1: \begin{abstract}

2: We compare waveforms and orbital dynamics from the first

3: long-term, fully non-linear, numerical simulations of a generic

4: black-hole binary configuration with post-Newtonian predictions. The

5: binary has mass ratio $q\sim0.8$ with arbitrarily oriented spins of

6: magnitude $S_1/m_1^2\sim0.6$ and $S_2/m_2^2\sim0.4$ and orbits 9 times

7: prior to merger. The numerical simulation starts with an initial separation of

8: $r\approx11M$, with orbital parameters determined by initial

9:  2.5PN and 3.5PN

10: post-Newtonian evolutions of a quasi-circular binary with an initial

11: separation of $r=50M$. The resulting binaries have very little

12: eccentricity according to the 2.5PN and 3.5PN systems, but show

13: significant eccentricities of $e\sim0.01-0.02$ and $e\sim0.002-0.005$

14: in the respective numerical simulations, thus demonstrating that 3.5PN

15: significantly reduces the eccentricity of the binary compared to

16: 2.5PN. We perform three numerical evolutions from $r\approx11M$ with

17: maximum resolutions of $h=M/48,M/53.3,M/59.3$, to verify numerical

18: convergence. We observe a reasonably good agreement between the PN and

19: numerical waveforms, with an overlap of nearly 99\% for the first six

20: cycles of the $(\ell=2,m=\pm2)$ modes, 91\% for the $(\ell=2,m=\pm1)$

21: modes, and nearly 91\% for the $(\ell=3,m=\pm3)$ modes. The phase

22: differences between numerical and post-Newtonian approximations appear

23: to be independent of the $(\ell,m)$ modes considered and relatively

24: small for the first 3-4 orbits. An advantage of the 3.5 PN model over

25: the 2.5 PN one seems to be observed, which indicates that still higher

26: PN order (perhaps even 4.0PN) may yield significantly better

27: waveforms. In

28: addition, we identify features in the waveforms likely related to

29: precession and precession-induced eccentricity.

30: 

31: \end{abstract}

32: