1: \begin{abstract}

2: %In multiobjective optimization, introduction of the properly Pareto optimal solutions is to avoid providing the decision maker with some inappropriate Pareto optimal solutions whose trade-offs do not essentially differ from a weakly Pareto optimal solution.

3: 

4: In multiobjective optimization, most branch and bound algorithms provide the decision maker with the whole Pareto front, and then decision maker could select a single solution finally. However, if the number of objectives is large, the number of candidate solutions may be also large, and it may be difficult for the decision maker to select the most interesting solution. As we argue in this paper, the most interesting solutions are the ones whose trade-offs are bounded. These solutions are usually known as the properly Pareto optimal solutions. We propose a branch-and-bound-based algorithm to provide the decision maker with so-called $\epsilon$-properly Pareto optimal solutions. The discarding test of the algorithm adopts a dominance relation induced by a convex polyhedral cone instead of the common used Pareto dominance relation. In this way, the proposed algorithm excludes the subboxes which do not contain $\epsilon$-properly Pareto optimal solution from further exploration. We establish the global convergence results of the proposed algorithm. Finally, the algorithm is applied to benchmark problems as well as to two real-world optimization problems.

5: 

6: 

7: 

8: \keywords{Multiobjective optimization \and Global optimization \and Branch and bound algorithm \and Properly Pareto optimal solution}

9: % \PACS{PACS code1 \and PACS code2 \and more}

10: \subclass{90C26\and 90C29\and 90C30}

11: \end{abstract}

12: