1: \begin{abstract}

2: In this paper\footnote{This paper has been published in proceedings of COLT 2017. However, this version 

3: is more recent. We have corrected some typos ($2/(m+M)$ instead of $1/(m+M)$ on pages 3-4) and slightly

4: improved the upper bound of \Cref{thTwo}.}, we revisit the recently established theoretical guarantees 

5: for the convergence of the Langevin Monte Carlo algorithm of sampling from 

6: a smooth and (strongly) log-concave density. We improve the existing results

7: when the convergence is measured in the Wasserstein distance and provide 

8: further insights on the very tight relations between, on the one hand, the 

9: Langevin Monte Carlo for sampling and, on the other hand, the gradient 

10: descent for optimization. Finally, we also establish guarantees for the

11: convergence of a version of the Langevin Monte Carlo algorithm that is based

12: on noisy evaluations of the gradient. 

13: \end{abstract}

14: