1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
30: %% use the longabstract style option.
31:
32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
33:
34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
36: %% the \begin{document} command.
37: %%
38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
41: %% for information.
42:
43: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
44: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
45:
46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
47:
48: \slugcomment{To appear in ApJ}
49:
50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
56:
57: \shorttitle{H53$\alpha$ Observations of the Orion BN/KL Region}
58: \shortauthors{Rodr\'\i guez et al.}
59:
60: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
62:
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
66: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
67: %% you desire.
68:
69: %\title{VLA Observations of 7-mm Continuum and H53$\alpha$ Radio \\ Recombination Line
70: % Emission from the Orion BN/KL Region}
71: \title{Resolving the Structure and Kinematics of the BN Object \\ at $0\rlap.{''}2$
72: Resolution}
73:
74: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
75: %% author and affiliation information.
76: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
77: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
78: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
79: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
80:
81: \author{Luis F. Rodr\'\i guez}
82: \affil{Centro de Radioastronom\'\i a y Astrof\'\i sica, UNAM, Morelia 58089, M\'exico}
83: \email{l.rodriguez@astrosmo.unam.mx}
84:
85: \author{Luis A. Zapata\altaffilmark{1}}
86: \affil{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Radioastronomie, Auf dem H\"ugel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany}
87: \email{lzapata@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de}
88:
89:
90: \and
91:
92: \author{Paul T. P. Ho\altaffilmark{1}}
93: \affil{Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Taipei 106, Taiwan}
94: \email{pho@asiaa.sinica.edu.tw}
95:
96: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
97: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
98: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
99: %% affiliation.
100:
101: \altaffiltext{1}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,
102: and
103: Submillimeter Array, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA}
104:
105: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
106: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
107: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
108: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
109: %% editorial office after submission.
110:
111: \begin{abstract}
112: We present sensitive 7 mm observations of the H53$\alpha$ recombination line
113: and adjacent continuum, made toward the Orion BN/KL region. In the continuum
114: we detect the BN object, the radio source
115: I (GMR I) and the radio counterpart of the infrared source n
116: (Orion-n). Comparing with observations made at similar angular resolutions
117: but lower frequency, we discuss the spectral indices and angular sizes of these
118: sources. In the H53$\alpha$ line we only detect the BN object.
119: This is the first time that radio recombination lines are detected from this source.
120: The LSR radial velocity of BN from the H53$\alpha$ line, $v_{LSR} = 20.1 \pm 2.1$
121: km s$^{-1}$,
122: is consistent with that found from previous studies in near-infared lines.
123: While the continuum emission is expected to have
124: considerable optical depth at 7 mm, the observed H53$\alpha$ line emission is consistent with
125: an optically-thin nature and we discuss possible explanations
126: for this apparent discrepancy.
127: %Most of the H53$\alpha$ line emission comes from a ``bar'' centered in the continuum source
128: %and elongated in the NE-SW direction.
129: There is evidence of a velocity gradient, with the NE part of BN being redshifted by $\sim
130: 10$ km s$^{-1}$ with respect to the SW part. This is consistent with the
131: suggestion of Jiang et al. that BN may be driving an ionized outflow
132: along that direction.
133: \end{abstract}
134:
135: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
136: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
137: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
138: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
139:
140: \keywords{ISM: individual (\objectname{Orion}) --- radio continuum: ISM ---
141: radio lines: ISM}
142:
143: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
144: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
145: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
146: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
147: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
148: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
149: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
150: %% each reference.
151:
152:
153: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
154: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
155: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
156: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
157: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
158: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
159: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
160: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
161: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
162: %%
163: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
164: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
165: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
166: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
167:
168: \section{Introduction}
169:
170: Located at about 1$'$ to the NW of the Orion Trapezium, the
171: BN/KL region has been, as
172: the closest region of massive star formation, the subject of extensive studies.
173: Recently, Rodr\'\i guez et al. (2005) and G\'omez et al. (2005)
174: reported large proper motions (equivalent to velocities of the order of
175: a few tens of km s$^{-1}$) for the radio sources associated with the infrared sources
176: BN and n, as well as for the radio source I. All three objects
177: are located at the core of the BN/KL region and appear
178: to be moving away from a common point where they must all have been
179: located about 500 years ago.
180: Even when these proper motions are now available, there is no
181: radial velocity information for these three sources, with the
182: exception of the near-infrared spectroscopic study of BN
183: made by Scoville et al. (1983), that report an LSR radial
184: velocity of +21 km s$^{-1}$ for this source.
185: In this paper we present 7 mm continuum and H53$\alpha$
186: radio recombination line observations of the BN/KL region in an
187: attempt to obtain additional information on the radial velocities of
188: these sources.
189:
190: \section{Observations}
191:
192: %% In a manner similar to \objectname authors can provide links to dataset
193: %% hosted at participating data centers via the \dataset{} command. The
194: %% second curly bracket argument is printed in the text while the first
195: %% parentheses argument serves as the valid data set identifier. Large
196: %% lists of data set are best provided in a table (see Table 3 for an example).
197: %% Valid data set identifiers should be obtained from the data center that
198: %% is currently hosting the data.
199: %%
200: %% Note that AASTeX interprets everything between the curly braces in the
201: %% macro as regular text, so any special characters, e.g. "#" or "_," must be
202: %% preceded by a backslash. Otherwise, you will get a LaTeX error when you
203: %% compile your manuscript. Special characters do not
204: %% need to be escaped in the optional, square-bracket argument.
205:
206: The 7 mm observations were made in the B configuration
207: of the VLA of the NRAO\footnote{The National Radio
208: Astronomy Observatory is operated by Associated Universities
209: Inc. under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.},
210: during 2007 December 14. The central rest frequency observed was
211: that of the H53$\alpha$ line, 42951.97 MHz,
212: and we integrated on-source for a total of
213: approximately 3 hours. We observed in the spectral line
214: mode, with 15 channels of 1.56 MHz each (10.9 km s$^{-1}$)
215: and both circular polarizations. The bandpass calibrator was
216: 0319+415. A continuum channel recorded the
217: central 75\% of the full spectral window. The absolute amplitude
218: calibrator was 1331+305
219: (with an adopted flux density of 1.47 Jy)
220: and the phase calibrator was 0541$-$056 (with a bootstrapped flux density
221: of 1.78$\pm$0.08 Jy). The phase noise rms was about 30$^\circ$,
222: indicating good weather conditions. The phase center of these observations was at
223: $\alpha(2000) = 05^h~35^m~14\rlap.^s13;~\delta(2000) = -05^\circ~22{'}~26\rlap.^{''}6$.
224:
225: The data were acquired and reduced using the recommended VLA procedures
226: for high frequency data, including the fast-switching mode with a
227: cycle of 120 seconds.
228: Clean maps were
229: obtained using the task IMAGR of AIPS with the ROBUST parameter set to 0.
230:
231: %We made images with natural weighting to
232: %obtain the highest signal-to-noise possible.
233:
234:
235: %% In this section, we use the \subsection command to set off
236: %% a subsection. \footnote is used to insert a footnote to the text.
237:
238: %% Observe the use of the LaTeX \label
239: %% command after the \subsection to give a symbolic KEY to the
240: %% subsection for cross-referencing in a \ref command.
241: %% You can use LaTeX's \ref and \label commands to keep track of
242: %% cross-references to sections, equations, tables, and figures.
243: %% That way, if you change the order of any elements, LaTeX will
244: %% automatically renumber them.
245:
246: %% This section also includes several of the displayed math environments
247: %% mentioned in the Author Guide.
248:
249: \section{Continuum Analysis}
250:
251: \subsection{Spectral Indices}
252:
253: In Figure 1 we show the image obtained from the continuum channel.
254: Three sources, BN, I and n, are evident in the image. No other sources
255: were detected above a 5-$\sigma$ lower limit of 1.75 mJy in our $1'$
256: field of view. The positions, flux
257: densities, and deconvolved angular sizes of these sources are
258: given in Table 1. The continuum flux density of the sources
259: has been obtained from the line-free channels.
260: The line emission will be discussed below.
261: The flux density obtained at 7 mm by us
262: for BN is in good agreement with the values previously reported in
263: the literature:
264: we obtain a flux density of 28.6$\pm$0.6 mJy, while
265: values of 31$\pm$5 and 28.0$\pm$0.6 were obtained by Menten \& Reid (1995)
266: and Chandler \& Wood (1997), respectively.
267: In the case of source I, the agreement is acceptable,
268: since we obtain a flux density of 14.5$\pm$0.7 mJy,
269: while values of
270: 13$\pm$2 and 10.8$\pm$0.6 mJy were reported by Menten \& Reid (1995)
271: and Chandler \& Wood (1997), respectively.
272: Careful monitoring would be required
273: to test if the radio continuum from source I is variable in time.
274:
275: The spectral indices determined from our 7 mm observations and the
276: 3.6 cm observations of G\'omez et al. (2008) are given in the last column of Table 2.
277: Our spectral indices for BN and
278: I are in excellent agreement in this spectral range with the more detailed analysis
279: presented by Plambeck et al. (1995) and Beuther et al. (2004).
280:
281: We have detected source n for the first time
282: at 7 mm and this detection allows the first estimate of the spectral index of this source
283: over a wide frequency range.
284: The value of 0.2$\pm$0.1 suggests marginally thick free-free emission, as expected in
285: an ionized outflow. This supports the interpretation of this source
286: as an ionized outflow by G\'omez et al. (2008).
287: The position given by us in Table 1 is consistent with the
288: extrapolation of the proper motions of this source discussed by G\'omez et al. (2008).
289:
290: \subsection{Deconvolved Angular Sizes}
291:
292: The radio source I has parameters
293: consistent with an optically thick free-free source (spectral
294: index of $1.5\pm0.1$).
295: % and comparable angular sizes at 3.6 cm and 7 mm).
296: Beuther et al. (2004) suggest that this spectral index is either the result of
297: optically thick free-free plus dust emission, or $H^-$ free-free emission
298: that gives rise to a power-law spectrum with an index of $\sim$1.6.
299:
300: In the case of the radio source associated with the infrared source n
301: we only have an upper limit to its size at 7 mm. In addition,
302: G\'omez et al. (2008) report important morphological variations
303: over time in this source
304: that suggest that comparisons at different frequencies should be made
305: only from simultaneous observations.
306:
307: In the case of BN,
308: the frequency dependences of flux density and angular size (this last
309: parameter taken to
310: be the geometric mean of the major and minor axes reported in Tables 1 and 2) can be accounted for with
311: a simple model of a sphere of ionized gas in which
312: the electron density
313: decreases as a power-law function of radius, $n_e \propto r^{-\alpha}$.
314: In this case, the flux density of the source is expected to go with
315: frequency as $S_\nu \propto \nu^{(6.2-4\alpha)/(1-2\alpha)}$ and the angular size is expected to go with
316: frequency as $\theta_\nu \propto \nu^{2.1/(1-2\alpha)}$ (Reynolds 1986).
317: The frequency dependences of flux density ($S_\nu \propto \nu^{1.1\pm0.1}$) and angular
318: size ($\theta_\nu \propto \nu^{-0.36\pm0.12}$) for
319: BN are consistent with a steeply declining electron density
320: distribution
321: %model with value of
322: with power law index of
323: $\alpha = 3.0\pm0.3$. The continuum spectrum of BN produced
324: by Plambeck et al. (1995) indicates that a constant
325: %the single
326: spectral index extends from 5 to 100 GHz.
327: %We also note that the frequency dependences
328: %of flux density ($S_\nu \propto \nu^{1.5\pm0.1}$) and angular
329: %size ($\theta_\nu \propto \nu^{-0.36\pm0.12}$) for
330: %radio source I are consistent with a steeply declining electron density
331: %distribution
332: %model with value of
333: %with power law index of $\alpha = 3.0\pm0.3$.
334:
335: \section{Analysis of the H53$\alpha$ Recombination Line Emission}
336:
337: \subsection{Radial LSR Velocity}
338:
339: We clearly detected the H53$\alpha$ line emission only from BN.
340: The spectrum is shown in Figure 2. The parameters of
341: the Gaussian least squares fit to the profile are given in Table 3.
342: We note that the radial LSR velocity determined by us, $+20.1\pm2.1$
343: km s$^{-1}$, agrees well with the value of $+21$ km s$^{-1}$
344: reported by Scoville et al. (1983) from near-IR spectroscopy.
345: In a single dish study of the H41$\alpha$ line made with an
346: angular resolution of 24$''$ toward
347: Orion IRc2, Jaffe \& Mart\'\i n-Pintado (1999) report emission
348: with $v_{LSR}$ = -3.6 km s$^{-1}$.
349: Most likely, this is emission from the ambient H~II region, since
350: its radial velocity practically coincides with the
351: value determined for the large H~II region (Orion A) ionized by
352: the Trapezium stars (e. g. Peimbert et al. 1988).
353: The single dish observations of the H51$\alpha$ emission
354: of Hasegawa \& Akabane (1984), made with an angular resolution of 33$''$,
355: most probably come also from the ambient ionized gas and not
356: from BN.
357:
358: \subsection{LTE Interpretation}
359:
360: If we assume that the line emission is optically thin and in LTE,
361: the electron temperature, $T_e^*$, is given by
362: (Mezger \& H\"oglund 1967; Gordon 1969; Quireza et al. 2006):
363:
364: \begin{equation}\Biggl[{{T_e^*} \over {K}}\Biggr] = \Biggl[7100 \biggl({{\nu_L} \over {GHz}} \biggr)^{1.1}
365: \biggl({{S_C} \over {S_L}} \biggr) \biggl({{\Delta v} \over {km~s^{-1}}}\biggr)^{-1}
366: (1 + y^+)^{-1} \Biggr]^{0.87}, \end{equation} %\eqno(1) $$
367:
368: \noindent where $\nu_L$ is the line frequency, $S_C$ is the continuum flux density,
369: $S_L$ is the peak line flux density, $\Delta v$ is the FWHM line width, and
370: $y^+$ is the ionized helium to ionized hydrogen abundance ratio.
371: In the case of BN, we can adopt $y^+ \simeq 0$ given that the
372: source is not of very high luminosity, and using the values given in Tables 1 and 3,
373: we obtain $T_e^* \simeq 8,200$ K. This value is similar to that
374: determined for the nearby Orion A from radio recombination lines (e. g. Lichten, Rodr\'\i guez, \&
375: Chaisson 1979).
376:
377: It is somewhat
378: surprising that we get a very reasonable estimate for $T_e^*$ when our previous discussion
379: seemed to imply that BN is partially optically thick at 7 mm.
380: One possibility is that we have two effects fortuitously canceling each other. For example, the
381: optical thickness of the source will diminish the
382: line emission, while maser effects (such as those observed
383: in MWC 349; Mart\'\i n-Pintado et al. 1989) will amplify the line.
384: However, in an attempt to understand this result in LTE conditions, we will discuss the expected
385: LTE radio recombination line emission from
386: a sphere of ionized gas in which the electron density
387: decreases as a power-law function of radius, $n_e \propto r^{-\alpha}$.
388: As noted before, the modeling of the continuum emission from such a source
389: was presented in detail by Panagia \& Felli (1975) and Reynolds (1986). The radio recombination line emission
390: for the case $\alpha = 2$ has been discussed by Altenhoff, Strittmatter, \&
391: Wendker (1981) and Rodr\'\i guez (1982).
392: Here we generalize the derivation of the recombination line emission
393: to the case of $\alpha > 1.5$. This lower limit is
394: adopted to avoid the total emission from the source to diverge.
395:
396: For a sphere of ionized gas, the free-free continuum emission will be given by
397: (Panagia \& Felli 1975):
398:
399: \begin{equation}S_C = 2 \pi {{r_0^2} \over {d^2}} B_\nu \int_0^\infty
400: \biggl(1 - exp[-\tau_C(\xi)]\biggr)~ \xi~ d\xi, \end{equation} %\eqno(2)$$
401:
402: \noindent where $r_0$ is a reference radius, $d$ is the distance to the source,
403: $B_\nu$ is Planck's function, $\xi$ is the projected radius in units of $r_0$,
404: and $\tau_C(\xi)$ is the continuum optical depth along the line of sight with
405: projected radius $\xi$. On the other hand, the free-free continuum plus
406: radio recombination line emission will be given by an equation similar to eqn. (2), but with the
407: continuum opacity substituted by the continuum plus line opacity (Rodr\'\i guez 1982):
408:
409: \begin{equation}S_{L+C} = 2 \pi {{r_0^2} \over {d^2}} B_\nu \int_0^\infty \biggl(1 - exp[-\tau_{L+C}(\xi)]
410: \biggr) \xi d\xi, \end{equation} %\eqno(3) $$
411:
412: \noindent where $\tau_{L+C}(\xi)$ is the line plus continuum optical depth along the line of sight with
413: projected radius $\xi$.
414:
415: The line-to-continuum ratio will be given by:
416:
417: \begin{equation}{{S_L} \over {S_C}} = {{S_{L+C} - S_C} \over {S_C}}. \end{equation} %\eqno(4) $$
418:
419: The opacity of these emission processes depends on projected radius as (Panagia \& Felli 1975):
420:
421: \begin{equation}\tau(\xi) \propto \xi^{-(2 \alpha -1)}. \end{equation} %\eqno(5)$$
422:
423: We now introduce the definite integral (Gradshteyn \& Ryzhik 1994)
424:
425: \begin{equation}\int_0^\infty [1- exp(-\mu x^{-p})]~x~ dx =
426: - {{1} \over {p}}~ \mu^{{2} \over{p}}~ \Gamma(-{{2} \over{p}}), \end{equation} %\eqno(7)$$
427:
428: \noindent valid for $\mu > 0$ and $p > 0$ and with $\Gamma$ being the Gamma function.
429: Substituting eqns. (2) and (3) in eqn. (4), and using the integral
430: defined in eqn. (7), it can be shown that
431:
432: \begin{equation}{{S_L} \over {S_C}} = \Biggl[{{\kappa_L + \kappa_C}
433: \over {\kappa_C}} \Biggr]^{1/(\alpha -0.5)} - 1, \end{equation} %\eqno(7)$$
434:
435: \noindent where $\kappa_L$ and $\kappa_C$ are the line and continuum absorption coefficients
436: at the frequency of observation, respectively.
437: In this last step we have also
438: assumed that the opacity of the line and continuum processes are proportional to
439: the line and continuum absorption coefficients, respectively, that is, that the
440: physical depths producing the line and continuum emissions are the
441: same. Under the LTE assumption, we have
442: that
443:
444: \begin{equation}{{\kappa_L} \over {\kappa_C}} = 7100 \biggl({{\nu_L} \over {GHz}} \biggr)^{1.1}
445: \biggl({{T_e^*} \over {K}} \biggr)^{-1.1} \biggl({{\Delta v} \over {km~s^{-1}}}\biggr)^{-1}
446: (1 + y^+)^{-1}. \end{equation} %\eqno(8)$$
447:
448: For $\nu \leq$ 43 GHz and typical parameters of an H II region, we
449: can see from eqn. (8) that $\kappa_L<\kappa_C$, and
450: eqn. (7) can be approximated by:
451:
452: \begin{equation}{{S_L} \over {S_C}} \simeq {{1} \over
453: {(\alpha -0.5)}} \Biggl[{{\kappa_L} \over {\kappa_C}} \Biggr]. \end{equation} %\eqno(9)$$
454:
455: That is, the expected optically-thin, LTE line-to-continuum ratio:
456:
457: \begin{equation}{{S_L} \over {S_C}} \simeq \Biggl[{{\kappa_L} \over {\kappa_C}} \Biggr], \end{equation} %\eqno(10)$$
458:
459: \noindent becomes attenuated by a factor $1/(\alpha -0.5)$. In the case of $\alpha = 2$,
460: the factor is 2/3, and we reproduce the result of Altenhoff, Strittmatter, \&
461: Wendker (1981) and Rodr\'\i guez (1982). In the case of BN, we have that $\alpha \simeq 3$, and
462: we expect the attenuation factor to be 2/5. If BN can be modeled this way, we would have expected
463: to derive electron temperatures under the LTE assumption (see eqn. 1) of order
464:
465: \begin{equation}T_e^*(\alpha = 3) \simeq 2.2~ T_e^*(thin). \end{equation} %\eqno(11)$$
466:
467: However, from the discussion in the first paragraph of this section observationally
468: we determine that
469:
470: \begin{equation}T_e^*(\alpha = 3) \simeq T_e^*(thin). \end{equation} %\eqno(12)$$
471:
472: Summarizing: i) BN seems to have significant optical depth in the continuum at
473: 7 mm, ii) this significant optical depth should attenuate the observed recombination
474: line emission with respect to the optically-thin case, but iii) the line emission seems
475: to be as strong as in the optically-thin case.
476:
477: As possible explanations for the ``normal'' (apparently optically-thin and in LTE)
478: radio recombination line emission
479: observed from BN we can think of two options.
480: The first is that, as noted before, there is a non-LTE line-amplifying
481: mechanism that approximately compensates for the optical depth attenuation.
482: The second possibility is that the free-free emission from BN at 7 mm is already optically thin.
483: However, this last possibility seems to be in contradiction with the results
484: of Plambeck et al. (1995) that suggest a single spectral index
485: from 5 to 100 GHz. Observations of radio recombination lines around
486: 100 GHz are needed to solve this problem.
487:
488: A comparison with the H53$\alpha$ emission from the hypercompact H~II
489: region G28.20-0.04N is also of interest.
490: The continuum flux densities from this source at
491: 21, 6, 3.6, and 2 cm are 49, 135, 297, and 543 mJy, respectively
492: (Sewilo et al. 2004). At 7 mm the continuum flux density is 641 mJy
493: (Sewilo et al. 2008), indicating
494: that the source has become optically thin at this wavelength.
495: Using the H53$\alpha$ line parameters given by (Sewilo et al. 2008)
496: we derive an LTE electron temperature of $T_e^* \simeq 7,600$ K,
497: similar to the value for BN and in this case consistent with
498: the optically-thin nature of G28.20-0.04N.
499:
500: The non detection of H53$\alpha$ emission from radio source I is consistent
501: with its expected large optical depth. The formulation above implies $\alpha \simeq 5$, and an
502: attenuation factor of 2/9.
503: This confirms the notion that BN and radio source I are two sources
504: intrinsically very different in nature.
505: This difference is also evident in the brightness temperature of both sources.
506: At 7 mm, the brightness temperature of a source is
507:
508: \begin{equation}\Biggl[{{T_B} \over {K}} \Biggr] \simeq 0.96 \Biggl[{{S_\nu} \over {mJy}}
509: \Biggr] \Biggl[{{\theta_{maj} \times
510: \theta_{min}} \over {arcsec^2}} \Biggr]^{-2}. \end{equation} %\eqno(13)$$
511:
512: Using the values of Table 1, we get $T_B \simeq$ 7,800 K for BN, confirming
513: its nature as photoionized gas. However, for the radio source I we get
514: $T_B \simeq$ 2,600 K. So, even when source I seems to be optically thick, its
515: brightness temperature is substantially lower than that expected for
516: a photoionized region. Reid et al. (2007) have discussed as possible
517: explanations for this low brightness temperature $H^-$ free-free opacity or
518: a photoionized disk.
519:
520: Following the discussion of Reid et al. (2007), we consider
521: it unlikely that dust emission could be a dominant contributor to the 7 mm emission of BN or
522: Orion I. A dense, warm, dusty disk would be expected to show many molecular lines at
523: millimeter/submillimeter wavelengths. While Beuther et al. (2006) and Friedel
524: \& Snyder(2008) find numerous, strong,
525: molecular lines toward the nearby "hot core", they find no strong lines toward the position of
526: Orion I (with the exception of
527: the strong SiO masers slightly offset from Orion I) or BN.
528: Also, the brightness temperatures derived by us at 7 mm (7,800 K for BN and
529: 2,600 K for source I) are
530: high enough to sublimate dust and suggest that free-free emission from
531: ionized gas dominates the continuum emission.
532: Finally, the continuum spectra of BN and of source I measured by Plambeck et al.(1995)
533: and Beuther et al. (2006), respectively, suggest that the dust
534: emission becomes dominant only above $\sim$300 GHz.
535:
536:
537: In the case of source n, no detection was expected given its
538: weakness even in the continuum.
539:
540: \subsection{Spatial Distribution of the H53$\alpha$ Line Emission}
541:
542: The H53$\alpha$ line emission in the individual velocity
543: channels shows evidence of structure but unfortunately the signal-to-noise
544: ratio is not large enough to reach reliable conclusions from the
545: analysis of these individual channels. However, an image
546: with good signal-to-noise ratio can be obtained averaging over the velocity
547: range of -21.2 to +66.1 km s$^{-1}$, using the task MOMNT in
548: AIPS. This line image is compared
549: in Figure 3 with a continuum image
550: made from the line-free channels.
551: The larger apparent size of the continuum image is simply the
552: result of its much better signal-to-noise ratio.
553: For the total line emission we obtain an upper limit of
554: $0\rlap.{''}12$ for its size, that is consistent with the
555: size of the continuum emission given in Table 1.
556: We also show images of the blueshifted (-21.2 to +22.5 km s$^{-1}$)
557: and redshifted (+22.5 to 66.1 km s$^{-1}$) line emission in Figure 3.
558: The cross in the figure indicates the centroid of the total line
559: emission. The centroid of the line emission does not appear to
560: coincide with the centroid of the continuum emission and
561: we attribute this to opacity effects.
562:
563: An interesting conclusion comes from comparing the total
564: line emission, with the blueshifted and redshifted components.
565: The blueshifted emission seems slightly shifted to the SW, while the
566: redshifted emission seems slightly shifted to the NE, suggesting a
567: velocity gradient. This result supports the suggestion of
568: Jiang et al. (2005) of the presence of an outflow in BN along a
569: position angle of 36$^\circ$. Given the modest signal-to-noise ratio
570: of the data, it is difficult to estimate the magnitude
571: of the velocity shift and we crudely assume it is of order one
572: channel ($\sim$10 km s$^{-1}$), since most of the line
573: emission is concentrated in the central two channels
574: of the spectrum (see Figure 2). The position shift between the blueshifted and
575: the redshifted emissions is $0\rlap.{''}028 \pm 0\rlap.{''}007$
576: ($12 \pm 3$ AU at the distance of 414 pc given by Menten et al. 2007), significant to the
577: 4-$\sigma$ level. Unfortunately, the data of Jiang et al. (2005) does not
578: include line observations and there is no kinematic information in their paper to
579: compare with our results.
580:
581: The small velocity gradient observed by us in BN is consistent with a
582: slow bipolar outflow but also with Keplerian rotation around a central mass
583: of only 0.2 $M_\odot$.
584:
585: \section{Conclusions}
586:
587: We presented observations of the H53$\alpha$ recombination line
588: and adjacent continuum toward the Orion BN/KL region.
589: In the continuum we detect the BN object, the radio source
590: I (GMR I) and the radio counterpart of the infrared source n
591: (Orion-n) and discuss its parameters.
592: In the H53$\alpha$ line we only detect the BN object,
593: the first time that radio recombination lines have been detected from this source.
594: The LSR radial velocity of BN from the H53$\alpha$ line, $v_{LSR} = 20.1 \pm 2.1$
595: km s$^{-1}$,
596: is consistent with that found from previous studies in near-infared lines,
597: $v_{LSR} = 21$ km s$^{-1}$.
598: We discuss the line-to-continuum ratio from BN and present evidence
599: for a possible velocity gradient across this source.
600: %% The equation environment wil produce a numbered display equation.
601:
602: %% The \notetoeditor{TEXT} command allows the author to communicate
603: %% information to the copy editor. This information will appear as a
604: %% footnote on the printed copy for the manuscript style file. Nothing will
605: %% appear on the printed copy if the preprint or
606: %% preprint2 style files are used.
607:
608: %% The eqnarray environment produces multi-line display math. The end of
609: %% each line is marked with a \\. Lines will be numbered unless the \\
610: %% is preceded by a \nonumber command.
611: %% Alignment points are marked by ampersands (&). There should be two
612: %% ampersands (&) per line.
613:
614: %% Putting eqnarrays or equations inside the mathletters environment groups
615: %% the enclosed equations by letter. For instance, the eqnarray below, instead
616: %% of being numbered, say, (4) and (5), would be numbered (4a) and (4b).
617: %% LaTeX the paper and look at the output to see the results.
618:
619: %% This section contains more display math examples, including unnumbered
620: %% equations (displaymath environment). The last paragraph includes some
621: %% examples of in-line math featuring a couple of the AASTeX symbol macros.
622:
623: %% The displaymath environment will produce the same sort of equation as
624: %% the equation environment, except that the equation will not be numbered
625: %% by LaTeX.
626:
627: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,
628: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments
629: %% command.
630:
631: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
632: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
633: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
634: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
635: %% text to be printed in the second.
636:
637: \acknowledgments
638:
639: LFR and LAZ acknowledge the support
640: of CONACyT, M\'exico and DGAPA, UNAM.
641:
642: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
643: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
644: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
645: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
646: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
647: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
648: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
649: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
650:
651: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
652: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
653: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
654: %% copy editing. Individual instruments or configurations can be provided
655: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
656:
657: {\it Facilities:} \facility{VLA}
658:
659: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
660: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
661: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
662:
663: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
664: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
665: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
666:
667: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
668: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
669: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
670: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
671: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
672: %%
673: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
674: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
675: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
676: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
677: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
678: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
679: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
680: %% place of the \cite commands.
681:
682: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
683: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
684: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
685:
686: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
687: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
688: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
689: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
690: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
691:
692: \begin{thebibliography}{}
693:
694: %\bibitem[Acord et al.(1998)]{1998ApJ...495L.107A} Acord, J.~M., Churchwell,
695: %E., \& Wood, D.~O.~S.\ 1998, \apjl, 495, L107
696:
697: \bibitem[Altenhoff et
698: al.(1981)]{1981A&A....93...48A} Altenhoff, W.~J., Strittmatter, P.~A., \& Wendker, H.~J.\ 1981, \aap, 93, 48
699:
700: \bibitem[Beuther et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...616L..31B} Beuther, H., et al.\
701: 2004, \apjl, 616, L31
702:
703: \bibitem[Beuther et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...636..323B} Beuther, H., et al.\
704: 2006, \apj, 636, 323
705:
706: \bibitem[Chandler
707: \& Wood(1997)]{1997MNRAS.287..445C} Chandler, C.~J., \& Wood, D.~O.~S.\ 1997, \mnras, 287, 445
708:
709: %\bibitem[Churchwell(2002)]{2002ARA&A..40...27C} Churchwell, E.\ 2002, \araa, 40, 27
710:
711: \bibitem[Friedel
712: \& Snyder(2008)]{2008ApJ...672..962F} Friedel, D.~N., \& Snyder, L.~E.\ 2008, \apj, 672, 962
713:
714:
715: %\bibitem[Garay et
716: %al.(1989)]{1989A&A...215..101G} Garay, G., Gathier, R., \& Rodriguez, L.~F.\ 1989, \aap, 215, 101
717:
718: \bibitem[]{go05} G\'omez, L., Rodr\'{\i}guez, L.F., Loinard, L.,
719: Poveda, A., Lizano, S., \& Allen, C.\
720: 2005, ApJ, 635, 1166
721:
722: \bibitem[]{go07} G\'omez, L., et al. 2008, ApJ, 685, 333
723:
724: \bibitem[]{go69} Gordon, M.~A.\ 1969, \apj, 158,
725: 479
726:
727: \bibitem[]{gr94} Gradshteyn, I.~S., \& Ryzhik, I.~M.\ 1994, New York: Academic Press,
728: 5th ed., edited by Jeffrey, A., p. 386
729:
730:
731: \bibitem[Hasegawa
732: \& Akabane(1984)]{1984ApJ...287L..91H} Hasegawa, T., \& Akabane, K.\ 1984, \apjl, 287, L91
733:
734: \bibitem[Jaffe
735: \& Mart{\'{\i}}n-Pintado(1999)]{1999ApJ...520..162J} Jaffe, D.~T., \&
736: Mart{\'{\i}}n-Pintado, J.\ 1999, \apj, 520, 162
737:
738: \bibitem[]{ji05} Jiang, Z., Tamura, M.,
739: Fukagawa, M., Hough, J., Lucas, P., Suto, H., Ishii, M.,
740: \& Yang, J.\ 2005, \nat, 437, 112
741:
742: \bibitem[Lichten et al.(1979)]{1979ApJ...229..524L} Lichten, S.~M.,
743: Rodriguez, L.~F., \& Chaisson, E.~J.\ 1979, \apj, 229, 524
744:
745: \bibitem[Martin-Pintado et
746: al.(1989)]{1989A&A...215L..13M} Mart\'\i n-Pintado, J.,
747: Bachiller, R., Thum, C., \& Walmsley, M.\ 1989, \aap, 215, L13
748:
749:
750: \bibitem[Menten
751: \& Reid(1995)]{1995ApJ...445L.157M} Menten, K.~M., \& Reid, M.~J.\ 1995, \apjl, 445, L157
752:
753: \bibitem[]{me07} Menten, K. M., Reid, M. J., Forbrich, J., \& Brunthaler, A.
754: 2007, A\&A, 474, 515
755:
756:
757: \bibitem[Panagia
758: \& Felli(1975)]{1975A&A....39....1P} Panagia, N., \& Felli, M.\ 1975, \aap, 39, 1
759:
760: \bibitem[Peimbert et al.(1992)]{1992ApJ...395..484P} Peimbert, M.,
761: Rodriguez, L.~F., Bania, T.~M., Rood, R.~T.,
762: \& Wilson, T.~L.\ 1992, \apj, 395, 484
763:
764: \bibitem[Plambeck et al.(1995)]{1995ApJ...455L.189P} Plambeck, R.~L.,
765: Wright, M.~C.~H., Mundy, L.~G., \& Looney, L.~W.\ 1995, \apjl, 455, L189
766:
767: \bibitem[]{qui06}Quireza, C., Rood,
768: R.~T., Bania, T.~M., Balser, D.~S., \& Maciel, W.~J.\ 2006, \apj, 653, 1226
769:
770:
771: \bibitem[Reid et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...664..950R} Reid, M.~J., Menten,
772: K.~M., Greenhill, L.~J., \& Chandler, C.~J.\ 2007, \apj, 664, 950
773:
774: \bibitem[]{re86} Reynolds, S. P. 1986, ApJ, 304, 713
775:
776: \bibitem[Rodriguez(1982)]{1982RMxAA...5..179R} Rodriguez, L.~F.\ 1982,
777: Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica, 5, 179
778:
779: %\bibitem[Rodriguez et al.(1982)]{1982ApJ...255..103R} Rodriguez, L.~F.,
780: %Canto, J., \& Moran, J.~M.\ 1982, \apj, 255, 103
781:
782: \bibitem[]{ro05} Rodr\'{\i}guez, L. F., Poveda, A., Lizano, S., \& Allen, C.
783: 2005, ApJ, 627, L65
784:
785: \bibitem[Scoville et al.(1983)]{1983ApJ...275..201S} Scoville, N.,
786: Kleinmann, S.~G., Hall, D.~N.~B., \& Ridgway, S.~T.\ 1983, \apj, 275, 201
787:
788: \bibitem[Sewilo et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...605..285S} Sewilo, M., Churchwell,
789: E., Kurtz, S., Goss, W.~M., \& Hofner, P.\ 2004, \apj, 605, 285
790:
791: \bibitem[Sewilo et al.(2008)]{2008arXiv0803.2872S} Sewilo, M., Churchwell,
792: E., Kurtz, S., Goss, W.~M.,
793: \& Hofner, P.\ 2008, 681, 350
794:
795:
796:
797: \end{thebibliography}
798:
799: \clearpage
800:
801: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
802: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
803: %% To embed the sample graphics in
804: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
805: %% \includegraphics commands
806: %%
807: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
808: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
809: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
810: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
811: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
812: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
813: %%
814: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
815: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
816: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
817: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
818: %% journal to journal.
819:
820: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
821: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
822: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
823: %% available in the electronic journal.
824:
825:
826: %% Here we use \plottwo to present two versions of the same figure,
827: %% one in black and white for print the other in RGB color
828: %% for online presentation. Note that the caption indicates
829: %% that a color version of the figure will be available online.
830: %%
831:
832: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may
833: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the
834: %% User Guide for details.
835: %%
836: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
837: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
838: %% after every seventh one.
839:
840: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before
841: %% each one.
842:
843: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables: the
844: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX
845: %% table environment. Use of deluxetable is preferred.
846: %%
847:
848: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,
849: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.
850:
851: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}
852: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.
853: %% We also use the \rotate command to rotate the table to
854: %% landscape orientation since it is very wide even at the
855: %% reduced font size.
856: %%
857: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed
858: %% inside the \tablecaption.
859:
860: %% This table also includes a table comment indicating that the full
861: %% version will be available in machine-readable format in the electronic
862: %% edition.
863:
864: \clearpage
865:
866: \begin{table}
867: \begin{center}
868: %\scriptsize
869: \small
870: \caption{Parameters of the 7 mm Continuum Sources in the Orion BN/KL Region\label{tbl-1}}
871: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
872: \tableline\tableline
873: &\multicolumn{2}{c}{Position$^a$} & Total Flux
874: & \\
875: \cline{2-3}
876: Source & $\alpha$(J2000) & $\delta$(J2000) & Density (mJy) &
877: Deconvolved Angular Size$^b$ \\
878: \tableline
879: BN & 05 35 14.110 & -05 22 22.73 & 28.6$\pm$0.6
880: & $0\rlap.{''}07 \pm 0\rlap.{''}01 \times 0\rlap.{''}05 \pm 0\rlap.{''}01;~ +45^\circ
881: \pm 29^\circ$ \\
882: n & 05 35 14.359 & -05 22 32.78 & 3.0$\pm$0.6
883: & $\leq 0\rlap.{''}2$ \\
884: I & 05 35 14.514 & -05 22 30.57 & 14.5$\pm$0.7
885: & $0\rlap.{''}09 \pm 0\rlap.{''}01 \times 0\rlap.{''}06 \pm 0\rlap.{''}02;~ +134^\circ
886: \pm 44^\circ$ \\
887: \tableline
888: \end{tabular}
889: %% Any table notes must follow the \end{tabular} command.
890: \tablenotetext{a}{Units of right
891: ascension are hours, minutes, and seconds
892: and units of declination are degrees, arcminutes, and arcseconds. Positional accuracy
893: is estimated to be $0\rlap.{''}01$.}
894: \tablenotetext{b}{Major axis $\times$ minor axis; position angle of major axis.}
895: %\tablecomments{We can also attach a long-ish paragraph of explanatory
896: %material to a table.}
897: \end{center}
898: \end{table}
899:
900: \clearpage
901:
902: \begin{table}
903: \begin{center}
904: %\scriptsize
905: \small
906: \caption{Parameters of the 3.6 cm Continuum Sources in the Orion BN/KL Region\label{tbl-2}}
907: \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
908: \tableline\tableline
909: &\multicolumn{2}{c}{Position$^a$} & Total Flux
910: & & Spectral \\
911: \cline{2-3}
912: Source & $\alpha$(J2000) & $\delta$(J2000) & Density (mJy) &
913: Deconvolved Angular Size$^b$ & Index \\
914: \tableline
915: BN & 05 35 14.110 & -05 22 22.74 & 4.8$\pm$0.1
916: & $0\rlap.{''}17 \pm 0\rlap.{''}01 \times 0\rlap.{''}08 \pm 0\rlap.{''}02;~ +63^\circ
917: \pm 7^\circ$ & 1.1$\pm$0.1 \\
918: n & 05 35 14.355 & -05 22 32.78 & 2.2$\pm$0.2
919: & $0\rlap.{''}50 \pm 0\rlap.{''}04 \times \leq 0\rlap.{''}09;~ +20^\circ
920: \pm 3^\circ$ & 0.2$\pm$0.1 \\
921: I & 05 35 14.514 & -05 22 30.56 & 1.2$\pm$0.1
922: & $0\rlap.{''}19 \pm 0\rlap.{''}04 \times \leq 0\rlap.{''}15;~ +136^\circ
923: \pm 23^\circ$ & 1.5$\pm$0.1 \\
924: \tableline
925: \end{tabular}
926: %% Any table notes must follow the \end{tabular} command.
927: \tablenotetext{a}{Units of right
928: ascension are hours, minutes, and seconds
929: and units of declination are degrees, arcminutes, and arcseconds. Positional accuracy
930: is estimated to be $0\rlap.{''}01$.}
931: \tablenotetext{b}{Major axis $\times$ minor axis; position angle of major axis.}
932: %\tablecomments{We can also attach a long-ish paragraph of explanatory
933: %material to a table.}
934: \end{center}
935: \end{table}
936:
937: \clearpage
938:
939: \begin{table}
940: \begin{center}
941: %\scriptsize
942: \small
943: \caption{Parameters of H53$\alpha$ Recombination Line from the BN Object\label{tbl-3}}
944: \begin{tabular}{lcc}
945: \tableline\tableline
946: Peak Flux & Half Maximum & LSR Radial \\
947: Density (mJy) & Line Width (km s$^{-1}$) & Velocity (km s$^{-1}$) \\
948: \tableline
949: 10.4$\pm$1.1 & 39.0$\pm$4.9 & 20.1$\pm$2.1 \\
950: \tableline
951: \end{tabular}
952: %% Any table notes must follow the \end{tabular} command.
953: %\tablenotetext{a}{Units of right
954: %ascension are hours, minutes, and seconds
955: %and units of declination are degrees, arcminutes, and arcseconds. Positional accuracy
956: %is estimated to be $0\rlap.{''}01$.}
957: %\tablenotetext{b}{Major axis $\times$ minor axis; position angle of major axis.}
958: %\tablecomments{We can also attach a long-ish paragraph of explanatory
959: %material to a table.}
960: \end{center}
961: \end{table}
962:
963: \clearpage
964:
965: \begin{figure}
966: \epsscale{.80}
967: %\plotone{BNCONTBIG2.PS}
968: \plotone{f1.eps}
969: \caption{Contour image of the 7 mm continuum emission
970: from the BN/KL region. The three sources detected are marked
971: with their names.
972: Contours are
973: -5, 5, 10, 20, and 40 times 0.35 mJy beam$^{-1}$, the rms noise of the image.
974: The half power contour of the synthesized beam
975: ($0\rlap.{''}17 \times 0\rlap.{''}15$
976: with a position angle of $+17^\circ$) is shown in the bottom left corner.
977: \label{fig1}}
978: \end{figure}
979:
980: \clearpage
981:
982: \begin{figure}
983: \epsscale{.80}
984: %\plotone{bnh53a.eps}
985: \plotone{f2.eps}
986: \caption{Spectrum of the H53$\alpha$ line emission
987: from BN. The dashed line is the least squares fit
988: to the data, whose parameters are given in Table 3.
989: \label{fig2}}
990: \end{figure}
991:
992: \begin{figure}
993: \epsscale{1.0}
994: %\plotone{BN4NEW.PS}
995: \plotone{f3.eps}
996: \caption{Contour images of the 7 mm continuum emission
997: (top left), the average of the total (-21.2 to +66.1 km s$^{-1}$)
998: H53$\alpha$ line emission (top right),
999: the average of the blueshifted (-21.2 to +22.5 km s$^{-1}$)
1000: H53$\alpha$ line emission (bottom left),
1001: and the average of the redshifted (+22.5 to 66.1 km s$^{-1}$)
1002: H53$\alpha$ line emission (bottom right)
1003: from the BN object.
1004: Contours are
1005: 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 times 1.0 mJy beam$^{-1}$ for the continuum image.
1006: Contours are 1, 2, and 4 times
1007: 12.0 mJy beam$^{-1}$ km s$^{-1}$ for the total line image
1008: and 16.0 mJy beam$^{-1}$ km s$^{-1}$ for the blueshifted and
1009: redshifted line images.
1010: The cross marks the peak position of the average of the total H53$\alpha$ line emission.
1011: The half power contour of the synthesized beam ($0\rlap.{''}17
1012: \times 0\rlap.{''}15$
1013: with a position angle of $+17^\circ$) is shown in the bottom left corner
1014: of the images.
1015: \label{fig3}}
1016: \end{figure}
1017:
1018:
1019: %If the table is more than one page long, the width of the table can vary
1020: %% from page to page when the default \tablewidth is used, as below. The
1021: %% individual table widths for each page will be written to the log file; a
1022: %% maximum tablewidth for the table can be computed from these values.
1023: %% The \tablewidth argument can then be reset and the file reprocessed, so
1024: %% that the table is of uniform width throughout. Try getting the widths
1025: %% from the log file and changing the \tablewidth parameter to see how
1026: %% adjusting this value affects table formatting.
1027:
1028: %% The \dataset{} macro has also been applied to a few of the objects to
1029: %% show how many observations can be tagged in a table.
1030:
1031: %% Tables may also be prepared as separate files. See the accompanying
1032: %% sample file table.tex for an example of an external table file.
1033: %% To include an external file in your main document, use the \input
1034: %% command. Uncomment the line below to include table.tex in this
1035: %% sample file. (Note that you will need to comment out the \documentclass,
1036: %% \begin{document}, and \end{document} commands from table.tex if you want
1037: %% to include it in this document.)
1038:
1039: %% \input{table}
1040:
1041: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
1042: %% that appears after it.
1043:
1044: \end{document}
1045:
1046: %%
1047: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
1048: