1: \begin{abstract}

2: Data from 58 strong lensing events surveyed by the Sloan Lens ACS Survey

3: is used to estimate the projected galaxy mass inside their Einstein radii 

4: by two independent methods: stellar dynamics and strong gravitational lensing. 

5: We perform a joint analysis of these two estimates inside models with up to 

6: three degrees of freedom with respect to the lens density profile, stellar 

7: velocity anisotropy and line-of-sigh external convergence, which

8: incorporates the effect of the Large-Scale Structure on strong lensing.

9: A Bayesian analysis is employed to estimate the model parameters, 

10: evaluate their significance and compare models.

11: We find that the data favor Jaffe's light profile over Hernquist's, but that 

12: any particular choice between these two does not change the qualitative 

13: conclusions with respect to the features of the system that we investigate.

14: The density profile is compatible with an isothermal, being sightly steeper 

15: and having an uncertainty in the logarithmic slope of the order of 5\% 

16: in models that take into account a prior ignorance on anisotropy and 

17: external convergence.

18: We identify a considerable degeneracy between the density profile slope and 

19: the anisotropy parameter, which largely increases the uncertainties in the 

20: estimates of these parameters, but we encounter no evidence in favor of an 

21: anisotropic velocity distribution on average for the whole sample.

22: A line-of-sight external convergence following a prior probability distribution 

23: given by cosmology has a small effect on the estimation of the  

24: lens density profile, but can increase the dispersion of its value by 

25: nearly 40\%.

26: \end{abstract}

27: