1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \documentclass{emulateapj}
3:
4: \def\kms{km s$^{-1}$}
5: \def\msun{M$_{\odot}$}
6:
7: \begin{document}
8: \slugcomment{Accepted to ApJ Letters}
9:
10: \title{ THE ANISOTROPIC SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF HYPERVELOCITY STARS }
11:
12: \author{Warren R.\ Brown,
13: Margaret J.\ Geller,
14: Scott J.\ Kenyon}
15:
16: \affil{Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, 60 Garden St, Cambridge, MA 02138}
17: \email{ wbrown@cfa.harvard.edu} %, mgeller@cfa.harvard.edu, skenyon@cfa.harvard.edu}
18:
19: \and \author{Benjamin C.\ Bromley}
20: \affil{Department of Physics, University of Utah, 115 S 1400 E, Rm 201, Salt Lake City, UT 84112}
21: %\email{bromley@physics.utah.edu}
22:
23:
24: \shorttitle{ Anisotropic Distribution of Hypervelocity Stars }
25: \shortauthors{Brown et al.}
26:
27: \begin{abstract}
28:
29: We study the distribution of angular positions and angular separations of
30: unbound hypervelocity stars (HVSs). HVSs are spatially anisotropic at the
31: 3-$\sigma$ level. The spatial anisotropy is significant in Galactic longitude, not
32: in latitude, and the inclusion of lower velocity, possibly bound HVSs reduces the
33: significance of the anisotropy. We discuss how the observed distribution of HVSs
34: may be linked to their origin. In the future, measuring the distribution of HVSs in
35: the southern sky will provide additional constraints on the spatial anisotropy and
36: the origin of HVSs.
37:
38: \end{abstract}
39:
40: \keywords{
41: Galaxy: bulge ---
42: Galaxy: halo ---
43: Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics ---
44: Galaxy: structure ---
45: stars: early-type
46: }
47:
48: \section{INTRODUCTION}
49:
50: Unbound HVSs were predicted by \citet{hills88} as the natural consequence of
51: the massive black hole (MBH) in the Galactic center. Following the discovery of the
52: first HVS \citep{brown05}, observers have reported the discovery of at least 16
53: unbound HVSs and evidence for a similar number of bound HVSs ejected by the same
54: mechanism \citep{hirsch05, edelmann05, brown06, brown06b, brown07a, brown07b,
55: brown08c}. Follow-up observations of 4 HVSs establish they are main sequence B stars
56: \citep{fuentes06, bonanos08, przybilla08, przybilla08b, lopezmorales08} like the
57: S-stars orbiting Sgr A$^*$ today \citep{ghez03, eisenhauer05, martins08}.
58: Although not all unbound stars are necessarily HVSs -- the massive B star HD
59: 271791 is the first example of an unbound ``hyper-runaway'' ejected from the outer
60: disk \citep{heber08, przybilla08c} -- runaway ejection velocities are limited to
61: $\sim$300~km~s$^{-1}$ for 3 M$_{\sun}$ stars \citep{leonard88, leonard90, leonard91,
62: leonard93, portegies00, davies02, gualandris05}. Thus the 14 unbound 2.5-4
63: M$_{\sun}$ stars found in the \citet{brown07b, brown08c} targeted surveys are almost
64: certainly HVSs ejected from the Galactic center.
65:
66: Remarkably, 8 of the 14 HVSs in the \citet{brown07b, brown08c} targeted
67: surveys are located in just two constellations, Leo and Sextans, even though the
68: surveys cover $1/5^{\rm th}$ of the sky. This spatial anisotropy is almost
69: certainly linked to the origin of the HVSs.
70:
71: In \S 2 we show that the observed distribution of HVSs on the sky is
72: anisotropic at the 3-$\sigma$ level. In \S 3 we discuss plausible explanations for
73: the observed anisotropy of HVSs.
74:
75:
76: \section{OBSERVED ANISOTROPY}
77:
78: \subsection{Sample}
79:
80: We consider the 14 HVSs from the combined surveys of \citet{brown07b,
81: brown08c}. Our surveys use the MMT telescope to measure radial velocities for stars
82: with the colors of 2.5-4 M$_{\sun}$ stars. Heliocentric velocities are converted to
83: Galactocentric velocities assuming that the local rotation speed is 220 km s$^{-1}$
84: and that the Sun moves at (U,V,W)=(10, 5.2, 7.2) km s$^{-1}$ relative to the local
85: standard of rest \citep{dehnen98}. The original HVS survey \citep{brown07b} is
86: 100\% complete for stars with $17<g'_0<19.5$ over 7300~deg$^2$ covered by the Sloan
87: Digital Sky Survey Data Release 6. The new HVS survey \citep{brown08c} is 59\%
88: complete for stars with $19.5<g'_0<20.5$ over the same region of sky.
89:
90: Figure \ref{fig:polar} plots the spatial distribution of stars with observed
91: velocities. The combined HVS survey contains 693 stars and 14 HVSs in the 7300
92: deg$^2$ Sloan region covering the north Galactic cap. HVS2 \citep{hirsch05} is also
93: located in this region (see Fig.\ \ref{fig:polar}), however it falls outside our
94: color / magnitude criteria. Thus we exclude HVS2 from this analysis.
95:
96: \subsection{Significant Anisotropy}
97:
98: Figure \ref{fig:gll} plots the cumulative Galactic longitude and latitude
99: distributions of the HVSs and the other survey stars. Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) tests
100: find 0.007 and 0.11 likelihoods that the HVSs are drawn from the same longitude and
101: latitude distributions, respectively, as the survey stars. Thus the distribution of
102: HVS longitudes appears anisotropic at the 3-$\sigma$ level.
103:
104: \begin{figure} % FIGURE 1: POLAR SKY MAP
105: % \includegraphics[width=4.25in, bb=35 185 575 705]{/home/wbrown/Bcand/Final5/polar.ps}
106: \plotone{f1.eps}
107: \caption{ \label{fig:polar}
108: Polar projection, in Galactic coordinates, showing the 14 unbound HVSs ({\it
109: stars}) and the 693 other stars ({\it diamonds}) in our HVS survey \citep{brown08c}
110: covering the north Galactic cap. HVS2, while not part of the survey, is also marked
111: ({\it plus sign}).}
112: \end{figure}
113:
114: \begin{figure} % FIGURE 2: GLON GLAT DISTR
115: % \includegraphics[width=4.25in, bb=20 435 590 700]{/home/wbrown/Bcand/Final5/gll2.ps}
116: \plotone{f2.eps}
117: \caption{ \label{fig:gll}
118: Cumulative distributions of Galactic $l$ and $b$ of the 14 HVSs ({\it
119: dashed lines}) and the 693 other stars ({\it solid lines}) in our HVS survey
120: \citep{brown08c}.}
121: \end{figure}
122:
123:
124: As a second test, we explore the anisotropy in terms of the distribution of
125: angular separations, $\theta$, of the HVSs compared to the survey stars. Because the
126: new HVS survey is not yet complete, we calculate $\theta$'s for all unique pairs of
127: stars in the new and original surveys separately. The original survey includes
128: HVS4-HVS10; a K-S test finds a 0.031 likelihood that those HVSs are drawn from the
129: same distribution of $\theta$ as the original survey stars. The new survey includes
130: HVS1 and HVS11-HVS16; a K-S test finds a $7\times10^{-9}$ likelihood that those HVSs
131: are drawn from the same distribution of $\theta$ as the new survey stars. Figure
132: \ref{fig:angcor} plots the $\theta$'s of both surveys concatenated together. The
133: likelihood of the combined set of HVSs is $7\times10^{-8}$; thus the distribution of
134: HVS angular separations differs from the distribution of survey star angular
135: separations at the 5-$\sigma$ level.
136:
137: As a third test, we measure the clustering of HVSs using the two-point
138: angular correlation function $w(\theta)$. We use a Monte Carlo estimator
139: \citep{landy93} and compare the observed HVSs against 10$^5$ sets randomly drawn
140: from the survey region. The lower panel of Figure \ref{fig:angcor} plots the
141: resulting $w(\theta)$ in 15$^{\circ}$ bins. Errorbars are determined by Poisson
142: statistics. HVSs are clustered at small angular separations $\theta<45^{\circ}$ and
143: missing at large angular separations $\theta>60^{\circ}$ with $\sim$3.5-$\sigma$
144: significance.
145:
146:
147: \begin{figure} % FIGURE 3: SIGNIFICANCE
148: % \includegraphics[width=4.25in]{/home/wbrown/Bcand/Final5/angcor.ps}
149: \plotone{f3.eps}
150: \caption{ \label{fig:angcor}
151: Upper panel: cumulative distribution of angular separations, $\theta$.
152: Lower panel: two-point angular correlation function $w(\theta)$ of the HVSs with
153: respect to sets randomly drawn from the survey region. }
154: \end{figure}
155:
156:
157: \subsection{Velocity Dependence}
158:
159: We now consider the spatial anisotropy of lower velocity stars that may also
160: be HVSs. \citet{brown08c} identify 4 ``possible HVSs,'' stars that are bound in the
161: \citet{kenyon08} potential model but unbound in the \citet{xue08} potential model.
162: Adding the 4 possible HVSs to the above analysis reduces the significance of the
163: anisotropy to the 2-$\sigma$ level. There are also 8 possibly ``bound HVSs,'' stars
164: with $v_{rf}>+275$ km s$^{-1}$ that are significant outliers from the overall
165: velocity distribution \citep{brown08c}. Adding the bound HVSs to the above analysis
166: yields an insignificant anisotropy. Thus lower velocity stars have a more isotropic
167: distribution, a trend noted previously in \citet{brown07a}.
168:
169:
170: \subsection{HVS Pairs}
171:
172: There are 3 pairs of unbound HVSs with angular separations less than
173: 3.5$^{\circ}$ (see Fig.\ \ref{fig:polar}): HVS7 \& HVS15 near
174: ($l,b$)=(265$^{\circ}$, 55$^{\circ}$), HVS12 \& HVS13 and HVS12 \& HVS14 near
175: ($l,b$)= (245$^{\circ}$, 52$^{\circ}$).
176: Any physical association between the individual HVSs, however, appears
177: unlikely. HVS7 \& HVS15 are separated by $2.5^{\circ}$ but have velocities and
178: distances that imply a $\sim$70 Myr difference in travel time from the Galactic
179: Center \citep[see Fig.\ 3 of][]{brown08c}. HVS12 has a 429 km s$^{-1}$ minimum
180: rest-frame velocity very similar to that of HVS13 and HVS14, but it has half the
181: distance of the other two HVSs. Thus none of the HVS pairs share a common ejection
182: event.
183:
184:
185: \section{ORIGIN OF THE SPATIAL ANISOTROPY}
186:
187: We observe that the spatial anisotropy of unbound HVSs is statistically
188: robust, that lower velocity HVSs are systematically more isotropic, and that
189: apparent close pairs of HVSs are physically unrelated. Possible explanations for
190: the observations include:
191:
192: \vskip 2pt
193:
194: \noindent {\it Selection Effect.} Previously, we argued that the HVS anisotropy may
195: be a selection effect of our magnitude-limited survey and the Sun's off-center
196: location in the Galaxy \citep{brown07a}. However, this selection effect can account
197: only for an extra $\sim$10\% HVSs in the anti-center hemisphere, not all of the HVSs
198: in the anti-center hemisphere. Moreover, the observed HVSs cluster around
199: $l=240^{\circ}$, not $l=180^{\circ}$.
200:
201: \vskip 2pt
202:
203: \noindent {\it Runaways.} Runaway stars like HD 271791 may contaminate the
204: population of HVSs. However, we expect runaways ejected from the disk to have an
205: isotropic distribution in Galactic longitude, as demonstrated by the
206: \citet{martin06} Hipparcos-selected sample of runaway B stars. Moreover, because
207: runaways are systematically ejected at low velocities \citep[e.g.,][]{portegies00},
208: the fastest runaways are those ejected in the direction of Galactic rotation and
209: thus preferentially found at low Galactic latitudes. Thus the expected distribution
210: of runaway longitudes and latitudes are contrary to the observed distribution of
211: HVSs.
212:
213: \vskip 2pt
214:
215: \noindent {\it Large Scale Structure.} The distribution of Local Group dwarf
216: galaxies is anisotropic, possibly due to a tidal origin \citep[e.g.,][]{metz08}. A
217: tidal debris origin appears supported by the clumping of HVS travel times around
218: 100-200 Myr, however the travel times are simply a product of the HVS's $\sim$500 km
219: s$^{-1}$ velocities and our magnitude-limited survey depth of 50-100 kpc. HVS
220: travel times are in fact problematic for a tidal debris origin because the times are
221: a significant fraction of the stars' main sequence lifetimes, and multiple
222: (gas-rich) tidal disruption events would be required to explain the full
223: $2\times10^8$ yr span of HVS travel times. No dwarf galaxy in the Local Group
224: travels with radial velocities comparable to the unbound HVSs; known dwarf galaxy
225: remnants like the Sgr stream \citep{ibata94} are bound. We thus consider tidal
226: debris an unlikely explanation for the observed set of HVSs \citep[however,
227: see][]{abadi08}.
228:
229: \vskip 2pt
230:
231: \noindent {\it Binary Black Hole.} While an equal-mass binary MBH is ruled out in
232: the Galactic Center \citep{reid04}, theorists speculate that the massive star
233: clusters in the Galactic Center form intermediate mass black holes (IMBHs) in their
234: cores. If such IMBHs exist, dynamical friction causes them to in-spiral into the
235: central MBH, preferentially ejecting HVSs from their orbital planes. Thus the
236: expected signature of a IMBH in-spiral is a ring of HVSs around the sky
237: \citep{gualandris05, levin06, sesana06}. \citet{baumgardt06} argue, however, that
238: stellar interactions perturb the orbital plane of an in-spiraling IMBH; the
239: resulting HVS distribution in this scenario may in fact be isotropic. Moreover, a
240: single IMBH in-spiral event happens on timescales 10-100$\times$ shorter than the
241: observed span of HVS travel times; multiple IMBH in-spiral events are required to
242: explain the observed HVSs.
243:
244: \vskip 2pt
245:
246: \noindent {\it Galactic Center Structure.} The Galactic center contains many
247: well-defined structures. As illustrated in \citet{paumard06}, the molecular gas
248: circum-nuclear disk and the ionized northern arm are roughly aligned with the plane
249: of the Milky Way. The gaseous minispiral is perpendicular to the plane of the Milky
250: Way. Notably, the stellar disk 0.1 pc from the MBH is roughly perpendicular to the
251: gaseous components \citep{lu08}.
252: The stellar disk contains massive stars \citep{tanner06, paumard06},
253: possibly formed in-situ from a gas accretion disk \citep{genzel03, levin03}.
254: Dynamical interactions between a pair of stellar disks may scatter stars in towards
255: the MBH, explaining both the S-stars and the HVSs \citep{lockmann08b, perets08c}.
256: Clearly, the Galactic center contains non-isotropic distributions of stars and gas
257: which may provide a natural source for the observed anisotropy of HVSs ejected from
258: the Galactic center. However, it is unclear if the observed structures can persist
259: long enough to explain the anisotropic distribution of HVSs.
260:
261: %\noindent {\it Galactic Potential.} The Galactic potential maps the initial HVS
262: %ejection velocities from the Galactic center to the final velocities observed in
263: %the outer halo. HVSs ejected at the highest velocities escape the Galaxy while
264: %lower velocity ejections remain bound. Because many HVSs are marginally unbound,
265: %an anisotropic potential can lead to an observed anisotropic spatial distribution
266: %of HVSs. NOW IN SEPARATE PAPER PER THE REFEREE.
267:
268:
269: \section{CONCLUSION}
270:
271: Unbound HVSs are spatially anisotropic at the 3-$\sigma$ level. The
272: anisotropy is most significant in Galactic longitude, and not in latitude.
273: Lower velocity HVSs are systematically more isotropic, and apparent close
274: pairs of HVSs are physically unrelated.
275:
276: The observed distribution of HVSs is linked to the origin of the HVSs.
277: \citet{abadi08} propose a tidal debris explanation, although this appears difficult
278: to reconcile with all the observations. We investigate other physical models for
279: the anisotropy in a separate paper. In the future, measuring the distribution of
280: bound and unbound HVSs over the southern sky will allow us to better constrain the
281: anisotropy and the origin of HVSs.
282:
283:
284: \acknowledgements
285:
286: This work is based on observations obtained at the MMT Observatory, a joint
287: facility of the Smithsonian Institution and the University of Arizona. This
288: research makes use of NASA's Astrophysics Data System Bibliographic Services. We
289: thank the anonymous referee and Oleg Gnedin for helpful comments. This work was
290: supported by the Smithsonian Institution.
291:
292: {\it Facilities:} {MMT (Blue Channel Spectrograph)}
293:
294:
295: % REFERENCES
296: %\clearpage
297: %\bibliographystyle{/home/wbrown/lib/apj} \bibliography{/home/wbrown/text/RefHS}
298: \begin{thebibliography}{45}
299: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
300:
301: \bibitem[{{Abadi} {et~al.}(2008){Abadi}, {Navarro}, \& {Steinmetz}}]{abadi08}
302: {Abadi}, M.~G., {Navarro}, J.~F., \& {Steinmetz}, M. 2008, \apj, submitted
303:
304: \bibitem[{{Baumgardt} {et~al.}(2006){Baumgardt}, {Gualandris}, \& {Portegies
305: Zwart}}]{baumgardt06}
306: {Baumgardt}, H., {Gualandris}, A., \& {Portegies Zwart}, S. 2006, \mnras, 372,
307: 174
308:
309: \bibitem[{{Bonanos} {et~al.}(2008){Bonanos}, {L{\'o}pez-Morales}, {Hunter}, \&
310: {Ryans}}]{bonanos08}
311: {Bonanos}, A.~Z., {L{\'o}pez-Morales}, M., {Hunter}, I., \& {Ryans}, R.~S.~I.
312: 2008, \apjl, 675, L77
313:
314: \bibitem[{{Brown} {et~al.}(2008){Brown}, {Geller}, \& {Kenyon}}]{brown08c}
315: {Brown}, W.~R., {Geller}, M.~J., \& {Kenyon}, S.~J. 2008, \apj, accepted
316:
317: \bibitem[{{Brown} {et~al.}(2005){Brown}, {Geller}, {Kenyon}, \&
318: {Kurtz}}]{brown05}
319: {Brown}, W.~R., {Geller}, M.~J., {Kenyon}, S.~J., \& {Kurtz}, M.~J. 2005,
320: \apjl, 622, L33
321:
322: \bibitem[{{Brown} {et~al.}(2006{\natexlab{a}}){Brown}, {Geller}, {Kenyon}, \&
323: {Kurtz}}]{brown06}
324: ---. 2006{\natexlab{a}}, \apjl, 640, L35
325:
326: \bibitem[{{Brown} {et~al.}(2006{\natexlab{b}}){Brown}, {Geller}, {Kenyon}, \&
327: {Kurtz}}]{brown06b}
328: ---. 2006{\natexlab{b}}, \apj, 647, 303
329:
330: \bibitem[{{Brown} {et~al.}(2007{\natexlab{a}}){Brown}, {Geller}, {Kenyon},
331: {Kurtz}, \& {Bromley}}]{brown07a}
332: {Brown}, W.~R., {Geller}, M.~J., {Kenyon}, S.~J., {Kurtz}, M.~J., \& {Bromley},
333: B.~C. 2007{\natexlab{a}}, \apj, 660, 311
334:
335: \bibitem[{{Brown} {et~al.}(2007{\natexlab{b}}){Brown}, {Geller}, {Kenyon},
336: {Kurtz}, \& {Bromley}}]{brown07b}
337: ---. 2007{\natexlab{b}}, \apj, 671, 1708
338:
339: \bibitem[{{Davies} {et~al.}(2002){Davies}, {King}, \& {Ritter}}]{davies02}
340: {Davies}, M.~B., {King}, A., \& {Ritter}, H. 2002, \mnras, 333, 463
341:
342: \bibitem[{{Dehnen} \& {Binney}(1998)}]{dehnen98}
343: {Dehnen}, W. \& {Binney}, J.~J. 1998, \mnras, 298, 387
344:
345: \bibitem[{{Edelmann} {et~al.}(2005){Edelmann}, {Napiwotzki}, {Heber},
346: {Christlieb}, \& {Reimers}}]{edelmann05}
347: {Edelmann}, H., {Napiwotzki}, R., {Heber}, U., {Christlieb}, N., \& {Reimers},
348: D. 2005, \apjl, 634, L181
349:
350: \bibitem[{{Eisenhauer} {et~al.}(2005)}]{eisenhauer05}
351: {Eisenhauer}, F. {et~al.} 2005, \apj, 628, 246
352:
353: \bibitem[{{Fuentes} {et~al.}(2006){Fuentes}, {Stanek}, {Gaudi}, {McLeod},
354: {Bogdanov}, {Hartman}, {Hickox}, \& {Holman}}]{fuentes06}
355: {Fuentes}, C.~I., {Stanek}, K.~Z., {Gaudi}, B.~S., {McLeod}, B.~A., {Bogdanov},
356: S., {Hartman}, J.~D., {Hickox}, R.~C., \& {Holman}, M.~J. 2006, \apjl, 636,
357: L37
358:
359: \bibitem[{{Genzel} {et~al.}(2003)}]{genzel03}
360: {Genzel}, R. {et~al.} 2003, \apj, 594, 812
361:
362: \bibitem[{{Ghez} {et~al.}(2003)}]{ghez03}
363: {Ghez}, A.~M. {et~al.} 2003, \apjl, 586, L127
364:
365: \bibitem[{{Gualandris} {et~al.}(2005){Gualandris}, {Portegies Zwart}, \&
366: {Sipior}}]{gualandris05}
367: {Gualandris}, A., {Portegies Zwart}, S.~P., \& {Sipior}, M.~S. 2005, \mnras,
368: 363, 223
369:
370: \bibitem[{{Heber} {et~al.}(2008){Heber}, {Edelmann}, {Napiwotzki}, {Altmann},
371: \& {Scholz}}]{heber08}
372: {Heber}, U., {Edelmann}, H., {Napiwotzki}, R., {Altmann}, M., \& {Scholz},
373: R.-D. 2008, \aap, 483, L21
374:
375: \bibitem[{{Hills}(1988)}]{hills88}
376: {Hills}, J.~G. 1988, \nat, 331, 687
377:
378: \bibitem[{{Hirsch} {et~al.}(2005){Hirsch}, {Heber}, {O'Toole}, \&
379: {Bresolin}}]{hirsch05}
380: {Hirsch}, H.~A., {Heber}, U., {O'Toole}, S.~J., \& {Bresolin}, F. 2005, \aap,
381: 444, L61
382:
383: \bibitem[{{Ibata} {et~al.}(1994){Ibata}, {Gilmore}, \& {Irwin}}]{ibata94}
384: {Ibata}, R.~A., {Gilmore}, G., \& {Irwin}, M.~J. 1994, \nat, 370, 194
385:
386: \bibitem[{{Kenyon} {et~al.}(2008){Kenyon}, {Bromley}, {Geller}, \&
387: {Brown}}]{kenyon08}
388: {Kenyon}, S.~J., {Bromley}, B.~C., {Geller}, M.~J., \& {Brown}, W.~R. 2008,
389: \apj, 680, 312
390:
391: \bibitem[{{Landy} \& {Szalay}(1993)}]{landy93}
392: {Landy}, S.~D. \& {Szalay}, A.~S. 1993, \apj, 412, 64
393:
394: \bibitem[{{Leonard}(1991)}]{leonard91}
395: {Leonard}, P.~J.~T. 1991, \aj, 101, 562
396:
397: \bibitem[{{Leonard}(1993)}]{leonard93}
398: {Leonard}, P.~J.~T. 1993, in ASP Conf.\ Ser.\ 45, Luminous High-Latitude Stars,
399: ed. D.~Sasselov, 360
400:
401: \bibitem[{{Leonard} \& {Duncan}(1988)}]{leonard88}
402: {Leonard}, P.~J.~T. \& {Duncan}, M.~J. 1988, \aj, 96, 222
403:
404: \bibitem[{{Leonard} \& {Duncan}(1990)}]{leonard90}
405: ---. 1990, \aj, 99, 608
406:
407: \bibitem[{{Levin}(2006)}]{levin06}
408: {Levin}, Y. 2006, \apj, 653, 1203
409:
410: \bibitem[{{Levin} \& {Beloborodov}(2003)}]{levin03}
411: {Levin}, Y. \& {Beloborodov}, A.~M. 2003, \apjl, 590, L33
412:
413: \bibitem[{{L{\"o}ckmann} {et~al.}(2008){L{\"o}ckmann}, {Baumgardt}, \&
414: {Kroupa}}]{lockmann08b}
415: {L{\"o}ckmann}, U., {Baumgardt}, H., \& {Kroupa}, P. 2008, \apjl, 683, L151
416:
417: \bibitem[{{L{\'o}pez-Morales} \& {Bonanos}(2008)}]{lopezmorales08}
418: {L{\'o}pez-Morales}, M. \& {Bonanos}, A.~Z. 2008, \apjl, 685, L47
419:
420: \bibitem[{{Lu} {et~al.}(2008){Lu}, {Ghez}, {Hornstein}, {Morris}, {Becklin}, \&
421: {Matthews}}]{lu08}
422: {Lu}, J.~R., {Ghez}, A.~M., {Hornstein}, S.~D., {Morris}, M.~R., {Becklin},
423: E.~E., \& {Matthews}, K. 2008, \apj, accepted
424:
425: \bibitem[{{Martin}(2006)}]{martin06}
426: {Martin}, J.~C. 2006, \aj, 131, 3047
427:
428: \bibitem[{{Martins} {et~al.}(2008){Martins}, {Gillessen}, {Eisenhauer},
429: {Genzel}, {Ott}, \& {Trippe}}]{martins08}
430: {Martins}, F., {Gillessen}, S., {Eisenhauer}, F., {Genzel}, R., {Ott}, T., \&
431: {Trippe}, S. 2008, \apjl, 672, L119
432:
433: \bibitem[{{Metz} {et~al.}(2008){Metz}, {Kroupa}, \& {Libeskind}}]{metz08}
434: {Metz}, M., {Kroupa}, P., \& {Libeskind}, N.~I. 2008, \apj, 680, 287
435:
436: \bibitem[{{Paumard} {et~al.}(2006)}]{paumard06}
437: {Paumard}, T. {et~al.} 2006, \apj, 643, 1011
438:
439: \bibitem[{{Perets} {et~al.}(2008){Perets}, {Gualandris}, {Merritt}, \&
440: {Alexander}}]{perets08c}
441: {Perets}, H.~B., {Gualandris}, A., {Merritt}, D., \& {Alexander}, T. 2008,
442: astro-ph/0807.2340
443:
444: \bibitem[{{Portegies Zwart}(2000)}]{portegies00}
445: {Portegies Zwart}, S.~F. 2000, \apj, 544, 437
446:
447: \bibitem[{{Przybilla} {et~al.}(2008{\natexlab{a}}){Przybilla}, {Nieva},
448: {Heber}, \& {Butler}}]{przybilla08c}
449: {Przybilla}, N., {Nieva}, M.~F., {Heber}, U., \& {Butler}, K.
450: 2008{\natexlab{a}}, \apjl, 684, L103
451:
452: \bibitem[{{Przybilla} {et~al.}(2008{\natexlab{b}}){Przybilla}, {Nieva},
453: {Heber}, {Firnstein}, {Butler}, {Napiwotzki}, \& {Edelmann}}]{przybilla08}
454: {Przybilla}, N., {Nieva}, M.~F., {Heber}, U., {Firnstein}, M., {Butler}, K.,
455: {Napiwotzki}, R., \& {Edelmann}, H. 2008{\natexlab{b}}, \aap, 480, L37
456:
457: \bibitem[{{Przybilla} {et~al.}(2008{\natexlab{c}}){Przybilla}, {Nieva},
458: {Tillich}, {Heber}, {Butler}, \& {Brown}}]{przybilla08b}
459: {Przybilla}, N., {Nieva}, M.~F., {Tillich}, A., {Heber}, U., {Butler}, K., \&
460: {Brown}, W.~R. 2008{\natexlab{c}}, \aap, 488, L51
461:
462: \bibitem[{{Reid} \& {Brunthaler}(2004)}]{reid04}
463: {Reid}, M.~J. \& {Brunthaler}, A. 2004, \apj, 616, 872
464:
465: \bibitem[{{Sesana} {et~al.}(2006){Sesana}, {Haardt}, \& {Madau}}]{sesana06}
466: {Sesana}, A., {Haardt}, F., \& {Madau}, P. 2006, \apj, 651, 392
467:
468: \bibitem[{{Tanner} {et~al.}(2006)}]{tanner06}
469: {Tanner}, A. {et~al.} 2006, \apj, 641, 891
470:
471: \bibitem[{{Xue} {et~al.}(2008)}]{xue08}
472: {Xue}, X. {et~al.} 2008, \apj, 684, 1143
473:
474: \end{thebibliography}
475:
476: % FIGURES
477: %\clearpage
478:
479: \end{document}
480: