1: \begin{abstract}

2: We discuss several approaches to defining power in studies designed around the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) false discovery

3: rate (FDR) procedure. We focus primarily on the \textit{average power} and the $\lambda$-\textit{power}, which are the

4: expected true positive fraction and the probability that the true positive fraction exceeds $\lambda$, respectively.

5: We prove results concerning strong consistency and asymptotic normality for the positive call fraction (PCF), the true

6: positive fraction (TPF) and false discovery fraction (FDF). Convergence of their corresponding expected values, including a

7: convergence result for the average power, follow as a corollaries. After reviewing what is known about convergence in

8: distribution of the errors of the plugin procedure, \cite{GenoveseC:2004}, we prove central limit theorems for fully

9: empirical versions of the PCF, TPF, and FDF, using a result for stopped stochastic processes. The central limit theorem

10: (CLT) for the TPF is used to obtain an approximate expression for the $\lambda$-power, while the CLT for the FDF is used

11: to introduce an approximate procedure for determining a suitably small nominal FDR that results in a speicified bound on

12: the FDF with stipulated high probability. The paper also contains the results of a large simulation study covering a

13: fairly substantial portion of the space of possible inputs encountered in application of the results in the design of a

14: biomarker study, a micro-array experiment and a GWAS study.

15: \end{abstract}

16: