1: \begin{abstract}

2: The distributed computation of Nash equilibria is assuming growing

3: relevance in engineering where such problems emerge in the

4: context of distributed control. Accordingly, we consider static

5: stochastic convex games complicated by a parametric misspecification, a

6: natural concern when competing in any large-scale networked engineered

7: system. In settings {where the equilibrium conditions are captured by a

8: strongly monotone stochastic variational inequality problem}, we present

9: two sets of  distributedschemes  in which agents {\em learn the equilibrium

10: strategy} and {\em correct the misspecification} by leveraging

11: noise-corrupted observations.

12: \noindent{(1) \bf Monotone stochastic Nash games:} {We  present a

13: set of coupled stochastic approximation  schemes distributed across

14: 	agents in which the first scheme updates each agent's strategy via a

15: 	projected (stochastic) gradient step while the second scheme

16: 	updates every agent's belief regarding its misspecified parameter.

17: 	We proceed to show that the produced sequences converge to the true

18: 	equilibrium strategy and the true parameter in an almost sure

19: 	sense.  Surprisingly, convergence in the equilibrium strategy

20: 	achieves the {\em optimal} rate of convergence in a mean-squared sense

21: 	with a quantifiable degradation in the rate constant};

22: \noindent {(2) \bf Stochastic Nash-Cournot games with unobservable

23: 	aggregate output:} We refine (1) to a Cournot setting where the

24: 	tuple of strategies is not observable and assume that payoff

25: 	functions and strategy sets are public knowledge (a common knowledge

26: 			assumption). When noise-corrupted prices are observable,

27: {iterative fixed-point} schemes are developed, allowing for {\em

28: 	simultaneously} learning the equilibrium strategies and the

29: 	parameter in an almost-sure sense.

30: %Preliminary numerics support the theoretical statements and demonstrate the superiority over sequential counterparts in which learning precedes computation.

31: 	\end{abstract}

32: