1: \begin{abstract}

2: 

3: The Dirichlet-Neumann scheme is the most common partitioned algorithm for fluid-structure interaction (FSI)

4: and offers high flexibility concerning the solvers employed for the two subproblems.

5: %

6: Nevertheless, it is not without shortcomings:

7: %

8: To begin with,

9: %

10: the inherent added-mass effect 

11: often destabilizes the numerical solution severely.

12: %

13: Moreover,

14: the Dirichlet-Neumann scheme cannot be applied to

15: % ``balloon-type'' cases, i.e., 

16: FSI problems in which an incompressible fluid is fully enclosed by Dirichlet boundaries, as it is incapable of satisfying the volume constraint. 

17: 

18: In the last decade, interface quasi-Newton methods have proven to control the added-mass effect and 

19: substantially speed up convergence

20: by adding a Newton-like update step to the Dirichlet-Neumann coupling.

21: They are, however, without effect on the incompressibility dilemma.

22: %

23: %

24: As an alternative, the Robin-Neumann scheme

25: generalizes the fluid's boundary condition

26: to a Robin condition 

27: by including the Cauchy stresses.

28: %

29: While this modification in fact successfully tackles both drawbacks of the Dirichlet-Neumann approach,

30: the price to be paid is a strong dependency on the Robin weighting parameter, 

31: %with very limited possibilities for good a priori choices.

32: with very limited a priori knowledge about good choices.

33: %

34: 

35: This work proposes a strategy to

36: %

37: merge these two ideas and benefit from their combined strengths.

38: %

39: The effectiveness of this new 

40: quasi-Newton-accelerated Robin-Neumann scheme

41: %Robin-Neumann quasi-Newton scheme (RN-QN)

42: is demonstrated for 

43: different FSI simulations

44: and compared to both Robin- and Dirichlet-Neumann variants.

45: %

46: \end{abstract}

47: