1d342d5f16891b4c.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: Douglas-Rachford Splitting (DRS) methods based on the proximal point algorithms for the Poisson and Gaussian log-likelihood functions 
3: are proposed for ptychography and phase retrieval.
4: 
5: 
6: 
7: Fixed point analysis shows  that the DRS iterated sequences are always bounded explicitly in terms of the step size
8: and that the fixed points are   attracting if and only if the fixed points are regular solutions.
9: This alleviates  two major drawbacks of the classical Douglas-Rachford algorithm:
10: slow convergence when the feasibility problem is consistent and divergent behavior when the feasibility problem is inconsistent. 
11: 
12: Fixed point analysis also leads to a simple, explicit expression for the optimal step size in terms of the spectral gap
13: of an underlying matrix. 
14: 
15: When applied to the challenging problem of {\em blind} ptychography, which seeks to recover both the object and the probe simultaneously,
16: Alternating Minimization with the DRS inner loops, even with  a far from optimal step size,  converges geometrically under the nearly minimum conditions established in the uniqueness theory. 
17: 
18:  
19: 
20: \commentout{Three boundary conditions are considered in the simulations: periodic, dark-field and bright-field boundary conditions.
21: The dark-field boundary condition is suited for isolated objects while the bright-field boundary condition is for non-isolated objects.
22: The periodic boundary condition is a mathematically convenient reference point. Depending on the availability of the boundary prior
23: the dark-field and 
24: the bright-field boundary conditions may or may not be enforced in the reconstruction.  Not surprisingly, enforcing the boundary condition 
25: improves the rate of convergence, sometimes in a significant way. Enforcing the bright-field condition in the reconstruction
26: can also remove
27: the linear phase ambiguity. 
28: }
29: 
30: \end{abstract}
31: