0aa5083c36fa82d4.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: We develop an efficient sampling and free energy calculation technique
3: within the adaptive biasing potential (ABP) framework.  By mollifying
4: the density of states we obtain an approximate free energy and an
5: adaptive bias potential that is computed directly from the population
6: along the coordinates of the free energy. Because of the mollifier,
7: the bias potential is ``nonlocal'' and its gradient admits a simple 
8: analytic expression. 
9: A single observation of the reaction
10: coordinate can thus be used to update the approximate free energy at
11: every point within a neighborhood of the observation.  This greatly
12: reduces the equilibration time of the adaptive bias potential.  This
13: approximation introduces two parameters: strength of mollification and
14: the zero of energy of the bias potential.  While we observe that the
15: approximate free energy is a very good estimate of the actual free
16: energy for a large range of mollification strength, we demonstrate that the
17: errors associated with the mollification may be removed via
18: deconvolution.  The zero of energy of the bias potential, which is
19: easy to choose, influences the speed of convergence but not the
20: limiting accuracy.  This method is simple to apply to free energy or
21: mean force computation in multiple dimensions and does not involve
22: second derivatives of the reaction coordinates, matrix manipulations
23: nor on-the-fly adaptation of parameters.  For the alanine dipeptide
24: test case, the new method is found to gain as much as a factor of ten in
25: efficiency as compared to two common adaptive biasing force
26: formulations and it is shown to be as efficient as well-tempered metadynamics 
27: with the post-process deconvolution giving a clear advantage to the mollified density of states method. 
28: \end{abstract}
29: