1: \begin{abstract}

2:     The growing adoption of large language models (LLMs) presents substantial potential for deeper understanding of human behaviours within game theory frameworks through simulations.

3:     Leveraging on the diverse pool of LLM types and addressing the gap in research on competitive games, this paper examines the strategic interactions among multiple types of LLM-based agents in a classical game of beauty contest. 

4:     %This contributes to making a case for LLMs to be used as simulated agents in multi-player competitive games, as well as leveraging on the existence of a pool of LLMs.

5:     Drawing parallels to experiments involving human subjects, LLM-based agents are assessed similarly in terms of strategic levels. They demonstrate varying depth of reasoning that falls within a range of level-$0$ and $1$, and demonstrate convergence in actions in repeated settings.

6:     %Drawing parallels to human subject experiments, the evolution of strategic levels are comparable and do not exceed $2$.

7:     Furthermore, I also explore how variation in group composition of agent types influence strategic behaviours, where I found higher proportion of fixed-strategy opponents enhances convergence for LLM-based agents, and having a mixed environment with agents of differing relative strategic levels accelerates convergence for all agents. There could also be higher average payoffs for the more intelligent agents, albeit at the expense of the less intelligent agents.

8:     %providing insights on how the degree of population heterogeneity could affect game play. 

9:     These results not only provide insights into outcomes for simulated agents under specified scenarios, it also offer valuable implications for understanding strategic interactions between algorithms.

10: \end{abstract}

11: