1: \begin{abstract}

2: The paper is devoted to the problem of estimation of a univariate

3: component in a heteroscedastic nonparametric multiple regression

4: under the mean integrated squared error (MISE) criteria. The aim is to

5: understand how the scale function should be used for estimation of the

6: univariate component. It is known that the scale function does not

7: affect the rate of the MISE convergence, and as a result sharp

8: constants are explored. The paper begins with developing a

9: sharp-minimax theory for a pivotal model $Y=f(X) + \sigma(X,{\mathbf Z})

10: \varepsilon$, where $\varepsilon$ is standard normal and independent of the

11: predictor $X$ and the auxiliary vector-covariate ${\mathbf Z}$. It is

12: shown that if the scale $\sigma(x,{\mathbf z})$ depends on the auxiliary

13: variable, then a special estimator, which uses the scale (or its

14: estimate), is asymptotically sharp minimax and adaptive to unknown

15: smoothness of $f(x)$. This is an interesting conclusion because if the

16: scale does not depend on the auxiliary covariate ${\mathbf Z}$, then

17: ignoring the heteroscedasticity can yield a sharp minimax estimation.

18: The pivotal model serves as a natural benchmark for a general additive

19: model $Y = f(X) + g({\mathbf Z}) + \sigma(X,{\mathbf Z})\varepsilon$, where

20: $\varepsilon$ may depend on $(X,{\mathbf Z})$ and have only a finite fourth

21: moment. It is shown that for this model a data-driven estimator can

22: perform as well as for the benchmark. Furthermore, the estimator,

23: suggested for continuous responses, can be also used for the case of

24: discrete responses. Bernoulli and Poisson regressions, that are

25: inherently heteroscedastic, are particular considered examples for

26: which sharp minimax lower bounds are obtained as well. A numerical

27: study shows that the asymptotic theory sheds light on small samples.

28: \end{abstract}