1: \begin{abstract}

2: 

3: The main purpose of this work is to give a constructive proof for a 

4: particular case of the no-name lemma. Let $G$ be a

5: finite group, $K$ be a field, $L$ be a permutation $G$-lattice 

6: and $K[L]$ be the group algebra of $L$ over

7: $K$. The no-name lemma asserts that the invariant field of the

8: quotient field of $K[L]$, $K(L)^G$ is a purely transcendental

9: extension of $K^G$. In other words, there exist $y_1, \ldots , y_n$

10: which are algebraically independent over $K^G$ such that $K(L)^G \cong

11: K^G(y_1, \ldots , y_n)$.  We define elements $\lbrace y_1, \ldots, y_n

12: \rbrace \subset K[L]^G$ with the desired properties, in the case when

13: $G$ is the Galois group of a finite extension $\mathrm{Gal}(K/F)$, and

14: %is given as a group of (signed) permutation matrices.

15: $L$ is a sign permutation $G$-lattice.

16: \end{abstract}

17: