1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\usepackage{tipa}
3: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
4: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
5: %%\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
6: %%\newcommand{\myemail}{lufj@mail.ihep.ac.cn}
7:
8: %\usepackage{multirow}
9: %\usepackage{graphicx}
10: %\usepackage{psfig}
11: \slugcomment{draft version}
12: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
13:
14:
15: \begin{document}
16:
17: \title{A Cr-K emission line survey in young supernova remnants with {\sl Chandra}}
18: \author{X.J. Yang\altaffilmark{1,2}, H.Tsunemi\altaffilmark{3}, F.J. Lu\altaffilmark{1},
19: L. Chen\altaffilmark{2}}
20:
21: \altaffiltext{1}{Particle Astrophysics Center, Institute of High Energy Physics,
22: Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, P.R. China, yangxj@mail.ihep.ac.cn,
23: lufj@mail.ihep.ac.cn}
24: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing
25: 100875, P.R. China}
26: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Earth and Space Science, Graduate School of Science, Osaka
27: University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan; tsunemi@ess.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp}
28:
29:
30:
31: \begin{abstract}
32:
33: We performed a Cr-K emission line survey in young supernova remnants (SNRs)
34: with the {\sl Chandra} archival data. Our sample includes
35: W49B, Cas A, Tycho and Kepler. We confirmed the existence of the Cr line
36: in W49B and discovered this emission line in the other three SNRs.
37: The line center energies, equivalent widths (EWs) and fluxes of the Cr lines
38: are given. The Cr in Cas A is in a high ionization state while that in
39: Tycho and Kepler is in a much lower one. We find a good positive correlation
40: between Cr and Fe line center energies, suggesting a common origin
41: of Cr and Fe in the nucleosynthesis, which is consistent with the
42: theoretical predictions. We propose that the EW ratio between Cr and
43: Fe can be used as a supplementary constraint on the progenitors'
44: properties and the explosion mechanism.
45:
46: \end{abstract}
47:
48: \keywords{ISM: supernova remnants -- ISM: individual: W49B, Cas A, Tycho, Kepler }
49:
50:
51: \section{Introduction}
52: The X-ray emission of young supernova remnants (SNRs) is predominantly from
53: the ejecta heated by the reverse shock. Since the ejecta are metal abundant,
54: their X-ray spectra usually show strong emission lines of heavy elements such as
55: O, Ne, Mg, Si, S, Ar, Ca and Fe. Many works have focused on
56: these emission lines from young SNRs, e.g. W49B (Hwang et al. 2000a; Miceli et al.
57: 2006), Tycho (Tsunemi et al. 1986; Hwang et al. 1997), Cas A
58: (Tsunemi et al. 1986; Holt et al. 1994; Hughes et al. 2000; Hwang
59: et al. 2000b) and Kepler (Hatsukade et al. 1990; Kinugasa \&
60: Tsunemi, 1999; Cassam-Chena\"i et al. 2004; Reynolds et al. 2007).
61: Comparision of the abundance pattern of an SNR with the theoretical
62: predictions could be used to constrain the properties of the corresponding
63: supernova (SN) (e.g., Hughes et al. 1995; Rakowski et al. 2006).
64:
65: For a long time the K lines from heavy elements such as Ti, Cr and
66: Mn, which are expected to appear in 4$-$6 keV had not been detected
67: in SNRs. The first and the only case, as far as we know, is the detection of
68: the He-like lines of Cr and Mn in SNR W49B by the Advanced Satellite for Cosmology and
69: Astrophysics ({\sl ASCA}) (Hwang et al. 2000a) and {\sl XMM-Newton} (Miceli et al. 2006).
70: Hwang et al. (2000a) proposed that Cr, Mn and Ni would be the most promising
71: heavy atomic species for future detection, since they are the most
72: abundant elements next to Fe with K-shell emission lines at energies
73: above $\sim$4 keV.
74:
75: From nucleosynthesis theories (Woosley \& Weaver 1994; Woosley
76: \& Weaver 1995; Thielemann et al. 1996) we know that Cr is mainly
77: formed from the decay of Fe during SN explosions. SNRs from type Ia
78: explosions are the top candidates for the detection of Cr emission, as the
79: progenitors are completely destroyed during the SN explosions and
80: all material is ejected into interstellar space. The Cr line emission could
81: also be detected in a core-collapse SNR, if there is a large
82: fraction of Cr formed outside the mass cut. In this paper, we report
83: a Cr line survey in the young and bright SNRs W49B, Cas A, Tycho and
84: Kepler using the abundant archival data collected by the {\sl Chandra}
85: X-ray observatory. We describe the observations and data analyses in
86: $\S$ 2. The results are shown in $\S$ 3, discussion in $\S$ 4
87: and summary in $\S$ 5. All through this paper, the statistical
88: uncertainties are given at 90\% confidence level.
89:
90:
91: \section{Observations and Data analyses}
92:
93: SNRs are important observational targets for {\sl Chandra}. For
94: example, as one of the largest projects, {\sl Chandra} has observed the Cas A
95: SNR for a few times with a total exposure time
96: of 1 Ms (Hwang et al. 2004). The Kepler SNR was also observed for 750 ks (Reynolds et al. 2007).
97: In this paper, we collected almost all the available {\sl Chandra} ACIS-S
98: data of the four SNRs. The detailed observation information is listed
99: in Table 1. The data were processed using the CIAO software package
100: (version 3.4). We created new level 2 event files for all the
101: observations we used, applying gain map, time-dependent gain and
102: charge transfer inefficiency corrections with the latest released
103: calibration files (CALDB version 3.4.3 and ATOMDB version
104: 1.3.1). The only exception is that the charge transfer inefficiency can
105: not be corrected for all the Cas A data since
106: they are acquired in GRADED mode. Fig. 1 shows the X-ray
107: images of the four SNRs. Since the Cr line is very weak,
108: we extracted the spectrum of each SNR from almost the entire source region, as
109: illustrated in Fig. 1. The background spectra were extracted from
110: the off-source regions.
111:
112:
113: Cas A and Kepler have been observed for a few times spanning 4 to 5 months.
114: We therefore carefully performed the analysis to eliminate the
115: effect of any CCD performance evolution with time.
116: Taking Cas A as an example, we first created source and background
117: spectra as well as the corresponding RMF and ARF files for each
118: of the 9 observations (including IDs 4634, 4635, 4636, 4637, 4638, 4639, 5196,
119: 5319, 5320), and then combined them with FTOOLs
120: {\footnote{http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/software/ftools/}}.
121: This process has taken into account the degradation of the CCD
122: performance during the observation span. We noticed that
123: there is no clear difference between the 9 RMF files, therefore the
124: ARF files can be added with FTOOLs {\sl addarf}. The total photon
125: number of each source spectrum was taken as the corresponding adding
126: weight. We performed a joint fit to the spectra of all the observations
127: by using their respective RMF and ARF files, and found
128: that the fitting results are consistent with those obtained by
129: using the combined data and the added RMF and ARF. This demonstrates
130: that the combining process works well and
131: suggests that the gain is properly calibrated from observation to
132: observation. The spectral fitting was done with XSPEC version 11.3.2
133: (Arnaud 1996).
134:
135:
136: The 0.5$-$8.0 keV spectra of the four SNRs are plotted in Fig. 2.
137: Apparently the spectrum of Cas A has the best statistics, therefore
138: we take it as an example to describe our spectral analysis process. We first
139: fitted the continuum-dominant 4.2$-$6.0 keV spectrum with bremsstrahlung
140: and power law models respectively. In both cases, three line-like features
141: appear in the residual distribution. In this case, we added three Gaussian
142: components to account for these lines.
143: The fitting models and residuals are plotted
144: in Fig. 3. The best fit centroid energies of the three lines are
145: 4.607, 4.878 and 5.635 keV respectively. The power law model can
146: represent the continuum emission better than the bremsstrahlung one,
147: with $\chi^2$ 452.9 vs. 560.3 for 111 degrees of freedom (d.o.f.),
148: although neither of the two fits is statistically acceptable.
149: However, adapting different continuum models does not change
150: the best fit results of the line strength significantly, e.g. the equivalent
151: width (EW) of the 5.635 keV line is 9.6$\pm{0.87}$ eV with the power law model
152: and 10.7$\pm{0.95}$ eV with the bremsstrahlung. For the other three
153: SNRs, the power law model also fits the continuum emission better
154: than the bremsstrahlung model does. The latter model seems
155: to overestimate the spectra at low energies, while underestimating
156: at high energies. In this case, the power law model was used in
157: the following fitting process to account for the continuum emission.
158: We also note here that the 4.2$-$6.0 keV spectrum of Cas A is more
159: complicated than the model we used. This will be further discussed in $\S$ 3.2.
160:
161: According to the Astrophysical Plasma Emission Code
162: (APEC{\footnote{http://cxc.harvard.edu/atomdb}}), the two lines
163: below 5.0 keV could be the He-like Ca-K emission, while the Ti-K emission
164: could not be ruled out as it also emits around those energies.
165: Unfortunately, Ti has not been considered in the currently available plasma codes,
166: thus we cannot get the emissivities of the Ti lines to judge whether they
167: represent these observed line features or not. Since the
168: main topic of the current paper is Cr emission and the
169: line candidates below 5.0 keV are beyond its scope, we only adopt
170: data above 5.0 keV for the analyses of the continuum and line
171: emission. As an element of the Fe-group, Cr is closely related to Fe in its
172: synthesis process (Woosley \& Weaver 1994; Woosley \& Weaver 1995;
173: Thielemann et al. 1996). A comparative study of the Fe and Cr
174: emission should be important. Therefore we take the 5.0$-$7.5 keV
175: spectra to study both the Cr and the Fe K lines in the following.
176:
177: We note here that the systematic errors of the EWs and fluxes induced by
178: using different continuum models and different energy ranges are included in
179: the parameters' confidence ranges in Tables 2 \& 3.
180: By fitting the 5.0$-$7.5 keV spectra of the four SNRs with bremsstrahlung
181: to represent the continuum model, we can get the best fit EWs and fluxes
182: of the Cr and Fe emission lines along with their 90\% statistical errors.
183: Likewise, by fitting these spectra with the continuum energy extended down to
184: 4.2 keV, we can also get another set of best fit EWs, fluxes and their confidence ranges.
185: The final confidence ranges listed in Tables 2 \& 3 cover those
186: from the above two fittings and from fitting with a power law continuum model
187: to the data in 5.0$-$7.5 keV.
188:
189:
190: \section{Results}
191:
192: \subsection {W49B}
193:
194: In the analysis of the {\sl ASCA} spectrum, Hwang et al. (2000a)
195: found evidence of the He-like Cr and Mn lines near 5.69 and 6.18
196: keV, and the existence of these lines was confirmed by {\sl XMM-Newton}
197: (Miceli et al. 2006). From the
198: spectra (Fig. 2 (top left) and Fig. 4 (top left)), we can see that
199: the Cr and Mn lines are also detected with {\sl Chandra}. We fitted
200: the 5.0$-$7.5 keV spectrum with a power law model plus three
201: Gaussian components to account for the continuum, Cr, Mn and Fe
202: lines respectively. Eliminating the Gaussian component for Cr (or Mn)
203: leads to an increasing of $\chi^2$, from 93.4 for d.o.f
204: 68 to 185.8 (or 103.7) for d.o.f
205: 71. The Cr line emission is firmly detected in the {\sl Chandra}
206: spectrum, while the Mn line is less significant.
207:
208:
209: Fig. 4 (top left) shows the fitting model and residuals, and Table 2
210: gives the best fit results for the Cr and Fe lines, including line
211: center energies and fluxes along with their uncertainties. The EWs
212: of the two lines, calculated from the XSPEC command {\sl eqwidth},
213: are given in the same table. From our fitting analyses, the Cr line
214: center energy is $E_{Cr}$ = 5.656$^{+0.014}_{-0.016}$ keV, and the
215: flux is $f_{Cr}$ = (0.32$^{+0.08}_{-0.07}$) $\times 10^{-4}$ photons
216: cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, while for the Mn line, $E_{Mn}$ =
217: 6.126$^{+0.035}_{-0.030}$ keV and $f_{Mn}$ = (0.10$\pm{0.05}$)
218: $\times 10^{-4}$ photons cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$. The fitted line
219: parameters are generally in good agreement with those from {\sl
220: ASCA} and {\sl XMM-Newton} (c.f Table 3).
221:
222:
223: \subsection {Cas A}
224:
225: The 5.0$-$7.5 keV spectrum of Cas A is shown in Fig. 4 (top right).
226: It was fitted with a power law (for continuum) plus three Gaussian
227: components (for the lines). Two Gaussian components were used to
228: represent the Fe-K complex since it cannot be well fitted by
229: a single Gaussian profile. The centroid energies for these two Gaussian
230: components are 6.600$\pm{0.001}$ keV and 6.659$\pm{0.001}$ keV, with their
231: widths 100$\pm{2}$ eV and 72$\pm{7}$ eV respectively. The centroid energy
232: of the Fe-K complex listed in Table 2 is the emission measure weighted
233: mean value, while the flux and EW are the sums of the two components.
234: The third Gaussian component is for the 5.635 keV line mentioned in $\S$ 2.
235: Adding the third Gaussian leads to a much better
236: fit (c.f. Fig. 3), with the reduced $\chi^{2}$ decreasing from
237: 993.8/65 to 222.9/62 for data in 5.0$-$6.0 keV. This represents a
238: significant detection of the Cr-K line emission, and its best fit parameters
239: are listed in Table 2 as well.
240:
241: The requirement of two Gaussian components for the Fe-K complex is
242: probably due to the Doppler shift variation across the whole remnant. Spatially
243: resolved X-ray spectroscopy of Cas A by both {\sl XMM-Newton}
244: (Willingale et al. 2002) and {\sl Chandra} (Yang et al. 2008) shows
245: that different parts of this remnant are moving with different
246: line of sight velocities, with typical value of $\pm$1000 km
247: s$^{-1}$. Considering this, we selected two regions based on the
248: Doppler shift map from the {\sl XMM-Newton} observation (Willingale
249: et al. 2002), as illustrated in Fig.1. The spectra of the two
250: regions are given in Fig. 5. They were fitted with a power
251: law plus two Gaussian components, representing the continuum, Cr and Fe-K line emission.
252: The Cr line is very significant in both spectra. Adding a Gaussian
253: component for Cr leads to the reduced $\chi^{2}$ decreasing from 440.0/62 to 197.4/59
254: and from 670.9/62 to 184.2/59 for the blueshifted
255: and redshifted regions respectively in 5.0$-$6.0 keV .
256: The fitted line center energies of the Fe-K lines are
257: 6.591$\pm{0.001}$ keV and 6.669$\pm{0.001}$ keV, which
258: are generally consistent with the line center energies of the
259: two components fitted to the Fe-K line of the whole remnant spectrum.
260: This demonstrates that the
261: Doppler shift dominates the structure of the Fe-K complex of Cas A.
262: The centroid energies of the Cr line in the two regions are
263: 5.590$^{+0.008}_{-0.007}$ and 5.657$^{+0.010}_{-0.008}$ keV, with
264: a separation similar to that of the two Fe-K lines. The Cr and Fe
265: ejecta are thus probably moving with similar velocity.
266: We noticed that the Fe-K line from a small region of Cas A also
267: cannot be well represented by one Gaussian component (c.f Fig. 5,
268: residual distribution), suggesting small velocity
269: difference even within such a scale (c.f Fig. 7 in Willingale et al.
270: 2002).
271:
272: On the other hand, the existence of more than one strong Fe-K line
273: that cannot be resolved with {\sl Chandra} ACIS could also
274: contribute to the broadening of the Fe-K line in Cas A.
275: Various Fe-K lines around this energy have been clearly displayed in
276: the spectra of the cataclysmic variables V1223 Sagittarii (Mukai et
277: al. 2001) and U Geminorum (Szkody et al. 2002) using data collected
278: by the High Energy Transmission Grating onboard {\sl Chandra}. The
279: centroid energy difference of the two Gaussian components in Cas A is
280: about 60 eV, which is comparable with the difference of the He-like
281: triplet of Fe-K lines ($\sim$65 eV {\footnote{c.f Mewe et al. 1985;
282: http:
283: //www.camdb.ac.cn/e/spectra/spectra\_{}search.asp}}). Higher energy resolution
284: spectra from future missions will help us to resolve the Fe-K
285: complex.
286:
287:
288:
289:
290: \subsection {Tycho \& Kepler}
291:
292: The 5.0$-$7.5 keV spectra of Tycho and Kepler are shown in Fig.
293: 4. We first fitted the spectrum of Tycho with a power law (for
294: continuum emission) plus one Gaussian component (for the Fe-K line). A
295: line-like structure came out around 5.45 keV in the residual
296: distribution. As the neutral Cr K line is near 5.4 keV while the
297: H-like Cr K line is around 5.9 keV (c.f Table 4), this structure
298: might be the Cr line in relatively low ionization state. In this
299: case, we added a Gaussian component there, and the reduced $\chi^{2}$
300: decreased from 36.6/21 to 11.4/18 in 5.0$-$6.0 keV.
301: For the Kepler spectrum in the same energy range, adding a Gaussian
302: component around 5.46 keV also leads to a reduction of the reduced
303: $\chi^{2}$ from 47.6/24 to 27.8/21. Finally, the 5.0$-$7.5 keV spectra of
304: Tycho and Kepler were fitted with a power law (for continuum)
305: plus two Gaussian components (one for the Cr line and the other for the
306: Fe line). The fitting models and residual distribution are also
307: given in Fig. 4.
308:
309: The best fit parameters for the Cr and Fe lines are listed in Table
310: 2, along with their confidence ranges. Although there are big
311: uncertainties in the EWs and fluxes of Cr lines in both Tycho and
312: Kepler, the detection of these lines is significant, judging from
313: the changes of $\chi^{2}$ mentioned above and the lower limits of
314: the confidence ranges. From Table 2, we can see that the centroid
315: energies of the putative Cr lines in Tycho and Kepler are about 200
316: eV lower than those of W49B and Cas A. This will be further
317: discussed in $\S$ 4.1.
318:
319: \section{Discussion}
320:
321: \subsection{The ionization state and spatial correlations between Cr and Fe}
322:
323: The different line center energies of the Cr emission lines in these
324: SNRs reflects that the ionization states of Cr in these SNRs are dissimilar.
325: The Cr in W49B is in relatively high ionization state since its line
326: center energy is 5.656$^{+0.014}_{-0.016}$ keV (c.f Table 2). For
327: Cas A, the centroid energy of the Cr line is
328: 5.635$^{+0.007}_{-0.005}$ keV, which also suggests a high
329: ionization state of Cr. The center energies of the putative Cr lines
330: in Tycho and Kepler are about 200 eV lower than those in W49B and
331: Cas A. If these lines do come from Cr, it should be in a relatively
332: low ionization state (c.f Table 4). We noticed that the Fe-K line
333: center energies in Tycho and Kepler are both around 6.44 keV. This
334: implies low ionization states of Fe as well, as suggested by previous
335: observations (Tsunemi et al. 1986;
336: Hwang et al. 1998; Hwang et al. 2002; Kinugasa \& Tsunemi 1999).
337:
338:
339: In Fig. 6, we plot the Cr line center energy versus that of the Fe line
340: in these four SNRs. The theoretical centroid energies of Cr and Fe K
341: lines in different ionization states given in Table 4 are
342: overplotted in the same figure. Obviously, there is a positive
343: correlation between the two line center energies both theoretically
344: and observationally. We can conclude from Fig. 6 that the emission
345: lines around 5.46 keV in Tycho and Kepler are from Cr. Meanwhile,
346: the Cr in Cas A and W49B might be He/Li-like, while Ne-like or an even
347: lower ionization state in Tycho and Kepler.
348: Since the line center energy is closely related to the ionization
349: ages of the emitting plasma, such a positive correlation implies
350: that the ionization ages of Cr and Fe are closely related to each
351: other.
352:
353: The above ionization state correlation suggests that the Cr and
354: Fe ejecta are co-located, which is also supported by the spectra
355: of the blueshift and redshift regions in Cas A. As shown in $\S$ 3.2,
356: the Cr and Fe ejecta are probably moving with the same velocity as implied by
357: the centroid energies of the Cr and Fe lines from these two regions.
358: Meanwhile, the EW ratio of the Cr line to the Fe line in the blueshift
359: region spectrum is 0.82\%, while it is 0.91\% in the redshift one. They are both
360: consistent with the overall value (0.85$^{+0.18}_{-0.07}$\%, c.f. Table 2) within the
361: confidence range. This is further evidence that Cr and Fe are co-located.
362:
363: According to the nucleosynthesis theory (Woosley \& Weaver
364: 1994; Woosley et al. 1995), $^{50}$Cr is generated by explosive
365: oxygen and silicon burning, while $^{52,53}$Cr are the products of
366: $^{52,53}$Fe decay in explosive silicon burning. The most abundant
367: Fe is $^{56}$Fe decayed from $^{56}$Ni, which is also
368: produced mainly from explosive silicon burning. Among all the
369: isotopes of Cr, $^{52}$Cr is the most abundant, and its production is
370: generally at least one order of magnitude greater than the others
371: (Nomoto et al. 1984; Woosley et al. 1995). In this case, most of the Cr
372: would be located near and thus share a similar ionization time
373: with Fe in SNRs.
374: Cayrel et al. (2004) observed a number of so-called ``first stars'',
375: i.e. very metal-poor dwarfs and giants. They found that the scatter of the
376: Cr/Fe values of these stars is very small, indicating that the
377: production of Fe and Cr are very closely linked. Our results are consistent
378: with the theoretical predictions and further strengthen the previous
379: observational statement in a different way.
380:
381:
382:
383: \subsection{Using the Cr to Fe EW ratio to constrain the SN explosion process}
384:
385: Many theoretical calculations of nucleosynthesis have included Cr
386: for both Ia (Woosley \& Weaver 1994; Iwamoto et al. 1999) and
387: core-collapse SNe (Woosley \& Weaver 1995; Thielemann et al. 1996;
388: Maeda \& Nomoto 2003). In order to compare with these models, we
389: need the mass (or abundance) ratio between Cr and the other
390: elements. Hwang et al. (2000a) interpolated the He$\alpha$
391: emissivity of Cr from those of Si, S, Ar, Ca and Fe, using the
392: Raymond-Smith (RS) code for the 2 keV plasma in collisional ionization
393: equilibrium (CIE), and then calculated the Cr abundance of
394: W49B. They found that the Cr and Fe abundances are consistent with a
395: solar ratio, corresponding to an atomic number ratio $1.0\%$ of Cr
396: to Fe (Anders \& Grevesse 1989) and thus a mass ratio $M_{Cr/Fe}$
397: $\sim0.9\%$. Cr and Fe in Tycho and Kepler are in relatively low
398: ionization state, and as emissivities in these states are not well calculated for
399: elements such as Si, S, Ar, Ca, and Fe, it is difficult to
400: interpolate the Cr emissivity as done by Hwang et al. (2000a).
401: However, according to the discussion in $\S$4.1, Cr and Fe are
402: spatially correlated and thus have similar temperatures and
403: ionization ages, therefore the EW ratio of the Cr and Fe K lines
404: (EW$_{Cr/Fe}$) would be a good representation of the mass ratio of
405: these two elements. Considering this, we use the EW ratio for the
406: discussion below.
407:
408:
409: From Table 2, we can see that EW$_{Cr/Fe}$ of these four SNRs differ from
410: one another. This ratio might be used to constrain the properties of
411: the corresponding SNe. Badenes et al. (2006) have made detailed
412: comparisons of the X-ray spectra of the type Ia SNR Tycho with the
413: theoretical models. They found the one-dimensional delayed
414: detonation model can well reproduce its X-ray emission. From
415: numerical calculations, the standard SNe Ia models, i.e carbon
416: deflagration and Chandrasekar mass models (e.g W7, W70 etc, Nomoto
417: et al. 1984) often yield relatively small $M_{Cr/Fe}$ ($<1\%$,
418: Nomoto et al. 1997; Iwamoto et al. 1999). Multi-dimension models
419: based on W7 also give similar $M_{Cr/Fe}$ (Travaglio et al. 2004;
420: 2005). On the other hand, the delayed detonation models (WDD, CDD
421: etc) produce much larger $M_{Cr/Fe}$ ($> 2\%$), and $M_{Cr/Fe}$ decreases as
422: the transition density increases (Nomoto et al. 1997;
423: Iwamoto et al. 1999). Therefore, our
424: observational results of Tycho suggest that there should be a
425: deflagration-detonation transition at some stage of Tycho's SN
426: explosion, which further confirm the results of Badenes et al.
427: (2006). Meanwhile, we favor a relatively small transition density,
428: probably $1.7\times10^7$ g cm$^{-3}$ (Nomoto et al. 1997; Iwamoto et
429: al. 1999). This is also consistent with that suggested by
430: Badenes et al. (2006, $2.2\times10^7$ g cm$^{-3}$).
431:
432: Cas A has been identified as the remnant of a core-collapse SN. The
433: recent study of its progenitor implies the mass to be 15$-$25
434: $M_{\odot}$ (Young et al. 2006). According to the calculations of
435: spherical models by Thielemann et al. (1996), a 20$M_{\odot}$
436: progenitor gives a $M_{Cr/Fe}$ of 1.2\%, which is higher than our
437: measured value. However the non-spherical explosion may lead to a
438: smaller $M_{Cr/Fe}$ (Maeda \& Nomoto 2003). It has already been
439: suggested that the explosion of Cas A is asymmetric, based on the
440: jet structure (Hwang et al. 2004) and the Doppler map (Willingale et
441: al. 2002). Meanwhile, a bigger progenitor mass would lead to a smaller
442: mass cut and thus smaller $M_{Cr/Fe}$, since Cr is
443: mainly produced in the incomplete Si-burning zone (Umeda \& Nomoto 2002).
444: Therefore, we support a higher progenitor mass (Young et al. 2006)
445: and the asymmetric explosion scenario for Cas A.
446:
447:
448: The classifications of W49B and Kepler are not conclusive. For W49B,
449: Hwang et al. (2000a) compared the relative abundances of Mg, S, Ar,
450: Ca, Fe and Ni to Si, and suggested that W49B may have a type Ia
451: progenitor. However they claimed that a low mass (13$-$15
452: $M_{\odot}$) type II progenitor is also possible. The {\sl Chandra}
453: image of W49B shows a bipolar jet, which was taken as evidence for a
454: gamma-ray burst (GRB)
455: remnant{\footnote{Http://chandra.harvard.edu/press/04\_{}releases/press\_{}060204.html}}.
456: This was further supported by multi-band observations (Keohane
457: et al. 2007). The nucleosynthesis calculation for bipolar
458: core-collapse SN explosions (Maeda \& Nomoto 2003) generally
459: predicts an EW$_{Cr/Fe}$ of $1.0\pm0.5$\%, which matches the
460: observations perfectly (Hwang et al. 2000a; Miceli et al. 2006; this
461: paper). Kepler tends to be identified as a type Ia SNR (Reynolds et al. 2007).
462: If so, the small EW$_{Cr/Fe}$ would favor the carbon deflagration
463: models (W7, W70 etc) rather than those involving detonation (Nomoto
464: et al. 1997; Iwamoto et al. 1999; Travaglio et al. 2004;
465: 2005).
466:
467: The above discussions are based on the overall mass ratio of Cr to
468: Fe in an SNR. It is possible that in these SNRs there are still a
469: fraction of Fe and Cr that has not been overtaken by the reverse
470: shock and so invisible in X-rays. However, according to our
471: discussion in $\S$4.1, Cr and Fe should be well mixed, so the
472: observed EW ratio of Cr to Fe could represent the overall Cr to Fe
473: mass properly. Therefore the main conclusions are reliable no matter
474: what fraction of Fe is observed.
475:
476:
477:
478: \section{Summary}
479:
480: We performed a Cr K line survey with the {\sl Chandra} data in
481: young SNRs W49B, Cas A, Tycho and W49B. We confirmed the Cr line in
482: W49B, and gave a consistent flux and line center energy with respect
483: to the previous results. Then we report, for the first time, the
484: detection of Cr lines in Cas A, Tycho and Kepler. We conclude that Cr
485: in Cas A is in a high ionization state similar to that of W49B, while
486: Cr is in a low ionization state low in Tycho and Kepler. We find that Cr and Fe have similar
487: ionization states and are co-located in these four SNRs. The reason
488: might be that Cr and Fe are synthesized by the same process deep inside the progenitor.
489: We propose that the EW ratio of Cr to Fe might be used as an supplementary
490: constraint on the properties of the SN explosions. For the type Ia SNR Tycho,
491: EW$_{Cr/Fe}$ favors the delayed detonation model with relatively small transition
492: density ($1.7\times10^7$ g cm$^{-3}$) from deflagration to
493: detonation. This is consistent with the model suggested by Badenes
494: et al. (2006) from the comparison of Tycho's X-ray spectra with
495: theoretical calculations. The relatively small EW$_{Cr/Fe}$ in Cas A
496: and W49B suggests their asymmetric explosions, which is also
497: consistent with the previous results. If we adopt the type Ia origin for
498: Kepler, its small EW$_{Cr/Fe}$ could be attributed to the carbon
499: deflagration explosion.
500:
501:
502: \acknowledgements
503: We are grateful to the anonymous referee for very helpful comments and
504: suggestions leading to significant improvements of the paper.
505: The manuscript is read by Dr. E. Miller in MIT.
506: This work is supported by the Nature Science Foundation of
507: China through grants 10533020, 10573017, 10778716 and
508: by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research by the Ministry
509: of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan(16002004).
510:
511:
512:
513:
514:
515: \begin{thebibliography}{}
516:
517: \bibitem[1989]{Anders} Anders, L., \& Grevesse, N. ~1989, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 53, 197
518:
519: \bibitem[1996]{Arnaud} Arnaud, K. A. ~1996, ASPC, 101, 17
520:
521: \bibitem[2006]{Badenes} Badenes, C., Borkowski, K. J., Hughes, J. P., Hwang, U., \& Bravo, E. ~2006, ApJ, 645, 1373
522:
523: \bibitem[2004]{Cassam} Cassam-Chena\"i, G., Decourchelle, A., Ballet, J., Hwang, U., Hughes, J. P., Petre, R. ~2004, A\&A, 414, 545
524:
525: \bibitem[2004]{Cayrel} Cayrel, R., Depagne, E., Spite, M., Hill, V., Spite, F., Francois, P., Plez, B., Beers, T., Primas, F., Andersen, J., et al. ~2004, A\&A, 416, 1117
526:
527: \bibitem[1999]{Hatsukade} Hatsukade, I., Tsunemi, H., Yamashita, K., Koyama, K., Asaoka, Y., \& Asaoka, I. ~1990, PASJ, 42, 279
528:
529: \bibitem[1994]{Holt} Holt, S. S., Gotthelf, E. V., Tsunemi, H., \& Negoro, H. ~1994, PASJ, 46, L151
530:
531: \bibitem[2002]{Hwang_01} Hwang, U., Decourchelle, A., Holt, S. S., Petre, R. ~2002, ApJ, 581, 1101
532:
533: \bibitem[1997]{Hwang_02} Hwang, U., \& Gotthelf, E. V. ~1997, ApJ, 475, 665
534:
535: \bibitem[1998]{Hwang_03} Hwang, U., Hughes, J. P., Petre, R. ~1998, ApJ, 497, 833
536:
537: \bibitem[2003]{Hwang_04} Hwang, U., Laming, J. M., Badenes, C., et al. ~2004, ApJ, 615, L117
538:
539: \bibitem[2000a]{Hwang_05} Hwang, U., Petre, R., Hughes, J. P. ~2000a, ApJ, 532, 970
540:
541: \bibitem[2000b]{Hwang_06} Hwang, U., Holt, S. S., \& Petre, R. ~2000b, ApJ, 537, L119
542:
543: \bibitem[1995]{Hughes_01} Hughes, J. P., Hayashi, I., Helfand, D., Hwang, U., Itoh, M., Kirshner, R., Koyama, K., Markert, T., Tsunemi, H., \& Woo, J. ~1995, ApJ, 444, L81
544:
545: \bibitem[2000a]{Hughes_02} Hughes, J. P., Rakowski, C. E., Burrows, D. N., \& Slane, P. O. ~2000, ApJ, 528, L109
546:
547: \bibitem[1999]{Iwamoto} Iwamoto, K., Brachwitz, F., Nomoto, K., Kishimoto, N., Umeda, H., Hix, W. R., \& Thielemann, F-K ~1999, ApJS, 125, 439
548:
549: \bibitem[2007]{Keohane} Keohane, J. W., Reach, W. T., Rho, J., \& Jarrett, T. H. ~2007, ApJ, 654, 938
550:
551: \bibitem[1999]{Kinugasa} Kinugasa, K., \& Tsunemi, H. ~1999, PASJ, 51, 239
552:
553: \bibitem[2003]{Maeda} Maeda, K. \& Nomoto, K. ~2003, ApJ, 598, 1163
554:
555: \bibitem[1985]{Mewe} Mewe, R., Gronenschild, E. H. B. M. \& van den Oord, G. H. J. ~1985, A\&A, 62, 197
556:
557: \bibitem[2001]{Mukai} Mukai, K., Kallman, T., Schlegel, E., Bruch, A., Handler, G. \& Kemp, J. ~2001, ASPC, 251, 90
558:
559: \bibitem[2006]{Miceli} Miceli, M., Decourchelle, A., Ballet, J., Bocchino, F., Hughes, J. P., Hwang, U., \& Petre, R. ~2006, A\&A, 453, 567
560:
561: \bibitem[1984]{Nomoto_01} Nomoto, K., Thielemann, F.K., \& Yokoi, K. ~1984, ApJ, 286, 644
562:
563: \bibitem[1997]{Nomoto_02} Nomoto, K., Iwamoto, K., Nakasato, N., Thielemann, F.-K., Brachwitz, F., Tsujimoto, T., Kubo, Y., \& Kishimoto, N. ~1997, NuPhA, 621, 467
564:
565: \bibitem[2006]{Rakowski} Rakowski, C. E., Badenes, C., Gaensler, B. M., Gelfand, J. D., Hughes, J. P. \& Slane, P. O. ~2006, ApJ, 646, 982
566:
567: \bibitem[2007]{Reynolds} Reynolds, S. P., Borkowski, K. J., Hwang, U., Hughes, J. P., Badenes, C., Laming, J. M., \& Blondin, J. M. ~2007, ApJ, 668, L135
568:
569: \bibitem[2002]{Szkody} Szkody, P., Nishikida, K., Raymond, J. C., Seth, A., Hoard, D. W., Long, K. S., \& Sion, E. M. ~2002, ApJ, 574, 942
570:
571: \bibitem[1996]{Thielemann} Thielemann, F.-K, Nomoto, K., \& Hashimoto, M. ~1996, ApJ, 460, 408
572:
573: \bibitem[2004]{Travaglio_01} Travaglio, C., Hillebrandt, W., Reinecke, M., \& Thielemann, F.-K. ~2004, A\&A, 425, 1029
574:
575: \bibitem[2004]{Travaglio_02} Travaglio, C., Hillebrandt, W., \& Reinecke, M. ~2005, A\&A, 443, 1007
576:
577: \bibitem[1986]{Tsunemi} Tsunemi, H., Yamashita, K., Masai, K., Hayakawa, S., \& Koyama, K. ~1986, ApJ, 306, 248
578:
579: \bibitem[2002]{Umeda} Umeda, H., \& Nomoto, K. ~2002, ApJ, 565, 385
580:
581: \bibitem[2002]{Willingale} Willingale, R., Bleeker, J. A. M., van der Heyden, K. J., Kaastra, J. S., \& Vink, J. ~2002, A\&A, 381, 1039
582:
583: \bibitem[1994]{Woosley_01} Woosley, S. E., \& Weaver, T. A. ~1994, ApJ, 423, 371
584:
585: \bibitem[1995]{Woosley_02} Woosley, S. E., Langer, N., \& Weaver, T. A. ~1995, ApJ, 448, 315
586:
587: \bibitem[1995]{Woosley_03} Woosley, S. E., \& Weaver, T. A. ~1995, ApJS, 101, 181
588:
589: \bibitem[2008]{Yang} Yang, X.J., Lu, F.J., \& Chen, L. ~2008, ChJAA, 8, 439
590:
591: \bibitem[2006]{Young} Young, P. A., Fryer, C. L., Hungerford, A., Arnett, D., Rockefeller, G., Timmes, F. X., Voit, B., Meakin, C., Eriksen, K. A. ~2006, ApJ, 640, 891
592:
593: \end{thebibliography}
594:
595: \clearpage
596:
597: \begin{table*}
598: \caption[]{Information of {\sl Chandra} observations we used}
599: \label{obsinfor_02}
600: \begin{tabular}{cccc}
601: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
602: Target & Obs$\_$ID & $t_{exp} (ks)$ & Obs-date \\
603: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
604: W49B & 117 & $\sim$50 & July, 2000 \\ \hline
605: Cas A & VLP\tablenotemark{\ast} & $\sim$1000 & February$\sim$May, 2004 \\ \hline
606: Tycho & 115 & $\sim$50 & September, 2000 \\ \hline
607: Kepler & LP\tablenotemark{\dagger} & $\sim$750 & April$\sim$August, 2006 \\ \hline
608:
609: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
610:
611: \end{tabular}
612:
613: \tablenotetext{\ast}{Very Large Project, Observation IDs: 4634, 4635, 4636, 4637, 4638, 4639, 5196, 5319 and 5320.}
614: \tablenotetext{\dagger}{Large Project, Observation IDs: 6714, 6715, 6716, 6717 and 6718.}
615:
616: \end{table*}
617:
618:
619:
620:
621: \begin{table*}
622: \caption{The Cr and Fe line parameters of W49B, Cas A, Tycho and Kepler}
623: \label{tychocas_01}
624: \begin{tabular}{cccccccc}
625: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
626: & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Cr} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Fe} & \\
627: \cline{2-4} \cline{5-7} \\
628: SNR & line center & EW & flux & line center & EW & flux & EW$_{Cr/Fe}$ \\
629: & eV & eV & $\frac{10^{-4}photons}{cm^{2} s}$ & eV & eV & $\frac{10^{-4}photons}{cm^{2}s}$ & \\
630: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
631: W49B & 5656$^{+14}_{-16}$ & 79.6$^{+20.3}_{-18.2}$ & 0.32$^{+0.08}_{-0.07}$ & 6666$^{+1}_{-2}$ & 5000$^{+280}_{-250}$ & 10.2$^{+0.6}_{-0.5}$ & 1.6$^{+0.40}_{-0.36}$\% \\
632: CasA & 5635$^{+7}_{-5}$ & 8.31$^{+1.72}_{-0.69}$ & 0.65$^{+0.13}_{-0.05}$ & 6633$^{+1}_{-1}$ & 981$^{+12}_{-10}$ & 48.3$^{+0.03}_{-0.03}$ & 0.85$^{+0.18}_{-0.07}$\% \\
633: Tycho & 5465$^{+45}_{-50}$ & 46.2$^{+40.8}_{-14.6}$ & 0.33$^{+0.29}_{-0.10}$ & 6436$^{+6}_{-7}$ & 1280$^{+52}_{-42}$ & 6.13$^{+0.24}_{-0.22}$ & 3.6$^{+3.2}_{-1.1}$\% \\
634: Kepler & 5469$^{+40}_{-45}$ & 16.5$^{+8.0}_{-6.6}$ & 0.03$^{+0.014}_{-0.012}$ & 6443$^{+1}_{-2}$ & 2630$^{+80}_{-30}$ & 3.61$^{+0.05}_{-0.04}$ & 0.63$^{+0.30}_{-0.25}$\% \\
635:
636: \hline \noalign{\smallskip} \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
637:
638: \end{tabular}
639: \end{table*}
640:
641:
642: \begin{table*}
643: \caption{The Cr, Mn and Fe line parameters of W49B from different instruments.}
644: \label{tychocas_02}
645: \begin{tabular}{ccccccc}
646: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
647: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Cr} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Mn} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Fe} \\
648: \cline{2-3} \cline{4-5} \cline{6-7} \\
649: Instrument & line center & flux & line center & flux & line center & flux \\
650: & eV & $\frac{10^{-4}photons}{cm^{2} s}$ & eV & $\frac{10^{-4}photons}{cm^{2}s}$ & eV
651: & $\frac{10^{-4}photons}{cm^{2}s}$ \\
652: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
653: {\sl ASCA}\tablenotemark{a} & 5685$^{+20}_{-27}$ & 0.30$^{+0.08}_{-0.11}$ & 6172$^{+47}_{-49}$ & 0.13$^{+0.14}_{-0.06}$ & 6658$^{+3}_{-2}$ & 8.30$\pm 0.30$ \\
654: {\sl XMM-Newton}\tablenotemark{b} & 5660$\pm{10}$ & 0.25$\pm{0.04}$ & 6170$\pm{50}$ & 0.10$\pm{0.03}$ & $-$ & $-$ \\
655: {\sl Chandra}\tablenotemark{c} & 5656$^{+14}_{-16}$ & 0.32$^{+0.08}_{-0.07}$ & 6126$^{+35}_{-30}$ & 0.10$\pm{0.05}$ & 6666$^{+1}_{-2}$ & 10.2$^{+0.6}_{-0.5}$ \\
656: \hline \noalign{\smallskip} \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
657: \end{tabular}
658:
659: \tablenotetext{a}{Hwang et al. 2000a}
660: \tablenotetext{b}{Miceli et al. 2006}
661: \tablenotetext{c}{this paper}
662: \end{table*}
663:
664:
665: \begin{table*}
666: \caption[]{The K shell line energies of Cr and Fe in different
667: ionization states.} \label{obsinfor_01}
668: \begin{tabular}{ccccccc}
669: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
670: element & neutral\tablenotemark{a} & B-like\tablenotemark{b} & Be-like\tablenotemark{b} & Li-like\tablenotemark{b} & He-like\tablenotemark{b} & H-like\tablenotemark{c} \\
671: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
672: Cr\tablenotemark{\dagger} & 5.420 & 5.533 & 5.580 & 5.657 & 5.665 & 5.916 \\
673: Fe\tablenotemark{\ddagger} & 6.405 & 6.549 & 6.617 & 6.652 & 6.674 & 6.966 \\
674: \hline \noalign{\smallskip} \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
675: \end{tabular}
676:
677: \tablenotetext{a}{K$\alpha$ line energy}
678: \tablenotetext{b}{line energy with transition from level 2p to 1s}
679: \tablenotetext{c}{Ly$\alpha$ line energy}
680: \tablenotetext{\dagger}{http://www.camdb.ac.cn/e/spectra/spectra\_{}search.asp}
681: \tablenotetext{\ddagger}{Mewe et al. 1985}
682: \end{table*}
683:
684: \clearpage
685:
686: \begin{figure*}
687: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth,clip]{f1.eps}
688: \caption{{\sl Chandra} images of W49B, Cas A, Tycho and Kepler. The
689: source spectral regions are overplotted. In order to cover the whole
690: Tycho SNR, we use multi-regions as shown in the stretch. The
691: double-arrowed lines represent 1 arcmin for the corresponding image.
692: The two boxes in the Cas A image represent the blueshift (southeast,
693: blue one) and redshift (northwest, red one) dominated portions we
694: selected to create the spectra as described in $\S$ 3.2. }
695: \end{figure*}
696:
697: \begin{figure*}
698: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth,clip]{f2.eps}
699: \caption{The 0.5$-$8.0 keV spectra of W49B, Cas A, Tycho and Kepler.}
700: \end{figure*}
701:
702: \begin{figure*}
703: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth,clip]{f3.eps}
704: \caption{The 4.2$-$6.0 keV spectrum of Cas A fitting with different
705: models. The left panel presents the fitting with one power law,
706: while the right panel one power law plus three Gaussian components.
707: The residual (normalized by sigma, $\chi$) distributions are also
708: plotted. The strength of all the Gaussian components are multiplied by a
709: factor of 15, so as to be shown clearly. }
710: \end{figure*}
711:
712: \begin{figure*}
713: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth,clip]{f4.eps}
714: \caption{The 5.0$-$7.5 keV spectra of W49B, Cas A, Tycho and Kepler.
715: The lines represent the fitting models as described in $\S$ 3. The
716: strength of the Cr line for Cas A is multiplied by a factor of 10,
717: while that for Kepler a factor of 5. }
718: \end{figure*}
719:
720: \begin{figure*}
721: \includegraphics[width=8cm,angle=270,clip]{f5.eps}
722: \caption{The 5.0$-$7.5 keV spectra of Cas A from the redshift (upper
723: curve) and blueshift (lower curve) dominated portions. They are both
724: fitted with a model involving a power law plus two Gaussian components. }
725: \end{figure*}
726:
727:
728: \begin{figure*}
729: \includegraphics[width=12cm,clip]{f6.eps}
730: \caption{The line center energy of Cr versus Fe in W49B, CasA, Tycho
731: and Kepler. The errors of the Fe line are not plotted, since they
732: are almost within the size of the symbols. The stars represent
733: the line center energy of Cr and Fe in various ionization states, as
734: given in Table 4. }
735: \end{figure*}
736:
737:
738: \end{document}
739: