1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
5: %% AASTeX v5.0 LaTeX 2e macros.
6:
7: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.0 document
8: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
9: %% any data that comes before this command.
10:
11: %% The command below calls the default manuscript style,
12: %% which will produce a double-spaced document on one column.
13: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
14: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
15: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
16:
17: %% preprint produces a one-column, single-spaced document:
18:
19: % \documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
20:
21: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
22:
23: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
24:
25: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
26: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
27: %% the \begin{document} command.
28: %%
29: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
30: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
31: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.0 Author Guide
32: %% for information.
33:
34: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
35: \newcommand{\1}{{~\sc i}}
36: \newcommand{\2}{{\sc ii}}
37: \newcommand{\3}{{~\sc iii}}
38: \newcommand{\4}{{~\sc iv}}
39: \newcommand{\kms}{\mbox{km\,s$^{-1}$}}
40: \newcommand{\ms}{\mbox{$M_\sun$}}
41: \newcommand{\ls}{\mbox{$L_{\mbox{\sun}}$}}
42: \newcommand{\my}{\mbox{$M_{\mbox{\sun}}$\,yr$^{-1}$}}
43: \newcommand{\mloss}{\mbox{$\dot{M}$}}
44: \newcommand{\secs}{\mbox{\rlap{.}$^{\rm s}$}}
45: \newcommand{\lsim}{\raisebox{-.4ex}{$\stackrel{\sf <}{\scriptstyle\sf \sim}$}}
46: \newcommand{\gsim}{\raisebox{-.4ex}{$\stackrel{\sf >}{\scriptstyle\sf \sim}$}}
47: %\newcommand{\farcs}{\mbox{\rlap{.}$''$}}
48: \newcommand{\fdeg}{\mbox{\rlap{.}$^\circ$}}
49: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
50:
51: \slugcomment{submitted to ApJ}
52:
53:
54: \shorttitle{Bipolar outflow in IRAS 08544$-$4431}
55: \shortauthors{Dinh-V-Trung}
56:
57:
58: \begin{document}
59:
60: \title{The peculiar molecular envelope around the post-AGB star IRAS 08544$-$4431}
61:
62: \author{Dinh-V-Trung\footnote{on leave from Center for Quantum Electronics, Institute of Physics,
63: Vietnamese Academy of Science and Technology,
64: 10 DaoTan, BaDinh, Hanoi, Vietnam}}
65: \affil{Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, P.O. Box 23-141, Taipei 106, Taiwan}
66: \email{trung@asiaa.sinica.edu.tw}
67:
68: \begin{abstract}
69: Circumbinary disks have been hypothesized to exist around a number of binary post-AGB stars. Although
70: most of the circumbinary disks have been inferred through the near IR excess, a few of them are strong
71: emitters of molecular emission. Here
72: we present high angular resolution observations of the emission of $^{12}$CO and
73: its isotopomer $^{13}$CO J=2--1 line from the circumstellar envelope around the binary post-AGB star
74: IRAS 08544$-$4431, which is one of the most prominent members of this class of objects.
75: We find that the envelope is resolved in our observations and two separate components can
76: be identified: (a) a central extended and strong component with very narrow linewidth between 2 - 6 \kms;
77: (b) a weak bipolar outflow with expansion velocity up to 8 \kms.
78: The central compact component possesses low and variable $^{12}$CO/$^{13}$CO J=2--1 line ratio, indicating
79: optically thick emission of the main isotope. We estimate a molecular gas mass of 0.0047 M$_\odot$ for
80: this component based on the optically thinner $^{13}$CO J=2--1 line.
81: We discuss the relation of the molecular envelope and the circumbinary disk inferred from near IR excess
82: and compare with other known cases where the distribution of molecular gas has been imaged at high
83: angular resolution.
84:
85: \end{abstract}
86:
87: \keywords{circumstellar matter: --- ISM: molecules ---
88: stars: AGB and post-AGB---stars: individual (IRAS 08544$-$4431)---stars: mass loss}
89:
90: \section{Introduction}
91:
92: The rapid evolution of low and intermediate mass stars (0.5 to 8 M$_\odot$) after the end of the Asymptotic
93: Giant Branch (AGB) phase is accompanied by a radical change in morphology of the circumstellar envelope
94: around them. The circumstellar envelope created by the slow and dusty stellar wind during the AGB phase is
95: known to be roughly spherically symmetric as the radiation pressure on dust grains is expected
96: to be isotropic. However, a variety of morphologies ranging from spherical to multipolar shapes have been
97: observed in post-AGB envelopes and planetary nebulae (Sahai et al. 2007).
98: This morphological change has also been seen together
99: with the appearance of collimated high velocity outflows such as the Egg nebula (Cox et al. 2000) or CRL 618
100: (S\'{a}nchez-Contreras et al. 2004). The origin of the morphology and the mechanism to generate the high velocity
101: outflow are still under active study. One commonly suggested mechanism is the presence of a binary
102: companion (Balick \& Frank 2002).
103: The companion can capture wind material into a rotating disk around it. Consequently, high velocity jets
104: could be launched from the disk through magneto-centrifugal effect (Soker 2006, Nordhaus \& Blackman 2006,
105: Nordhaus et al. 2007). Alternatively, the gravitational force of the companion
106: may also attract the wind material toward the equatorial, thus forming a circumbinary disk-like structure
107: or torus. Numerical simulations by Mastrodemos \& Morris (1999) and more recently by Edgar et al. (2008)
108: suggest that the torus is likely to be in expansion and not in rotation around the central star. However,
109: when the torus is dense enough, it could serve to confine and channel the wind from the
110: central star into bipolar directions.
111:
112: The presence of rotating disks around a large number of post-AGB stars has been inferred from the IR excess
113: (De Ruyter et al. 2006). The excess suggests that hot dust exists close to the hot post-AGB stars, even
114: though the mass loss due to dusty slow wind is expected to have ceased long ago. However,
115: until recently only the rotating disk around post-AGB star Red Rectangle has been imaged at high
116: angular resolution (Bujarrabal et al. 2005).
117:
118: IRAS 08544$-$4431 is a F-type post-AGB star and is among the first post-AGB
119: stars discovered to have near IR excess (Maas et al. 2003). From radial velocity measurements, Maas et al. (2003)
120: inferred that the star is a binary system with an orbital period of
121: 499 days and a mass function, which is a measure of the ratio between the companion mass to the primary mass
122: in a single-line spectroscopic binary system, of 0.02 M$_\odot$.
123: Using a typical luminosity for post-AGB star, de Ruyter et al. (2006)
124: suggested a distance close to 1 kpc for IRAS 08544$-$4431. Spectroscopic observations by Maas et al. (2003)
125: show that the star is an O-rich post-AGB star. More interesting, the abundance of metals
126: with high condensation temperature is strongly depleted. Such anormaly could be
127: explained as gas and dust separation and reaccretion from a long-lived reservoir of material around the star, i.e
128: a rotating disk. CO emission lines have also been detected from IRAS 08544$-$4431 (Maas et al. 2003).
129: Unlike the parabolic shape seen in the envelope around AGB stars, the line
130: profiles of CO lines of IRAS 08544$-$4431 are very peculiar with a strong central peak and extended wings,
131: suggesting unusual kinematics of the molecular gas in the envelope.
132: Using optical interferometry technique, Deroo et al. (2007) resolved the near IR continuum emission into an
133: elongated structure. They found that both the SED and the interferometric data
134: could be well fitted using the irradiated dust disk model. However, information on the kinematics of the molecular gas
135: around IRAS 08544$-$4431 is really needed to settle the question concerning the existence of a rotating disk
136: around this star.
137:
138: In this paper we present high angular resolution observations of CO J=2--1 transition and its isotopes
139: from the envelope around IRAS 08544-4431 using the Sub-millimeter array. We resolve the envelope and probe
140: its morphology and kinematics. In Sec. 4 we will discuss the implication of our new results.
141:
142: \section{Observation}
143: %
144: We use the Sub-Millimeter Array (SMA), which consists of 8 antennas of
145: 6 m in diameter, to observe IRAS 08544$-$4431. The observation was carried out
146: during the night of 09 April 2007 under excellent weather conditions.
147: The zenith opacity of the atmosphere at 230 GHz was around
148: 0.1, resulting in antenna temperatures (single sideband) in the range
149: of 300 K to 400 K. In our observation the SMA provides projected baselines in the range
150: between 6 m to 78 m. The total on-source integration time of our
151: observation is slightly less than 03 hours.
152: The coordinates of IRAS 08544$-$4431 taken from Maas et
153: al.\ (2005), $\alpha_{\rm J2000}$=08:56:14.18, $\delta_{\rm
154: J2000}$=$-$44:43:10.7, were used as phase center in our
155: observation. The nearby and relatively strong quasar 0826$-$225
156: was monitored frequently to correct
157: for gain variation due to atmospheric fluctuations. Saturn and its moon
158: Titan were used as bandpass and flux calibrator,
159: respectively. The large bandwidth ($\sim$2 GHz) of the SMA correlator
160: allows us to cover simultaneously the $^{12}$CO $J$=2--1 line in the
161: upper sideband and the $^{13}$CO $J$=2--1 and C$^{18}$O $J$=2--1
162: lines in the lower sideband. In our observation the SMA correlator was
163: setup in normal mode, providing a frequency resolution of 0.825 MHz or
164: $\sim$1 \kms\ in velocity resolution. The visibilities are edited and
165: calibrated using the MIR/IDL package (Scoville et al. 1993), which is developed specifically
166: for SMA data reduction. The calibrated data are then exported for
167: further processing with the MIRIAD package (Sault et al. 1995). The line data are then
168: Fourier-transformed to form dirty images. Deconvolution of the dirty
169: images is done using the task $clean$. The resulting synthesized beam
170: for $^{12}$CO $J$=2--1 channel maps is 5\farcs9x2\farcs2 at position
171: angle PA=17\fdeg5. The corresponding conversion factor between flux
172: and brightness temperature is 1.76 K Jy$^{-1}$. The rms noise level for each
173: channel of 1 \kms\ is 110 mJy beam$^{-1}$. $^{13}$CO $J$=2--1
174: emission has been also detected and imaged. The synthesized beam for the
175: $^{13}$CO J=2--1 emission is 5\farcs8x2\farcs4.
176: The C$^{18}$O J=2$-$1 line is not detected in our observations and, therefore,
177: we will not discuss this line any further in this paper.
178:
179: We also form the continuum image by averaging line free channels in the
180: upper sideband. No 230 GHz continuum emission from IRAS 08544$-$4431 is detected in our
181: observations with rms noise level of 3 mJy beam$^{-1}$.
182:
183: \section{Results}
184: %
185: In Figure 1, we show the channel maps of $^{12}$CO J=2--1 emission. Because of the very low
186: declination of the source, resulting in an elongated synthesized beam, the emission in
187: the channel maps near the systemic velocity appears extended and resolved.
188: The deconvolved size of the emission at velocity
189: V$_{\rm LSR}$ = 44 km s$^{-1}$ is 4".3x4".5. The $^{12}$CO J=2--1 emission also reveals
190: more asymmetry to the North East of the envelope, namely in channels at velocity
191: V$_{\rm LRS}$ = 45 - 46 \kms.
192: In Figure 3 we compare the total flux of the
193: $^{12}$CO J=2--1 line detected with the SMA with that obtained previouly with SEST
194: telescope (Maas et al. 2003). The line shape is very similar between interferometric and
195: single dish observations, although the line intensity seen by the SMA is slightly higher,
196: probably related to the difficulty of calibrating the absolute flux for this very low
197: declination source. Therefore we conclude that
198: the SMA detects all the flux of the $^{12}$CO J=2--1 line.
199:
200: In Figure 2 we show the channel maps of $^{13}$CO J=2--1. This line is significantly
201: weaker than the J=2--1 line of the main isotope and its emission appears spatially less
202: extended. We note that
203: the $^{13}$CO J=2--1 line is also noticeably narrower, covering a velocity range between
204: 42 - 48 \kms, as can be seen in the total intensity profiles shown in Figure 3.
205: Only central velocity channels between 44 and 46 \kms\, contain significant amount of emission.
206: The higher velocity component seen in the main isotope line is not detected in $^{13}$CO J=2--1 emission.
207: That suggests a strong variation in the $^{12}$CO/$^{13}$CO line ratio within the envelope of IRAS
208: 08544$-$4431. We will discuss further about the implication of the variation of this ratio in the following
209: section.
210:
211: Toward the wings the $^{12}$CO J=2--1 emission becomes more compact. In addition, the emission
212: at the redshifted and blueshifted
213: wings show slight positional velocity shift. In the redshifted wing, the emission is located
214: to the North West of the center. Whereas, the centroid of the emission in the blueshifted wing is
215: slightly shifted toward the South East (see Fig. 1). Such trend in spatial kinematics of the
216: emission could be more easily seen in the position-velocity diagram of the cuts along the position
217: angle PA=19$^\circ$ and the perpendicular direction at PA=109$^\circ$, which are shown in
218: Figure 4. A slight position-velocity gradient can bee seen in the digram along the minor axis of the envelope.
219: That position-velocity gradient, which is often seen in post-AGB envelopes and
220: young planetary nebulae with high velocity jets such as CRL 2688 (Cox et al. 2000),
221: CRL 618 (Sanchez Contreras et al. 2004) and NGC 6302 (Dinh-V-Trung et al. 2008), indicates
222: the presence of a weak bipolar outflow in the
223: envelope of IRAS 08544$-$4431.
224:
225: From the properties of the envelope discussed above, we tentatively separate the envelope
226: into two kinematic components: an extended and massive envelope, having a very narrow linewidth of
227: about 2 to 6 \kms, and a weak bipolar outflow with expansion velocity up to 8 \kms.
228:
229: \section{Molecular gas in IRAS 08544$-$4431}
230: %
231: \subsection{CO line opacity}
232:
233: In IRAS 08544$-$4431 the $^{12}$CO $J$=2--1 transition is very likely optically
234: thick. This is supported by two observational results: the relatively
235: intense $J$=1--0 line and the relatively high and variable
236: $^{12}$CO/$^{13}$CO $J$=2--1 intensity ratio.
237:
238: The $^{12}$CO $J$=1--0 transition was observed by Maas et al. (2003) using the
239: same SEST telescope. The peak main beam temperature is $\sim$0.15 K.
240: Because the emitting region as seen in our SMA channel maps
241: is small in comparison to the telescope beams, when converted to the
242: same telescope beam, the
243: intensity ratio of $^{12}$CO $J$=2--1 and $J$=1--0 is almost exactly 1.
244: When these lines are optically thin and for the
245: high excitation temperatures deduced in the previous subsection, such
246: an intensity ratio should approach 4 (the ratio of the squares of the
247: upper level $J$-value for each transition), which is the opacity ratio
248: in the high-excitation limit. The measured line ratio of 1 is
249: clearly incompatible with optically thin emission. We conclude that
250: both $^{12}$CO $J$=1--0 and $J$=2--1 lines are optically thick.
251:
252: In our observations the $J$=2--1 line of the isotope $^{13}$CO is significantly weaker
253: than the line of the main isotope. The emission of this line concentrates
254: in a few channels around the systemic velocity, between V$_{\rm LSR}$ = 44 to 46 \kms.
255: By comparing the channel maps of the two lines we conclude that the
256: $^{12}$CO/$^{13}$CO $J$=2--1 intensity ratio significantly varies for
257: the different parts of the nebula. This strong variation can be readily seen from the
258: total spectra in main-beam brightness units. Values as low as 2.5 are
259: reached around the peak of emissions at the systemic velocity of the nebula. In
260: the wings where the emission of the isotope line is much weaker, the
261: ratio increases rapidly. Such a trend of the line ratio, depending on the intensity, is
262: expected if the emission of the main isotope is optically thick. The low
263: values of the $^{12}$CO/$^{13}$CO intensity ratio near the systemic velocity
264: are, on the other hand, too low to represent the abundance ratio, as would be the case if
265: both lines are optically thin. For instance, the
266: $^{12}$CO/$^{13}$CO line intensity ratios for circumstellar envelopes around
267: AGB and post-AGB stars are usually much larger (Bujarrabal et
268: al.\ 2001), about 10 or higher. We note that similar behavior of
269: the $^{12}$CO/$^{13}$CO $J$=2--1 intensity ratio has been seen in
270: a few other cases such as in the molecular envelope around young planetary
271: nebula NGC 6302 (Dinh-V-Trung et al. 2008).
272: %
273: \subsection{Estimate of gas temperature}
274: %
275: The kinetic temperature ($T_{\rm k}$) of the molecular gas detected in
276: our maps can be estimated from the brightness temperature distribution
277: ($T_{\rm mb}$), particularly for the $J$=2--1 transition. We can see
278: that values as high as $T_{\rm mb}$ $\sim$ 8 K are found at the peak of
279: the emission in the velocity channel maps around the systemic velocity.
280: $T_{\rm mb}$ is approximately equal to $T_{\rm k}$ --
281: $T_{\rm bg}$ (the cosmic background temperature, 3 K), in the limit of
282: thermalized level populations, high opacities, and resolved spatial
283: distribution. Otherwise, $T_{\rm k}$ must be larger than $T_{\rm mb}$
284: + $T_{\rm bg}$, except for very peculiar excitation states. The envelope
285: is also clearly resolved in our observations.
286: As we argue in the previous section,
287: $^{12}$CO $J$=2--1 line is likely optically thick and the gas densities
288: are high enough to thermalize the CO low-J lines.
289: Therefore, we conclude that the kinetic temperature in the
290: molecular gas in IRAS 08544$-$4431 is typically $\sim$ 10 K.
291:
292: \subsection{Mass of molecular gas in the nebula}
293:
294: We use the formula of Nyman \& Olofsson (1993) and Chiu et al. (2006) to
295: estimate the mass of molecular gas in IRAS 08544$-$4431.
296: We have used the $^{13}$CO $J$=2--1 line, assuming optically
297: thin emission, a typical excitation temperature $T_{\rm ex}$ of 10 K, and a $^{13}$CO relative
298: abundance of $f_{\rm ^{13}CO}$ = 2 10$^{-5}$ with respect to H$_2$ (Bujarrabal et al. 2001).
299: Because the distance to IRAS 08544$-$4431 is still very uncertain, we adopt a distance $D$ = 1 kpc.
300: \begin{equation}
301: M = \frac{16\pi k m_{\rm H}}{hcg_{\rm u}A_{\rm ul}f_{\rm ^{13}CO}}\frac{D^2}{A_{\rm e}}
302: I_{\rm ^{13}CO}\,Q(T_{\rm ex})\,e^{E_{\rm u}/kT_{\rm ex}}
303: \end{equation}
304: Where $A_{\rm e}$ is the effective temperature of the telescope, $Q(T_{\rm ex})$ is
305: the partition function. The integrated intensity $I_{\rm ^{13}CO}$ of $^{13}$CO J=2--1 measured from
306: our data and converted to the same angule resolution of the SEST telescope
307: is $\sim$0.86 K\kms. That corresponds to a
308: molecular gas mass of 4.7 10$^{-3}$ M$_\odot$. As shown in the above equation, the estimated
309: gas mass scales with square of the distance to the star, which is currently not known. Thus
310: the gas mass in the evelope will be lower if the star is located at a smaller distance. If we adopt higher excitation
311: temperature of 250 K as in Maas et al. (2003), the molecular gas mass is $\sim$0.03 M$_\odot$.
312: The molecular gas mass estimate from Maas et al. (2003) is $\sim$0.02 M$_\odot$ (the larger value
313: quoted in their paper is probably a typo error), which is a factor
314: of four higher than our estimate here, mainly due to the difference in the assumed excitation
315: temperature of the gas.
316: %
317: \section{Implications of our observations}
318: %
319: As seen in section 3, the nebula around IRAS 08544$-$4431 consists of a central component with
320: strong CO emission but with very low expansion velocity traced mainly by the
321: $^{13}$CO J=2--1 emission, and a weak bipolar outflow oriented roughly
322: in the East - West direction. The very narrow
323: linewidth of the emission from the central component implies an expansion velocity
324: of only $\sim$1 to 3 \kms. Such low expansion velocity is rarely seen in normal AGB or post-AGB stars where
325: the expansion velocity is usually in the range of 10 to 20 \kms.
326: An alternative interpretation commonly put forward in the literature (Maas et al. 2003) is
327: that the gas is not in expansion but is distributed
328: in the form of a stable rotation disk around the central star. At large radial
329: distance from the star, say a few thousands AU, the rotation velocity is expected to be
330: quite small, approximately 1 \kms or less for a 1M$_\odot$ central post-AGB star.
331: In addition, the spatially extended emitting
332: region suggests that such a disk
333: is seen at moderate inclination angle, i.e. close to face-on. Thus the apparent narrow linewidth
334: is consistent with the hypothesis of a rotating disk around the central
335: post-AGB star of IRAS 08544$-$4431.
336: The blueshifted and redshifted wings of $^{12}$CO emission in IRAS 08544$-$4431 most probably comes from
337: a pair of wide opening angle outflow. Assuming that the bipolar outflow is oriented perpendicular
338: to the disk, then the whole nebula must be viewed close to the symmetry axis.
339:
340: The complex kinematics of the molecular gas in IRAS 08544$-$4431 strongly resembles that observed in
341: another post-AGB star 89 Her, which is also a prominent member of the class of post-AGB stars with near
342: infrared excess. The $^{12}$CO emission from 89 Her also
343: consists of a central compact core and a pair of
344: wide opening angle outflow (Bujarrabal et al. 2007). From the compact size of the central core
345: seen in both radio and near IR interferometric observations, Bujarrabal et al. (2007) suggest that the central
346: core is likely to be a rotating disk seen close to face-on, consistent with its very narrow $^{12}$CO emission.
347:
348: One common feature among these peculiar post-AGB stars is that they all have a binary companion. The orbital
349: period of these systems is relatively short, approximately 1 yr (Maas et al. 2003, de Ruyter et al. 2006). Such close-in
350: binary companion may have important dynamical effect because the companion might capture or redirect the
351: wind material toward the orbital plane, producing a disk-like structure. The presence of a binary companion
352: and the very pecular kinematics, i.e. the narrow linewidth of CO emission, are
353: consistent with the interpretation that the gas resides in a stable rotating disk around the post-AGB star.
354: In addition, the near infrared excess is particularly prominent
355: in Red Rectangle, 89 Her and IRAS 08544$-$4431 (De Ruyter et al. 2006). By fitting the SED of these stars de Ruyter et al.
356: (2006) infer that the dust must be quite hot and must exist within a few tens of stellar radii.
357: Because there is no evidence for present day dust formation around these hot post-AGB stars, the dust particles must
358: be stored in a long lived reservoir around the stars, i.e. a rotating disk.
359: However, to date only the disk around Red Rectangle has been imaged and clearly resolved using radio
360: interferometry (Bujarrabal et al. 2005). In this case,
361: the kinematics of the disk is found to be quite complex with the inner part in Keplerian rotation and some slow
362: expansion in the outer part.
363:
364: Currently, the formation mechanism of the rotating disk around these post-AGB stars is not well understood.
365: The source that provides the large amount of angular momentum of the gas and dust
366: in the rotating disk has not been identified. It has commonly been thought that the gas and dust acquire the
367: necessary angular momemtum through gravitational interaction with a binary companion, although how that process
368: happens has not been demonstrated clearly in detail.
369: Recently, Akashi \& Soker (2007) propose a different scenario for the formation of these circumbinary rotating disk. They argue that
370: the interaction between a wide angle jet and the slowly expanding envelope pushes back the
371: wind material toward the center of the nebula. The back-flowing material will then form a rotating disk
372: with diameter up to 10$^3$ AU around the central post-AGB star. This model, however, is still rather speculative
373: and has not been tested in any real three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulation.
374:
375: In the near future high angular resolution obserations with ALMA will allow us to resolve the
376: central component and to study its spatial kinematics in much greater detail.
377: \acknowledgments
378:
379: We are grateful to an anonymous referee for constructive comments which help improve the presentation
380: of the paper. We thank the SMA staff for their help with the observations. This research has made use of
381: NASA's Astrophysics Data System Bibliographic Services
382: and the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France.
383:
384: \begin{thebibliography}{}
385: \bibitem[Akashi \& Soker (2007)]{ak07} Akashi, M., Soker, N., 2007, NewA 13, 157
386: \bibitem[Balick \& Frank (2002)]{balick02}
387: Balick, B., Frank, A., 2002, ARAA 40, 439
388: \bibitem[Bujarrabal et al. (2007)]{bujarrabal07}
389: Bujarrabal, V., Van Winckel, H., Neri, R., Alcolea, J., Castro-Carrizo, A., Deroo, P., 2007, A\&A 468, L45
390: \bibitem[Bujarrabal et al. (2005)]{bujarrabal05}
391: Bujarrabal, V., Castro-Carrizo, A., Alcolea, J., Neri, R., 2005, A\&A 441, 1031
392: \bibitem[Bujarrabal et al. (2001)]{bujarrabal01}
393: Bujarrabal, V., Castro-Carrizo, A., Alcolea, J., S\'{a}nchez Contreras, C., 2001, A\&A 377, 868
394: \bibitem[Cox et al. (2000)]{cox00} Cox, P., Lucas, R., Huggins, P., J., Forveille, T.,
395: Bachiller, R., Guilloteau, S., Maillard, J., P., Omont, A., 2000, A\&A 353, L25
396: \bibitem[Deroo et al. (2007)]{deroo07}
397: Deroo, P., Acke, B., Verhoelst, T., Dominik, C., Tatulli, E., Van Winckel, H., 2007, A\&A 474, L45
398: \bibitem[De Ruyter et al. (2006)]{deruyter06}
399: De Ruyter, S., Van Winckel, H., Maas, T., Lloyd Evans, T., Waters, L.B.F.M., Dejonghe, H., 2006, A\&A 448, 641
400: \bibitem[Dinh-V-Trung et al. (2008)]{trung08}
401: Dinh-V-Trung, Bujarrabal, V., Castro-Carrizo, A., Lim, J., Kwok, S., 2008, ApJ 673, 934
402: \bibitem[Edgar et al. (2008)]{edgar08} Edgar, R. G., Nordhaus, J., Frank, A., 2008, ApJ 675, L101
403: \bibitem[Jura \& Kahane (1999)]{jura99}
404: Jura, M.,Kahane, C., 1999, ApJ 521, 302
405: \bibitem[Kahane et al. (1998)]{kahane98}
406: Kahane, C., Barnbaum, C., Uchida, K., Balm, S.P.,\& Jura, M., 1998, ApJ 500, 466
407: \bibitem[Maas et al. (2003)]{maas03}
408: Maas, T., Van Winckel, H., Lloyd Evans, T., Nyman, L.,\AA, Kilkenny, D., Martinez, P.,
409: Marang, F., Van Wyk, F., 2003, A\&A 405, 271
410: \bibitem[Maas et al. (2005)]{maas05}
411: Maas, T., Van Winckel, H., Lloyd Evans, T., 2005, A\&A 429, 297
412: \bibitem[Mastrodemos \& Morris (1999)]{mastro99} Mastrodemos, N., Morris, M., 1999, ApJ 523, 357
413: \bibitem[Nordhaus \& Blackman (2006)]{nordhaus06} Nordhaus, J., Blackman, E. G., 2006, MNRAS 370, 2004
414: \bibitem[Nordhaus et al. (2007)]{nordhaus07} Nordhaus, J., Blackman, E. G., Frank, A., 2007, MNRAS 367, 599
415: \bibitem[Sahai et al. (2007)]{sahai07}
416: Sahai, R., Morris, M., S\'{a}nchez-Contreras, C., Claussen, M., 2007, AJ 134, 2200
417: \bibitem[S\'{a}nchez-Contreras et al. (2004)]{sanchez04}
418: S\'{a}nchez-Contreras, C., Bujarrabal, V., Castro-Carrizo, A., Alcolea, J., Sargent, A., 2004, ApJ 617, 1142
419: \bibitem[Sault et al. (1995)]{sault95} Sault, R. J., Teuben, P. J., \& Wright, M. C. H., 1995, in ASP Conf. Ser. 77,
420: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and System IV, ed. R. A. Shaw, H. E. Payne, \& J. J. E. Hayes
421: (San Francisco: ASP), 433
422: \bibitem[Scoville et al. (1993)]{scoville93} Scoville, N. Z., Carlstrom, J. E., Chandler, C. J., Phillips, J. A.,
423: Scott, S. L., Tilanus, R. P. J., \& Wang, Z. 1993, PASP, 105, 1482
424: \bibitem[Soker (2006)]{soker06} Soker, N., 2006, PASP 118, 260
425: \bibitem[Van Winckel (2003)]{winckel03}
426: Van Winckel, H., 2003, ARAA 41, 391
427: \bibitem[Winters et al. (2007)]{winters07}
428: Winters, J.M., Le Bertre, T., Pety, J., Neri, R., 2007, A\&A 475, 559
429: \end{thebibliography}
430:
431: \begin{figure*}[ht]
432: \plotone{f1.ps}
433: \caption{Channel maps of $^{12}$CO J=2--1 emission from IRAS 08544$-$4431 shown in both contours and greyscale.
434: The synthesized beam of 5".6x2".8 is shown in the lower left of each frame. The LSR velocity of each channel
435: is shown in the upper left. The cross denotes the pointing center of our observations.
436: Contour levels are (3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40)$\sigma$, where $\sigma$ = 0.11
437: Jy beam$^{-1}$ is the rms noise level.}
438: \label{fig1}
439: \end{figure*}
440:
441: \begin{figure*}[ht]
442: \plotone{f2.ps}
443: \caption{Channel maps of $^{13}$CO J=2--1 emission from IRAS 08544$-$4431 shown in both contours and greyscale.
444: The synthesized beam of 5".6x2".8 is shown in the lower left of each frame. The LSR velocity of each channel
445: is shown in the upper left. The cross denotes the pointing center of our observations.
446: Contour levels are (3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40)$\sigma$, where $\sigma$ = 0.11
447: Jy beam$^{-1}$ is the rms noise level.}
448: \label{fig2}
449: \end{figure*}
450:
451: \begin{figure*}[ht]
452: \plotone{f3.ps}
453: \caption{CO line profiles. The thick solid line represents the $^{12}$CO J=2--1 emission obtained with the SMA.
454: The dotted line shows the same line observed with the SEST telescope (Maas et al. 2003). The thin line represents
455: the $^{13}$CO J=2--1 emission obtained with the SMA. The SMA data have been convolved to the same resolution of 23"
456: of the SEST telescope.}
457: \label{fig3}
458: \end{figure*}
459:
460: \begin{figure*}[ht]
461: %\plotone{f4.ps}
462: \setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
463: \begin{picture}(16.,18.)
464: \put(0.0,0.0){\includegraphics*{f4.ps}}
465: \end{picture}
466: \caption{Position velocity diagrams of $^{12}$CO J=2--1 emission along position angles of 19$^\circ$ (upper frame) and
467: 109$^\circ$, respectively. Contour levels are (3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40)$\sigma$, where $\sigma$ = 0.11
468: Jy beam$^{-1}$ is the rms noise level.}
469: \label{fig4}
470: \end{figure*}
471:
472: \end{document}
473: