1674b0e9185171ae.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: % Intrinsic calibrations are essential for modern perception and navigation systems
3: % deployed on autonomous robots \addd{to ensure the obtained measurements are meaningful
4: % and valid.} 
5: Sensor calibration, which can be intrinsic or extrinsic, is an essential step to
6: achieve the measurement accuracy required for modern perception and navigation
7: systems deployed on autonomous robots. Intrinsic calibration models for
8: spinning LiDARs have been based on hypothesized physical mechanisms,
9: resulting in anywhere from three to ten parameters to be estimated from data, while
10: no phenomenological models have yet been proposed for solid-state LiDARs. Instead of
11: going down that road, we propose to abstract away from the physics of a LiDAR type (spinning vs. solid-state, for example) and focus on the point cloud's spatial geometry generated by the sensor. By modeling the calibration parameters as an
12: element of a matrix Lie Group, we achieve a unifying view of calibration for
13: different types of LiDARs. We further prove mathematically that the proposed model is
14: well-constrained (has a unique answer) given four appropriately orientated
15: targets. The proof provides a guideline for target positioning in the form of a
16: tetrahedron. Moreover, an existing semi-definite programming global solver for SE(3) can be modified to efficiently compute the optimal calibration parameters. For solid-state LiDARs, we illustrate how the method works in simulation. For
17: spinning LiDARs, we show with experimental data that the proposed matrix Lie Group
18: model performs equally well as physics-based models in terms of reducing the point-to-plane 
19: distance while being more robust to noise.
20: \end{abstract}
21: