1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
4: \newcommand{\myemail}{maybhate@stsci.edu}
5:
6: \usepackage[dvips]{color}
7:
8:
9: \slugcomment{Draft \today}
10:
11: \newcommand{\gI}{$g\!-\!I$}
12: \shorttitle{Globular clusters in Four Poststarburst Galaxies}
13: \shortauthors{Maybhate et al.}
14:
15:
16: \begin{document}
17:
18:
19: \title{Globular Cluster Populations in Four Early-Type Poststarburst Galaxies
20: \altaffilmark{1}}
21:
22:
23:
24: \author{Aparna Maybhate\altaffilmark{2}, Paul Goudfrooij\altaffilmark{2},
25: Fran\c cois Schweizer\altaffilmark{3}, Thomas H. Puzia\altaffilmark{4},
26: David Carter\altaffilmark{5}}
27:
28: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations with the NASA/ESA {\it Hubble
29: Space Telescope}, obtained at the Space Telescope Science
30: Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for
31: Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555}
32: \altaffiltext{2}{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin
33: Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218; maybhate@stsci.edu, goudfroo@stsci.edu}
34: \altaffiltext{3}{Carnegie Observatories, 813 Santa Barbara Street,
35: Pasadena, CA 91101; schweizer@ociw.edu}
36: \altaffiltext{4}{Plaskett Fellow, Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics, 5071 West Saanich
37: Road, Victoria, BC V9E 2E7, Canada; puziat@nrc.ca}
38: \altaffiltext{5}{Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John
39: Moores University, 12 Quays House, Egerton Wharf, Birkenhead, CH41 1
40: LD, United Kingdom; dxc@astro.livjm.ac.uk}
41:
42:
43: \begin{abstract}
44: We present a study of the globular cluster systems of four early-type
45: poststarburst galaxies using deep {\it g}- and {\it I}-band images from the
46: {\it ACS} camera aboard the {\it Hubble Space Telescope (HST)}.
47: All the galaxies feature shells distributed around their main bodies and are
48: thus likely merger remnants.
49: The color distribution of the globular clusters in all four galaxies
50: shows a broad peak centered on $g-I \approx 1.4$, while PGC 6240 and
51: PGC 42871 show a significant number of globular clusters with
52: $g\!-\!I \approx 1.0$.
53: The latter globular clusters are interpreted as being of age $\sim$\,500
54: Myr and likely having been formed in the merger.
55: The color of the redder peak is consistent with that expected for
56: an old metal-poor population that is very commonly found around
57: normal galaxies. However, all galaxies except PGC 10922 contain
58: several globular clusters that are significantly brighter than the
59: maximum luminosity
60: expected of a single old metal-poor population.
61: To test for multiple-age populations of overlapping \gI\
62: color, we model the luminosity functions of the globular clusters
63: as composites of an old metal-poor subpopulation with a range of plausible
64: specific frequencies and an intermediate-age subpopulation of solar
65: metallicity. We find that three of the four sample galaxies show evidence for
66: the presence of an intermediate-age ($\sim$\,1 Gyr) globular cluster
67: population, in addition to the old metal-poor GC population seen in normal
68: early-type galaxies. None of the galaxies show a significant population of
69: clusters consistent with an old, metal-rich red cluster population that is
70: typically seen in early-type galaxies.
71:
72:
73:
74:
75: The presence of a substantial number of intermediate-age clusters and
76: the absence of old, metal-rich clusters indicate that the progenitor
77: galaxies which formed the resulting shell galaxy were gas rich
78: and did not host significant bulges. Late-type spirals seem to be the most
79: plausible progenitors. These results lend credence to the
80: ``merger scenario'' in which the red, metal-rich GCs
81: observed in normal ellipticals are formed during a dissipative merger event
82: that also forms the elliptical itself.
83:
84:
85: \end{abstract}
86:
87:
88: \keywords{galaxies: elliptical and lenticular --- galaxies:
89: individual(PGC 6510, PGC 10922, PGC 42871, PGC 6240) ---
90: galaxies: interactions --- galaxies: star clusters}
91:
92:
93:
94: \section{Introduction}
95:
96: Mergers seem to have played a major role in determining the shapes and
97: dynamics of elliptical galaxies. A few galactic mergers still occur and
98: offer valuable clues to past evolutionary processes. Young globular
99: clusters formed during mergers hold strong promise for age-dating such
100: events, besides helping shed light on the cluster-formation process itself.
101: Globular clusters are very useful probes of the dynamical and chemical
102: assembly history of galaxies. Many globular cluster (GC) systems in normal
103: giant elliptical galaxies show a bimodal color distribution, indicating
104: the occurrence of a second event/mechanism of cluster formation.
105: The ``merger'' model suggests that metal-rich (``red'') clusters are formed
106: during major mergers of gas-rich galaxies \citep{sch87,az92}.
107: Globular cluster systems in young merger remnants such as NGC 7252
108: \citep[e.g.,][]{miller97} reveal a bimodal color distribution featuring not
109: only the well-known ``universal'' halo population of old metal-poor GCs, but
110: also hundreds of second-generation GCs that are young, metal-rich, and have
111: most probably formed from the metal-enriched gas associated with the
112: progenitor spirals. The many structural properties that merger remnants such
113: as NGC 1275, NGC 3921, and NGC 7252 share with normal ellipticals suggest not
114: only that these merger remnants are proto-ellipticals
115: \citep[e.g.,][]{schweizer98} but also that many normal ellipticals with
116: bimodal color distributions may have formed their metal-rich GCs in a similar
117: manner. If this is indeed the case, it should be possible to find ellipticals
118: with second-generation GC systems of intermediate age ($\sim$ 1--4
119: Gyr). Evidence for the existence of intermediate-age GCs in ellipticals has
120: been recently found for a few galaxies like NGC 1316
121: \citep{goudfroo01a,goudfroo01b,goudfroo04}, NGC 3610
122: \citep{whitmore97,whitmore02,goudfroo07}, NGC 1700 \citep{whitmore97,brown00},
123: NGC 4365 \citep{puzia02,larsen03,kundu05}, and NGC 5128 \citep{minniti96,peng04}.
124:
125: This paper aims at searching for intermediate-age clusters in a sample
126: of early-type galaxies which show evidence for having experienced a merger
127: and a starburst in the recent past (during which GCs may well have
128: formed). To select the sample, we used the \citet{malin} catalog. This catalog
129: consists of southern elliptical galaxies that feature shells
130: and/or ripples around their main body and in their outer envelopes. Shells
131: are a common result of galaxy mergers \citep{quinn84,dupraz86,hq88,hq89}
132: or interactions \citep{tw90,thomson91} and are expected to have a
133: lifetime of only $\sim 10^9$ years. Approximately 10\% of these
134: early-type shell galaxies have colors, absolute magnitudes, and spectra
135: characteristic of ``poststarburst''
136: galaxies \citep[featuring strong Balmer lines][]{carter88}.
137:
138: A poststarburst spectrum is characterized by the presence of
139: strong Balmer absorption lines (indicative of A-type
140: stars), but without strong [O\,{\sc ii}] or H$\alpha$ emission lines
141: \citep{dressler83}. The existence of strong Balmer absorption lines
142: indicates that these galaxies have experienced star formation in the
143: past $\sim$ 0.1 -- 1 Gyr while the absence of emission lines indicates
144: they are no longer forming stars. Most such galaxies are classified as
145: poststarburst based on the nature of the spectrum only in their central
146: region. Often no information is available on the extent of the poststarburst
147: event or the amount of {\it global} star formation.
148: It is interesting to investigate the global properties of the poststarburst class of
149: galaxies and explore the connection (if any) between properties of the host galaxy
150: and its star formation history. We will address these issues through a
151: study of the GC systems of these galaxies since they provide
152: a good handle on the impact of major star formation episodes in a galaxy.
153: If numerous intermediate-age GCs with
154: ages consistent with those of the poststarburst population in the
155: nucleus were to be found, we could be fairly confident that the A
156: stars were formed in a relatively vigorous star formation
157: event, likely associated with a recent dissipative galaxy merger. Conversely,
158: an absence of such GCs would indicate that no strong star formation was
159: associated with the event that caused star formation to end $\sim$\,0.1 to
160: 1 Gyr ago. The latter would be consistent with a scenario where gas is
161: removed from the galaxy, e.g.\ by weak ram pressure stripping.
162:
163: The nearest four galaxies from \citet{carter88} which showed a poststarburst
164: spectrum were selected for this study. The basic properties of these galaxies
165: are given in Table~\ref{tbl-1}. A detailed study of one of the galaxies,
166: namely PGC 6240 (AM 0139$-$655) has been presented in an earlier paper
167: \citep[][hereafter Paper I]{aparna}.
168: The current paper presents a study of the properties of the GC systems as well as the
169: diffuse light of all four early-type poststarburst
170: galaxies. It discusses the implications of these properties in the context
171: of the star formation history of these galaxies,
172: and of the assembly history of early-type galaxies in general.
173:
174:
175: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
176:
177: The four galaxies were observed as part of HST
178: General Observer program 10227 (PI: Goudfrooij), using the Wide Field Channel
179: (WFC) of ACS with the filters F475W and F814W.
180: The observations consisted of several long exposures plus a few short ones
181: to guarantee getting an unsaturated galaxy center. The total exposure times
182: were 7874s, 9350s, 8369s, and 21440s in F475W and 2712s, 3970s, 5908s, and 7300s
183: in F814W for PGC 6510, PGC 10922, PGC 42871, and PGC 6240, respectively.
184: The data were processed with the ACS on-the-fly pipeline, which
185: included dark and bias subtraction and flat fielding. Individual flat-fielded
186: images were carefully
187: checked for satellite trails and saturated pixels in the central region
188: of each galaxy. These pixels were flagged and masked out.
189: The individual images of a galaxy
190: in each band were co-added using the PyRAF\footnote{PyRAF is a product
191: of the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by AURA
192: for NASA} task MULTIDRIZZLE \citep{kok}. This resulted in images
193: cleaned of cosmic rays and corrected for geometric distortion. A combination
194: of the short and long-exposure images enabled us to get good resultant
195: multidrizzled images with unsaturated centers. The isophotal contours of the four galaxies
196: are shown in Fig.~\ref{contour}.
197: It is obvious from the figure that the sample galaxies show significant
198: differences in global morphology, even though they all share the properties of a
199: poststarburst spectrum and shell structure. PGC 6510 appears to be a disky
200: elliptical, PGC 10922 shows rounder isophotes but has a distorted center (due
201: to dust absorption), while the isophotes of both PGC 6240 and PGC 42871 appear
202: irregular in the outer regions.
203:
204:
205:
206: \section{Cluster Candidate Selection}
207:
208: To select cluster candidates,
209: the F475W and F814W images obtained from MULTIDRIZZLE were first
210: added together to get a high signal-to-noise {\it g+I\/} image for each galaxy. Elliptical
211: isophotes were then fit to this coadded image using the task ELLIPSE within
212: STSDAS\footnote{STSDAS is a product of the Space Telescope Science Institute,
213: which is operated by AURA for NASA}, and allowing the center,
214: ellipticity, and position angle of the isophotes to vary.
215: This yielded a smooth model of each galaxy's count distribution.
216: The search for sources
217: was performed on an image created by dividing the {\it g+I\/} image
218: by the square root of the model image. This ensures uniform shot noise
219: characteristics over the whole image. The detection threshold for selecting
220: sources was set at 4\/$\sigma$ above the background.
221: Typical half-light radii of globular clusters fall into
222: the range 1 -- 20 pc \citep{kundu,vanden,jordan}. At the distance of our
223: sample galaxies, the spatial scale is 14\,--\,25 pc per ACS$/$WFC pixel.
224: Thus, we expect the globular clusters to appear as nearly unresolved point
225: sources.
226: There are two advantages in using the {\it g+I\/} images, rather than the
227: individual $g$- or $I$-band images, for cluster-candidate selection.
228: Firstly, the coadded images reach a greater depth than the individual images,
229: and secondly, the photometric zero-point of a {\it g+I\/} image is
230: significantly less color dependent than that of the individual images.
231: A detailed illustration and
232: discussion of these advantages can be found in \citet{goudfroo07}.
233:
234: To perform cluster photometry, a
235: smooth elliptical model was constructed for each galaxy in each
236: filter in a manner similar to the one described above. This model was
237: subtracted from the corresponding drizzled image to get a residual image. The
238: cluster candidates are clearly visible once the underlying galaxy light has
239: been subtracted. Aperture photometry was then performed through an aperture
240: of 3 pixel radius for all the detected sources. The photometry lists thus
241: obtained for
242: both filters were then matched for further analysis. Aperture corrections
243: from 3 pixel to 10 pixel radius were determined using a few bright
244: point sources in
245: each band. The corrections from 10 pixel radius to infinity were taken from
246: \citet{siri}. Finally, the F475W and F814W magnitudes were converted from
247: the instrumental system (STMAG) to SDSS {\it g} and Cousins {\it I} magnitudes
248: in the VEGA system
249: via the SYNPHOT package in STSDAS; for details, see Paper I. The {\it g} and
250: {\it I} magnitudes and the $g-I$ color were corrected for Milky Way foreground
251: reddening using $A_V$ given in Table~\ref{tbl-1} and the relations
252: $A_g = 1.16 \times A_V$ and $E(g-I) = 0.59 \times A_V$.
253:
254:
255: After discarding clusters with photometric errors $>$\,0.4 mag in each
256: band, the first selection criterion we applied considered the target's
257: color index $g-I$. Using the population-synthesis models GALEV of
258: \citet{galev}, we determined that
259: the range $0.0 \leq g-I \leq 2.2$ includes all model clusters
260: with ages from $10^{7}$ to $10^{10}$ years and metallicities $Z$ from
261: 0.0004 to 0.05 (where $Z=0.02$ corresponds to solar metallicity), as shown in
262: Fig.~\ref{ssp}. The GALEV models are calibrated to the ACS filters and
263: were hence chosen to avoid introducing systematic errors while converting to
264: a standard system.
265: However, the differences between model predictions of GALEV and
266: (e.g.) \citet{bc03} in the age range 0.5\,--\,14 Gyr stay within 0.05
267: mag in $V\!-\!I$. We also verified that the results obtained using
268: the \citet{maraston} models are consistent with those from GALEV as shown
269: in Fig.\ 2.
270: An extensive comparison between the various Simple Stellar Population (SSP)
271: models can be found in \citet{pessev}.
272: Sources with colors outside the range $0.0 \leq g-I \leq 2.2$ were judged
273: unlikely to be real star clusters and were discarded.
274: The resultant source list contains cluster candidates, stars, and background
275: galaxies. To further constrain the selection and discard extended
276: background galaxies, we determined the FWHM of all objects in the
277: color-selected lists from the coadded image, using the IRAF task IMEXAM, and
278: retained objects with $1.5 <$ FWHM $< 3.0$ pixels. An additional
279: compactness criterion was applied to only retain sources that had a
280: difference in magnitudes between apertures of 2 and 5 pixel radius
281: of 0.2 to 0.6 mag. Our final list of GC candidates contains the sources
282: that satisfy all the above criteria.
283:
284: Completeness tests were done for each galaxy on the image used to detect
285: cluster candidates
286: (i.e., the {\it g+I\/} image). Artificial clusters were added to the image in
287: batches of 100 for five different background levels and in 0.25 mag intervals.
288: Using the
289: background levels in the parts of the image farthest away from, and
290: nearest to, the galaxy center where clusters are still detected as the
291: two extremes, the five background levels were determined by dividing this
292: interval into five logarithmically equal intervals. The radial-intensity
293: profile of the artificial clusters was determined by fitting PSFs to the
294: real clusters in
295: the {\it g+I\/} image. A smooth elliptical model of each host galaxy was
296: obtained, and the {\it g+I\/} image was divided by the square root of
297: this model image. Source detection was then performed on this image in
298: the same manner as done previously for the actual sources.
299: Other criteria (permissible error in photometric magnitude, FWHM, and
300: compactness) were also applied in exactly the same manner as before.
301: A typical sample of completeness curves, obtained for PGC 6510
302: is shown in Fig.~\ref{ccurves}.
303:
304:
305:
306:
307: \subsection{Selecting ``Genuine'' versus ``Background'' sources}
308:
309: To determine the radial extent of the
310: cluster candidates that are physically associated with
311: the target galaxy versus compact background galaxies that have similar
312: colors and apparent magnitudes, we examined the surface number density of the GC
313: candidates as a function of galactocentric radius. This was achieved
314: by dividing each galaxy image into annular rings centered on the galaxy center and
315: computing the number of sources per unit area in each ring. The bright
316: background due to the presence of the galaxy would prevent the detection of
317: faint sources in the inner regions, while sources of the same magnitude would
318: be easily detected in the outer regions of low background.
319: To account for this effect, we applied a magnitude cut-off to the sources
320: that were considered for the surface density measurements. This
321: cut-off was chosen to be at the magnitude associated with a
322: completeness value of 80\% at a galactocentric radius of 6\arcsec.
323: Only sources outside that radius were taken into account.
324: Figure~\ref{magdensity} shows the results. We find that the
325: surface-density profile flattens off beyond a certain radius for each
326: galaxy. This radius was taken to be the limiting radius for the
327: sources associated with that galaxy and was found to be 60{\arcsec},
328: 94{\arcsec}, 104{\arcsec}, and 78\arcsec\ for PGC 6510, PGC 10922,
329: PGC 42871, and PGC 6240, respectively. All sources detected beyond this
330: radius were considered background sources.
331:
332: The radial GC surface-number-density profiles are in most cases
333: similar to the surface brightness profile of the parent galaxies, which is
334: consistent with the situation for the metal-rich subpopulation of GCs
335: in normal early-type galaxies
336: \citep{harris79,harris86,az98,goudfroo07}. However, the GCs in PGC 10922 seem
337: to have a more extended distribution, similar to that seen for metal-poor GCs
338: in normal early-type galaxies. Quantitatively, simple power-law fits to the
339: outer data points yield exponents ranging from $-1.09$ to $-1.94$, whereas
340: surface-number-density
341: profiles for GCs in normal elliptical galaxies show power-law exponents in the
342: range between $-1$ and $-2$ \citep{az98,puzia04}. It is also seen that in all
343: cases, the innermost GC bin has a lower surface number density than
344: that represented by the power-law fits. This could be due to the faster
345: destruction of GCs in the inner regions of these galaxies due to effects
346: such as bulge shocking
347: \citep[e.g.,][]{gnedin98,puzia04}. Table~\ref{tbl-2} gives the
348: limiting magnitude, power-law exponent, and radial range considered for the
349: fit in each case. A list of the thirty brightest clusters in the $I$-band
350: in PGC 6510, PGC 10922, and PGC 42871 (with their positions, $I$-band
351: magnitudes and distance from the galaxy center) is given in Table~\ref{tbl-3}.
352: Paper I already contains a list of the brightest clusters in PGC 6240 and
353: it is not repeated here.
354:
355:
356:
357: \section{Globular Cluster Color Distributions}
358:
359: Color--magnitude diagrams for the clusters associated with each galaxy within
360: the limiting galactocentric radius as found in the previous section are shown
361: for equal areas of increasing galactocentric distance in Fig.~\ref{cmd}.
362: Note that the magnitudes and colors have been corrected for foreground reddening
363: as described in Sect.\ 3.
364: For comparison, we indicate the area which would be populated by old
365: metal-poor GCs similar to those in the halo
366: of our Galaxy, scaled to the distance of each galaxy.
367: Typically a large number of GCs with $g\!-\!I \approx 1.4$ to 1.5 is seen
368: in each galaxy.
369: This color index is similar to, though
370: slightly larger than,
371: the mean index expected for a
372: population of old metal-poor GCs like those in the halo of our
373: Galaxy (e.g., a mean age of 14 Gyr and a mean [Fe/H] of $-$1.5). Note,
374: however, that this color is also consistent with solar-metallicity
375: clusters of age $\sim$\,1 Gyr as indicated by
376: SSP synthesis models (cf.\ Fig.~\ref{ssp}), the presence of which
377: might be expected in a poststarburst galaxy.
378: Intermediate-age GCs in established merger remnants feature a radial
379: surface number density distribution that is significantly more
380: centrally concentrated than that of old
381: metal-poor GCs \citep[e.g.,][]{whitmore97,goudfroo07}.
382: In an attempt to discriminate between the two plausible interpretations of the
383: nature of the GCs with $g\!-\!I \approx 1.4$, we therefore
384: divide up the clusters into four equal-area bins of increasing
385: galactocentric radii (see different symbols in Fig.~\ref{cmd}).
386: All color distributions appear broader than the halo
387: GC distributions in our Galaxy as outlined by the rectangles.
388: The innermost GCs in most of the galaxies have mean colors that
389: are somewhat redder ($g\!-\!I \approx 1.5$) than those of old metal-poor GCs.
390: While this could in principle be a result of reddening by dust in the
391: inner regions that shifts the clusters to fainter magnitudes and
392: redder colors, there are
393: very few clusters found in the inner dusty regions. Alternatively, it could
394: indicate the presence of a second-generation population of clusters
395: with ages slightly larger than 1.0 Gyr.
396: A comparison of the dimming vector for a 1.0 Gyr old population aging to
397: 1.6 Gyr (shown in
398: Fig.~\ref{cmd}) with the distribution of the inner clusters in the CMD
399: does suggest the possibility of these clusters being slightly
400: older than 1.0 Gyr. Apart from that, there is also a population of (inner)
401: clusters with colors significantly bluer than old metal-poor GCs
402: in PGC 6240. Thus, it appears likely that the GC systems of these poststarburst
403: galaxies are made up of more than a single-age population. The question of
404: how to disentangle the different populations in a quantitative way
405: will be discussed further in the next Section.
406:
407: The color distribution of the GCs was analyzed by first computing the
408: non-parametric
409: Epanechnikov-kernel probability-density function \citep{silverman86}
410: of all objects within the limiting radius.
411: The probability-density function of all objects outside this radius was
412: then computed similarly
413: to provide an estimate of the contamination by compact background galaxies.
414: Finally, the background density estimate was scaled to that of the cluster
415: candidates by area, and the true color
416: distribution of the GCs was derived by statistical subtraction.
417: Figure~\ref{color} shows the color distributions of the sources within the
418: limiting radius, the background sources, and the inner sources after
419: statistical background subtraction.
420: The final color distribution appears mostly unimodal in
421: PGC 6510, while that of PGC 42871 shows the possible presence of a second,
422: bluer population similar to that found earlier for PGC 6240 \citep{aparna}.
423: According to the SSP models of \citet{galev} shown in Fig.~\ref{ssp},
424: these can be explained by a metal-rich population with ages of a few
425: hundred Myr.
426: In case of PGC 10922, the color distribution shows some indications
427: of clusters with colors $\approx$ 1.0 and $\approx$ 0.0. However, as they
428: are very few in number, it is difficult to draw any conclusions about
429: them.
430: It is also interesting to note that we do not detect any significant
431: population of old, metal-rich ($-1.0 \la \mbox{[Fe/H]} \la 0.0$) GCs in any
432: of the sample galaxies (they should show up at
433: $1.8 \la g-I \la 2.0$), whereas such a population {\it is\/} generally present
434: in normal early-type galaxies \citep[e.g.,][]{peng06}. This is discussed
435: further in Section~\ref{s:HostConnection}.
436:
437: \section{Luminosity Functions}
438:
439: To derive cluster luminosity functions (LFs), we
440: used the completeness curves described in Sect.\ 3 to assign a completeness
441: value to each cluster. This value was computed via bilinear
442: interpolation in cluster magnitude and background value. Clusters with
443: completeness values less than $25\%$ were excluded from being counted.
444: The remaining clusters were divided into two groups based on their distance
445: from the center of the galaxy. Clusters within the limiting radius
446: (determined in Sect.\ 3) were designated as actual GC candidates and those
447: outside this
448: radius as likely background contaminants. The LFs of the GC candidates were
449: then corrected for background contamination using the scaled LFs of the
450: background. The final corrected LFs are shown in Fig.~\ref{lf}.
451:
452: If the LFs were made up entirely of clusters belonging to an old metal-poor
453: population similar to that found in our Galaxy, and hence had a gaussian form
454: with a turn-over at $M_I = -8.1$ and $\sigma = 1.2$ \citep{harris96,
455: barmby01}, we would not expect to see any clusters brighter than
456: $M_I \approx -11.0$.
457: However, except for PGC 10922, the galaxies in our sample show
458: clusters significantly brighter than this value.
459: While the GC color distribution alone may show no obvious indication of the
460: presence of more than one subpopulation, the fact that overluminous
461: GCs are seen in the LF which are unlikely to belong to an
462: old population suggests that the observed
463: LF is due to the superposition of an old population and a younger population
464: with mean colors that are similar to one another.
465:
466: For example, the LF of PGC 42871 shows an excess of luminous clusters
467: at magnitudes brighter than $M_I = -11.0$.
468: Inspection of the CMD (Fig.~\ref{cmd}) shows that these luminous clusters
469: predominantly have \gI\ colors redder than 1.5 mag and, hence, are not
470: associated with the bluer peak seen in Fig.~\ref{color}.
471: SSP models show that between the ages of 1 and 2 Gyr, the colors of
472: metal-rich
473: clusters of solar metallicity are indistinguishable from those of typical old
474: metal-poor clusters. However, these intermediate-age clusters are brighter
475: than the old clusters by $\sim$1.5 mag for a given mass
476: \citep{whitmore97,goudfroo01b}.
477: Using the SSP models of \citet{galev} shown in Fig.~\ref{ssp}, we find that
478: the colors of these luminous clusters are consistent with them being
479: intermediate-age clusters (1\,--\,1.5 Gyr) of solar metallicity.
480:
481: Our assumption of solar metallicity
482: for these second-generation GCs is based on (a) the expectation of finding
483: high metallicity GCs formed from gas in evolved spirals which are the
484: likely precursor galaxies, and (b) the finding that intermediate-age
485: GCs in other merger remnants have metallicities consistent with solar
486: \citep[e.g.,][]{ss98,goudfroo01a,schweizer04}.
487:
488: \subsection{Modeling the Composite LF} \label{s:compositeLF}
489:
490: As the above example shows, the color distribution of clusters in
491: poststarburst galaxies of age $\sim$\,0.5\,--\,2 Gyr is not expected to
492: show the signature of two subpopulations prominently because the younger,
493: metal-rich population will have a mean color similar to that of the
494: old metal-poor population.
495: In that case, one way to test for the presence of multiple populations
496: and estimate their properties is to study the LF.
497: In Paper I, we attempted to model the cluster LF of PGC 6240 as a combination of an
498: old metal-poor population and an intermediate-age population. The old
499: population was estimated by fitting template gaussian LF components.
500: These were then
501: subtracted from the observed LF, and the residual LF was used to
502: estimate the contribution of the intermediate-age population by means of
503: least-squares fits.
504: Here we use the same method to investigate the LFs of clusters in
505: PGC 6510, PGC 10922, and PGC
506: 42871 and to explore the possibility of multiple cluster populations
507: of different ages but similar color. For PGC 10922 and PGC 42871, we
508: consider only clusters with \gI\ $> 1.15$ to avoid contamination
509: by clusters associated with the bluer peak seen in the color distribution.
510:
511: We estimate the contributions of the old metal-poor GCs and the
512: intermediate-age GCs in the following manner.
513: First, we compute the total $g$ and $I$ magnitudes and \gI\ of the galaxies
514: using the ellipse fitting task and elapert within STSDAS.
515: PGC 42871 and PGC 6240 do not show evidence for their
516: integrated colors being significantly reddened by dust. However, PGC 6510
517: has redder colors and the color-index map (Fig.~\ref{colmap}) also shows strong
518: evidence for patchy dust distributed asymmetrically around the central region.
519: Since the dust distribution is asymmetric about the central region, we use
520: the unreddened regions to compute the reddening in the dusty regions and
521: correct the total magnitudes and color of PGC 6510. The corrected values
522: are given in Table~\ref{tbl-4}.
523: To estimate the gaussian LFs associated with the old metal-poor GC
524: population,
525: we need to apply luminosity fading to the galaxies' light. Treating
526: the diffuse light of the galaxies as SSPs, we estimate the luminosity-weighted
527: age for a solar-metallicity population from the total integrated \gI\ color index
528: of each galaxy and look up the expected fading in the $B$ and $V$ bands when the
529: galaxy ages to 14 Gyr using the GALEV SSP models (see Table~\ref{tbl-4}). A
530: comparison with the Maraston models is also shown in the table. The following
531: calculations are done using values from the GALEV models.
532:
533:
534: Using the galaxy's faded $M_V$ value in the equation for the specific
535: frequency:
536: \begin{equation}
537: S_N = N_{\rm GC}10^{0.4(M_V + 15)}
538: \end{equation}
539: (i.e., the number of star clusters per galaxy luminosity normalized
540: to an absolute {\it V} magnitude of $-$15
541: \citep{harris81}), we calculate the number of old GCs expected for four typical
542: values of $S_N$ = 3.0, 1.0, 0.5, 0.25. The specific frequency is known to
543: increase systematically along the Hubble sequence, from 0.5 $\pm$ 0.2 for Sc
544: spirals to 2.6 $\pm$ 0.5 for ellipticals outside of clusters
545: \citep{harris}. The estimated gaussians for the old metal-poor population
546: were calculated using $M_I = -8.1$ and $\sigma = 1.2$ \citep{harris96,
547: barmby01} for each value of $S_N$. The contributions of the gaussians for
548: each specific frequency are plotted in the left panel of Fig.~\ref{composite}
549: for each galaxy. The residuals obtained by subtracting these estimated
550: gaussians from the observed LF are shown in the right panel.
551: We find in each case that the residuals are fit well by power laws with
552: exponents $\alpha$ between $-1.54$ and $-2.17$. These exponents
553: are consistent with values found for young and intermediate-age cluster
554: systems \citep[e.g.,][]{whitmore99,whitmore02,goudfroo01b,goudfroo04,goudfroo07}.
555:
556: Figure~\ref{composite} illustrates that the observed luminosity functions
557: can be well modeled as composites of an old metal-poor population, as is
558: normally seen in early-type galaxies, and an intermediate-age population that
559: is more metal-rich. However, note that the relative
560: contributions of these two populations to the total LF vary significantly
561: from galaxy to galaxy: The clusters in PGC 6510 seem to be predominantly
562: intermediate-age metal-rich ones, whereas almost all clusters in PGC
563: 10922 can be attributed to an old metal-poor population.
564: This result is best seen for $S_N$ values of 1.0 and 2.0 [cases (b) and (c)
565: in the top right panel of PGC 10922].
566:
567:
568: \section{The Cluster System -- Host Galaxy Connection} \label{s:HostConnection}
569:
570: In this section we discuss the properties of the cluster systems in the four
571: early-type poststarburst galaxies of our sample in terms of implications
572: related to the assembly of their host galaxies.
573:
574:
575: \subsection{The Nature of the Merger Progenitor Galaxies} \label{s:progenitors}
576:
577: The GC color distribution of most normal early-type galaxies is bimodal,
578: including a ``blue'' peak with a mean color that is similar to that of
579: sentence the end of Section 6.1.
580: metal-poor GCs in the halo of our Galaxy and a ``red'' peak with a mean color
581: similar to that of the underlying diffuse galaxy light. The mean color of the
582: red peak has been shown to strongly correlate with the luminosity of the
583: parent galaxy \citep[e.g.,][]{larsen01,peng06}. According to the GALEV models,
584: this peak should be seen at $g\!-\!I =$ 1.74, 1.83 and 2.02 for $Z =$ 0.2
585: $Z_\odot$, 0.4 $Z_\odot$, and 1.0 $Z_\odot$ respectively. However, we see no clear
586: indication of the presence of this ``red peak'' in any of the galaxies in our
587: sample.
588: This indicates that the progenitor galaxies lacked any significant number of
589: old, metal-rich GCs typically seen in normal early-type
590: galaxies.
591: This in turn seems to point to late-type spirals as being the progenitors of
592: these poststarburst early-type shell galaxies since old, metal-rich clusters
593: are typically associated with spheroidal components of galaxies
594: \citep[see also][]{forbes01,goudfroo03}.
595: Thus, it seems unlikely that the progenitors of these poststarburst galaxies were
596: ellipticals as also indicated by the presence of shells and other sharp
597: features indicative of former disks.
598:
599: However, it is interesting to ask whether the sample
600: galaxies will eventually evolve into elliptical galaxies similar to
601: present-day normal ellipticals. A comparison of the GCs
602: of present-day ellipticals with those of our sample galaxies can shed light
603: on this. For any such comparison, we need to take into account the changes
604: in the GC systems
605: of our sample galaxies as they evolve to older ages. One important such change
606: is due to cluster disruption. Star clusters are vulnerable to disruption by a variety
607: of processes operating on different time scales. Since the intermediate-age
608: clusters in our
609: sample are $\sim$ 1 Gyr old, processes such as two-body relaxation, tidal
610: disruption, and dynamical friction all play important roles in removing stars
611: from the cluster \citep[e.g.,][]{fz01,vesperini03b}.
612:
613: In light of this, we estimate the number of intermediate-age clusters that
614: are expected to survive as the galaxy ages. The mass function of ``old'' GCs
615: is known to have a turnover at $2\times 10^5 M_\odot$.
616: The number of intermediate-age clusters with masses greater than this value is
617: not expected to be affected by disruption to within 10\%
618: \citep{fz01,goudfroo07}. These relatively massive clusters
619: are thus assumed to survive and become ``old'' metal-rich red GCs as the galaxy
620: ages. This allows us
621: to calculate the number of old metal-poor GCs and the number of expected
622: metal-rich GCs using the results from Fig.~\ref{composite} for each of the
623: four values of $S_N$. We derive the
624: expected number of metal-rich GCs in each galaxy by calculating the number of
625: intermediate-age clusters with masses $\geq2\times 10^5 M_\odot$ given by the
626: power-law fit, and by applying passive evolution of the galaxies' $V$-band
627: luminosity to an age of 14 Gyr using the GALEV SSP models. The
628: resulting ratio of metal-poor to metal-rich (i.e., blue to red) clusters
629: thus obtained is compared with that in early-type galaxies of the Virgo
630: cluster \citep{peng06} in the top panel of Fig.~\ref{comparison}.
631: We do this for all
632: galaxies
633: except PGC 10922, which does not show evidence for the presence of any
634: significant intermediate-age GC population (see
635: Sect. 5.1 and the Appendix). As the figure shows,
636: the values for PGC 6240 and PGC 42871 are consistent with those
637: for early-type Virgo cluster galaxies if $0.5 \la S_N \la 1$.
638: Under the assumption that these early-type poststarburst galaxies will indeed
639: evolve to become ``normal'' early-type galaxies at old age, this finding
640: not only suggests that the most likely progenitors of these poststarburst galaxies
641: were spiral galaxies with Hubble types Sb or later
642: \citep[]{harris,az98,goudfroo03,chandar04}, but also provides new
643: evidence based on GC system properties to support the view that mergers of
644: such spiral galaxies can indeed produce ``normal'' early-type galaxies at old age.
645: The presence of strong tidal features in the sample galaxies (and many poststarburst
646: galaxies in general) also suggests disk-dominated progenitors
647: \citep[e.g.,][]{zabludoff96,mihos96}.
648:
649: Note that the above analysis was performed by taking into account the
650: luminosity-weighted age of the galaxies. Table~\ref{tbl-4} shows that the
651: integrated colors of PGC~6240 and PGC~42871 are indeed
652: consistent with those of their intermediate-age GC
653: populations. Hence, this assumption seems fair for those two galaxies. However,
654: for PGC 6510, the integrated color of the galaxy is somewhat redder than
655: that of the intermediate-age GC population. To evaluate
656: whether this difference may account for its low values of the ratio of the number
657: of metal-poor to metal-rich clusters seen in the top panel of
658: Fig.~\ref{comparison}, we consider the alternative scenario where the diffuse
659: light of the galaxies is produced by a combination of an old and a
660: young
661: population (i.e., that the galaxy in question is an ``E+A''
662: galaxy\footnote{ Many papers now use the more general term k+a,
663: where the k stands for the spectral type of an old stellar population
664: \citep[e.g.,][]{franx93}.}).
665: In this context, we assign the young population to have an age
666: as indicated by the Balmer line equivalent widths in the central spectra of
667: \citet[][see Appendix A]{carter88}, and to have solar metallicity. For the old
668: population, we estimate a metallicity by evaluating the galaxies' absolute
669: $K$-band magnitudes relative to that of NGC 4472, the brightest elliptical
670: galaxy in the Virgo cluster, and then utilizing the [Fe/H] versus galaxy $M_B$
671: relation of \citet[][transformed to $M_K$ using $K$ galaxy magnitudes
672: from 2MASS]{peng06}. Using the GALEV SSP models and the Maraston models, we then model the integrated
673: \gI\ color of the galaxies (listed in Table~\ref{tbl-4}) as a linear combination
674: of an old component (with an age of 14 Gyr) plus a young component (with an age
675: determined as mentioned above). Finally, the luminosity fading of this composite
676: galaxy to an effective age of 14 Gyr is derived by fading only the young
677: component. Table~\ref{tbl-5} lists all relevant fading values for the sample galaxies.
678:
679: Using the faded magnitudes thus obtained, we repeat the procedure in Section 5.1
680: and model the GC luminosity function as a superposition of an old metal-poor and
681: an intermediate-age metal-rich population, and re-derive the predicted ratio
682: of the number of blue to red GCs at an age of 14 Gyr.
683: For PGC 6240 and PGC 42871, this exercise results in a predicted number of
684: old metal-poor GCs that far exceeds the number of GCs observed, even at the
685: brightest GC magnitudes. This indicates that the use of luminosity-weighted
686: ages to model the contributions of the metal-poor and metal-rich
687: GCs gives more realistic results than using a combination
688: of ages for those two galaxies. This is consistent with the fact that the
689: integrated colors of those two galaxies are very similar to the mean color of
690: their intermediate-age GCs.
691: On the other hand, for PGC 6510, we find that the
692: scenario involving a combination of young and old ages yields a prediction for
693: the number ratio of the blue to red GCs that is fully consistent with
694: those of normal early-type galaxies if the progenitor galaxies had $S_N
695: \approx 0.5$ (see bottom panel of Fig.~\ref{comparison} and
696: right panel of Fig.~\ref{p6510_compositegauss}).
697: The case of PGC 6510
698: will be discussed in greater detail in Sect.~\ref{s:strange_case} below.
699: The above analysis was also done using the Maraston models. However, we do
700: not find significant differences between the results obtained using either
701: model.
702:
703: \subsection{The Spatial Extent of the Poststarburst Population}
704:
705: To address the spatial extent of the poststarburst population in the sample
706: galaxies, we use the radial color distribution of the host galaxy as a proxy.
707: \citet{bartholomew2001} find that poststarburst galaxies in distant clusters tend to
708: have slightly bluer gradients towards the center than ``normal'' early-type
709: galaxies.
710: Recent numerical simulations by \citet{bekki2005} suggest that elliptical E+A
711: galaxies formed by major mergers should have positive radial color gradients
712: (i.e., bluer color in the inner regions).
713: Examining the radial \gI\ color-index profile of the underlying galaxies obtained from the
714: ellipse fits made in the two passbands, we find that PGC 6240 and PGC 42871
715: get redder outwards, whereas PGC 6510 and PGC 10922 show redder colors in the
716: inner regions (Fig.~\ref{radcol}). This behavior is also seen in the
717: two-dimensional \gI\ color-index maps shown in Fig.~\ref{colmap}. It may well be
718: relevant that the two galaxies that show evidence for hosting the youngest GC
719: populations (i.e., PGC 6240 and PGC 42871) also show the bluest color in their
720: central regions. These two galaxies also have the strongest H$\delta$
721: equivalent widths in their nuclear spectrum among the sample galaxies
722: \citep[][see also Appendix A]{carter88}.
723: The other two galaxies (PGC 6510 and PGC 10922) show dusty central
724: regions (especially PGC 10922), and it seems likely that the central reddening
725: in their radial color distributions can at
726: least partly be attributed to dust (cf.\ Fig.~\ref{colmap}).
727: Note that the inner color profiles of the latter two galaxies
728: show a dip to bluer colors towards their very center (Fig.~\ref{radcol}),
729: which may well represent a signature of the poststarburst population in these
730: galaxies. However, Figs.~\ref{radcol} and \ref{colmap} seem to argue
731: that the spatial extent of the poststarburst population in PGC 10922 and (to
732: a lesser extent) PGC 6510 is smaller than that in PGC 6240 and PGC 42871. We
733: note that this finding is reinforced by the properties of the GC systems of
734: these galaxies.
735: We suggest that deep optical spectra of the target galaxies be
736: obtained to verify the spatial extent of the poststarburst population. This
737: would also provide quantitative information on the issue as to how well the
738: integrated color of the target galaxies can reliably be interpreted as a
739: simple stellar population, which is relevant to analyses related to the
740: evolution of GC specific frequencies in intermediate-age galaxies (cf.\
741: Sect.~\ref{s:progenitors}).
742:
743: \subsection{The remarkable GC system of PGC 6510}\label{s:strange_case}
744:
745: As mentioned briefly in Sect.~\ref{s:compositeLF}, the GC system of PGC 6510 shows some
746: interesting properties.
747: Figures~\ref{composite} and \ref{comparison} show that if the current
748: integrated \gI\ color of PGC~6510 is interpreted in terms of an SSP
749: (i.e., a single age and metallicity), the modeling in
750: Sect.~5 results in the old metal-poor GCs making up
751: an unexpectedly small fraction of the total GC system unless the progenitor galaxies
752: had an unusually high specific frequency of old metal-poor GCs ($S_N \ga
753: 3$). This result seems somewhat counterintuitive, since such high $S_N$ values
754: are unknown among gas-rich galaxies, whereas a significant
755: amount of gas was needed to trigger the starburst that led to the poststarburst
756: spectrum and the formation of the significant number of intermediate-age
757: GCs. However, in case of the alternative scenario in which the integrated
758: color of PGC~6510 is due to a superposition of a young and an old component (see
759: Sect.~\ref{s:progenitors} above for details), our modeling shows that
760: progenitor galaxies with $S_N$ values of 0.5\,--\,1 (typical for late-type
761: galaxies) {\it can\/} account for a more significant fraction of GCs in PGC~6510 being
762: of the old metal-poor kind, especially at the faint end of
763: the LF (compare Fig.~\ref{p6510_compositegauss} with the top left panel of
764: Fig.~\ref{composite}).
765: To further constrain the fractions of GCs in this galaxy that are of
766: intermediate age versus old,
767: we utilize the large size of the GC population to compare the radial surface
768: number density profiles of the bright vs.\ the
769: faint GCs in this galaxy.
770: To avoid introducing a bias due to the high background in the innermost
771: regions of the galaxy, we first determine the background level at which a
772: GC of magnitude $I$ = 25.5 is detected at $80\%$ completeness and
773: discard all GCs at higher
774: background levels for this exercise. We then
775: calculate the completeness-corrected surface-number densities of the
776: brightest $33\%$ and the faintest $33\%$ of the GCs selected this way.
777: We find that the surface-number-density profile of the bright GCs
778: follows the surface brightness
779: profile of the galaxy very closely (see Fig.~\ref{brt_faint}, left panel),
780: whereas the faint GCs show a more extended
781: radial distribution. This reinforces the idea that
782: the brightest GCs are primarily intermediate-age ones since the radial profile of
783: intermediate-age GCs is expected to follow the surface brightness profile
784: of the parent galaxy \citep[e.g.,][]{schweizer96,whitmore97,goudfroo07}. We
785: also plot the completeness- and background-corrected LFs of the inner
786: half and the outer half of the GC system (within the outer radius beyond
787: which objects were assigned to the background) and find that the inner
788: half of the GC system hosts relatively more bright GCs (see
789: Fig.~\ref{brt_faint}, right panel).
790: Both of the above results lend credence to the idea that PGC 6510 hosts a
791: significant number of intermediate-age GCs and that old GCs populate
792: the LF mainly at fainter magnitudes, as predicted by our modeling in
793: Sect.~\ref{s:HostConnection} for the case of a composite age structure for the
794: diffuse light of PGC~6510.
795:
796:
797: \section{Summary and Conclusions}
798:
799: We have analyzed {\it HST/ACS\/} images of four early-type shell galaxies, for
800: which spectroscopy of the central region revealed a poststarburst spectrum, in
801: order to study the properties of their globular cluster systems. Our results
802: are summarized as follows.
803:
804: \begin{itemize}
805: \item
806: The color distributions of the globular clusters in all four galaxies
807: show a broad peak centered on $g\!-\!I \approx 1.4$, while PGC 6240 and
808: PGC 42871 also have a significant number of GCs with $g\!-\!I \approx 1.0$.
809: The mean color
810: of the former peak is consistent with SSP model predictions for both an old
811: ($\sim$\,14 Gyr), metal-poor ([Z/H] $\sim$\,$-1.5$) population and an
812: intermediate-age (1\,--\,2 Gyr) population of roughly solar metallicity. The
813: GCs with $g\!-\!I \approx 1.0$ are interpreted as being of age
814: $\sim$\,500 Myr and likely having formed in the merger.
815: Except for PGC 10922, the galaxies host several GCs in the
816: redder peak that are brighter than the maximum luminosity expected of a
817: single old, metal-poor ``halo'' GC of the kind commonly found around normal
818: galaxies.
819: To test for multiple populations of overlapping color around $g\!-\!I \approx
820: 1.4$, we fit the observed GCLFs as composites of a Gaussian (as
821: seen in ``old'' GC systems) and a power law (seen in young and
822: intermediate-age GC systems). By scaling the Gaussian component using
823: plausible values of the specific frequencies ($S_N$ values) of old metal-poor
824: GCs seen in present-day normal galaxies, we find the following:
825:
826: \begin{enumerate}
827: \item{}
828: We deduce the presence of a substantial population of intermediate-age
829: GCs in three out of four galaxies in our sample.
830: These GCs have ages between 1\,--\,1.5 Gyr which is comparable to
831: typical lifetimes of the shells, providing evidence that these GCs
832: likely formed during the same merger event that formed the shells.
833:
834: \item{}
835: The integrated colors of PGC 6240 and PGC 42871 are consistent with those of
836: the intermediate-age GCs, suggesting that the bulk of the field stars were
837: formed in the same star formation event that formed the intermediate-age
838: GCs. Interpreting the integrated light of PGC 6240 and PGC 42871 as a single-age
839: stellar population of solar metallicity, the ratio of the numbers of
840: metal-poor to metal-rich GCs are consistent with those of present-day
841: (giant) early-type galaxies if
842: the $S_N$ values of the merger progenitor galaxies were in the range
843: $0.5 \la S_N \la 1$. This range of $S_N$ values is consistent with
844: that of late-type spiral galaxies.
845: Under the assumption that these early-type poststarburst galaxies will indeed
846: evolve to become ``normal'' early-type galaxies at old age, this finding
847: not only suggests that the most likely progenitors of the poststarburst galaxies in our
848: sample were late-type spiral galaxies, but also provides new
849: evidence (based on GC system properties) to support the view that mergers
850: of such spiral galaxies can indeed produce ``normal'' early-type galaxies
851: at old age.
852:
853: \item{}
854: The integrated color of PGC 6510 is redder than that of its bright
855: GCs that are very likely of intermediate age, suggesting that a significant
856: fraction of the field stars are older than those GCs. Interpreting the
857: integrated light of PGC 6510 as a superposition of a young population (with
858: solar metallicity) and a 14-Gyr old population (with a metallicity estimated from
859: the galaxy's $K$-band luminosity), the ratio of the numbers of
860: metal-poor to metal-rich GCs is consistent with those of
861: present-day (giant) early-type galaxies if the $S_N$ values of the merger
862: progenitor galaxies were in the range $0.5 \la S_N \la 1$, just like the
863: situation for PGC 6240 and PGC 42871. GCs at the bright end of
864: the GCLF in PGC 6510 follow the surface brightness profile of the parent
865: galaxy closely, supporting the notion that they are indeed intermediate-age
866: clusters. In contrast, GCs at the faint end of the LF (but still at 80\%
867: completeness) show a flatter surface number density profile, consistent with
868: the presence of a significant fraction of old GCs among the fainter GCs.
869:
870: \item{}
871: We find no evidence for the presence of intermediate-age GCs in
872: PGC 10922, the galaxy with the smallest H$\delta$ equivalent width in
873: its nuclear spectrum among our sample.
874: This may partly be due to the presence of a very dusty inner
875: region (of $\sim$\,3 kpc diameter), which prevents the detection of
876: any GCs there. This would imply that the star formation
877: activity that was responsible for the poststarburst spectrum of the galaxy was
878: confined to that inner dusty region. The properties of the population
879: of old metal-poor GCs in this galaxy are similar to those in PGC
880: 6240 and PGC 42871.
881: \end{enumerate}
882:
883:
884: \item
885: The color distributions of GCs in all four galaxies appear devoid
886: of any old metal-rich clusters, which are
887: generally associated with the spheroidal component of (early-type)
888: galaxies. This indicates that the progenitor galaxies must have lacked any
889: substantial bulge and were most likely of late Hubble type.
890: \end{itemize}
891:
892: In closing, we note that our analysis is based on $g$-- and
893: $I$--band imaging and, hence, on magnitudes and one color index only.
894: Given the age-metallicity degeneracy among
895: optical colors (e.g., Fig.~\ref{ssp}), additional spectra and/or near-infrared
896: icolors will clearly be needed to check the ages and metallicities
897: deduced for the second-generation GCs.
898:
899: Early-type poststarburst galaxies are thought to represent an intermediate phase
900: in the formation of (at least) some elliptical galaxies from mergers. Our
901: results, based on properties of GC systems of such galaxies, generally
902: support the idea that mergers of spiral galaxies are accompanied by
903: the formation of clusters which evolve and form the old, metal-rich
904: peak of the GC color distribution as the merger remnant evolves into an
905: elliptical galaxy.
906:
907:
908: \appendix
909:
910: \section{Notes on individual galaxies}
911: {\bf PGC 6510}:
912: The equivalent width (EW) of H$\delta$ in the central spectrum for this galaxy
913: is $5.0\pm0.8$ \AA\ \citep{carter88}. This indicates an age of $\sim$\,1 Gyr
914: from a comparison with the \citet{bc03} models of solar metallicity.
915: Using the integrated colors and the \citet{galev} models as described in Section 5.1,
916: the luminosity-weighted age for this galaxy is found to be 1.8 Gyr.
917: The GC color distribution appears unimodal. However, the LF shows an excess
918: of bright clusters.
919: This LF is modeled as a composite of an old metal-poor GC population and an
920: intermediate-age cluster population having the same color.
921: This modeling shows that most of the clusters detected in this galaxy
922: are of intermediate age. The \gI\ color-index map of PGC 6510 shows an
923: asymmetrical dust distribution (Fig.~\ref{colmap}). The properties of the
924: GC system of this galaxy are somewhat peculiar and do not seem to be consistent with
925: those of the other galaxies in the sample or with normal present-day
926: ellipticals, unless significant disruption of the newly formed clusters will
927: take place over the next $\sim$\,10 Gyr. However, modeling the diffuse
928: light of the galaxy as a combination of an old and a young population
929: gives plausible results for the properties of the GC systems.
930:
931: {\bf PGC 10922}:
932: The H$\delta$ EW for this galaxy is $3.7\pm0.7$ \AA, which implies an age
933: of 1.5 Gyr from \citet{bc03}.
934: The luminosity-weighted age is found to be 2.2 Gyr.
935: The nuclear spectrum of this galaxy resembles a poststarburst spectrum but we do not
936: see evidence for large-scale star formation.
937: This galaxy has the reddest color in the central region among the sample galaxies.
938: This is also seen in the \gI\ map, where the central region appears surrounded
939: by a circular dust ring with spurs.
940: It seems plausible that the poststarburst population is localized near the
941: center and the dusty structure in this region prevents us from detecting any
942: clusters there.
943:
944: {\bf PGC 42871}:
945: The H$\delta$ EW is $12.0\pm1.0$ \AA, implying an age of $\sim$\,0.3 Gyr.
946: The luminosity-weighted age of the galaxy is about 1 Gyr. The color
947: distribution of the GCs suggests an excess of objects
948: at \gI\ $\approx 0.7$, which is interpreted as representing a population of
949: younger-age ($\sim$\,80 -- 200 Myr) clusters
950: based on a comparison with SSP models of solar metallicity.
951: The redder peak at \gI\ = 1.35 is likely made up of a composite population
952: of old metal-poor clusters and intermediate-age solar-metallicity clusters,
953: as discussed in Section 5. Thus, we find evidence for the presence of
954: three separate subpopulations of GCs in this galaxy.
955:
956: {\bf PGC 6240}:
957: The H$\delta$ EW for this galaxy is $13.6\pm 1.0$ \AA, which corresponds to
958: an age of $\sim$\,0.3 Gyr. The luminosity-weighted age is found to be
959: about 1 Gyr. This galaxy clearly shows bimodality
960: in its color distribution with the bluer peak at \gI\ = 0.85 consistent with a $\sim$ 0.4 Gyr
961: old cluster population of solar metallicity. The brightest shell associated
962: with the galaxy harbors some of the youngest clusters \citep{aparna}. The
963: red clusters are modeled as a composite of
964: an old metal-poor population and an intermediate-age population. Hence, we
965: find evidence for the presence of three subpopulations of GCs in this galaxy as well.
966:
967: \acknowledgements
968: We would like to thank an anonymous referee for helpful comments and suggestions. Support for {\it HST\/} Program GO-10227 was provided by NASA through a grant
969: to PG from the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the
970: Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA
971: contract NAS5--26555.
972:
973: {\it Facilities:} \facility{HST (ACS)}.
974:
975: \begin{thebibliography}{}
976: \bibitem[Anders \& Fritze-v.\ Alvensleben(2003)]{galev} Anders, P., \&
977: Fritze-v.\ Alvensleben, U. 2003, \aap, 401, 1063
978: \bibitem[Ashman \& Zepf(1998)]{az98} Ashman, K.M., \& Zepf, S.E. 1998, Globular Cluster Systems (Cambridge Univ. Press)
979: \bibitem[Ashman \& Zepf(1992)]{az92} Ashman, K.M., \& Zepf, S.E. 1992, \apj, 384, 50
980: \bibitem[Barmby, Huchra, \& Brodie(2001)]{barmby01} Barmby, P., Huchra, J.P., \& Brodie, J, P. 2001, \aj, 121, 1482
981: \bibitem[Bartholomew et al.(2001)]{bartholomew2001} Bartholomew, L.J., Rose, J.A., \& Gaba, A.E. 2001, \aj, 122, 2913
982: \bibitem[Bekki et al.(2005)]{bekki2005} Bekki, K., Couch, W.J., Shioya, Y., \& Vazdekis, A. 2005, \mnras, 359, 949
983: \bibitem[Brown et al.(2000)]{brown00} Brown, R.J.N., Forbes, D.A., Kissler-Patig, M., \& Brodie, J.P. 2000, \mnras, 317, 406
984: \bibitem[Bruzual \& Charlot(2003)]{bc03} Bruzual, G.A., \& Charlot, S. 2003, \mnras, 344, 1000
985: \bibitem[Burstein \& Heiles(1982)]{burstein} Burstein, D., \& Heiles, C. 1982, \aj, 87, 1165
986: \bibitem[Buyle et al.(2006)]{buyle2006} Buyle, P., Michielsen, D., De Rijcke, S., Pisano, D.J., Dejonghe, H., \& Freeman, K. 2006, \apj, 649, 163
987: \bibitem[Carter et al.(1988)]{carter88} Carter, D., Prieur, J.L., Wilkinson, A., Sparks, W.B., \& Malin, D.F. 1988, \mnras, 235, 813
988: \bibitem[Chandar, Whitmore, \& Lee(2004)]{chandar04} Chandar, R., Whitmore, B. C., \& Lee, M. G. 2004, \apj, 611, 220
989: \bibitem[di Matteo et al.(2007)]{dimatteo07} di Matteo, P., Combes, F., Melchior, A.-L., \& Semelin, B. 2007, \aap, 468, 61
990: \bibitem[Dressler \& Gunn(1983)]{dressler83} Dressler, A., \& Gunn, J.E. 1983, \apj, 270, 7
991: \bibitem[Dupraz \& Combes(1986)]{dupraz86} Dupraz, C., \& Combes, F. 1986, \aap, 166, 53
992: \bibitem[Fall \& Zhang(2001)]{fz01} Fall, S.M., \& Zhang, Q. 2001, \apj, 561, 751
993: \bibitem[Forbes et al.(2001)]{forbes01} Forbes, D.A., Beasley, M.A., Brodie, J.P., \& Kissler-Patig, M. 2001, \apj, 563, L143
994: \bibitem[Franx(1993)]{franx93} Franx, M. 1993, \pasp, 105, 1058
995: \bibitem[Gnedin \& Ostriker(1998)]{gnedin98} Gnedin, O.Y., \& Ostriker, J.P. 1998, ASPC, 136, 56
996: \bibitem[Goudfrooij et al.(2001a)]{goudfroo01a} Goudfrooij, P., Mack, J., Kissler-Patig, M., Meylan, G., \& Minniti, D. 2001a, \mnras, 322, 643
997: \bibitem[Goudfrooij et al.(2001b)]{goudfroo01b} Goudfrooij, P., Alonso, M.V., Maraston, C., \& Minniti, D. 2001b, \mnras, 328, 237
998: \bibitem[Goudfrooij et al.(2003)]{goudfroo03} Goudfrooij, P., Strader, J., Brenneman, L., Kissler-Patig, M., Minniti, D., \& Huizinga, E.J. 2003, \mnras, 343, 665
999: \bibitem[Goudfrooij et al.(2004)]{goudfroo04} Goudfrooij, P., Gilmore, D., Whitmore, B.C., Schweizer, F. 2004, \apj, 613, L121
1000: \bibitem[Goudfrooij et al.(2007)]{goudfroo07} Goudfrooij, P., Schweizer, F., Gilmore, D., \& Whitmore, B.C. 2007, \aj, 133, 273
1001: \bibitem[Harris \& Racine(1979)]{harris79} Harris, W.E., \& Racine, R. 1979, \araa, 17, 241
1002: \bibitem[Harris \& van den Bergh(1981)]{harris81} Harris, W.E., \& van den Bergh, S. 1981, \aj, 86, 1627
1003: \bibitem[Harris(1986)]{harris86} Harris, W.E. 1986, \aj, 91, 822
1004: \bibitem[Harris(1991)]{harris} Harris, W.E. 1991, \araa, 29, 543
1005: \bibitem[Harris (1996)]{harris96} Harris, W.E. 1996, \aj, 112, 1487
1006: \bibitem[Hau et al.(1999)]{hau99} Hau, G.K.T., Carter, D., \& Balcells, M. 1999, \mnras, 306, 437
1007: \bibitem[Hernquist \& Quinn(1988)]{hq88} Hernquist, L., \& Quinn, P. 1988, \apj, 331, 682
1008: \bibitem[Hernquist \& Quinn(1989)]{hq89} Hernquist, L., \& Quinn, P. 1989, \apj, 342, 1
1009: \bibitem[Jord\'{a}n et al.(2005)]{jordan} Jord\'{a}n, A., C\^{o}te, P., Blakeslee, J. P., et al. 2005, \apj, 634, 1002
1010: \bibitem[Kaviraj et al.(2007)]{kaviraj} Kaviraj, S., Kirkby, L.A., Silk, J., \& Sarzi, M. 2007, {\it astro-ph/0707.3570}
1011: \bibitem[Koekemoer et al.(2002)]{kok} Koekemoer, A.M., Fruchter, A.S., Hook, R.N., \& Hack, W. 2002, in {\it The 2002 HST Calibration Workshop: Hubble after the Installation of the ACS and the NICMOS Cooling System}, ed. S. Arribas, A. Koekemoer, \& B. Whitmore (Baltimore: Space Telescope Science Institute), 337
1012: \bibitem[Kundu et al.(2005)]{kundu05} Kundu, A., et al. 2005, \apj, 634L, 41
1013: \bibitem[Kundu \& Whitmore(2001)]{kundu} Kundu, A., \& Whitmore, B. C. 2001, \aj, 121, 2950
1014: \bibitem[Larsen et al.(2001)]{larsen01}
1015: Larsen, S. S., Brodie, J. P., Huchra, J. P., Forbes, D. A., \& Grillmair, C. J., 2001, \aj, 121, 2974
1016: \bibitem[Larsen et al.(2003)]{larsen03} Larsen, S.S., Brodie, J.P., Beasley, M.A., Forbes, D.A., Kissler-Patig, M., Kuntschner, H., \& Puzia, T.H. 2003, \apj, 585, 767
1017: \bibitem[Malin \& Carter(1983)]{malin} Malin, D.F., \& Carter, D. 1983, \apj, 274, 534
1018: \bibitem[Maraston(2005)]{maraston} Maraston, C. 2005, \mnras, 362, 799
1019: \bibitem[Maybhate et al.(2007)]{aparna} Maybhate, A., Goudfrooij, P., Schweizer, F., Puzia, T., \& Carter, D. 2007, \aj, 134, 1729 (Paper I)
1020: \bibitem[Mihos \& Hernquist(1996)]{mihos96} Mihos, J. C., \& Hernquist, L. 1996, \apj, 464, 641
1021: \bibitem[Miller et al.(1997)]{miller97} Miller, B.W., Whitmore, B.C., Schweizer, F., \& Fall, S.M. 1997, \aj, 114, 2381
1022: \bibitem[Minniti et al.(1996)]{minniti96} Minniti, D., Alonso, M.V., Goudfrooij, P., Jablonka, P., \& Meylan, G. 1996, \apj, 467, 221
1023: \bibitem[Peng et al.(2004)]{peng04} Peng, E.W., Ford, H.C., \& Freeman, K.C. 2004, \apj, 602, 705
1024: \bibitem[Peng et al.(2006)]{peng06} Peng, E., et al.\ 2006, \apj, 639, 95
1025: \bibitem[Pessev et al.(2008)]{pessev} Pessev, P.M., Goudfrooij, P., Puzia, T.H., \& Chandar, R. 2008, {\it arXiv:0801.2375}
1026: \bibitem[Puzia et al.(2002)]{puzia02} Puzia, T.H., Zepf, S.E., Kissler-Patig, M., Hilker, M., Minniti, D., \& Goudfrooij, P. 2002, \aap, 391, 453
1027: \bibitem[Puzia et al.(2004)]{puzia04} Puzia, T.H., et al. 2004, \aap, 123, 143
1028: \bibitem[Quinn(1984)]{quinn84} Quinn, P.J. 1984, \apj, 279, 596
1029: \bibitem[Salpeter(1955)]{sal} Salpeter, E.E. 1955, \apj, 121, 161
1030: \bibitem[Schweizer(1987)]{sch87} Schweizer, F. 1987, in {\it Nearly Normal Galaxies}, ed. S.M. Faber (New York: Springer), 18
1031: \bibitem[Schweizer et al.(1996)]{schweizer96} Schweizer, F., Miller, B.W., Whitmore, B.C., \& Fall, S.M. 1996, \aj, 112, 1839
1032: \bibitem[Schweizer(1998)]{schweizer98} Schweizer, F. 1998, in {\it Galaxies: Interactions and Induced Star Formation}, ed. D. Friedli, L. Martinet, \& D. Pfenniger (New York: Springer), 105
1033: \bibitem[Schweizer \& Seitzer(1998)]{ss98} Schweizer, F., \& Seitzer, P. 1998, \aj, 116, 2206
1034: \bibitem[Schweizer et al.(2004)]{schweizer04} Schweizer, F., Seitzer, P., \& Brodie, J, P. 2004, \aj, 128, 202
1035: \bibitem[Silverman(1986)]{silverman86} Silverman, B.W. 1986, in {\it Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis}, Chap and Hall/CRC Press, Inc.
1036: \bibitem[Sirianni et al.(2005)]{siri} Sirianni, M., et al. 2005, \pasp, 117,1409
1037: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(2006)]{skrutskie06} Skrutskie, M.F., et al. 2006, \aj, 131, 1163
1038: \bibitem[Thomson(1991)]{thomson91} Thomson, R.C. 1991, \mnras, 253, 256
1039: \bibitem[Thomson \& Wright(1990)]{tw90} Thomson, R.C., \& Wright, A.E. 1990, \mnras, 247, 122
1040: \bibitem[van den Bergh \& Mackey(2004)]{vanden} van den Bergh, S., \& Mackey, A. D. 2004, \mnras, 354, 713
1041: \bibitem[Vesperini \& Zepf(2003)]{vesperini03a} Vesperini, E., \& Zepf, S. E.,
1042: \apj, 587, L97
1043: \bibitem[Vesperini et al.(2003)]{vesperini03b} Vesperini, E., Zepf, S. E.,
1044: Kundu, A., \& Ashman, K. M. 2003, \apj, 593, 760
1045: \bibitem[Whitmore et al.(1997)]{whitmore97}Whitmore, B.C., Miller, B.W., Schweizer, F., \& Fall, S.M. 1997, \aj, 114, 1797
1046: \bibitem[Whitmore et al.(1999)]{whitmore99} Whitmore, B. C., Zhang, Q., Leitherer, C., Fall, S. M., Schweizer, F., \& Miller, B. W. 1999, \aj, 118, 155
1047: \bibitem[Whitmore et al.(2002)]{whitmore02} Whitmore, B. C., Schweizer, F., Kundu, A., \& Miller, B. W. 2002, \aj, 124, 147
1048: \bibitem[Zabludoff et al.(1996)]{zabludoff96} Zabludoff, A.I., Zaritsky, D., Lin, H., Tucker, D., Hashimoto, Y., Schectman, S.A., Oemler, A., \& Kirshner, R.P. 1996, \apj, 466, 104
1049: \end{thebibliography}{}
1050:
1051:
1052:
1053:
1054: \clearpage
1055:
1056: \begin{deluxetable}{lllll}
1057: \tablecaption{General properties of the sample. \label{tbl-1}}
1058: \tablehead{
1059: \colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{PGC 6510} & \colhead{PGC 10922} & \colhead{PGC 42871} & \colhead{PGC 6240}}
1060: \startdata
1061: Malin \& Carter (1983)& MC 0148$-$836 & MC 0247$-$833 & MC 1241$-$339 & MC 0140$-$658\\
1062: Alternative name& --&ESO 003$-$ G 013 & AM 1241$-$335& AM 0139$-$655\\
1063: RA$^*$(J2000)&1h 46m 21.9s&2h 53m 35.9s&12h 44m 05.2s & 1h 41m 30.98s\\
1064: Dec$^*$(J2000)& $-83\degr$ 23$\arcmin$ 59$\arcsec$& $-83\degr$ 08$\arcmin$ 32$\arcsec$& $-34\degr$ 12$\arcmin$ 07$\arcsec$& $-65\degr$ 36$\arcmin$ 55.4$\arcsec$\\
1065: Type&E-S0&S0&S0-a & S0\\
1066: ${\it v}_{hel}$ (km s $^{-1}$) & 4652 $\pm$ 15 & 4819 $\pm$ 15 & 6074 $\pm$ 15 & 8216 $\pm$ 15\\
1067: ${\it v}_{\rm LG}$(km s $^{-1}$) & 4365& 4529& 5944 & 7936\\
1068: Velocity disp.\ (km s $^{-1}$) & 181.9 $\pm$ 68.7 & 189.9 $\pm$ 59.1 & 178.7 $\pm$ 48.8 & 249.1 $\pm$ 46.5\\
1069: Distance (Mpc)$^{**}$ & 58.2 & 60.4 & 79.2 & 105.8\\
1070: $m-M$& 33.82 & 33.90 & 34.49 & 35.12\\
1071: ${\it M}_{B}$& $-$20.08& $-$20.47& $-$21.46& $-$20.57\\
1072: ${\it M}_{K_s}$& $-$23.00& $-$24.19& $-$24.65& $-$24.50\\
1073: $A_V^{***}$&0.45&0.44&0.30 & 0.0\\
1074: \enddata
1075: \tablenotetext{*}{From ACS images, this work.}
1076: \tablenotetext{**}{Using ${\it H}_{0}$ = 75 km s $^{-1}Mpc^{-1}$}
1077: \tablenotetext{***}{\citet{burstein}}
1078: \tablecomments{All other parameters are taken from LEDA (http://leda.univ-lyon1.fr/ or computed
1079: using values from LEDA and ${\it H}_{0}$ = 75 km s $^{-1}Mpc^{-1}$)}
1080: \end{deluxetable}
1081:
1082:
1083: \begin{deluxetable}{llcl}
1084: \tablecaption{Results of power-law fits to the GC surface density. \label{tbl-2}}
1085: \tablehead{
1086: \colhead{Galaxy} & \colhead{$I$-band cut-off}&\colhead{Radial range(\arcsec)} & \colhead{Power-law exponent}}
1087: \startdata
1088: PGC 6510& 26.0& 14 -- 137& $-1.73\pm 0.14$\\
1089: PGC 10922& 25.8& 17 -- 178& $-1.09\pm 0.12$\\
1090: PGC 42871& 25.0& 7 -- 115& $-1.94\pm 0.42$\\
1091: PGC 6240& 26.6& 6 -- 108& $-1.51\pm 0.28$\\
1092:
1093: \enddata
1094: \end{deluxetable}
1095:
1096: \begin{deluxetable}{ccrrr}
1097: \tablewidth{0pt}
1098: \footnotesize
1099: \tablecaption{Positions and photometry of the 30 brightest GCCs in PGC 6510, PGC 10922, and PGC 42871 \label{tbl-3}}
1100: \tablehead{
1101: \colhead{RA (2000)}&\colhead{Dec (2000)}&
1102: \colhead{{$I$} (mag)}&\colhead{{$g-I$} (mag)} &
1103: \colhead{$r^{*}(\arcsec)$}}
1104: \startdata
1105:
1106: && PGC 6510 &&\\
1107: 1 46 22.42 & $-$83 23 58.74 & 20.38 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.04 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.30 \\
1108: 1 46 19.78 & $-$83 23 58.71 & 21.15 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.87 $\pm$ 0.02 & 3.22 \\
1109: 1 46 26.14 & $-$83 24 13.69 & 21.62 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.22 $\pm$ 0.02 & 16.48 \\
1110: 1 46 06.90 & $-$83 24 30.83 & 21.73 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.18 $\pm$ 0.02 & 40.34 \\
1111: 1 46 21.52 & $-$83 24 01.83 & 21.80 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.00 $\pm$ 0.03 & 2.91 \\
1112: 1 46 20.21 & $-$83 23 48.45 & 21.91 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.30 $\pm$ 0.02 & 10.62 \\
1113: 1 46 26.85 & $-$83 23 56.99 & 22.05 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.23 $\pm$ 0.02 & 9.02 \\
1114: 1 46 20.55 & $-$83 24 01.64 & 22.05 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.45 $\pm$ 0.05 & 3.31 \\
1115: 1 46 22.77 & $-$83 23 55.09 & 22.13 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.47 $\pm$ 0.03 & 4.21 \\
1116: 1 46 13.62 & $-$83 23 47.14 & 22.15 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.65 $\pm$ 0.02 & 17.97 \\
1117: 1 46 53.05 & $-$83 24 22.08 & 22.22 $\pm$ 0.01 & 0.96 $\pm$ 0.02 & 58.13 \\
1118: 1 46 15.32 & $-$83 23 52.50 & 22.41 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.68 $\pm$ 0.03 & 12.52 \\
1119: 1 46 13.79 & $-$83 23 53.05 & 22.48 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.64 $\pm$ 0.03 & 14.61 \\
1120: 1 46 08.92 & $-$83 24 16.34 & 22.54 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.43 $\pm$ 0.03 & 27.72 \\
1121: 1 46 22.67 & $-$83 23 54.19 & 22.55 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.40 $\pm$ 0.04 & 4.95 \\
1122: 1 46 34.19 & $-$83 24 02.90 & 22.56 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.19 $\pm$ 0.02 & 21.69 \\
1123: 1 46 20.87 & $-$83 23 02.92 & 22.57 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.57 $\pm$ 0.03 & 55.33 \\
1124: 1 46 17.91 & $-$83 23 56.47 & 22.61 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.35 $\pm$ 0.03 & 6.83 \\
1125: 1 46 21.59 & $-$83 23 56.69 & 22.73 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1.12 $\pm$ 0.06 & 2.18 \\
1126: 1 46 23.09 & $-$83 24 08.91 & 22.81 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.61 $\pm$ 0.03 & 10.19 \\
1127: 1 46 27.70 & $-$83 23 46.24 & 22.97 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.20 $\pm$ 0.03 & 16.19 \\
1128: 1 46 22.08 & $-$83 23 18.06 & 22.99 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.03 $\pm$ 0.03 & 40.35 \\
1129: 1 46 26.61 & $-$83 24 02.48 & 23.05 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.44 $\pm$ 0.04 & 9.13 \\
1130: 1 46 17.28 & $-$83 24 05.53 & 23.05 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.19 $\pm$ 0.03 & 9.94 \\
1131: 1 46 24.86 & $-$83 23 53.34 & 23.06 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.27 $\pm$ 0.04 & 7.72 \\
1132: 1 46 20.92 & $-$83 23 58.87 & 23.13 $\pm$ 0.06 & 1.73 $\pm$ 0.20 & 1.27 \\
1133: 1 46 17.04 & $-$83 23 59.59 & 23.18 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.52 $\pm$ 0.04 & 7.92 \\
1134: 1 46 07.54 & $-$83 23 37.82 & 23.20 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.45 $\pm$ 0.04 & 31.83 \\
1135: 1 46 20.99 & $-$83 23 55.94 & 23.24 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1.91 $\pm$ 0.11 & 3.14 \\
1136: 1 46 22.86 & $-$83 23 53.04 & 23.25 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.72 $\pm$ 0.05 & 6.13 \\
1137:
1138: & & PGC 10922 &&\\
1139: 2 53 27.25 & $-$83 08 46.14 & 20.26 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.61 $\pm$ 0.01 & 20.10 \\
1140: 2 52 51.47 & $-$83 09 30.32 & 20.34 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.11 $\pm$ 0.01 & 97.72 \\
1141: 2 53 40.62 & $-$83 09 01.99 & 20.49 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.32 $\pm$ 0.01 & 30.66 \\
1142: 2 53 14.73 & $-$83 08 19.50 & 20.82 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.68 $\pm$ 0.01 & 39.62 \\
1143: 2 53 48.11 & $-$83 09 27.39 & 20.84 $\pm$ 0.01 & 2.04 $\pm$ 0.01 & 59.12 \\
1144: 2 54 11.37 & $-$83 08 11.53 & 20.94 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.09 $\pm$ 0.01 & 67.51 \\
1145: 2 52 31.78 & $-$83 08 46.46 & 21.63 $\pm$ 0.01 & 0.91 $\pm$ 0.01 & 115.08 \\
1146: 2 54 28.47 & $-$83 08 24.44 & 21.74 $\pm$ 0.01 & 0.74 $\pm$ 0.01 & 95.09 \\
1147: 2 53 31.85 & $-$83 07 07.20 & 21.78 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.58 $\pm$ 0.01 & 85.75 \\
1148: 2 53 42.42 & $-$83 10 15.81 & 21.80 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.48 $\pm$ 0.01 & 103.85 \\
1149: 2 54 35.12 & $-$83 09 04.06 & 21.87 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.22 $\pm$ 0.01 & 111.08 \\
1150: 2 53 46.48 & $-$83 07 37.37 & 21.99 $\pm$ 0.01 & 0.76 $\pm$ 0.01 & 58.67 \\
1151: 2 53 44.58 & $-$83 06 52.96 & 22.24 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.02 $\pm$ 0.01 & 101.03 \\
1152: 2 52 46.70 & $-$83 08 00.83 & 22.41 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.02 $\pm$ 0.01 & 93.21 \\
1153: 2 52 28.29 & $-$83 08 47.67 & 22.58 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.42 $\pm$ 0.01 & 121.42 \\
1154: 2 53 21.37 & $-$83 07 18.51 & 22.71 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.76 $\pm$ 0.02 & 78.43 \\
1155: 2 53 50.39 & $-$83 08 33.09 & 22.74 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.03 $\pm$ 0.01 & 26.52 \\
1156: 2 52 40.81 & $-$83 09 12.94 & 22.80 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.82 $\pm$ 0.02 & 105.97 \\
1157: 2 54 11.23 & $-$83 09 14.10 & 22.81 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.35 $\pm$ 0.02 & 76.05 \\
1158: 2 53 35.25 & $-$83 08 58.09 & 23.18 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.75 $\pm$ 0.02 & 25.41 \\
1159: 2 53 19.84 & $-$83 07 16.66 & 23.24 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.47 $\pm$ 0.02 & 81.10 \\
1160: 2 53 07.95 & $-$83 07 51.23 & 23.29 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.07 $\pm$ 0.02 & 64.59 \\
1161: 2 53 49.22 & $-$83 08 31.17 & 23.38 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.41 $\pm$ 0.02 & 24.47 \\
1162: 2 53 35.03 & $-$83 08 21.60 & 23.62 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.62 $\pm$ 0.03 & 11.13 \\
1163: 2 54 11.87 & $-$83 07 35.29 & 23.66 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.11 $\pm$ 0.02 & 86.75 \\
1164: 2 53 34.44 & $-$83 08 04.21 & 23.83 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.79 $\pm$ 0.04 & 28.55 \\
1165: 2 53 57.73 & $-$83 09 36.50 & 24.10 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.27 $\pm$ 0.03 & 75.11 \\
1166: 2 53 22.87 & $-$83 07 11.32 & 24.12 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.45 $\pm$ 0.04 & 84.51 \\
1167: 2 54 01.96 & $-$83 07 23.31 & 24.20 $\pm$ 0.02 & 2.12 $\pm$ 0.06 & 83.97 \\
1168: 2 53 52.48 & $-$83 08 44.55 & 24.24 $\pm$ 0.02 & 2.04 $\pm$ 0.06 & 32.50 \\
1169:
1170: && PGC 42871&&\\
1171: 12 44 03.53 & $-$34 10 29.57 & 20.25 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.77 $\pm$ 0.01 & 101.29 \\
1172: 12 43 58.46 & $-$34 12 16.48 & 20.40 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.96 $\pm$ 0.01 & 84.57 \\
1173: 12 44 10.70 & $-$34 11 47.39 & 20.72 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.93 $\pm$ 0.01 & 70.86 \\
1174: 12 44 06.82 & $-$34 10 31.77 & 20.94 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.50 $\pm$ 0.01 & 98.77 \\
1175: 12 44 02.58 & $-$34 13 11.03 & 21.27 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.96 $\pm$ 0.01 & 70.68 \\
1176: 12 44 05.39 & $-$34 12 02.16 & 21.50 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.55 $\pm$ 0.01 & 6.67 \\
1177: 12 44 05.29 & $-$34 12 35.41 & 21.65 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.61 $\pm$ 0.01 & 26.82 \\
1178: 12 44 04.93 & $-$34 12 23.02 & 22.23 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.56 $\pm$ 0.01 & 14.96 \\
1179: 12 44 06.46 & $-$34 13 16.33 & 22.27 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.34 $\pm$ 0.01 & 69.37 \\
1180: 12 44 05.38 & $-$34 11 53.42 & 22.33 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.59 $\pm$ 0.01 & 15.26 \\
1181: 12 44 12.35 & $-$34 12 30.94 & 22.52 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.82 $\pm$ 0.02 & 90.88 \\
1182: 12 44 05.78 & $-$34 12 09.38 & 22.63 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.62 $\pm$ 0.02 & 6.68 \\
1183: 12 44 05.39 & $-$34 12 53.29 & 22.66 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.74 $\pm$ 0.02 & 44.72 \\
1184: 12 44 04.56 & $-$34 12 04.23 & 22.67 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.52 $\pm$ 0.02 & 9.56 \\
1185: 12 44 05.32 & $-$34 12 10.99 & 22.80 $\pm$ 0.07 & 0.64 $\pm$ 0.05 & 2.55 \\
1186: 12 44 12.15 & $-$34 11 17.92 & 23.04 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.70 $\pm$ 0.02 & 99.50 \\
1187: 12 44 03.60 & $-$34 11 01.01 & 23.14 $\pm$ 0.01 & 2.11 $\pm$ 0.03 & 70.62 \\
1188: 12 44 05.27 & $-$34 12 12.38 & 23.16 $\pm$ 0.05 & 1.33 $\pm$ 0.10 & 3.80 \\
1189: 12 44 07.06 & $-$34 11 41.88 & 23.16 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.65 $\pm$ 0.02 & 34.96 \\
1190: 12 44 05.73 & $-$34 12 24.86 & 23.21 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.47 $\pm$ 0.02 & 17.31 \\
1191: 12 44 05.46 & $-$34 12 23.44 & 23.24 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.41 $\pm$ 0.02 & 15.07 \\
1192: 12 44 03.07 & $-$34 12 25.57 & 23.28 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.48 $\pm$ 0.07 & 31.97 \\
1193: 12 44 05.86 & $-$34 12 22.47 & 23.35 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.55 $\pm$ 0.02 & 15.80 \\
1194: 12 44 06.13 & $-$34 11 54.34 & 23.41 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.58 $\pm$ 0.02 & 17.96 \\
1195: 12 44 04.87 & $-$34 12 15.98 & 23.43 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.59 $\pm$ 0.03 & 8.76 \\
1196: 12 44 05.76 & $-$34 12 16.41 & 23.47 $\pm$ 0.02 & 0.71 $\pm$ 0.02 & 10.02 \\
1197: 12 44 06.17 & $-$34 10 32.79 & 23.47 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.37 $\pm$ 0.02 & 96.50 \\
1198: 12 44 05.65 & $-$34 11 52.03 & 23.67 $\pm$ 0.02 & 2.07 $\pm$ 0.05 & 17.30 \\
1199: 12 44 04.19 & $-$34 12 20.27 & 23.78 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.73 $\pm$ 0.03 & 17.59 \\
1200: 12 44 07.02 & $-$34 10 36.40 & 23.82 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.88 $\pm$ 0.04 & 94.80\\
1201: \enddata
1202: \end{deluxetable}
1203:
1204: \clearpage
1205: \begin{center}
1206: \begin{table}
1207: \footnotesize
1208: \caption{Fading results using a single luminosity-weighted age \label{tbl-4}}
1209: \smallskip
1210: \begin{tabular*}{15cm}{@{\extracolsep{\fill}}lcccccc@{}}
1211: \hline\hline
1212: \multicolumn{1}{c}{~} \\ [-2.ex]
1213: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Galaxy} &{$g_0$} & {$(g-I)_0$} & {SSP Age} & {$V_{\rm est}$} & Fading in $V$
1214: & {$M_{V,\,{\rm faded}}$} \\
1215: & (mag) & (mag) & (Gyr) & (mag) & (mag) & (mag) \\
1216: \multicolumn{1}{c}{(1)} & (2) & (3) & (4) & (5) & (6) & (7)\\ [0.8ex]
1217: \hline
1218: \multicolumn{1}{c}{~} \\ [-2.ex]
1219: &&&Anders \& FvA&&&\\
1220: PGC6510&14.17&1.49&1.4&13.68&2.27&-17.86\\
1221: %PGC 6510 & 14.23 & 1.49 & $1.4 \pm 0.2$ & $13.68 \pm 0.02$ & $2.27 \pm 0.12$
1222: % & $-17.86 \pm 0.12$ \\
1223: %PGC 10922& 13.16 & 1.60 & 2.2 & 12.54 & 1.85 & $-19.51$\\
1224: PGC 42871& 13.04 & 1.30 & 1.0 & 12.61 & 2.54 & $-19.24$\\
1225: PGC 6240 & 13.64 & 1.30 & 1.0 & 13.21 & 2.54 & $-19.45$ \\
1226: &&&&&&\\
1227: &&&Maraston&&&\\
1228: PGC 6510 & 14.17 & 1.49 & 3.0 & 13.74 & 1.65
1229: & -18.46\\
1230: %PGC 10922& 13.16 & 1.60 & 2.2 & 12.54 & 1.85 & $-19.51$\\
1231: PGC 42871& 13.04 & 1.30 & 0.9 & 12.73 & 2.62 & $-19.14$ \\
1232: PGC 6240 & 13.64 & 1.30 & 0.9 & 13.33 & 2.62 & $-19.17$
1233:
1234: \end{tabular*}
1235: \tablecomments{
1236: Column~(1): Object ID. Column~(2):
1237: Total $g$ magnitude corrected for Galactic foreground
1238: extinction. Column~(3): Total \gI\ color corrected for Galactic foreground
1239: extinction. Column~(4): Luminosity-weighted age
1240: at solar metallicity. Column~(5): $V$ magnitude of the galaxy
1241: at the age in the previous column. Column~(6): Fading in $V$ to an age of 14
1242: Gyr. Column~(7): Faded absolute $V$ magnitude.
1243: }
1244: \end{table}
1245: \end{center}
1246:
1247:
1248: \begin{center}
1249: \begin{table}
1250: \footnotesize
1251: \caption{Fading results using a combination of young and old components \label{tbl-5}}
1252: \smallskip
1253: \begin{tabular*}{16cm}{@{\extracolsep{\fill}}lccccc@{}}
1254: \hline\hline
1255: \multicolumn{1}{c}{~} \\ [-2.ex]
1256: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Galaxy} & Young age&\multicolumn{2}{c}{$L_{\rm frac, young}$}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{Fading (mag)}\\
1257: &(Gyr)& $B$ & $V$ & $B$ & $V$ \\
1258: \multicolumn{1}{c}{(1)} & (2) & (3) & (4) & (5) & (6) \\ [0.8ex]
1259: \hline
1260: \multicolumn{1}{c}{~} \\ [-2.ex]
1261: &&Anders \& FvA&&\\
1262: PGC 6510 & 1.0 & 0.61 & 0.53 & 0.93 & 0.72\\
1263: %PGC 10922 & 1.5 & 0.85 & 0.69 & 1.60 & 1.01\\
1264: PGC 42871 & 0.3 & 0.58 & 0.41 & 0.92 & 0.55\\
1265: PGC 6240 & 0.3 & 0.58 & 0.41 & 0.92 & 0.55\\
1266: &&&&\\
1267: &&Maraston&&\\
1268: PGC 6510 & 1.0 & 0.46 & 0.40 & 0.61 & 0.50 \\
1269: %PGC 10922 & 1.5 & 0.85 & 0.69 & 1.60 & 1.01\\
1270: PGC 42871 & 0.3 & 0.47 & 0.34 & 0.69 & 0.43 \\
1271: PGC 6240 & 0.3 & 0.47 & 0.34 & 0.69 & 0.43
1272:
1273: \end{tabular*}
1274: \tablecomments{
1275: Column~(1): Object ID. Column~(2):
1276: Age of young component as derived from Balmer line strengths in central spectrum (cf.\
1277: Appendix A). Column~(3): Current luminosity fraction of young component in the $B$
1278: filter. Column~(4): Same as column (3), but in the $V$ filter. Column~(5): Fading of
1279: composite population (due to young component) in $B$ to an age of 14 Gyr.
1280: Column~(6): Same as column (5), but in $V$.
1281: }
1282: \end{table}
1283: \end{center}
1284:
1285: \begin{figure}
1286: \plotone{Fig1.eps}
1287: \caption{Contour plots of the sample galaxies. Contours represent $I$-band
1288: surface-brightness values from 13.5 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ to 21.5 mag arcsec
1289: $^{-2}$ for PGC 6240 ({\it bottom right}) and 13.5 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ to
1290: 20.5 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ for the remaining galaxies ({\it top left:} PGC 6510,
1291: {\it top right:} PGC 10922, and {\it bottom left:} PGC 42871).
1292: In spite of several common properties
1293: like morphological type, poststarburst spectrum, and presence of shells,
1294: the isophotes show a substantial variety among the four galaxies. \label{contour}}
1295: \end{figure}
1296:
1297:
1298: \begin{figure}
1299: \plotone{Fig2.eps}
1300: \caption{{\it Top panel}: Time evolution of the \gI\ color index using GALEV SSP models
1301: \citep{galev}. Model curves are plotted for a \citet{sal} IMF and
1302: metallicities as indicated in the figure. \gI\ = 1.35 is consistent with
1303: both the universal metal-poor population (Z $\sim$ 0.02 Z$_\odot$) as well
1304: as a 1 Gyr population with solar metallicity. {\it Bottom panel}: Time evolution of
1305: the \gI\ color index for the blue horizontal branch using Maraston models \citep{maraston}. The ages
1306: obtained for \gI\ = 1.35 is consistent with that
1307: obtained using the GALEV models. \label{ssp}}
1308: \end{figure}
1309:
1310:
1311: \begin{figure}
1312: \plotone{Fig3.eps}
1313: \caption{A set of typical completeness curves determined for the combined
1314: {\it g+I\/} image for five different values of the background. The curves
1315: shown are for PGC 6510 and represent from left to right: 1000, 530, 276,
1316: 150, 80 counts per pixel for an effective {
1317: \it g+I} exposure time of 705 s.\label{ccurves}}
1318: \end{figure}
1319:
1320:
1321: \begin{figure}
1322: \plotone{Fig4.eps}
1323: \caption{The surface number density of the GC candidates is compared to the
1324: surface brightness profile of the underlying galaxy. The crosses denote the
1325: surface brightness of the underlying galaxy light with an arbitrary
1326: zeropoint. The
1327: squares represent the logarithmic number density of GC candidates per
1328: square arcsec. The solid lines represent power-law fits to the GC surface
1329: number density in the outer regions. \label{magdensity}}
1330: \end{figure}
1331:
1332: \begin{figure}
1333: \plotone{Fig5.eps}
1334: %\plotone{cmd.ps}
1335: \caption{$g$ versus \gI\ color--magnitude diagrams of the GC
1336: candidates in each galaxy within the limiting radius given in
1337: Sect. 3.1. The red, green, blue, and black circles represent
1338: GC candidates within equal areas of increasing galactocentric radius with the
1339: red ones found at the smallest radii. The rectangle enclosed by dashed lines
1340: represents the
1341: magnitude and color range expected for old metal-poor GCs, and the arrow is
1342: the
1343: vector for dimming by age from 1 Gyr to 1.6 Gyr as determined from the GALEV models.\label{cmd}}
1344: \end{figure}
1345:
1346:
1347: \begin{figure}
1348: \plotone{Fig6.eps}
1349: \caption{GC color distributions for each of the sample galaxies. The open
1350: histogram in each panel represents the observed color distribution
1351: corrected for foreground reddening, while the
1352: hatched histogram represents the background-subtracted distribution. The
1353: distribution of the background sources is shown in the lower panel for each
1354: case. The solid black line is the probability-density estimate of the
1355: uncorrected distribution. The solid red line is a non-parametric
1356: probability-density estimate using an adaptive Epanechnikov kernel of the
1357: background-corrected GC color distribution. The dashed red lines mark the
1358: bootstrapped 90$\%$ confidence limits. \label{color}}
1359: \end{figure}
1360:
1361:
1362: \begin{figure}
1363: \plotone{Fig7.eps}
1364: \caption{Luminosity functions of the GCs in the $I$-band corrected for
1365: background contamination and completeness. The $I$-band magnitudes have
1366: been corrected for foreground reddening. Note the presence of several
1367: luminous clusters brighter than $M_I = -11.0$ in PGC 6510, PGC 42871, and
1368: PGC 6240. \label{lf}}
1369: \end{figure}
1370:
1371: \begin{figure}
1372: \plotone{Fig8.eps}
1373: \caption{$I$-band luminosity functions (LFs) of the GCs in the sample
1374: galaxies. The histogram in the left panel of each figure shows the LF of the
1375: galaxy corrected for background contamination and completeness. The dashed curves
1376: represent the estimated gaussians representing the old
1377: metal-poor GCs with $S_N$ values of 3.0, 1.0, 0.5, and 0.25 (from the top curve
1378: to the bottom curve using the GALEV model),
1379: for PGC 6510, PGC 42871, and PGC 6240. In the case of
1380: PGC 10922, the dashed curves represent the estimated gaussians
1381: representing the old metal-poor GCs with $S_N$ values of 3.0, 2.0, 1.0,
1382: 0.5, and 0.25, respectively. The histograms in the right panel for each
1383: galaxy show the
1384: residual LF obtained after subtracting the contribution of each gaussian
1385: from the total LF. The solid lines in the right panels are power-law fits to
1386: these residual cluster LFs. The best-fit exponents $\alpha$ are
1387: indicated in each panel. \label{composite}}
1388: \end{figure}
1389:
1390: \begin{figure}
1391: \plotone{Fig9.eps}
1392: \caption{{\it Top panel}: The number ratio of metal-poor blue GCs to
1393: metal-rich red GCs of the sample galaxies (using GALEV) for
1394: $S_N$ (= 3.0, 1.0, 0.5, and 0.25 from the top to the bottom) of the old metal-poor GCs is plotted versus galaxy $M_B$ and compared
1395: with values for normal early-type galaxies (black filled circles) from \citet{peng06}. The $M_B$
1396: values of the sample galaxies have been faded from their current
1397: luminosity-weighted ages to an age of 14 Gyr. PGC 10922 is not
1398: plotted
1399: because we do not detect any significant intermediate-age GC
1400: population in it, whereas we do so in the other galaxies. {\it Bottom panel}:
1401: The number ratio of metal-poor blue GCs to metal-rich red GCs (using GALEV) computed by
1402: considering the integrated light of the galaxies to be due to a
1403: superposition of old and young components. See Sect.~\ref{s:progenitors} for
1404: more detailed information.
1405: \label{comparison}}
1406: \end{figure}
1407:
1408:
1409: \begin{figure}
1410: \plotone{Fig10.eps}
1411: \caption{{\it Left panel:} $I$-band LF of the GCs in PGC 6510. The histogram in the left panel
1412: shows the LF of the galaxy corrected for background contamination and
1413: completeness (similar to that shown in Fig.~\ref{composite}. The dashed curves represent
1414: the estimated gaussians representing the old metal-poor GCs with $S_N$ values
1415: of 3.0, 1.0, 0.5, and 0.25 (from the top to the bottom curve). In this case, the
1416: diffuse light of the galaxy is modeled as a combination of an old and a young
1417: population.(See Sect. 6.1 for details). {\it Right panel:} The histograms show the residual
1418: LF obtained after subtracting the contributions to each gaussian from the total LF. The
1419: solid lines are power-law fits to these residual cluster LFs. The best-fit exponents $\alpha$
1420: are indicated in each panel. \label{p6510_compositegauss}}
1421: \end{figure}
1422:
1423:
1424: \begin{figure}
1425: \plotone{Fig11.eps}
1426: \caption{ The radial distribution of the \gI\ color of the diffuse galaxy
1427: light. The central regions of PGC 6510 and PGC 10922 are redder than their
1428: outer regions, whereas PGC 42871 and PGC 6240 have blue central
1429: regions. In case of PGC 6510, the open squares represent the observed colors
1430: and the open triangles represent the colors obtained after correction for dust. \label{radcol}}
1431: \end{figure}
1432:
1433: \begin{figure}
1434: \plotone{Fig12.eps}
1435: \caption{\gI\ color-index maps of the central regions of the sample
1436: galaxies. Darker regions represent bluer colors and lighter regions
1437: represent redder colors. The images are 5 kpc on each
1438: side. Clockwise from top left: PGC 6510, PGC 10922, PGC 6240 and PGC
1439: 42871. \label{colmap}}
1440: \end{figure}
1441:
1442: \begin{figure}
1443: \plotone{Fig13.eps}
1444: \caption{{\it Left panel}: The surface number density of the brightest
1445: 33$\%$ (open red squares) and the faintest 33$\%$ of the clusters
1446: with completeness $\ge 80$\% in the innermost radial bin (filled blue
1447: triangles) in PGC 6510 are plotted as a function of galactocentric
1448: radius. The surface brightness profile
1449: of PGC 6510 is also plotted on an arbitrary scale. Note that the
1450: profile of the bright clusters follows the galaxy surface-brightness
1451: profile closely. {\it Right panel}: The difference in the
1452: number of clusters per magnitude bin between the inner and the outer
1453: halves of the system of cluster candidates of PGC 6510 plotted for
1454: clusters
1455: with $I \le 25.5$ and galactocentric radius $\ge 10$ \arcsec, which
1456: ensures a completeness of $\ge 80$\% throughout.
1457: The total background- and completeness-corrected number of clusters
1458: in the outer half has been normalized to match that in the inner
1459: half. Note that the inner half of the cluster system hosts
1460: systematically more bright clusters than the outer half.
1461: \label{brt_faint}}
1462: \end{figure}
1463:
1464: \end{document}
1465:
1466: