1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
3: \documentclass{emulateapj}
4: \usepackage{graphicx,apjfonts}
5: %\usepackage{graphicx,apjfonts,emulateapj5,onecolfloat5}
6: %\usepackage{graphicx} % Use the last line to get good ApJL format
7: \usepackage{natbib}
8: \usepackage{lscape}
9: %\usepackage{psfig}
10:
11: \slugcomment{Accepted by ApJ on Oct.25th 2008}
12:
13: \providecommand{\bm}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath$#1$\unboldmath}}
14: \def\Msolar{$M_{\odot}$ }
15: \def\kms{${\rm km~s}^{-1}$ }
16: \def\etal{et al.}
17: \def\hkpc{$h^{-1}$~kpc }
18: % \def\liu#1{{\bf Liu: #1}}
19:
20: \shorttitle{}
21: \shortauthors{}
22: \begin{document}
23:
24:
25: \title{Mergers of luminous early-type galaxies in the local universe and
26: gravitational wave background}
27:
28: \author{Z. L. Wen\altaffilmark{1,3},
29: F. S. Liu\altaffilmark{2,1},
30: and
31: J. L. Han\altaffilmark{1}}
32:
33: \altaffiltext{1}{National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
34: 20A Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100012, P.R.China;
35: zhonglue@bao.ac.cn, hjl@bao.ac.cn.}
36: \altaffiltext{2}{College of Physics Science and Technology,
37: Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang 110034, P.R.China;
38: lfs@bao.ac.cn.}
39: \altaffiltext{3}{Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,
40: Beijing, 100049, P.R.China}
41:
42: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
43:
44: \begin{abstract}
45: Supermassive black hole (SMBH) coalescence in galaxy mergers is
46: believed to be one of the primary sources of very low frequency
47: gravitational waves (GWs). Significant contribution of the GWs comes from
48: mergers of massive galaxies with redshifts $z<2$. Very few previous
49: studies gave the merger rate of massive galaxies.
50: %
51: We selected a large sample (1209) of close pairs of galaxies with projected
52: separations $7<r_p<$50 kpc from 87,889 luminous early-type galaxies
53: ($M_r<-21.5$) from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release
54: 6. These pairs constitute a complete volume-limited sample in the
55: local universe ($z<0.12$). Using our newly developed technique, 249
56: mergers have been identified by searching for interaction
57: features. From them, we found that the merger fraction of luminous
58: early-type galaxies is 0.8\%, and the merger rate in the local
59: universe is
60: %
61: $R_{\rm g} \sim (1.0\pm0.4)\times 10^{-5}~{\rm ~Mpc^{-3}~Gyr^{-1}}$
62: %
63: with an uncertainty mainly depending on the merging timescale.
64: %
65: We estimated the masses of SMBHs in the centers of merging galaxies based
66: on their luminosities. We found that the chirp mass distribution of
67: the SMBH binaries follows a power law with an index of $-3.0\pm0.5$ in the
68: range $5\times 10^8$--$5\times 10^{9}$~$M_{\odot}$.
69: %
70: Using the SMBH population in the mergers and assuming that the SMBHs
71: can be efficiently driven into the GW regime, we investigated the
72: stochastic GW background in the frequency range $10^{-9}$--$10^{-7}$ Hz.
73: We obtained the spectrum of the GW background of
74: $h_c(f)\sim 10^{-15}(f/{\rm yr}^{-1})^{-2/3}$, which is one magnitude
75: higher than that obtained by Jaffe \& Backer in 2003, but consistent
76: with those calculated from galaxy-formation models.
77:
78: \end{abstract}
79:
80: \keywords{galaxies: interactions --- galaxies: general ---
81: black hole physics --- gravitational waves}
82:
83:
84: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
85: \section{Introduction}
86:
87: Gravitational waves (GWs) are a new window to observe violent
88: astrophysical dynamic processes. Efforts in the detection of GWs are
89: currently being made at several frequency bands.
90: %
91: For example, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory
92: (LIGO) aims to detect GWs in the frequency range 1--$10^4$~Hz
93: \citep{aad+92} emitted from the coalescence of binary compact objects
94: or from the cosmic GW background.
95: %
96: In the frequency range $10^{-6}$--0.1~Hz, the Laser
97: Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) is expected to detect the GWs
98: emitted from the coalescence of massive black hole (BH) binaries in the
99: mass range $10^3$--$10^7$ $M_{\odot}$ and from the unresolved
100: white dwarf binaries in the Milky Way and nearby galaxies
101: \citep{hae94,nyp01}.
102: %
103: Precision timing of millisecond pulsars appears to be a unique
104: technique \citep{saz78,det79,jhl+05,jhv+06} to measure GWs emitted
105: from the coalescence of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) with masses
106: $10^7$--$10^{10}~M_{\odot}$ in galactic nuclei, cosmic superstrings, and
107: relic GW background from the big bang \citep{mag00,phi01,jb03} in the
108: frequency range $10^{-9}$--$10^{-7}$~Hz.
109:
110: The SMBH mergers at redshifts $z<2$ dominate the GW background and
111: resolvable signal at a frequency band $10^{-9}$--$10^{-7}$~Hz
112: \citep{wl03,shmv04,svc08,svv08}. Only galaxy mergers provide a chance
113: for the SMBH mergers. At present, the galaxy merger history is
114: not very clear. The evolution of the merger rate is often described by a
115: power law, $R_{\rm g}(z)\propto (1+z)^m$, where, $m$ is the evolution
116: index. However, the merger rate of massive galaxies has not been
117: determined precisely from observations. In the rest of the introduction,
118: we will review the current knowledge on galaxy pair fraction and
119: merger rate, and then discuss current understanding on GWs from
120: SMBH coalescence.
121:
122: In this paper, we assume a $\Lambda$CDM cosmology taking
123: $H_0=$100 $h$ ${\rm km~s}^{-1}$ ${\rm Mpc}^{-1}$, with $h=0.72$,
124: $\Omega_m=0.3$ and $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.7$.
125:
126: \subsection{Galaxy pair fraction and merger rate: current knowledge}
127:
128: Three methods have previously been applied for measurement of the
129: merger rate and its evolution.
130: %
131: The first and most straightforward is to count the incidence of
132: strong disturbed galaxies with double nucleus, or
133: tidal tails \citep[e.g.][]{lal+00,
134: cbd+03,ccw03,lrc+04,van05,klc+07,ldf+08}.
135: %
136: The second is to take statistics of close pairs from a
137: spectroscopic redshift survey assuming that the close pairs will
138: result in galaxy mergers over a relatively short timescale
139: \citep{zk89,bkw+94,cpi94,ye95,wfr95,nir+97,ppy+97,wk98,pcm+00,
140: ppc+02,bfe+04,lkw+04,dld+05,dcl+07,bnm+06,kss+07,lpk+08,pa08}. Physical
141: pairs with separations $r_p<$20 $h^{-1}$~kpc and line-of-sight
142: velocity differences $\Delta v<500$ ${\rm km~s}^{-1}$ are expected to
143: merge within 0.5~Gyr \citep{pcm+00, con06}. Key problems of such
144: studies were the very limited number of galaxies with spectroscopic
145: redshifts, the incompleteness of the sample, and the
146: contamination of unphysical pairs \citep{pcm+00,dcl+07}.
147: %
148: Another useful but less direct method is the statistics of close pairs
149: from the two-point correlation function of galaxies at small scales
150: \citep[e.g.][]{mhc+06,bps+06}. The projected correlation function can
151: be obtained from a large sample of galaxies, and can be
152: ``deprojected'' to get the real-space correlation function.
153:
154: Morphological signatures of interactions can be found by visual
155: inspection, which is very time consuming and somewhat subjective. Some
156: excellent studies have been published recently.
157: %
158: \citet{lal+00} studied merger fraction using 285 galaxies from the
159: Canada--France Redshift Survey and Autofib-Low Dispersion Spectrograph
160: Survey. They found 49 pairs by visual identification, 37 of which
161: have a Lee ratio $L_R>1.5$. Combining the result given by
162: \citet{ppy+97}, \citet{lal+00} determined the merger fraction
163: evolution as $2.1\% \times (1+z)^{3.4\pm0.6}$.
164: %
165: \citet{cbd+03} studied the fraction of galaxies undergoing major
166: mergers as a function of redshift using model-independent
167: morphological signatures (concentration, asymmetry, clumpiness) in the
168: WFPC2 and NICMOS Hubble Deep Field North. Their samples have 51, 142,
169: 93, and 183 galaxies ($M_B<-18$) in the four redshift ranges with $\langle
170: z \rangle =$ 0.58, 1.10, 1.73, and 1.41, respectively. They found that
171: the corresponding merger fractions are 4\%, 14\%, 14\%, and 9\%.
172: %
173: Recently, \citet{ldf+08} found 312 merger candidates with
174: morphological disturbances based on a volume-limited sample of 3009
175: galaxies ($M_B<-18.94$) from the All-Wavelength Extended
176: Groth Strip International Survey. A constant merger fraction of
177: (10$\pm$2)\% was found in the redshift range of $z=0.2$--1.2.
178:
179: There has been much effort applied to the statistics of close pairs, as
180: summarized in Table 2 of \citet{kss+07}.
181: %
182: \citet{ccp+00} selected kinematic pairs of galaxies ($M_B-5\log
183: h<-19.8$) with $5<r_p<100$ $h^{-1}$~kpc and $\Delta v<1000$ ${\rm
184: km~s}^{-1}$ in the redshift range of $z=0.1$--1.1. They found 18
185: pairs from 300 galaxies of the Caltech Faint Galaxy Redshift Survey and 91
186: pairs from 3000 galaxies of the Canadian Network for Observational
187: Cosmology.
188: %
189: \citet{pcm+00} defined $N_c$, ``the number of dynamically close {\it
190: companions per galaxy}'', to study the pair fraction. From 5426
191: galaxies ($-21<M_B<-18$) in the Second Southern Sky
192: Redshift Surveys, they found 80 {\it companions} satisfying the
193: conditions $5<r_p<20$ $h^{-1}$~kpc and $\Delta v<500$ ${\rm
194: km~s}^{-1}$, and derived $N_c=(2.26\pm0.52)\%$ at an average
195: redshift $\langle z \rangle=0.015$.
196: %
197: Using the same selection criteria, \citet{ppc+02} identified 88
198: galaxies in close pairs from 4184 field galaxies at redshifts
199: $0.12\leq z \leq 0.55$ from the Canadian Network for Observational
200: Cosmology. They obtained $N_c = (3.21\pm0.77)\%$ at redshift $\langle
201: z \rangle=0.3$. Combing the early result in \citet{pcm+00}, they also
202: determined the merger rate evolution as $(1+z)^{2.3\pm0.7}$.
203: %
204: \citet{lkw+04} found 79 paired galaxies ($10<r_p<50$ $h^{-1}$~kpc,
205: $\Delta v<500$ ${\rm km~s}^{-1}$) out of 2547 galaxies from the
206: initial data of the DEEP2 Redshift Survey, and found that the pair
207: fraction $N_c$ is $\sim8\%$ at redshift $z\sim0.6$ and increases to
208: $\sim10\%$ at redshift $z\sim1.1$. Fitting a power-law model to the
209: pair fractions determined from higher redshift together with those
210: determined at lower redshift \citep{pcm+00,ppc+02}, \citet{lkw+04} obtained
211: the evolution index $m=0.51\pm0.28$.
212: %
213: From the Millennium Galaxy Catalogue, \citet{dld+05} found 137
214: dynamically close companions ($5<r_p<20$ $h^{-1}$~kpc, $\Delta v<500$
215: ${\rm km~s}^{-1}$) in a bright sample ($-22 < M_B-5\log h < -19$) and
216: 176 companions in a faint sample ($-22 < M_B-5\log h < -18$). They
217: found the pair fractions $N_c=(1.74\pm0.15)\%$ at redshift $\langle z
218: \rangle = 0.123$ and $(3.57\pm0.27)\%$ at redshift $\langle z \rangle
219: =0.116$, respectively, after a correction for ($\sim30\%$) missing
220: pairs.
221:
222: Above studies have used relatively small samples. Recently, 1749 close
223: pairs ($5<r_p<20$ kpc) have been found by \citet{kss+07} from a
224: complete sample of 59,221 galaxies ($M_V<-19.8$) in the redshift range
225: of $z=0.1$--1.2 from the Cosmic Evolution Survey field. This is the
226: largest data set of close pairs. Supplemented by the local pair
227: fraction from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), they found the pair
228: fraction evolution to be $(1+z)^{3.1\pm0.1}$.
229: %
230: Note that the majority of these statistics were studied for general
231: mergers, using close pairs selected with small radial velocity
232: differences and small projected separations.
233:
234: Recently, several studies have been carried out on mergers between
235: gas-poor early-type massive galaxies, also called ``dry
236: merger'' \citep{bnm+06,lpk+08}.
237: %
238: \citet{mhc+06} studied the merger rate of Luminous Red Galaxies in the
239: SDSS using the two-point correlation function. They found that the
240: correlation function closely follows $\xi(r)\sim r^{-2}$ over four orders
241: of magnitude, from 0.01 to 100~$h^{-1}$~Mpc. Taking a merger length
242: scale of $r_f=10$~kpc and a typical velocity dispersion, $\sigma_v\sim
243: 200$ ${\rm km~s}^{-1}$, the dynamical time is about $t_{\rm dyn}=
244: $200~Myr. The merger rate per galaxy, $\Gamma$, for galaxies with a
245: comoving number density, $n=10^{-4}~{\rm Mpc^{-3}}$, is
246: %%
247: $$\Gamma \approx \frac{4\pi n\; r_f^2\xi(r_f)}{t_{\rm
248: dyn}}=\frac{1}{160~{\rm Gyr}}. $$
249: %%
250: We can further find a comoving volume merger rate of galaxies,
251: %%
252: \begin{equation}
253: R_{\rm g}\equiv n\Gamma=6\times 10^{-7}~{\rm Mpc}^{-3}~{\rm Gyr}^{-1}.
254: \end{equation}
255: %%
256: Note that this is one magnitude smaller than that of
257: \citet{mhc+06}.\footnote{Equation (12) in \citet{mhc+06} has a wrong form
258: of $\Gamma/n$.}
259: %
260: \citet{bnm+06} found six dry mergers (12 galaxies) from 468 early-type
261: galaxies ($M_V<-20.5$) in the redshift range of $z=0.1$--0.7 from
262: the Galaxy Evolution from Morphology and spectral energy distributions (SEDs) survey. Their
263: simulations show that {\it the distinct interaction features in the
264: mergers of early-type galaxies only appear in the last pass or
265: coalescence}.
266: %
267: Following this, \citet{mgh+08} identified 38 merging pairs of massive
268: galaxies (stellar masses $M_{\rm star} >5\times 10^{10}$ $M_{\odot}$
269: and $r_p\le30$~kpc) from 845 galaxy groups/clusters at redshifts
270: $z<0.12$ in the SDSS Data Release 2 (DR2). They found that the merger rate
271: of massive galaxies in the galaxy groups is several times higher than
272: that of the SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies.
273: %
274: \citet{lpk+08} studied the evolution of pair fraction and merger rate
275: for different types of pairs of galaxies ($-21 < M_B < -19$) with
276: $10<r_p< 30$, 50, 100 $h^{-1}$~kpc and $\Delta v<500$ ${\rm
277: km~s}^{-1}$. Their sample includes 218 blue--blue pairs, 122 red--red
278: pairs and 166 red--blue pairs in the redshift range of $z= 0.1$--1.2
279: from Team Keck Redshift Survey and other surveys mentioned above.
280: %
281: They found that the merger rate evolutions are different for
282: different types of pairs. The blue--blue pairs have a merger rate
283: evolution index $m=1.27\pm0.35$, whereas the red--red pairs and
284: red--blue pairs have negative indices, as $-0.92\pm0.59$ and
285: $-1.52\pm0.42$, respectively.
286:
287: In summary, most previous studies work on the pair fraction and merger
288: rate of a general merger. The pair fraction varies in a range of 1\%--10\%
289: in the redshift range of $z= 0.2$--1.2 with an evolution index
290: of $m=0-3$. Only a few authors have tried to determine merger rates
291: for different types of galaxies. The mergers of early-type galaxies have
292: been explored only recently \citep{bnm+06, mhc+06,lpk+08,ldf+08}. The
293: large uncertainty of merger rate remains due to either the small
294: sample or the contamination of unphysical pairs. The merger rate
295: should be better determined using the fraction of merging galaxies,
296: rather than the fraction of galaxies in the projected close pairs.
297:
298: Using the SDSS data, we select a large complete volume-limited
299: pair sample of luminous early-type galaxies and try to determine the merger
300: rate in the local universe ($z<0.12$). The BHs in the luminous
301: early-type galaxies are much more massive than those in late-type
302: galaxies, and their mergers will play an important role in the
303: formation of massive galaxies and SMBH binaries.
304:
305: \subsection{SMBH mergers and GWs}
306:
307: SMBHs exist in the nucleus of nearby and distant galaxies. When
308: two galaxies merge, the SMBHs in the centers of galaxies sink toward the
309: center of a newly formed galaxy through dynamic friction
310: \citep{bbr80,yu02}, and then a SMBH binary can be formed. The SMBH
311: binary continues to harden (i.e., lose energy, shrink, and move faster)
312: and becomes a bound system through, e.g., stellar dynamics
313: \citep{qui96,mm01,shm06} or gas dynamics
314: \citep{gr00,an02,elc+04,dch+07}. Consequently, the SMBH binary loses
315: energy and angular momentum by GW radiation, and eventually coalesces
316: to produce a luminous GW event.
317:
318: The GWs emitted from SMBH binaries can be detected as individual
319: sources and a stochastic background from many events together. Recent
320: studies \citep{shv+88,simt03,vkl+08} have suggested that SMBH binaries
321: may exist in the centers of galaxies with orbit periods of a few
322: years. They are possible individual GW-emitting sources to be revealed
323: by pulsar timing observations. The GW amplitude from a SMBH binary is
324: \citep{tho87}
325: %
326: \begin{equation}
327: h_s=4\sqrt{\frac{2}{5}}\frac{(GM_c)^{5/3}}{c^4D(z)}[\pi f(1+z)]^{2/3},
328: \label{hs}
329: \end{equation}
330: %
331: where $M_c$ is the chirp mass of the SMBH binary,
332: %
333: \begin{equation}
334: M_c^{5/3}=\frac{M_1M_2}{(M_1+M_2)^{1/3}};
335: \label{chirpmass}
336: \end{equation}
337: %
338: here $M_1$ and $M_2$ are SMBH masses; $f$ is the observed GW
339: frequency; $c$ is the speed of light; $D(z)$ is the comoving distance
340: to the system located at $z$,
341: %
342: \begin{equation}
343: D(z)=\frac{c}{H_0}\int_0^z \frac{dz}{E(z)};
344: \end{equation}
345: %
346: here $E(z)=\sqrt{\Omega_{\Lambda}+\Omega_m(1+z)^3}$. The frequency
347: change of the GW per unit time in the observer's frame is given by
348: \citet{pm63}:
349: %
350: \begin{equation}
351: \frac{df}{dt}=\frac{96}{5\pi}\Big(\frac{GM_c}{c^3}\Big)^{5/3}(\pi
352: f)^{11/3}(1+z)^{5/3}.
353: \label{timeeq}
354: \end{equation}
355:
356: A large number of unresolved coalescing SMBH binaries together can produce a
357: stochastic GW background. The spectrum can be formulated as
358: \citep{phi01,jb03,eins04}
359: %
360: \begin{equation}
361: h_c^2(f)=\int dz\;dM_c\; h_s^2 N(f,z,M_c) \;
362: \; f \; \theta(f_{\rm max}-f),
363: \label{hcf}
364: \end{equation}
365: %
366: where $N(f,z,M_c)\;dz\;dM_c$ is the number of SMBH binaries per unit
367: frequency in mass interval $dM_c$ and redshift interval $dz$. The
368: $\theta(x)$ in Equation~\ref{hcf} is the step function \citep{eins04} and
369: $f_{\rm max}=c^3/[6^{3/2}\pi G(M_1+M_2)]$ is the maximum frequency of the
370: GW before the SMBHs plunge together \citep{hug02}. $N(f,z,M_c)$ is
371: related to the merger rate of SMBH per unit comoving volume, $R_{\rm
372: BH}(z)$, by
373: %
374: \begin{equation}
375: N(f,z,M_c)=\frac{4\pi c^3}{H_0^3}\frac{D(z)^2}{E(z)(1+z)}
376: \frac{dt}{df}\frac{\Phi(M_c,z)}{n_{\rm BH}(z)}R_{\rm BH}(z),
377: \label{numbin}
378: \end{equation}
379: %
380: here, $\Phi(M_c,z)$ is the chirp mass distribution of SMBH binaries;
381: $n_{\rm BH}(z)=\int \Phi(M_c,z)\;dM_c$ is the number density of SMBH
382: binaries.
383:
384: \citet{rr95} estimated the number of GW-emitting sources by examining
385: the probability of SMBH binary coalescence through the process by
386: interaction with field stars. They used the SMBH mass function from
387: the model of active galactic nuclei \citep[AGNs;][]{sb92} and a merger rate evolution as
388: $(1+z)^{3.5}$. Finally, they obtained a GW spectrum of $h_c(f)\sim
389: 10^{-16}(f/\rm yr^{-1})^{-2/3}$ at frequency $f\sim 0.1-1 {\rm
390: yr}^{-1}$.
391: %
392: \citet{phi01} further formulated the calculation of the GW background,
393: and obtained the spectrum in a power law $h_c(f)\sim f^{-2/3}$. He
394: found that the GW spectrum index is independent of cosmology. The
395: amplitude is in an order of $\sim 10^{-16}$ at the frequency of $1
396: {\rm yr}^{-1}$ which depends on the merger rate of SMBHs and the SMBH
397: population in the universe.
398:
399: \citet{jb03} formulated all ingredients including the merger rate of
400: SMBHs, the distribution of SMBH masses, the strain of the GW
401: background for a single binary, and the GW radiation timescale
402: ($\tau_{\rm GW}=f\;dt/df$). They obtained the spectrum\footnote{The
403: authors misquoted the strain amplitude of $h_c(f)\sim 10^{-15}(f/\rm
404: yr^{-1})^{-2/3}$ in their abstract.} of $h_c(f)\sim 10^{-16}(f/\rm
405: yr^{-1})^{-2/3}$, confirming the results of \citet{rr95} and
406: \citet{phi01}. They also found that the slope of the spectrum is
407: determined by the strain and timescale of individual merger event,
408: independent of the merger models and SMBH population. The large
409: uncertainty of the spectrum amplitudes comes from approximations in
410: the theoretical formulation, lack of knowledge of the merger rate and
411: SMBH population, and unknown dynamical processes of SMBH binary to
412: reach a GW-dominated regime.
413:
414: To minimize the uncertainties, some efforts have been made to
415: calculate the GW background utilizing the galaxy merger rate and the
416: SMBH population based on the standard hierarchical structure formation
417: scenarios \citep{wl03,eins04,shmv04,svc08}. These studies show that
418: the amplitude of the GW background is a few times higher than those
419: given by \citet{phi01} and \citet{jb03}. The characteristic strain
420: spectrum is dominated by SMBHs with masses larger than $10^{9}$
421: $M_{\odot}$ at low redshifts ($z<2$), and the spectrum becomes steeper
422: than $-2/3$ when the frequency is larger than about $10^{-7}$~Hz.
423:
424: Clearly, observational determination of the merger rate of SMBHs and
425: the SMBH mass function in the binaries is crucial for a more precise
426: calculation of the GW background. This paper is organized as
427: follows. In Section 2, we describe the identification of merging pairs and
428: determine the merger rate of luminous early-type galaxies in the local
429: universe. In Section 3, we derive the chirp mass distribution of the SMBH
430: binaries in the mergers and calculate the spectrum amplitude of the GW
431: background. We give conclusions in Section 4.
432:
433:
434: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
435: %
436: \section{Pair fraction and merger rate of luminous early-type galaxies in the SDSS}
437: %
438: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
439:
440: To determine the pair fraction and merger rate of luminous early-type
441: galaxies in the local universe, we selected a large and complete
442: sample of close pairs of galaxies ($M_r<-21.5$) at redshifts $z<0.12$
443: directly from the SDSS DR6. The SDSS provides
444: photometric data in five broad bands ($u$, $g$, $r$, $i$, and $z$) for
445: more than 8400 deg$^2$ to the limit of $r=22$ mag, deeper than
446: any previous wide sky surveys. The follow-up spectroscopy observations
447: have measured spectra of more than 790,000 galaxies in about 7425
448: deg$^2$ \citep{dr6}. The main galaxy sample reaches an
449: extinction-corrected Petrosian magnitude of $r=17.77$ \citep{swl+02}
450: and a completeness of $\sim$90\% \citep{bll+03}. We selected this
451: sample of projected close pairs incorporating the spectroscopic with
452: photometric catalogs, and then identified the mergers by searching for
453: the interaction features.
454:
455: \subsection{Pairs of luminous early-type galaxies: sample}
456:
457: In previous studies, close pairs were usually selected using the
458: criteria $\Delta v<500$ ${\rm km~s}^{-1}$ and $r_p<20$ $h^{-1}$~kpc
459: or $r_p<30$ $h^{-1}$~kpc (see Section 1.1). However, direct searches of
460: pairs from the SDSS spectroscopic catalog would miss $\sim$70\% of
461: close pairs due to the fiber collision problem \citep{mgh+08}. Targets of
462: the spectroscopic survey are assigned to fibers with a radius of 1.5
463: arcsec, and two fibers cannot be placed more closely than 55
464: arcsec. The incompleteness is severe on very small angular
465: scales. However, the estimated photometric redshifts \citep{olc+08}
466: can be used as the complement of the spectroscopic redshifts of
467: galaxies.
468:
469: We obtained a complete pair sample of luminous early-type galaxies
470: from the SDSS with the following steps. We found the redshifts of
471: bright galaxies ($13.5<r<17.5$) and constructed a sample of close
472: pairs with projected separations $7<r_p<50$~kpc at redshifts
473: $z<0.12$. The photometric redshifts are taken for the galaxies without
474: spectroscopic redshifts. If the spectroscopic redshifts are available
475: for both galaxies in a pair (i.e., the spec--spec pair), {\it the
476: redshift for the pair} is taken as the average of the two
477: redshifts. If the spectroscopic redshift is available for only one of
478: the paired galaxies (i.e., the spec--phot pair), it is taken as the
479: pair redshift. If no spectroscopic redshifts are available for both
480: galaxies (i.e., the phot--phot pair), the pair redshift has to be taken
481: as the average of the two photometric redshifts.
482: %
483: The lower limit of 7~kpc in separation corresponds to $\sim3''$ at
484: redshift $z=0.12$. The photometry becomes unreliable for paired
485: galaxies with smaller angular separations \citep{mhc+06}. The upper
486: limit of 50~kpc is chosen so that all merging pairs, even the one with
487: a large separation, can be included in our sample. We restricted the
488: redshift range of $z<0.12$ to get enough samples for our statistics and
489: to have the galaxies well resolved for the further image analysis.
490: %
491: We applied the $K$-correction for all galaxies to the rest frame
492: \citep{br07}. The galaxies in the pairs must have $M_r<-21.5$ and
493: satisfy the color constraints of $(u-r)>2.2$ and $(g-r)>0.7$
494: \citep{sik+01}. However, the sample is still contaminated by some red
495: late-type galaxies, e.g., edge-on spiral galaxies with dust lanes or
496: galaxies with red bulges, which were about $10\%$ and have been
497: excluded by visual inspection on color images of all targets from the
498: {\it DR6 Catalog Archive
499: Server}\footnote{http://cas.sdss.org/astro/en/}. Following the above
500: selection criteria, we obtained 1209 pairs from 87,889 galaxies with
501: $M_r<-21.5$ at redshifts $z<0.12$. There are 230 spec--spec pairs, 543
502: spec--phot pairs and 436 phot--phot pairs. These pairs are listed in
503: Table 1 (a full list is available in the online version).
504:
505: \begin{figure}[ht!]
506: \epsscale{1.1}
507: \plotone{f1a.eps}\\[2mm]
508: \plotone{f1b.eps}
509: \caption{Top: distribution of line-of-sight velocity differences
510: for the spec--spec pairs. Bottom: fractions of pairs with
511: velocity differences $\Delta v < 500$ ${\rm km~s}^{-1}$ for various
512: maximum projected separations.
513: \label{velhist}}
514: \end{figure}
515:
516: Figure~\ref{velhist} shows the distribution of line-of-sight velocity
517: differences for the spec--spec sample. 71\% of the pairs have
518: $\Delta v<500$ ${\rm km~s}^{-1}$. We also show in
519: Figure~\ref{velhist} the fraction of pairs with $\Delta v < 500$ ${\rm
520: km~s}^{-1}$ as a function of projected separation. Among the close
521: pairs with $r_p<30$ kpc, 81\% have the $\Delta v < 500$ ${\rm
522: km~s}^{-1}$.
523:
524: \subsection{Identification of mergers}
525:
526: Most of the previous efforts in the determination of the merger rate used the
527: projected close pairs. Very few groups \citep{bnm+06,mgh+08}
528: identified interaction features for pairs of luminous early-type
529: galaxies. The apparent close pairs may be widely separated in a
530: three-dimensional space. It is necessary to check how many of the projected
531: close pairs are merging.
532:
533: \begin{figure}[ht]
534: \epsscale{1.1}
535: \plotone{f2.eps}
536: \caption{Difference between the SDSS model magnitude and our fitted
537: magnitude against the fitted magnitude for paired galaxies.
538: \label{magcom}}
539: \end{figure}
540:
541: In merging galaxies, stars and gas may be torn apart from parent
542: galaxies under tidal force. The induced asymmetric features (such as
543: tails, bridges and plumes) can be used as evidence for galaxy
544: interactions.
545: %
546: Interaction involving at least one gas-rich late-type galaxy usually
547: accompanies strong star forming and creates distinct long tidal
548: tails. Such a merger is distinct and easy to identify. In
549: contrast, merger involving only gas-poor early-type galaxies usually
550: does not create distinct interaction features. However, the weak
551: features of early-type galaxy merging can be identified after a smooth
552: symmetric model for each paired galaxy is subtracted from the image
553: \citep{bnm+06,mgh+08}.
554:
555: We extracted the SDSS $r$-band images for all selected pairs. The
556: corrected frames have been processed by the SDSS pipeline, including
557: bias-subtraction, flat-field, cosmic-ray removal, and correction for
558: pixel defect. We performed a precise sky background subtraction from
559: the corrected frames \citep[see details in][]{lxm+08}.
560: %
561: We applied the GALFIT package \citep{phir02} to construct a smooth
562: symmetric model for every early-type galaxy in the projected pair
563: list. The model fitting requires an observational image, a masked
564: image, and an image of the point-spread function (PSF) that is the
565: seeing of SDSS images characterized by the parameters of
566: double-Gaussian profiles \citep{slb+02}.
567: %
568: From the SDSS catalog, we also obtained a list of other fainter
569: galaxies and stars within $2R_{90}$ from the centers of two
570: galaxies. Here $R_{90}$ is the radius containing 90\% of the Petrosian
571: flux. The stars have directly been modeled with the PSF, but the
572: target early-type galaxies and other fainter galaxies have been
573: modeled by the S{\'e}rsic function \citep{ser68} convolved with the
574: PSF image. Objects {\it outside} $2R_{90}$ in the extracted image were
575: masked. The fitting is to minimize the $\chi^2$ between the
576: sky-subtracted image of unmasked pixels and the PSF-convolved model
577: for paired galaxies and other objects in the image.
578:
579: The modeling procedure provides a fitted magnitude for each galaxy,
580: which is the integrated flux of the best-fitted S{\'e}rsic
581: function. The advantage of the fitted magnitude is that the fluxes
582: from both galaxies in the overlapped region can be
583: separated. Moreover, we have corrected the sky background for bright
584: objects and objects in crowded fields in the SDSS pipeline \citep[see
585: more detailed discussion and solution in][]{lxm+08}, which would
586: result in a systematic underestimation for luminosities (and sizes)
587: of bright objects in the SDSS pipeline
588: \citep{mhs+05,lfr+07,lxm+08}. Brighter galaxies tend to be influenced
589: more severely \citep[see Figure 3 of][]{lxm+08}. This tendency can be
590: seen in Figure~\ref{magcom} from a rough comparison between the fitted
591: magnitudes and the SDSS model magnitudes. Therefore, the fitted
592: magnitudes are adopted in the following analysis.
593:
594: \begin{figure}[t]
595: \epsscale{1.15}
596: \plotone{f3a.eps}\\[2mm]
597: \plotone{f3b.eps}
598: \caption{Examples of the sky-subtracted images {\it (left)}, the models
599: with GALFIT {\it (middle)}, and the residual images {\it (right)} for
600: merging {\it (top 3)} and nonmerging pairs {\it (bottom 3)}.
601: \label{fitsample1}}
602: \end{figure}
603:
604: Figure~\ref{fitsample1} illustrates six examples of GALFIT
605: fitting. The top three pairs with significant interaction signatures
606: (e.g., short tidal tails, bridges) in the residual images ({\it right
607: panels}) are considered as the merging systems. In contrast, there are no
608: obvious interaction features in the residual images of the bottom three
609: examples. The lack of clear interaction signatures suggests that these
610: pairs may be either due to projection effects or at early stages of
611: interaction.
612:
613: \begin{figure}
614: \epsscale{1.1}
615: \plotone{f4.eps}
616: \caption{An example of the residual image of a galaxy pair. The
617: ellipses mark the regions with three times of the fitted major and
618: minor axes of the S{\'e}rsic function for each galaxy.
619: The paired galaxies are overlapped in the region of $C$.
620: \label{illuasy}}
621: \end{figure}
622:
623: Quantitative criteria are needed to identify interaction signatures.
624: We noted that \citet{cbj00} developed a method to estimate the
625: rotational asymmetry of galaxies and identify major mergers
626: \citep{cbd+03,dcl+07}. In this paper, we measured the asymmetry
627: factors of early-type galaxy pairs from the residual images (see an
628: example in Figure~\ref{illuasy}). The photometric region $A$ or $B$ is
629: within 3$R_e$ but not overlapped. Here $R_e$ is the effective radius,
630: a parameter in the fitted S{\'e}rsic function. The overlapped region
631: is marked as region $C$. Our asymmetry calculation is to measure
632: the difference between any pixels and those symmetric pixels with
633: respect to galactic centers. Two different cases exist. One is a pair
634: of pixels within the region $A$ or $B$; the other is a pixel triplet,
635: with one pixel in the region $C$, but it has symmetric pixels in
636: region $A$ and $B$ (or even $C$). It is supposed that there are $N_A$
637: pairs in region $A$, $N_B$ pairs in region $B$, and $N_C$
638: pixel triplets, and that the rms value of the residual image is
639: $\sigma$. We defined the sum of difference squares for three regions
640: as being
641: \begin{eqnarray}
642: \Delta_A&=&\sum^{N_A}[I_A(i)-I_A(i')]^2-2N_A\sigma^2,\nonumber\\
643: \Delta_B&=&\sum^{N_B}[I_B(i)-I_B(i')]^2-2N_B\sigma^2,\nonumber\\
644: \Delta_C&=&\sum^{N_C}[I_C(i)-I_A(i')-I_B(i')]^2-3N_C\sigma^2.\nonumber\\
645: \end{eqnarray}
646: %
647: Here, $I_A(i)-I_A(i')$ is the residual image difference between a
648: symmetric pixel pair, $i$ and $i'$, in the region $A$;
649: $I_B(i)-I_B(i')$ is that in the region $B$; and
650: $I_C(i)-I_A(i')-I_B(i')$ is that for a pixel in region $C$ and its
651: symmetric pixels in regions $A$ and $B$ (or even $C$). It is
652: necessary to subtract the noise power. We also defined
653: %
654: \begin{eqnarray}
655: S_A&=&\sum^{N_A}[I_A(i)+I_A(i')]^2-2N_A\sigma^2,\nonumber\\
656: S_B&=&\sum^{N_B}[I_B(i)+I_B(i')]^2-2N_B\sigma^2,\nonumber\\
657: S_C&=&\sum^{N_C}[I_C(i)+I_A(i')+I_B(i')]^2-3N_C\sigma^2,\nonumber\\
658: \end{eqnarray}
659: %
660: for normalization. Then, the asymmetry factor, $a$, is defined as
661: %
662: \begin{equation}
663: a=\frac{\Delta_A+\Delta_B+\Delta_C}{S_A+S_B+S_C}.
664: \end{equation}
665: %
666:
667: Ideally, $a \sim 0$ is for a galaxy pair without any interaction
668: feature. A large $a$ means a stronger asymmetric interaction.
669:
670: \begin{figure}
671: \epsscale{1.1}
672: \plotone{f5.eps}
673: \caption{Distribution of the asymmetry factors, $a$, for pairs with
674: and without clear interaction features.
675: \label{asymmetry}}
676: \end{figure}
677:
678: By visual inspection on the residual images of all projected pairs, we
679: found 74 pairs with obvious interaction features and 111 pairs clearly
680: without any feature. The magnitude of residual image $r_{\rm
681: res}<20$~mag and the asymmetry factor $a>0.45$ can clearly separate
682: the two kinds of pairs, as shown in Figure~\ref{asymmetry}. We then
683: took these criteria to automatically identify the merging pairs from
684: other projected pairs. Note that the asymmetry factor $a$ sometimes
685: becomes abnormal when the image of a pair is contaminated by the
686: objects located within $2R_{90}$ of target galaxies. We verified the
687: interaction pairs by a further visual check of such a
688: contamination. Finally, 249 pairs have been identified as merging
689: pairs, which is about 21\% of all projected pairs.
690:
691: \subsection{Pair fraction and merger rate}
692:
693: Our pair sample can be used to estimate the physical pair fraction and
694: merger rate of luminous early-type galaxies (and SMBHs).
695:
696: As shown in Figure~\ref{sepatation}, only about 30\%--40\% of projected
697: pairs with $7<r_p<20$ kpc are mergers. The fraction of mergers among
698: the projected pairs decreases with the projected separation, to $\sim
699: 20\%$ at 30 kpc and 10\% at 50 kpc. The fraction can be
700: formulated to be $(0.42\pm0.04)-(0.007\pm0.001) r_p/{\rm kpc}$. {\it
701: Previous pair statistics on the merger fraction with the projected
702: pairs should be scaled by these factors.}
703:
704: Note that there still are galaxy mergers with $r_p<7$~kpc which
705: likely merge in a shorter timescale, but are not included in our
706: sample. Taking the number in each separation bin at $r_p<7$~kpc to be
707: the average number between 7 and 20 kpc, we extrapolated another 57
708: merging pairs with $r_p<7$~kpc. In total, there should be 306 mergers.
709:
710: \begin{figure}[tb]
711: \epsscale{1.1}
712: \plotone{f6a.eps}\\[2mm]
713: \plotone{f6b.eps}
714: \caption{Top panel: distribution of the projected separations,
715: $r_p$, for the merging and nonmerging pairs and the fraction of
716: merging pairs among the projected pairs in each separation bin. {\it
717: Lower panel}: distribution of velocity differences $\Delta v$ for
718: the merging and nonmerging pairs in the spec--spec sample. For the
719: mergers, the velocity dispersions have a Gaussian distribution with
720: a standard deviation about 134 ${\rm km~s}^{-1}$.
721: \label{sepatation}}
722: \end{figure}
723:
724: We also checked the distribution of velocity differences for the
725: spec--spec pairs. As shown in Figure~\ref{sepatation}, the
726: velocity differences for merging pairs roughly follow a Gaussian
727: distribution with a standard deviation of about 134 ${\rm
728: km~s}^{-1}$. Mergers rarely have $\Delta v>500$ ${\rm km~s}^{-1}$.
729:
730: The pair fraction is defined as the number of galaxies in physical
731: pairs divided by the total number of galaxies (i.e., the number of
732: physical pairs $\times2$ /the total number of galaxies), which is the
733: same as $N_c$ in Section 1.1 if there is no triple system. Including the
734: estimated merging pairs with $r_p<7$ kpc, we found that {\it the
735: fraction of galaxies in the merging pairs is 0.6\% or 0.8\%} if one
736: sets $r_p<30$ or $r_p<50$ kpc, respectively. Note that some physical
737: bound pairs are not at the stage of merging and may not show strong
738: interaction signatures; the above-estimated fraction of merging
739: galaxies should be considered as the lower limit of the physical pair
740: fraction.
741:
742: Previous statistics of close pairs usually utilized $\Delta v < 500$
743: ${\rm km~s}^{-1}$ as the criteria for sample selection. If we blindly
744: used the projected pairs with $\Delta v < 500$ ${\rm km~s}^{-1}$ (see
745: Figure~\ref{velhist}), without identification of merging features, we
746: then got the pair fraction, $N_c$, is (1.1$\pm$0.1)\% and
747: (2.2$\pm$0.2)\% for $7<r_p<30$ kpc and $7<r_p<50$ kpc, respectively,
748: or (1.0$\pm$0.1)\% for $5<r_p<20$ $h^{-1}$ kpc. The pair fraction is two
749: or three time larger than that determined with identification of merging
750: features, but is consistent with that given by \citet{kss+07}.
751:
752: \begin{figure}
753: \epsscale{1.1}
754: \plotone{f7.eps}
755: \caption{The pair fraction we obtained is indicated as the black dot
756: at $z=0.09$ and compared with previous statistics of close pairs
757: ({\it in the upper panel}): gray crosses indicate the values at
758: $z=0.01$ from \citet{pcm+00} and at $z=0.3$ from \citet{ppc+02},
759: filled gray triangle at $z=0.12$ from \citet{dld+05}, open gray
760: triangle at $z=0.1$ from \citet{dcl+07}, gray diamonds from
761: \citet{ccp+00}, gray stars from \citet{kss+07}, black circles from
762: \citet{lpk+08}. The values for early-type galaxies are marked as
763: black symbols.
764: %
765: The merger rate we determined is indicated as the black dot {\it in
766: the lower panel}, and compared with that from \citet{mhc+06} by
767: black square and \citet{lpk+08} by the black circles for dry merger, and
768: \citet{dcl+07} by gray triangle for general mergers. The solid line is
769: the evolution of the merger rate calculated for dry mergers
770: by \citet{ks08} according to the semianalytical model of galaxy
771: formation.}
772: \label{fra_com}
773: \end{figure}
774:
775: In Figure~\ref{fra_com}, we have plotted all results on $N_c$ against
776: redshifts found from the literature by statistics of close pairs. All
777: values have been normalized to the selection criteria, $5 < r_p < 20$
778: $h^{-1}$~kpc and $\Delta v < 500$ ${\rm km~s}^{-1}$
779: \citep{pcm+00}. Our result is plotted as a black dot at the mean
780: redshift $\langle z \rangle=0.09$. The gray cross at redshift
781: $z=0.01$ is taken from \citet{pcm+00}, and that at redshift $z=0.3$
782: is from \citet{ppc+02}; the filled gray triangle at redshift $z=0.12$
783: is from \citet{dld+05}, and the open gray triangle at redshift $z=0.1$ is from
784: \citet{dcl+07}. \citet{ccp+00} derived fractions with $r_p\le 50$
785: $h^{-1}$~kpc and $\Delta v<1000$ ${\rm km~s}^{-1}$. They found that
786: the number of pairs with $r_p\le 50$ $h^{-1}$~kpc is 3.8 times that
787: with $r_p\le 20$ $h^{-1}$~kpc. The ratio between the number of pairs
788: with $\Delta v<500$ ${\rm km~s}^{-1}$ and that with $\Delta v<1000$
789: ${\rm km~s}^{-1}$ is 0.9. We normalized the values and showed them as
790: gray diamonds. \citet{kss+07} gave the pair fractions with 5 $<r_p<
791: 20$ kpc adopting $h=0.7$. We corrected their values based on the fact
792: that the pair fraction is roughly proportional to the maximum
793: projected separation \citep{pcm+00}. The normalized values after
794: correction are shown as gray stars. \citet{lkw+04,lpk+08} studied
795: close pairs with 10 $<r_p< 30$, 50, 100 $h^{-1}$~kpc. The values from
796: \citet{lkw+04} are shown as gray squares. \citet{lpk+08} provided
797: pair fractions for different types of pairs. For a direct comparison
798: with our result, the black circles in the upper panel of
799: Figure~\ref{fra_com} are the pair fractions for early-type mergers.
800: The normalized pair fraction from \citet{lpk+08} is 3.2\% at
801: redshift $z=0.12$, three times that of this work.
802:
803: Now we can estimate the merger rate of luminous early-type galaxies
804: from our sample. The merger rate is defined as the number of merger
805: events per unit time per comoving volume:
806: %
807: \begin{equation}
808: R_{\rm g}(z)=n(z)C_{\rm mg}/T_{\rm mg},
809: \end{equation}
810: %
811: where $T_{\rm mg}$ is the timescale for a pair to merge, $C_{\rm mg}$
812: is the fraction of pairs that will merge within $T_{\rm mg}$, and
813: $n(z)$ is the number density of pairs, i.e., the number of pairs
814: divided by the comoving volume.
815: %
816: The merging timescale depends on separation, relative velocity, and
817: mass ratios of galaxies. It has always been assumed that the merging
818: pairs will coalesce within some binary orbits. \citet{pcm+00} and
819: \citet{con06} assumed an average value of 0.5 Gyr for the merging
820: timescale. \citet{bnm+06} suggested $T_{\rm
821: mg}\sim0.15\pm0.05$ Gyr for massive merging pairs with
822: $r_p<20$~kpc. \citet{rfv07} found a merging timescale of $\sim0.11$
823: Gyr for a very luminous merger system, such as CL0958+4702. Here, we
824: adopted an average merging timescale of 0.3$^{+0.2}_{-0.1}$ Gyr for
825: the mergers in our sample, which show the distinct interaction
826: features. We further assumed $C_{\rm mg}=1$ for our merging pairs, as
827: suggested by simulations \citep{bnm+06}. Based on our sample of
828: merging pairs including 57 pairs with $r_p<7$~kpc, we found that the
829: number density of merging pairs is $n=3.1\times10^{-6}~{\rm Mpc^{-3}}$
830: at redshifts $z<0.12$. Putting these all together, we derived {\it the
831: comoving volume merger rate},
832: %
833: \begin{equation}
834: R_{\rm g}=(1.0\pm0.4)\times10^{-5}~{\rm Mpc^{-3}~Gyr^{-1}}.
835: \label{rg}
836: \end{equation}
837: %
838: The uncertainty mainly depends on the merging timescale.
839:
840: In the lower panel of Figure~\ref{fra_com}, we made a comparison of
841: our merger rate with those from the literature. Our merger rate (black
842: dot) is much larger than $6\times10^{-7}~{\rm Mpc^{-3}~Gyr^{-1}}$
843: (filled square) by \citet{mhc+06} for the SDSS Luminous Red
844: Galaxies, but much smaller than $\sim10^{-4}~{\rm Mpc^{-3}~Gyr^{-1}}$
845: (open circles) by \citet{lpk+08} for early-type galaxy pairs in a
846: number of surveys and $5.2\times10^{-4}~h^3~{\rm Mpc^{-3}~Gyr^{-1}}$
847: (gray triangle) by \citet{dcl+07} for general merger from the
848: Millennium Galaxy Catalog. Based on a semianalytical model of galaxy
849: formation, \citet{ks08} found that the merger rate of dry mergers with
850: masses $M>6.3\times 10^{10}$ $M_{\odot}$ is almost a constant value of
851: $6\times10^{-5}~{\rm Mpc^{-3}~Gyr^{-1}}$ at redshifts $z<0.8$ (see the
852: line in the lower panel of Figure~\ref{fra_com}).
853:
854: The discrepancy probably arises from different magnitude limits for
855: the sample selections. The lower magnitude limit in \citet{lpk+08} is
856: $M_B=-19$, which appears to be one magnitude fainter than the limit in
857: our sample after the color correction of $B-r=1.2$ \citep{jsr+05}.
858: %
859: Given $-23.2<M_g<-21.2$, after $k$-corrections to redshift $z=0.3$,
860: the number density of the SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies in
861: \citet{mhc+06} is $10^{-4}~{\rm Mpc^{-3}}$, 10\% of that for our
862: sample and 4\% for the fainter galaxies ($-21<M_B<-19$) by
863: \citet{dcl+07} and \citet{lpk+08}. Relating the magnitudes of mergers
864: to the masses of mergers \citep{jk07}, we scaled up our merger rate
865: with $M>4.2\times10^{11}~M_{\odot}$ by a factor of 5--10 to the
866: value with $M>6.3\times10^{10}~M_{\odot}$ according to the cumulative
867: function of merger rate against the mass of the merger \citep[Figure 2
868: of][]{ks08}. In general, our corrected merger rate appears to be in
869: good agreement with that from the model of \citet{ks08}.
870:
871: \section{SMBH Mergers in the pairs and Gravitational Wave Background}
872:
873: In the following, we assume that SMBH binaries can be formed in
874: galaxy mergers, and efficiently driven to coalescence with GWs
875: radiation.
876: %
877: The detailed physical processes of an SMBH binary shrinking to the GW
878: regime are far from clear \citep{jb03,svc08}. But very few SMBH
879: binaries have been found in the centers of galaxies
880: \citep[e.g.,][]{ooi+85,rtz+06}, implying that most of the SMBH binaries
881: from galaxy merging must have lost enough momentum and merged in a
882: very short period.
883: %
884: A large number of merging-induced coalescences generate a stochastic
885: GW background, which could be a promising GW source to be detected
886: by using pulsar timing measurement.
887:
888: \subsection{The masses of SMBHs in mergers}
889:
890: The mass of an SMBH, $M$, in the center of galaxy is tightly related to
891: the velocity dispersion, $\sigma$, the luminosity, $L$, or the mass of
892: bulge $M_{\rm bulge}$, \citep{mtr+98,mf01,md02,mh03,hr04}. The SMBH
893: mass correlates more tightly with $\sigma$ than $L$
894: \citep{fm00,gbb+00}. For massive early-type galaxies, however,
895: whether $L$ or $\sigma$ is a better predictor of the SMBH mass is
896: still an open question. The $M$--$L$ relation predicts more $10^9$
897: $M_{\odot}$ SMBHs than the $M$--$\sigma$ relation does
898: \citep{lfr+07}. Recently, \citet{tbh+07} suggested that the $M$--$\sigma$
899: relation may not follow a single power law. Because of the lack of the
900: velocity dispersions for all pairs, we estimated the masses of SMBHs
901: in mergers using the $M$--$L$ relation \citep{tbh+07}
902: %
903: \begin{equation}
904: \log M=(8.69\pm0.10) - \frac{(1.31\pm0.15)}{2.5}(M_r+22).
905: \end{equation}
906: %
907: As stated in Section 2.2, the magnitudes of paired galaxies are taken from
908: the model-fitted values in $r$ band.
909:
910: \begin{figure}
911: \epsscale{1.1}
912: \plotone{f8.eps}
913: \caption{The chirp mass distribution of the SMBH binaries in the
914: mergers (filled circle) and all projected pairs (open circle). The
915: lines represent the best fits of power laws.
916: \label{chirp}}
917: \end{figure}
918:
919: From these masses of SMBHs, we determined the chirp masses of the SMBH
920: binaries in the mergers (Eq.~\ref{chirpmass}). We found that the chirp
921: mass distribution of SMBH binaries (Figure~\ref{chirp}) can be fitted
922: with a power law
923: %
924: \begin{equation}
925: \Phi[\log (M /M_{\odot})]=(21.7\pm4.2)-(3.0\pm0.5)\log M/M_{\odot}.
926: \label{chmass}
927: \end{equation}
928: %
929: The two points of low chirp masses were excluded in the fitting
930: because they are underestimated due to the sample selection effect. The
931: magnitude cutoff for galaxies is $M_r=-21.5$, so that pairs with one
932: galaxy fainter than $M_r=-21.5$ are missing in our sample.
933:
934: \subsection{The amplitude of gravitational wave strain}
935:
936: The spectrum of the GW background from the SMBH mergers can be
937: calculated from the chirp mass distribution and the coalescence rate
938: of a population of SMBH binaries (see Equation~\ref{hs}--\ref{numbin}). Based
939: on the newly determined chirp mass distribution and merger rate, we
940: can estimate the amplitude of the GW strain (see Equation~\ref{timeeq}--\ref{numbin}).
941: Recall that (see Section 1.2) no observation-based chirp mass
942: distributions were ever available in any previous calculations.
943:
944: Another necessary parameter for the estimation of the GW strain is the
945: merger rate evolution index, $m$. Previous studies (see Section 1.1) have
946: parameterized the merger rate of galaxies as a function of redshift in
947: the form of $(1+z)^m$ with an uncertainty of $m$ in the range of -1 to
948: 3. In the following discussion, we assume that the merger rate of
949: galaxies is equal to that of SMBHs and both evolve in the form of
950: $R(z)\propto(1+z)^m$. We also assume that the chirp mass distribution
951: does not depend on redshift. After putting the local merger rate from
952: Eq.\ref{rg} and the chirp mass distribution from Eq.\ref{chmass} into
953: Eq.~\ref{hcf}, we obtained
954: %
955: \begin{equation}
956: h_c(f)=1.1\times 10^{-15}\Big(\frac{f}{\rm yr^{-1}}\Big)^{-2/3}I^{1/2},
957: \label{hcfnew}
958: \end{equation}
959: %
960: in the frequency range of $f\sim 10^{-9}$ to $10^{-7}$ Hz. Here
961: \begin{equation}
962: I=\int \frac{dz}{E(z)(1+z)^{4/3-m}}.
963: \end{equation}
964: %
965: The integration between redshift $z=0$ and 3 can be simplified as
966: %
967: \begin{equation}
968: I^{1/2}\approx (0.2m+0.56)^{3.6}+0.7,
969: \end{equation}
970: %
971: in the range of $m=-1$ to 4.
972:
973: For the calculation of $h_c(f)$ above, we considered only the massive
974: mergers. Lower mass systems (i.e., $M_r>-21.5$) is found to add only
975: 1\% of the strain amplitude, if the SMBH population at lower mass
976: in \citet{bdf+07} and the merging fraction of this work are considered.
977:
978: \begin{figure}
979: \epsscale{1.1}
980: \plotone{f9.eps}
981: \caption{Strain spectrum of the stochastic GW background calculated in
982: the range of $m=-1$ to 2 using Eq.\ref{hcfnew} (light gray
983: area). The strain spectrum obtained by \citet{jb03} is shown as the
984: dark gray area, which was calculated with a different merger rate
985: and SMBH population. The strain spectrum obtained by \citet{wl03} is
986: shown as the dashed line, by \citet{shmv04} as dot-dashed line, and
987: by \citet{eins04} as the dotted line. The upper thin solid and lower
988: thick solid lines represent the upper limit of GWs constrained by
989: using available pulsar-timing data sets and simulated data sets of
990: the complete PPTA \citep{jhv+06}.
991: \label{strain}}
992: \end{figure}
993:
994: We showed our strain spectrum together with previous estimations in
995: Figure~\ref{strain}. \citet{wl03} calculated the strain spectrum of
996: the GW background with a theoretical model, giving the strain of
997: (0.5--0.9)$\times10^{-15}(f/{\rm yr}^{-1})^{-2/3}$ for different
998: initial parameters of the model (see their Figure 6). The amplitude
999: corresponds to the evolution index $m$ in the range of $-3.6$ to 0
1000: according to the local merger rate and the SMBH population in this
1001: work. The amplitudes obtained by \citet{shmv04} and \citet{eins04}
1002: correspond to the indices $m=1.5$ and $m=0.9$, respectively.
1003: \citet{jb03} quoted the pair fraction from \citet{ccp+00} and the SMBH
1004: population transformed from \citet{fs91}. They showed that the GW
1005: background is dominated by the systems of $\sim
1006: 10^8$~$M_{\odot}$. Thus, the GW strain amplitude they estimated is a
1007: few times lower than this work and others \citep{wl03,shmv04,eins04}.
1008:
1009: The strain amplitude we estimated is comparable to the GW detection
1010: sensitivity of the pulsar timing project.
1011: %
1012: Using currently available pulsar timing data sets, one can place the upper
1013: limit of the GW background strain or the GW energy density. The GW energy
1014: density per unit logarithmic frequency interval can be written as
1015: \citep{phi01}
1016: \begin{equation}
1017: \Omega(f)=\frac{2\pi^2}{3H_0^2}f^2h_c(f)^2.
1018: \end{equation}
1019: %
1020: Using the eight year timing data of PSR B1855+09, \citet{ktr94} obtained
1021: $\Omega h^2<6\times10^{-8}$ for the cosmic GW background. Using the 17
1022: year data of this object, \citet{lom02} got
1023: $\Omega(f)h^2<2\times10^{-9}$. \citet{jhv+06} developed a new
1024: technique to place better limits using the available pulsar-timing
1025: data sets in the Parks pulsar-timing array (PPTA) project
1026: \citep{hob05,man06} and the simulation data sets (20 pulsars with rms
1027: timing residual of 100~ns over five years) of the future complete
1028: PPTA. They derived the upper limits of the GW background emitted from
1029: the SMBH coalescence to be $1.1\times 10^{-14}(f/{\rm
1030: yr}^{-1})^{-2/3}$ and $6.5\times 10^{-16}(f/{\rm yr}^{-1})^{-2/3}$
1031: for the available data of the PPTA and the complete PPTA,
1032: respectively.
1033: %
1034: The upper limit from the available pulsar-timing data corresponds to
1035: an index $m=5.8$, which is not very meaningful from our knowledge of
1036: the evolution of the galaxy merger rate. The complete PPTA data in future
1037: could limit the index $m$ to $-1.6$.
1038:
1039: \section{Conclusions}
1040:
1041: Previously almost all calculations for GW background have been derived from
1042: the theoretical models of galaxy mergers and simulations, with the
1043: merger rate or/and SMBH mass function ``calibrated'' by the observed
1044: values.
1045: %
1046: \citet{jb03} have directly used the observed galaxy merger rate and
1047: the SMBH mass function for this purpose.
1048: %
1049: However, when deriving the merger rate from projected galaxy pairs, very
1050: few previous authors have carefully checked the merging fraction of a
1051: large sample of pairs. Normally, the merging conditions were set as
1052: projected separations $r_p<20$ $h^{-1}$~kpc and the radial velocity
1053: differences $\Delta v<500$ ${\rm km~s}^{-1}$, which are certainly
1054: necessary but not sufficient conditions.
1055:
1056: We have made a careful selection of a large complete volume-limited
1057: sample of projected close pairs ($r_p<50$ kpc) of luminous early-type
1058: galaxies ($M_r<-21.5$) in the local universe ($z<0.12$) from the SDSS
1059: photometric and spectroscopic data. 71\% of the pairs have $\Delta v<500$
1060: ${\rm km~s}^{-1}$, and 21\% of the pairs show merging
1061: features. Considering the total number of all luminous early-type
1062: galaxies, we found that 0.8\% of the galaxies are merging.
1063: %
1064: From the merging pairs, we derived a comoving volume merger rate of
1065: $\sim (1.0\pm0.4)\times 10^{-5}$ ${\rm Mpc^{-3}~Gyr^{-1}}$ for
1066: luminous early-type galaxies. This is a direct observational
1067: determination of the merger rate of luminous galaxies in the local
1068: universe. Our merger rate is larger than that derived from the SDSS
1069: Luminous Red Galaxies \citep{mhc+06}.
1070:
1071: For the first time, from the identified merging pairs of a complete
1072: sample of luminous early-type galaxies, we found that the chirp mass
1073: distribution of SMBH binaries can be described by a power law. With
1074: less assumptions than previous authors, we obtained the strain
1075: amplitude of the GW background from coalescence of SMBH binaries in
1076: frequency range $10^{-9}$--$10^{-7}$~Hz, $h_c(f)\sim
1077: 10^{-15}(f/{\rm yr}^{-1})^{-2/3}$. The uncertainty of the GW
1078: background estimation now mainly comes from poor knowledge on the
1079: merger rate evolution, the SMBH population and unknown processes for an
1080: SMBH binary to be driven into the GW regime.
1081:
1082: \acknowledgments
1083:
1084: We thank the anonymous referee, Professor Fredrick A. Jenet and Dr. R.N.Manchester for
1085: helpful comments. We thank Dr. JunHui Zhao and Dr. XiaoHui Sun for
1086: careful reading of the manuscript.
1087: %
1088: This work is partially supported by the National Natural Science
1089: Foundation (NNSF) of China (10521001, 10773016) and the National Key
1090: Basic Research Science Foundation of China (2007CB815403) and the
1091: Doctoral Foundation of SYNU of China (054-55440105020).
1092: %
1093: Funding for the SDSS and SDSS-II has been provided by the Alfred
1094: P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National
1095: Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National
1096: Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Japanese Monbukagakusho, the
1097: Max Planck Society, and the Higher Education Funding Council for
1098: England. The SDSS Web site is http://www.sdss.org/.
1099: %
1100: The SDSS is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium for the
1101: Participating Institutions. The Participating Institutions are the
1102: American Museum of Natural History, Astrophysical Institute Potsdam,
1103: University of Basel, Cambridge University, Case Western Reserve
1104: University, University of Chicago, Drexel University, Fermilab, the
1105: Institute for Advanced Study, the Japan Participation Group, Johns
1106: Hopkins University, the Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, the
1107: Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, the Korean
1108: Scientist Group, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST), Los Alamos
1109: National Laboratory, the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (MPIA),
1110: the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics (MPA), New Mexico State
1111: University, Ohio State University, University of Pittsburgh,
1112: University of Portsmouth, Princeton University, the United States
1113: Naval Observatory, and the University of Washington.
1114:
1115:
1116: \bibliographystyle{apj}
1117: \bibliography{journals,gw}
1118:
1119: \input{tab1}
1120:
1121:
1122:
1123: \end{document}
1124:
1125: