1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: 

3: %\usepackage{graphics}

4: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

5: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

6: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

7: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

8: 

9: \newcommand{\ang}{{\rm \AA}}

10: \newcommand{\etal}{{\it et~al.\/}}

11: \newcommand{\Fha}{\mbox{$F_{\rm H\alpha}$}}

12: \newcommand{\FHI}{\mbox{$F_{\rm HI}$}}

13: \newcommand{\FNII}{\mbox{$F_{[N_{\rm II}]}$}}

14: \newcommand{\Hline}[1]{\mbox{H{\footnotesize {#1}}}}

15: \newcommand{\Halpha}{\Hline{\mbox{$\alpha$}}}

16: \newcommand{\Hbeta}{\Hline{\mbox{$\beta$}}}

17: \newcommand{\HI}{{\sc Hi}}

18: \newcommand{\HII}{{\sc Hii}}

19: \newcommand{\HIMF}{{\sc HiMF}}

20: \newcommand{\HICAT}{{\sc HiCAT}}

21: %\newcommand{\HIPASS}{{\sc HiPASS}}

22: \newcommand{\HIPASS}{{HIPASS}}

23: \newcommand{\iraf}{{\sl IRAF\/}}

24: \newcommand{\lha}{\mbox{$l_{\rm H\alpha}$}}

25: \newcommand{\lhap}{\mbox{$l'_{\rm H\alpha}$}}

26: \newcommand{\Lsun}{\mbox{$\rm L_\odot$}}

27: \newcommand{\Lstar}{\mbox{$L_\star$}}

28: % All these masses used to be {\cal M}

29: % \newcommand{\mass}{\cal M}

30: \newcommand{\mass}{M}

31: % \newcommand{\mass}{\textit{M}}

32: \newcommand{\MHI}{\mbox{$\mass_{\rm HI}$}}

33: \newcommand{\MHtwo}{\mbox{$\mass_{\rm H2}$}}

34: \newcommand{\Mdyn}{\mbox{$\mass_{\rm dyn}$}}

35: \newcommand{\Msun}{\mbox{$\mass_\odot$}}

36: \newcommand{\Mstar}{\mbox{$\mass_\star$}}

37: \newcommand{\nHI}{\mbox{$n_{\rm HI}$}}

38: %\newcommand{\NII}{[{\sc Nii}]}

39: \newcommand{\rHII}{\mbox{$r_{\rm HII}$}}

40: \newcommand{\rmax}{\mbox{$r_{\rm max}$}}

41: \newcommand{\re}{\mbox{$r_{e}$}}

42: \newcommand{\rhoHI}{\mbox{$\rho_{\rm HI}$}} 

43: \newcommand{\SFRD}{\mbox{$\dot{\rho}_{\rm SFR}$}} 

44: \newcommand{\SFRDo}{\mbox{$\dot{\rho}_{\rm SFR}(0)$}} 

45: \newcommand{\SFRu}{\mbox{$\rm M_\odot\,yr^{-1}$}}

46: \newcommand{\SFRDunits}{\(\Msun\ \mbox{\rm yr}^{-1}\ \mbox{\rm Mpc}^{-3}\)}

47: \newcommand{\SFRDp}{\mbox{$\dot{\rho}'_{\rm SFR}$}} 

48: \newcommand{\SFRDpo}{\mbox{$\dot{\rho}'_{\rm SFR}(0)$}} 

49: \newcommand{\SFRDz}{\mbox{$\dot{\rho}_{\rm SFR}(z)$}} 

50: \newcommand{\SFRDpz}{\mbox{$\dot{\rho}'_{\rm SFR}(z)$}} 

51: \newcommand{\tgas}{\mbox{$t_{\rm gas}$}}

52: \newcommand{\torb}{\mbox{$t_{\rm orb}$}}

53: \newcommand{\vcirc}{\mbox{$v_{\rm circ}$}}

54: \newcommand{\pro}[1]{\mbox{\sl #1}}

55: \newcommand{\vdag}{\mbox{(v)^\dagger}}

56: \newcommand{\myemail}{jgrimes@pha.jhu.edu}

57: \newcommand{\ch}{\mbox{{\it Chandra\/}}}

58: \newcommand{\spitz}{\mbox{{\it Spitzer}}}

59: \newcommand{\ulg}{\mbox{ULIRGs}}

60: \newcommand{\ul}{\mbox{ULIRG}}

61: \newcommand{\irof}{\mbox{IRAS\,05189-2524}}

62: \newcommand{\iros}{\mbox{IRAS\,17208-0014}}

63: \newcommand{\irto}{\mbox{IRAS\,20551-4250}}

64: \newcommand{\irtt}{\mbox{IRAS\,23128-5919}}

65: \newcommand{\iron}{\mbox{IRAS\,19245-4140}}

66: \newcommand{\tol}{\mbox{Tol\,0440-381}}

67: \newcommand{\sbs}{\mbox{SBS\,0335-052}}

68: \newcommand{\ugc}{\mbox{UGC\,05101}}

69: \newcommand{\cps} {\mbox{counts s$^{-1}$}}

70: \newcommand{\ergs} {\mbox{erg s$^{-1}$}}

71: \newcommand{\ergcms} {\mbox{erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$}}

72: \newcommand{\ergcmsa} {\mbox{erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ \AA$^{-1}$}}

73: \newcommand{\cms} {\mbox{cm$^{-2}$}}

74: \newcommand{\chsq}{\mbox{$\chi^2$}}

75: \newcommand{\feka}{\mbox{$Fe-K\alpha$}}

76: \newcommand{\afe}{\mbox{$\alpha/\rm{Fe}$}}

77: \newcommand{\alphe}{\mbox{$\alpha$-element}}

78: \newcommand{\ha}{\mbox{$\rm{H}\-\alpha$}}

79: \newcommand{\xmm}{\mbox{\it XMM-Newton}}

80: \newcommand{\fu}{\mbox{\it FUSE\/}}

81: \newcommand{\vv}{\mbox{VV\,114}}

82: \newcommand{\lfir}{\mbox{$\rm{L_{FIR}}$}}

83: \newcommand{\ovi}{\mbox{\ion{O}{6}}}

84: \newcommand{\oviw}{\mbox{\ion{O}{6}$\lambda1032$}}

85: \newcommand{\oviww}{\mbox{\ion{O}{6}$\lambda\lambda1032,1038$}}

86: \newcommand{\oi}{\mbox{\ion{O}{1}}}

87: \newcommand{\oiaw}{\mbox{\ion{O}{1}$\lambda989$}}

88: \newcommand{\oibw}{\mbox{\ion{O}{1}$\lambda1039$}}

89: \newcommand{\oicw}{\mbox{\ion{O}{1}$\lambda976$}}

90: \newcommand{\cii}{\mbox{\ion{C}{2}}}

91: \newcommand{\ciiw}{\mbox{\ion{C}{2}$\lambda1036$}}

92: \newcommand{\ciibw}{\mbox{\ion{C}{2}$\lambda1335$}}

93: \newcommand{\aliiw}{\mbox{\ion{Al}{2}$\lambda1671$}}

94: \newcommand{\siiiw}{\mbox{\ion{Si}{2}$\lambda1260$}}

95: \newcommand{\sthw}{\mbox{\ion{S}{3}$\lambda1012$}}

96: \newcommand{\naoww}{\mbox{\ion{Na}{1}$\lambda\lambda5890,5896$}}

97: \newcommand{\nai}{\mbox{\ion{Na}{1}}}

98: \newcommand{\naiww}{\mbox{\ion{Na}{1}$\lambda\lambda5890,5896$}}

99: \newcommand{\sth}{\mbox{\ion{S}{3}}}

100: \newcommand{\ciii}{\mbox{\ion{C}{3}}}

101: \newcommand{\ciiiw}{\mbox{\ion{C}{3}$\lambda977$}}

102: \newcommand{\niii}{\mbox{\ion{N}{3}}}

103: \newcommand{\niiiw}{\mbox{\ion{N}{3}$\lambda990$}}

104: \newcommand{\nii}{\mbox{\ion{N}{2}}}

105: \newcommand{\niiw}{\mbox{\ion{N}{2}$\lambda1084$}}

106: %\newcommand{\ni}{\mbox{\ion{N}{1}}}

107: \newcommand{\hoo}{\mbox{Haro\,11}}

108: \newcommand{\ks}{{\rm{km\,s^{-1}}}}

109: \newcommand{\kms}{\mbox{$\rm{km\,s^{-1}}$}}

110: \newcommand{\lya}{\mbox{$\rm{Ly}\-\alpha$}}

111: \newcommand{\lyb}{\mbox{$\rm{Ly}\-\beta$}}

112: \newcommand{\lybw}{\mbox{$\rm{Ly}\-\beta\,\lambda1025$}}

113: \newcommand{\novi}{\mbox{$\rm N_{O\,VI}$}}

114: \newcommand{\htwo}{\mbox{$\rm{H_{2}}$}}

115: \newcommand{\tlyl}{\mbox{$\rm{\tau_{Ly}}$}}

116: \newcommand{\izw}{\mbox{I\,Zw\,18}}

117: \newcommand{\llfn}{\mbox{$\log(\lambda f N/N_H)$}}

118: \newcommand{\flyabs}{\mbox{$\rm f_{esc,abs}$}}

119: \newcommand{\flyrel}{\mbox{$\rm f_{esc,rel}$}}

120: 

121: 

122: 

123: 

124: %\slugcomment{ApJ}

125: 

126: 

127: \shorttitle{\fu\,Observations of Starburst Galaxies}

128: \shortauthors{J. Grimes et al.}

129: 

130: %\slugcomment{***DRAFT***}

131: \begin{document}

132: 

133: \title{Far- Ultraviolet Observations of Starburst Galaxies with \fu: Galactic Feedback in the Local Universe}

134: 

135: \author{J. P. Grimes\altaffilmark{1}, T. Heckman\altaffilmark{1},

136: A. Aloisi\altaffilmark{2}, D. Calzetti\altaffilmark{3}, 

137: %C. Hoopes\altaffilmark{1},

138: C. Leitherer\altaffilmark{2},

139: C. L. Martin\altaffilmark{4}, G. Meurer\altaffilmark{1},

140: K. Sembach\altaffilmark{2}, D. Strickland\altaffilmark{1}}

141: \altaffiltext{1}{Center for Astrophysical Sciences, Johns Hopkins University,

142:     3400 N. Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21218; jgrimes@pha.jhu.edu, heckman@pha.jhu.edu,

143:     choopes@pha.jhu.edu,meurer@pha.jhu.edu,dks@pha.jhu.edu

144:     }

145: \altaffiltext{2}{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive,

146:    Baltimore, MD, 21218; aloisi@stsci.edu,leitherer@stsci.edu,sembach@stsci.edu}

147: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, 710 N. Pleasant St, 

148: 	Amherst, MA 01003}

149: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106

150: 	cmartin@physics.ucsb.edu}

151: \begin{abstract}

152: 

153: 

154: We have analyzed \fu\, (905-1187 \AA) spectra of a sample of 

155: 16 local starburst galaxies.

156: These galaxies cover almost three orders of magnitude in

157: star-formation rates and over two orders of magnitude in stellar mass.

158: Absorption features from the stars and interstellar medium are observed

159: in all the spectra. The strongest interstellar absorption features are generally

160: blue-shifted by $\sim$ 50 to 300 km s$^{-1}$, 

161: implying the almost ubiquitous presence of starburst-driven galactic winds in this sample.

162: The outflow velocites increase with both the star formation rate and the star formation rate

163: per unit stellar mass, consistent with a galactic wind driven by the population of massive stars.

164: We find outflowing coronal-phase gas (T $\sim 10^{5.5}$ K) detected via the \ovi\ absorption-line in nearly

165: every galaxy. 

166: The \ovi\ absorption-line

167: profile is optically-thin, is generally weak near the galaxy systemic velocity,

168: and has a higher mean outflow velocity than seen in the lower ionization lines.

169: The relationship between the line width and column density for the \ovi\ absorbing gas

170: is in good agreement with expectations for radiatively cooling and outflowing gas. Such gas will be created in the interaction of the

171: hot out-rushing wind seen in X-ray emission and cool dense ambient material.

172: \ovi\, emission is not generally detected in our sample, suggesting that radiative cooling by

173: the coronal gas is not dynamically significant in draining energy from galactic winds.

174: We find that the measured

175: outflow velocities in the HI and HII phases of the interstellar gas in a given galaxy

176: increase with the strength (equivalent width) of the absorption

177: feature and not with the ionization potential of the species. The strong lines often have profiles

178: consisting of a broad and optically-thick component centered near the galaxy systemic velocity

179: and weaker but highly blue-shifted absorption.

180: This suggests that

181: the outflowing gas with high velocity has a lower column density than the more quiescent

182: gas, and can only be readily detected in the strongest absorption lines.

183: From direct observations below the Lyman edge in the galaxy rest-frame, we find no evidence of Lyman continuum 

184: radiation escaping from any of the

185: galaxies in the sample.  Moreover, the small escape fraction of light

186: in the center of the strong \cii\ absorption feature confirms the high opacity

187: below the Lyman limit in the neutral ISM. The absolute fraction of escaping Lyman continuum photons is typically $<$1\%. 

188: This sample provides a unique window on the global properties

189: of local star-forming galaxies as observed in the far-UV

190: and also provides a useful comparison sample 

191: for understanding spectra of high redshift star-forming galaxies.

192: 

193: 

194: \end{abstract}

195: 

196: 

197: \keywords{ galaxies: starburst  ---

198:              galaxies: halos ---

199:              UV: galaxies ---

200:              galaxies: individual (Haro11)

201:              galaxies: individual (VV114)

202:              galaxies: individual (NGC1140)

203:              galaxies: individual (SBS0335-052)

204:              galaxies: individual (TOL0440-381)

205:              galaxies: individual (NGC1705)

206:              galaxies: individual (NGC1741)

207:              galaxies: individual (IZW18)

208:              galaxies: individual (NGC3310)

209:              galaxies: individual (Haro3)

210:              galaxies: individual (NGC3690)

211:              galaxies: individual (NGC4214)

212:              galaxies: individual (MRK54)

213:              galaxies: individual (IRAS19245-4140)

214:              galaxies: individual (NGC7673)

215:              galaxies: individual (NGC7714)}

216: 

217: \section{Introduction}

218: 

219: While $\Lambda$CDM  simulations

220: of a universe dominated by dark matter and

221: dark energy have led to a robust understanding

222: of the large scale structure of the universe,

223: many questions remain when studying

224: smaller scales where 

225: baryonic physics become important \citep{rob05,som99,ben03}. 

226: Thus, understanding the interplay

227: between a galaxy's components (e.g. gas, stars, radiation, 

228: black holes) and its environment is an important next step

229: for cosmology studies.

230: 

231: In particular, feedback on the surrounding gas-phase baryons provided

232: by massive stars is believed to play a major role

233: in the formation and evolution of galaxies. Starburst driven

234: galactic winds are the most obvious manifestation of these processes.

235: These ``superwinds'' appear to be omnipresent

236: in galaxies with star formation rates (SFR)

237: per unit area $\Sigma_\ast \gtrsim 

238: 10^{-1}\,\rm{M_\odot\,yr^{-1}\,kpc^{-2}}$ \citep{heck03}.

239: Locally, these starbursts alone account for

240: roughly 20\% of the high-mass star formation and 

241: 10\% of the radiant energy production 

242: \citep{heck05}.  Powered by supernovae and

243: stellar winds these outflows

244: drive gas, dust, energy, and metals out of galaxies 

245: and possibly into the inter-galactic medium \citep[IGM,][]{heck98,veill05}.  

246: The higher overall star-formation rates at

247: $z\sim1$ and above \citep{bunk04,hop06}

248: imply that star-formation driven winds

249: are even more important in the early universe.

250: Such winds at high redshift almost

251: certainly had a profound

252: impact on the energetics, ionization, and chemical composition

253: of the IGM \citep{ag05}. 

254: 

255: Lyman break galaxies  \citep[LBGs,][]{steid99} are the most widely

256: studied population of high redshift

257: star forming galaxies as they can be efficiently

258: selected using the Lyman-break dropout technique.

259: Rest frame UV spectroscopy of LBGs have shown that

260: starburst driven galactic winds appear to be a

261: ubiquitous property of LBGs \citep{shap03}. 

262: During the cosmological important

263: epoch of $z\sim2-4$ LBGs constitute a 

264: significant (and possibly dominant) fraction 

265: of the population of star forming galaxies  \citep{peac00}.

266: 

267: Studies of the outflows in star forming galaxies are complicated by their

268: multiphase nature \citep{strick04b}. 

269: The mechanical energy from the supernovae and stellar winds 

270: create an over-pressurized cavity of hot gas at  $\sim10^8$ K \citep{chev85}. 

271: The hot gas expands

272: and cools adiabatically as it

273: accelerates into lower pressure regions.  

274: Shock fronts form at the interface between the hot outflowing gas

275: and the ambient material \citep{strick00}.  Some of this ambient material

276: is subsequently swept up into the outflow itself.  Unfortunately, 

277: directly studying the hot wind fluid is only possible in a

278: few local galaxies \citep[e.g.][]{strick07} due to the low emissivity of the hot gas

279: and observational constraints in the hard X-ray band.  

280: Observations

281: then of superwinds focus on either material entrained 

282: in the wind fluid 

283: (e.g. neutral, ionized, molecular gas and dust) or created through

284: the interface between the hot wind and the ambient 

285: material \citep{marc05}.

286: 

287: The coronal 

288: gas ($T \sim 10^5 - 10^6$ K) observed in galactic

289: winds is of particular importance.

290: This phase is  intimately connected to the mechanical/thermal energy that drives the 

291: outflows and places important limits on the cooling efficiency of the outflow.

292: The coronal phase is probed through observations of the \oviww\, 

293: doublet found in the rest frame FUV.  Unfortunately, observations of this

294: wavelength regime in LBGs are generally limited by  

295: its location deep within the Lyman $\alpha$ forest.

296: Our knowledge of the properties of the 

297: winds in LBGs is generally then limited to what can be inferred from 

298: the interstellar UV absorption lines longward of Lyman $\alpha$. 

299: 

300: Studies of local star-forming galaxies in this wavelength regime

301: have been limited by UV absorption in the Earth's atmosphere.  

302: Hopkins ultraviolet telescope (HUT) observations of star forming galaxies

303: analyzed by \citet{leith02} probed the 912-1800 \AA\, regime but with very low spectral resolution.

304: \citet{heck98} studied a large sample of 45 starburst galaxies 

305: using the {\sl International Ultraviolet Explorer} (IUE)

306: with similarly low resolution and wavelength coverage only longward of about 1150 \ang.  

307: HST UV ($>1215$ \AA) spectral studies have also been undertaken \citep[e.g.][]{vaz05,schwa06}

308: although they focus primarily on specific star clusters given the 

309: small spectroscopic apertures of {\sl HST}.  

310: 

311: The situation changed however with the launch

312: of the {\it Far-ultraviolet Spectrographic Explorer} (\fu) 

313: in 1999.  \fu\, provides high resolution spectroscopy

314: with an aperture that is well matched to observing 

315: global FUV properties of local star-forming galaxies.

316: Two previous works using overlapping data sets have used \fu\ to study

317: dust attenuation in the FUV \citep{buat02} and

318: stellar populations \citep{pell07}.

319: However, 

320: while several previous works have studied specific galaxies

321: with \fu\,\citep[e.g.][]{heck01,al03,hoop03,hoop04,grim05,berg06,grim06},

322: a study of the global properties of outflows in a representative sample of star-forming 

323: galaxies has not previously been undertaken.  

324: 

325: In this paper we will focus on the absorption lines

326: produced by the interstellar medium (ISM) and observed in the \fu\, wavebands.  We will first introduce

327: our sample selection method and analysis techniques in Section \ref{s:fusesampledata}.

328: Next we will discuss the outflow velocity distributions of the

329: various ISM absorption features in Section \ref{s:velvel}.

330: Section \ref{s:ovi} focuses on the 

331: different physical origin of the coronal gas as traced by  \ovi.

332: We then compare the outflow velocities and strengths of the

333: absorption features to the physical properties of the galaxies in

334: Sections \ref{s:velsfr} and \ref{s:eqw} respectively.

335: Section \ref{s:lyman} discusses the possible escape of Lyman continuum 

336: emission in local

337: starburst galaxies.

338: 

339: \section{\fu~Observations\label{s:fusesampledata}}

340: 

341: 

342: The \fu\,satellite is 

343: a high resolution spectrometer with sensitivity in

344: the 905 - 1187 \ang\, range.  

345: Four co-aligned  prime focus 

346: telescopes, each with its own Rowland spectrograph,

347: comprise the four \fu\, channels.  Each channel has its own

348: focal plane assembly with four  apertures.  

349: Only two science apertures are relevant to this work, the

350: low-resolution aperture (LWRS; $30\arcsec \times 30\arcsec$)

351: and the medium-resolution aperture (MDRS: $4\arcsec \times 20\arcsec$).

352: Spectral resolution (full width at half maximum) ranges from about $17 \ks$

353: for a point source to about $100 \ks$ for a uniform source filling the LWRS.

354: Two channels have an Al+LiF optical coating while the other two

355: are SiC providing sensitivity for the $\sim$990 - 1187 \ang\, and

356: $\sim$905 - 1070 \ang\, ranges respectively.  The spectra are imaged onto

357: two micro-channel plate (MCP) detectors (1 \& 2) each with two sides (A \& B).  

358: The four channels and two sides to each MCP produce eight individual spectra

359: for every \fu\, observation.  Telescope acquisition and guiding is controlled 

360: by a fine error sensor which is

361: aligned with the LiF 1 channel for the observations in this paper.  

362: 

363: 

364: \subsection{Sample Selection}

365: 

366: One of the primary motivations for this work is to study the properties 

367: of  \ovi\, absorption in star-forming galaxies.

368: The \ovi\, feature is actually a doublet at 1032 and 1038 \ang.

369: In our galaxies the feature is optically thin, and the $\lambda$1038 line will be half

370: as strong as the $\lambda$1032 line. Since the weaker $\lambda$1038 line is severely blended

371: with \ciiw\, and \oibw, we do not attempt to measure it in our spectra.

372: Therefore, our sample selection is driven by the desire to

373: pick star-forming galaxies in which we {\it could} detect \oviw.

374: While \oviw\, is generally a prominent feature in these galaxies, it can

375: be very broad and is found in a complicated region of the

376: spectra.   The wavelength region around \oviw\,

377: is particularly intricate due to the presence of several other strong features 

378: most noteably \lybw\, and \ciiw.  More problematically, Milky Way (MW) \ovi\, and \cii\,

379: are strong absorption features that may also fall on the observed redshifted extra-galactic \oviw\, feature.

380: Therefore, we cut galaxies with systemic

381: velocities $\rm{v_{sys}}<600\,\ks$ and $1000<\rm{v_{sys}}<1500\, \ks$

382: as extragalactic \ovi\, would then be blended with the strong

383: Milky Way \ovi\, and \cii\, features respectively.  The two highest redshift galaxies in the 

384: original sample were also dropped as the \ovi\,was shifted onto the gap between the 

385: LiF channels at $\sim$1090\ang.  

386: We also require 

387: S/N $> 4$ in 0.078 \ang\, bins in the LiF 1A galaxy spectrum.  The

388: LiF 1A spectrum is the highest S/N spectrum

389: of the eight spectra that are obtained during every \fu\, exposure.

390: This reduced our sample from the 54 star-forming

391: galaxies we found in the archive to only 15 objects.  We have however made an exception for 

392: one galaxy, NGC 4214.  One of the side-effects of dropping galaxies

393: with $\rm{v_{sys}}<600\,\ks$ is that we dropped a majority of the lower SFR galaxies found in the archive.  

394: In the case of NGC 4214, it is a particularly high quality dataset (S/N=14.6) with sufficiently narrow 

395: absorption features so that they are cleanly separated from the MW features.  We therefore include

396: NGC 4214 in our sample for a total of 16 galaxies.  Table \ref{t:fuselumins} lists

397: the galaxies in our sample along with many of their physical properties.  

398: 

399: The \fu\, apertures for these observations are generally pointed directly

400: at the location of the most intense SF in every galaxy.

401: As the FUV emission of most of the starbursts in the sample

402: is strongly peaked near the galaxy center,

403: the LWRS aperture includes the majority of the FUV emission

404: for each galaxy.  We are therefore probing the FUV properties

405: of the entire galaxy, similar to observations of high redshift LBGs.

406: The lone MDRS pointing, NGC\,7714 has a compact nuclear starburst

407: so that the majority of FUV emission of the galaxy is enclosed even in the smaller

408: aperture.  We have overlaid the \fu\,aperture and orientation on FUV or UV images for

409: 15 of the galaxies in this sample in Figures \ref{f:images1} and \ref{f:images2}.  \tol\,

410: has been excluded as a UV image of that object is not available.  

411: All of the images in this sample are continuum UV images although the majority are at significantly

412:  longer wavelengths than our \fu\, spectroscopy.  Most of the images are {\sl HST} WFPC 

413:  using either the  F255W ($\lambda_c=2599$\,\AA), F300W ($\lambda_c=2987$\,\AA), or F336W 

414:  ($\lambda_c=3344$\,\AA) filters.  All but three of the images are from high spatial resolution

415:  {\it HST} instruments with the exception of the low resolution images of Mrk\,54 

416:  (SDSS U-Band), NGC\,4214 ({\it GALEX} NUV), and Haro\,3 ({\it GALEX} NUV).  

417:  A logarithmic image scaling has been used to highlight the various features

418:  of these galaxies although it does somewhat misrepresent the relative strength

419:  of the central features.  Specifically, only NGC\,3310 has significant extended emission

420:  outside of the central regions of the \fu\,aperture.

421:  

422:  The selected galaxies in our sample represent a wide range in galaxy types

423:  and properties.  The galaxies span over two orders of magnitude in 

424:  stellar mass and nearly three orders of magnitude in SFR.  We have included several dwarf galaxies (e.g. \izw, NGC\,4214,

425:  NGC\,1705), spirals (NGC\,3310, NGC\,7714), compact ultraviolet luminous galaxies 

426:  (UVLG; \vv, \hoo, Mrk\,54), and highly IR-luminous mergers (NGC\,3690, \vv).  

427:  The UVLGs are of particular interest due to their 

428:  strong similarities to LBGs in terms of their masses, UV luminosities, and

429:  UV surface brightnesses \citep{heck05,hoop06,over08}.  

430:  

431:  %Mrk\,54 is also probably an LBG analogue although

432:  %it's lack of SDSS spectroscopy precluded it from inclusion in the catalog

433:  %by \citet{hoop06}.  It is  very UV luminous 

434:  %($\rm L_{UV}\sim5\times10^{10}\,L_\odot$) and has a high

435:  %UV surface brightness ($\rm I_{UV}\sim3.2\times10^{9}\,L_\odot\,kpc^{-2}$) 

436: % which match the UVLG selection criteria.

437: 

438: 

439: 

440: \subsection{Data Reduction}

441: 

442: We have chosen to use a consistent data

443: reduction method throughout the sample aimed at maximizing S/N.  

444: This method involves several extra analysis steps 

445: but provides superior data quality compared

446: to the standard data reduction method for the targets in our sample.

447: While some of the observations have high

448: S/N ratios in the LiF channels, the lower effective area SiC 

449: channels are almost always relatively low S/N.  Our study focuses principally 

450: on the LiF channel data

451: but we use the SiC data for measuring the very strong \ciiiw\,absorption line and

452: investigating possible escaping Lyman continuum emission.

453: 

454: The first step was to run all  raw exposure data through the CalFUSE 3.1.8 

455: data pipeline to produce intermediate data (IDF) files.

456: We then extracted all eight flux calibrated spectra for every \fu\, exposure.  

457: See \citet{dix07} for a complete discussion of the calibrations and corrections applied 

458: to the data.  Mirror misalignment and thermally-induced

459: rotations of the spectrograph gratings cause

460: small zero point shifts in the wavelength calibration.  

461: Therefore we cross calibrate the flux calibrated exposures

462: to determine the individual zero-point wavelength

463: shifts.  Given that most of our observations

464: are relatively low S/N spectra of extended sources

465: it is difficult to accurately determine many of these wavelength offsets.

466: We subsequently have chosen conservative offsets.

467: A histogram of the offsets used for all of the individual exposures in

468: shown in  Figure \ref{f:wlshifts}.  The majority of the offsets are 

469: $< 0.013$ \ang\, ($< 4\, \ks$) which is significantly less than the wavelength inaccuracies

470: caused by localized distortions of the detector (0.025 \ang\, $\sim 8\, \ks$).  

471: 

472: After determining the wavelength offset for each individual spectra we retroactively apply

473: the correction to the individual IDF files.  

474: We also examine the count rates of the individual exposures

475: and throw out the exposures with significant discrepancies.

476: These variations are usually caused by misalignment of a mirror

477: on the target.  The IDF files for each exposure are then combined

478: to create one total IDF file for each channel.  

479: We then re-extract a combined flux calibrated spectrum which

480: also has the zero-point wavelength corrections applied.  More

481: importantly, however, the  longer, combined IDF files 

482: allow the CalFUSE pipeline to do an improved background subtraction.

483: In particular, the pipeline fits the various backgrounds (e.g. detector, airglow, and geo-coronal

484: scattered light).  For the shorter, individual exposures it simply scales the background

485: files by exposure time when extracting flux calibrated spectra.  

486: As there can be significant background variations, exposure time

487: scaling can introduce significant background subtraction errors.

488: The backgrounds

489: dominate the signal for many of these spectra so that errors in the background subtraction

490: introduces systematic offsets in the flux scale.  Even when using

491: background fitting, these systematic offsets can still be seen in many

492: of the low S/N SiC spectra.

493: 

494: In order to minimize the detector background, we have extracted our

495: spectra using the smaller, point source detector regions \citep{dix07} for 

496: all objects in our sample with the exception of NGC\,1705, NGC\,3310, and NGC\,4214.

497: A visual examination of the 2-D detector images shows that these three

498: galaxies have source counts falling outside of the point source aperture.  

499: These are the three highest flux galaxies within our sample.

500: Figure \ref{f:images1} suggests

501: that at least for NGC\,3310, the galaxy has considerable extent within the

502: \fu\, aperture. By using the smaller point 

503: source region for the remaining 14 galaxies we include

504: the same amount of source flux but minimize the included background.

505: 

506: For galaxies which contain  a significant fraction of night only data, 

507: we have thrown out the daytime data.  Significant airglow features contaminate

508: the day time spectra and are best avoided whenever possible.  Table \ref{t:fusesample}

509: lists the \fu\, observational data for all of the galaxies included in our sample.

510: 

511: \subsection{Data}

512: 

513: The SiC 2A, LiF 1A, and LiF 2A spectra for every galaxy

514: in our sample are shown in Figures \ref{f:Haro11spec} - \ref{f:NGC7714spec}. 

515: These channels cover most of the wavelength

516: regime between 920 - 1180 \ang.  We use LiF 2B for these panels instead of LiF 1B

517: as it is rarely affected by the ``worm''.  The ``worm'' is depression in the observed flux

518: that can span over 50 \ang\,in length \citep{dix07}.

519: Shadowing by a grid of quantum efficiency wires where the secondary focus falls above the detectors and close to the location of the wires causes these observed drops in flux.

520: This feature is seen in almost all of the

521: LiF 1B spectra in our sample but does not affect any of the other channels.

522: 

523:  Most of the common MW, galactic, and airglow features are

524:  marked on these figures.  The galactic absorption lines probe the stellar 

525:  population, interstellar medium (ISM), and outflowing gas.  

526:  \htwo, usually of MW origin, is present in many of the galaxies

527:  and is a significant hurdle in identifying and fitting many of the 

528:  weaker ISM absorption features.

529: 

530: \subsubsection{Gaussian Fits\label{s:gaussian}}

531: 

532: We have fit absorption lines to most of the most 

533: prominent features using the \iraf\, \citep{tod96}

534:  tool {\it specfit} \citep{kriss94}.  We have not attempted

535:  to fit every possible feature but have instead focused on

536:  the strongest, separable lines that we

537:  positively identify (this can be particularly difficult in

538:  galaxies contaminated by MW \htwo).

539:  Each line was fit using a freely varying powerlaw for 

540:  the continuum and a symmetric gaussian absorption line.  

541:  When absorption lines 

542:  are  blended (e.g. \ion{O}{1}~$\lambda$989 and \ion{N}{3}~$\lambda$990) we 

543:  fit them simultaneously. Due to the differences in the redshifts of the

544: galaxies (and hence differing degrees of blending or contamination by 

545: lines due to the Milky Way), it was not possible to consistently define

546: the spectral windows over which the adjacent continuum was fit for any given

547: absorption feature.

548: 

549: We note that the compact UV sizes of most of these galaxies implies

550: that the velocity resolution in our spectra willi typically  be roughly $20 \ks$ (FWHM).

551: The worst resolution will be for NGC 3310, which based on its angular size

552: we estimate will be about $60 \ks$. In all cases, the observed absorption-lines

553: are well-resolved. 

554: 

555:  For the majority of absorption lines we have used the LiF 

556: channels to make two independent measurements of the equivalent width, velocity, and 

557: full-width half-maximum (FWHM).  For lines with only one

558: measurement, the line either fell in the gap between LiF 

559: channels or was in the region (1125-1160\AA) 

560: affected by the worm on the LiF 1B channel.  

561: We have generally ignored the SiC channels above 1000 \AA\,

562: due to their lower S/N.  The results of our fits are listed in Tables 

563: \ref{t:HARO11dat} - \ref{t:NGC7714da}.

564: 

565: 

566: The listed statistical errors are $1\sigma$ and are

567: calculated from the minimization error matrix which is 

568: re-scaled by the reduced $\chi^2$ value 

569: \citep{kriss94}.  Systematic errors are probably not

570: large in the FWHM measurement but may 

571: be important to the equivalent width and centroid velocity.

572: The equivalent width determination is largely a problem for

573: saturated lines in low S/N spectra.  Background over-subtraction

574: is a common problem for these spectra so it is difficult

575: to determine the continuum level and flux zero point. 

576: Systematic wavelength calibration errors exist and are particularly

577: hard to quantify for our extended sources using the LWRS aperture.  

578: \citet{dix07} suggest that they are order 10 \kms\, which seems

579: consistent with the observed variations in our results.  

580: A comparison of the derived parameters for 

581: features with data on two LiF channels shows broad agreement,

582: generally well within the $1\sigma$ error bars as  expected.

583: In these cases, we have used the error

584: weighted value to create a single measurement for the analysis that follows.

585: 

586: Close up plots of six strong absorption features for all

587: 16 galaxies are shown in Figures \ref{f:Haro11lines} -

588:  \ref{f:NGC7714lines}.   The plots focus

589: on the ISM absorption lines observed in almost all of the

590: spectra, specifically \oviw, \ciiw, \ciiiw, \oiaw, \niiw, and \oibw.  

591: We have displayed these spectra even when the

592: absorption feature was not observed.  MW ISM contamination, 

593: \htwo, airglow, instrument coverage gaps, and signal quality play an

594: important role in which features are actually detected.  Line blending is also 

595: important most particularly for \oiaw\, as it falls right next to the  

596: strong \niiiw \, feature.

597: 

598: Another potentially problematic blending is 

599:  \ciiiw\, with \oicw.  However,

600:  we have checked the significance of the contamination

601:  by modeling the \oicw\, line using our gaussian fits to \oibw.  From 

602:  \citet{mort91} we expect \oicw\, to be a factor of 2.7 weaker 

603:  than \oibw\, for an optically thin feature.  In Figure \ref{f:oi976} we have overlayed

604:  an \oicw\,absorption feature with the same velocity and FWHM

605:  as the \oibw\, profile but we have lowered the equivalent width by 

606:  a factor of 2.7 for NGC 1140 and NGC 3310.   As shown in these plots, 

607:  this feature is significantly weaker

608:  than the observed \ciiiw\, profile.

609:  Fitting these profile with the \oicw\, contribution

610:  does not change the derived equivalent widths,

611:  centroid velocities, and FWHMs in a 

612:  significant manner.  The largest percentage change is

613:  seen in the FWHMs which lower by

614:  12 and 11 \kms\, for NGC 1140 and NGC 3310 respectively.

615:  This is only 25\% of the $1\sigma$ statistical error.  

616: We therefore conclude that the weak \oicw\, is not significantly

617: affecting our fits to the \ciiiw\, profile.  

618: 

619: 

620: The strength of the absorption lines varies widely across the sample.  

621: As discussed in our previous work \citet{grim06}

622: and \citet{grim07}, most of the strong  absorption line profiles

623: are non-gaussian.  The absorption profiles

624: frequently show significant structure suggesting

625: that in many cases these are an

626: aggregate profile representing

627: multiple absorbers spread throughout

628: the galaxy's ISM and starburst driven outflow.  

629: Many of the profiles are asymmetric, with stronger absorption on the 

630: blueward side of the line core.  This is consistent with absorbing gas

631: entrained in and accelerated by an outflowing wind fluid.

632: 

633: In our previous work we have successfully modeled many of

634: the stronger lines with two gaussian component fits.  Physically, for both

635: \hoo\, and \vv\, the stronger gaussian was associated with the host galaxy ISM while

636: the blueshifted gaussian represented outflowing gas at several hundred \kms.

637: For this work, covering a wide range of galaxy star formation rates 

638: and data quality, a multiple component fit is not feasible.

639: Therefore, we have used two additional methods to study the strongest

640: absorbers in our sample.

641: 

642: \subsubsection{Apparent Optical Depth Method}

643: 

644: 

645: For \oviw\, we use the apparent optical depth

646: method as described in \citet{sem03}.  This method assumes

647: that the \ovi\, absorption features are not saturated - 

648: which is consistent with the observed \ovi\, profiles.  

649: The apparent column density as a function of velocity is given by

650: \begin{equation}

651: {\rm N_a}(\nu)=\frac{\tau_{\rm a}(\nu)}{f \lambda}\frac{m_e c}{\pi e^2}=

652: 3.768\times10^{14}\frac{\tau_{\rm a}(\nu)}{f \lambda({\rm \AA})}

653: \end{equation}

654: where 

655: \begin{equation}

656: \rm{

657: \tau_a(\nu)=-\ln [I_{obs}(\nu)/I_0(\nu)].}

658: \end{equation}

659: $\rm{I_0(\nu)}$ is the continuum intensity while 

660: $\rm{I_{obs}(\nu)}$ is the observed line intensity.

661: The \ovi\, line profiles in Figures \ref{f:Haro11lines} - \ref{f:NGC7714lines}

662:  show that the line is clearly resolved

663: when present.  Therefore we can

664: obtain the column density by integrating over velocities

665: as $\rm{N}=\int\rm{N(\nu)} d\nu=\int\rm{N_a(\nu)} d\nu$.

666: The apparent optical depth method also allows us to calculate

667: the velocity centroid and line width using

668: $\bar{\nu}=\int\nu\tau_{\rm a}(\nu)d\nu/\int\tau_{\rm a}(\nu)d\nu$

669: and 

670: $b=[2 \int (\nu - \bar{\nu})^2 \tau_{\rm a}(\nu)d\nu/\int\tau_{\rm a}(\nu)d\nu]^{\onehalf}$

671: respectively.  Table \ref{t:fuseovi} lists our results.    

672: 

673: In our previous work we have calculated the \ovi\, parameters for 

674: \vv\, and \hoo\, from gaussian fits.  For \vv\, these two methods

675: are in excellent agreement as we had found

676: \novi\, $\sim2.0\times10^{15}\,{\rm cm^{-2}}$ while we now calculate

677: \novi\, $\sim2.2\times10^{15}\,{\rm cm^{-2}}$ using the apparent 

678: optical depth measurement.  These results are consistent 

679: because the \ovi\, profile shape is approximately gaussian for \vv \,(see Figure \ref{f:VV114lines}).

680: We find however a larger discrepancy for \hoo\, with

681: \novi\, $\sim4.2\times10^{14}\,{\rm cm^{-2}}$

682: and \novi\, $\sim8.0\times10^{14}\,{\rm cm^{-2}}$

683: for the gaussian and apparent optical depth methods respectively.

684: For \hoo\, (Figure \ref{f:Haro11lines}), a multicomponent profile is observed.

685: In this case the apparent

686: optical depth method better includes the extended blue wing.  We also now derive

687: a larger absorption line width and a more blueshifted

688: velocity centroid, consistent with a significant

689: contribution from the  extended blue wing

690: of the absorption profile.  

691: The apparent optical depth method 

692: provides a significant improvement over gaussian profiling

693: for \ovi\, and is applicable as \ovi\, is not saturated or blended 

694: significantly with other lines (partly due to our sample selection).

695: Table \ref{t:fuseovi} does not include

696: four galaxies. For NGC\,1140, \izw, and \iron\, 

697: we do not positively detect \ovi\, absorption.  

698: In \tol\, the \ovi\ is a broad, shallow feature

699: making it impossible to reliably estimate the velocity limits

700: over which the above integral should be performed.

701: 

702: \subsubsection{Non-parametric Equivalent Widths\label{s:npeqw}}

703: 

704: Several other strong absorbers exist in the spectra 

705: of these star-forming galaxies, specifically

706: \ciiw, \ciiiw, and \niiw.    Unlike \oviw\, however,

707: these lines are frequently saturated at line center and therefore

708: we are unable to apply the apparent optical depth method.

709: We therefore measure the equivalent widths and

710: velocity centroids of these lines using the \iraf\, \citep{tod96}

711: tool {\it splot}.  The procedure subtracts a user defined

712: linear continuum and sums the resulting flux to calculate the

713: equivalent width.  The comparably strong \oiaw\, and

714: \niiiw\, lines are frequently blended, so 

715: these lines have been excluded from the procedure.

716: Our results are listed in Table \ref{t:fusesplot}.  

717: These lines are frequently saturated, particularly

718: \ciii\, and \cii\,, so the equivalent widths are essentially just a measure

719: of how broad the absorption feature is.

720: 

721: We have also compared the non-parametric equivalent widths, centroids, and widths

722: with those derived from our previous gaussian fits in Section \ref{s:gaussian}.  There is broad

723: agreement for the derived values using the \cii\, and \nii\,features.

724: The principal outliers are the \cii\, centroid velocities for some of the galaxies with

725: higher SFR ($>$ a few $\rm10^{10}\,L_\odot$) where the 

726: outflow velocities are found to be higher from the non-parametric fits. 

727: In the case of \ciii, there is a systematic shift to higher outflow velocities for

728: the non-parametric values.  This is observed in almost all

729: of the galaxies in our sample not just in the galaxies with higher SFR.  

730: These findings are consistent with

731: our motivation for using a non-parametric method to measure

732: these absorption features.  Specifically, as line

733: strengths increase the absorption features are found to be

734: increasingly non-gaussian and blue-asymmetric.

735: 

736: For the analysis that follows unless otherwise stated, 

737: we use these non-parametric measurements for the \ciii, \cii, and \nii\, features.

738: For \ovi\, we use the results derived from the apparent optical depth method and for

739: the remaining lines we use the gaussian data.

740: 

741: \section{Discussion}

742: 

743: This paper is intended to be a general study of 

744: the FUV properties of starburst galaxies.  

745: As stated previously, we will focus on the strongest

746: ISM absorption features in order to include

747: the majority of galaxies in our sample.  In particular,

748: we will focus on the following

749: lines:  \oviw, \ciiiw, \sthw, \niiw, \ciiw, \oibw.  These lines

750: are detected and measured throughout most of our sample.

751: They also represent three different phases of the ISM - coronal (\ovi), HII (\ciii, \sth, \nii) 

752: and HI (\cii, \oi).

753: 

754: \subsection{Outflow Velocity Distributions\label{s:velvel}}

755: 

756: In Figure \ref{f:velhist} we have plotted histograms of the

757: relative velocities for the strongest of these absorption features.

758: These lines are listed in order of increasing ionization

759: potential.  With the exception of the neutral oxygen ion, the other

760: absorption features show the presence of outflows

761: ranging up to a few hundred \kms. 

762: As the ionization state increases 

763: the lines generally have

764: larger outflow velocities.  The sole

765: exception is \cii\, which is mildly

766: more blueshifted than \nii.  The \ciii\, and \ovi\, lines however

767: are significantly more blueshifted than the two 

768: lower ionization state ions.

769: 

770: In Figure \ref{f:velvel} we have directly compared the

771: velocities of these absorption features.

772: The left panel shows \cii\, versus \nii\,outflow velocity

773: while the right panel is \ciii\, versus \ovi.  For the majority

774: of galaxies in our sample, \cii\, is clearly

775: more blueshifted than \nii.  Similarly, \ovi\, has an higher outflow 

776: velocity than \ciii.  This confirms the pattern seen in

777: Figure \ref{f:velhist}.

778: 

779: As we have previously discussed, the

780: \ovi\, line (unlike \ciii, \cii, and \nii) 

781: is not saturated for any of the galaxies in our sample.

782: Moreover, an examination of the

783: \ovi\, profile shape suggests a different origin for this feature.

784: The strongest part

785: of the \ovi\ profile is blueshifted, and the absorption at or near the

786: galaxy systemic velocity is weaker. In contrast, the

787:  \ciii, \cii, and \nii\, lines are broad with extended blueshifted wings,

788: and have the strongest absorption (the line core)

789: at or near the galaxy's systemic velocity. Furthermore, the maxiumum outflow speed (defined

790: by the blueward extent of the absorption-line profile) is similar for \ovi\,

791: and \ciii. 

792: 

793: Thus, the gas traced by the \ovi\, line

794: appears to be primarily in the outflow rather than in the quiescent ISM,

795: while the lower ionization lines are produced by both. 

796: This difference is not surprising since \ovi\ has a much higher 

797: ionization potential and is produced in

798: significantly higher temperature gas.  

799: We will discuss this further in Section \ref{s:ovi}.

800: 

801: Several previous studies have suggested that the measured outflow 

802: velocities increase with the ionization potential of the species in starbursts.

803: \citet{vaz04} used {\sl HST STIS} spectroscopy of 

804: NGC 1705 (also represented in our \fu\, sample)

805: and found that several high ionization lines 

806: had higher outflow speeds.   

807: \citet{schwa06} similarly used {\sl HST STIS}

808: to observe starclusters in 17 star-forming galaxies 

809: (including NGC 3310 and NGC 1741 also in this work).

810: While \ciibw, \aliiw, and \siiiw\, all trace

811: the neutral hydrogen phase, 

812: they found evidence that \ciibw\,

813: had higher outflow speeds than the two slightly lower

814: ionization features. 

815: We also noticed similar behavior previously

816: when studying the \fu\, observations of Haro 11 

817: \citep[][ \hoo\, is also in this sample]{grim06}.

818: \citet{schwa06} suggest that

819: this could be explained by less dense, hotter

820: gas escaping the starburst region and

821: expanding at a faster speed than the 

822: denser, lower ionization gas.

823: 

824: This picture appears to be different

825: than what is observed in high redshift

826: Lyman break galaxies (LBGs).  

827: \citet{pett02} have examined

828: high quality spectra of the lensed LBG, MS1512-cB58.

829: They found the same velocity distributions

830: for both the low and high ionization features. 

831: Using a composite LBG spectrum, 

832: \citet{shap03}  also found 

833: similar outflow velocities for both

834: the lower and higher ionized absorption features.

835: 

836: As discussed previously \ciii\,, with an ionization potential of 

837: 24.4 eV, has significantly higher outflow velocities than

838: \cii\, (11.3 eV), \nii\, (14.5 eV), and \oi.  

839: This is then consistent with the idea that

840: higher ionization lines have higher outflow velocities.

841: On the other hand, the lower ionization \cii\, has a slightly higher

842: outflow velocity than \nii \,(e.g. left panel of Figure \ref{f:velvel}).

843: To study this further we have plotted the \ciiw\, versus

844: \sthw\, velocities (Figure \ref{f:velsiii}).  \sth\, has a much higher

845: ionization potential (23.3 eV) than \cii\, but is a weaker feature.  It

846: is not saturated and is well fit by a gaussian model (unlike 

847: the stronger features).  \cii, \ciii\, and \nii\, all 

848: have significantly higher

849: outflow velocities than \sth\,, which is not consistent

850: with an increase of velocity with ionization energy.

851: 

852: In Tables \ref{t:HARO11dat} - \ref{t:VV114data} 

853: we listed the absorption

854: features in order of decreasing values of

855: $\log(\lambda f N/N_H)$.  The oscillator 

856: strength ($f$) values are from \citet{mort91} 

857: and solar relative abundances are assumed for $N/N_H$.  

858: While the majority of the galaxies in our

859: sample do not have solar metallicity (Table \ref{t:fuselumins}), 

860: this is still a useful predictor of the relative

861: strengths of the absorption features.  

862: With the exception of \ovi\ (which we have already argued

863: has a different physical origin than the

864: other ISM absorption features) 

865: the values of the equivalent widths

866: follow decreasing $\log(\lambda f N/N_H)$ (see also Table \ref{t:fusesplot}).

867: It is particularly striking that

868: our previous ordering of outflow velocities

869: follows the same general trend as the line strengths.

870: Both outflow velocities and line strengths

871: decrease  from 

872: \ciii, \cii, \nii,  to \oibw.

873: 

874: An examination of the line profiles

875: show that the stronger lines have 

876: extended blue absorption wings.

877: In fact, these extended absorption wings

878: were our prime motivation in using 

879: a non-parametric method for 

880: measuring the equivalents widths

881: and centroid velocities (Section \ref{s:npeqw})

882: of the strongest features.  This was not

883: necessary for the weaker lines like

884: \oibw\, and \sthw\,which are

885: well fit by gaussian modeling.  

886: As the absorption lines increase in strength,

887: the extended blue wing

888: in the absorption-line profile becomes more and more conspicuous.

889: The simplest explanation for this is that

890: the high velocity outflowing gas has a lower column density

891: than the more quiescent gas in the ISM.

892: We therefore only detect the fastest moving gas in the strongest

893: absorption features.   

894: This explanation is consistent with the

895: observations of the LBG cB58 where the stronger lines

896: span progressively broader ranges in velocity \citep{pett02}.

897: It also explains the higher outflow

898: speeds for \ciibw\, relative to \aliiw\, and \siiiw\, \citep{schwa06}

899: as \ciibw\, is the strongest feature.

900: Lastly, in the work by \citet{vaz04}, the

901: lines with the highest measured equivalent widths

902: are preferentially those with the highest

903: ionization energies.  This result

904: thus appears to be consistent

905: throughout a wide range of galaxy types and

906: absorption features.  

907: 

908: This result is particularly relevant to outflow

909: velocities derived in other wavelength regimes.  

910: For example, the \naoww\, doublet has 

911: $\log(\lambda f N/N_H) = - 1.94$, similar to

912: \niiw.

913: This suggests that observations of local outflows using \nai\,

914: absorption are not biased by measuring lower ionic

915: states than the FUV and UV measurements of

916: higher ionization absorption lines.  

917: The derived outflow velocities

918: should be consistent with those of other similarly strong

919: absorption features in the neutral and ionized gas.

920: This could strengthen studies comparing

921: observations of \nai\,absorption in local galaxies with the

922: properties of outflows observed in LBGs. Unfortunately, there

923: is only one galaxy in our sample having published data on the

924: \nai\, absorption feature: NGC~4214 \citep{schwa04}. In this case

925: the agreement is good: they find an outflow speed of 23 $\ks$, while we find 

926: speeds ranging from 0 to 58 $\ks$ depending on the particular line.

927: 

928: \subsection{Origin of \ovi~Absorption\label{s:ovi}}

929: 

930: The \ovi ~line is a particularly interesting one

931: due to its potential importance in radiative cooling and the relatively

932: narrow temperature range over which it is a significant (e.g. $\rm T\sim10^5-10^6\,K$).

933: As we have discussed, the kinematics of the coronal gas as traced by the 

934: \ovi ~absorption line are different from that seen in the cooler gas.  

935: In particular, \ovi\, is the most blueshifted ion and (on kinematic grounds) is located {\sl primarily} 

936: in the outflowing gas and not in

937: galaxy itself.  

938: 

939: Several previous papers have studied \ovi\ in specific galaxies, 

940: e.g. NGC 1705 \citep{heck01}, \vv \, \citep{grim06}, and \hoo\, \citep{grim07}.

941: They attributed the production of  \ovi~

942: to the intermediate temperature regions created by the 

943: hydrodynamical interaction between hot outrushing gas

944: and the cooler denser material seen in H$\alpha$ images. 

945: Such a situation is predicted to be

946: created as an overpressured superbubble 

947: accelerates and then fragments as it expands out of the galaxy

948: and again as the wind encounters ambient clouds in the galaxy halo.

949: 

950: \citet{heck02} derived a simple and general relationship between the \ovi~

951: column density and absorption line width which will hold whenever there 

952: is a radiatively cooling gas flow passing through the coronal

953: temperature regime.  They showed that this simple model accounted for the 

954: properties of \ovi ~ absorption line systems as diverse as clouds in the disk and halo of the

955: Milky Way, high velocity clouds, the Magellanic Clouds, starburst outflows, 

956: and some of the clouds in the IGM.  Using the the values found in Table

957: \ref{t:fuseovi}, in Figure \ref{f:bovi}  we have updated the original plot from \citet{heck02}.

958: Our results for the \ovi\, measured for the galaxies in our sample are fully consistent with

959: the model predictions. The fact that starbursts tend to lie at slightly lower column density than the model

960: predicts is not surprising, given that the model is so generic and idealized (the exact value of the coefficient

961: relating column density to flow speed depends weakly on the exact nature of the flow, as described

962: in Heckman et al. (2002).

963: We conclude that \ovi\, traces radiatively cooling gas produced in an interaction between the

964: hot outrushing gas seen in X-rays and the cool clouds seen in H$\alpha$ emission, and that this is is a generic feature of starburst

965: galaxies.

966: 

967: In the case of NGC~1705 \citet{heck01} showed that the overall mass of the coronal phase gas was significantly

968: smaller than the lower ionization material (by about two orders-of-magnitude). They showed that this is

969: consistent with the picture in which this gas is rapidly cooling (it is transitory). Following \citet{heck01} we

970: can make a rough estimate of the gas mass for our sample of galaxies. This mass is simply the product of

971: the \ovi\, column density, the surface area of the \ovi\ region, and the inverse ratio of \ovi\, to total

972: column. 

973: The most physically plausible idealized geometrical 

974: model is one in which the coronal gas traces the interface between spherically expanding wind and the ambient gas in

975: the galaxy halo. \citet{grim05} found that the wind radius as traced in soft X-ray emission increased systematically

976: with both the star formation rate and galaxy stellar mass. Over the range spanned by our sample, the radius would range

977: from about 0.7 kpc to about 10 kpc. The conversion from \ovi\, to total column density would be factor of about $10^4$

978: for gas in collisional ionization equilibrium at $T = 3 \times 10^5$ K and with a solar oxygen abundance. The implied

979: masses of coronal gas range from about $10^6 M_{\odot}$ for the dwarf starbursts like NGC~1705, NGC~4214, and Haro~3 to

980: about $10^8 M_{\odot}$ for the most powerful starbursts like VV~114 and NGC~3690. 

981: 

982: It is also interesting to note the lack of \ovi\, emission in the sample.

983: While weak \ovi\, emission is observed in \hoo\, \citep{berg06,grim07}

984: there is no

985: convincing evidence for it 

986: in any of the other galaxies in this sample.  

987: Very broad (few thousand km s$^{-1}$) \ovi\, emission features appear in a few of the spectra,

988: consistent with stellar winds in the population of O stars \citep{pell02}.

989: As \ovi\, emission is the dominant

990: cooling mechanism for coronal gas, the general lack of observed emission implies that radiative cooling

991: is not significantly impeding the growth of the outflow.

992: This is true even in the case of \hoo\

993:  \citet{grim07}.

994: They suggested that the \ovi\, emission may not be

995: from coronal gas cooling but instead could be resonant scattering 

996: of far-UV continuum photons 

997: from the starburst off \ovi\, ions in the backside of the galactic wind 

998: traced by the blueshifted \ovi\ absorption.

999: 

1000: \subsection{Dependence of Outflow Velocities on SFR \& Stellar Mass \label{s:velsfr}}

1001: 

1002: In \citet{grim05} we analyzed

1003: \ch\, data of star-forming galaxies ranging

1004: from dwarf starbursts to ultra-luminous

1005: infrared galaxies (ULIRGs).  We showed 

1006: that the temperature of the hot gas was not

1007: dependent upon the galaxy's SFR.

1008: The thermalized X-ray gas is thought

1009: to be produced in a reverse shock

1010: between the hot out-rushing wind fluid

1011: and the ambient material \citep{strick00},

1012: and its temperature is then determined

1013: by the wind outflow velocity.  

1014: Since a relationship between

1015: X-ray temperature and SFR was not observed,

1016: it follows then that

1017: the wind outflow velocity does not depend

1018: on the SFR. 

1019: 

1020: In contrast, \citet{mart05b}, \citet{schwa06}, and \citet{rup05} have shown that 

1021: the outflow speed measured in absorption lines does depend on

1022: the SFR.  \citet{mart05b} and \citet{rup05} 

1023: observed outflows in 

1024: luminous infrared galaxies (LIRGs)

1025: and ULIRGs using the NaI D doublet and found that

1026: the outflow velocities increased with the

1027: SFR up to values of SFR of a few tens M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$.

1028: At higher SFRs (extending up

1029: to several hundred \SFRu),

1030: the relation appears to saturate with  

1031: the outflow velocities no longer increasing.

1032: Similarly, in the STIS starburst sample 

1033: discussed in Section \ref{s:velvel} \citet{schwa06} also 

1034: found that the outflow speeds

1035: increased with the SFR below $\sim$10 \SFRu.

1036: 

1037: \citet{mart05b} suggests that the simplest explanation

1038: is that there is not enough momentum carried by the wind fluid

1039: in the lower SFR galaxies, so that the winds are unable

1040: to accelerate the entrained absorbing material up to the 

1041: velocity of the wind fluid itself. The relation between

1042: SFR and the outflow speed seen in the absorption-lines 

1043: saturates at about 500 $\ks$ \citep{mart05b} and this is reached at

1044: starburst luminosities $sim$ few $\times 10^{11} L_{\odot}$. If the X-ray emission in galactic

1045: winds arises in wind shocks, the observed temperatures of

1046: $kT_X \sim$ 0.3 to 0.7 keV correspond to wind shock speeds of

1047: $\sim$ 500 to 800 $\ks$ \citep{grim05}. This is then compatible

1048: with the idea that at sufficiently high SFR (high enough wind momentum)

1049: the entrained absorbing gas has been accelerated to near the wind speed.

1050: 

1051: %While

1052: %\citet{grim05} did not observe a relationship between

1053: %the SFR and the X-ray temperature, they did

1054: %find a correlation between the mean dust

1055: %temperature  ratio and the X-ray temperature.

1056: %As the FIR emission is 

1057: %reprocessed UV light,  the 

1058: %F60$\micron$/F100$\micron$ ratio

1059: % corresponds to the

1060: %luminosity-weighted mean dust temperature

1061: %which is set by the mean FUV intensity in the

1062: %starburst ($\propto$ SFR per unit area).

1063: %This suggests that regions of high

1064: %density SF could supply enough momentum

1065: %to accelerate the clouds to the terminal velocity

1066: %and depends more on the local SFR density than

1067: %the global SFR.

1068: 

1069: We can check these results with our data. To that end, we will use the sum of the

1070: IRAS IR and \fu\, UV luminosity as our

1071: tracer of the SFR (see Table \ref{t:fuselumins}).

1072: The UV luminosity is based on the 

1073: continuum flux at 1150 \AA \,and is

1074: corrected for Milky Way extinction.

1075: The combined UV and IR luminosity

1076: provides a reasonable estimate of the

1077: intrinsic UV flux of the galaxy, and thus traces

1078: recent SF.  

1079: 

1080: \citet{mart05b} also found that

1081: the outflow velocity increased with the

1082: rotational speed of the galaxy.  This suggests that

1083: faster outflows are found in more massive galaxies.

1084: We check this correlation using the near-infrared luminosity of the galaxy

1085: ($\rm L_K$) as a proxy for stellar mass.

1086: The K-Band Cousins-Glass-Johnson (CGJ) luminosities are derived

1087: from the 2MASS atlas \citep{jarr03}.  The 2MASS K and J Band

1088: fluxes given in the catalog were converted to K-Band CGJ using the

1089: transformations from \citet{carp01}. We expect the K-band luminosity

1090: to trace the stellar mass to a factor of roughly two (e.g. Leitherer \& Heckman 1995;

1091: Bell \& de Jong 2001; Dasyra et al. 2006).

1092: 

1093: 

1094: We have made no attempt to correct

1095: for the viewing angle dependence of

1096: the outflow velocity.  This is primarily a practical

1097: decision as we 

1098: do not have a robust way of obtaining the

1099: orientation of the outflow in these galaxies.

1100: While this will increase the scatter in our 

1101: outflow velocity plots,  sample

1102: selection effects probably minimize

1103: the resulting damage.

1104: In particular, an edge-on spiral

1105: galaxy would not have had enough FUV flux to meet our

1106: S/N requirements as the disk heavily absorbs

1107: the nuclear starburst (e.g. M\,82).  

1108: Spiral arm features are apparent for

1109: several of the 

1110: galaxies in our sample (Figures 

1111: \ref{f:images1} and \ref{f:images2}) 

1112: suggesting that we are observing the galaxies 

1113: roughly face-on, and hence roughly along the expected outflow

1114: direction.  Several other of the galaxies

1115: have irregular morphologies.  

1116: In these irregular galaxies it is not

1117: at all apparent how inclination angle would be defined.

1118: As an example, \hoo\, has several

1119: regions of intense SF which high resolution

1120: HST ACS imaging suggests 

1121: could be driving multiple outflows.

1122: 

1123: In Figures \ref{f:vovi} and \ref{f:vovi90} we

1124: have plotted the \ovi\, outflow velocity

1125: as a function of the near-IR K-band luminosity

1126: and the UV+IR luminosity, using two measurements

1127: of the outflow velocity. The first plot uses the

1128: median velocity defined by the apparent optical

1129: depth method (e.g. half the absorbing column density

1130: lies on either side of this velocity). The second plot

1131: traces the blueward extent of the outflow (the `maximum'

1132: outflow speed). We define this as that velocity for which

1133: 90\% (10\%) of the absorbing column density lies to the

1134: red (blue). The maximum outflow velocity correlates better

1135: both the K-band and the UV+IR luminosity that does

1136: the median velocity.

1137: For comparison, in Figure \ref{f:vciii}

1138: we have plotted the \ciii\, outflow

1139: velocities (medians) as a function of 2-Mass K-band

1140: and UV+IR luminosity.

1141:  

1142: 

1143: %If we drop the consistently largest outlier in all of these plots (NGC\,3310),

1144: %the Kendall $\tau_a$ coefficients improve significantly and favor

1145: %SFR even more strongly.  We find

1146: %Kendall $\tau_a$ coefficients of 0.87 and 0.73

1147: %for the relation between the \ovi\,outflow

1148: %velocity and the IR+UV and K-band luminosities

1149: %respectively.  While the relationship between SFR and outflow

1150: %velocity appears to be linear, this is not required by the Kendall $\tau$

1151: %statistic.

1152: 

1153: The outflow speed of \ovi\, clearly correlates better with 

1154: with the SFR than does \ciii. The

1155: increase in outflow velocity with increasing SFR is also observed in the other

1156: strong absorption features such as \cii\, and \nii.

1157: We have noted previously that the profile shapes

1158: of these strong lines suggest that there are

1159: two components (higher column density gas at or near the systemic

1160: velocity and lower column density outflowing gas). In contrast,

1161: the \ovi\, absorption seems to originate only in the outflow. This

1162: may explain the stronger correlation ibetween SFR and outflow speed

1163: seen in \ovi.

1164: 

1165: Since the outflow speeds increase with both SFR and stellar mass,

1166: it is instructive to examine the outflow speeds as a function

1167: of the specific SFR (SFR/$M_*$). To do this, we 

1168: have plotted the median \ovi\, and \ciii\,outflow

1169: velocities versus $\rm (L_{IR} + L_{UV})/L_K$ 

1170: in Figure \ref{f:sfrdk}.  

1171: While these plots show a significant amount

1172: of scatter, we see that the

1173: outflow speeds generally increase with the specific SFR.

1174: The \ovi\,outflow velocity correlates

1175: more strongly with $\rm (L_{IR} + L_{UV})/L_K$

1176: than does the \ciii\,velocity.

1177: As previously discussed, the properties of \ovi\,are closely tied

1178: to the wind and thus presumably to the SFR.  

1179: 

1180: 

1181: The case of NGC\,3310 requires further discussion as it is a significant outlier

1182: in most of our plots, with an outflow speed that is larger than expected for

1183: its SFR or mass.  We note that the very large outflow speeds we see have been

1184: confirmed with STIS far-UV spectra of three individual regions in NGC 3310 (Schwartz et al. 2006).  

1185: Examining the UV morphology of NGC\,3310 in Figure \ref{f:images1},

1186: we see that NGC\,3310 is the only galaxy with significant star formation

1187: spread throughout multiple locations in the \fu\, aperture.

1188: Radio HI velocity maps \citep{kreg01} of the regions observed by \fu\, display 

1189: a spread of almost 200 \kms\, which could increase

1190: the observed width of our absorption features, but should not produce

1191: highly blueshifted absorption.

1192: Another way in which NGC\,3310 stands out

1193: within our sample is that it is the highest metallicity galaxy with 

1194: $\rm\log(O/H)+12=9.0$.  

1195: In principle, higher metallicity 

1196: could allow us to probe gas with lower total column density.

1197: However, as we will show below

1198: the strengths of the strong absorption lines do not depend

1199: significantly on metallicty in our sample. 

1200: Thus, this is unlikely  

1201: to explain the large observed outflow speed in NGC\,3310.

1202: 

1203: NGC\,3310 is included in the young stellar population study of 16 starburst galaxies

1204: (11 also in our sample) by \citet{pell07}. By fitting the FUV spectra with models

1205: of instantaneous bursts, they

1206: estimated an 

1207: age of $18\pm2$ Myr for the starburst in NGC\,3310 which was 10 Myrs older

1208: than any of the other galaxies in their sample.

1209: As the Type II supernovae that drive the galactic wind persist for

1210: 40 Myr, the total amount of kinetic energy injected into the wind

1211: will increase as the starburst ages.

1212: NGC\,3310 appears to be a more mature starburst

1213: and may therefore have a more evolved wind.  

1214: 

1215: %Kendall

1216: %L_SFR2          OVIS_v_rel              -0.636363636363636 0.00643509253470606 -2.72474630456533

1217: %L_K             OVIS_v_rel              -0.563636363636364 0.0158067762901434 -2.41334672690072

1218: %L_K             CIII_sys                -0.494505494505495 0.0137580214441065 -2.46352005653112

1219: %L_SFR2          CIII_sys                -0.516483516483517 0.0100818357668983 -2.57300983682139

1220: %

1221: %m1

1222: %L_SFR2          OVIS_v_rel              -0.866666666666667 0.000486164284050915 -3.48826604489967

1223: %L_SFR2          CIII_sys                -0.641025641025641 0.00228503069394462 -3.05044438043281

1224: %L_K             OVIS_v_rel              -0.733333333333333 0.00316122289759884 -2.95160973029972

1225: %L_K             CIII_sys                -0.615384615384615 0.0034068234622997 -2.9284266052155

1226: 

1227: 

1228: \subsection{Absorption-Line Equivalent Widths \label{s:eqw}}

1229: 

1230: It has known for some time that the strengths of the UV interstellar absorption-lines

1231: correlate with other key properties of starbursts. \citet{heck98} used IUE spectra of 45 local starbursts

1232: to show that the equivalent widths of the strongest lines arising in the HI phase of the ISM correlated

1233: postively with the amount of UV extinction and reddening, the galaxy rotation speed and absolute magnitude,

1234: the metallicity, and SFR. Unfortunately, the poor spectral resolution and modest S/N of these spectra

1235: did not allow them to determine the astrophysics underlying these correlations. Because starbursts

1236: in more massive galaxies are known to have higher metallicity \citep{trem04}, higher SFR, and higher extinction \citep{heck98}

1237: it is especially difficult to sort out the fundamental relations from secondary correlations.

1238: 

1239: In general, the equivalent width of an interstellar absorption-line will depend on very different

1240: parameters depending on the optical depth of the line. In the limiting case of optically-thick

1241: gas the equivalent width is set purely by the product of velocity width of the line (the Doppler b-parameter)

1242: and the fraction of the UV continuum source covered by the absorber (the covering factor). In the case

1243: of optically thin gas the equivalent width is determined by the product of the ionic column density,

1244: the oscillator strength of the transition, and the covering factor. In our data we have examples

1245: of both optically thick and optically-thin transitions. Because the optically-thick lines are black

1246: (or nearly so) at line center, we know the covering factor is near unity.

1247: 

1248: We also probe gas spanning a range in ionization potential. We have described the properties of the coronal

1249: gas traced by \ovi\ at some length, so here we will confine our attention to the lines tracing the HI phase (ionization potentials less than

1250: a Rydberg) and the HII phase (ionization potentials between 1 and 4 Rydbergs). For each of these two phase we will use one optically-thick

1251: and one optically-thin line. Hence, 

1252: in Figure \ref{f:eqw} we plot the equivalent widths

1253: of \oibw, \ciiw, \sthw, and \ciiiw\, versus 

1254: gas phase metallicity, K-band luminosity,

1255: and IR+UV luminosity.  The first two lines trace the HI phase, with the \oi\, line being optically-thin and \cii\, optically-thick.

1256: The second two lines trace the HII phase, with the \sth\, line being optically-thin and \ciii\, optically-thick.

1257: 

1258: In fact, the only pattern that emerges is that the poorest correlations are those between

1259: the equivalent widths of the lines tracing the HII phase (the \ciii\, and sthw\, lines) and the metallicity (Kendall $\tau_a=0.38$ and 0.44

1260: respectively). All the other correlations are of comparable strength (Kendall $\tau_a=0.56$ to 0.75). This may reflect the relatively

1261: small sample size and the fact that the different starburst propertiues are interconnected:

1262: galaxies with higher masses will

1263: have higher velocity dispersions, higher SFRs, and higher metallicity.

1264: 

1265: %For the lower ionic states (\oi \,and \cii)

1266: %the gas phase oxygen abundance traces the 

1267: %strength of the absorption features.  Similarly, the

1268: %K-band also follows the strength of the lines with 

1269: %less scatter than the IR+UV luminosity.  

1270: %This is also confirmed by the Kendall $\tau$

1271: %coefficient which equally prefers the K-Band and metallicity ($\sim\tau_a=0.71$) 

1272: %over SFR ($\tau_a=0.58$).

1273: %This is likely a corollary of the mass-metallicity

1274: %relation \citep[e.g.][]{trem04} which 

1275: %shows that higher metallicities are 

1276: %found in higher mass galaxies.  

1277: %Higher equivalent width measurements

1278: %would be expected for larger galaxies and,

1279: %as larger galaxies have higher metallicities in general,

1280: %metallicity  should also correlate with the equivalent width.

1281: 

1282: 

1283: %The equivalent widths of the higher ionic states, \sth\, and \ciii\,

1284: %however poorly match the gas phase oxygen 

1285: %abundance ($\tau_a=0.41$) and instead

1286: %are correlated with both the stellar mass ($\tau_a=0.66$)

1287: %and SFR ($\tau_a=0.61$).

1288: %This suggests that some mechanism is decoupling the

1289: %metallicities of the higher ionization states from that observed

1290: %in the lower ionizations.  The improved correlations

1291: %of the higher ionization states with SFR suggests

1292: %that SF might play a role but is far from conclusive.

1293: %One possibility is that stellar and supernovae ejecta

1294: %are preferentially enriching higher ionization gas. 

1295: 

1296: 

1297: %L_K             OI1039_EQW              0.688888888888889 0.00555892084110246 2.77272429209974

1298: %L_SFR2          OI1039_EQW              0.6 0.0157372239486099 2.41495341569977

1299: %Z               OI1039_EQW              0.748113400276763 0.000709703970445203 3.38580278183086

1300: 

1301: %L_K             CII_EQW         0.717948717948718 0.000634322243871188 3.41649770608475

1302: %Z               CII_EQW         0.693888666488711 0.000959969767908004 3.30200330200495

1303: %L_SFR2          CII_EQW         0.564102564102564 0.0072662074323389 2.68439105478088

1304: 

1305: 

1306: %L_K             SIII1013_EQW            0.697277051246695 0.00283057865143438 2.98556196500987

1307: %L_SFR2          SIII1013_EQW            0.623879466904938 0.00755598350760698 2.67129228448251

1308: %Z               SIII1013_EQW            0.441979999939274 0.0752503921260919 1.77893518420722

1309: 

1310: %L_K             CIII_EQW                0.615384615384615 0.0034068234622997 2.9284266052155

1311: %Z               CIII_EQW                0.379157861267156 0.0711849273937568 1.80429594883094

1312: %L_SFR2          CIII_EQW                0.58974358974359 0.00500970982232436 2.80640882999819

1313: 

1314: 

1315: \subsection{Lyman Continuum Emission \label{s:lyman}}

1316: 

1317: 

1318: One of the major puzzles in cosmology today is determining

1319: the source of the UV photons required to reionize the universe 

1320: at  redshifts $\rm{6\lesssim z \lesssim 14}$ \citep{fan06}. 

1321: The known population of AGN do not

1322:  appear to be sufficient by a wide margin, and the leading candidates are star

1323: forming galaxies \citep{sti04,pan05}.  While stars in the early

1324: universe are thought be able to produce enough UV photons, 

1325: it is not well understood what fraction of these photons

1326: can escape through the neutral hydrogen gas of the host galaxy \citep{yan04}

1327: into the IGM.  Superwinds, driven by starbursts, may be able to

1328: enhance the fraction of ionizing radiation by clearing channels

1329: through the surrounding gas \citep{dov00}.

1330: 

1331: 

1332: The escape of ionizing continuum radiation from star forming galaxies 

1333: was first observed by \citet{steid01} in a sample of 

1334: $\rm{z\sim 3.4}$ LBGs.  

1335: More recent work by \citet{shap06} focused on deep rest-frame UV spectroscopy 

1336: and found a sample-averaged relative Lyman continuum

1337: escape fraction ($f_{esc}$) of 14\%.  They however detected

1338: Lyman continuum emission in only 2 of the 14 galaxies in

1339: their sample, which suggests that even at high redshifts ($\rm{z\sim3}$)

1340: ionizing radiation is either relatively rare or viewing angle dependent.

1341:  

1342: 

1343: Determining the escape fraction in starburst galaxies

1344: is therefore an important step in evaluating 

1345: the importance of starburst galaxies in reionizing the universe.

1346: Local searches for Lyman continuum emission have so far been inconclusive.

1347:  \citet{leith95} and \citet{hurw97} found $f_{esc}\lesssim\,10\%$ in a galaxy sample

1348:  based on {\it HUT} observationsi and Deharveng et al. (2001) obtained

1349: a similar result for Mrk~54 using \fu. 

1350: Most recently \citet{berg06} published an analysis showing 

1351: the detection of Lyman continuum emission in \hoo.  

1352: We however re-analyzed the same data in

1353: \citet{grim07} and did not find any

1354: convincing evidence of Lyman leakage.  

1355: We showed that uncertainties in the background

1356: subtraction and geocoronal contamination

1357: were larger than any detected signal.

1358: We therefore placed a limit on the escaping Lyman continuum

1359: emission in \hoo\, of $f_{esc}\lesssim\,2\%$.

1360: 

1361: 

1362: 

1363: \subsubsection{Below the Lyman Limit\label{s:belowlyman} in Other Starbursts}

1364: 

1365: We have looked directly for Lyman continuum emission in 

1366: other galaxies observed by \fu.  In order

1367: to move the Lyman limit farther from the

1368: detector edge, we have chosen the nine highest redshift

1369: galaxies in our sample.  

1370: Figures \ref{f:flyc1} and  \ref{f:flyc2} show the

1371: SiC 2A spectra for the nine galaxies plotted

1372: in order of increasing redshift.  While the SiC 1B

1373: spectra also cover this wavelength regime, 

1374: background subtraction problems are even more

1375: severe for the SiC 1B channel. 

1376: In order to minimize 

1377: contamination by dayglow we have plotted the

1378: night only spectra for all of the galaxies with the

1379: exception of \vv.  In the case of \vv, there was 

1380: not enough night time exposure  to exclude the

1381: day observations.

1382: 

1383: We have plotted the spectra in the observed frame

1384: so that airglow features may be more easily identified.  The

1385: intrinsic Lyman continuum region for each galaxy is also 

1386: clearly marked.  Several of the  spectra are very noisy and 

1387: systematic flux offsets caused by background over-subtraction

1388: in the CALFUSE pipeline are observed.  As would

1389: be expected, the background

1390: subtraction problems are much more prevalent in the 

1391: lower S/N spectra , specifically \sbs, \tol, \iron, and NGC\,7673.

1392: A large number of apparent emission features can be observed,

1393: particularly in the wavelength region between 920-930 \AA.

1394: These are easily observed in the day/night spectrum of

1395: \vv\, but also in the night only spectra of \tol.  

1396: These features, while varying widely in

1397: relative strength, are found at the same wavelengths in

1398: most of the spectra.  They are properly identified 

1399: as geocoronal emission features, mostly

1400:  \ion{H}{1}, \ion{O}{1}, \ion{N}{1}, and $\rm{N_2}$.

1401: For comparison, LWRS spectra (SiC 1B) of airglow

1402: and the earth limb are found in Figure \ref{f:airglow}.

1403: The large number of variable  emission

1404: features highlights the difficulty in studying

1405: Lyman continuum emission in this wavelength regime.

1406: 

1407: 

1408: No convincing evidence of Lyman continuum emission is seen in any of the 

1409: nine spectra.  All of the galaxies 

1410: have flat spectra in the Lyman continuum regions with continuum

1411: levels at or below zero.

1412: The spectra with continuum

1413: levels below zero are indicative of  background over-subtraction by

1414: the CALFUSE pipeline.  This is commonly observed in low S/N \fu\,

1415: spectra on the SiC 1B and SiC 2A detectors as discussed previously,

1416: and highlights the difficulty in studying Lyman

1417: continuum emission.  The \fu\, background dominates the signal

1418: in these wavelength regions.

1419: The emission features that are observed

1420: can all be identified as geo-coronal emission, 

1421: with varying strengths in all of the spectra.  

1422: In addition to these extracted spectra,

1423: we have also examined the

1424: 2-D detector images.  A visual inspection of the 2-D spectra

1425: confirm our analysis of the one-dimensional spectra as we do not observe

1426: any evidence of Lyman continuum emission.

1427: 

1428: We have chosen to derive numerical limits for the

1429: five galaxies with S/N$>$5 on the LiF 1A channel.  

1430: We have excluded the lower

1431: S/N galaxies such as \tol\,and \iron\, due to the significant errors

1432: introduced by the background subtraction.  

1433: \iron\, for example,

1434: has a S/N of only 1.3 longward of the Lyman limit on the SiC 2A channel.  

1435: While these errors exist even in the five galaxies with

1436: higher S/N, we can still place meaningful limits on the

1437: Lyman escape fraction.

1438: 

1439: We follow the work of \citet{shap06} in estimating both

1440: the absolute and relative escape fractions. The absolute

1441: escape fraction describes

1442: the fraction of ionizing photons that escape the host galaxy.  The relative escape fraction

1443: neglects the effects of dust extinction and is defined as the percentage of escaping ionizing 

1444: photons relative to escaping non-ionizing FUV photons \citep[1500 \AA, ][]{shap06}.

1445: The relative escape fraction was introduced due to the difficulty in determining the

1446: intrinsic ionizing flux for high-z galaxies.

1447: 

1448: For these five galaxies we have measured an upper limit

1449: to the flux below the Lyman limit in each galaxy.  We have then

1450: converted these to luminosities with 

1451: $\rm L_{esc}\sim\lambda F_\lambda$ ($\lambda$=900 \AA).

1452: From Starburst99 v5.1 \citep{vaz05} we find an intrinsic ratio of

1453: the bolometric to ionizing radiation of   

1454: $\rm L_{bol}/L_{ioniz}\sim7$.  If we assume that the

1455: IR + UV luminosities dominate the bolometric luminosity

1456: as expected in these star-forming galaxies we derive:

1457: 

1458: \begin{equation}

1459: \rm f_{esc,abs}=\frac{L_{esc}}{L_{UV}+L_{IR}}\left(\frac{L_{bol}}{L_{ioniz}}\right)_{intrinsic}.

1460: \end{equation}

1461: 

1462: We slightly modify $\rm f_{esc,rel}$ of \citet{shap06} to use

1463: 1150 \AA\, instead of 1500 \AA\, as our reference wavelength.

1464: These values should be roughly comparable as we would 

1465: expect the intrinsic luminosities of starburst galaxies to be 

1466: comparable at 1150 \AA\, and 1500 \AA\, \citep{leith02}.

1467: We estimate $\rm f_{esc,rel}$ from 

1468: 

1469: \begin{equation}

1470: \rm f_{esc,rel}=\left(\frac{L_{900\, \AA}}{L_{1150\, \AA}}\right)_{obs}

1471: \left(\frac{L_{1150\, \AA}}{L_{900\, \AA}}\right)_{intrinsic}.

1472: \end{equation}

1473: 

1474: We obtain an intrinsic ratio $\rm L_{1150\, \AA}/L_{900\, \AA}\sim4$ from Starburst99. 

1475: The derived values for $\rm f_{esc,rel}$ and $\rm f_{esc,abs}$

1476: are found in Table \ref{t:lylimit}.  The observed fluxes and luminosities have been

1477: corrected for MW extinction using \citet{card89}.

1478: We find $\rm f_{esc,abs}< 0.2-7\%$ and $\rm f_{esc,rel}<9-26\%$

1479: for the galaxies.  The weakest limit, 

1480: $\rm f_{esc,rel}<26\%$, is from \vv\, which is known to contain

1481: strong intrinsic dust attenuation \citep{gold02}.

1482: Our upper limits for $\rm f_{esc,rel}$ are comparable

1483: to the average value of 14 LBGs with $\rm <f_{esc,rel}>\sim14\%$

1484: from \citet{shap06}.  

1485: This average value in the high redshift sample however is dominated by two galaxies

1486: with $\rm f_{esc,rel}>40\%$.  While our low redshift limits are compatible with

1487: the sample averaged values of $\rm f_{esc,rel}$ in LBGs,

1488: our limits show that the extreme Lyman continuum leakage

1489: observed in some LBGs is not observed in our small, local sample.

1490: 

1491: 

1492: 

1493: 

1494: %Here's my suggestion. First of all we need to distinguish between the

1495: %absolute escape fraction (the fraction of all the Lyman cont. photons that

1496: %escape) and what Steidel/Shapley ect call the relative escapre fraction. The

1497: %latter is what they measure. It differs from the absolute escape fraction in

1498: %that it neglects the effects of dust on the escape of the Lyman contiuuum

1499: %and considers only the photoelectic opacity of HI. For a dust-free galaxy

1500: %the two techniques would roughly agree, but of course in many of our objects

1501: %dust extinction is a factor of ten in the FUV.

1502: 

1503: %Here's how I would measure f_esc,abs

1504: 

1505: %1. Measure an upper limit to F_lambda below the Lyman limit for each galaxy

1506: %2. Convert this into a limit on L_esc ~ lambda*P_lambda at ~900A

1507: %3. Then f_esc,abs ~ L_esc/(L_UV+L_IR) * (L_BOL/L_ION)_intrinsic

1508: %4. Starburst99 gives us (L_BOL/L_ION)_intrinsic ~ 7.

1509: 

1510: %For L_esc,rel we can just slightly modify the Steidel/Shapley approach (they

1511: %use 1500A as a reference but we can use ~1150):

1512: 

1513: %F_esc,rel = (L_1150/L_900)_Intrinsic/(f_1150/f_900)_data

1514: 

1515: %This requires that the fluxes and luminosities are measured in the same

1516: %units. Shapley/Steidel use f_nu and L_nu (per Hertz). We can just use f_1150

1517: %and f_900 as fluxes per Angstrom. Then Starburst 99 implies that

1518: %(L_1150/L_900)_intrinsic in units of erg s^-1 Ang^-1 ~ 4. 

1519: 

1520: 

1521: 

1522: \subsubsection{Limits from \cii\label{s:ciilimit}}

1523: 

1524: Given the difficulties in directly observing Lyman continuum emission

1525: on the SiC detectors it is useful to investigate

1526: the Lyman escape fraction using a different method.

1527: Previously, \citet{heck01b} have argued that since the optical depth

1528: at the Lyman edge must be much larger than that of

1529: the optical depth at line center for \cii,

1530: we can then use the 

1531: residual intensity in the core of the  

1532: \cii\, line to place

1533: upper limits on the escape fraction at the Lyman limit.

1534: 

1535: Assuming that \cii\, is the dominant ionic species of carbon

1536: in the \ion{H}{1} phase, \cite{heck01b} derive

1537: \begin{equation}

1538: \tau_{\rm Ly} = 4\times10^{-16}\, (N_H/N_j)\,(b/f\lambda)\, \tau_{\rm C}=8.6\, Z_{\rm C}^{-1}\, (b/100\,\ks)\, \tau_{\rm C}

1539: \label{e:cii}

1540: \end{equation}

1541: where $\rm Z_{C}$ is the gas-phase carbon abundance 

1542: in solar units and $b$ is the Doppler parameter.

1543: In our earlier gaussian fits to \cii, we find that $b$ varies from $\sim65-470\,\ks$.

1544: Using the smallest Doppler parameter and solar abundances we expect the optical

1545: depth at the Lyman edge would be a factor of $\sim5$ times larger than the

1546: \cii\, optical depth.  As the majority of the galaxies in our sample have 

1547: broader lines and sub-solar

1548: abundances, we would expect the Lyman limit optical depth

1549: to be enhanced by an even greater value.

1550: 

1551: An examination of the \cii\, feature for the galaxies in our sample 

1552: (e.g. Figures \ref{f:Haro11lines} - \ref{f:NGC7714lines}) shows that it

1553: is nearly black in almost all cases.  Given our estimates of

1554: the optical depth enhancement expected at the 

1555: Lyman limit, this suggests that none of the galaxies in our sample have

1556: significant amounts of escaping Lyman continuum emission.

1557: 

1558: The most likely scenario for the escape of Lyman continuum emission

1559: is the picket fence model.  Instead of a uniform slab of hydrogen surrounding

1560: a galaxy, holes in the gas surrounding the galaxy would allow ionizing photons

1561: to escape into the IGM.  Starburst driven outflows could, for example,

1562: create ``tunnels'' in the surrounding neutral gas. 

1563: The picket fence model would explain the variability

1564: seen in the center of some of the \cii\, features.  For example,

1565: in Figure \ref{f:VV114lines} of \vv's \cii\, profile a small fraction 

1566: of photons are escaping at 0 \kms\, while the line is completely black

1567: at both $\sim\pm100\,\ks$.  The few galaxies with

1568:  a significant

1569: \cii\, escape fraction stand out due to their low metallicity, 

1570: suggesting that their Lyman continuum

1571: escape fraction would still be very low.

1572: 

1573: We have conservatively estimated the continuum level

1574: and calculated a residual relative intensity

1575: for the \cii\,line center.  We calculate an upper limit to $\rm f_{esc,C II}$ by

1576: finding the upper bound to the normalized residual flux

1577: near line center. 

1578: Only our highest redshift galaxy Mrk 54 has been excluded,

1579: as the \cii\, feature falls in the gap between the LiF channels.

1580: We also estimate upper limits for Lyman continuum emission using 

1581: \flyabs$=\rm f_{esc,C II}\,L_{UV}/(L_{UV}+L_{IR})$ following

1582: the methods of the previous section.  For all but one of the galaxies

1583: in our sample we find \flyabs$\lesssim2\%$.  

1584: 

1585: Using Equation \ref{e:cii} we have also estimated the optical

1586: depth of the Lyman limit using our estimate 

1587: of the \cii\,escape fraction and assuming the slab model

1588: of hydrogen surrounding a galaxy.  The Doppler parameters are found from our

1589: Gaussian fits in Tables \ref{t:HARO11dat} - \ref{t:VV114data}.  As

1590: many of these lines are non-gaussian these must be considered 

1591: only rough estimates.  We have used the gas phase oxygen

1592: metallicities in Table \ref{t:fuselumins} 

1593: for the carbon metallicity and solar oxygen abundances

1594: from \citet{asp05}.  The results can be found in 

1595: Table \ref{t:ciilimit}.  

1596: Our lowest derived optical depth is $\rm \tau_{Ly}\sim20$

1597: found for NGC\,3310 but the majority of galaxies

1598: have $\rm \tau_{Ly}\gtrsim100$.

1599: While these optical depths are only 

1600: rough estimates,  they suggest that the

1601: Lyman limit optical depth is well above the threshold needed to allow

1602: Lyman photons to escape the galaxy in the case of the simple slab model.

1603: 

1604: 

1605: \section{Conclusions}

1606: 

1607: 

1608: Starburst driven outflows are a cosmologically

1609: important example of galactic feedback.

1610: These outflows drive gas, metals, and energy out

1611: of galaxy centers and possibly into the 

1612: IGM.  Outflows in the early universe 

1613: may also blow out ``tunnels''

1614: allowing Lyman continuum photons from stars

1615: to escape the galaxy and reionize the universe.

1616: Studies of these superwinds

1617: are therefore vital to expanding our understanding of galaxy 

1618: formation and evolution.

1619: 

1620: The extreme scale and energetics of starburst driven

1621: outflows complicate studies of their properties.  

1622: Originating as a hot (T $>10^8\,$K) wind fluid,

1623: the outflows expand out into ambient gas of the galaxy and possibly 

1624: beyond.  Shocks, other hydrodynamical interactions, and

1625: entrained ambient gas and dust 

1626: produce a complicated, multiphase outflow

1627: that requires  panchromatic observations to properly characterize it.

1628: 

1629: 

1630: Observations in the FUV play an important role in understanding

1631: outflows as they probe the neutral, ionized, and coronal gas.

1632: This gas traces the interaction between the hot outflowing wind fluid

1633: and the denser ambient ISM.

1634: Unfortunately, due to observational constraints at both

1635: low redshifts (due to UV atmospheric absorption) and high redshifts (due to contamination by the Ly$\alpha$ forest), 

1636: studies at these wavelengths were severely limited until the launch of

1637: the \fu\,satellite in 1999.  As the number of star-forming galaxies observed by \fu\,

1638: has grown, it now possible to study the global properties of these

1639: outflows in the FUV.

1640: 

1641: In this work we have analyzed FUV  spectra of a sample of 16 local, star-forming galaxies

1642: covering almost three orders of magnitude in SFR and over two orders of magnitude in stellar mass.

1643: Interstellar medium absorption and stellar photospheric 

1644: features are observed throughout the

1645: sample of spectra.  The strongest ISM absorption lines are generally blueshifted

1646: by $\sim$ 80 to 300 $\ks$ relative to thge galaxy systemic velocity, implying that galactic outflows are the norm

1647: in starbursts.  

1648: 

1649: Coronal gas is an important coolant for gas at temperatures

1650: T$\sim10^{5.5}\,$K and is only directly observable

1651: in the FUV through observations of the \oviww\, doublet. 

1652: \ovi\, emission is only detected in 1 of the 16 galaxies in our sample.

1653: This suggests that radiative cooling of the coronal gas is not 

1654: dynamically significant in the wind and does not impede its outflow.

1655: In contrast, \ovi\, absorption is nearly ubiquitous in our sample

1656: and is found to trace systematically higher outflow speeds than the

1657: photoionized and neutral gas.  

1658: We find a strong relationship between \ovi\ column density and the width

1659: of the line that is consistent with the 

1660: production of \ovi\, in a radiatively cooling gas flow passing through the coronal

1661: temperature regime.  This is expected to occur

1662: at the interface between the outrushing hot wind seen in X-rays and the 

1663: cool dense material in its path. 

1664: 

1665: Previous studies \citep{vaz04,schwa04,grim06} have suggested that the observed

1666: outflow velocities in a galaxy increase with the ionization potential of the

1667: species observed. While this is clearly the case for the coronal phase gas,

1668: it is not the case for the neutral and photoionized material. Our new results show that the

1669: derived outflow velocities in thius gas in a given galaxy increase with line strength (equivalent width)

1670: and not ionization state.

1671: This could be explained if the

1672: observations of the stronger lines probe lower column density

1673: gas than the weaker absorption features.  The lower column density

1674: gas extends to greater outflow velocities and is not readily observable

1675: in weaker absorption features.  We conclude that the extensive studies

1676: of outflows in the local star forming galaxies using the

1677: \naiww\ doublet in the optical

1678: should be able to reliably measure the outflow velocities

1679: that would be seen in the strong FUV absorption-lines. This is because the

1680: \naiww\  line should be sufficiently strong to probe the low column density

1681: outflowing gas.

1682: 

1683: In agreement with previous UV \citep{schwa06} and optical \citep{mart05b,rup05} studies 

1684: we find that the outflow velocities of the strongest absorption lines

1685: increase with increasing SFR and increasing specific SFR (SFR/M$_*$). We speculate that 

1686: starbursts with higher SFR generate more

1687: wind momentum which can accelerate the absorbing material (clouds) entrained in the wind to 

1688: higher outflow velocities. Our sample does not probe the regime of very high SFR (of-order $10^2$

1689: M$_{\odot}$ per year) where

1690: the relationship appears to flatten \citep{mart05b}.

1691: 

1692: We find that the equivalent width of the optically thin lines arising

1693: in the HI phase correlates most strongly with the gas-phase metallicity (as expected

1694: since the equivalent width should be proportional to the column density of the metal species).

1695: In contrast, the equivalent widths of the optically-thick lines in the HI and HII phase

1696: correlate better with the galaxy mass and the SFR. This

1697: is consistent with the fact that the equivalent width for these optically-thick lines

1698: is determined by the velocity dispersion in the ISM. More massive galaxies and

1699: galaxies undergoing elevated SFR will have higher velocity dispersions due to

1700: both gravity and the kinetic energy input from massive stars.

1701: 

1702: Lastly, we have looked for escaping Lyman continuum emission

1703: in our sample.  We find no convincing evidence of escaping

1704: ionizing radiation in any of the observed galaxies.

1705: In a subsample of five of our galaxies with suitable redshifts and 

1706: data quality we find that the upper limit to the absolute fraction of escaping Lyman continuum photons

1707: ranges from \flyabs$< 0.2 - 6.3 \%$.  Following 

1708: \citet{shap06} we also derive upper limits to the realtive escape fractioni (the ratio of the fraction

1709: of escaping Lyman continuum and non-ionizing FUV continuum). These range from \flyrel$< 9 - 26\%$ for this subsample.

1710: While our upper limits are compatible with 

1711: observations of high redshift Lyman Break Galaxies, we do not observe any

1712: evidence of Lyman continuum emission as observed in some

1713: Lyman Break Galaxies.

1714: 

1715: Using the escape fraction of light at the center of

1716: the \cii\, feature we also place limits on the

1717: escape fraction of Lyman continuum emission in 15 of the

1718: galaxies included in our sample.

1719: In a simple model where a galaxy is surrounded

1720: by a slab of neutral hydrogen we find significant

1721: optical depths at the Lyman limit of 

1722: $\tau_{\rm Ly}>20$.  

1723: In a more realistic model with holes

1724: in the neutral gas surrounding a galaxy, we

1725: find \flyabs$<2\%$ for almost all of the galaxies.

1726: This suggests that local starburst galaxies are not allowing the escape of 

1727: significant amounts of hydrogen ionizing photons, even in galaxies

1728: with strong winds.

1729: 

1730: This work provides a unique view of the 

1731: properties of outflows in star-forming galaxies.

1732: The wealth of absorption features over a variety

1733: of gas phases enables direct comparisons difficult

1734: in other wavelength regimes.  The projected physical size of \fu's 

1735: large spectroscopic aperture for these local starbursts is particularly well matched to high redshift

1736: spectrographic observations of Lyman Break Galaxies and other star forming galaxies  - both

1737: probe the outflows on the galactic scale.  Thus, this study

1738: should provide an excellent complement

1739: to the high redshift observations.

1740: 

1741: 

1742: \acknowledgements

1743: 

1744: 

1745: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1746: 

1747: \bibitem[Aguirre et al.(2005)]{ag05} Aguirre, A., Schaye, 

1748: J., Hernquist, L., Kay, S., Springel, V., \& Theuns, T.\ 2005, \apjl, 620, 

1749: L13 

1750: 

1751: \bibitem[Aloisi et al.(2003)]{al03} Aloisi, A., Savaglio, 

1752: S., Heckman, T.~M., Hoopes, C.~G., Leitherer, C., \& Sembach, K.~R.\ 2003, 

1753: \apj, 595, 760 

1754: 

1755: \bibitem[Anders \& Grevesse(1989)]{and89} Anders, E., \& 

1756: Grevesse, N.\ 1989, \gca, 53, 197

1757: 

1758: 

1759: 

1760: \bibitem[Asplund et al.(2005)]{asp05} Asplund, M., Grevesse, 

1761: N., \& Sauval, A.~J.\ 2005, ASP Conf.~Ser.~336: Cosmic Abundances as 

1762: Records of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis, 336, 25 

1763: 

1764: 

1765: \bibitem[Barkana \& Loeb(2006)]{bark06} Barkana, R., \& Loeb, 

1766: A.\ 2006, \mnras, 371, 395 

1767: 

1768: \bibitem[Bennett et al.(2003)]{benn03} Bennett, C.~L., et al.\ 

1769: 2003, \apjs, 148, 1 

1770: 

1771: \bibitem[Benson et al.(2003)]{ben03} Benson, A.~J., Bower, 

1772: R.~G., Frenk, C.~S., Lacey, C.~G., Baugh, C.~M., \& Cole, S.\ 2003, \apj, 

1773: 599, 38 

1774: 

1775: \bibitem[Bergvall et al.(2000)]{berg00} Bergvall, N., 

1776: Masegosa, J., {\"O}stlin, G., \& Cernicharo, J.\ 2000, \aap, 359, 41 

1777: 

1778: 

1779: \bibitem[Bergvall \& $\rm{\ddot{O}}$stlin(2002)]{berg02} Bergvall, N., 

1780: 	$\rm{\ddot{O}}$stlin, G.\ 2002, \aap, 390, 891

1781: 

1782: \bibitem[Bergvall et al.(2006)]{berg06} Bergvall, N., Zackrisson, E., Andersson, B.-G., Arnberg, D., Masegoas, J., \& Ostlin, G.\

1783: 2006, A\&A, 448, 513

1784: 

1785: \bibitem[Bouwens et al.(2006)]{bouw06} Bouwens, R.~J., 

1786: Illingworth, G.~D., Blakeslee, J.~P., \& Franx, M.\ 2006, \apj, 653, 53

1787: 

1788: \bibitem[Buat et al.(2002)]{buat02} Buat, V., Burgarella, D., 

1789: Deharveng, J.~M., \& Kunth, D.\ 2002, \aap, 393, 33 

1790: 

1791: \bibitem[Bunker et al.(2004)]{bunk04} Bunker, A.~J., Stanway, 

1792: E.~R., Ellis, R.~S., \& McMahon, R.~G.\ 2004, \mnras, 355, 374 

1793: 

1794: 

1795: \bibitem[Cardelli et al.(1989)]{card89} Cardelli, J.~A., 

1796: Clayton, G.~C., \& Mathis, J.~S.\ 1989, \apj, 345, 245 

1797: 

1798: \bibitem[Carpenter(2001)]{carp01} Carpenter, J.~M.\ 2001, \aj,

1799: 121, 2851   

1800: 

1801: \bibitem[Chandra Interactive Analysis of Observations (CIAO)]{ciao}

1802: Chandra Interactive Analysis of Observations (CIAO), http://cxc.harvard.edu/ciao/

1803: 

1804: \bibitem[Charlot \& Longhetti(2001)]{char01} Charlot, S., \& 

1805: Longhetti, M.\ 2001, \mnras, 323, 887 

1806: 

1807: \bibitem[Chevalier \& Clegg(1985)]{chev85} Chevalier, R.~A.~\&

1808: Clegg, A.~W.\ 1985, \nat, 317, 44

1809: 

1810: \bibitem[Colbert et al.(2004)]{colb04} Colbert, E.~J.~M., 

1811: Heckman, T.~M., Ptak, A.~F., Strickland, D.~K., \& Weaver, K.~A.\ 2004, 

1812: \apj, 602, 231 

1813: 

1814: \bibitem[Conti et al.(1996)]{cont96} Conti, P.~S., Leitherer, 

1815: C., \& Vacca, W.~D.\ 1996, \apjl, 461, L87 

1816: 

1817: %\bibitem[Condon et al.(1991)]{con91} Condon, J.~J., Huang, 

1818: %Z.-P., Yin, Q.~F., \& Thuan, T.~X.\ 1991, \apj, 378, 65 

1819: 

1820: %\bibitem[Davis et al.(1985)]{davis85} Davis, M., Efstathiou, 

1821: %G., Frenk, C.~S., \& White, S.~D.~M.\ 1985, \apj, 292, 371 

1822: 

1823: \bibitem[Deharveng et al.(2001)]{deh01} Deharveng, J.-M., 

1824: Buat, V., Le Brun, V., Milliard, B., Kunth, D., Shull, J.~M., \& Gry, C.\ 

1825: 2001, \aap, 375, 805 

1826: 

1827: %\bibitem[Dixon \& Sahnow(2003)]{dix03} Dixon, W.~V., \& 

1828: %Sahnow, D.~J.\ 2003, ASP Conf.~Ser.~295: Astronomical Data Analysis 

1829: %Software and Systems XII, 295, 241 

1830: 

1831: \bibitem[Dixon et al.(2006)]{dix06} Dixon, W.~V.~D., Sankrit, 

1832: R., \& Otte, B.\ 2006, \apj, 647, 328 

1833: 

1834: 

1835: \bibitem[Dixon et al.(2007)]{dix07} Dixon, W.~V., et al.\ 

1836: 2007, \pasp, 119, 527 

1837: 

1838: 

1839: %\bibitem[Dopita \& Sutherland(1996)]{dop96} Dopita, M.~A., \& 

1840: %Sutherland, R.~S.\ 1996, \apjs, 102, 161 

1841: 

1842: \bibitem[Dove et al.(2000)]{dov00} Dove, J.~B., Shull, J.~M., 

1843: \& Ferrara, A.\ 2000, \apj, 531, 846 

1844: 

1845: %\bibitem[Doyon et al.(1995)]{doy95} Doyon, R., Nadeau, D., 

1846: %Joseph, R.~D., Goldader, J.~D., Sanders, D.~B., \& Rowlands, N.\ 1995, 

1847: %\apj, 450, 111

1848: 

1849: \bibitem[Fan et al.(2006)]{fan06} Fan, X., Carilli, C.~L., \& 

1850: Keating, B.\ 2006, \araa, 44, 415 

1851: 

1852: \bibitem[Feldman et al.(2001)]{feld01} Feldman, Paul D.

1853: Sahnow, D., Kruk, J., Murphy, E., Moos, H.W. \ 2001,

1854: J. Geophys. Res., 106(A5), 8119

1855: 

1856: 

1857: \bibitem[Franceschini et al.(2003)]{franc03} Franceschini, A., 

1858: et al.\ 2003, \mnras, 343, 1181 

1859: 

1860: %\bibitem[Fujita et al.(2003)]{fuj03} Fujita, A., Martin, 

1861: %C.~L., Mac Low, M.-M., \& Abel, T.\ 2003, \apj, 599, 50

1862: 

1863: %\bibitem[Fujita et al.(2004)]{fuj04} Fujita, A., Mac Low, 

1864: %M.-M., Ferrara, A., \& Meiksin, A.\ 2004, \apj, 613, 159 

1865: 

1866: \bibitem[Giavalisco(2002)]{giav02} Giavalisco, M.\ 2002, 

1867: \araa, 40, 579 

1868: 

1869: 

1870: %\bibitem[Gilfanov et al.(2004)]{gilf04} Gilfanov, M., Grimm, 

1871: %H.-J., \& Sunyaev, R.\ 2004, Nuclear Physics B Proceedings Supplements, 

1872: %132, 369 

1873: 

1874: \bibitem[Goldader et al.(2002)]{gold02} Goldader, J.~D., 

1875: Meurer, G., Heckman, T.~M., Seibert, M., Sanders, D.~B., Calzetti, D., \& 

1876: Steidel, C.~C.\ 2002, \apj, 568, 651 

1877: 

1878: \bibitem[Grimes et al.(2007)]{grim07} Grimes, J.~P., Heckman, 

1879: T., Hoopes, C., Strickland, D., Aloisi, A., \& Ptak, A.\ 2007, 

1880: \apj, in press. 

1881: 

1882: \bibitem[Grimes et al.(2006)]{grim06} Grimes, J.~P., Heckman, 

1883: T., Hoopes, C., Strickland, D., Aloisi, A., Meurer, G., \& Ptak, A.\ 2006, 

1884: \apj, 648, 310 

1885: 

1886: \bibitem[Grimes et al.(2005)]{grim05} Grimes, J.~P., Heckman, 

1887: T., Strickland, D., \& Ptak, A.\ 2005, \apj, 628, 187 

1888: 

1889: %\bibitem[Heckman, Armus, \& Miley(1990)]{heck90} Heckman,

1890: %T.~M., Armus, L., \& Miley, G.~K.\ 1990, \apjs, 74, 833

1891: 

1892: 

1893: \bibitem[Heckman et al.(1998)]{heck98} Heckman, T.~M., Robert,

1894: C., Leitherer, C., Garnett, D.~R., \& van der Rydt, F.\ 1998, \apj, 503,

1895: 646

1896: 

1897: %\bibitem[Heckman et al.(2000)]{heck00} Heckman, T.~M., Lehnert, M., Strickland, D., \& Armus, L.\ 2000,

1898: %\apjs, 129, 493

1899: 

1900: \bibitem[Heckman et al.(2001a)]{heck01} Heckman, T.~M., 

1901: Sembach, K.~R., Meurer, G.~R., Strickland, D.~K., Martin, C.~L., Calzetti, 

1902: D., \& Leitherer, C.\ 2001, \apj, 554, 1021 

1903: 

1904: 

1905: \bibitem[Heckman et al.(2001b)]{heck01b} Heckman, T.~M., 

1906: Sembach, K.~R., Meurer, G.~R., Leitherer, C., Calzetti, D., \& Martin, 

1907: C.~L.\ 2001, \apj, 558, 56 

1908: 

1909: \bibitem[Heckman et al.(2002)]{heck02} Heckman, T.~M., Norman, 

1910: C.~A., Strickland, D.~K., \& Sembach, K.~R.\ 2002, \apj, 577, 691

1911: 

1912: \bibitem[Heckman(2003)]{heck03} Heckman, T.~M.\ 2003, Revista 

1913: Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, 17, 47 

1914: 

1915: \bibitem[Heckman et al.(2005)]{heck05} Heckman, T.~M., et al.\ 

1916: 2005, \apjl, 619, L35 

1917: %

1918: \bibitem[Helsdon \& Ponman(2000)]{hels00} Helsdon, S.~F., \& 

1919: Ponman, T.~J.\ 2000, \mnras, 315, 356 

1920: 

1921: 

1922: \bibitem[Hoopes et al.(2003)]{hoop03}

1923: Hoopes, C.~G., Heckman, T.~M., Strickland, D.~K., \& Howk, J.~C.\ 2003,

1924: \apjl, 596, L175

1925: 

1926: \bibitem[Hoopes et al.(2004)]{hoop04} Hoopes, C.~G., Sembach, 

1927: K.~R., Heckman, T.~M., Meurer, G.~R., Aloisi, A., Calzetti, D., Leitherer, 

1928: C., \& Martin, C.~L.\ 2004, \apj, 612, 825 

1929: 

1930: \bibitem[Hoopes et al.(2006)]{hoop06} Hoopes, C.~G., et al.\ 

1931: 2006, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0609415 

1932: 

1933: \bibitem[Hopkins \& Beacom (2006)]{hop06} Hopkins, A., \& Beacom, J.\ 2006, \apj, 651, 142

1934:  

1935: \bibitem[Horne(1986)]{horn86} Horne, K.\ 1986, \pasp, 98, 609 

1936: 

1937: \bibitem[Hurwitz et al.(1997)]{hurw97} Hurwitz, M., Jelinsky, 

1938: P., \& Dixon, W.~V.~D.\ 1997, \apjl, 481, L31

1939: 

1940: %\bibitem[Iono et al.(2004)]{iono04} Iono, D., Ho, P.~T.~P., 

1941: %Yun, M.~S., Matsushita, S., Peck, A.~B., \& Sakamoto, K.\ 2004, \apjl, 616, 

1942: %L63 

1943: 

1944: \bibitem[Izotov et al.(1997)]{izo97} Izotov, Y.~I., 

1945: Lipovetsky, V.~A., Chaffee, F.~H., Foltz, C.~B., Guseva, N.~G., \& Kniazev, 

1946: A.~Y.\ 1997, \apj, 476, 698 

1947: 

1948: \bibitem[Izotov \& Thuan(1999)]{izo99} Izotov, Y.~I., \& 

1949: Thuan, T.~X.\ 1999, \apj, 511, 639

1950: 

1951: \bibitem[Izotov \& Thuan(2004)]{izo04} Izotov, Y.~I., \& 

1952: Thuan, T.~X.\ 2004, \apj, 602, 200 

1953: 

1954: \bibitem[Jarrett et al.(2003)]{jarr03} Jarrett, T.~H.,

1955: Chester, T., Cutri, R., Schneider, S.~E., \& Huchra, J.~P.\ 2003, \aj,

1956: 125, 525

1957: 

1958: \bibitem[Kennicutt(1998)]{kenn98} Kennicutt, R.~C.\ 1998, 

1959: \apj, 498, 541 

1960: 

1961: 

1962: 

1963: \bibitem[Kim et al.(1995)]{kim95} Kim, D.-C., Sanders, D.~B., 

1964: Veilleux, S., Mazzarella, J.~M., \& Soifer, B.~T.\ 1995, \apjs, 98, 129

1965: 

1966: \bibitem[Klypin et al.(1999)]{klyp99} Klypin, A., Kravtsov, 

1967: A.~V., Valenzuela, O., \& Prada, F.\ 1999, \apj, 522, 82 

1968: 

1969: \bibitem[Kunth et al.(2003)]{kun03} Kunth, D., Leitherer, C., 

1970: Mas-Hesse, J.~M., {\"O}stlin, G., \& Petrosian, A.\ 2003, \apj, 597, 263

1971: 

1972: \bibitem[Kregel \& Sancisi(2001)]{kreg01} Kregel, M., \& 

1973: Sancisi, R.\ 2001, \aap, 376, 59 

1974: 

1975: \bibitem[Kriss(1994)]{kriss94} Kriss, G.\ 1994, ASP Conf.~Ser.~ 

1976: 61: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems III, 61, 437

1977: 

1978: \bibitem[Lehmer et al.(2005)]{lehm05} Lehmer, B.~D., et al.\ 

1979: 2005, \aj, 129, 1 

1980: 

1981: %\bibitem[Lehnert \& Heckman(1996)]{lehn96} Lehnert, M.~D.~\&

1982: %Heckman, T.~M.\ 1996, \apj, 462, 651

1983: 

1984: %\bibitem[Levenson et al.(2006)]{lev06} Levenson, N.~A.,

1985: %Heckman, T.~M., Krolik, J.~H., Weaver, K.~A., \& Zycki, P.,~T. \ 2006, submitted

1986: %

1987: \bibitem[Leitherer et al.(1995)]{leith95} Leitherer, C., 

1988: Ferguson, H.~C., Heckman, T.~M., \& Lowenthal, J.~D.\ 1995, \apjl, 454, L19 

1989: 

1990: \bibitem[Leitherer et al.(2002)]{leith02} Leitherer, C., Li, 

1991: I.-H., Calzetti, D., \& Heckman, T.~M.\ 2002, \apjs, 140, 303 

1992: 

1993: \bibitem[Limongi \& Chieffi(2006)]{lim06} Limongi, M., \& 

1994: Chieffi, A.\ 2006, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0611140 

1995: 

1996: %\bibitem[Loeb \& Barkana(2001)]{loeb01} Loeb, A., \& Barkana, 

1997: %R.\ 2001, \araa, 39, 19 

1998: 

1999: %\bibitem[Malkan et al.(2003)]{malk03} Malkan, M., Webb, W., \& 

2000: %Konopacky, Q.\ 2003, \apj, 598, 878 

2001: 

2002: \bibitem[Marcolini et al.(2005)]{marc05} Marcolini, A., 

2003: Strickland, D.~K., D'Ercole, A., Heckman, T.~M., \& Hoopes, C.~G.\ 2005, 

2004: \mnras, 362, 626 

2005: 

2006: %\bibitem[Martin(2005)]{mart05b} Martin, C.~L.\ 2005, \apj, 621, 227

2007: 

2008: \bibitem[Martin(2005)]{mart05b} Martin, C.~L.\ 2005, \apj, 621, 

2009: 227 

2010: 

2011: 

2012: \bibitem[Moos et al.(2000)]{moos00} Moos, H.~W., et al.\ 2000, 

2013: \apjl, 538, L1 

2014: 

2015: \bibitem[Morton(1991)]{mort91} Morton, D.~C.\ 1991, \apjs, 77, 

2016: 119 

2017: 

2018: \bibitem[Moshir et al.(1993)]{mosh93} Moshir, M., et al.\ 

2019: 1993, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 2156, 0 

2020: 

2021: \bibitem[Nandra et al.(2002)]{nan02} Nandra, K., Mushotzky, 

2022: R.~F., Arnaud, K., Steidel, C.~C., Adelberger, K.~L., Gardner, J.~P., 

2023: Teplitz, H.~I., \& Windhorst, R.~A.\ 2002, \apj, 576, 625 

2024: 

2025: \bibitem[{\"O}stlin et al.(2001)]{ost01} {\"O}stlin, G., 

2026: Amram, P., Bergvall, N., Masegosa, J., Boulesteix, J., \& M{\'a}rquez, I.\ 

2027: 2001, \aap, 374, 800 

2028: 

2029: \bibitem[{\"O}stlin et al.(2007)]{ost07} {\"O}stlin, G., 

2030: Cumming, R.~J., \& Bergvall, N.\ 2007, \aap, 461, 471 

2031: 

2032: %\bibitem[Oskinova et al.(2006)]{osk06} Oskinova, L.~M.,

2033: %Feldmeier, A, Hamann, W.~R. (astro-ph 0603286)

2034: 

2035: \bibitem[Otte et al.(2003)]{ott03} Otte, B., Murphy, E.~M., 

2036: Howk, J.~C., Wang, Q.~D., Oegerle, W.~R., \& Sembach, K.~R.\ 2003, \apj, 

2037: 591, 821 

2038: 

2039: \bibitem[Ouchi et al.(2004)]{ouchi04} Ouchi, M., et al.\ 2004, 

2040: \apj, 611, 685 

2041: 

2042: %\bibitem[Otte \& Dixon(2006)]{ott06} Otte, B., \& Dixon, 

2043: %W.~V.~D.\ 2006, \apj, 647, 312 

2044: 

2045: \bibitem[Overzier et al.(2008)]{over08} Overzier, R., 

2046: Heckman, T., Kauffmann, G., Seibert, M., Rich, R.M., Basu-Zych, A.,

2047: Lotz, J., Aloisi, A., Charlot, S., Hoopes, C., Martin, D.C., Schiminovich, D.,

2048: \& Madore, B. 2008, \apj, 677, 37

2049: 

2050: \bibitem[Panagia et al.(2005)]{pan05} Panagia, N., Fall, 

2051: S.~M., Mobasher, B., Dickinson, M., Ferguson, H.~C., Giavalisco, M., Stern, 

2052: D., \& Wiklind, T.\ 2005, \apjl, 633, L1

2053: 

2054: \bibitem[Peacock et al.(2000)]{peac00} Peacock, J.~A., et al.\ 

2055: 2000, \mnras, 318, 535 

2056: 

2057: \bibitem[Pellerin et al.(2002)]{pell02} Pellerin, A., et al.\ 

2058: 2002, \apjs, 143, 159 

2059: 

2060: \bibitem[Pellerin \& Robert(2007)]{pell07} Pellerin, A., \& 

2061: Robert, C.\ 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 708, arXiv:0708.1351 

2062: 

2063: \bibitem[Pettini et al.(2002)]{pett02} Pettini, M., Rix, 

2064: S.~A., Steidel, C.~C., Adelberger, K.~L., Hunt, M.~P., \& Shapley, A.~E.\ 

2065: 2002, \apj, 569, 742 

2066: 

2067: \bibitem[Robert et al.(2003)]{rob03} Robert, C., Pellerin, 

2068: A., Aloisi, A., Leitherer, C., Hoopes, C., \& Heckman, T.~M.\ 2003, \apjs, 

2069: 144, 21 

2070: 

2071: \bibitem[Robertson et al.(2005)]{rob05} Robertson, B., 

2072: Bullock, J.~S., Font, A.~S., Johnston, K.~V., \& Hernquist, L.\ 2005, \apj, 

2073: 632, 872 

2074: 

2075: \bibitem[Rupke et al.(2005)]{rup05} Rupke, D.~S., Veilleux, 

2076: S., \& Sanders, D.~B.\ 2005, \apjs, 160, 115 

2077: 

2078: 

2079: \bibitem[Sanders \& Mirabel (1996)]{sand96} Sanders, D.~B.~\&

2080: Mirabel, I.~F.\ 1996, \araa, 34, 749  

2081: 

2082: \bibitem[Sanders et al.(2003)]{sand03} Sanders, D.~B., 

2083: Mazzarella, J.~M., Kim, D.-C., Surace, J.~A., \& Soifer, B.~T.\ 2003, \aj, 

2084: 126, 1607 

2085: 

2086: %\bibitem[Sako et al.(2002)]{sak02} Sako, M., Kahn, S.~M., 

2087: %Paerels, F., Liedahl, D.~A., Watanabe, S., Nagase, F., \& Takahashi, T.\ 

2088: %2002, High Resolution X-ray Spectroscopy with XMM-Newton and Chandra

2089: 

2090: %\bibitem[Scannapieco et al.(2005)]{scann05} Scannapieco, C., 

2091: %Tissera, P.~B., White, S.~D.~M., \& Springel, V.\ 2005, \mnras, 907 

2092: 

2093: %\bibitem[Schild et al.(2004)]{schil04} Schild, H., et al.\ 

2094: %2004, \aap, 422, 177 

2095: 

2096: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)]{schleg98} Schlegel, D.~J., 

2097: Finkbeiner, D.~P., \& Davis, M.\ 1998, \apj, 500, 525 

2098: 

2099: 

2100: \bibitem[Schmitt et al.(2006)]{schmitt06} Schmitt, H.~R., 

2101: Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Giavalisco, M., Heckman, T.~M., Kennicutt, R.~C., 

2102: Jr., Leitherer, C., \& Meurer, G.~R.\ 2006, \apjs, 164, 52 

2103: 

2104: 

2105: \bibitem[Schwartz \& Martin(2004)]{schwa04} Schwartz, C.~M., \& 

2106: Martin, C.~L.\ 2004, \apj, 610, 201 

2107: 

2108: \bibitem[Schwartz et al.(2006)]{schwa06} Schwartz, C.~M., 

2109: Martin, C.~L., Chandar, R., Leitherer, C., Heckman, T.~M., \& Oey, M.~S.\ 

2110: 2006, \apj, 646, 858

2111: 

2112: \bibitem[Seibert et al.(2005)]{seib05} Seibert, M., et al.\ 

2113: 2005, \apjl, 619, L55

2114: 

2115: \bibitem[Sembach et al.(2003)]{sem03} Sembach, K.~R., et al.\ 

2116: 2003, \apjs, 146, 165 

2117: 

2118: \bibitem[Shapley et al.(2006)]{shap06} Shapley, A.~E., 

2119: Steidel, C.~C., Pettini, M., Adelberger, K.~L., \& Erb, D.~K.\ 2006, \apj, 

2120: 651, 688 

2121: 

2122: \bibitem[Shapley et al.(2003)]{shap03} Shapley, A.~E., 

2123: Steidel, C.~C., Pettini, M., \& Adelberger, K.~L.\ 2003, \apj, 588, 65 

2124: 

2125: \bibitem[Soifer, Boehmer, Neugebauer, \& Sanders(1989)]{soif89} 

2126: Soifer, B.~T., Boehmer, L., Neugebauer,

2127: G., \& Sanders, D.~B.\ 1989, \aj, 98, 766

2128: 

2129: \bibitem[Sommer-Larsen et al.(1999)]{som99} Sommer-Larsen, 

2130: J., Gelato, S., \& Vedel, H.\ 1999, \apj, 519, 501 

2131: 

2132: %\bibitem[Springel et al.(2005)]{spring05} Springel, V., et al.\ 

2133: %2005, \nat, 435, 629 

2134: 

2135: \bibitem[Steidel et al.(1999)]{steid99} Steidel, C.~C., 

2136: Adelberger, K.~L., Giavalisco, M., Dickinson, M., \& Pettini, M.\ 1999, 

2137: \apj, 519, 1 

2138: 

2139: \bibitem[Steidel et al.(2001)]{steid01} Steidel, C.~C., 

2140: Pettini, M., \& Adelberger, K.~L.\ 2001, \apj, 546, 665 

2141: 

2142: \bibitem[Stiavelli et al.(2004)]{sti04} Stiavelli, M., Fall, 

2143: S.~M., \& Panagia, N.\ 2004, \apjl, 610, L1 

2144: 

2145: \bibitem[Strickland et al.(2000)]{strick00b} Strickland, D.~K., 

2146: Heckman, T.~M., Weaver, K.~A., \& Dahlem, M.\ 2000, \aj, 120, 2965 

2147: 

2148: 

2149: \bibitem[Strickland \& Stevens(2000)]{strick00} Strickland, 

2150: D.~K., \& Stevens, I.~R.\ 2000, \mnras, 314, 511

2151: 

2152: \bibitem[Strickland et al.(2004)]{strick04b} Strickland, D.~K., 

2153: Heckman, T.~M., Colbert, E.~J.~M., Hoopes, C.~G., \& Weaver, K.~A.\ 2004, 

2154: \apj, 606, 829 

2155: 

2156: \bibitem[Strickland(2005)]{strick05} Strickland, D.~K.\ 2005, 

2157: Extra-Planar Gas, 331, 345 

2158: 

2159: \bibitem[Strickland \& Heckman(2007)]{strick07} Strickland, 

2160: D.~K., \& Heckman, T.~M.\ 2007, \apj, 658, 258

2161: 

2162: %

2163: %\bibitem[Sutherland \& Dopita(1993)]{suth93} Sutherland, 

2164: %R.~S., \& Dopita, M.~A.\ 1993, \apjs, 88, 253 

2165: 

2166: \bibitem[Tamura et al.(2004)]{tam04} Tamura, T., Kaastra, 

2167: J.~S., den Herder, J.~W.~A., Bleeker, J.~A.~M., \& Peterson, J.~R.\ 2004, 

2168: \aap, 420, 135 

2169: 

2170: \bibitem[Terlevich et al.(1991)]{terl91} Terlevich, R., 

2171: Melnick, J., Masegosa, J., Moles, M., \& Copetti, M.~V.~F.\ 1991, \aaps, 

2172: 91, 285 

2173: 

2174: \bibitem[Tody \& Fitzpatrick(1996)]{tod96} Tody, D., \& 

2175: Fitzpatrick, M.\ 1996, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, 

2176: 101, 322 

2177: 

2178: \bibitem[Tremonti et al.(2004)]{trem04} Tremonti, C.~A., et 

2179: al.\ 2004, \apj, 613, 898 

2180: 

2181: \bibitem[Vader et al.(1993)]{vad93} Vader, J.~P., Frogel, 

2182: J.~A., Terndrup, D.~M., \& Heisler, C.~A.\ 1993, \aj, 106, 1743 

2183: 

2184: \bibitem[V{\'a}zquez et al.(2004)]{vaz04} V{\'a}zquez, G.~A., 

2185: Leitherer, C., Heckman, T.~M., Lennon, D.~J., de Mello, D.~F., Meurer, 

2186: G.~R., \& Martin, C.~L.\ 2004, \apj, 600, 162 

2187: 

2188: \bibitem[V{\'a}zquez \& Leitherer(2005)]{vaz05} V{\'a}zquez, 

2189: G.~A., \& Leitherer, C.\ 2005, \apj, 621, 695 

2190: 

2191: 

2192: \bibitem[Veilleux et al.(2005)]{veill05} Veilleux, S., Cecil, 

2193: G., \& Bland-Hawthorn, J.\ 2005, \araa, 43, 769 

2194: 

2195: \bibitem[Yan \& Windhorst(2004)]{yan04} Yan, H., \& 

2196: Windhorst, R.~A.\ 2004, \apjl, 600, L1 

2197: 

2198: \bibitem[York et al.(2000)]{york00} York, D.~G., et al.\ 2000, 

2199: \aj, 120, 1579 

2200: 

2201: 

2202: 

2203: \end{thebibliography}

2204: 

2205: %%log(L_FUV)=10.39 L_sun, giving a FUV surface brightness of log(I_FUV)=8.89 L_sun/kpc2

2206: %% ($10^{10.3}\,\rm{L}_{\odot}$) and surface 

2207: %%brightness ($10^{9.5}\,\rm{L_{\odot}\,kpc^{-2}}$)

2208: 

2209: 

2210: \clearpage

2211: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrlllllcc}

2212: \rotate

2213: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2214: \tablecolumns{10}

2215: \tablewidth{0pc}

2216: \tablecaption{\fu~Galaxy Properties\label{t:fuselumins}}

2217: \tablehead{

2218: \colhead{Galaxy} &  \colhead{$\rm{v_{sys}}$} & \colhead{Distance} & \colhead{MW E(B-V)}  &

2219: 	\colhead{$\rm{L_{FUV}}$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{$\rm{L_{K}}$}  &

2220: 	 \colhead{$\rm{L_{IR}}$} &  \colhead{$\rm{L_{UV}+L_{IR}}$} &

2221: 	\colhead{$\rm{F_{60\mu m}/F_{100\mu m}}$} & \colhead{Z} \\

2222: 	& \colhead{(\kms)} & \colhead{(Mpc)} & \colhead{(mag)} & \colhead{$\rm{(L_\odot)}$} & 

2223: 	\colhead{$\rm{(L_\odot)}$} &

2224: 	\colhead{$\rm{(L_\odot)}$} & \colhead{$\rm{(L_\odot)}$} &

2225: 	& \colhead{(log[O/H]+12)} }

2226: \startdata

2227: HARO11  & 6175 &  88 & 0.011 & $1.6\times 10^{10}$ & $4.5\times 10^{9}$ & $1.9\times 10^{11}$ & $2.1\times 10^{11}$ & 1.37 & 7.9 \\ 

2228: VV114  & 6016 &  86 & 0.016 & $2.4\times 10^{10}$ & $2.0\times 10^{10}$ & $5.2\times 10^{11}$ & $5.4\times 10^{11}$ & 0.73 & 8.6 \\ 

2229: NGC1140  & 1501 &  21 & 0.038 & $2.4\times 10^{9}$ & $7.7\times 10^{8}$ & $4.4\times 10^{9}$ & $6.8\times 10^{9}$ & 0.68 & 8.0 \\ 

2230: SBS0335-052  & 4043 &  57 & 0.047 & $2.6\times 10^{9}$ &  \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 7.3 \\ 

2231: TOL0440-381  & 12291 & 178 & 0.015 & $1.7\times 10^{10}$ & $2.8\times 10^{9}$ & $2.4\times 10^{10}$ & $4.1\times 10^{10}$ & \nodata  & 8.2 \\ 

2232: NGC1705  & 632 &   8 & 0.008 & $1.0\times 10^{9}$ & $1.3\times 10^{8}$ & $2.6\times 10^{8}$ & $1.3\times 10^{9}$ & 0.38 & 8.0 \\ 

2233: NGC1741  & 4037 &  57 & 0.051 & $1.1\times 10^{10}$ & $1.6\times 10^{9}$ & $3.8\times 10^{10}$ & $4.9\times 10^{10}$ & 0.71 & 8.0 \\ 

2234: IZW18  & 751 &  10 & 0.032 & $1.3\times 10^{8}$ &  \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 7.2 \\ 

2235: NGC3310  & 983 &  14 & 0.022 & $2.4\times 10^{9}$ & $1.9\times 10^{9}$ & $2.0\times 10^{10}$ & $2.3\times 10^{10}$ & 0.78 & 9.0 \\ 

2236: HARO3  & 963 &  13 & 0.007 & $4.2\times 10^{8}$ & $2.7\times 10^{8}$ & $3.0\times 10^{9}$ & $3.4\times 10^{9}$ & 0.82 & 8.3 \\ 

2237: NGC3690  & 3121 &  44 & 0.017 & $6.3\times 10^{9}$ & $2.3\times 10^{10}$ & $6.6\times 10^{11}$ & $6.7\times 10^{11}$ & 0.93 & 8.8 \\ 

2238: NGC4214  & 291 &   4 & 0.022 & $2.1\times 10^{8}$ & $3.1\times 10^{8}$ & $9.0\times 10^{8}$ & $1.1\times 10^{9}$ & 0.60 & 8.2 \\ 

2239: MRK54  & 13450 & 196 & 0.015 & $5.2\times 10^{10}$ & $7.7\times 10^{9}$ & $1.2\times 10^{11}$ & $1.7\times 10^{11}$ & 0.51 &  8.6 \\ 

2240: IRAS19245-4140  & 2832 &  40 & 0.087 & $8.8\times 10^{9}$ & $3.9\times 10^{8}$ & $8.2\times 10^{9}$ & $1.7\times 10^{10}$ & 1.67 &  8.0\\ 

2241: NGC7673  & 3392 &  48 & 0.043 & $6.7\times 10^{9}$ & $3.2\times 10^{9}$ & $3.2\times 10^{10}$ & $3.9\times 10^{10}$ & 0.74 & 8.5 \\ 

2242: NGC7714  & 2803 &  39 & 0.052 & $9.4\times 10^{8}$ & $5.3\times 10^{9}$ & $5.6\times 10^{10}$ & $5.7\times 10^{10}$ & 0.91 & 8.7 \\ 

2243: \enddata

2244: \tablecomments{$\rm{v_{sys}}$, MW  E(B-V), IRAS, and K-Band fluxes were obtained from NED where available. 

2245: IRAS \citep{soif89,mosh93}  and 2Mass \citep{jarr03} luminosities are 

2246: transformed using methods of \citet{sand96} and \citet{carp01} respectively.

2247: The references for the gas-phase nebular metallicity measurements are as follows, 

2248: \hoo\, \citep{berg02}, \vv\,\citep{kim95,char01}, 

2249: NGC\,1140, NGC\,1705, NGC\,3310, NGC\,3690, NGC\,4214, NGC\,7673, NGC\,7714 \citep{heck98},

2250: \sbs\,\citep{izo97}, \tol\,\citep{terl91,pell07}, NGC\,1741 \citep{cont96}, 

2251: Haro\,3 \citep{izo04}, \izw\,\citep{izo99},  \iron\,\citep{ost07}, and Mrk\,54 \citep[spectrum from 

2252: A. Boselli with conversions from][]{char01}.

2253: }

2254: \tablenotetext{a}{FUV luminosity derived from \fu\, LiF 2A continuum flux at 1150\,\ang.  Values are corrected for MW extinction using

2255: the method of \citet{card89} and the E(B-V) values given in this table.}

2256: \end{deluxetable}

2257: 

2258: 

2259: 

2260: \clearpage

2261: 

2262: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrcclllrrr}

2263: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2264: \rotate

2265: \tablecolumns{11}

2266: \tablewidth{0pc}

2267: \tablecaption{\fu~Observation Data\label{t:fusesample}}

2268: \tablehead{\colhead{Galaxy} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{\fu\, Pointing} & 

2269: 	\colhead{Aperture} & \colhead{Region\tablenotemark{a}} 

2270: 	& \colhead{DAY/NIGHT} &

2271: 	\colhead{Obs. Date} & \colhead{PI} &

2272: 	\colhead{Obs. Time\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{Exposures} & \colhead{S/N\tablenotemark{c}}\\ 

2273: 	& \multicolumn{2}{c}{(J2000)} & & & & \colhead{(UT)} & & \colhead{(ks)} & }

2274: \startdata

2275: HARO 11  & $00^{\rm h}36^{\rm m}52\fs5$ & $-33\degr33\arcmin19\arcsec$ & LWRS & PC & NIGHT & 	

2276: 	2001-10-12 & Bergvall &	11.9 & 6 & 7.2\\ 

2277: VV 114  & $01^{\rm h}07^{\rm m}46\fs6$ & $-17\degr30\arcmin24\arcsec$ & LWRS & PC & BOTH 

2278: 	& 2003-07-26 & Heckman & 11.2 & 4 & 6.6\\ 

2279: NGC 1140  & $02^{\rm h}54^{\rm m}33\fs6$ & $-10\degr01\arcmin39\arcsec$ & LWRS & PC & BOTH &

2280: 	2001-11-28 & Buat & 3.9 & 2 & 4.8\\ 

2281: SBS 0335-052  & $03^{\rm h}37^{\rm m}43\fs1$ & $-05\degr02\arcmin39\arcsec$ & LWRS & PC & BOTH &

2282: 	2001-09-26 & Thuan & 24.4 & 8 & 4.1\\ 

2283: TOL 0440-381  & $04^{\rm h}42^{\rm m}08\fs0$ & $-38\degr01\arcmin10\arcsec$ & LWRS & PC & BOTH &

2284: 	2000-12-13 & Deharveng & 31.2 & 11 & 4.0\\ 

2285: NGC 1705  & $04^{\rm h}54^{\rm m}13\fs5$ & $-53\degr21\arcmin39\arcsec$ & LWRS & EC & BOTH &

2286: 	2000-02-04 & Heckman & 24.0 & 13 & 27.2\\ 

2287: NGC 1741  & $05^{\rm h}01^{\rm m}37\fs7$ & $-04\degr15\arcmin30\arcsec$ & LWRS & PC & NIGHT &

2288: 	2003-12-23 & Heckman & 18.5 & 10 & 8.4\\ 

2289: IZW 18  & $09^{\rm h}34^{\rm m}02\fs3$ & $+55\degr14\arcmin25\arcsec$ & LWRS & PC & BOTH &

2290: 	2001-02-11 & Moos & 58.2 & 37 & 9.7\\ 

2291: NGC 3310  & $10^{\rm h}38^{\rm m}45\fs7$ & $+53\degr30\arcmin06\arcsec$ & LWRS & EC & BOTH &

2292: 	2000-05-05 & Heckman & 27.1 & 11 & 18.0\\ 

2293: HARO 3  & $10^{\rm h}45^{\rm m}22\fs4$ & $+55\degr57\arcmin37\arcsec$ & LWRS & PC & NIGHT &

2294: 	2002-04-07 & Thuan & 4.9 & 4 & 6.2\\ 

2295: NGC 3690  & $11^{\rm h}28^{\rm m}31\fs0$ & $+58\degr33\arcmin41\arcsec$ & LWRS & PC & NIGHT &

2296: 	2001-03-25 & Heckman &34.9 & 20 & 10.8\\ 

2297: %NGC 4038-S  & $12^{\rm h}01^{\rm m}50\fs4$ & $-18\degr52\arcmin12\arcsec$ & LWRS & PC & BOTH &

2298: %	2004-06-19 & 21.1 & 10 & 7.7\\ 

2299: NGC 4214  & $12^{\rm h}15^{\rm m}39\fs4$ & $+36\degr19\arcmin35\arcsec$ & LWRS & EC & BOTH &

2300: 	2000-05-12 & Heckman & 11.1 & 6 & 14.6\\ 

2301: MRK 54  & $12^{\rm h}56^{\rm m}55\fs9$ & $+32\degr26\arcmin52\arcsec$ & LWRS & PC & BOTH &

2302: 	2000-02-19 & Deharveng & 25.8 & 13 & 5.8\\ 

2303: IRAS 19245-4140  & $19^{\rm h}27^{\rm m}58\fs0$ & $-41\degr34\arcmin27\arcsec$ & LWRS & PC & NIGHT &

2304: 	2000-05-21 & Buat & 2.9 & 6 & 4.7\\ 

2305: NGC 7673  & $23^{\rm h}27^{\rm m}41\fs6$ & $+23\degr35\arcmin30\arcsec$ & LWRS & PC & NIGHT & 

2306: 	2000-07-20 &Buat &  6.3 & 3 & 4.7\\ 

2307: NGC 7714  & $23^{\rm h}36^{\rm m}14\fs1$ & $+02\degr09\arcmin19\arcsec$ & MDRS & PC & BOTH & 

2308: 	2001-12-04 & Benjamin & 78.4 & 46 & 4.3\\

2309: \enddata

2310: \tablenotetext{a}{Detector region used for spectra extraction.  Although all targets are extended (EC) the majority have

2311: flux falling entirely within the smaller point source (PC) extraction region.  Using the smaller point source region

2312: minimizes background subtraction errors which are very important in the lower S/N data.}

2313: \tablenotetext{b}{Exposure time in LiF 1A channel.}

2314: \tablenotetext{c}{S/N in 0.078\,\ang\,bins in LiF 1A channel.}

2315: \end{deluxetable}

2316: 

2317: 

2318: 

2319: 

2320: 

2321: 			\begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}

2322: 			\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2323: 			\tablecolumns{7}

2324: 			\tablewidth{0pc}

2325: 			\tablecaption{       HARO11         ISM Absorption Line Fit Data

2326: 			\label{t:HARO11dat}}

2327: 			\tablehead{

2328: 			\colhead{Ion} & \colhead{$\lambda_{0}$} & \colhead{$log(\lambda f N/N_H)$} &

2329: 			                 \colhead{Instrument} & \colhead{$\rm{W}_\lambda$} &

2330: 			                 \colhead{$\rm{v_{c}}$} & \colhead{FWHM} \\

2331: 			                  & \colhead{\AA} & & & \colhead{\AA} & \colhead{\kms} &

2332: 			                  \colhead{\kms}}

2333: 			\startdata

2334: \ion{C}{3} & 977.02 & -0.61 & 2asic & 1.83$\pm$0.57 & 5998$\pm$6 & 269$\pm$10\\ 

2335: \ion{O}{6} & 1031.93 & -1.13 & 1alif & 0.38$\pm$0.06 & 6039$\pm$16 & 193$\pm$34\\ 

2336:  & & & 2blif & 0.39$\pm$0.07 & 6050$\pm$14 & 159$\pm$34\\ 

2337: \ion{C}{2} & 1036.34 & -1.37 & 1alif & 1.29$\pm$0.05 & 6063$\pm$6 & 381$\pm$18\\ 

2338:  & & & 2blif & 1.24$\pm$0.13 & 6074$\pm$8 & 344$\pm$36\\ 

2339: \ion{O}{1} & 988.73 & -1.56 & 1alif & 0.72$\pm$0.05 & 6092$\pm$14 & 276$\pm$14\\ 

2340:  & & & 2blif & 0.66$\pm$0.09 & 6079$\pm$23 & 304$\pm$26\\ 

2341: \ion{N}{2} & 1083.99 & -2.00 & 1blif & 0.92$\pm$0.07 & 6081$\pm$10 & 353$\pm$28\\ 

2342:  & & & 2alif & 1.00$\pm$0.08 & 6085$\pm$11 & 381$\pm$33\\ 

2343: \ion{N}{3} & 989.80 & -2.03 & 1alif & 1.04$\pm$0.05 & 6076$\pm$6 & 276\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2344:  & & & 2blif & 1.05$\pm$0.08 & 6073$\pm$10 & 304\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2345: \ion{O}{1} & 1039.23 & -2.29 & 1alif & 0.35$\pm$0.07 & 6112$\pm$14 & 244$\pm$51\\ 

2346:  & & & 2blif & 0.37$\pm$0.12 & 6130$\pm$16 & 200$\pm$77\\ 

2347: \ion{N}{1} & 1134.41 & -2.57 & 2alif & 0.15\tablenotemark{b} & 6048$\pm$79 & 300\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2348: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1096.88 & -2.96 & 2alif & 0.20$\pm$0.04 & 6119$\pm$9 & 131$\pm$24\\ 

2349: \ion{Si}{2} & 1020.70 & -2.99 & 1alif & 0.53$\pm$0.18 & 6023$\pm$17 & 339$\pm$88\\ 

2350:  & & & 2blif & 0.32$\pm$0.10 & 6015$\pm$17 & 232$\pm$67\\ 

2351: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1121.97 & -3.14 & 2alif & 0.25\tablenotemark{b} & 6088$\pm$68 & 203\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2352: \ion{S}{3} & 1012.50 & -3.24 & 1alif & 0.52$\pm$0.18 & 6083$\pm$6 & 225\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2353:  & & & 2blif & 0.68$\pm$0.22 & 6078$\pm$13 & 290$\pm$75\\ 

2354: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1125.45 & -3.41 & 2alif & 0.23$\pm$0.05 & 6062$\pm$17 & 195$\pm$37\\ 

2355: \ion{Ar}{1} & 1066.66 & -3.58 & 2alif & 0.54$\pm$0.08 & 6136$\pm$20 & 332$\pm$55\\ 

2356:  & 1128.00 & -4.01 & 2alif & 0.14\tablenotemark{b} & 6202$\pm$74 & 327\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2357: \ion{P}{5} s & 1117.98 &   & 2alif & 0.30$\pm$0.06 & 6165$\pm$24 & 327$\pm$63\\ 

2358: \ion{Si}{4} s & 1122.48 &   & 2alif & 0.63$\pm$0.09 & 6163$\pm$17 & 222$\pm$29\\ 

2359: \ion{Si}{4} s & 1128.33 &   & 2alif & 0.30\tablenotemark{b} & 6202\tablenotemark{b} & 327\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2360: 	\enddata

2361: 	\tablenotetext{a}{Using $\rm{v_{sys}}=$      6175       \kms}

2362: 	\tablenotetext{b}{Errors are undetermined for this value.}

2363: 	\end{deluxetable}

2364: 

2365: 

2366: \clearpage

2367: 			\begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}

2368: 			\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2369: 			\tablecolumns{7}

2370: 			\tablewidth{0pc}

2371: 			\tablecaption{        HARO3         ISM Absorption Line Fit Data

2372: 			\label{t:HARO3data}}

2373: 			\tablehead{

2374: 			\colhead{Ion} & \colhead{$\lambda_{0}$} & \colhead{$log(\lambda f N/N_H)$} &

2375: 			                 \colhead{Instrument} & \colhead{$\rm{W}_\lambda$} &

2376: 			                 \colhead{$\rm{v_{c}}$} & \colhead{FWHM} \\

2377: 			                  & \colhead{\AA} & & & \colhead{\AA} & \colhead{\kms} &

2378: 			                  \colhead{\kms}}

2379: 			\startdata

2380: \ion{C}{3} & 977.02 & -0.61 & 2asic & 1.16\tablenotemark{b} & 913$\pm$26 & 202$\pm$16\\ 

2381: \ion{O}{6} & 1031.93 & -1.13 & 1alif & 0.71$\pm$0.08 & 787$\pm$26 & 324\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2382:  & & & 2blif & 0.85$\pm$0.12 & 796$\pm$21 & 324$\pm$53\\ 

2383: \ion{C}{2} & 1036.34 & -1.37 & 1alif & 0.97$\pm$0.07 & 868$\pm$3 & 229$\pm$26\\ 

2384:  & & & 2blif & 1.11$\pm$0.13 & 876$\pm$10 & 259$\pm$54\\ 

2385: \ion{O}{1} & 988.73 & -1.56 & 1alif & 0.97\tablenotemark{b} & 912$\pm$11 & 150\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2386:  & & & 2blif & 0.46$\pm$0.06 & 906$\pm$4 & 88$\pm$14\\ 

2387: \ion{N}{3} & 989.80 & -2.03 & 1alif & 0.87\tablenotemark{b} & 914$\pm$6 & 127$\pm$2\\ 

2388:  & & & 2blif & 0.59\tablenotemark{b} & 920$\pm$22 & 110\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2389: \ion{O}{1} & 1039.23 & -2.29 & 1alif & 0.51$\pm$0.04 & 895$\pm$4 & 120$\pm$16\\ 

2390:  & & & 2blif & 0.47$\pm$0.10 & 905$\pm$2 & 86$\pm$5\\ 

2391: \ion{N}{1} & 1134.98 & -2.39 & 1blif & 0.33$\pm$0.04 & 900$\pm$8 & 118\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2392:  & & & 2alif & 0.30$\pm$0.04 & 901$\pm$12 & 144\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2393: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1144.94 & -2.42 & 1blif & 0.42$\pm$0.07 & 891$\pm$5 & 85$\pm$22\\ 

2394:  & & & 2alif & 0.45$\pm$0.10 & 871$\pm$12 & 172$\pm$44\\ 

2395: \ion{N}{1} & 1134.41 & -2.57 & 1blif & 0.41$\pm$0.04 & 884$\pm$6 & 118$\pm$11\\ 

2396:  & & & 2alif & 0.38$\pm$0.04 & 878$\pm$8 & 144$\pm$14\\ 

2397: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1096.88 & -2.96 & 1blif & 0.34$\pm$0.06 & 904$\pm$8 & 117$\pm$20\\ 

2398:  & & & 2alif & 0.31$\pm$0.06 & 886$\pm$9 & 139$\pm$24\\ 

2399: \ion{Si}{2} & 1020.70 & -2.99 & 1alif & 0.35$\pm$0.04 & 912$\pm$4 & 107$\pm$15\\ 

2400:  & & & 2blif & 0.41$\pm$0.13 & 941$\pm$15 & 118$\pm$37\\ 

2401: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1121.97 & -3.14 & 1blif & 0.43$\pm$0.08 & 902$\pm$9 & 132$\pm$29\\ 

2402:  & & & 2alif & 0.46$\pm$0.12 & 924$\pm$16 & 156$\pm$42\\ 

2403: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1143.23 & -3.19 & 1blif & 0.21$\pm$0.08 & 894$\pm$12 & 86\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2404:  & & & 2alif & 0.25$\pm$0.07 & 907$\pm$13 & 134$\pm$36\\ 

2405: \ion{S}{3} & 1012.50 & -3.24 & 1alif & 0.40$\pm$0.07 & 921$\pm$8 & 130$\pm$22\\ 

2406:  & & & 2blif & 0.45$\pm$0.06 & 920$\pm$6 & 109$\pm$18\\ 

2407: \ion{Ar}{1} & 1066.66 & -3.58 & 1alif & 0.14\tablenotemark{b} & 888$\pm$31 & 80\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2408:  & & & 2blif & 0.19$\pm$0.07 & 897$\pm$10 & 67\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2409: \ion{Si}{4} s & 1122.48 &   & 1blif & 0.47$\pm$0.08 & 922$\pm$7 & 129$\pm$26\\ 

2410:  & & & 2alif & 0.44$\pm$0.06 & 902$\pm$4 & 105$\pm$15\\ 

2411: \ion{C}{3} s & 1175.59 &   & 1blif & 1.50$\pm$0.15 & 938$\pm$31 & 500\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2412: 	\enddata

2413: 	\tablenotetext{a}{Using $\rm{v_{sys}}=$      963        \kms}

2414: 	\tablenotetext{b}{Errors are undetermined for this value.}

2415: 	\end{deluxetable}

2416: 

2417: 

2418: \clearpage

2419: 			\begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}

2420: 			\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2421: 			\tablecolumns{7}

2422: 			\tablewidth{0pc}

2423: 			\tablecaption{   IRAS19245-4140     ISM Absorption Line Fit Data

2424: 			\label{t:IRAS19245}}

2425: 			\tablehead{

2426: 			\colhead{Ion} & \colhead{$\lambda_{0}$} & \colhead{$log(\lambda f N/N_H)$} &

2427: 			                 \colhead{Instrument} & \colhead{$\rm{W}_\lambda$} &

2428: 			                 \colhead{$\rm{v_{c}}$} & \colhead{FWHM} \\

2429: 			                  & \colhead{\AA} & & & \colhead{\AA} & \colhead{\kms} &

2430: 			                  \colhead{\kms}}

2431: 			\startdata

2432: \ion{C}{3} & 977.02 & -0.61 & 2asic & 2.50$\pm$0.74 & 2748$\pm$29 & 663$\pm$235\\ 

2433: \ion{C}{2} & 1036.34 & -1.37 & 1alif & 0.86$\pm$0.09 & 2746$\pm$11 & 272$\pm$30\\ 

2434:  & & & 2blif & 0.75$\pm$0.25 & 2761$\pm$31 & 256$\pm$96\\ 

2435: \ion{O}{1} & 988.73 & -1.56 & 1alif & 0.31$\pm$0.03 & 2774$\pm$8 & 81$\pm$13\\ 

2436: \ion{N}{2} & 1083.99 & -2.00 & 2alif & 0.17\tablenotemark{b} & 2792$\pm$14 & 72\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2437: \ion{N}{3} & 989.80 & -2.03 & 1alif & 0.32\tablenotemark{b} & 2708$\pm$7 & 89\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2438: \ion{N}{1} & 1134.41 & -2.57 & 1blif & 0.38\tablenotemark{b} & 2782$\pm$1 & 50$\pm$11\\ 

2439:  & & & 2alif & 0.30\tablenotemark{b} & 2794$\pm$0 & 37\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2440: \ion{Si}{2} & 1020.70 & -2.99 & 1alif & 0.14$\pm$0.05 & 2821$\pm$9 & 59$\pm$21\\ 

2441:  & & & 2blif & 0.07\tablenotemark{b} & 2820$\pm$27 & 59\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2442: \ion{Ar}{1} & 1048.22 & -3.00 & 1alif & 0.08\tablenotemark{b} & 2787$\pm$14 & 48\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2443: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1121.97 & -3.14 & 1blif & 0.11\tablenotemark{b} & 2862$\pm$15 & 67\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2444:  & & & 2alif & 0.14\tablenotemark{b} & 2828$\pm$11 & 45\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2445: \ion{S}{3} & 1012.50 & -3.24 & 1alif & 0.32\tablenotemark{b} & 2785$\pm$5 & 50$\pm$7\\ 

2446:  & & & 2blif & 0.30\tablenotemark{b} & 2793$\pm$8 & 50\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2447: \ion{Si}{4} s & 1122.48 &   & 1blif & 0.18$\pm$0.02 & 2830$\pm$6 & 60$\pm$12\\ 

2448:  & & & 2alif & 0.21\tablenotemark{b} & 2829$\pm$11 & 60\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2449: \ion{C}{3} s & 1175.59 &   & 1blif & 2.55$\pm$0.50 & 2795$\pm$25 & 641$\pm$130\\ 

2450: 	\enddata

2451: 	\tablenotetext{a}{Using $\rm{v_{sys}}=$      2832       \kms}

2452: 	\tablenotetext{b}{Errors are undetermined for this value.}

2453: 	\end{deluxetable}

2454: 

2455: 

2456: \clearpage

2457: 			\begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}

2458: 			\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2459: 			\tablecolumns{7}

2460: 			\tablewidth{0pc}

2461: 			\tablecaption{        IZW18         ISM Absorption Line Fit Data

2462: 			\label{t:IZW18data}}

2463: 			\tablehead{

2464: 			\colhead{Ion} & \colhead{$\lambda_{0}$} & \colhead{$log(\lambda f N/N_H)$} &

2465: 			                 \colhead{Instrument} & \colhead{$\rm{W}_\lambda$} &

2466: 			                 \colhead{$\rm{v_{c}}$} & \colhead{FWHM} \\

2467: 			                  & \colhead{\AA} & & & \colhead{\AA} & \colhead{\kms} &

2468: 			                  \colhead{\kms}}

2469: 			\startdata

2470: \ion{C}{2} & 1036.34 & -1.37 & 1alif & 0.63$\pm$0.05 & 748$\pm$7 & 180$\pm$16\\ 

2471:  & & & 2blif & 0.65$\pm$0.06 & 757$\pm$8 & 190$\pm$18\\ 

2472: \ion{O}{1} & 988.73 & -1.56 & 1alif & 0.64$\pm$0.23 & 784$\pm$4 & 106$\pm$12\\ 

2473:  & & & 2asic & 0.54\tablenotemark{b} & 816$\pm$5 & 84$\pm$15\\ 

2474: \ion{N}{3} & 989.80 & -2.03 & 1alif & 0.51$\pm$0.10 & 711$\pm$9 & 122$\pm$28\\ 

2475:  & & & 2asic & 0.69$\pm$0.15 & 754$\pm$11 & 180$\pm$68\\ 

2476: \ion{O}{1} & 1039.23 & -2.29 & 1alif & 0.18$\pm$0.02 & 759$\pm$5 & 76$\pm$9\\ 

2477:  & & & 2blif & 0.23$\pm$0.03 & 770$\pm$5 & 79$\pm$13\\ 

2478: \ion{Si}{2} & 1020.70 & -2.99 & 1alif & 0.15$\pm$0.02 & 774$\pm$8 & 100\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2479:  & & & 2blif & 0.17$\pm$0.03 & 788$\pm$11 & 100\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2480: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1121.97 & -3.14 & 1blif & 0.10$\pm$0.03 & 751$\pm$8 & 65$\pm$22\\ 

2481:  & & & 2alif & 0.13$\pm$0.01 & 769$\pm$2 & 57$\pm$6\\ 

2482: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1125.45 & -3.41 & 1blif & 0.09$\pm$0.02 & 745$\pm$6 & 56$\pm$16\\ 

2483:  & & & 2alif & 0.11$\pm$0.02 & 772$\pm$6 & 79$\pm$15\\ 

2484: \ion{Ar}{1} & 1066.66 & -3.58 & 1alif & 0.06\tablenotemark{b} & 758$\pm$20 & 70\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2485: \ion{Si}{4} s & 1122.48 &   & 1blif & 0.18$\pm$0.05 & 753$\pm$17 & 149$\pm$54\\ 

2486:  & & & 2alif & 0.21$\pm$0.02 & 768$\pm$5 & 126$\pm$15\\ 

2487: \ion{Si}{4} s & 1128.33 &   & 1blif & 0.18\tablenotemark{b} & 775$\pm$34 & 155\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2488:  & & & 2alif & 0.18\tablenotemark{b} & 779$\pm$68 & 228\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2489: \ion{C}{3} s & 1175.59 &   & 1blif & 0.86$\pm$0.07 & 747$\pm$15 & 423$\pm$38\\ 

2490:  & & & 2alif & 0.81$\pm$0.06 & 757$\pm$12 & 388$\pm$30\\ 

2491: 	\enddata

2492: 	\tablenotetext{a}{Using $\rm{v_{sys}}=$      751        \kms}

2493: 	\tablenotetext{b}{Errors are undetermined for this value.}

2494: 	\end{deluxetable}

2495: 

2496: 

2497: \clearpage

2498: 			\begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}

2499: 			\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2500: 			\tablecolumns{7}

2501: 			\tablewidth{0pc}

2502: 			\tablecaption{        MRK54         ISM Absorption Line Fit Data

2503: 			\label{t:MRK54data}}

2504: 			\tablehead{

2505: 			\colhead{Ion} & \colhead{$\lambda_{0}$} & \colhead{$log(\lambda f N/N_H)$} &

2506: 			                 \colhead{Instrument} & \colhead{$\rm{W}_\lambda$} &

2507: 			                 \colhead{$\rm{v_{c}}$} & \colhead{FWHM} \\

2508: 			                  & \colhead{\AA} & & & \colhead{\AA} & \colhead{\kms} &

2509: 			                  \colhead{\kms}}

2510: 			\startdata

2511: \ion{C}{3} & 977.02 & -0.61 & 1alif & 1.76$\pm$0.12 & 13382$\pm$12 & 434$\pm$46\\ 

2512:  & & & 2blif & 1.48$\pm$0.09 & 13402$\pm$6 & 368$\pm$28\\ 

2513: \ion{O}{6} & 1031.93 & -1.13 & 1alif & 0.77$\pm$0.09 & 13321$\pm$14 & 287$\pm$38\\ 

2514: \ion{O}{1} & 988.73 & -1.56 & 1alif & 1.18$\pm$0.34 & 13541$\pm$46 & 386$\pm$112\\ 

2515:  & & & 2blif & 0.82$\pm$0.19 & 13526$\pm$30 & 337$\pm$86\\ 

2516: \ion{N}{2} & 1083.99 & -2.00 & 1blif & 1.41$\pm$0.12 & 13466$\pm$9 & 409$\pm$39\\ 

2517:  & & & 2alif & 1.60$\pm$0.13 & 13469$\pm$10 & 497$\pm$44\\ 

2518: \ion{N}{3} & 989.80 & -2.03 & 1alif & 0.67$\pm$0.11 & 13481$\pm$13 & 177$\pm$45\\ 

2519:  & & & 2blif & 0.82\tablenotemark{b} & 13463$\pm$5 & 138$\pm$20\\ 

2520: \ion{Si}{2} & 1020.70 & -2.99 & 1alif & 0.53$\pm$0.15 & 13544$\pm$58 & 300\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2521:  & & & 2blif & 0.81$\pm$0.07 & 13528$\pm$21 & 400\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2522: \ion{S}{3} & 1012.50 & -3.24 & 1alif & 0.62$\pm$0.11 & 13432$\pm$14 & 310$\pm$46\\ 

2523:  & & & 2blif & 0.54$\pm$0.12 & 13429$\pm$15 & 277$\pm$56\\ 

2524: \ion{S}{4} s & 1062.66 &   & 1blif & 0.64$\pm$0.07 & 13529$\pm$27 & 400\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2525:  & & & 2alif & 0.74$\pm$0.06 & 13525$\pm$20 & 400\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2526: \ion{Si}{4} s & 1122.48 &   & 1blif & 0.96$\pm$0.12 & 13434$\pm$14 & 312$\pm$44\\ 

2527:  & & & 2alif & 0.97$\pm$0.16 & 13423$\pm$24 & 334$\pm$62\\ 

2528: \ion{Si}{4} s & 1128.33 &   & 2alif & 0.71$\pm$0.07 & 13453$\pm$14 & 299$\pm$33\\ 

2529: 	\enddata

2530: 	\tablenotetext{a}{Using $\rm{v_{sys}}=$     13450       \kms}

2531: 	\tablenotetext{b}{Errors are undetermined for this value.}

2532: 	\end{deluxetable}

2533: 

2534: 

2535: \clearpage

2536: 			\begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}

2537: 			\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2538: 			\tablecolumns{7}

2539: 			\tablewidth{0pc}

2540: 			\tablecaption{       NGC1140        ISM Absorption Line Fit Data

2541: 			\label{t:NGC1140da}}

2542: 			\tablehead{

2543: 			\colhead{Ion} & \colhead{$\lambda_{0}$} & \colhead{$log(\lambda f N/N_H)$} &

2544: 			                 \colhead{Instrument} & \colhead{$\rm{W}_\lambda$} &

2545: 			                 \colhead{$\rm{v_{c}}$} & \colhead{FWHM} \\

2546: 			                  & \colhead{\AA} & & & \colhead{\AA} & \colhead{\kms} &

2547: 			                  \colhead{\kms}}

2548: 			\startdata

2549: \ion{C}{3} & 977.02 & -0.61 & 2asic & 1.32$\pm$0.18 & 1438$\pm$11 & 268$\pm$46\\ 

2550: \ion{C}{2} & 1036.34 & -1.37 & 1alif & 0.93$\pm$0.08 & 1481$\pm$6 & 250$\pm$21\\ 

2551:  & & & 2blif & 1.33$\pm$0.27 & 1487$\pm$27 & 358$\pm$76\\ 

2552: \ion{O}{1} & 988.73 & -1.56 & 2asic & 0.51$\pm$0.12 & 1542$\pm$5 & 100\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2553:  & & & 2blif & 0.75\tablenotemark{b} & 1548$\pm$6 & 100\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2554: \ion{N}{2} & 1083.99 & -2.00 & 2alif & 0.63$\pm$0.10 & 1517$\pm$7 & 177$\pm$28\\ 

2555: \ion{N}{3} & 989.80 & -2.03 & 2asic & 0.99\tablenotemark{b} & 1502$\pm$5 & 138$\pm$39\\ 

2556:  & & & 2blif & 0.69$\pm$0.10 & 1517$\pm$7 & 130\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2557: \ion{O}{1} & 1039.23 & -2.29 & 1alif & 0.45$\pm$0.03 & 1510$\pm$2 & 110$\pm$11\\ 

2558:  & & & 2blif & 0.42$\pm$0.05 & 1526$\pm$4 & 112$\pm$13\\ 

2559: \ion{N}{1} & 1134.98 & -2.39 & 1blif & 0.24$\pm$0.05 & 1505$\pm$12 & 109$\pm$21\\ 

2560:  & & & 2alif & 0.22$\pm$0.03 & 1515$\pm$8 & 103\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2561: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1144.94 & -2.42 & 1blif & 0.39$\pm$0.04 & 1511$\pm$6 & 105\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2562:  & & & 2alif & 0.39$\pm$0.06 & 1534$\pm$6 & 121$\pm$21\\ 

2563: \ion{N}{1} & 1134.41 & -2.57 & 1blif & 0.30$\pm$0.04 & 1490$\pm$8 & 109$\pm$14\\ 

2564:  & & & 2alif & 0.26$\pm$0.03 & 1491$\pm$7 & 103$\pm$11\\ 

2565: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1063.18 & -2.70 & 1alif & 0.37$\pm$0.06 & 1504$\pm$9 & 145$\pm$30\\ 

2566:  & & & 2blif & 0.44$\pm$0.09 & 1514$\pm$13 & 147$\pm$37\\ 

2567: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1096.88 & -2.96 & 1blif & 0.26$\pm$0.05 & 1503$\pm$9 & 122$\pm$28\\ 

2568:  & & & 2alif & 0.27$\pm$0.04 & 1515$\pm$7 & 112$\pm$21\\ 

2569: \ion{Ar}{1} & 1048.22 & -3.00 & 1alif & 0.16$\pm$0.04 & 1512$\pm$16 & 130\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2570:  & & & 2blif & 0.26$\pm$0.05 & 1529$\pm$13 & 130\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2571: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1121.97 & -3.14 & 1blif & 0.31$\pm$0.10 & 1512$\pm$10 & 115$\pm$42\\ 

2572:  & & & 2alif & 0.32\tablenotemark{b} & 1494$\pm$25 & 148\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2573: \ion{S}{3} & 1012.50 & -3.24 & 1alif & 0.47$\pm$0.09 & 1509$\pm$9 & 175$\pm$31\\ 

2574:  & & & 2blif & 0.50\tablenotemark{b} & 1501$\pm$27 & 168\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2575: \ion{Ar}{1} & 1066.66 & -3.58 & 1alif & 0.16$\pm$0.04 & 1493$\pm$24 & 130\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2576: \ion{Si}{4} s & 1122.48 &   & 1blif & 0.41$\pm$0.08 & 1512$\pm$10 & 132$\pm$31\\ 

2577:  & & & 2alif & 0.67$\pm$0.18 & 1494$\pm$25 & 208$\pm$47\\ 

2578: \ion{C}{3} s & 1175.59 &   & 1blif & 1.16$\pm$0.07 & 1498$\pm$14 & 300\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2579: 	\enddata

2580: 	\tablenotetext{a}{Using $\rm{v_{sys}}=$      1501       \kms}

2581: 	\tablenotetext{b}{Errors are undetermined for this value.}

2582: 	\end{deluxetable}

2583: 

2584: 

2585: \clearpage

2586: 			\begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}

2587: 			\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2588: 			\tablecolumns{7}

2589: 			\tablewidth{0pc}

2590: 			\tablecaption{       NGC1705        ISM Absorption Line Fit Data

2591: 			\label{t:NGC1705da}}

2592: 			\tablehead{

2593: 			\colhead{Ion} & \colhead{$\lambda_{0}$} & \colhead{$log(\lambda f N/N_H)$} &

2594: 			                 \colhead{Instrument} & \colhead{$\rm{W}_\lambda$} &

2595: 			                 \colhead{$\rm{v_{c}}$} & \colhead{FWHM} \\

2596: 			                  & \colhead{\AA} & & & \colhead{\AA} & \colhead{\kms} &

2597: 			                  \colhead{\kms}}

2598: 			\startdata

2599: \ion{C}{3} & 977.02 & -0.61 & 1bsic & 1.21$\pm$0.29 & 613$\pm$20 & 310\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2600:  & & & 2asic & 1.23\tablenotemark{b} & 651$\pm$28 & 325\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2601: \ion{O}{6} & 1031.93 & -1.13 & 1alif & 0.18$\pm$0.01 & 554$\pm$3 & 111$\pm$9\\ 

2602:  & & & 2blif & 0.20$\pm$0.01 & 559$\pm$3 & 125$\pm$9\\ 

2603: \ion{C}{2} & 1036.34 & -1.37 & 1alif & 1.01\tablenotemark{b} & 600$\pm$37 & 262\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2604:  & & & 2blif & 1.02$\pm$0.26 & 597$\pm$24 & 270$\pm$84\\ 

2605: \ion{O}{1} & 988.73 & -1.56 & 1alif & 0.58$\pm$0.04 & 600$\pm$3 & 162$\pm$21\\ 

2606:  & & & 2blif & 0.53$\pm$0.04 & 596$\pm$4 & 153$\pm$14\\ 

2607: \ion{N}{2} & 1083.99 & -2.00 & 1asic & 0.49$\pm$0.06 & 626$\pm$4 & 160$\pm$18\\ 

2608: \ion{N}{3} & 989.80 & -2.03 & 1alif & 0.60$\pm$0.05 & 597$\pm$2 & 130$\pm$13\\ 

2609:  & & & 2blif & 0.63$\pm$0.04 & 594$\pm$3 & 145$\pm$14\\ 

2610: \ion{O}{1} & 1039.23 & -2.29 & 1alif & 0.22\tablenotemark{b} & 606$\pm$31 & 72\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2611:  & & & 2blif & 0.23\tablenotemark{b} & 600$\pm$32 & 77\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2612: \ion{N}{1} & 1134.98 & -2.39 & 1blif & 0.07$\pm$0.01 & 592$\pm$6 & 73\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2613:  & & & 2alif & 0.05$\pm$0.01 & 593$\pm$3 & 50\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2614: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1144.94 & -2.42 & 1blif & 0.24$\pm$0.02 & 610$\pm$2 & 87$\pm$7\\ 

2615:  & & & 2alif & 0.25$\pm$0.02 & 609$\pm$2 & 89$\pm$7\\ 

2616: \ion{N}{1} & 1134.41 & -2.57 & 1blif & 0.07$\pm$0.01 & 614$\pm$9 & 73$\pm$9\\ 

2617:  & & & 2alif & 0.05$\pm$0.01 & 597$\pm$8 & 50$\pm$15\\ 

2618: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1096.88 & -2.96 & 1blif & 0.14$\pm$0.01 & 607$\pm$3 & 88$\pm$7\\ 

2619:  & & & 2alif & 0.11$\pm$0.02 & 603$\pm$5 & 67$\pm$14\\ 

2620: \ion{Si}{2} & 1020.70 & -2.99 & 1alif & 0.09$\pm$0.01 & 613$\pm$2 & 77$\pm$7\\ 

2621:  & & & 2blif & 0.09$\pm$0.01 & 599$\pm$3 & 80\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2622: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1121.97 & -3.14 & 1blif & 0.18\tablenotemark{b} & 620$\pm$50 & 120\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2623:  & & & 2alif & 0.12\tablenotemark{b} & 603$\pm$7 & 108$\pm$43\\ 

2624: \ion{S}{3} & 1012.50 & -3.24 & 1alif & 0.18$\pm$0.02 & 608$\pm$11 & 130\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2625:  & & & 2blif & 0.17$\pm$0.03 & 603$\pm$14 & 130\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2626: \ion{Ar}{1} & 1066.66 & -3.58 & 1alif & 0.11$\pm$0.02 & 622$\pm$9 & 110\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2627:  & & & 2blif & 0.12$\pm$0.01 & 592$\pm$6 & 110\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2628: \ion{Si}{4} s & 1122.48 &   & 1blif & 0.40\tablenotemark{b} & 627$\pm$47 & 172\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2629:  & & & 2alif & 0.48$\pm$0.00 & 618$\pm$4 & 200$\pm$4\\ 

2630: \ion{C}{3} s & 1175.59 &   & 1blif & 1.67$\pm$0.04 & 639$\pm$4 & 515$\pm$13\\ 

2631:  & & & 2alif & 1.65$\pm$0.04 & 634$\pm$4 & 507$\pm$12\\ 

2632: 	\enddata

2633: 	\tablenotetext{a}{Using $\rm{v_{sys}}=$      632        \kms}

2634: 	\tablenotetext{b}{Errors are undetermined for this value.}

2635: 	\end{deluxetable}

2636: 

2637: 

2638: \clearpage

2639: 			\begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}

2640: 			\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2641: 			\tablecolumns{7}

2642: 			\tablewidth{0pc}

2643: 			\tablecaption{       NGC1741        ISM Absorption Line Fit Data

2644: 			\label{t:NGC1741da}}

2645: 			\tablehead{

2646: 			\colhead{Ion} & \colhead{$\lambda_{0}$} & \colhead{$log(\lambda f N/N_H)$} &

2647: 			                 \colhead{Instrument} & \colhead{$\rm{W}_\lambda$} &

2648: 			                 \colhead{$\rm{v_{c}}$} & \colhead{FWHM} \\

2649: 			                  & \colhead{\AA} & & & \colhead{\AA} & \colhead{\kms} &

2650: 			                  \colhead{\kms}}

2651: 			\startdata

2652: \ion{C}{3} & 977.02 & -0.61 & 2asic & 1.08\tablenotemark{b} & 4007$\pm$20 & 164$\pm$15\\ 

2653: \ion{O}{6} & 1031.93 & -1.13 & 1alif & 0.58$\pm$0.08 & 3833$\pm$32 & 400\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2654:  & & & 2blif & 0.58$\pm$0.20 & 3921$\pm$92 & 400\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2655: \ion{C}{2} & 1036.34 & -1.37 & 1alif & 1.38$\pm$0.07 & 3985$\pm$4 & 300$\pm$28\\ 

2656:  & & & 2blif & 1.39$\pm$0.19 & 3986$\pm$4 & 270$\pm$29\\ 

2657: \ion{O}{1} & 988.73 & -1.56 & 1alif & 1.16$\pm$0.25 & 4024$\pm$10 & 234$\pm$56\\ 

2658:  & & & 2blif & 0.98\tablenotemark{b} & 4046$\pm$11 & 182$\pm$50\\ 

2659: \ion{N}{2} & 1083.99 & -2.00 & 1blif & 0.93$\pm$0.19 & 3957$\pm$9 & 277$\pm$57\\ 

2660:  & & & 2alif & 0.91$\pm$0.05 & 3982$\pm$5 & 263$\pm$16\\ 

2661: \ion{N}{3} & 989.80 & -2.03 & 1alif & 0.84$\pm$0.10 & 4004$\pm$12 & 223$\pm$31\\ 

2662:  & & & 2blif & 0.79$\pm$0.15 & 3981$\pm$18 & 206$\pm$37\\ 

2663: \ion{O}{1} & 1039.23 & -2.29 & 1alif & 0.58$\pm$0.07 & 3981$\pm$7 & 222$\pm$25\\ 

2664:  & & & 2blif & 0.49$\pm$0.07 & 3977$\pm$11 & 190$\pm$28\\ 

2665: \ion{N}{1} & 1134.98 & -2.39 & 1blif & 0.16$\pm$0.06 & 3962$\pm$11 & 82$\pm$24\\ 

2666:  & & & 2alif & 0.16$\pm$0.04 & 3944$\pm$16 & 141$\pm$40\\ 

2667: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1144.94 & -2.42 & 2alif & 0.40$\pm$0.04 & 3992$\pm$13 & 200\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2668: \ion{N}{1} & 1134.41 & -2.57 & 1blif & 0.20$\pm$0.07 & 3937$\pm$9 & 82$\pm$31\\ 

2669:  & & & 2alif & 0.31$\pm$0.05 & 3928$\pm$15 & 141$\pm$23\\ 

2670: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1096.88 & -2.96 & 1blif & 0.30$\pm$0.05 & 3953$\pm$13 & 181$\pm$37\\ 

2671:  & & & 2alif & 0.30$\pm$0.06 & 3964$\pm$13 & 200$\pm$46\\ 

2672: \ion{Si}{2} & 1020.70 & -2.99 & 1alif & 0.45$\pm$0.08 & 3954$\pm$8 & 211$\pm$34\\ 

2673:  & & & 2blif & 0.42$\pm$0.08 & 3963$\pm$8 & 180$\pm$35\\ 

2674: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1121.97 & -3.14 & 1blif & 0.45$\pm$0.14 & 3979$\pm$22 & 204$\pm$54\\ 

2675:  & & & 2alif & 0.34\tablenotemark{b} & 3978$\pm$42 & 199$\pm$70\\ 

2676: \ion{S}{4} s & 1062.66 &   & 1alif & 0.38$\pm$0.05 & 4017$\pm$23 & 200\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2677: \ion{Si}{4} s & 1122.48 &   & 1blif & 0.58$\pm$0.10 & 4001$\pm$13 & 194$\pm$29\\ 

2678:  & & & 2alif & 0.59$\pm$0.15 & 4003$\pm$23 & 218$\pm$39\\ 

2679: 	\enddata

2680: 	\tablenotetext{a}{Using $\rm{v_{sys}}=$      4037       \kms}

2681: 	\tablenotetext{b}{Errors are undetermined for this value.}

2682: 	\end{deluxetable}

2683: 

2684: 

2685: \clearpage

2686: 			\begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}

2687: 			\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2688: 			\tablecolumns{7}

2689: 			\tablewidth{0pc}

2690: 			\tablecaption{       NGC3310        ISM Absorption Line Fit Data

2691: 			\label{t:NGC3310da}}

2692: 			\tablehead{

2693: 			\colhead{Ion} & \colhead{$\lambda_{0}$} & \colhead{$log(\lambda f N/N_H)$} &

2694: 			                 \colhead{Instrument} & \colhead{$\rm{W}_\lambda$} &

2695: 			                 \colhead{$\rm{v_{c}}$} & \colhead{FWHM} \\

2696: 			                  & \colhead{\AA} & & & \colhead{\AA} & \colhead{\kms} &

2697: 			                  \colhead{\kms}}

2698: 			\startdata

2699: \ion{C}{3} & 977.02 & -0.61 & 1bsic & 2.44$\pm$0.05 & 701$\pm$5 & 583$\pm$19\\ 

2700:  & & & 2asic & 2.10$\pm$0.61 & 705$\pm$19 & 450$\pm$169\\ 

2701: \ion{O}{6} & 1031.93 & -1.13 & 1alif & 1.67$\pm$0.04 & 616$\pm$5 & 556$\pm$15\\ 

2702:  & & & 2blif & 1.71$\pm$0.04 & 620$\pm$5 & 554$\pm$15\\ 

2703: \ion{C}{2} & 1036.34 & -1.37 & 1alif & 3.31$\pm$0.07 & 749$\pm$6 & 786$\pm$31\\ 

2704:  & & & 2blif & 3.41$\pm$0.07 & 752$\pm$6 & 803$\pm$35\\ 

2705: \ion{O}{1} & 988.73 & -1.56 & 1alif & 1.57\tablenotemark{b} & 877$\pm$10 & 270$\pm$50\\ 

2706:  & & & 2blif & 1.52\tablenotemark{b} & 859$\pm$6 & 259$\pm$42\\ 

2707: \ion{N}{2} & 1083.99 & -2.00 & 1asic & 2.23$\pm$0.17 & 889$\pm$9 & 627$\pm$48\\ 

2708:  & & & 2bsic & 2.06$\pm$0.13 & 874$\pm$9 & 581$\pm$40\\ 

2709: \ion{N}{3} & 989.80 & -2.03 & 1alif & 1.21$\pm$0.13 & 891$\pm$17 & 349$\pm$38\\ 

2710:  & & & 2blif & 1.11$\pm$0.15 & 884$\pm$21 & 352$\pm$47\\ 

2711: \ion{O}{1} & 1039.23 & -2.29 & 1alif & 0.63$\pm$0.05 & 945$\pm$16 & 450\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2712:  & & & 2blif & 0.72$\pm$0.01 & 966$\pm$15 & 450\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2713: \ion{N}{1} & 1134.98 & -2.39 & 1blif & 0.16$\pm$0.04 & 837$\pm$6 & 397$\pm$18\\ 

2714:  & & & 2alif & 0.15$\pm$0.04 & 846$\pm$7 & 360$\pm$19\\ 

2715: \ion{N}{1} & 1134.41 & -2.57 & 1blif & 0.55$\pm$0.03 & 837$\pm$6 & 397$\pm$19\\ 

2716:  & & & 2alif & 0.50$\pm$0.03 & 846$\pm$7 & 360$\pm$19\\ 

2717: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1096.88 & -2.96 & 2alif & 0.40$\pm$0.11 & 892$\pm$38 & 351$\pm$101\\ 

2718: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1121.97 & -3.14 & 1blif & 0.45$\pm$0.10 & 885$\pm$20 & 305$\pm$48\\ 

2719:  & & & 2alif & 0.53\tablenotemark{b} & 909$\pm$32 & 335$\pm$47\\ 

2720: \ion{S}{3} & 1012.50 & -3.24 & 1alif & 0.56$\pm$0.02 & 950$\pm$8 & 350\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2721:  & & & 2blif & 0.78$\pm$0.22 & 923$\pm$10 & 439$\pm$95\\ 

2722: \ion{Ar}{1} & 1066.66 & -3.58 & 1alif & 0.39$\pm$0.02 & 930$\pm$4 & 231$\pm$15\\ 

2723:  & & & 2blif & 0.34$\pm$0.06 & 922$\pm$13 & 229$\pm$39\\ 

2724: \ion{S}{4} s & 1062.66 &   & 1alif & 0.82$\pm$0.19 & 946$\pm$35 & 520$\pm$106\\ 

2725:  & & & 2blif & 0.64\tablenotemark{b} & 949$\pm$105 & 432\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2726: \ion{Si}{4} s & 1122.48 &   & 1blif & 0.70$\pm$0.12 & 978$\pm$20 & 346$\pm$50\\ 

2727:  & & & 2alif & 0.71$\pm$0.25 & 973$\pm$48 & 383$\pm$73\\ 

2728: \ion{C}{3} s & 1175.59 &   & 2alif & 1.54$\pm$0.05 & 985$\pm$4 & 530$\pm$15\\ 

2729: 	\enddata

2730: 	\tablenotetext{a}{Using $\rm{v_{sys}}=$      983        \kms}

2731: 	\tablenotetext{b}{Errors are undetermined for this value.}

2732: 	\end{deluxetable}

2733: 

2734: 

2735: \clearpage

2736: 			\begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}

2737: 			\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2738: 			\tablecolumns{7}

2739: 			\tablewidth{0pc}

2740: 			\tablecaption{       NGC3690        ISM Absorption Line Fit Data

2741: 			\label{t:NGC3690da}}

2742: 			\tablehead{

2743: 			\colhead{Ion} & \colhead{$\lambda_{0}$} & \colhead{$log(\lambda f N/N_H)$} &

2744: 			                 \colhead{Instrument} & \colhead{$\rm{W}_\lambda$} &

2745: 			                 \colhead{$\rm{v_{c}}$} & \colhead{FWHM} \\

2746: 			                  & \colhead{\AA} & & & \colhead{\AA} & \colhead{\kms} &

2747: 			                  \colhead{\kms}}

2748: 			\startdata

2749: \ion{C}{3} & 977.02 & -0.61 & 1bsic & 1.69$\pm$0.10 & 3033$\pm$84 & 385\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2750:  & & & 2asic & 1.53$\pm$0.20 & 3111$\pm$9 & 364$\pm$104\\ 

2751: \ion{O}{6} & 1031.93 & -1.13 & 1alif & 0.78\tablenotemark{b} & 2866$\pm$37 & 429\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2752:  & & & 2blif & 0.98$\pm$0.16 & 2842$\pm$24 & 564$\pm$89\\ 

2753: \ion{C}{2} & 1036.34 & -1.37 & 1alif & 2.40$\pm$0.10 & 3051$\pm$6 & 580$\pm$39\\ 

2754:  & & & 2blif & 2.20$\pm$0.08 & 3052$\pm$6 & 501$\pm$36\\ 

2755: \ion{N}{2} & 1083.99 & -2.00 & 2alif & 2.27$\pm$0.08 & 3075$\pm$5 & 589$\pm$22\\ 

2756: \ion{O}{1} & 1039.23 & -2.29 & 1alif & 0.63$\pm$0.07 & 3169$\pm$4 & 172$\pm$20\\ 

2757:  & & & 2blif & 0.82$\pm$0.06 & 3142$\pm$4 & 224$\pm$17\\ 

2758: \ion{N}{1} & 1134.98 & -2.39 & 1blif & 0.42$\pm$0.04 & 3153$\pm$8 & 173\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2759:  & & & 2alif & 0.53$\pm$0.03 & 3151$\pm$6 & 192$\pm$10\\ 

2760: \ion{N}{1} & 1134.41 & -2.57 & 1blif & 0.55$\pm$0.04 & 3132$\pm$7 & 173$\pm$12\\ 

2761:  & & & 2alif & 0.68$\pm$0.03 & 3138$\pm$5 & 192$\pm$10\\ 

2762: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1096.88 & -2.96 & 1blif & 0.49$\pm$0.08 & 3131$\pm$8 & 213$\pm$35\\ 

2763:  & & & 2alif & 0.61$\pm$0.05 & 3098$\pm$6 & 233$\pm$20\\ 

2764: \ion{S}{3} & 1012.50 & -3.24 & 1alif & 0.55\tablenotemark{b} & 3099$\pm$146 & 319\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2765:  & & & 2blif & 0.57$\pm$0.10 & 3114$\pm$19 & 262$\pm$41\\ 

2766: \ion{Si}{4} s & 1128.33 &   & 1blif & 0.67$\pm$0.15 & 3079$\pm$27 & 365$\pm$69\\ 

2767:  & & & 2alif & 0.48\tablenotemark{b} & 3128$\pm$36 & 299$\pm$88\\ 

2768: 	\enddata

2769: 	\tablenotetext{a}{Using $\rm{v_{sys}}=$      3121       \kms}

2770: 	\tablenotetext{b}{Errors are undetermined for this value.}

2771: 	\end{deluxetable}

2772: 

2773: 

2774: \clearpage

2775: 			\begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}

2776: 			\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2777: 			\tablecolumns{7}

2778: 			\tablewidth{0pc}

2779: 			\tablecaption{       NGC4214        ISM Absorption Line Fit Data

2780: 			\label{t:NGC4214da}}

2781: 			\tablehead{

2782: 			\colhead{Ion} & \colhead{$\lambda_{0}$} & \colhead{$log(\lambda f N/N_H)$} &

2783: 			                 \colhead{Instrument} & \colhead{$\rm{W}_\lambda$} &

2784: 			                 \colhead{$\rm{v_{c}}$} & \colhead{FWHM} \\

2785: 			                  & \colhead{\AA} & & & \colhead{\AA} & \colhead{\kms} &

2786: 			                  \colhead{\kms}}

2787: 			\startdata

2788: \ion{C}{3} & 977.02 & -0.61 & 2asic & 1.04$\pm$0.33 & 233$\pm$4 & 194$\pm$28\\ 

2789: \ion{O}{6} & 1031.93 & -1.13 & 1alif & 0.29$\pm$0.04 & 212$\pm$5 & 124$\pm$16\\ 

2790:  & & & 2blif & 0.35$\pm$0.03 & 225$\pm$5 & 152$\pm$15\\ 

2791: \ion{C}{2} & 1036.34 & -1.37 & 1alif & 1.04$\pm$0.04 & 273$\pm$2 & 263$\pm$13\\ 

2792:  & & & 2blif & 1.06$\pm$0.03 & 279$\pm$2 & 265$\pm$12\\ 

2793: \ion{O}{1} & 988.73 & -1.56 & 1alif & 0.47$\pm$0.14 & 283$\pm$12 & 110\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2794:  & & & 2blif & 0.50$\pm$0.15 & 285$\pm$6 & 110\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2795: \ion{N}{2} & 1083.99 & -2.00 & 1asic & 0.63$\pm$0.03 & 289$\pm$4 & 162$\pm$8\\ 

2796:  & & & 2bsic & 0.74$\pm$0.09 & 299$\pm$7 & 197$\pm$28\\ 

2797: \ion{N}{3} & 989.80 & -2.03 & 1alif & 0.55$\pm$0.06 & 294$\pm$4 & 135$\pm$24\\ 

2798:  & & & 2blif & 0.50$\pm$0.06 & 295$\pm$2 & 98$\pm$12\\ 

2799: \ion{O}{1} & 1039.23 & -2.29 & 1alif & 0.41$\pm$0.02 & 294$\pm$2 & 112$\pm$7\\ 

2800:  & & & 2blif & 0.47$\pm$0.03 & 298$\pm$2 & 128$\pm$8\\ 

2801: \ion{N}{1} & 1134.98 & -2.39 & 1blif & 0.29$\pm$0.02 & 305$\pm$4 & 110$\pm$6\\ 

2802:  & & & 2alif & 0.29$\pm$0.01 & 301$\pm$3 & 112$\pm$11\\ 

2803: \ion{N}{1} & 1134.41 & -2.57 & 1blif & 0.35$\pm$0.02 & 290$\pm$3 & 110$\pm$6\\ 

2804:  & & & 2alif & 0.34$\pm$0.02 & 283$\pm$3 & 112$\pm$5\\ 

2805: \ion{Si}{2} & 1020.70 & -2.99 & 1alif & 0.28$\pm$0.02 & 312$\pm$3 & 104$\pm$8\\ 

2806:  & & & 2blif & 0.25$\pm$0.02 & 308$\pm$2 & 93$\pm$6\\ 

2807: \ion{S}{3} & 1012.50 & -3.24 & 1alif & 0.32$\pm$0.02 & 293$\pm$3 & 123$\pm$9\\ 

2808:  & & & 2blif & 0.31$\pm$0.02 & 293$\pm$3 & 120$\pm$9\\ 

2809: \ion{P}{5} s & 1117.98 &   & 2alif & 0.27$\pm$0.05 & 294$\pm$10 & 290$\pm$44\\ 

2810: \ion{Si}{4} s & 1128.33 &   & 1blif & 0.63$\pm$0.05 & 298$\pm$7 & 318$\pm$25\\ 

2811:  & & & 2alif & 0.62$\pm$0.04 & 304$\pm$6 & 334$\pm$21\\ 

2812: \ion{C}{3} s & 1175.59 &   & 1blif & 1.53$\pm$0.07 & 285$\pm$9 & 545$\pm$26\\ 

2813:  & & & 2alif & 1.40$\pm$0.07 & 288$\pm$6 & 510$\pm$25\\ 

2814: 	\enddata

2815: 	\tablenotetext{a}{Using $\rm{v_{sys}}=$      291        \kms}

2816: 	\tablenotetext{b}{Errors are undetermined for this value.}

2817: 	\end{deluxetable}

2818: 

2819: 

2820: \clearpage

2821: 			\begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}

2822: 			\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2823: 			\tablecolumns{7}

2824: 			\tablewidth{0pc}

2825: 			\tablecaption{       NGC7673        ISM Absorption Line Fit Data

2826: 			\label{t:NGC7673da}}

2827: 			\tablehead{

2828: 			\colhead{Ion} & \colhead{$\lambda_{0}$} & \colhead{$log(\lambda f N/N_H)$} &

2829: 			                 \colhead{Instrument} & \colhead{$\rm{W}_\lambda$} &

2830: 			                 \colhead{$\rm{v_{c}}$} & \colhead{FWHM} \\

2831: 			                  & \colhead{\AA} & & & \colhead{\AA} & \colhead{\kms} &

2832: 			                  \colhead{\kms}}

2833: 			\startdata

2834: \ion{O}{6} & 1031.93 & -1.13 & 1alif & 0.95$\pm$0.17 & 3323$\pm$28 & 386$\pm$66\\ 

2835:  & & & 2blif & 1.07$\pm$0.15 & 3323\tablenotemark{b} & 386\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2836: \ion{C}{2} & 1036.34 & -1.37 & 1alif & 2.06$\pm$0.34 & 3355$\pm$30 & 469$\pm$166\\ 

2837:  & & & 2blif & 2.07$\pm$0.58 & 3382$\pm$14 & 350$\pm$11\\ 

2838: \ion{N}{2} & 1083.99 & -2.00 & 1blif & 1.52$\pm$0.12 & 3401$\pm$15 & 440$\pm$40\\ 

2839:  & & & 2alif & 1.45$\pm$0.12 & 3405$\pm$14 & 411$\pm$32\\ 

2840: \ion{O}{1} & 1039.23 & -2.29 & 1alif & 1.02$\pm$0.12 & 3435$\pm$8 & 283$\pm$29\\ 

2841:  & & & 2blif & 0.92$\pm$0.17 & 3419$\pm$10 & 254$\pm$53\\ 

2842: \ion{N}{1} & 1134.41 & -2.57 & 2alif & 0.47$\pm$0.06 & 3404$\pm$26 & 381$\pm$53\\ 

2843: \ion{P}{5} s & 1117.98 &   & 2alif & 0.45$\pm$0.05 & 3417$\pm$19 & 250\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2844: \ion{Si}{4} s & 1128.33 &   & 1blif & 0.32$\pm$0.09 & 3402$\pm$33 & 250\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2845:  & & & 2alif & 0.57$\pm$0.10 & 3455$\pm$19 & 259$\pm$50\\ 

2846: 	\enddata

2847: 	\tablenotetext{a}{Using $\rm{v_{sys}}=$      3392       \kms}

2848: 	\tablenotetext{b}{Errors are undetermined for this value.}

2849: 	\end{deluxetable}

2850: 

2851: 

2852: \clearpage

2853: 			\begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}

2854: 			\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2855: 			\tablecolumns{7}

2856: 			\tablewidth{0pc}

2857: 			\tablecaption{       NGC7714        ISM Absorption Line Fit Data

2858: 			\label{t:NGC7714da}}

2859: 			\tablehead{

2860: 			\colhead{Ion} & \colhead{$\lambda_{0}$} & \colhead{$log(\lambda f N/N_H)$} &

2861: 			                 \colhead{Instrument} & \colhead{$\rm{W}_\lambda$} &

2862: 			                 \colhead{$\rm{v_{c}}$} & \colhead{FWHM} \\

2863: 			                  & \colhead{\AA} & & & \colhead{\AA} & \colhead{\kms} &

2864: 			                  \colhead{\kms}}

2865: 			\startdata

2866: \ion{O}{6} & 1031.93 & -1.13 & 1alif & 1.54$\pm$0.01 & 2589$\pm$3 & 363$\pm$6\\ 

2867:  & & & 2blif & 1.56$\pm$0.14 & 2594$\pm$16 & 522$\pm$51\\ 

2868: \ion{C}{2} & 1036.34 & -1.37 & 1alif & 1.94$\pm$0.35 & 2739$\pm$42 & 532$\pm$110\\ 

2869:  & & & 2blif & 2.76$\pm$0.10 & 2726$\pm$9 & 709$\pm$30\\ 

2870: \ion{N}{2} & 1083.99 & -2.00 & 2alif & 2.36$\pm$0.11 & 2753$\pm$8 & 628$\pm$33\\ 

2871: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1096.88 & -2.96 & 1blif & 0.49$\pm$0.09 & 2725$\pm$11 & 220$\pm$48\\ 

2872:  & & & 2alif & 0.46$\pm$0.08 & 2757$\pm$14 & 349$\pm$55\\ 

2873: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1121.97 & -3.14 & 2alif & 0.50$\pm$0.10 & 2727$\pm$19 & 258$\pm$36\\ 

2874: \ion{S}{3} & 1012.50 & -3.24 & 1alif & 0.58\tablenotemark{b} & 2750$\pm$61 & 188\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2875:  & & & 2blif & 0.62$\pm$0.04 & 2751$\pm$9 & 200\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2876: \ion{Si}{4} s & 1122.48 &   & 2alif & 0.80$\pm$0.08 & 2766$\pm$9 & 255$\pm$22\\ 

2877: 	\enddata

2878: 	\tablenotetext{a}{Using $\rm{v_{sys}}=$      2803       \kms}

2879: 	\tablenotetext{b}{Errors are undetermined for this value.}

2880: 	\end{deluxetable}

2881: 

2882: 

2883: \clearpage

2884: 			\begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}

2885: 			\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2886: 			\tablecolumns{7}

2887: 			\tablewidth{0pc}

2888: 			\tablecaption{     SBS0335-052      ISM Absorption Line Fit Data

2889: 			\label{t:SBS0335- }}

2890: 			\tablehead{

2891: 			\colhead{Ion} & \colhead{$\lambda_{0}$} & \colhead{$log(\lambda f N/N_H)$} &

2892: 			                 \colhead{Instrument} & \colhead{$\rm{W}_\lambda$} &

2893: 			                 \colhead{$\rm{v_{c}}$} & \colhead{FWHM} \\

2894: 			                  & \colhead{\AA} & & & \colhead{\AA} & \colhead{\kms} &

2895: 			                  \colhead{\kms}}

2896: 			\startdata

2897: \ion{O}{6} & 1031.93 & -1.13 & 1alif & 0.16\tablenotemark{b} & 3863$\pm$105 & 155\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2898:  & & & 2blif & 0.13\tablenotemark{b} & 3919$\pm$82 & 132\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2899: \ion{C}{2} & 1036.34 & -1.37 & 1alif & 0.47$\pm$0.08 & 4040$\pm$10 & 138$\pm$26\\ 

2900:  & & & 2blif & 0.38$\pm$0.07 & 4051$\pm$7 & 94$\pm$19\\ 

2901: \ion{O}{1} & 988.73 & -1.56 & 1alif & 0.40\tablenotemark{b} & 4043$\pm$12 & 76\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2902:  & & & 2blif & 0.39\tablenotemark{b} & 4075$\pm$10 & 56\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2903: \ion{N}{2} & 1083.99 & -2.00 & 2alif & 0.23\tablenotemark{b} & 4095$\pm$45 & 176\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2904: \ion{N}{3} & 989.80 & -2.03 & 1alif & 0.46$\pm$0.10 & 4058$\pm$11 & 115$\pm$24\\ 

2905:  & & & 2blif & 0.51$\pm$0.18 & 4093$\pm$7 & 86$\pm$12\\ 

2906: \ion{O}{1} & 1039.23 & -2.29 & 1alif & 0.23\tablenotemark{b} & 4066$\pm$3 & 35\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2907:  & & & 2blif & 0.21$\pm$0.02 & 4081$\pm$3 & 54$\pm$3\\ 

2908: \ion{N}{1} & 1134.98 & -2.39 & 2alif & 0.10$\pm$0.03 & 4069$\pm$4 & 31\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2909: \ion{N}{1} & 1134.41 & -2.57 & 2alif & 0.11$\pm$0.03 & 4073$\pm$5 & 31$\pm$9\\ 

2910: 	\enddata

2911: 	\tablenotetext{a}{Using $\rm{v_{sys}}=$      4043       \kms}

2912: 	\tablenotetext{b}{Errors are undetermined for this value.}

2913: 	\end{deluxetable}

2914: 

2915: 

2916: \clearpage

2917: 			\begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}

2918: 			\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2919: 			\tablecolumns{7}

2920: 			\tablewidth{0pc}

2921: 			\tablecaption{     TOL0440-381      ISM Absorption Line Fit Data

2922: 			\label{t:TOL0440- }}

2923: 			\tablehead{

2924: 			\colhead{Ion} & \colhead{$\lambda_{0}$} & \colhead{$log(\lambda f N/N_H)$} &

2925: 			                 \colhead{Instrument} & \colhead{$\rm{W}_\lambda$} &

2926: 			                 \colhead{$\rm{v_{c}}$} & \colhead{FWHM} \\

2927: 			                  & \colhead{\AA} & & & \colhead{\AA} & \colhead{\kms} &

2928: 			                  \colhead{\kms}}

2929: 			\startdata

2930: \ion{C}{3} & 977.02 & -0.61 & 1alif & 1.23$\pm$0.22 & 12063$\pm$16 & 369$\pm$76\\ 

2931:  & & & 2blif & 1.23\tablenotemark{b} & 12063$\pm$7 & 369\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2932: \ion{C}{2} & 1036.34 & -1.37 & 1alif & 1.25$\pm$0.42 & 12171$\pm$9 & 222$\pm$31\\ 

2933: \ion{N}{2} & 1083.99 & -2.00 & 2alif & 0.60$\pm$0.07 & 12194$\pm$11 & 206$\pm$25\\ 

2934: \ion{S}{3} & 1012.50 & -3.24 & 1alif & 0.52$\pm$0.05 & 12197$\pm$12 & 252$\pm$26\\ 

2935:  & & & 2blif & 0.58$\pm$0.06 & 12205$\pm$9 & 192$\pm$22\\ 

2936: \ion{S}{4} s & 1062.66 &   & 2alif & 0.55$\pm$0.11 & 12254$\pm$32 & 376$\pm$73\\ 

2937: \ion{Si}{4} s & 1128.33 &   & 2alif & 0.82$\pm$0.13 & 12298$\pm$28 & 351$\pm$54\\ 

2938: 	\enddata

2939: 	\tablenotetext{a}{Using $\rm{v_{sys}}=$     12291       \kms}

2940: 	\tablenotetext{b}{Errors are undetermined for this value.}

2941: 	\end{deluxetable}

2942: 

2943: 

2944: \clearpage

2945: 			\begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}

2946: 			\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2947: 			\tablecolumns{7}

2948: 			\tablewidth{0pc}

2949: 			\tablecaption{        VV114 ISM Absorption Line Fit Data

2950: 			\label{t:VV114data}}

2951: 			\tablehead{

2952: 			\colhead{Ion} & \colhead{$\lambda_{0}$} & \colhead{$log(\lambda f N/N_H)$} &

2953: 			                 \colhead{Instrument} & \colhead{$\rm{W}_\lambda$} &

2954: 			                 \colhead{$\rm{v_{c}}$} & \colhead{FWHM} \\

2955: 			                  & \colhead{\AA} & & & \colhead{\AA} & \colhead{\kms} &

2956: 			                  \colhead{\kms}}

2957: 			\startdata

2958: \ion{C}{3} & 977.02 & -0.61 & 1alif & 2.55$\pm$0.81 & 5971$\pm$8 & 350\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2959:  & & & 2blif & 2.39\tablenotemark{b} & 5990$\pm$5 & 304$\pm$5\\ 

2960: \ion{O}{6} & 1031.93 & -1.13 & 1alif & 1.52$\pm$0.10 & 5684$\pm$25 & 750\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2961:  & & & 2blif & 1.51$\pm$0.47 & 5759$\pm$28 & 783$\pm$196\\ 

2962: \ion{C}{2} & 1036.34 & -1.37 & 1alif & 2.70$\pm$0.48 & 5964$\pm$22 & 746$\pm$134\\ 

2963:  & & & 2blif & 2.54$\pm$0.17 & 5962$\pm$17 & 635$\pm$66\\ 

2964: \ion{O}{1} & 988.73 & -1.56 & 1alif & 1.59\tablenotemark{b} & 6084$\pm$312 & 350\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2965:  & & & 2blif & 2.32$\pm$0.80 & 6114$\pm$40 & 448$\pm$37\\ 

2966: \ion{N}{2} & 1083.99 & -2.00 & 1blif & 2.25$\pm$0.09 & 5975$\pm$10 & 651$\pm$30\\ 

2967:  & & & 2alif & 2.34$\pm$0.09 & 5980$\pm$8 & 645$\pm$26\\ 

2968: \ion{N}{3} & 989.80 & -2.03 & 1alif & 2.33\tablenotemark{b} & 5873$\pm$11 & 400$\pm$129\\ 

2969:  & & & 2blif & 2.32$\pm$0.57 & 5900$\pm$2 & 395$\pm$37\\ 

2970: \ion{O}{1} & 1039.23 & -2.29 & 1alif & 0.61$\pm$0.07 & 6088$\pm$22 & 310\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2971:  & & & 2blif & 0.53$\pm$0.10 & 6110$\pm$23 & 310$\pm$61\\ 

2972: \ion{N}{1} & 1134.41 & -2.57 & 2alif & 0.35$\pm$0.06 & 6021$\pm$27 & 300$\pm$51\\ 

2973: \ion{Fe}{2} & 1096.88 & -2.96 & 2alif & 0.15$\pm$0.05 & 6055$\pm$33 & 220\tablenotemark{b}\\ 

2974: \ion{S}{3} & 1012.50 & -3.24 & 1alif & 0.30$\pm$0.09 & 5964$\pm$24 & 201$\pm$64\\ 

2975:  & & & 2blif & 0.32$\pm$0.06 & 6021$\pm$20 & 211$\pm$40\\ 

2976: \ion{Si}{4} s & 1128.33 &   & 2alif & 0.13\tablenotemark{b} & 6024$\pm$31 & 339$\pm$72\\ 

2977: 	\enddata

2978: 	\tablenotetext{a}{Using $\rm{v_{sys}}=$      6016       \kms}

2979: 	\tablenotetext{b}{Errors are undetermined for this value.}

2980: 	\end{deluxetable}

2981: 

2982: 

2983: \clearpage

2984: 

2985: 

2986: 

2987: 

2988: 

2989: 

2990: 

2991: 

2992: 

2993: 

2994: 

2995: 

2996: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrr}

2997: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

2998: \tablecolumns{4}

2999: \tablewidth{0pc}

3000: \tablecaption{\ovi~Data: Apparent Optical Depth Method\label{t:fuseovi}}

3001: \tablehead{\colhead{Galaxy} &  \colhead{$\rm{N_{O\,VI}}$} & \colhead{b} & 

3002: 	\colhead{$\rm v_{O\,VI} - v_{sys}$} \\

3003: 	& \colhead{(\cms)} & \colhead{(\kms)} & \colhead{(\kms)}}

3004: \startdata

3005: Haro 11	& $8.0\times10^{14}$ &	204 &	-217 \\

3006: VV 114	& $2.2\times10^{15}$ &	438 &	-243 \\

3007: SBS 0335-052	& $2.6\times10^{14}$ &	131 &	-166 \\

3008: NGC 1705	 & $2.1\times10^{14}$ &	76 &	-78 \\

3009: NGC 1741	& $6.3\times10^{14}$ &	228 &	-127 \\

3010: NGC 3310	 & $1.9\times10^{15}$ &	232 &	-325 \\

3011: Haro 3	& $7.5\times10^{14}$ &	149 &	-102	 \\		

3012: NGC 3690	 & $8.5\times10^{14}$ &	269 &	-304 \\

3013: %NGC 4038-S & $6.6\times10^{14}$ &	71 &	-108 \\

3014: NGC 4214	 & $4.0\times10^{14}$ &	98 &	-87 \\

3015: Mrk 54	& $1.3\times10^{15}$ &	188 &	-145 \\

3016: NGC 7673	 & $1.9\times10^{15}$ &	251 &	-88 \\

3017: NGC 7714	 & $1.7\times10^{15}$ &	221 &	-170 

3018: \enddata

3019: \end{deluxetable}

3020: 

3021: 

3022: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrr}

3023: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

3024: \tablecolumns{7}

3025: \tablewidth{0pc}

3026: \tablecaption{Line Data: Non-parametric Measurement\label{t:fusesplot}}

3027: \tablehead{ & \multicolumn{2}{c}{\ion{C}{3}} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{\ion{C}{2}}  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{\ion{N}{2}} \\

3028: 	\cline{2-3} \cline{4-5} \cline{6-7}

3029: 	\colhead{Galaxy} &  \colhead{$\rm{W_{C III}}$} & \colhead{$\rm{v_{C III}}$} &

3030: 	\colhead{$\rm{W_{C II}}$} & \colhead{$\rm{v_{C II}}$} &

3031: 	\colhead{$\rm{W_{N II}}$} & \colhead{$\rm{v_{N II}}$} \\

3032: 	& \colhead{(\ang)} & \colhead{(\kms)} & \colhead{(\ang)} & \colhead{(\kms)} & \colhead{(\ang)} & \colhead{(\kms)}} 

3033: \startdata

3034: Haro\,11 & 1.74 & -253 & 1.16 & -118 & 0.92 & -113 \\

3035: VV114 & 3.37 & -212 & 2.51 & -94 & 2.11 & -84 \\

3036: NGC\,1140 & 1.28 & -62 & 0.87 & -45 & 0.66 & 6 \\

3037: SBS\,0335-052 &  \nodata & \nodata & 0.47 & -9 & 0.28 & 34 \\

3038: Tol\,0440-381 & 1.28 & -151 & 1.15 & -120 & 0.71 & -82 \\

3039: NGC\,1705 & 1.14 & -19 & 0.87 & -38 & 0.56 & -6 \\

3040: NGC\,1741 & \nodata & \nodata & 1.27 & -41 & 0.94 & -35 \\

3041: IZW\,18 & 0.61 & -137 &  \nodata &  \nodata &  \nodata & \nodata \\

3042: NGC\,3310 & 2.05 & -254 & 2.54 & -186 & 1.86 & -93 \\

3043: Haro\,3 & 0.97 & -27 & 0.74 & -49 & 0.74 & 49 \\

3044: NGC3690 & 1.91 & -153 & 2.14 & -67 & 1.80 & -77 \\

3045: %NGC4038-S & 2.15 & 88 & 1.52 & 48 & 1.53 & 57 \\

3046: NGC\,4214 & 1.05 & -71 & 0.93 & -18 & 0.60 & -13 \\

3047: Mrk\,54 & 2.15 & -167 & 2.65 & 11 & 1.42 & -18 \\

3048: IRAS\,19245-4140 & 1.71 & -98 & 0.82 & -77 & 0.20 & -21 \\

3049: NGC\,7673 & 2.36 & -129 & 1.44 & -96 & 1.29 & -20 \\

3050: NGC\,7714 & 1.91 & -46 & 2.09 & -24 & 2.69 & -67 \\

3051: \enddata

3052: \tablecomments{These measurements were made using the IRAF splot command ``e''.}

3053: \end{deluxetable}

3054: 

3055: \clearpage

3056: 

3057: \begin{deluxetable}{llrr}

3058: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

3059: \tablecolumns{4}

3060: \tablewidth{0pc}

3061: \tablecaption{Correlations of Outflow Speeds with Galaxy Properties\label{t:voutcorr}}

3062: \tablehead{

3063:         \colhead{Galaxy Parameter} & \colhead{Outflow Measure} & \colhead{$\tau_a$} & \colhead{$P_{null}$}}

3064: \startdata

3065: $L_{IR}+L_{UV}$ & $v_{sys}-v_{OVI}$ &  -0.636 & 0.00644 \\

3066: $L_K$           & $v_{sys}-v_{OVI}$ &  -0.564 & 0.0158 \\

3067: $L_{IR}+L_{UV}$ & $v_{sys}-v_{CIII}$ & -0.516 & 0.0101 \\

3068: $L_K$           & $v_{sys}-v_{CIII}$ & -0.495 & 0.0138 \\

3069: \enddata

3070: \tablecomments{Col 3. measures the strength of the correlation between the parameters in the first two columns, using the

3071: value $\tau_a$ from the Kendall rank test. Col.  4 specifies the probability of the null hypothesis that the

3072: two parameters are uncorrelated.}

3073: \end{deluxetable}

3074: 

3075: 

3076: \begin{deluxetable}{llrr}

3077: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

3078: \tablecolumns{4}

3079: \tablewidth{0pc}

3080: \tablecaption{Correlations of Equivalent Widths with Galaxy Properties\label{t:eqwcorr}}

3081: \tablehead{

3082:         \colhead{Galaxy Parameter} & \colhead{Line} & \colhead{$\tau_a$} & \colhead{$P_{null}$}}

3083: \startdata

3084: $log(O/H)+12$ & EQW$_{OI}$ & 0.748 & 0.000710 \\

3085: $L_K$ & EQW$_{OI}$ & 0.689 & 0.00556 \\

3086: $L_{IR}+L_{UV}$ & EQW$_{OI}$ & 0.600 & 0.0157 \\

3087: $log(O/H)+12$ & EQW$_{CII}$ & 0.694 & 0.000960 \\

3088: $L_K$ & EQW$_{CII}$ & 0.718 & 0.000634 \\

3089: $L_{IR}+L_{UV}$ & EQW$_{CII}$ & 0.564 & 0.00727\\

3090: $log(O/H)+12$ & EQW$_{SIII}$ & 0.442 & 0.0753 \\

3091: $L_K$ & EQW$_{SIII}$ & 0.697 & 0.00283 \\

3092: $L_{IR}+L_{UV}$ & EQW$_{SIII}$ & 0.624 & 0.00756 \\

3093: $log(O/H)+12$ & EQW$_{CIII}$ & 0.379 & 0.0712 \\

3094: $L_K$ & EQW$_{CIII}$ & 0.615 & 0.00341 \\

3095: $L_{IR}+L_{UV}$ & EQW$_{CIII}$ & 0.590 & 0.00510 \\

3096: \enddata

3097: \tablecomments{Col 3. measures the strength of the correlation between the parameters in the first two columns, using the 

3098: value $\tau_a$ from the Kendall rank test. Col.  4 specifies the probability of the null hypothesis that the

3099: two parameters are uncorrelated.}

3100: \end{deluxetable}

3101: 

3102: 

3103: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrrrrr}

3104: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

3105: \tablecolumns{10}

3106: \tablewidth{0pc}

3107: \tablecaption{Lyman Limit Escape Fraction\label{t:lylimit}}

3108: \tablehead{ 

3109: 	\colhead{Galaxy} &  \colhead{MW E(B-V)} & \colhead{$\rm F_{1150 \AA}$} &

3110: 	\colhead{$\rm F_{1150 \AA,corr}$} &  \colhead{$\rm F_{900 \AA}$} &

3111: 	\colhead{$\rm F_{900 \AA,corr}$} &  \colhead{$\rm L_{1150 \AA} + L_{IR}$} &

3112: 	\colhead{$\rm L_{900 \AA}$} & \colhead{$\rm f_{esc,abs}$} & \colhead{$\rm f_{esc,rel}$} \\

3113: 	 & \colhead{(mag)} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{(\ergcmsa)}  &   \multicolumn{2}{c}{(\ergcmsa)} & 

3114: 	 \colhead{\Lsun} & \colhead{\Lsun}

3115: 	& \colhead{(\%)} & \colhead{(\%)} \\ }

3116: \startdata

3117: Haro\,11 & 0.011 & $5.2\times10^{-14}$ & $5.9\times10^{-14}$ & $<1.3\times10^{-15}$ & 

3118: 	$<1.6\times10^{-15}$ & $2.1\times10^{11}$ & $4.6\times10^{8}$ & $<$1.6 & $<$11 \\

3119: Mrk\,54 & 0.015 & $3.2\times10^{-14}$ & $3.8\times10^{-14}$ & $<6.5\times10^{-16}$ & 

3120: 	$<8.9\times10^{-16}$ & $1.7\times10^{11}$ & $1.2\times10^{9}$ & $<$5.0 & $<$9 \\

3121: NGC\,1741 & 0.051 & $5.2\times10^{-14}$ & $9.2\times10^{-14}$ & $<1.3\times10^{-15}$ & 

3122: 	$<3.7\times10^{-15}$ & $4.9\times10^{10}$ & $4.4\times10^{8}$ & $<$6.3 & $<$16 \\

3123: NGC\,3690 & 0.017 & $7.4\times10^{-14}$ & $8.9\times10^{-14}$ & $<1.6\times10^{-15}$ & 

3124: 	$<2.3\times10^{-15}$ & $6.7\times10^{11}$ & $1.6\times10^{8}$ & $<$0.2 & $<$10 \\

3125: VV\,114 & 0.016 & $7.6\times10^{-14}$ & $9.1\times10^{-14}$ & $<4.2\times10^{-15}$ & 

3126: 	$<5.8\times10^{-15}$ & $5.4\times10^{11}$ & $1.6\times10^{9}$ & $<$2.0 & $<$26 \\

3127: \enddata

3128: \tablecomments{We have estimated an upper limit to the flux below the Lyman limit for the galaxies

3129: with S/N$>$5 in the LiF 1A channel.  See Section \ref{s:belowlyman} for a discussion of the derived

3130: values in this table.  We find $f_{esc}<7\%$ for all five galaxies.}

3131: \end{deluxetable}

3132: 

3133: 

3134: 

3135: %\begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrr}

3136: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

3137: %\tablecolumns{7}

3138: %\tablewidth{0pc}

3139: %\tablecaption{C II Limits on the Escape Fraction\label{t:ciilimit}}

3140: %\tablehead{ & & \colhead{P.F.} & & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Slab}  \\

3141: %	\cline{3-3}  \cline{5-7} 

3142: %	\colhead{Galaxy} &  \colhead{$\rm f_{esc,C\,II}$} & \colhead{$\rm f_{esc,abs}$} & &

3143: %	\colhead{$\rm Z$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{$b$\tablenotemark{b}} & 

3144: %	\colhead{$\tau_{\rm Ly}$} \\

3145: %	& \colhead{(\%)} & \colhead{(\%)} & & \colhead{($\rm Z_\odot$)} & \colhead{(\kms)} & }

3146: %\startdata

3147: %Haro\,11 & $\leq$8 & $\leq$1.1 & & 0.17 & 225 & 281.2 \\

3148: %Haro\,3 & 0 & 0 & & 0.46 & 141  & $\infty$\\

3149: %IRAS\,19245-4140 & $\leq$21 & $\leq$19 & & 0.22 & 163  & 100.0 \\

3150: %IZw\,18 & $\leq$10 &  \nodata & & 0.03 & 111 &  633.9 \\

3151: %NGC\,1140 & $<$4 & $<$2.5 & & 0.22 & 181  & 229.0 \\

3152: %NGC\,1705 & $<$1 & $<$1.4 & & 0.22 & 155  & 280.6 \\

3153: %NGC\,1741 & $<$1 & $<$0.4 & & 0.22 & 161  & 291.5 \\

3154: %NGC\,3310 & $\leq$5 & $\leq$0.9 &  & 2.19 & 172  & 20.3\\

3155: %NGC\,3690 & 0 & 0 & & 1.38 & 477   & $\infty$\\

3156: %NGC\,7673 & 0 & 0 & & 0.69 & 229   & $\infty$\\

3157: %NGC\,7714 & $<$3 & $<$0.1 & & 1.10 & 323  & 88.8 \\

3158: %SBS\,0335-052 & $<$18 &  \nodata & & 0.05 & 66 & 208.1\\

3159: %Tol\,0440-381 & $<$4 & $<$11 & & 0.34 & 211  & 172.4\\

3160: %VV\,114 & $<$2 & $<$0.2 & & 0.87 & 419 &  161.9\\

3161: %NGC\,4214 & $<$1 & $<$0.3 & & 0.35 & 66  & 75.4\\

3162: %\enddata

3163: %\tablecomments{We have conservatively estimated the 

3164: %continuum level and found the lowest convincing escape fraction in

3165: %C\,II at line center.  We then estimate $\rm f_{esc,abs}$ using the

3166: %picket fence (P.F.) model for escaping radiation.  We also

3167: %find extremely high optical depths ($\geq20$) below

3168: %the Lyman limit assuming the slab model. }

3169: %\tablenotetext{a}{Derived assuming carbon has the same metallicity as oxygen using the gas phase oxygen abundances in Table \ref{t:fuselumins} and solar abundances from \citet{asp05}.}

3170: %\tablenotetext{b}{From gaussian fits in Tables \ref{t:HARO11dat} - \ref{t:VV114data}.}

3171: %\end{deluxetable}

3172: 

3173: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrr}

3174: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

3175: \tablecolumns{7}

3176: \tablewidth{0pc}

3177: \tablecaption{Lyman Limit: C II Limits on the Escape Fraction\label{t:ciilimit}}

3178: \tablehead{ & & \colhead{P.F.} & & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Slab}  \\

3179: 	\cline{3-3}  \cline{5-7} 

3180: 	\colhead{Galaxy} &  \colhead{$\rm f_{esc,C\,II}$} & \colhead{$\rm f_{esc,abs}$} & &

3181: 	\colhead{$\rm Z$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{$b$\tablenotemark{b}} & 

3182: 	\colhead{$\tau_{\rm Ly}$} \\

3183: 	& \colhead{(\%)} & \colhead{(\%)} & & \colhead{($\rm Z_\odot$)} & \colhead{(\kms)} & }

3184: \startdata

3185: Haro\,11 & $\leq$8 & $\leq$0.6 & & 0.17 & 225 & 281.2 \\

3186: Haro\,3 & $<0.5$ & $<0.1$ & & 0.46 & 141  & $\infty$\\

3187: IRAS\,19245-4140 & $\leq$21 & $\leq$11 & & 0.22 & 163  & 100.0 \\

3188: IZw\,18 & $\leq$10 &  \nodata & & 0.03 & 111 &  633.9 \\

3189: NGC\,1140 & $<$4 & $<$1.4 & & 0.22 & 181  & 229.0 \\

3190: NGC\,1705 & $<$1 & $<$0.8 & & 0.22 & 155  & 280.6 \\

3191: NGC\,1741 & $<$1 & $<$0.2 & & 0.22 & 161  & 291.5 \\

3192: NGC\,3310 & $\leq$5 & $\leq$0.5 &  & 2.19 & 172  & 20.3\\

3193: NGC\,3690 & $<1$ & $<0.1$ & & 1.38 & 477   & $\infty$\\

3194: NGC\,7673 & $\leq10$ & $\leq1.7$ & & 0.69 & 229   & $\infty$\\

3195: NGC\,7714 & $<$3 & $<$0.1 & & 1.10 & 323  & 88.8 \\

3196: SBS\,0335-052 & $<$18 &  \nodata & & 0.05 & 66 & 208.1\\

3197: Tol\,0440-381 & $<$4 & $<$1.6 & & 0.34 & 211  & 172.4\\

3198: VV\,114 & $<$2 & $<$0.1 & & 0.87 & 419 &  161.9\\

3199: NGC\,4214 & $<$1 & $<$0.2 & & 0.35 & 66  & 75.4\\

3200: \enddata

3201: \tablecomments{We have conservatively estimated the 

3202: continuum level and found the lowest convincing escape fraction in

3203: C\,II at line center.  We then estimate $\rm f_{esc,abs}$ using the

3204: picket fence (P.F.) model for escaping radiation.  We also

3205: find extremely high optical depths ($\geq20$) below

3206: the Lyman limit assuming the slab model. }

3207: \tablenotetext{a}{Derived using the gas phase oxygen abundances in Table \ref{t:fuselumins} and a solar C/O abundance ratio from \citet{asp05}.}

3208: \tablenotetext{b}{From gaussian fits in Tables \ref{t:HARO11dat} - \ref{t:VV114data}.}

3209: \end{deluxetable}

3210: 

3211: 

3212: 

3213: 

3214: 

3215: \begin{figure}

3216: \centering

3217: \leavevmode

3218: \includegraphics[width=4in]{f1.eps}

3219: \caption{

3220: Histogram of all of the individual wavelength offsets used to correct for 

3221: zero point shifts in the wavelength calibrations.  The vast majority

3222: of the corrections are less than 0.02 \AA\, (6 km s$^{-1}$).  The overlaid arrows

3223: are 5\arcsec in length.

3224: \label{f:wlshifts}}

3225: \end{figure}

3226: 

3227: \begin{figure}

3228: \centering

3229: \leavevmode

3230: \includegraphics[width=6in]{f2a.eps}

3231: \includegraphics[width=6in]{f2b.eps}

3232: \includegraphics[width=6in]{f2c.eps}

3233: \caption{

3234: UV or FUV images with \fu\,aperture overlay for \hoo, \vv, NGC\,1140,

3235: \sbs, NGC\,1705, NGC\,1741, \izw, NGC\,3310, and Haro\,3.

3236: The \fu\, LWRS aperture has been overlaid at the nominal

3237: position and orientation for the \fu\,observations.   The image

3238: of Haro\,3 is a {\sl GALEX  } NUV observation at significantly lower

3239: spatial resolution than observed in the other panels.

3240: The overlaid arrows

3241: are 5\arcsec in length.

3242: \label{f:images1}}

3243: \end{figure}

3244: 

3245: 

3246: \begin{figure}

3247: \centering

3248: \leavevmode

3249: \includegraphics[width=6in]{f3a.eps}

3250: \includegraphics[width=6in]{f3b.eps}

3251: \caption{

3252: UV images with \fu\,aperture overlay for NGC\,3690, NGC\,4214, Mrk\,54,

3253:  \iron, NGC\,7673, and NGC\,7714.  The \fu\, LWRS aperture has been overlaid at the nominal

3254: position and orientation for the \fu\,observations.   The images

3255: of NGC\,4214 ({\sl GALEX } NUV) and Mrk\,54 (SDSS U-band) are at significantly lower

3256: spatial resolutions than observed in the other panels.

3257: \label{f:images2}}

3258: \end{figure}

3259: 

3260: 

3261: 

3262: \begin{figure}

3263: \centering

3264: \leavevmode

3265: \includegraphics[width=5in,angle=90]{f4.eps}

3266: \caption{Spectra of Haro\,11 from the {\it FUSE} SiC 2A, LiF 1A, and LiF 2A channels.

3267: Locations of prominent ISM, stellar photospheric (dashed lines), Milky Way, and airglow ($\earth$) features have 

3268: been identified.

3269: \label{f:Haro11spec}}

3270: \end{figure}

3271: 

3272: \clearpage

3273: 

3274: \begin{figure}

3275: \centering

3276: \leavevmode

3277: \includegraphics[width=5in,angle=90]{f5.eps}

3278: \caption{Spectra of VV\,114 from the {\it FUSE} SiC 2A, LiF 1A, and LiF 2A channels.

3279: Locations of prominent ISM, stellar photospheric (dashed lines), Milky Way, and airglow ($\earth$) features have 

3280: been identified.

3281: \label{f:VV114spec}}

3282: \end{figure}

3283: 

3284: \clearpage

3285: 

3286: \begin{figure}

3287: \centering

3288: \leavevmode

3289: \includegraphics[width=5in,angle=90]{f6.eps}

3290: \caption{Spectra of NGC1140 from the {\it FUSE} SiC 2A, LiF 1A, and LiF 2A channels.

3291: Locations of prominent ISM, stellar photospheric (dashed lines), Milky Way, and airglow ($\earth$) features have 

3292: been identified.

3293: \label{f:NGC1140spec}}

3294: \end{figure}

3295: 

3296: \clearpage

3297: 

3298: \begin{figure}

3299: \centering

3300: \leavevmode

3301: \includegraphics[width=5in,angle=90]{f7.eps}

3302: \caption{Spectra of SBS\,0335-052 from the {\it FUSE} SiC 2A, LiF 1A, and LiF 2A channels.

3303: Locations of prominent ISM, stellar photospheric (dashed lines), Milky Way, and airglow ($\earth$) features have 

3304: been identified.

3305: \label{f:SBS0335-052spec}}

3306: \end{figure}

3307: 

3308: \clearpage

3309: 

3310: \begin{figure}

3311: \centering

3312: \leavevmode

3313: \includegraphics[width=5in,angle=90]{f8.eps}

3314: \caption{Spectra of Tol\,0440-381 from the {\it FUSE} SiC 2A, LiF 1A, and LiF 2A channels.

3315: Locations of prominent ISM, stellar photospheric (dashed lines), Milky Way, and airglow ($\earth$) features have 

3316: been identified.

3317: \label{f:Tol0440-381spec}}

3318: \end{figure}

3319: 

3320: \clearpage

3321: 

3322: \begin{figure}

3323: \centering

3324: \leavevmode

3325: \includegraphics[width=5in,angle=90]{f9.eps}

3326: \caption{Spectra of NGC\,1705 from the {\it FUSE} SiC 2A, LiF 1A, and LiF 2A channels.

3327: Locations of prominent ISM, stellar photospheric (dashed lines), Milky Way, and airglow ($\earth$) features have 

3328: been identified.

3329: \label{f:NGC1705spec}}

3330: \end{figure}

3331: 

3332: \clearpage

3333: 

3334: \begin{figure}

3335: \centering

3336: \leavevmode

3337: \includegraphics[width=5in,angle=90]{f10.eps}

3338: \caption{Spectra of NGC\,1741 from the {\it FUSE} SiC 2A, LiF 1A, and LiF 2A channels.

3339: Locations of prominent ISM, stellar photospheric (dashed lines), Milky Way, and airglow ($\earth$) features have 

3340: been identified.

3341: \label{f:NGC1741spec}}

3342: \end{figure}

3343: 

3344: \clearpage

3345: 

3346: \begin{figure}

3347: \centering

3348: \leavevmode

3349: \includegraphics[width=5in,angle=90]{f11.eps}

3350: \caption{Spectra of IZW\,18 from the {\it FUSE} SiC 2A, LiF 1A, and LiF 2A channels.

3351: Locations of prominent ISM, stellar photospheric (dashed lines), Milky Way, and airglow ($\earth$) features have 

3352: been identified.

3353: \label{f:IZW18spec}}

3354: \end{figure}

3355: 

3356: \clearpage

3357: 

3358: \begin{figure}

3359: \centering

3360: \leavevmode

3361: \includegraphics[width=5in,angle=90]{f12.eps}

3362: \caption{Spectra of NGC\,3310 from the {\it FUSE} SiC 2A, LiF 1A, and LiF 2A channels.

3363: Locations of prominent ISM, stellar photospheric (dashed lines), Milky Way, and airglow ($\earth$) features have 

3364: been identified.

3365: \label{f:NGC3310spec}}

3366: \end{figure}

3367: 

3368: \clearpage

3369: 

3370: \begin{figure}

3371: \centering

3372: \leavevmode

3373: \includegraphics[width=5in,angle=90]{f13.eps}

3374: \caption{Spectra of Haro\,3 from the {\it FUSE} SiC 2A, LiF 1A, and LiF 2A channels.

3375: Locations of prominent ISM, stellar photospheric (dashed lines), Milky Way, and airglow ($\earth$) features have 

3376: been identified.

3377: \label{f:Haro3spec}}

3378: \end{figure}

3379: 

3380: \clearpage

3381: 

3382: \begin{figure}

3383: \centering

3384: \leavevmode

3385: \includegraphics[width=5in,angle=90]{f14.eps}

3386: \caption{Spectra of NGC\,3690 from the {\it FUSE} SiC 2A, LiF 1A, and LiF 2A channels.

3387: Locations of prominent ISM, stellar photospheric (dashed lines), Milky Way, and airglow ($\earth$) features have 

3388: been identified.

3389: \label{f:NGC3690spec}}

3390: \end{figure}

3391: 

3392: \clearpage

3393: 

3394: \begin{figure}

3395: \centering

3396: \leavevmode

3397: \includegraphics[width=5in,angle=90]{f15.eps}

3398: \caption{Spectra of NGC\,4214 from the {\it FUSE} SiC 2A, LiF 1A, and LiF 2A channels.

3399: Locations of prominent ISM, stellar photospheric (dashed lines), Milky Way, and airglow ($\earth$) features have 

3400: been identified.

3401: \label{f:NGC4214spec}}

3402: \end{figure}

3403: 

3404: \clearpage

3405: 

3406: \begin{figure}

3407: \centering

3408: \leavevmode

3409: \includegraphics[width=5in,angle=90]{f16.eps}

3410: \caption{Spectra of Mrk\,54 from the {\it FUSE} SiC 2A, LiF 1A, and LiF 2A channels.

3411: Locations of prominent ISM, stellar photospheric (dashed lines), Milky Way, and airglow ($\earth$) features have 

3412: been identified.

3413: \label{f:Mrk54spec}}

3414: \end{figure}

3415: 

3416: \clearpage

3417: 

3418: \begin{figure}

3419: \centering

3420: \leavevmode

3421: \includegraphics[width=5in,angle=90]{f17.eps}

3422: \caption{Spectra of IRAS\,19245-4140 from the {\it FUSE} SiC 2A, LiF 1A, and LiF 2A channels.

3423: Locations of prominent ISM, stellar photospheric (dashed lines), Milky Way, and airglow ($\earth$) features have 

3424: been identified.

3425: \label{f:IRAS19245-4140spec}}

3426: \end{figure}

3427: 

3428: \clearpage

3429: 

3430: \begin{figure}

3431: \centering

3432: \leavevmode

3433: \includegraphics[width=5in,angle=90]{f18.eps}

3434: \caption{Spectra of NGC\,7673 from the {\it FUSE} SiC 2A, LiF 1A, and LiF 2A channels.

3435: Locations of prominent ISM, stellar photospheric (dashed lines), Milky Way, and airglow ($\earth$) features have 

3436: been identified.

3437: \label{f:NGC7673spec}}

3438: \end{figure}

3439: 

3440: \clearpage

3441: 

3442: \begin{figure}

3443: \centering

3444: \leavevmode

3445: \includegraphics[width=5in,angle=90]{f19.eps}

3446: \caption{Spectra of NGC\,7714 from the {\it FUSE} SiC 2A, LiF 1A, and LiF 2A channels.

3447: Locations of prominent ISM, stellar photospheric (dashed lines), Milky Way, and airglow ($\earth$) features have 

3448: been identified.

3449: \label{f:NGC7714spec}}

3450: \end{figure}

3451: 

3452: \clearpage

3453: 

3454: \begin{figure}

3455: \centering

3456: \leavevmode

3457: \includegraphics[width=4in]{f20.eps}

3458: \caption{Prominent spectral absorption lines plotted for Haro11.

3459: Note: \ion{O}{1}$\lambda$989 is blended with \ion{N}{3}$\lambda$990. 

3460: \label{f:Haro11lines}}

3461: \end{figure}

3462: 

3463: \clearpage

3464: 

3465: \begin{figure}

3466: \centering

3467: \leavevmode

3468: \includegraphics[width=4in]{f21.eps}

3469: \caption{Prominent spectral absorption lines plotted for VV114.

3470: Note: \ion{O}{1}$\lambda$989 is blended with \ion{N}{3}$\lambda$990. 

3471: \label{f:VV114lines}}

3472: \end{figure}

3473: 

3474: \clearpage

3475: 

3476: \begin{figure}

3477: \centering

3478: \leavevmode

3479: \includegraphics[width=4in]{f22.eps}

3480: \caption{Prominent spectral absorption lines plotted for NGC1140.

3481: Note: \ion{O}{1}$\lambda$989 is blended with \ion{N}{3}$\lambda$990. 

3482: \label{f:NGC1140lines}}

3483: \end{figure}

3484: 

3485: \clearpage

3486: 

3487: \begin{figure}

3488: \centering

3489: \leavevmode

3490: \includegraphics[width=4in]{f23.eps}

3491: \caption{Prominent spectral absorption lines plotted for SBS0335-052.

3492: Note: \ion{O}{1}$\lambda$989 is blended with \ion{N}{3}$\lambda$990. 

3493: \label{f:SBS0335-052lines}}

3494: \end{figure}

3495: 

3496: \clearpage

3497: 

3498: \begin{figure}

3499: \centering

3500: \leavevmode

3501: \includegraphics[width=4in]{f24.eps}

3502: \caption{Prominent spectral absorption lines plotted for Tol0440-381.

3503: Note: \ion{O}{1}$\lambda$989 is blended with \ion{N}{3}$\lambda$990. 

3504: \label{f:Tol0440-381lines}}

3505: \end{figure}

3506: 

3507: \clearpage

3508: 

3509: \begin{figure}

3510: \centering

3511: \leavevmode

3512: \includegraphics[width=4in]{f25.eps}

3513: \caption{Prominent spectral absorption lines plotted for NGC1705.

3514: Note: \ion{O}{1}$\lambda$989 is blended with \ion{N}{3}$\lambda$990. 

3515: \label{f:NGC1705lines}}

3516: \end{figure}

3517: 

3518: \clearpage

3519: 

3520: \begin{figure}

3521: \centering

3522: \leavevmode

3523: \includegraphics[width=4in]{f26.eps}

3524: \caption{Prominent spectral absorption lines plotted for NGC1741.

3525: Note: \ion{O}{1}$\lambda$989 is blended with \ion{N}{3}$\lambda$990. 

3526: \label{f:NGC1741lines}}

3527: \end{figure}

3528: 

3529: \clearpage

3530: 

3531: \begin{figure}

3532: \centering

3533: \leavevmode

3534: \includegraphics[width=4in]{f27.eps}

3535: \caption{Prominent spectral absorption lines plotted for IZW18.

3536: Note: \ion{O}{1}$\lambda$989 is blended with \ion{N}{3}$\lambda$990. 

3537: \label{f:IZW18lines}}

3538: \end{figure}

3539: 

3540: \clearpage

3541: 

3542: \begin{figure}

3543: \centering

3544: \leavevmode

3545: \includegraphics[width=4in]{f28.eps}

3546: \caption{Prominent spectral absorption lines plotted for NGC3310.

3547: Note: \ion{O}{1}$\lambda$989 is blended with \ion{N}{3}$\lambda$990. 

3548: \label{f:NGC3310lines}}

3549: \end{figure}

3550: 

3551: \clearpage

3552: 

3553: \begin{figure}

3554: \centering

3555: \leavevmode

3556: \includegraphics[width=4in]{f29.eps}

3557: \caption{Prominent spectral absorption lines plotted for Haro3.

3558: Note: \ion{O}{1}$\lambda$989 is blended with \ion{N}{3}$\lambda$990. 

3559: \label{f:Haro3lines}}

3560: \end{figure}

3561: 

3562: \clearpage

3563: 

3564: \begin{figure}

3565: \centering

3566: \leavevmode

3567: \includegraphics[width=4in]{f30.eps}

3568: \caption{Prominent spectral absorption lines plotted for NGC3690.

3569: Note: \ion{O}{1}$\lambda$989 is blended with \ion{N}{3}$\lambda$990. 

3570: \label{f:NGC3690lines}}

3571: \end{figure}

3572: 

3573: \clearpage

3574: 

3575: \begin{figure}

3576: \centering

3577: \leavevmode

3578: \includegraphics[width=4in]{f31.eps}

3579: \caption{Prominent spectral absorption lines plotted for NGC4214.

3580: Note: \ion{O}{1}$\lambda$989 is blended with \ion{N}{3}$\lambda$990. 

3581: \label{f:NGC4214lines}}

3582: \end{figure}

3583: 

3584: \clearpage

3585: 

3586: \begin{figure}

3587: \centering

3588: \leavevmode

3589: \includegraphics[width=4in]{f32.eps}

3590: \caption{Prominent spectral absorption lines plotted for Mrk54.

3591: Note: \ion{O}{1}$\lambda$989 is blended with \ion{N}{3}$\lambda$990. 

3592: \label{f:Mrk54lines}}

3593: \end{figure}

3594: 

3595: \clearpage

3596: 

3597: \begin{figure}

3598: \centering

3599: \leavevmode

3600: \includegraphics[width=4in]{f33.eps}

3601: \caption{Prominent spectral absorption lines plotted for IRAS19245-4140.

3602: Note: \ion{O}{1}$\lambda$989 is blended with \ion{N}{3}$\lambda$990. 

3603: \label{f:IRAS19245-4140lines}}

3604: \end{figure}

3605: 

3606: \clearpage

3607: 

3608: \begin{figure}

3609: \centering

3610: \leavevmode

3611: \includegraphics[width=4in]{f34.eps}

3612: \caption{Prominent spectral absorption lines plotted for NGC7673.

3613: Note: \ion{O}{1}$\lambda$989 is blended with \ion{N}{3}$\lambda$990. 

3614: \label{f:NGC7673lines}}

3615: \end{figure}

3616: 

3617: \clearpage

3618: 

3619: \begin{figure}

3620: \centering

3621: \leavevmode

3622: \includegraphics[width=4in]{f35.eps}

3623: \caption{Prominent spectral absorption lines plotted for NGC7714.

3624: Note: \ion{O}{1}$\lambda$989 is blended with \ion{N}{3}$\lambda$990. 

3625: \label{f:NGC7714lines}}

3626: \end{figure}

3627: 

3628: \clearpage

3629: 

3630: 

3631: 

3632: \begin{figure}

3633: \centering

3634: \leavevmode

3635: \includegraphics[width=3in,angle=90]{f36.eps}

3636: \caption{

3637: Overlay of \oicw\, on \ciiiw\, for NGC 1140 and NGC 3310.  

3638: The \oi\, feature is significantly weaker than the \ciii\, profile

3639: and does not significantly affect our measured parameters for

3640: the \ciiiw\, line.

3641: \label{f:oi976}}

3642: \end{figure}

3643: 

3644: \begin{figure}

3645: \centering

3646: \leavevmode

3647: \includegraphics[width=5in]{f37.eps}

3648: \caption{

3649: Velocity Outflow Histogram for Prominent Absorption Lines:  Outflows

3650: are observed for all of the absorption features except \oibw.

3651: Observed outflow velocities are significantly higher for

3652: \ovi\, and \ciii.

3653: \label{f:velhist}}

3654: \end{figure}

3655: 

3656: 

3657: \begin{figure}

3658: \centering

3659: \leavevmode

3660: \columnwidth=.5\columnwidth

3661: \includegraphics[width=3.1in]{f38a.eps}

3662: \includegraphics[width=3.1in]{f38b.eps}

3663: \caption{

3664: Outflow Velocity Comparison:  The plot on the left shows the

3665: \ciiw\, versus \niiw\, velocities while the right

3666: displays the \ciiiw\, versus \oviw\, velocities.

3667: \cii\, and \ovi\, are generally more blueshifted than

3668: the \nii\, and \ciii\, features respectively.

3669: The lines represents $\rm{v_x = v_y}$ for both plots.

3670: NGC~3310 (which has unusually large outflow velocities for its

3671: mass and star formation rate) is denoted by a red circle.

3672: \label{f:velvel}}

3673: \end{figure}

3674: 

3675: 

3676: \begin{figure}

3677: \centering

3678: \leavevmode

3679: \includegraphics[width=3.1in]{f39.eps}

3680: %\includegraphics[width=3.1in]{v_cii_vs_v_oi.eps}

3681: \caption{

3682: %\ciiw\, versus \sthw\, and \oibw\, velocities.  While \sth\, has a significantly higher

3683: \ciiw\, versus \sthw\,velocities.  While \sth\, has a significantly larger

3684: ionization energy (23.3 eV) than \ciiw\, (11.3 eV), 

3685: higher outflow velocities are observed in \cii.  

3686: %The line  represents $\rm{v_{x} = v_{y}}$ in both plots.

3687: The line  represents $\rm{v_{C II} = v_{S III}}$ in both plots.

3688: NGC~3310 (which has unusually large outflow velocities for its

3689: mass and star formation rate) is denoted by a red circle.

3690: \label{f:velsiii}}

3691: \end{figure}

3692: 

3693: 

3694: \begin{figure}

3695: \centering

3696: \leavevmode

3697: \includegraphics[width=5in]{f40.eps}

3698: \caption{

3699: Column density vs. line width for a wide variety of \ovi~absorption line systems including

3700: galactic disk and halo, high velocity clouds, starburst galaxies, and the IGM.

3701: The two dashed lines indicate the predictions  for radiatively cooling gas for assumed

3702: temperatures of $\rm{T_{OVI}=10^5,\, 10^6~K}$.  This plot is originally from \citep{heck02}.

3703: The star-forming galaxies from this work

3704: have been added and extend the relationship to much higher column densities.

3705: \label{f:bovi}}

3706: \end{figure}

3707: 

3708: 

3709: \begin{figure}

3710: \centering

3711: \leavevmode

3712: \includegraphics[width=3.1in]{f41a.eps}

3713: \includegraphics[width=3.1in]{f41b.eps}

3714: \caption{

3715: The log of the \ovi\, outflow velocities in  km/s versus the log of the K-Band and 

3716: IR+UV luminosities (in $L_{\odot}$). These are roughly proportional to the stellar mass

3717: and star formation rate respectively. 

3718: NGC~3310 (which has unusually large outflow velocities for its

3719: mass and star formation rate) is denoted by a red circle.

3720: \label{f:vovi}}

3721: \end{figure}

3722: 

3723: \begin{figure}

3724: \centering

3725: \leavevmode

3726: \includegraphics[width=6in]{f42.eps}

3727: \caption{

3728: Same as Figure 41, except that here we plot the `maximum' outflow velocity. This is defined so that 90\% (10\%) of 

3729: the absorbing column of gas is to the red (blue) of the velocity. See text for details.

3730: NGC~3310 (which has unusually large outflow velocities for its

3731: mass and star formation rate) is denoted by a red circle.

3732: \label{f:vovi90}}

3733: \end{figure}

3734: 

3735: \begin{figure}

3736: \centering

3737: \leavevmode

3738: \includegraphics[width=3.1in]{f43a.eps}

3739: \includegraphics[width=3.1in]{f43b.eps}

3740: \caption{

3741: The log of the \ciii\, outflow velocities in  km/s versus the log of the K-Band and 

3742: IR+UV luminosities (in $L_{\odot}$). These are roughly proportional to the stellar mass

3743: and star formation rate respectively.

3744: NGC~3310 (which has unusually large outflow velocities for its

3745: mass and star formation rate) is denoted by a red circle.

3746: \label{f:vciii}}

3747: \end{figure}

3748: 

3749: \begin{figure}

3750: \centering

3751: \leavevmode

3752: \includegraphics[width=3.1in]{f44a.eps}

3753: \includegraphics[width=3.1in]{f44b.eps}

3754: \caption{

3755: \ovi\, and \ciii\, outflow velocities versus $\rm (L_{IR} + L_{UV})/L_K$.

3756: While these plots have a large degree of scatter, 

3757: the higher SFR/Mass galaxies tend to have higher

3758: outflow velocities. NGC~3310 (which has unusually large outflow velocities for its

3759: mass and star formation rate) is denoted by a red circle.

3760: \label{f:sfrdk}}

3761: \end{figure}

3762: 

3763: 

3764: \begin{figure}

3765: \centering

3766: \leavevmode

3767: \includegraphics[width=5in]{f45a.eps}

3768: \includegraphics[width=5in]{f45b.eps}

3769: \includegraphics[width=5in]{f45c.eps}

3770: \includegraphics[width=5in]{f45d.eps}

3771: \caption{

3772: Equivalent widths of \oi, \cii, \sth, and \ciii \,

3773: compared to gas phase metallicity, K-band luminosity,

3774: and IR+UV luminosity.  For the lower ionic states (\oi\, \& \cii)

3775: the gas phase abundance and stellar mass 

3776: track the strength of the lines.  The higher ionization states

3777: however poorly match the metallicity and instead

3778: are correlated with the SFR and stellar mass.  

3779: \label{f:eqw}}

3780: \end{figure}

3781: 

3782: 

3783: \begin{figure}

3784: \centering

3785: \leavevmode

3786: \includegraphics[width=5in,angle=90]{f46.eps}

3787: \caption[SiC 2A Spectra of Lyman Continuum Regions]{

3788: This figure shows the Lyman continuum regions of five galaxies in order of

3789: increasing redshift.  We have plotted only the night data in order to minimize

3790: contamination from airglow and earth limb emission.  There is 

3791: no convincing evidence of Lyman continuum emission in 

3792:  these spectra.  The spectra are generally very noisy in this wavelength region

3793: and any possible signal is dominated by the background uncertainties and 

3794: airglow emission.  These plots do show earth limb and airglow 

3795: contamination from \ion{H}{1}, \ion{O}{1}, \ion{N}{1}, and $\rm{N_2}$ (for a better

3796: example see Figure \ref{f:flyc2}).  

3797: \label{f:flyc1}}

3798: \end{figure}

3799: 

3800: \begin{figure}

3801: \centering

3802: \leavevmode

3803: \includegraphics[width=5in,angle=90]{f47.eps}

3804: \caption[SiC 2A Spectra of Lyman Continuum Regions (continued)]{

3805: This is identical to Figure \ref{f:flyc1} but for an additional four galaxies.  

3806: No convincing evidence of Lyman continuum emission is observed in 

3807:  these galaxies.  Earth limb and airglow emission however are

3808: present from \ion{H}{1}, \ion{O}{1}, \ion{N}{1}, and $\rm{N_2}$.  This is 

3809: easily confirmed by comparing the specta, particularly 

3810: \vv\, and \tol\, which both have strong contamination from airglow

3811: in the Lyman continuum regions.  These features however are 

3812: present in all eight spectra in the two figures.

3813: We have included both the night and day time data for \vv\, due to the small

3814: percentage of night time data available for that target.

3815: \label{f:flyc2}}

3816: \end{figure}

3817: 

3818: 

3819: 

3820: \begin{figure}

3821: \centering

3822: \leavevmode

3823: \includegraphics[width=5in,angle=90]{f48.eps}

3824: \caption[]{

3825: Plots of LWRS SiC 1B night airglow (top) and  earth limb (bottom) spectra. 

3826: Data originally from \citet{feld01}.  Though the night airglow spectrum is very noisy

3827: the two spectra show the wealth of geo-coronal

3828: emission features that impact data analysis in these wavelength regions.

3829: \label{f:airglow}}

3830: \end{figure}

3831: 

3832: \end{document}

3833: 

3834: 

3835: