1: \begin{abstract}

2: In federated optimization, heterogeneity in the clients' local datasets and computation speeds results in large variations in the number of local updates performed by each client in each communication round. Naive weighted aggregation of such models causes objective inconsistency, that is, the global model converges to a stationary point of a mismatched objective function which can be arbitrarily different from the true objective. This paper provides a general framework to analyze the convergence of federated heterogeneous optimization algorithms. It subsumes previously proposed methods such as FedAvg and FedProx and provides the first principled understanding of the solution bias and the convergence slowdown due to objective inconsistency. Using insights from this analysis, we propose FedNova, a normalized averaging method that eliminates objective inconsistency while preserving fast error convergence.

3: %\JW{Do we need to add one more sentence at the beginning to introduce FL?}

4: %\GJ{I don't think it is necessary. An abstract generally does not need to give background information. It should directly talk about the problem, how we solve it, and what are the main insights.}

5: \end{abstract}

6: