192e6e5db41b3373.tex
1: \begin{proof}[Proof of Lemma~\ref{lem:normal}]
2:   Let $S$ be any essential surface in $E(K)$ which is not a fiber.  We
3:   will assume that $S$ is orientable, since if not we can replace it
4:   with the boundary of its regular neighborhood, which is an
5:   orientable essential surface with the same boundary slope.  By
6:   \cite{HoffmanEtAl2016}, there is a geometric solution to the gluing
7:   and completeness equations for $\cT$, that is, one where all
8:   tetrahedra are positively oriented.  Thus the interior of $E(K)$ is
9:   hyperbolic and no edge of $\cT$ is homotopically peripheral.
10:   Therefore, by \cite[Theorem 1.6]{Walsh2011}, the surface
11:   $S$ can be isotoped into spun-normal form with respect to $\cT$.
12:   (Technical note: the hypotheses in \cite{Walsh2011} require that $S$
13:   is not a \emph{virtual} fiber, but the only virtual fibers in the
14:   exterior of a knot in $S^3$ are actual fibers.)  Thus the boundary
15:   slope of $S$ is also the boundary slope of a spun-normal surface,
16:   proving the first part of the lemma.  To see that the spun-normal
17:   surfaces have only the boundary slopes listed above, one simply
18:   computes the boundary slopes of the finite collection of vertex
19:   spun-normal surfaces.  This is easily done rigorously using SnapPy
20:   \cite{SnapPy} or Regina \cite{Regina}; for example, in the former
21:   one simply does: \verb|Manifold('K6_36').normal_boundary_slopes()|
22: \end{proof}
23: