1: The electron and muon candidates are selected with common track- and vertex-selection
2: criteria while channel-specific methods are applied for lepton identification and the
3: treatment of the $J/\psi$ signal.
4:
5: All tracks passing the SLT are initially considered as lepton
6: candidates. The track reconstruction procedure consists of finding
7: straight segments in the VDS and PCs independently, matching them to
8: each other and also to segments in the TCs. A full, iterative fit of
9: found tracks is then performed. To reject incorrectly reconstructed or
10: ghost tracks, loose cuts on the minimum number of hits in the VDS and
11: OTR, as well as on the $\chi^2 $ probability of the track fit are
12: applied by the event reconstruction algorithms. The detector
13: acceptance and trigger requirements effectively limit the momentum and
14: transverse momentum ranges of lepton tracks to $5 < p <
15: 200\,\mathrm{GeV/c}$ and $0.7 < p_T < 5.0\,\mathrm{GeV/c}$,
16: respectively. For each event, among all possible pairs of oppositely
17: charged lepton candidates consistent with a common vertex ($\chi^{2}$
18: probability greater than $1\%$), only the pair with the best particle
19: identification (see below) for both leptons is accepted.
20:
21: \subsection{Dimuon channel}
22:
23: \begin{figure}
24: \includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{eps_files/minv_muo.eps}
25: \includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{eps_files/minv_ele.eps}
26: \caption{The $\mu^+\mu^-$ (a) and $e^+e^-$ (b) invariant mass
27: distributions for the full data sample in the $J/\psi$ mass region.
28: The continuous lines represent the result of fits performed with the
29: functions described in the text; the dashed lines are the fitted
30: backgrounds.}
31: \label{invmass}
32: \end{figure}
33:
34: Since muons are the only particles having a significant probability
35: of penetrating through the absorbers of the MUON detector, only minimal
36: selection cuts are needed to obtain a clean sample (see also~\cite{HBpsiprime}).
37: The background of muons from pion and kaon decays is reduced by imposing tighter
38: cuts on the quality of the track fit and on the matching of track segments
39: in the VDS, OTR and MUON. Doing so rejects the typical ``broken
40: trajectories'' produced by decays into leptons. Contamination from kaons is
41: further reduced by discarding tracks with high values of the corresponding
42: RICH likelihood. After all selection cuts, the background under the $J/\psi$
43: signal is reduced by a factor of $2.5$ with respect to the triggered data
44: with a loss of about $11\%$ of the signal.
45:
46: Fig.~\ref{invmass}(a) shows the resulting dimuon mass spectrum
47: together with the result of a fit to a sum of three
48: functions~\cite{spiri}, which model the $J/\psi$ and $\psi(2S)$
49: signals and the exponential background. The $J/\psi$ and $\psi(2S)$
50: signals are each modeled as a superposition of three Gaussians with a
51: common mean which takes into account track resolution and effects of
52: Moli\`{e}re scattering and a function representing the radiative tail
53: due to the decay $J/\psi \to \mu^+\mu^-\gamma$~\cite{spiri}. The background
54: is described by an exponential of a second-order polynomial. The fitted
55: position and width of the $J/\psi$ peak are $3.0930\pm
56: 0.0002\,{\rm GeV}/{\rm c}^2$ and $40 \pm 1\,\mathrm{MeV/c^2}$, respectively.
57:
58:
59: \begin{table}
60: \begin{center}
61: \begin{tabular}{crrrr}
62: Channel& C & Ti & W & Total \\
63: \hline
64: $\mu^+ \mu^-$ & 94800 & 8060 & 48100 & 152000 \\
65: $e^+ e^-$ & 57700 & 4280 & 25300 & 87200 \\ \hline
66:
67: \end{tabular}
68:
69: \caption{The numbers of reconstructed $J/\psi$s after all selection cuts
70: in the dimuon and dielectron channels, and for different target
71: materials.} \label{tb:njpsi}
72: \end{center}
73: \end{table}
74:
75: \begin{figure*}[htb]
76: \begin{center}
77: \includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth]{eps_files/accep_muo_xf_pt.eps}
78: \includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth]{eps_files/accep_ele_xf_pt.eps}
79: \caption{Distribution of the number of $J/\psi$s reconstructed in
80: the carbon target sample (points) and in the corresponding MC data
81: (histograms, arbitrarily re-normalized) as a function of $p_T$ and
82: $x_F$. (a) and (b): muon channel, (c) and (d): electron channel.}
83: \label{fig:accep}
84: \end{center}
85: \end{figure*}
86:
87: \subsection{Dielectron channel}
88:
89: The $J/\psi$ selection in the dielectron channel is affected by major
90: background contributions from charged hadrons which produce energetic
91: ECAL clusters and by overlapping photon and charged-hadron energy
92: deposits in the ECAL. For this reason, the electron identification
93: requirements were the subject of careful optimization studies which
94: resulted in much more stringent selection cuts than for the muon sample.
95:
96: A cut on the transverse energy of the ECAL cluster ($E_T> 1.15$\,GeV)
97: is applied in order to mask different threshold cuts applied at
98: the pretrigger level for the various acquisition periods.
99:
100: The reconstructed momentum vectors of electrons and positrons are
101: corrected for energy loss from brems\-strahlung (BR) emission in the
102: materials in front of the magnet. For each electron track, an attempt
103: to identify an ECAL cluster due to a BR photon is made by looking for
104: an energy deposition in coincidence with the extrapolation of the
105: associated VDS track segment to the ECAL. Any recovered energy (about
106: $18\%$ of the initial electron energy on average) is then added to the
107: momentum measured by the tracking system. Since BR is a clear
108: signature for an electron track, it is also exploited to obtain
109: substantial background reduction which is essential for accurate
110: $J/\psi$ counting. The baseline results of the analysis are obtained
111: by requiring that at least one lepton of a decaying $J/\psi$ has an
112: associated BR cluster. This requirement reduces the signal by about
113: $30\%$ and suppresses the background by more than a factor of
114: two. Alternative requirements (no BR requirement, only one, or both
115: electrons emitting BR) lead to very different background shapes and
116: amounts. The differences are exploited for systematic studies on the
117: stability of signal counting and on the correctness of the MC
118: simulation.
119:
120: Adjustments to the measured momenta of electron tracks were applied to
121: compensate for differences in multiple scattering between electrons
122: and muons since the track-fitter had been calibrated for muons. For
123: this purpose, a correction map, determined from the shift of the
124: $J/\psi$ peak position in different kinematic regions was used.
125:
126: Additional selection cuts are applied to further improve the
127: significance of the dielectron signal. A particularly discriminating
128: variable is the ratio $E/p$, where $E$ is the energy of an ECAL
129: cluster and $p$ is the momentum of the associated track. The $E/p$
130: distribution for electrons has a Gaussian shape with a mean value
131: close to 1 and width varying between $6.4\%$ and $7.4\%$ depending on
132: calorimeter sector. Values of $E/p$ much lower than $1$ are mainly
133: due to particles, mostly hadrons, which release only part of their
134: energy in the calorimeter. Further selection variables used in the
135: analysis are the distances $\Delta x$ and $\Delta y$ -- along the $x$
136: and $y$ directions -- between the reconstructed cluster and the track
137: position extrapolated to the ECAL. The $\Delta x$ and $\Delta y$
138: distributions for electrons are, apart from a small tail,
139: well described by Gaussians centered at zero with widths between
140: $0.2$ and $1.0$\,cm depending on calorimeter sector. Cuts on these
141: quantities lead to a significant reduction of the contamination from
142: hadrons and random cluster-track matches which are characterized by
143: significantly wider distributions. The selection of the candidate
144: electron-positron pairs is further refined by putting an upper bound
145: on the distance of closest approach ($\Delta b$) between the two
146: accepted tracks near the vertex.
147:
148: All the requirements described above have been simultaneously
149: optimized by maximizing the significance $S/\sqrt{S+B}$ of the
150: $J/\psi$ signal ($S$) -- taken from the MC (scaled to the number of
151: $J/\psi$ in the data) -- with respect to the background ($B$) -- evaluated
152: from the data. The optimal ranges for the different cut variables depend
153: on the number (one or two) of BR clusters associated to the
154: electron-positron pair. When both electron and positron have a BR cluster
155: correlated to the track, where the cluster position was determined
156: by hierarchical clustering~\cite{ecal}, the event is already rather
157: cleanly reconstructed and only one additional request (for each lepton candidate),
158: $(E/p - 1)/\sigma_{E/p} > -3.6$, is applied. When only one of the two possible
159: BR clusters is found, the accepted ranges are determined for each lepton as
160: $-3.6 < (E/p - 1)/\sigma_{E/p} < 5.4$, $|\Delta x|/\sigma_{\Delta x} < 7.0$,
161: $|\Delta y|/\sigma_{\Delta y} < 3.3$ and $\Delta b < 370\,\mu {\rm m}$, respectively.
162:
163: The combined selection cuts increase the $S/B$ ratio of the $J/\psi$
164: by about a factor of $10$ with respect to triggered events, and have
165: an overall efficiency of $(45 \pm 4)\%$ as evaluated using the data and
166: verified with the simulation -- the rather large uncertainty is due to
167: the difficulty of counting the signal when no cuts are applied. As can
168: be seen in Fig.~\ref{invmass}(b), the significance of the optimized
169: $J/\psi$ signal, although less than that of the muon channel shown in
170: Fig.~\ref{invmass}(a), is nonetheless such that the electron sample
171: significantly enhances the statistical precision of the final results. The
172: method adopted for counting the signal uses a Gaussian shape for the
173: right part of the peak and a Breit-Wigner shape for the left part to
174: account for the sizable asymmetry of the signal caused by
175: missing BR energy and the contribution of the radiative decay $J/\psi
176: \to e^+e^- \gamma$. The background is parametrized with a Gaussian at
177: lower mass values and an exponential at higher mass, joined together
178: such that the resulting curve is smooth. The position and width of the
179: $J/\psi$ peak as determined from the fit are $3.110 \pm 0.001$ ${\rm
180: GeV}/{\rm c}^2$ and $72 \pm 1\,\mathrm{MeV/c^2}$, respectively.
181:
182: \bigskip
183:
184: The yields of selected $J/\psi$ candidates for the two decay channels and for
185: each target material are listed in Table~\ref{tb:njpsi}. Fig.~\ref{fig:accep} shows
186: (for the carbon data) a comparison between data and MC of the distributions of
187: reconstructed $J/\psi$s as a function of the kinematic variables $p_T$ and $x_F$.
188:
189: