed towards a hot
389: core, G34.3+0.15 (see Table 1).
390:
391:
392: %
393: %As we particularly focus on the observational properties of a
394: %methanol line in Sect. 4, we simply start the calculations where most
395: %methanol evaporates into the gas, that is, where the
396: %timescale of the thermal evaporation of methanol, $\tau_{\rm evap}$,
397: %becomes shorter than its adsorption time onto dust grains, $\tau_{\rm
398: %ads}$
399: %%in this model
400: %(see also Fig.~\ref{f4}, and see e.g.,
401: %Nomura \& Millar 2004 and references therein
402: %%Tielens \& Allamandola 1987
403: %for $\tau_{\rm evap}$ and $\tau_{\rm ads}$).
404: %
405: %Now, the evaporation time is proportional to
406: %$\exp(E_{b}/kT_d)$ (see e.g., Tielens \& Allamandola 1987 for $\tau_{\rm
407: %evap}$ and $\tau_{\rm ads}$),
408: %and adsorption times are given by $\tau_{\rm
409: %evap}=\nu_{0}^{-1}\exp(E_{b}/kT_d)$ and $\tau_{\rm ads}=(S\pi a^2
410: %d_gnv_{\rm th})^{-1}$, respectively,
411: %%where $E_{b}$ is the
412: %%binding energy of the molecules onto the dust grains, $\nu_{0}$ its
413: %%vibrational frequency, $kT$ the thermal energy of the gas, $S$ the
414: %%sticking probability, $\pi d_ga^2n$ the grain surface area per unit
415: %%volume, $v_{\rm th}$ the thermal velocity of the molecule
416: %and the icy mantle evaporation is very sensitive to the dust temperature,
417: %$T_d$, and the binding energy of a molecule onto dust grains, $E_{b}$.
418: %(see NM04 and references therein for details).
419:
420: Since we particularly focus on the observational properties of a
421: methanol line in Sect.~4, we simply start the calculations where most
422: methanol evaporates into the gas, that is, where the
423: timescale of the thermal evaporation of methanol, $\tau_{\rm evap}$,
424: becomes shorter than its adsorption timescale onto dust grains, $\tau_{\rm
425: ads}$ (see Fig.~\ref{f4}).
426: %
427: The evaporation time
428: is given by $\tau_{\rm evap}=\nu_{0}^{-1}\exp(E_{b}/kT_d)$,
429: where $\nu_{0}$ is the vibrational frequency of the adsorbed species on
430: the grain surface. The timescale is very
431: sensitive to the binding energy of the molecules onto the dust grains
432: $E_{b}$, and the thermal energy of the grains, $kT_d$.
433: The binding energy of methanol of $E_b/k=4235$K is used in this work,
434: which is experimentally measured for pure methanol ice (Sandford
435: \& Allamandola 1993). We note that the binding energy of methanol
436: on methanol is equal to that of methanol on water ice within the error
437: bars (W.A.Brown, private communication).
438: The adsorption time is given by $\tau_{\rm ads}=(S\pi a^2 d_gnv_{\rm
439: th})^{-1}$, where $S$ is the
440: sticking probability, $\pi a^2d_gn$ the grain surface area per unit
441: volume ($d_g$ is the abundance of the dust grains relative
442: to total hydrogen nuclei), and
443: $v_{\rm th}$ the thermal velocity of the molecule
444: (e.g., Tielens \& Allamandola 1987). Here we use $S=0.3$ and
445: the averaged grain surface area per total hydrogen nuclei of
446: $<d_ga^2>=2.2\times 10^{-22}$cm$^2$ which is similar to that
447: of the MRN dust model by Mathis et al. (1977) (see NM04 for details of
448: the parameters; see also discussions in Sect.~5 for effect of dust
449: evolution).
450: %
451: In this model all the ice mantle molecules evaporate at the same dust
452: temperature of $T_d\sim 85-100$K, depending on the local density.
453: %
454: The influence of this simple treatment of the ice mantle evaporation
455: is briefly discussed in Sect.~5.
456: %
457: %and the icy mantle evaporation is very sensitive to the dust temperature,
458: %$T_d$, and the binding energy of a molecule onto dust grains, $E_{b}$.
459: %(see NM04 and references therein for details).
460: %
461: %For simplicity, all the icy mantle molecules are assumed to evaporate at
462: %the dust temperature of $T_d\sim 85-100$K
463: %in these calculations, but
464: %The evaporation of ice mantle molecules, however, may depend on the
465: %binding energy of each molecule
466: %and the morphology of water ice (e.g., Collings et al. 2004).
467: %Therefore, different parent molecules may evaporate at different
468: %positions (see e.g., Markwick et al. 2002).
469: %In addition, surface chemistry involving heavy radicals on warm dust
470: %grains may affect molecular abundances in both solid- and gas-phase
471: %(e.g., Garrod \& Herbst 2006; Aikawa et al. 2008).
472: %More detailed model including the detailed evaporation process
473: %as well as surface reactions on dust grains is to be constructed in
474: %future work for more broaden and complete analysis.
475:
476: \begin{figure}
477: % \centering
478: % \includegraphics[width=8cm]{f1a.eps}
479: % \includegraphics[width=8cm]{f1b.eps}
480: \hspace*{0.8cm} \includegraphics[width=13cm]{f1.eps}
481: % \includegraphics[height=16cm,width=8cm]{f1.eps}
482: \caption{Evolution of molecular abundances relative to total
483: hydrogen nuclei along the accretion flow,
484: $z=1.2H$, for a model with the mass accretion rate of
485: $\dot{M}=1.0\times 10^{-8}M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$.
486: The figure at the bottom shows the gas
487: density ($n$) and temperature ($T$) profiles and the distance from the
488: central star ($x$). The molecules
489: evaporated from ice mantles are destroyed by chemical reactions around
490: the timescale of $\sim 10^4$yr.}
491: \label{f1}
492: \end{figure}
493:
494: \section{Resulting molecular distributions}
495:
496: We calculate molecular abundances
497: using the obtained density and temperature profiles.
498: %Making use of the density and temperature profiles of the disk, we
499: %calculate the chemical reactions along the accretion flows, which are
500: %initiated by the evaporation of icy mantle molecules on dust grains.
501: Figure~\ref{f1} shows the resulting evolution of abundances of some
502: molecules relative to total hydrogen nuclei along the stream line
503: of $z=1.2H$. The results for
504: a fiducial model with the mass accretion
505: rate of $\dot{M}=1.0\times 10^{-8}M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ are plotted,
506: in which the gas density and temperature range over $n\sim 3\times
507: 10^{11}-1\times 10^{13}$ cm$^{-3}$ and $T\sim 100-240$K, respectively,
508: along the flow. The gas density ($n$) and temperature ($T$)
509: profiles as well as the distance from the central star ($x$) are also
510: plotted in the figure at the bottom.
511:
512: Figure~\ref{f1} shows that the parent molecules which evaporate from
513: grain surface, such as NH$_3$, H$_2$S, C$_2$H$_2$ and
514: CH$_3$OH in this model, are relatively stable, but are eventually
515: destroyed by reactions with ionised
516: species or atomic hydrogen to produce daughter species, such as HCN,
517: SO$_2$, and CH$_3$OCH$_3$, around a timescale of $\tau_{\rm chem}\sim
518: 10^4$yr.
519: %
520: The parent and a part of daughter species end up as CO and small
521: hydro-carbon molecules.
522: %
523: The timescales for the destruction of these parent molecules are nearly
524: independent of the total density, $n$.
525: This is because the number densities of ionised species and atomic
526: hydrogen, which are formed via cosmic-ray ionisation and induced
527: photoreactions, respectively, are not very sensitive to $n$.
528: %
529: OCS is destroyed on a longer timescale than other parent molecules
530: since its main
531: reactant is H$_3^+$, while many of the other molecules are destroyed
532: mainly by H$_3$O$^+$ which is more abundant than H$_3^+$. OCS does not
533: react with H$_3$O$^+$ because its proton affinity is smaller than that
534: of water.
535: %In addition, the formation rates of OCS and CH$_4$ are relatively high
536: %compared with the other molecules.
537: %
538: H$_2$O and CH$_4$ are hardly altered since they are produced efficiently
539: in the gas-phase, especially at high temperature in the case of H$_2$O,
540: which is formed via endothermic reactions, O $\stck{{\rm H}_2}$ OH
541: $\stck{{\rm H}_2}$ H$_2$O. Methane is formed via the destruction of
542: methanol and the formation processes are less temperature dependent.
543: %
544: The abundances of NH$_3$ and HCN increase around $t\sim 10^5$yr in
545: Figure~\ref{f1} owing to endothermic reactions and high temperature in
546: the inner disk.
547: %
548: The detailed gas-phase chemistry induced by the evaporated
549: molecules is similar to that occurring in hot molecular cores, which is
550: discussed in NM04.
551: %
552: Along $z=1.2H$ molecules are not affected by UV and X-ray irradiation
553: from the central star in this model (see also Sect.~\ref{S4}).
554: We note that the timescales for destruction of these parent molecules by
555: chemical reactions have uncertainties of about an order of
556: magnitude due to the uncertainties in the rate coefficients of the
557: reactions (e.g., Wakalem et al. 2005).
558:
559: \begin{figure*}
560: \centering
561: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{f2a.eps}
562: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{f2b.eps}
563: \caption{Abundance profiles of some species relative to total
564: hydrogen nuclei as a
565: function of the disk radius along the stream line of $z=1.2H$ for models
566: with the mass accretion rates of $\dot{M}=$ (a) $1.0\times 10^{-8}$
567: and (b) $5.0\times 10^{-8}M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$.
568: Some molecules are abundant just around the region of the ice mantle
569: evaporation when $\dot{M}$ is low and
570: the accretion time ($\tau_{\rm acc}$) is longer than the timescale of
571: the chemical reactions which destroy the parent molecules,
572: %velocity, $v_{\rm acc}$, is low,
573: while they are abundant even close to the central star when
574: $\dot{M}$ is high and $\tau_{\rm acc}$ is short enough.}
575: %$v_{\rm acc}$ is high.}
576: \label{f2}
577: \end{figure*}
578:
579: In Figure~\ref{f2}, we plot the abundance profiles of some species
580: relative to total hydrogen nuclei as a
581: function of the disk radius along the stream line of $z=1.2H$ for models
582: with mass accretion rates of $\dot{M}=$ (a) $1.0\times 10^{-8}$
583: and (b) $5.0\times 10^{-8}M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$.
584: %
585: In the steady accretion flow, a location of a fluid particle in the
586: disk, $x$, is simply related to a time after the ice evaporation, $t$,
587: as $t=\int_{x_{\rm evap}}^x \{v_{\rm acc}(x')\}^{-1}dx'$ (where $x_{\rm
588: evap}$ is the evaporation radius), as shown in the bottom of
589: Figure~\ref{f1}.
590: %
591: The radial dependence of the accretion velocity is weak, and
592: $v_{\rm acc}\sim 40$ cm s$^{-1}$
593: for the fiducial model with $\dot{M}=1.0\times 10^{-8}M_{\odot}$
594: yr$^{-1}$. In this work the accretion velocity is set to be proportional
595: to the mass accretion rate ($v_{\rm acc}\propto \dot{M}$)
596: by artificially fixing the surface density of
597: the disk to that of the fiducial model for the purpose of clear
598: understanding of the effect of accretion flow on the chemical structure
599: in the disk.
600: %the surface density of the disk is artificially fixed with
601: %that of the fiducial model so that the accretion velocity
602: %is proportional to the mass accretion rate for clear understanding of
603: %the effect of the accretion flow on the chemical structure in the disk.
604:
605: %__________________________________________________ Table 2
606: %\begin{table}[b]
607: %\caption[]{Observed fractional abundances of warm molecules with respect
608: % to CO.}\label{T2}
609: %$$ \begin{array}{p{0.11\linewidth}|ccc}
610: %%{p{0.11\linewidth}cp{0.12\linewidth}c}
611: %\hline
612: % Species & {\rm IRS\ 46} & {\rm GV\ Tau\ S} & {\rm AA\ Tau} \\ \hline
613: % H$_2$O & - & - & 1.3 \\
614: % OH & - & - & 0.18 \\
615: % HCN & 0.025 & 0.0031 & 0.13 \\
616: % C$_2$H$_2$ & 0.015 & 0.0062 & 0.016 \\
617: % CO$_2$ & 0.05 & - & 0.004-0.26 \\
618: % CH$_4$ & - & < 0.0019 & - \\ \hline
619: %\end{array}
620: %$$
621: %\end{table}
622: %
623:
624:
625: Figure~\ref{f2} shows that the molecular abundance profiles in the inner
626: disk change
627: dramatically depending on the velocity of the accretion flow. When the
628: accretion velocity is small and the accretion time, $\tau_{\rm acc}\sim
629: x/v_{\rm acc}$, is longer than the timescale of the chemical reactions
630: which destroy the evaporated molecules, $\tau_{\rm chem}$, the
631: parent molecules are transported only a small distance along the
632: accretion flow before they are destroyed by the chemical reactions.
633: Therefore, some parent and daughter species are abundant only in the
634: region where parent molecules are evaporated into the gas.
635: %
636: On the other hand, if the accretion velocity is high and the accretion
637: time is shorter than the chemical timescale, the parent
638: molecules are transported to the central star before they are destroyed,
639: and high abundances occur even close to the star.
640: Some daughter species, such as HCN, become abundant gradually
641: as the gas is transported inwards
642: %only in the very inner region of the disk
643: in this case. We note that the abundances of some daughter species
644: %, such as HCN and SO$_2$,
645: are very sensitive to the initial fractional abundances;
646: %some initial
647: %conditions, such as the ice mantle composition and the H$_2$O
648: %abundance in the gas-phase;
649: for example, if atomic nitrogen is abundant
650: initially, the maximum value of the HCN abundance increases by about two
651: orders of magnitude compared with the model we used here.
652: %and large differences appear in their abundances for different conditions.
653: %
654: Along the stream line of $z=1.2H$, C$_2$H$_2$ is destroyed by an
655: endothermic reaction, C$_2$H$_2$+O$\rightarrow$CO+CH$_2$.
656: %which is sensitive to the gas temperature.
657: Thus, the C$_2$H$_2$ abundance decreases, independent of the accretion
658: rate, around $x\sim 4-5$AU, where the gas temperature becomes high
659: enough for the above reaction to proceed.
660: %and drops more quickly than other parent molecules for the model
661: %with $\dot{M}=5.0\times 10^{-8}M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$.
662: %by a reaction with atomic oxygen
663: %where the density and temperature are relatively high.
664: Along stream lines in upper layers of the disk slightly above $z=1.2H$,
665: where the gas density is relatively low, C$_2$H$_2$ is destroyed by
666: reactions with molecular ions around a timescale of $10^4$yr, similar to
667: other parent molecules.
668: %remains in high abundance.
669: %Also, we note that the destruction time of the parent molecules
670: %will not be very sensitive to the evaporation conditions basically,
671: %though their spatial distributions will be affected by the
672: %conditions, depending on the accretion time.
673:
674: %Finally, we note that, for simplicity,
675: %all the species are assumed to evaporate at
676: %the dust temperature of $T_d\sim 85-100$K
677: %%the same time
678: %in these calculations, but the evaporation of ice
679: %mantle molecules may depend on the binding energy of each molecule
680: %and the morphology of water ice (e.g., Collings et al. 2004).
681: %Therefore, different parent molecules may evaporate at different
682: %positions (see e.g., Markwick et al. 2002).
683: %More detailed model including the detailed evaporation process
684: %as well as surface reactions on dust grains
685: %should be constructed in future.
686:
687: %{\bf
688: %Finally, we briefly compare our results with the recent observations of
689: %infrared lines of some warm molecules in the disks around young stars.
690: %First, warm molecular lines have been observed in absorption features
691: %towards a Class I/II source, IRS 46 at wavelengths of $13-16\mu$m by
692: %the Infrared Spectrograph (IRS) on board the Spitzer Space Telescope
693: %(Lahius et al. 2006). Gibb et al. (2007) also have detected absorption
694: %lines of some warm molecules towards a T Tauri star, GV Tau S, at
695: %wavelengths of around $3\mu$m by the NIRSPEC/Keck. In addition, Carr
696: %\& Najita (2008) have detected emission lines of warm molecules towards
697: %a classical T Tauri star, AA Tau, at wavelengths of $13-30\mu$m by
698: %the IRS/Spitzer. The abundances of the warm molecules relative
699: %to CO derived from the observations are listed in Table~2.
700:
701: %In our calculations, the resulting abundance ratio of H$_2$O/CO is $\sim
702: %2$, and similar to the observational result.
703: %The C$_2$H$_2$/CO abundance ratio is $\sim 0.4$ before C$_2$H$_2$ is
704: %destroyed by chemical reactions, which is more than an order of
705: %magnitude larger than the observed values. Thus, C$_2$H$_2$ may be
706: %partly destroyed or the C$_2$H$_2$ abundance in the ice may be smaller than
707: %that we assumed here. HCN/CO
708: %%abundance ratio
709: %is $\sim 10^{-5}$ at
710: %most, which is orders of magnitude smaller than the observed values.
711: %This may be due to the assumed initial abundances, as we have discussed
712: %above. OH/CO
713: %%abundance ratio
714: %is also orders of magnitude smaller,
715: %which may be caused by the initial abundances as well. CO$_2$/CO
716: %%abundance ratio
717: %is initially $\sim 0.02$, but CO$_2$ is destroyed soon in this
718: %calculations, and it seems difficult to keep the observed high abundances.
719: %More detailed observations may be needed in order to understand the
720: %CO$_2$/CO ratio. CH$_4$/CO
721: %%abundance ratio
722: %is $\sim 0.0015$, which
723: %is consistent with the observed upper limit. We note that emission lines
724: %of hot/warm H$_2$ (e.g., Bary et al. 2008; Bitner et al. 2008) and CO
725: %(e.g., Carr et al. 1993; Brittain et al. 2005) have also been observed
726: %towards many young circumstellar disks. However, their abundances are
727: %almost uniform all over the calculated region except the surface layer,
728: %and give us less information on the chemical process, while they give
729: %important information on the density and temperature in the inner disks.}
730:
731:
732: %\section{Discussion}
733: \section{Methanol line emission}\label{S4}
734:
735: Using the gas density and temperature as well as the molecular abundance
736: profiles obtained in Sect.~3, we calculate the brightness temperature of
737: 145GHz $J_K=3_0-2_0$ transition of methanol.
738: %which is an abundant ice molecule in many
739: %%Now, methanol has been observed in ice absorption features towards many
740: %high and low mass star forming cores (e.g., Gibb et al. 2004; Boogert et
741: %al. 2008).
742: %Methanol, which is difficult to form efficiently in the gas phase,
743: %is also known to be more
744: %%Observations of molecular line emission, on the other hand, have shown
745: %%that methanol is
746: %abundant in the gas-phase around high and low mass
747: %young stars (e.g., Macdonald et al. 1996; Sch\"oier et al. 2002)
748: %%while it is less abundant
749: %by a few orders of magnitude compared with cold dark clouds
750: %%in contrast
751: %(e.g., Ohishi et al. 1992).
752: %In addition, laboratory experiments have shown that methanol can
753: %be formed in ice mantle with reasonably short timescale
754: %as a result of hydrogenation of carbon monoxide
755: %%and the observed abundances of icy methanol can be
756: %%reproduced by the reaction with a reasonable timescale
757: %(e.g., Watanabe et al. 2006).
758: %Therefore, methanol is thought one of the most probable components of
759: %grain mantle molecules.
760: %
761: Figure~\ref{f3} shows the resulting brightness temperature of
762: %$T_B$, of our calculations
763: %at the line centre of the 145GHz $J_K=3_0-2_0$ transition
764: %of methanol
765: the line along a single line of sight
766: as a function of the disk radius for models with the
767: mass accretion rates of $\dot{M}=1.0\times 10^{-7}$
768: ({\it solid line}), $1.0\times 10^{-8}$ ({\it dotted
769: line}), and $1.0\times 10^{-9}$ ({\it dot-dashed line}) $M_{\odot}$
770: yr$^{-1}$. We assume that
771: %The molecules are simply assumed to be
772: the molecules are in the local thermal equilibrium.
773: The assumption is reasonable since
774: the line is emitted from regions
775: %in the disk
776: where the density is
777: much higher than the critical density for this transition, $n_{\rm cr}\sim
778: 2\times 10^5$cm$^{-3}$ (e.g., Pavlychenkov et al. 2007).
779: The disk is assumed to be face-on to an observer.
780: %and the disk is faced-on to an observer.
781: The molecular data is taken from Leiden Atomic and Molecular Database
782: (http://www.strw.leidenuniv.nl/\textasciitilde moldata/)
783: (Sch\"oier et al. 2005), and a part of the RATRAN code
784: (http://www.sron.rug.nl/\textasciitilde vdtak/ratran/ratran.html)
785: (Hogerheijde \& van
786: der Tak 2000) is used for the line radiative transfer calculations (see
787: NM05 for the detailed equations used in the calculations).
788:
789: \begin{figure}
790: \centering
791: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{f3.eps}
792: \caption{Brightness temperature of the 145GHz $J_K=3_0-2_0$ line of
793: methanol calculated along a single line of sight as a function of
794: the disk radius for models with mass
795: accretion rates of $\dot{M}=1.0\times 10^{-7}$ ({\it solid line}),
796: $1.0\times 10^{-8}$ ({\it dotted line}), and $1.0\times 10^{-9}$ ({\it
797: dot-dashed line}) $M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$. The ALMA detection limit for
798: the beam size of $\sim 14$AU is
799: also plotted with a thin solid line, showing that the line emission
800: will be detectable in the inner disk when the accretion rate and
801: the accretion velocity are high.}
802: \label{f3}
803: \end{figure}
804:
805: The figure shows that the brightness temperature of the line, $T_B$, is
806: high all over the inner disk when the accretion velocity is high, while
807: $T_B$ becomes high just around the region where the methanol is
808: evaporated into the gas when the accretion velocity is low, since $T_B$
809: traces the abundance of methanol (see Sect.~3).
810: %
811: Now, methanol is mainly destroyed by chemical reactions with H$_3$O$^+$,
812: %where the density is high,
813: on a timescale around $\tau_{\rm chem}\sim (kn_{{\rm H}_3{\rm
814: O}^+})^{-1}\sim
815: 10^4$yr. Here the rate coefficient is $k\sim 3\times 10^{-9}$cm$^3$s$^{-1}$
816: and the number density of H$_3$O$^+$ is $n_{{\rm H}_3{\rm O}^+}\sim
817: 10^{-3}$ cm$^{-3}$,
818: %$n_{{\rm H}_3^+}\sim 10^{-4}$ cm$^{-3}$.
819: which is almost independent of the total number density, $n$,
820: since the formation process of H$_3$O$^+$ is related to cosmic-ray
821: ionisation.
822: The timescale of methanol destruction is slightly affected by the
823: abundance of NH$_3$ which helps recycle methanol by
824: reacting with CH$_3$OH$_2^+$ (e.g., Rodgers \& Charnley 2001).
825: When the accretion rate is high, $T_B$ is high even in slightly outer
826: regions ($x\sim$7--9 AU)
827: because the dust temperature is higher due to the viscous heating.
828:
829: At the disk surface methanol is photodissociated due to UV and
830: X-ray irradiation from the central star. The timescales of the
831: dissociation are roughly given by $\tau_{\rm UV}\sim k_{\rm UV}^{-1}\sim
832: 30G_{\rm FUV}^{-1}$ yr and $\tau_{\rm X}\sim k_{\rm X}^{-1}\sim
833: 10^{-11}\zeta_{\rm X}^{-1}$ yr, respectively,
834: %Here $k_{\rm UV}\sim 10^{-9}G_{\rm FUV}$ s$^{-1}$ and $k_{\rm X}\sim
835: %3\times 10^3\zeta_{\rm X}$,
836: where $G_{\rm FUV}$ is the FUV radiation field normalized by 1.6$\times
837: 10^{-3}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ and $\zeta_{\rm X}$ is the total
838: hydrogen ionisation rate by X-rays.
839: Therefore, the photodissociation dominates the destruction of methanol
840: where
841: %the FUV radiation field is
842: $G_{\rm FUV}\ga 3\times 10^{-3}$
843: %[$G_{\rm FUV}$ is normalized by 1.6$\times 10^{-3}$ ergs s$^{-1}$
844: %cm$^{-2}$] and the X-ray ionisation rate is
845: or $\zeta_{\rm X}\ga 10^{-15}$ s$^{-1}$.
846: %
847: In Figure~\ref{f4} the contour lines of $G_{\rm FUV}=10^{-3}$ and
848: $10^{-10}$ ({\it thin solid lines}), $\zeta_{\rm X}=10^{-15}$
849: and $10^{-17}$ s$^{-1}$ ({\it dashed lines}) are plotted in $z$ vs $x$
850: plane of the disk together with the line of $\tau_{\rm evap}=\tau_{\rm
851: ads}$ for methanol ({\it thick solid line}), which corresponds to $T_d\sim
852: 85-100$K, and $z=H$ ({\it dot-dashed line}) for the fiducial model.
853: %
854: Figure~\ref{f4} shows that
855: the line brightness temperature at $x\ga 6-7.5$AU in Figure~\ref{f3}
856: is low because the methanol can evaporate from dust grains only in the
857: surface layer of the disk where it is dissociated
858: quickly by strong X-ray and UV irradiation from the central star.
859: %In this region $T_B$ becomes high only when
860: %%when the accretion velocity is high enough and
861: %$\tau_{\rm acc}$ is shorter than $\tau_{\rm X}$ and $\tau_{\rm UV}$.
862:
863: %
864: %The turbulent mixing in the radial direction may not be very significant
865: %will transport material
866: %inward and outward only if the material gain or lose angular momentum.
867: %if there is no effective angular momentum transfer process.
868: %Detailed models which takes into account angular
869: %momentum transfer of the material should be constructed in future work.
870:
871: In Figure~\ref{f3} we also plot with a thin solid line the ALMA detection limit
872: for the methanol line, calculated
873: using the ESO ALMA Sensitivity Calculator
874: (http://www.eso.org/sci/facilities/alma/observing/tools
875: /etc/index.html).
876: The detection limit of $\sim 17$K is achieved when we observe for 600 sec
877: by using 50 antennas of the 12m Array, assuming a velocity resolution of
878: 1 km s$^{-1}$, and a beam size of 0.1 arcsec, which corresponds to
879: $\sim$14AU when the disk is located at the distance of nearby
880: star-forming regions, $\sim$ 140 pc.
881: %
882: %{\bf We note that the strong line emitting region (where $T_B>100$K) is
883: %larger than $\sim$14AU
884: %as shown in Figure~\ref{f3}}
885: %
886: %An unsuccessful search for the 145GHz $J_K=3_0-2_0$ transition of
887: %methanol has been made
888: The 145GHz $J_K=3_0-2_0$ transition of methanol has not been detected
889: towards DM Tau (Dutrey 2001), and other methanol line searches
890: towards some T Tauri and Herbig Ae stars (Thi et al. 2004; Semenov
891: et al. 2005), have also been unsuccessful.
892: %but no detection has been reported yet.
893: %
894: Our results suggest that when the accretion velocity at $x\leq 10$AU
895: %in the disk
896: is high enough, ALMA can detect the methanol line, taking advantage of
897: high spatial resolution to avoid beam dilution.
898: %observations with high spatial resolution and high sensitivity will
899: %detect the methanol line without suffering from beam dilution.
900: %(where the disk is located at the distance of $\sim$ 140 pc).
901: When the accretion velocity is low enough, line detection will be
902: difficult even with ALMA. Thus, the
903: observations of methanol by ALMA
904: could be a useful tool to diagnose the existence of accretion flows
905: in the inner disks.
906: %in the inner region of the disks.
907: %
908: %We note that the line will no trace the accretion flow at the disk
909: %midplane since it is optically thick in this region. Less abundant
910: %isotopes could trace the flow at the disk midplane.
911:
912: %uncertainties in disk structure (surface density)
913: %-> uncertainties in accretion rates
914:
915: \begin{figure}
916: \centering
917: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{f4.eps}
918: % \includegraphics[width=7.4cm]{f4b.eps}
919: \caption{Line of $\tau_{\rm evap}=\tau_{\rm ads}$ inside which
920: the icy methanol evaporates into the gas ({\it thick solid
921: line}), line of $z=H$ ({\it dot-dashed line}), and contour lines of
922: $G_{\rm FUV}=10^{-3}$ and $10^{-10}$ ({\it thin solid lines}),
923: $\zeta_{\rm X}=10^{-15}$ and $10^{-17}$ s$^{-1}$ ({\it dashed
924: lines}) for the fiducial model with $\dot{M}=1.0\times 10^{-8}
925: M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$. The evaporated methanol is quickly
926: dissociated due to strong UV photons or X-rays at $x\geq 7$AU.}
927: \label{f4}
928: \end{figure}
929:
930:
931: \section{Discussions}
932:
933: In this section, we discuss some possible effects of the
934: assumptions on our results.
935: %which we have made in this work.
936:
937: First, we discuss the influences of the simple treatment of
938: the evaporation process we have taken in this work.
939: Although we simply assume that all the species evaporate at the same
940: dust temperature, the evaporation of ice mantle molecules may depend on
941: the binding energy of each molecule
942: and the morphology of water ice (e.g., Collings et al. 2004).
943: Therefore, different parent molecules may evaporate at different
944: positions (see e.g., Markwick et al. 2002), which will affect the
945: spatial distributions of molecular abundances.
946: In particular, CO and N$_2$ are likely to evaporate at temperatures much
947: lower than 85K, particularly if they are abundant in the surface layers
948: of the ice. However, given the chemical stability of these species, they
949: are unlikely to affect the overall abundance of a molecule such as methanol.
950: %a species to which we return in the following section.
951: So, the timescales for the destruction of the parent molecules by chemical
952: reactions, $\tau_{\rm chem}$, analysed in Sect.~3
953: %above
954: %on the other hand,
955: will not be very sensitive to the treatment of the ice mantle evaporation.
956: %
957: In addition to the evaporation process, surface chemistry involving
958: heavy radicals on warm dust
959: grains may affect molecular abundances in both solid- and gas-phase
960: (e.g., Garrod \& Herbst 2006; Aikawa et al. 2008).
961: More detailed model including the detailed evaporation process
962: as well as surface reactions on dust grains should be constructed in
963: future work.
964:
965: Next, if we take into account the effect of turbulent mixing in the vertical
966: direction, the methanol abundance may increase near the line, $\tau_{\rm
967: evap}=\tau_{\rm ads}$, (see Fig.~\ref{f4}) when the diffusion time is
968: shorter than the timescale of the photodissociation (e.g., Willacy et
969: al. 2006). In the inner disk ($x\la 6$AU) the methanol abundance may
970: slightly decrease via the vertical mixing because of the
971: photodissociation at the disk surface.
972: %
973: The turbulent mixing in the radial direction may enhance the gas-phase
974: methanol abundance outside the evaporation radius if the timescale of
975: the turbulent diffusion is shorter than the timescale of the chemical
976: reactions and that of the adsorption on dust grains. A detailed
977: mixing model which treats angular momentum
978: transfer will be needed in order to obtain the diffusion timescale, and
979: advance further discussion.
980:
981: Finally,
982: we note that the brightness temperature of the methanol line will
983: reflect some conditions other than the accretion velocity: the
984: high-$T_B$ region becomes smaller if the central star is less luminous
985: and the dust temperature in the disk is low. Also, $T_B$ becomes low if
986: the methanol abundance in the ice mantle is low.
987: %{\bf or the binding energy of the methanol is high}.
988: If the amount of small
989: dust grains decreases due to the dust coagulation and settling in the
990: disk, methanol is photodissociated by
991: ineffectively attenuated FUV photons from the central star
992: (e.g., Aikawa \& Nomura 2006), and therefore $T_B$ drops,
993: although the evaporation radius moves slightly outwards owing to
994: the decrease of the total grain surface area per unit volume, that is,
995: the decrease of the adsorption rate (e.g., Aikawa 2007).
996: %also in this case.
997: Thus, some causes other than low
998: accretion velocity can lead to low methanol abundance and the
999: non-detection of the line. However, if the observed methanol abundance
1000: is high in the
1001: inner disk, then the accretion velocity must be high in the planet-forming
1002: region.
1003:
1004:
1005: \section{Conclusions}
1006:
1007: We have calculated the gas-phase chemical reactions, initiated by the ice mantle
1008: evaporation, along the accretion
1009: flow in protoplanetary disks to show that the accretion velocity affects the abundance
1010: profiles of the evaporated molecules and their daughter species in the
1011: inner disk.
1012: %depending on whether the accretion time is shorter or
1013: %longer than the timescale of destruction of the evaporated molecules
1014: %by chemical reactions.
1015: %
1016: We have obtained the brightness temperature profile of an
1017: emission line of methanol, and suggested that this could be useful
1018: as an indicator of accretion velocity in the planet-forming regions
1019: in disks using ALMA observations.
1020: % with high sensitivity and
1021: %high spatial resolution.
1022:
1023: \begin{acknowledgements}
1024: We are thankful to an anonymous referee and an editor, M. Walmsley, for
1025: their comments which improved the clarity of our discussion.
1026: H.\ N. is financially supported by the JSPS Postdoctoral Fellowships
1027: for Research Abroad. Astrophysics at QUB is supported by a grant from the STFC.
1028: \end{acknowledgements}
1029:
1030: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1031: \bibitem[]{}
1032: Aikawa, Y. 2007, ApJ, 656, L93
1033: \bibitem[]{}
1034: Aikawa, Y. \& Herbst, E. 1999, A\&A, 351, 233
1035: \bibitem[]{}
1036: Aikawa, Y. \& Nomura, H. 2006, ApJ, 642, 1152
1037: \bibitem[]{}
1038: Aikawa, Y., van Zadelhoff, G.J., van Dishoeck, E.F., \& Herbst, E. 2002, A\&A, 386, 622
1039: \bibitem[]{}
1040: Aikawa, Y., Wakelam, V., Garrod, R.T., \& Herbst, E. 2008, ApJ, 674, 984
1041: %\bibitem[]{}
1042: %Bary, J.S., Weintraub, D.A., Shukla, S.J., Leisenring, J.M., \& Kastner, J.H. 2008, ApJ, 678, 1088
1043: %\bibitem[]{}
1044: %Bitner, M.A. et al. 2008, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/0808.1099)
1045: \bibitem[]{}
1046: Bockelee-Morvan, D., Colom, P., Crovisier, J., Despois, D., Paubert, G. 1991, Nature, 350, 318
1047: \bibitem[]{}
1048: Boogert, A.C.A. et al. 2008, ApJ, 678, 985
1049: %in press (astro-ph/0801.1167)
1050: %\bibitem[]{}
1051: %Brittain, S.D, Retting, T.W., Simon, T. \& Kulesa, C. 2005, ApJ, 626, 283
1052: \bibitem[]{}
1053: Carr, J.S. \& Najita, J.R. 2008, Nature, 319, 1504
1054: %\bibitem[]{}
1055: %Carr J. S., Tokunaga A. T., Najita J., Shu F. H., \& Glassgold A.E. 1993, ApJ, 411, L37
1056: \bibitem[]{}
1057: Caselli, P., Walmsley, C.M., Tafalla, M., Dore, L., \& Myers, P.C. 1999, ApJ, 523, L165
1058: \bibitem[]{}
1059: Ceccarelli, C., Caselli, P., Herbst, E., Tielens, A.G.G.M., \& Caux, E., in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, and K. Keil (Tuscon: Univ. Arizona Press), 47
1060: \bibitem[]{}
1061: Collings, M.P. et al. 2004, MNRAS, 354, 1133
1062: \bibitem[]{}
1063: D'Alessio, P., Merin, B., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., \& Montesinos, B. 2005, RMxAA, 41, 61
1064: \bibitem[]{}
1065: Dullemond, C.P., van Zadelhoff, G.J., Natta, A. 2002, A\&A, 389, 464
1066: \bibitem[]{}
1067: Dutrey, A. 2001, in Science with the Atacama Large Millimeter Array, ASP Conf. Ser. 235, ed. A. Wootten (San Francisco: ASP), 215
1068: \bibitem[]{}
1069: Dutrey, A., Guilloteau, S., \& Guelin, M. 1997, A\&A, 317, L55
1070: \bibitem[]{}
1071: Garrod, R.T., \& Herbst, E. 2006, A\&A 457, 927
1072: \bibitem[]{}
1073: Garmire, G., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1426
1074: \bibitem[]{}
1075: Gibb, E.L., van Brunt, K.A., Brittain, S.D., \& Retting, T.W. 2007, ApJ, 660, 1572
1076: \bibitem[]{}
1077: Gibb, E.L., Whittet, D.C.B., Boogert, A.C.A., \& Tielens, A.G.G.M. 2004, ApJS, 151, 35
1078: \bibitem[]{}
1079: Glassgold, A.E., Najita, J., \& Igea, J. 2004, ApJ, 615, 972
1080: %\bibitem[]{}
1081: %Hayashi, C., Nakazawa, K., \& Nakagawa, Y. 1985, in Protostars and Planets II, ed. D.C. Black \& M.S. Mathews (Tuscon: Univ. Arizona Press), 1100
1082: \bibitem[]{}
1083: Hogerheijde, M. R., \& van der Tak, F. F. S. 2000, A\&A, 362, 697
1084: \bibitem[]{}
1085: Hollenbach, D.J., Yorke, H.W., \& Johnstone, D. 2000, in Protostars and Planets IV, ed. V.G. Mannings, A.P. Boss, \& S.S. Russell (Tuscon: Univ. Arizona Press), 401
1086: \bibitem[]{}
1087: Kominami, J. \& Ida, S. 2002, Icarus, 157, 43
1088: \bibitem[]{}
1089: Lahuis, F. et al. 2006, ApJ, 636, L145
1090: \bibitem[]{}
1091: Macdonald, G.H., Gibb, A.G., Habing, R.J., \& Millar, T.J. 1996, A\&AS, 119, 333
1092: \bibitem[]{}
1093: Markwick, A. J., Ilgner, M., Millar, T. J., \& Henning, T. 2002, A\&A, 385, 632
1094: \bibitem[]{}
1095: Mathis, J.S., Rumpl, W. \& Nordsieck, K.H. 1977, ApJ, 217, 425
1096: \bibitem[]{}
1097: Millar, T.J. 1993, in Dust and Chemistry in Astronomy, ed. T.J. Millar \& D.A. Williams (Bristol: IOP Publishing), 249
1098: \bibitem[]{}
1099: Nakagawa, Y., Sekiya, M., \& Hayashi, C. 1986, Icarus, 67, 375
1100: \bibitem[]{}
1101: Nomura, H. 2002, ApJ, 567, 587
1102: \bibitem[]{}
1103: Nomura, H., Aikawa, Y., Tsujimoto, M., Nakagawa, Y., \& Millar, T.J. 2007, ApJ, 661, 334
1104: \bibitem[]{}
1105: Nomura, H. \& Millar, T.J. 2004, A\&A, 414, 409 (NM04)
1106: \bibitem[]{}
1107: Nomura, H. \& Millar, T.J. 2005, A\&A, 438, 923 (NM05)
1108: \bibitem[]{}
1109: Ohishi, M., Irvine, W.M., \& Kaifu, N. 1992, in Astrochemistry of Cosmic Phenomena, IAU Symp. 150, ed. P.D. Singh (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 171
1110: \bibitem[]{}
1111: %Papaloizou, J.C.B., Nelson, R.P., Kley, W., Masset, F.S., \& Artymowicz, P. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, and K. Keil (Tuscon: Univ. Arizona Press), 655
1112: Papaloizou, J.C.B. et al. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, and K. Keil (Tuscon: Univ. Arizona Press), 655
1113: \bibitem[]{}
1114: Pavlychenkov, Ya. et al. 2007, ApJ, 2007, 669, 1262
1115: \bibitem[]{}
1116: Qi, C., Wilner, D., Aikawa, Y., Blake, G.A., \& Hogerheijde, M.R. 2008, ApJ, 681, 1396
1117: %in press (astro-ph/0803.2753)
1118: \bibitem[]{}
1119: Rodgers, S.D., \& Charnley, S.B. 2001, ApJ, 546, 324
1120: \bibitem[]{}
1121: Sandford, S.A. \& Allamandola, L.J. 1993, ApJ. 417, 815
1122: \bibitem[]{}
1123: Sano, T., Miyama, S. M., Umebayashi, T., \& Nakano, T. 2000, ApJ, 543, 486
1124: \bibitem[]{}
1125: Sch\"oier, F.L., J{\o}rgensen, J.K., van Dishoeck, E.F. \& Blake, G.A. 2002, A\&A, 390, 1001
1126: \bibitem[]{}
1127: Sch\"oier, F. L., van der Tak, F.F.S., van Dishoeck, E.F., \& Black, J.H. 2005, A\&A, 432, 369
1128: \bibitem[]{}
1129: Semenov, D. et al. 2005, ApJ, 621, 853
1130: \bibitem[]{}
1131: Thi, W.-F., van Zadelhoff, G.-J., \& van Dishoeck, E. F. 2004, A\&A, 425, 955
1132: \bibitem[]{}
1133: Tielens, A.G.G.M., \& Allamandola, L.J. 1987, in Interstellar Processes, ed. D.J.\ Hollenbach, H.A.\ Thoronson Jr (Reidel, Dordrecht), 397
1134: %\bibitem[]{}
1135: %Vasyunin, A.I., Semenov, D., Henning, Th., Wakelam, V., Herbst, E., \& Sobolev, A.M. 2008, ApJ, 672, 629
1136: \bibitem[]{}
1137: Wakalem, V., Selsis, F., Herbst, E., \& Caselli, P. 2005, A\&A, 444, 883
1138: \bibitem[]{}
1139: Watanabe, N., Nagaoka, A., Hidaka, H. Shiraki, T., Chigai, T., \& Kouchi, A. 2006, P\&SS, 54, 1107
1140: \bibitem[]{}
1141: Willacy, K. 2007, ApJ, 660, 441
1142: \bibitem[]{}
1143: Willacy, K., Klahr, H.H., Millar, T.J., \& Henning, Th. 1998, A\&A, 338, 995
1144: \bibitem[]{}
1145: Willacy, K., Langer, W., Allen, M., \& Bryden, G. 2006, ApJ, 644, 1202
1146: \bibitem[]{}
1147: Woodall, J., Agundez, M., Markwick-Kemper, A. J., \& Millar, T. J. 2007, A\&A, 466, 1197
1148: \end{thebibliography}
1149: \end{document}
1150: