1: %%

2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'

3: %%

4: %% Modified 2005 December 5

5: %%

6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the

7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.

8: 

9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document

10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore

11: %% any data that comes before this command.

12: 

13: %% The command below calls the preprint style

14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.

15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use

16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.

17: %%

18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

19: 

20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

21: 

22: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

23: 

24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

25: 

26: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

27: 

28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the

29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,

30: %% use the longabstract style option.

31: 

32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}

33: 

34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so

35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before

36: %% the \begin{document} command.

37: %%

38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts

39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing

40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide

41: %% for information.

42: 

43: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

44: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}

45: 

46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.

47: 

48: \slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}

49: 

50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although

51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.

52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,

53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.).  The right

54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.

55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.

56: 

57: \shorttitle{Accretion Properties of Nearby Hard X-ray AGNs}

58: \shortauthors{Wang \& Wei}

59: 

60: %% This is the end of the preamble.  Indicate the beginning of the

61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.

62: 

63: \begin{document}

64: 

65: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than

66: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if

67: %% you desire.

68: 

69: \title{Accretion Properties of 

70:    A Sample of Hard X-ray ($<60$keV) Selected Seyfert 1 Galaxies}

71: 

72: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format

73: %% author and affiliation information.

74: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command

75: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address

76: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.

77: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.

78: 

79: \author{J. Wang\altaffilmark{1} Y. F. Mao \altaffilmark{1} and J. Y. Wei\altaffilmark{1} }

80: \affil{National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Science, 20A Datun Road,

81: Chaoyang District, Beijing, China}

82: \email{wj@bao.ac.cn}

83: 

84: 

85: 

86: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which

87: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name.  Specify alternate

88: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each

89: %% affiliation.

90: 

91: 

92: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript

93: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the

94: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author

95: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the

96: %% editorial office after submission.

97: 

98: \begin{abstract}

99: We examine the accretion properties in 

100: a sample of 42 hard (3-60keV) X-ray selected nearby broad-line AGNs. The energy range 

101: in the sample is harder than that usually used in the similar previous studies.

102: These AGNs are mainly complied from the RXTE

103: All Sky Survey (XSS), and complemented by the released \it INTEGRAL \rm

104: AGN catalog. The black hole masses, bolometric luminosities of AGN, and

105: Eddington ratios are derived from 

106: their optical spectra in terms of the broad H$\beta$ emission line. The tight correlation 

107: between the hard X-ray (3-20keV) and bolometric/line luminosity is

108: well identified in our sample. Also identified 

109: is a strong inverse Baldwin relationship of the H$\beta$ emission line.

110: In addition, all these hard X-ray AGNs are biased toward luminous objects with 

111: high Eddington ratio (mostly between 0.01 to 0.1) and low column density ($<10^{22}\ \mathrm{cm^{-2}}$),

112: which is most likely due to the selection effect of the surveys.

113: The hard X-ray luminosity is consequently found to be strongly 

114: correlated with the black hole mass. 

115: We believe the sample completeness 

116: will be improved in the next few years by the ongoing \it Swift \rm and \it INTEGRAL \rm missions, 

117: and by the next advanced missions, such as NuSTAR, Simbol-X, and NeXT.  

118: Finally, the correlation between 

119: RFe (=optical \ion{Fe}{2}/H$\beta$) and disk temperature as assessed by 

120: $T\propto (L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}})M_{\mathrm{BH}}^{-1}$ leads us 

121: to suggest that the strength of the \ion{Fe}{2} emission is mainly determined by the shape of the ionizing spectrum.  

122: \end{abstract}

123: 

124: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented

125: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors

126: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine

127: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.

128: 

129: \keywords{galaxies: Seyferts --- X-rays: galaxies --- quasars: emission lines}

130: 

131: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.

132: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep

133: %% and \citet commands to identify citations.  The citations are

134: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds

135: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have

136: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus

137: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for

138: %% each reference.

139: 

140: 

141: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper

142: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging

143: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}.  Each macro takes the

144: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket 

145: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification

146: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper.  The text appearing 

147: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper. 

148: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked

149: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers  

150: %%

151: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,

152: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first

153: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).

154: %%  Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error. 

155: 

156: \section{Introduction}

157: 

158: It is now generally believed that the power of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs)

159: is extracted through the accretion of gas onto a central supermassive 

160: black hole (SMBH). Such energy mechanism means that AGNs are characterized by 

161: their strong hard X-ray emission ($h\nu >2$keV), which is widely used as direct evidence 

162: suggesting the existence of a nuclear accretion activity 

163: ($L_\mathrm{2-8keV}>10^{42}\ \mathrm{ergs\ s^{-1}}$, e.g., Silverman et al. 2005; Brusa 

164: et al. 2007; Hasinger et al. 2005).

165: The commonly accepted model is that the hard X-ray emission from AGNs is 

166: primarily produced by the inverse Compton scattering of the UV/soft X-ray photons emitted from 

167: the accretion disk (e.g, Zdziarski et al. 1995, 2000; Haardt \& Maraschi 1991; Kawaguchi 

168: et al. 2001). The absorption-corrected X-ray photon spectra within the energy band 2-10keV 

169: could be best described as a cut-off powerlaw with index $\Gamma\sim1.9$ (e.g., 

170: Zdziarski et al. 1995; Reeves \& Turner 2000; Piconcelli et al. 2005; Dadina 2008; 

171: Panessa et al. 2008). The synthesis spectra become flat beyond 10keV because 

172: of the Compton reflection caused by the ionized surface of the accretion disk 

173: (e.g., George \& Fabian 1991).  

174: 

175: 

176: Because the hard X-ray emission from central engine can penetrate the obscuration material 

177: much more easily than lower energy emission, it possesses particular importance in

178: testing the traditional unified model (Antonucci 1993) in Seyfert 2 galaxies (e.g., 

179: Moran et al. 2002; Cardamone et al. 2007). 

180: The studies of the \it Chandra \rm and \it XMM-Newton \rm observatories showed that the 

181: cosmic X-ray background (CXRB) at 2-30keV

182: might be contributed by many unknown obscured AGNs which are predicted by the

183: CXRB models (e.g., Comastri et al. 1995; De Luca \& Molendi 2004; Worsley et al. 2005;

184: Gilli et al. 2007; Severgnini et al. 2003; Levenson et al. 2006).

185: Taking into account of the issue of co-evolution of AGN

186: and bulge of its host galaxy (e.g., Heckman et al. 2004; Kauffmann et al. 2003;

187: Wang et al. 2006; Wang \& Wei 2008 and references therein), 

188: the hard X-ray emission from AGNs is also

189: an important tool in detecting and separating AGN's contribution from circumnuclear 

190: star formation activity. The X-ray luminosities of 

191: known most X-ray luminous starforming and elliptical galaxies are not higher than

192: $L_{\mathrm{X}}=10^{42}\ \mathrm{erg\ s^{-1}}$ (Zezas et al. 2003; Lira et al. 2002a, 2002b;

193: O'Sullivan et al. 2001).    

194: 

195: 

196: Heckman et al. (2005) identified a very tight correlation between the hard X-ray (3-20keV)  

197: and [\ion{O}{3}] luminosities in a sample of hard X-ray selected AGNs 

198: when they performed a comparison between the hard X-ray

199: selected and [\ion{O}{3}] emission-line selected AGNs. In 2-10keV bandpass, 

200: similar correlations were identified in the Palomar optically selected AGNs 

201: by Panessa et al. (2006).

202: On the contrary, a very weak $L_{\mathrm{[OIII]}}$-$L_{\mathrm{X}}$ correlation was

203: identified in the AGNs selected by their bright [\ion{O}{3}] emission lines 

204: (Heckman et al. 2005). The result suggests that many AGNs might be missed in the 

205: hard X-ray survey. Moreover, Netzer et al. (2006) claimed that the 

206: $L_{\mathrm{[OIII]}}$/$L_{\mathrm{X}}$ ratio depends on the X-ray luminosity.

207: 

208: 

209: 

210: The questions are therefore naturally raised: why is the $L_{\mathrm{[OIII]}}$-$L_{\mathrm{X}}$

211: correlation broken in some kind of AGNs? which parameters (or what are the physical reasons that)

212: determine the correlation? Are the hard X-ray selected AGNs particular in some parameters?

213: Both black hole mass ($M_{\mathrm{BH}}$) and Eddington ratio ($L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$) are

214: two key parameters determining the observed properties of AGNs. In addition, with the 

215: development of the technology in hard X-ray detection, a major advance in studying AGN hard X-ray emission 

216: will be achieved in the next 

217: a few years due to the launch of new missions with enhanced hard X-ray capability (in sensitivity 

218: and imaging), such as NuSTAR, Simbol-X, and NeXT (e.g., Takahashi et al. 2008; Ferrando et al. 2003). 

219: The study on the existent surveys certainly prepares the ground for the future surveys. 

220: 

221: 

222: 

223: 

224: In this paper, we examine the optical spectral properties of a sample of 42 hard X-ray 

225: selected broad-line AGNs, which allows us to investigate the properties of 

226: $M_{\mathrm{BH}}$ and $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ in these hard X-ray AGNs. 

227: The sample is mainly compiled from the AGN catalog of the RXTE 3-20keV All Sky Survey (XSS, 

228: Sazonov \& Revnivtsev 2004), and complemented by the AGN catalog 

229: released by the \it INTEGRAL \rm all-sky hard X-ray survey (Bassani et al. 2006a and references therein). 

230: Note that the energy range used in this work is extended to the Compton reflection region, 

231: and is harder than the range (i.e., 0.5-10 keV) usually used in the similar previous studies.  

232: The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 and 3 shows the sample selection and spectroscopic 

233: observations, respectively.

234: The data reduction is described in the next section. Section 5 presents the 

235: results and discussions. The cosmology with $h_0=0.7$, $\Omega_M=0.3$, and $\Omega_\Lambda=0.7$ 

236: (Bennett et al. 2003) is adopted in our calculations throughout the paper. 

237: 

238: 

239: 

240:     

241: 

242: 

243: \section{The Sample}

244: 

245: %% In a manner similar to \objectname authors can provide links to dataset

246: %% hosted at participating data centers via the \dataset{} command.  The

247: %% second curly bracket argument is printed in the text while the first

248: %% parentheses argument serves as the valid data set identifier.  Large

249: %% lists of data set are best provided in a table (see Table 3 for an example).

250: %% Valid data set identifiers should be obtained from the data center that

251: %% is currently hosting the data.

252: %%

253: %% Note that AASTeX interprets everything between the curly braces in the 

254: %% macro as regular text, so any special characters, e.g. "#" or "_," must be 

255: %% preceded by a backslash. Otherwise, you will get a LaTeX error when you 

256: %% compile your manuscript.  Special characters do not 

257: %% need to be escaped in the optional, square-bracket argument.

258: 

259: 

260: %% In this section, we use  the \subsection command to set off

261: %% a subsection.  \footnote is used to insert a footnote to the text.

262: 

263: %% Observe the use of the LaTeX \label

264: %% command after the \subsection to give a symbolic KEY to the

265: %% subsection for cross-referencing in a \ref command.

266: %% You can use LaTeX's \ref and \label commands to keep track of

267: %% cross-references to sections, equations, tables, and figures.

268: %% That way, if you change the order of any elements, LaTeX will

269: %% automatically renumber them.

270: 

271: %% This section also includes several of the displayed math environments

272: %% mentioned in the Author Guide.

273: 

274: 

275: Our sample is mainly compiled from the RXTE 3-20keV All-Sky Survey 

276: (XSS, Revnivtsev et al. 2004). Sazonov \& Revnivtsev (2004, hereafter SR04) identified 

277: 95 nearby AGNs with 

278: $z_{\mathrm{median}}\sim0.035$ detected in XSS. The survey covers about 90\% of the sky

279: at $|b|>10\symbol{23}$. The sensitivity of the survey in 

280: the energy band 3-20 keV is better than $2.5\times10^{-11}\mathrm{ergs\ s^{-1}\ cm^{-2}}$.

281: SR04 therefore provides a nearly complete sample for bright hard X-ray selected 

282: AGNs, although the sample is still biased against sources with absorption column 

283: $N_{\mathrm{H}}\geq 10^{23}\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$. The IBIS telescope (Ubertini et al. 2003)

284: onboard the  \it INTEGRAL \rm observatory (Winkler et al. 2003) provides a better 

285: capability for heavily obscured objects because of its good sensitivity beyond 20 keV. 

286: After about three years \it INTEGRAL \rm observation, their all-sky survey project

287: allows Bassani et al. (2006a) to 

288: identify 62 AGNs in the energy bandpass 20-100keV above a flux of 

289: $1.5\times10^{-11}\mathrm{ergs\ s^{-1}\ cm^{-2}}$ by analyzing 11,300 

290: \it INTEGRAL \rm points (see also in Bassani et al. 2006b; Bird et al. 2006; 

291: Beckmann et al. 2006).

292: 

293: 

294: Both catalogs are then combined to enlarge our sample content, and to attempt to 

295: alleviate the bias against the obscuration.   

296: We further limit the objects to the broad-line AGNs 

297: according to the identification provided by 

298: previous optical spectroscopy. The BAT instrument (Barthelmy et al. 2005) onboard the 

299: \it Swift \rm satellite (Gehrels et al. 2004) provides an all-sky hard X-ray survey with a sensitivity 

300: down to a few $\times 10^{-11}\mathrm{ergs\ s^{-1}\ cm^{-2}}$ in higher energy band 14-195 keV. 

301: Markwardt et al. (2005) identified 44 previous known AGNs in the \it Swift \rm survey. 

302: However, considering the spectroscopic observation condition (see below), only three objects 

303: are not listed in our sample. It is worthy noting that the ongoing \it Swift\rm/BAT and 

304: \it INTEGRAL \rm survey could provide a larger sample of $\sim100$ hard X-ray selected AGNs at 

305: the end of our program (i.e., Krivonos et al. 2006; Sazonov et al. 2007; Tueller et al. 2008). 

306: We will perform a subsequent spectroscopic study on these AGNs in the next work. 

307: 

308: Figure 1 shows the column density ($\mathrm{N_H}$) distribution for our sample. 

309: $\mathrm{N_H}$ is complied from SR04, and from Sazonov et al. (2007) for the objects 

310: detected by \it INTEGRAL \rm only. Briefly, these authors determined $\mathrm{N_H}$ by 

311: fitting the available spectra from different X-ray instruments by an absorbed powerlaw.

312: Values of $\mathrm{N_H}$ less than $10^{22}\ \mathrm{cm^{-2}}$ were ignored in the 

313: fitting of SR04 and Sazonov et al. (2007). As 

314: shown in the figure, the current sample is still strongly biased against AGNs with large 

315: column density.   

316: 

317: 

318: 

319: \section{Spectroscopic Observations}

320: 

321: Both because of the constraint of the observatory site and because of the instrumental capability, 

322: the spectroscopic observations are only carried out for the bright ($m_v<16.5$mag) objects

323: located in the northern sky with declination $\delta>-20\symbol{23}$. In total, 

324: there are 53 objects fulfilling the selection criterion. Six of these objects 

325: are not observed because of the poor weather conditions. Among the remaining objects, 

326: five objects (i.e., XSSJ\,02151-0033, XSS\,J11570+5514, XSS\,J22363-1230, NGC\,788, IGR\,J21247+5058)

327: are excluded in subsequent spectral modeling because of the weakness or absence of broad H$\alpha$ and/or

328: H$\beta$ emission lines\footnote{Our spectroscopic observations show that three objects, i.e., 

329: XSS\,J02151-0033, XSS\,J11570+5514, and XSS\,J22363-1230, could be further classified 

330: as Seyfert 1.9-like galaxies without broad components of Balmer emission lines except a broad 

331: H$\alpha$ emission. In addition, the continuum is dominated by the contribution from starlight of  

332: host galaxy rather than AGN in XSS\,J02151-0033 and XSS\,J11570+5514, which precludes the measurements 

333: of the \ion{Fe}{2} complex. We

334: include NGC\,788 in our observation program because multi-classification is shown in the

335: NED (see also in Beckmann et al. 2006). Our spectrum indicates a Seyfert 2 nucleus in the object.

336: In fact, the object is classified as a Seyfert 2 galaxy with 

337: polarized broad emission lines in the catalogue of quasars and active nuclei (Veron-Cetty \& Veron 2006). 

338: Our spectrum taken in Dec 20, 2006 shows that the spectrum of IGR\,J21247+5058 is 

339: dominated by a typical late type star, which is consistent with Masetti et al. (2004). 

340: By identifying the broad emission bump around 6700\AA\ as H$\alpha$, these author argued that the background AGN 

341: is aligned with a F- or early G-type star by chance.}    

342: 

343: 

344: The total 42 high (or intermediate high) quality optical spectra were obtained by using the 

345: National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Science (NAOC), 2.16m 

346: telescope in Xinglong observatory during several observing runs carried out 

347: from November 2005 to Mar 2008. The spectra were taken by the OMR spectrograph 

348: equipped with a back-illuminated SPEC10 1340$\times$400 CCD as detector. A grating of 

349: 300$\mathrm{g\ mm^{-1}}$ and a slit of 2.0\symbol{125} oriented in south-north

350: direction were used in our observations. This setup results in a final spectral 

351: resolution $\sim 9\AA$ as measured from both comparison spectra and night sky 

352: emission lines. The blazed wavelength was fixed to be 6000\AA, which provides a 

353: wavelength coverage of 3800-8300\AA\ in observer frame. This attempt covers both 

354: H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$ region in most spectra because of their 

355: small redshifts. Each object was observed successively twice. 

356: The two exposures were combined prior to extraction to enhance the S/N ratio and

357: eliminate the contamination of cosmic-rays easily. The exposure time for each 

358: frame is generally between 900 and 3600 seconds depending on the brightness

359: of the object. The wavelength calibration associated with each object was

360: carried out by the helium-neon-argon comparison arcs taken between the two successive frames.

361: The arcs were obtained at the position being nearly identical to that of the specified object.  

362: Two or three Kitt Peak National Observatory (KPNO) standard stars (Massey et al. 1988)

363: were observed per night for both flux calibration and removal of the 

364: atmospheric absorption features. All the objects were observed as close to meridian 

365: as possible. Table 1 shows the log of observations of the 42 objects listed in our 

366: sample.

367: 

368: 

369: \section{Data Reduction and Emission Line Measurements}

370: 

371: The standard procedures using the IRAF package \footnote{IRAF is distributed by the 

372: National Optical Astronomical Observatories, which is operated by the Association 

373: of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the 

374: National Science Foundation.} are adopted by us to reduce the 

375: unprocessed frames. The CCD reductions include bias subtraction, flat-field correction,

376: and cosmic-rays removal before the extraction of signal. One-dimensional sky-subtracted 

377: spectra are then wavelength and flux calibrated. The uncertainties of the wavelength and flux 

378: calibrations are no more than 1\AA\ and 20\%, respectively. The Galactic extinctions 

379: are corrected by the color excess, the parameter $E(B-V)$ taken from the NASA/IAPC Extragalactic

380: Database (NED), assuming an $R_V=3.1$ extinction law of Milk Way (Cardelli et al. 1989). 

381: The spectra are then transformed to the rest frame, along with a $k$-correction,  

382: according to the narrow peak of H$\beta$.       

383:  

384: \subsection{\ion{Fe}{2} subtractions}

385: 

386: In order to determine the strength of the optical \ion{Fe}{2} complex and to

387: reliably profile the emission lines in H$\beta$ region, the \ion{Fe}{2} complex should 

388: be modeled and then removed from each spectrum at first. We 

389: simply adopt the empirical template of the \ion{Fe}{2} complex introduced in 

390: Boroson \& Green (1992, hereafter BG92). For each object,  

391: the template is first broadened to the FWHM of the H$\beta$ broad component 

392: by convolving with a Gaussian profile (BG92).

393: The broadened template and a broken powerlaw are combined to model the continuum by a $\chi^2$

394: minimization for individual object. The minimization is performed over the 

395: rest frame wavelength range from 4300 to 7000\AA, except for the regions around 

396: the strong emission lines (i.e., H$\alpha$+[\ion{N}{2}], [\ion{S}{2}], H$\beta$, 

397: H$\gamma$, [\ion{O}{3}], \ion{He}{2}). The fittings

398: are illustrated in the left column of Figure 2 for three typical cases.

399: The flux of the \ion{Fe}{2} complex is integrated between the rest 

400: wavelength 4434 and 4686\AA. 

401: The \ion{Fe}{2} complex is not measured in XSS\,J11067+7234 because its continuum  

402: is dominated by the starlight from the host galaxy. 

403: 

404: \subsection{Emission lines measurements}

405: 

406: After removing the \ion{Fe}{2} blends and continuum, the isolated AGN emission lines

407: at H$\beta$ region are modeled by the SPECFIT task (Kriss 1994) in IRAF package. 

408: In each object, each of the [\ion{O}{3}]$\lambda\lambda$4959,5007 doublet is modeled 

409: by a single Gaussian component. The flux ratio of the doublet is fixed to be 3 

410: (e.g., Dimitrijevic et al. 2007). In principle, each H$\beta$ profile is modeled by a set 

411: of two Gaussian components: a narrow and a broad Gaussian component (denoted as 

412: H$\beta_\mathrm{n}$ and H$\beta_\mathrm{b}$, respectively). The profile modelings are 

413: illustrated for the three cases in the right column in Figure 2. The deblendings of the 

414: H$\beta$ emission line are, however, difficult in 15 objects because no obvious transition

415: between the narrow and broad components is observed. In these 15 cases, the reported 

416: H$\beta_\mathrm{b}$ measurements include both components, and the 

417: contribution of H$\beta_\mathrm{n}$ is usually expected to be less than 3\% for typical broad-line 

418: AGNs as suggested by BG92. 

419: 

420: The described modeling works very well in most objects, except in three ones. 

421: In XSS\,J22539-1735, a very broad H$\beta$ component ($\mathrm{FWHM\sim10,000\ km\ s^{-1}}$) 

422: is required to properly reproduce the observed profile. Such component has been 

423: reported in H$\beta$ and highly ionized emission lines in previous studies 

424: (e.g., Sulentic et al. 2000b; Wang et al. 2005; Veron-Cetty et al. 2007; 

425: Marziani et al. 2003; Mullaney \& Ward 2008; Hu et al. 2008). A double 

426: peaked and a boxy H$\beta$ profile is observed in XSS\,J18408+7947 and XSS\,J23073+0447,

427: respectively. In all of the three cases, each H$\beta$ line is modeled by three 

428: Gaussian components, i.e., a narrow and two broad components. The modeled narrow 

429: component is then subtracted from the observed spectrum to derive a residual profile 

430: which is then used to measure FWHM and integrated flux.  

431:  

432: \section{Results and Discussion}

433: 

434: Table 2 lists the following items measured from the spectra. Column (2) and (3)

435: lists the equivalent widths (EWs) of H$\beta_{\mathrm{n}}$ and H$\beta_{\mathrm{b}}$,

436: respectively. All the EWs refer to the continuum level determined from the continuum fitting 

437: at the position of wavelength $\lambda$4861. The line ratio RFe (=\ion{Fe}{2}/H$\beta_b$) 

438: is shown in column (4). Column (5) lists the luminosity of the

439: H$\beta$ broad component, and Column (6) the FWHM of the broad H$\beta$ in units of $\mathrm{km\ s^{-1}}$. 

440: All quoted widths are not corrected for the intrinsic resolution, since the widths are 

441: much broader than the resolution. Column (7) shows the luminosity of the [\ion{O}{3}] emission line.

442: Both [\ion{O}{3}] and H$\beta_b$ luminosities are calculated from the cosmology-corrected luminosity distance

443: \footnote{Because the objects listed in our sample are generally very nearby, the radial velocity is

444: corrected by a redshift of 0.017877 to the reference frame defined by the 3K Microwave Background Radiation.

445: }

446: given by NED. The next two columns show the absorption-corrected hard X-ray luminosities 

447: in the bandpass 3-20 keV (XSS) and in 17-60 keV (\it INTEGRAL\rm).    

448: 

449: 

450: Six out of the 42 AGNs are detected by \it INTEGRAL \rm only. In order to estimate their X-ray luminosities

451: in the bandpass 3-20 keV from the luminosities in 17-60 keV, a transformation is derived in terms of the 

452: 18 objects detected by both surveys. The left panel of Figure 3 shows the relationship between the two 

453: sets of luminosity. A unweighted fitting yields a relationship 

454: $\log L_{\mathrm{17-60 keV}}=1.03\log L_{\mathrm{3-20keV}}-1.39$ with a standard deviation of 0.25.

455: After transform the luminosities in the bandpass 17-60 keV to 3-20 keV for the six objects,   

456: the strong correlation between the [\ion{O}{3}] and 3-20 keV luminosity is shown in the right panel of Figure 3 

457: for the total 42 objects. The correlation is highly consistent with that derived in Heckman et al. (2005), 

458: which firmly demonstrates the accuracy of our observations and calibrations.  

459: 

460: \subsection{Hard X-ray vs. bolometric luminosity}

461: 

462: The detection of hard X-ray emission from a nucleus is regarded as strong evidence of accretion activity 

463: occurring around the central SMBH.

464: The correlations between X-ray luminosity and luminosities of optical emission lines (e.g., H$\alpha$, 

465: H$\beta$, [\ion{O}{3}]) have been extensively established in the previous studies 

466: (e.g., Elvis et al. 1984; Ward et al. 1988; 

467: Mulchaey et al. 1994; Heckman et al. 2005; Panessa et al. 2006). However, the correlations seem to 

468: depend on sample selection (Heckman et al. 2005) and on X-ray luminosity itself (Netzer et al. 2006).

469: In this paper, we estimate the  

470: luminosity of AGN at rest wavelength 5100\AA\ from the H$\beta_b$ component according to the calibration 

471: given by Greene \& Ho (2005):

472: \begin{equation}

473: L_{5100}=7.31\times10^{43}\bigg(\frac{L_{\mathrm{H\beta}}}{10^{42}\ \mathrm{erg\ s^{-1}}}\bigg)^{0.883}\ \mathrm{ergs\ s^{-1}} 

474: \end{equation}

475: The bolometric luminosity is then derived by adopting the usually used bolometric correction 

476: $L_{\mathrm{bol}}\approx 9\lambda L_{\lambda}(5100\AA)$ (e.g., Kaspi et al. 2000). The significant

477: correlation between $L_{\mathrm{bol}}$ and $L_{\mathrm{3-20keV}}$ is shown in the left panel in Figure 4. 

478: A unweighted least square fitting gives a relationship:

479: \begin{equation} 

480: \log L_X = (0.91\pm0.06)\log L_{\mathrm{bol}}+(3.04\pm2.78)

481: \end{equation}

482: or $L_{\mathrm{bol}}/L_X\sim 10$ for simplification. The correlation strongly 

483: indicates a close link between the hard X-ray emission and ionizing radiation emitted from the accretion disk. 

484: Note that the bolometric luminosity spans four orders of magnitude, down to $L_{\mathrm{bol}}\sim10^{43}\ 

485: \mathrm{ergs\ s^{-1}}$, which is close to the formal definition of low luminous AGNs 

486: (i.e., $L_{\mathrm{bol}}<10^{43}\ \mathrm{ergs\ s^{-1}}$, Ho 2003). These faint galaxies generally 

487: radiate at low state with Eddington ratio marginally exceeds 0.01. 

488: 

489: 

490: \subsection{Black Hole Mass and Eddington Ratio}

491: 

492: It is now generally believed that black hole mass ($M_{\mathrm{BH}}$) and specific accretion rate 

493: ($L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$) are two basic parameters determining the properties of AGNs. The 

494: role of $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ in driving the Eigenvector I (EI) space 

495: \footnote{ The EI space is one of the key properties of AGN

496: phenomena. It was first established by BG92 who analyzed the optical spectra of 87 bright PG quasars. 

497: In addition to the anti-correlation between the intensity of \ion{Fe}{2} and [\ion{O}{3}],

498: the EI space has been subsequently extended to ultraviolet and soft X-ray bands (i.e., FWHM(\ion{C}{4}) and

499: $\Gamma_\mathrm{s}$, e.g., Wang et al. 1996; Xu et al. 2003; Grupe 2004; Sulentic et al. 2007;

500: see Sulentic et al. 2000a for a review). 

501: }

502: has been extensively investigated in 

503: numerous previous studies (e.g., Boroson 2002; Sulentic et al. 2006; Xu et al. 2003; Grupe 2004; 

504: Zamanov \& Marziani 2002; Marziani et al. 2001), because of the great progress in the calibration of 

505: the $R_{\mathrm{BLR}}-L$

506: relationship (e.g, Kaspi et al. 2000, 2005, 2007; McLure \& Jarvis 2004; Vestergaard \& Peterson 2006; 

507: Peterson et al. 2004; Bentz et al. 2006) due to the recent great advance in 

508: the reverberation mapping (e.g., Kapsi et al. 2000; Peterson \& Bentz 2006). 

509: We refer the reads to McGill et al. (2008, and references 

510: therein) for a summary of the existing formula used to calculate $M_{\mathrm{BH}}$ basing upon 

511: ``single-epoch'' observation. In this work, the black hole mass is estimated 

512: by the width and luminosity of H$\beta_b$ in individual object, according to the 

513: scaling law obtained by Greene \& Ho (2005).  

514: \begin{equation}

515: M_{\mathrm{BH}}=3.6\times10^6\bigg(\frac{L_{\mathrm{H\beta}}}{10^{42}\ \mathrm{erg\ s^{-1}}}\bigg)^{0.56}

516: \bigg(\frac{\mathrm{FWHM_{H\beta}}}{1000\ \mathrm{km\ s^{-1}}}\bigg)^2\ \mathrm{M_{\odot}}

517: \end{equation}

518: For each object, the estimated $M_{\mathrm{BH}}$ and $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ is listed in Column (10) and (11) 

519: in Table 2, respectively. The bolometric luminosity $L_{\mathrm{bol}}$ is estimated from the

520: H$\beta_b$ component as described above.   

521: 

522: The calculations of both $L_{\mathrm{bol}}$ and $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ allow us to 

523: find that the current sample is strongly biased against sub-luminous AGNs usually with 

524: low $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$. In fact, the left panel of Figure 4 shows the lack of AGNs with 

525: $L_{\mathrm{bol}}<10^{43}\ \mathrm{ergs\ s^{-1}}$.  

526: Figure 5 displays the distributions of the $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ (\it left panel\rm) 

527: and $M_{\mathrm{BH}}$ (\it middle panel\rm) for the total 42 AGNs. 

528: As shown in the middle panel, the $M_{\mathrm{BH}}$ is sampled within a wide range ($\sim3$ dex) 

529: from $10^{6}M_\odot$ to $10^{9}M_\odot$ with a peak at $10^{7-8}M_\odot$. In contrast, the left panel 

530: shows that $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ distributes in a relatively narrow range as compared with the previous studies. 

531: The total range of our $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ spans from 0.01 to 1. 

532: In particular, about $\sim60$\% objects listed in the sample have $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ between 0.01 and 0.1.

533: However, the $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ of bright local AGNs usually spans at least three orders of 

534: magnitude from 1 to 0.001 (e.g., Woo \& Urry 2002; Boroson 2002). Basing upon the 2-10keV X-ray luminosity, 

535: Panessa et al. (2006) indicated that the $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ 

536: of the Palomar optically selected AGNs ranges from $10^{-5}$ to 0.1. As an additional test, 

537: the right panel of Figure 4 shows the $M_{\mathrm{BH}}$ vs. $L_{\mathrm{3-20keV}}$ plot. 

538: $L_{\mathrm{3-20keV}}$ as a function of $M_{\mathrm{BH}}$ is over-plotted as dashed lines for

539: three different $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ (i.e., 1, 0.1, and 0.01). As shown in the plot, 

540: a majority of our objects are located below the line with $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}=0.1$ and 

541: above the line with $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}=0.01$. 

542: 

543: 

544: In summary,  

545: the hard X-ray selected AGNs listed in our sample are luminous AGNs with a 

546: wide range of $M_{\mathrm{BH}}$ but a nearly constant accretion activity (i.e., $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$),

547: which is likely due to the selection effect of the survey that is biased toward 

548: X-ray luminous objects. In active (or luminous) AGN, the optical/UV ionizing radiation 

549: is believed to be emitted from a standard geometric thin disk (e.g., Shakura \& Sunyaev 1973). The

550: low energy photon is comptonized by a hot corona to produce the hard X-ray emission below 10keV (Haardt \& Maraschi 1991). 

551: A Compton recoil of the soft photon is required to occur on the ionized surface of the accretion disk to produce 

552: the emission spectrum beyond 10keV. The main observation feature of the reflection is a bump 

553: peaked at about 30keV 

554: (e.g., George \& Fabian 1991; Zycki et al. 1994; Ross \& Fabian 2002, 2005). 

555: 

556: 

557: 

558: The bias towards active AGNs could be possibly caused by the fact that 

559: either intensive Compton reflection

560: takes place only in AGNs at high state with large $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ or the surveys are 

561: biased against the Compton-thick objects. In the first case, the theory of the Compton reflection

562: predicts that the X-ray emission contributed by 

563: the reflection depends primarily on the X-ray ionizing parameter, 

564: and secondarily on the UV radiation produced by the dissipation inside the accretion disk. 

565: In the second case, our analysis implies a possible connection between the less X-ray absorption

566: and high $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ in broad-line AGNs. In fact, we selected the objects with regardless of

567: their X-ray spectral properties. Figure 1 shows the lack of objects with large 

568: column density in the sample. 

569: We believe that the sample completeness would be improved  

570: by including the ongoing \it Swift\rm/BAT survey with large effective collecting area and 

571: harder energy bandpass (14-195 keV) in the future studies.     

572: 

573: Figure 4 shows that the hard X-ray luminosity is strongly correlated with the 

574: $M_{\mathrm{BH}}$ in our sample. In fact, the correlation is naturally expected given the tight 

575: $L_{\mathrm{3-20keV}}$

576: vs. $L_{\mathrm{bol}}$ correlation and nearly constant $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$. 

577: The $L_X$ vs. $M_{\mathrm{BH}}$ correlation provides us a potential estimate of black hole mass for

578: luminous AGNs within $0.01\leq L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}\leq 0.1$. The following relationship is obtained 

579: by us through a least square fitting: 

580: $\log(M_{\mathrm{BH}}/M_\odot)=(0.82\pm0.09)\log L_{3-20\mathrm{keV}}-(28.23\pm3.78)$. Our results 

581: conflicts with Panessa et al. (2006) and Pellegrini (2005) who did not find the correlation,

582: but is in agreement with Kiuchi et al. (2006). Panessa et al. (2006) investigated a sample of 

583: 47 nearby Seyfert galaxies selected from the Palomar spectroscopy (Ho et al. 1997).

584: The luminosity obtained by 

585: different X-ray instruments is down to 

586: $L_{\mathrm{2-10keV}}\sim10^{38} \mathrm{ergs\ s^{-1}}$. 

587: The studies in Pellegrini (2005) are based on the \it Chandra \rm observations down to a 

588: luminosity $L_{\mathrm{2-10keV}}\sim10^{38} \mathrm{ergs\ s^{-1}}$.

589: Kiuchi et al. (2006) used the broad-line AGN sample detected by the \it ASCA \rm Large Sky Survey 

590: (ALSS) and \it ASCA \rm Medium Sensitivity Survey in the northern sky (AMSSn) with a detection 

591: limit of a few $\times 10^{-13}\ \mathrm{ergs\ s^{-1}\ cm^{-2}}$ in 2-10keV bandpass. 

592: As discussed above, it is worthy noting that the correlation most likely does not reflect the 

593: physics but a selection effect of the surveys.   

594: 

595: 

596: 

597: \subsection{\ion{Fe}{2} ratio vs. disk temperature relation} 

598: 

599: As a key parameter in the EI space, 

600: the \ion{Fe}{2} ratio (RFe) is defined as the ratio of the optical \ion{Fe}{2} complex to H$\beta$.

601: Although the total \ion{Fe}{2} emission 

602: increases by fourfold with reasonable ionization parameter in AGN (Korista et al. 1997), 

603: traditional photoionization 

604: models can not explain the strong \ion{Fe}{2} emission in optical and UV bands

605: (e.g, Netzer \& Wills 1983; Joly 1987; Collin-Souffrin et al. 1988). 

606: At present, the problem is only slightly alleviated by the major improvements

607: in the atomic data and by the improved treatment of the line excitation process (Sigut \& Pradhan 2003;

608: Baldwin et al. 2004). We refer the reads to Collin \& Joly (2000) for a summary of the 

609: mechanisms that can enhance the \ion{Fe}{2} emission. BG92 put forward a picture in which the RFe is 

610: determined by the vertical structure of the accretion disk. The vertical structure is 

611: governed by $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$. A large $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ leads to a large 

612: X-ray heated volume that could generate large \ion{Fe}{2} emission. Sulentic et al. (2000b)  

613: developed a semi-analysis model in which the RFe depends on $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ as 

614: $\mathrm{RFe}\propto0.55\log(L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}})$. Although the RFe is found to generally

615: increase with $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ in 

616: optical bright quasars, Netzer et al. (2004) found that a number of high-z 

617: quasars deviate the trend, i.e., with very small RFe but large $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ (see also 

618: in Netzer \& Trakhtenbrot 2007). Using the large database 

619: provided by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, Netzer \& Trakhtenbrot (2007) recently suggested that the 

620: enhanced RFe is mainly caused by increased metal abundance.     

621: 

622: 

623: In the current sample, the distribution of RFe is shown in the right panel of Figure 5. 

624: RFe uniformly ranges from $10^{-3}$ to 1. On the contrary, $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ distributes in a 

625: quite narrow range as describe above. In fact, no correlation between RFe and $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$

626: is found in our sample (see the upper panel in Figure 6), which motivates us to suspect that RFe does not 

627: depend on $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ only. 

628: RFe is plotted against the characteristic disk temperature $T_{\mathrm{max}}$ in the 

629: bottom panel in Figure 6. The temperature scales with $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ and $M_{\mathrm{BH}}$ as predicted by 

630: the standard geometric thin disk model (e.g., Shakura \& Sunyaev 1973).

631: The exact formula of disk temperature depends on various accretion disk models. 

632: For a rapidly rotating Kerr hole, with a spin parameter $a_*=0.998$ and efficiency of 0.31, we have 

633: $T_{\mathrm{max}} =10^{5.56} (L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}})^{1/4}M_{\mathrm{BH}}^{-1/4}\ \mathrm{K}$.   

634: The diagram indicates an obvious correlation between the two parameters.

635: A spearman rank-order test calculated by survival analysis yields a formal correlation coefficient $r_s=0.414$ 

636: ($P=0.0088$, where $P$ is the probability of null correlation). The correlation is not highly significant 

637: probably because of the small sample size. The estimated 

638: temperature spans about one order of magnitude ($\Delta\log T_{\mathrm{max}}\approx1.25$), 

639: corresponding to a factor of $\sim18$. 

640: The correlation then suggests a trend of more intensive \ion{Fe}{2} emission for higher disk temperature. 

641: A marginal dependence of the continuum shape of QSOs on $T_{\mathrm{max}}$ was 

642: recently identified by Bonning et al. (2007)

643: who compared the observations of SDSS with the NLTE models of accretion disk. The current result    

644: means that the strength of the \ion{Fe}{2} emission is likely controlled by the spectral shape of 

645: the ionizing continuum.  

646: 

647: \subsection{Equivalent width of H$\beta$ vs. $L_X$}

648: The physical reason of the absence of the Baldwin relationship (Baldwin 1977) for 

649: low ionization emission lines is still an open question. In fact, a weak inverse Baldwin relationship for H$\beta$

650: has been demonstrated by recent studies basing upon large AGN samples (e.g., Croom et al. 2002; 

651: Greene \& Ho 2005). We identify a tight, positive correlation between 

652: $L_X$ and EW(H$\beta_b$) in our hard X-ray selected AGNs (i.e., an inverse Baldwin relationship).

653: Figure 7 presents the correlation with correlation coefficient $r=0.611$ ($P=10^{-4}$) estimated by 

654: the spearman rank-order analysis. 

655: EW(H$\beta_b$) roughly scales with hard X-ray luminosity as $\mathrm{EW(H\beta_b)}\propto L_X^{0.39}$.

656: Wilkes et al. (1999) identified a marginal Baldwin effect in H$\beta$ line. Noted that they 

657: examined only the luminous local quasars with $L_{\mathrm{1-10keV}}>10^{44}\ \mathrm{ergs\ s^{-1}}$. 

658: 

659: 

660: Although many models are developed to explain the Baldwin effect for high ionization emission 

661: lines (e.g., \ion{C}{4}, Wandel 1999; Korista et al. 1998; Shields et al. 1995;

662: Wills et al. 1999; Baskin \& Loar 2004; Bachev et al. 2004), these models can not explain the 

663: difference between \ion{C}{4} and H$\beta$. Croom et al. (2002) suggested that the inverse 

664: Baldwin relationship could be explained if the longer wavelength continuum contains emission from 

665: other components (e.g., thermal dust emission, non-thermal radio emission, starlight). 

666: We estimate the possible contribution of the unknown sources as follows.

667: We start from the relationship $\log L_X=39.08+2.56\log \mathrm{EW(H\beta)}$, and re-write 

668: $\mathrm{EW(H\beta)}=L(H\beta)/(L'+L_c)$, where $L_c$ and $L'$ is the AGN luminosity and 

669: luminosity of other unknown sources at the H$\beta$ wavelength, respectively. The X-ray luminosity 

670: could be replaced by $L_c$ given Eq. (2) and the bolometric correction factor of 9.

671: Replacing $L(H\beta)$ as $L_c$ given Eq.(1) finally yields a relationship 

672: $\log(1+L'/L_c)=9.48-0.21\log L_c$. Considering the typical case with 

673: $L_{\mathrm{c}}\sim10^{44}\ \mathrm{erg\ s^{-1}}$, about 40\% of the observed 

674: continuum at H$\beta$ wavelength is estimated to be contributed by the unknown sources.

675: 

676: 

677: 

678: 

679: 

680: \section{Conclusion}

681: 

682: The properties ($L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ and $M_{\mathrm{BH}}$) of accretion onto SMBH are examined in 

683: a sample of 42 hard X-ray selected (3-60keV) broad-line AGNs in terms of their optical spectra taken by us. 

684: The energy range is harder than that usually used in the similar previous studies. 

685: These AGNs are mainly compiled from the RXTE All Sky Survey 

686: (Sazonov \& Revnivtsev 2004), and are complemented 

687: by the released \it INTEGRAL \rm AGN sample (Bassani et al. 2006a). 

688: The statistical analysis allows us to draw the following conclusions: 

689: \begin{enumerate}

690: \item We confirm the tight correlation between the hard X-ray and optical emission line luminosities 

691: (and bolometric luminosity) in our sample, which suggests a close link between the hard X-ray 

692: emission reflected by the ionized surface of the accretion disk and UV/optical radiation.

693: Using the hard X-ray luminosity, a strong inverse Baldwin relationship of the H$\beta$ emission line 

694: is identified in the sample.  

695: \item The hard X-ray selected broad-line AGNs listed in the sample are found 

696: to be strongly biased toward luminous AGNs with high $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ and low column density. 

697: Since $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ is constant (mostly between 0.01 and 0.1) in a first order approximation,

698: the hard X-ray luminosity is strongly correlated with the black hole mass in our sample, which

699: is most likely due to the selection effect of the surveys.  

700:  

701: \item Although the RFe parameter is independent on $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ in our sample, it is found to be 

702: correlated with the accretion disk temperature as assessed by $T\propto(L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}})M_{\mathrm{BH}}^{-1}$.

703: This result implies that the strength of the \ion{Fe}{2} emission is determined by 

704: the shape of the ionizing spectrum. 

705: \end{enumerate} 

706: 

707: Finally, it should be mentioned that a new era in AGN hard X-ray study will be opened in next a few years 

708: due to the launch of new missions with enhanced hard X-ray detection capability in 

709: not only sensitivity, but also imaging, such as Simbol-X, NeXT and NuSTAR. 

710: These missions will provide larger, and more complete samples to study the present open issues. 

711: 

712: 

713: %% The \notetoeditor{TEXT} command allows the author to communicate

714: %% information to the copy editor.  This information will appear as a

715: %% footnote on the printed copy for the manuscript style file.  Nothing will

716: %% appear on the printed copy if the preprint or

717: %% preprint2 style files are used.

718: 

719: %% The eqnarray environment produces multi-line display math. The end of

720: %% each line is marked with a \\. Lines will be numbered unless the \\

721: %% is preceded by a \nonumber command.

722: %% Alignment points are marked by ampersands (&). There should be two

723: %% ampersands (&) per line.

724: 

725: %% Putting eqnarrays or equations inside the mathletters environment groups

726: %% the enclosed equations by letter. For instance, the eqnarray below, instead

727: %% of being numbered, say, (4) and (5), would be numbered (4a) and (4b).

728: %% LaTeX the paper and look at the output to see the results.

729: 

730: %% examples of in-line math featuring a couple of the AASTeX symbol macros.

731: 

732: 

733: %% The displaymath environment will produce the same sort of equation as

734: %% the equation environment, except that the equation will not be numbered

735: %% by LaTeX.

736: 

737: 

738: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,

739: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments

740: %% command.

741: 

742: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the

743: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]

744: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,

745: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the

746: %% text to be printed in the second.

747: 

748: \acknowledgments

749: We would like to thank the anonymous referee for his/her valuable comments 

750: that help to improve the paper.  

751: The authors are grateful to Todd A. Boroson and Richard F. Green for providing 

752: us the \ion{Fe}{2} template. Special thanks go to the staff at Xinglong 

753: observatory as a part of National Astronomical Observatories, China Academy of Science 

754: for their instrumental and observational help. This search is supported by the 

755: NFS of China under grant 10503005.

756: 

757: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their

758: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope

759: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches

760: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be

761: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes

762: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.

763: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX

764: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.

765: 

766: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the

767: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research

768: %% for the paper.  Each keyword will be checked against the master list during

769: %% copy editing.  Individual instruments or configurations can be provided 

770: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.

771: 

772: %{\it Facilities:} \facility{Nickel}, \facility{HST (STIS)}, \facility{CXO (ASIS)}.

773: 

774: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.

775: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix

776: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.

777: 

778: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.

779: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix

780: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.

781: 

782: 

783: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.

784: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.

785: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of

786: %% curly braces.  If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error

787: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".

788: %%

789: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite

790: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a

791: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds

792: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).

793: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the

794: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain

795: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in

796: %% place of the \cite commands.

797: 

798: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.

799: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.

800: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.

801: 

802: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly

803: %% different from previous examples.  The natbib system solves a host

804: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly

805: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.

806: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.

807: 

808: \begin{thebibliography}{}

809: \bibitem[Antonucci 1993]{ant93} Antonucci, R., 1993, \araa, 31, 473

810: \bibitem[Bachev et al. 2004]{bac04} Bachev, R., et al., 2004, \apj, 617, 171

811: \bibitem[Baldwin 1977]{bal77} Baldwin, J. A., 1977, \apj, 214, 679 

812: \bibitem[Baldwin et al. 2004]{bal04} Baldwin, J. A., Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., et al., 2004, \apj, 615, 610

813: \bibitem[Barthelmy et al. 2005] {bar05} Barthelmy, S. D., Barbier, L. M., Cummings, J. R., et al., 2005, SSRV, 120, 143

814: \bibitem[Baskin \& Loar 2004]{bas04} Baskin, A., \&  Loar, A., 2004, \mnras, 350, L31

815: \bibitem[Bassani et al. 2006b]{bas06b} Bassani, L., Malizia, A., Stephen, J. B., et al., 2006b, arXiv: astro-ph/10455 

816: \bibitem[Bassani et al. 2006a]{bas06a} Bassani, L., Molina, M., Malizia, A., et al., 2006a, \apj, 636, L65

817: \bibitem[Beckmann et al. 2006]{bec06} Beckmann, V., Gehrels, N., Shrader, C. R., et al., 2006, \apj, 638, 642

818: \bibitem[Bennett et al. 2003]{ben03} Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., et al., 2003, \apjs, 148, 1

819: \bibitem[Bentz et al. 2006]{ben06} Bentz, M. C., Peterson, B. M., Pogge, R. W., et al., 2006, \apj, 644, 133

820: \bibitem[Bird et al. 2006]{bir06} Bird, A. J., Barlow, E. J., Bassani, L., et al., 2006, \apj, 636, 765

821: \bibitem[Bonning et al. 2007]{bon07} Bonning, E. W., Cheng, L., Shields, G. A., et al., 2007, \apj, 659, 211

822: \bibitem[Boroson 2002]{bor02} Boroson, T. A., 2002, \apj, 565, 78

823: \bibitem[Boroson \& Green 1992]{bor92} Boroson, T. A., \& Green, R. F., 1992, \apjs, 80, 109 (BG92)

824: \bibitem[Brusa et al. 2007]{bru07}Brusa, M., Zamorani, G., Comastri, A., et al., 2007, \apjs, 172, 353

825: \bibitem[Cardamone et al. 2007]{car07} Cardamone, C. N., Moran, E. C., \& Kay, L. E., 2007, \aj, 134, 1264 

826: \bibitem[Cardelli et al. 1989]{car89} Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., \& Mathis, J. S., 1989, \apj, 345, 245

827: \bibitem[Comastri et al. 1995]{com95} Comastri, A., Setti, G., Zamorani, G., et al., 1995, \aap, 296, 1

828: \bibitem[Collin-Souffrin et al. 1988]{col88} Collin, S., Hameury, J. M., \& Joly, M., \aap, 205, 19

829: \bibitem[Collin \& Joly 2000]{col00} Collin, S., \& Joly, M., 2000, NewAR, 44, 531

830: \bibitem[Croom et al. 2002]{cro02} Croom, S. M., Smith, R. J., Boly, B. J., et al., 2001, \mnras, 322, L29

831: \bibitem[Dadina 2008]{dad08} Dadina, M., 2008, astro-ph/arXiv0801.4338, accetped by \aap

832: \bibitem[De Luca \& Molendi 2004]{del04} De Luca, A., \& Molendi, S., 2004, \aap, 419, 837

833: \bibitem[Dimitrijevic et al. 2007]{dim07} Dimitrijevic. M. S., Popovic, L. C., Kovacevic, L., et al., 2007, \mnras, 374, 1181

834: \bibitem[Elvis et al. 1984]{elv84} Elvis, M., Soltan, A., \& Keel, W. C., 1984, \apj, 283, 479

835: \bibitem[Ferrando et al. 2004]{fer03} Ferrando, P., Arnaud, M., Cordier, B., et al., 2003, arXiv:astro-ph/0309424

836: \bibitem[Gehrels e tal. 2004]{geh04} Gehrels, N., Chincarini, G., Giommi, P., et al., 2004, \apj, 611, 1005

837: \bibitem[George \& Fabian 1991]{geo91} George, I. M., \& Fabian, A. C., 1991, \mnras, 249, 352

838: \bibitem[Gilli et al. 2007]{gil07} Gilli, R., Comastri, A., \& Hasinger, G., 2007, \aap, 463, 79

839: \bibitem[Greene \& Ho 2005]{gre05} Greene, J. E., \& Ho, L. C., 2005, \apj, 630, 122

840: \bibitem[Grupe 2004] {gru04} Grupe, D., 2004, \aj, 127, 1799

841: \bibitem[Haardt \& Maraschi 1991]{haa91} Haardt, F., \& Maraschi, L., 1991, \apj, 1991, 380, L51

842: \bibitem[Hasinger et al. 2005]{has05} Hasinger, G., Miyaji, T., \& Schmidt, M., 2005, \aap, 441, 417

843: \bibitem[Heckman et al. 2004]{hec04} Heckman, T. M., Kauffmann, G., Brinchmann, J., et al., 2005, \apj, 613, 109

844: \bibitem[Heckman et al. 2005]{hec05}Heckman, T. M., Ptak, A., Hornschemeier, A., et al., 2005, \apj, 634, 161 

845: \bibitem[Ho 2005]{ho05} Ho, L. C., 2005, Active Galactic Nuclei: From central Engine to Host Galaxy, 

846: ASPC, Ser, 290, 379

847: \bibitem[Ho et al. 1997]{ho97} Ho, L. C., Filippenko, A. V., \& Sargent, W. L., 1997, \apjs, 112, 315 

848: \bibitem[Hu et al. 2008]{hu08} Hu, C., Wang, J. M., Ho, L. C., et al., 2008, astro-ph/arXiv:0807.2060, accepted by ApJL 

849: \bibitem[Joly 1987]{jol87} Joly, M., 1987, \aap, 184, 33

850: \bibitem[Kaspi et al. 2000]{kas00} Kaspi, S., Smith, P. S., Netzer, H., et al., 2000, \apj, 533, 631 

851: \bibitem[Kaspi et al. 2005]{kas05} Kaspi, S., Smith, P. S., Netzer, H., et al., 2005, \apj, 629, 61

852: \bibitem[Kaspi et al. 2007]{kas07} Kaspi, S., Brandt, W. N., Maoz, D., et al., 2007, \apj, 659, 997 

853: \bibitem[Kauffmann et al. 2003]{kau03} Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., Tremonti, C., et al., 2003, \mnras, 346, 1055

854: \bibitem[Kawaguchi et al. 2001]{kaw01} Kawaguchi, T., Shimura, T. \& Mineshige, S., 2001, \apj, 546, 966

855: \bibitem[Kiuchi et al. 2006]{kiu06} Kiuchi, G., Ohta, K., Akiyama, M., et al., 2006, \apj, 647, 892

856: \bibitem[Korista et al. 1998]{kor98} Korista, K., Baldwin, J., \& Ferland, G., 1998, \apj, 507, 24

857: \bibitem[Korista et al. 1997]{kor97} Korista, K., Baldwin, J., Ferland, G., et al., 1997, \apjs, 108, 401

858: \bibitem[Kriss 1994]{kri94} Kriss, G., 1994, Adass, 3, 437

859: \bibitem[Krivonos et al. 2007]{kri07} Krivonos, R., Revnivtsev, M., Lutovinov, A., et al., 2007, \aap, 475, 775

860: \bibitem[Levenson et al. 2006]{lev06} Levenson, N. A., Heckman, T. M., Krolik, J. H., et al., 2006, 648, 111

861: \bibitem[Lira et al. 2002a]{lir02a} Lira, P., Ward, M. J., Zezas, A., et al., 2002, \mnras, 333, 709

862: \bibitem[Lira et al. 2002b]{lir02b} Lira, P.; Ward, M. J., Zezas, A., et al., 2002, \mnras, 330, 259

863: \bibitem[Markwardt et al., 2005]{mar05} Markwardt, C. B., Tuller, J., Skinner, G. K., et al., 2005, \apj, 633, L77

864: \bibitem[Marziani et al. 2003]{mar03} Marziani, P., Sulentic, J. W., Zamanov, R., et al., 2003, MmsAI, 74, 490

865: \bibitem[Marziani et al. 2001]{mar01} Marziani, P., Sulentic, J. W., Zwitter, T., et al., 2001, \apj, 558, 533

866: \bibitem[Masetti et al. 2004]{mas04} Masetti, N., Palazzi, E., Bassani, L., et al., 2004, \aap, 426, L41

867: \bibitem[Massey et al. 1988]{mas88} Massey, P., Strobel, K., Barnes, J. V., et al., 1988, \apj, 328, 315

868: \bibitem[McGill et al. 2008]{mcg08} McGill, K. L., Woo, J., Treu, T., et al., 2008, \apj, 673, 703

869: \bibitem[McLure \& Jarvis 2004]{mcl04} McLure, R. J., \& Jarvis, M. J., 2004, \mnras, 353, L45

870: \bibitem[Moran et al. 2002]{mor02} Moran, E. C., Filippenko, A. V., \& Chornock, R., 2002, \apj, 579, L71

871: \bibitem[Mulchaey et al. 1994]{mul94} Mulchaey, J. S., Koratkar, A., Ward, M. J., et al., 1994, \apj, 436, 586

872: \bibitem[Mullaney \& Ward 2008]{mul08} Mullaney, J. R., \& Ward, M. J., 2008, \mnras, 385, 53 

873: \bibitem[Netzer et al. 2006]{net06} Netzer, H., Mainieri, V., Rosati, P., et al., 2006, \aap, 453, 525

874: \bibitem[Netzer et al. 2004]{net04} Netzer, H., Shemmer, O., Maiolino, R., et al., 2004, \apj, 614, 558  

875: \bibitem[Netzer \& Trakhtenbrot 2007]{net07} Netzer, H., \& Trakhtenbrot, B., 2007, \apj, 654, 754  

876: \bibitem[Netzer \& Wills 1983]{net83} Netzer, H., \& Wills, B. J., 1983, \apj, 275, 445

877: \bibitem[O'Sullivan et al. 2001]{osu01} O'Sullivan, E., Forbes, D. A., \& Ponman, T. J., 2001, \mnras, 328, 461

878: \bibitem[Panessa et al. 2006]{pan06} Panessa, F., Bassani, L., Cappi, M., et al., 2006, \aap, 455, 173

879: \bibitem[Panessa et al. 2008]{pan08} Panessa, F., Bassani, L., De Rosa, A., et al., 2008, \aap, 483, 151 

880: \bibitem[Piconcelli et al. 2005]{pic05} Piconcelli, E., Jimenez-Bailon, E., Guainazzi, M., et al., 2005, \aap, 423, 15

881: \bibitem[Pellegrini 2005]{pel05} Pellegrini, S., 2005, \apj, 624, 155

882: \bibitem[Peterson et al. 2004]{pet04} Peterson, B. M., Ferrarese, L., Gilbert, K. M., et al., 2004, \apj, 613, 682 

883: \bibitem[Peterson \& Bentz 2006]{pet06} Peterson, B. M., \& Bentz, M. C., 2006, NewAR, 50, 796 

884: \bibitem[Reeves \& Turner 2000]{ree00} Reeves, J. N., \& Turner, M. J. L., 2000, \mnras, 316, 234

885: \bibitem[Revnivtsev et al. 2004]{rev04} Revnivtsev, M., Sazonov, S., Jahoda, K., et al., 2004, \aap, 418, 927

886: \bibitem[Ross \& Fabian 2002]{ros02} Ross, R. R., \& Fabian, A. C., 2002, \mnras, 336, 315

887: \bibitem[Ross \& Fabian 2005]{ros05} Ross, R. R., \& Fabian, A. C., 2005, \mnras, 358, 211

888: \bibitem[Shakura \& Sunyave 1973]{sha73} Shakura, N. I., \& Sunyaev, R. A., 1973, \aap, 24 ,337

889: \bibitem[Sazonov \& Revnivtsev 2004]{saz04} Sazonov, S. Y., \& Revnivtsev, M. G., 2004, \aap, 423, 469

890: \bibitem[Sazonov et al. 2007]{saz07} Sazonov, S., Revnivtsev, M., Krivonos, R., et al., 2007, \aap, 462, 57 

891: \bibitem[Severgnini et al. 2003]{sev03} Severgnini, P., Caccianiga, A., Braito, V., et al., 2003, \aap, 406, 483

892: \bibitem[Shields et al. 1995]{shi95} Shields, J. C., Ferland, G. J., \& Peterson, B. M., 1995, \apj, 411, 507 

893: \bibitem[Sigut \& Pradhan 2003]{sig03} Sigut, T. A. A., \& Pradhan, A. K., 2003, \apjs, 145, 15

894: \bibitem[Silverman et al. 2005]{sil05} Silverman, J. D., Green, P. J., Barkhouse, W. A., et al., 2005, \apj, 618, 123

895: \bibitem[Sulentic et al. 2007]{sul07} Sulentic, J. W., Bachev, R., Marziani, P., et al., 2007, \apj, 666, 757

896: \bibitem[Sulentic et al. 2000a]{sul00a} Sulentic, J. W., Marziani, P., \& Dultzin-Hacyan, D., 2000a, \araa, 38, 521 

897: \bibitem[Sulentic et al. 2000b]{sul00b} Sulentic, J. W., Marziani, P., \& Zwitter, T., et al., 2000b, \apj, 545, L15

898: \bibitem[Sulentic et al. 2006]{sul06} Sulentic, J. W., Repetto, P., Stirpe, G. M., et al., 2006, \aap, 456, 929

899: \bibitem[Takahashi et al. 2008]{ta08} Takahashi, T., Kelley, R., Mitsuda, K., et al., 2008, astro-ph/arXiv:0807.2007 

900: \bibitem[Tuller et al. 2008]{tul08} Tueller, J., Mushotzky, R. F., Barthelmy, S., et al., 2008, \apj, 681, 113

901: \bibitem[Ubertini et al. 2003]{ube03} Ubertini, P., Lebrun, F., Di Cocco, G., et al., 2003, \aap, 411, L131

902: \bibitem[Veron-Cetty \& Veron 2006]{ver06} Veron-Cetty, M.-P., \& Veron, P., 2006, \aap, 455, 773

903: \bibitem[Veron-Cetty et al. 2007]{ver07} Veron-Cetty, M.-P., Veron, P., Joly, M., et al., 2007, \aap, 475, 487

904: \bibitem[Vestergaard \& Peterson 2006]{ves06} Vestergaard, M., \& Peterson, B. M., 2006, \apj, 641, 689

905: \bibitem[Wandel 1999]{wan99} Wandel, A., 1999, \apj, 527, 649

906: \bibitem[Wang et al. 2006]{wan06}Wang, J., Wei, J. Y., \& He, X. T., 2005, NewA, 10, 353

907: \bibitem[Wang et al. 2006]{wan06}Wang, J., Wei, J. Y., \& He, X. T., 2006, \apj, 638, 106

908: \bibitem[Wang \& Wei 2008]{wan08}Wang, J., \& Wei, J. Y., 2008, \apj, 679, 86

909: \bibitem[Wang et al. 1996]{wan96} Wang, T., Brinkmann, W., \& Bergeron, J., 1996, \aap, 309, 81

910: \bibitem[Ward et al. 1988]{war88} Ward, M. J., Done, C., Fabian, A. C., et al., 1988, \apj, 324, 767 

911: \bibitem[Wilkes et al. 1999]{wilk99} Wilkes, B. J., Kuraszkiewicz, J., Green, P. J., et al., 1999, \apj, 513, 76 

912: \bibitem[Wills et al. 1999]{wil99} Wills, B. J., Bortherton, M. S., Fang, D., et al., 1993, \apj, 415, 563

913: \bibitem[Winkler et al. 2003]{win03} Winkler, C., Courvoisier, T. J. -L., Di Cocco, G., et al., 2003, \aap, 411, L1

914: \bibitem[Worsley et al. 2005]{wor05} Worsley, M. A., Fabian, A. C., Bauer, F. E., et al., 2005, \mnras, 357, 1281

915: \bibitem[Xu et al. 2003]{xu03} Xu, D. W., Komossa, S., Wei, J. Y., et al., 2003, \apj, 590, 73

916: \bibitem[Zamanov \& Marziani 2002]{zam02} Zamanov, R., \& Marziani, P., 2002, \apj, 571, L77

917: \bibitem[Zdziarski et al. 1995]{zdz95} Zdziarski, A. A., Johnson, W. N., \& Done, C., et al., 1995, \apj, 438, L63

918: \bibitem[Zdziarski et al. 2000]{zdz00} Zdziarski, A. A., Poutanen, J., \& Johnson, W. N., 2000, \apj, 542, 703

919: \bibitem[Zezas et al. 2003]{zez03} Zezas, A., Hernquist, L., Fabbiano, G., et al., 2003, \apj, 699, L73

920: \bibitem[Zycki et al. 1994]{zyc94} Zycki, P. T., Krolik, J. H., Zdziarski, A. A., et al., 1994, \apj, 437, 597

921: \end{thebibliography}

922: 

923: \clearpage

924: 

925: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include

926: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.

927: %% To embed the sample graphics in

928: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and

929: %% \includegraphics commands

930: %%

931: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or

932: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the

933: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,

934: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the

935: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,

936: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.

937: %%

938: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of

939: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check

940: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to

941: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from

942: %% journal to journal.

943: 

944: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to

945: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption

946: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be

947: %% available in the electronic journal.

948: 

949: \begin{figure}

950: \plotone{f1.eps}

951: \caption{Observed X-ray absorption distribution of the 42 hard X-ray selected 

952: broad-line AGNs listed in the sample. 

953: }

954: \end{figure}

955: 

956: 

957: 

958: \begin{figure}

959: \plotone{f2.eps}

960: \caption{\it left column\rm: the modeling of the continuum and \ion{Fe}{2} complex around 

961: H$\beta$ region for three typical cases. In each panel, the blue curve shows the 

962: observed spectrum, and the overlaid red one the modeled spectrum (continuum + \ion{Fe}{2} complex).

963: The strong emission lines, especially the two strong \ion{Fe}{2} complex around the H$\beta$, 

964: are marked on the figure.

965: \it right column\rm: the modeling of the emission-line profile

966: by a set of Gaussian components for the H$\beta$ and [\ion{O}{3}] doublet in 

967: the three cases, after subtract the modeled continuum and \ion{Fe}{2} complex. In each panel, 

968: the observed profile is shown by the black curve. The three red short dashed lines show 

969: the modeled H$\beta$ broad component and [\ion{O}{3}] doublet. The modeled narrow H$\beta$ 

970: emission is presented by the long dashed line.  

971: }

972: \end{figure}

973: 

974: 

975: \begin{figure}

976: %\epsscale{.80}

977: \plotone{f3.eps}

978: \caption{ \it left panel\rm: the luminosity in the energy bandpass 3-20 keV plotted  against

979: the luminosity in 17-60 keV for the 18 objects detected by both XSS and \it INTEGRAL. \rm The solid

980: line shows the best fit to the data without taking into account of the errors. The $1\sigma$ dispersion

981: is marked by the two dashed lines. \it right panel\rm: the tight correlation between the 

982: [\ion{O}{3}] emission line and 3-20 keV luminosity. 

983: }

984: \end{figure}

985: 

986: \clearpage

987: \begin{figure}

988: %\epsscale{.80}

989: \plotone{f4.eps}

990: \caption{\it left panel\rm: $L_{\mathrm{3-20keV}}$ plotted against the bolometric luminosity 

991: estimated from the H$\beta$ broad component. The solid line shows the best fit to the data: 

992: $\log L_X = (0.91\pm0.06)\log L_{\mathrm{bol}}+(3.04\pm2.78)$.

993: \it right panel\rm: Distribution on the plot of $L_X$ vs. black hole mass. The three dashed lines show the 

994: $L_X$ as a function of the black hole mass for different $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ =0.01, 0.1, and 1.   

995: }

996: \end{figure}

997: 

998: \clearpage

999: \begin{figure}

1000: %\epsscale{.80}

1001: \plotone{f5.eps}

1002: \caption{Distribution of the Eddington ratio (\it left panel\rm), black hole mass (\it middle panel\rm), 

1003: and parameter RFe (\it right panel\rm).

1004: }

1005: \end{figure}

1006: 

1007: \clearpage

1008: \begin{figure}

1009: \epsscale{.80}

1010: \plotone{f6.eps}

1011: \caption{\it top panel: \rm RFe plotted against $L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$ ($r_s=0.237$, $P=0.134$).  

1012: \it bottom panel: \rm the same as the top panel, but for 

1013: $T_{\mathrm{max}}=10^{5.56} (L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}})^{1/4}{M_{\mathrm{BH}}}^{-1/4}$. 

1014: The diagram shows a relatively strong  correlation between the two parameters ($r_s=0.414$, $P=0.0088$).

1015: In both panels, the points with zero flux of the \ion{Fe}{2} emission are indicated by superposed arrows. 

1016: The correlation coefficients are calculated by survival analysis.  

1017: }

1018: \end{figure}

1019: 

1020: \clearpage

1021: \begin{figure}

1022: \epsscale{.80}

1023: \plotone{f7.eps}

1024: \caption{Hard X-ray luminosity is plotted as a function of equivalent width of the 

1025: H$\beta$ broad component. A spearman rank-order test yields a correlation coefficient 

1026: $r=0.611$ ($P=10^{-4}$). 

1027: }

1028: \end{figure}

1029: %% Here we use \plottwo to present two versions of the same figure,

1030: %% one in black and white for print the other in RGB color

1031: %% for online presentation. Note that the caption indicates

1032: %% that a color version of the figure will be available online.

1033: %%

1034: 

1035: 

1036: %% This figure uses \includegraphics to scale and rotate the still frame

1037: %% for an mpeg animation.

1038: 

1039: 

1040: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may

1041: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the

1042: %% User Guide for details.

1043: %%

1044: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,

1045: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage

1046: %% after every seventh one.

1047: 

1048: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before

1049: %% each one.

1050: 

1051: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables:  the

1052: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX

1053: %% table environment.  Use of deluxetable is preferred.

1054: %%

1055: 

1056: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,

1057: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.

1058: 

1059: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}

1060: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.

1061: %% We also use the \rotate command to rotate the table to

1062: %% landscape orientation since it is very wide even at the

1063: %% reduced font size.

1064: %%

1065: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed

1066: %% inside the \tablecaption.

1067: 

1068: %% This table also includes a table comment indicating that the full

1069: %% version will be available in machine-readable format in the electronic

1070: %% edition.

1071: 

1072: \clearpage

1073: 

1074: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before

1075: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark

1076: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.

1077: 

1078: %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using

1079: %% \tableline, not \hline.

1080: %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.

1081: %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.

1082: 

1083: \clearpage

1084: 

1085: \begin{table}

1086: \scriptsize

1087: \begin{center}

1088: \caption{Log of spectroscopic observation\label{tbl-2}}

1089: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccc}

1090: \tableline\tableline

1091: Name & Other name &  R.A. & Decl. & z & Date & Exposure (s) & $m_v$ & AGN Type \\

1092: (1) & (2) & (3) & (4) & (5) & (6) & (7) & (8) & (9)\\

1093: \tableline

1094: XSS\,J00368+4557 & CGCG\,535-012 & 00 36 21.0 & 45 39 54 & 0.048 & 2400 & 2006 Aug 15 & 15.45 & S1 \\

1095: QSO\,0241+622    & \dotfill  & 02 44 57.7 & 62 28 07 & 0.044 & 3600 & 2006 Dec 17 & 16.1 & S1 \\

1096: 3C\,111          & \dotfill & 04 18 21.3 & 38 01 36 & 0.0485 & 3600 & 2007 Nov 03 & 18.0 & S1 \\ 

1097: XSS\,J04331+0520 & 3C\,120 & 04 33 11.1 &  05 21 16 & 0.033 & 1800 & 2007 Feb 16 & 14.2 & BLRG \\    

1098: XSS\,J05103+1640 & IRAS\,05078+1626 & 05 10 45.5 & 16 29 56 & 0.018 & 1800 & 2007 Feb 16 & 15.6 & S1\\

1099: XSS\,J05162-0008 & AKN\,120 & 05 16 11.4 & -00 08 59 & 0.033 & 1200 & 2006 Nov 18 & 14.1 & S1 \\

1100: XSS\,J05552+4617 & MCG\,+8-11-11 & 05 54 53.6 & 46 26 22 & 0.02 & 1800 & 2007 Feb 17 & 15.0 & S1 \\

1101: Mark\,6          & \dotfill & 06 52 12.2 & 74 25 37 & 0.01881 & 3600 & 2007 Feb 16 & 15.0 & S1.5 \\  

1102: XSS\,J07434+4945 & MRK\,79 & 07 42 32.8 & 49 48 35 & 0.022 & 1800 & 2005 Nov 29 & 14.9 & S1 \\

1103: XSS\,J08117+7600 & PG\,0804+761 & 08 10 58.6 & 76 02 42 & 0.1 & 2400 & 2007 Nov 16 & 15.15 & S1\\

1104: XSS\,J09204+1608 & MRK\,704 & 09 18 26.0 & 16 18 19 & 0.029 & 1800 & 2006 Nov 17 & 15.38 & S1 \\

1105: XSS\,J09261+5204 & MRK\,110 & 09 25 12.9 & 52 17 11 & 0.036 & 1800 & 2005 Nov 30 & 15.6  & NLS1 \\

1106: XSS\,J10231+1950 & NGC\,3227 & 10 23 30.6 & 19 51 54 & 0.0038 & 1800 & 2006 Jan 31 & 11.1 &  S1 \\

1107: XSS\,J11067+7234 & NGC\,3516 & 11 06 47.5 & 72 34 07 & 0.008836 & 900 & 2006 Dec 18 & 12.5 & S1 \\

1108: XSS\,J11417+5910 & SBS\,1136+594 & 11 39 08.9 & 59 11 55 & 0.06 & 2400 & 2007 Jan 26 & 15.5 & S1 \\

1109: XSS\,J12032+4424 & NGC\,4051 & 12 03 09.6 & 44 31 53 & 0.0023 & 1200 & 2006 Nov 16 & 10.83 & NLS1 \\

1110: XSS\,J12106+3927 & NGC\,4151 & 12 10 32.6 & 39 24 21 & 0.0033 & 1800 & 2006 Jan 29 & 11.5  & S1 \\

1111: XSS\,J12164+1427 & PG\,1211+143 & 12 14 17.7 & 14 03 13 & 0.081 & 3600 & 2006 Feb 04 & 14.63 & NLS1 \\

1112: NGC\,4253        & \dotfill & 12 18 26.5 & 29 48 46 & 0.01293 & 1200 & 2006 Dec 21 & 13.7 & S1.5 \\

1113: XSS\,J12206+7509 & MRK\,205 & 12 21 44.0 & 75 18 38 & 0.07 & 2400 & 2007 Jan 27 & 14.5 &  S1 \\

1114: XSS\,J12288+0200 & 3C\,273  & 12 29 06.7 & 02 03 08 & 0.15834 & 900 & 2006 Dec 21 & 12.86 & RLQ \\

1115: XSS\,J12408-0516 & NGC\,4593 & 12 39 39.4 & -05 20 39 & 0.009 & 1200 & 2007 Jan 26 & 14.67 & S1 \\

1116: XSS\,J13420-1432 & NPM1G\,-14.0512 & 13 41 12.9 & -14 38 41 & 0.042 & 2400 &  2008 Mar 13 &  15.50 & NLS1 \\ 

1117: XSS\,J13530+6916 & MRK\,279 & 13 53 03.4 & 69 18 30 & 0.031 & 1200 & 2007 Feb 16 & 14.57 & S1 \\

1118: XSS\,J14181+2514 & NGC\,5548 & 14 17 59.5 & 25 08 12 & 0.017 & 1800 & 2008 Mar 03 & 13.3 &  S1 \\

1119: XSS\,J15042+1046 & MRK\,841 & 15 04 01.2 & 10 26 16 & 0.036 & 1200 & 2007 Feb 16 & 14.0 & S1\\

1120: XSS\,J15348+5750 & MRK\,290 & 15 35 52.3 & 57 54 09 & 0.030 & 2400 & 2008 Mar 13 & 15.1 &  S1 \\

1121: XSS\,J17276-1359 & PDS\,456 & 17 28 19.8 & -14 15 56 & 0.184 & 1800 & 2007 Sep 07 & 14.69 & RQQ \\

1122: XSS\,J17413+1851 & 4C\,+18.51 & 17 42 07.0 & 18 27 21 & 0.19 & 2400 & 2007 Sep 07 & 16.43 & RLQ\\

1123: XSS\,J18196+6454 & H\,1821+643 & 18 21 57.3 & 64 20 36 & 0.297 & 1800 & 2006 Aug 16 & 14.1 & RQQ\\

1124: XSS\,J18348+3238 & 3C\,382 & 18 35 02.1 & 32 41 50 & 0.059 & 1800 & 2006 Aug 16 & 15.5 & BLRG\\

1125: XSS\,J18408+7947 & 3C\,390.3 & 18 42 09.0 & 79 46 17 & 0.056 & 1800 & 2006 Aug 15 & 14.37 & BLRG\\

1126: 1H\,1934-063A    & \dotfill & 19 37 33.0 & -06 13 05 & 0.01059 & 1800 & 2006 Aug 16 & 14.09 & S1 \\

1127: NGC\,6814        & \dotfill & 19 42 40.6 & -10 19 25 & 0.00521 & 1800 & 2007 Nov 04 & 12.06 & S1.5\\ 

1128: XSS\,J20404+7521 & 4C\,+74.26 & 20 42 37.3 & 75 08 02 & 0.1 & 1800 & 2006 Sep 15 & 15.13 & RLQ\\

1129: XSS\,J20441-1042 & MRK\,509 & 20 44 09.7 & -10 43 25 & 0.034 & 1800 & 2006 Sep 15 & 13.0 & S1\\

1130: XSS\,J21128+8216 & S5\,2116+81 & 21 14 01.2 & 82 04 48 & 0.084 & 2400 & 2006 Aug 15 & 15.7 & BLRG\\

1131: XSS\,J22423+2958 & AKN\,564 & 22 42 39.3 & 29 43 31 & 0.025 & 1800 & 2006 Nov 15 & 14.55 & NLS1 \\

1132: XSS\,J22539-1735 & MR\,2251-178 & 22 54 05.8 & -17 34 55 & 0.064 & 1800 & 2006 Nov 15 & 14.36 & RQQ\\

1133: XSS\,J23033+0858 & NGC\,7469 & 23 03 15.6 & 08 52 26 & 0.016 & 1800 & 2006 Aug 15 & 13.0 &  S1\\

1134: XSS\,J23040-0834 & MRK\,926 & 23 04 43.5 & -08 41 09 & 0.047 & 1800 & 2007 Nov 03 & 14.6 &  S1\\

1135: XSS\,J23073+0447 & PG\,2304+042 & 23 07 02.9 & 04 32 57 & 0.042 & 2400 & 2007 Nov 02 & 15.44 & S1\\  

1136:  

1137: \tableline

1138: \end{tabular}

1139: %% Any table notes must follow the \end{tabular} command.

1140: \end{center}

1141: \end{table}

1142: 

1143: %% If the table is more than one page long, the width of the table can vary

1144: %% from page to page when the default \tablewidth is used, as below.  The

1145: %% individual table widths for each page will be written to the log file; a

1146: %% maximum tablewidth for the table can be computed from these values.

1147: %% The \tablewidth argument can then be reset and the file reprocessed, so

1148: %% that the table is of uniform width throughout. Try getting the widths

1149: %% from the log file and changing the \tablewidth parameter to see how

1150: %% adjusting this value affects table formatting.

1151: 

1152: %% The \dataset{} macro has also been applied to a few of the objects to

1153: %% show how many observations can be tagged in a table.

1154: 

1155: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccccc}

1156: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1157: \rotate

1158: \tablecaption{List of properties of the hard X-ray selected AGNs}

1159: \tablewidth{0pt}

1160: \tablehead{ 

1161: \colhead{Name} & \colhead{$\mathrm{EW(H\beta_n)}$} & \colhead{$\mathrm{EW(H\beta_b)}$}  

1162: & \colhead{RFe} & \colhead{$\log[L(H\beta_b)]$} & \colhead{FWHM(H$\beta_b$)} & \colhead{$\log[L([\mathrm{OIII}])]$} & 

1163: \colhead{$\log[L_{2-30\mathrm{keV}}]$} & \colhead{$\log[L_{17-60\mathrm{keV}}]$} & \colhead{

1164: $\log(M_{\mathrm{BH}}/M_\odot)$} & \colhead{$L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}}$}\\

1165: \colhead{} & \colhead{\AA} & \colhead{\AA} & \colhead{} & \colhead{$\mathrm{ergs\ s^{-1}}$} 

1166: & \colhead{$\mathrm{km\ s^{-1}}$} & \colhead{$\mathrm{ergs\ s^{-1}}$} & \colhead{$\mathrm{ergs\ s^{-1}}$} 

1167: & \colhead{$\mathrm{ergs\ s^{-1}}$} & \colhead{} & \colhead{}\\ 

1168: \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} & \colhead{(3)} & \colhead{(4)} & \colhead{(5)} & \colhead{(6)} &

1169: \colhead{(7)} & \colhead{(8)} & \colhead{(9)} & \colhead{(10)} & \colhead{(11)}  \\

1170: }

1171: \startdata

1172: XSSJ\,00368+4557   &   \dotfill &  82.6  &  0.35  & 42.1 &  2555  &  41.3  & 43.48 & \dotfill &    7.42 & 0.23 \\

1173: QSO\,0241+622      &   \dotfill &  43.6  &  0.26  & 42.1 &  9401  &  41.8  & 44.34 & 44.28    &    8.54 & 0.02 \\

1174: 3C\,111            &   \dotfill & 119.9  &  0.00  & 43.3 &  3445  &  42.8  & 44.53 & 44.59    &    8.33 & 0.30 \\

1175: XSS\,J04331+0520   &   10.5     & 82.7   &  0.24  & 42.2 &  5367  &  42.1  & 44.16 & \dotfill &    8.11 & 0.06 \\  

1176: XSS\,J05103+1640   &    9.0     & 74.5   &  $>0.$ & 41.3 &  4855  &  41.5  & 43.47 & 43.58    &    7.55 & 0.04\\

1177: XSS\,J05162-0008   &    2.3     & 72.7   &  0.55  & 42.5 &  6595  &  41.5  & 44.   & 44.26    &    8.48 & 0.05\\

1178: XSS\,J05552+4617   &   53.5     & 103.2  &  0.30  & 41.2 &  5761  &  41.7  & 43.56 & 43.67    &    7.60 & 0.02\\

1179: Mark\,6            &    6.0     & 37.4   &  0.42  & 41.4 &  5627  &  41.7  & 43.32 & 43.41    &    7.74 & 0.03\\

1180: XSS\,J07434+4945   &    8.6     & 65.8   &  0.40  & 41.6 &  3815  &  41.7  & 43.45 & \dotfill &    7.47 & 0.07\\

1181: XSS\,J08117+7600   &  \dotfill  & 74.7   &  0.52  & 43.4 &  3146  &  42.3  & 44.47 & 44.43    &    8.32 & 0.39\\

1182: XSS\,J09204+1608   &    6.9     & 91.8   &  0.29  & 41.9 &  6421  &  41.6  & 43.65 & \dotfill &    8.11 & 0.03\\

1183: XSS\,J09261+5204   &  \dotfill  & 118.6  &  0.08  & 42.1 &  1798  &  41.8  & 43.81 & 44.17    &    7.12 & 0.47\\

1184: XSS\,J10231+1950   &    5.1     & 39.3   &  0.007 & 40.5 &  4556  &  40.6  & 42.4  & 42.67    &    7.01 & 0.02\\

1185: XSS\,J11067+7234   &  \dotfill  & 31.9   &  \dotfill & 41.1 & 5020 & 40.7  & 43.04 & \dotfill &    7.46 & 0.03\\ 

1186: XSS\,J11417+5910   &    7.3     & 73.8   &  0.13  & 42.0 &  4608  &  41.9  & 43.82 & \dotfill &    7.91 & 0.07\\

1187: XSS\,J12032+4424   &  \dotfill  & 21.5   &  0.61  & 39.9 &  1202  &  40.0  & 42.04 & 41.87    &    5.53 & 0.20\\

1188: XSS\,J12106+3927   &   37.2     & 100.0  &  0.12  & 40.8 &  6354  &  41.3  & 43.17 & 43.37    &    7.49 & 0.01 \\

1189: XSS\,J12164+1427   &  \dotfill  & 120.3  &  0.40  & 42.5 &  1804  &  41.7  & 44.22 & \dotfill &    7.32 & 0.60\\

1190: NGC\,4253          &  11.3      & 32.1   &  0.72  & 40.8 &  2153  &  41.3  & 42.59 & 42.7     &    6.57 & 0.13\\

1191: XSS\,J12206+7509   &  \dotfill  & 95.6   &  0.21  & 42.5 &  3037  &  41.8  & 43.88 & \dotfill &    7.83 & 0.23\\

1192: XSS\,J12288+0200   &  \dotfill  & 71.3   &  0.51  & 44.1 &  2970  &  43.2  & 45.91 & 45.92    &    8.66 & 0.74\\

1193: XSS\,J12408-0516   &  \dotfill  & 49.8   &  0.54  & 41.0 &  3654  &  40.4  & 42.57 & 43.04    &    7.12 & 0.05\\

1194: XSS\,J13420-1432   &   15.3     & 64.6   &  0.66  & 41.8 &  4112  &  41.8  & 43.57 & \dotfill &   7.67 & 0.07\\

1195: XSS\,J13530+6916   &    5.7     & 59.6   &  0.44  & 42.2 &  5147  &  41.8  & 43.94 & \dotfill &    8.07 & 0.06\\

1196: XSS\,J14181+2514   &    7.8     & 62.7   &  0.04  & 41.3 & 10312  &  41.5  & 43.66 & 43.08    &    8.20 & 0.008\\

1197: XSS\,J15042+1046   &    9.4     & 129.6  &  0.33  & 42.5 &  5709  &  42.2  & 43.67 & \dotfill &    8.33 & 0.061\\

1198: XSS\,J15348+5750   &    4.2     & 23.5   &  0.71  & 41.1 &  4740  &  41.6  & 43.43 & \dotfill &    7.41 & 0.03\\

1199: XSS\,J17276-1359   &  \dotfill  & 74.6   &  3.58  & 44.1 &  2957  &  $<42.7$ & 44.93 & \dotfill &  8.66 & 0.75\\  

1200: XSS\,J17413+1851   &    1.8     & 115.5  &  0.04  & 43.0 & 13506  &  42.2  & 45.45 & \dotfill &    9.35 & 0.02\\

1201: XSS\,J18196+6454   &    2.9     & 65.4   &  0.18  & 44.3 &  5797  &  43.7  & 45.61 & \dotfill &    9.36 & 0.23\\

1202: XSS\,J18348+3238   &  \dotfill  & 111.4  &  0.19  & 42.8 &  8340  &  41.8  & 44.58 & 44.45    &    8.84 & 0.04\\

1203: XSS\,J18408+7947   &    3.2     & 118.8  &  0.15  & 42.5 & 13799  &  42.0  & 44.39 & 44.61    &    9.13 & 0.01\\

1204: 1H\,1934-063A      &  \dotfill  & 55.2   &  0.94  & 41.1 &  1354  &  41.0  & 42.48 & 42.59    &    6.29 & 0.38\\

1205: NGC\,6814          &  \dotfill  & 38.8   &  0.75  & 40.2 &  5182  &  40.2  & 42.35 & 42.47    &    6.95 & 0.01\\

1206: XSS\,J20404+7521   &  \dotfill  & 85.4   &  $>0.$ & 43.6 &  9418  &  42.5  & 44.73 & 44.98    &    9.37 & 0.05\\

1207: XSS\,J20441-1042   &   10.7     & 111.8  &  0.21  & 42.4 &  2261  &  42.1  & 44.2  & 44.13    &    7.47 & 0.36\\

1208: XSS\,J21128+8216   &    6.3     & 150.0  &  0.14  & 42.6 &  4123  &  42.3  & 44.25 & 44.65    &    8.12 & 0.13\\

1209: XSS\,J22423+2958   &  \dotfill  & 56.6   &  0.74  & 41.7 &  3649  &  41.7  & 43.42 & \dotfill &    7.52 & 0.09\\

1210: XSS\,J22539-1735   &    5.7     & 132.5  &  0.02  & 42.9 &  4093  &  42.6  & 44.63 & 44.62    &    8.28 & 0.16\\

1211: XSS\,J23033+0858   &   13.7     & 45.3   &  0.30  & 41.5 &  2819  &  41.6  & 43.27 & 43.40    &    7.17 & 0.12\\

1212: XSS\,J23040-0834   &    3.4     & 65.1   &  $>0.$ & 42.5 &  7083  &  42.2  & 44.23 & 44.21    &    8.51 & 0.04\\

1213: XSS\,J23073+0447   &    2.7     & 42.0   &  $>0.$ & 41.2 &  7322  &  41.2  & 43.67 & \dotfill &    7.85 & 0.01\\

1214: \enddata

1215: \end{deluxetable}

1216: 

1217: 

1218: 

1219: %% Tables may also be prepared as separate files. See the accompanying

1220: %% sample file table.tex for an example of an external table file.

1221: %% To include an external file in your main document, use the \input

1222: %% command. Uncomment the line below to include table.tex in this

1223: %% sample file. (Note that you will need to comment out the \documentclass,

1224: %% \begin{document}, and \end{document} commands from table.tex if you want

1225: %% to include it in this document.)

1226: 

1227: %% \input{table}

1228: 

1229: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text

1230: %% that appears after it.

1231: 

1232: \end{document}

1233: 

1234: %%

1235: %% End of file `sample.tex'.

1236: