0955a8b2b605e535.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2:     We investigate the numerical accuracy of the \ac{EKT} in reproducing the
3:     \ac{FCI}\acused{CI} and \ac{CASCI} \acp{IE} of atomic and molecular systems
4:     calculated as the difference between the energies of $N$ and $(N-1$) electron
5:     states. In particular, we study the convergence of the \ac{EKT} \acp{IE} to
6:     their exact values as the basis set and the active space sizes vary. We find
7:     that the first \ac{FCI} \ac{EKT} \acp{IE} approach their exact counterparts as
8:     the basis set size increases. However, increasing the basis set or the active
9:     space sizes do not always lead to more accurate \ac{CASCI} \ac{EKT} \acp{IE}.
10:     Our investigation supports the Davidson \etal's\ observation [E. R. Davidson,
11:     \etal, J. Chem. Phys. 155, 051102 (2021)] that the \ac{FCI} \ac{EKT} \acp{IE}
12:     can be systematically improved with arbitrary numerical accuracy by
13:     supplementing the basis set with diffuse functions of appropriate symmetry which
14:     allow the detached electron to travel far away from the reference system. By
15:     changing the exponent and the center of the diffuse functions, our results
16:     delineate a complex pattern for the \ac{CASCI} \ac{EKT} \ac{IE} of \ce{LiH}
17:     which can be important for the spectroscopic studies of small molecules.
18: \end{abstract}
19: