1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2:
3: \textheight=22cm
4: \textwidth=16cm
5:
6: \oddsidemargin=0cm
7: \evensidemargin=0cm
8:
9:
10: %\setlength{\textwidth}{45zw}
11: %\setlength{\textheight}{38\baselineskip}
12: %\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-0.2cm}
13: %\setlength{\topmargin}{0.7cm}
14: %\iftombow
15: % \addtolength{\topmargin}{-1in}
16: %\else
17: % \addtolength{\topmargin}{-1truein}
18: %\fi
19: \usepackage{graphicx}
20: %\usepackage{feynmp}
21: \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
22: \usepackage{bm}
23: \usepackage{graphicx, color}
24: \usepackage{wrapfig}
25: \begin{document}
26: \title{
27: \begin{flushright}
28: \ \\*[-80pt]
29: \begin{minipage}{0.2\linewidth}
30: \normalsize
31: %arXiv:YYMM.NNNN \\
32: KUNS-2166 \\*[50pt]
33: \end{minipage}
34: \end{flushright}
35: {\Large \bf
36: Lepton Flavor Model from $\Delta(54)$ Symmetry
37: \\*[20pt]}}
38:
39:
40: \author{
41: \centerline{
42: Hajime~Ishimori$^{1,}$\footnote{E-mail address:
43: ishimori@muse.sc.niigata-u.ac.jp},
44: \quad Tatsuo~Kobayashi$^{2,}$\footnote{E-mail address:
45: kobayash@gauge.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp},
46: \quad Hiroshi Okada$^{3,}$
47: \footnote{E-mail address: HOkada@Bue.edu.eg},
48: }\\
49: \centerline{Yusuke~Shimizu$^{1,}$\footnote{E-mail address:
50: shimizu@muse.sc.niigata-u.ac.jp},
51: \quad and \quad Morimitsu~Tanimoto$^{4,}$\footnote{E-mail address:
52: tanimoto@muse.sc.niigata-u.ac.jp} }
53: \\*[20pt]
54: \centerline{
55: \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
56: \begin{center}
57: $^1${\it \normalsize
58: Graduate~School~of~Science~and~Technology,~Niigata~University, \\
59: Niigata~950-2181,~Japan } \\
60: $^2${\it \normalsize
61: Department of Physics, Kyoto University,
62: Kyoto 606-8502, Japan} \\
63: $^3${\it \normalsize
64: Centre for Theoretical Physics, The British University in Egypt,
65: El-Sherouk City, 11837, Egypt} \\
66: $^4${\it \normalsize
67: Department of Physics, Niigata University,~Niigata, 950-2181, Japan }
68: \end{center}
69: \end{minipage}}
70: \\*[50pt]}
71: \vskip 2 cm
72: \date{\small
73: \centerline{ \bf Abstract}
74: \begin{minipage}{0.9\linewidth}
75: \medskip
76: We present the lepton flavor model with $\Delta (54)$,
77: which appears typically in heterotic string models
78: on the $T^2/Z_3$ orbifold.
79: Our model reproduces the tri-bimaximal mixing in
80: the parameter region around
81: degenerate neutrino masses or two massless neutrinos.
82: We predict the deviation from the tri-bimaximal mixing
83: by putting the experimental data of neutrino masses
84: in the normal hierarchy of neutrino masses.
85: The upper bound of $\sin^2\theta_{13}$ is $0.01$.
86: There is the strong correlation between
87: $\theta_{23}$ and $\theta_{13}$.
88: Unless $\theta_{23}$ is deviated from the maximal mixing considerably,
89: $\theta_{13}$ remains to be tiny.
90: \end{minipage}
91: }
92:
93: \begin{titlepage}
94: \maketitle
95: \thispagestyle{empty}
96: \end{titlepage}
97:
98: \section{Introduction}
99: It is the important task to find an origin of the observed hierarchies
100: in masses and flavor mixing for quarks and leptons.
101: Neutrino experimental data provide us a valuable clue to find this origin.
102: In particular, recent experiments of the neutrino
103: oscillation go into the new phase of precise determination of
104: mixing angles and mass squared differences \cite{Threeflavors}.
105: Those indicate the tri-bimaximal mixing for three flavors
106: in the lepton sector \cite{HPS}.
107: Therefore, it is necessary
108: to find a natural model that leads to this mixing pattern with good accuracy.
109:
110: The tri-bimaximal mixing for three flavors indicates the specific
111: neutrino mass matrix, in which matrix elements are connected each other.
112: The non-Abelian discrete flavor symmetry is appropriate to explain
113: such a structure of the mass matrix which leads to the tri-bimaximal,
114: because the symmetry provides the definite meaning of generations
115: and connects different generations.
116: Actually, several types of models with various non-Abelian discrete flavor
117: symmetries have been proposed, such as
118: $S_3$ \cite{S3-FTY}-\cite{S3-Lavoura},
119: $D_4$ \cite{Grimus}-\cite{Ishimori:2008ns}, $D_6$ \cite{D6},
120: $Q_4 \cite{Q4},\ Q_6$ \cite{Q6},
121: $A_4$ \cite{A4-Ma and Rajasekaran}-\cite{A4-Lin}, $T^\prime $ \cite{T-Feruglio}-\cite{T-Ding},
122: $S_4$ \cite{S4-Ma}-\cite{S4-Morisi} and
123: $\Delta (27)$ \cite{Delta(27)-Gerard}-\cite{Delta(27)-Ma(2008)}.
124:
125:
126: Non-Abelian discrete symmetries are symmetries of
127: geometrical solids.
128: Thus, an origin of non-Abelian discrete flavor symmetries
129: may be compact extra dimensions, e.g.
130: string-derived compact spaces.
131: Recently, which types of non-Abelian discrete flavor symmetries
132: can appear in heterotic orbifold models has been studied
133: \cite{Kobayashi:2004ya,Kobayashi:2006wq,Ko:2007dz}.
134: Simple orbifolds can lead to non-Abelian flavor symmetries such as
135: $D_4$, $\Delta(54)$ and so on.
136: For example, the $\Delta(54)$ flavor symmetry can appear
137: typically in heterotic string models on
138: factorizable orbifolds including the $T^2/Z_3$ orbifold.
139: Other string compactifications would lead to different
140: flavor symmetries.
141:
142:
143: The $D_4$ flavor model has been already proposed by
144: Grimus and Lavoura \cite{Grimus} and phenomenologically important results
145: have been obtained \cite{D4-2}.
146: The $\Delta(54)$ flavor symmetry would be also interesting,
147: e.g. from the viewpoint that $\Delta(54)$ has
148: triplet irreducible representations \cite{delta54}, while
149: $D_4$ has only singlets and doublets.
150: Indeed, non-Abelian flavor symmetries,
151: $A_4$, $S_4$, and $T'$, include triplet irreducible representations
152: and those are useful to explain the three generations of
153: leptons with their mixing angles and reproduce
154: the tri-bimaximal mixing of flavors.
155: The $\Delta(54)$ flavor symmetry would have similarly
156: interesting aspects.
157: However, the group $\Delta(54)$ is rather unfamiliar compared to other
158: discrete groups used as the flavor symmetry.
159: Its phenomenological applications have not been studied.
160: Thus, our purpose in this paper is to present
161: a lepton flavor model with the $\Delta(54)$ symmetry
162: and study phenomenological implications.
163:
164: The paper is organized as follows:
165: we present the framework of the lepton flavor model with $\Delta (54)$
166: in section 2, and
167: discuss the effect of the higher order corrections, in section 3.
168: % discuss the neutrino masses, flavor mixing angles and Higgs potential
169: %In section 4, we discuss potential analysis.
170: In section 4, we present the potential analysis to assure the VEVs used
171: in section 2.
172: Numerical results are exhibited in section 5 for neutrino masses and mixing
173: angles.
174: Section 6 is devoted to summary and discussion.
175: In the appendix, we present the character table, the kronecker products and
176: Clebsch Gordan coefficients of $\Delta (54)$.
177:
178:
179: \section{$\Delta(54)$ Lepton Flavor model}
180: In this section, we present the lepton flavor model with
181: the $\Delta(54)$ flavor symmetry.
182: We propose our model within the framework of supersymmetric models.
183: However, similar non-supersymmetric models could be constructed.
184:
185: The $\Delta(54)$ group is one of series of $\Delta(6n^2)$
186: that has been discussed by a few authors \cite{delta54,Lam}. The group
187: $\Delta(54)$ has irreducible representations $1_1$, $1_2$, $2_1$, $2_2$,
188: $2_3$, $2_4$, $3_1^{(1)}$, $3_1^{(2)}$, $3_2^{(1)}$,
189: and $3_2^{(2)}$.
190: It is remarked that there are four triplets and only $3_1^{(1)}\times 3_1^{(2)}$ leads to the trivial singlet.
191: The relevant multiplication rules are summarized in appendix.
192:
193:
194:
195: \begin{table}[h]
196: \begin{center}
197: \begin{tabular}{|c|ccc||c||ccc|}
198: \hline
199: &$(l_e,l_\mu,l_\tau)$ & $(e^c,\mu^c,\tau^c)$ &
200: $(N_e^c,N_\mu^c,N_\tau^c)$ &$h_{u(d)}$ &$ \chi_1 $& $(\chi_{2},\chi_3)$&
201: $(\chi_{4},\chi_5,\chi_6)$ \\ \hline
202: $\Delta(54)$ &$3_1^{(1)}$ & $3_2^{(2)}$ & $3_1^{(2)}$
203: & $1_1$ & $1_2$ & $2_1$ & $3_1^{(2)}$ \\
204: \hline
205: \end{tabular}
206: \end{center}
207: \caption{Assignments of $\Delta(54)$ representations}
208: \end{table}
209: Let us present the model of the lepton flavor with the $\Delta(54)$
210: group. The triplet representations of the group
211: correspond to the three generations of leptons.
212: The left-handed leptons $(l_e,l_\mu,l_\tau)$,
213: the right-handed charged leptons $(e^c,\mu^c,\tau^c)$
214: and the right-handed neutrinos $(N_e^c,N_\mu^c,N_\tau^c)$
215: are assigned by $3_1^{(1)}$,
216: $3_2^{(2)}$, and $3_1^{(2)}$, respectively.
217: Since $3_1^{(1)}\times 3_1^{(2)}$ makes
218: trivial singlet $1_1$, only Dirac neutrino Yukawa couplings are allowed
219: in tree level. On the other hand, charged leptons and
220: the right-handed Majorana neutrinos cannot have mass terms
221: unless new scalars $\chi_i$ are introduced in addition to the usual Higgs
222: doublets, $h_u$ and $h_d$.
223: These new scalars are supposed to be $SU(2)$ gauge singlets.
224: The gauge singlets $\chi_1$, $(\chi_2, \chi_3)$ and
225: $(\chi_4, \chi_5, \chi_6)$ are assigned to
226: $1_2$, $2_1$, and $3_1^{(2)}$ of the $\Delta(54)$ representations,
227: respectively.
228: The particle assignments of $\Delta(54)$ are summarized in Table 1.
229: The usual Higgs doublets $h_u$ and $h_d$ are assigned to
230: the trivial singlet $1_1$ of $\Delta(54)$.
231: Here, we use the conventional notation that
232: we denote the superfield and its lowest scalar component by
233: the same letter.
234:
235:
236: In this setup of the particle assignment,
237: let us consider the superpotential of leptons at the leading order
238: in terms of the cut-off scale $\Lambda$, which is taken to be
239: the Planck scale.
240: For charged leptons, the superpotential of
241: the Yukawa sector respecting to $\Delta(54)$ symmetry
242: is given as
243: \begin{eqnarray}
244: w_l
245: &=&
246: y_1^l
247: ( e^c l_e+ \mu^c l_\mu+ \tau^c l_\tau )\chi_1 h_d/\Lambda
248: \nonumber\\
249: &&+y_2^l \ [
250: (\omega e^c l_e+\omega^2 \mu^c l_\mu+ \tau^c l_\tau )\chi_2
251: -( e^c l_e+\omega^2 \mu^c l_\mu+\omega \tau^c l_\tau )\chi_3]
252: \ h_d/\Lambda.
253: \end{eqnarray}
254: For the right-handed Majorana neutrinos we can write the superpotential
255: as follows:
256: \begin{eqnarray}
257: w_N
258: &=&y_1 ( N_e^c N_e^c\chi_4+ N_\mu^c N_\mu^c\chi_5+ N_\tau^c N_\tau^c\chi_6)
259: \nonumber\\&&
260: +y_2 \ [( N_\mu^c N_\tau^c+ N_\tau^c N_\mu^c)\chi_4
261: +( N_e^c N_\tau^c+ N_\tau^c N_e^c)\chi_5
262: +( N_e^c N_\mu^c+ N_\mu^c N_e^c)\chi_6].
263: \end{eqnarray}
264: The superpotential for the Dirac neutrinos has tree level contributions
265: as
266: \begin{eqnarray}
267: %{\cal L}_D
268: w_D
269: &=&
270: y_D
271: \ ( N^c_e l_e+N^c_ \mu l_\mu+ N^c_\tau l_\tau )h_u \ .
272: \end{eqnarray}
273:
274: We assume that the scalar fields, $h_{u,d}$ and $\chi_i$, develop
275: their vacuum expectation values (VEVs) as follows:
276: \begin{eqnarray}
277: \left<h_u\right>=v_u, \ \left<h_d\right>=v_d,
278: \quad
279: \left<\chi_1\right>=u_1,
280: \
281: \left<(\chi_2,\chi_3)\right>=(u_2,u_3),
282: \
283: \left<(\chi_4,\chi_5,\chi_6)\right>=(u_4,u_5,u_6).
284: \end{eqnarray}
285: Then, we obtain the diagonal mass matrix for charged leptons
286: \begin{eqnarray}
287: M_l
288: =
289: y_1^lv_d
290: \begin{pmatrix}\alpha_1 & 0 & 0 \\
291: 0 & \alpha_1 & 0 \\
292: 0 & 0 & \alpha_1 \\
293: \end{pmatrix}
294: +y_2^l v_d
295: \begin{pmatrix} \omega\alpha_2-\alpha_3 & 0 & 0 \\
296: 0 & \omega^2\alpha_2-\omega^2\alpha_3 & 0 \\
297: 0 & 0 & \alpha_2-\omega\alpha_3 \\
298: \end{pmatrix},
299: \label{ME}
300: \end{eqnarray}
301: while the right-handed Majorana mass matrix is given as
302: \begin{eqnarray}
303: M_N
304: &=&
305: {y_1 \Lambda}
306: \begin{pmatrix}\alpha_4 & 0 & 0 \\
307: 0 & \alpha_5 &0 \\
308: 0 & 0 &\alpha_6 \\
309: \end{pmatrix}
310: + {y_2 \Lambda}
311: \begin{pmatrix}0 & \alpha_{6} & \alpha_{5} \\
312: \alpha_{6} & 0 &\alpha_{4} \\
313: \alpha_{5} & \alpha_{4} & 0 \\
314: \end{pmatrix},
315: \label{MR}
316: \end{eqnarray}
317: and the Dirac mass matrix of neutrinos is
318: \begin{eqnarray}
319: M_D =
320: y_Dv_u
321: \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\
322: 0 & 1 & 0 \\
323: 0 & 0 & 1 \\
324: \end{pmatrix},
325: \label{MD}
326: \end{eqnarray}
327: where we denote $\alpha_i=u_i/\Lambda \ (i=1-6)$.
328: By using the seesaw mechanism $M_\nu = M_D^T M_N^{-1} M_D$, the neutrino
329: mass matrix can be written as
330: \begin{eqnarray}
331: M_\nu
332: &=&
333: \frac{y_D^2v_u^2}{ \Lambda d}
334: \begin{pmatrix}y_1^2\alpha_5\alpha_6-y_2^2\alpha_4^2 & -y_1y_2
335: \alpha_6^2+y_2^2\alpha_4\alpha_5 & -y_1y_2 \alpha_5^2+y_2^2\alpha_4\alpha_6 \\
336: -y_1y_2 \alpha_6^2+y_2^2\alpha_4\alpha_5 &
337: y_1^2\alpha_4\alpha_6-y_2^2\alpha_5^2 & -y_1y_2 \alpha_4^2+y_2^2 \alpha_5\alpha_6 \\
338: -y_1y_2 \alpha_5^2+y_2^2\alpha_4\alpha_6 & -y_1y_2
339: \alpha_4^2+y_2^2 \alpha_5\alpha_6 & y_1^2\alpha_4\alpha_5-y_2^2\alpha_6^2 \\
340: \end{pmatrix},
341: \label{neumassmatrix}
342: \nonumber\\
343: \nonumber\\
344: d&=&y_1^3\alpha_4\alpha_5\alpha_6-y_1y_2^2\alpha_4^3-
345: y_1y_2^2\alpha_5^3-y_1y_2^2\alpha_6^3
346: +2y_2^3\alpha_4\alpha_5\alpha_6.
347: \end{eqnarray}
348:
349: Since the charged leptons mass matrix is diagonal one,
350: we can simply get the mass eigenvalues as
351: \begin{eqnarray}
352: \left( \begin{array}{cc}
353: m_e \\
354: m_\mu \\
355: m_\tau \\
356: \end{array} \right)
357: =
358: v_d
359: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
360: 1&\omega &-1 \\
361: 1&\omega^2 &-\omega^2 \\
362: 1&1 &-\omega \\
363: \end{array} \right)
364: \left( \begin{array}{cc}
365: y^\ell_1\alpha_1 \\
366: y^\ell_2\alpha _2 \\
367: y^\ell_2\alpha _3 \\
368: \end{array} \right) .
369: \end{eqnarray}
370: In order to estimate magnitudes of $\alpha_1$, $\alpha_2$ and $\alpha_3$,
371: we rewrite as
372: \begin{eqnarray}
373: \left( \begin{array}{cc}
374: y^\ell_1\alpha_1 \\
375: y^\ell_2\alpha _2 \\
376: y^\ell_2\alpha _3 \\
377: \end{array} \right)
378: =
379: \frac{1 }{3v_d}
380: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
381: 1&1 & 1 \\
382: -\omega-1&\omega & 1 \\
383: -1&-\omega &\omega+1 \\
384: \end{array} \right)
385: \left( \begin{array}{cc}
386: m_e \\
387: m_\mu \\
388: m_\tau \\
389: \end{array} \right) ,
390: \end{eqnarray}
391: which gives the relation of $|y^\ell_2\alpha_2| = |y^\ell_2\alpha_3|$.
392: Inserting the experimental values of the charged lepton masses
393: and $v_d\simeq 55$GeV, which is given by taking $\tan\beta=3$,
394: we obtain numerical results
395: \begin{equation}
396: \begin{pmatrix}
397: y_1^\ell \alpha _1 \\
398: y_2^\ell \alpha _2 \\
399: y_2^\ell \alpha _3
400: \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}
401: 1.14\times 10^{-2} \\
402: %正確な値: 0.011389
403: 1.05\times 10^{-2} e^{0.016 i\pi } \\
404: %正確な値: 0.0104935e^{0.0159211i\pi }
405: 1.05\times 10^{-2} e^{0.32 i\pi } \
406: %正確な値: 0.0104935e^{0.317387\pi }
407: \end{pmatrix}.
408: \label{alpha123}
409: \end{equation}
410: Thus, it is found that $\alpha_i(i=1,2,3)$ are order of ${\cal O}(10^{-2})$
411: if the Yukawa couplings are order one.
412:
413: In our model,
414: the lepton mixing comes from the structure of the neutrino mass matrix
415: of Eq.(\ref{neumassmatrix}).
416: In order to reproduce the maximal mixing between
417: $\nu_\mu$ and $\nu_\tau$, we take $\alpha_5=\alpha_6$, and then
418: we have
419: \begin{eqnarray}
420: \label{mass}
421: M_\nu
422: &=&
423: \frac{y_D^2v_u^2}{ \Lambda d}
424: \begin{pmatrix}y_1^2\alpha_5^2-y_2^2\alpha_4^2 & -y_1y_2
425: \alpha_5^2+y_2^2\alpha_4\alpha_5 & -y_1y_2 \alpha_5^2+y_2^2\alpha_4\alpha_5 \\
426: -y_1y_2 \alpha_5^2+y_2^2\alpha_4\alpha_5 &
427: y_1^2\alpha_4\alpha_5-y_2^2\alpha_5^2 & -y_1y_2 \alpha_4^2+y_2^2 \alpha_5^2 \\
428: -y_1y_2 \alpha_5^2+y_2^2\alpha_4\alpha_5 & -y_1y_2
429: \alpha_4^2+y_2^2 \alpha_5^2 & y_1^2\alpha_4\alpha_5-y_2^2\alpha_5^2 \\
430: \end{pmatrix}.
431: \label{neutri}
432: % \nonumber\\
433: % d&=&y_1^3\alpha_4\alpha_5^2-y_1y_2^2\alpha_4^3-2y_1y_2^2\alpha_5^3+
434: % 2y_2^3\alpha_4\alpha_5^2.
435: \end{eqnarray}
436: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
437:
438: The tri-bimaximal mixing is realized by the condition of
439: $M_\nu(1,1)+M_\nu(1,2)=M_\nu(2,2)+M_\nu(2,3)$ in Eq. (\ref{neutri}),
440: which turns to
441: \begin{eqnarray}
442: (y_1-y_2)(\alpha_4-\alpha_5)(y_1\alpha_5-y_2\alpha_4)=0.
443: \end{eqnarray}
444: Therefore, we have three cases realizing the tri-bimaximal mixing
445: in Eq.(\ref{neutri}) as
446: \begin{eqnarray}
447: y_1=y_2, \qquad \alpha_4=\alpha_5, \qquad y_1\alpha_5=y_2\alpha_4.
448: \label{limit}
449: \label{condition}
450: \end{eqnarray}
451: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
452: Let us investigate the neutrino mass spectrum in these cases.
453: In general the neutrino mass matrix with the tri-bimaximal mixing is
454: expressed as
455: \begin{eqnarray}
456: M_\nu
457: =
458: \frac{m_1+m_3}{2}
459: \begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 \\
460: 0 & 1 &0 \\
461: 0 & 0 & 1 \\
462: \end{pmatrix}
463: +\frac{m_2-m_1}{3}
464: \begin{pmatrix}1 & 1 & 1 \\
465: 1 & 1 &1 \\
466: 1 & 1 & 1 \\
467: \end{pmatrix}
468: +\frac{m_1-m_3}{2}
469: \begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 \\
470: 0 & 0 &1 \\
471: 0 & 1 & 0 \\
472: \end{pmatrix}
473: .
474: \label{tri-bi1}
475: \end{eqnarray}
476: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
477: Actually, the neutrino mass matrix of
478: Eq.(\ref{neutri}) is decomposed under the condition in Eq.(\ref{condition})
479: as follows.
480: In the case of $\alpha_4=\alpha_5$, the neutrino mass matrix is expressed as
481: \begin{eqnarray}
482: M_\nu
483: &=&
484: \frac{y_D^2v_u ^2\alpha_4^2(y_1-y_2)}{ \Lambda d}
485: \left[
486: (y_1+2y_2)
487: \begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 \\
488: 0 & 1 &0 \\
489: 0 & 0 & 1 \\
490: \end{pmatrix}
491: -y_2
492: \begin{pmatrix}1 & 1 & 1 \\
493: 1 & 1 &1 \\
494: 1 & 1 & 1 \\
495: \end{pmatrix}
496: \right ].
497: \end{eqnarray}
498: Therefore, it is found that neutrino masses are given as
499: \begin{eqnarray}
500: \frac{m_1+m_3}{2}
501: &=&
502: \frac{y_D^2v_u^2\alpha_4^2(y_1-y_2)}{ \Lambda d}
503: (y_1+2y_2),
504: \nonumber\\
505: \frac{m_2-m_1}{3}
506: &=&-\frac{y_D^2v_u^2 \alpha_4^2}{ \Lambda d}
507: (y_1-y_2) y_2,
508: \nonumber\\
509: m_1-m_3&=&0.
510: \end{eqnarray}
511: In the case of $y_1=y_2$, the mass matrix is decomposed as
512: \begin{eqnarray}
513: M_\nu
514: &=&
515: \frac{y_D^2y_1^2v^2(\alpha_4-\alpha_5)}{ \Lambda d}
516: \left[
517: \alpha_5
518: \begin{pmatrix}1 & 1 & 1 \\
519: 1 & 1 &1 \\
520: 1 & 1 & 1 \\
521: \end{pmatrix}
522: -(\alpha_4+2\alpha_5)
523: \begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 \\
524: 0 & 0 &1 \\
525: 0 & 1 & 0 \\
526: \end{pmatrix}\right ],
527: \end{eqnarray}
528: and we have
529: \begin{eqnarray}
530: m_1+m_3&=&0,
531: \nonumber\\
532: \frac{m_2-m_1}{3}
533: &=&\frac{y_D^2 y_1^2 v_u^2(\alpha_4-\alpha_5)}{ \Lambda d}
534: \alpha_5,
535: \nonumber\\
536: \frac{m_1-m_3}{2}
537: &=&-\frac{y_D^2 y_1^2 v_u^2(\alpha_4-\alpha_5)}{ \Lambda d}
538: (\alpha_4+2\alpha_5).
539: \end{eqnarray}
540: In the last case of
541: $y_1\alpha_5=y_2\alpha_4$, we have
542: \begin{eqnarray}
543: M_\nu
544: &=&
545: \frac{y_D^2v_u^2}{ \Lambda d}
546: y_1^2 \alpha_4\alpha_5 \left (1-\frac{\alpha_5^3}{\alpha_4^3}\right)
547: \left[
548: \begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 \\
549: 0 & 1 &0 \\
550: 0 & 0 & 1 \\
551: \end{pmatrix}
552: -
553: \begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 \\
554: 0 & 0 &1 \\
555: 0 & 1 & 0 \\
556: \end{pmatrix}
557: \right ].
558: \end{eqnarray}
559: Then, we obtain
560: \begin{eqnarray}
561: &&m_3=
562: \frac{2y_D^2v_u^2}{ \Lambda d}
563: y_1^2 \alpha_4\alpha_5 \left (1-\frac{\alpha_5^3}{\alpha_4^3}\right),
564: \nonumber\\
565: && m_2=m_1=0 \ .
566: \label{tri-bi2}
567: \end{eqnarray}
568:
569: Thus, the tri-bimaximal mixing is not realized for
570: arbitrary neutrino masses $m_1$, $m_2$ and $m_3$ in our model.
571: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
572: In both conditions of $y_1=y_2$ and $\alpha_4=\alpha_5$,
573: we have $|m_1|=|m_3|$, which leads to quasi-degenerate neutrino masses
574: due to the condition of $\Delta m^2_{\rm atm} \gg \Delta m_{\rm sol}^2$.
575: Therefore, we do not discuss these cases in this paper
576: because we need fine-tuning of parameters
577: in order to be consistent with the experimental data of the neutrino
578: oscillations \cite{Threeflavors}.
579:
580: In the case of $y_1\alpha_5=y_2\alpha_4$, the neutrino mass matrix turns to be
581: \begin{eqnarray}
582: M_\nu
583: =
584: \frac{y_D^2y_1^2v_u^2}{ \Lambda d}
585: \begin{pmatrix}0 & 0 & 0 \\
586: 0 & \alpha_4\alpha_5- \alpha_5^4/\alpha_4^2 &
587: -\alpha_4\alpha_5+ \alpha_5^4/\alpha_4^2 \\
588: 0 & -\alpha_4\alpha_5+\alpha_5^4/\alpha_4^2 &
589: \alpha_4\alpha_5- \alpha_5^4/\alpha_4^2 \\
590: \end{pmatrix}.
591: \label{proto}
592: \end{eqnarray}
593: This neutrino matrix is a prototype
594: which leads to the tri-bimaximal mixing
595: with the mass hierarchy $m_3\gg m_2\geq m_1$,
596: then we expect that realistic mass matrix is obtained near the condition
597: $y_1\alpha_5=y_2\alpha_4$.
598:
599: Let us discuss the detail of the mass matrix (\ref{mass}).
600: After rotating $\theta_{23}=45^\circ$, we get
601: \begin{eqnarray}
602: \frac{y_D^2v_u^2}{ \Lambda d}
603: \begin{pmatrix}y_1^2\alpha_5^2-y_2^2\alpha_4^2 & \sqrt2(-y_1y_2
604: \alpha_5^2+y_2^2\alpha_4\alpha_5) & 0 \\
605: \sqrt2(-y_1y_2 \alpha_5^2+y_2^2\alpha_4\alpha_5) & y_1^2
606: \alpha_4\alpha_5-y_1y_2 \alpha_4^2 & 0 \\
607: 0 & 0 & y_1^2 \alpha_4\alpha_5+y_1y_2
608: \alpha_4^2-2y_2^2\alpha_5^2 \\
609: \end{pmatrix},
610: \end{eqnarray}
611: which leads $\theta_{13}=0$ and
612: \begin{eqnarray}
613: \theta_{12}
614: =\frac12\arctan\frac{2\sqrt2 y_2\alpha_5}
615: {y_1\alpha_5+y_2\alpha_4-y_1 \alpha_4} \qquad (y_2\alpha_4\not
616: =y_1\alpha_5).
617: \end{eqnarray}
618: %where we exclude the case $$.
619: Neutrino masses are given as
620: \begin{eqnarray}
621: m_1&=& \frac{y_D^2v_u^2}{ \Lambda d}
622: [y_1^2\alpha_5^2-y_2^2\alpha_4^2 -\sqrt2 (-y_1y_2
623: \alpha_5^2+y_2^2\alpha_4\alpha_5)\tan\theta_{12}],
624: \nonumber\\
625: m_2&=& \frac{y_D^2v_u^2}{ \Lambda d}
626: [y_1^2 \alpha_4\alpha_5-y_1y_2 \alpha_4^2 + {\sqrt2} (-y_1y_2
627: \alpha_5^2+y_2^2\alpha_4\alpha_5) \tan\theta_{12}],
628: \nonumber\\
629: m_3&=&\ \frac{y_D^2v_u^2}{ \Lambda d}
630: [y_1^2 \alpha_4\alpha_5+y_1y_2 \alpha_4^2-2y_2^2\alpha_5^2],
631: \label{m3}
632: \end{eqnarray}
633: which are reconciled with the normal hierarchy of neutrino masses
634: in the case of $y_1\alpha_5\simeq y_2\alpha_4$.
635:
636: Let us estimate magnitudes of $\alpha_i(i=4,5,6)$
637: by using Eq.(\ref{m3}). Suppose
638: $\tilde \alpha=\alpha_4\simeq \alpha_5=\alpha_6$.
639: If we take all Yukawa couplings to be order one,
640: Eq.(\ref{m3}) turns to be
641: $v_u^2=\Lambda \tilde\alpha m_3$ because of $d\sim \tilde\alpha^3$.
642: Putting $v_u\simeq 165$GeV ($\tan\beta=3$),
643: $m_3\simeq \sqrt{\Delta m_{\rm atm}^2}\simeq 0.05$eV,
644: and $\Lambda = 2.43\times 10^{18}$GeV, we obtain
645: $\tilde \alpha={\cal O}(10^{-4}-10^{-3})$.
646: Thus, values of $\alpha_i (i=4,5,6)$ are enough suppressed
647: to discuss perturbative series of higher mass operators.
648:
649: \section{Higher order corrections}
650:
651: Let us consider higher order contributions to mass matrices.
652: There are six expansion parameters $\alpha_i$, all of which
653: are expected to be small.
654:
655: Since products $3_1^{(1)}\times 3_2^{(2)}\times 2_1\times 1_2$
656: and $3_1^{(1)}\times 3_2^{(2)}\times 2_1\times 2_1$
657: give the $\Delta(54)$ invariant in the charged lepton sector,
658: the superpotential of next leading order is written as
659: \begin{eqnarray}
660: \delta w_l
661: &=&
662: y_3^l
663: [(\omega e^c l_e+\omega^2 \mu^c l_\mu+ \tau^c l_\tau )\chi_2
664: +(e^c l_e+\omega^2 \mu^c l_\mu+\omega \tau^c l_\tau )\chi_3]
665: \chi_1 h_d/\Lambda^2
666: \nonumber\\&&
667: +y_4^l
668: ( (e^c l_e+\omega^2 \mu^c l_\mu+\omega \tau^c l_\tau )\chi_2 ^2 -
669: (\omega e^c l_e+\omega^2 \mu^c l_\mu+ \tau^c l_\tau )\chi_3 ^2)
670: h_d/\Lambda^2.
671: \label{LE}
672: \end{eqnarray}
673: For the right-handed Majorana neutrinos,
674: the $\Delta(54)$ invariant product
675: $3_1^{(2)}\times 3_1^{(2)}\times 3_1^{(2)}\times 2_1$ gives
676: \begin{eqnarray}
677: \delta w_N
678: &=&
679: y_3
680: [(\omega N_e^c N_e^c\chi_4+\omega^2 N_\mu^c N_\mu^c\chi_5+
681: N_\tau^c N_\tau^c\chi_6)\chi_2
682: \nonumber\\&&
683: +( N_e^c N_e^c\chi_4+\omega^2 N_\mu^c N_\mu^c\chi_5+
684: \omega N_\tau^c N_\tau^c\chi_6)\chi_3 ]/\Lambda
685: \nonumber\\&&
686: +y_4\left [\{\omega ( N_\mu^c N_\tau^c+ N_\tau^c N_\mu^c)\chi_4
687: +\omega^2(N_e^c N_\tau^c+ N_\tau^c N_e^c)\chi_5
688: +(N_e^c N_\mu^c+\bar N_\mu^c N_e^c)\chi_6\}\chi_2 \right .
689: \nonumber\\&&
690: +\{( N_\mu^c N_\tau^c+ N_\tau^c N_\mu^c)\chi_4
691: +\omega^2(N_e^c l_\tau^c+N_\tau^c N_e^c)\chi_5
692: \nonumber\\&&
693: +\omega ( N_e^c N_\mu+ N_\mu^c N_e^c)\chi_6\}\chi_3\left .\right ]
694: /\Lambda .
695: \label{LR}
696: \end{eqnarray}
697: The product $3_1^{(1)}\times 3_1^{(2)}\times 2_1$
698: gives a $\Delta(54)$ invariant in the Dirac neutrino sector as
699: \begin{eqnarray}
700: \delta w_D
701: &=&
702: y^D_2
703: [ (\omega N_e^c l_e+\omega^2 N_ \mu^c l_\mu+ N_\tau^c l_\tau )\chi_2
704: + (N_e^c l_e+\omega^2 N_ \mu^c l_\mu+\omega N_\tau^c l_\tau )\chi_3]
705: h_u/\Lambda.
706: \label{LD}
707: \end{eqnarray}
708: These correction terms of the superpotential in Eqs.
709: (\ref{LE}), (\ref{LR}), (\ref{LD}) give corrections of mass matrices
710: \begin{eqnarray}
711: \delta M_l
712: &= &
713: y_3^lv_d\alpha_1
714: \begin{pmatrix}\omega\alpha_2+\alpha_3 & 0 & 0 \\
715: 0 & \omega^2(\alpha_2+\alpha_3) & 0 \\
716: 0 & 0 & \alpha_2+\omega\alpha_3 \\
717: \end{pmatrix}
718: \nonumber\\&&
719: +\ y_4^lv_d
720: \begin{pmatrix}\alpha_2^2-\omega\alpha_3^2 & 0 & 0 \\
721: 0 & \omega^2(\alpha_2^2-\alpha_3^2) & 0 \\
722: 0 & 0 & \omega\alpha_2^2-\alpha_3^2 \\
723: \end{pmatrix},
724: \label{delE}
725: \end{eqnarray}
726: for charged leptons,
727: \begin{eqnarray}
728: \delta M_N
729: &=&
730: y_3\Lambda
731: \begin{pmatrix}(\omega\alpha_2+\alpha_3)\alpha_4 & 0 & 0 \\
732: 0 & \omega^2(\alpha_2+\alpha_3)\alpha_5 &0 \\
733: 0 & 0 &(\alpha_2+\omega\alpha_3)\alpha_6 \\
734: \end{pmatrix}
735: \nonumber\\&&
736: +\ y_4 \Lambda
737: \begin{pmatrix}0 & (\alpha_2+\omega\alpha_3)\alpha_{6}
738: &\omega^2(\alpha_2+\alpha_3) \alpha_{5} \\
739: (\alpha_2+ \omega\alpha_3)\alpha_{6} & 0
740: &(\omega\alpha_2+\alpha_3)\alpha_{4} \\
741: \omega^2(\alpha_2+ \alpha_3)\alpha_{5} &
742: (\omega\alpha_2+\alpha_3)\alpha_{4} & 0 \\
743: \end{pmatrix},
744: \label{delR}
745: \end{eqnarray}
746: for right-handed Majorana neutrinos, and
747: \begin{eqnarray}
748: \delta M_D
749: =
750: y^D_2v_u
751: \begin{pmatrix} \omega\alpha_2+ \alpha_3 & 0 & 0 \\
752: 0 & \omega^2\alpha_2+\omega^2\alpha_3 & 0 \\
753: 0 & 0 & \alpha_2+\omega\alpha_3 \\
754: \end{pmatrix},
755: \label{delD}
756: \end{eqnarray}
757: for Dirac neutrinos.
758: It is noticed that the corrections of the mass matrices
759: do not change the zero textures in the leading mass matrices
760: of Eqs. (\ref{ME}), (\ref{MR}), (\ref{MD}).
761:
762: Since the magnitudes of $\alpha_i(i=1,2,3)$ are of
763: ${\cal O}(10^{-2})$ as seen in
764: Eq.(\ref{alpha123}), mass matrix corrections
765: $\delta M_l$ and $\delta M_D$ in Eqs. (\ref{delE}) and (\ref{delD})
766: are suppressed enough.
767: On the other hand, the magnitudes of $\alpha_i(i=4,5,6)$ are
768: ${\cal O}(10^{-4}-10^{-3})$ as discussed in the previous section.
769: Therefore, the correction $\delta M_N$ in Eq.(\ref{delR})
770: is also suppressed enough.
771: In conclusion, we can neglect the higher order contribution
772: in our numerical study of neutrino masses and mixing angles.
773:
774: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
775:
776:
777: \section{Vacuum alignment}
778: We analyze the scalar potential to find out the vacuum alignment
779: \footnote{Instead of analyzing the potential minimum,
780: the vacuum alignment could be realized by imposing boundary conditions
781: of $\chi_i$ in extra dimensions \cite{Kobayashi:2008ih}
782: \cite{Seidl}.}.
783: The scalar potential becomes rather simple in the $\Delta(54)$ symmetry.
784: Especially, the supersymmetry is important to see the vacuum
785: alignment.
786:
787: %\begin{table}[h]
788: %\begin{center}
789: %\begin{tabular}{|c|ccc|}
790: %\hline
791: % & $\chi _1$ & $(\chi _2,\chi _3)$ & $(\chi_4,\chi_5,\chi_6)$
792: %\\ \hline
793: %$\Delta (54)$ & $ 1_2$ & $ 2_1$ & $ 3_1^{(2)}$
794: % \\ \hline
795: %\end{tabular}
796: %\end{center}
797:
798: %\end{table}
799:
800: The $\Delta(54)$ invariant superpotential is given as
801: \begin{eqnarray}
802: w &=&
803: \mu _1\chi _1^2 + \mu _2\chi _2\chi _3
804: \nonumber\\&&
805: + \eta _2(\chi _2^3+\chi _3^3) + \eta _3(\chi _4^3+\chi _5^3+\chi _6^3) +
806: \eta _3^\prime \chi _4\chi _5\chi _6
807: \nonumber\\&&
808: + \frac{\lambda _1}{\Lambda }\chi _1^4 + \frac{\lambda _2}{\Lambda }\chi
809: _2^2\chi _3^2 %+ \frac{\lambda _2^\prime }{\Lambda }\chi _2^2\chi _3^2
810: + \frac{\lambda _3}{\Lambda }\chi _1^2\chi _2\chi _3 +\frac{\lambda
811: _4}{\Lambda }\chi _1(\chi _2^3-\chi _3^3)
812: \nonumber\\&&
813: + \frac{\lambda _6}{\Lambda }\left [\chi _2(\omega \chi _4^3+\omega ^2\chi
814: _5^3+\chi _6^3)+\chi _3(\chi _4^3+\omega ^2\chi _5^3+\omega \chi
815: _6^3)\right ]
816: \ ,
817: \end{eqnarray}
818: which leads to the scalar potential
819: \begin{eqnarray}
820: V &=& |2\mu _1\chi _1+4\frac{\lambda _1}{\Lambda }\chi _1^3+2\frac{\lambda
821: _3}{\Lambda }\chi _1\chi _2\chi _3+\frac{\lambda _4}{\Lambda }(\chi
822: _2^3-\chi _3^3)|^2
823: \nonumber\\
824: && + |\mu _2\chi _3+3\eta _2\chi _2^2+2\frac{\lambda _2}{\Lambda }\chi
825: _2\chi _3^2%+2\frac{\lambda _2^\prime }{\Lambda }\chi _2\chi _3^2
826: +\frac{\lambda _3}{\Lambda }\chi _1^2\chi _3+3\frac{\lambda _4}{\Lambda
827: }\chi _1\chi _2^2+\frac{\lambda _6}{\Lambda }(\omega \chi _4^3+\omega ^2\chi
828: _5^3+\chi _6^3)|^2
829: \nonumber\\
830: && + |\mu _2\chi _2+3\eta _2\chi _3^2+2\frac{\lambda _2}{\Lambda }\chi
831: _2^2\chi _3%+2\frac{\lambda _2^\prime }{\Lambda }\chi _2^2\chi _3
832: +\frac{\lambda _3}{\Lambda }\chi _1^2\chi _2-3\frac{\lambda _4}{\Lambda
833: }\chi _1\chi _3^2+\frac{\lambda _6}{\Lambda }(\chi _4^3+\omega ^2\chi
834: _5^3+\omega \chi _6^3)|^2
835: \nonumber\\
836: && + |3\eta _3\chi _4^2+\eta _3^\prime \chi _5\chi _6+3\frac{\lambda
837: _6}{\Lambda }(\omega \chi _2+\chi _3)\chi _4^2|^2
838: + |3\eta _3\chi _5^2+\eta _3^\prime \chi _4\chi _6+3\frac{\lambda
839: _6}{\Lambda }\omega ^2(\chi _2+\chi _3)\chi _5^2|^2
840: \nonumber\\
841: && + |3\eta _3\chi _6^2+\eta _3^\prime \chi _4\chi _5+3\frac{\lambda
842: _6}{\Lambda }(\chi _2+\omega \chi _3)\chi _6^2|^2 \ .
843: \end{eqnarray}
844: VEVs of $\chi_i$ must be much larger than the weak scale.
845: We assume that their VEVs are determined with neglecting
846: supersymmetry breaking terms, i.e. $V_{\text{min}}=0$.
847: Then, the conditions of the potential minimum, $V_{\text{min}}=0$ are
848: written as
849: \begin{eqnarray}
850: 2\mu _1\chi _1+4\frac{\lambda _1}{\Lambda }\chi _1^3+2\frac{\lambda
851: _3}{\Lambda }\chi _1\chi _2\chi _3+\frac{\lambda _4}{\Lambda }(\chi _2^3-\chi
852: _3^3) &=& 0 ,
853: \nonumber\\
854: \mu _2\chi _3+3\eta _2\chi _2^2+2\frac{\lambda _2}{\Lambda }\chi _2\chi
855: _3^2%+2\frac{\lambda _2^\prime }{\Lambda }\chi _2\chi _3^2
856: +\frac{\lambda _3}{\Lambda }\chi _1^2\chi _3+3\frac{\lambda _4}{\Lambda
857: }\chi _1\chi _2^2+\frac{\lambda _6}{\Lambda }(\omega \chi _4^3+\omega ^2\chi
858: _5^3+\chi _6^3) &=& 0 ,
859: \nonumber\\
860: \mu _2\chi _2+3\eta _2\chi _3^2+2\frac{\lambda _2}{\Lambda }\chi _2^2\chi
861: _3%+2\frac{\lambda _2^\prime }{\Lambda }\chi _2^2\chi _3
862: +\frac{\lambda _3}{\Lambda }\chi _1^2\chi _2-3\frac{\lambda _4}{\Lambda
863: }\chi _1\chi _3^2+\frac{\lambda _6}{\Lambda }(\chi _4^3+\omega ^2\chi
864: _5^3+\omega \chi _6^3) &=& 0 ,
865: \nonumber\\
866: 3\eta _3\chi _4^2+\eta _3^\prime \chi _5\chi _6+3\frac{\lambda
867: _6}{\Lambda }(\omega \chi _2+\chi _3)\chi _4^2 &=& 0 ,
868: \nonumber\\
869: 3\eta _3\chi _5^2+\eta _3^\prime \chi _4\chi _6+3\frac{\lambda
870: _6}{\Lambda }\omega ^2(\chi _2+\chi _3)\chi _5^2 &=& 0 ,
871: \nonumber\\
872: 3\eta _3\chi _6^2+\eta _3^\prime \chi _4\chi _5+3\frac{\lambda
873: _6}{\Lambda }(\chi _2+\omega \chi _3)\chi _6^2 &=& 0.
874: \end{eqnarray}
875: A solution of the last three equations is
876: \begin{eqnarray}
877: \chi_4=\chi_5=\chi_6 \qquad {\rm with} \qquad
878: 3\eta _3 + \eta _3^\prime = 0\ ,
879: \end{eqnarray}
880: where the higher dimensional operators proportional to $\lambda_6$
881: are neglected.
882: If we include the $\lambda_6$ terms,
883: the relation $\alpha_4=\alpha_5=\alpha_6$ is deviated in order of ${\cal O}(\alpha_i^2)$.
884: Therefore, we take randomly $\alpha_i(i=4,5,6)$ around
885: $\alpha_4=\alpha_5=\alpha_6$ in our numerical analysis.
886:
887: \section{Numerical result}
888:
889: We show our numerical analysis of neutrino masses and mixing angles
890: in the normal mass hierarchy.
891: Neglecting higher order corrections of mass matrices in section 3,
892: we obtain the allowed region of parameters and predictions of neutrino masses and mixing angles. Here, we neglect the renomarization effect of the
893: neutrino mass matrix because we suppose the normal hierarchy of
894: neutrino masses and take $\tan\beta = 3$.
895: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
896: \begin{figure}[tbh]
897: \begin{center}
898: \includegraphics[width=7 cm]{theta12-13.eps}
899: \quad
900: \includegraphics[width=7 cm]{theta23-13.eps}
901: \quad
902: \caption{Prediction of the upper bound of $\sin^2\theta_{13}$
903: on (a) $\sin^2\theta_{12}-\sin^2\theta_{13}$ and
904: (b) $\sin^2\theta_{23}-\sin^2\theta_{13}$ planes.}
905: \end{center}
906: \end{figure}
907: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
908: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
909: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
910: \begin{figure}[tb]
911: \begin{minipage}[]{0.4\linewidth}
912: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{theta12-23.eps}
913: \caption{Allowed region on $\sin^2\theta_{12}-\sin^2\theta_{23}$ plane. }
914: \end{minipage}
915: \hspace{2cm}
916: \begin{minipage}[]{0.4\linewidth}
917: \includegraphics[width=7 cm]{m1-m2.eps}
918: \caption{The allowed mass region on the $m_1-m_2$ plane. }
919: \end{minipage}
920: \end{figure}
921: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
922:
923: Input data of masses and mixing angles are taken in the region of
924: 3$\sigma$ of the experimental data \cite{Threeflavors}:
925: \begin{eqnarray}
926: &&\Delta m_{\rm atm}^2=(2.07\sim 2.75)\times 10^{-3}
927: {\rm eV}^2 \ ,
928: \quad \Delta m_{\rm sol}^2= (7.05\sim 8.34) \times 10^{-5} {\rm eV}^2 \ ,
929: \nonumber \\
930: && \sin^2 \theta_{\rm atm}=0.36\sim 0.67 \ ,
931: \quad \sin^2 \theta_{\rm sol}=0.25 \sim 0.37 \ , \quad
932: \sin^2 \theta_{\rm reactor} \leq 0.056\ ,
933: %\label{}
934: \end{eqnarray}
935: and $\Lambda=2.43 \times 10^{18}$GeV is taken.
936: We fix $y_D=y_1=1$ as a convention, and vary $y_2/y_1$.
937: The change of $y_D$ and $y_1$ is absorbed into the change of
938: $\alpha_i(i=4,5,6)$.
939: If we take a smaller value of $y_1$, values of $\alpha_i$ scale up.
940: On the other hand,
941: if we take a smaller value of $y_D$, the magnitude of $\alpha_i$ scale down.
942: As expected in the discussion of section 2,
943: the experimentally allowed values are reproduced
944: around $\alpha_4=\alpha_5=\alpha_6$.
945:
946:
947:
948:
949:
950: We can predict the deviation from the tri-bimaximal mixing.
951: The remarkable prediction is given in the magnitude of $\sin^2\theta_{13}$.
952: In Figures 1 (a) and (b), we plot the allowed region of mixing angles
953: in planes of $\sin^2\theta_{12}$-$\sin^2\theta_{13}$ and
954: $\sin^2\theta_{23}$-$\sin^2\theta_{13}$, respectively.
955: It is found that the upper bound of $\sin^2\theta_{13}$ is $0.01$.
956: It is also found the strong correlation between
957: $\sin^2\theta_{23}$ and $\sin^2\theta_{13}$.
958: Unless $\theta_{23}$ is deviated from the maximal mixing considerably,
959: $\theta_{13}$ remains to be tiny. This is a testable relation in this model.
960:
961: The allowed region on the
962: $\sin^2\theta_{12}$-$\sin^2\theta_{23}$ plane is presented in Figure 2.
963: There is no correlation between $\sin^2\theta_{23}$ and $\sin^2\theta_{12}$
964: as well as between $\sin^2\theta_{13}$ and $\sin^2\theta_{12}$.
965:
966: Let us discuss the first and second neutrino masses on the $m_1-m_2$ plane
967: in Figure 3.
968: We find the lightest neutrino mass $m_1$ in the very narrow region
969: of $m_1\simeq (6-7)\times 10^{-3}$eV in our model.
970:
971: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
972: \begin{figure}[!tb]
973: \begin{center}
974: \includegraphics[width=7 cm]{a5-a4.eps}
975: \qquad
976: \includegraphics[width=7 cm]{a5-a6.eps}
977: \caption{Allowd regions on (a) $\alpha_5-\alpha_4$ and
978: (b) $\alpha_5-\alpha_6$ planes. }
979: \end{center}
980: \end{figure}
981: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
982: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
983: \begin{wrapfigure}{r}{ 7.5cm}
984: \begin{center}
985: \includegraphics[width=7. cm]{ya.eps}
986: \caption{The allowed region on $y_1\alpha_5-y_2\alpha_4$ plane.
987: The solid line denote $y_1\alpha_5=y_2\alpha_4$ one.}
988: \end{center}
989: \end{wrapfigure}
990: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
991:
992: In Figure 4, we present allowed regions of parameters of
993: $\alpha_4$, $\alpha_5$ and $\alpha_6$, which give the
994: neutrino masses and mixing angles consistent with the experimental data.
995: It is found $\alpha_4\sim \alpha_5\sim \alpha_6 \sim{\cal O}(10^{-3})$,
996: which can be realized in the potential analysis of the previous section.
997: Since the magnitude of $\alpha_i$ is found to be
998: ${\cal O}(10^{-3})$ as expected in the section 2,
999: the neglect of the higher order corrections on the mass matrices
1000: are guaranteed.
1001:
1002:
1003: At last, we discuss about the relation of $y_1\alpha_5\simeq y_2\alpha_4$,
1004: which is expected in our analysis
1005: as discussed in Eq.(\ref{proto}) of section 2.
1006: This relation is well satisfied in our numerical result,
1007: which is shown on $y_1\alpha_5- y_2\alpha_4$ plane in Figure 5.
1008: By taking account of both results in Figure 4(a) and Figure 5,
1009: we have found that the ratio $y_2/y_1$ is constrained around $0.3- 0.5$.
1010: Thus, Yukawa couplings $y_1$ and $y_2$ are of the same order.
1011:
1012: \section{Summary and Discussion}
1013:
1014: We have presented the flavor model for the lepton mass matrices
1015: by using the discrete symmetry $\Delta (54)$, which could be
1016: originated from the string orbifold.
1017: The left-handed leptons, the right-handed charged leptons
1018: and the right-handed neutrinos are assigned by $3_1^{(1)}$,
1019: $3_2^{(2)}$, and $3_1^{(2)}$, respectively.
1020: We introduce gauge singlets $\chi_1$, $(\chi_2, \chi_3)$ and
1021: $(\chi_4, \chi_5, \chi_6)$, which are assigned to be
1022: $1_2$, $2_1$, and $3_1^{(2)}$ of the $\Delta(54)$ representations,
1023: respectively.
1024: The $\Delta(54)$ flavor symmetry can appear
1025: in heterotic string models on factorizable orbifolds
1026: including the $T^2/Z_3$ orbifold \cite{Kobayashi:2006wq}.
1027: In these string models only singlets and
1028: triplets appear as fundamental modes,
1029: but doublets do not appear as fundamental modes.
1030: The doublet plays an role in our model,
1031: and such doublet could appear, e.g.
1032: as composite modes of triplets.
1033:
1034: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1035: %%%%%%%% Add discussions %%%%%%
1036: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1037: As discussed in Eqs.(\ref{tri-bi1})-(\ref{tri-bi2}), the tri-bimaximal mixing is not realized for arbitrary neutrino masses in our model.
1038: Parameters are adapted to get neutrino masses consistent
1039: with observed values of $\Delta m^2_{\rm atm}$ and $\Delta m_{\rm sol}^2$.
1040: Then, the deviation from the tri-bimaximal mixing is estimated.
1041: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1042: Therefore, our approach does not predict the tri-bimaximal mixing,
1043: but constrain the neutrino mass matrix by putting $\theta_{23}\simeq \pi/4$
1044: by hand.
1045: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1046:
1047: It is useful to give a following comment as to $\Delta(27)$ flavor symmetry.
1048: Our mass matrix gives the same result
1049: in the $\Delta(27)$ flavor symmetry \cite{Delta(27)-Ma(2006)},
1050: where the type II seesaw is used.
1051: Our neutrino mass matrix is given as $M_\nu\propto M_N^{-1}$, where
1052: $M_N$ is the just same as the neutrino mass matrix $M_\nu$
1053: in the $\Delta(27)$ flavor symmetry \cite{Delta(27)-Ma(2006)}.
1054: Therefore, if the type I seesaw is used in the $\Delta(27)$ flavor symmetry,
1055: the same neutrino mass matrix can be obtained.
1056:
1057: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1058: %Our $M_\nu$ is in agreement with the one in the $\Delta(27)$ model
1059: % for the case of $y_1=y_2$ or $\alpha_4=\alpha_5$ in Eq.(\ref{limit}).
1060: %However, ours is completely different from the one of $\Delta(27)$
1061: %in the case of $y_1\alpha_5=y_2\alpha_4$ as seen in Eq.(\ref{proto}).
1062: %Since our numerical analysis has been done
1063: %around $y_1\alpha_5=y_2\alpha_4$, our result is independent
1064: %of the previous one \cite{Delta(27)-Ma(2006)}.
1065: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1066:
1067: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1068: %, but
1069: % different from that in the $A_4$ flavor symmetry
1070: % \cite{A4-Ma and Rajasekaran}-\cite{A4-Lin}, in which
1071: % the tri-bimaximal mixing is reproduced for arbitrary neutrino masses
1072: %if vacuum alignments of scalar fields are guaranteed.
1073: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1074: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1075:
1076: The model reproduces the almost tri-bimaximal mixing in
1077: the parameter region around two vanishing neutrino masses.
1078: We have predicted the deviation from the tri-bimaximal mixing
1079: by input of the experimental data of $\Delta m^2_{\rm atm}$
1080: and $\Delta m^2_{\rm sol}$
1081: in the case of normal hierarchy of neutrino masses.
1082: We have found that the upper bound of $\sin^2\theta_{13}$ is $0.01$.
1083: There is the strong correlation between
1084: $\sin^2\theta_{23}$ and $\sin^2\theta_{13}$.
1085: Unless $\theta_{23}$ is deviated from the maximal mixing considerably,
1086: $\theta_{13}$ remains to be tiny.
1087: Therefore, the model is testable in the future neutrino experiments.
1088:
1089: %%%%% acknowledgement %%%%%
1090: \vspace{1cm}
1091: \noindent
1092: {\bf Acknowledgement}
1093:
1094:
1095: T.~K.\/ is supported in part by the
1096: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research, No.~20540266,
1097: and
1098: the Grant-in-Aid for the Global COE Program
1099: "The Next Generation of Physics, Spun from Universality
1100: and Emergence" from the Ministry of Education, Culture,
1101: Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.
1102: The work of M.T. has been supported by the
1103: Grant-in-Aid for Science Research
1104: of the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan
1105: No. 17540243.
1106:
1107: \newpage
1108: \appendix
1109: \section{Appendix}
1110: \subsection{Character table of $\Delta(54)$}
1111:
1112: Group-theoretical aspects of $\Delta(54)$ can be found
1113: in ref.\cite{delta54}, in which $\Delta(6n^2)$ is investigated.
1114: $\Delta(54)$ is a discrete subgroup of
1115: $\mathrm{SU}(3)$, i.e.\ the group $\Delta(6n^2)$ (with $n=3$) and
1116: it has order
1117: $54$.
1118: The generators of $\Delta(54)$ are given by the set
1119: \begin{equation}
1120: a= \left(
1121: \begin{array}{ccc}
1122: 0 & 1 & 0 \\
1123: 0 & 0 & 1 \\
1124: 1 & 0 & 0
1125: \end{array}
1126: \right), \
1127: b= \left(
1128: \begin{array}{ccc}
1129: 0 & 0 & 1 \\
1130: 0 & 1 & 0 \\
1131: 1 & 0 & 0
1132: \end{array}
1133: \right), \
1134: c= \left(
1135: \begin{array}{ccc}
1136: \omega & 0 & 0 \\
1137: 0 & \omega^2 & 0 \\
1138: 0 & 0 & 1
1139: \end{array}
1140: \right), \
1141: c'= \left(
1142: \begin{array}{ccc}
1143: \omega^2 & 0 & 0 \\
1144: 0 & \omega & 0 \\
1145: 0 & 0 & 1
1146: \end{array}
1147: \right).
1148: \end{equation}
1149: It has four three-dimensional irreducible representations
1150: $\mathbf{3}_1^{(1)},\,
1151: \mathbf{{3}}_1^{(2)}, \, \mathbf{3}_2^{(1)},\, \mathbf{{3'}}_2^{(2)}\,$,
1152: four two-dimensional
1153: ones $\mathbf{2}_{1},\, \mathbf{2}_{2}, \, \mathbf{2}_{3}, \,
1154: \mathbf{2}_{4}$,
1155: and two one-dimensional ones $\mathbf{1}_{1}, \, \mathbf{1}_{2}$.
1156: Generators of three-dimensional representations are mainly divided into two
1157: types.
1158: For $\mathbf{{3}}_1^{(1)}, ~\mathbf{{3}}_1^{(2)}$, generators are $a$, $b$,
1159: $c$, and
1160: for $\mathbf{{3}}_2^{(1)}, ~\mathbf{{3}}_2^{(2)}$, generators are $a$, $b$,
1161: $c'$.
1162: Their
1163: character table are presented in Table \ref{character}.
1164:
1165: \vskip 1 cm
1166: \begin{table}[!h]
1167: \centerline{
1168: \begin{tabular}{|c|rrrrrrrrrr|}
1169: \hline
1170: irrep & 1a & 6a & 6b & 3a & 3b & 3c & 2a & 3d & 3e & 3f \\
1171: & \scriptsize{(1)} & \scriptsize{(9)} & \scriptsize{(9)} &
1172: \scriptsize{(6)} & \scriptsize{(6)} & \scriptsize{(6)} & \scriptsize{(9)} &
1173: \scriptsize{(6)} & \scriptsize{(1)} & \scriptsize{(1)} \\
1174: \hline
1175: $\mathbf{1}_{1}$ & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\
1176: $\mathbf{1}_{2}$ & 1 & -1 & -1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & -1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\
1177: $\mathbf{2}_{1}$ & 2 & 0 & 0 & 2 & -1 & -1 & 0 & -1 & 2 & 2 \\
1178: $\mathbf{2}_{2}$ & 2 & 0 & 0 & -1 & -1 & -1 & 0 & 2 & 2 & 2 \\
1179: $\mathbf{2}_{3}$ & 2 & 0 & 0 & -1 & -1 & 2 & 0 & -1 & 2 & 2 \\
1180: $\mathbf{2}_{4}$ & 2 & 0 & 0 & -1 & 2 & -1 & 0 & -1 & 2 & 2 \\
1181: $\mathbf{3_2^{(1)}}$ & 3 & $-\bar{\omega}$ & $-\omega$ & 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 & 0
1182: & $3\bar{\omega}$ & $3\omega$ \\
1183: $\mathbf{3_2^{(2)}}$ & 3 & $-\omega$ & $-\bar{\omega}$ & 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 & 0
1184: & $3\omega$ & $3\bar{\omega}$ \\
1185: $\mathbf{3_1^{(2)}}$ & 3 & $\omega$ & $\bar{\omega}$ & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 &
1186: $3\omega$ & $3\bar{\omega}$ \\
1187: $\mathbf{3_1^{(1)}}$ & 3 & $\bar{\omega}$ & $\omega$ & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 &
1188: $3\bar{\omega}$ & $3\omega$ \\
1189: \hline
1190: \end{tabular}
1191: }
1192: \caption{Character table of the group $\Delta(54)$. }
1193: \label{character}
1194: \end{table}
1195:
1196: \newpage
1197:
1198:
1199:
1200: \subsection{Kronecker products}
1201: We display Kronecker products and calculation of Clebsch Gordan coefficients.
1202: The Kronecker products can be calculate from the character table
1203: in the previous subsection.
1204: \begin{equation}
1205: \begin{split}
1206: &1_i\times 1_i = 1_1\ (i=1,2), \quad 1_1\times 1_2 = 1_2\times 1_1 = 1_2,
1207: \\
1208: &1_i\times 2_r = 2_r, \quad 1_i \times 3_j^{(l)} = 3_{((i+j)\bmod
1209: 2)+1}^{(l)}\ (j,l=1,2), \\
1210: &2_r\times 2_r = 1_1 + 1_2 + 2_r\ (r=1,2,3,4), \\
1211: &2_a\times 2_b = 2_c + 2_d\ (a,b,c,d = 1,2,3,4,\ \text{different each other}), \\
1212: &2_r\times 3_j^{(l)} = 3_1^{(l)} + 3_2^{(l)}, \\
1213: &3_j^{(l)}\times 3_j^{(l)} = 3_1^{(l^\prime )} + 3_1^{(l^\prime )} +
1214: 3_2^{(l^\prime )}\ (l^\prime =1,2,\ l\not = l' ), \\
1215: &3_j^{(l)}\times 3_{j^\prime }^{(l)} = 3_2^{(l^\prime )} + 3_2^{(l^\prime
1216: )} + 3_1^{(l^\prime )}\ (j^\prime =1,2, \ j\not =j' ), \\
1217: &3_j^{(l)}\times 3_j^{(l^\prime )} = 1_1 + 2_1 + 2_2 + 2_3 + 2_4, \\
1218: &3_j^{(l)}\times 3_{j^\prime }^{(l^\prime )} = 1_2 + 2_1 + 2_2 + 2_3 + 2_4.
1219: \end{split}
1220: \end{equation}
1221:
1222: \subsection{Multiplication of $\Delta(54)$}
1223: We present the relevant multiplication rules
1224: of $\Delta (54)$.
1225: The multiplication rules of two dimensional representation
1226: are given as
1227: \begin{align*}
1228: (x_1,x_2)_{2_r}\times (y_1,y_2)_{2_r} &= (x_1y_2+x_2y_1)_{1_1} +
1229: (x_1y_2-x_2y_1)_{1_2} + (x_2y_2,x_1y_1)_{2_r} \ (r=1,2,3,4) \\
1230: (x_1,x_2)_{2_1}\times (y_1,y_2)_{2_2} &= (x_2y_2,x_1y_1)_{2_3} +
1231: (x_2y_1,x_1y_2)_{2_4} \\
1232: (x_1,x_2)_{2_1}\times (y_1,y_2)_{2_3} &= (x_2y_2,x_1y_1)_{2_2} +
1233: (x_2y_1,x_1y_2)_{2_4}, \\
1234: (x_1,x_2)_{2_1}\times (y_1,y_2)_{2_4} &= (x_1y_2,x_2y_1)_{2_2} +
1235: (x_1y_1,x_2y_2)_{2_3}, \\
1236: (x_1,x_2)_{2_2}\times (y_1,y_2)_{2_3} &= (x_2y_2,x_1y_1)_{2_1} +
1237: (x_1y_2,x_2y_1)_{2_4},\\
1238: (x_1,x_2)_{2_2}\times (y_1,y_2)_{2_4} &= (x_1y_1,x_2y_2)_{2_1} +
1239: (x_1y_2,x_2y_1)_{2_3}, \\
1240: (x_1,x_2)_{2_3}\times (y_1,y_2)_{2_4} &= (x_1y_2,x_2y_1)_{2_1} +
1241: (x_1y_1,x_2y_2)_{2_2}.
1242: \end{align*}
1243: The multiplication rules of three dimensional representation is given as
1244: \begin{align*}
1245: (x_1,x_2,x_3)_{3_1^{(1)}}\times (y_1,y_2,y_3)_{3_1^{(1)}} &=
1246: (x_1y_1,x_2y_2,x_3y_3)_{3_1^{(2)}} \\
1247: &\ \ \ \ + (x_2y_3+x_3y_2,x_3y_1+x_1y_3,x_1y_2+x_2y_1)_{3_1^{(2)}} \\
1248: &\ \ \ \ + (x_2y_3-x_3y_2,x_3y_1-x_1y_3,x_1y_2-x_2y_1)_{3_2^{(2)}}, \\
1249: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1250: (x_1,x_2,x_3)_{3_1^{(2)}}\times (y_1,y_2,y_3)_{3_1^{(2)}} &=
1251: (x_1y_1,x_2y_2,x_3y_3)_{3_1^{(1)}} \\
1252: &\ \ \ \ + (x_2y_3+x_3y_2,x_3y_1+x_1y_3,x_1y_2+x_2y_1)_{3_1^{(1)}} \\
1253: &\ \ \ \ + (x_2y_3-x_3y_2,x_3y_1-x_1y_3,x_1y_2-x_2y_1)_{3_2^{(1)}}, \\
1254: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1255: (x_1,x_2,x_3)_{3_1^{(1)}}\times (y_1,y_2,y_3)_{3_1^{(2)}} &=
1256: (x_1y_1+x_2y_2+x_3y_3)_{1_1} \\
1257: &\ \ \ \ + (x_1y_1+\omega ^2x_2y_2+\omega x_3y_3,\omega x_1y_1+\omega
1258: ^2x_2y_2+x_3y_3)_{2_1} \\
1259: &\ \ \ \ + (x_1y_2+\omega ^2x_2y_3+\omega x_3y_1,\omega x_1y_3+\omega
1260: ^2x_2y_1+x_3y_2)_{2_2} \\
1261: &\ \ \ \ + (x_1y_3+\omega ^2x_2y_1+\omega x_3y_2,\omega x_1y_2+\omega
1262: ^2x_2y_3+x_3y_1)_{2_3} \\
1263: &\ \ \ \ + (x_1y_3+x_2y_1+x_3y_2,x_1y_2+x_2y_3+x_3y_1)_{2_4}, \\
1264: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1265: (x_1,x_2,x_3)_{3_1^{(2)}}\times (y_1,y_2,y_3)_{3_1^{(1)}} &=
1266: (x_1y_1+x_2y_2+x_3y_3)_{1_1} \\
1267: &\ \ \ \ + (x_1y_1+\omega ^2x_2y_2+\omega x_3y_3,\omega x_1y_1+\omega
1268: ^2x_2y_2+x_3y_3)_{2_1} \\
1269: &\ \ \ \ + (x_1y_3+\omega ^2x_2y_1+\omega x_3y_2,\omega x_1y_2+\omega
1270: ^2x_2y_3+x_3y_1)_{2_2} \\
1271: &\ \ \ \ + (x_1y_2+\omega ^2x_2y_3+\omega x_3y_1,\omega x_1y_3+\omega
1272: ^2x_2y_1+x_3y_2)_{2_3} \\
1273: &\ \ \ \ + (x_1y_2+x_2y_3+x_3y_1,x_1y_3+x_2y_1+x_3y_2)_{2_4}, \\
1274: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1275: (x_1,x_2,x_3)_{3_2^{(1)}}\times (y_1,y_2,y_3)_{3_2^{(1)}} &=
1276: (x_1y_1,x_2y_2,x_3y_3)_{3_1^{(2)}} \\
1277: &\ \ \ \ + (x_2y_3+x_3y_2,x_3y_1+x_1y_3,x_1y_2+x_2y_1)_{3_1^{(2)}} \\
1278: &\ \ \ \ + (x_2y_3-x_3y_2,x_3y_1-x_1y_3,x_1y_2-x_2y_1)_{3_2^{(2)}}, \\
1279: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1280: (x_1,x_2,x_3)_{3_2^{(2)}}\times (y_1,y_2,y_3)_{3_2^{(2)}} &=
1281: (x_1y_1,x_2y_2,x_3y_3)_{3_1^{(1)}} \\
1282: &\ \ \ \ + (x_2y_3+x_3y_2,x_3y_1+x_1y_3,x_1y_2+x_2y_1)_{3_1^{(1)}} \\
1283: &\ \ \ \ + (x_2y_3-x_3y_2,x_3y_1-x_1y_3,x_1y_2-x_2y_1)_{3_2^{(1)}}, \\
1284: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1285: (x_1,x_2,x_3)_{3_1^{(1)}}\times (y_1,y_2,y_3)_{3_2^{(2)}} &=
1286: (x_1y_1+x_2y_2+x_3y_3)_{1_2} \\
1287: &\ \ \ \ + (x_1y_1+\omega ^2x_2y_2+\omega x_3y_3,-\omega x_1y_1-\omega
1288: ^2x_2y_2-x_3y_3)_{2_1} \\
1289: &\ \ \ \ + (x_1y_2+\omega ^2x_2y_3+\omega x_3y_1,-\omega x_1y_3-\omega
1290: ^2x_2y_1-x_3y_2)_{2_2} \\
1291: &\ \ \ \ + (x_1y_3+\omega ^2x_2y_1+\omega x_3y_2,-\omega x_1y_2-\omega
1292: ^2x_2y_3-x_3y_1)_{2_3} \\
1293: &\ \ \ \ + (x_1y_3+x_2y_1+x_3y_2,-x_1y_2-x_2y_3-x_3y_1)_{2_4},\\
1294: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1295: (x_1,x_2,x_3)_{3_1^{(2)}}\times (y_1,y_2,y_3)_{3_2^{(1)}} &=
1296: (x_1y_1+x_2y_2+x_3y_3)_{1_2} \\
1297: &\ \ \ \ + (x_1y_1+\omega ^2x_2y_2+\omega x_3y_3,-\omega x_1y_1-\omega
1298: ^2x_2y_2-x_3y_3)_{2_1} \\
1299: &\ \ \ \ + (x_1y_3+\omega ^2x_2y_1+\omega x_3y_2,-\omega x_1y_2-\omega
1300: ^2x_2y_3-x_3y_1)_{2_2} \\
1301: &\ \ \ \ + (x_1y_2+\omega ^2x_2y_3+\omega x_3y_1,-\omega x_1y_3-\omega
1302: ^2x_2y_1-x_3y_2)_{2_3} \\
1303: &\ \ \ \ + (x_1y_2+x_2y_3+x_3y_1,-x_1y_3-x_2y_1-x_3y_2)_{2_4}.
1304: \end{align*}
1305:
1306: \begin{thebibliography}{110}
1307: \bibitem{Threeflavors}
1308: T.~Schwetz, M.~Tortola, and J.W.F.~Valle, arXiv:0808.2016;\\
1309: G.L. Fogli, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, A. Palazzo, and A.M. Rotunno,
1310: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 101} 141801 (2008); arXiv:0806.2649.
1311:
1312: \bibitem{HPS}
1313: P.F. Harrison, D.H. Perkins, and W.G. Scott,
1314: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 530}, 167 (2002);\\
1315: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B530,167;%%
1316: P.F. Harrison and W.G. Scott,
1317: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 535}, 163 (2002).
1318: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B535,163;%%
1319:
1320:
1321: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1322: \bibitem{S3-FTY}
1323: M. Fukugita, M. Tanimoto, and T. Yanagida,
1324: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 57}, 4429 (1998).
1325:
1326: \bibitem{S3-Tanimoto}
1327: M. Tanimoto, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 59}, 017304 (1999),
1328: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 483}, 417 (2000).
1329:
1330: \bibitem{S3-Harrison}
1331: P. F. Harrison and W. G. Scott, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 557}, 76 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0302025.
1332:
1333: \bibitem{S3-Kubo}
1334: J. Kubo, A. Mondragon, M. Mondragon, and E. Rodriguez-Jauregui
1335: Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 109}, 795 (2003), Erratum-ibid. {\bf 114},
1336: 287 (2005), arXiv: hep-ph/0302196.
1337:
1338: \bibitem{S3-S.-L.Chen}
1339: S.-L. Chen, M. Frigerio, and E. Ma, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 70}, 073008 (2004),
1340: arXiv:hep-ph/0404084.
1341:
1342: \bibitem{S3-Grimus}
1343: W. Grimus and L. Lavoura, JHEP {\bf 08}, 013 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0504153.
1344:
1345: \bibitem{S3-Caravaglios}
1346: F. Caravaglios and S. Morisi (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0503234.
1347:
1348: \bibitem{S3-Mohapatra}
1349: R.~N. Mohapatra, S. Nasri, and H.-B. Yu, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 639}, 318 (2006),
1350: arXiv:hep-ph/0605020.
1351:
1352: \bibitem{S3-Morisi}
1353: S. Morisi and M. Picariello, Int. J. Theor. Phys. {\bf 45}, 1267 (2006),
1354: arXiv:hep-ph/0505113.
1355:
1356: \bibitem{S3-Watanabe}
1357: N. Haba, A. Watanabe, K. Yoshioka, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97} 041601
1358: (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0603116.
1359:
1360: \bibitem{S3-Shingai}
1361: S. Kaneko, H. Sawanaka, T. Shingai, M. Tanimoto,
1362: K. Yoshioka, Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 117}, 161 (2007),
1363: arXiv:hep-ph/0609220.
1364:
1365: \bibitem{S3-Koide}
1366: Y. Koide, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C50}, 809 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0612058.
1367:
1368: \bibitem{S3-C.-Y.Chen}
1369: C.-Y. Chen and L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 77}, 093009 (2008),
1370: arXiv:0709.3767.
1371:
1372: \bibitem{S3-Feruglio}
1373: F. Feruglio and Y. Lin, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 800}, 77 (2008), arXiv:0712.1528.
1374:
1375: \bibitem{S3-Mondragon}
1376: A. Mondragon, M. Mondragon, and E. Peinado, AIP Conf. Proc. {\bf 1026},
1377: 164 (2008), arXiv:0712.2488.
1378:
1379: \bibitem{S3-Mitra}
1380: M. Mitra and S. Choubey (2008), arXiv:0806.3254.
1381:
1382: \bibitem{S3-Lavoura}
1383: W. Grimus and L. Lavoura, arXiv:0811.4766.
1384:
1385: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1386: \bibitem{Grimus}
1387: W.~Grimus and L.~Lavoura,
1388: %``A discrete symmetry group for maximal atmospheric neutrino mixing,''
1389: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 572}, 189 (2003).
1390: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0305046].
1391: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B572,189;%%
1392:
1393: \bibitem{D4}
1394: W.~Grimus, A.~S.~Joshipura, S.~Kaneko, L.~Lavoura, and M.~Tanimoto,
1395: %``Lepton mixing angle theta(13) = 0 with a horizontal symmetry D(4),''
1396: JHEP {\bf 0407}, 078 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0407112;
1397: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0407,078;%%
1398: \\
1399: A.~Blum, R.~N.~Mohapatra and W.~Rodejohann,
1400: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 76}, 053003 (2007),
1401: arXiv:0706.3801;
1402: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D76,053003;%%
1403: \\
1404: A.~Blum, C.~Hagedorn and M.~Lindner,
1405: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 77}, 076004 (2008).
1406: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0709.3450;%%
1407:
1408: \bibitem{D4-2}
1409: W.~Grimus, A.~S.~Joshipura, S.~Kaneko, L.~Lavoura, H.~Sawanaka, and
1410: M.~Tanimoto,
1411: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 713}, 151 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0408123.
1412: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B713,151;%%
1413:
1414: %\cite{Ishimori:2008gp}
1415: \bibitem{Ishimori:2008gp}
1416: H.~Ishimori, T.~Kobayashi, H.~Ohki, Y.~Omura, R.~Takahashi, and
1417: M.~Tanimoto,
1418: %``D4 Flavor Symmetry for Neutrino Masses and Mixing,''
1419: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 662}, 178 (2008), arXiv:0802.2310.
1420: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B662,178;%%
1421:
1422: %\cite{Ishimori:2008ns}
1423: \bibitem{Ishimori:2008ns}
1424: H.~Ishimori, T.~Kobayashi, H.~Ohki, Y.~Omura, R.~Takahashi, and
1425: M.~Tanimoto,
1426: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 77}, 115005 (2008), arXiv:0803.0796.
1427: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D77,115005;%%
1428: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1429: \bibitem{D6}
1430: Y. Kajiyama, J. Kubo, and H. Okada,
1431: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 75}, 033001 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0610072 .
1432: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1433: \bibitem{Q4}
1434: M.~Frigerio, S.~Kaneko, E.~Ma, and M.~Tanimoto,
1435: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 011901 (2005).
1436: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1437: \bibitem{Q6}
1438: K.S.~Babu and J.~Kubo, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 056006 (2005);
1439: \\
1440: Y.~Kajiyama, E.~Itou and J.~Kubo,
1441: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 743}, 74 (2006).
1442: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1443:
1444:
1445: \bibitem{A4-Ma and Rajasekaran}
1446: E.~Ma and G.~Rajasekaran,
1447: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 113012 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0106291;
1448: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D64,113012;%%
1449: \\
1450: E.~Ma,
1451: Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 17}, 2361 (2002).
1452: %%CITATION = MPLAE,A17,2361;%%
1453:
1454:
1455: \bibitem{A4-Babu et al.}
1456: K. S. Babu, E. Ma, and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Lett. B{ \bf 552}, 207 (2003),
1457: arXiv:hep-ph/0206292.
1458:
1459: \bibitem{A4-Hirsch}
1460: M.~Hirsch, J.C.~Romao, S.~Skadhauge, J.W.F.~Valle, and A.~Villanova del
1461: Moral, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 093006 (2004).
1462:
1463: \bibitem{A4-Ma}
1464: E. Ma, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 70}, 031901 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0404199.
1465:
1466: \bibitem{A4-Altarelli and Feruglio}
1467: G. Altarelli and F. Feruglio,
1468: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 720}, 64 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0504165;
1469: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 741}, 215 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0512103.
1470:
1471:
1472: \bibitem{A4-Chen et al.}
1473: S.-L. Chen, M. Frigerio, and E. Ma,
1474: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 724}, 423 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0504181.
1475:
1476: \bibitem{A4-Zee}
1477: A. Zee, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 630}, 58 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0508278.
1478:
1479:
1480: \bibitem{A4-Adhikary et al.}
1481: B. Adhikary, B. Brahmachari, A. Ghosal, E. Ma, and M. K. Parida,
1482: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 638}, 345 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0603059.
1483:
1484: \bibitem{A4-Valle}
1485: J. W. F. Valle, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. {\bf 53}, 473 (2006),
1486: arXiv:hep-ph/0608101.
1487:
1488: \bibitem{A4-He}
1489: X.-G.~He, Y.-Y.~Keum, and R.R.~Volkas,
1490: JHEP {\bf 0604}, 039 (2006).
1491:
1492: \bibitem{A4-Sawanaka}
1493: E.~Ma, H.~Sawanaka, and M.~Tanimoto, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 641},
1494: 301 (2006).
1495: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B641,301;%%
1496:
1497: \bibitem{A4-Adhikary and Ghosal}
1498: B. Adhikary and A. Ghosal, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 75}, 073020 (2007),
1499: arXiv:hep-ph/0609193.
1500:
1501: \bibitem{A4-Ma(2007)}
1502: E. Ma, Phys.\ Rev. D {\bf 70}, 031901 (2004),
1503: Phys.\ Rev. D {\bf 72}, 037301 (2005),
1504: Mod. Phys. Lett. A {\bf 22}, 101 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0610342.
1505:
1506: \bibitem{A4-Altarelli et al.}
1507: G. Altarelli, F. Feruglio, and Y. Lin, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 775}, 31 (2007),
1508: arXiv:hep-ph/0610165.
1509:
1510: \bibitem{A4-Hirsch et al.}
1511: M. Hirsch, A. S. Joshipura, S. Kaneko, and J.W.F. Valle,
1512: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 99}, 151802 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0703046.
1513:
1514:
1515:
1516: \bibitem{A4-King}
1517: S. F. King and M. Malinsk\'y, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 645}, 351 (2007).
1518: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B645,351;%%
1519:
1520: \bibitem{A4-Lavoura}
1521: L. Lavoura and H. K\"uhb\"ock,
1522: Mod. Phys. Lett. A {\bf 22}, 181 (2007), arXiv:0711.0670.
1523: %%CITATION = MPLAE,A22,181;%%
1524:
1525: \bibitem{A4-Honda}
1526: M. Honda and M. Tanimoto, Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 119}, 585 (2008),
1527: arXiv:0801.0181.
1528:
1529: \bibitem{A4-Bazzocchi}
1530: F. Bazzocchi, S. Kaneko, and S. Morisi, JHEP {\bf 03}, 063 (2008),
1531: arXiv:0707.3032.
1532:
1533: \bibitem{A4-Morisi}
1534: F. Bazzocchi, M. Frigerio, and S. Morisi,
1535: arXiv:0809.3573.
1536:
1537: \bibitem{A4-Lin}
1538: Y. Lin, arXiv:0804.2867.
1539:
1540: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1541:
1542:
1543: \bibitem{T-Feruglio}
1544: F. Feruglio, C. Hagedorn, Y. Lin , and L. Merlo, Nucl. Phys. B775, 120 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0702194.
1545:
1546: \bibitem{T-Chen}
1547: M.~C.~Chen and K.~T.~Mahanthappa,
1548: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 652}, 34 (2007), arXiv:0705.0714.
1549:
1550: \bibitem{T-Aranda}
1551: A. Aranda, Phys. Rev. D76, 111301 (2007), arXiv:0707.3661.
1552:
1553: \bibitem{T-Eby}
1554: D. A. Eby, P. H. Frampton, and S. Matsuzaki (2008), arXiv:0810.4899.
1555:
1556: \bibitem{T-Frampton}
1557: P. H. Frampton and T. W. Kephart, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A {\bf 10}, 4689 (1995),
1558: arXiv:hep-ph/9409330.
1559:
1560: \bibitem{T-Ding}
1561: G. J. Ding, Phys. Rev. D{\bf 78}, 036011 (2008).
1562:
1563: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1564:
1565: \bibitem{S4-Ma}
1566: E. Ma, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 632}, 352 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0508231.
1567:
1568: \bibitem{S4-Hagedorn}
1569: C. Hagedorn, M. Lindner, and R.~N. Mohapatra, JHEP {\bf 06}, 042 (2006),
1570: arXiv:hep-ph/0602244.
1571:
1572: \bibitem{S4-Cai}
1573: Y. Cai and H.-B. Yu, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 74}, 115005 (2006),
1574: arXiv:hep-ph/0608022.
1575:
1576: \bibitem{S4-Zhang}
1577: H. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 655}, 132 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0612214.
1578:
1579: \bibitem{S4-Koide}
1580: Y. Koide, JHEP {\bf 08}, 086 (2007), arXiv:0705.2275.
1581:
1582:
1583: \bibitem{S4-Morisi}
1584: F. Bazzocchi and S. Morisi, arXiv:0811.0345.
1585:
1586: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1587: \bibitem{Delta(27)-Gerard}
1588: G.C. Branco, J.M. Gerard, and W.Grimus,
1589: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 136}, 383 (1984).
1590:
1591: \bibitem{Delta(27)-Luhn}
1592: C. Luhn, S. Nasri, and P. Ramond, J. Math. Phys. {\bf 48}, 073501 (2007),
1593: arXiv:hep-th/0701188.
1594:
1595: \bibitem{Delta(27)-Medeiros}
1596: I. de Medeiros Varzielas, S. F. King, and G. G. Ross,
1597: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 648}, 201 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0607045.
1598:
1599: \bibitem{Delta(27)-Ma(2006)}
1600: E. Ma, Mod. Phys. Lett. A {\bf 21}, 1917 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0607056.
1601:
1602: \bibitem{Delta(27)-Ma(2008)}
1603: E. Ma, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 660}, 505 (2008), arXiv:0709.0507.
1604:
1605: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1606:
1607: \bibitem{Kobayashi:2004ya}
1608: T.~Kobayashi, S.~Raby and R.~J.~Zhang,
1609: %``Searching for realistic 4d string models with a Pati-Salam symmetry:
1610: %Orbifold grand unified theories from heterotic string compactification
1611: on a
1612: %Z(6) orbifold,''
1613: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 704}, 3 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0409098.
1614: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B704,3;%%
1615:
1616:
1617: %\cite{Kobayashi:2006wq}
1618: \bibitem{Kobayashi:2006wq}
1619: T.~Kobayashi, H.~P.~Nilles, F.~Ploger, S.~Raby and M.~Ratz,
1620: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 768}, 135 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0611020.
1621: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B768,135;%%
1622:
1623: %\cite{Ko:2007dz}
1624: \bibitem{Ko:2007dz}
1625: P.~Ko, T.~Kobayashi, J.~h.~Park and S.~Raby,
1626: %``String-derived D4 flavor symmetry and phenomenological implications,''
1627: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 76}, 035005 (2007)
1628: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 76}, 059901 (2007)], arXiv:0704.2807.
1629: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D76,035005;%%
1630:
1631: \bibitem{delta54}
1632: J. A. Escobar and C. Luhn, arXiv:0809.0639.
1633:
1634: \bibitem{Lam}
1635: C. S. Lam, arXiv:0809.1185.
1636:
1637: %\cite{Kobayashi:2008ih}
1638: \bibitem{Kobayashi:2008ih}
1639: T.~Kobayashi, Y.~Omura and K.~Yoshioka,
1640: %``Flavor Symmetry Breaking and Vacuum Alignment on Orbifolds,''
1641: arXiv:0809.3064.
1642: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0809.3064;%%
1643:
1644: \bibitem{Seidl}
1645: G. Seidl, arXiv:0811.3775.
1646:
1647:
1648: %\bibitem{MNS}
1649: %Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, and S. Sakata,
1650: %Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 28}, 870 (1962).
1651: %%CITATION = PTPKA,28,870;%%
1652:
1653:
1654: \end{thebibliography}
1655: \end{document}
1656: