0d51acd2d2f2133d.tex
1: \begin{definition}
2:   An \emph{inverse category} is a category $\cat{C}$ in which every
3:   morphism $f \colon X \to Y$ allows a unique morphism $f^\dag \colon Y
4:   \to X$ satisfying $f=ff^\dag f$ and $f^\dag=f^\dag f f^\dag$.
5:   Equivalently, it is a dagger category satisfying
6:   $f=ff^\dag f$ and $pq=qp$ for idempotents $p,q \colon X
7:   \to X$.
8:   The proof of equivalence of these two statements is the same as for
9:   inverse semigroups
10:   (see~\cite[Theorem~1.1.3]{lawson:inversesemigroups} or~\cite[Theorem~2.20]{cockettlack:restriction1}).
11:   Inverse categories are a special case of \emph{restriction
12:   categories}~\cite{cockettlack:restriction1}. 
13: 
14:   The category $\PInj$ is an inverse category under its dagger
15:   (see~\ref{spans}). The following 
16:   categorification of the Wagner--Preston %representation
17:   theorem~\cite[Theorem~1.5.1]{lawson:inversesemigroups} 
18:   shows that it is in fact a representative one. See
19:   also~\cite[3.4]{cockettlack:restriction1}. 
20: \end{definition}