1: \begin{abstract}

2: We extend the notion of generalised Cesaro summation/convergence developed

3: in {[}1{]} to the more natural setting of what we call {}``remainder''

4: Cesaro summation/convergence and, after illustrating the utility of

5: this approach in deriving certain classical results, use it to develop

6: a notion of generalised root identities. These extend elementary root

7: identities for polynomials both to more general functions and to a

8: family of identities parametrised by a complex parameter $\mu$. In

9: so doing they equate one expression (the derivative side) which is

10: defined via Fourier theory, with another (the root side) which is

11: defined via remainder Cesaro summation. For $\mu\in\mathbb{Z_{\leq\textrm{0}}}$

12: these identities are naturally adapted to investigating the asymptotic

13: behaviour of the given function and the geometric distribution of

14: its roots. For the gamma function we show that $\Gamma$ satisfies

15: the generalised root identities and use them to constructively deduce

16: Stirling's theorem. For the Riemann zeta function, $\zeta$, the implications

17: of the generalised root identities for $\mu=0,-1$ and $-2$ are explored

18: in detail; in the case of $\mu=-2$ a symmetry of the non-trivial

19: roots is broken and allows us to conclude, after detailed computation,

20: that the Riemann hypothesis must be false. In light of this, some

21: final direct discussion is given of areas where the arguments used

22: throughout the paper are deficient in rigour and require more detailed

23: justification. The conclusion of section 1 gives guidance on the most

24: direct route through the paper to the claim regarding the Riemann

25: hypothesis.

26: \end{abstract}

27: