1: \def\nfn{\nu F_{\nu}}
2: \def\nfnsy{\left( \nfn \right)_{\rm sy}}
3: \def\nfnssc{\left( \nfn \right)_{\rm SSC}}
4: \def\nfnerc{\left( \nfn \right)_{\rm ERC}}
5: \def\nfnsyn{F_{{\rm sy}, -10}}
6: \def\nfnsscn{F_{{\rm SSC}, -10}}
7: \def\nfnercn{F_{{\rm ERC}, -10}}
8: \def\esy{\epsilon_{\rm sy}}
9: \def\essc{\epsilon_{\rm SSC}}
10: \def\eerc{\epsilon_{\rm ERC}}
11: \def\estar{\epsilon_{\ast}}
12: \def\esyn{\epsilon_{{\rm sy}, -7}}
13: \def\esscn{\epsilon_{{\rm SSC}, -1}}
14: \def\eercn{\epsilon_{{\rm ERC}, 2}}
15: \def\estarn{\epsilon_{\ast, -5}}
16: \def\eb{\epsilon_B}
17: \def\gcr{\gamma_{\rm cr}}
18: \def\fsp{f_{\rm sp}}
19: \def\fsy{f_{\rm sy}}
20: \def\ferc{f_{\rm ERC}}
21: \def\fssc{f_{\rm SSC}}
22: \def\uext{u_{\rm ext}}
23: \def\Bcr{B_{\rm cr}}
24: \def\taur{\tau_{\rm repr}}
25: \def\ls{\lower4pt\hbox{${\buildrel < \over \sim}$}}
26: \def\gs{\lower4pt\hbox{${\buildrel > \over \sim}$}}
27:
28: \documentclass[12pt, preprint]{aastex}
29: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
30: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
31:
32: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
33: \newcommand{\myemail}{mboett@helios.phy.ohiou.edu}
34:
35: \slugcomment{Accepted for publication in {\it The Astrophysical Journal}}
36:
37: \shorttitle{3C~66A in 2007 -- 2008}
38: \shortauthors{B\"ottcher et al.}
39:
40: \begin{document}
41:
42: \title{The WEBT Campaign on the Intermediate BL Lac Object
43: 3C~66A in 2007 -- 2008\footnote{The radio-to-optical data
44: presented in this paper are stored in the WEBT archive; for
45: questions regarding their availability, please contact the WEBT
46: President Massimo Villata ({\tt villata@oato.inaf.it}).}}
47:
48: \author{M. B\"ottcher\altaffilmark{1},
49: K. Fultz\altaffilmark{1},
50: H. D. Aller\altaffilmark{2},
51: M. F. Aller\altaffilmark{2},
52: J. Apodaca\altaffilmark{3},
53: A. A. Arkharov\altaffilmark{4},
54: U. Bach\altaffilmark{5},
55: R. Bachev\altaffilmark{6},
56: A. Berdyugin\altaffilmark{7},
57: C. Buemi\altaffilmark{8},
58: P. Calcidese\altaffilmark{9},
59: D. Carosati\altaffilmark{10},
60: P. Charlot\altaffilmark{11,12},
61: S. Ciprini\altaffilmark{13},
62: A. Di Paola\altaffilmark{14},
63: M. Dolci\altaffilmark{15},
64: N. V. Efimova\altaffilmark{4},
65: E. Forn\'e Scurrats\altaffilmark{16},
66: A. Frasca\altaffilmark{8},
67: A. C. Gupta\altaffilmark{17},
68: V. A. Hagen-Thorn\altaffilmark{18,19},
69: J. Heidt\altaffilmark{20},
70: D. Hiriart\altaffilmark{21},
71: T. S. Konstantinova\altaffilmark{18},
72: E. N. Kopatskaya\altaffilmark{18},
73: A. L\"ahteenm\"aki\altaffilmark{22},
74: L. Lanteri\altaffilmark{23},
75: V. M. Larionov\altaffilmark{18,19},
76: J.-F. Le Campion\altaffilmark{11,12},
77: P. Leto\altaffilmark{24},
78: E. Lindfors\altaffilmark{7},
79: E. Marilli\altaffilmark{8}
80: B. Mihov\altaffilmark{6},
81: E. Nieppola\altaffilmark{22},
82: K. Nilsson\altaffilmark{7},
83: J. M. Ohlert\altaffilmark{25}
84: E. Ovcharov\altaffilmark{26},
85: P. P\"a\"akk\"onen\altaffilmark{27},
86: M. Pasanen\altaffilmark{7},
87: B. Ragozzine\altaffilmark{1},
88: C. M. Raiteri\altaffilmark{23},
89: J. A. Ros\altaffilmark{28},
90: A. Sadun\altaffilmark{3},
91: A. Sanchez\altaffilmark{29},
92: E. Semkov\altaffilmark{6},
93: M. Sorcia\altaffilmark{32},
94: A. Strigachev\altaffilmark{6},
95: L. Takalo\altaffilmark{7},
96: M. Tornikoski\altaffilmark{22},
97: C. Trigilio\altaffilmark{8},
98: G. Umana\altaffilmark{8},
99: A. Valcheva\altaffilmark{6},
100: M. Villata\altaffilmark{23},
101: A. Volvach\altaffilmark{30},
102: J.-H. Wu\altaffilmark{31},
103: X. Zhou\altaffilmark{31}
104: }
105:
106: \altaffiltext{1}{Astrophysical Institute, Department of Physics and Astronomy, \\
107: Clippinger 339, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA}
108: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 830 Dennison Building, \\
109: Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1042, USA}
110: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics, University of Colorado Denver,
111: Campus Box 157, P. O. Box 173364, Denver, CO 80217-3364, USA}
112: \altaffiltext{4}{Pulkovo Observatory, Pulkovskoye Shosse, 65, 196140, St. Petersburg, Russia}
113: \altaffiltext{5}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Radioastronomie, Radioobservatorium
114: Effelsberg, Max-Planck-Stra\ss e 28, D-53902 Bad M\"unstereifel-Effelsberg, Germany}
115: \altaffiltext{6}{Institute of Astronomy, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences,
116: 72 Tsarigradsko shosse Blvd., 1784 Sofia, Bulgaria}
117: \altaffiltext{7}{Tuorla Observatory, University of Turku, 21500 Piikki\"o, Finland}
118: \altaffiltext{8}{Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania, Viale A.\ Doria 6, \\
119: I-95125 Catania, Italy}
120: \altaffiltext{9}{Osservatorio Astronomico della Regione Autonoma Valle
121: d'Aosta, Italy}
122: \altaffiltext{10}{Osservatorio di Armenzano, Assisi, Italy}
123: \altaffiltext{11}{Universit\'e de Bordeaux, Observatoire Aquitain des Sciences de l'Univers, Floirac, France}
124: \altaffiltext{12}{CNRS, Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Bordeaux -- UMR 5804, Floirac, France}
125: \altaffiltext{13}{Osservatorio Astronomico, Universit\`a di Perugia, Via B.\ Bonfigli, \\
126: I-06126 Perugia, Italy}
127: \altaffiltext{14}{Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF), Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma,\\
128: Via Frascati, Monteporzio Cantone, Roma, Italy}
129: \altaffiltext{15}{Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF), Osservatorio Astronomico di Teramo,\\
130: Via Maggini, Teramo, Italy}
131: \altaffiltext{16}{Code MPC B29, Astronomical Observatory L'Ampolla, Tarragona, Spain}
132: \altaffiltext{17}{Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences
133: (ARIES), Manora Peak, Nainital -- 263 129, India}
134: \altaffiltext{18}{Astronomical Institute, St. Petersburg State University, \\
135: Universitetsky pr.\ 28, Petrodvoretz, 198504 St. Petersburg, Russia}
136: \altaffiltext{19}{Isaac Newton Institute of Chile, St. Petersburg Branch, \\
137: 198504 St. Petersburg, Russia}
138: \altaffiltext{20}{Landessternwarte Heidelberg-K\"onigstuhl, K\"onigstuhl, \\
139: D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany}
140: \altaffiltext{21}{Instituto de Astronom\'{\i}a, Universidad Nacional
141: Aut\'onoma de M\'exico,\\
142: Apdo.\ Postal 877, 22800 Ensenada, B.C., M\'exico}
143: \altaffiltext{22}{Mets\"ahovi Radio Observatory, Helsinki University of Technology TKK, \\
144: Mets\"ahovintie 114, 02540 Kylm\"al\"a, Finland}
145: \altaffiltext{23}{Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF), Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino,\\
146: Via Osservatorio 20, I-10025 Pino Torinese, Italy}
147: \altaffiltext{24}{INAF, Instituto di Radioastronomia, Sezione di Noto, Italy}
148: \altaffiltext{25}{Michael Adrian Observatory, Astronomie-Stiftung Trebur, Fichtenstra\ss e 7,
149: D-65468 Trebur, Germany}
150: \altaffiltext{26}{Sofia University ``St. Kliment Ohridski'', Faculty of Physics,
151: 5 James Bourchier Blvd., 1164 Sofia, Bulgaria}
152: \altaffiltext{27}{Department of Physics and Mathematics, University of Joensuu,
153: Joensuu, Finland}
154: \altaffiltext{28}{Agrupaci\`on Astronomica de Sabadell, Sabadell 08200, Spain}
155: \altaffiltext{29}{Gualba Observatory, MPC 442, Barcelona, Spain}
156: \altaffiltext{30}{Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, Naunchy, Crimea 98409, Ukraine}
157: \altaffiltext{31}{National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
158: 20A Datun Road, Beijing 100012, China}
159: \altaffiltext{32}{Instituto de Astronom\'{\i}a, Universidad Nacional
160: Aut\'onoma de M\'exico,\\
161: Apdo. Postal 70-264, 04510 M\'exico, D.F., M\'exico}
162:
163:
164:
165: \begin{abstract}
166: Prompted by a high optical state in September 2007, the Whole Earth
167: Blazar Telescope (WEBT) consortium organized an intensive optical,
168: near-IR (JHK) and radio observing campaign on the intermediate BL~Lac
169: object 3C~66A throughout the fall and winter of 2007 -- 2008. In this
170: paper, we present data from 28 observatories in 12 countries, covering
171: the observing season from late July 2007 through February 2008.
172:
173: The source remained in a high optical state throughout the observing
174: period and exhibited several bright flares on time scales of $\sim 10$~days.
175: This included an exceptional outburst around September 15 -- 20, 2007, reaching
176: a peak brightness at $R \sim 13.4$. Our campaign revealed microvariability
177: with flux changes up to $\vert {\rm d}R/{\rm d}t \vert \sim 0.02$~mag/hr.
178:
179: Our observations do not reveal evidence for systematic spectral variability
180: in the overall high state covered by our campaign, in agreement with
181: previous results. In particular, we do not find evidence for spectral
182: hysteresis in 3C~66A for which hints were found in an earlier campaign
183: in a somewhat lower flux state. We did also not find any evidence for
184: spectral lags in the discrete correlation functions between different
185: optical bands.
186:
187: We infer a value of the magnetic field in the emission region of $B \sim
188: 19 \, e_B^{2/7} \, \tau_h^{-6/7} \, D_1^{13/7}$~G, where $e_B$ is the
189: magnetic field equipartition fraction, $\tau_h$ is the shortest observed
190: variability time scale in units of hours, and $D_1$ is the Doppler factor
191: in units of 10. From the lack of systematic spectral variability, we can
192: derive an upper limit on the Doppler factor, $D \le 28 \, \tau_h^{-1/8}
193: \, e_B^{3/16}$. This is in perfect agreement with superluminal motion
194: measurements with the VLBI/VLBA of $\beta_{\rm app} \le 27$ and
195: argues against models with very high Lorentz factors of $\Gamma \gtrsim
196: 50$, required for a one-zone synchrotron-self-Compton interpretation of
197: some high-frequency-peaked BL Lac objects detected at TeV $\gamma$-ray
198: energies.
199: \end{abstract}
200:
201: \keywords{galaxies: active --- BL Lacertae objects: individual (3C~66A)
202: --- gamma-rays: theory --- radiation mechanisms: non-thermal}
203:
204: \section{Introduction}
205:
206: Blazars are the most violent class of active galactic nuclei, consisting
207: of flat-spectrum radio quasars (FSRQs) and BL~Lac objects. They exhibit
208: rapid variability down to time scales as short as a few minutes
209: \citep{aharonian07,albert07b}. Their observed flux is dominated by a
210: non-thermal continuum exhibiting two broad spectral bumps: A low-frequency
211: bump from radio to UV -- X-ray frequencies, and a high-frequency component
212: from X-ray to $\gamma$-rays.
213:
214: In the framework of relativistic jet models, the low-frequency (radio
215: -- optical/UV) emission from blazars is interpreted as synchrotron
216: emission from nonthermal electrons in a relativistic jet. The
217: high-frequency (X-ray -- $\gamma$-ray) emission could either be
218: produced via Compton upscattering of low frequency radiation by the
219: same electrons responsible for the synchrotron emission \citep[leptonic
220: jet models; for a recent review see, e.g.,][]{boettcher07}, or
221: due to hadronic processes initiated by relativistic protons
222: co-accelerated with the electrons \citep[hadronic models, for
223: a recent discussion see, e.g.,][]{muecke01,muecke03}.
224:
225: The blazar 3C~66A (= 0219+428) is classified as a low-frequency
226: peaked BL~Lac object (LBL), a class also commonly referred to
227: as radio selected BL~Lac objects. Its nonthermal low-frequency
228: spectral component extends from radio frequencies through soft X-rays
229: and typically peaks in the optical frequency range. The high-frequency
230: component seems to peak in the multi-MeV -- GeV energy range. Since its
231: optical identification by \cite{wills74}, 3C~66A has been the target of
232: many radio, IR, optical, X-ray, and $\gamma$-ray observations in the past,
233: although it is not as regularly monitored at radio frequencies as many other
234: blazars due to problems with source confusion with the nearby radio
235: galaxy 3C~66B (6'.5 from 3C~66A), in particular at lower (4.8 and
236: 8~GHz) frequencies \citep{aller94,takalo96}.
237:
238: To date, about 2 dozen blazars have been detected at very high energies
239: ($> 100$~GeV) with ground-based air \v Cerenkov telescope facilities. Until very
240: recently, all TeV blazars belonged to the sub-class of high-frequency peaked
241: BL~Lac objects (HBLs). However, the recent detections of the intermediate
242: BL~Lac object W~Comae \citep{beilicke08}, the low-frequency peaked BL~Lac
243: object BL~Lacertae \citep{albert07a}, and even the flat-spectrum radio
244: quasar 3C~279 \citep{albert08} demonstrate the potential to extend the
245: extragalactic TeV source list to all classes of blazars, in particular
246: intermediate and low-frequency peaked BL~Lac objects (LBLs) with lower
247: $\nu F_{\nu}$ peak frequencies in their broadband spectral energy
248: distributions (SEDs).
249:
250: 3C~66A has been suggested for quite some time as a promising candidate
251: for detection by the new generation of atmospheric \v Cerenkov
252: telescope facilities like MAGIC or VERITAS \citep[e.g.][]{cg02}
253: (it is too far north in the sky to be observed by HESS),
254: and intensive
255: observations of 3C~66A by the VERITAS collaboration have recently
256: resulted in the significant detection of VHE $\gamma$-ray emission
257: from 3C~66A in September -- October 2008 \citep{swordy08}.
258:
259:
260: In the optical,
261: 3C~66A is generally observed as a point source, with no indication of
262: the host galaxy. The host galaxy of 3C~66A was marginally resolved by
263: \cite{wurtz96}. They found $R_{\rm Gunn} = 19.0^{\rm mag}$ for the host
264: galaxy; the Hubble type could not be determined. In 3C~66A, a weak Mg~II
265: emission line has been detected by \cite{miller78}. This led
266: to the determination of its redshift at $z = 0.444$, which was
267: later confirmed by the detection of a weak Ly$\alpha$ line in
268: the IUE spectrum of 3C~66A \citep{lanzetta93}. However, as recently
269: pointed out by \cite{bramel05}, these redshift determinations are
270: actually still quite uncertain \citep[see also][]{finke08a}. In this
271: paper, we do base our analysis on a redshift value of $z = 0.444$, but
272: remind the reader that some results of the physical interpretation should
273: be considered as tentative pending a more solid redshift determination.
274:
275: The long-term variability of 3C~66A at near-infrared (J, H, and K bands)
276: and optical (U, B, V, R, I) wavelengths has recently been compiled and
277: analyzed by \cite{fl99} and \cite{fl00}, respectively. Variability at
278: those wavelengths is typically characterized by variations over $\ls
279: 1.5$~mag on time scales ranging from $\sim 1$~week to several years.
280: A positive correlation between the B -- R color (spectral hardness)
281: and the R magnitude has been found by \cite{vagnetti03}. The most recent
282: multiwavelength campaign on 3C~66A in 2003 -- 2004 \citep{boettcher05}
283: found hints for spectral hysteresis, with the B -- R hardness peaking
284: several days prior to the R- and B-band fluxes during large flares.
285: That campaign also confirmed the results from an intensive long-monitoring
286: effort by \cite{takalo96}, revealing evidence for rapid microvariability,
287: including a decline $\sim 0.2$~mag within $\sim 6$~hr. \cite{lainela99}
288: also report a 65-day periodicity of the source in its optically bright
289: state, which has so far not been confirmed in any other analysis. However,
290: the campaign of \cite{boettcher05} showed several major outbursts separated
291: by $\sim 50$ -- 57~days, possibly also indicating a quasi-periodic behavior.
292:
293: Superluminal motion of individual radio components of the jet
294: has been detected by \cite{jorstad01}. While the identification
295: of radio knots across different observing epochs is not unique,
296: \cite{jorstad01} favor an interpretation implying superluminal
297: motions of up to $\beta_{\rm app} \sim 19 \, h^{-1} \approx
298: 27$, where $h = H_0 / (100$~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$) parameterizes
299: the Hubble constant.
300: This would imply a lower limit on the bulk Lorentz factor
301: of the radio emitting regions of $\Gamma \ge 27$. Theoretical
302: modeling using a time-dependent leptonic jet model produced an
303: acceptable fit to the SED and light curve of 3C~66A during the
304: 2003 -- 2004 campaign with such a choice of $\Gamma$ \citep{joshi07}.
305:
306: In the fall of 2007, 3C~66A was found in a very active state, reaching
307: a peak brightness around Sept. 14 of $R \sim 13.4$. This triggered a
308: new optical -- IR -- radio observing campaign by the Whole Earth Blazar
309: Telescope (WEBT\footnote{\tt http://www.oato.inaf.it/blazars/webt/})
310: collaboration with intensive monitoring throughout fall and winter
311: 2007 -- 2008. In this paper we present collected data from late
312: July 2007 through early March 2008. This high optical state also
313: triggered very-high-energy $\gamma$-ray observations with the
314: VERITAS array. Continued observations by VERITAS throughout
315: the observing season in 2008 resulted in the VHE $\gamma$-ray detection
316: mentioned above \citep{swordy08}.
317: Details of those observations will be published
318: in a separate paper. In the following, we will present in \S \ref{observations}
319: a summary of the observations and data analysis, and present light curves
320: in the various frequency bands. In \S \ref{variability} we test for spectral
321: variability to be derived from our results. Cross-correlations between
322: the variability in different optical bands are presented in \S
323: \ref{crosscorrelations}. We discuss our results and derive limits on
324: the magnetic field and the Doppler factor in \S \ref{discussion},
325: and we summarize in \S \ref{summary}.
326:
327: Throughout this paper, we refer to $\alpha$ as the energy
328: spectral index, $F_{\nu}$~[Jy]~$\propto \nu^{-\alpha}$. A
329: cosmology with $\Omega_m = 0.3$, $\Omega_{\Lambda} = 0.7$,
330: and $H_0 = 70$~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$ is used. In this cosmology,
331: and using the redshift of $z = 0.444$, the luminosity distance
332: of 3C~66A is $d_L = 2.46$~Gpc.
333:
334: \begin{figure}
335: \plotone{f1.eps}
336: \caption{Timeline of the WEBT campaign on 3C~66A in 2007 -- 2008,
337: including the observed (before extinction correction) optical (UBVRI),
338: near-infrared K-band, and radio light curves}
339: \label{timeline}
340: \end{figure}
341:
342: \section{\label{observations}Observations, data reduction,
343: and light curves}
344:
345: 3C~66A was observed in a coordinated multiwavelength campaign at radio,
346: near-IR, and optical frequencies by the WEBT collaboration during the
347: 2007 -- 2008 observing season, from late July 2007 through early
348: March 2008. The object is being continuously monitored at radio
349: to optical wavelengths by the GLAST-AGILE Support Program \citep[GASP;
350: see][]{villata08}, whose observers contributed also to this campaign.
351: The overall timeline of the campaign, along with the measured long-term
352: light curves at radio, infrared, and optical frequencies is
353: illustrated in Fig. \ref{timeline}. Table \ref{observatories}
354: lists all participating observatories which contributed data to
355: this campaign. In this section, we will describe the individual
356: observations in the various frequency ranges and outline the data
357: reduction and analysis.
358:
359: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
360: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
361: \tablecaption{List of observatories that contributed data to this campaign.
362: In addition to the standard optical Johnson's-Cousin's UBVRIJHK bands, we
363: obtained optical/near-IR data in the c, i, and o bands. The central wavelengths
364: of these bands are c = 4206 \AA, i = 6658 \AA, and o = 9173 \AA.}
365: \tablewidth{0pt}
366: \tablehead{
367: \colhead{Observatory} & \colhead{Specifications} & \colhead{frequency / filters / energy range} &
368: \colhead{$N_{\rm obs}$}
369: }
370: \startdata
371: \multispan 4 \hss \bf Radio Observatories \hss \\
372: \noalign{\smallskip\hrule\smallskip}
373: Crimean Radio Obs., Ukraine & 22 m & 36 GHz & 5 \\
374: Medicina, Italy & 32 m & 5, 8, 22 GHz & 19 \\
375: Mets\"ahovi, Finland & 14 m & 37 GHz & 32 \\
376: Noto, Italy & 32 m & 43 GHz & 19 \\
377: UMRAO, Michigan, USA & 26 m & 4.8, 8, 14.5 GHz & 12 \\
378: \noalign{\smallskip\hrule\smallskip}
379: \multispan 4 \hss \bf Infrared Observatories \hss \\
380: \noalign{\smallskip\hrule\smallskip}
381: Campo Imperatore, Italy & 1.1 m & J, H, K & 72 \\
382: \noalign{\smallskip\hrule\smallskip}
383: \multispan 4 \hss \bf Optical Observatories \hss \\
384: \noalign{\smallskip\hrule\smallskip}
385: ARIES, Nainital, India & 104 cm & B, V, R, I & 15 \\
386: Armenzano, Italy & 35, 40 cm & B, V, R, I & 70 \\
387: Belogradchik, Bulgaria & 60 cm & V, R, I & 17 \\
388: Obs. de Bordeaux, France & 20 cm & V & 34 \\
389: Catania, Italy & 91 cm & U, B, V & 60 \\
390: Crimean Astr. Obs., Ukraine & 70 cm & B, V, R, I & 147 \\
391: Gualba Obs., Spain & 35 cm & V, R, I & 12 \\
392: Jakokoski Obs., Finland & 51 cm & R & 69 \\
393: Kitt Peak (MDM), Arizona, USA & 130 cm & U, B, V, R, I & 333 \\
394: L'Ampolla, Spain & 36 cm & R & 396 \\
395: Michael Adrian Obs., Germany & 120 cm & R & 180 \\
396: New Mexico Skies Obs., USA & 30 cm & V, R, I & 18 \\
397: Perugia, Italy & 40 cm & R & 25 \\
398: Roque (KVA), Canary Islands & 35 cm & R & 318 \\
399: Rozhen, Bulgaria & 200 cm & U, B, V, R, I & 139 \\
400: Sabadell, Spain & 50 cm & V, R & 464 \\
401: San Pedro M\'artir, Mexico & 84 cm & R & 10 \\
402: St. Petersburg, Russia & 38 cm & B, V,. R, I & 50 \\
403: Torino, Italy & 105 cm & B, V, R, I & 77 \\
404: Tuorla, Finland & 103 cm & R & 19 \\
405: Valle d'Aosta, Italy & 81 cm & B, V, R, I & 53 \\
406: Xinglong, China & 60 cm & c, i, o & 699 \\
407: \noalign{\smallskip\hrule\smallskip}
408: \enddata
409: \label{observatories}
410: \end{deluxetable}
411:
412: \subsection{\label{optical}Optical and infrared observations}
413:
414: In the optical component of the WEBT campaign, 22
415: observatories in 12 countries contributed 3461 individual
416: photometric data points. The observing strategy and data analysis
417: followed to a large extent the standard procedure used for the
418: previous, successful WEBT campaign on 3C~66A in 2003 -- 2004
419: \citep{boettcher05}.
420: Observers were asked to perform bias (and, where necessary, dark)
421: corrections as well as flat-fielding on their frames, and obtain
422: instrumental magnitudes, applying either aperture photometry (using
423: IRAF or CCDPHOT) or Gaussian fitting for the source 3C~66A and the
424: comparison stars no. 13, 14, 21, and 23 in the tables of \cite{gp01},
425: where high-precision standard magnitudes for these stars have been
426: published. This calibration has then been used to convert instrumental
427: to standard photometric magnitudes for each data set. In the next step,
428: unreliable data points (with large error bars at times when higher-quality
429: data points were available) were discarded. Our data did not provide
430: evidence for significant variability on sub-hour time scales. Consequently,
431: error bars on individual data sets could be further reduced by re-binning
432: on time scales of 20~min.
433: Finally, there may be systematic offsets between different instruments
434: and telescopes. Wherever our data sets contained sufficient independent
435: measurements to clearly identify such offsets, individual data sets
436: were corrected by applying appropriate correction factors. The resulting
437: offsets, by which individual data sets have been corrected to create a
438: uniform light curve, are listed in Tab. \ref{offsets}.
439:
440: \begin{figure}
441: \plotone{f2.eps}
442: \caption{Observed light curves in the optical R, c, i, and o bands (before
443: extinction correction) over the entire duration of the campaign. The central
444: wavelengths of these bands are c = 4206 \AA, i = 6658 \AA, and o = 9173 \AA.}
445: \label{rcio}
446: \end{figure}
447:
448: In order to provide information on the intrinsic broadband
449: spectral shape (and, in particular, a reliable extraction
450: of B - R color indices), the data were de-reddened. For
451: this purpose, Galactic Extinction coefficients were
452: calculated using Table 3 of \cite{cardelli89}, based on $A_B
453: = 0.363$~mag\footnote{\tt http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/}
454: and $R_V = 3.1$. As mentioned in the introduction, the R
455: magnitude of the host galaxy of 3C~66A is $\sim 19$~mag, so
456: its contribution is negligible compared to the average AGN
457: magnitude of $R \ls 14$, and no host-galaxy correction
458: was applied.
459:
460:
461: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccc}
462: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
463: \tablecaption{Inter-instrumental correction offsets for optical data. Only
464: those telescopes are listed for which non-zero offsets were required.}
465: \tablewidth{0pt}
466: \tablehead{
467: \colhead{Observatory} & \colhead{B} & \colhead{V} & \colhead{R} & \colhead{I}
468: }
469: \startdata
470: ARIES& +0.12& -& -& -\\
471: Belogradchik& -& -& -& +0.03\\
472: Rozhen& +0.06& -& -& -\\
473: Torino& -0.12& -& -& -\\
474: Valle d'Aosta& -& -& -& +0.035\\
475: \enddata
476: \label{offsets}
477: \end{deluxetable}
478:
479:
480: As a consequence of the chosen observing strategy, the
481: R- and B-band light curves are the most densely sampled
482: ones. The R-band light curve over the entire duration of the
483: campaign is compared to the light curves at all other optical
484: bands as well as the near-IR K-band and 36/37~GHz radio light
485: curves in Figs.~\ref{timeline} and \ref{rcio}.
486: These figures illustrate that the object remained in a very bright
487: and active state, with an average magnitude of $R \sim 14.0$,
488: throughout the campaign. The source exhibited several large flares
489: with $\Delta R \gs 0.5$~mag out to $R \sim 13.5$ -- $13.6$, on
490: characteristic time scales of $\sim 10$~days. The most dramatic
491: outburst occurred around September 14, with a peak magnitude of
492: $R \sim 13.4$. As already found in 2003 -- 2004 \citep{boettcher05},
493: visual inspection of individual major outbursts suggests periods of
494: more rapid decline than rise (see, e.g., Fig. \ref{R330}).
495:
496:
497: \begin{figure}
498: \plotone{f3.eps}
499: \caption{Details of the R-band light curve (no extinction correction)
500: during the outburst around August 16, 2007. Particularly remarkable
501: is the rapid decline on JD 2454331 (August 18) with a slope of
502: $\sim 0.016$~mag/hr. }
503: \label{R330}
504: \end{figure}
505:
506: Our campaign revealed clear evidence for rapid intraday microvariability. Two
507: examples are shown in Figures \ref{R330} and \ref{R403}, revealing a rapid decline
508: of the optical brightness by ${\rm d}R/{\rm d}t \sim 0.016$~mag/hr on JD~2454331 (August 18,
509: 2007), and a rapid rise by ${\rm d}R/{\rm d}t \sim -0.008$~mag/hr on JD~2454402 (October 28,
510: 2007). Our results do not provide any evidence for periodicity or quasi-periodicity.
511: Overall, the variability patterns in all optical bands are very well correlated
512: with no discernable time lag between bands (see \S \ref{crosscorrelations}).
513:
514: \begin{figure}
515: \plotone{f4.eps}
516: \caption{Details of the R-band light curve (no extinction correction) on Oct.
517: 28 -- 29, 2007 (JD~2454402 -- 2454403). The rise around JD~2454402.8 has a
518: slope of $\sim -0.008$~mag/hr.}
519: \label{R403}
520: \end{figure}
521:
522: In the context of our WEBT campaign, 3C~66A was also observed at near-infrared
523: wavelengths in the J, H, and K bands with the AZT-24 1.1-m telescope
524: at Campo Imperatore, Italy.
525: The primary data were analyzed using the same standard technique as the optical
526: data (see above), including flat-field subtraction, extraction of instrumental
527: magnitudes, calibration against comparison stars to obtain standard magnitudes,
528: and de-reddening. The sampling was not dense enough to allow an improvement of
529: the data quality by re-binning. Also, the IR observations covered only a period
530: of $\sim 1$~month so that we can not draw any conclusions concerning
531: correlated variability with optical or radio fluxes.
532:
533: \begin{figure}
534: \plotone{f5.eps}
535: \caption{Light curves in the near-infrared J, H, and K bands during the campaign,
536: compared to the R-band light curve.}
537: \label{IR_lc}
538: \end{figure}
539:
540: The resulting K-band light curve is included in Fig. \ref{timeline}, and
541: a comparison of all three IR band light curves (J, H, K) is shown in
542: Fig. \ref{IR_lc}. Within the limited time resolution and coverage, the
543: JHK variability tracks the variability in the optical bands. For example,
544: small BVRI flares on JD~2454387 and JD~2454391 -- 2454392 are closely
545: matched by the JHK light curves. The JHK light curves exhibit variability
546: on similar time scales as the optical bands, but with somewhat smaller
547: amplitudes of $\Delta(JHK) \ls 0.3$~mag. Rapid variability with rise
548: and decay rates of $\Delta(JHK) \gs 0.1$~mag/day can be seen, in
549: particular around JD~2454387 -- 2454392.
550:
551:
552: \begin{figure}
553: \plotone{f6.eps}
554: \caption{Radio light curves of 3C~66A in 2007.}
555: \label{radio_lc}
556: \end{figure}
557:
558: \subsection{\label{radio}Radio observations}
559:
560: At radio frequencies, the object was monitored using the Noto radio
561: telescope at 43~GHz, the 22~m radio telescope (RT~22) of the Crimean
562: Radio Observatory at 36~GHz, the University of Michigan Radio Astronomy
563: Observatory (UMRAO) 26~m telescope, at 4.8, 8, and 14.5~GHz, the
564: 14~m Mets\"ahovi Radio Telescope of the Helsinki University of
565: Technology, at 37~GHz, and the Medicina radio telescope at 5, 8,
566: and 22~GHz.
567:
568: The observations at 43 GHz have been performed using the 32-m radio
569: telescope in Noto (Italy). The observations reported in this paper
570: were carried out using the 43 GHz supereterodyne cooled receiver
571: with a 400~MHz instantaneous band. For details of the data analysis
572: and flux calibration, see \cite{ott94}.
573:
574: The observations at 36~GHz were carried out at the 22~m Crimean
575: Astrophysical Observatory radio telescope (RT~22), using two similar
576: Dicke switched radiometers. For details of the analysis and
577: calibration of data from the RT~22, see \cite{volvach06}.
578: At the UMRAO, the source was monitored in the course of the
579: on-going long-term blazar monitoring program. The data were
580: analyzed following the standard procedure described in
581: \cite{aller85}. As mentioned above, the sampling was rather
582: poor, and some individual errors were rather large due to
583: source confusion problems with 3C~66B.
584:
585: The 37 GHz observations were made with the 13.7 m diameter Mets\"ahovi
586: radio telescope, which is a radome enclosed paraboloid antenna situated in
587: Finland (24$^o$ 23' 38''E, +60$^o$ 13' 05''). The measurements were made with
588: a 1 GHz-band dual beam receiver centered at 36.8 GHz. A detailed description
589: on the data reduction and analysis is given in \cite{ter98}.
590:
591: The radio data at 5, 8, and 22~GHz from the Medicina antenna were
592: taken within a long-term monitoring program of gamma-ray bright
593: blazars. For details on the analysis of data from the Medicina
594: antenna see \cite{bach07}.
595:
596: The 36 and 37~GHz light curves from the Crimean Astrophysical
597: Observatory and Mets\"ahovi, respectively, are included in
598: Fig. \ref{timeline} and in the compilation of all radio light
599: curves throughout 2007 in Fig. \ref{radio_lc}. They reveal
600: small-amplitude ($\Delta F / F \ls 20$~\%) variability
601: on time scales of $\sim 10$ -- 20~days. The sampling is
602: insufficient to allow any conclusions about possible correlations
603: of the radio variability with optical or infrared variability.
604:
605: The most dramatic radio variability appears to occur at the
606: highest observed radio frequency of 43~GHz at the Noto radio
607: observatory (see Fig. \ref{radio_lc}), possibly indicating
608: erratic variability on a one-day time scale. However, we point
609: out that the observed erratic variability at higher radio frequencies
610: ($\ge 14.5$~GHz) may, at least in part, be a consequence of
611: interstellar scintillation \citep[for a more detailed discussion of
612: this aspect, see][]{boettcher05}.
613:
614:
615: \begin{figure}
616: \plotone{f7.eps}
617: \caption{Intrinsic (after extinction correction) optical -- near-IR
618: spectral energy distributions during 6 epochs throughout the campaign. }
619: \label{SEDs}
620: \end{figure}
621:
622: \begin{figure}
623: \plotone{f8.eps}
624: \caption{Intrinsic (after extinction correction) light curves of the R
625: magnitudes and the intrinsic B -- R color index of 3C~66A over the duration
626: of the entire campaign. No obvious correlation can be identified. }
627: \label{B_R_lc}
628: \end{figure}
629:
630: \section{\label{variability}Optical spectral variability}
631:
632: To investigate optical spectral variability observed during our campaign,
633: we first computed snap-shot optical continuum spectra for several points
634: in time throughout the campaign. A compilation of several such optical
635: / near-IR sections of the SEDs are plotted in Fig. \ref{SEDs}. As in
636: our earlier campaign on 3C~66A \citep{boettcher05}, we find the (presumably)
637: synchrotron peak of the SED in the optical regime,
638: around (4 -- 6)$\times 10^{14}$~Hz. In order to investigate whether
639: there is a systematic shift of the synchrotron peak with varying optical
640: flux level, we calculated
641: B - R color indices for any pair of B and R magnitude measurements taken
642: within 20 minutes of each other. Fig. \ref{B_R_lc} shows the resulting
643: plot of the B - R color index vs. time, together with the R band light curve.
644: This figure does not confirm the hint in our compilation of snap-shot optical/IR
645: SEDs of a correlation between the brightness and the hardness of the source
646: during our campaign.
647:
648: \begin{figure}
649: \plotone{f9.eps}
650: \caption{Intrinsic optical hardness -- intensity diagram for the complete data
651: set over the entire duration of the campaign. No correlation of the B - R
652: index with R-band magnitude can be identified. }
653: \label{HID}
654: \end{figure}
655:
656: This is further illustrated in Fig. \ref{HID}, showing the hardness-intensity
657: diagram of B - R color index vs. R-band magnitude. No trend of B - R index
658: with brightness can be found. In our previous campaign \citep{boettcher05},
659: we had found a weak positive correlation of hardness with flux for low
660: flux states, $R_{\rm dered} \gs 14.0$ \citep[in agreement with the
661: positive correlation identified by][]{vagnetti03}, but no correlation at
662: brighter flux states. Similar results were also found for the low-frequency
663: peaked BL~Lac object BL~Lacertae \citep{papadakis07}. Since during the entire
664: 2007-2008 campaign the source remained in a bright state with $R_{\rm dered}
665: \ls 14.0$, our results are in perfect agreement with our previous findings.
666:
667: \begin{figure}
668: \plotone{f10.eps}
669: \caption{Intrinsic optical hardness -- intensity diagram for the flare around
670: Sept. 15, 2007. Individual points are labeled by JD - 2454000, and the arrows
671: indicate the time sequence. No hints of spectral hysteresis or other systematic
672: spectral evolution are visible. }
673: \label{hysteresis}
674: \end{figure}
675:
676: In \cite{boettcher05}, we had also found hints of systematic spectral
677: evolution during optical flares, with peaks of the B - R hardness occurring
678: consistently a few days before peaks in the R-band light curve. Hardness
679: -- intensity diagrams of an individual flare showed a tentative hint of
680: spectral hysteresis. During our 2007-2008 campaign, we did not find such
681: indications. Fig. \ref{hysteresis} shows the time-resolved hardness-intensity
682: diagram and spectral evolution during the exceptionally bright outburst
683: around Sept. 15, 2007 ($\sim$~JD~2454348 -- 2454370). The points are
684: labeled by their respective JD, and the arrows indicate the time sequence.
685: Our results do not confirm the existence of spectral hysteresis in 3C~66A.
686:
687: \begin{figure}
688: \plotone{f11.eps}
689: \caption{Discrete correlation functions (DCF) of B, V, and I band vs.
690: R band light curves. Different symbols indicate different time lag bin
691: sizes, as indicated in the legend, indicating that our results are independent
692: of our choice of a bin size. The curves indicate our best fit with an asymmetric
693: Gaussian.}
694: \label{DCF}
695: \end{figure}
696:
697:
698: \section{\label{crosscorrelations}Inter-band cross-correlations and time lags}
699:
700: Our spectral variability analysis in the previous section already indicated
701: the lack of systematic spectral variability. This would be consistent with
702: a tight correlation at zero time lag between different optical bands. We
703: tested this hypothesis using the discrete correlation function \citep[DCF,][]{ek88}.
704:
705:
706: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccc}
707: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
708: \tablecaption{Best-fit parameters of an asymmetric Gaussian (see Eq. \ref{DCFfit})
709: to the discrete correlation functions between various optical bands. }
710: \tablewidth{0pt}
711: \tablehead{
712: \colhead{Band (vs. R)} & \colhead{B} & \colhead{V} & \colhead{I}
713: }
714: \startdata
715: $F_0$& 0.703& 1.168& 0.776\\
716: $\sigma_r$ [d]& $2.01 \pm 0.51$& $0.74 \pm 0.08$& $2.02 \pm 0.55$\\
717: $\sigma_d$ [d]& $1.88 \pm 0.20$& $1.28 \pm 0.06$& $2.30 \pm 0.27$\\
718: $\tau_p$ [d]& $0.13 \pm 0.19$& $-0.01 \pm 0.05$& $0.09 \pm 0.21$\\
719: \enddata
720: \label{Gaussfits}
721: \end{deluxetable}
722:
723: Fig. \ref{DCF} shows a compilation of the DCFs of the B, V, and I
724: bands with respect to R as a reference band. We calculated DCFs with
725: various time lag bins and obtained consistent results, independent of
726: our choice of the bin size. In order to test for possible time lags
727: between the various light curves, we fitted the DCFs with an asymmetric
728: Gaussian of the form
729:
730: \begin{equation}
731: DCF (\tau) = F_0 \, \cases{
732: e^{-{(\tau - \tau_p)^2 \over \sigma_{r}^2}} & for $\tau \le \tau_p$ \cr
733: e^{-{(\tau - \tau_p)^2 \over \sigma_{d}^2}} & for $\tau > \tau_p$\cr}
734: \label{DCFfit}
735: \end{equation}
736: where $F_0$ is the peak value of the DCF, $\tau_p$ is the delay
737: time scale at which the DCF peaks, and $\sigma_{r,d}$ parametrize the
738: Gaussian width of the DCF.
739: The best-fit functions are plotted in Fig. \ref{DCF},
740: and the best-fit parameters are quoted in Tab. \ref{Gaussfits}. These
741: results confirm that there is no evidence for time lags among the
742: optical bands in our campaign data. The rather low normalization of
743: the resulting DCF fits of $\sim 0.7$ and $\sim 0.8$ in the B vs. R
744: and I vs. R correlations might be a consequence of uneven sampling
745: with several substantial data gaps in the B and I light curves
746: (see Fig. \ref{timeline}).
747:
748:
749: \section{\label{discussion}Discussion}
750:
751: The location of the synchrotron peak in the optical regime allows an estimate
752: of a combination of the magnetic field $B \equiv B_G$~G and the Doppler factor
753: $D \equiv 10 \, D_1$. We follow the approach of Eq. (8) in \cite{boettcher03}.
754: Here, the magnetic field energy density is parametrized as a fraction
755: $e_B$ of the energy density in relativistic leptons. Furthermore, constraining
756: the size of the emission region by the observed variability time scale,
757: $\tau_{\rm var, obs} \equiv 1 \, \tau_h$~hr, through $R = c \, \tau_{\rm
758: var, obs} \, D / (1 + z)$, we find
759:
760: \begin{equation}
761: B_{e_B} = 8.4 \, \left( {d_{27}^4 \, f_{-10} \, e_B^2 \, (1 + z)^2 \over
762: \epsilon_{\rm sy, -6} \, (p - 2) \, \tau_h^6 \, D_1^{13}} \right)^{1/7}
763: \; {\rm G}
764: \label{BeB}
765: \end{equation}
766: where $d_{27} = 7.38$ is the luminosity distance in units of $10^{27}$~cm,
767: $f_{-10} \approx 0.5$ is the peak $\nu F_{\nu}$ flux in units of $10^{-10}$
768: ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$, and $\epsilon_{\rm sy, -6}
769: = \epsilon_{\rm sy}/10^{-6} \approx 5$ the dimensionless photon energy,
770: $\epsilon = h \nu / (m_e c^2)$, at the peak of the synchrotron component
771: at $\nu_{\rm sy} \sim 5 \times 10^{14}$~Hz.
772: $p$ is the spectral index of the nonthermal electron population radiating
773: above the synchrotron peak. With these values, Eq. (\ref{BeB}) yields
774:
775: \begin{equation}
776: B_{e_B} = 19 \, e_B^{2/7} \, (p - 2)^{-1/7} \, \tau_h^{-6/7} \, D_1^{-13/7}
777: \; {\rm G}.
778: \label{BeBest}
779: \end{equation}
780:
781: The lack of spectral variability may be interpreted as evidence that the
782: synchrotron cooling time of electrons radiating in the optical regime
783: is shorter than the light crossing time, which (including a factor $D/(1+z)$)
784: then determines the shortest observed variability time scale. If this were
785: not the case, frequency-dependent radiative cooling effects would be expected
786: to lead to observable time lags and systematic spectral variability. Hence,
787: the condition ${\tau'}_{\rm sy} \, (1 + z) / D \le \tau_{\rm var, obs}$
788: may be translated into a Doppler-factor dependent lower limit on the magnetic
789: field. Regarding electrons emitting in the R band, we find
790:
791: \begin{equation}
792: \tau_{\rm sy, obs} = 7.32 \times 10^4 \, \left( {1 + z \over D} \right)^{1/2}
793: \, B_G^{-3/2} \; {\rm s} \le \tau_{\rm var, obs}
794: \label{tausy}
795: \end{equation}
796: which yields the magnetic-field limit
797:
798: \begin{equation}
799: B \ge 3.9 \, D^{-1/3} \, \tau_h^{-2/3} \; {\rm G}.
800: \label{Btau}
801: \end{equation}
802: Combining this limit with the magnetic-field estimate of Eq. (\ref{BeBest}),
803: we infer an upper limit on the Doppler factor:
804:
805: \begin{equation}
806: D \le 28 \, (p - 2)^{-3/32} \, \tau_h^{-1/8}\, e_B^{3/16}.
807: \label{Dlimit}
808: \end{equation}
809: This restricts the Doppler factor to values typically found in the modeling
810: of blazar-type quasars and low-frequency peaked BL~Lac objects and excludes
811: extreme values of $\Gamma \sim D \gs 50$, found in one-zone, leptonic
812: synchrotron-self-Compton models for several high-frequency peaked BL~Lac
813: objects detected at $E \gs 1$~TeV \citep[e.g.,][]{bfr07,gt08,finke08b}.
814: This aspect is particularly exciting now, after the recent detection
815: of 3C~66A at $> 100$~GeV energies by VERITAS \citep{swordy08}. The very
816: high Doppler factors mentioned above are primarily required to accomodate
817: the very rapid variability, on time scales down to just a few minutes, at
818: GeV -- TeV energies seen in a few HBLs. Should future VHE $\gamma$-ray
819: observations of 3C~66A indicate such rapid variability for this object
820: as well, this would pose serious problems for conventional blazar emission
821: models.
822:
823: \section{\label{summary}Summary}
824:
825: We reported on an extensive optical, near-IR (JHK), and radio monitoring
826: campaign by the WEBT throughout the fall and winter of 2007 -- 2008,
827: prompted by a high optical state in September 2007 with $R < 13.5$.
828: Twenty-eight observatories in 12 countries in North America, Europe,
829: and Asia contributed to this campaign.
830:
831: The source remained in a high optical state throughout the observing
832: period and exhibited several bright flares on time scales of $\sim 10$~days,
833: including an exceptional outburst around September 15 -- 20, 2007, reaching
834: a peak brightness at $R \sim 13.4$. Our campaign revealed microvariability
835: with flux changes up to $\vert {\rm d}R/{\rm d}t \vert \sim 0.02$~mag/hr with occasional
836: indications of a slower rise than decay of individual flares.
837:
838: Our observations do not reveal evidence for systematic spectral variability
839: in the overall high state ($R_{\rm dered} \ls 14.0$) covered by our
840: campaign, in agreement with previous results for the same overall brightness
841: state. Note, however, that a positive correlation between optical spectral
842: hardness (B - R color index) and optical flux at dereddened R-band magnitudes
843: of $R_{\rm dered} \gs 14.0$ has been found before. In particular, we do
844: not find evidence for spectral hysteresis in 3C~66A for which hints were found
845: in an earlier campaign in a somewhat lower flux state. On the same note, we
846: did not find evidence for time lags between optical bands.
847:
848: During our campaign, as in earlier campaigns, the peak of the low-frequency
849: (presumably synchrotron) component of the SED of 3C~66A was located in the
850: optical regime. From the observed synchrotron peak flux, we infer a value
851: of the magnetic field of the emission region of $B \sim 19 \, e_B^{2/7} \,
852: \tau_h^{-6/7} \, D_1^{13/7}$~G. From the lack of systematic spectral variability,
853: a Doppler-factor dependent lower limit on the magnetic field can be derived,
854: which implies an upper limit on the Doppler factor, $D \le 28 \, \tau_h^{-1/8}
855: \, e_B^{3/16}$. This excludes extreme values of the Doppler factor of $D \gs 50$,
856: inferred for some high-frequency-peaked BL Lac objects detected at TeV energies.
857:
858: \acknowledgments
859: The work of M. B\"ottcher was partially supported through NASA's XMM-Newton guest
860: observer program, award no. NNX08AD67G.
861: The UMRAO is partially supported by funds from the NSF, most recently AST-0607523,
862: and from the University of Michigan's Department of Astronomy.
863: This publication is partly based on observations with the Medicina and Noto
864: telescopes operated by INAF - Istituto di Radioastronomia.
865: The Mets\"ahovi radio astronomy team acknowledges support from the Academy
866: of Finland.
867: J. Wu and X. Zhou are supported by the Chinese National Natural Science
868: Foundation grants 10603006, 10573020, and 10633020.
869: The AZT-24 observations were made within an agreement between the Pulkovo,
870: Rome, and Teramo Observatories.
871:
872:
873:
874: \begin{thebibliography}{}
875:
876: \bibitem[Acciari et al.(2008)]{beilicke08}Acciari, V. A., et al. (The VERITAS
877: Collaboration), 2008, ApJL, in press (arXiv:0808.0889)
878:
879: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2007)]{aharonian07}Aharonian, F., et al., 2007,
880: ApJ, 664, L71
881:
882: \bibitem[Albert et al.(2007a)]{albert07a}Albert, J., et al., 2007a, ApJ, 666, L17
883:
884: \bibitem[Albert et al.(2007b)]{albert07b}Albert, J., et al., 2007b, ApJ, 669, 862
885:
886: \bibitem[Albert et al.(2008)]{albert08}Albert, J., et al., 2008, Science, vol. 320,
887: no. 5884, p. 1752
888:
889: \bibitem[Aller, Aller, \& Hughes(1994)]{aller94}Aller, M. F., Aller, D. H.,
890: \& Hughes, P. A., 1994, in ``Workshop on Intensive Monitoring of OJ~287'',
891: eds. Kidger, M. R., \& Takalo, L. O., Tuorla Observatory Reports, 174, 60
892:
893: \bibitem[Aller et al.(1985)]{aller85}Aller, H. D., Aller, M. F.,
894: Latimer, G. E., \& Hodge, P. E., 1985, ApJS, 59, 513
895:
896: \bibitem[Bach et al.(2007)]{bach07}Bach, U., et al., 2007, A\&A, 464, 175
897:
898: \bibitem[Begelman et al.(2008)]{bfr07}Begelman, M. C., Fabian, A. C., \&
899: Rees, M. J., 2008, MNRAS, 384, L19
900:
901: \bibitem[B\"ottcher et al.(2003)]{boettcher03}B\"ottcher, M., et al., 2003, ApJ,
902: 596, 847
903:
904: \bibitem[B\"ottcher et al.(2005)]{boettcher05}B\"ottcher, M., et al., 2005,
905: ApJ, 968, 977
906:
907: \bibitem[B\"ottcher(2007)]{boettcher07}B\"ottcher, M., 2007, ApSS, 309, 95
908:
909: %\bibitem[B\"ottcher et al.(2007b)]{boettcher07b}B\"ottcher, M., et al., 2007,
910: %ApJ, 670, 968
911:
912: \bibitem[Bramel et al.(2005)]{bramel05}Bramel, D. A., et al., 2005, ApJ, 629, 108
913:
914: \bibitem[Cardelli et al.(1989)]{cardelli89}Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, C., \&
915: Mathis, J. S., 1989, ApJ, 345, 245
916:
917: \bibitem[Costamante \& Ghisellini(2002)]{cg02}Costamante, L., \& Ghisellini, G.,
918: 2002, A\&A, 384, 384, 56
919:
920: \bibitem[Edelson \& Krolik(1988)]{ek88}Edelson, R. A., \& Krolik, J. H.,
921: 1988, ApJ, 333, 646
922:
923: \bibitem[Fan \& Lin(1999)]{fl99}Fan, J. H., \& Lin, R. G., 1999, ApJS, 121, 131
924:
925: \bibitem[Fan \& Lin(2000)]{fl00}Fan, J. H., \& Lin, R. G., 2000, ApJ, 537, 101
926:
927: \bibitem[Finke et al.(2008a)]{finke08a}Finke, J. D., Shields, J. C.,
928: B\"ottcher, M., \& Basu, S., 2008a, A\&A, 477, 513
929:
930: \bibitem[Finke et al.(2008b)]{finke08b}Finke, J. D., Dermer, C. D., \& B\"ottcher, M.,
931: 2008b, ApJ, in press (arXiv:0802.1529)
932:
933: \bibitem[Ghisellini \& Tavecchio(2008)]{gt08}Ghisellino, G.,
934: \& Tavecchio, F., 2008, MNRAS, 386, L28
935:
936: \bibitem[Gonz\'alez-P\'erez et al.(2001)]{gp01}Gonz\'alez-P\'erez, J. N.,
937: Kidger, M. R., \& Mart\'\i n-Luis, F., 2001, AJ, 122, 2055
938:
939: \bibitem[Jorstad et al.(2001)]{jorstad01}Jorstad, S. G., Marscher, A. P.,
940: Mattox, J. R., Wehrle, A. E., Bloom, S. D., \& Yurchenko, A. V., 2001,
941: ApJS, 134, 181
942:
943: \bibitem[Joshi \& B\"ottcher(2007)]{joshi07}Joshi, M., \& B\"ottcher, M., 2007,
944: ApJ, 662, 884
945:
946: \bibitem[Lanzetta, Turnshek, \& Sandoval(1993)]{lanzetta93}Lanzetta, K. M.,
947: Turnshek, D. A., \& Sandoval, J., 1993, ApJS, 84, 109
948:
949: \bibitem[Lainela et al.(1999)]{lainela99}Lainela, M., et al., 1999,
950: ApJ, 521, 561
951:
952: \bibitem[Miller, French, \& Hawley(1978)]{miller78}Miller, J. S.,
953: French, H. B., \& Hawley, S. A., 1978, in Pittsburgh Conference on
954: BL~Lac Objects, ed. A. M. Wolfe (Pittsburgh: Univ. Pittsburgh), p. 176
955:
956: \bibitem[M\"ucke \& Protheroe(2001)]{muecke01}M\"ucke, A., \& Protheroe, R. J.,
957: 2001, Astropart. Phys., 15, 121
958:
959: \bibitem[M\"ucke et al.(2003)]{muecke03}M\"ucke, A., Protheroe, R. J.,
960: Engel, R., Rachen, J. P., \& Stanev, T., 2003, Astropart. Phys.,
961: 18, 593
962:
963: \bibitem[Ott et al.(1994)]{ott94}Ott, M., Witzel, A., Quirrenbach, A.,
964: Krichbaum, T. P., Standke, K. H., Schalinski, C. J., \& Hummel, C. A.,
965: 1994, A\&A, 284, 331
966:
967: \bibitem[Papadakis et al.(2007)]{papadakis07}Papadakis, I., et al., 2007,
968: A\&A, 470, 857
969:
970: \bibitem[Swordy et al.(2008)]{swordy08}Swordy, S., et al., 2008, ATel \# 1753
971:
972: \bibitem[Takalo et al.(1996)]{takalo96}Takalo, L. O., et al., 1996,
973: A\&AS, 120, 313
974:
975: \bibitem[Ter\"asranta et al.(1998)]{ter98}Ter\"asranta, H., et al., 1998,
976: A\&AS, 132, 305
977:
978: \bibitem[Vagnetti et al.(2003)]{vagnetti03}Vagnetti, F., Trevese, D., \&
979: Nesci, R., 2003, ApJ, 590, 123
980:
981: \bibitem[Villata et al.(2008)]{villata08}Villata, M., et al., 2008, A\&A,
982: 481, L79
983:
984: \bibitem[Volvach(2006)]{volvach06}Volvach, A., E., ASP Conf. Ser., 360, 133
985:
986: \bibitem[Wills \& Wills(1974)]{wills74}Wills, B. J., \& Wills, D., 1974,
987: ApJ, 190, L97
988:
989: \bibitem[Wurtz, Stocke, \& Yee(1996)]{wurtz96}Wurtz, R., Stocke, J. T.,
990: \& Yee, H. K. C., 1996, ApJS, 103, 109
991:
992: \end{thebibliography}
993:
994: \end{document}