1: \begin{abstract}

2: We study the problem of estimating the average causal effect of treating every member of a population, as opposed to none, using an experiment that treats only some. This is the policy-relevant estimand when deciding whether to scale up an intervention based on the results of an RCT, for example, but differs from the usual average treatment effect in the presence of spillovers. We consider both estimation and experimental design given a bound (parametrized by $\eta > 0$) on the rate at which spillovers decay with the ``distance'' between units, defined in a generalized way to encompass spatial settings, panel data, and some directed networks. Over all estimators linear in the outcomes and all cluster-randomized designs the optimal geometric rate of convergence is $n^{-\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{\eta}}}$, and this rate can be achieved using a generalized ``Scaling Clusters'' design that we provide. Both results are unchanged under the additional assumption, implicit in recent applied studies, that potential outcomes are linear in population treatment assignments. An OLS estimator similar (but not identical) to those used in these studies is consistent and rate-optimal under linearity, and its finite-sample performance can be improved by incorporating additional information about the structure of spillovers. As a robust alternative, we also provide an optimized weighting approach that minimizes mean squared error when linearity holds while remaining consistent and rate-optimal when it does not. We also provide asymptotically valid inference methods.

3: 

4: \end{abstract}

5: