1: \begin{abstract} 

2: Empirical evidence suggesting that living systems might operate in the vicinity of critical points, at the borderline between order and disorder, has proliferated in recent years, with

3: examples ranging from spontaneous brain activity to flock dynamics.  However, a well-founded theory for understanding how and why interacting living systems could dynamically tune themselves to be

4: poised in the vicinity of a critical point is lacking.

5: Here we employ tools from statistical mechanics and information theory to show that complex adaptive or evolutionary systems can be much more efficient in coping with diverse heterogeneous

6: environmental conditions when operating at criticality.  Analytical as well as computational evolutionary and adaptive models vividly illustrate that a community of such systems dynamically self-tunes

7: close to a critical state as the complexity of the environment increases while they remain non-critical for simple and predictable environments.  A more robust convergence to criticality emerges in

8: co-evolutionary and co-adaptive set-ups in which individuals aim to represent other agents in the community with fidelity, thereby creating a collective critical ensemble and providing the best

9: possible trade-off between accuracy and flexibility.  Our approach provides a parsimonious and general mechanism for the emergence of critical-like behavior in living systems needing to cope with

10: complex environments or trying to efficiently coordinate themselves as an ensemble.

11:  \end{abstract}

12: