1e0e4611107dd8a5.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: In mathematical epidemiology, epidemic control often aims at driving
3: the number of infected individuals to zero, asymptotically.
4: However, during the transitory phase, the 
5: number of infected can peak at high values. 
6: In this paper, we consider mosquito vector control in 
7: the Ross-Macdonald epidemiological model,
8: with the goal of capping the proportion of infected by dengue at the peak. 
9: % This approach differs from the widespread stationary vaccination control
10: % strategies, based upon having control reproductive number stricly less
11: % than one to ensure convergence, 
12: % and also from cost minimization optimal control ones.
13: % Indeed, instead of aiming at an equilibrium or optimizing, we look for
14: % policies able to maintain the proportion of infected individuals below to
15: % threshold for all times. Thus doing, we focus both on transitories and
16: % on asymptotics, in to robust way. 
17: We formulate this problem as one of control of a dynamical system
18: under state constraint. 
19: We allow for time-dependent fumigation rates to reduce the population
20: of mosquito vector, in order to maintain the proportion of infected 
21: individuals by dengue below a threshold for all times.
22: The so-called viability kernel is the set of initial states 
23: (mosquitoes and infected individuals) for which  
24: such a fumigation control trajectory exists.
25: Depending on whether the cap on the 
26: proportion of infected is low, high or medium,
27: we provide different expressions of the viability kernel.
28: We also characterize so-called viable policies that produce, 
29: at each time, a fumigation rate as a function of 
30: current proportions of infected humans and mosquitoes,
31: such that the proportion of infected humans remains 
32: below a threshold for all times. 
33: We provide a numerical application in the case of control
34: of a dengue outbreak in 2013 in Cali, Colombia.  
35: 
36: \end{abstract}
37: