1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2004 January 9
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
16:
17: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
18: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
19:
20: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
21: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
22:
23: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
24: %% title page in preprint2 mode.
25: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
26:
27: % Emula estil ApJ, per submissio usar 12pt,preprint
28: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
29:
30: \newcommand{\kms} {~km~s$^{-1}$}
31: \newcommand{\mjy} {~mJy~beam$^{-1}$}
32: \newcommand{\jy} {~Jy~beam$^{-1}$}
33: \newcommand{\cmd} {~cm$^{-2}$}
34: \newcommand{\cmt} {~cm$^{-3}$}
35: \newcommand{\vlsr} {$v_{\rm LSR}$}
36: \newcommand{\lo} {$L_{\sun}$}
37: \newcommand{\mo} {$M_{\sun}$}
38: \newcommand{\T}[1] {T_{\rm #1}}
39: \newcommand{\eg} {e.\,g.,}
40: \newcommand{\ie} {i.\,e.,}
41: \newcommand{\ndh} {N$_2$H$^+$}
42: \newcommand{\nh} {NH$_3$}
43: \newcommand{\h} {H$_2$}
44: \newcommand{\hco} {HCO$^+$}
45: \newcommand{\form} {H$_2$CO}
46: \newcommand{\metha} {CH$_3$OH}
47: \newcommand{\cdo} {C$^{18}$O}
48: \newcommand{\tco} {$^{13}$CO}
49: \newcommand{\J}[2] {\mbox{#1--#2}}
50: \newcommand{\JK}[4] {\mbox{#1$_{#2}$--#3$_{#4}$}}
51:
52: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
53:
54: \slugcomment{Submitted to the \apj}
55:
56: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
57: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
58: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
59: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
60: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
61: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
62:
63: \shorttitle{Resolving a double core in L723}
64: \shortauthors{Girart et al.}
65:
66: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
67: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
68:
69: \begin{document}
70:
71: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
72: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
73: %% you desire.
74:
75: \title{The L723 low mass star forming protostellar system: resolving a double
76: core}
77:
78: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
79: %% author and affiliation information.
80: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
81: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
82: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
83: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
84:
85: \author{J. M. Girart}
86: \affil{Institut de Ci\`encies de l'Espai, (CSIC-IEEC),
87: Campus UAB, Facultat de Ci\`encies, Torre C5 - parell 2,
88: 08193 Bellaterra, Catalunya, Spain}
89: \email{girart@ieec.cat}
90:
91: \author{R. Rao}
92: \affil{Submillimeter Array,
93: Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
94: 645 N. Aohoku Pl, HI 9672}
95: \email{rrao@sma.hawaii.edu}
96:
97: \and
98:
99: \author{R. Estalella}
100: \affil{Departament d'Astronomia i Meteorologia, Universitat de Barcelona,
101: Mart\'i i Franqu\`es 1, 08028 Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain}
102:
103:
104: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
105: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
106: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
107: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
108: %% editorial office after submission.
109:
110: \begin{abstract}
111: We present 1.35 mm Submillimeter Array (SMA) observations around the low--mass
112: Class 0 source IRAS 19156+1906, at the the center of the LDN~723 (L723) dark
113: cloud. We detected emission from dust as well as emission from \form\
114: \JK{3}{0,3}{2}{0,2}, DCN \J{3}{2} and CN \J{2}{1} lines, which arise from two
115: cores, SMA~1 and SMA~2, separated by $2\farcs9$ (880 AU in projected
116: distance). SMA~2 is associated with the previously detected source VLA~2.
117: Weak SiO \J{5}{4}\ emission is detected, possibly tracing a region of
118: interaction between the dense envelope and the outflow. We modeled the dust
119: and the \form\ emission from the two cores. The results from the modeling show
120: that the cores have similar physical properties (density and temperature
121: distribution) but that SMA~2 has a larger p--\form\ abundance (by a factor
122: 3--10) than SMA~1. The p--\form\ abundances found are compatible with the
123: value of the outer part of the circumstellar envelopes associated with Class 0
124: sources. SMA~2 is harboring an active multiple low--mass protostellar system
125: and powering at least one molecular outflow \citep{Carrasco08}. In contrast,
126: there are no known signs of outflow activity towards SMA~1. This suggests that
127: SMA~2 is more evolved than SMA~1. The kinematics of the two sources show
128: marginal evidence of infall and rotation motions. The mass detected by the SMA
129: observation, which trace scales of $\la$1000~AU, is only a small fraction of
130: the mass contained in the large scale molecular envelope, which suggests that
131: L723 is still in a very early phase of star formation. Despite the apparent
132: quiescent nature of the L723, fragmentation is occurring at the center of the
133: cloud at different scales. Thus, at $\simeq1000$~AU the cloud has fragmented in
134: two cores, SMA 1 and SMA 2. At the same time, at least one of these cores,
135: SMA~2, has undergone additional fragmentation at scales of $\simeq150~$AU,
136: forming a multiple stellar system.
137: \end{abstract}
138:
139: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
140: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
141: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
142: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
143:
144: \keywords{
145: ISM: individual (LDN 723) ---
146: ISM: molecules ---
147: radio lines: ISM ---
148: stars: formation
149: }
150:
151:
152: \section{Introduction}
153:
154:
155: L723 is an isolated molecular cloud located at a distance of $300 \pm 150$~pc
156: \citep{Goldsmith84} and with a systemic velocity of $V_{\rm LSR} \simeq
157: 10.9$\kms\ \citep{Girart97}. It harbors a low--mass, Class 0, young stellar
158: object, first identified by the IRAS satellite, IRAS 19156+1906
159: \citep{Goldsmith84}, with a bolometric luminosity of 3.4~L$_{\odot}$
160: \citep{Dartois05}. The properties of the protostar in the IR to mm wavelength
161: range have been object of several studies \citep{Davidson87, Andre93,
162: Pezzuto02, Dartois05}. IRAS 19156+1906 is associated with a CO outflow with a
163: quadrupolar morphology \citep{Goldsmith84, Moriarty89, Avery90, Hayashi91,
164: Lee02}. This outflow consists of a pair of bipolar lobes aligned along the
165: East--West direction (position angle $PA\simeq100\arcdeg$) and another pair of
166: bipolar lobes aligned roughly in the North-South direction
167: ($PA\simeq32\arcdeg$), with IRAS 19156+1906 located at their common center
168: \citep{Avery90, Lee02}. The East--West (EW) pair of lobes, and in particular
169: the blueshifted, eastern lobe, is associated with several Herbig-Haro (HH)
170: objects \citep{Palacios99, Lopez07}. Very Large Array (VLA) observations at
171: 3.6~cm reveal two sources, VLA~1 and VLA~2, toward the center of outflow
172: \citep{Anglada91}, although VLA~1 is likely a background source
173: \citep{Anglada96,Girart97}. VLA~2 shows the characteristics of a thermal
174: radio-jet (jet--like morphology and partially optically thick free-free
175: emission), and was first identified as the powering source of the EW pair of
176: molecular lobes \citep{Anglada96}. Recent, very sensitive, sub-arcsecond
177: angular resolution ($0\farcs2$--$0\farcs7$) VLA observations at 3.6 cm and 7
178: mm resolve VLA 2 into several components. The two brightest sources at 3.6~cm,
179: VLA~2A and 2B, are separated by $0\farcs3$ (90 AU in projection) and are
180: possibly tracing embedded protostars \citep{Anglada04,Carrasco08}. VLA~2A is
181: associated with extended emission along a $PA \simeq 115\arcdeg$. Two
182: additional sources, believed to also trace embedded protostars are identified
183: at 7~mm: VLA~2C, located at the position of the water maser emission
184: \citep{Girart97,Furuya03}, and VLA~2D, located $\sim 3''$ southeast of VLA~2A.
185: \citet{Carrasco08} suggest that the CO high velocity emission and the HH
186: objects are tracing three different outflows. One of them is the NS outflow
187: possibly powered by VLA~2B. The other two are what previously was considered
188: as the EW pair of lobes: one of the outflows has a $PA\simeq 115\arcdeg$ and
189: is powered by VLA~2A, whereas the other one seems to be a ``fossil'' outflow
190: with a $PA\simeq 90\arcdeg$.
191:
192: High angular resolution (3\farcs5) VLA observations of L723 carried out by
193: \citet{Girart97}, show that the \nh\ emission arises from a V-shaped structure
194: that traces the dense molecular envelope around the embedded protostars. This
195: structure is elongated roughly east-west and is 0.15~pc long, with a mass of
196: $7~M_{\odot}$. The ammonia maps show evidence of heating and line broadening
197: toward VLA 2. A second spot of heating is observed $10\arcsec$ west of VLA 2.
198: This western hot spot (WHS here after) is interpreted by \citet{Girart97} as a
199: very young protostar with and age shorter than $2\times10^{4}$~yr. The \nh\
200: structure is only partially traced by CS and N$_2$H$^+$
201: \citep{Hirano98,Chen07}. The dense envelope of L723 was also observed at
202: sub-millimeter wavelengths ($850~\mu$m and $450~\mu$m) by \cite{Shirley02} and
203: \citet{Estalella03} using the continuum SCUBA camera of the JCMT. A strong
204: millimeter source was found, peaking at the position of VLA 2, with a large
205: extension that matches the high-density gas traced by \nh.
206:
207: In this paper we present a study of the molecular and dust emission at scales
208: of $\sim 1000$~AU around the low--mass star forming region of L723. In \S~2 we
209: describe the observational procedure with the SMA. In \S~3 we describe the main
210: results obtained with the SMA data. In \S~4 we present an analysis of the dust
211: and \form\ emission. In \S~5 we discuss the possible evolutionary scenarios of
212: the sources in the region.
213:
214:
215: \section{SMA Observations}\label{Sobs}
216:
217: The observations were carried out with the 8--antenna SMA\footnote{The
218: Submillimeter Array is a joint project between the Smithsonian Astrophysical
219: Observatory and the Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
220: and is funded by the Smithsonian Institution and the Academia Sinica.} array
221: at Mauna Kea at 1.3 millimeters in 2004 August (compact
222: configuration). The phase center was set at
223: $\alpha(J2000)=19^\mathrm{h}17^\mathrm{m}53\fs400$ and
224: $\delta(J2000)=19\degr12'19\farcs40$. The phase calibrator used was QSO
225: 1925$+$211, and QSO 1749$+$096 was used as a reference calibrator.
226: Absolute flux and bandpass calibration was done by observing Uranus and Jupiter,
227: respectively.
228: The SMA correlator has a bandwidth of 2~GHz with 24
229: partially overlapping windows (chunks) of 104~MHz. All the chunks had 128
230: channels, except the second chunk which was configured to have 512 channels.
231: The correlator was setup to observe the \form\ \JK{3}{0,3}{2}{0,2} line in
232: the second chunk of the lower side band. Maps were made with the $(u,v)$
233: data weighted by the associated system temperatures and using a robust
234: weighting of 0.0 (continuum data), 0.5 (\form) and 1 (other line data).
235: Table~\ref{tobserva} lists the basic information about the resulting maps,
236: including the frequency of the lines or continuum, the channel resolution
237: (for line observations), the resulting synthesized beam and the $rms$ noise of
238: the maps.
239:
240:
241:
242: \section{Results}
243:
244: \subsection{Dust continuum\label{ResultDust}}
245:
246: The 1.35~mm continuum map shows that the emission is clearly resolved into two
247: components, L723 SMA 1 and SMA 2, with similar intensities (see
248: Figure~\ref{fdust}) and separated by $2\farcs9$ (880 AU in projected distance)
249: with a position angle of $106\arcdeg$. These two components were previously
250: detected by \citet{Launhardt04} at 3~mm. The strongest component, SMA~2, is
251: associated with VLA 2A, 2B and 2C, 3.6~cm and 7~mm continuum sources that are
252: probably young stellar objects \citep{Carrasco08}. The other component, SMA~1,
253: is only detected at 3~mm \citep{Launhardt04} and marginally at 7~mm (source VLA
254: 2D: Carrasco et al. 2008) and does not have known counterparts at other
255: wavelengths. Table~\ref{tdust} gives the values of position, intensity, flux
256: densities and the deconvolved sizes for both mm sources obtained by fitting a
257: Gaussian to each component. The two sources are partially resolved at scales of
258: about $1\farcs0$--$2\farcs0$ (300--600~AU).
259:
260: Naturally weighted maps were obtained in order to better estimate the total flux
261: of the double core and to try to detect the WHS. The total flux density
262: detected by our observations for SMA~2 and SMA~1 is $128\pm6$~mJy, which is
263: 22~mJy higher ($\sim$20\%) than that from the map shown in Figure~\ref{fdust},
264: obtained with a robust weight of 0. This excess is possibly due to the better
265: sensitivity of the natural weighted map to weak and extended emission. No
266: emission is detected with the SMA at the position of WHS, with a 3-$\sigma$
267: upper limit of 4.2~\mjy. Gaussian tapers were applied to the visibilities to
268: increase the beam size and see if the WHS could be detected, which yielded
269: negative results.
270:
271: The mass of the circumstellar material traced by the dust emission at mm
272: wavelength, where it is optically thin is:
273: \begin{equation}\label{equ}
274: M = \frac{gS_{\nu}D^2}{\kappa_{\nu}B_{\nu}(T_{\rm dust})}
275: \end{equation}
276: with $g$ the gas--to--dust ratio, $D$ the distance, $S_{\nu}$ the flux density,
277: $\kappa_{\nu}$ the dust mass opacity coefficient and $B_{\nu}$ the Planck
278: function for a blackbody of dust temperature $T_{\rm dust}$. The major source
279: of uncertainty in the mass derivation is the poor knowledge of the distance
280: ($300\pm150$~pc). To derive the mass we adopted $g=100$ \citep{Draine04}, a
281: dust mass opacity of $\kappa_{\rm 250GHz}=0.9$~cm$^2$~g$^{-1}$
282: \citep{Ossenkopf94}. To estimate the temperature of the dust, we used the VLA
283: NH$_{3}$ (1,1) and (2,2) maps from \citet{Girart97}, which have a slightly
284: higher angular resolution ($3\farcs7\times3\farcs3$) than the SMA maps.
285: Following the standard analysis procedure for these two ammonia lines, we
286: obtain that at the SMA~1, SMA~2 and WHS peak positions the ammonia rotation
287: temperature is $\simeq 20$~K, which converted to the gas kinetic temperature
288: of the gas is $\sim 25$~K \citep{Danby88}. Table~\ref{tmass} gives the mass
289: derived for the different components using this value for the dust
290: temperature. The total mass of the emission detected by the SMA is $\sim
291: 0.24$~\mo, which is only a small fraction, $\sim 5$\%, of the dense envelope
292: detected at larger scales \citep{Girart97,Shirley02}. WHS has a very small
293: mass, $\la 0.01$~\mo.
294:
295:
296:
297: \subsection{H$_2$CO} \label{srform}
298:
299: Figure~\ref{fform} shows the channel maps for the \form\ \JK{3}{0,3}{2}{0,2}\
300: line. The \form\ emission is concentrated around the two mm continuum sources,
301: SMA~1 and SMA~2, although in most of the channels SMA~2 has brighter \form\
302: emission than SMA~1. Toward SMA~2 the \form\ emission peaks at or very close
303: to the dust emission peak, whereas around SMA~1 the peak emission is, in some
304: channels, displaced to the SE (only at $v_{\rm LSR}=10.79$\kms\ the
305: \form\ peaks at the same position as the dust). The kinematics of the two
306: sources is difficult to disentangle because their separation is similar to
307: the angular resolution. The first order moment of the emission shows velocity
308: gradients along the two cores with velocity shifts up to $\sim 1$\kms.
309: Although there is not a clear simple trend, the emission east of SMA~1 is
310: clearly blueshifted with respect to the rest of the region. The velocity
311: dispersion of the \form\ emission (second-order moment map: see
312: Fig.~\ref{fmom}) changes little around the two cores, with values within the
313: range of 0.5 to 0.7\kms, which corresponds, for a Gaussian line, to a full
314: width at half maximum of 1.2 to 1.7\kms. This velocity dispersion range is
315: larger than the one measured from VLA NH$_3$ observations, $\le 0.42$\kms\
316: \citep{Girart97}. Figure~\ref{fespectra} shows that the spectra of \form\
317: has larger line widths that those of \nh\ (note that the (1,1) and (2,2)
318: transitions have hyperfine components, which broadens the line, specially for
319: the (1,1)).
320:
321: Since VLA~2 is a thermal radio jet with a well defined orientation
322: \citep{Anglada96}, position-velocity (PV) plots along ($PA=116\arcdeg$) and
323: perpendicular ($PA=26\arcdeg$) to the radio jet orientation were made crossing
324: VLA~2, which lies at the peak of SMA~2 (Figure~\ref{fpv}). The PV plot along
325: the radio jet direction passes very close to SMA~1 (see Fig.~\ref{fpv}). In
326: the direction perpendicular to the jet, the \form\ shows a velocity gradient
327: ($\sim 0.8$\kms\ within $1''$ around VLA~2) that could be indicative of
328: rotation. In the direction along the radio jet there is overlap of the
329: emission between SMA~2 and SMA~1. Nevertheless, at the position of SMA~1 the
330: \form\ emission shows a relative minimum. In Figure~\ref{fpv} we also show the
331: PV plot centered on SMA~1 with a position angle of $PA=30\arcdeg$, nearly
332: perpendicular to the PV along the VLA~2 radio jet direction. This PV plot shows
333: two weak peaks at different velocities, \vlsr$\simeq 10.8$ and 11.9\kms, that
334: are slightly shifted in position ($\simeq 0\farcs9$) .
335:
336:
337: As in the case of the continuum emission, no emission is detected at the
338: position of the ammonia WHS (see Fig.~\ref{fespectra}). The 3-$\sigma$ upper
339: limit from the SMA map is 0.53~\jy\ (2.4~K).
340:
341:
342: \subsection{SiO}
343:
344: The SiO \J{5}{4}\ line is marginally detected towards the SMA~1 and SMA~2
345: system (see Figure~\ref{fsio}). The emission appears clumpy and elongated in
346: the NW-SE direction ($PA\simeq145\arcdeg$), with the strongest emission about
347: $11''$ SE of SMA~1. Taking into account the fact that the SiO is a tracer of
348: molecular shocks, the emission appears relatively ``quiescent'': it is only
349: slightly redshifted with respect to the systemic velocity (the emission is
350: detected in the $v_{\rm LSR}=11.31$ and 12.44\kms\ channels) and the
351: line-width, $\Delta v \simeq 2$\kms, is only slightly larger than that of
352: the lines tracing the dense circumstellar material such as \form\ and ammonia.
353:
354: The emission is apparently more associated with SMA~1, but given the complex
355: outflow activity in the region \citep{Lee02,Carrasco08} it is difficult to
356: elucidate with which outflow and powering source it is associated. Nevertheless,
357: at the SiO velocity and location there is strong CO emission (see channel maps
358: from Lee et a. 2002), which suggests that the SiO is tracing a region of
359: interaction between the dense envelope and the outflow \citep{Codella99}.
360:
361:
362: \subsection{Other molecules}
363:
364: Several hyperfine transitions of the CN \J{2}{1} rotational transition were
365: detected (Fig.~\ref{fespe}). The strongest line is a blend of three hyperfine
366: lines, the $F$=\J{7/2}{5/2}, \J{5/2}{3/2}\ and \J{3/2}{1/2}\ of the
367: $J$=\J{5/2}{3/2} set. The $J$=\J{3/2}{5/2}, $F$=\J{1/2}{3/2}\ hyperfine line
368: is also marginally detected. Although there are other hyperfine transitions
369: within the bandwidth their relative intensities were too small to be detected
370: (see Fig.~\ref{fespe}). The integrated intensity of the detected transitions
371: (Fig.~\ref{fmol}) shows that the emission is concentrated around VLA~2, being
372: only weakly detected towards SMA~1. We also marginally detected the DCN
373: \J{3}{2}\ line toward the two sources (Figs.~\ref{fmol} and \ref{fespe}).
374: Despite the poor spectral resolution ($\sim 1$\kms), these two molecules show
375: emission at the ambient molecular gas velocity with narrow line widths ($\sim
376: 1$\kms).
377:
378:
379:
380: \section{Analysis}
381:
382:
383: \subsection{Model of the dust emission\label{ModelDust}}
384:
385: The dust emission from SMA~1 and SMA~2 are partially resolved with sizes of
386: several hundred AU, which suggest that a significant contribution to the
387: emission is possibly coming from the infalling envelopes around the disks.
388: Figure~\ref{UVplot} shows clearly that the correlated amplitude in the
389: visibility data centered on VLA~2 comes mostly from an extended component,
390: although there is also a weaker unresolved component, with a flux density of
391: $\sim 20$~mJy, that appears to be dominant at visibility radii larger than
392: $\sim 40$~k$\lambda$. To better characterize this apparently compact
393: component, additional maps were obtained using only visibilities that have a
394: radius in the $(u,v)$ plane larger than 45~k$\lambda$. The resulting map of the
395: emission from SMA~1 and SMA~2 appears to be compact. Both sources are
396: unresolved with fluxes of $19.7\pm2.4$ and $13.3\pm2.4$~mJy for SMA~2 and
397: SMA~1, respectively. This is about one third of the total flux density detected
398: by the SMA for each source. A Gaussian fit to SMA~2 using the task IMFIT of
399: AIPS yields an upper limit of the diameter of $\simeq 1\farcs2$: The other
400: source, SMA~1, is too weak to do the same fitting. In any case, the compact
401: dusty components seem to arise from a structure with a radius of $\la 180$~AU.
402: Without proper modeling it is not possible to elucidate whether this compact
403: component traces the disk or the inner part of the envelope. Interestingly, the
404: peaks of the two components are slightly shifted ($\sim0\farcs4$) with respect
405: to the peak position given in Table~\ref{tdust}. This could be produced by a
406: somewhat asymmetrical distribution of the gas and dust in the envelope, which
407: will not be a surprise because of the multiplicity detected with the VLA at the
408: center of SMA~2. The compact component of SMA~2 coincides well with the
409: centimeter source VLA~2A detected by \citet{Carrasco08}
410: (the position of the dust is
411: $\alpha$(J2000)$=19^h17^m53\fs666$ and
412: $\delta$(J2000)$=19\arcdeg12'19\farcs63$).
413: The peak of the SMA~1 compact component
414: ($\alpha$(J2000)$=19^h17^m53\fs920$ and
415: $\delta$(J2000)$=19\arcdeg12'18\farcs52$) is displaced to the northwest with
416: respect to VLA~2D by $0\farcs67$ (see Fig.~\ref{fdust4}). Given the weak
417: detection of this source at both 1.35 and 7 mm (5 and 4-$\sigma$ respectively)
418: further more sensitive observations are needed to confirm this displacement.
419:
420:
421: In order to characterize the properties of the double cores we modeled the dust
422: emission assuming, for simplicity, that it arises from two independent
423: optically--thin twin circumstellar envelopes with a radial density and
424: temperature profiles at the position of the dusty sources detected with the
425: SMA. The model integrates the dust emission assuming spherical symmetry from
426: an inner radius, $R_{\rm inner}$, to an outer radius of $1.5\times10^4$~AU
427: (this value is somewhat arbitrary and does not affect the fit because the
428: emission at these scales is filtered out by the SMA). We do not include the
429: possible contribution from the circumstellar disks, since it is possible that
430: at this stage the disks are small, with a radius of $\la 30$~AU,
431: \citep{Rodriguez05}. The three possible protostars associated with SMA~2 are
432: separated by a projected distance of $\simeq0\farcs9$ or 270~AU
433: \citep{Carrasco08}, below the angular resolution of our observations. If these
434: sources are truly nearby protostars, it is possible that there is a cavity in
435: the envelope between these sources. To check whether there is a significant
436: cavity, we used different radii of 30, 100 and 180~AU. We adopted the density
437: profile expected for an infalling envelope, $n(r) \propto r^{-1.5}$, up to an
438: infall radius, $R_{\rm infall}$. Beyond $R_{\rm infall}$ we used a $r^{-2}$
439: density profile. In order to minimize the free parameters in the model, we
440: adopted a $R_{\rm infall}=1000$~AU, the value found by \citet{Shirley02}. For
441: a dusty cloud heated by an internal source, the temperature radial profile can
442: be characterized as $T \propto r^{-2/(4+\beta)}$ \citep{Kenyon93}, where
443: $\beta$ is the dust emissivity spectral index. The value used is $\beta=1.5$,
444: which was derived from 850 and 450~$\mu$m SCUBA observations
445: \citep{Estalella03}. We adopted an 1.35~mm dust opacity of $\kappa
446: \simeq0.9$~cm$^2$, which should be adequate for dusty particles with ice
447: mantles at densities of about 10$^6$~\cmt\ according to \citet{Ossenkopf94}.
448: Additional free parameters were the density $n_0$ and temperature $T_0$ at
449: a radius of 1,000~AU. Intensity profiles were obtained for each set of
450: $R_{\rm inner}$, $n_0$ and $T_0$ and converted to a 2-D image map.
451: These modeled maps were multiplied by the primary beam response of the
452: SMA antennae, assumed to be $56''$ at 1.35~mm. Two sets of visibility data
453: were generated: one obtained by subtracting the modeled map to the
454: visibility continuum data of the SMA observations. The other set was obtained
455: by replacing the values of observed visibilities with the values expected
456: from the modeled map. Maps of the residual and of the model were obtained
457: from the visibilities using the same parameters as the SMA maps shown here.
458: The {\em rms} and {\em bias} was finally computed for these residual maps.
459: The bias is defined as the absolute flux density of the residual on a
460: given region (the region where the emission is detected). The models with
461: an inner radius of 180~AU cannot reproduce well the SMA data, which suggests
462: that if there is an inner cavity (produced by the presence of a multiple
463: protostellar system), it is not big enough to affect the simple model used here.
464: With respect to the solutions with an inner radius of 30 and 100~AU, there
465: is, for both, a family of possible solutions in the $T_0$--$n_0$ plane.
466: The plot of the {\em rms} for these two inner radii in the range of densities
467: and temperatures computed are shown in Figure~\ref{fresidumodel}.
468: The best set of solutions can be expressed as
469: $n_0=$ $1.5\times10^6 \, [T_0/30 \, {\rm K}]^{-1.2}$~\cmt\ and
470: $1.1\times10^6 \, [T_0/30 \, {\rm K}]^{-1.2}$~\cmt\ for
471: the 30 and 100~AU inner radius, respectively.
472:
473: The VLA ammonia maps from \citet{Girart97} can be used to further constrain
474: the model. At the positions of SMA~1 and SMA~2 the kinetic temperature
475: estimated from the \nh\ (1,1) and (2,2) maps is $\simeq25$~K (see
476: \S~\ref{ResultDust}). Since the beam of the VLA maps is $\simeq3\farcs5$, it
477: is reasonable to adopt the value of $1\farcs75$ or 520~AU, as the radius at
478: which the gas is at 25~K. This implies that the temperature profile of the
479: dust can be written as $T = 20 \, (r/1000\, {\rm AU})^{-0.35}$~K. The
480: previous two equations that give the best set of solutions yield a density
481: profile of $n({\rm H_2}) = $ $2.4 \times 10^6 (r/1000\, {\rm AU})^{-1.5}$~\cmt\
482: for $R_{\rm inner}=30$~AU, and of $1.8 \times 10^6 (r/1000\, {\rm
483: AU})^{-1.5}$~\cmt\ for $R_{\rm inner}=100$~AU. Figure~\ref{UVplot} shows that
484: the correlated flux in the visibility domain for the model with $R_{\rm
485: inner}=30$~AU, $T_0=20$~K and $n_0=2.4\times10^6$~\cmt\ fits reasonably well
486: the SMA data. The synthetic maps from the model and from the residuals for
487: this particular solution also show the remarkable similitude with the L723
488: dusty binary system (see Fig.~\ref{fmapmodel}). Indeed, from the residual map
489: obtained using only the longest baselines (see right panels of
490: Fig.~\ref{fmapmodel}) the model of the binary envelope can account within the
491: $rms$ level of the map the compact, apparently unresolved, component of the two
492: dusty sources, without the need of invoking the presence of an accretion disk
493: (see the discussion section). On the other hand, the residual map done using
494: all the visibilities shows some significant residuals (at a $\sim4$-$\sigma$
495: level): there are some positive residuals northeast of SMA~2 and extended
496: negatives on the southern side of the dust emission from both SMA~1 and SMA~2.
497: These residuals could be due to the departure from the spherical symmetry of
498: the data.
499:
500: We can also compare the density we found with the value derived by
501: \citet{Dartois05} by modeling the spectral energy distribution of L723. They
502: estimated that at 100 AU the density is $2.2\times10^7$\cmt, which is a factor
503: 2.6 to 3.4 lower than what we derive for $T_0=20$~K. This difference could be
504: due to the different dust opacity and the different density profile used.
505:
506:
507: The derived density distribution can be used to estimate the mass of the two
508: envelopes. The equivalent radius of the SMA shortest baselines in the
509: visibility domain ($\simeq12$~k$\lambda$) is $3\farcs75$ (1125~AU). The
510: combined mass for the two envelope within a radius of 1125~AU is in the
511: 0.14--0.36~\mo\ range for a temperature range of $T_0=20$--30~K and of $R_{\rm
512: inner}=30$--100~AU. These values are compatible with the mass estimated in
513: Table~\ref{tmass}.
514:
515:
516: As an additional test for the model, we have used a 3.2~mm continuum map
517: obtained with the BIMA array. These observations were carried out in September
518: 2003 in the C configuration. The continuum was observed simultaneously with the
519: N$_2$H$^+$ 1--0 and CH$_3$OH $2_0$--$1_0$~A and $2_{-1}$--$1_{-1}$~E lines
520: (Masqu\'e, Girart \& Estalella, in preparation).
521: The dust model was extrapolated to this wavelength, and the standard position
522: of the BIMA antennas at the C configuration were used to create a synthetic
523: BIMA map using the same procedure as the one described for the SMA. The
524: synthetic maps were obtained for the $R_{\rm inner}=30$~AU, $T_0=20$~K and
525: $n_0=2.4\times10^6$~\cmt\ model. Figure~\ref{fbimamodel} shows that the model
526: also reproduces reasonably well the BIMA map.
527:
528:
529: \subsection{Modeling the H$_2$CO emission} \label{smodelform}
530:
531: Once the dust emission was successfully modeled, we modeled the \form\
532: emission using the one dimensional version of Ratran \citep{Hogerheijde00}.
533: This is a Monte Carlo code that calculates the radiative transfer and
534: excitation of molecular lines. The code is formulated from the viewpoint of
535: cells rather than photons, which allows the separation of local and external
536: contributions of the radiation field. This gives an accurate and fast
537: performance even for high opacities \citep{Hogerheijde00}. The \form\
538: collisional rates used were derived by \citet{Green91} and were downloaded
539: from the Leiden Atomic and Molecular Database \citep{Schoier05}.
540:
541: We modeled the emission as arising from two cores with the same density and
542: temperature profile, as suggested by the dust modeling. Since there is
543: a family of possible solutions, we fixed
544: the temperature and density profiles derived in the previous section that
545: agrees with the ammonia rotational temperature:
546: $T = 20 \, (r/1000\, {\rm AU})^{-0.35}$~K and
547: $n({\rm H_2}) = 2.4 \times 10^6 (r/1000\, {\rm AU})^{-1.5}$~\cmt\
548: (the solution for $R_{infall}=30$~AU).
549:
550: The kinematics is not well resolved with our observations, so we assume that
551: the gas is in free-fall collapse. This is marginally suggested by the line
552: profile at the position of SMA~1 and SMA~2 (see Fig.~\ref{fmodel2} and
553: \S~\ref{Stwin}). We adopted a velocity field for the free-falling gas of
554: $v_{\rm infall} = 0.5 \, (r/1000\, {\rm AU})^{-0.5}$\kms\ and an intrinsic
555: linewidth of 0.6\kms. Using these values the modeled line width was similar to
556: the \form\ values measured with the SMA and, in any case, the use of these
557: values should not affect critically the derivation of the \form\ properties
558: \citep{Jorgensen04}.
559:
560: To run RATRAN we adopted a fixed \form\ abundance within a shell with an inner
561: and outer radius $R_{in}$ and $R_{out}$, respectively, with the abundance being
562: zero outside the shell. We ran a series of models with Ratran using a range of
563: values for $R_{in}$ and $R_{out}$ and for the p--\form\ abundance,
564: $X[$p--\form$]$. Since the \form\ emission is significantly different between
565: the two envelopes, we made synthesized maps using different sets of ($R_{in}$,
566: $R_{out}$, $X[$p--\form$]$) values for SMA~1 and SMA~2. Synthesized maps with
567: 16 channels and with a spectral resolution of 0.28\kms\ were generated. We took
568: into account that the systemic velocity of the \form\ between the two cores
569: differs by $\simeq0.2$\kms\ (see Table~\ref{tform}). The maps were multiplied by
570: the primary beam of the SMA and then converted to visibilities. Maps of the
571: model and of the residuals (generated by subtracting the model to the data in
572: the visibility domain) were made in the same fashion as for the SMA dust
573: emission maps (see \S~\ref{ModelDust}).
574:
575: We explored values within the range of $8\times10^{-11}$ to $1\times10^{-8}$
576: for $X[$p--\form$]$, 30 to 240~AU for $R_{in}$ and 300 to $10^4$~AU for
577: $R_{out}$. In order to find the best set of solutions, we computed separately
578: the $\chi^2$ parameter for the spectra at the SMA~1 and SMA~2 positions and for
579: the total flux density within a region of $11''\times8''$ centered around the
580: twin envelopes. Table~\ref{tRatran} shows the range of the best fits found. The
581: range of parameters is better constrained for SMA~2 than for SMA~1. This is
582: due to its higher intensity and its apparently more compact size. Indeed, the
583: model yields solutions that imply that the \form\ around SMA~2 should arise
584: from the inner region of the envelope. More specifically, the outer radius
585: cannot be significantly larger than 600 AU, but not lower than 300~AU
586: (otherwise the emission would be unresolved, which is not the case). The SMA~2
587: abundance is also relatively well constrained,
588: $X[$p--\form$]\simeq(3$--$10)\times10^{-10}$. For SMA~1, the best set of
589: solution yields \form\ abundances in the range
590: $X[$p--\form$]\simeq(8$--$30)\times10^{-11}$, but with values always
591: lower than for SMA~2: the best solutions are found when SMA~2 abundances are a
592: factor of 3 to 10 higher than for SMA~1. Another difference with respect to
593: SMA~2 is that the best models for SMA~1 have a larger outer radius than for
594: SMA~2, $R_{out}\simeq 600$--5000 AU.
595:
596: Figure~\ref{fmodel1} shows the synthesized model, the SMA data and the residual
597: for one of the best solutions found (see the figure caption for details).
598: Figure~\ref{fmodel2} shows the spectra toward SMA~1 and SMA~2 for the same
599: model and for the SMA data. These figures show that the models fit the
600: observations reasonably well, although the residuals appear up to about a
601: 4-$\sigma$ level. In spite of the good match between the synthesized and
602: observed spectra for the two sources, the model reproduces better the
603: morphology of SMA~2 than that of SMA~1. The morphology mismatch between SMA~1 and
604: the synthesized map occurs for all the models. This suggest that the emission,
605: specially from SMA~1, departs from the idealized spherical model used with the
606: assumption that the \form\ arises only within a shell. Indeed, the
607: position--velocity cuts in two orthogonal directions centered on SMA~1 (see
608: Fig.~\ref{fpv}) show a double peak in one of them and what roughly appear to
609: partially be a ``donut'', centered on SMA~1, in the other cut (partially
610: because of the overlap with SMA~2 in the NW side). This suggests that the
611: \form\ emission may not come from the shell of a spherical envelope but from a
612: contracting and somewhat flattened shell or torus. For example, such a case was
613: more clearly observed in the CS emission associated with the dense core ahead
614: of HH~80N \citep{Girart01}. The marginal evidence that the \form\ arises from a
615: torus supports the idea that the emission does not come from a spherical
616: configuration. However, despite the limitations of the adopted approach,
617: given the limited signal-to-noise ratio obtained and the use of only one
618: transition, the results from the modeling should be regarded as a good first
619: approximation to the properties of \form\ in these two cores.
620:
621: The derived p--\form\ abundances are compatible with the value found by
622: \citet{Jorgensen05}, $9.6\times10^{-10}$, from single-dish observations, and
623: are also within the range of values found for the so--called outer part of the
624: circumstellar envelopes associated with Class 0 sources
625: \citep{Jorgensen05,Maret04}, which are defined as the region where temperatures
626: are lower than $\simeq100$~K. In the inner region of the envelopes, where the
627: temperature is $\ga 100$~K, the icy grain mantles evaporates and molecular
628: abundances are expected to increase significantly: the \form\ reaches abundances
629: between $10^{-8}$ and $10^{-6}$ \citep{Jorgensen05,Maret04}. Our model did not
630: take into account this warm component. Nevertheless, the reasonable solutions
631: found in this paper imply that the total amount of \form\ in the inner warm
632: region is not significant, despite the very high \form\ abundance expected. This
633: can be explained by the fact that for L723, the warm region is very small due to
634: its low total bolometric luminosity, 3.4~L$_{\odot}$ (the temperature of 100~K is
635: reached at a radius of 10~AU).
636:
637:
638:
639:
640: \section{Discussion}
641:
642:
643: \subsection{The Twin Cores\label{Stwin}}
644:
645: The dust emission reveals two similar substructures, with SMA~2 being only
646: slightly more massive than SMA~1 (Table~\ref{tdust}). In fact, the modeling of
647: the emission suggest that within the observational uncertainties (sensitivity
648: and angular resolution) the dust properties of the two cores can be accounted
649: as arising from ``identical'' twin cores. However, these twin cores have
650: different molecular properties. The CN \J{2}{1} and \form\ \JK{3}{03}{2}{02}
651: emission is stronger in SMA~2 than in SMA~1. In fact, the modeling carried out
652: in \S~\ref{smodelform} shows that the \form\ associated with SMA~2 has a higher
653: molecular abundance (by a factor 3--10) and arises from a more compact region
654: than in SMA~1. In both cores, the line width of the \form\ lines are clearly
655: larger (by up to 50\%) than those of \nh. In addition, the \form\
656: \JK{3}{03}{2}{02} emission is more compact than the \nh\ emission, as can be
657: clearly seen in Fig.~\ref{fmol}. These two features taken together are a good
658: indication of the presence of radial velocity gradients, with increasing
659: velocity with decreasing radius to protostars. Both infall and rotation
660: velocities are expected to have this behavior. The presence of a blueshifted
661: peak slightky higher than the redshifted one at the position of the two cores
662: (Fig.~\ref{fmodel2}) is an additional marginal evidence of infall motions.
663:
664: Previous observations find clear star formation signatures associated
665: with the SMA~2 core. First the presence of a well studied thermal radio jet,
666: VLA~2A, pinpoint the position of a protostar that is powering the east--west
667: molecular outflow \citep{Anglada96,Carrasco08}. VLA high angular resolution
668: observations reveal the presence of a water maser, and 7~mm and 3.6~cm
669: sources (VLA 2B and 2C) $\sim0\farcs5$ around VLA~2A
670: \citep{Girart97,Carrasco08}. \citet{Carrasco08} interpret these as a young
671: stellar system, which is forming in the 150~AU vicinity (in projected
672: distance) around VLA 2A. In addition, they find that VLA~2B may be powering
673: the north-south molecular outflow. This stellar system is being formed inside
674: the SMA~2 core. In contrast, there are not known signs of outflow activity
675: towards SMA~1, yet. There is only marginal dust emission detected at 7~mm,
676: labeled as VLA 2D \citep{Carrasco08}.
677:
678: In conclusion, our study and analysis of SMA~1 and SMA~2 show that they have
679: almost identical properties (mass, and density and temperature distribution)
680: and that there is marginal evidence of infall motions in both. However, the
681: \form\ abundance towards SMA~2 is significantly higher than in SMA~1. Since
682: SMA~2 shows clear outflow activity, in contrast with SMA~1, this suggests that
683: SMA~2 is more evolved (due to a higher infall rate or because it is older). In
684: any case, they are not ``identical'' twin cores but ``fraternal'' twin cores.
685:
686:
687: \subsection{The Mass Reservoir around the Class 0 protostellar system}
688:
689: The total mass derived from the SMA observations is less than 10\% of the whole
690: dense core, derived from SCUBA JCMT observations at 850 and 450 $\mu$m
691: \citep{Estalella03} or from VLA \nh\ observations \citep{Girart97}. That is,
692: the mass accreting to the protostars (or to the disks) at scales of $\la
693: 1000$~AU is only a small part of the dense core. In addition, from the modeling
694: we found that the dust emission detected by the SMA at 1.35~mm seems to arise
695: from the dense twin envelopes, SMA 1 and SMA 2, and within the limits of our
696: sensitivity there is no need to invoke to the presence of protostellar disks.
697: That means that the contribution from the disks at 1.35~mm should not be
698: higher than $\simeq 8$~mJy (the 5--$\sigma$ value of the continuum residual
699: map of Fig.~\ref{fmapmodel}). Assuming that the disk has a temperature of 50
700: K, the upper limit of the disk mass is $6\times10^{-3}$~M$_{\odot}$. This mass
701: would be higher if the dust emission from the disk is not optically thin, but
702: it would be lower if the temperature is higher. In any case, this suggests that
703: the disk mass is less than 10\% of the mass of each of the twin cores. Thus,
704: the large scale (0.1~pc) molecular envelope traced by \nh\ or SCUBA contain
705: most of the mass or, in other words, it is still the major reservoir of mass to
706: keep the star formation going on. Therefore, L723 seems to be in a very early
707: phase of star formation.
708:
709: It is clear that fragmentation is occurring at different levels. The $0.1$~pc
710: scale molecular envelope has fragmented at the center and at scales of
711: $\simeq1000$~AU into two cores, SMA 1 and SMA 2. At the same time, at least
712: one of these cores, SMA~2, has undergone additional fragmentation at scales of
713: $\simeq150~$AU, forming a multiple stellar system. However, we note that within
714: the uncertainties, the SMA 2 can be modeled a single envelope down to a
715: radius of 30 AU. It is interesting to note
716: that whatever is the fragmentation process that is acting in the different
717: scales (turbulence, the initial magnetic field and angular momentum
718: configuration) is occurring within a 0.1~pc dense envelope that appears to be
719: very quiescent at scales of few thousands AU outside its center according to
720: the \nh\ data \citep{Girart97}: line widths of only $\la0.5$\kms\ and small
721: velocity gradients, of 3\kms~pc$^{-1}$ .
722:
723:
724:
725: \section{Summary}
726:
727: We present continuum and line 1.35~mm high angular resolution observations
728: ($\simeq3''$) carried out with the SMA toward the low--mass protostellar region
729: in the L723 dark cloud. We detected emission of the dust, the \form\
730: \JK{3}{0,3}{2}{0,2}, DCN \J{3}{2} and SiO \J{5}{4}\ transitions, as well as
731: a few lines of the CN \J{2}{1} transition. We performed a radiative transfer
732: analysis of the dust emission as well as for the \form\ line in order to
733: constrain the physical and chemical conditions of the two cores. The main
734: results of the paper can be summarized as:
735: \begin{enumerate}
736: \item The dust emission arises from two similar cores, SMA~1 and SMA~2,
737: separated by $2\farcs9$ (880 AU in projected distance) and with masses of 0.06
738: and 0.08~M$_{\odot}$, respectively. They are partially resolved, with
739: deconvolved sizes of $\sim$500~AU. SMA~2 is associated with VLA~2 and water
740: maser emission. We modeled the dust emission from the two cores assuming that
741: the cores have a density and temperature radial distribution of the type:
742: $n(r) \propto r^{-1.5}$ and $T \propto r^{-0.35}$. We found that within the
743: uncertainty achieved, the two cores can be considered almost ``identical''
744: twins. The best set of solutions are those with a density and temperature that
745: match the following expression: $n_0{\rm (H_2)}=1.45\times10^6 \, [T_0/30 \,
746: {\rm K}]^{1.2}$~\cmt\ ($n_0$ and $T_0$ are the density and temperature at a
747: radius of 1000~AU). The model shows that all the emission detected can arise
748: from the cores, with possibly no evidence of contribution from the accretion
749: disk, which yields an upper limit of the disk mass of
750: $\sim6\times10^{-3}$~M$_{\odot}$.
751:
752: \item The \form\ emission is concentrated around the two mm continuum sources,
753: SMA~1 and SMA~2, although the emission is brighter toward SMA~2. The
754: kinematics of the two sources is difficult to disentangle because their
755: separation is similar to the angular resolution. Nevertheless, there is
756: marginal evidence of infall motions in both sources (double peak line, with
757: brighter blueshifted component), of a velocity gradient around SMA~2 indicative
758: of rotation, and that the \form\ in SMA~1 arises from a contracting and
759: somewhat flattened structure. The linewidth of \form\ has values in the
760: 1.2--1.7 \kms\ range, which is $\sim$50\% larger than the values measures for
761: the \nh\ lines by \citet{Girart97}. The \form\ emission was modeled adopting
762: the density and temperature profile constrained by the dust emission. We used
763: RATRAN assuming a fixed p--\form\ abundance within a shell with a inner and
764: outer radius $R_{in}$ and $R_{out}$, respectively, being the abundance zero
765: outside the shell. Reasonable models were found for a p--\form\ abundance
766: range of $(3$--$10)\times10^{-10}$ and (8--$30)\times10^{-11}$ for SMA~2
767: and SMA~1, respectively, but with the SMA~1 abundance lower than for SMA~2 by
768: a factor 3 to 10. The best models are those that have a more compact emission
769: in SMA~2 ($R_{out}\simeq 300$--600 AU) than in SMA~1 ($R_{out}\simeq 600$--5000
770: AU). The p--\form\ abundances found are compatible with the value of the
771: outer part of the circumstellar envelopes associated with Class 0 sources. The
772: total amount of \form\ in the inner warm region of the circumstellar envelopes
773: (where $T\ga 100$~K) is not significant, despite the very high \form\ abundance
774: expected (e.g.; Maret et al. 2004). This can be explained by the fact that for
775: L723, the warm region is very small (a radius of $\la 10$~AU) due to its low
776: total bolometric luminosity, 3.4~L$_{\odot}$.
777:
778: \item The DCN and CN lines arise from the same region than the dust and
779: \form. The CN emission peaks clearly toward SMA~2, whereas the DCN shows
780: similar emission in SMA~1 and in SMA~2.
781:
782: \item SiO is detected marginally at slightly redshifted velocities
783: around SMA~1 and SMA~2, and is possibly tracing a region of interaction between
784: the dense envelope and the outflow.
785:
786: \item The Western Hot Spot (WHS), detected by \citet{Girart97} from \nh\
787: observations as a spot of local heating, is not detected by the SMA (line and
788: continuum) observations. The non--detection of the 1.35~mm emission yields an
789: upper limit of the WHS mass of $\simeq$0.01~M$_{\odot}$.
790:
791: \item The above results suggest that although SMA~1 and SMA~2 cores have
792: almost identical physical properties (density and temperature distribution),
793: they are rather ``fraternal'' twin cores, with SMA~2 being in a more evolved
794: stage. Thus, SMA~2 is harboring an active multiple low--mass protostellar system
795: (VLA~2A, 2B and 2C), powering at least one molecular outflow
796: \citep{Carrasco08}. In contrast, there are not signs of outflow activity
797: towards SMA~1.
798:
799: \item The large scale, 0.1~pc, molecular envelope (traced by \nh\ or SCUBA)
800: is the major reservoir of mass to keep the star formation going on (it contains
801: about $\ga 90$\% of the mass), which suggests that L723 is still in a very
802: early phase of star formation.
803:
804: \item Fragmentation is occurring at different levels at the center of the L723
805: dense molecular cloud: at scales of $\simeq1000$~AU the cloud has fragmented
806: into two cores, SMA 1 and SMA 2, and SMA~2 has undergone additional
807: fragmentation at scales of $\simeq150~$AU, forming a multiple stellar system
808: \citep{Carrasco08}. Whatever is the fragmentation process that is acting at the
809: different scales (turbulence, the initial magnetic field and angular momentum
810: configuration) it is occurring within a 0.1~pc dense envelope that appears to
811: be at larger scales.
812:
813: \end{enumerate}
814:
815:
816: \acknowledgments
817: JMG is grateful to the SMA staff at Hilo for the support during the visit to
818: the SMA. We would like to thank the anonymous referee for the valuable
819: comments. JMG acknowledges support from the DURSI (Generalitat de Catalunya)
820: grant BE-2004-00370. JMG and RE are supported by MICINN grant
821: AYA2005-05823-C03 (co-funded with FEDER funds).
822:
823: %Facilities: \facility{SMA}, \facility{BIMA}.
824:
825:
826: \begin{thebibliography}{}
827: \bibitem[Andr\'e, et al.(1993)]{Andre93}
828: Andr\'e, P., Ward-Thomson, D., \& Barsony, M. 1993, \apj, 406, 122
829: \bibitem[Anglada(2004)]{Anglada04}
830: Anglada, G.\ 2004, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference
831: Series, 21, 100
832: \bibitem[Anglada et al.(1991)]{Anglada91}
833: Anglada, G., Estalella, R., Rodriguez, L.F., Torrelles, J.M., Lopez, R.,\&
834: Cant\'o, J. 1991, \apj, 376, 615
835: \bibitem[Anglada et al.(1996)]{Anglada96}
836: Anglada, G., Rodriguez, L.~F., \& Torrelles, J.~M.\ 1996, \apjl, 473, L123
837: \bibitem[Avery et al.(1990)]{Avery90}
838: Avery, L.W., Hayashi, S.S., \& White, G.J. 1990, \apj, 357, 524
839: \bibitem[Carrasco--Gonz\'alez et al.(2008)]{Carrasco08}
840: Carrasco--Gonz\'alez, C., Anglada, G., Rodr\'iguez, L. F., Torrelles, J. M.,
841: Osorio, M., \& Girart, J. M. 2008, The Astrophysical Journal, 676,1073
842: \bibitem[Chen et al.(2007)]{Chen07}
843: Chen, X., Launhardt, R., \& Henning, T.\ 2007, \apj, 669, 1058
844: \bibitem[Codella et al.(1999)]{Codella99}
845: Codella, C., Bachiller, R., \& Reipurth, B.\ 1999, \aap, 343, 585
846: \bibitem[Danby et al.(1988)]{Danby88}
847: Danby, G., Flower, D. R., Valiron, P., Schilke, P., \& Walmsley, C. M. 1988,
848: \mnras, 235, 229
849: \bibitem[Davidson(1987)]{Davidson87}
850: Davidson, J.A. 1987, \apj, 315, 602
851: \bibitem[Dartois et al.(2005)]{Dartois05}
852: Dartois, E., Pontoppidan, K, Thi, W.-F., \& Mu\~noz Caro, G. M. 2005, \aap,
853: 444, 57
854: \bibitem[Draine(2004)]{Draine04}
855: Draine, B.~T.\ 2004, The Cold Universe, Saas-Fee Advanced Course 32,
856: Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes 2002 of the Swiss Society for Astronomy and
857: Astrophysics (SSAA), Springer, 2004.~Edited by A.W.~Blain, F.~Combes,
858: B.T.~Draine, D.~Pfenniger and Y.~Revaz, p.~213
859: \bibitem[Estalella et al.(2003)]{Estalella03}
860: Estalella, R., Palau, A., Girart, J.M., Beltran, M.T., Anglada, G. Ho, P.T.P.,
861: \& Osorio, M. 2003, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference
862: Series, 15, 135
863: \bibitem[Furuya et al.(2003)]{Furuya03}
864: Furuya, R.~S., Kitamura, Y., Wootten, A., Claussen, M.~J., \& Kawabe, R.\
865: 2003, \apjs, 144, 71
866: \bibitem[Girart et al.(1997)]{Girart97}
867: Girart, J.M., Estalella, R., Anglada, G., Torrelles, J.M., Ho, P.T.P., \&
868: Rodriguez, L.F. 1997, \apj, 489, 743
869: \bibitem[Girart et al.(2001)]{Girart01}
870: Girart, J.~M.,Estalella, R., Viti, S., Williams, D.~A., \& Ho, P.~T.~P.\
871: 2001, \apjl, 562, L91
872: \bibitem[Goldsmith et al.(1984)]{Goldsmith84}
873: Goldsmith , P.F., Snell ,R.L., \& Hemeon-Heyer, M. 1984, \apj, 286, 599
874: \bibitem[Green(1991)]{Green91}
875: Green, S. 1991, ApJS, 76, 979
876: \bibitem[Hayashi et al.(1991)]{Hayashi91}
877: Hayashi, S.S., Hasenawa, T., \& Kaifu, N. 1991, \apj, 377, 492
878: \bibitem[Hirano et al.(1998)]{Hirano98}
879: Hirano, N., Hayashi, S.~S., Umemoto, T., \& Ukita, N.\ 1998, \apj, 504,
880: 334
881: \bibitem[Hogerheijde \& van der Tak(2000)]{Hogerheijde00}
882: Hogerheijde, M.~R., \& van der Tak, F.~F.~S.\ 2000, \aap, 362, 697
883: \bibitem[J{\o}rgensen et al.(2004)]{Jorgensen04}
884: J{\o}rgensen, J.~K., Sch{\"o}ier, F.~L., \& van Dishoeck, E.~F.\ 2004, \aap,
885: 416, 603
886: \bibitem[J{\o}rgensen et al.(2005)]{Jorgensen05}
887: J{\o}rgensen, J.~K., Sch{\"o}ier, F.~L., \& van Dishoeck, E.~F.\ 2005, \aap,
888: 437, 177
889: \bibitem[Kenyon et al.(1993)]{Kenyon93}
890: Kenyon, S.~J., Calvet, N., \& Hartmann, L.\ 1993, \apj, 414, 676
891: \bibitem[Launhardt(2004)]{Launhardt04}
892: Launhardt, R. 2004, IAU Symp.\ 221, 213
893: \bibitem[Lee et al.(2002)]{Lee02}
894: Lee, C.-F., Mundy, L.G., Stone, J.M., \& Ostriker, E. C. 2002, \apj, 576, 294
895: \bibitem[L\'opez et al.(2007)]{Lopez07}
896: L\'opez, R., Estalella, R., G\'omez, G., \& Riera, A. 2007, \aap, 454, 233
897: \bibitem[Maret et al.(2004)]{Maret04}
898: Maret, S., et al.\ 2004, \aap, 416, 577
899: \bibitem[Moriarty-Schieven \& Snell(1989)]{Moriarty89}
900: Moriarty-Schieven, G.H.,\& Snell, R.L. 1989, \apj, 338, 952
901: \bibitem[Ossenkopf \& Henning(1994)]{Ossenkopf94}
902: Ossenkopf, V., \& Henning, T.\ 1994, \aap, 291, 943
903: \bibitem[Palacios \& Eiroa(1999)]{Palacios99}
904: Palacios, J.,\& Eiroa, C. 1999, \aap, 346, 233
905: \bibitem[Pezzuto et al.(2002)]{Pezzuto02}
906: Pezzuto, S., Grillo, F., Benettini, M., et al.\ 2002, \mnras, 330, 1034
907: \bibitem[Rodr{\'{\i}}guez et al.(2005)]{Rodriguez05}
908: Rodr{\'{\i}}guez, L.~F., Loinard, L., D'Alessio, P., Wilner, D.~J., \& Ho,
909: P.~T.~P.\ 2005, \apjl, 621, L133
910: \bibitem[Shirley et al.(2002)]{Shirley02}
911: Shirley, Y., Evans N.J., \& Rawlings,J. 2002, \apj, 575, 337
912: \bibitem[Sch\"oier et al.(2005)]{Schoier05}
913: Sch\"oier, F. L., van der Tak, F. F. S., van Dishoeck E. F., \&
914: Black, J. H. 2005, \aap, 432, 369
915: \end{thebibliography}
916:
917: \clearpage
918:
919: %
920: % FIGURES
921: %
922:
923: %--- FIG 1
924: \begin{figure}
925: \epsscale{0.8}
926: %\plotone{fig_sma_dust.ps}
927: \plotone{f1.eps}
928: \caption{
929: SMA map of the continuum emission at 1.35~mm (222.31 GHz) toward L723 VLA~2.
930: Contour levels are $-3$, 3, 5, 7, 9 , 11, 13, 15 and 17 times 1.8~\mjy, the
931: rms noise of the map. The synthesized beam is shown in the lower right
932: corner. The crosses show the position of VLA~2A (the western cross) and
933: VLA~2C, which are associated with SMA 2, and VLA~2D, associated with SMA 1.
934: These sources were detected by the VLA at 3.6~and 7~mm from sub--arcsecond
935: maps by \citet{Carrasco08}. The titled cross shows the position of the WHS
936: \citep{Girart97}.
937: \label{fdust}}
938: \end{figure}
939: %---
940:
941: \clearpage
942:
943: %--- FIG 2
944: \begin{figure}
945: \epsscale{1.0}
946: %\plotone{fig_sma_h2co.eps}
947: \plotone{f2.eps}
948: \caption{
949: SMA map of the \form\ \JK{3}{0,3}{2}{0,2} emission toward L723 VLA 2. Contour
950: levels are $-2$, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 times 0.18~\jy, the rms noise of the
951: map. The synthesized beam is shown in the lower right corner of the lower
952: right panel. The crosses show the position of the dust sources SMA~1
953: and SMA~2. The \vlsr\ velocity of the channels is shown in the lower left corner
954: of the panels.
955: \label{fform}}
956: \end{figure}
957: %---
958:
959: \clearpage
960:
961: %--- FIG 3
962: \begin{figure}
963: \epsscale{0.8}
964: %\plotone{fig_spec3pos.eps}
965: \plotone{f3.eps}
966: \caption{
967: Spectra of the \form\ \JK{3}{0,3}{2}{0,2}, \nh\ (2,2) and (1,1) toward the
968: position of SMA~2 (left panels), SMA~1 (central panels) and WHS (right panels).
969: The spectra were taken from channel maps at similar angular resolution, $\sim
970: 3''$. The \nh\ spectra are taken from
971: \citet{Girart97}.
972: \label{fespectra}}
973: \end{figure}
974: %---
975:
976: \clearpage
977:
978: %--- FIG 4
979: \begin{figure}
980: \epsscale{0.7}
981: %\plotone{l723_h2co_mom_color.ps}
982: \plotone{f4.eps}
983: \caption{
984: Color image of the first order (bottom panel) and second order (top panel)
985: moments of the \form\ emission towards L723 VLA~2 superposed with the zero
986: order moment (integrated emission) contour map. The color image level is shown
987: in the right side of the panels. The first contour is 0.1~\jy\ \kms, and the
988: contour levels are 0.3 ~\jy\ \kms. The crosses show the position of the dust
989: sources SMA~1 and SMA~2. The synthesized beam of the maps is shown in the
990: bottom right corner of the bottom panel.
991: \label{fmom}}
992: \end{figure}
993: %---
994:
995: \clearpage
996:
997: %--- FIG 5
998: \begin{figure}
999: \epsscale{0.55}
1000: %\plotone{fig_h2co_pv.eps}
1001: \plotone{f5.eps}
1002: \caption{
1003: Position-velocity (PV) plots of the \form\ \JK{3}{0,3}{2}{0,2} emission. The
1004: {\it top} and {\it central} panels show the PV plot perpendicular and along
1005: the VLA~2 thermal radio jet direction, $PA=26\arcdeg$ and $116\arcdeg$,
1006: respectively, centered on SMA~2 (and VLA~2). The {\it bottom} panel shows the
1007: PV plot centered on SMA~1 with a position angle, $PA=30\arcdeg$ nearly
1008: perpendicular to the VLA~2 radio jet and similar to the north-south pair of
1009: lobes of the quadrupolar molecular outflow \citep{Lee02}.
1010: \label{fpv}}
1011: \end{figure}
1012: %---
1013:
1014: %--- FIG 6
1015: \begin{figure}
1016: \epsscale{0.45}
1017: %\plotone{fig_sma_sio.ps}
1018: \plotone{f6.eps}
1019: \caption{
1020: Contour map of the SiO \J{5}{4}\ emission overlaid with the grey scale image
1021: of the 1.35~mm dust. Contours are $-3$, $-2$, 2, 3, 4 and 5 times 0.05~\jy,
1022: the rms noise of the map. The synthesized beam is shown in the bottom right
1023: corner.
1024: The filled triangles mark H$_{2}$ knots \citep{Palacios99}.
1025: \label{fsio}}
1026: \end{figure}
1027: %---
1028:
1029: \clearpage
1030:
1031: %--- FIG 7
1032: \begin{figure}
1033: \epsscale{0.55}
1034: %\plotone{fig_molecules.ps}
1035: \plotone{f7.eps}
1036: \caption{
1037: Integrated emission of the \form\ \JK{3}{0,3}{2}{0,2}, CN \J{2}{1}, DCN
1038: \J{3}{2} lines observed with the SMA. For comparison we have also included the
1039: integrated emission of the \nh\ (2,2) line obtained with the VLA by
1040: \citet{Girart97}. The synthesized beams are shown in the lower right corner
1041: of each panel. Contours are $-2$, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 12 times 3.2, 34,
1042: 16 and 51~\mjy\ \kms\ for \nh, DCN, CN and \form, respectively. The crosses
1043: show the position of SMA 1 and SMA 2. The titled cross shows the position of the
1044: WHS.
1045: \label{fmol}}
1046: \end{figure}
1047: %---
1048:
1049: \clearpage
1050:
1051: %--- FIG 8
1052: \begin{figure}
1053: \epsscale{0.7}
1054: %\plotone{fig_spectra.ps}
1055: \plotone{f8.eps}
1056: \caption{
1057: Spectra of the \form\ \JK{3}{0,3}{2}{0,2}, DCN \J{3}{2},
1058: CN $N=$2--1, $J=5/2$--$3/2$ and $J=3/2$--$1/2$ obtained
1059: averaging a region of $7''\times5''$ around SMA~1 and SMA~2.
1060: The CN and DCN spectra has a lower velocity resolution ($\simeq 1.0$\kms).
1061: For the CN hyperfine transitions, a vertical dashed line
1062: indicates the position of the expected hyperfine transition with the height
1063: proportional to its relative intensity.
1064: \label{fespe}}
1065: \end{figure}
1066: %---
1067:
1068: \clearpage
1069:
1070: %--- FIG 9
1071: \begin{figure}
1072: \epsscale{0.9}
1073: %\plotone{fig_amp_uvd.eps}
1074: \plotone{f9.eps}
1075: \caption{
1076: SMA correlated flux for the 1.35~mm continuum emission $versus$ uv distance
1077: (in units of k$\lambda$) at the position of SMA~2. The correlated flux was
1078: derived by vector averaging the amplitude of the visibilities over annular
1079: bins. The bins have a width of 3.3~k$\lambda$ for radius lower than
1080: 50~k$\lambda$ and of 10~k$\lambda$ for larger radii. The solid line shows the
1081: expected value for the amplitude assuming no signal (i.e., the "zero bias").
1082: The dotted line shows the expected flux for an unresolved source of 20~mJy.
1083: The open squares show the expected correlated for the model $T_0=20$~K and
1084: $n_0({\rm H_2})=2.4\times10^6$~\cmt\ described in \S~\ref{ModelDust}.
1085: \label{UVplot}}
1086: \end{figure}
1087: %---
1088:
1089: \clearpage
1090:
1091: %--- FIG 10
1092: \begin{figure}
1093: \epsscale{0.7}
1094: %\plotone{fig_dust_uv45kl.ps}
1095: \plotone{f10.eps}
1096: \caption{
1097: SMA map of the 1.35~mm dust emission obtained using only the visibilities with
1098: a radius larger than 45~k$\lambda$ in the $(u,v)$ plane and applying a Natural
1099: weighting to the visibilities. The contour levels are $-3$, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7
1100: times the rms noise of the map, 2.4~\mjy. The synthesized beam,
1101: $2\farcs94\times0\farcs92$ with a $PA=74.2\arcdeg$, is shown in the bottom
1102: right corner.
1103: The crosses show the position of VLA~2A (the western cross) and
1104: VLA~2C, which are associated with SMA 2, and VLA~2D, associated with SMA 1.
1105: \label{fdust4}}
1106: \end{figure}
1107: %---
1108:
1109: %--- FIG 11
1110: \begin{figure}
1111: \epsscale{0.8}
1112: %\plotone{fig_dust_chi2.ps}
1113: %\plotone{fig_dust_model_res.ps}
1114: \plotone{f11.eps}
1115: \caption{
1116: Plots shows the locus of best solutions represented by the function of the
1117: {\em rms} of the residual map derived by subtracting the dust
1118: model for an inner radius of 30 ({\em left panel}) an 100~AU ({\em right
1119: panel}) to the SMA visibility data of the 1.3~mm continuum emission. Levels
1120: are in steps of 3 times the {\em rms} of the original SMA
1121: map, 1.5~\mjy. The dashed grey line shows the line of approximately set of best solutions represented as the function
1122: $n{\rm (H_2)}=1.5\times10^6 \, [T/30 \, {\rm K}]^{1.2}$~\cmt\ (left panel) and
1123: $n{\rm (H_2)}=1.1\times10^6 \, [T/30 \, {\rm K}]^{1.2}$~\cmt\ (right panel).
1124: \label{fresidumodel}}
1125: \end{figure}
1126: %---
1127:
1128: \clearpage
1129:
1130: %--- FIG 12
1131: \begin{figure}
1132: \epsscale{0.8}
1133: %\plotone{fig_map_dustmodel.ps}
1134: \plotone{f12.eps}
1135: \caption{
1136: SMA synthetics maps for the dust model $R_{\rm inner}=30$~AU, $T_0=20$~K
1137: and $n_0=2.4\times10^6$~\cmt\ described in
1138: \S~\ref{ModelDust}.
1139: {\em Left panels}: the model (top) and residual (bottom) dust
1140: maps obtained using all the visibilities observed with the SMA
1141: and using robust of 1.
1142: Contours levels for the model map are are $-3$, 3, 5, 7, \nodata,
1143: 21 times 1.5~\mjy, the $rms$ of the map.
1144: Contour levels for the residual map are $-3$, $-2$, 2, 3, and
1145: 4 times 1.5~\mjy,
1146: {\em Right panels}: the model (top) and residual (bottom) dust maps
1147: obtained using visibilities with a radius larger than 45~k$\lambda$
1148: and Natural weighting (as in Fig.~\ref{fdust4}).
1149: Contour levels are $-3$, $-2$, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 times 2.4~\mjy.
1150: The synthesized beams are shown in the lower left corner of
1151: each panel. The crosses show the position of SMA~1 and SMA~2.
1152: \label{fmapmodel}}
1153: \end{figure}
1154: %
1155:
1156: %--- FIG 13 NEW
1157: \begin{figure}
1158: \epsscale{1.0}
1159: %\plotone{fig_bima_model.ps}
1160: \plotone{f13.eps}
1161: \caption{
1162: {\em Left panel}: BIMA map of the 3.2~mm continuum emission obtained
1163: with the C configuration in September 2003. The synthesized beam,
1164: $10\farcs6\times6\farcs7$ and $PA=-7\arcdeg$, is shown in the bottom
1165: right corner. Contours are $-2$, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 times 2.8\mjy,
1166: the rms noise of the map. The crosses show the position of SMA~1 and SMA~2.
1167: {\em Middle panel}:
1168: BIMA synthetic map at 3.2~mm continuum at the C configuration
1169: for the dust model $T_0=20$~K and $n({\rm H_2})_0=2.4\times10^6$~\cmt\
1170: described in \S~\ref{ModelDust}. Contours are the same as in the previous panel.
1171: {\em Right panels}: BIMA residual map obtained from the previous two maps.
1172: \label{fbimamodel}}
1173: \end{figure}
1174: %
1175:
1176: %--- FIG 14 - OLD FIG 13
1177: \begin{figure}
1178: \epsscale{0.9}
1179: %\plotone{fig_h2co_model2.eps}
1180: \plotone{f14.eps}
1181: \caption{
1182: Synthetic (solid line) and observed (dashed grey line) \form\
1183: \JK{3}{0,3}{2}{0,2}\ spectra at SMA~1 (left panel) and SMA~2 (right panel).
1184: The model parameters for the synthetic spectra are the same as in
1185: Figure~\ref{fmodel1}.
1186: \label{fmodel2}}
1187: \end{figure}
1188: %---
1189:
1190: \clearpage
1191:
1192: %--- FIG 15 - OLD FIG 14
1193: \begin{figure}
1194: \epsscale{0.55}
1195: %\plotone{fig_h2co_model.eps}
1196: \plotone{f15.eps}
1197: \caption{
1198: Channel maps of one of the best models, the SMA data and the residual
1199: (SMA$-$model) for the \form\ \JK{3}{0,3}{2}{0,2}\ emission. Contours are $-3$,
1200: $-2$, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 $\times$ 0.17~\mjy. The synthesized beam is shown
1201: in the lower right corner of the lower right panel. The crosses show the
1202: position of the dust sources SMA~1 and SMA~2. The parameters for this model are
1203: $X[$p--\form$]=3\times10^{-9}$, $R_{in}=240$~AU and $R_{out}=600$~AU for
1204: SMA~2, and $X[$p--\form$]=1\times10^{-10}$, $R_{in}=60$~AU and
1205: $R_{out}=5000$~AU for SMA~1.
1206: The \vlsr\ velocity of the channels is shown in the lower left corner
1207: of the right panels.
1208: \label{fmodel1}}
1209: \end{figure}
1210: %---
1211:
1212: \clearpage
1213:
1214: %
1215: % TABLES
1216: %
1217:
1218: \begin{deluxetable}{lrccccc}
1219: \tablecaption{Parameters of the SMA observations\label{tobserva}}
1220: \tablewidth{0pt}
1221: \tablehead{
1222: \multicolumn{2}{c}{}&
1223: \multicolumn{2}{c}{Synthesized Beam}&
1224: \colhead{} &
1225: \colhead{Spectral} &
1226: \colhead{$rms$}
1227: \\
1228: \cline{3-4}
1229: \colhead{} &
1230: \colhead{$\nu$} &
1231: \colhead{HPBW} &
1232: \colhead{PA} &
1233: \colhead{$\Delta\nu$} &
1234: \colhead{Resolution} &
1235: \colhead{Noise}
1236: \\
1237: \colhead{Observation} &
1238: \colhead{(GHz)} &
1239: \colhead{(arcsec)}&
1240: \colhead{(deg)}&
1241: \colhead{(MHz)} &
1242: \colhead{(km~s$^{-1}$)} &
1243: \colhead{$\!\!\!\!$(mJy~beam$^{-1}$)}
1244: }
1245: \startdata
1246: Continuum
1247: & 222.31 & $3.3\times1.5$ & 79 & 4000 & & 1.8 \\
1248: \form\ \JK{3}{0,3}{2}{0,2}
1249: & 218.2222 & $3.1\times1.8$ & 76 & 104 & 0.28 & 175 \\
1250: DCN \J{3}{2}
1251: & 217.2385 & $3.2\times2.1$ &76& 104 & 1.07 & 78 \\
1252: SiO \J{5}{4}
1253: & 217.1050 & $3.2\times2.1$ & 76 & 104 & 1.12 & 60 \\
1254: CN \J{2}{1} \J{5/2}{3/2}\ \J{7/2}{5/2}\tablenotemark{a}
1255: & 226.8748 & $3.1\times2.0$ & 76 & 104 & 1.07 & 65 \\
1256: CN \J{2}{1} \J{3/2}{1/2}\ \J{5/2}{3/2}\tablenotemark{a}
1257: & 226.6595 & $3.1\times2.0$ & 76 & 104 & 1.07 & 88 \\
1258: \enddata
1259: \tablenotetext{a}{CN N,J,F hyperfine transitions }
1260: \end{deluxetable}
1261:
1262:
1263: \begin{deluxetable}{lllccll}
1264: \tablecaption{Dust properties at 1.35~mm\tablenotemark{a}\label{tdust}}
1265: \tablewidth{0cm}
1266: \tablehead{
1267: \colhead{} &
1268: \multicolumn{2}{c}{Positions} &
1269: \colhead{$I_{\nu}$}&
1270: \colhead{$S_{\nu}$} &
1271: \colhead{Deconvolved Size} &
1272: \colhead{PA}
1273: \\
1274: \cline{2-3}
1275: \colhead{Source} &
1276: \colhead{$\alpha$(J2000)} &
1277: \colhead{$\delta$(J2000)} &
1278: \colhead{(mJy~beam$^{-1}$)}&
1279: \colhead{(mJy)} &
1280: \colhead{(arcsec)} &
1281: \colhead{(deg)}
1282: }
1283: \startdata
1284: SMA 1
1285: & $19^{\rm h}17^{\rm m}53\fs884$
1286: & $19\arcdeg12'18\farcs51$
1287: & 29.9$\pm$1.8 &45$\pm$4
1288: & $(2.0\pm0.3)\times (\la0.6)$
1289: & $56\pm9$ \\
1290: SMA 2
1291: & $19^{\rm h}17^{\rm m}53\fs694$
1292: & $19\arcdeg12'19\farcs68$
1293: & 33.7$\pm$1.8 & 59$\pm$4
1294: & $(2.3\pm0.2)\times(1.0\pm0.2)$
1295: & $73\pm6$ \\
1296: \enddata
1297: \tablenotetext{a}{ Values corrected by the primary beam of the SMA antennas.}
1298: \end{deluxetable}
1299:
1300:
1301: %\clearpage
1302:
1303: \begin{table}
1304: \caption[]{Masses of the different components in L723}
1305: \label{tmass}
1306: \[
1307: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
1308: \hline
1309: & $S_{\nu}({\rm 1.35mm})$ & $T_{\rm dust}$ & $M$ \\
1310: Source & (mJy) & (K) & (M$_{\odot}$) \\
1311: \hline
1312: All$^a$& 128$\pm6$ & 25 & 0.24 \\
1313: SMA~1 & 45$\pm4$ & 25 & 0.09 \\
1314: SMA~2 & 59$\pm4$ & 25 & 0.11 \\
1315: WHS & $\le5.7$ & 25 & $\le0.011$ \\
1316: \hline
1317: \end{tabular}
1318: \]
1319: \begin{list}{}{}
1320: \item[$^a$] To estimate the total mass we took into account the contribution of
1321: the mass from the 24~mJy excess of emission of the Natural map (obtained
1322: adopting a temperature of 20~K).
1323: \end{list}
1324: \end{table}
1325: %
1326:
1327: \begin{table}
1328: \caption{\form\ \JK{3}{0,3}{2}{0,2}}\label{tform}
1329: \centering
1330: \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
1331: \hline
1332: & $I_{\nu}$ & $\int I_{\nu} dv$ & $v_{\rm LSR}$ & $\Delta v$ \\
1333: Source& (K) & (K\kms) & (km~s$^{-1}$) & (km~s$^{-1}$) \\
1334: \hline
1335: SMA 1 & 4.0$\pm$0.7 & 8.7$\pm$1.0 & 11.47$\pm$0.11 & 2.0$\pm$0.3\\
1336: SMA 2 & 8.7$\pm$0.7 & 14.6$\pm$0.8 & 11.64$\pm$0.04 & 1.6$\pm$0.1\\
1337: \hline
1338: \end{tabular}
1339: \end{table}
1340:
1341:
1342: \begin{table}
1343: \caption{Best \form\ Models}\label{tRatran}
1344: \centering
1345: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
1346: \hline
1347: && $R_{in}$ & $R_{out}$ \\
1348: Source & $X[$p--\form$]$ & (AU) & (AU) \\
1349: \hline
1350: SMA 1 & $(8$--$30) \times10^{-11}$ & 30--120 & 600--5000 \\
1351: SMA 2 & $(3$--$10) \times10^{-10}$ & 30--240 & 300--600 \\
1352: \hline
1353: \end{tabular}
1354: \end{table}
1355:
1356: \end{document}
1357: