1: \begin{abstract}

2: In this manuscript we focus on the question: what is the correct notion of 

3: Stokes-Biot stability?  Stokes-Biot stable discretizations have 

4: been introduced, independently by several authors, as a means of discretizing 

5: Biot's equations of poroelasticity; such schemes  

6: %.  Stokes-Biot stable discretizations 

7: retain 

8: their stability and convergence properties, with respect to appropriately 

9: defined norms, in the context of a vanishing storage coefficient and a vanishing 

10: hydraulic conductivity.  The basic premise of a Stokes-Biot stable discretization 

11: is: one part Stokes stability and one part mixed Darcy stability.  In this manuscript 

12: we remark on the observation that the latter condition can be generalized to a 

13: wider class of discrete spaces.  In particular: a parameter-uniform inf-sup 

14: condition for a mixed Darcy sub-problem is not strictly necessary to retain the 

15: practical advantages currently enjoyed by the class of Stokes-Biot stable 

16: Euler-Galerkin discretization schemes.  

17: \keywords{Poroelasticity \and Biot's Equations \and Mixed Method \and Darcy Stability \and Stokes-Biot Stability}

18: \subclass{65M60 \and 74S05 \and 76S05} 

19: \end{abstract}

20: